NEWSLETTER 36 Repro - Masonic Province of Yorkshire, West Riding
NEWSLETTER 36 Repro - Masonic Province of Yorkshire, West Riding
NEWSLETTER 36 Repro - Masonic Province of Yorkshire, West Riding
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>NEWSLETTER</strong> <strong>36</strong> <strong>Repro</strong> 11/5/07 11:45 AM Page 9<br />
Reasons given included<br />
• Lost interest - Why? • Family commitments<br />
• Pressure <strong>of</strong> work • Ill health<br />
• Left the district • Cost <strong>of</strong> subscriptions<br />
• Transport problems<br />
I found these comments the most interesting, illuminating<br />
and worrying part <strong>of</strong> the survey. It was obvious, too, that those<br />
resigning with a "grudge" had not discussed their problems with<br />
the Lodge’s Liaison Officer who, after all, is appointed to provide<br />
just such a sympathetic ear when required.<br />
We can do nothing about deaths or Brethren moving to<br />
other parts <strong>of</strong> the country, prompting their resignation, but we<br />
can do something about resignations for disillusionment and<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> interest and indeed exclusions.<br />
This latter topic may be addressed by exercising caution in<br />
the selection process. Don’t let us get carried away by the<br />
attraction <strong>of</strong> numbers in favour <strong>of</strong> quality Brethren. Quality rather<br />
than quantity is the order <strong>of</strong> the day.<br />
We won’t always get it right but at least we can exercise<br />
greater care, making sure that both the proposer and seconder<br />
know the would-be candidate and we should also take notice <strong>of</strong><br />
any unfavourable response to enquiries.<br />
<strong>Masonic</strong> Premises<br />
THE thorny issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Masonic</strong> premises is not within my remit<br />
unless a move from one building to another is requested.<br />
However, it is worth noting that we have 60 <strong>Masonic</strong> Halls to<br />
house 209 Lodges – an average <strong>of</strong> 3.5 Lodges per rooms.<br />
If the premises which house five or more Lodges are<br />
removed from the equation, then 100 Lodges practise their<br />
Freemasonry in 48 <strong>Masonic</strong> Halls – an average <strong>of</strong> just over two<br />
Lodges in those rooms.<br />
Indeed, there are 16 buildings where only two Lodges meet<br />
and 15 where there is only one.<br />
And I have to ask is this economic sense?<br />
I would suggest that there must be room for rationalisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> premises, putting aside the understandable loyalties that<br />
Brethren have for one set <strong>of</strong> rooms or another.<br />
We should not overspend on rooms that are unsalvageable<br />
for sentimental reasons and if it will help those who wish to<br />
address potential problems, I have appointed an advisory<br />
committee, which will provide support, advice and pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
expertise, if requested to do so.<br />
The Royal Arch<br />
I MAKE no secret <strong>of</strong> my great affection for this delightful Order.<br />
Around 42% <strong>of</strong> our Craft members are Royal Arch Masons<br />
– commendable in comparison with the figures for other<br />
<strong>Province</strong>s, but how I would like to see the numbers soar to 50%<br />
plus.<br />
I would ask all Brethren to become ambassadors for the<br />
Royal Arch. Anyone who wears a RA jewel should advertise his<br />
beliefs and feel free to approach those who do not wear such a<br />
jewel.<br />
I do not, however, feel that Brethren should be coerced into<br />
joining any additional Order unless or until he is happy to do so.<br />
Royal Arch membership figures are just as promising as<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the Craft. There has been an increase in newly Exalted<br />
Companions and a reduction in resignations and deaths<br />
At the last count, there were 3266 Royal Arch Masons in our<br />
province, an increase <strong>of</strong> one over the 2005 figure. Yes, only one,<br />
but this is a step in the right direction and again, the first time we<br />
have been in positive balance for a good many years.<br />
Charity<br />
CAN I reiterate the magnificent figure <strong>of</strong> £5,000,000-plus<br />
announced at our special evening at the Royal Armouries in<br />
Leeds was the largest sum the Grand Charity has ever received<br />
from a Festival.<br />
I must also repeat my thanks to everyone concerned,<br />
Brethren and their families, for the tremendous efforts and<br />
overwhelming generosity these past seven years.<br />
This is a truly wonderful result and one for which this<br />
<strong>Province</strong> should feel justifiably very proud.<br />
For the immediate future all our charitable giving will be<br />
directed to building up the Provincial Grand Master’s Fund and<br />
in a new initiative we expect to be able to consider requests for<br />
at least two larger grants each year, in addition to the existing<br />
work to support deserving causes in our communities.<br />
At a recent meeting, the fund committee distributed just<br />
over £40,000 to local charities.<br />
In conclusion, I was pleased with an attendance <strong>of</strong> 956 at<br />
our Provincial meeting at Harrogate in May when the Alms<br />
collection realised £4,435.90.<br />
I was disappointed, however, that <strong>of</strong> the 315 appointments<br />
and promotions, there were 46 apologies.<br />
Even more disconcerting was the vast majority <strong>of</strong> Master<br />
Masons invited to attend did not even see fit to respond, let<br />
alone attend.<br />
They don’t know what they missed! Not to be too<br />
disheartened, I shall try again next year, but possibly with<br />
certain adjustments.<br />
However, with minor exceptions, I know the <strong>Province</strong> is in<br />
good heart. Let us strive to keep it that way.<br />
7