11.07.2015 Views

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong> for CIUIn contrast, patients with CIU without this autoimmuneresponse experience <strong>the</strong> same effects <strong>of</strong>mast cell degranulation and subsequent release <strong>of</strong>histam<strong>in</strong>e by a process yet to be elucidated.The sent<strong>in</strong>el <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> histam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> CIUis, <strong>the</strong>refore, unequivocal; irrespective <strong>of</strong> etiology,<strong>the</strong> appropriate use <strong>of</strong> H 1antihistam<strong>in</strong>es—whichstabilize an active conformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> H 1receptorand thus prevent activation by histam<strong>in</strong>e—rema<strong>in</strong>s<strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> treatment. 14 However, for patientsunresponsive to conventional H 1-antihistam<strong>in</strong>emono<strong>the</strong>rapy, adjunctive treatments <strong>of</strong>ten are prescribed<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> H 1antihistam<strong>in</strong>es(ei<strong>the</strong>r 2 different newer-generation agents concurrentlyor a newer-generation agent plus a firstgenerationagent at night), H 2antihistam<strong>in</strong>es,tricyclic antidepressants (pr<strong>in</strong>cipally doxep<strong>in</strong>),antileukotriene <strong>the</strong>rapy, and <strong>in</strong>termittent pulses <strong>of</strong>corticosteroids. 15 In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate symptomcontrol after <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>rapies have beenexplored, immunomodulatory agents such ascyclospor<strong>in</strong>e have been used to treat patientsrefractory to conventional <strong>the</strong>rapy. 14The method <strong>of</strong> activity for <strong>the</strong> adjunctive treatmentsis based on <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g approaches: block<strong>in</strong>gH 1and H 2receptors, block<strong>in</strong>g nonhistam<strong>in</strong>emediators <strong>of</strong> urticaria, and block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cellular and<strong>in</strong>flammatory components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> urticarial reaction.In summary, because H 1antihistam<strong>in</strong>es are first-l<strong>in</strong>e<strong>the</strong>rapy for CIU, and for many patients rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>only option available, <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> optimalantihistam<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>of</strong> vital importance.Selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong>The first antihistam<strong>in</strong>e was developed <strong>in</strong> 1937;<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1940s, phenbenzam<strong>in</strong>e became <strong>the</strong> firstcommercially available antihistam<strong>in</strong>e, followed bysimilar H 1-receptor antagonists such as chlorpheniram<strong>in</strong>e,brompheniram<strong>in</strong>e, and diphenhydram<strong>in</strong>e.Despite its relative antiquity, diphenhydram<strong>in</strong>erema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> most widely used antihistam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>United States. 16 These first-generation H 1-receptorantagonists, though effective <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong>urticaria and allergic rh<strong>in</strong>itis, were shown to causeundesired side effects for 2 dist<strong>in</strong>ct reasons: <strong>the</strong>irlack <strong>of</strong> selectivity for <strong>the</strong> H 1receptor and <strong>the</strong>irpropensity to cross <strong>the</strong> blood-bra<strong>in</strong> barrier and affect<strong>the</strong> central nervous system. 17As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> selectivity, oldergenerationagents cause antichol<strong>in</strong>ergic effects suchas dry mouth, headache, and ur<strong>in</strong>ary retention. 18-20Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, at supracl<strong>in</strong>ical doses, some antihistam<strong>in</strong>esare toxic 16 and have been shown to causes<strong>in</strong>us tachycardia. 21 Children have been known toexperience severe toxic reactions and even deathfollow<strong>in</strong>g overdose <strong>of</strong> older-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>esbecause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drug’s lack <strong>of</strong> selectivity. 22-25Because older-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es canb<strong>in</strong>d to H 1receptors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> and histam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> plays a role <strong>in</strong> central nervous systemarousal and alertness, <strong>the</strong>se agents also are associatedwith sedation and cognitive impairment (eg,impaired sensorimotor coord<strong>in</strong>ation and decreases <strong>in</strong>attention span, memory function, ability to process<strong>in</strong>formation, and psychomotor performance 16,26,27 ).The b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> first-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es tocerebral H 1receptors has been demonstrated <strong>in</strong>many studies employ<strong>in</strong>g objective psychometric testsand also by <strong>the</strong> relatively new technique <strong>of</strong> positronemission tomographic imag<strong>in</strong>g. 28-30Newer-Generation <strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong>Newer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es were developed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> early 1980s with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g more specificfor <strong>the</strong> H 1receptor, as well as <strong>of</strong> overcom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>adverse events observed with older agents. As testamentto achiev<strong>in</strong>g this goal, allergists agree thatnewer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es are preferred t<strong>of</strong>irst-generation agents because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir more favorableefficacy:safety ratio. 16,18 Although <strong>the</strong>re is nosuch formal consensus among dermatologists andthose specifically treat<strong>in</strong>g CIU, it is likely <strong>the</strong> samelogic would apply if equivalent efficacy between oldand new antihistam<strong>in</strong>es can be established for CIU.This review explores <strong>the</strong> newer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>esavailable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States for <strong>the</strong>treatment <strong>of</strong> CIU: fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e, loratad<strong>in</strong>e, desloratad<strong>in</strong>e,and cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e. An evidence-based analysis<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se agents and an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>rapeutic w<strong>in</strong>dow <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se antihistam<strong>in</strong>es, withparticular focus on <strong>the</strong>ir sedation and cognitiveimpairment potential, are emphasized (Table).Efficacy <strong>of</strong> Newer-Generation <strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong>Numerous randomized double-bl<strong>in</strong>d cl<strong>in</strong>ical studieshave demonstrated <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e, 31-34loratad<strong>in</strong>e, 35,36 desloratad<strong>in</strong>e, 37,38 and cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e 39,40 <strong>in</strong>reliev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> CIU.Fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e—The safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> variousdoses <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e at reliev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> symptoms<strong>of</strong> CIU has been established <strong>in</strong> several largerandomized controlled cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials. Two similarCIU studies <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>eHCl us<strong>in</strong>g doses <strong>of</strong> 20, 60, 120, and 240 mgtwice daily (BID). In both studies, doses <strong>of</strong> 60 mgor more BID were shown to reduce severity <strong>of</strong>pruritus, number <strong>of</strong> wheals, and <strong>in</strong>terference withsleep and normal daily activities compared withplacebo. 33,34 Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, studies <strong>in</strong> Japanese andThai patients have <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> effectiveness120 CUTIS ®

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!