11.07.2015 Views

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6236Reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Formaldehyde</strong> with PeptidesSCHEME 1. The reaction <strong>of</strong> formaldehyde with prote<strong>in</strong>s startswith the formation <strong>of</strong> methylol adducts on am<strong>in</strong>o groups [1]. Themethylol adducts <strong>of</strong> primary am<strong>in</strong>o groups are partially dehydrated,yield<strong>in</strong>g labile Schiff-bases [2], which can form cross-l<strong>in</strong>ks with severalam<strong>in</strong>o acid residues, e.g. with tyros<strong>in</strong>e [3].map systematically the different chemical modifications <strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>by formaldehyde treatment. The selected peptides can bedivided <strong>in</strong>to two groups (see Table I): the first group had theam<strong>in</strong>o acid sequence Ac-VELXVLL, <strong>in</strong> which one am<strong>in</strong>o acidresidue (X) varies and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g am<strong>in</strong>o acid residues arenon-reactive with formaldehyde. The second group was synthesizedfor study<strong>in</strong>g the possible formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tramolecular,formaldehyde-mediated cross-l<strong>in</strong>ks between two reactive residuesand conta<strong>in</strong>ed peptides with the follow<strong>in</strong>g sequence: Ac-LOENXLLZF-NH 2 , where O, X, and Z are either a (non-reactive)alan<strong>in</strong>e residue or an arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, lys<strong>in</strong>e, and histid<strong>in</strong>eresidue <strong>in</strong> different permutations (see Table I). The reactionconditions were largely based on the detoxification process <strong>of</strong>diphtheria tox<strong>in</strong> for vacc<strong>in</strong>e production (1). Because glyc<strong>in</strong>e isused as a reagent dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>activation <strong>of</strong> diphtheria tox<strong>in</strong> byformaldehyde for the preparation <strong>of</strong> diphtheria toxoid vacc<strong>in</strong>es(6), it was especially chosen to study <strong>in</strong> detail the cross-l<strong>in</strong>kreaction with peptides. The conversion <strong>of</strong> peptides was monitoredby tandem reversed-phase liquid chromatography, electrosprayionization mass spectrometry (LC/MS). 1 In this paper,we present an overview <strong>of</strong> the major conversion products result<strong>in</strong>gfrom reactions between model peptides and formaldehyde(<strong>in</strong> the absence and presence <strong>of</strong> glyc<strong>in</strong>e), several <strong>of</strong> whichhave not been identified before. Our data can be used for theprediction and identification <strong>of</strong> reactive sites <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s afterexposure to formaldehyde.1 The abbreviations used are: LC/MS, tandem liquid chromatography-electrosprayionization mass spectrometry; Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl; Me 2 SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid;Ac-Arg-OME, N -acetylarg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e methyl ester; MS, mass spectrometry.EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESChemicals—<strong>Formaldehyde</strong> (37%), formic acid (99%), glyc<strong>in</strong>e, potassiumdihydrogen phosphate (KH 2 PO 4 3H 2 O), and dipotassium hydrogenphosphate (K 2 HPO 4 3H 2 O) were purchased from Merck (Amsterdam,The Netherlands). Sodium cyanoborohydride (NaCNBH 3 ) wasobta<strong>in</strong>ed from Sigma (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). N -Acetylarg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>emethyl ester (Ac-Arg-OMe) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Bachem Ag (Bubendorf,Switzerland). Dimethyl sulfoxide (Me 2 SO) ultra-grade was acquiredfrom Acros Organics (’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands).Endoprote<strong>in</strong>ase Glu-C was bought from Roche Applied Science (Almere,The Netherlands).Peptides—Peptides (Table I) were synthesized on a 30-mmol scale byus<strong>in</strong>g an automated multiple peptide synthesizer equipped with a 96-column reaction block (SYRO II, Fa. MultiSynTech Gmbh, Witten,Germany). Coupl<strong>in</strong>gs were performed with N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl(Fmoc)-am<strong>in</strong>o acid (90 mmol), benzotriazolyloxy-tris-[N-pyrrolid<strong>in</strong>o]phosphoniumhexafluorophosphate (90 mmol), and N-methylmorphol<strong>in</strong>e(180 mmol). S<strong>in</strong>gle coupl<strong>in</strong>gs were performed <strong>in</strong> cycles 1–9 anddouble coupl<strong>in</strong>gs from cycle 10. The Fmoc group was cleaved withpiperid<strong>in</strong>e/N,N-dimethylacetamide, 2/8 (v/v). Side-cha<strong>in</strong> deprotectionand cleavage from the solid support was effected with trifluoroaceticacid (TFA)/water (95/5, v/v), except for cyste<strong>in</strong>e-, methion<strong>in</strong>e-, and tryptophan-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gpeptides, which were treated with TFA/ethanethiol(95/5, v/v). The peptides were purified by reversed-phase (C8 column)high performance liquid chromatography and their identity was confirmedby LC/MS. Before use, peptides were dissolved <strong>in</strong> water orMe 2 SO/water (50/50, v/v) to a f<strong>in</strong>al concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 mM.Standard Reactions with Peptides—For the reaction <strong>of</strong> peptides withformaldehyde, 10 l <strong>of</strong>a10mM peptide solution, 10 l <strong>of</strong>1M potassiumphosphate, pH 7.2, and 5 l <strong>of</strong> a second agent (1.0 M glyc<strong>in</strong>e, 1.0 MNaCNBH 3 , 1.0 M Ac-Arg-OME, or water) were added to 70 l <strong>of</strong> water.The reaction was started by add<strong>in</strong>g 5 l <strong>of</strong> an aqueous solution <strong>of</strong> 1.0 Mformaldehyde. After mix<strong>in</strong>g, the solution was <strong>in</strong>cubated for 48 h at35 °C. Samples were stored at 20 °C before analysis.Variations <strong>in</strong> Reaction Conditions—The effect <strong>of</strong> different reactionconditions was <strong>in</strong>vestigated by vary<strong>in</strong>g the reaction time, pH, reagentconcentrations, and the moment <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> NaCNBH 3 . The reaction<strong>of</strong> peptides with formaldehyde and glyc<strong>in</strong>e was monitored for 6 weeks.Aliquots (10 l) were taken after 2, 6, and 24 h, 2, 6 and 24 days, and6 weeks, and stored at 20 °C before analysis. To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the effect<strong>of</strong> pH, reactions were performed <strong>in</strong> potassium phosphate buffer at pH5.2, 7.2, and 9.2. The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> the reagents onadduct formation was studied by vary<strong>in</strong>g the formaldehyde or theglyc<strong>in</strong>e concentration to f<strong>in</strong>al concentrations <strong>of</strong> 5, 50, and 500 mM. Todeterm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>ternal cross-l<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> peptides, NaCNBH 3 was added 48 hafter formaldehyde addition.Removal <strong>of</strong> Excess <strong>Formaldehyde</strong>—Removal <strong>of</strong> formaldehyde wasperformed on a high-performance liquid chromatography systemequipped with a 10 cm long 200-m <strong>in</strong>ner diameter column filled withPoros 10 R2 (5 m; PerSeptive Biosystems). The sample was dilutedwith water to a peptide concentration <strong>of</strong> 100 M, and 10 l <strong>of</strong> the dilutedsample was trapped on the column. The column was r<strong>in</strong>sed for 10 m<strong>in</strong>with solvent A (0.075% TFA <strong>in</strong> water) at a flow rate <strong>of</strong> 3 l/m<strong>in</strong> toremove formaldehyde. The peptide was eluted by a l<strong>in</strong>ear gradient from0–60% solvent B (0.075% TFA <strong>in</strong> acetonitrile) <strong>in</strong> 25 m<strong>in</strong>. The fractionconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the peptide was dried <strong>in</strong> a vacuum centrifuge (Concentrator5301, Eppendorf) and dissolved <strong>in</strong> 100 l <strong>of</strong> water. Sample was stored at20 °C before analysis.<strong>Formaldehyde</strong> Treatment <strong>of</strong> Ac-Arg-OME—<strong>Formaldehyde</strong>, glyc<strong>in</strong>e,and an arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e derivative, Ac-Arg-OME, were dissolved or diluted <strong>in</strong>D 2 O to f<strong>in</strong>al concentrations <strong>of</strong> 1.0 M. A reaction mixture was preparedby successively add<strong>in</strong>g 400 l <strong>of</strong> glyc<strong>in</strong>e solution, 100 l <strong>of</strong> Ac-Arg-OMEsolution, and 200 l <strong>of</strong> formaldehyde solution to 300 l <strong>of</strong>D 2 O. Aftereach addition, the solution was homogenized by gentle mix<strong>in</strong>g. Thepreparation was <strong>in</strong>cubated for 48 h at 35 °C. Sample was stored at20 °C before analysis.Digestion by Endoprote<strong>in</strong>ase Glu-C—Peptides were digested by mix<strong>in</strong>g5 l <strong>of</strong>1mM peptide solution, 5 l <strong>of</strong>1.0 M potassium phosphatebuffer, pH 9.0, 1.0 l <strong>of</strong>1g/l endoprote<strong>in</strong>ase Glu-C solution, and 39l <strong>of</strong> water, followed by <strong>in</strong>cubation for 24 h at 37 °C. Subsequently,samples were stored at 20 °C before analysis.Nano-electrospray MS—Analytes were diluted to a concentration <strong>of</strong>10 M <strong>in</strong> water conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5% (v/v) Me 2 SO and 5% (v/v) formic acid. Agold-coated nano-electrospray needle with an orifice <strong>of</strong> 1–2 m <strong>in</strong>nerdiameter was loaded with 10 l <strong>of</strong> the sample. A stable spray wasobta<strong>in</strong>ed by an overpressure <strong>of</strong> 0.5 bar onto the needles and adjust<strong>in</strong>gthe electrospray voltage to 0.75 kV. The capillary was heated to 150 °C.MS-spectra were acquired from m/z 50–2000, followed by successivestages <strong>of</strong> collision-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong> dissociation (up to MS 4 measurements). Thecollision energies were optimized for each <strong>in</strong>dividual collision-<strong><strong>in</strong>duced</strong>dissociation mass analysis (between 30–35%).LC/MS—Peptide samples were analyzed by nano-scale reversedphase-liquid chromatography (HP 1100 Series LC system, HewlettPackard Gmbh, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to electrospray massspectrometry (LCQ Classic quadrupole ion trap), essentially as describedpreviously by Meir<strong>in</strong>g et al. (23). Briefly, each peptide samplewas diluted to a concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.1 M <strong>in</strong> water conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5% (v/v)Me 2 SO and 5% (v/v) formic acid. An <strong>in</strong>jection volume <strong>of</strong> 10 l was usedfor analysis. To desalt the samples for MS analysis, analytes weretrapped on a 15 mm long 100 m <strong>in</strong>ner diameter trapp<strong>in</strong>g columnwith Aqua C18 (5 m; Phenomenex) at a flow rate <strong>of</strong> 3 l/m<strong>in</strong> and byus<strong>in</strong>g 100% solvent A (0.1 M acetic acid <strong>in</strong> water) as eluent for 10 m<strong>in</strong>.Then, analytes were separated by reversed-phase chromatography byDownloaded from www.jbc.org by on April 12, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!