11.07.2015 Views

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Formaldehyde</strong> with Peptides 6241SCHEME 4. MS analysis <strong>of</strong> two productsformed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cubation <strong>of</strong> Ac-Arg-OME with formaldehyde andTABLE IIIConversion <strong>of</strong> peptides to a glyc<strong>in</strong>e-formaldehyde adduct after 48-h<strong>in</strong>cubation with formaldehyde aResidue m ConversionDa %Asparag<strong>in</strong>e 87 4.0 1.8Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e 99 56 13198 41 14Glutam<strong>in</strong>e 87 3.6 1.6Histid<strong>in</strong>e 87 6.6 1.9Tryptophan 87 4.7 1.5Tyros<strong>in</strong>e 87 62 4174 5.2 1.3N-term<strong>in</strong>al am<strong>in</strong>o group 12 76 b99 13 ba Mean S.D.; n 3.b n 1.conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a histid<strong>in</strong>e (peptide 5 and 18), asparag<strong>in</strong>e (peptide8), glutam<strong>in</strong>e (peptide 10), or tryptophan residue (peptide 14),yield<strong>in</strong>g products with a mass <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 87 Da. This can beexpla<strong>in</strong>ed by the coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> glyc<strong>in</strong>e to the peptides via amethylene bridge (Table II).The peptide with a tyros<strong>in</strong>e residue (peptide 15) gave twoproducts with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 87 Da and 174 Da, which meansthat one or two glyc<strong>in</strong>e/formaldehyde adducts were coupled tothe peptide, most probably to the ortho positions <strong>of</strong> the phenolic2 The products (MS 1 <strong>in</strong> A and B) were fragmented by the massspectrometer <strong>in</strong> four successive steps. The m/z <strong>of</strong> the products and thefragments were measured.group (Table II). This type <strong>of</strong> reaction is known as the Mannichsynthesis (21, 28).Glyc<strong>in</strong>e was also coupled by formaldehyde to the N-term<strong>in</strong>alam<strong>in</strong>o group <strong>of</strong> peptide 16, which gave the peptide a mass<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 99 Da. The formation <strong>of</strong> this adduct presumablyoccurs <strong>in</strong> two steps: (i) a 4-imidazolid<strong>in</strong>one is formed and then(ii) the glyc<strong>in</strong>e is attached via a methylene bridge to this4-imidazolid<strong>in</strong>one. The proposed structure is given <strong>in</strong> Scheme3, reaction 3.Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g peptides were also modified by formaldehydeand glyc<strong>in</strong>e. Peptide products were found with mass<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>of</strong> 99 and 198 Da. The mass <strong>in</strong>crease can be expla<strong>in</strong>edby the coupl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> one or two glyc<strong>in</strong>e molecules to the peptidevia two methylene bridges (see Table II). To verify that thismodification occurs specifically on the arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e residue, anarg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e derivative, Ac-Arg-OME, was treated with formaldehydeand glyc<strong>in</strong>e. The two ma<strong>in</strong> products from Ac-Arg-OMEhad the same mass <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> 99 and 198 Da. Their proposedstructures are given <strong>in</strong> Scheme 4. MS 4 measurements wereperformed on both products with ion masses <strong>of</strong> 330 and 429 Da.The product with ion mass <strong>of</strong> 330 Da was degraded after fourrepeated fragmentations <strong>in</strong>to fragment ions with m/z <strong>of</strong> 243,214, and 172 Da. The product with ion mass <strong>of</strong> 429 Da wasfragmented to ions with m/z <strong>of</strong> 342, 255, 226, and 184 Da. Thepossible structures <strong>of</strong> the fragment ions are given <strong>in</strong> Scheme 4.Unexpectedly, formaldehyde did not cross-l<strong>in</strong>k detectableamounts <strong>of</strong> glyc<strong>in</strong>e to peptides 2, 6, and 19 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a cyste<strong>in</strong>eor a lys<strong>in</strong>e residue, whereas these types <strong>of</strong> cross-l<strong>in</strong>kshave been described <strong>in</strong> several articles (1, 8, 22, 29, 30). Pro-Downloaded from www.jbc.org by on April 12, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!