11.07.2015 Views

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong> for CIUDesloratad<strong>in</strong>e—Desloratad<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> major activemetabolite <strong>of</strong> loratad<strong>in</strong>e, which has been available<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States s<strong>in</strong>ce 2002 for <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong>CIU. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> drug has been evaluated <strong>in</strong>2 major randomized controlled cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials. 37,38R<strong>in</strong>g et al 37 reported that desloratad<strong>in</strong>e exhibitedsuperior efficacy compared with placebo <strong>in</strong> amulticenter, randomized, double-bl<strong>in</strong>d trial <strong>of</strong>190 patients with a history <strong>of</strong> CIU. Patients wereassigned to receive ei<strong>the</strong>r desloratad<strong>in</strong>e 5 mg QDor placebo QD for 6 weeks. The active treatmentwas superior to placebo at reduc<strong>in</strong>g pruritus andoverall symptoms after <strong>the</strong> first dose and throughout<strong>the</strong> 6-week study. 37 Similarly, <strong>the</strong>rapeuticresponse and global CIU status, as well as QOLmeasures such as <strong>in</strong>terference with sleep, wereimproved with desloratad<strong>in</strong>e compared withplacebo throughout <strong>the</strong> study period. 37 Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>same dose (5 mg QD), a fur<strong>the</strong>r 6-week placebocontrolledstudy <strong>of</strong> desloratad<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong>effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this agent at reliev<strong>in</strong>g CIU symptoms.38 Over <strong>the</strong> study period, <strong>the</strong> mean total CIUsymptom score was significantly improved comparedwith placebo, as were <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual scores <strong>of</strong>pruritus, number <strong>of</strong> hives, and <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> largesthive. Interference with sleep was reduced and performance<strong>of</strong> daily activities was improved withdesloratad<strong>in</strong>e. These statistically and cl<strong>in</strong>ically significantimprovements were seen with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first24 hours <strong>of</strong> treatment and were susta<strong>in</strong>ed throughout<strong>the</strong> 6-week treatment period. 38Cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e—As with loratad<strong>in</strong>e, cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e hasbeen shown to be as effective as first-generationhydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e at reliev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> CIU. 40For example, a 4-week, multicenter, randomized,double-bl<strong>in</strong>d, double-dummy trial <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong>efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e 10 mg QD andhydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e 25 mg 3 times daily compared withplacebo <strong>in</strong> patients with CIU. Patients <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cetiriz<strong>in</strong>eand hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e groups showed significantreductions dur<strong>in</strong>g weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> numberand size <strong>of</strong> lesions and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> severity <strong>of</strong> prurituscompared with patients who received placebo.In addition, physician and patient evaluations at<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> week 4 revealed an improvement <strong>in</strong>urticarial symptoms for <strong>the</strong> cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e and hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>egroups compared with <strong>the</strong> placebo group. 40All 4 newer-generation H 1antihistam<strong>in</strong>es (fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e,loratad<strong>in</strong>e, desloratad<strong>in</strong>e, and cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e)have been shown to be superior to placebo at treat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> CIU, and both loratad<strong>in</strong>e andcetiriz<strong>in</strong>e have been proven to be as effective asfirst-generation hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e. 35,40 Although no trialshave evaluated fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e and desloratad<strong>in</strong>e comparedwith hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e, comparisons demonstrat<strong>in</strong>gequivalence have been made with <strong>the</strong>ir parent compounds(loratad<strong>in</strong>e 35 and terfenad<strong>in</strong>e 45 ).There are few controlled studies <strong>in</strong> whichnewer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es have been directlycompared, and <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence-based datademonstrat<strong>in</strong>g statistical superiority <strong>of</strong> one secondgenerationagent over ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong>CIU. For example, although a recent trial compared<strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e with fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e,<strong>the</strong> results are weakened by <strong>the</strong> study design.Patients with CIU were randomized to ei<strong>the</strong>rcetiriz<strong>in</strong>e 10 mg (n52) or fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e 180 mg(n45); at 28 days, 51.9% (27) and 4.4% (2) <strong>of</strong>cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e and fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e patients, respectively,were symptom free (P.00001), while partialimprovement was experienced by 36.5% (19) <strong>of</strong>cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e patients and 42.2% (19) <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>epatients. 46 However, <strong>the</strong>re was no control group,basel<strong>in</strong>e symptom severity data were not provided,and <strong>the</strong> authors did not describe how <strong>the</strong>patients’ symptoms were assessed. 46 Therefore, adef<strong>in</strong>itive assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relative efficacy <strong>of</strong>newer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es cannot be achievedby review<strong>in</strong>g published trials alone.Anti-<strong>in</strong>flammatory PropertiesDue to <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> well-designed placebocontrolledcomparisons <strong>of</strong> newer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es,o<strong>the</strong>r properties have been exam<strong>in</strong>edto aid treatment comparisons. For example, it hasbeen suggested that some H 1-receptor antagonistsmay achieve anti-<strong>in</strong>flammatory effects <strong>in</strong> a cl<strong>in</strong>icalcontext, which could prove advantageous <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>treatment <strong>of</strong> CIU because <strong>the</strong> disease is characterizedby tissue <strong>in</strong>flammation. 47To <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> anti-<strong>in</strong>flammatory activity <strong>of</strong>fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e, an immunohistochemical evaluation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agent was undertaken <strong>in</strong> patients with CIU. 48Twenty patients received fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e HCl 180 mgQD for 4 weeks; <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> adhesionmolecules, mast cell proteases, and pro<strong>in</strong>flammatorycytok<strong>in</strong>es were evaluated before and after treatment,as were <strong>the</strong> patients’ assessments <strong>of</strong> urticarial symptoms.After treatment with fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e, significantdecreases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> endo<strong>the</strong>lial leukocyteadhesion molecule-1 (P.02), vascular cell adhesionmolecule-1 (P.04), and tryptase (P.04) wereobserved, confirm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>ehas some anti-<strong>in</strong>flammatory properties.This study <strong>in</strong> humans must be put <strong>in</strong>to contextwith <strong>the</strong> numerous <strong>in</strong> vitro, ex vivo, and animalstudies that have been conducted <strong>in</strong> this area. A review<strong>of</strong> such data suggests that all newer-generationantihistam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>hibit <strong>the</strong> release or generation <strong>of</strong>multiple <strong>in</strong>flammatory mediators, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g IL-4,122 CUTIS ®

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!