11.07.2015 Views

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

Review of H1 Antihistamines in the Treatment of ... - Ob.Gyn. News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong> for CIUH 1<strong>Antihistam<strong>in</strong>es</strong> <strong>in</strong> Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria: Efficacy and Safety Comparison*Drows<strong>in</strong>ess Drows<strong>in</strong>ess ( Impairment Impairment (Antichol<strong>in</strong>ergic (Recommended Recommended (Recommended RecommendedAntihistam<strong>in</strong>e Efficacy Effect Dose) Dose) Dose) Dose)Cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e 3 0 1 1 1 1Chlorpheniram<strong>in</strong>e 2/3 3 2 3 2 3Desloratad<strong>in</strong>e 3 0 0 1 0 1Diphenhydram<strong>in</strong>e 3 3 3 3 3 3Fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e 3 0 0 0 0 0Hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e 3 3 3 3 3 3Loratad<strong>in</strong>e 3 0 0 1 0 1*0 <strong>in</strong>dicates none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, strong.<strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e 60 mg BID is not limited byethnicity or genotype. 41,42Although many studies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed some QOLparameters as secondary endpo<strong>in</strong>ts as a component<strong>of</strong> efficacy studies, fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e has been studiedus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> validated DLQI and Work Productivityand Activity Impairment questionnaires. 43 Twoidentically designed 4-week, multicenter, randomized,double-bl<strong>in</strong>d, placebo-controlled, parallelgrouptrials exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> 60 mg BID onpatients aged 12 to 65 years with moderate tosevere CIU. Fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e treatment significantlyimproved overall DLQI score compared withplacebo (P≤.0002), and also significantly <strong>in</strong>creasedwork productivity (P≤.014). In addition, a trendtoward <strong>in</strong>creased classroom productivity and significantimprovements <strong>in</strong> 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 6 <strong>in</strong>dividual DLQIdoma<strong>in</strong>s were observed. 43The efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> once-daily(QD) doses <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e have been evaluated<strong>in</strong> a large, multicenter, double-bl<strong>in</strong>d, placebocontrolled,parallel-group, dose-rang<strong>in</strong>g study. 31Adults (N222) were randomized to receive ei<strong>the</strong>rfex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>e HCl 60, 120, 180, or 240 mg QD orplacebo QD for 6 weeks. The comb<strong>in</strong>ed fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>egroups showed a significant reduction <strong>in</strong> meantotal symptom score (pruritus score and number <strong>of</strong>wheals) compared with placebo (P.0019). Thestudy suggested that 180 mg QD is <strong>the</strong> optimal dosefor <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> CIU because this dose alonesignificantly reduced <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> wheals comparedwith placebo (P.0064) and significantlyimproved mean total symptom score consistentlyover <strong>the</strong> 6-week study period (P.05). 31 Support<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> this once-daily dose, a recentdouble-bl<strong>in</strong>d placebo-controlled study <strong>of</strong> fex<strong>of</strong>enad<strong>in</strong>eHCl 180 mg QD was shown to produce a beneficialeffect on urticaria. 32Loratad<strong>in</strong>e—The relative efficacy <strong>of</strong> loratad<strong>in</strong>eand <strong>the</strong> first-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>e hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>ehas been established <strong>in</strong> a large 4-week (optional12-week) trial compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2 compounds withplacebo <strong>in</strong> 172 patients with CIU. Patients wererandomized to receive ei<strong>the</strong>r: 10 mg loratad<strong>in</strong>e QDand placebo BID; hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e 3 times daily; orplacebo 3 times daily. As measured by all efficacyevaluations (physician and patient evaluations <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> treatment at each visit plus patientdaily diary cards), loratad<strong>in</strong>e and hydroxyz<strong>in</strong>e werefound to be more effective than placebo and cl<strong>in</strong>icallycomparable to each o<strong>the</strong>r. 35In <strong>the</strong> only placebo-controlled comparativestudy between 2 newer-generation antihistam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> CIU, Guerra et al 44 showed thatloratad<strong>in</strong>e was more effective than cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> someaspects <strong>of</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> CIU. In thisdouble-bl<strong>in</strong>d study, 116 patients with CIU wererandomly assigned loratad<strong>in</strong>e 10 mg, cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e 10 mg,or placebo QD for 28 days. Both active drugs significantlyreduced global cl<strong>in</strong>ical symptoms (P.05),but loratad<strong>in</strong>e was more rapid <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g itsactivity than cetiriz<strong>in</strong>e (P.01 at day 3) andalso appeared to be safer when <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong>treatment-emergent side effects were compared. 44VOLUME 76, AUGUST 2005 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!