11.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

Proceedings of SerbiaTrib '13

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SerbianTribologySocietyFaculty<strong>of</strong>EngineeringUniversity<strong>of</strong>KragujevacSERBIATRIB<strong>'13</strong>13 th InternationalConferenceonTribology15–17May2013,Kragujevac,SerbiaPROCEEDINGSSERBIATRIB<strong>'13</strong>


tribology in industryISSN 0354-8996VOLUME 332011.3


Serbian Tribology SocietyUniversity <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac,Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringSERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference on Tribology15 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, SerbiaPROCEEDINGSEDITORS: Miroslav Babić, Slobodan Mitrović


13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ‘13PROCEEDINGSISBN: 978-86-86663-98-6Editors:Publisher:For the Publisher:Technical editor:Printed by:Circulation:Miroslav Babić, Ph.D.University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringSlobodan Mitrović, Ph.D.University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringSerbian Tribology SocietySestre Janjić 6, 34000 Kragujevac, SerbiaUniversity <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringSestre Janjić 6, 34000 Kragujevac, SerbiaMiroslav Babić, Ph.D., Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringBranko Ivković, Ph.D., Serbian Tribology SocietySlobodan Mitrović, Ph.D.University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringDragan Džunić, research assistentUniversity <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringMarko Pantić, research assistentUniversity <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringKOPIRNICA MAŠINAC,34000 Kragujevac, Serbia100 copiesCopyright © 2013 by Serbian Tribology Society and Faculty <strong>of</strong> EngineeringThe publication <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Proceedings</strong> was financially supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education,Science and Technological Development <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.


Supported byMinistry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science and Technological Development <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia


International Scientific CommitteeAleksandar MarinkovićAleksandar RacAleksandar VenclAndrei TudorBharat BhushanBogdan SoviljBranko IvkovićDamir KakašDušan StamenkovićEmilia AssenovaFriedrich FranekGeetha ManivasagamHakan KaleliKonstantinos-Dionysios BouzakisLorena DeleanuMara KandevaMarion MerkleinMehmet Baki KaramisMiroslav BabićNiculae Napoleon AntonescuNikolai MyshkinNyagol ManolovSlobodan MitrovićSlobodan TanasijevićUniversity <strong>of</strong> Belgrade (Serbia)Serbian Tribology Society (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade (Serbia)University Politehnica <strong>of</strong> Bucharest (Romania)The Ohio State University (USA)University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad (Serbia)Serbian Tribology Society (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Novi Sad (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Niš (Serbia)Technical University <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria)Vienna University <strong>of</strong> Technology (Austria)VIT University (India)Yildiz Technical University (Turkey)Aristotle University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki (Greece)University Dunarea de Jos (Romania)Technical University <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria)Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen Nürnberg(Germany)Erciyes University (Turkey)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)Petroleum-Gas University <strong>of</strong> Ploiesti (Romania)V.A. Belyi Metal-Polymer Research Institute <strong>of</strong>National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> Belarus (Belarus)Technical University <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>ia (Bulgaria)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)Organising CommitteeHonorary President:Branko IvkovićPresidents:Miroslav BabićSlobodan MitrovićMembers:Blaža StojanovićFatima ZivićMarko PantićDragan DzunićSerbian Tribology Society (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac (Serbia)


PrefaceThe International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB, is traditionally organized by theSerbian Tribology Society every two years, since 1989. The previous conferences were held inKragujevac (1989, 1991, 1993, 1999, 2005, 2007 and 2011), Herceg Novi (1995), Kopaonik(1997), Belgrade (2001, 2003 and 2009). This year the 13 th International Conference onTribology – SERBIATRIB <strong>'13</strong> also takes place on May 15-17, 2013 in Kragujevac.This Conference is organized by the Serbian Tribology Society (STS) and the University <strong>of</strong>Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering. Organizing Scientific Conferences, STS plays a significantrole in helping engineers and researchers to introduce in the fundamentals <strong>of</strong> tribology and topresent their experience, solutions and research results.The scope <strong>of</strong> the 13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB <strong>'13</strong> embraces thestate <strong>of</strong> art and future trends in tribology research and application. The following two aspects <strong>of</strong>tribology practice require special attention. Firstly, the requirement for higher productivity <strong>of</strong>machinery means that machines must operate under higher loads and at higher speeds andtemperatures, and that is why finding the right solutions for tribological processes is extremelyimportant. Secondly, the good tribology knowledge can greatly contribute to the saving <strong>of</strong>material and energy.The Conference program generally includes the following topics: fundamentals <strong>of</strong> friction andwear; tribological properties <strong>of</strong> solid materials; surface engineering and coating tribology;lubricants and lubrication; tribotesting and tribosystem monitoring; tribology in machineelements; tribology in manufacturing processes; tribology in transportation engineering; designand calculation <strong>of</strong> tribocontacts; sealing tribology; biotribology; nano and microtribology andother topics related to tribology.All together 76 papers <strong>of</strong> authors from 18 countries (Taiwan, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine,Germany, Poland, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy,Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey and Serbia) are published in the <strong>Proceedings</strong>.Approximately 37 papers were submitted by the foreign authors and app. 39 papers by theSerbian authors. All papers are classified into five chapters: Plenary lectures (4) Tribological properties <strong>of</strong> materials and coatings (29) Tribology in machine elements (23) Tribometry (13) Trenje, habanje i podmazivanje (7) – papers written in Serbian languageIt was a great pleasure for us to organize this Conference and we hope that the Conference,bringing together specialists, research scientists and industrial technologists, and <strong>Proceedings</strong>will stimulate new ideas and concepts, promoting further advances in the field <strong>of</strong> tribology. The


Editors would like to thank the Scientific and the Organizing Committee and all those who havehelped in making the Conference better. We would like to thank especially pr<strong>of</strong>. Miroslav Babićand pr<strong>of</strong>. Branko Ivković for the helpful suggestions and support.The Conference is financially supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science andTechnological Development, Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.We wish to all participants a pleasant stay in Kragujevac and we are looking forward to seeingyou all together at the 14 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB '15.Kragujevac, May 2013Editors


ContentsPlenary Lectures1. THE GREEN AUTOMOBILE – DEFINITION AND REALIZATIONWilfried J. Bartz ........................................................................................................................................................... 32. THE ECO-LABEL AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN BIODEGRADABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTALLYACCEPTABILITY OF LUBRICANTSWilfried J. Bartz ........................................................................................................................................................... 33. ROUGHNESS AND TEXTURE CONCEPTS IN TRIBOLOGYN.K. Myhkin, A.Ya. Grigoriev ....................................................................................................................................... 44. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COATINGS’ CHARACTERIZATRION FOR FACILITATING THE COATED TOOLLIFE PREDICTIONK.-D. Bouzakis, G. Skordaris, E. Bouzakis, N. Michailidis ......................................................................................... 10Tribological Properties <strong>of</strong> Materials and Coating5. PREDICTION OF COATED TOOLS PERFORMANCE IN MILLING BASED ON THE FILM FATIGUE ATDIFFERENT STRAIN RATESK.D. Bouzakis, R. Paraskevopoulou, G. Katirtzoglou, S. Makrimallakis, E. Bouzakis, P. Charalampous .................. 136. SELECTIVE TRANSFER OF MATERIALS IN THE ASPECT OF GREEN TRIBOLOGYEmilia Assenova, Gottlieb Polzer, Dr. Tsermaa, Mara Kandeva ................................................................................ 217. ABRASIVE WEAR AND WEAR-RESISTANCE OF HIGH STRENGTH CAST IRONCONTAINING Sn MICROALLOYMara Kandeva, Boryana Ivanova ............................................................................................................................... 268. INFLUENCE OF NANO-DIAMOND PARTICLES ON THE TRIBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OFNICKEL CHEMICAL COATINGSMara Kandeva, Dimitar Karastoianov, Boryana Ivanova, Viara Pojidaeva ................................................................ 319. WEAR BEHAVIOR OF AUSTEMPERED DUCTILE IRONWITH NANOSIZED ADDITIVESJ. Kaleicheva ............................................................................................................................................................. 3710. NICKEL COMPOSITE COATINGS MODIFIED BY DIAMOND NANOPARTICLESM. Kandeva, N. Gidikova, R. Valov, V. Petkov .......................................................................................................... 4211. TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS, DEPOSITED BY HVOF AND APSTECHNIQUES, AND COMPOSITE ELECTRODEPOSITS Ni/SiCAT BOTH ROOM TEMPERATURE AND 300°C.A.Lanzutti, M. Lekka, E. Marin, L.Fedrizzi ................................................................................................................. 4612. MECHANOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF NANOSIZED MIXED OXIDESN.G. Kostova, M. Kandeva, M. Fabian, A. Eliyas, P. Balaz ....................................................................................... 55


13. WEAR OF POLISHED STEEL SURFACES IN DRY FRICTION LINEAR CONTACT ON POLIMER COMPOSITESWITH GLASS FIBRESDorin Rus, Lucian Capitanu ....................................................................................................................................... 5814. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FRICTION COEFFICIENT AND WEAR RATE OF COMPOSITEMATERIALS SLIDING AGAINST SMOOTH AND ROUGH MILD STEEL COUNTERFACESMohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury, Dewan Muhammad Nuruzzaman,Biplov Kumar Roy, Sohel Samad, Rayhan Sarker, Abul Hasnat Mohammad Rezwan ............................................. 6515. ABRASIVE WEAR RESISTANCE OF THE IRON- AND WC-BASED HARDFACED COATINGS EVALUATEDWITH SCRATCH TEST METHODAleksandar Vencl, Bojan Gligorijević, Boris Katavić, Bogdan Nedić, Dragan Džunić ................................................. 7516. TOPOGRAPHIC AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TI6AL4V ALLOY SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION IN DRY ANDWET RECIPROCATING SLIDINGZinaida Doni, Mihaela Buciumeanu, Liviu Palaghian ................................................................................................ 8017. FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF UHMWPE DURING DRY RECIPROCATING SLIDINGFatima Živić, Miroslav Babić, Slobodan Mitrović, Dragan Adamović, Svetlana Pelemis ........................................... 8718. THE POTENTIAL OF MAGNESIUM ALLOYS AS BIOABSORBABLE / BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANTS FORBIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONSFatima Živić, Nenad Grujović, Geetha Manivasagam, Caroline Richard, Jessem Landoulsi, Vojislav Petrović ........ 9219. ANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE LAYER FORMATION OF SINGLE CYLINDER ENGINE COMBUSTIONCHAMBER WITH PHOSPHOROUS-FREE AND CONVENTIONAL ENGINE LUBRICANTSL.Yüksek, H.Kaleli, D.Özkan, H. Hacikadiroğlu ......................................................................................................... 9820. TRIBOLOGICAL STUDY OF BIOCOMPATIBLE HYBRID ORGANIC MOLECULES FILM WITH ANTIBACTERIALEFFECTJ.H. Horng, C.C.Wei, S. Y. Chern, W.H. Kao, K.W. Chern, Y.S. Chen ................................................................... 10221. THE INFLUENCE OF CORROSION ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF THERMALLY TREATED ZA27/SIC PCOMPOSITESBiljana Bobić, Aleksandar Vencl, Miroslav Babić, Slobodan Mitrović, Ilija Bobić ...................................................... 10622. TRIBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISATION OF PBT + GLASS BEAD COMPOSITES WITH THE HELP OF BLOCK-ON-RING TESTConstantin Georgescu, Mihai Botan, Lorena Deleanu ............................................................................................. 11323. NORMAL FORCE INFLUENCE ON 3D TEXTURE PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZINGTHE FRICTION COUPLE STEEL – PBT + 10% PTFEConstantin Georgescu, Lorena Deleanu, Catalin Pirvu ............................................................................................ 11924. WEAR BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITES BASED ON ZA27 ALLOY REINFORCEDWITH GRAPHITE PARTICLESSlobodan Mitrović, Miroslav Babić, Ilija Bobić, Fatima Zivić, Dragan Dzunić, Marko Pantić .................................... 12425. WEAR PROPERTIES OF A356/10SiC/1Gr HYBRID COMPOSITES IN LUBRICATED SLIDING CONDITIONSBabić Miroslav, Stojanović Blaža, Mitrović Slobodan, Bobić Ilija, Miloradović Nenad, Pantić Marko, Džunić Dragan .... 12926. A REVIEW OF THE TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF PTFE COMPOSITES FILLED WITH GLASS, GRAPHITE,CARBON OR BRONZE REINFORCEMENTMiloš Stanković, Aleksandar Vencl, Aleksandar Marinković .................................................................................... 135


27. WEAR CHARACTERISTICS OF HYBRID COMPOSITES BASED ON ZA27 ALLOY REINFORCED WITHSILICON CARBIDE AND GRAPHITE PARTICLESSlobodan Mitrović, Miroslav Babić, Nenad Miloradović, Ilija Bobić, Blaža Stojanović, Dragan Džunić .................... 14128. INFLUENCE OF OXIDATION LAYER GENERATED ON PREHEATED CONTACT PAIRS ON STATICCOEFFICIENT OF FRICTIONMarija Jeremić, Dragan Adamović, Slobodan Mitrović, Bojan Bogdanović, Aleksandar SimićSaša Ranđelović, Petar Todorović .......................................................................................................................... 14729. DYNAMICS OF SAMS IN BOUNDARY LUBRICATIONJelena Manojlović .................................................................................................................................................... 15330. INFLUENCE OF RICE HUSK ASH – SILICON CARBIDE WEIGHT RATIOS ON THEMECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF Al-Mg-Si ALLOY MATRIX HYBRID COMPOSITESK. K. Alaneme, T. M. Adewale ................................................................................................................................. 16031. TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF NANOMETRIC ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITIONSAPPLIED ON AISI 420 STAINLESS STEELE. Marin, A.Lanzutti,L.Fedrizzi ................................................................................................................................. 16932. PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF QUATERNARY AMMONIUMSURFACTANTS ON MUSCOVITE MICAJelena Manojlović ..................................................................................................................................................... 17733. MO-C MULTILAYERED CVD COATINGSA. Sagalovych, V. Sagalovych ................................................................................................................................. 184Tribology <strong>of</strong> Machine Elements34. EQUILIBRIUM STATE FORMATION FEATURES OF SURFACE LAYERS OF MACHINE PARTSVyacheslav F. Bezjazychnyj, Alexander N. Sutyagin .............................................................................................. 19535. THE INVESTIGATION OF COATED TOOLS TRIBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCE ON THECUTTING PROCESS AND THE QUALITY PARAMETERS OF THE PARTS SURFACE LAYERFomenko Roman Nikolaevich................................................................................................................................... 19836. MODELING SURFACE ROUGHNESS EFFECTS ON PISTON SKIRT EHL IN INITIAL ENGINE START UP USINGHIGH AND LOW VISCOSITY GRADE OILSMubashir Gulzar, S. Adnan Qasim, Riaz A Mufti ..................................................................................................... 20437. STRESSES AND DEFORMATIONS ANALYSIS OFA DRY FRICTION CLUTCH SYSTEMOday I. Abdullah, Josef Schlattmann, Abdullah M. Al-Shabibi ................................................................................. 21038. THE WAVINESS OF AN ABRASIVE WATER JET GENERATED SURFACEJ.Baralić, P.Janković, B.Nedić .................................................................................................................................. 21739. EFFECT OF REFRACTORY ELEMENTS ON WEAR INTENSITY OF THE SURFACE LAYERSIN THE ABRASIVE SOIL MASSJ. Napiórkowski, P. Drożyner, P. SzczyglakP P ............................................................................................................ 22240. EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF TOOTH HEIGHT CHANGING AT TIMING BELTSBlaža Stojanović, Lozica Ivanović, Andreja Ilić, Ivan Miletić .................................................................................... 226


41. CYCLO DRIVE EFFICIENCYTihomir Mačkić, Živko Babić, Nenad Kostić, Mirko Blagojević ................................................................................. 23042. TRIBOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROCESS OF WINDING THE STEEL ROPEAROUND THE WINCH DRUMMiloš Matejić, Mirko Blagojević, Vesna Marjanović, Rodoljub Vujanac, Boban Simić ............................................. 23443. APPLICATIVE MONITORING OF VEHICLES ENGINE OILPerić Sreten, Nedić Bogdan, Grkić Aleksandar ....................................................................................................... 24044. ADVANTAGES AND APPLICATIONS OF SELF-LUBRICATING PLASTIC BEARINGSAleksandar Marinković, Miloš Stanković .................................................................................................................. 24745. EFFECT OF VISCOSITY ON ELASTOHYDRODYNAMIC LUBRICATION BETWEEN PARALLEL SURFACESSUBJECTED TO HIGH ACCELERATIONUsman Ali Zia, Aamer A. Baqai, Waseem Akram .................................................................................................... 25146. INCREASING OF TOOL LIFE FOR HOT FORGING USING SURFACE MODIFICATIONMilentije Stefanović, Dragan Džunić, Vesna Mandić, Srbislav Aleksandrović, Dragan Adamović,Slobodan Mitrović .................................................................................................................................................... 26147. ANALYSIS OF TRIBOLOGICAL PROCESS DURING IRONING OF SHEET METAL MADE OF AlMg3Dragan Adamović, Milentije Stefanović, Srbislav Aleksandrović,Miroslav Živković, Fatima Živić, Marko Topalović .................................................................................................... 26548. OPTIMAL DESIGN OF A CAMMECHANISM WITH TRANSLATING FLAT-FACE FOLLOWER USING GENETICALGORITHMI. Tsiafis, S. Mitsi, K.D. Bouzakis, A. Papadimitriou ................................................................................................. 27049. INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS TYPES OF ROCK AGGREGATES ON SELECTION OF THE WORKING PARTSMATERIAL IN CIVIL ENGINEERINGV. Lazić, M. Mutavdžić, R. Nikolić, S. Aleksandrović, D. Milosavljević, B. Krstić, R. Čukić ..................................... 27550. TECHNO-ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR REPARATORY HARD-FACING OF MACHINE SYSTEMS'WORKING PARTSV. Lazić, R. Čukić, S. Aleksandrović, D. Milosavljević, R. Nikolić, B. Krstić, B. Nedeljković .................................... 28151. TRIBOLOGY ASPECT OF RUBBER SHOCK ABSORBERS DEVELOPMENTMilan Banić, Dušan Stamenković, Miloš Milošević, Aleksandar Miltenović ............................................................. 28652. EFFECTS OF USING OF MQL TECHNIQUE IN METAL CUTTINGGordana Globočki Lakić, Branislav Sredanović, Davorin Kramar, Bogdan Nedić, Janez Kopač ............................. 29253. TRIBOLOGICAL ASPECT OF RUBBER BASED PARTS USED IN ENGINEERINGDušan Stamenković, Milan Nikolić, Miloš Milošević, Milan Banić,Aleksandar Miltenović, Miroslav Mijajlović ............................................................................................................... 30254. POSSIBILITY OF REPLACING THE CHORINATED PARAFFINS IN METALWORKING FLUIDSMarica Dugić, Branka Kojić, Pero Dugić, Goran Dugić ............................................................................................ 30855. QUALITY OF PLASMA CUTTINGBogdan Nedić, Marko Janković, Miroslav Radovanović, Gordana Globočki Lakić .................................................. 31456. TRIBOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SINTERED STEEL GEAR IN APPLICATION WORM-AND-GEAR SETAleksandar Miltenović, Milan Banić, Miroslav Mijajlović, Đorđe Miltenović .............................................................. 320


Tribometry57. PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE SEIZURE TREND OF A MOM-THP WITH SELF-DIRECTED BALLSLucian Capitanu, Liliana – Laura Badita, Virgil Florescu, Dumitru Catalin Bursuc .................................................. 33158. ANALYZING THE INFLUENCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT POSITION ON TORQUE TRANSMISSIONBY FRICTIONMarija Jeremić, Bojan Bogdanović, Aleksandar Simić, Dragomir Miljanić, Petar Todorović,Sasa Randjelovic, Branko Tadić .............................................................................................................................. 34159. USE ALGORITHM FOR CONSTRUCTION 3D VISIBILITY GRAPHS TO DESCRIBE PLASTIC AND ELASTICDEFORMATION OF ROBOT LASER HARDENED SPECIMENSM. Babič, P. Kokol, M. Milfelner, P. Panjan, Igor Belič ............................................................................................ 34860. USE FRACTAL GEOMETRY TO DESCRIBE FRICTION OF ROBOT LASER HARDENED SPECIMENSM. Babič, P. Kokol, M. Milfelner, P. Panjan, Igor Belič ............................................................................................ 35161. USE NEW PROCESS IN ROBOT LASER HARDENING TO DECREASE WEAR OF SPECIMENSM. Babič, P. Kokol, M. Milfelner, P. Panjan, Igor Belič ............................................................................................ 35562. DIFFERENT WAYS OF FRICTION COEFFICIENT DETERMINATION IN STRIPE IRONING TESTS Aleksandrovic, M. Stefanovic, V. Lazic, D. Adamovic, M. Djordjevic, D. Arsic ..................................................... 35963. A NANOMECHANICAL APPROACH ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF EPOXYREINFORCED CARBON NANOTUBE NANOCOMPOSITESG. Mansour, D. Tzetzis, K.D. Bouzakis .................................................................................................................... 36464. SOME TRIBOLOGY STATE TESTS OF “EPDM” RUBBER BASED ON LABORATORY EXPERIMENTATIONSAbhijit Mukhopadhyay .............................................................................................................................................. 37365. APPLICATION OF 3D SOFTWARE PACKAGES FOR DESIGNING TRIBOMETER OF MODULAR TYPEIvan Mačužić, Branislav Jeremić, Petar Todorović, Marko Đapan, Milan Radenković, Marko Milošević ................. 38066. USING OF KALMAN FILTER AS A PROGNOSTIC TOOL FOR TRIBOLOGY PROCESSESIvan Mačužić, Petar Todorović, Marko Đapan, Milan Radenković, Branislav Jeremić ............................................ 38467. FRICTION COEFFICIENT ESTIMATION DURING FRICTION STIR WELDINGWITH THE SINGLE SHOULDERED WELDING TOOLMiroslav Mijajlović, Dušan Stamenković, Milan Banić, Aleksandar Miletnović, Miloš Milošević ............................... 38868. MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION FOR DETERMINATION OF STATIC COEFFICIENT OF ROLLINGFRICTIONPetar Todorović, Ivan Mačužić, Branislav Jeremić, Marko Đapan, Branko Tadić ................................................... 39669. IMPLEMENATION SQL REPORTING SERVICE IN THE TRIBOLOGYCAL DATA BASESMilan Erić, Marko Djukić ........................................................................................................................................... 401Trenje, habanje i podmazivanje70. VEŠTAČKO STARENJE TIKSOLIVENE ZA27 LEGURE I ČESTIČNIH ZA27/SIC KOMPOZITAI. Bobić, M. Babić, A.Vencl, S. Mitrović, B. Bobić .................................................................................................... 40971. UTICAJ POVRŠINE PODLOGE NA KARAKTERISTIKE PREVLAKA CINKADesimir Jovanović, Bogdan Nedić, Milomir Čupović , Vlatko Matrušić ..................................................................... 414


72. DEFEKTACIJA REDUKTORA BKSH-335 ZA POKRETANJE TRAKASTIH TRANSPORTERABAGERA Sch Rs 630Svetislav Lj. Marković, Ljubica Milović, Bratislav Stojiljković .................................................................................... 42073. ISPITIVANJE MEHANIČKIH I STRUKTURNIH OSOBINA PREVLAKAOTPORNIH NA EROZIJU I VISOKE TEMPERATUREMihailo R. Mrdak ..................................................................................................................................................... 42674. IZBOR MERNE GLAVE DIFERENCIJALNOG PNEUMATSKOG KOMPARATORA ZA KONTROLUUNUTRAŠNJIH MERA MAŠINSKIH DELOVADragiša Skoko, Cvetko Crnojević, Mileta Ristivojević .............................................................................................. 43375. POVEĆANJE POUZDANOSTI PODSISTEMA KOPANJA ROTORNOG BAGERA PODEŠAVANJEMTRIBOLOŠKIH KARAKTERISTIKA REZNIH ELEMENATAVojin Vukotić, Dragan Čabrilo .................................................................................................................................. 44076. PONAŠANJE NEHRĐAJUĆIH ČELIKA U KOMBINIRANIM UVJETIMA TROŠENJAGoran Rozing, Antun Pintarić, Desimir Jovanović, Vlatko Marušić ......................................................................... 446Authors Index ................................................................................................................................................................. 453


Plenary Lectures13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ’1315 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, Serbia


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTHE GREEN AUTOMOBILE– DEFINITION AND REALIZATION –Wilfried J. Bartz 11 T+S Tribology and Lubrication Engineering, Technische Akademie Esslingen e. V., Ostfildern, GermanyAbstract: The green automobile has to be green from the cradle to the grave. This means that the life cycle assessmentshould be the required approach which means the environmental impact <strong>of</strong> raw material generation, <strong>of</strong> production,during use and <strong>of</strong> disposal and recycling have to be taken into account.The overall aim is the reduction <strong>of</strong> energy as well as health and safety <strong>of</strong> the mankind. Nowadays the resources <strong>of</strong>energy carriers are consumed faster than expected.The impacts mentioned above can be characterized by emissions, primary energy demand, consumption <strong>of</strong> resourcesand waste generation. Often these environmental impacts are evaluated as CO2-emissions, contribution to thegreenhouse effect and summer smog and as primary energy demand during life cycle <strong>of</strong> all energy consumers.Mostly these impacts are simplified to the contribution <strong>of</strong> lubricants by higher efficiency in powertrains, by longerlubricants lifetimes, by energy reductions during the production <strong>of</strong> automobiles and during their use. The lastmentioned aspects mainly mean the reduced fuel consumption by reducing the friction between all moving parts.Some <strong>of</strong> the aspects mentioned above are explained and evaluated in this presentation. As an result an overall energyreduction is possible.THE ECO-LABEL AND THE CONFLICT BETWEENBIODEGRADABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTALLYACCEPTABILITY OF LUBRICANTSWilfried J. Bartz 11 T+S Tribology and Lubrication Engineering, Technische Akademie Esslingen e. V., Ostfildern, GermanyAbstract: Often the environmentally acceptability is equated with the fast biodegradability. But for thedegradation process oxygen is necessary. If large amounts <strong>of</strong> lubricants will be introduced into theenvironment, for instance as an accident, so much oxygen has to be taken from the surrounding, that otherorganisms will suffer.Nevertheless the regulations to define environmentally acceptable lubricants, which are listed in theframework to receive the European Eco-Label do not consider this aspect. The criteria for the Eco-Labelinclude environmentally and human health hazards, aquatic toxicity requirements, biodegradability ,exclusion <strong>of</strong> specific substances, the imperative use <strong>of</strong> renewable raw materials and <strong>of</strong> course the technicalperformance.Details <strong>of</strong> these criteria will be explained in the presentation.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 3


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacROUGHNESS AND TEXTURE CONCEPTS IN TRIBOLOGYN.K. Myhkin 1 , A.Ya. Grigoriev 11 Metal-Polymer Research Institute, Belarus, nkmyshkin@mail.ruAbstract: Current knowledge on scale and spatial organization <strong>of</strong> engineering surfaces is presented. Mainmethods <strong>of</strong> surface roughness analysis are discussed. A review <strong>of</strong> theoretical and practical problems intribology involving concept <strong>of</strong> rough surface is presented. Critical analysis <strong>of</strong> rough surface description inthe evolution from 2D to 3D set <strong>of</strong> parameters is carried out. Advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> traditionaland modern approaches <strong>of</strong> surface analysis based on concepts <strong>of</strong> roughness and texture are discussed.Keywords: surface roughness, roughness parameters, texture, wear surface, debris.1. INTRODUCTIONSurface asperities influence practically all theaspects <strong>of</strong> solids contact. There are a lot <strong>of</strong> theoreticaland experimental data on mutual dependence <strong>of</strong>roughness and such phenomena as adhesion, contactstiffness, abrasion and many others which occurduring friction and wear [1-3]. It is commonlyaccepted that understanding <strong>of</strong> friction phenomenais directly connected to analysis <strong>of</strong> surface structureand its transformation due to wear. So, at presentany friction and wear model is involving surfaceroughness parameters.Traditional concept <strong>of</strong> rough surface basedmainly on pr<strong>of</strong>ile parameters is not fully satisfiedmodern trends in tribology. Development <strong>of</strong> 3Dparameters did not change the situation significantly.Only recently, a new view <strong>of</strong> surface spatial organizationwas introduced. The concept is knownas texture and it reflects the appearance <strong>of</strong> distinctivesurface pattern. The current paper presents areview <strong>of</strong> the problems <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces analysisin their evolution from statistical height and stepparameters <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles to dimensionless and scaleinvariant representation <strong>of</strong> surface texture.2. ROUGHNESS ORIGINThe deviation <strong>of</strong> a real surface from the ideallysmooth are associated with the action <strong>of</strong> variousfactors, which can be divided onto structural, technological,and operational ones [4-6]. Their featuresdefine scale and textural properties which form surfacegeometric irregularities and as a result differenttypes <strong>of</strong> roughness.Structural roughness is inherently connectedwith discrete nature <strong>of</strong> solids. Having small but finitesizes, the atoms and molecules <strong>of</strong> solids arelocated within a certain distance from each other. Ifassume that the boundary <strong>of</strong> solids corresponds tosome constant potential <strong>of</strong> atomic interaction withthe surrounding phase, it is evident that its reliefhas a periodic nature. Surface image with atomicresolution presented on Figure 1a confirms that.Figure 1. а – AFM image <strong>of</strong> pyrolytic graphite surface(amplitude <strong>of</strong> surface deviation 0.43 nm); b – deformation<strong>of</strong> gold surface structure under effect <strong>of</strong> surfaceforces [7] (TEM); c – surface <strong>of</strong> spiral dislocation; d –surface <strong>of</strong> steel fracture.4 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The relief characteristics at this level are closelyrelated to surface forces and here significant quantum-mechanicaleffects occurs such as thermal oscillations<strong>of</strong> atoms with amplitudes up to 10% percent<strong>of</strong> interatomic distances and spontaneouschanges in their position. Moreover various atomicstacking faults in the surface layer produce compensatingdeformations <strong>of</strong> the layer material (Figure1 b). However, from a practical point <strong>of</strong> view,these properties are not significant, at least for thepresent level <strong>of</strong> tribological problems.Strict periodicity <strong>of</strong> atomic roughness is characteristiconly for ideal crystals. Real solids are imperfect.The imperfections <strong>of</strong> atomic structureknown as dislocations form next level <strong>of</strong> physicalroughness (Figure 1 c).Crystalline structure <strong>of</strong> solids can form last level<strong>of</strong> structural roughness. Unlike to previous types <strong>of</strong>irregularities which characterized by sub-nanometerheights, the size <strong>of</strong> corresponded asperities is comparableto the size <strong>of</strong> crystallites and can reach upto hundreds <strong>of</strong> microns. Usually this type <strong>of</strong> reliefis observed on the fracture surfaces <strong>of</strong> metals (Figure1 d).Technological roughness is a result <strong>of</strong> mechanical,thermal or any other types <strong>of</strong> material processing.These surface deviations consist <strong>of</strong> periodicaland random components. Formation <strong>of</strong> periodicalcomponents results from the processes <strong>of</strong> copying<strong>of</strong> tool cutting edges and roughness is affectedby technology (Figure 2). The appearance <strong>of</strong> therandom components is associated with material destructionduring chip formation and its adhesion tocutting edges (build-up), work hardening and fatiguefailure <strong>of</strong> surface layers, etc.Figure 2. Machined surfaces (Ra 1.6): a – cylindricalgrinding ; b – turningErrors in mounting <strong>of</strong> the parts during machining,the presence <strong>of</strong> elastic deformations and vibrationin the machine-tool system, cutting tool wear,and so on, leads to waviness and deviations <strong>of</strong> form(hour-glassing, faceting, barrelling, etc.) <strong>of</strong> the realsurface or the pr<strong>of</strong>ile from the corresponding parametersspecified on the basis <strong>of</strong> design. Thesedeviations can be periodic or stochastic.Operation roughness. Main reasons <strong>of</strong> surfacedegradation <strong>of</strong> machine parts during operation arewear and corrosion. Nowadays it is generally acceptedthat mechanisms <strong>of</strong> wear and corrosion correspondedto certain morphological types <strong>of</strong> formedsurfaces and fracture fragments (wear particles oroxides). It is a basis <strong>of</strong> modern methods <strong>of</strong> tribomonitoringand triboanalysis [8,9].The theoretical background <strong>of</strong> the methods isprovided by phenomenological models <strong>of</strong> frictioncontact damage. While using these models the actualwear mechanism is established basing on classification<strong>of</strong> friction surface morphology (Figure 3).Figure 3. Surface damage at friction: a – abrasion wear;b – plastic deformation; c – ploughing and adhesive fracture;d – fatigue wearThus, the delamination <strong>of</strong> thin material layersand the formation <strong>of</strong> exfoliation and spalling regionsare related to fatigue wear at cyclic elasticcontact. It is followed by the separation <strong>of</strong> materialdebris which points to plastic deformation <strong>of</strong> thesurface layer at excessive loading and lubricant filmtearing. The appearance linear relief <strong>of</strong> asperitieswith sharp edges indicates abrasive wear. Defectsshaped as deep tear-outs, delaminated thin filmspoint to adhesive and cohesive interaction <strong>of</strong> thecontact surfaces. Thus, analysis <strong>of</strong> wear debris andfriction surfaces allows for evaluation <strong>of</strong> the operatingconditions <strong>of</strong> tribosystem, condition <strong>of</strong> lubricant,and provides the opportunity to predict failure<strong>of</strong> the tribosystem and take measures to prevent it[10].3. SCALE STRUCTURE OF ROUGH LAYERAs it can be seen the heights <strong>of</strong> the surface asperitieslie in a wide range. On lower side they arelimited by the dimensions <strong>of</strong> the atomic and supermolecularformations, on the upper one by maximalheights which are proportional to the length <strong>of</strong> theexamined pr<strong>of</strong>ile [11].13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 5


Figure 4. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the height and spacing parameters<strong>of</strong> surface asperitiesIt is evident that in this case there are no limitationson the existence <strong>of</strong> asperities in various dimensionalranges (both spacing-wise and heightwise).However, in spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that there is nouniversally substantiated criterion for distinguishingasperities on the basis <strong>of</strong> scale, at the presenttime there exists the concept <strong>of</strong> the surface as anensemble <strong>of</strong> asperities <strong>of</strong> four dimensional levels:macrodeviations, waviness, roughness, and subroughness[12].4. SURFACE MEASUREMENTIn studying the topography the need arises forthe solution <strong>of</strong> three basic problems: description <strong>of</strong>the surface, development <strong>of</strong> representative surfaceevaluation systems and technical realization <strong>of</strong> themeasurement processes. In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that theseproblems are interdependent, the last problem is<strong>of</strong> special importance, since our theoretical concepts,and therefore our understanding <strong>of</strong> how anyparticular phenomena may take place on the surface,are based on the quantitative estimates. Thereforeit is evident that roughness measurements are<strong>of</strong> primary importance in studying the topography.Nowadays a great number <strong>of</strong> experimental methods<strong>of</strong> surface measurement are used. Stylus methodsremain the most widespread; they yield resultsforming the basis for current standards. Opticalmethods involving electromagnetic radiation suchas light section, shadow projection, interferencetechniques etc. have became widely applied. Atomic-forcemicroscopy has found a wide spread in surfacemetrology now. Figure 5 represents some capabilities<strong>of</strong> different methods <strong>of</strong> roughness measurementand their vertical and lateral resolution. Ascan be seen there is no method for measuring fullrange <strong>of</strong> asperities deviations.Figure 5. Resolution <strong>of</strong> various methods <strong>of</strong> roughnessmeasurementThe foregoing concepts form the basis <strong>of</strong> therepresentation <strong>of</strong> a surface in such disciplines asmechanical engineering, machine design, technology,tribology, heattransfer, and so on. On the wholein this representation the surface is examined as therealization <strong>of</strong> a random field, the characteristics <strong>of</strong>which are evaluated on the basis <strong>of</strong> twodimensionalpr<strong>of</strong>ilogram samples [12]. In this casethe system <strong>of</strong> topography estimates is based onanalysis <strong>of</strong> the histogram characteristics <strong>of</strong> the asperitiesin some range <strong>of</strong> their values.A characteristic feature <strong>of</strong> this approach is thefact that the mutual influence and interrelationship<strong>of</strong> the asperities are generally ignored (except forthe fact that the surfaces may be classified as isotropicor anisotropic), i.e., the spatial organization<strong>of</strong> the asperities is not taken into account. We canillustrate the ambiguity arising in the surface representationsin this case. Figure 6 a, b shows photographs(obtained on a scanning electron microscope(SEM)) <strong>of</strong> surfaces having different spatial structure.Table 1 present the results <strong>of</strong> a comprehensivestudy <strong>of</strong> their microgeometry.Figure 6. Two types <strong>of</strong> surface texturesTable 1. Roughness parameters <strong>of</strong> surfaces on Figure 6.RoghnessparameterSample on Figure 5abRa 3.20.5 2.30.3Rz 19.34.2 15.92.0Rmax 15.03.7 12.21.4S 56.718.6 43.27.6Sm 165.9 4.4 117.78.76 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


It can be seen that in spite <strong>of</strong> the significant differencebetween the studied objects practically allthe quantitative estimates coincide in the limits <strong>of</strong>the measurement errors. It is impossible to determinecriteria on the basis <strong>of</strong> which we can judge thedifference between these surfaces.The principal reasons why it is not possible toevaluate the topographic properties <strong>of</strong> surfacessolely with the aid <strong>of</strong> histogram estimates were discussedin [14, 15]. Specifically, it was shown thaton the basis <strong>of</strong> these characteristics we cannot constructa satisfactory prognostic model, since in thefinal analysis it is valid only in the limits <strong>of</strong> thosevalues that were used for its construction. The use<strong>of</strong> this model may lead to unexpected results. Forexample, according to the authors <strong>of</strong> [15], by superposingthe parameters we can achieve a gooddescription <strong>of</strong> practically any phenomenon, includingthose not relating to the examined object. Consideringthat the modern instruments yield aboutfifty different characteristics (including 3D) thatmay be subsequently used, the drawbacks <strong>of</strong> thisapproach become still more evident [6]For more correct representation <strong>of</strong> the surface itis necessary to have the possibility <strong>of</strong> characterizingit as an object, having a definite topology. In tribologythis approach is formalized by concept <strong>of</strong> texture[16, 17].5. CONCEPT OF TEXTURESurface texture is rather difficult to define. Mostauthors agree that this notion reflects the features <strong>of</strong>the surface relief caused by the two-level model <strong>of</strong>spatial relations <strong>of</strong> irregularities heights [18, 19].The mode <strong>of</strong> these relations at the local level governsthe shape <strong>of</strong> irregularities and at the globallevel, the position <strong>of</strong> irregularities relatively to eachother. To some extent, the concept <strong>of</strong> texture unitesthe ideas <strong>of</strong> treatment direction and irregularity directionaccording to the USSR Standards GOST2789–73 and 9378–93. The texture is outlined qualitativelyby several adjectives characterizing theshape and mutual position <strong>of</strong> irregularities, such asstepwise linear, facet random, spherical, sphericalradial, etc.There are numerous approaches to the description<strong>of</strong> texture; however, all <strong>of</strong> them are reduced toone <strong>of</strong> the following: comparative and parametricalapproach, usage <strong>of</strong> invariant presentations, and parameterization<strong>of</strong> visual content.Comparative methods are based on expert visualevaluation <strong>of</strong> the similarity <strong>of</strong> the object under investigationand the reference. The features <strong>of</strong> man’svision allow him to notice and identify minute distinctionsin roughness, texture, color, and shape <strong>of</strong>objects. The simplicity <strong>of</strong> comparative methods andthe fact that they provide sufficient accuracy formost applications encouraged their widespread use.Thus, for qualitative evaluation <strong>of</strong> roughness, samplereference surfaces are used according to GOST9378–93 (Figure 2).Comparative methods are very simple and inmost cases a set <strong>of</strong> references and an optical microscopeare sufficient to realize them. Their disadvantagesare the subjective and qualitative nature <strong>of</strong>the estimates obtained. To overcome them, theopinions and agreement <strong>of</strong> multiple experts areused [20].Parametric methods use different statistics <strong>of</strong>surface asperity heights and spacing, brightness,and color characteristics <strong>of</strong> their images.In order to evaluate texture properties, roughnessparameters are most <strong>of</strong>ten used, e.g., accordingto GOST 25142–82. Since 2007, the ISO 25178standard has been used to describe 3D surfaceproperties. However, they are mainly similar tostandard pr<strong>of</strong>ile estimates and hence inherit all theirshortcomings [6, 15].The advantages <strong>of</strong> the parametric approach arein the simple interpretation <strong>of</strong> the respective estimates,while their weak descriptive ability can beconsidered a shortcoming. Nevertheless, when agreat number <strong>of</strong> similar characteristics are used, theapproach is capable to solve the problems with accuracysufficient for most practical applications.The essence <strong>of</strong> invariant representation is theapplication <strong>of</strong> normalized description methods, i.e.,the representation <strong>of</strong> analysis objects in a form independent<strong>of</strong> their scale and coordinate origin.The simplest procedure <strong>of</strong> invariant representationis based on the Fourier transform <strong>of</strong> surfaceheights [21]. With respective normalization, thecoefficients <strong>of</strong> the amplitude spectrum (Fourier descriptors)do not depend on the scale and positionand can be considered as a complete (single-valuedand reversible) system <strong>of</strong> features. More complicatedmethods use fractal compression <strong>of</strong> images andwavelet transforms [22, 23].Features are not defined in the given approach atall. It is believed that all elements <strong>of</strong> normalizedrepresentations are features. It is <strong>of</strong> no significancethat they can be numerous and do not have visualinterpretation. It is assumed that they are analyzedand classified by computer methods; therefore, thesize <strong>of</strong> the feature vector is not important. The approachis unsuitable for research because <strong>of</strong> the absence<strong>of</strong> any visual and geometric interpretation.Parameterization <strong>of</strong> visual content is based onthe assumption that representative description <strong>of</strong>texture is the only possible by means <strong>of</strong> estimatesreflecting the visual content <strong>of</strong> the objects underinvestigation.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 7


Realization <strong>of</strong> the approach is based on the introduction<strong>of</strong> a structural element, i.e., the minimalvisually perceived region <strong>of</strong> the object under analysis.It is believed that the features <strong>of</strong> dislocation <strong>of</strong>structural elements relative to each other governlocal morphological properties at small distances,and global ones at large distances. Differences inthe choice <strong>of</strong> structural element type and description<strong>of</strong> their mutual position are responsible for thevariety <strong>of</strong> the methods for realizing the given approach.One <strong>of</strong> the methods is based on the use <strong>of</strong> cooccurrencematrices (COM) [16, 17]. The use <strong>of</strong>COM is motivated by the known assumption thatthe second order probabilities <strong>of</strong> features derivedfrom the images reflect their visual content [24].In order to describe the texture by the givenmethod, a surface region is chosen as a structuralelement whose position is characterized by the direction<strong>of</strong> gradient G i and distance P i from the coordinatecenter (Figure 7 a). The mutual position <strong>of</strong>two structural elements is specified by the distancebetween them ρ and the difference invariant descriptionbased on COM (Figure 7 b), the number<strong>of</strong> pairs <strong>of</strong> structural elements is counted with certainρ and g being present at the surface area underanalysis. Both height-coded and half-tone imagescan be used taken by various microscopy methodsarranged as upside lightening.Figure 7. Parameterization <strong>of</strong> visual contents <strong>of</strong> texture:a – scheme <strong>of</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> structure element; b –matrix <strong>of</strong> co-occurrence <strong>of</strong> texture elementsWith respective normalization, COM does not dependon scale and object position in the field <strong>of</strong> view.As with invariant presentations, each <strong>of</strong> the COMelements can be considered as a feature. However,since COM elements define the areas <strong>of</strong> the surface,and then the possibility arises <strong>of</strong> non-parametric comparison<strong>of</strong> objects with visualization <strong>of</strong> their similarityor dissimilarity [25, 26]. The technique involvesmarking the areas whose COM elements have eitherclose or essentially different values on the images <strong>of</strong>the compared objects. In the former case, this allowsfor visualizing the similarity <strong>of</strong> the objects, and in thelatter their distinction. Figure 8 shows the results <strong>of</strong>the solutions <strong>of</strong> this problem.Figure 8. The visual matching <strong>of</strong> surface texturedifferences: a, b – surface <strong>of</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> hard drivemagnetic media; d – difference <strong>of</strong> the surface a from b(presence <strong>of</strong> “kidney-like” structures)The advantage <strong>of</strong> the approach consists in itsgeneral nature, allowing us to unite the features <strong>of</strong>texture <strong>of</strong> objects. This makes analysis <strong>of</strong> theirmorphology and classification much easier. However,its realization is rather complicated.Prospects in development <strong>of</strong> texture analysis andapplications look very promising. The analyticaland computational tools in texture analysis are progressingquickly [27]. The progress in technologyresults in a possibility to use a variety <strong>of</strong> methodsfor making regular textures and micro-textures e.g.by laser [28] or patterning with rigid asperities [29].These technological advances can bring a lot <strong>of</strong>fruitful applications in many areas <strong>of</strong> tribology.6. CONCLUSIONSSurface 3D organization can be described bydefinition <strong>of</strong> texture. Experience <strong>of</strong> image recognitiontheory can provide methods for rough surfacetexture description and visualization <strong>of</strong> texture similarity/dissimilarity.The description <strong>of</strong> a surfacetexture by special type <strong>of</strong> COM is in a good agreementwith the texture distinctions obtained by expertvisual perception. Texture analysis can be efficientlyapplied for solving practical tribologicalproblems in micro/nanoscale.REFERENCES[1] N.K. Myshkin, C.K. Kim, M.I Petrokovets: Introductionto Tribology, Cheong Moon Gak, 1997.[2] Micro/Nano Tribology, Ed. By B. Bhushan, CRCPress, 1998.[3] G. W. Stachowiak: Engineering Tribology. Butterworth-Heinemann,2005.[4] I.V. Dunin-Barkovskii and A.N. Kartashova:Measurement and Analysis <strong>of</strong> Surface Roughness,Waviness, and Noncircularity [in Russian], Moscow,1978.[5] T.R. Thomas: Rough Surfaces, Imperial CollegePress, London, 1999.[6] D. Whitehouse: Surface and Their Meausrement,Kogan Page Science, 2004.[7] M. Pruton: Surface Physics, Clarendon: Oxford,1985.[8] B.J. Roylance, R. Dwyer-Joyce: Wear debris andassociated wear phenomena – fundamental re-8 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


search and practice, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part JJEng. Tribology, No. 214, pp. 79-105, 2000.[9] N.K. Myshkin, A.Ya. Grigoriev: Morphology: Texture,Shape and Color <strong>of</strong> Friction Surfaces andWear Debris, Journal <strong>of</strong> Friction and Wear, Vol.29, No. 3, pp. 192-199, 2008.[10] D.W. Anderson: Wear particle atlas, ReportNAEC-92-163.[11] R.S. Sayles, T.R. Thomas: Surface Topography asa Non-Stationary Random Process, Nature 271(5644), pp. 431–434, 1978.[12] N.B. Demkin and E.V. Ryzhov: Surface Qualityand Contact <strong>of</strong> Machine Parts [in Russian], Moscow,1981.[13] A.P. Khusu, Yu.R. Vitenberg, and V.A. Pal'mov:Surface Roughness (Theoretical-Probabilistic Approach)[in Russian], Moscow, 1975.[14] A.Ya. Grigoriev, N.K. Myshkin, O.V. Kholodilov:Surface Microgeometry Analysis Methods, SovietJournal <strong>of</strong> Friction and Wear, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.138-155, 1989.[15] M. Zecchino: Characterization surface quality:why average roughness is not enough, AP. Notes <strong>of</strong>Iveco Instrument, December, pp. 24–30, 2003.[16] A.Ya. Grigoriev, S.A. Chizhik, N.K. Myshkin: Textureclassification <strong>of</strong> engineering surfaces with nanoscaleroughnes, Int. J. <strong>of</strong> Machine Tools andManufacture, Vol. 38, No. 5–6, pp. 719–724, 1998.[17] N. K. Myshkin, A. Ya. Grigoriev: Spatial characterization<strong>of</strong> engineering surface, in Proc. <strong>of</strong> 3rd InternationalConference on Surface Engineering,Chengdu, China, pp. 54–61, 2002[18] R.M. Haralick: Statistical and structural approachesto texture, <strong>Proceedings</strong> IEEE, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp.786–804, 1979.[19] M. Sonka, V. Hlavac, R. Boyle: Image processing,analysis and machine, Boston: PWS publishing,1999.[20] A.Ya. Grigoriev, R. Chang, E.S. Yoon, H. Kong:Classification <strong>of</strong> Wear Particles by Semantic Features,Journal <strong>of</strong> Friction and Wear, Vol. 20, No. 2pp. 42-48, 1999.[21] Z. Peng, T.B. Kirk: Two-Dimensional Fast FourierTransform and Power Spectrum for Wear ParticleAnalysis, Tribology Int, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 583-590, 1997.[22] T.B. Kirk, G.W. Stachowiak, A.W. Batchelor:Fractal Parameters and Computer Image AnalysisApplied to Wear Particles Isolated by Ferrography,Wear, Vol. 145, pp. 347-365, 1991.[23] S.-H. Lee, H. Zahouani, R. Caterini, T.G. Mathia:Morphological characterization <strong>of</strong> engineered surfacesby wavelet transform, in Proc. <strong>of</strong> 7 th Int. Conf.on Metrology and Properties <strong>of</strong> Eng. Surfaces,Goteborg, pp. 182-190, 1997.[24] H. Tamura, S. Mori, T. Yamawaki: Texture featurescorresponding to visual perception, IEEETrans. SMC-8, Vol. 8, pp. 460–473, 1978.[25] N.K. Myshkin, A.Ya. Grigoriev, S.A. Chizhik,K.Y. Choi, M.I.: Surface Roughness and TextureAnalysis in Microscale, Wear, Vol. 254, pp. 1001-1009, 2003.[26] P. Podsiadlo, G.W. Stachowiak: Development <strong>of</strong>advanced quantitative analysis methods for wearparticle characterization and classification to aidtribological diagnosis, Tribology International,Vol. 38, pp. 887-892, 2005.[27] P.Podsiadlo, G.W.Stachowiak: Directional MultiscaleAnalysis and Optimization for Surface Textures,Tribology Letters, Vol. 49, pp. 179-191, 2013.[28] I. Etsion, State <strong>of</strong> the Art in Laser Surface Texturing,ASME J. Tribology, Vol. 127, pp. 248-253, 2005.[29] D.T. Nguen et al.: Friction <strong>of</strong> Rubber with SrfacesPatterned with Rigid Spherical Asperities, TribologyLetters, Vol. 49, pp. 135-144, 2013.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 9


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COATINGS’CHARACTERIZATRION FOR FACILITATING THE COATEDTOOL LIFE PREDICTIONK.-D. Bouzakis 1,2 , G. Skordaris 1,2 , E. Bouzakis 1,2 , N. Michailidis 2,31 Laboratory for Machine Tools and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, AristotelesUniversity <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Greece2 Fraunh<strong>of</strong>er Project Center Coatings in Manufacturing, in Centre for Research and Technology Hellas in Thessalonikiand in Fraunh<strong>of</strong>er Institute for Production Technology in Aachen, Germany3 Physical Metallurgy Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Aristoteles University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, GreeceAbstract: Coated tools constitute the majority <strong>of</strong> the tools applied in material removal processes. The paperintroduces analytical-experimental methodologies for predicting film properties and cutting performance <strong>of</strong>coated tools. In a first stage, procedures for calculating stress-strain curves and fatigue critical loads <strong>of</strong>coatings by nanoindentations and impact tests respectively, at various temperatures determined, arepresented. In a further stage, methodologies for the assessment <strong>of</strong> the film adhesion by inclined impact testsand <strong>of</strong> the film brittleness by nano-impacts are described. Moreover, the effect <strong>of</strong> the cutting edge impactduration in milling on the tool performance is demonstrated and explained via impact tests at various forcesignal times. Finally, the potential <strong>of</strong> micro-blasting on PVD coatings at appropriate conditions to improvethe coated tool life is exhibited. In this context, a tool life increase is associated with the appropriateselection <strong>of</strong> micro-blasting conditions. The relevant results are evaluated by Finite Elements Method (FEM)supported procedures. The described procedures allow the prediction <strong>of</strong> coated tool cutting performanceand the effective adaption <strong>of</strong> the cutting conditions to the film properties, thus restricting the relatedexperimental cost.10 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Tribological Properties <strong>of</strong>Materials and Coatings13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ’1315 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, Serbia


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPREDICTION OF COATED TOOLS PERFORMANCE INMILLING BASED ON THE FILM FATIGUE AT DIFFERENTSTRAIN RATESK.D. Bouzakis 1,2,a , R. Paraskevopoulou 1,b , G. Katirtzoglou 1,2,c , S. Makrimallakis 1,2,d , E. Bouzakis 1,2,e ,P. Charalampous 1,f1 Laboratory for Machine Tools and Manufacturing Engineering, Aristoteles University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece2 Fraunh<strong>of</strong>er Project Center Coatings in Manufacturing, in Centre for Research and Technology Hellasin Thessaloniki, Greece and in Fraunh<strong>of</strong>er Institute for Production Technology in Aachen, Germanya bouzakis@eng.auth.gr, b paraskeu@auth.gr, c gkatirz@auth.gr, d makrimallakis_s@eng.auth.gr, e E.Bouzakis@certh.gr,f paschalischaralampous@gmail.comAbstract: The knowledge <strong>of</strong> coated tool wear mechanisms in milling is pivotal for explaining the filmfailure and selecting the appropriate cutting strategy and conditions. In this paper, tool wear experimentswere carried out in milling <strong>of</strong> four different steels using coated cemented carbide inserts. The variablestress, strain and strain rate fields developed in the tool during cutting affect the film-substratedeformations and in this way the resulting coating’s loads and its fatigue failure. For investigating theinfluence <strong>of</strong> cyclic impact loads magnitude and duration on the films’ fatigue <strong>of</strong> coated speciments, animpact tester was employed which facilitates the modulation <strong>of</strong> the force signal. The attained tool life upto the films’ fatigue failure was assosiated to a critical force for the film fatigue endurance and to thecutting edge entry impact duration. These factors converge sufficiently to the tool life in all examinedmilling kinematics and workpiece material cases.Keywords: milling, tool wear, entry impact duration1. INTRODUCTIONMilling operations are <strong>of</strong>ten associated withcomplicated cutting edge-workpiece contact andintensive tool impact loads. These facts render theprediction <strong>of</strong> the tool wear development a difficultto be achieved task [1, 2]. Recent investigationswith coated cemented carbide inserts revealed thatthe milling up or down kinematic, as well as thecutting parameters, significantly affect the stressfield developed in the cutting edge during thematerial removal and consequently the cuttingperformance [3, 4].The present paper introduces a method forcalculating the coated tool wear evolution inmilling. In such cutting procedures, repetitiveimpact loads with variable duration and magnitudesare exerted on the coated cutting edge, caused bythe interrupted material removal. Hence, it wasnecessary to quantify the effect <strong>of</strong> the cutting edgeentry impact duration on the coated tool fatiguefailure at various cutting loads. This was enabled bya developed impact tester, facilitating the appliedimpact force modulation [5].2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILSIn the conducted investigations, peripheral andface milling experiments were conducted by a 3-axis numerically controlled milling center applyingmilling cutters <strong>of</strong> 17, 35, 57 and 90 mm effectivediameters. The geometry <strong>of</strong> the cutters and theemployed cutting inserts is exhibited in Figure 1.The cemented carbide inserts are coated by a TiAlNPVD film <strong>of</strong> ca. 3 μm thickness.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 13


Figure 1. The employed milling cuttersThe chamfer <strong>of</strong> ca. 280 μm and edge radius 20μm respectively (see Figure 1) contribute to cuttingedge stabilization especially at elevated dynamicloads. This may lead to an effective avoidance <strong>of</strong>cutting edge micro breakages, especially when thechip formation is not stable, as for example at thecutting edge entry into the workpiece materialduring up milling [3].The specifications <strong>of</strong> the applied workpiecematerial are displayed in Figure 2. Four differentsteels were used; the hardened steel IMPAX, thestainless steel 304 L and the hardened steelsNIMAX and 42CrMo4.Figure 3. The employed coatings and substratepropertiesThe mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the applied coatingand substrate materials were detected bynanoindentations and a FEM-based algorithm,facilitating the determination <strong>of</strong> related stress-straincurves [6]. The elastoplastic film material laws aredemonstrated in Figure 3.For rendering possible the modulation <strong>of</strong> theimpact force characteristics such as <strong>of</strong> frequency,impact duration and force signal pattern, an impacttester has been employed, in which a piezoelectricactuator is applied for the force generation [5]. Bythis device, the fatigue behaviour <strong>of</strong> thin hardcoatings at different impact force patternsamplitudes and durations can be investigated.3. IMPACT FORCE AMPLITUDE ANDDURATION EFFECT ON COATINGS’FATIGUE FAILUREFigure 2. The employed workpiece material propertiesFor detecting the effect <strong>of</strong> the cutting edge entryimpact duration on the film fatigue failure, impacttests at forces <strong>of</strong> various durations and amplitudeswere carried out on the used coated inserts (seeFigure 4a).14 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


edge without chamfer and smaller radius, versus thecutting length corresponds to a trapezoidal forcepattern at significantly lower entry impact duration<strong>of</strong> 0.036 ms.Considering these facts and the results exhibitedin Figure 4b, the chamfered coated cutting edgescan withstand to fatigue failure approximately atwo and half times higher entry impact forceamplitude. In this way, at the same stress level, thefilm failure <strong>of</strong> a chamfered cutting edge may appearin up milling after a longer cutting time comparedto an insert without chamfer. The temperaturedeveloped close to the transient region <strong>of</strong> thecutting edge between flank and rake amounts toabout 200 o C at a cutting speed <strong>of</strong> 200 m/min andchip tool contact time up to roughly 15 ms [4].Thus, in this cutting edge region, the crystallinestructure <strong>of</strong> the investigated TiAlN film remainsstable, no diffusion or oxidation takes place and thefilm fatigue, which can be investigated by theimpact test, is the prevailing factor.Figure 4. a) Triangular and trapezoidal impact forcesignals b) Effect <strong>of</strong> impact signal and entry impactdurations on the critical force amplitudeAll applied triangular force signals withdurations (FSD) <strong>of</strong> 10 ms, 20 ms and 35 ms and thetrapezoidal ones <strong>of</strong> 20 ms and 40 ms, which arepresented at the upper Figure 4a part, had aconstant signal growth time t e <strong>of</strong> 5 ms (entry impactduration t e ). In contrast, the displayed force signalsat the bottom <strong>of</strong> Figure 4a possess different entryimpact durations t e from about 0.5 ms up to 15 ms.These force signals are created by the piezoelectricactuator and measured by the piezoelectric forcetransducer.The effect <strong>of</strong> the force pattern on the criticalforce amplitude, which induces coating fatiguefailure after one million impacts, is monitored inFigure 4b. According to these results, the criticalfatigue force amplitude remains practicallyinvariable versus the force signal duration atconstant t e . On the other hand, t e affectssignificantly the film fatigue behaviour, as it isexhibited in the same diagram. An increase <strong>of</strong> theimpact entry duration t e from 0.05 ms up to 15 msresults in a significant critical fatigue impact forceamplitude augmentation from about 60 daN up to220 daN respectively. The cutting load signal, i.e.the stress course versus the cutting length, when achamfered cutting edge is used, resembles to atriangular force signal at entry impact duration <strong>of</strong>3.6 ms [3]. Moreover, the stress course on a cutting4. FLANK WEAR DEVELOPMENT VERSUSTHE CUTTING EDGE ENTRY IMPACTDURATIONThe contact conditions at the tool entry into thematerial in milling are pivotal for the tool wear [1,2, 4, 7, 8]. The impact load on the cutting edge atthe tool entrance into the workpiece materialdepends on the milling kinematic (up or down,peripheral or face), since these factors affect thedeveloped chip geometry and thus the stress fields<strong>of</strong> the coating versus the tool rotation. The entryimpact duration corresponds to the cutting time, upto the development <strong>of</strong> the maximum equivalentstress in the coating.For describing the effect <strong>of</strong> the entry impactduration on the tool wear in milling with coatedtools, the accumulated tool life is introduced. Thelatter parameter refers to a flank wear land widthVB <strong>of</strong> 0.15 mm. This parameter can be calculatedconsidering the undeformed chip length l cu , thecutting speed v and the attained number <strong>of</strong> cutsNC 0.15 up to the same VB according to the equationshown in the upper part <strong>of</strong> Figure 5a. In Figure 5aand 5b characteristic examples concerning theeffect <strong>of</strong> the entry impact duration on the tool lifeare exhibited. These examples refer to peripheraland face milling <strong>of</strong> different undeformed chiplengths. Further examples in milling at variousconditions, kinematics and materials are presentedin [3, 9, 10, 11]. As it can be observed in Figure 5a,at an undeformed chip length <strong>of</strong> roughly 80 mm, asimilar tool wear evolution in up and down, face orperipheral milling develops, leading to almost thesame accumulative tool life.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 15


Figure 5. Flank wear land width versus number <strong>of</strong> cutsin various cases <strong>of</strong> face and peripheral millingMoreover, as it is demonstrated in Figure 5b,when up milling is applied, the flank weardevelopment is less intense compared to downperipheral or face milling at a chip length <strong>of</strong> about40 mm. The attained accumulative tool life in upmilling is approximately three times highercompared to those ones in down milling. Thisbehaviour can be explained, based on the developedcutting edge entry impact duration in the previouslydescribed cases.To highlight this effect, in Figure 6, the obtainedaccumulative tool life in the investigated peripheraland face milling cases is displayed versus thecutting edge entry impact duration t e . The curve inthis chart describes the effect <strong>of</strong> the cutting entryimpact duration on the accumulated tool life. Therelevant results were obtained in milling, at varioustool geometries, cutting kinematics and conditions[3, 9, 10, 11].In down milling, face or peripheral, atundeformed chip lengths l cu <strong>of</strong> ca. 40 mm, thecutting edge entry impact durations t e amount toapproximately 0.1 ms leading to the accumulativetool life diminishing.Furthermore, in up milling at an undeformedchip length l cu <strong>of</strong> ca. 40 mm, due to the smootherchip thickness growth at chip formation start, thecutting edge entry impact duration t e isapproximately 2.2 ms and the accumulative tool lifeincreases significantly compared to thecorresponding one in down milling.In contrary, in down and up milling, face orperipheral, at undeformed chip lengths l cu <strong>of</strong> about80 mm, the entry impact duration varies from 3.1 to5.4 ms and the accumulative life remains almost onthe same level.Considering Figure 6, it can be concluded thatentry impact duration larger than 2 ms leadpractically to almost the same accumulative toollife. Furthermore, it is obvious, that short entryimpact durations correspond to comparably lowercoating fatigue critical forces (see Figure 4) anddiminishes the coated tool life. Longer entrydurations improve the film fatigue behaviour, thusenhancing the coated tool life.The accumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> theemployed hardened steel IMPAX versus the entryimpact duration at various cutting speeds isdisplayed in Figure 7. The accumulated tool life inmilling <strong>of</strong> the employed hardened steel IMPAXversus the entry impact duration, displayed in Figure7, can be described by the equations, displayed inFigure 7b, for the cutting speeds <strong>of</strong> 100, 200 and 300m/min.Similar experiments were conducted for allemployed hardened steels. Figure 8 illustrates theaccumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> NIMAX, AISI304 L and the 42CrMo4 versus the entry impactduration at various cutting speeds. The obtainedaccumulated tool life <strong>of</strong> NIMAX is substantiallylower than the corresponding <strong>of</strong> IMPAX at thesame cutting speed and almost equal to 1/3 <strong>of</strong> that.Figure 6. Accumulated tool life in milling versus theentry impact duration16 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 7. Accumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> theemployed hardened steel IMPAX versus the entryimpact duration at various cutting speedsfunction <strong>of</strong> the cutting speed and the entry impactduration is:T0.15C3( v,te) CC41teC2e(1)The parameters C 1 , C 2 , C 3 and C 4 depend on thecutting tool and workpiece material data. Moreover,these parameters are functions <strong>of</strong> the cutting speedand the entry impact duration.Considering the entry impact duration, usingequation (1), the cutting tool life T 0.15 up to a flankwear land width VB equal to 0.15 mm can beestimated. Moreover, the number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC 0.15corresponding to a flank wear land width VB equalto 0.15 mm can be calculated based on theundeformed chip length and the cutting speed usingthe relation (2).T0 .15 NC0.15 lcuv (2)Bearing in mind that a number <strong>of</strong> cuts equal tozero corresponds to a tool wear VB also equal tozero and the number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC 0.15 is associated toVB equal to 0.15 mm, the evolution <strong>of</strong> the toolwear during milling can be calculated as describedin [9].6. COMPUTATION OF THE TOOL WEARIN MILLING AT CHANGEABLECUTTING CONDITIONSDuring milling a workpiece, the values <strong>of</strong>parameters influencing the tool wear developmentsuch as chip length, chip thickness, entry impactduration etc. may vary in the successive tool paths.Considering these circumstances, for computing thetool wear developed during milling, themethodology explained in Figure 9, is applied [15,16].Figure 8. Accumulated tool life in milling <strong>of</strong> theemployed hardened steels versus the entry impactduration at various cutting speedsThis is due to comparatively higher hardness <strong>of</strong>NIMAX. Moreover, it is obvious that due toreasons described in [11, 12, 13, 14] stainless steelis difficult to cut.5. THE DEVELOPED MODEL FORDESCRIBING THE WEAR EVOLUTIONON COATED TOOLS IN MILLING BASEDON CUTTING EDGE ENTRY IMPACTDURATIONThe general form <strong>of</strong> the equations, shown inFigure 7, describing the accumulated tool life as aFigure 9. Determination <strong>of</strong> tool wear evolution inmilling at various cutting conditions13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 17


Based on the cutting data <strong>of</strong> every tool path, thenumber <strong>of</strong> cuts NC i and furthermore the tool wearVB i at the end <strong>of</strong> a tool path (i) can be calculated,as demonstrated in this figure. The flank wear VB i-1developed in the previous tool path (i-1), is relatedto a number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC i-1 considering the cuttingdata <strong>of</strong> the actual tool path. The number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC idata <strong>of</strong> the actual tool path is added to the NC i-1and thus the flank wear VB i at the tool path (i) canbe determined. By this method the flank weardevelopment can be effectively predicted in allsuccessive cutting tool paths.7. AN APPLICATION EXAMPLE OF THEDEVELOPED METHODOLOGYThe analytical method for estimating the toolwear is applied in the case <strong>of</strong> a test part presented inFigure 10. Considering the initial and finalworkpiece’s geometry, the tool paths required toremove the raw material volume were defined usingthe commercial “OPUS-CAM” system [17].Figure 10. The employed test part and the tool pathsrequired for the material removalFigure 11. Determination <strong>of</strong> chip data along the toolpaths by a CAD/ CAM systemThe determined tool paths are presented in thelower part <strong>of</strong> Figure 10 too. The machining tookplace in forty z-levels. The raw material removalwas accomplished using up milling and downmilling as well. Both operations lead to the samefinal workpiece shape, but the tool wear behaviourin each case may be different.After the tool paths have been determined, the“Schnitte.dat” file is generated by OPUS, as shownin Figure 11. This file contains geometrical datarelated to the chips formed in each tool path. Morespecifically, the parameters illustrated in Figure 10,determined at certain distances from every tool pathinitial point are stored into the “Schnitte.dat” file.In the first column <strong>of</strong> the file, the tool position isdefined as a percentage p <strong>of</strong> the actual tool pathlength l i , whereas i is the number <strong>of</strong> the tool path.At every tool position, the angle φ ref <strong>of</strong> the first toolrake – workpiece contact, the corresponding entryangle φ ent at the maximum cutting edge penetrationinto the part material and the exit angle φ ex arestored. Moreover, in the following columns, theundeformed chip length l cu , the axial depth <strong>of</strong> cut a zand the chip width b are accumulated. The data <strong>of</strong>the “Schnitte.dat” file are further processed by thedeveloped Data - PREparation (DAPRE) s<strong>of</strong>tware.Thus, various data, as for instance the entryimpact time per chip, the undeformed chip lengths,the tool –workpiece contact angle etc. can beprovided. Considering these data the coated toolwear evolution versus the number <strong>of</strong> cuts isdescribed and in this way, the conduct <strong>of</strong>algorithms for an analytical optimization <strong>of</strong> millingprocess towards attaining set targets is facilitated.18 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 13. Calculated and measured flank weardevelopment versus the number <strong>of</strong> cuts8. CONCLUSIONSFigure 12. Histograms <strong>of</strong> the entry impact durationalong the tool pathsCharacteristic results <strong>of</strong> this methodology aredisplayed in Figure 12, where histograms <strong>of</strong> theentry impact time <strong>of</strong> the removed chips in both upand down milling kinematics are illustrated.In up milling almost all chips were cut at impactduration <strong>of</strong> approximately 4,8 ms. In contrary,when down milling is applied almost half chipspossess entry impact durations <strong>of</strong> less than 4 ms,while some <strong>of</strong> them are associated with impactdurations less than 1 ms. In this way, it is expecteda more intense wear evolution in down millingcompared to up one.It is has to be pointed out, that the more intensetool wear evolution in down milling <strong>of</strong> thisparticular test part compared to the up one, cannotstand for every milling case and depends on theworkpiece and the tool edge geometry and materialdata.For calculating the tool wear developed duringmilling <strong>of</strong> the test part, the introduced method inprevious paragraph was used. The flank wear landwidth VB versus the number <strong>of</strong> cuts NC wascalculated and experimentally detected. Themeasured and the calculated values <strong>of</strong> the tool wearevolution in both milling kinematics are presentedin Figure 13. The experimental results convergesufficiently with the calculated ones.The results described in this paper show thesignificant effect <strong>of</strong> the cutting edge entry impactduration on the coated tools wear evolution inperipheral and face milling. The effect <strong>of</strong> cuttingedge entry impact duration on the coated toolfatigue failure was investigated via an impact testerwith force signal modulation facilities. Moreover,based on the cutting edge impact duration, acalculation <strong>of</strong> the expected tool wear developmentcan be carried out. In this way, the selection <strong>of</strong>optimum cutting conditions and strategies inmilling with coated tools can be achieved.REFERENCES[1] H.-J. Jakobs, P. Winkelmann: AktuelleStandzeitfunktion für die Arbeitsgestaltung beimFräsen, Fertigungstechnik und Betrieb, Vol. 31, pp.352–356, 1981.[2] L.J. Dammer: Ein Beitrag zur Prozessanalyse undSchnittwertvograbe beim Messerkopfstirnfräsen,Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1982.[3] K.-D. Bouzakis, S. Makrimallakis, G. Katirtzoglou,E. Bouzakis, G. Skordaris, G. Maliaris, S. Gerardis:Coated tools’ wear description in down and upmilling based on the cutting edge entry impactduration, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology|Vol. 61, No. 1, pp.115-118, 2012.[4] Bouzakis K.-D, Gerardis S, Katirtzoglou G,Makrimallakis S, Michailidis N, Lili E., IncreasingTool Life by Adjusting the Milling CuttingConditions According to PVD Films’ Properties,CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.57, No. 1, pp.105–108, 2008.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 19


[5] K.-D. Bouzakis, G. Maliaris, S. Makrimallakis:Strain rate effect on the fatigue failure <strong>of</strong> thinPVD coatings: An investigation by a novel impacttester with adjustable repetitive force,International Journal <strong>of</strong> Fatigue, Vol. 44, pp. 87-97, 2012.[6] K.-D. Bouzakis, N. Michailidis, G. Erkens: Thinhard coatings stress-strain curves determinationthrough a FEM supported evaluation <strong>of</strong>nanoindentation test results, Surface and CoatingsTechnology, 142-144, pp. 102-109, 2001.[7] M. Kronenberg: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Initial Contact <strong>of</strong>Milling Cutter and Work in Relation to Tool Life,Transactions <strong>of</strong> the ASME, pp. 217–228, 1946.[8] K. Okushima, T. Hoshi: The Effect <strong>of</strong> the Diameter<strong>of</strong> Carbide Face Milling Cutters on Their Failures,Bulletin <strong>of</strong> JSME, pp. 308–316, 1963.[9] K.-D. Bouzakis, R. Paraskevopoulou, G.Katirtzoglou, E. Bouzakis, K. Efstathiou: CoatedTools Wear Description in Milling FacilitatingConsiderations towards Sustainable Manufacturing,The 10th Global Conference on SustainableManufacturing, pp. 20-25, 2012.[10] K.D. Bouzakis, R. Paraskevopoulou, G.Katirtzoglou, S. Makrimallakis, E. Bouzakis, K.Efstathiou: Predictive model <strong>of</strong> tool wear in millingwith coated tools integrated into a CAM system,accepted for publication, CIRP Annals -Manufacturing Technology 2013.[11] K.-D. Bouzakis, S. Makrimallakis, G. Skordaris, E.Bouzakis, S. Kombogiannis, G. Katirtzoglou, G.Malliaris: Coated tool performance in up and downmilling stainless steel, explained by film mechanicaland fatigue properties, accepted for publicationWear, 2013.[12] L. E. Murr : Metallurgical effects <strong>of</strong> shock and highstrain-rateloading, In: T.Z. Blazynski (Ed.)Materials at high strain rates, Elsevier, Essex,England, pp.1-46, 1987.[13] J. Harding: The effect <strong>of</strong> high strain rates onmaterial properties, In: T.Z. Blazynski (Ed.)Materials at high strain rates, Elsevier, Essex,England, pp. 133-186, 1987.[14] B.L. Boyce, M.F. Dilmore: The dynamic tensilebehavior <strong>of</strong> tough, ultrahigh-strength steels atstrain-rates from 0.0002 s -1 to 200 s -1 , InternationalJournal <strong>of</strong> Impact Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 2,pp.263-271, 2009.[15] K.D. Bouzakis: Konzept und technologischeGrundlagen zur automatisierten Erstellungoptimaler Bearbeitungsdaten beim Wälzfräzen,Habilitation, TH Aachen, 1980.[16] K. Efstathiou: Automatic generation <strong>of</strong> optimumtechnological data for numerically controlledmilling based and on measurements <strong>of</strong> theworkpiece solid geometry, Ph. D. Thesis: AristotlesUniversity, Thessaloniki, 1991.[17] Opus-CAM, 2012, User Manual.20 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacSELECTIVE TRANSFER OF MATERIALS IN THE ASPECT OFGREEN TRIBOLOGYEmilia Assenova 1 , Gottlieb Polzer 2 , Dr. Tsermaa 3 , Mara Kandeva 41 Society <strong>of</strong> Bulgarian Tribologists, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, emiass@abv.bg2 Tribology Unit, 08115 Schoenfels, Germany, pr<strong>of</strong>essor-polzer@gmx.de3 University <strong>of</strong> Ulan Bator, Mongolia, pr<strong>of</strong>essor-polzer@gmx.de4 Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Tribology Center, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, kandeva@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bgAbstract: One <strong>of</strong> green tribology’s principles touches the environmental implication <strong>of</strong> coatings and lubricants,development, optimization and implementation <strong>of</strong> ecology friendly manufacturing and implementation <strong>of</strong>coatings.The paper deals with green tribology in the aspect <strong>of</strong> wear reducing frictional coatings andregeneration <strong>of</strong> worn surfaces without joint dismantling. Copper frictional coatings in the case <strong>of</strong> nonabrasivetreatment <strong>of</strong> steel or cast iron surfaces, their production with the assistance <strong>of</strong> selective transfer <strong>of</strong> materialsbetween the friction surfaces are considered. In the example <strong>of</strong> frictional coating deposition, this phenomenonis supported by the rubbing <strong>of</strong> brass stick on steel cylinder surface under particular conditions <strong>of</strong> selectivetransfer in the presence <strong>of</strong> a special lubricant. Important is the extremely low wear <strong>of</strong> components coated undercondition <strong>of</strong> selective material transfer mode with wide practical application. The interdisciplinary character <strong>of</strong>the study and application <strong>of</strong> technologies for coating formation, layer growth techniques, surface texturing, etc.involves studies by specialists <strong>of</strong> different sciences.Keywords: green tribology, frictional coatings, surface design, selective transfer.1. INTRODUCTION1.1 Tribology and Green TribologyNatural resources have been cruelly consumedin the last three centuries and the earth is seriouslydamaged and polluted. Humanity has to survivefighting with the pollution and the deficiency <strong>of</strong>material, energy and cleanness. Generally speaking,this problem is mainly the result <strong>of</strong> the misuse <strong>of</strong>our contact with nature. So, it is contact deficiencyand a way out could be sought in the science <strong>of</strong>contacts, i.e. in tribology. Radical knowledge andtechnologies <strong>of</strong> sustainability are needed toestablish new human way <strong>of</strong> thinking.Tribology is supposed to assist the knowledgeand technologies in the purpose to meet theexpectations <strong>of</strong> quality, reliability and environmentsustainability. Tribology comprises the knowledge<strong>of</strong> friction, lubrication, wear, hermeticity and otherprocess between contacting surfaces. The modernconcept observes tribology problems as essentiallyinterdisciplinary. Typical tribological studiesinvolve the efforts <strong>of</strong> mechanical engineers,material scientists, chemists, physicists, and s<strong>of</strong>orth. New areas <strong>of</strong> tribological studies have beendeveloped at the interface <strong>of</strong> various scientificdisciplines, for example, nanotribology,biotribology, geotribology, ecotribology, etc.Recently, the new concept <strong>of</strong> ‘green tribology’has been defined as ‘the science and technology <strong>of</strong>the tribological aspects <strong>of</strong> ecological balance and <strong>of</strong>environmental and biological impacts’ by H. P. Jost[1,2]. The former notion was eco-tribology andstressed the interaction <strong>of</strong> contact systems with theenvironment [3,4]. Green Tribology means savingmaterials, energy, improving the environment andthe quality <strong>of</strong> life. The area <strong>of</strong> Green Tribology willdirectly affect the economy by reducing waste andextending equipment life, improve thetechnological and environmental balance, andimprove the sustainability and safety in the humansociety. Green Tribology reflects in fact thetribological aspects <strong>of</strong> ecological balance and <strong>of</strong>environmental impacts, and is expected to directlyaffect the reducing <strong>of</strong> waste and thermal pollution,and extending equipment quality, reliability and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 21


life, which are some <strong>of</strong> the key challenges facingthe societies today [5], [6], [7].1.2. Wear preventionTribological knowledge helps to reveal and healwear related problems. So, it is possible to improvequality significantly by measures preventing thereasons for failures related to wear <strong>of</strong> contactingsurfaces. What is wear? Wear is a process <strong>of</strong>tribological interaction resulting in physicochemicalloss <strong>of</strong> material (weight, size or shape)from the surfaces in contact. Most important forms<strong>of</strong> wear are abrasion, corrosion, erosion, attrition,fretting, thermal destruction, scuffing, pitting,etching, etc. [8]The specific field <strong>of</strong> green or environmentfriendlytribology emphasizes the aspects <strong>of</strong>interacting bodies, which are <strong>of</strong> importance formaterial, and energy sustainability and safety, andwhich have huge impact upon today’s environment.This includes essentially the control <strong>of</strong> friction andwear, being <strong>of</strong> importance for energy, resources andcleanness conservation [5]. One <strong>of</strong> the mostimportant tasks <strong>of</strong> Green Tribology is Minimization<strong>of</strong> wear. Wear limits the lifetime <strong>of</strong> components andcreates the problem <strong>of</strong> their recycling. Wear can leadto high consumption <strong>of</strong> the natural resources. Wearcreates debris and particles that contaminate theenvironment and can be even hazardous for humans.Moreover, the large amount <strong>of</strong> heat generated in thecontact joints, also leads to its thermal distortion andfailure, and to pollution <strong>of</strong> the environment withmaterial waste and heat.Measures for minimizing wear are related tosurface processing, namely optimal materialselection and surface texturing, and/or coating thesurfaces. It leads to good health and preservation <strong>of</strong>performance quality <strong>of</strong> machines, equipment andproduction systems, and hence, material, energyand environment saving as a whole.1.3. Surface coatingsThere are various methods for surface coatingsdeposition, a diversity <strong>of</strong> approaches to study thebehavior <strong>of</strong> the coatings, and numerous areas <strong>of</strong>their application.Wear prevention coatings are applied in manyareas: production industry and power industry,marine, automotive and transportation industry,aerospace techniques, agriculture, food processing,mining and metallurgy, sporting equipmentindustry, electronics, packaging, robotics,renewable energy sources, waste treatment andmore. A great variety <strong>of</strong> parameters influences thequality <strong>of</strong> the coating, depending also on theapplication. Important characteristics are: thickness,porosity, microstructure, inclusions, cracks,microhardnes and adhesion and cohesion bondstrength [9]. Control is realized using variousstandardized test methods by means <strong>of</strong> tensile testmachines, scratch testers, etc.The paper concerns the method <strong>of</strong> coatingdeposition during friction process. It aims andfocuses on the procedures <strong>of</strong> obtaining and thestudy <strong>of</strong> copper frictional coatings under selectivetransfer mode in the case <strong>of</strong> nonabrasive treatment<strong>of</strong> steel and cast iron surfaces.2. FRICTIONAL COATINGS UNDERCONDITIONS OF SELECTIVETRANSFER2.1. BackgroundTribologists have the task to keep the destructionas small as possible or to stop it, in order that thesystem comes to the equilibrium process betweendestruction and regeneration. Exactly this happens inthe process <strong>of</strong> selective transfer <strong>of</strong> material betweenfriction surfaces. In the case <strong>of</strong> frictional coatingsproduction, this phenomenon is assisted by rubbing<strong>of</strong> brass against steel under the special conditions <strong>of</strong>selective transfer.D. N. Garkunov and G. Polzer are <strong>of</strong> the firstresearchers in theory and practice <strong>of</strong> selectivetransfer <strong>of</strong> material during friction coatingdeposition [10], [11], [12], [13]. Common workswere carried out connecting the Tribology Center inS<strong>of</strong>ia and the Tribology Group <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Polzer inZwickau, and recently in Schoenfels, Germany.What is friction coating deposition? A steel element(e.g. a shaft) to be coated is both subjected torotation and to the pressure <strong>of</strong> а brass stick in thepresence <strong>of</strong> a special lubricant, forming a bronzesteeltribocouple (See the principle in Fig. 1).Figure 1. Principle assembly for brass deposition onshaft (1 - surface active liquid; 2 - brass rod; 3 - shaftto be coated)The film forms on the friction surfaces in thebronze-steel tribocouple with glycerin lubricationpassing firstly through dissolution <strong>of</strong> the bronzesurface, where the glycerin acts as a weak acid. Theatoms <strong>of</strong> the elements (tin, zinc, iron, aluminum)absorbed in bronze outgo into the lubricant, asresult the bronze surface is enriched with copper.22 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Friction deformation <strong>of</strong> the bronze surface causesnew passing <strong>of</strong> elements into the lubricant, so thebronze layer is purified and it nearly contains onlycopper. Its pores fill with glycerin. Glycerin isreducer for copper oxides, hence the copper film isfree form oxides; it is very active with free ions andis highly adhesive for the steel surface. The steelsurface is covered by thin copper layer. Selforganizationand selective transfer <strong>of</strong> copper tosteel take place. Before the stabilized selectivetransfer, the process goes on until steel and bronzeare coated by 2 μm copper layers [12]. Mechanicaland chemical transformations take place; e.g.formation <strong>of</strong> surface active substances on thefriction surfaces; they interact chemically with thesurfaces and form chemisorbed layers (see Fig. 2).the special conditions <strong>of</strong> selective transfer <strong>of</strong>material. Different processes result. In the contactzones emerges reactive coating deposition withspecial properties: Copper is rubbed on the steelfriction surfaces with totally different electrochemicalpotential, and secondly, not only thecontent but also the structure in the friction surfacesis being changed [13].The compress forces at the rotation <strong>of</strong> the brassstick involve great pressure in the contact zonebetween stick and basic material due to the relativesmall contact surface, hence a positive gradient <strong>of</strong>the shear strength in depth direction <strong>of</strong> the frictionsurface according to I. V. Kragelsky [8].Figure 2. Formation <strong>of</strong> micelles and interaction <strong>of</strong>surface-active substances with bronze (as per [12])Some results <strong>of</strong> the basic studies and applicationin the area <strong>of</strong> copper frictional coatings arepresented below. Based on equation <strong>of</strong> thetheoretical physics, G. Polzer [11] had formerlyderived equations <strong>of</strong> self-organization at friction.Always when destruction problems are available innature, there is either a simultaneous growthprocess which involves equilibrium betweendestruction and regeneration or destruction leads toexponential destroying <strong>of</strong> the whole system, in ourcase the tribological couple.A self-organization in the system brass-glycerolsteelis observed and the obtained film – a coat withsignificant change <strong>of</strong> wear-resistance. Major resultis the low wear <strong>of</strong> components coated undercondition <strong>of</strong> selective material transfer mode.Important is also the reduction <strong>of</strong> the concentration<strong>of</strong> hydrogen at the frictional surface and,respectively, the lower hydrogen wear. It is highlyimportant for practical applications that theinclination for welding and seizure [13] betweenthe friction surfaces is significantly lowered underconditions <strong>of</strong> selective transfer. A considerablepractical result is the possibility for dismantlingfreerestoration <strong>of</strong> worn units/couples.2.2. Experimental workThe phenomenon <strong>of</strong> direct coating deposition isassisted by the rubbing/deposition <strong>of</strong> brass underFigure 3. MBZ 3A Brass-coating device for slidingbushes (application in lathes)Figure 4. Brass-coating device for cylinder-bushing byboring machineAs a result, a tribological system appears whichcan bear higher loads at the influence <strong>of</strong> variousprocesses. Different machines were designed andconstructed at the Department Tribotechnik inZwickau’ Higher Technical School, correspondingto the principles <strong>of</strong> the frictional deposition and theideas <strong>of</strong> the selective transfer. Many pieces <strong>of</strong> the13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 23


devices „MBZ 1" for shaft coatings and „MBZ 3A" for application in rotating machines weremanufactured (see Figs.3, 4, 5, 6), e.g. the „MBZ 3A" for engine cylinders was produced in 30 items.Unfortunately there is not sufficient use <strong>of</strong> theadvantages <strong>of</strong> the deposition <strong>of</strong> copper frictionalcoatings in the overall practice.coatings, however, improve significantly thewearresistance against hydrogen wear [13].Figure 5. View <strong>of</strong> the brass-coating device MBZ 3AFigure 7. Hardness in different depth after frictionalcoating deposition on steelFigure 6. The brass-coating device applied in anautomatic machineSome diagrams referring to a part <strong>of</strong> the basicnew results are presented below. In Fig. 7 is giventhe variation <strong>of</strong> hardness in depth; so thestrengthening can also be obtained at differentrotation speeds.Fig. 8 shows the reduction <strong>of</strong> hydrogenconcentration <strong>of</strong> the friction surface in depth. Thehydrogen wear results from synergetic interaction<strong>of</strong> various surface phenomena: exoemission,adsorption, frictional destruction, which providehydrogen extraction from the frictional surfaces.Thermal gradient is also formed, as well aselectrical and magnetic fields; this leads tohydrogen diffusion in the metal, hydrogenconcentration in the subsurface layer and rapidwear <strong>of</strong> this layer [12]. Metal defect formation inthe friction deformed layer also increases the H 2concentration and augments the wear. FrictionalFigure. 8. Reduction <strong>of</strong> H 2 concentration at thefrictional surface in depthFigure 9. Wear distribution in upper dead point <strong>of</strong> enginecylinder after different sliding paths: for cylinder withfrictional brass coating (left) and uncoated (right)By means <strong>of</strong> brass frictional coating in differentconstructions <strong>of</strong> steel and cast iron it can beobtained not only the 10 - 20 % lowering <strong>of</strong> frictionforce, but also a changed wear distribution, whichis to be seen, e.g., for the upper death point in24 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


engine cylinders <strong>of</strong> 2-cylinder-twotact-Ottomotorsafter various completed paths (see Fig. 9). This wasthe reason that the brass frictional coatings weresuccessfully applied in the practice <strong>of</strong> the companyPeißig in Zwickau, especially in highly loaded racemotors for more than 20 years too.3. CONCLUSIONGreen tribology should be integrated into worldscience and make its impact on the solutions forworldwide problems. Being a new field, greentribology has a number <strong>of</strong> challenges. A basic one<strong>of</strong> them, minimising the wear, is being discussed inabove investigation <strong>of</strong> wear reduction possibilitiesthrough frictional coatings.The study <strong>of</strong> frictional coatings and theirapplication can be summarized in the following: Self-organization in the system brass-glycerolsteelunder selective transfer is observed andthe obtained film – a designed or controllablecoat with significant change <strong>of</strong> wearresistance– can be intentionally manipulatedto influence its properties during friction. Important features <strong>of</strong> the coating depositedduring friction under selective material transfermode: Low wear <strong>of</strong> components at nonabrasivetreatment <strong>of</strong> steel/cast iron, and lower hydrogenwear <strong>of</strong> the coated surfaces; lower inclinationfor welding and seizure between the frictionsurfaces; possibility for dismantling-freerestoration <strong>of</strong> worn units/couples.The practical implementation <strong>of</strong> brass-copperfrictional coating is <strong>of</strong> extreme importance and wasrealized in Germany, Russia, Kazakhstan, Poland, etc.The interdisciplinary character <strong>of</strong> the study andapplication <strong>of</strong> technologies for frictional coatingformation, layer growth techniques, surfacetexturing, etc. involves intervention by specialists<strong>of</strong> different sciences. The work and collaborationbetween scientists <strong>of</strong> Russia, Germany, Poland,Bulgaria, Mongolia and Vietnam in this field wascarried out by the International Council forSelective Transfer and Frictional coatings,established in 1990 in London.REFERENCES[1] H. P. Jost: 30 th Anniversary and Green Tribology.Report <strong>of</strong> a Chinese Mission to the UnitedKingdom, 7-14 June 2009, issued by the TribologyNetwork <strong>of</strong> the Institution <strong>of</strong> Engineering &Technology[2] H. P. Jost: The Presidential Address, 5 th WTCKyoto, 2009.[3] W. J. Bartz: Ecotribology: Environmentallyacceptable tribological practices. TribologyInternational, Volume 39, Issue 8, August 2006, pp.728–733.[4] M. Kandeva, E. Assenova, M. Daneva:Triboecology as a methodological center <strong>of</strong> modernscience. <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd EuropeanConference on Tribology ECOTRIB 2009, Pisa,Italy, 2009.[5] M. Nosonovski, B. Bhushan (edtrs): Greentribology. Biomimetics, Energy Conservation andSustainability, Springer Verlag, 2012.[6] R. Wood: NCats Newsletters, Univ. <strong>of</strong>Southampton, October 2011.[7] E. Assenova, V. Majstorovic, A. Vencl, M.Kandeva: Green tribology and quality <strong>of</strong> life,International Convention on Quality 2012, Belgrade(Serbia), 05-07.06.2012, <strong>Proceedings</strong>, p.p. 32-38,Published in: Advanced Quality, 40, 2, p.p.26-32,2012.[8] I.V. Kragelsky: Friction and Wear, Moscow,Mashinostroienie, 1968 (in Russian; available alsoin English)[9] A. Vencl, S.Arostegui, G. Favaro, F. Zivic, M.Mrdak, S. Mitrović, V. Popovic: Evaluation <strong>of</strong>adhesion/cohesion bond strength <strong>of</strong> the thick plasmaspray coatings by scratch testing on coatings crosssections,Tribology International, 44, 11, 2011, p.p.1281-1288.[10] D.N. Garkunov: Triboengineering (wear and nondeterioration),Moscow Agricultural AcademyPress, Moscow, 2000 (in Russian)[11] G. Polzer: Der Erfahrungsaustausch:Reibbeschichten und selective Uebertragung, Publ.Bezirks-Neuerer-Zentrum, Gera, 1988.[12] D.N. Garkunov: Scientific Discoveries inTribotechnologies. No-wear effect under friction:Hydrogen wear <strong>of</strong> metals. MAA Publishing House,Moscow, 2007.[13] G. Polzer, E. Assenova, Dr. Tsermaa: Copperfrictional coatings under conditions <strong>of</strong> selectivetransfer, Tribological Journal BULTRIB - S<strong>of</strong>ia,Vol. 3, 2012.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 25


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacABRASIVE WEAR AND WEAR-RESISTANCE OF HIGHSTRENGTH CAST IRON CONTAINING Sn MICROALLOYMara Kandeva 1 , Boryana Ivanova 21 Tribology Center, Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, kandeva@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bg2 Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, bsaykova@tu-s<strong>of</strong>iaAbstract: A procedure for the study <strong>of</strong> wear <strong>of</strong> high strength (spheroid) cast iron under conditions <strong>of</strong> dryfriction on surfaces with fixed abrasive following the kinematics scheme „pin-on-cylinder” with spiralmovement has been developed. Five type specimens <strong>of</strong> high strength cast iron without and with micro alloy<strong>of</strong> various Sn contents – 0,08; 0,02; 0,06; and 0,12 mass percents were studied. The experimental resultslead to graphs and diagrams <strong>of</strong> the relationships for the parameters mass and linear wear, wear rate andintensity, and wear-resistance depending on process time, sliding way and normal load.This study is connected with the completion <strong>of</strong> a PhD dissertation and <strong>of</strong> the tasks under the Project ДУНК-01/3 “University R&D Complex for innovation and transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge in micro/nano-technologies andmaterials, energy efficiency and virtual engineering” funded by the Bulgarian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education andScience.Keywords: tribology, high strength cast iron, micro alloying, abrasive wear, wear-resistance1. INTRODUCTIONBeing a natural composite material with steelmetal matrix with embedded graphite phase, thehigh strength (spheroid) cast iron provides acomplex <strong>of</strong> properties which make it different fromthe conventional Fe-C alloys.The mechanical and tribological properties arestrongly dependent on the composition, structure,and on the size and distribution <strong>of</strong> the graphiteinclusion, as well as on the presence <strong>of</strong> microalloyingelements both in bulk and surface layer.Tin (Sn) is most <strong>of</strong>ten used as alloying element.The usual quantities <strong>of</strong> less than 0.15 % do notinfluence the leaning to graphite adoption in thecrystallization process.Alloying <strong>of</strong> spheroid cast iron by Sn causesperlitization <strong>of</strong> the metal base, along with strengthand hardness increase by decrease <strong>of</strong> the relativeincrement <strong>of</strong> collision resilience. This influencesthe parameters <strong>of</strong> friction and wear in the contactjoints <strong>of</strong> machines [1,2,3].The paper aims study <strong>of</strong> the parameters <strong>of</strong> wear<strong>of</strong> high strength cast iron micro-alloyed by variousmass percent contents <strong>of</strong> tin (Sn) under conditions<strong>of</strong> dry friction on a surface with fixed abrasiveparticles.2. MATERIALS, PROCEDURE ANDPARAMETERS OF WEAR2.1. MaterialsSample specimens <strong>of</strong> high strength cast ironwith the following mass percent contents <strong>of</strong> tin(Sn): 0,018%, 0,020%, 0,032% and 0,051%. Thechemical composition and the designation <strong>of</strong> thesample specimens are given in Table 1.Wedge-shaped sample specimens were obtainedthrough gravitational casting in the factory ”Osam”in the city <strong>of</strong> Lovech.Hardness was measured by means <strong>of</strong> Brinellhardness meter <strong>of</strong> the type 2109TB, using a steelball <strong>of</strong> diameter 10 mm and normal load 30 kN, by15 s hold time. [4]Table 2 shows specimens’ hardness.26 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 1: Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> sample specimens№ Chemicalelement, %Specimen’s number0 1 2 3 41 C 3,87 3,87 3,87 3,87 3,872 Sn - 0,018 0,020 0,032 0,0513 Si 1,55 1,55 1,55 1,55 1,554 Mn 0,34 0,34 0,34 0,34 0,345 P 0,029 0,068 0,063 0,075 0,0776 S 0,012 0,051 0,059 0,047 0,0607 Cr 0,030 0,030 0,030 0,030 0,0308 Mo 0,018 0,019 0,020 0,017 0,0189 Ni 0,024 0,024 0,024 0,024 0,02410 Co 0,013 0,017 0,014 0,013 0,01311 Cu 0,051 0,058 0,077 0,059 0,07012 Ti 0,0013 0,0013 0,0018 0,0015 0,001313 W 0,126 0,126 0,135 0,123 0,12614 Pb 0,039 0,039 0,043 0,040 0,03915 As 0,036 0,036 0,037 0,038 0,04016 Zr 0,003 0,003 0,003 0,003 0,00317 B 0,0083 0,0083 0,0074 0,0091 0,0088Table 2: Specimens’ hardnessSpecimen’s No. 0 1 2 3 4Sn, % - 0,018 0,020 0,032 0,051Hardness, НВ 179 197 203 262 2772.2 Procedure and device for abrasive wearstudyThe experimental study was realized by aprocedure and device for quick tests according tothe kinematical scheme „pin-on-disk”. Figure 1shows the functional scheme <strong>of</strong> the device. Theprocedure was elaborated in the Laboratory <strong>of</strong>Tribology at the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Industrial Technology<strong>of</strong> the Technical University – S<strong>of</strong>ia. The actuallyvalid standards were taken into consideration [5,6].The studied cylindrical specimen 3 (the body)was mounted fixed in an appropriate holder <strong>of</strong> theloading head 6. Its position allows that the frontalsurface К enters in contact with the abrasive surface2 <strong>of</strong> the horizontal disk 1 (the counter-body). Thehorizontal disk 1 is rotating with constant rotationalspeed ω = const around its vertical axis. Thenumber <strong>of</strong> revolutions <strong>of</strong> the disk 1 is read by therevolution-counter 5.The device allows variation <strong>of</strong> the relativesliding speed between the specimen 3 and the disk1 using two manners: by changing the rotationalspeed <strong>of</strong> the disk through a control unit or byvariation <strong>of</strong> the distance R between the revolutionaxis <strong>of</strong> the counter-body 1 and the axis <strong>of</strong> thespecimen 3.Figure 1: Functional scheme <strong>of</strong> the device “pin-on-disk”The abrasive surface 2 <strong>of</strong> the counter-body 1 isbeing modeled through surfaces <strong>of</strong> impregnatedcarbo-corundum with hardness minimum 60%higher than the hardness <strong>of</strong> the tested coatingsaccording to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the standard.The procedure <strong>of</strong> the investigation comprises thefollowing sequence:1. The surfaces <strong>of</strong> all specimens, which are <strong>of</strong> equalcylindrical shape and size, are subjected tomechanical treatment in three stages – rough,grinding and polishing, up to obtaining the equalroughness Ra = 0 ,4 ÷ 0, 6 µ m .13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 27


2. The mass <strong>of</strong> the specimen is measured beforeand after a given sliding path (number <strong>of</strong> cycles <strong>of</strong>interaction) by means <strong>of</strong> electronic balance <strong>of</strong> thetype WPS 180/C/2 with accuracy up to 0,1 mg .Specimens are cleaned with a solution neutralizingthe static electricity before each measurement.3. The specimen 3 is fixed in the loading head 6 ina given position, and by means <strong>of</strong> system <strong>of</strong>leverages the normal central load P is being set.2.3 Parameters <strong>of</strong> wearParameters <strong>of</strong> the studied mass and linear wear aregiven in Table 3.Table 3. Parameters <strong>of</strong> wearMass wearmass, [mg] m o -mwear rate, [mg/min]m o -m/twear intensity, [mg/m]m o -m/Sspecific intensity, [mg/mm 2 m] m o -m/A a S,absolute wear-resistance, [m/mg] S/m o -mspecific wear-resistance, [mm 2 m/mg] S.A a /m o -mLinear wearwear, [µm] h o -hwear rate, [µm/min]h o -h/twear intensity, [µm/m]h o -h/Sspecific intensityh o -h/A a S[µm /mm 2 m]absolute wear-resistance, [m/ µm] S/h o -hspecific wear-resistance [mm 2 m/ µm] S.A a /h o -hThe designations in the table are as follows: А а– apparent contact area <strong>of</strong> sliding; S – sliding path.The factor “comparative wear-resistance” ε isintroduced, which is non-dimensional and gives theratio between the absolute wear-resistance <strong>of</strong> thetested specimen and the wear-resistance <strong>of</strong> a chosenreference sample. A sample <strong>of</strong> high strength castiron without Sn micro-alloy was accepted asreference sample by the authors.All specimens are studied under equalconditions given in Table 3.Table 3: Test parametersnormal loadР = 10,3 [N]apparent contact areaA a = 78,5.10 -6[m 2 ]apparent contact pressure Р а = 13,12[N/cm 2 ]average sliding speedV = 13,1 [cm/s]type <strong>of</strong> the specimencylindricalmaterial density <strong>of</strong> the7,8.10 3 [kg/m 3 ]specimeninitial roughness <strong>of</strong> theRa = 0,4÷0,6specimen[µm]abrasive surface Corundum Р 3203. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSA part <strong>of</strong> the experimental results for theparameters <strong>of</strong> wear are given in this paper in theform <strong>of</strong> graphs, tables and diagrams.605040302010wear, h [µm]0wear resistance, [m/µm]908070605040302010050403020100Figure 2. Variation <strong>of</strong> linear wear [µm] withthe friction path [m]Figure 3. Diagram <strong>of</strong> mass wear [mg] <strong>of</strong>all specimens for two friction cycles100 300 500 700 900№ 0 - 0%Sn№ 1 - 0,018%Sn№ 2 - 0,02%Sn№ 3 - 0,032%Sn№ 4 - 0,051%SnFigure 4. Variation <strong>of</strong> wear rate [µm/min] withthe number <strong>of</strong> friction cycles43,532,521,510,500 23,2 69,6 116 162,4 208,8Road friction S, [m]38,548,12836,90% Sn 0,018%Sn 0,02%Sn 0,032%Sn 0,051%Sn0 0,018 0,02 0,032 0,051% Sn36,5N = 500 cl46,8N = 900 cl0% Sn0,018% Sn0,02% Sn0,032% Sn0,051% Sn35,537,531,5 31,3N = 500 clN = 900 clFigure 5. Variation <strong>of</strong> wear-resistance [m/µm] withthe Sn % contents for two friction cycles28 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 4: Comparative wear-resistance by using as reference sample high strength cast iron without Sn micro-alloyNumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesComparative wear-resistance, ε i,0Nε 1,0 ε 2,0 ε 3,0 ε 4,0N = 500 cl 1,38 1,06 1,23 1,23N = 900 cl 1,3 1,04 1,4 1,343,532,521,510,50Figure 6 Wear-resistance <strong>of</strong> cast-iron [m/µm] atvarious Sn % contents for friction cycles numberN=900 cl and N=500 clε = Ii/I01,41,210,80,60,40,200 % Sn 0,018% Sn 0,02% Sn 0,032% Sn 0,051% Sn0,018/0 0,02/0 0,032/0 0,051/0N=900 clN=500 clN=500 clN=900 clFigure 7. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the comparative wear-resistanceε i,0 = I i /I 0 by reference sample high strength cast ironwithout Sn micro-alloy for two friction cycles4. RESULTS ANALYSIS, OUTCOME ANDCONCLUSIONSThe above investigations confirm the authors’outcome <strong>of</strong> earlier studies, namely that microalloying<strong>of</strong> high strength cast iron with Sninfluences its mechanical and tribologicalproperties [2,7].Increasing the Sn % contents leads to increase <strong>of</strong>the hardness <strong>of</strong> the high strength cast iron.The highest values <strong>of</strong> wear are for the specimenswithout Sn micro-alloy. All specimens containingSn show higher wear-resistance compared with castiron without Sn contents. A direct dependenceexists between the % contents <strong>of</strong> Sn and hardnessand wear-resistance <strong>of</strong> cast iron in the studied limits<strong>of</strong> Sn contents. Deviation <strong>of</strong> this dependence isobserved for the specimen with 0,02% Sn contents.The same statement is to be seen in the earlierstudies <strong>of</strong> the authors.Maximum wear-resistance is obtained for0,032% Sn contents. At higher contents - 0,051%,the wear-resistance decreases. The wear-resistanceis equal for sliding path 500 cycles at 0,032% and0,051% contents, however the comparative wearresistancefor the cast iron with lower Sn contents(0,032%) is higher – Table 4. Although the authorshave no photos <strong>of</strong> the microstructure at this stage <strong>of</strong>the study, the last observation could be interpretedas result related to the non-homogeneousdistribution <strong>of</strong> the graphite phase in the structure <strong>of</strong>the specimen.Wear and wear-resistance are the parameters,which are most sensitive to the structure <strong>of</strong> materialand the time <strong>of</strong> wear process (the friction path). It ispossible that in some stages <strong>of</strong> the wearing processa structure <strong>of</strong> higher contents <strong>of</strong> the graphite phasesis available in the contact zone. The relationshipbetween wear and friction path under conditions <strong>of</strong>abrasive wear is not linear function (Figs. 2 and 4).A period <strong>of</strong> running-in is observed, which is <strong>of</strong>various duration for specimens with differentcontents <strong>of</strong> tin. The period <strong>of</strong> running-in will besubject <strong>of</strong> individual study.The obtained results are sign for the authors thatfuture systematic complex investigations on tin areneeded, including also comparative study with highstrength cast iron alloyed with copper.AcknowledgementThis study is connected with the completion <strong>of</strong> aPhD dissertation and <strong>of</strong> the tasks under theProject ДУНК-01/3 “University R&D Complex forinnovation and transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge inmicro/nano-technologies and materials, energyefficiency and virtual engineering” funded by theBulgarian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science.REFERENCES[1] Я.Е. Гольдштейн, В.Г. Мизин, Модифицированиеи микролегирование чугуна и стали, М.,Металлургия,1986. Ya.E. Goldstein, W.G.Mizgin,Modifying and micro-alloying <strong>of</strong> cast iron and steel,Moscow, Metallurgy,1986 (in Russian)[2] П. Добрев, Ж. Калейчева, Б. Съйкова,Микролегиране на високояк чугун с калай, XIIIНационална конференция «Металолеене2007»,Ловеч, Машини, технологии и материали;P.Dobrev, J. Kaleicheva, B. Saikova, Micro-alloying<strong>of</strong> high-stenght cast iron with tin, XIII Nat. Conf.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 29


«Metal casting 2007», Machines, technologies andmaterials, Lovech, Bulgaria (in Bulgarian)[3] С. Бондаренко, И. Гладкий, Повышениеэксплоатационных свойств чугунов, работающихв условиях гидроабразивного износа, Вiсникхарнiвськ. державн. технiч. Университету,Харкiв, 2003, вып. 14, с. 388-391.S. Bondarenko, I. Gladkij, Improvement <strong>of</strong> theoperational properties <strong>of</strong> cast iron working underhydro-abrasive wear conditions, Kharkov, 2003,issue 14, pp. 388-391(in Russian)[4] В. Анчев, В. Тошков, Л. Василева, Ж.Захаридова, Ж. Калейчева, Й. Николов, Р.Петров, В. Симеонов,Ръководство залабораторни упражнения по материалознание,ИК „КИНГ”, 2001, рр. 112-113.V. Anchev, et al., Manual for laboratory works inmaterial science, Ed. house „KING” рр. 112-113 (inBulgarian)[5] БДС 14289-77, Метод за изпитване на абразивноизносване при триене върху закрепениабразивни частици, Bulgarian State Standard14289-77, Method for testing <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear atfriction on fixed abrasive particles (in Bulgarian)[6] М. Kandeva, D. Karastoyanov, A. Andonova: Wearand tribothermal effects <strong>of</strong> nanostructured nickelchemical coatings, Applied Mechanics andMaterials. Vols. 157-158 (2012), pp. 960-963.[7] B. Ivanova, M. Kandeva, J. Kaleicheva, R.Rangelov: Influence <strong>of</strong> Tin on the Structure andProperties <strong>of</strong> Spherographitic Cast Iron, 12thInternational Conference on Tribology, Kragujevac,Serbia, 11-13 May 2011, pp 42-45.30 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacINFLUENCE OF NANO-DIAMOND PARTICLESON THE TRIBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OFNICKEL CHEMICAL COATINGSMara Kandeva 1 , Dimitar Karastoianov 2 , Boryana Ivanova 3 , Viara Pojidaeva 41 Tribology Center, Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, kandeva@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bg2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Information and Communication Technologies – Bulgarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, dkarast@clmi.bas.bg3 Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, bsaykova@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bg4 University <strong>of</strong> Mining and Geology „S t Ivan Rilsky” – S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, vpojidaeva@abv.bgAbstract: Friction and wear <strong>of</strong> 10 types Ni chemical coatings, with and without heat treatment, containingnano-diamond particles <strong>of</strong> various size – 0;5 nm; 100 nm; 200 nm and 250 nm, are studied in the paper.Procedure and laboratory device for friction investigation in starting regime were developed. Experimentalresults for the influence <strong>of</strong> the particle size on the static friction force and the change <strong>of</strong> friction coefficienthave been obtained. Abrasive wear has been studied by means <strong>of</strong> the procedure developed by the authors forthe study <strong>of</strong> above coatings under conditions <strong>of</strong> dry friction on surfaces with fixed abrasive. The obtainedresults are related to the parameters linear wear, wear rate and wear-resistance. A part <strong>of</strong> this study isconnected with the tasks on the 7 FP Project „Acom In (Advanced Computing Innovations)” coordinated bythe Institute <strong>of</strong> Information and Communication Technologies at the Bulgarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, and theother part is carried out under the Project ДУНК-01/3 “University R&D Complex for innovation andtransfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge in micro/nano-technologies and materials, energy efficiency and virtual engineering”funded by the Bulgarian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science.Keywords: tribology, nano-diamond particles, coatings, friction, wear1. INTRODUCTIONNi chemical coatings are obtained through themethod <strong>of</strong> electro-less chemical deposition knownin the literature as „Electroless Niсkel”.From chemical point <strong>of</strong> view, chemicaldeposition is a deoxidization process whichdevelops between positive charged metal ions М z+and negative electrons е:z Me ze Me(1)where z is the valence <strong>of</strong> the metal ion.Coatings obtained through chemical depositiondiffer in the methods for procurement <strong>of</strong> theelectrons necessary for the deoxidization.In the galvanic (electrolyte) methods, electriccurrent is passed through the solution <strong>of</strong> the metalsalt (electrolyte) and the metal ions are reduced tothe corresponding metal atom Ме on the cathode(the coated detail). The cathode renders, and theanode obtains electrons, which are provided byexternal source – the electric current.At chemical Ni deposition an external source isnot needed for providing electrons. The necessaryelectrons are obtained as a result <strong>of</strong> chemicalreactions going between the solution and thesurface <strong>of</strong> the detail to be coated. As a consequencethe Ni metal ions <strong>of</strong> the solution obtain a givennumber <strong>of</strong> electrons depending on their valencepassing thus in state <strong>of</strong> neutral atoms (Ме). Theatoms gradually build the crystal grid <strong>of</strong> thecoating. In this case, the role <strong>of</strong> „supplier <strong>of</strong>electrons” is realized by different substances(chemical agents) called reducers (deoxidizers)from the solution [1].Imbedding <strong>of</strong> micro- or nano-sized particles <strong>of</strong>various natures in the Ni matrix changes thephysico-mechanical and the tribologicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the coatings.In connection with the improvement <strong>of</strong> theresource <strong>of</strong> tribosystems, a special interest fornanotribology represent Ni chemical coatings13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 31


containing in their structure particles <strong>of</strong> thenanosize scale [2,3]. Imbedding <strong>of</strong> nano-sizedparticles in the solution for the production <strong>of</strong> the Nicoating brings changes in the character <strong>of</strong> thecontact interactions on three levels: interaction <strong>of</strong>nanoparticles with Ni ions into the solution with theelectrons, interaction <strong>of</strong> the built atom with thesurface <strong>of</strong> the detail and formation <strong>of</strong> the crystalgrid <strong>of</strong> the coating [4].The purpose <strong>of</strong> the present work is to studysome characteristics <strong>of</strong> contact friction and wear forNi chemical coatings, without and withnanodiamond particles <strong>of</strong> different size: 4 nm,100 nm, 200 nm and 250 nm.2. NICKEL CHEMICAL COATINGSTen types <strong>of</strong> coatings are studied, gathered in 5series with number given in Table 1.Table 1: Description <strong>of</strong> the specimens with coatings <strong>of</strong> chemical Ni containing nanodiamond particlesThickness <strong>of</strong> the№ <strong>of</strong>seriesDesignation <strong>of</strong> theseries№ Designation <strong>of</strong> thecoatingComposition<strong>of</strong> the coatingcoating before wear,h 1 , µmI N 1 N- Ni 25,562 N+ Ni+T o C 11,283 nD4- Ni+Di 4 nm 23,22IInD44 nD4+ Ni+Di 4 nm +T o C 85 nD100- Ni+Di 100 nm 27,94IIInD100 6 nD100+ Ni+Di 100 nm +T o C 7,127 nD200- Ni+Di 200 nm 26,24IVnD200 8 nD200+ Ni+Di 200 nm +T o C 9,149 nD250- Ni+Di 250 nm 30,5VnD250 10 nD250+ Ni+Di 250 nm +T o C 8,7Each series has its designation in Latin letters,correspondingly: N - Nickel coating without nanoparticles; nD - Nickel coating with diamondnanoparticles;The number after the letter D indicates theaverage size <strong>of</strong> the nanoparticles – 4 nm, 100 nm,200 nm, 250 nm. Each series includes two groups<strong>of</strong> coatings: first group - coatings without heattreatment designated by the sign (-) and secondgroup - with heat treatment at 360 о С during 6 hoursdesignated by the sign (+).3. ABRASIVE WEAR3.1 Device and procedureExperimental study <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear <strong>of</strong> Nicoatings is realized by means <strong>of</strong> the test rig TABERABRASER according to the kinematical scheme„disk-on-disk” (Fig.1).The specimen 1 (the body) with depositedcoating 2 is in the shape <strong>of</strong> disk and is fixedappropriately on carrying horizontal disk 3 drivedby electrical motor 4 with a constant rotationalspeed =1[s -1 ]=const. The counter-body 5 is anabrasive disk (roller) <strong>of</strong> special material CS 10mounted on horizontal axis 6 in the device 8, bymeans <strong>of</strong> which is set the desired normal load Р inthe contact zone К. Thus, the body 1 and thecounter-body 5 are located on two crossed axes.Because <strong>of</strong> the constant rotational speed <strong>of</strong> thebody 1 and the constant nominal contact pressurep a , the friction in the contact zone К supportsconstant speed <strong>of</strong> rotation <strong>of</strong> the counter-body 5.The procedure <strong>of</strong> the experimental study onabrasive wear is realized in the following sequence<strong>of</strong> operations:- clean-up, cleaning <strong>of</strong> lubricants and drying <strong>of</strong> theequal specimens. The specimens represent disks <strong>of</strong>diameter 100 mm and thickness 3 mm with thedeposited coatings;- measuring <strong>of</strong> roughness <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaces <strong>of</strong>the specimens before and after wear;- measuring <strong>of</strong> specimens mass m o before and itsmass m i after a given friction path L by electronicbalance WPS 180/C/2 <strong>of</strong> accuracy 0,1 mg. At everymeasurement the specimens are cleaned withappropriate solution against static electricity;32 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


- measuring <strong>of</strong> coating thickness h 1 before wearand h 2 after wear by means <strong>of</strong> Pocket LEPTOSKOP2021 Fe device in 10 points <strong>of</strong> the surface; theaverage value is taken for thickness <strong>of</strong> the sample;- the specimen 1 is fixed on the carrying horizontaldisk 3; then the normal load Р is set. The frictionpath L is determined by the number <strong>of</strong> cycles readby the revolution counter 8.Figure 1. TABER ABRASER – device for study <strong>of</strong> abrasive wearThe procedure <strong>of</strong> the experimental study onabrasive wear is realized in the following sequence<strong>of</strong> operations:- clean-up, cleaning <strong>of</strong> lubricants and drying <strong>of</strong> theequal specimens. The specimens represent disks <strong>of</strong>diameter 100 mm and thickness 3 mm with thedeposited coatings;- measuring <strong>of</strong> roughness <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaces <strong>of</strong>the specimens before and after wear;- measuring <strong>of</strong> specimens mass m o before and itsmass m i after a given friction path L by electronicbalance WPS 180/C/2 <strong>of</strong> accuracy 0,1 mg. At everymeasurement the specimens are cleaned withappropriate solution against static electricity;- measuring <strong>of</strong> coating thickness h 1 before wearand h 2 after wear by means <strong>of</strong> Pocket LEPTOSKOP2021 Fe device in 10 points <strong>of</strong> the surface; theaverage value is taken for thickness <strong>of</strong> the sample;- the specimen 1 is fixed on the carrying horizontaldisk 3; then the normal load Р is set. The frictionpath L is determined by the number <strong>of</strong> cycles readby the revolution counter 8.Abrasive wear for all coatings is obtained byfixed equal operating conditions – nominal contactpressure given with the normal load Р, averagesliding speed V and parameters <strong>of</strong> the abrasivesurface.The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the experiment are givenin Table 2.Table 2. Working parameters in the experiment:Apparent contact area Aa 0, 26 cm 2Nominal contact pressure pa 9, 42 N/cm 2Average sliding speed V 22,3 cm/sAbrasive material CS 10wearresistance and their change in time,respectively the friction path.Wear intensity is determined as mass (or linear)wear for unit friction path, and absolutewearresistance - as the reciprocate value <strong>of</strong> wearintensity.The relative wearresistance is the ratio betweenthe absolute wearresistance <strong>of</strong> the tested coatingand the absolute wearresistance <strong>of</strong> reference samplefor equal friction path (number <strong>of</strong> cycles).Two reference samples are used in the presentwork – Nickel coating without nanodiamondparticles with heat treatment and without heattreatment.3.2 Experimental resultsFigure 2. Dependence <strong>of</strong> wearresistance I h onnanoparticles size for coatings without heat treatmentThe parameters <strong>of</strong> mass and linear wear arestudied: speed, wear intensity, absolute and relativeFigure 3. Dependence <strong>of</strong> wearresistance I h onnanoparticles size for coatings with heat treatment13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 33


Figure 4.Wearresistance <strong>of</strong> Ni coatings without and withnanoparticles without and with heat treatment3.3 Analysis <strong>of</strong> the experimental resultsThe presence <strong>of</strong> nanodiamond particles affectsthe value and the character <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wear.This influence becomes more complicated alongwith the heat treatment <strong>of</strong> the coating.For size <strong>of</strong> nanoparticles 4 nm and 100 nmcoatings with heat treatment show higher wear, andfor size 200 and 250 nm the opposite effect isobserved – wear is lower than that <strong>of</strong> the casewithout heat treatment.The dependence <strong>of</strong> wear on nanodiamondparticles size is <strong>of</strong> nonlinear character, and thevarious coatings show different duration <strong>of</strong> therunning-in process.The boundary number <strong>of</strong> cycles N*, where thewhole coating is worn, is always bigger forcoatings without heat treatment.The highest wearresistance show Ni coatingswith nanodiamond particles <strong>of</strong> the size δ = 100 nmwithout heat treatment.4. STARTING CONTACT FRICTION4.1 TheoryFrom the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> process history, or intime cross-section <strong>of</strong> the process, tribosystemundergo three friction stages: starting, kinetic andpathological friction. The starting friction, knownas static friction in the classical mechanics, is doneunder conditions <strong>of</strong> preliminary microdisplacementin the contact zone and the tribosystem performsthe transition between static state (at rest) andmovement. Kinetic is the friction when the body ismoving upon the counterbody.The kinetic friction matches the stationary andthe pathological regimes <strong>of</strong> contact joint operation.The pathological friction is characterized byabrupt increase <strong>of</strong> friction with wear and seizure incontact.Figure 5. Variation <strong>of</strong> friction force and frictioncoefficient with displacementThe difference between starting friction force Т оand sliding friction force ТT To T(1)gives the jump in the friction force during systemtransition from state at rest and state <strong>of</strong> movement,and corresponds to the jump in the frictioncoefficient, i.e. o (2)The work <strong>of</strong> the starting friction force is givenby:A T T S PS (3)s o o o o oAnd the work <strong>of</strong> the kinetic friction force is:A T TS PSpLet present the ratio AsTo ApToPSo PS s .100 .100A T PSsooo(4)Then: s 100,%(5)oThe parameter s is called relative change <strong>of</strong>the starting friction; it is the ratio between the jump<strong>of</strong> friction and the starting friction coefficient.Similarly, for the relative change <strong>of</strong> the kineticfriction p is obtained the expression: AsTo ApToPSo PS p .100 .100 .100A TPSorp p 100,%(6)4.2 Procedure and experimental resultsThe parameters <strong>of</strong> starting friction have beenstudied using a test rig with functional scheme asshown in Figure 5.34 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 5. Functional scheme <strong>of</strong> the test rig for study <strong>of</strong>starting frictionThe experimental arrangement consists <strong>of</strong> body1 and counterbody 2, which form a contact. Thebody 1 is fixed in the holder 3 and is connectedthrough the nonelastic thread with thedynamometer 6 and micrometric screw 5.Tangential force is loaded on the body 1 near thecontact surface through slow turning <strong>of</strong> themicrometric screw. The normal load Р is set bymeans <strong>of</strong> the loading bodies 4.The body 1 is a prismatic sample <strong>of</strong> size30 х 50 х 8 mm made <strong>of</strong> duraluminium (Al), andthe counterbody 2 represents a round disk <strong>of</strong>diameter ф 100 mm and thickness 3 mm with thedeposited coating.The procedure <strong>of</strong> measurement the friction forceis <strong>of</strong> following sequence:- The specimen 2 with coating is fixed in the bed<strong>of</strong> the base, and the body 1 is mounted in the holder3, then they are put on the specimen 2.- The normal load is set by the loading bodies 4.- The elastic dynamometer 6 is put in the initialreset to zero.- The micrometric screw 5 is turned very slowlyand the pointer <strong>of</strong> the dynamometer 6 shifts withease. In the moment <strong>of</strong> shivering <strong>of</strong> the pointerbackwards, the indication <strong>of</strong> the dynamometer isread. The maximum value <strong>of</strong> the indicationcorresponds to the value <strong>of</strong> the starting frictionforce То.- The screw keeps on turning and the indications<strong>of</strong> the dynamometer are observed; they match thekinetic friction force Т after the jump <strong>of</strong> friction.- The dial <strong>of</strong> the dynamometer is calibrated inforce [N].- During the tests the body 1 is made <strong>of</strong> the samematerial but for each test with different coatings adifferent specimen <strong>of</strong> this material is used. Allspecimens <strong>of</strong> the body have equal size androughness Ra 0, 418 m.Table 3 shows the results <strong>of</strong> starting and kineticfriction, and the figures give some diagrams.353025201510500‐ 0+ 5‐ 5+ 100‐ 100+ 200‐ 200+ 250‐ 250+Figure 6. Diagram <strong>of</strong> starting friction force То0,10,090,080,070,060,050,040,030,020,01Figure 7. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the jump <strong>of</strong> friction force Δµ30252015105040353025201510500‐ 0+ 5‐ 5+ 100‐ 100+ 200‐ 200+ 250‐ 250+Figure 8. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the relative change <strong>of</strong>starting friction Ψs0‐ 0+ 5‐ 5+ 100‐ 100+ 200‐ 200+ 250‐ 250+Figure 9. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the relative change <strong>of</strong>kinetic friction Ψр13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 35


Table 3. Experimental data <strong>of</strong> friction parameters№ Series То, [N] Т, [N] µо µ Δµ Ψs Ψр1 0- ( Ni Al ) 19,62 16,35 0,34 0,28 0,06 17,6 21,42 0+ ( Ni Al ) 21,8 18,53 0,38 0,32 0,057 15 17,83 5- ( Ni nD5 Al ) 15,26 10,90 0,266 0,19 0,076 28,6 404 5+ ( Ni nD5 Al ) 30,52 27,25 0,53 0,475 0,055 10,4 11,65 100- ( Ni nD100 Al ) 27,25 21,80 0,47 0,38 0,09 19,1 23,66 100+ ( Ni nD100 Al ) 21,8 19,62 0,38 0,342 0,038 10 11,17 200- ( Ni nD200 Al ) 20,71 17,44 0,36 0,30 0,06 16,7 208 200+ ( Ni nD200 Al ) 33,79 28,34 0,59 0,494 0,096 16,3 19,49 250- ( Ni nD250 Al ) 11,99 9,81 0,20 0,17 0,03 15 17,610 250+ ( Ni nD250 Al ) 19,62 16,35 0,342 0,285 0,057 16,7 204.3 Analysis <strong>of</strong> the experimental resultsA jump in the friction force is observed for alltested tribosystems however at different values <strong>of</strong>starting friction force and kinetic friction force.The jump is <strong>of</strong> different duration for thedifferent coatings.The influence <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> nanodiamondparticles upon friction parameters is notunambiguous.The relationship between the starting frictionforce and the size <strong>of</strong> nanodiamond particles isstrongly nonlinear. This is most clearly expressedfor coatings with heat treatment. At coatingswithout heat treatment this relationship has clearmaximum for particles size 100 nm, howeverthe value <strong>of</strong> the maximum is lower than the twomaximums in the curve <strong>of</strong> the coatings without heattreatment.Genesis and variations in the friction forcesdepend directly on the formation and evolution <strong>of</strong>the contact spots, the latest depending on manyvarious factors too.REFERENCES[1] Gavrilov G., C. Nikolov: Electroless Nickel andComposite Coatings, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Technika, 1985.[2] Karaguiozova Z., T. Babul, A. Ciski, S. Stavrev:Influence <strong>of</strong> Cubic Nanostructured Additions on theProperties <strong>of</strong> Electroless Coatings, – IJNM, Vol. 5,No 1-2, pp. 129-138, 2010.[3] Kralov I., P. Sinapov, K. Nedelchev, I. Ignatov,Friction Induced Rail Vibrations, AIP, Vol. 1497,pp. 19-25, 2012.[4] Kandeva M., D. Karastoyanov and A. Andonova,Wear and tribothermal effects <strong>of</strong> nanostructurednickel chemical coatings, Applied Mechanics andMaterials, Vols. 157-158, pp. 960-963, 201236 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacWEAR BEHAVIOR OF AUSTEMPERED DUCTILE IRONWITH NANOSIZED ADDITIVESJ. KaleichevaTechnical University <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, e-mail: jkaleich@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bgAbstract: The microstructure and properties <strong>of</strong> austempered ductile iron (ADI) strengthened withnanosized addtives <strong>of</strong> titanium nitride + titanium carbonitride (TiN + TiCN), titanium nitride TiN and cubicboron nitride cBN are investigated. The TiN, TiCN and cBN, nanosized particles are coated by electrolessnickel coating EFTTOM-NICKEL prior to the edition to the melt. The spheroidal graphite iron samples areundergoing an austempering, including heating at 900 о С for an hour, after that isothermal retention at 280о С, 2 h and 380 о С, 2h. The metallographic analysis by optical metallographic microscope GX41 OLIMPUSand hardness measurements by Vickers Method are performed. The structure <strong>of</strong> the austempered ductileiron consists <strong>of</strong> lower bainite and upper bainite.Experimental investigation <strong>of</strong> the wear by fixed abrasiveare also carried out. The influence <strong>of</strong> the nanosized additives on the microstructure, mechanical andtribological properties <strong>of</strong> the austempered ductile irons (ADI) is studied.Keywords: nanosized particles, austempered ductile iron, hardness, wear resistance1. INTRODUCTIONThe austempering <strong>of</strong> the iron-carbon alloys is anisothermal heat treatment, which reduces theinternal stresses and deformations and increases thedetails’ impact strength. The bainitic structure isformed at this type <strong>of</strong> heat treatment, which iswidely applicable in constructional steels andductile iron processing due to its high strength andincreased toughness [1-2]. Incompleteaustempering is also applied in case <strong>of</strong> heattreatment <strong>of</strong> some hypereutectoid and ledeburitesteels [3]. The possibility <strong>of</strong> wider practicalapplication <strong>of</strong> this heat treatment type requires anadditional data for the bainitic transformation iniron-carbon alloys with different compositionincluding alloys with nanomodifiers. Nanosizedparticles added to the iron melt in a small quantitytransform the graphite morphology from laminar tovermicular one [5], increase the graphite quantity[6] and change the matrix structure, whichincreases the cast iron wear resistance [4-6].The aim <strong>of</strong> the performed investigation is tostudy the tribological properties, the microstructureand hardness <strong>of</strong> austempered ductile iron,containing additives <strong>of</strong> nanosized particles –titanium nitride+titanium carbonitride (TiN +TiCN), titanium nitride TiN and cubic boron nitridecBN.2. MATERIAL AND INVESTIGATIONMETHODSThe composition <strong>of</strong> the austempered cast ironsamples is: Fe-3,55C-2,67Si-0,31Mn-0,009S-0,027P-0,040Cu-0,025Cr-0,08Ni-0,06Mg wt%. TheTiN, TiCN and cBN, nanosized particles are coatedby electroless nickel coating EFTTOM-NICKEL[7] prior to the edition to the melt. The nickelcoating improves the particles wetting into the meltand their uniformity distribution into the castingvolume.The ductile cast iron samples are undergoingaustempering, including heat treatment at 900 о С foran hour, after that isothermal retention at 280 о С, 2h and 380 о С, 2h.The austempered ductile iron samples’microstructure is observed by means <strong>of</strong> an opticalmetallographic microscope GX41 OLIMPUS. Thesamples surface is treated with 2 % HNO3 -C2H5OH solution. The hardness testing isperformed by Vickers method (Table 1).The experimental wear examination <strong>of</strong> the castand austempered ductile iron (ADI) is performed in13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 37


friction conditions <strong>of</strong> a fixed abrasive by acinematic scheme „pin - disc” using an acceleratedtesting method and device [6].Table 1. Nanoadditives, hardness and wear resistance.№<strong>of</strong>sample1MicrostructureNanosizedadditiveHardnessHV10WearresistanceI- 314 5,9.10 62 upper TiN + TiCN 319 7,75.10 63 bainite TiN 317 6,13.10 64 cBN 312 7.10 65- 388 7,8.10 66 lower TiN + TiCN 413 5,46.10 67 bainite TiN 405 7,34.10 68 cBN 422 6,79.10 63. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSThe cast iron structure consists <strong>of</strong> upper bainiteafter austempering at 380 о С for 2 hours and <strong>of</strong>lower bainite after austempering at 280 о С for 2hours (Figure 1). The bainite is an orientedneedlelike grain structure <strong>of</strong> α-phase (bainiticferrite), carbides and untransformed austenite. Theα-phase is formed in the low carbon austenite areaby a martensitic mechanism [1,2]. Upon coolingfrom the temperature <strong>of</strong> the isotherm to ambientone, a part <strong>of</strong> the untransformed austeniteundergoes martensitic transformation and other itspart remains as a retained austenite A in thestructure.Figure 1. Lower bainitic (c) and upper bainitic (a,b,d)microstructure. (a- sample1; b- sample 2; c, d- sample 8)The nanosized additives change the bainiticferrite morphology and the austenitic conversiondegree during the austempering (Figure1). Thehardness <strong>of</strong> the austempered, with upper bainiticstructure samples changes from 312 to 319 HV10(Figure 2a) and this one <strong>of</strong> the samples with lowerbainitic structure changes from 388 to 422 HV10(Figure 3a). The austempered samples hardnesswith lower bainitic structure is higher than this one<strong>of</strong> the samples with upper bainitic structure, whichis explained with the different carbon satiety <strong>of</strong> theα-phase (bainitic ferrite) and with the varyingdegree <strong>of</strong> austenitic transformation in the lower andupper part <strong>of</strong> the bainitic area [1,2].The experimental data for massive wear m , thespeed <strong>of</strong> wear dm / dt , absolute intensity <strong>of</strong> wear iand absolute wear resistance I <strong>of</strong> the samples andtheir alteration with the time <strong>of</strong> the contactinteraction (Table 2, 3) are received. The massivewear m dependence on cycle’s number N (frictionroad) and massive wear speed dm / dt dependenceon the friction time t are presented in Figures 4 and5. Figure 2b and 3b show the wear resistance I <strong>of</strong>austempered ductile cast iron samples with upperand lower bainitic structure for the same frictionroad L 700 [m].38 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 2. Test results for massive wear, wear speed, intensity <strong>of</strong> wear and wear resistance (samples 1÷4).Friction road, S [m]140 280 420 560 700Cycles number , N 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Massive wear,m [mg]Wear speed, dm/dt[mg / min]Intensity <strong>of</strong> wear, iWear resistance, ITime , t [min] 2,35 4,7 7,05 9,4 11,75sample 1 22,3 32,7 38,6 42,4 46,5sample 2 19 24,4 28 32,8 35,3sample 3 20 25 32,6 38,2 44,8sample 4 16,3 24 27,1 33,8 39,1sample 1 9,49 6,96 5,48 4,52 3,96sample 2 8,08 5,19 3,97 3,49 3,0sample 3 8,51 5,32 4,62 4,06 3,81sample 4 6,94 5,11 3,84 3,6 3,33sample 1 0,406.10 -6 0,298.10 -6 0,234.10 -6 0,194.10 -6 0,169.10 -6sample 2 0,346.10 -6 0,222.10 -6 0,17.10 -6 0,149.10 -6 0,129.10 -6sample 3 0,364.10 -6 0,228.10 -6 0,198.10 -6 0,174.10 -6 0,163.10 -6sample 4 0,297.10 -6 0,218.10 -6 0,164.10 -6 0,154.10 -6 0,142.10 -6sample 1 2,46.10 6 3,36.10 6 4,27.10 6 5,15.10 6 5,9.10 6sample 2 2,89.10 6 4,5.10 6 5,88.10 6 6,69.10 6 7,75.10 6sample 3 2,75.10 6 4,39.10 6 5,05.10 6 5,75.10 6 6,13.10 6sample 4 3,37.10 6 4,59.10 6 6,1.10 6 6,49.10 6 7.10 6Table 3.Test results for massive wear, wear speed, intensity <strong>of</strong> wear and wear resistance (samples 5÷8).Friction road, S [m]140 280 420 560 700Cycles number , N 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Massive wear,m [mg]Wear speed, dm/dt[mg / min]Intensity <strong>of</strong> wear, iWear resistance, ITime , t [min] 2,35 4,7 7,05 9,4 11,75sample 5 14,2 20,4 24,4 29,3 35,2sample 6 26,4 33,6 37,7 44,9 50,2sample 7 14,6 21,7 27,2 34,8 37,4sample 8 15,9 23,7 29,4 35 40,4sample 5 6,04 4,34 3,46 3,12 2,99sample 6 11,2 7,15 5,35 4,78 4,27sample 7 6,21 4,62 3,86 3,7 3,18sample 8 6,76 5,04 4,17 3,72 3,44sample 5 0,259.10 -6 0,186.10 -6 0,148.10 -6 0,133.10 -6 0,128.10 -6sample 6 0,48.10 -6 0,306.10 -6 0,229.10 -6 0,204.10 -6 0,183.10 -6sample 7 0,266.10 -6 0,198.10 -6 0,165.10 -6 0,158.10 -6 0,136.10 -6sample 8 0,29.10 -6 0,22.10 -6 0,178.10 -6 0,159.10 -6 0,147.10 -6sample 5 3,86.10 6 5,38.10 6 6,75.10 6 7,5.10 6 7,8.10 6sample 6 2,08.10 6 3,27.10 6 4,37.10 6 4,9.10 6 5,46.10 6sample 7 3,76.10 6 5,05.10 6 6,06.10 6 6,31.10 6 7,34.10 6sample 8 3,45.10 6 4,54.10 6 5,62.10 6 6,27.10 6 6,79.10 6The wear resistance is a multifactorial parameterand to make its prognosis using the standardmeasured properties (hardness etc.) could bewrong, since these features are not always reliablecriteria for the steels’and irons’’ wear resistanceevaluation. The metastable structures in the ironcarbonalloys as a martensite, bainite and retainedaustenite have higher resistance to abrasive wear incomparison to this one <strong>of</strong> the stable structures(ferrite, pearlite etc.). The intensive strengthening isgoing <strong>of</strong>f during the wear process due to dynamicstrain ageing <strong>of</strong> martensite and partialtransformation <strong>of</strong> the metastable retained austenitein a strain-induced martensite [8].The samples hardness with upper bainiticstructure without and with nanoadditives are similar13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 39


in values (312÷319 HV10). The wear resistance I <strong>of</strong>these cast irons consisting nanosized additives is inthe range between 6,13.10 6 ÷ 7,75.10 6 and it is with4 to 32 % higher than this one <strong>of</strong> the cast ironsamples without nanoadditives (I = 5,9.10 6 ).Samples hardness with lower bainitic structure is388÷422 HV10. The wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the castiron samples with lower bainitic structure withoutnanoadditives (I = 7,8.10 6 ) is higher than this one <strong>of</strong>the cast iron samples with nanoadditives ( I =5,46.10 6 ÷7,34.10 6 ). The obtained results for thewear resistance values <strong>of</strong> the tested cast ironssamples are probably related to the characteristics<strong>of</strong> structures upper bainite, lower bainite, retainedaustenite and martensite during abrasive wear. Thedifferent quantitative proportion between thestructural components in the samples with andwithout nanoadditives defines the degree <strong>of</strong>strengthening and the resistance during abrasivewear due to strain ageing <strong>of</strong> the carbon sated α-solid solution (martensite and bainitic ferrite) andalso to partially transformation <strong>of</strong> the retainedaustenite into deformation martensite.Figure 3. Hardness HV10 (a) and wear resistance I (b)<strong>of</strong> austempered ductile iron samples without (5) andwith (6,7,8) nanoadditives.Figure 4. Dependence <strong>of</strong> the massive wear m on thecycles number N (a) and <strong>of</strong> the wear speed dm/dt on thefriction time t (b) (samples 1÷4).Figure 2. Hardness HV10 (a) and wear resistance I (b)<strong>of</strong> austempered ductile iron samples without (1) andwith (2,3,4) nanoadditives.40 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


knowledge transfer in the field <strong>of</strong>micro/nanotechnologies and materials, powereffectiveness and virtual engineering”, contractDUNK-01/3.Figure 5. Dependence <strong>of</strong> the massive wear m on thecycles number N (a) and <strong>of</strong> the wear speed dm/dt on thefriction time t (b) (samples 5÷8).4. CONCLUSIONThe microstructure, hardness HV10 andtribological properties <strong>of</strong> austempered ductile castiron samples without and with nanosized additives<strong>of</strong> titanium nitride + titanium carbonitride (TiN +TiCN), titanium nitride TiN and cubic boron nitridecBN are investigated. The nanosized particleschange the bainitc ferrite morphology in theaustempered iron structure. In the cast iron with aupper bainitic structure the nanosized additivesincrease the wear resistance with 4÷32 % incomparison to this one <strong>of</strong> the irons withoutnanoadditives. The results for the wear resistance <strong>of</strong>the irons with lower bainitic structure show thehighest value (I = 7,8.10 6 ) for the cast iron withoutnanoadditives.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe presented investigations are carried out andfinanced under the Project “University Complex forresearch and development <strong>of</strong> innovations andREFERENCES[1] G.V. Kurdyumov, L.M. Utevskiy, R.I. Entin:Transformations in Iron and Steel, Nauka,Moscow,1977 (In Russian).[2] H.K.D.H.Bhadeshia: Bainiteinsteels, 2 nd edit.London, Inst.<strong>of</strong> Materials, Cambridge, 2001.[3] J.Kaleicheva: Structure and Properties <strong>of</strong> High-Speed Steels after Austempering. Int. J.Microstructure and Materials Properties 2, pp. 16-23, 2007.[4] J. Li, M. Chen, H. Gao, Y. Zhao, Structures andProperties <strong>of</strong> Cast Irons Reinforced by TraceAddition <strong>of</strong> Modified SiC Nanopowders. ChineseJournal <strong>of</strong> Chemical Physics 20, pp. 625 – 631,2007.[5] Y. Wang, Z. Pan, Z. Wang, X. Sun, L. Wang,Sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> Cr–Mo–Cu alloy castirons with and without nanoadditives, Wear 271,pp. 2953– 2962, 2011.[6] J.Kaleicheva, M. Kandeva, Z. Karaguiozova, V.Mishev: Wear behavior <strong>of</strong> ductile cast irons withnanoparticle additives. <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 3nd Int.Conf. on Diagnosis and Prediction in MechanicalEngineering Systems DIPRE12, May 31-June 1 st2012, Galati, Romania, Paper 38.[7] G.Gavrilov, C. Nicolov: Electroless Nickel andComposite Coatings, Tehnika, S<strong>of</strong>ia, 1985 (InBulgarian).[8] А.Makarov: Wear resistance increase <strong>of</strong> Ironalloys at the expense <strong>of</strong> metastable and nanocrystalstructure formation, DSc thesis, Ural Department<strong>of</strong> the Mechanical Engineering Institute <strong>of</strong> theRussian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Chelyabinsk, 2009(In Russian).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 41


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacNICKEL COMPOSITE COATINGS MODIFIED BY DIAMONDNANOPARTICLESM. Kandeva 1 , N. Gidikova 2 , R. Valov 2 , V. Petkov 21 Technical University-S<strong>of</strong>ia, Centre <strong>of</strong> Tribology, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, kandeva@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bg2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Metal Science, Equipment and Technologies with Hydroaerodynamics Centre, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria,radoslav.valov@gmail.com, vladimir2pe@yahoo.comAbstract: The study deals with composite Ni electro-chemical coatings on steel containing diamondnanoparticles with grain size up to 100 nm. Coatings were obtained at various concentrations <strong>of</strong> thenanoparticles in the electrolyte and at various process time.A procedure is developed for the study <strong>of</strong> wear parameters <strong>of</strong> the coatings under conditions <strong>of</strong> dry frictionwith abrasive surface. Experimental results for linear wear, wear rate, wear intensity and wear-resistancehave been obtained. The study is related and financed under the Technical University - S<strong>of</strong>ia ContractDUNK-01/3 “University R&D Complex for innovation and transfer <strong>of</strong> knowledge in micro/nanotechnologiesand materials, energy efficiency and virtual engineering” funded by the Bulgarian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Educationand Science.Keywords: tribology, wear resistance, abrasive wear, Ni-coatings, diamond nanoparticles1. INTRODUCTIONThe deposition <strong>of</strong> nickel coating on steel isapplied in industry to increase the corrosionresistance and the wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the surfaces[1].There is a lot <strong>of</strong> work done in the recent yearson the application <strong>of</strong> nanoparticles <strong>of</strong> differentmaterials and with various concentrations. Thisleads to improvement <strong>of</strong> the mechanical andtribological characteristics [2] [3].The objective <strong>of</strong> the present work is to study theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the diamond nanoparticles concentration onthe wear parameters <strong>of</strong> electrochemical nickel coatings.The wear is performed in dry friction conditions onsurface with firmly embedded abrasive particles.2. MATERIALS AND METHODSElectrochemical nickel coatings deposited onsubstrate <strong>of</strong> carbon steel C45 are studied.The electrochemical nickel depositing isperformed on cylindrical samples with diameter 30mm and height 10 mm. Standard electrolyte withcomposition: NiSO 4 .7H 2 O - 240 g/l,Na 2 SO 4 .10H 2 O – 150 g/l, NaCl - 15 g/l, H 3 BO 3 -20 g/l, is used. The pH <strong>of</strong> the solution is 5.0 - 5.5.The anode is made <strong>of</strong> nickel. The temperature <strong>of</strong>galvanization is 25 - 30 0 C.The diamond nanoparticles (ND) are producedby detonation synthesis and the grain size is up to100 nm. The nanoparticles are added in theelectrolyte as water suspension. The nickeldeposition is carried out with concentrations <strong>of</strong> thediamond nanoparticles 1, 5, 10 and 20 g/l at 3А/dm 2 current density. The time <strong>of</strong> theelectrochemical nickel deposition is 10 and 15 min.The galvanization process is performed after theactivation <strong>of</strong> the nanoparticles in the electrolyte andat continuous vigorous stirring during the nickeldeposition. The studied parameters are the Ni yield,the thickness <strong>of</strong> the layer, the microhardness andespecially the wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the coating. Theirchanges related to the parameters <strong>of</strong> thegalvanization as current density, depositionduration and the concentration <strong>of</strong> the diamondnanoparticles (C NDDS ) are studied.The data concerning the studied samples <strong>of</strong>electrochemical nickel coatings are presented intable 1. The coatings are obtained at differentdiamond nanoparticles concentration.42 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 1. Parameters <strong>of</strong> the electrochemical nickel coatingsSample No Coating Nanoparticlesconcentration, g/lCurrent density,А/dm 2Processduration, minYield <strong>of</strong> nickel,mg/cm 28 Ni - 3 10 4,879 Ni - 3 15 8,0617 Ni+nDi-1% 1% 3 10 11,1818 Ni+nDi-1% 1% 3 15 8,8928 Ni+nDi-5% 5% 3 15 8,3138 Ni+nDi-10% 10% 3 15 5,6648 Ni+nDi-20% 20% 3 15 7,053. DEVICE AND METHOD OFINVESTIGATION3.1 Device for investigation <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wearat dry friction on surface with fixed particlesThe experimental investigation is carried outaccording to the method and with the device foraccelerated test by the kinematic scheme “thumb –disc”. The device is presented schematically onfigure 1. The method is in conformity with theexisting standards [4].Figure 1. Functional scheme <strong>of</strong>the device “thumb – disc”The studied cylindrical sample 3 (body) with thedeposited coating K is installed immovably insuitable holder <strong>of</strong> the loading head 6. It ispositioned in such a way that its front surfacecontacts the abrasive surface 2 <strong>of</strong> the horizontaldisc 1 (counter body). The horizontal disc 1 rotateswith constant angular velocity ω = const around itsvertical axis. The number <strong>of</strong> cycles <strong>of</strong> disc 1 ismeasured with a cyclometer 5.The device permits change in the relative slidingspeed between the sample 3 and the disc 1 in twoways: by changing the angular disc velocity bycontrol bloc and by changing the distance Rbetween the rotation axis <strong>of</strong> the counter body 1 andthe axis <strong>of</strong> the sample 3.The abrasive surface 2 <strong>of</strong> the counter body 1 ismolded by surfaces <strong>of</strong> impregnated carbocorundum with hardness at least 60 % more thanthat <strong>of</strong> the tested coatings which corresponds to therequirements <strong>of</strong> the standard [4].2.2 Method for investigation <strong>of</strong> the abrasivewearThe method for investigation is performed in thefollowing sequence <strong>of</strong> operations:• Cleaning, degreasing and drying <strong>of</strong>cylindrical samples with equal dimensionsand roughness;• Measurement <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> the samplebefore m 0 and after m i covering definitefriction distance S (number <strong>of</strong> cycles). Themeasurement is done with electronicbalance WPS 180/C/2 with precision 0.1mg. The samples are dipped in specialsolution to prevent accumulation <strong>of</strong> staticelectricity. The mass wear m is determinedas the difference <strong>of</strong> the two measurements;• Measurement <strong>of</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong> thecoating before h 0 and after h i the wear atdefinite friction distance S with the devicePocket LEPTOSKOP 2021 Fe at 10 points<strong>of</strong> the surface and calculating the average<strong>of</strong> the measured values;• The normal loading P is applied along thesample axis by a lever system in theloading head and the cycle number N isread on the cyclometer which correspond tothe friction distance S.The abrasive wear <strong>of</strong> all coatings is fixed at oneand the same working conditions which arepresented on Table 2.Table 2. Experimental parametersParametersValuesNominal contact pressure, p a 1,46 [N/cm 2 ]Average sliding speed, V15,5 [cm/s]Nominal contact area, A a 7,065 [сm 2 ]Abrasive surface Corundum Р 32013 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 43


3.3 Wear parametersThe following parameters <strong>of</strong> mass and linearwear are studied:- Absolute mass m (linear h) wear;- Average rate <strong>of</strong> mass dm/dt, [mg/min] (lineardh/dt, [µm/min]) wear;- Absolute intensity by mass wear im , [ mg / m]asper the formulae:im= m/S(1)- Absolute intensity by linear wear hcorrespondingly:ihi , [ m/m]µ ,= h/S(2)- The friction distance S is calculated by thecorresponding number <strong>of</strong> cycles N and the distanceR between the axis <strong>of</strong> rotation and the mass center<strong>of</strong> the nominal contact site by the formulae:S = 2πRN(3)- Absolute wear resistance by mass mI , [ / ]m mg :Im= 1/ im= S / m(4)- Absolute wear resistance by linear wear I h ,[ m/m]µ :Ih= 1/ ih= S / h(5)- Comparative wear resistance εie, - dimensionlessvalue, representing the ratio between the absolutewear resistance <strong>of</strong> the tested sample I i and theabsolute wear resistance <strong>of</strong> a standard sample I o .ε = (6)ie , Ii/IoSample with electrochemical nickel coatingwithout diamond nanoparticles is accepted as astandard in the present study.The index i indicates the percentage <strong>of</strong> thediamond nanoparticles.3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSThe obtained experimental results <strong>of</strong> the massand linear wear, the rate <strong>of</strong> wear, the absolute andthe comparative wear resistance are presented in theform <strong>of</strong> graphical relations, tables and diagrams.wear, mg6050403020100100 200 300 500 600Cycles8-Ni9-Ni17-Ni+nDi,1%18-Ni+nDi,1%28-Ni+nDi,5%38-Ni+nDi,10%48-Ni+nDi,20%Figure 2. The relation <strong>of</strong> the mass wear m [mg] from thenumber N <strong>of</strong> the friction cycleswear rate mg/min454035302520151050100 200 300 500 600Cycles8-Ni9-Ni17-Ni+nDi,1%18-Ni+nDi,1%28-Ni+nDi,5%38-Ni+nDi,10%48-Ni+nDi,20%Figure 3. The relation <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> mass wear from thewear distance10864203,532,521,510,505.346.558.544.125.074.48 9 17 18 28 38 48N=600 cl2.67Figure 4. Linear wear in [µm] at N = 600 cl.for each sample1,92,323,031,468 9 17 18 28 38 48N=600 clFigure 5. Rate <strong>of</strong> linear wear in [µm/min] at N = 600 cl.for each sample1,81,60,9544 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 6. Wear resistance by linear wear I h , [µm/m] atN = 600 cl. for each sampleFigure 7. Diagram <strong>of</strong> the comparative wear resistanceε i,0 = I i /I 0Table 3. Comparative wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the samples compared to the standard – electrochemical nickel coating withoutdiamond nanoparticles.Number <strong>of</strong> cyclesNComparative wear resistance, ε i,eε 1,0 ε 5,0 ε 10,0 ε 20,0N = 300 cl 1,22 0,76 1,60 3,68N = 600 cl 1,27 1,05 1,21 2,004. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTSIt is found that the nickel yield decreases with theincrease <strong>of</strong> the diamond nanoparticles concentration inthe electrolyte. The Ni yield acquires its highest values<strong>of</strong> about 12.0 mg/cm 2 at diamond nanoparticlesconcentration C NDDS = 1g/l, current density I = 3 A/dm 2and process duration t = 10 min.It is found also that the microhardness <strong>of</strong> the coatingat concentration <strong>of</strong> the diamond nanoparticles C NDDS =1g/l is 4800 МPa or 2.5 times more than that <strong>of</strong> purenickel coating (1950 MPa) and 1.7 times more than that<strong>of</strong> coating at concentration <strong>of</strong> the diamond nanoparticlesC NDDS = 5 g/l (2800МPа).The increase <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wear with the frictiondistance has nonlinear character and is different for thedifferent coatings. This relation is linear only for coatingderived from electrolyte with diamond nanoparticlesconcentration 5 %.The abrasive wear rate is not constant value in time.The only exception is coating obtained from electrolytewith diamond nanoparticles concentration 10 %.The presence <strong>of</strong> diamond nanoparticles in theelectrochemical nickel coatings leads to increase <strong>of</strong> thewear resistance. The wear resistance is increased withthe increase <strong>of</strong> the diamond nanoparticles content in theelectrolyte and the relation is <strong>of</strong> nonlinear character.Coating with 20 % content <strong>of</strong> diamond nanoparticlespossesses the highest wear resistance – 52,1.10 -6 at N =600 cycles. This wear resistance is 2 times higher thanthe wear resistance <strong>of</strong> coating without nanoparticles.Out <strong>of</strong> the studied coatings the coating containing 1% nanoparticles and deposited with current density 3A/dm 2 and process duration 10 minutes possesses thelowest wear resistance.Comparing the wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the coatings obtainedat equal diamond nanoparticles concentration 1 % andcurrent density 3 A/dm 2 , the coating obtained at processduration 15 minutes has 2 times higher wear resistance.REFERENCES[1] I. Petrov, P. Detkov, A. Drovosekov, M.V. Ivanov,T. Tyler, O. Shenderova, N.P.Voznekova, Y.P.Toporov, D. Schulz: Nickel galvanic coatings codepositedwith fractions <strong>of</strong> detonationnanodiamond, Diamond and related Materials 15,pp. 2035-2038, 2006.[2] M. Kandeva, Il. Peichev, N. Kostova, K. Stoichkov,Complex Study <strong>of</strong> Surface Layers and Coatings, Journal<strong>of</strong> the Balkan Tribological Association 17, 2011.[3] M. Kandeva, D. Karastoyanov and A. Andonova,Wear and tribotermal effects <strong>of</strong> nanostructurednickel chemical coatings, Applied Mechanics andMaterials Vols. 157-158, pp 960-963, 2012.[4] БДС 14289-77, Меthod <strong>of</strong> abrasion test by frictionagainst embedded abragant grain13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 45


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF THERMAL SPRAY COATINGS,DEPOSITED BY HVOF AND APS TECHNIQUES, ANDCOMPOSITE ELECTRODEPOSITS NI/SIC AT BOTH ROOMTEMPERATURE AND 300°C.A.Lanzutti 1 , M. Lekka 1 , E. Marin 1 , L.Fedrizzi 11 Università di Udine, Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Via del Cotonificio 108, 33100 Udine Italy,alex.lanzutti@uniud.itAbstract: Both the thermal spray and the electroplating coatings are widely used because <strong>of</strong> their high wearresistance combined with good corrosion resistance. In particular the addition <strong>of</strong> both micro particles ornano-particles to the electrodeposited coatings could lead to an increase <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties,caused by the change <strong>of</strong> the coating microsctructure.The thermal spray coatings were deposited following industrial standards procedures, while the Ni/SiCcomposite coatings were produced at laboratory scale using both micro- and nano-sized ceramic particles.All the produced coatings were characterized regarding their microstructure, mechanical properties and thewear resistance. The tribological properties were analyzed using a tribometer under ball on diskconfiguration at both room temperature and 300 o C.The results showed that the cermet thermal spray coatings have a high wear resistance, while the Ni nanocompositeshowed good anti wear properties compared to the harder ceramic/cermet coatings deposited bythermal spray technique.Keywords: thermal spray coatings, nano-composite electrodeposits, Ni/SiC, micro-compositeelectrodeposits, HVOF, APS, dry sliding, 300°C).1. INTRODUCTIONThe thermal spray coatings are widely used formany industrial applications [1-13] because <strong>of</strong> thepossibility to deposit different type <strong>of</strong> materials,ranging from different metal alloys to ceramics, andtheir technological properties, in particular the highwear resistance even if they are used also ascorrosion barriers at both high temperaturedegradation or wet corrosion.The thermal spray coatings are mainly used forhigh temperature applications (oxidation resistanceor fused salts resistance). Usually these types <strong>of</strong>coatings are deposited with the addition <strong>of</strong> rareearths in order to inhibit the oxidative degradationprocesses [1-3]. Some technological processes areused to reduce the porosity <strong>of</strong> the coating and thusincrease both mechanical properties and the barriereffect to oxidative environments. Sidhu et al [2]have found that the laser remelting process increaseboth the mechanical properties and the oxidationresistance and leaves only a small amount <strong>of</strong>porosity to the coating (


coatings and observed their good wear resistance,related to their high hardness, but low corrosionresistance, in wet wear tests. This behaviour isrelated to the low toughness that promote the crackenucleations and thus the permeation <strong>of</strong> corrosionmedia that enhances the undermining corrosion <strong>of</strong>the coating. Toma et al [8] showed that the addition<strong>of</strong> Cr to metal matrix increased the abrasion andcorrosion resistance. Fedrizzi et al [9] showed thatthese type <strong>of</strong> coatings can be used as an alternativeto hard chromium and their performance are alsoincreased if are used nano-sized powders. Murthyet al[11] showed that the coatings grinded have anhigher wear resistance because <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong>an hard layer on surface. Other researcher [12]found out that the decrease in powder size increasethe coating performance because <strong>of</strong> both reduction<strong>of</strong> the porosity and increase <strong>of</strong> the mechanicalproperties. This enhances both corrosion and wearsprotection.The ceramic coating Cr 2 O 3 was subjected tonumerous studies in the area <strong>of</strong> both wear andcorrosion protection. It was shown by Ahn et althat, in the reciprocating wear tests, the wearmechanism is a plastic deformation <strong>of</strong> wear debristhat influence both the friction and wear behavior.This is related to a formation <strong>of</strong> CrO 2 layer underhertzian loads [4]. Bolelli et al [5] performed weartests at room temperature on different plasma sprayceramic coatings. He found that the Cr 2 O 3 coatingis the hardest and most anisotropic coating withhigh abrasion resistance, as confirmed by Leivo etal [6], while in sliding condition the material formsa compact trib<strong>of</strong>ilm. The high temperature data forthis type <strong>of</strong> coatings is scarce.The Ni based electrodeposits are widely used asboth corrosion/wear barrier coatings in manyapplications ranging from high temperatureapplications to room temperature applications inboth dry and wet conditions [14-21].In this work composite coatings are alsoanalyzed . The introduction <strong>of</strong> reinforcing particlesis aimed to enhances both the wear and corrosionproperties, in particular if the nano-particles areembedded to the metal matrix they produce a nanostructuredmicrostructure.Garcia et al [14] showed that the increase <strong>of</strong>wear properties at room temperature for microcompositeNi/SiC coatings is a function <strong>of</strong> particle’size. In particular the decrease <strong>of</strong> particle’ sizeleads to an increase <strong>of</strong> anti-wear properties.The reaserch group <strong>of</strong> Zimmermann et al [15-16] observed that the addition <strong>of</strong> sub-microsizedparticles to the coating leads to an increase <strong>of</strong> bothmechanical strength and toughness, if thereinforcing content is below the 2 wt%. Above the2wt% they showed that some particles’ coalescenceis possible, during the deposition, leading to tcoating embrittlement. They tried to add nanoparticlesto the coating and observed a notableincrease <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties.Benea et al [17-18] in many works demonstratethat the addition <strong>of</strong> SiC nano particles, in Ni matrix,leads to an increase <strong>of</strong> the wear properties and theycalculated the relation between the microstructure<strong>of</strong> the coating and the wear performance.The wear properties <strong>of</strong> both micro compositeand nano composite Ni/SiC coatings at hightemperature were investigated by Lekka et al [19].They found an increase <strong>of</strong> anti-wear properties <strong>of</strong>the composite coating at both room temperature testand 300°C compared to the pure Ni coating.This work aimed to compare the wearperformance <strong>of</strong> the most used thermal spraycoatings with the anti-wear properties <strong>of</strong> the Nicomposite coating, highlighting the importantproperties <strong>of</strong> the composite coatings produced witha simple and cheaper technique compared to thethermal spray process.2. EXPERIMENTAL2.1 Samples productionFor all types <strong>of</strong> the deposits ASTM 387 F22steel plates (7×10 cm) and discs (d=5 cm) havebeen used as substrates (chemical composition inTable 1).Table 1: Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> steel substrate ASTM387 F22C Si Mn P Cr Mo Fe0.11 0.31 0.5 0.025 2.2 0.9 Bal.The thermal spray coatings have been depositedusing industrial procedures. The deposited coatingswere: NiCr 80/20 and NiCr 80/20 + Cr 2 O 3deposited by APS (Air Plasma Spray) techniqueand WC CoCr 18/4 deposited by HVOF technique.Regarding the Ni matrix coatings, three types <strong>of</strong>deposits have been prepared: pure Ni (to be used asreference). Ni containing microparticles <strong>of</strong> SiC andNi containing nanoparticles <strong>of</strong> SiC. Theelectroplating bath used was a high speed nickelsulfammate plating bath having the followingcomposition: 500 g/l Ni(SO 3NH 2 ) 2 . 4H 2 O, 20 g/lNiCl 2 . 6H 2 O, 25 g/l H 3 BO 3 , 1 ml/l surfactant (CH 3(CH) 11 OSO 3 Na based industrial product. Thedeposition was carried out using a galvanic pilotplant (12 l plating tank) under galvanostatic controlat 4 A/dm 2 , 50 °C, under continuous mechanicalstirring. The deposition time was 2.5h in order toobtain 70–80 μm thick deposits. For the production13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 47


<strong>of</strong> the composite coatings 20g/l <strong>of</strong> micro- or nanopowderswere added into the electroplating bath,dispersed using ultrasounds (200W, 24kHz) for30min and then maintained in suspension undercontinuous mechanical stirring during theelectrodeposition. The micro-particles have a meandimension <strong>of</strong> 2μm and a very irregular and sharpshape, while the nano-particles have a meandiameter <strong>of</strong> 45 nm [19].2.2 Samples characterizationThe specimens characterization includesmicrostructure, chemical composition,microhardness, wear resistance at both roomtemperature and 300°C and corrosion resistance intwo different environments.The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the specimens have beenanalysed by SEM (Zeiss Evo-40) + EDXS (Oxfordinstruments INCA) in cross section. Both the SiCcontent and the coatings’ porosity were calculatedusing an image analysis s<strong>of</strong>tware [13]. For nanocomposite coating The SiC content was measuredthrough the measurements <strong>of</strong> RF GDOES (HR-Pr<strong>of</strong>ile, Horiba Jobin Yvon), calibrated using 28CRM (Certified Reference Material) samples. Thesystem was set up using an Ar pressure <strong>of</strong> 650Paand a applied power <strong>of</strong> 50W. The micro-compositecoating were not analysed by the GDOES because<strong>of</strong> some issues related to the plasma erosion <strong>of</strong> thereinforcing particles [21].Micro-hardness measurements (HV 0,3 ) havebeen performed on cross section <strong>of</strong> the specimens.Wear tests have been performed using a CETRUMT tribometer in a ball-on-disc configuration atboth room temperature and at 300 °C. The testingparameters are summarized in Table 2. The volumeloss has been evaluated using a stylus pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer(DEKTAK 150 Veeco). The wear rate K [10 −6mm 3 /Nm] has been calculated using the equationdescribed in [22].Table 2: Wear test parameters.Counter materialApplied loadTest radiusRotation speedSliding speedTest durationWC sphere (d 9.5mm)70N18mm300rpm0.565 m/s60 minFig.1: Microstructure <strong>of</strong> gr. 22 steel.The Gr 22 steel presents a ferritic microstructurewith some carbides precipitated in the metal matrix,that leads to the high creep strength <strong>of</strong> material.The carbides are mainly produced by Cr and Mo.The hardness <strong>of</strong> the material is about 180±20 HV 0,3and the ferritic grain size is about 45±15 µm.In Fig.2 are shown the SEM micrographsobtained for Thermal spray coatings and therelative data acquired by mechanicalcharacterization and image analysis. In Tab. 3 thethermal spray coatings’ properties are listed.a)b)3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS3.1 Microstructural characterizationIn Fig. 1 is shown the microstructure <strong>of</strong> the steelsubstrate.48 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


c)a)Figure 2: SEM images and microstructuralcharacterization <strong>of</strong> thermal spray coatings: a) NiCr80/20, b) WC CoCr 18/4 and c) NiCr 80/20+ Cr 2 O 3 .b)Table 3: Results <strong>of</strong> thermal spray coatings’characterization.Coating Thickness[µm]Porosityvol.%HardnessHV 0,3NiCr 98±16 6.5 359±18WCCoCr 105±15 3.45 1027±21NiCr+Cr 2 O 3 (38+187) ±255.5+10.1 (341+1118)±24As can be observed, the three types <strong>of</strong> thermalspray coatings present different thickness andporosity. The porosity, acquired by image analysis,is higher for the coatings deposited by APStechnique compared to the HVOF deposits. Thisdifference could be related to both powders sizeand impact velocity, that is lower in APS techniquewith respect to HVOF. Indeed, the difference inkinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the molten powders, that is higherin HVOF technique, leads to a different density ondeposited coating. The hardness acquired isassociated to the material deposited and the valuesacquired are similar to data available in scientificliterature for thermal spray coatings [1-13].The SEM micrographs obtained on cross section<strong>of</strong> Ni/SiC composite coatings previously etched(acetic acid: nitric acid 1:1) are shown in Fig.3. InTab. 4 are listed the electrodeposited coatings’properties.Table 4: Results <strong>of</strong> Ni/SiC electrodepositscharacterization.Coating Thickness[µm]SiC wt.%HardnessHV 0.3Ni 78±7 - 172±7Ni/µSiC 73±8 0.8 247±8Ni/nSiC 75 ± 5 0.15 270 ±9Figure 3: SEM images and microstructuralcharacterization <strong>of</strong> electrodeposited coatings:a) pure Ni, b) Ni/µSiC and c) Ni/nSiC.The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the electrodeposits iscolumnar. In the case <strong>of</strong> the pure Ni the metalcolumns are oriented along the direction <strong>of</strong>electrical fields. The addition <strong>of</strong> SiC micro-particlesleads to a slight modification <strong>of</strong> the Ni columnsorientation and size. On the other hand, thecodeposition <strong>of</strong> SiC nano-particles leads to theformation <strong>of</strong> a fine grained deposit in which the Nicolumns are not oriented. The addition <strong>of</strong> microparticlesleads to a microstructure columnar with aslight modification <strong>of</strong> orientation, caused probablyc)13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 49


y the deviation <strong>of</strong> electrical field in proximity <strong>of</strong>ceramic particles that are in non-conductivematerial. On the contrary, the addition <strong>of</strong>nanoparticles gives a grain refinement and a multiorientation<strong>of</strong> columns. The SiC amount is higher inthe micro-composite coatings compared to thenano-composite one. The addition <strong>of</strong> particles leadsto a noticeable microhardness increase due to boththe presence <strong>of</strong> the particles and the grainrefinement.All the analysed samples showed a surfaceRoughness Ra <strong>of</strong> about 0.5µm, obtained after thesurface’ grinding.In particular the thermal spray coatings showedalso other degradation mechanisms which arerelated to their microstructure.Room temperature 300°CNiCr+Cr2O33.2 Tribological characterizationAll the wear tracks obtained for both bare steel,thermal spray and composite electrodeposits at bothroom temperature and 300°C are shown in Fig. 4-6.In Fig. 4 the top views <strong>of</strong> the wear tracksobtained for gr.22 steel are shown, tested at bothroom temperature and 300°C.WC CoCrRoom temperature 300°CNiCrFigure 4: SEM images <strong>of</strong> the wear tracks obtained forthe bare steel at both RT and 300°C.The steel is subjected to triboxidative wear atboth room temperature and 300°C. At roomtemperature the oxide produced is adherent to metalsubstrate and very homogeneus. At 300°C the oxideproduced is concentrated on the wear track’ sides.This phenomenon is related to the loss <strong>of</strong>mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the substrates that permitsthe countermaterial to destroy the oxide layer, thatis thus deposited on the sides <strong>of</strong> the wear track. At300°C are highlighted the debris <strong>of</strong> both oxide andsteel along the borders <strong>of</strong> wear track.In Fig. 5 the top views <strong>of</strong> the wear tracksobtained for thermal spray coatings are shown,tested at both room temperature and 300°C.For the metal matrix deposits the degradationmechanism is a triboxidation at both roomtemperature and 300°C, which intensity is varyingin function <strong>of</strong> the coating material.Figure 5: SEM images <strong>of</strong> the wear tracks obtained forthe thermal spray coatings at both RT and 300°C.The Ni/Cr showed a material detachmentoriginated by contact fatigue phenomenon,aggravated by its porosity. At high temperaturetests the detachment is decreased due to a possiblehardness decrease <strong>of</strong> the material which allowed thesealing <strong>of</strong> porosity, thus reducing the contactfatigue failure. The cermet coatings were allsubjected to triboxidation <strong>of</strong> metal matrix, moreintense at high temperature. For the ceramicmaterial (Cr 2 O 3 ) the degradation mechanism atroom temperature is similar to the NiCr coatingwhile at high temperature test the degradationbecomes more intense. This is caused by a phasechange <strong>of</strong> chromium oxide which enhances thewear ratio and reduces at the same time the frictioncoefficient [4].In Fig. 6 are shown the top views <strong>of</strong> the weartracks obtained for Ni/SiC electrodeposits tested atboth room temperature and 300°C.50 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Room temperature 300°CNi/µSiCNiNi/nSiCFigure 6: SEM images <strong>of</strong> the wear tracks obtained forthe Ni/SiC deposits at both RT and 300°C.The Ni electrodeposits showed, at roomtemperature, a triboxidation with a descaling <strong>of</strong>oxide which forms a third body between thecounter material and the wear track, thus leading tothe formation <strong>of</strong> secondary tracks related toabrasive wear. At high temperature the coatingsshowed a strong triboxidation. By EDXS analysison pure Ni coatings, it was detected that during thewear test the steel substrate was reached. For thecomposite Ni/SiC coatings it seems that the oxideproduced is more adherent to steel substrate at hightemperature. Probably both the grain refinementand the presence <strong>of</strong> ceramic particles are linking theoxide to the metal matrix. It seems that somecounter-material was transferred to the coatingsurface, due to a slight adhesion phenomena.The wear rate <strong>of</strong> all tested coatings at both roomtemperature and 300°C are shown in Fig. 7.Figure 7: wear rates graph at both room temperature and300°C for all the coatings tested.All the coatings protect the steel substrate duringthe test, except for the pure Ni coating that showed,at 300°C, the highest wear rate. It is possible toobserve that the cermet coating has the lowest wearrate compared to the other coatings at both testtemperatures. This is related to the high amount <strong>of</strong>WC which is bonded by a metal matrix that hashigh oxidation resistance at the test temperatures.For this coating the wear resistance is associated tothe carbide component and the particles binding isrelated to the metal matrix which has a hightoughness. On the other hand, the NiCr coatingshowed a lower wear rate at high temperature tests,compared to the room temperature one, and thiscould be related to both high oxidation resistance <strong>of</strong>the material, that contains a high amount <strong>of</strong> Cr, andto the reduction <strong>of</strong> material detachment thatconsequently reduces the abrasive phenomena. Theceramic coating (Cr 2 O 3 ) showed a high wear rate at300°C tests due to phase change <strong>of</strong> chromium oxideunder tribological contact.The electrodeposits showed good wearresistance at room temperature, higher for the nanocompositecoating. This reduction in wear ratecould be related to the grain refinement <strong>of</strong>microstructure <strong>of</strong> the metal matrix, which increasesalso the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the coating. Thiseffect is not visible in the micro-composite coatingsbecause the reinforcement particles are usuallydetached from the metal matrix leading to intensiveabrasive wear caused by hard particle third bodycontact between counter material and surface <strong>of</strong> thespecimen. At high temperature the mechanicalbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the coating is reduced, probablybecause <strong>of</strong> the hardness decrease. In this case thepure Ni coating is completely removed while themicro composite coating showed a better wearresistance, compared to the pure Ni one, but thewear rate values were still higher than the thermalspray coatings wear rates. The higher wear13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 51


esistance <strong>of</strong> the nano-composite coating at 300°Cis probably related to the higher mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the metal matrix compared to theother electrodeposits.In fig 8-9 the COF (Friction Coefficients <strong>of</strong> thetested materials) are shown.COF [-]COF [-] COF [-]RT test300°C testRT test300°C testRT test300°C testTime [s]Time [s]Time [s]Fig.8: COF graphs at both room temperature and 300°Cfor the thermal spray coatings: a) NiCr 80/20, b) Wc CoCr (18/4), c) NiCr 80/20+ Cr 2 O 3 .a)b)c)For all the test performed on thermal spraycoatings, it is possible to observe that the COFvalues, at the end <strong>of</strong> the test, are comparablebetween the tests performed at differenttemperature, apart the ceramic coating that showeda lower COF at high temperature due to the changephase <strong>of</strong> ceramic oxide under hertzian loads. TheNiCr coatings showed a noisy COF graph because<strong>of</strong> the coating material detachment that producedabrasive particles that dissipated more energy,required to move the particles in the hertziansystem. At high temperature there is a start at lowCOF and, at regime, it reached the same values <strong>of</strong>the test at room temperature. Probably during thestart <strong>of</strong> the test the surface <strong>of</strong> the sample wascovered by a oxide layer produced during the heatup <strong>of</strong> the system. The presence <strong>of</strong> oxide decreasedthe surface energy in proximity <strong>of</strong> the hertziancontact <strong>of</strong> the two materials, reducing the frictioncoefficient. When the oxide was broken the contactbetween the two materials was between the WCand the Ni/Cr slightly oxidized.For the WC-CoCr coating the COF are slightlydifferent and this is caused mainly by the number <strong>of</strong>third body particles produced during the test.Indeed is possible that at high temperature theamount <strong>of</strong> abrasive particles, that are taking part tothe hertzian system, are higher due to the intensetriboxidation that cause probably a high amount <strong>of</strong>descaled oxide. At the end <strong>of</strong> the test part <strong>of</strong> theparticles are evacuated from the wear trackreaching a COF value comparable with the roomtemperature test.The COF acquired from the test performed at300°C is lower compared to the value acquired atroom temperature test. This behaviour is related tothe change phase <strong>of</strong> ceramic oxide that decreasedthe contact energy and thus the COF. The frictioncoefficient values are higher at the start <strong>of</strong> the testbecause <strong>of</strong> possible partial fragmentation <strong>of</strong> thematerial caused by brittle contact between thecountermaterial and the coating. This leads to havean high amount <strong>of</strong> third body particles that increasethe COF value, at the beginning, that is decreasing,during the test, because <strong>of</strong> particle’ evacuation formthe wear track caused by the relative motion <strong>of</strong> thetwo materials.The COF acquired for the Ni/SiCelectrodeposits is lower compared to the pure Nielectrodeposit. This could be related to bothdifferent mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the compositematerial respect to the pure Ni and possibleinteractions <strong>of</strong> SiC particles with countermaterialthat could lower the surface energy and interaction<strong>of</strong> the 2 surfaces.52 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


COF [-] COF [-]Fig.9: COF graphs at both room temperature and 300°Cfor the Ni/SiC composite coatings: a) Room temperaturetest, b) 300°C.At high temperature the COF graphs are verysimilar and this behaviour could be related to thechange <strong>of</strong> contact, compared with roomtemperature test, that is between Ni oxide and theWC sphere, instead <strong>of</strong> Ni slightly oxidized andWC.4. CONCLUSIONSTime [s]Time [s]In this work different type <strong>of</strong> coatings have beenanalysed deposited either by thermal spraytechniques or by electrodeposition. The coatingsdeposited by thermal spray are: NiCr (APS), WCCoCr (HVOF) and NiCr+Cr 2 O 3 (APS) . Theelectrodeposits are Ni/SiC coatings with nano- ormicro-sized particles embedded in metal matrix.The analysed coatings showed differentmicrostructure that depends on both depositedmaterial and deposition technique.Regarding the wear properties, The steelsubstrate showed the worst wear resistance at bothroom temperature and 300°C. This behaviour isrelated to the low mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> thissteel, that are decreasing as the temperatureincreases.All the tested metal matrix coatings underwenttriboxidation, that was increased at hightemperature test. The triboxidation behaviourdepends on metal oxidation resistance. The ceramica)b)coating was subjected to an intensive materialdetachment, caused mainly by the highinterconnected porosity <strong>of</strong> the thermal sprayedcoating. The detachment increased in function <strong>of</strong>temperature because the ceramic oxide changedphase under the hertzian loads. For all the metalmatrix coatings was present a third body abrasioncaused mainly by both oxide descaling and ceramicreinforcement detachment from the metal matrix.Observing the wear rates, the WC CoCr coatingshowed the highest wear resistance at both roomtemperature and 300°C. This behaviour is related tothe microstructure <strong>of</strong> the deposit: the reinforcingparticles (WC) give high hardness also at hightemperature and the metal matrix (CoCr) increasesthe toughness <strong>of</strong> the coating and acts as binder forthe reinforcing particles. The electrodepositsNi/nSiC showed a wear behaviour that iscomparable with the WC CoCr one. For the nanocompositeelectrodeposits the synergy <strong>of</strong> both grainrefinement and nano-particles embedding leads toan increase <strong>of</strong> hardness at both room temperatureand 300°C. This effect probably enhances the wearresistance <strong>of</strong> the Ni metal matrix that is subjected tohertzian loads.The COF values are strongly dependent on thematerial analysed but it was observed, for thermalspray coating, similar COF values between theroom temperature test and the 300°C tests. Theceramic coating showed the lowest COF values athigh temperature caused mainly by the production<strong>of</strong> brittle CrO 2 phase. The electrodeposits showedsome differences in the COF values between thehigh temperature tests and the room temperaturetests caused mainly by the change <strong>of</strong> hertziancontact from Ni slightly oxidized, at roomtemperature, to Ni strongly oxidized, at 300°C. Atroom temperature is visible a different in COFvalue between pure metal and composite coatings.This effect is related to the different mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the coating and the possibleinteraction <strong>of</strong> reinforcing particles with thecountermaterial in the hertzian contact/motion.REFERENCES[1] N.F. Ak, C. Tekmen, I. Ozdemir, H.S. Soykan, E.Celik, NiCr coatings on stainless steel by HVOFtechnique, Surface and coatings technology, Vol.173-174, pp 1070-1073, 2003.[2] B.S. Sidhu, D. Puri, S. Prakash, Mechanical andmetallurgical properties <strong>of</strong> plasma sprayed andlaser remelted Ni-20Cr and stellite-6 coatings,Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Processing Technology, Vol.159, pp 347-355, 2005.[3] H. Singh, D. Puri, S. Prakash, Some studies on hotcorrosion performance <strong>of</strong> plasma sprayed coatings13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 53


on Fe-based superalloy, Surface & coatingstechnology, vol 192, pp 27-38, 2005.[4] H.S. Ahn, O.K. Kwon, Tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong>plasma-sprayed chromium oxide coating, wear, vol.225-229, pp814-824, 1999.[5] G. Bolelli, V. Cannillo, L. Lusvaraghi, T.Manfredini, wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> thermally sprayedceramic oxide coatings, wear, vol. 261, pp 1298-1315, 2006.[6] E.M. Leivo, M.S. Vippola, P.P.A. Sorsa, P.M.J.Vuoristo, T.A. Mantyla, wear and corrosionproperties <strong>of</strong> plasma sprayed Al2O3 and Cr2O3coatings sealed by aluminum phosphates, Journal <strong>of</strong>Thermal spray technology, vol. 6, pp205-210, 1997.[7] L. Fedrizzi, L. Valentinelli, S. Rossi, S. Segna,Tribocorrosion behaviour <strong>of</strong> HVOF cermetcoatings, Corrosion Science, Vol. 49, pp 2781-2799,2007;[8] D. Toma, W. Brandl, G. Maringean, wear andcorrosion behavior <strong>of</strong> thermally sprayed cermetcoatings, Surface and coatings technology, vol.138,pp 149-158, 2001.[9] L.Fedrizzi, S. Rossi, R. Cristel, P.L. Bonora,Corrosion and wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> HVOF cermetcoatings used to replace hard chromium, vol. 49,Electrochimica Acta, pp 2803-2814, 2004;[10] P.L. Ko, M.F. Robertson, wear characteristics <strong>of</strong>electrolytic hard chrome and thermal sprayed WC-10Co-4Cr coatings sliding against Al-Ni bronze inair at 21°C and at -40°C, wear, vol 252, pp 880-893, 2002.[11] J.K.N. Murthy, D.S. Rao, B. Venkataraman, Effect<strong>of</strong> grinding on the erosion behavior <strong>of</strong> a WC-Co-Crcoating deposited by HVOF and detonation gunspray process, wear, vol 249, pp592-600, 2001.[12] C.W. Lee, J.H. Han, J. Yoon, MC Shin, S.I. Kwun,A study on powder mixing for high fracturetoughness and wear resistance <strong>of</strong> WC-CO-Crcoatings sprayed by HVOF, Surface and coatingstechnology, vol. 204, pp 2223-2229, 2010.[13] S. Deshpande, A. Kulkarni, S. Sampath, H. Herman,Application <strong>of</strong> image analysis for characterization<strong>of</strong> porosity in thermal spray coatings andcorrelation with small angle neutron scattering.Surface and coatings technology, vol. 187, pp 6-16,2004.[14] I. Garsia, J. Fransaer, J.P. Celis, Role <strong>of</strong> contactfrequency on the wear rate <strong>of</strong> steel in discontinuoussliding contact conditions, Surface and Coatingstechnology, vol. 141, pp 171-178, 2001.[15] A.F. Zimmermann, G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, U. Erb,Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> Ni silicon carbidenanocomposites, Material Science and Engineering,Vol A328, pp 137-146, 2002.[16] A.F. Zimmermann, D.G. Clark, K.T. Aust, U. Erb,pulse electroideposition <strong>of</strong> Ni-SiC nanocomposite,Material Letters, Vol. 52, pp 85-90, 2002.[17] L. Benea, P.L. Bonora, A. Borello, S. Martelli, F.Wenger, P. Ponthiaux, J. Galland, Preprataion andinvestigation <strong>of</strong> nanostructured SiC-Ni layers byelectrodeposition, Solid State Ionics, Vol. 151 pp89-95, 2002;[18] L. Benea, P.L. Bonora, A. Borello, S. Martelli, wearcorrosion properties <strong>of</strong> nano-structured SiC-Nicomposite coatings obtained by electroplating,Wear, Vol. 249, pp 995-1003, 2002.[19] M.Lekka, A. Lanzutti, A. Casagrande, C. deLeitenburg, P.L. Bonora, L. Fedrizzi, Room andhigh temperature wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> Ni matrixmicro. Nano-SiC composite electrodeposits, surfaceand coatings technology, vol. 206, pp 3658-3665,2012;[20] M. Lekka, P.L. Bonora, A. Lanzutti, S. Benoni, P.Caoduro, L. Fedrizzi, Industrialization <strong>of</strong> NimicroSiCelectrodeposition on copper moulds forsteel continuos casting, metallurgia italiana, vol 6,pp 1-7, 2012;[21] A. Lanzutti, E. Marin, M. Lekka, P. Chapon, L.Fedrizzi, Rf-GDOES analysis <strong>of</strong> compositemetal/ceramic electroplated coatings with nano- tomicroceramic particles’ size: issues in plasmasputtering <strong>of</strong> Ni/micro-SiC coatings. SIA, vol. 44,pp 48-45, 2012.[22] K. Holmberg, A. Matthews, Coatings tribology:Properties, Mechanisms, Techniques andApplications in Surface engineering, Elsevier, UK,2009.54 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacMECHANOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF NANOSIZED MIXEDOXIDESN.G. Kostova 1 , M. Kandeva 2 , M. Fabian 3 , A. Eliyas 1 , P. Balaz 31 Institute <strong>of</strong> Catalysis, Bulgarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 1113 S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, nkostova@ic.bas.bg2 Technical University <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>ia, S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria, kandeva@tu-s<strong>of</strong>ia.bg3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Geotechnics, Slovak Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 043 53 Kosice, Slovakia, balaz@saske.skAbstract: Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO nanosized mixed oxides samples were successfully synthesized using a simplemechanochemical method. The composites were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fouriertransform infrared, and UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopies The pattern <strong>of</strong> XRD shows broadeningin the diffraction peaks, indicating a decrease in the particle size <strong>of</strong> the samples with milling time.Keywords: nanotribology, mechanochemistry, ball-milling, X-ray diffraction1. INTRODUCTIONThe mixed oxides find application catalysts andsupport for catalysts, batteries, magnetic materialsand gas sensors [1, 2]. The mixed metals oxides areused in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry.The catalytic activity <strong>of</strong> mixed oxide systems isusually higher than that <strong>of</strong> the individual oxidecomponents. The research work is aimed atachieving the maximal efficiency. In order toachieve this aim two strategies are applied ingeneral: modification <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong> preparationand addition <strong>of</strong> dopants. The mixed oxides areusually obtained in the form <strong>of</strong> powders and theserepresent a substantial part <strong>of</strong> the industrialcatalysts due to their low price, easiness <strong>of</strong>regeneration and their selective action. They areprepared by the sol-gel method [3], solid statereaction method [4], co-precipitation [5], citric acidmethod [6], solution-combustion method [7-8],thermal decomposition method [9],mechanochemical processing [10-12], gas-phaseflame synthesis and aerogel method [13].Mechanochemical processing is a method forproduction <strong>of</strong> nanosized materials [11]. Its mainadvantage is the option to synthesize nanopowdersat low temperatures by a simple one-step procedure<strong>of</strong> milling. Mechanochemistry is generallyperformed in high-energy ball mills using powderreactant mixtures. In this work we report on Fe2O3-Zno mixed oxides formation during milling in aplanetary ball mill.2. EXPERIMENTALMechanochemical synthesis <strong>of</strong> Fe 2 O 3 -ZnOmixed oxides was performed in a laboratoryplanetary mill Pulverisette 6 (Fritsch, Germany) byhigh-energy milling <strong>of</strong> hematite and ZnO. Thefollowing experimental conditions were applied forthe mechanochemical synthesis: loading <strong>of</strong> the mill,50 balls <strong>of</strong> 10 mm in diameter; material <strong>of</strong> millingchamber and balls was tungsten carbide; volume <strong>of</strong>milling chamber, 250 ml; room temperature;rotational speed <strong>of</strong> the mill planet carrier 400 min –1 ;milling time, 20 min.X-ray powder diffraction patterns (XRD) <strong>of</strong> thesamples were registered at room temperature with aTUR M62 apparatus with PC management and dataaccumulation, using HZG-4 goniometer with CoK radiation. The XRD lines were identified bycomparing the measured patterns to the JCPDS datacards.Specific surface area was determined by the lowtemperature nitrogen adsorption method in aGemini 2360 sorption apparatus (Micromeritics,USA).The phase evolution during high energy ballmilling was followed by Nicolet 6700 FTIRspectrometer (thermo Electron Corporation, USA).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 55


The method <strong>of</strong> dilution <strong>of</strong> the studied sample inKBr at concentration 0.5 % was used.The diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra weretaken with a Thermo Evolution 300 UV-VisSpectrophotometer equipped with a Praying Mantisdevice with Spectralon as the reference. Spectralonis a fluoropolymer, which has the highest diffusereflectance <strong>of</strong> any known material or coating overthe ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared regions <strong>of</strong>the spectrum.As milling proceeds broadening <strong>of</strong> diffraction peaksis observed due to grain size reduction.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTextural properties <strong>of</strong> initial hematite andrutile and mechanochemically synthesized mixedoxides are presented in Table 1.Table 1. Samples composition and textural propertiesSamplecodeChemicalcomposition [%]Fe 2 O 3 ZnOSpecificsurface area,m 2 g -1PorevolumeZnO 0.0 100.0 5.5 0.004ZnO-MA 0.0 100.0 3.0 0.0020.3 FZ 0.3 99.7 5.3 0.0044.3 FZ 4.3 95.7 5.4 0.00414.3 FZn 14.3 85.7 5.3 0.00466 FZ 66.0 33.0 6.6 0.005The XRD patterns <strong>of</strong> the Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO mixedoxides with different iron content are presented inFig. 1.66 FZ14.3 FZ4.3 FZFigure 2. FTIR spectra <strong>of</strong> the Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO mixed oxidesFigure 2 shows the IFTR spectra themechanically activated Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO mixed oxides.All the samples show prominent absorption bandand shoulder at about 440 cm - 1 and 550 cm -1 ,respectively. Slight variation with increasing <strong>of</strong> ironcontent in the samples is due to grain size influencethe band position. The band at lower frequency <strong>of</strong>440 cm-1 corresponds to M-O stretching vibrationin octahedral site. This shift can be result <strong>of</strong> highercontent <strong>of</strong> oxygen vacancies present in the structureand created during mechanical activation [14].The diffuse reflectance <strong>of</strong> the ZnO and Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO mixed oxides are shown in Fig. 3. The spectra<strong>of</strong> the samples in UV region exhibit an absorptionpeak at about 220-250 nm attributable to isolated,tetrahedral coordinated species.0.3 FZZnO MA****ooo * o*o * oZnO+Fe 2O 310 20 30 40 50, degreeFigure 1. XRD patterns <strong>of</strong> the Fe 2 O 3 -ZnO sample. Themark (*) indicated the peaks corresponding to Fe 2 O 3 , andthe marks (o) – peaks corresponding to ZnO.The XRD diagram marks as ZnO+Fe 2 O 3corresponds to the starting mixture with molar ratioZnO:Fe 2 O 3 = 1:1 before milling. All the diffractionpeaks <strong>of</strong> mechanical activated zinc oxide and 0.3FZ sample can be well indexed to the hexagonalphase ZnO (JCPDS card no. 36-1451. A decrease inthe reflection intensity was observed during milling.Figure 3. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra <strong>of</strong> ZnO andFe 2 O 3 -ZnO mixed oxidesThe samples with larger iron content showintense absorption in wide wavelength range fromUV to visible light with absorption tail extendinginto infrared region. This means that Fe componentwas physically connected to the external surface <strong>of</strong>ZnO structure. The peak with maximum centred at56 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


about 260 nm is related to isolated Fe 3+ cations,while the second band at about 350 nm correspondsto small oligonuclear (FeO) n species. At higher ironcontent the peak around 520 nm is observedindicating the presence <strong>of</strong> iron oxide particles.This peak can be assigned to symmetrical andspin forbidden d-d transitions <strong>of</strong> Fe 3+. [15]. Whenthe sample contains small iron content (sample 0.3FZ), the band slightly shifts to the right without tailbroadening. This means that the Fe component waswell inserted inter the framework <strong>of</strong> the ZnOstructure.In a ball mill intense mixing takes place andreactants are brought into intimate contact with eachother. Grinding reduces the particle size andincreases the surface area available for reaction. Newreactive surfaces are exposed during particle fractureand the introduction <strong>of</strong> dislocations increases thesurface reactivity. At the point <strong>of</strong> contact betweentwo grinding balls during a collision event, a highlylocalised triboplasma is formed giving energy forchemical reactions to occur.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis investigation was financially supported bythe National Science Fund <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria (projectDNTS/Slovakia 01/3), by the Slovak Research andDevelopment Agency (project APVV-0189-10),and through a bilateral project between BulgarianAcademy <strong>of</strong> Sciences and Slovak Academy <strong>of</strong>Sciences.REFERENCES[1] I.E. Wachs, K. Routray: Catalysis science <strong>of</strong> bulkmixed oxides ACS Catalysis Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 1235-1246, 2012.[2] M.V. Reddy, G.V. Subba, B.V.R. Chowdari: Metaloxides and oxisalds as anode materials for Li ionbatteries, Chem. Rev. DOI: 10.1021/cr 3001884,2013.[3] B. Palanisamy, C.M. Babu, B. Sundaravel, S.Anandan, V. Murugesan: Sol-gel synthesis <strong>of</strong> mixedFe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 photocatalyst: Application fordegradation <strong>of</strong> 4-chlorophenol, J. Hazard. Mater.,Vol. 252-253, pp. 233-242, 2013.[4] S. Martha, K.H. Reddy, N. Biswal, K. Parida: Facilesynthesis <strong>of</strong> InGaZn mixed oxide nanorods forenhanced hydrogen production under visible light,Dalton Trans. Vol. 41, pp. 14107-14116, 2012.[5] K-T. Li, L-D. Tsai, C-H. Wu, I. Wang: Lactic acidesterification on titania-silica binary oxides, Ind.Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 52, No. 13, pp. 4734-4739,2013.[6] H. Zhou, P. Hu, Z. Huang, F. Qin, W. Shen, H. Xu:Preparation <strong>of</strong> NiCe mixed oxides for catalyticdecomposition <strong>of</strong> N 2 O, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol.52, No. 12, pp. 4504-4509, 2013.[7] G.K. Pradhan, S.Martha, K.M. Parida: Synthesis <strong>of</strong>multifunctional nanostructured zinc-iron mixedoxide photocatalysts by a simple solutioncombustiontechnique, Appl. Mater. Interface, Vol.4, No. 2, pp. 707-713, 2012.[8] G. Lauramoy, R. Carbonio, E.L. Moyano: Mixedoxides as highly selective catalysts for the flashpyrolysis <strong>of</strong> phenacyl benzotriazole: One-potsynthesis <strong>of</strong> dibenzazepin-7-one, ACS Catal DOI:10.1021/cs3008335, April 3, 2013.[9] S.M.A. Shibli, J.N. Sebeelamol: Development <strong>of</strong>Fe 2 O 3 -TiO 2 mixed oxide incorporated Ni-P coatingfor electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction,Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, pp. 2271-2282,2012.[10] P. Balaz, M. Achimovicova, M. Balaz, P. Billik, Z.Cherkezova-Zheleva, J.M. Criado, F. Delogu, E.Dutkova, E. Gaffet, F.J. Gotor, R. Kumar, I. Mitov,T. Rojac, M. Senna, A. Streletskii, K. Wieczorek-Ciurowa: Hallmarks <strong>of</strong> mechanochemistry:fromnanoparticles to technology, Chem. Soc. Rev., DOI:10.1039/c3cs35468g, pp. 1-67, 2013.[11] P. Balaz: Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience andMineral Engineering, Springer-Verlag, BerlinHeidelberg, 2008.[12] A.M. Al-Saie, A. Al-Shater, S. Arekat, A. Jaffar, M.Bououdina: Effect <strong>of</strong> annealing <strong>of</strong> the structure andmagnetic properties <strong>of</strong> mechanically milled TiO 2 -Fe 2 O 3 mixture, Ceramics International, Vo. 39, pp.3803-3808, 2013.[13] K.M. Shrestha, C.M. Sorensen, K.J. Klabunde:MgO-TiO 2 mixed oxide nanoparticles: Comparison<strong>of</strong> flame synthesis versus aerogel method;characterization and photocatalytic activities,Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Research Vol. 28, No, 3, pp.431-439, 2013.[14] M. Fabian, A. Eliyas, N.G. Kostova, J. Brianchn, P.Balaz: Photocatalytic activity <strong>of</strong> nanocrystallineghanite (ZnAl 2 O 4 ) synthesized by ball milling, Microand Nano Technology, <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> InternationalMultidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM2012, 17-23 June 2012, Albena, BulgariaBulgaria,Vol. III, pp. 391-497, ISSN: 1314-1314-2704.[15] Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, T. Shishido, T. Takehira:Characterization <strong>of</strong> iron-containing MCM-41 andits catalytic properties, J. Catal. Vol. 209, pp. 186-196, 2002.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 57


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacWEAR OF POLISHED STEEL SURFACES IN DRY FRICTIONLINEAR CONTACT ON POLIMER COMPOSITES WITH GLASSFIBRESDorin Rus 1 Lucian Capitanu 21 Mechanical Departament, Institute <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, 59 Plevnei Way, 050141, Bucharest, Romania, e-dorinrus@gmail.com2* Institute <strong>of</strong> Solid Mechanics <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, 15 Constantin Mille, 010141, Bucharest, Romanialuciancapitanu@yahoo.comAbstract: It is generally known that the friction and wear between polymers and polished steel surfaces has aspecial character, the behaviour to friction and wear <strong>of</strong> a certain polymer might not be valid for a differentpolymer, moreover in dry friction conditions. In this paper, we study the reaction to wear <strong>of</strong> certain polymerswith short glass fibres on different steel surfaces, considering the linear friction contact, observing thefriction influence over the metallic surfaces wear. The paper includes also its analysis over the steel’s wearfrom different points <strong>of</strong> view: the reinforcement content influence and tribological parameters (load, contactpressure, sliding speed, contact temperature, etc.). Thus, we present our findings related to the fact that theabrasive component <strong>of</strong> the friction force is more significant than the adhesive component, which generally isspecific to the polymers’ friction. Our detections also state that, in the case <strong>of</strong> the polyamide with 30% glassfibres, the steel surface linear wear rate order are <strong>of</strong> 10 -4 mm/h, respectively the order <strong>of</strong> volumetric wearrate is <strong>of</strong> 10 -6 cm 3 /h. The resulting volumetric wear coefficients are <strong>of</strong> the order (10 -11 – 10 -12 ) cm 3 /cm andrespectively linear wear coefficients <strong>of</strong> 10 -9 mm/cm.Keywords: wear, composite thermoplastics, comparative wearing coefficient.1. INTRODUCTIONThe tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> polymers hasdistinctive characteristics, some <strong>of</strong> them beingdescribed by Bowden and Tabor [1]. The mainconcept related to the polymers’ tribology iscomposed <strong>of</strong> three basic elements involved infriction: (i) junctions adhesion, their type andresistance; (ii) materials’ shearing and fracturethrough friction during the contact; and (iii) the realcontact area.Friction’s straining component results from thepolymer’s resistance to “ploughing” made by theasperities existing on the harder counter-face. Thepolymer’s surface asperities bear elastic, plastic andviscous-elastic strains, according to the material’sproperties. Friction adhesion component comes out<strong>of</strong> the adhesion junctions formed on the real contactspots between the paired surfaces. Friction adhesioncomponent in what the polymers are concerned isconsidered to be much greater than the strainingcomponent. Special attention should be granted tothe transfer films, these transfer films being the keyfactors determining the tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong>polymers and polymeric composites. In what theglass fibers reinforced polymer is concerned, wealso encounter a strong abrasive component [2].Several models were developed to describe thecontact adhesion. The Johnson-Kendall-Roberts(JKR) model, mentioned sometimes as the contactmechanics model [3-4] and the Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) model [5] are the best known. Themodels’ comparative analysis [6] shows that theJKR model is applied to bodies with micrometricdimensions and larger than that, with polymerproperties, whilst the DMT model is valid forbodies with nanometer dimensions, with metalproperties.Several authors [7-17] studied the polymers’friction on hard surfaces. By using the method <strong>of</strong>58 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


contact’s conformity [18] they obtain the hardness,the deformability value (index) (which describesthe coarse surfaces’ deformation properties), aswell as the elasticity module for organic polymerspolymethylmethacrylate – PMMA; polystyrene –PS; polycarbonate – PC, ultra high molecularweight polyethylene – UHMWPE. We alsodescribe the dependence <strong>of</strong> the imposed penetrationdepth, the maximum load and the straining speed,the hardness and the elastic modulus [18-22]. Thetypical penetrating depths are included within theapproximate 10 nm to 10 μm range, whilst theapplied loads are smaller than 300 mN.We can observe the fact that almost withoutexception, the ploughing is accompanied byadhesion and in certain conditions it may lead tomicro-cutting, which represents a supplementaryadding to increase the friction force.There are other mechanisms to dissipate theenergy while straining. For instance, whenever apolymer with viscous-elastic reaction slides on ahard surface, the energy dissipation is caused by thehigh losses through hysteresis. This strainingcomponent is known under the name <strong>of</strong> friction dueto elastic hysteresis [1]. The energy can, as well, betransported further, for instance through elasticwaves generated at the interface and coming out atinfinit, as, a nucleation and micro-cracksdevelopment within the material, consequence [20].The mechanical component consists in theresistance <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>ter material to harder asperities’ploughing. The adhesion component comes <strong>of</strong> theadhesion links formed between the surfaces duringthe friction contact. We believe that for polymersthe adhesion molecular component exceeds by farthe mechanical one [20], and we can explain itthrough the generated films’ transfer on the metalcounter-face. The following factors considerablyaffect the friction force: the contact load, slidingspeed and temperature. The effects are notindependent. For instance, according to the contactload and contact speed, the temperature mayconsiderably vary, changing the friction mode [21].2. MATERIALS AND METHODSIn order to study the metallic counter-part’swear in dry contact with glass fibres reinforcedplastic materials we use Timken type frictioncouples (with linear contact), cylinder on plan,which allows us to attain high contact pressures,hence high contact temperatures. In this manner wenotice, whether and in which conditions the plasticmaterial transfer on the metallic surface appears, aswell as the influence <strong>of</strong> the glass fibres fillingduring this phenomenon, and its effect on thesurface’s wear. As we do not follow the polymer’swear, but only the polymer’s friction influence,over the samples’ metallic surfaces wear, we usethe unidirectional sliding movement.We perform the tests using experimentalequipment containing a Timken type linear contactfriction couple, continuously controlling the normaland friction loads, and contact temperature. Theunidirectional movement and the linear contactallow us to attain very high contact pressures andtemperatures. We build the friction couple out <strong>of</strong> aplastic cylinder Nylonplast AVE polyamide + 30%glass fibres, which rotates at different speedsagainst the polished surface <strong>of</strong> a steel plan disk.The cylinder has an outer diameter <strong>of</strong> 22.5 mm and10 mm height.We choose as sample steel disks with 18.2 mmdiameter and 3 mm thickness. We polish the disks’surfaces successively using sandpaper <strong>of</strong> differentgranulations (200, 400, 600 and 800) and, finally,we polish them on the felt with diamond paste. Weobtain mirror polished surfaces, with roughness R a<strong>of</strong> 0.05 µm. This metal surface’s quality allows usto eliminate the influence <strong>of</strong> the metallic surface’sstate on the friction coefficient’s evolution andvisualization, to make measurements using opticalmicroscopy and to accurately record the wear tracesappeared on the metallic surfaces.Fig.1 shows the friction couple (a) and itsinstallation within the experimental equipment (b).(a)Figure 1. Friction couple (a) and its installation in theexperimental equipment (b), where 1 - cylindrical liner;2 – steel disk sample; 3 – nut; 4 – hole; 5 - knife-edge.The friction couple is build out <strong>of</strong> a cylindricalliner (1) and a plane disk type sample (2). The lineris fixed with the help <strong>of</strong> a nut (3) on the drivingshaft (4), and the disk sample is placed in a specialhole made within the elastic blade (5). We build thesample disk base in such a manner so that the baseallows the sample to make small rotations aroundthe edge <strong>of</strong> a knife fixed in the sample’s bezel,perpendicularly on the driving arbour. In this waywe ensure a uniform repartition <strong>of</strong> the load on theentire linear contact between the liner and steelsample, even if there are small building orassembling imperfections. An electric engine putsthe shaft into a rotation movement using trapezoidaltransmission belts.The experimental device allows us tosimultaneously measure the normal and tangential(b)13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 59


(friction) efforts through resistive converter straingauges,assembled on the elastic blade (5). The use<strong>of</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> converters strain-gauges connectedwithin the circuits <strong>of</strong> two strain-gauges bridges,<strong>of</strong>fers us the possibility to make simultaneousmeasurements, while separately, gives us thepossibility to measure the normal and frictionforces. We apply the normal load to the elasticblade, through a calibrated spring system. Theinstallation allows us to register the friction forceon an X-Y recorder. We control the tests’ durationthrough an alarm clock and we measure the contacttemperature with the help <strong>of</strong> a miniaturethermocouple, connected to a millivoltmetercalibrated in 0 C.I used the uni-directional testing because thepurpose <strong>of</strong> investigations was the study <strong>of</strong> metallicsurface wear. We perform the tests, based onHooke's law, at normal loadings <strong>of</strong> 10; 20; 30; 40and 50 N, loadings which are adequate to somecontact pressures all calculated considering theelastic contact hypothesis, that is: 16.3; 23.5; 28.2;32.6 and 36.4 MPa (for Nylonplast AVE polyamidewith 30% glass fibres) respectively, we use slidingspeeds, adequate to the diameter <strong>of</strong> the plasticcomposite sample, which are: 0.1856; 0.2785;0.3713; 0.4641; 0.5570; 1.114 and 1.5357 m/s, andwhich resulted as a consequence <strong>of</strong> electric motor’sspeed and the belt pulleys’ primitive diameters.As we know [21], we may characterize amaterial’s wearing coefficient (percentage) bywearing factor k. Archard’s relation defines thisfactor:V u kNvt(1)where: V u – the wear’s material volume; N - the testload; v - the sliding speed; t - the test period; k –volumetric wearing factor.By dividing both <strong>of</strong> this relation’s terms (4) bynominal contact area A, we obtain:Which means that:V u/ A kNvt / A(2)h u* k pvt(3)where: h u - wear’s material depth; p - the pressureon the nominal contact area and k * is the linearwearing factor. Relation (6) expresses a general law<strong>of</strong> the wear as a function <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure pand the length <strong>of</strong> the wearing path, so that L f vt.We could then write:respectively:k V / Nvt V / NL(4)uuf*k hu/ pvt hu/ pL(5)fConsidering the large area <strong>of</strong> the load (N) orpressure (p) and the relative speed values usedduring tests in order to evaluate the wearingreaction <strong>of</strong> the metallic counter-pieces amid thefrictional couples, we use comparative wearcoefficients K and K * , defined by:and:K V / L kN (cm 3 / cm) (6)K*uf* h / L k p (cm / cm) (7)ufWe consider these wearing coefficients withrespect to the period in which the frictional couplefunctions at different sliding speeds, under certainloading conditions (contact pressure).The main objectives <strong>of</strong> these tests are thedetermination <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> material removedby wearing, the mean depth <strong>of</strong> the wearied layers,the frictional factors and coefficients, for differentloading conditions.Coefficients k and k * are coefficients <strong>of</strong> the wearprocess, while the comparative factors K and K * arecoefficients <strong>of</strong> this process’s consequences, that is,the amount <strong>of</strong> resulted wear and reported to thelength <strong>of</strong> the friction pathway. They can bequalitatively expressed in units <strong>of</strong> wear volume ona measure <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the friction pathway (cm 3/ cm), as wear’s depth on a measure <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong>the friction pathway (cm / cm) or as wear’s weighton a measure <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the sliding frictionpathway (mg / cm). Coefficients K and K * have nomathematical implication (can not simplify).Using the procedure described in [22], at the endwe obtain the mean depth (8) and the volume <strong>of</strong>worn metallic material (9):and:Vu2l/ 8r10,527NE1 E2LE1E2h (8)n i1Siqi0.351E1 E2Nlm/ E1E2(9)where l m is the mean width <strong>of</strong> the wear imprint.Practically, we have to measure the width <strong>of</strong>wear imprints in three points established before,computing then the mean value <strong>of</strong> this width. Withthis value we can obtain the volume <strong>of</strong> wornmetallic material V u and the removed layer’s meandepth h mu .We study the wearing <strong>of</strong> the friction couple’smetallic component on linear contact Timkenmachinery, see Fig. 1. Almost all tests are madewithout lubricating the frictional surfaces, but thereare also tests with micro-lubricating.60 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


In order to calculate the metallic component’swear, we use the method described above. Theequations (8) and (9) take into consideration, for thestudied materials, particular forms obtained byintroducing the interfering parameters numericalvalues, thus obtaining for a mean depth h mu and aworn material volume V u the following relations: Nylonplast AVE polyamide + 30% glass fibres/ steel:25h l 8r 6.94 10N (mm) (10)mum14V u 4.5510Nl m(mm 3 ) (11)The studies concerning the metallic semi-couplewear are generally based on the elastic contacthypothesis. For these plane half-couple the valuesfor the equivalent elasticity module for NylonplastAVE polyamide + 30% glass fibres, E = 20.25MPa. Assuming that the plastic liner does notcrush, we impose the condition p max 0.5H,where H stands for the Brinell hardness. Therequired condition allows us to establish thefollowing values <strong>of</strong> the maximum loadings (contactpressure) <strong>of</strong> the couple:p 1 = 16.3 MPa; p 2 = 23.5 MPa; p 3 = 28.2 MPa;p 4 = 32.6 MPa; p 5 = 36.4 Mpa.We perform the experimental tests consideringbroader domains to vary the relative speed andnormal loadings, or contact pressures. We usecouples with liner made from thermoplasticmaterial with linear contact on a steel surface(C120, Rp3, a.s.o.).Table 1. The results <strong>of</strong> the experimental tests performed inorder to determine the wear rate <strong>of</strong> metallic component.Frictional couple: Polyamide Nylonplast AVE +30% glassfibres / C120; ν = 18.56 cm/s.N (N)) t (hour)10 110 120 120 130 130 140 140 150 150 1Average wear rateh mu (10 -4 mm/h) V mu (10 -6 cm 3 /h)0.9649 0.13872.4798 0.44044.0336 0.83815.4874 1.30867,1635 1.8667(a)3. RESULTSTable 1 is the representation <strong>of</strong> the experimentaltests results, testing two friction couples, for one <strong>of</strong>the 8 different relative sliding speeds used. Table 1represents the results <strong>of</strong> the tribologicalexperimental tests, e.g. the mean values <strong>of</strong> the wearimprint depth h u (10 −4 mm), and the average values<strong>of</strong> the worn material volume V u (10 −6 cm 3 ). Theaverage width l m represents the arithmetical averagecalculated based upon 3 measured values <strong>of</strong> thewear trace’s width. By dividing h u and V u to theduration <strong>of</strong> experimental test, we obtain the values<strong>of</strong> the wear rate in terms <strong>of</strong> depth h mu (10 −4 mm/h)and volume V mu (10 −6 cm 3 /h).Based upon the methodology described above,we process the results obtaining the variationcurves <strong>of</strong> the wear with normal loading and relativespeed, presented in Fig. 2 (a) and (b), for two <strong>of</strong> thetested couples, Nyloplast AVE Polyamide + 30%glass fibres / C120 steel, and respectively NyloplastAVE Polyamide + 30% glass fibres / Rp 3 steel.(b)Figure 2. The results <strong>of</strong> variation curves <strong>of</strong> the wearvolume with normal loading and relative speed, fortested couples (a) Nyloplast AVE Polyamide + 30%glass fibres/ C120 steel and (b) Nyloplast AVEPolyamide + 30% glass fibres/ Rp 3 steel. Measurementerrors were ±1.5 %.These curves characterize only the testedfrictional couples (one combination <strong>of</strong> materials).Furthermore, we can make the comparativeevaluation <strong>of</strong> different couples only qualitatively.Thus, using relations (8) and (9) we obtain thevariation curves <strong>of</strong> the "comparative wearcoefficients" (as volume and depth), K (cm 3 / cm)and K * (mm / cm). These master-curves are plottedin Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 representing the two tested and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 61


taken into discussion couples, for different normalloading values.While measuring the wear traces widths with thehelp <strong>of</strong> optical microscopy, we also takemicrophotographs, in order to identify the plasticK(10 -11 cm 3 /cm)1.6y = 1.587e NYLONPLAST AVE+30% glass/C120material’s transfer and the metallic surfaces’ wear-0.009xNYLONPLAST AVE+30% glass/Rp3y = 1.395emechanisms. These microphotographs prove that-0.009x1.4y = 1.138ethe wear mechanisms vary from one couple to-0.009x- N = 10 N1.2another, due to surfaces’ nature: metallic andy = 1.020e -0.010x- N = 20 N- N = 30 Ncomposite plastic material, especially their hardness1y = 0.8739e -0.009x- N = 40 N(59 HRC for C120 hardened steel and 62 HRC fory = 0.803e -0.011x0.8Rp3 hardened steel), the glass fibres content, 30%and 20%, the composite plastic materials’ elastoplasticcharacteristics while in contact with metallic0.6y = 0.664e -0.013x0.4surfaces. he glass-fibres torn from the polymermatrix.0.2y = 0.424e -0.019xv(cm/s)00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130Figure 3. The variation curves <strong>of</strong> the volumetriccomparative wear coefficients K (cm 3 / cm).NYLONPLAST AVE+30% glass/C120K*(10 -9 mm/cm)12NYLONPLAST AVE+30% glass/Rp310y = 12.608e -0.0253x(a)- N = 20 N8y = 8.4032e -0.0249x- N = 30 N- N = 40 N6y = 5.2364e -0.0253x4y = 8.8046e -0.022x2y = 6.4915e -0.0173xy = 5.4312e -0.0153xv(cm/s)00 10 20 30 40 50 60(b)Figure 5. Wear and plastic material transfer on C120 steelsurface, following the friction with Nylonplast AVE polyamidereinforced with 30% fine glass fibres (a), in experimentalconditions: v = 27,85 cm/s; N =20 N; T = 150 0 C; t = 60 minand (b) in experimental conditions v = 27,85 cm/s; N =30 N; T= 175 0 C; t = 60 min.Considering the same loading conditions, thetwo couples to which we make reference have adifferent behaviour. On C120 steel sample (Fig. 5),at a normal load <strong>of</strong> 20 N and a contact temperature<strong>of</strong> 150 0 C, there are plastic material transferbridges, broadways on the wear traces (Fig. 5a), aswell as the glass-fibres torn from the polymermatrix. At 1750 C contact temperature,corresponding to a normal load <strong>of</strong> 30 N and acontact pressure <strong>of</strong> 2879.5 MPa, the plastic materialtransfer on the wear trace’s edge is obvious (Fig.5b), leaving the impression that the plastic matrixmelts and drips <strong>of</strong>f on the wear trace’s exit edge.Considering the same mechanical stress40 K = 1.3950 e - 0,0090 v K * = 12,6080 e – 0,0253 v conditions (load and relative speed), theFigure 4 The variation curves <strong>of</strong> the linear comparative wearcoefficients K * (mm / cm).In Table 2 are listed the equations for thecomparative wear coefficients (the volumetric andthe depth ones), for C120 and in Table 3. for Rp3steel.Table 2. The variation curve <strong>of</strong> compatative wear corfficientequations for Nylonplast AVE Polyamide + 30% glassfibres/C120Load (N) K K *10 K = 0.8030 e - 0,0110 v20 K = 0,8739 e – 0,0090 v K * = 5,4312 e – 0,0153 v30 K = 1.1380 e - 0,0090 v K * = 6,4915 e – 0,0173 v40 K = 1.5870 e - 0,0090 v K * = 8,8046 e – 0,0200 vTable 3. The variation curve <strong>of</strong> compatative wear corfficientequations for Nylonplast AVE Polyamide + 30% glass fibres /Rp3Load (N) K K *10 K = 0.4240 e - 0,0190v20 K = 0,6640 e – 0,0130 v K * = 5,2346 e – 0,0253 v30 K = 1.0200 e - 0,0100 v K * = 8,4032 e – 0,0249 v62 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


microscopic inspection <strong>of</strong> the Rp3 steel samples,while in friction contact, with the same compositeplastic material, reveals a less pronounced plasticmaterial transfer through adherence onto themetallic surface, visible on the left side in Figs 6 (a)and 6 (b), and if the test duration is double (120min), practically there is no plastic material transferas one can see in Fig 6 (c).(a)v= 27,85 cm/s; N =40 N; t = 60 min;T=217 0 C(b)v = 27,85 cm/s N =30 N; t = 120 min;T= 175 0 C(c)v = 27,85 cm/s; N =40 N; t = 120 min;T =237 0 CFigure 6. Wear and plastic material transfer on Rp3 steelsurface, following the friction with Nylonplast AVE polyamidereinforced with 30% short glass fibres.We consider that due to high registered contacttemperature (237 0 C) the transfer takes place forsure, but the transferred material is subsequentlyremoved through friction from the contact area,under the form <strong>of</strong> wear particles following the glassfibres abrasive action. After this stage, the abrasivewear due to glass fibres becomes predominant.It is possible that the less pronounced plasticmaterial transfer emphasized on the Rp3 steelsurfaces to be due to this steel’s chemicalcomposition and structure.We detect the same findings in the case <strong>of</strong> Norylpolyamide +20% glass fibres in friction on thesame steels, but to a lesser scale. In the case <strong>of</strong>Lexan 3412 polycarbonate reinforced with 20%glass fibres friction onto the same metallic surfacesand considering the same stress conditions,generally speaking there is no plastic materialtransfer. The transfer appears only if the loadreaches 40 N, which corresponds to a contactpressure <strong>of</strong> 3449.7 MPa, and when the contacttemperature reaches 251 0 C. We do consider thatprobably the polycarbonate has a lesser transfercapacity than the polyamide.4. DISCUSSIONThe wear’s rate values, considering the usedexperimental conditions, cover a large range. Forgreater clarity, they are presented in Table 4.Comparing the metallic element’s wear ratesvalues at v = 46.41 cm/s and N = 40 N, it resultsthat the polyamide reinforced with 30% glass fibresinduces to the C120 steel a wear <strong>of</strong> approximately1.110 times more higher than to the Rp3 steel. Wedo estimate that this phenomenon is due to Rp3samples’ higher hardness (62 HRC), in comparisonto those from C120 (59 HRC).Table 4. The variation curve <strong>of</strong> compatative wear corfficientequations for Nylonplast AVE Polyamide + 30% glassfibres/Rp3Friction coupleVolumetric wearrate ( 10 -6 cm 3 /h)Linear wear rate(10 -4 mm/h)v = (18.56 - 46.41) cm/s; N = 10 – 50 NPolyamide + 30% 0.139 – 1.621 0.965 – 8.549glass fibres/ C120Polyamide + 30% 0.214 – 1.369 2.382 – 6.004glass fibres / Rp 3Polycarbonate +20% glass fibres /C1200.244 – 1.309 3.592 – 6.366v = (46.41 - 111.4) cm/sPolyamide + 20% 0.440 – 2.578 3,269 – 6,794glass fibres / C120Polyamide + 20%glass fibres / Rp 30,473 – 2,549 3.792 – 6.627Normal loads and corresponding contactpressures for the linear friction contact used duringthis research, lead to very high contact temperatures(180-240 0 C) according to the applied normal loadand relative sliding speed (see also Fig. 6a).In several cases they exceed the polymer’smelting temperature, thus being transferred on themetallic surface together with glass fibresfragments. Part <strong>of</strong> the glass fibres is smashed andstill produced a predominant abrasive wear <strong>of</strong> themetallic sample’s contact area, while another part ispushed out on the contact’s exit edge, together witha multitude <strong>of</strong> ejected glass fibres.We notice that only in the case <strong>of</strong> the frictioncouple Nyloplast AVE Polyamide + 30% glassfibres / C120 steel, there is a large plastic materialtransfer onto the metallic surface, which justifiesthe assertion that the transfer through adhesiondepends on the nature and characteristics <strong>of</strong> thecontact materials. From a qualitative point <strong>of</strong> view,obviously there is the fact that initially the wearprocess manifests itself as a wear throughadherence and polymer transfer onto the metallicsurface, which subsequently transforms itself into aprocess <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear, which leads to the plasticmaterial removal clung onto the contact area. Inwhat the friction couples are concerned – also seeFig. 6a.The process’ intensity depends on the fibres’content. The larger it is, the higher the intensity is.Metallic surface mechanical properties (especiallythe hardness), has a distinct influence over theplastic material transfer and metallic surface wear.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 63


5. CONCLUSIONThe diagrams’ analysis plotted in Figs. 3 and 4allows us to establish the variation equations for thecomparative volumetric wear coefficient K and forthe comparative depth wear coefficient K * , for steelin linear contact, while in friction with glassreinforced thermoplastics.The equations listed in Table 2 and 3, for thecomparative wear coefficients (the volumetric andthe depth ones), show that the variation is not alinear one, these coefficients evolvingexponentially. We also notice that the decrease <strong>of</strong>the K * coefficient with the increase <strong>of</strong> relative speedis faster than the decrease <strong>of</strong> the K coefficient.We consider that this effect is due to the factthat the thermoplastic material deforms under loadwhich means that for Timken type couples theincrease <strong>of</strong> the wear imprint width is more effectivethan that <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> the wear imprint. From thediagrams plotted here, one can notice that thevalues <strong>of</strong> wear coefficients for the metalliccomponent <strong>of</strong> the couple glass reinforcedthermoplastic/steel are in the domain (10 −11 ÷ 10 −12 )cm 3 /cm and respectively 10 −9 mm/cm. Thecomparative wearing coefficients and their mastercurvesvs. relative speed have a special importancefrom the practical point <strong>of</strong> view. Based on thesefindings we can establish an optimal couple <strong>of</strong>materials from the design phase.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank the RomanianAcademy for its material and technical support<strong>of</strong>fered in order to achieve these researches.REFERENCES[1] F.P. Bowden, D. Tabor. The Friction andLubrication <strong>of</strong> Solids, part I-II, Clarendon Press,Oxford,1964.[2] B. J. Briscoe, in: Friction and Wear <strong>of</strong> PolymerComposites, Ed. F. Klaus, Elsevier, Amsterdam,p. 25, 1986.[3] K.L. Johnson, K. Kendall and A. D. Roberts,Surface Energy and the Contact <strong>of</strong> Elastic Solids.Proc. Roy. Soc. A324, 301 1971.[4] K.L. Johnson, Contacts Mechanics, (CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, 1987.[5] B. V. Deryagin, V. M. Muller and Yu. P. Toporov.Adhesive Contact Deformation <strong>of</strong> a SingleMicroelastic Sphere. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 53,314 1975.[6] K. L. Jonson and J. A. Greenwood. An AdhesionMap for the Contact <strong>of</strong> Elastic Spheres J. ColloidInterf. Sci., 192, 326, 1997.[7] D. Maugis, Adhesion <strong>of</strong> spheres: The JKR – DMTtransition using a Dugdale model. J. Colloid Interf.Sci., 150, 243 (1992).[8] I.V. Kragelskii, Friction and Wear (PergamonPress, Elmsford, 1982).[9] N.K. Myshkin, A.V. Kovalev. Adhesion andFriction <strong>of</strong> Polymers, in PolymerTribology. ImperialCollege Press, London, 2009.[10] V. E. Starzhynsky, A. M. Farberov, S. S. Pesetskii,S. A. Osipenko and V. A. Braginsky, PrecisionPlastic Parts and Thei Production Technology,(Nauka I Tekhnika, Minsk, 1992) (in Russian).[11] B. J. Briscoe, Wear <strong>of</strong> polymers: an essay onfundamental aspects. Tribology Int., 14, 231, 1998.[12] G. Jintang, Tribochemical effects in formation <strong>of</strong>polymer transfer film. Wear, 245, 100, 2000.[13] H. Unal, U. Sen and A. Mimaroglu, Friction andwear behavior <strong>of</strong> unfilled engineeringthermoplastics. 183–187. Tribol. Int., 37, 727 2004.[14] H. Unal and A. Mimaroglu, Sliding friction andwear behaviour <strong>of</strong> polytetrafluoroethylene and itscomposites under dry conditions. Mater. Des., 24(2003), 239–245Mater. Des., 24, 183 (2003).[15] Y.K. Chen, O.P. Modi, A.S. Mhay, A. Chrysanthou,J.M. O’Sullivan, The effect <strong>of</strong> different metalliccounterface materials and different surfacetreatments on the wear and friction <strong>of</strong> polyamide 66and its composite in rolling–sliding contact. Wear255, 714 (2003)[16] C.J. Schwartz and S. Bahadur: The role <strong>of</strong> fillerdeformability, filler–polymer bonding, andcounterface material on the tribological behavior <strong>of</strong>polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Wear, 251, 1532 2001.[17] Y.M. Xu, B.G. Mellor: The effect <strong>of</strong> fillers on thewear resistance <strong>of</strong> thermoplastic polymericcoatings. Wear, 251, 1522 2001.[18] B.J. Briscoe, L. Fiori, E. Pelillo, Nano-indentation<strong>of</strong> polymeric Surfaces. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 31,2395, 1998.[19] H. Shulga, A. Kovalev, N. Myshkin, V.V. Tsukruk,Some aspects <strong>of</strong> AFM nanomechanical probing <strong>of</strong>surface polymer films. European Polymer Journal,40, 949, 2004.[20] A. Kovalev, H. Shulga, M. Lemieux, N. Myshkin,V.V. Tsukruk, Nano-mechanical probing <strong>of</strong> layerednanoscale polymer films with atomic forcemicroscopy. J. Mater. Res., 19, 716, 2004.[21] G.M. Bartenev, V.V. Lavrentev, Friction and Wear<strong>of</strong> Polymers, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981).[22] L. Capitanu, A. Iarovici, J. Onisoru – On polyamideand polycarbonate materials behaviour under dryfriction, The Annals <strong>of</strong> University “Dunarea de jos”Galati, fascicle VIII, Tribology, 2003, ISSN 1221-459064 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FRICTIONCOEFFICIENT AND WEAR RATE OF COMPOSITE MATERIALSSLIDING AGAINST SMOOTH AND ROUGH MILD STEELCOUNTERFACESMohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury 1 *, Dewan Muhammad Nuruzzaman 2 , Biplov Kumar Roy 1 ,Sohel Samad 1 , Rayhan Sarker 1 , Abul Hasnat Mohammad Rezwan 11 Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Dhaka University <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh,*asadzmn2003@yahoo.com2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang, MalaysiaAbstract: In the present study, friction coefficient and wear rate <strong>of</strong> gear fiber reinforced plastic (gear fiber)and glass fiber reinforced plastic (glass fiber) sliding against mild steel are investigated experimentally. Inorder to do so, a pin on disc apparatus is designed and fabricated. Experiments are carried out when smoothor rough mild steel pin slides on gear fiber and glass fiber disc. Experiments are conducted at normal load 10,15 and 20 N, sliding velocity 1, 1.5 and 2 m/s and relative humidity 70%. Variations <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient withthe duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing at different normal loads and sliding velocities are investigated. Results show thatfriction coefficient is influenced by duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing, normal load and sliding velocity. In general, frictioncoefficient increases for a certain duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing and after that it remains constant for the rest <strong>of</strong> theexperimental time. The obtained results reveal that friction coefficient decreases with the increase in normalload for gear fiber and glass fiber mating with smooth or rough mild steel counterface. On the other hand, it isalso found that friction coefficient increases with the increase in sliding velocity for both <strong>of</strong> the tested materials.Moreover, wear rate increases with the increase in normal load and sliding velocity. The magnitudes <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient and wear rate are different depending on sliding velocity and normal load for both smooth andrough counterface pin materials.Keywords: Friction coefficient, wear rate, gear fiber, glass fiber, mild steel, normal load, sliding velocity.1. INTRODUCTIONNumerous investigations have been carried outon friction and wear <strong>of</strong> different materials underdifferent operating conditions. Several researchers[1-6] observed that the friction force and wear ratedepend on roughness <strong>of</strong> the rubbing surfaces,relative motion, type <strong>of</strong> material, temperature,normal force, relative humidity, vibration, etc. Theparameters that dictate the tribological performance<strong>of</strong> polymer and its composites include polymermolecular structure, processing and treatment,properties, viscoelastic behavior, surface texture,etc. [7-10]. There have been also a number <strong>of</strong>investigations exploring the influence <strong>of</strong> testconditions, contact geometry and environment onthe friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> polymers andcomposites. [11-13] reported that the tribologicalbehavior <strong>of</strong> polyamide, high density polyethyleneand their composites is greatly affected by normalload, sliding speed and temperature. [14-15]showed that applied load and sliding speed playsignificant role on the wear behavior <strong>of</strong> polymerand composites. They also showed that applied loadhas more effect on the wear than the speed forcomposites. Experiments were carried out onfriction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> poly-ether-imide andits composites under different operating conditions[16-19]. Polymers and its composites areextensively used in sliding/rolling components suchas gears, cams, bearings, rollers, transmission beltsand grinding mills where their self-lubricatingproperties are exploited to avoid the need for oil orgrease lubrication with its attendant problems <strong>of</strong>13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 65


contamination [20,21]. However, when the contactbetween sliding pairs is present, there is theproblem <strong>of</strong> friction and wear. [22-24] demonstratedthat the friction coefficient can, generally, bereduced and the wear resistance increased byselecting the right material combinations.It was reported [25-27] that the influence <strong>of</strong> slidingspeed on friction and wear <strong>of</strong> polymer and itscomposite is greater than that <strong>of</strong> applied load thoughsome other researchers have different views. Unal etal. [28,29]reported that the applied load exerts greaterinfluence on the sliding wear <strong>of</strong> polymer and itscomposites than the sliding speed. Transfer film hasimportant effects on the tribological behavior <strong>of</strong>polymer and its’ composite. If the transfer film is thin,uniform and continuous, the wear loss and the frictioncoefficient are low [30]. The results by [31, 32]showed that tribological performance <strong>of</strong> polymermaterial can be improved significantly by fibrereinforcement or fillers. The reason was that thetransfer films formed and adhered close on the surface<strong>of</strong> counterface material during friction which resultedin the increase in wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the composites[31,10]. It was showed [33] that reinforcement <strong>of</strong>fibre or filler significantly improves the tribologicalbehavior <strong>of</strong> polymeric material but this is notnecessarily true for all cases. Franklin [34] reportedthat wear behavior <strong>of</strong> polymers under dryreciprocating sliding conditions does not alwaysfollow the generally accepted engineering rule <strong>of</strong>‘higher sliding speed, the higher wear rate’. Theinfluence <strong>of</strong> normal load on the friction coefficientand wear rate <strong>of</strong> different polymer and compositematerials was investigated [35]and it was found thatthe values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient and wear rate aredifferent for different materials. Several researchers[36-39] reported that friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> polymersand its composites rubbing against metal increases ordecreases depending on the range <strong>of</strong> sliding speed andsliding pairs. Researchers [40-43] have also observedthat the friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> polymers and itscomposites rubbing against metals decreases with theincrease in load though some other researchers havedifferent views. It was showed [45-47] that value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient increases with the increase in load.Friction coefficient and specific wear rate values fordifferent combinations <strong>of</strong> polymer and its compositewere obtained and compared [27]. For all materialcombinations, it was observed that the coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction decreases linearly with the increase in appliedpressure values. Unal et al. [37,29] reported that theapplied load exerts greater influence on the slidingwear <strong>of</strong> polymer and its composite than the slidingvelocity. Friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> glass fiberreinforcedpolyester composite were studied andresults showed that in general, friction and wear arestrongly influenced by all the test parameters such asapplied load, sliding speed, sliding distance and fiberorientations [48]. Moreover, it was found that appliednormal load, sliding speed and fiber orientations havemore pronounced effect on wear rate than slidingdistance. Wang and Li [26] observed that the slidingvelocity has more significant effect on the slidingwear as compared to the applied load and variations <strong>of</strong>wear rate with operating time can be distinguished bythree distinct periods. These periods are running-inperiod, steady state period and severe wear period,respectively. The friction and the wear behavior <strong>of</strong> thepolymeric material depend on the nature, thicknessand stability <strong>of</strong> the transfer film that is formed and onthe properties <strong>of</strong> the metallic counter face material[49]. Yang [50] studied the transfer <strong>of</strong>polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on to 316 stainlesssteel and silicon wafers using infraredspectrophotometry and founds that it was stronglytime and temperature dependent and reached a steadystate after a certain period <strong>of</strong> contact. Tsukizoe andOhmae [33] showed that reinforcement <strong>of</strong> fiber orfiller significantly improve the tribological behavior<strong>of</strong> polymeric material but this is not necessarily truefor all cases. Suresha et al. [38] showed that there is astrong inter-dependence on the friction coefficient andwear loss with respect to the applied loads for steelcomposites contact. It was found that the coefficient<strong>of</strong> friction and wear loss increase with the increase inapplied normal load for all the samples evaluated.From the aforementioned research works, it can beconcluded that friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> compositematerials at different normal loads and slidingvelocities differs significantly. Even now a day, theeffect <strong>of</strong> normal load and sliding velocity on frictioncoefficient and wear rate <strong>of</strong> composite materials suchas gear fiber and glass fiber sliding against differentcounterface surface conditions is less understood. Thismeans that more research work is needed for a betterunderstanding <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient and wear rate <strong>of</strong>these materials under different normal loads andsliding velocities for smooth and rough mild steelcounterfaces. Therefore, in order to understand moreclearly, in this study experiments are carried out toinvestigate the influence <strong>of</strong> normal loads and slidingvelocities on friction coefficient and wear rate <strong>of</strong> gearfiber and glass fiber. The effects <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing on friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> these materials arealso examined in this study.2. EXPERIMENTALA schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> the experimental set-upis shown in Fig. 1 i.e. a pin which can slide on arotating horizontal surface (disc). In this set-up acircular test sample (disc) is to be fixed on arotating plate (table) having a long vertical shaftclamped with screw from the bottom surface <strong>of</strong> the66 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


otating plate. The shaft passes through two closefitbush-bearings which are rigidly fixed withstainless steel plate and stainless steel base suchthat the shaft can move only axially and any radialmovement <strong>of</strong> the rotating shaft is restrained by thebush. These stainless steel plate and stainless steelbase are rigidly fixed with four vertical round barsto provide the rigidity to the main structure <strong>of</strong> thisset-up. The main base <strong>of</strong> the set-up is constructedby 10 mm thick mild steel plate consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 mmthick rubber sheet at the upper side and 20 mmthick rubber block at the lower side. A compoundV-pulley above the top stainless steel plate wasfixed with the shaft to transmit rotation to the shaftfrom a motor. An electronic speed control unit isused to vary the speed <strong>of</strong> the motor as required. A 6mm diameter cylindrical pin whose contacting footis flat, made <strong>of</strong> mild steel, fitted on a holder issubsequently fitted with an arm. The arm is pivotedwith a separate base in such a way that the arm withthe pin holder can rotate vertically and horizontallyabout the pivot point with very low friction. Slidingspeed can be varied by two ways (i) by changingthe frictional radius and (ii) by changing therotational speed <strong>of</strong> the shaft. In this research,sliding speed is varied by changing the rotationalspeed <strong>of</strong> the shaft while maintaining 25 mmconstant frictional radius. To measure the frictionalforce acting on the pin during sliding on therotating plate, a load cell (TML, Tokyo SokkiKenkyujo Co. Ltd, CLS-10NA) along with itsdigital indicator (TML, Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo Co.Ltd, Model no. TD-93A) was used. The coefficient<strong>of</strong> friction was obtained by dividing the frictionalforce by the applied normal force (load). Wear wasmeasured by weighing the test sample with anelectronic balance before and after the test, and thenthe difference in mass was converted to wear rate.To measure the surface roughness <strong>of</strong> the testsamples, Taylor Hobson Precision RoughnessChecker (Surtronic 25) was used. Each test wasconducted for 30 minutes <strong>of</strong> rubbing time with newpin and test sample. Furthermore, to ensure thereliability <strong>of</strong> the test results, each test was repeatedfive times and the scatter in results was small,therefore the average values <strong>of</strong> these test resultswere taken into consideration. The detailexperimental conditions are shown in Table 1.1151617214356131941112789 101 Load arm holder2. Load arm3. Normal load (dead weight)4. Horizontal load (Friction force)5. Pin sample6. Test disc with rotating table7. Load cell indicator8. Belt and pulley9. Motor10. Speed control unit11. Vertical motor base12. 3 mm Rubber pad13. Main shaft14. Stainless steel base15. Stainless steel plate16. Vertical square bar17. Mild steel main base plate18. Rubber block (20 mm thick)19. Pin holder.18Fig. 1. Block diagram <strong>of</strong> the experimental set-up.Table 1. Experimental Conditions.Sl. No. Parameters Operating Conditions1. Normal Load 10, 15, 20 N2. Sliding Velocity 1, 1.5, 2 m/s3. Relative Humidity 70 ( 5)%4. Duration <strong>of</strong> Rubbing 30 minutes5. Surface Condition Dry6. Disc material(i) Gear fiber reinforced Plastic(ii) Glass fiber reinforced plastic7. Roughness <strong>of</strong> Gear and Glass fiber, R a 0.70-0.80 m8. Pin material Mild steel9. Roughness <strong>of</strong> mild steel, R a(a) Smooth counterface: about 0.30 m(b) Rough counterface: about 3.0 m13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 67


3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONFigure 2 shows the variation <strong>of</strong> friction coefficientwith the duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing at different normal loadsfor gear fiber sliding against smooth mild steelconterface. During experiment, the sliding velocityand relative humidity were 1 m/s and 70%respectively. Curves 1, 2 and 3 <strong>of</strong> this figure aredrawn for normal laod 10, 15 and 20 N respectively.Curve 1 <strong>of</strong> this figure shows that during the starting,the value <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient is 0.104 and thenincreases very steadily up to 0.147 over a duration <strong>of</strong>20 minutes <strong>of</strong> rubbing and after that it remainsconstant for the rest <strong>of</strong> the experimental time. Thesefindings are in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong>Chowdhury and Helali [4]. At starting <strong>of</strong> experiment,the friction force is low due to contact betweensuperficial layer <strong>of</strong> pin and disc. As rubbingcontinues, the disc material becomes worn andreinforced material comes in contact with the pin,roughening <strong>of</strong> the disc surface causes the ploughingand hence friction coefficient increases with duration<strong>of</strong> rubbing. After certain duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing theincrease <strong>of</strong> roughness and other parameters may reachto a certain steady value hence the values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient remain constant for the rest <strong>of</strong> the time.Curves 2 and 3 show that for the high normal load, thefriction coefficient is less and the trend in variation <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient is almost the same as for curve 1.From these curves, it is also observed that time toreach steady state values is different for differentnormal load. From the obtained results it is found thatat normal load 10, 15 and 20 N, gear fibre takes 20, 17and 15 minutes respectively to reach steady friction. Itindicates that the higher the normal load, time to reachconstant friction is less. This may be due to the factthat the higher the normal load, the surface roughnessand other parameters take less time to stabilize.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.0510 N15 N20 N0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 2. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different normal loads (sliding velocity: 1m/s, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: gear fiber, pin:mild steel, smooth).Figure 3 shows the effect <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing on the value <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient atdifferent normal loads for gear fiber sliding against123rough mild steel counterface at sliding velocity 1m/s and relative humidity 70%. Curve 1 <strong>of</strong> thisfigure drawn for normal load 10 N, shows thatduring starting <strong>of</strong> the experiment, the value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient is 0.153 which rises for 22minutes to a value <strong>of</strong> 0.195 and then it becomessteady for the rest <strong>of</strong> the experimental time. Almostsimilar trends <strong>of</strong> variation are observed in curves 2and 3 which are drawn for load 15 and 20 Nrespectively. From these curves, it is found thattime to reach steady friction is different fordifferent normal loads. At normal load 10, 15 and20 N, gear fiber-mild steel rough pair takes 22, 19and 16 minutes respectively to reach steady frictionThat is, higher the normal load, gear fiber-mildsteel rough pair takes less time to stabilize.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.0510 N15 N20 N0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 3. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different normal loads (sliding velocity: 1m/s, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: gear fiber, pin:mild steel, rough).Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.0510 N15 N20 N0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 4. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different normal loads (sliding velocity: 1m/s, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: glass fiber, pin:mild steel, smooth).Figure 4 shows the effect <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing on the value <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient atdifferent normal load for glass fiber sliding againstsmooth mild steel counterface. Curve 1 <strong>of</strong> thisfigure drawn for normal load 10 N, shows thatduring starting <strong>of</strong> the experiment, the value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient is 0.123 which rises for 21minutes to a value <strong>of</strong> 0.167 and then it becomessteady for the rest <strong>of</strong> the experimental time. Almost12312368 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


similar trends <strong>of</strong> variation are observed in curves 2and 3 which are drawn for load 15 and 20 N,respectively. From the obtained results, it can alsobe seen that time to reach constant friction isdifferent for different normal load and higher thenormal load, glass fiber takes less time to stabilize.Several experiments are conducted to observethe effect <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing on frictioncoefficient at different sliding speeds for glass fibresliding against rough mild steel counterface andthese results are presented in Figure 5. Curve 1 <strong>of</strong>this figure drawn for normal load 10 N, shows thatduring starting <strong>of</strong> the experiment, the value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient is 0.175 which rises for 22minutes to a value <strong>of</strong> 0.225 and then it becomessteady for the rest <strong>of</strong> the experimental time. Almostsimilar trends <strong>of</strong> variation are observed in curves 2and 3 which are drawn for load 15 and 20 Nrespectively. From these curves, it is found thattime to reach steady friction is different fordifferent normal loads. At normal load 10, 15 and20 N, glass fiber-mild steel rough pair takes 20, 18and 15 minutes respectively to reach steady frictionThat is, higher the normal load, glass fiber-mildsteel rough pair takes less time to stabilize.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.0510 N15 N20 N0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 5. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different normal loads (sliding velocity: 1m/s, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: glass fiber, pin:mild steel, rough).Figure 6 shows comparison <strong>of</strong> the variation <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient with normal load for gear fibermildsteel smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glassfiber-mild steel smooth and glass fiber-mild steelrough sliding pairs. Curves <strong>of</strong> this figure are drawnfrom steady values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient shown inFigures 2-5 for gear fiber-mild steel smooth, gearfiber-mild steel rough, glass fiber-mild steel smoothand glass fiber-mild steel rough sliding pairs,respectively (to ensure the reliability <strong>of</strong> test results,each test was repeated five times and curves 1-3 <strong>of</strong>Figures 2-5 represent average value <strong>of</strong> fiveexperiments). It is shown that the friction coefficientvaries from 0.147 to 0.108, 0.195 to 0.127, 0.167 to0.123 and 0.225 to 0.135 with the variation <strong>of</strong>123normal load from 10 to 20 N for for gear fiber-mildsteel smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glass fibermildsteel smooth and glass fiber-mild steel roughsliding pairs, respectively. From the obtained results,it can be seen that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictiondecreases with the increase in applied load. It isknown that tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> polymers andpolymer composites can be associated with theirviscoelastic and temperature-related properties.Sliding contact <strong>of</strong> two materials results in heatgeneration at the asperities and hence increases intemperature at the frictional surfaces <strong>of</strong> the twomaterials which influences the viscoelastic propertyin the response <strong>of</strong> materials stress, adhesion andtransferring behaviors [27]. From the obtainedresults, it can also be seen that the highest values <strong>of</strong>the friction coefficient are obtained for glass fibermildsteel rough pair and the lowest values <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient are obtained for gear fiber-mildsteel smooth pair. The values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient<strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel rough pair and glass fibermildsteel smooth pair are found in between thehighest and lowest values. It is noted that the frictioncoefficients <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel rough pair arehigher than that <strong>of</strong> glass fiber-mild steel smooth pair.From this figure, it is also found that at identicalconditions, the values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> gearfiber and glass fiber sliding against smooth mildsteel counterface is lower than that <strong>of</strong> gear fiber andglass fiber sliding against rough mild steelcounterface. It was found that after friction tests, theaverage roughness <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel smoothpair, glass fiber-mild steel smooth pair, gear fibermildsteel rough pair and glass fiber-mild steel roughpair varied from 0.95-1.35, 1.25-1.65 and 1.55-1.75and 1.67-1.91 μm respectively.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.05gear fiber-mild steel, smooth pairgear fiber-mild steel, rough pairglass fiber-mild steel, smooth pairglass fiber-mild steel, rough pair0.008 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24Normal load (N)Fig. 6. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> Normal load forgear and glass fiber for different counterface surfaceconditions (Sliding velocity: 1 m/s, relative humidity: 70%).Figures 7, 8, 9 and 10 show the variation <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient with the duration <strong>of</strong> rubbingat different sliding velocities for gear fiber-mildsteel smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glassfiber-mild steel smooth and glass fiber-mild steel13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 69


ough sliding pairs, respectively at normal load15 N and relative humidity 70%. Curves 1, 2 and3 <strong>of</strong> Fig. 7 are drawn for sliding velocity 1, 1.5and 2 m/s respectively. Curve 1 <strong>of</strong> this figureshows that at initial stage <strong>of</strong> rubbing, the value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient is 0.087 which increasesalmost linearly up to 0.123 over a duration <strong>of</strong> 17minutes <strong>of</strong> rubbing and after that it remainsconstant for the rest <strong>of</strong> the experimental time. Atstarting <strong>of</strong> experiment, the friction force is lowdue to contact between superficial layer <strong>of</strong> pinand disc. As rubbing continues, the disc materialbecomes worn and reinforced material comes incontact with the pin, roughening <strong>of</strong> the discsurface causes the ploughing and hence frictioncoefficient increases with duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing.After certain duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing the increase <strong>of</strong>roughness and other parameters may reach to acertain steady value hence the values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient remain constant for the rest <strong>of</strong> thetime. Curves 2 and 3 show that for the highersliding velocity, the friction coefficient is moreand the trend in variation <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient isalmost the same as for curve 1. From thesecurves, it is also observed that time to reachsteady state value is different for different slidingvelocity. From the results it is found that gearfiber-mild steel smooth pair at sliding velocity 1,1.5 and 2 m/s takes to reach constant friction 17,14 and 11 minutes respectively. It indicates thatthe higher the sliding velocity, time to reachconstant friction is less. This may be due to thehigher the sliding velocity, the surface roughnessand other parameters take less time to stabilize.From Figs. 8, 9 and 10, it can be observed thatthe trends in variation <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient withthe duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing are very similar to that <strong>of</strong>Fig. 7 but the values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient aredifferent for gear fiber-mild steel rough pair,glass fiber-mild steel smooth pair and glass fibermildsteel rough pair.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.051 m/s1.5 m/s2 m/s0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 7. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different sliding velocities (normal load: 15N, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: gear fiber, pin:mild steel, smooth).321Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.051 m/s1.5 m/s2 m/s0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 8. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different sliding velocities (normal load: 15N, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: gear fiber, pin:mild steel, rough).Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.051 m/s1.5 m/s2 m/s0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 9. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different sliding velocities (normal load: 15N, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: glass fiber, pin:mild steel, smooth).Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.051 m/s1.5 m/s2 m/s0.000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32Duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing (min)Fig. 10. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing at different sliding velocities (normal load: 15N, relative humidity: 70%, test sample: glass fiber, pin:mild steel, rough).Figure 11 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the variation<strong>of</strong> friction coefficient with sliding speed for gearfiber-mild steel smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough,glass fiber-mild steel smooth and glass fiber-mildsteel rough sliding pairs. Curves <strong>of</strong> this figure aredrawn from steady values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficientshown in Figures 7–10 for gear fiber-mild steel32132132170 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glass fibermildsteel smooth and glass fiber-mild steel roughsliding pairs. It is shown that the friction coefficientvaries from 0.123 to 0.165, 0.143 to 0.189, 0.137 to0.176 and 0.156 to 0.213 with the variation <strong>of</strong>sliding speed from 1 to 2 m/s for gear fiber-mildsteel smooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glassfiber-mild steel smooth and glass fiber-mild steelrough sliding pairs respectively. From these resultsit is seen that the values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficientincrease almost linearly with sliding speed. Thesefindings are in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong>Mimaroglu et al. and Unal et al. [27,28]. With theincrease in sliding speed, the frictional heat maydecrease the strength <strong>of</strong> the materials and hightemperature results in stronger or increasedadhesion with pin [27,51]. The increase <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient with sliding speed can be explained bythe more adhesion <strong>of</strong> counterface pin material ondisc. From the obtained results, it can also be seenthat the highest values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient areobtained for glass fiber-mild steel rough pair andthe lowest values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient are obtainedfor gear fiber-mild steel smooth pair. The values <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel roughpair and glass fiber-mild steel smooth pair arefound in between the highest and lowest values. Itis noted that the friction coefficients <strong>of</strong> gear fibermildsteel rough pair are higher than that <strong>of</strong> glassfiber-mild steel smooth pair. From this figure, it isalso found that at identical conditions, the values <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> gear fiber and glass fibersliding against smooth mild steel counterface islower than that <strong>of</strong> gear fiber and glass fiber slidingagainst rough mild steel counterface. It was foundthat after friction tests, the average roughness <strong>of</strong>gear fiber-mild steel smooth pair, glass fiber-mildsteel smooth pair, gear fiber-mild steel rough pairand glass fiber-mild steel rough pair varied from1.05-1.45, 1.35-1.78 and 1.67-1.88 and 1.76-1.98μm respectively.Friction coefficient0.250.200.150.100.05gear fiber-mild steel, smooth pairgear fiber-mild steel, rough pairglass fiber-mild steel, smooth pairglass fiber-mild steel, rough pair0.000.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5Sliding velocity (m/s)Fig. 11. Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> Normal loadfor gear and glass fiber for different counterface surfaceconditions (normal load: 15 N, relative humidity: 70%).Variations <strong>of</strong> wear rate with normal load forgear fiber and glass fiber sliding against smooth orrough mild steel counterfaces are shown in Fig. 12.The experimental results indicate that the curvesdrawn showing the variation <strong>of</strong> wear rate from0.815 to 1.453, 1.135 to 1.751, 0.929 to 1.553 and1.638 to 2.35 mg/min with the variation <strong>of</strong> normalload from 10 to 20 N for gear fiber-mild steelsmooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glass fibermildsteel smooth and glass fiber-mild steel roughsliding pairs respectively. From these curves, it isobserved that wear rate increases with the increase<strong>of</strong> normal load for all types <strong>of</strong> sliding pairs. Whenthe load on the pin is increased, the actual area <strong>of</strong>contact would increase towards the nominal contactarea, resulting in increased frictional force betweentwo sliding surfaces. The increased frictional forceand real surface area in contact causes higher wear.This means that the shear force and frictional thrustare increased with increase <strong>of</strong> applied load andthese increased in values accelerate the wear rate.Similar trends <strong>of</strong> variation are also observed formild steel–mild steel couples [52], i.e wear rateincreases with the increase in normal load.Wear rate (mg/min)3.02.52.01.51.00.5gear fiber-mild steel, smooth pairgear fiber-mild steel, rough pairglass fiber-mild steel, smooth pairglass fiber-mild steel, rough pair0.08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24Normal load (N)Fig. 12. Wear rate as a function <strong>of</strong> Normal load for gear andglass fiber for different counterface surface conditions(Sliding velocity: 1 m/s, relative humidity: 70%).Figure 12 also shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> thevariation <strong>of</strong> wear rate with normal load for gearfiber and glass fiber under different pin surfaceconditions. From the obtained results, it can also beseen that the highest values <strong>of</strong> the wear rate areobtained for glass fiber-mild steel rough pair andthe lowest values <strong>of</strong> wear rate are obtained for gearfiber-mild steel smooth pair. The values <strong>of</strong> wearrate <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel rough pair and glassfiber-mild steel smooth pair are found in betweenthe highest and lowest values. It is noted that thewear rates <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel rough pair arehigher than that <strong>of</strong> glass fiber-mild steel smoothpair. From this figure, it is also found that atidentical conditions, the values <strong>of</strong> wear rate <strong>of</strong> gear13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 71


fiber and glass fiber sliding against smooth mildsteel counterface is lower than that <strong>of</strong> gear fiber andglass fiber sliding against rough mild steelcounterface.Variations <strong>of</strong> wear rate with sliding velocity forgear fiber and glass fibre mating with smooth orrough mild steel counterfaces are presented in Fig.13. Curves show the variation <strong>of</strong> wear rate from1.167 to 1.778, 1.433 to 2.25, 1.258 to 1.95 and1.987 to 2.78 mg/min with the variation in slidingspeed from 1 to 3 m/s for gear fiber-mild steelsmooth, gear fiber-mild steel rough, glass fibermildsteel smooth and glass fiber-mild steel roughsliding pairs respectively. From these curves, it isobserved that wear rate increases with the increasein sliding speed for all types <strong>of</strong> materialcombinations. These findings are in agreement withthe findings <strong>of</strong> Mimaroglu et al and Suresha et al.[27,38]. This is due to the fact that duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing is same for all sliding velocities, while thelength <strong>of</strong> rubbing is more for higher slidingvelocity. The reduction <strong>of</strong> shear strength <strong>of</strong> thematerial and increased true area <strong>of</strong> contact betweencontacting surfaces may have some role on thehigher wear rate at higher sliding velocity [51].Figure 13 also shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> thevariation <strong>of</strong> wear rate with sliding velocity fordifferent sliding pairs. From the obtained results, itcan also be seen that the highest values <strong>of</strong> the wearrate are obtained for glass fiber-mild steel roughpair and the lowest values <strong>of</strong> wear rate are obtainedfor gear fiber-mild steel smooth pair. The values <strong>of</strong>wear rate <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel rough pair andglass fiber-mild steel smooth pair are found inbetween the highest and lowest values. It is notedthat the wear rates <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel roughpair are higher than that <strong>of</strong> glass fiber-mild steelsmooth pair.Wear rate (mg/min)3.02.52.01.51.00.5gear fiber-mild steel, smooth pairgear fiber-mild steel, rough pairglass fiber-mild steel, smooth pairglass fiber-mild steel, rough pair0.00.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5Sliding velocity (m/s)Fig. 13. Wear rate as a function <strong>of</strong> Normal load for gearand glass fiber for different counterface surfaceconditions (normal load: 15 N, relative humidity: 70%).From this figure, it is also found that at identicalconditions, the values <strong>of</strong> wear rate <strong>of</strong> gear fiber andglass fiber sliding against smooth mild steelcounterface is lower than that <strong>of</strong> gear fiber andglass fiber sliding against rough mild steelcounterface. It is due to the fact that rough surfacesgenerally wear more quickly and have higherfriction coefficients than smooth surfaces.4. CONCLUSIONThe presence <strong>of</strong> normal load and sliding velocityindeed affects the friction force considerably.Within the observed range, the values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient decrease with the increase in normalload while friction coefficients increase with theincrease in sliding velocity for gear fiber and glassfiber sliding against smooth or rough mild steel pin.Friction coefficient varies with the duration <strong>of</strong>rubbing and after certain duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing,friction coefficient becomes steady for the observedrange <strong>of</strong> normal load and sliding velocity. Wearrates <strong>of</strong> gear fiber and glass mating with smooth orrough mild steel counterface increase with theincrease in normal load and sliding velocity. Thehighest values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient areobtained for glass fiber-mild steel rough pair andthe lowest values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient are obtainedfor gear fiber-mild steel smooth pair. The values <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steel roughpair and glass fiber-mild steel smooth pair arefound in between the highest and lowest values.The friction coefficients <strong>of</strong> gear fiber-mild steelrough pair are higher than that <strong>of</strong> glass fiber-mildsteel smooth pair. At identical conditions, thevalues <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> gear fiber and glassfiber sliding against smooth mild steel counterfaceis lower than that <strong>of</strong> gear fiber and glass fibersliding against rough mild steel counterface.As (i) the friction coefficient decreases with theincrease in normal load (ii) the values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient increase with the increase in slidingvelocity (iii) wear rate increases with the increasein normal load and sliding velocity and (iv) themagnitudes <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient and wear rate aredifferent for smooth and rough counterface pins andtype <strong>of</strong> materials, therefore maintaining anappropriate level <strong>of</strong> normal load, sliding velocity aswell as appropriate choice <strong>of</strong> counterface surfacecondition and tested materials, friction and wearmay be kept to some lower value to improvemechanical processes.REFERENCES[1] Archard, J.F.: “Wear theory and mechanisms”,Wear Control Handbook, ASME, New York, NY,1980.72 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[2] Tabor, D.: “Friction and wear – developments overthe last 50 years, keynote address”, <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong>the International Conference <strong>of</strong> Tribology –Friction, Lubrication and Wear, Queen Elizabeth IIConference Centre, London,Institute <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, London, pp. 157-72, 1987.[3] Kukureka, S.N., Chen, Y.K., Hooke, C.J. and Liao,P.: “The wear mechanisms <strong>of</strong> acetal inunlubricatedrolling-sliding contact”, Wear, Vol.185, pp. 1-8, 1995.[4] Chowdhury, M.A. and Helali, M.M.: “The effect <strong>of</strong>amplitude <strong>of</strong> vibration on the coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionfordifferent materials”, Tribology International, Vol.41, No. 4, pp. 307-14, 2008.[5] Chowdhury, M.A. and Helali, M.M.: “The frictionalbehavior <strong>of</strong> composite materials under horizontalvibration”, Industrial Lubrication and Tribology,Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 246-53, 2009a.[6] Chowdhury, M.A. and Helali, M.M.: “The frictionalbehavior <strong>of</strong> materials under vertical vibration”,Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, Vol. 61, No.3, pp. 154-60, 2009b.[7] El-Tayeb, N.S.M. and Mostafa, I.M.: “The effect <strong>of</strong>laminate orientations on friction and wearmechanisms <strong>of</strong> glass reinforced polyestercomposite”, Wear, Vol. 195, pp. 186-91, 1996.[8] El-Tayeb, N.S.M. and Gadelrab, R.M.: “Frictionand wear properties <strong>of</strong> e-glass fiber reinforcedepoxy compositesunder different sliding contactconditions”, Wear, Vol. 192, pp. 112-17, 1996.[9] Bahadur, S. and Zheng, Y.: “Mechanical andtribological behavior <strong>of</strong> polyester reinforced withshort glass fibers”, Wear, Vol. 137, pp. 251-66, 1990.[10] Bahadur, S. and Polineni, V.K.: “Tribologicalstudies <strong>of</strong> glass fabric-reinforced polyamidecomposites filled with CuO and PTFE”, Wear, Vol.200, pp. 95-104, 1996.[11] Watanabe, M.: “The friction and wear properties <strong>of</strong>nylon”, Wear, Vol. 110, pp. 379-88, 1968.[12] Tanaka, K.: “Transfer <strong>of</strong> semi crystalline polymerssliding against smooth steel surface”, Wear, Vol.75, pp. 183-99, 1982.[13] Bahadur, S. and Tabor, D.: “Role <strong>of</strong> fillers in thefriction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> high-densitypolyethylene”, in Lee, L.H. (Ed.), Polymer Wear andIts Control, ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 287, ACSPublications, Washington, DC, pp. 253-68, 1985.[14] Pihtili, H. and Tosun, N.: “Effect <strong>of</strong> load and speedon the wear behavior <strong>of</strong> woven glass fabrics andaramid fiber-reinforced composites”, Wear, Vol.252, pp. 979-84, 2002a.[15] Pihtili, H. and Tosun, N.: “Investigation <strong>of</strong> the wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> a glass fiber-reinforced composite andplain polyester resin”, Composites Science andTechnology, Vol. 62, pp. 367-70, 2002b.[16] Bijwe, J., Tewari, U.S., Vasudevan, P.: “Frictionand wear studies <strong>of</strong> polyetherimide composites”,Wear, Vol. 138, pp. 61-76, 1990.[17] Bijwe, J., Indumathi, J., John Rajesh, J. and Fahim,M.: “Friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> polyetherimidecomposites in various wear modes”, Wear, Vol. 249,pp. 715-26, 2001.[18] Bijwe, J. and Indumathi, J.: “Influence <strong>of</strong> fibers andsolid lubricants on low amplitude oscillating wear<strong>of</strong> polyetherimide composites”, Wear, Vol. 257, No.5/6, pp. 562-72, 2004.[19] Bijwe, J., Indumathi, J. and Ghosh, A.K.: “Role <strong>of</strong>fabric reinforcement on the low amplitudeoscillating wear <strong>of</strong> polyetherimide composites”,Wear, Vol. 256, No. 1/2, pp. 27-37, 2004.[20] Zhang, S.W.: ‘State-<strong>of</strong>-the-art <strong>of</strong> polymer tribology’,Tribol. Int., Vol. 31, Nos. 1–3, pp.49-60, 1998.[21] Kowandy, C., Richard, C. and Chen, Y.M.:‘Characterization <strong>of</strong> wear particles forcomprehension <strong>of</strong> wear mechanisms case <strong>of</strong> PTFEagainst cast iron’, Wear, Vol. 265, No. 11–12, pp.1714–1719, 2008.[22] Yamaguchi, Y.: Tribology <strong>of</strong> Plastic Materials:Their Characteristics and Applications to SlidingComponents, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.[23] Hooke, C.J., Kukureka, S.N., Liao, P., Rao, M. andChen, Y.K.: “The friction and wear <strong>of</strong> polymersinnon-conformal contacts”, Wear, Vol. 200, pp. 83-94, 1996.[24] Lawrence, C.C. and Stolarski, T.A.: “Rollingcontact wear <strong>of</strong> polymers: a preliminary study”,Wear, Vol. 132, pp. 83-91, 1989.[25] Feyzullahoglu, E. and Saffak, Z.: ‘The tribologicalbehavior <strong>of</strong> different engineering plastics under dryfriction conditions’, Mater. Design, Vol. 29, No. 1,pp. 205–211, 2008.[26] Wang, Y.Q., Li, J.: ‘Sliding wear behavior andmechanism <strong>of</strong> ultra-high molecularweightpolyethylene’, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 266, No. 1–2,pp. 155–160, 1999.[27] Mimaroglu, A., Unal, H. and Arda, T.: ‘Friction andwear performance <strong>of</strong> pure and glass fiber reinforcedpoly-ether-imide on polymer and steel counterfacematerials’, Wear, Vol. 262, No. 11–12, pp.1407–1413, 2007.[28] Unal, H., Sen, U. and Mimaroglu, A.: ‘Dry slidingwear characteristics <strong>of</strong> some industrial polymersagainst steel counterface’, Tribol. Int., Vol. 37, No.9, pp. 727–732, 2004.[29] Unal, H., Sen, U. and Mimaroglu, A.: ‘An approachto friction and wear properties<strong>of</strong>polytetrafluoroethylene composite’, Mater.Design, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 694–699, 2006.[30] Sirong, Y., Zhongzhen, Yu., Mai, Y-W.: ‘Effects <strong>of</strong>SEBS-g-MA on tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> nylon66/organoclay nanocomposites’, Tribol. Int., Vol.40, No. 5, pp. 855–862, 2007.[31] Bahadur, S. and Kapoor, A.: ‘The effect <strong>of</strong> ZnF2,ZnS and PbS fillers on the tribological behavior <strong>of</strong>nylon 11’, Wear, Vol. 155, No. 1, pp. 49–61, 1992.[32] Wang, J., Gu, M., Bai, S. and Ge, S.: ‘Investigation<strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> MoS2 filler on the tribological13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 73


properties <strong>of</strong> carbon fiber reinforced nylon 1010composites’, Wear, Vol. 255, No. 1–6, pp. 774–779,2003.[33] Tsukizoe, T. and Ohmae, N.: ‘Friction and wear <strong>of</strong>advanced composite materials’, FibreSci. Technol.,Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 265–286, 1983.[34] Franklin, S.E.: ‘Wear experiments with selectedengineering polymers and polymer compositesunder dry reciprocating sliding conditions’, Wear,Vol. 251, No. 1–12, pp. 1591–1598, 2001.[35] Nuruzzaman, D.M., Chowdhury, M.A. andRahaman, M.L.: ‘Effect <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> rubbing andnormal load on friction coefficient for polymer andcomposite materials’, Ind. Lubr. Tribol., Vol. 63,No. 5, pp. 320–326, 2011.[36] Benabdallah, H.: ‘Friction and wear <strong>of</strong> blendedpolyoxymethylene sliding against coated steel plates’,Wear, Vol. 254, No. 12, pp. 1239–1246, 2003.[37] Unal, H., Mimaroglu, A., Kadioglu, U. and Ekiz, H.:‘Sliding friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong>polytetrafluoroethylene and its composites underdry conditions’, Mater. Design, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.239–245, 2004.[38] Suresha, B., Chandramohan, G., Samapthkumaran,P., Seetharamu, S. and Vynatheya, S.: Friction andwear characteristics <strong>of</strong> carbon-epoxy and glassepoxywoven roving fiber composites, J. Reinf. Plast.Comp., Vol. 25, No. 7, pp.771–782, 2006.[39] Cho, M.H., Bahadur, S. and Pogosian, A.K.:‘Friction and wear studies using Taguchi method onpolyphenylene sulfide filled with a complex mixture<strong>of</strong> MoS2, Al2O3, and other compounds’, Wear, Vol.258, No. 11–12, pp. 1825–1835, 2005.[40] Santner, E. and Czichos, H.: “Tribology <strong>of</strong>polymers”, Tribology International, Vol. 22, No. 2,pp. 103-9, 1989.[41] Tevruz, T.: “Tribological behaviours <strong>of</strong> carbonfilledpolytetrafluoroethylene dry journal bearings”,Wear, Vol. 221, pp. 61-8, 1998.[42] Tevruz, T.: “Tribological behaviours <strong>of</strong> bronzefilledpolytetrafluoroethylene dry journal bearings”,Wear, Vol. 230, pp. 61-9, 1999.[43] Anderson, J.C.: “The wear and friction <strong>of</strong>commercialpolymers and composites”, in Friedrich,K. (Ed.), Frictionand Wear and PolymerComposites, Composite MaterialsSeries, Vol. 1,Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 329-62, 1986.[44] Stuart, B.H.: “Tribological studies <strong>of</strong> poly (etherether ketone) blends”, Tribology International, Vol.31, No. 11, pp. 647-51, 1998.[45] Unal, H., Mimaroglu, A.: “Friction and wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> unfilled engineering thermoplastics”,Material Design, Vol. 24, pp. 183-7, 2003.[46] Unal, H. and Mimaroglu, A.: “Influence <strong>of</strong> testconditions on the tribological properties <strong>of</strong>polymers”, Industrial Lubrication and Tribology,Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 178-83, 2003.[47] Suresha, B., Chandramohan, G., Prakash, J.N.,Balusamy, V. and Sankaranarayanasamy, K.: “Therole <strong>of</strong> fillerson friction and slide wearcharacteristics in glass-epoxy composite systems”,Journal <strong>of</strong> Minerals & Materials Characterization &Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 87-101, 2006a.[48] El-Tayeb, N.S.M., Yousif, B.F. and Yap, T.C.:“Tribological studies <strong>of</strong> polyester reinforced withCSM450-R-glass fiber sliding against smoothstainless steel counterface”, Wear, Vol. 261, pp.443-52, 2006.[49] Clerico, M. and Patierno, V.: “Sliding wear <strong>of</strong>polymeric composites”, Wear, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp.279-97, 299-301, 1979.[50] Yang, E.-L.: “Effect <strong>of</strong> crystalline and amorphousphases on the transfer <strong>of</strong> polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE)onto metallic substrates”, Journal <strong>of</strong> MaterialsResearch, Vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 3139-49, 1992.[51] B. Bhushan: Principle and Applications <strong>of</strong> Tribology,John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.[52] M. A. Chowdhury, M. M. Helali: The Effect <strong>of</strong>Frequency <strong>of</strong> Vibration and Humidity on the Wearrate, Wear, Vol. 262, pp. 198-203, 2007.74 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacABRASIVE WEAR RESISTANCE OF THE IRON- ANDWC-BASED HARDFACED COATINGS EVALUATED WITHSCRATCH TEST METHODAleksandar Vencl 1 , Bojan Gligorijević 2 , Boris Katavić 2 , Bogdan Nedić 3 , Dragan Džunić 31 University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia, avencl@mas.bg.ac.rs2 Institute Goša, Belgrade, Serbia, bojan.gligorijevic@institutgosa.rs, boris.katavic@institutgosa.rs3 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, nedic@kg.ac.rs, dzuna@kg.ac.rsAbstract: Abrasive wear is one <strong>of</strong> the most common types <strong>of</strong> wear, which makes abrasive wear resistancevery important in many industries. The hardfacing is considered as useful and economical way to improvethe performance <strong>of</strong> components submitted to severe abrasive wear conditions, with wide range <strong>of</strong> applicablefiller materials. The abrasive wear resistance <strong>of</strong> the three different hardfaced coatings (two iron-based andone WC-based), which were intended to be used for reparation <strong>of</strong> the impact plates <strong>of</strong> the ventilation mill,was investigated and compared. Abrasive wear tests were carried-out by using the scratch tester under thedry conditions. Three normal loads <strong>of</strong> 10, 50 and 100 N and the constant sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 4 mm/s were used.Scratch test was chosen as a relatively easy and quick test method. Wear mechanism analysis showedsignificant influence <strong>of</strong> the hardfaced coatings structure, which, along with hardness, has determinedcoatings abrasive wear resistance.Keywords: abrasive wear, scratch test, hardfacing, iron-based and WC-based materials, SEM-EDS.1. INTRODUCTIONMore than 50 % <strong>of</strong> all wear-related failures <strong>of</strong>industrial equipment are caused by abrasive wear[1]. The estimated costs <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear arebetween 1 and 4 % <strong>of</strong> the gross national product <strong>of</strong>an industrialized nation [2]. For these reasons, theabrasive wear resistance is a subject <strong>of</strong> greatimportance in many industries, such as agriculture,mining, mineral processing etc.Hardfacing could be defined as “coatingdeposition process in which a wear resistant,usually harder, material is deposited on the surface<strong>of</strong> a component by some <strong>of</strong> the weldingtechniques”. In most cases, hardfacing is used forcontrolling abrasive and erosive wear, like inmining, crushing and grinding, and agricultureindustries (buckets, bucket teeth, mill hammers,ball mills, digging tools, conveyer screws, etc.[3,4]). Hardfacing is also used to controlcombinations <strong>of</strong> wear and corrosion, as encounteredby mud seals, plows, knives in the food processingindustry, pumps handling corrosive liquids, orslurries [5]. The hardfacing is considered aseconomical way to improve the performance <strong>of</strong>components submitted to severe wear conditions,with wide range <strong>of</strong> applicable filler materials [6,7].The iron-based filler materials have drawn muchattention due to their low cost and good resistanceto abrasion in the hardfaced condition. However,their use is limited in applications where highimpact loading is present, i.e. high-stress orgouging abrasion [8]. For this reason, efforts arebeing made towards the improvement <strong>of</strong> theirimpact and other properties [9]. The progress isachieved mostly by modifying the hardfacedcoating’s structure. Taking into account their lowprice and improved properties, the resistance toabrasive wear <strong>of</strong> the iron-based hardfaced coatingsis normally tested against the resistance <strong>of</strong> proven,but more expensive materials, such as WC-basedhardfaced coatings.Abrasive wear has been defined as “wear bydisplacement <strong>of</strong> material from surfaces in relativemotion caused by the presence <strong>of</strong> hard particleseither between the surfaces or embedded in one <strong>of</strong>13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 75


them, or by the presence <strong>of</strong> hard protuberances onone or both <strong>of</strong> the surfaces” [10]. The second part<strong>of</strong> this definition corresponds to pure two-bodyabrasion, where tested material slides againstharder and rougher counter face material, while thefirst part corresponds to the three- and two-bodyabrasion, respectively. Another interesting example<strong>of</strong> two-body abrasion is the abrasive erosion,which is the special case <strong>of</strong> erosive wear. Abrasiveerosion has been defined as “erosive wear in whichthe loss <strong>of</strong> material from a solid surface is due torelative motion <strong>of</strong> solid particles which areentrained in a fluid, moving nearly parallel to asolid surface” [10]. Scratch test <strong>of</strong>fers a possibilityfor comparison <strong>of</strong> different materials relativelyeasy and in short period <strong>of</strong> time, with goodreproducibility [11]. In single-pass scratch test astylus (which tip is made <strong>of</strong> hard material) slideover the test sample producing a single scratch,which seems to be appropriate simulation <strong>of</strong> thetwo-body abrasion.In this study, the abrasive wear resistance <strong>of</strong> thethree different hardfaced coatings (two iron-based andone WC-based) was investigated and compared.2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS2.1 MaterialsThe filler materials (coating materials) weremanufactured by Castolin Eutectic Co. Ltd, Vienna.Their nominal chemical composition is shown inTable 1. The iron-based filler materials (basiccovered electrodes) were deposited by using theshielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process. TheWC-based filler material was deposited by oxy-fuelgas welding (OFW) process. The substrate materialwas the hot-rolled S355J2G3 steel.Table 1. Coatings composition, process and hardnessCoatingNominal chemicalcompositionHardfacingprocessHardnessHV 54541 Fe-Cr-C-Si SMAW 7395006 Fe-Cr-C-Si SMAW 7817888 T WC-Ni-Cr-Si-B OFW 677All coatings were deposited by hardfacing in asingle pass (one layer). The substrate preparationand hardfacing procedures (deposition parameters)are described elsewhere [9,12]. The measurements<strong>of</strong> near-surface hardness are performed on thecross-section <strong>of</strong> hardfaced samples by Vickersindenter (HV 5), and presented in (Table 1).The samples for structure characterization areobtained by cutting the hardfaced materialsperpendicular to coatings surface. The obtainedcross-sections are ground with SiC abrasive papersdown to P1200 and polished with aluminasuspensions down to 1 μm. The polished surfaces areanalyzed by using the scanning electron microscope(SEM) equipped with energy dispersive system(EDS). The SEM-EDS analysis was performed atUniversity <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mining andGeology by using the JEOL JSM–6610LV SEMconnected with the INCA350 energy dispersion X-ray analysis unit. The electron acceleration voltage<strong>of</strong> 20 kV and the tungsten filament were used.Before SEM-EDS analysis was performed, polishedsurfaces were 20 nm gold coated in a vacuumchamber by use <strong>of</strong> a sputter coater device.The Figure 1a shows the near-surface structure<strong>of</strong> the 4541 iron-based hardfaced coating. Theprimary austenite phase occupies more than a half<strong>of</strong> volume (50.7 vol. %) and the rest is the lamellareutectic mixture <strong>of</strong> austenite and Cr-carbides [9].The 5006 material during solidification achievesnear-eutectic structure (Fig. 1b). A small sphericalprimary Cr-carbides are observed (9.1 vol. %) inthe eutectic matrix. Based on Electron microprobeanalysis (EMPA), both coatings 4541 and 5006contain (Cr,Fe) 7 C 3 primary and eutectic carbides.The Figure 1c shows a larger WC grains (60 vol.%), which are embedded in the Ni-Cr based matrix.2.2 Scratch abrasion testingAbrasive wear tests are carried out on the scratchtester under the dry conditions, in ambient air atroom temperature (≈ 25 °C). A schematic diagram<strong>of</strong> scratch testing is presented in Figure 2. Stylus(indenter) was pressed with selected normal loadFigure 1. The structures (SEM) <strong>of</strong>: (a) 4541, (b) 5006 and (c) 7888 T hardfaced coating; back-scattered electron images76 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


(10, 50 and 100 N) against surface <strong>of</strong> the test sampleand moved with constant speed (4 mm/s), producingthe scratch <strong>of</strong> certain width and length (10 mm) onthe test sample. Indenter had Rockwell shape andthe cone was diamond with radius <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mm.Figure 2. Schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> scratch testingOn surface <strong>of</strong> each material under investigationat least three scratches are made with a gap betweenscratches <strong>of</strong> at least 1 mm. Before and after testing,both the indenter and the test samples are degreasedand cleaned with benzene. The wear scar widths onthe surface <strong>of</strong> the test samples are measured fromSEM images at the end <strong>of</strong> testing. The wear scarwidths and the known indenter geometry are usedto calculate the volume loss. After testing, themorphology <strong>of</strong> the test samples worn surfaces isexamined with SEM.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe results <strong>of</strong> the wear tests are presented inFigures 3, 4 and 5. Taking into account significantdifferences in structure homogeneity <strong>of</strong> thehardfaced coatings (Fig. 1), the repeatability <strong>of</strong> theresults, in terms <strong>of</strong> standard deviations, issatisfactory (within 16 %). Wear rate <strong>of</strong> the testedmaterials (volume loss divided by scratch length)increases with normal loading, as expected. Thehighest wear exhibits coating 7888 T. Nevertheless,wear rates for all coatings are high, even forabrasive wear. The reason for this is primarily dueto the experimental conditions.The test conditions were specific, i.e. the speedswere very low (4 mm/s) and the contact stressesvery high. At the end <strong>of</strong> test, the normal stresseswere between 2 and 5 GPa, which depends on thematerial, i.e. scratch width and applied normal load.With these conditions, a high-stress or evengouging abrasion can be expected. With high-stressabrasion, the worn surface may exhibit varyingdegrees <strong>of</strong> scratching with plastic flow <strong>of</strong>sufficiently ductile phases or fracture <strong>of</strong> brittlephases. In gouging abrasion, the stresses are higherthan those in high-stress abrasion, and they areaccompanied by large particles removal from thesurface, leaving deep groves and/or pits [8].The relation between the wear rate and thehardness <strong>of</strong> tested hardfaced coatings is shown inFigure 6. The first feature is that the abrasive wearrate decreases as the hardness increases, i.e. thehardest material (coating 5006) showed the highestabrasive wear resistance.Wear rate, mm 3 /mWear rate, mm 3 /mWear rate, mm 3 /m3.22.82.42.01.61.20.80.40.0Coating 4541(v = 4 mm/s)0.100.751.8810 50 100Normal load, NFigure 3. Wear rates <strong>of</strong> coating 4541 for differentnormal loads3.22.82.42.01.61.20.80.40.0Coating 5006(v = 4 mm/s)0.090.681.6710 50 100Normal load, NFigure 4. Wear rates <strong>of</strong> coating 5006 for differentnormal loads3.22.82.42.01.61.20.80.40.0Coating 7888 T(v = 4 mm/s)0.211.242.8810 50 100Normal load, NFigure 5. Wear rates <strong>of</strong> coating 7888 T for differentnormal loads13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 77


Wear rate, mm 3 /m3.503.002.502.001.501.000.500.002.881.240.211.880.7510 N50 N100 N1.670.680.10 0.09670 690 710 730 750 770 790Hardness HV5Figure 6. Wear rate vs. hardness <strong>of</strong> tested materials fordifferent normal loadsFor all applied loads, the relation betweenhardness and wear rate is non-linear. It is morecurved for higher loads (Fig. 6). This is connectedwith the coatings structure and exhibited wearmechanism. Coatings 4541 and 5006 exhibit mainlyploughing abrasive wear (Fig. 7a), while coating7888 T dominant type <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear is fracture(cracking) abrasive wear (Fig. 7b).Figure 7. The wear scar appearance (SEM) <strong>of</strong>: (a) 4541and (b) 7888 T hardfaced coating; 50 N normal load;back-scattered electron images4. CONCLUSIONScratch test <strong>of</strong>fers relatively easy and quickcomparison <strong>of</strong> different materials on abrasive wear.Structure <strong>of</strong> tested coatings showed influence onthe dominant type <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear, which togetherwith coatings hardness determined coatingsabrasive wear resistance.Coatings with lower hardness showed lowerabrasive wear resistance, but the dependence(hardness vs. wear rate) was non-linear.In the case <strong>of</strong> iron-based coatings, dominanttype <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear was ploughing and in the case<strong>of</strong> WC-based coatings, it was fracture (cracking)abrasive wear.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis work has been performed as a part <strong>of</strong>activities within the projects TR 34028, TR 35021and TR 35034. These projects are supported by theRepublic <strong>of</strong> Serbia, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Scienceand Technological Development, whose financialhelp is gratefully acknowledged.REFERENCES[1] A. Rac: Osnovi tribologije, Mašinski fakultetUniverziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, 1991.[2] R.G. Bayer: Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> wear failures, in: ASMHandbook Volume 11, Failure Analysis andPrevention, ASM International, Metals Park, pp.901-905, 2002.[3] V. Lazić, M. Jovanović, D. Milosavljević, M.Mutavdžić, R. Čukić: Choosing <strong>of</strong> the most suitabletechnology <strong>of</strong> hard facing <strong>of</strong> mixer blades used inasphalt bases, Tribology in Industry, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, pp. 3-10, 2008.[4] V. Lazić, M. Mutavdžić, D. Milosavljević, S.Aleksandrović, B. Nedeljković, P. Marinković, R.Čukić: Selection <strong>of</strong> the most appropriate technology<strong>of</strong> reparatory hard facing <strong>of</strong> working parts onuniversal construction machinery, Tribology inIndustry, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 18-27, 2011.[5] J.R. Davis, Hardfacing, weld cladding, anddissimilar metal joining, in: ASM Handbook Volume6, Welding, Brazing, and Soldering, ASMInternational, Metals Park, pp. 789-829, 1993.[6] EN 14700: Welding consumables – Weldingconsumables for hard-facing, European Committeefor Standardization, Brussels, 2005.[7] M. Šolar, M. Bregant: Dodatni materijali i njihovaupotreba kod reparaturnog navarivanja,Zavarivanje i zavarene konstrukcije, Vol. 51, No. 2,pp. 71-76, 2006.[8] A. Vencl, N. Manić, V. Popovic, M. Mrdak:Possibility <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wear resistancedetermination with scratch tester, Tribology Letters,Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 591-604, 2010.78 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[9] B.R. Gligorijevic, A. Vencl, B.T. Katavic:Characterization and comparison <strong>of</strong> the carbidesmorphologies in the near surface region <strong>of</strong> thesingle- and double layer iron-based hardfacedcoatings, Scientific Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the "Politehnica"University <strong>of</strong> Timișoara, Transactions onMechanics, Vol. 57 (71), Special Issue S1, pp. 15-20, 2012.[10] OECD, Research Group on Wear <strong>of</strong> EngineeringMaterials, Glossary <strong>of</strong> Terms and Definitions in theField <strong>of</strong> Friction, Wear and Lubrication: Ttribology,Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment, Paris, 1969.[11] A. Vencl, A. Rac, B. Ivković: Investigation <strong>of</strong>abrasive wear resistance <strong>of</strong> ferrous-based coatingswith scratch tester, Tribology in Industry, Vol. 29,No. 3-4, pp. 13-16, 2007.[12] A. Alil, B. Katavić, M. Ristić, D. Jovanović, M.Prokolab, S. Budimir, M. Kočić: Structural andmechanical properties <strong>of</strong> different hard weldedcoatings for impact plate for ventilation mill, Welding& Material Testing, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 7-11, 2011.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 79


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTOPOGRAPHIC AND ELECTROCHEMICAL TI6AL4VALLOY SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION IN DRY AND WETRECIPROCATING SLIDINGZinaida Doni 1 , Mihaela Buciumeanu 2 , Liviu Palaghian 31 “Dunarea de Jos” University <strong>of</strong> Galati, Romania, zinaida.doni@yahoo.com2 “Dunarea de Jos” University <strong>of</strong> Galati, Romania, mihaela.buciumeanu@ugal.ro3 “Dunarea de Jos” University <strong>of</strong> Galati, Romania, liviu.palaghian@ugal.roAbstract: This present paper shows the behavior <strong>of</strong> functional integrity state <strong>of</strong> a TI6Al4V alloy underreciprocating wear sliding conditions in a comparative way for two different counter materials, steel andceramic balls in dry and corrosive environment (3.5% NaCl). The surface integrity analysis <strong>of</strong> the dryreciprocating wear tests was based on the evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameters with the applied load. Inthe case <strong>of</strong> reciprocating wear tests in corrosive environment the surface integrity analysis was based onelectrochemical parameters. Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameters with theapplied load shows a higher stability <strong>of</strong> the Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair, while from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> theelectrochemical parameters the tribological properties are worst than Ti6Al4V/steel ball contact pair.Keywords: reciprocating wear, light alloy, roughness, surface integrity.1. INTRODUCTIONThe required functional properties <strong>of</strong> the contactsurfaces under relative motion are closely related tothe surface integrity state. The modifications <strong>of</strong> thesuperficial layer during the machining process andsubsequently during service life have an importantrole in defining the surface integrity state. ThusGriffiths [1] proposed to define the surface integritystate based the mechanical, chemical, metallurgicaland topographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the superficiallayer and their relation to the functionalperformance.Bellows and Tishler [2] stated that there are fivetypes <strong>of</strong> modifications <strong>of</strong> the superficial layerduring the machining process <strong>of</strong> a surface:mechanical, metallurgical, chemical, thermal andelectrical. These characteristics are changing duringthe service life. Besides other functionalcharacteristics, such as fatigue resistance,correlation between surface roughness parameters(Ra, Rz, Rk, etc.), and the wear rate has animportant role during the friction processes <strong>of</strong> thecontact surfaces under relative motion [3,4].Thus the surface integrity state can be definednot only due to the machining processes <strong>of</strong> thesurface, but also due to the operating processes.This can be called fuctional integrity state.Generally, it is intended that during the service lifeto maintain the same characterisics obtained fromthe machinig process or to have acceptablemodifications.The Ti6Al4V alloy is the most common titaniumalloy due to its physical, chemical and mechanicalproperties, such as: high strength, low density,excellent machinability and excellent corrosiveresistance. Some <strong>of</strong> the most widespreadapplications <strong>of</strong> these alloys include aircraft turbineengines, structural components and joints inaeronautics, structural elements in automotive andmaritime constructions, medical devices (dental andorthopedic implants).The spontaneously formation <strong>of</strong> a continue andstrong adherent oxide layer in air and also water (e.g. the marine environment, body fluids) providesextensive use <strong>of</strong> these alloys.Conventional ceramics materials such asalumina (Al 2 O 3 ) have excellent properties, such as:high hardness and good wear resistance, excellent80 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


dielectric properties, high resistance to chemicalattack in presence <strong>of</strong> acids and alkali, high thermalconductivity, high resistance and stiffness, excellentformability and high purity. Due to these propertiesalumina is widely used in technical applications (e.g. automotive industry and in medical implants).The general properties <strong>of</strong> the two types <strong>of</strong>materials (Ti6Al4V and Al 2 O 3 ) have leaded to theuse <strong>of</strong> these in applications where both wear andcorrosion resistant qualities are critical. In theseapplications, especially under relative motion andunder the action <strong>of</strong> external loads and in activechemical environments, it is mandatory to maintainthe surface integrity state during the service life.In the present paper is presented the evolution <strong>of</strong>the functional integrity state in a comparative wayfor two contact pairs (Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 andTi6Al4V/steel ball) in dry and corrosiveenvironment.2. DRY WEAR AND TRIBOCORROSIONFORMULATIONThe analysis <strong>of</strong> the functional integrity stateunder dry wear conditions is based on the wellknown Archard's wear law [5]. It says that theamount <strong>of</strong> the material loss depends on theproperties <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaces, topographicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the surfaces and test conditions.The most common form <strong>of</strong> Archard's equation isVSFn K(1)Hwhere V - the volumetric material loss <strong>of</strong> the body,K- the wear coefficient (it is dimensionless andalways less than unity), H - the hardness <strong>of</strong> thes<strong>of</strong>ter body in contact, F n - the applied normal loadand S - the sliding distance.It has been analysed the amonut <strong>of</strong> material thatwas removed (wear loss) in the wear process. Thesurface analysis <strong>of</strong> the wear tests was based on theevolution <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> the wear track (based onthe material loss) with the applied load. Anotherparameter that was analyzed is the final topography<strong>of</strong> the wear track by using the 3D roughnessparameters (Sa – Average Roughness, Sy - Peak-Peak Height, Sq - Root Mean Square Height, Sp -Maximum Peak Height, Sv - Maximum Pit Height).In the case <strong>of</strong> reciprocating wear tests incorrosive enviroment occur the degradationprocesss <strong>of</strong> surfaces by tribocorrosion. This processincludes the interaction between mechanical,chemical and electromechanical processes <strong>of</strong> wearthat lead to loss <strong>of</strong> weight by adding all theseeffects [6]:Wear=mechanical wear process+electrochemical(and/or chemical response) (2)This process includes the interaction <strong>of</strong>corrosion with: solid corrosive particles (debris),particles resulted due to abrasive processes, frettingprocesses, processes under biological solutionconditions, and triboxidation related to the mutualinteraction process under relative motion conditions<strong>of</strong> the surfaces.Generally, oxide layers are formed after thecorrosive attack which protects the material fromfurther corrosive attack. But these oxide films aresusceptible to the tribological processes that willaccelerate the corrosion in these areas. The galvanicactivity that results between the worn and unwornsurfaces under electrochemical conditions [7], leadsto an anodic current I a , [8]:Ia kb1 2 Fn l f H 1 f0i d (3)where: k b – proportionality factor; l – sliding length;f– frequency <strong>of</strong> the reciprocating motion; F n –normal load; H– surface hardness; i - corrosioncurrent density; τ- time.Equation (3) can be written as [9]:Ip kbVs Fn H 1 2 Qp(4)where: V s – sliding speed; Q p - passivation chargedensity [5].Qpi d(5)0corrOn the other hand, electrochemical wear can bedetermined based on passivation currentIV p t Mn Fmol(6)where: t – time; M – molecular weight; ρ – density;n – valence; I – Faraday's constant.The corrosion rate [10,11] can be determinedbased on linear polarization and on the Stern-Geary’s equation [12] as follows:icorr a c2.31a c R p(7)where: β a şi β c cathodic and anodic Tafel slopes(figure 1); R r – polarisation resistance.Thus the tribocorrosion processes can beanalysed based on the evolution <strong>of</strong> theelectrochemical parameters β a , β c , I corr , E corr..If in the dry wear conditions the amount <strong>of</strong> thematerial loss is determined based on the rationF n /H, in the case <strong>of</strong> wear tests in the corrosionenvironment conditions the wear process isinfluenced by the electrochemical parameters.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 81


Figure 1. Typical plot derived by the Tafelextrapolation method3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE3.1. MaterialsThe material contact pairs comparatively studiedin this work are: Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 and Ti6Al4V/steelball.The mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the materials usedin this study are presented in Table 1 and theirchemical composition is given in Tables 2 and 3.Table 1. Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V alloyMaterialMechanical propertiesE σ 0.2 σ r ε r (%) HV(GPa) (MPa) (MPa)Ti6Al4V 115 989 1055 16,1 360Al2O3 300 - 2200 1100(96%)100Cr6 210 1034 1158 15 750Table 2. Chemical composition (weight %) <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4ValloyElements Al V Fe Sn NiTi6Al4V 6.1 4.21 0.2 0.003 0,01Table 3. Chemical composition (weight %) <strong>of</strong> 100Cr6Elements C Si Mn P S Cr Mo100Cr6 0.93 0,15 0.25 0.026 0.15 1.35 0.103.2. Experimental test set-upReciprocating dry wear tests were carried out ona tribometer type CETR PRO 5003D. Theexperiments were carried out at a frequency <strong>of</strong> 1 Hzand the total stroke length <strong>of</strong> 3 mm during 3h, usinga reciprocating ball-on-plate configuration. Bearingsteel and Al 2 O 3 balls <strong>of</strong> 8 mm diameter were usedas counterpart. The experiments were carried out atthree normal loads 100, 120 and 140 N. Figure 4presents the schematic test configuration.Figure 2. Schematic specimen-pad contact testconfiguration (F n - normal load)The surface roughness parameters weredetermined using a 3D pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer type CETRPRO500. The roughness parameters were obtainedby scanning a surface <strong>of</strong> 500x500 µm, in 200 pointon each line. Multiple measurements in differentareas on the wear track were carried out to obtainstable roughness values that can be representativefor entire wear track. The 3D images were analyzedby using a processing image s<strong>of</strong>t - Scanning ProbeImagine Processor (SPIP). The 3D roughnessparameters used to describe the surface features areSa – Average Surface Roughness, Sy - Peak-PeakHeight, Sq - Root Mean Square Height, Sp -Maximum Peak Height, Sv - Maximum Pit Height.The initial surface roughness parameters studiedwere Sa =0.14 µm; Sy =3.96 µm; Sq =0.18 µm; Sp=3.34 µm; Sv =0.63 µm.In corrosive conditions the reciprocating wear testswere carried out under the same conditions, with thecontact pairs immersed in the electrolyte - an aqueoussolution <strong>of</strong> 3.5% NaCl (figure 3). The electrochemicalcharacteristics were obtained with a potentiostaticassembly.Figure 3. Schematic <strong>of</strong> the corrosion wear method4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ANDDISCUSSIONSFigure 4 shows the pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the wear track atthe end <strong>of</strong> the test for Ti6Al4V/steel ball contactpair for the three normal loads used in this study.Figure 5 shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> the weight losswith increasing applied normal load for bothcontact pairs.Regarding the functional integrity in terms <strong>of</strong>variation with the applied load it is remarked theequivalent level <strong>of</strong> the weight loss <strong>of</strong> the steel ballat higher loads (120-140 N) (figs. 4 and 5).82 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


parameter, Sv, was slightly influenced by themodification <strong>of</strong> the applied normal load.In the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair theroughness parameters that changed with increasingapplied normal load are Sa (figure 6a), Sq (figure6b) şi Sy (figure 6c).Figure 4. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>iles with the appliednormal loadaabbFigure 5. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the weight loss with increasingapplied normal load: a Ti6Al4V/Al2O3 and b.Ti6Al4V/steel ballOn the other hand, in the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3contact pair can be observed that the weight loss <strong>of</strong>the alumina ball increases with increasing appliednormal load (figure 5b).In the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair canbe observed a constant variation <strong>of</strong> the weight loss<strong>of</strong> the alumina ball counterpart (figure 5a) while inthe case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/steel ball to the steel ballcounterpart (figure 5b). Also, the weight loss washigher is the case <strong>of</strong> the steel ball counterpartcompared to the alumina ball counterpart.The evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameters withincreasing applied normal load over the functionalintegrity (figure 6) shows that in the case <strong>of</strong>Ti6Al4V/steel ball contact pair the roughnesscdFigure 6. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameterswith increasing applied normal load13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 83


Although the average roughness parameter Sa iscommonly used in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the evolution <strong>of</strong>surface topography, it does not allow tocharacterize the influence <strong>of</strong> roughness over thedegradation process <strong>of</strong> a surface or the load levelover the evolution <strong>of</strong> surface topography [13].The roughness parameter, Sv, (Maximum ValleyDepth) is closely related to load level. In this case(figure 6d) the constant evolution <strong>of</strong> this parameterfor Ti6Al4V/steel ball contact pair indicates a lowaffinity <strong>of</strong> the titanium alloy to the bearing steel.Similarly can be remarked the affinity <strong>of</strong> thetitanium alloy to ceramic materials (Al 2 O 3 ).The evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameter Sq(Root Mean Square) gives indications about thedegree <strong>of</strong> flattening <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. It was observed aconstant flattening level in the case <strong>of</strong>Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair. It gives indicationsabout the dimensional stability <strong>of</strong> this materialpairs, and consequently the possibility to use thisover a long period.abFigure 7. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the electrochemical parameters: a. Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 and b. Ti6Al4V/steel ballThe evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameter Sy(Peak-Peak Height) (figure 6c) refers to theinterdependence between surface roughness and itsimage. This is based mainly on the functional84 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


dependence <strong>of</strong> roughness height and grey levelimage <strong>of</strong> surface, which means that the higher parts<strong>of</strong> the asperities correspond to higher intensitypixels. Also this parameter indicates the stability <strong>of</strong>the surface conditions with increasing normal load.This leads to a longer stability <strong>of</strong> the initial surfaceconditions during the service life <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3contact pair. The evolution <strong>of</strong> previous mentionedroughness parameters shows that in terms <strong>of</strong>surface quality and functional maintenance theTi6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pairs present a higherfunctional integrity level.Figure 7a and b shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> theelectrochemical parameters for both contact pairs.The functional integrity <strong>of</strong> the tests in corrosiveenvironment for both material pairs indicateddifferences in the evolution <strong>of</strong> the electrochemicalparameters that characterize the electrochemicalstate <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaces.Thus, in the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair(figure 7a) at low load levels (100N) theelectrochemical parameters E corr and I corr do notchange much with time. Parameters β a and β c havesignificant variation, with an increasing tendencyfor β c and a decreasing tendency for β a . Theincrease <strong>of</strong> the applied load changes the evolution<strong>of</strong> those parameters with time. These will have anoscillatory tendency. In the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/steelball can be observed a more pronounced oscillatoryevolution <strong>of</strong> all electrochemical parameters withtime (figure 7b) at higher load levels than forTi6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair (except for theevolution <strong>of</strong> parameter β c ).The analysis from the functional integrity point<strong>of</strong> view based on electrochemical criterionsindicates a higher integrity level <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3contact pair.Figure 8 shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction with the sliding distance in the case <strong>of</strong> dryreciprocating wear tests.abFigure 9. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction with thesliding distance for reciprocating wear tests in corrosiveenvironment: a. /Ti6Al4V/Al2O3 and b. Ti6Al4V/steelballThe variation <strong>of</strong> COF for dry reciprocating wearconditions (figure 8) is similar for both contactpairs used in this study. The COF has a slighthigher value in the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 thanTi6Al4V/steel ball contact pairs.Also in the case <strong>of</strong> reciprocating wear incorrosive environment the variation <strong>of</strong> COF issimilar for both contact pairs. The COF was notinfluenced by the load level. The Ti6Al4V/steelball (figure 9b) contact pair showed a more stableevolution <strong>of</strong> the COF at a low level than in the case<strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair (figure 9a).5. CONCLUSIONFigure 8. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction with thesliding distance for dry reciprocating wear testsFigure 9 shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction with the sliding distance in the case <strong>of</strong>reciprocating wear tests in corrosive environmentfor both contact pairs.This present paper showed the behavior <strong>of</strong> aTI6Al4V alloy under reciprocating wear slidingconditions in a comparative way for two differentcounter materials, bearing steel and ceramic balls(Al 2 O 3 - 99.6%) in dry and corrosive environment(an aqueous solution <strong>of</strong> 3.5% NaCl). It aimed tohighlight the tribological characteristics that showsinvariability during the test and provides a highlevel <strong>of</strong> functional integrity <strong>of</strong> the surface.The conclusions drawn from this work are asfollows:13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 85


- in dry condition the Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contactpair showed a high functional integrity degree <strong>of</strong>the surfaces in terms <strong>of</strong> surface quality,characterized by roughness parameters Sa, Sq andSy, while for the Ti6Al4V/steel ball based on theroughness parameter Sv;- in the case <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/steel ball contact pair abetter functional integrity (evaluated based on theweight loss) occurred for higher applied loads thanin the case <strong>of</strong> lower loads;- from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the electrochemicalbehavior a higher functional integrity occurs in thecase <strong>of</strong> Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair at lowerapplied loads (assessed through parameters E corrand I corr );- the electrochemical parameters forTi6Al4V/Al 2 O 3 contact pair are at a lower levelthan those <strong>of</strong> the Ti6Al4V/steel ball contact pair;- the evolution <strong>of</strong> the roughness parameters andthe structural affinity between TI6Al4V alloy andthe bearing ball conduced to a higher functionalintegrity level from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> theevolution <strong>of</strong> COF by comparison to Ti6Al4V/Al 2 O 3contact pair.REFERENCES[1] B. Griffiths, Manufacturing Surface Technology-Surface Integrity and Functional Performance,Prenton Press, 2001.[2] G. Bellows, D. N. Tisher, Introduction to surfaceIntegrity Report TM70-974, Cincinnati: GeneralElectric Co., 1970.[3] N. Aris, K. Cheng, Characterization <strong>of</strong> the surfacefunctionality on precision machined engineeringsurfaces, International Journal <strong>of</strong> AdvancedManufacturing, Vol. 38, pp. 402-409, 2008.[4] I.S. Jawahir, E. Brinksmeier, R. M'Saoubi, D.K.Aspinwall, J.C. Outeiro, D. Meyer, D. Umbrello,A.D. Jayal, Surface integrity in material removalprocesses: Recent advances, CIRP Annals -Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60, pp. 603–626,2011.[5] J.F. Archard, Wear theory and mechanisms. In:M.B. Peterson, W.O. Winer, Wear ControlHandbook. ASME, 1980.[6] R. J. K. Wood, Tribo-corrosion <strong>of</strong> coatings: areview, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 40, pp. 5502–5521, 2007.[7] P. Ponthiaux, F. Wenger, D. Drees, J.P. Celis,Electrochemical techniques for studyingtribocorrosion processes, Wear, Vol. 256, pp. 459–468, 2004.[8] S. Mischler, S. Debaud, D. Landolt, Wearacceleratedcorrosion <strong>of</strong> passive metals intribocorrosion systems, Journal <strong>of</strong> theElectrochemical Society, Vol. 145, pp. 750-758,1998.[9] J. Perret, Modélisation de la tribocorrosion d'aciersinoxydables dans l'eau à haute pression et hautetempérature, Thèse No 4727 (2010) ÉcolePolytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne.[10] S. Feliu, J. A. Gonzalez, S. Miranda, Possibilitiesand Problems <strong>of</strong> in Situ Techniques for MeasuringSteel Corrosion Rates in Large Reinforced ConcreteStructures, Corrosion Science, Vol. 47, pp. 217-238,2005.[11] H. H. Uhlig, R. W. Revie, Corrosion and CorrosionControl, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, NewYork, 1985.[12] M. Stern, A. L. Geary, ElectrochemicalPolarization, A Theoretical Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Shape <strong>of</strong>Polarization Curves, Journal <strong>of</strong> ElectrochemicalScience, Vol.104, pp. 56-63, 1957.[13] V. Mereuta, M. Buciumeanu, L. Palaghian, 3DRoughness Parameters as Factors in Determiningthe Evolution <strong>of</strong> Effective Stress ConcentrationFactors in Fatigue Processes, Applied Mechanicsand Materials Vol. 248, pp 504-510, 2013.86 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacFRICTION COEFFICIENT OF UHMWPE DURING DRYRECIPROCATING SLIDINGFatima Živić 1 , Miroslav Babić 1 , Slobodan Mitrović 1 , Dragan Adamović 1 , Svetlana Pelemis 21 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, zivic@kg.ac.rs, babic@kg.ac.rs, boban@kg.ac.rs, adam@kg.ac.rs2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technology in Zvornik, University <strong>of</strong> East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, alannica@gmail.comAbstract: This paper deals with the friction coefficient behaviour during dry reciprocating sliding <strong>of</strong>UHMWPE in contact with alumina (Al2O3), within a range <strong>of</strong> velocities typical for hip implants. Five values<strong>of</strong> normal force (100 - 1000 mN) and three values <strong>of</strong> sliding speed (4 - 12 mm/s) have been observed. Realtime diagrams <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> the sliding cycles were recorded for each test.Dynamic friction coefficient curves exhibited rather uniform behavior for all test conditions. Somewhatlarger values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient could be observed during the running-in period in case <strong>of</strong> low loads(100-250 mN) and the lowest velocity (4 mm/s). In case <strong>of</strong> high loads and speeds, friction coefficient reachedsteady state values shortly after the beginning <strong>of</strong> the test.Keywords: UHMWPE, Dynamic friction coefficient, Reciprocating sliding.1. INTRODUCTIONUltra-high molecular weight polyethylene(UHMWPE) is a unique polymer with outstandingphysical and mechanical properties. Most notableare its chemical inertness, lubricity, impactresistance, and abrasion resistance. The first clinicalapplication <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE biomaterials started in1962 and continued with astonishing speed throughthe three decades <strong>of</strong> the clinical history (1962–1997), with a few clinically relevant innovationsoccurred beyond the removal <strong>of</strong> calcium stearateand changes in sterilization practice. Radiationcrosslinked UHMWPE materials had been recentlyintroduced to clinical practice around a year 2000.Today, second generation <strong>of</strong> radiation crosslinkedmaterials are in clinical use, and vitamin Estabilized UHMWPE has emerged as a new,internationally standardized biomaterial.At the November 2012 ASTM Meeting inAtlanta, GA, the UHMWPE working groupconsidered revisions to four UHMWPE-relatedstandards, including F648 (unfilled UHMWPEhomopolymer), F2102 (FTIR analysis <strong>of</strong>oxidation), F2565 (Guide for CrosslinkedUHMWPEs), and a new standard for small punchtesting <strong>of</strong> medical polymers, including UHMWPE,based on F2183. The next ASTM meeting <strong>of</strong> theUHMWPE working group will be in May, 2013.All existing data on UHMWPE indicate that forvery elderly patients, artificial joints incorporatingconventional UHMWPE will continue to be used.On the other hand, the more recently-introducedalternative bearing technologies, includingcrosslinked UHMWPE, should provide the greatestbenefit to young patients (less than 60 years in age)who lead an active lifestyle and who need a totalhip replacement. For patients in need <strong>of</strong> kneearthroplasty, shoulder arthroplasty, or total discreplacement, conventional UHMWPE continues toprevail as the polymeric bearing material <strong>of</strong> choice.Polymers are large molecules synthesized fromsmaller molecules, called monomers. Plastics arepolymers that are rigid solids at room temperatureand generally contain additional additives.UHMWPE has been used as a bearing surface, intotal joint prostheses, for more than 45 years.Each year, about 2 million joint replacementprocedures are performed around the world, and themajority <strong>of</strong> these joint replacements incorporateUHMWPE. Despite the success <strong>of</strong> these restorativeprocedures, orthopedic and spine implants haveonly a finite lifetime. Wear and damage <strong>of</strong> theUHMWPE components has historically been one <strong>of</strong>13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 87


the factors limiting implant longevity. In the past 10years, highly crosslinked UHMWPE biomaterialshave shown dramatic reductions in wear in clinicaluse around the world. The orthopedic communityawaits confirmation that these reductions in wearwill be associated with improved long-termsurvival, as expected.UHMWPE has been used for fabricating one <strong>of</strong>the bearing components in various arthroplasties,such as acetabular cups, acetabular cup liners, tibialinserts, etc. [1, 2]. Total joints with componentsmade <strong>of</strong> this material can function for more thantwenty years if they are well designed and wellimplanted. Components made <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE haveperformed admirably in vivo. The only majorconcern is wear and the effect <strong>of</strong> the wear particleson the in vivo longevity <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis. Someapplications <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE in biomedical area areshown in Fig. 1.Figure 1. Application <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE [1]: a) cup; b), c),d) liners; e) total knee components; f) shoulderprosthesis system components.Polyethylene contains the chemical elementscarbon and hydrogen. Polyethylene is createdthrough polymerization <strong>of</strong> ethene (Fig. 2), formingan extremely long, chained molecule calledgenerally polymer. At a molecular level, the carbonbackbone <strong>of</strong> polyethylene can twist, rotate, and foldinto ordered crystalline regions.Figure 2. Left: The repeating unit <strong>of</strong> polyethylene;Right: Granulated polyethylene.At a supermolecular level, the UHMWPEconsists <strong>of</strong> powder (also known as resin or flake)that must be consolidated at elevated temperaturesand pressures to form a bulk material. Furtherlayers <strong>of</strong> complexity are introduced by chemicalchanges that arise in UHMWPE due to radiationsterilization and processing.The mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> polyethyleneimprove slowly with rising molecular weight <strong>of</strong> theproduct. A dramatic change in mechanicalproperties, however, appears when molecularweight <strong>of</strong> the polyethylene molecule exceeds onemillion. This appears when more than 35000ethylene groups are added together. Such product iscalled Ultra High Molecular Weight PolyEthylene.The molecular weight <strong>of</strong> the UHMWPE currentlyused in total joint components varies between 4 to 6millions. Every such UHMWPE molecule iscomposed <strong>of</strong> 160 to 215 000 ethylene groups.The molecular chain <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE can bevisualised as a tangled string <strong>of</strong> spaghetti over akilometer long. Because the chain is not static, butimbued with internal (thermal) energy, themolecular chain can become mobile at elevatedtemperatures. When cooled below the melttemperature, the molecular chain <strong>of</strong> polyethylenehas the tendency to rotate about the C-C bonds andcreate chain folds. This chain folding, in turn,enables the molecule to form local ordered,sheetlike regions known as crystalline lamellae.These lamellae are embedded within amorphous(disordered) regions and may communicate withsurrounding lamellae by tie molecules. Thelamellae are on the order <strong>of</strong> 10–50 nm in thicknessand 10–50 µm in length. UHMWPE has a white,opaque appearance at room temperature. Attemperatures above the melt temperature <strong>of</strong> thelamellae, around 137°C, it becomes translucent.UHMWPE exhibits the composite nature due tointerconnected network <strong>of</strong> amorphous andcrystalline regions.Generally speaking, many polymers undergothree major thermal transitions: the glass transitiontemperature (Tg), the melt temperature (Tm), andthe flow temperature (Tf). The glass transition (Tg)is the temperature below which the polymer chainsbehave like a brittle glass. Below Tg, the polymerchains have insufficient thermal energy to slide pastone another, and the only way for the material torespond to mechanical stress is by stretching (orrupture) <strong>of</strong> the bonds constituting the molecularchain. In UHMWPE, the glass transition occursaround 120°C.UHMWPE shows two key features, the first oneis the peak melting temperature (Tm), which occursaround 137°C and corresponds to the point at whichthe majority <strong>of</strong> the crystalline regions have melted.The melt temperature reflects the thickness <strong>of</strong> thecrystals as well as their perfection. Thicker andmore perfect polyethylene crystals will tend to meltat a higher temperature than smaller crystals.As the temperature <strong>of</strong> a semicrystalline polymeris raised above the melt temperature, it mayundergo a flow transition and become liquid.88 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Polyethylenes with a molecular weight <strong>of</strong> less than500,000 g/mol can be observed to undergo such aflow transition (Tf). However, when the molecularweight <strong>of</strong> polyethylene increases above 500,000g/mol, the entanglement <strong>of</strong> the immense polymerchains prevents it from flowing. UHMWPE doesnot exhibit a flow transition for this reason.UHMWPE is a linear, low-pressure,polyethylene resin. It has both the highest abrasionresistance and highest impact strength <strong>of</strong> anyplastic. Combined with abrasion resistance andtoughness, the low coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction <strong>of</strong>UHMWPE yields a self-lubricating, non-sticksurface. Static and dynamic coefficients aresignificantly lower than steel and most plasticmaterials. Elastic modulus <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE isapproximately 0.69 GPa. ASTM F648-00 definesstandard specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene powder and fabricated formfor surgical implants. To date it has proven to bethe best polymer material for use in total joints.Along with the extensive application <strong>of</strong>UHMWPE, the understanding <strong>of</strong> polymer tribologyis becoming increasingly important. Many authorshave investigated different aspects <strong>of</strong> tribologicalperformance <strong>of</strong> UHMPWE [2-7]. The structuralfactors associated with surface mechanicalproperties (crosslinking, oxidation state, localorientation <strong>of</strong> polymer, crystallinity, etc.) can behighly variable and localized and may vary onmicron spatial scales or smaller [8]. Therelationship between UHMWPE mechanicalproperties and the in-vivo performance <strong>of</strong> afabricated form has not been determined. Whiletrends are apparent, specific property-polymerstructure relationships are not well understood. Themechanical properties are subject to variation as thefabrication process variables (such as temperature,pressure, and time) are changed. [ASTM F-648(2000)].Reciprocating sliding at different test devicesand from different aspects has been a subject <strong>of</strong>investigations [9-11]. Different approaches forimprovement <strong>of</strong> existing UHMWPE materials havebeen tried. [10] investigated effects <strong>of</strong> nitrogen ionirradiation on tribological properties. [9]investigated friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> ultrahighmolecular weight polyethylene as a function <strong>of</strong>polymer crystallinity. [2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15]investigated crosslinking and material behaviorwith different approaches to crosslinking.This paper deals with friction coefficientbehaviour during dry reciprocating sliding <strong>of</strong>UHMWPE in contact with alumina (Al2O3), withina range <strong>of</strong> velocities typical for hip implants. Fivevalues <strong>of</strong> normal force and three values <strong>of</strong> slidingspeed have been observed.2. MATERIALS AND TRIBOLOGICAL TESTPolished rectangular flat UHMWPE sampleswere used for tests, supplied by the companyNarcissus Ada, Serbia. Sliding tests were done atball-on-flat configuration <strong>of</strong> CSM Nanotribometerin dry conditions. Alumina was used as a ballmaterial (diameter, 1.5 mm), since it is extremelyhard and chemically inert. Alumina is frequentlyused in combination with UHMWPE in artificialhip joints. Duration <strong>of</strong> each test was 3000 cycles (1cycle, 1.6 mm), which is enough to reach stabilesteady state <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient. During the test,the dynamic friction coefficients were recorded inreal time, using the built-in TriboX 2.9.0 s<strong>of</strong>tware.Five values <strong>of</strong> normal force (100 - 1000 mN) andthree values <strong>of</strong> sliding speed (4 - 12 mm/s) havebeen tested. Maximum elastic contact stress(according to applied normal loads) were calculatedby Hertz method and compared to test conditions.Characteristics <strong>of</strong> conducted tribological tests aregiven in Table 1.Table 1. Tribological parameters.Normal load values, F nMaximum elastic contact stress(according to applied normalloads)Maximum linear speed values, v3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION100 mN, 250 mN, 500 mN,750 mN, 1000 mN28.5 MPa, 38.6 MPa, 48.7MPa, 55.7 MPa, 61.3 MPa4 mm/s; 8 mm/s; 12 mm/sReal time diagrams <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient as afunction <strong>of</strong> the sliding cycles (sliding distance) wererecorded for each test. Friction coefficient curve is <strong>of</strong>sinusoid shape, whereat the opposite directions aremarked with + and - sign, denoting coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction in two different directions <strong>of</strong> sample moving.Good agreement with reported values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient was obtained [6, 16, 17, 18].Dynamic friction coefficient curves exhibitedrather uniform behavior for all test conditions(Fig.3). Somewhat larger values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient could be observed during the running-inperiod in case <strong>of</strong> low loads (100-250 mN) and thelowest velocity (4 mm/s), as shown in Fig. 3a. Incase <strong>of</strong> high loads and speeds, friction coefficientreached steady state values shortly after thebeginning <strong>of</strong> the test. Maximum contact pressuresin these tests were approximately from 30 - 60MPa, representing high contact stresses exhibited inhip/knee implants. Especially extreme loadingconditions are present in the knee implant system.Similar behavior (short running-in phase for thefriction coefficient) was also reported by otherauthors [18].13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 89


nanotribometer. Comparative diagrams <strong>of</strong> variation<strong>of</strong> the average values <strong>of</strong> the dynamic frictioncoefficient, with load and sliding speed, are givenin Fig. 4. It can be seen from presented diagramsthat the sliding speed exhibited no significantinfluence on the friction coefficient. Load increaseproduced very slight decrease <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient, for all tested conditions.4. CONCLUSIONThis research showed that UHMWPE exhibitslow dynamic friction coefficient (average valuearound 0.1 for all tests) under dry conditions, incontact with alumina. It also showed that low loadsleaded to a bit longer running-in time, but for alltests steady friction state was achieved andmaintained throughout the test with very shortrunning-in periods. Sliding speed change showedno influence on the dynamic friction coefficient.Figure 3. Dynamic friction coefficient curve during drysliding: a) v=4 mm/s, F N =100mN; b) v=12 mm/s,F N =1000mN.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis paper is supported by TR-35021 project,financed by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science andTechnological Development <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong>Serbia.REFERENCESFigure 4. a) Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> thenormal load; b) Friction coefficient as a function <strong>of</strong> thenormal load and sliding speed.An average value <strong>of</strong> the dynamic coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction (denoted by 'friction coefficient' further inthe text) was calculated, for all test conditions, for asteady state period <strong>of</strong> friction, as the root meansquare function using the raw data obtained by the[1] S.M. Kurtz: UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook,Elsevier, London, 2009[2] G. Lewis: Properties <strong>of</strong> crosslinked ultra-highmolecular-weightpolyethylene, Biomaterials, Vol.22, pp. 371-401, 2001.[3] S.W. Zhang: State-<strong>of</strong>-the-art <strong>of</strong> polymer tribology,Tribology International, Vol. 31, pp. 49-60, 1998.[4] P.A. Williams, I.C. Clarke: Understandingpolyethylene wear mechanisms by modeling <strong>of</strong>debris size distributions, Wear, Vol. 267, pp. 646-652, 2009.[5] S. Ge, S. Wang, N. Gitis, M. Vinogradov, J. Xiao:Wear behavior and wear debris distribution <strong>of</strong>UHMWPE against Si3N4 ball in bi-directionalsliding, Wear, Vol. 264, pp. 571-578, 2008.[6] V. Banchet, V. Fridrici, J.C. Abry, Ph. Kapsa: Wearand friction characterization <strong>of</strong> materials for hipprosthesis, Wear, Vol. 263, pp. 1066-1071, 2007.[7] A. Kilgour, A. Elfick: Influence <strong>of</strong> crosslinkedpolyethylene structure on wear <strong>of</strong> jointreplacements, Tribology International, Vol. 42,No.11-12, pp. 1582-1594, 2009.[8] J.L. Gilbert, I. Merkhan: Rate effects on themicroindentation-based mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>oxidized, crosslinked, and highly crystallineultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene, Journal <strong>of</strong>Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Vol. 71A,No.3, pp. 549–558, 2004.90 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[9] K.S. Kanaga Karuppiah, A.L. Bruck, S.Sundararajan, J. Wang, Z. Lin, Z.H. Xu, X. Li:Friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> ultra-high molecularweight polyethylene as a function <strong>of</strong> polymercrystallinity, Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 4, No.5, pp.1401-1410, 2008.[10] L. Fasce, J. Cura, M. del Grosso, G.G. Bermúdez, P.Frontini: Effect <strong>of</strong> nitrogen ion irradiation on thenano-tribological and surface mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> ultra-high molecular weightpolyethylene, Surface and Coatings Technology,Vol. 204, No.23, pp. 3887-3894, 2010.[11] M. Flannery, T. McGloughlin, E. Jones, C.Birkinshaw: Analysis <strong>of</strong> wear and friction <strong>of</strong> totalknee replacements: Part I. Wear assessment on athree station wear simulator, Wear, Vol. 265, No.7-8, pp. 999-1008, 2008.[12] M. Flannery, E. Jones, C. Birkinshaw: Analysis <strong>of</strong>wear and friction <strong>of</strong> total knee replacements part II:Friction and lubrication as a function <strong>of</strong> wear,Wear, Vol. 265, No.7-8, pp. 1009-1016, 2008.[13] J.L. Gilbert, J. Cumber, A. Butterfield: Surfacemicromechanics <strong>of</strong> ultrahigh molecular weightpolyethylene: Microindentation testing,crosslinking, and material behavior, Journal <strong>of</strong>Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 61, pp. 270–281, 2002.[14] L.A. Pruitt: Deformation, yielding, fracture andfatigue behavior <strong>of</strong> conventional and highly crosslinkedultra high molecular weight polyethylene,Biomaterials, Vol. 26, No.8, pp. 905-915, 2005.[15] C. Zhu, O. Jacobs, R. Jaskulka, W. Köller, W. Wu:Effect <strong>of</strong> counterpart material and water lubricationon the sliding wear performance <strong>of</strong> crosslinked andnon-crosslinked ultra high molecular weightpolyethylene, Polymer Testing, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp.665-673, 2004.[16] H.J. Cho, W.J. Wei, H.C. Kao, C.K. Cheng, Wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> UHMWPE sliding on artificial hiparthroplasty materials, Materials Chemistry andPhysics, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp.9-16, 2004.[17] M.P. Gispert, A.P. Serro, R. Colaco, B. Saramango:Friction and wear mechanisms in hip prosthesis:Comparison <strong>of</strong> joint materials behaviour in severallubricants, Wear, Vol. 260, pp. 149-158, 2006.[18] S.K. Young, M.A. Lotito, T.S. Keller: Frictionreduction in total joint arthroplasty, Wear, Vol. 222,No. 1, pp. 29-37, 1998.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 91


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTHE POTENTIAL OF MAGNESIUM ALLOYS ASBIOABSORBABLE / BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANTS FORBIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONSFatima Zivic 1 , Nenad Grujovic 1 , Geetha Manivasagam 2 , Caroline Richard 3 , Jessem Landoulsi 4 ,Vojislav Petrovic 51 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, zivic@kg.ac.rs, gruja@kg.ac.rs2 Vellore Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Centre for Materials Engineering, Tamil Nadu, India, geethamanivasagam@vit.ac.in3 François Rabelais University <strong>of</strong> Tours, Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Mechanics and Rheology, EA 2640-France, caroline.richard@univ-tours.fr4 Pierre & Marie Curie University <strong>of</strong> Paris, Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Surface Reactivity, UMR 7197-France, jessem.landoulsi@upmc.fr5 AIMME - Instituto Tecnológico Metalmecánico, Unidad de Ingeniería de Producto, Valencia, Spain, vpetrovic@aimme.esAbstract: The potential <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloys as bioabsorbable / biodegradable implants for biomedicalapplications has been extensively studied as emerging direction. This paper gives a review <strong>of</strong> current topicsin this field. Research activities related to biomedical magnesium alloys have been pursued in two maindirections, orthopedic and cardiovascular implants, by investigating different aspects <strong>of</strong> alloying systemdesign, novel structures, degradation rate control, and surface modification methods. Magnesium alloys arecurrently considered for applications as load-bearing implant devices such as plates, screws and pins forrepairing bone fracture. Highly important direction <strong>of</strong> research is degradable coronary stents. Degradablevessel stents promote stable vessel regeneration, unlike permanent stents. Different combinations <strong>of</strong> alloyingelements have been investigated in order to decrease corrosion rate.Tribological issues are also importantfor understanding <strong>of</strong> different phenomenon related to prolongation <strong>of</strong> Mg alloys corrosion degradationtime/rate, such as tribocorrosion, corrosion fatigue, and fatigue crack growth behavior.Keywords: Mg alloys, Bioabsorbable / Biodegradable implants.1. INTRODUCTIONThe beginning <strong>of</strong> the resorbable implantsconcepts is related to using polymers withcontrolled dissolution rates: polylactides andpolyglycolides, back in 1970s [1]. But the problemassociated with use <strong>of</strong> polymers is their mechanicalproperties, where metals have better characteristicsand represent the promising field for advancements.The history <strong>of</strong> biodegradable magnesium (Mg)implants started shortly after the discovery <strong>of</strong>elemental magnesium by Sir Humphrey Davy in1808 [2]. It is supposed that the pure magnesiumwires were used as ligatures to stop bleedingvessels <strong>of</strong> three human patients in 1878 [2]. Theyelaborated corrosion induced degradation properties<strong>of</strong> pure magnesium and concluded that corrosionrate depended on the wire size. From those firstattempts, many other solutions and ideas were tried,because magnesium has been recognised as thepromising material for efficient degradableimplants. Today, in vitro and in vivo study dataexists, as well as some clinical trials data, but not soextensively present as for other biomedical metalmaterials, because degradable materials and Mgalloys are still having many unresolved issues ifcompared to the development <strong>of</strong> Ti biomedicalalloys. Even today, several important drawbacks <strong>of</strong>the technology and material need to be resolvedbefore its wide application in clinical practice.Magnesium is the seventh most abundantelement in earth’s crust (2% <strong>of</strong> the total mass) andalso essential and major constituent element <strong>of</strong>human body, nontoxic and biocompatibleaccordingly [3]. It belongs to the group <strong>of</strong> alkalineearth metals and cannot be found in elemental formin nature, but only in chemical combinations, sincebeing highly reactive. From aspects <strong>of</strong> the Mgalloys production, important mineral forms are:magnesite MgCO3 (27% Mg), dolomite92 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


MgCO3•CaCO3 (13% Mg), and carnalliteKCl•MgCl2•6H2O (8% Mg), as well as sea water,which contains 0.13% Mg or 1.1 kg Mg per m3(3rd most abundant among the dissolved mineralsin sea water) [3]. However, Mg alloys are stilllacking wide application due to several reasons, one<strong>of</strong> which is rather high price <strong>of</strong> base material andregarding degradable implants, too rapid corrosionrate when implanted, especially in solutionscontaining Cl -1 . In addition, there are certainlimitations related to the processing temperaturesand production protocols.The usage <strong>of</strong> magnesium (Mg) has historicallybeen limited by relatively high cost <strong>of</strong> productionand associated energy costs. However, Mg marketwill steadily increase, mainly due to the low costproduction in China. Magnesium is recovered byelectrolysis <strong>of</strong> molten anhydrous MgCl2, bythermal reduction <strong>of</strong> dolomite, or by extraction <strong>of</strong>magnesium oxide from sea water. The globalproduction <strong>of</strong> roughly 436,000 t (1997) is coveredby melt electrolysis to 75% and by thermalreduction to 25%. Cast magnesium alloys dominate85-90% <strong>of</strong> all magnesium alloy products, with Mg-Al-Zn system being the most widely used. Rareearth alloying additions increase cost and are <strong>of</strong>uncertain supply. US and Canada dominatedmagnesium production during the 1990s, however,since the late 90s, China become the mainproducer. Today, China dominates the worldproduction because <strong>of</strong> the relatively low operatingcosts. In general, electrolytic producers in the westhave been replaced by Chinese pyrometallurgicalproduction via the Pidgeon process (Pidgeon,1944). For example, the capital cost for AustraliaMagnesium (AM) Process using an electrolyticroute was estimated to be $10,000/tonne Mg, whilethe capital cost for the Pidgeon process wasestimated to be $3,000/tonne Mg in 2008.2. MAGNESIUM ALLOYSMagnesium alloys are standardized by ASTMnorm and they are marked with letters (A, B, C,etc.), indicating main alloying elements, followedby the rounded figures <strong>of</strong> each weight in percentageterms. The alloy AZ91D, for example, is an alloywith a rated content <strong>of</strong> 9% aluminium (A) and 1%zinc (Z) [3]. The corresponding DIN specificationwould be MgAl9Zn1. The most common alloyingelements are given in Table 1.Different alloying elements influence theproperties <strong>of</strong> the pure magnesium, depending on thewanted characteristics. The main mechanism forimproving the mechanical properties isprecipitation hardening and/or solid-solutionhardening. One <strong>of</strong> the most important alloyingelements is aluminium (Al) which increase tensilestrength, by forming the intermetallic phaseMg17Al12. The use <strong>of</strong> rare earth elements (e.g. Y,Nd, Ce) has become significant, especially fordesigning the medical grade Mg alloy fordegradable implants, since they impart a significantincrease in strength through precipitationhardening. But almost all elements used so far foralloying mostly increase susceptibility to corrosion.Review <strong>of</strong> commercially produced Mg alloys todayis given in Table 2 [3].Table 1. ASTM codes for magnesium’s alloying elements [3].AbbreviationletterAlloyingelementAbbreviationletterAlloyingelementA aluminium N nickelB bismuth P leadC copper Q silverD cadmium R chromiumE rare earths S siliconF iron T tinH thorium W yttriumK zirconium Y antimonyL lithium Z zincMmanganeseTable 2. Chemical composition (in weight %; Mg is thebalance; Cu, Ni in general


Energy absorption during impact or loading isinherent property <strong>of</strong> the foams. Fig. 1 shows stress–strain behavior <strong>of</strong> the foams in compression, ingeneral [1]. From Fig. 1, it can be seen that threezones exists: I. Elastic region: deformation <strong>of</strong> the porewalls; II. A plateau <strong>of</strong> nearly constant flow stress andlarge strain (10–50%) and III. Densification regionwith steep increase <strong>of</strong> flow stress where the plasticdamage occurs. Relatively wide region <strong>of</strong> constantflow stress during compressive loading explains thefact that while foams are in this interval, anyincreasing strain hardly entails increasing stress. Iftension is observed, the stress–strain behavior <strong>of</strong>foams is approximately similar to ductile metals(curve b in Fig. 1).Figure 1. Stress - strain behaviour <strong>of</strong> foams.3. MAGNESIUM ALLOYS ASDEGRADABLE IMPLANTSThe application <strong>of</strong> Mg and its alloys fordegradable implants started with ligatures for bloodvessels (Huse, 1878, pure magnesium) and plates,arrows, wire, sheets, rods (Payr, 1905, puremagnesium) [2]. Mg alloys have been tried indifferent medical areas, such as: pure Mg for band,suture from woven Mg wires, fusiform pins (in1940); Mg–Al2%-wt. pure magnesium wires forclotting aneurysms (dog studies in 1951); Mg–Al2%-wt. for intravascular wires (rat studies in1980) [2]. The potential <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloys asbioabsorbable / biodegradable implants forbiomedical applications has been extensively studiedas emerging direction. Research activities related tobiomedical magnesium alloys have been pursued intwo main directions, orthopedic and cardiovascularimplants, by investigating different aspects <strong>of</strong>alloying system design, novel structures, degradationrate control, and surface modification methods.Magnesium alloys are currently considered forapplications as load-bearing implant devices suchas plates, screws and pins for repairing bonefracture. Other metals currently used for boneimplants, such as stainless steels and titaniumalloys, have elastic modulus that are much higherthan natural bone, leading to unwanted stressshielding. The elastic modulus <strong>of</strong> magnesium andmany magnesium alloys are much closer to bone.The advantage <strong>of</strong> Mg alloys is favorable elasticresponse during loading (such as shown in Fig. 1).Also, the second surgery is avoided due to thedegradation <strong>of</strong> the implant after its function in thebody is finished. For example, compared with poly-96L/4D-lactide, the magnesium alloys AZ31 andAZ91 enhanced the osteogenesis response andincrease newly formed bone [4]. Investigationsshowed that Mg–6Zn, Mg–Ca and Mg–Mn–Znalloys gradually degrade within a bone and hadgood biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo [4].Highly important direction <strong>of</strong> research isdegradable coronary stents. Degradable vesselstents promote stable vessel regeneration, unlikepermanent stents [5, 6, 7]. However, as a vesseldefect gets larger, stronger and degradablematerials are paramount for stable vesselregeneration. Vessel scaffolding is necessary onlyfor a certain, limited time, than the permanent stenthas no known advantage. A stent is a miniaturemesh tube, made <strong>of</strong> a biocompatible metal,biodegradable metal or polymer, placed inside <strong>of</strong> ablood vessel (cardiovascular, neurovascular andperipheral blood vessels) or a natural conduit(gastrointestinal, urinary and biliary tracts). Thestent acts as a scaffold, pushing against the internalwalls <strong>of</strong> the conduit/vessel to open a blocked areaand thereby enables natural flow and prevents thevessel from collapsing, narrowing or closing. Stentsdiffer greatly in their design, dimensions andmaterial, depending on application. Coronary stentsare now the most commonly implanted medicaldevice for angioplasty, with more than 1 millionimplanted annually. Currently used metallic stentspermanently remain in the artery and are associatedwith limitations such as continued mechanicalstress, transfer to the tissue, and continuedbiological interaction with the surrounding tissue.Also, within 6 months, 30-35% patients suffer fromrestenosis. They are associated with late stentthrombosis and artifacts when non-invasivetechnologies such as MRI and MSCT are used. Thestent presence is required for a period <strong>of</strong> 6 - 12months during which arterial remodelling andhealing is achieved. After this period the stentpresence within the blood vessel cannot provideany beneficial effects. With the development <strong>of</strong>biodegradable implants, the concept <strong>of</strong> biomaterialshas shifted from purely mechanical replacementdevices towards true biological solutions. Bioabsorbablestents (Fig. 2) aim to mechanicallyprevent vessel recoil without the permanentpresence <strong>of</strong> an artificial implant. The advantages <strong>of</strong>bioabsorbable stents are to leave no stent behind,94 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


fully compatible with MRI/MSCT imaging, and arenot associated with late stent thrombosis.Figure 2. Bioabsorbable magnesium stent (Biotronik,Berlin, Germany) [6].Magnesium (Mg) alloys which has beendeveloped in the last ten years showed greatpotential in cardiovascular applications wheretemporary stent is required. Biotronik Mg AlloyBalloon expanding stent with a delivery catheterhas been clinically tested to some extent [7].Different combinations <strong>of</strong> alloying elementshave been investigated in order to decreasecorrosion rate. The addition <strong>of</strong> aluminium (Al) andrare earth (RE) elements has been reported toincrease its strength and improve corrosionresistance. But Al could cause nerve toxicity andrestraining growth to human body. Alloycontaining RE is very expensive. In some alloys,the low cost Ca has been used as alloying elementand Mg–Ca alloy exhibited increased corrosionresistance. The addition <strong>of</strong> Zn into Mg–Ca alloysincreases the tensile strength, ductility, hardnessand the kinetics <strong>of</strong> age hardening. Commercial Mgalloys such as WE43 (Mg–Y–RE–Zr), AZ91 (Mg–Al–Zn), AZ31 (Mg–Al–Zn–Mn) are underinvestigation. There are number <strong>of</strong> studies relatedto corrosion mechanisms and degradation kinetics.Published results indicate that the mechanismsaffecting the corrosion behaviour <strong>of</strong> Mg-basedstents in service conditions can be: internalgalvanic corrosion; localized corrosion (pittingand filiform); stress corrosion cracking (SCC) andfatigue corrosion. Simultaneous effect <strong>of</strong> differentcorrosion mechanisms influences a stent inservice, which makes the identification <strong>of</strong>correlations between in vitro and in vivoexperimental results very complex and manyissues has not yet been resolved. ASTM G31(Standard Practice for Laboratory ImmersionCorrosion Testing <strong>of</strong> Metals) <strong>of</strong>fers generalguidance for metal corrosion testing, but there areno standardized procedures for biocorrosion <strong>of</strong>biodegradable metal materials.Low corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> magnesium andits alloys, within the very aggressive environmentin the physiological system, is the vitalcharacteristic enabling degradability <strong>of</strong> the metalimplant. On the other hand, too rapid loss <strong>of</strong>mechanical properties and/or toxic degradationproducts are major problems associated with Mgalloys. Also, the high corrosion rate producesrapid hydrogen gas evolution within the body.The pursued development direction is to controlthe speed <strong>of</strong> corrosion, along with optimization<strong>of</strong> the biological response to these implants tomaximize recovery. Biologically compatiblesurface modifications through treatments orcoating systems have been investigated asprotective strategy in corrosive environments inorder to optimize implant properties [8, 9].Corrosion resistant coatings are commonly usedfor metals in many applications, but in area <strong>of</strong>dergadable implamnts, these coatings need todegrade along with the magnesium, or yield tothe environment, leaving no harmful traces. Some<strong>of</strong> the tried solutions are: anodization, puremagnesium coating on Mg alloy, PVD coating <strong>of</strong>aluminium, but all <strong>of</strong> them have some downsides.One <strong>of</strong> the most biocompatible coating optionsfor orthopedics is calcium phosphate coatings.Zhang et al. [9] investigated ion plating <strong>of</strong> Ticoatingon pure Mg for biomedical applications,inspired by good properties <strong>of</strong> both Ti and Mgalloys. They reported good results inimprovement <strong>of</strong> the corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> Mgand promising further potentials, butcomprehensive testing <strong>of</strong> this new coating is yetto come.Another method for increasing the corrosionresistance <strong>of</strong> a magnesium alloy is the surfacestructure modifications. Magnesium alloysundergo microgalvanic corrosion when multiplephases exist in an alloy, one more cathodic thananother and in order to slow the corrosion rate isto modify the surface to homogenize it [8].Amorphous surface would eliminate theformation <strong>of</strong> galvanic cells between grains andboundaries. One such a way is to make the matrixa completely amorphous bulk metallic glass tocompletely remove corrosion difference due tocrystal structure in the metal [8]. AmorphousMgZnCa alloys have been tested in vivo to showreduced hydrogen evolution [10]. Ionimplantation is another method <strong>of</strong> surfacemodification to increase corrosion resistance,also creating a gradual transition between themodified surface and the bulk <strong>of</strong> the material.This makes strong, adherent surfaces that do nothave the problems <strong>of</strong> adhesion, thermal stresses,and crackings that separate secondary coatingphases tend to have [8]. Plasma immersion ionimplantation <strong>of</strong> Al, Zr, and Ti has been used tocreate corrosion resistance on AZ91.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 95


4. FRICTION AND WEAR ISSUES RELATEDTO MG ALLOYSTribocorrosion is defined as an irreversibletransformation <strong>of</strong> a material from concomitantphysicochemical and mechanical surfaceinteractions occurring at tribological contacts [11].In general, metallic implants need to be tested totribocorrosion and wear issues, regardless <strong>of</strong> theirarea <strong>of</strong> application. The realised contacts betweenimplant material and either other implant material,or organic body constituent (e.g. bone) andelements <strong>of</strong> the aggressive physiological bodyenvironment, provoke certain responses (weardebris) that need to be investigated in more depth,especially for newly developed biomaterials. It isproven that even micro contacts within smallregions sometimes influence significant responses,ranging from changes in contact environment up toincreasing deterioration <strong>of</strong> implant surfaces due towear related processes. Two- or three-body contactsare frequently associated with tribocorrosion [12].Entrapped wear debris acts as an abrasive and isdefined as the third body. The main concernsrelated to the simultaneous action <strong>of</strong> corrosion andwear in biomedical systems are the ability <strong>of</strong> thepassive layer to withstand the mechanical stressesarising from wear, the ability <strong>of</strong> the metal surface torepassivate when the passive film is removed andthe resistance <strong>of</strong> the new repassivated surface toboth wear and corrosion [12]. Fretting has a biginfluence on the corrosion behavior <strong>of</strong> orthopedicdevices. The tribocorrosion and fretting corrosionmechanisms have been mainly related to in vitrolaboratory investigations. However, the in vivobehavior <strong>of</strong> metallic implants under combined wearcorrosion or fretting corrosion has been hardlystudied [12]. Also, the corrosion fatigue <strong>of</strong>structural magnesium alloys has been studied byseveral authors in NaCl and borate-bufferedsolutions, but generally focused on applications inelectronic, automotive and aerospace industries.The fatigue strength <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloys issignificantly reduced in humid environments, andthe fatigue limit drops drastically in NaCl solution[12]. Even though the corrosion behavior <strong>of</strong>biomedical magnesium-based alloys has beenextensively studied, corrosion fatigue has receivedlittle attention and degradable material mustmaintain appropriate mechanical strength duringthe healing <strong>of</strong> the fractured bone, to provide safeorthopedic device. Also, fatigue crack propagationbehavior needs to be studied for a wide variety <strong>of</strong>biodegradable Mg alloys [12]. Corrosion and wearresistances are frequently studied in synergy,because <strong>of</strong> the direct relationship between theseproperties and the biocompatibility <strong>of</strong> thebiomedical device.Regarding coronary stenting by using metallicimplants, analysis <strong>of</strong> the fatigue crack growthbehavior is <strong>of</strong> the utmost importance for its properfunctioning. There are my mathematical models inthe literature, but, in particular, the fatigue crackpropagation approach simulating crevice corrosionconditions in physiological solutions has beenhardly considered for biomedical magnesium alloys[12]. Very important aspect is tribology relatedphenomena during the production <strong>of</strong> magnesiumbiodegradable vascular stents minitubes, sincemagnesium alloys possess highly limited roomtemperatureformabilities [13]. Highly complexphysical, chemical and mechanical characteristics<strong>of</strong> magnesium must be taken into consideration, inorder to keep the magnesium alloy characteristics(microstructure, etc.) unchanged under theinfluence <strong>of</strong> e.g. severe abrasive friction and wearduring cold drawing [13].Highly important is the understanding <strong>of</strong> theMg alloy stent behaviour at its positioning duringthe movement through the vasculature, at theinitial interventional cardiovascular treatment.Lubricious coatings have been used for over 20years [14] and the benefits are well established:(1) lower frictional force between the device andthe vessel reduces tissue damage and preventsvasospasm; (2) improved maneuverability aidsnavigation <strong>of</strong> complex lesions and facilitatesaccess to tortuous vascular sites leading toexpansion <strong>of</strong> the patient population that canbenefit from these treatments; and (3) reducesthrombogenicity. In addition, reduced frictionbetween the therapy catheters and supportcatheters leads to improved outcomes, reducedprocedure time, and, ultimately, reduced cost [14].The stent is commonly placed at the one fixedposition within a blood vessel, meaning that thereare no further movement between the stentmaterial and surrounding tissue, leading to theconclusion that wear plays no significant role.However, blood flow around the placed stent hasmicro influence and might provoke nano-weardebris, which is not investigated so far. Such tinywear debris represents a form <strong>of</strong> particulate matterin the vasculature and it is well known that if largeenough and in sufficient quantities, can causeocclusion <strong>of</strong> blood vessels and lead to tissuehypoxia and, ultimately, necrosis [14]. If alloyingelements <strong>of</strong> Mg alloys, such as Al, Zn areconsidered as well, it is obvious that this areaneeds further studies. Since Mg alloys stents hasnot been widely tried in clinical practice, there aremany tribology related questions to be addresses.96 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


5. CONCLUSIONThe magnesium alloys as bioabsorbable /biodegradable implants for biomedical applicationsare highly promising materials, but some issuesneed to be resolved and extensive researchactivities are pursued throughout the world.Different aspects <strong>of</strong> alloying system design, novelstructures, degradation rate control, and surfacemodification methods have been tested, mainly inorder to increase corrosion degradation time.Significant attention is still needed related toproduction processes, tribocorrosion, fatigue crackgrowth behaviour, wear and friction processes andother complex issues when observed withinaggressive human body environment.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis paper is supported by TR-35021 project,financed by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science andTechnological Development <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong>Serbia.REFERENCES[1] J.A. Helsen, Y. Missirlis: Biomaterials, Biologicaland Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering,Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.[2] F. Witte: The history <strong>of</strong> biodegradable magnesiumimplants: A review, Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 6, No.5, pp. 1680-1692, 2010.[3] K.U. Kainer (Ed.): Magnesium – Alloys andTechnology, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2003.[4] S. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Zhao, J. Li, Y. Song, C. Xie,H. Tao, Y. Zhang, Y. He, Y. Jiang, Y. Bian:Research on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradablebiomaterial, Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.626-640, 2010.[5] H. Hermawan, D. Dubé, D. Mantovani:Developments in metallic biodegradable stents,Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 1693-1697,2010.[6] R. Erbel et al.: Temporary scaffolding <strong>of</strong> coronaryarteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: aprospective, non-randomised multicentre trial,PROGRESS-AMS (Clinical Performance andAngiographic Results <strong>of</strong> Coronary Stenting withAbsorbable Metal Stents), The Lancet, Vol. 369,No.9576, pp. 1869 - 1875, 2007.[7] R. Waksman et al.: Early- and Long-TermIntravascular Ultrasound and AngiographicFindings After Bioabsorbable Magnesium StentImplantation in Human Coronary Arteries, JACC:Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.312-320, 2009.[8] J. Waterman, M.P. Staiger: Coating systems formagnesium-based biomaterials - state <strong>of</strong> the art, In:W.H. Sillekens, S.R. Agnew, N.R. Neelameggham,S.N. Mathaudhu (Eds.): <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> MagnesiumTechnology 2011, TMS, The Minerals, Metals &Materials Society, San Diego, California, USA, pp.403-408, 2011.[9] E. Zhang, L. Xu, K. Yang: Formation by ion plating<strong>of</strong> Ti-coating on pure Mg for biomedicalapplications, Scripta Materialia, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp.523-527, 2005.[10] B. Zberg, P.J. Uggowitzer, J.F. L<strong>of</strong>fler: MgZnCaglasses without clinically observable hydrogenevolution for biodegradable implants, NatureMaterials, Vol. 8, No. 11, pp. 887-891, 2009.[11] D. Landolt, S. Mischler, M. Stemp, S. Barril: Thirdbody effects and material fluxes in tribocorrosionsystems involving a sliding contact, Wear, Vol. 256,pp. 517-524, 2004.[12] R.A. Antunes, M.C.L. de Oliveira: Corrosionfatigue <strong>of</strong> biomedical metallic alloys: Mechanismsand mitigation, Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 8, No. 3,pp. 937-962, 2012.[13] G. Fang, W.J. Ai, S. Leeflang, J. Duszczyk, J. Zhou:Multipass cold drawing <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloyminitubes for biodegradable vascular stents,Materials Science & Engineering C, doi:10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.039, In Press, 2013.[14] D.E. Babcock, R.W. Hergenrother, D.A. Craig, F.D.Kolodgie, R. Virmani: In vivo distribution <strong>of</strong>particulate matter from coated angioplasty ballooncatheters, Biomaterials, Vol. 34, No. 13, pp. 3196-3205, 2013.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 97


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacANALYSIS OF THE SURFACE LAYER FORMATION OF SINGLECYLINDER ENGINE COMBUSTION CHAMBER WITHPHOSPHOROUS-FREE AND CONVENTIONAL ENGINELUBRICANTSL.YÜKSEK 1* , H.KALELİ 2 , D.ÖZKAN 3 , H. HACIKADİROĞLU 31 Researcher Dr., Yıldız Technical University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Automotive Division34349 Beşiktaş-İstanbul/TURKEY, lyuksek@yildiz.edu.tr2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dr., Yıldız Technical University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Automotive Division34349 Beşiktaş-İstanbul/TURKEY, kaleli@yildiz.edu.tr3 PhD. Student, Yıldız Technical University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Energy Division34349 Beşiktaş-İstanbul/TURKEY, dogus_ozkan@hotmail.com*Corresponding author.Abstract: Phosphorus-free engine lubricants are gaining importance for preventing catalyst poisoningwhich is the major deactivation mechanism that causes three-way catalyst malfunction. The main purpose <strong>of</strong>this paper is to evaluate the mechanism <strong>of</strong> surface layer formation in combustion chamber <strong>of</strong> spark ignitionengines with phosphorous-free and phosphorous containing mineral engine lubricants. An experimentalendurance test was conducted for 100 hours at equal load conditions for each lubricant. Endurance testswere run with a laboratory engine test bench. Subsequently, engines dismantled and cylinder liners were cutaccurately to obtain specimens for microscopic examination. Optical microscopy, scanning electronmicroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy methods were used for evaluation.Elemental measurements on the surface which were obtained by X-ray spectroscopy were examinedstatistically. Results <strong>of</strong> the experiments showed that phosphorous containing lubricant deposited morecarbon and oxygen although less manganese and silica than the phosphorous containing rival. After the X-ray spectroscopy <strong>of</strong> the combustion chamber surface at top dead centre, iron element composition <strong>of</strong> thephosphorus-free lubricant was notably higher than phosphorus containing oil.Keywords: Phosphorous-free Oil, Combustion chamber, X-ray spectroscopy, Additive layer formation,Cylinder liner1. INTRODUCTIONMechanical losses are responsible for theapproximately 10-15% fuel energy loss. Half <strong>of</strong> themechanical losses are generated by the frictionbetween piston rings and cylinder liner. Therefore,the performance <strong>of</strong> the piston ring and cylinderliner tribological pair is the indicator <strong>of</strong> theperformance and the lifespan <strong>of</strong> an internalcombustion engine [1]. Particularly, wear aroundtop dead centre is the main limiter <strong>of</strong> effectiveengine life. Piston rings are intended to maintainthe dynamic sealing between crankcase and thecombustion chamber which minimize the powerlosses caused by the blow-by mass transfer throughthe crankcase during expansion stroke [2]. Success<strong>of</strong> this sealing mainly depends on the wear rate <strong>of</strong>ring and liner pack which are primarily the function<strong>of</strong> the formed trib<strong>of</strong>ilm on ring and liner surfaces.Engine lubricants are formulated to generate andsustain the protection against wear whilelubrication, cooling and cleaning <strong>of</strong> the surfaces arealso expected from lubricant. Modern enginelubricant can satisfy these demands with chemicalcompounds like anti-wear additives, anti-oxidantadditives, dispersants, detergents etc. [3]. Additivesalso enhance the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> baselubricant [4].98 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP) lubricantadditives are the most effective anti-wear and antioxidantadditives in the cost and performanceperspectives [5]. Therefore, it has been in use fordecades. Although, ZDDP mainly containsphosphorus which is a well-known poison for threewaycatalysts [6]. Environmental concerns becomemore dominant among authorities and individualswhich result stricter emission regulations [7].Automotive manufacturers are pressurised toproduce cleaner vehicles in all terms from well towheel. Harmful exhaust emissions are reducedthrough after-treatment systems like dieseloxidation catalysts, three-way catalyst and dieselparticulate filters. Poisoning phenomenon relatedwith lubricant has to be prevented, and hence, newand emerging technologies have become important.The solution is complex, namely reducing theamount <strong>of</strong> phosphorus, sulphur, zinc andmagnesium without deteriorating the performance<strong>of</strong> the oil [8].This study intended to investigate the interactionbetween phosphorus containing (PC) and Nonphosphorusand non-ash containing lubricant(NPNA) on the combustion chamber surface <strong>of</strong>internal combustion engines. An endurance test wasconducted with two <strong>of</strong> the identical spark ignitionengines. Both engines aged during 100 hours undercertain load conditions which were determinedaccording to standards. Liner surfaces are examinedwith electron, optical microscopy and energydispersive X-ray spectroscopy techniques.2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILSExperimental study consists <strong>of</strong> two equalendurance tests with two identical engines,specifications <strong>of</strong> which are listed in Table 1.Endurance tests were performed after a run-inperiod and a consecutive oil drain.Table 1. Specifications <strong>of</strong> test engines.DesignationValue/typeManufacturer/Model Honda/GX 200Type4-stroke air-cooled, SIAspirationNaturally aspiratedLubrication methodSplashNumber <strong>of</strong> cylinders 1Bore x Stroke (mm) 68 x 54Cylinder volume (cm 3 ) 196Compression ratio 8.5:1Crankcase oil capacity (l) 0.6Speed max (rpm) 3600Rated torque (Nm)12.4@2500 rpmRated power (kW)4.1@3600 rpmISO 8178 standard was selected as a reference todetermine load conditions and a direct currentgenerator was used to generate the brake load [9].An overall scheme <strong>of</strong> the test bench is shown inFigure 1. A specially formulated NPNA lubricantand a conventional PC lubricant were used for thetests, specifications <strong>of</strong> which are listed in Table 2under the courtesy <strong>of</strong> IDEMITSU KOSAN CO.LTD. Japanese petrochemical company.Figure 1. Schematic, CAD and real view <strong>of</strong> the testbench.Table 2. Specifications <strong>of</strong> test oils.Specification PC NPNASAE grade 10W30 10W30TBN (mgKOH/g) 5.73 3.13Viscosity 100 °C (cSt) 10.4 10.3Viscosity index 139 142Flash point (Celcius) 224 240Specific gravity@15 °C 0.874 0.862Ca content (wt %) 0.2 0Zn content (wt %) 0.09 0S content (wt %) 0.19 0.18P content (wt %) 0.08 0Operating conditions are summarized in Table 3for both types <strong>of</strong> engine oils. PC and NPNAlubricant were aged during 100 hours under certainloading conditions, at the end <strong>of</strong> the test, cylinderliner and piston rings were machined to obtainspecimens for microscopic analysis.Table 3. Details <strong>of</strong> load conditions.Specification PC NPNAEngine speed (rpm) 2500 2500Engine load (%) 75 75Endurance test duration (h) 100 100Ambient temperature (Celcius) 22±3 22±3Typical composition <strong>of</strong> cylinder liner wasrequired to obtain better assessment <strong>of</strong> the surfacewhich had been provided by the enginemanufacturer and these are listed in Table 4.Specimens had been ultrasonically cleaned with n-hexane.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 99


Table 4. Typical composition <strong>of</strong> cylinder liner.ElementComposition % massFe 93.97P 0.3V 0.15C 3.00Si 2.00Mn 0.60Figure 2. Optical, SEM and EDS results <strong>of</strong> PC lubricant.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTop dead centre is the most complex surface forthe tribologists where the conditions are extreme.Combustion induced pressure gradient acts upon topring and hence contact between liner and ring surfacereaches top levels and conditions become severe.Furthermore, combustion gases and sootcontroversially affect the lubrication in TDC area,acidic compounds, unburned hydrocarbons and sootaccumulation on liner surface occurs with constantreplenishment cycle. In addition to the factorsexplained above, high gas temperature reduces oilviscosity which also has detrimental effect on linerringlubrication. Base number retention capability andhigh temperature and high shear rate viscosity(HTHS) <strong>of</strong> engine lubricant become excessivelyimportant on TDC lubrication as well as theperformance <strong>of</strong> anti-wear additive. Total base numberindicates the ability <strong>of</strong> engine oil to neutralize acidiccompounds which primarily originate fromcombustion chamber and transfer through the liner tothe crankcase. The more the base number retention,the lower the oxidative wear on liner surfaceespecially around TDC.Downsized engines with turbochargers are ongoingtrend to fulfil the requirements <strong>of</strong> CO 2 emissionreduction and fuel economy [10]. Low load fueleconomy and torque flexibility make these types <strong>of</strong>engines favourable although increased boost levelsresult significantly higher contact pressures.Therefore, HTHS viscosity gains attention with risingin-cylinder pressure which is the wellness <strong>of</strong> lubricantperformance under severe operation conditions.Layer formation <strong>of</strong> anti-wear additive on TDCsurface is the main factor for decreasing the linerwear. Anti-wear additive acts like buffer between ringand liner asperities and prevents adhesion.Accumulated additives on surfaces can effectively bedetected through electron microscopy technique.Besides, it is possible to detect elemental distributionwith X-ray spectroscopy method.Equal tear-down processes were applied to testengines, which include dismantling <strong>of</strong> cylinder linersand piston rings. Scanning electron microscopy(SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy(EDS) were applied on TDC region <strong>of</strong> cylinder lineras shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.Figure 3. Optical, SEM and EDS results <strong>of</strong> NPNAlubricant.Labels on figures indicate the location <strong>of</strong> theinspection: G1 designation borders the combustionchamber surface where the sweep motion <strong>of</strong> topring has ended G2 designation indicates linersurface covered by piston crown. Representation <strong>of</strong>inspected surfaces are depicted in Figure 4, analysepoints were determined by considering the surfacelayers <strong>of</strong> additive accumulation.Figure 4. Schematic representation inspected surfaces.Figure 5. EDS result <strong>of</strong> combustion chamber surface.EDS measurements were applied for both <strong>of</strong> thesurfaces lubricated with test oils. Figure 5 showsthe elemental composition <strong>of</strong> layer on the surface <strong>of</strong>combustion chamber. Higher amount <strong>of</strong>carbonaceous deposit was detected with the PClubricant on combustion chamber surface. Similartrend observed for G2 surface as shown in Figure 6while atomic concentration is different.100 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


C- Lower deposits with NPNA on combustionsurface indicate the effect <strong>of</strong> lubricant oncarbonaceous deposit formation.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis study was supported by Idemitsu KosanCo. Ltd. and the authors would like to thank Dr.Hiroshi Fujita for his contributions throughout thisstudy.Figure 6. EDS result <strong>of</strong> TDC surface.Carbon and oxygen levels indicate the oil filmon both <strong>of</strong> the surfaces while the G1 surfaceenvironment is quite different than G2. Highercarbon concentration <strong>of</strong> PC surface <strong>of</strong> combustionchamber can be attributable to accumulation <strong>of</strong>swept portion <strong>of</strong> surface oil film.4. CONCLUSSIONNewly developed catalyst friendly phosphorusfreeengine oil and a conventional ZDDPcontaining engine oil were tested by applying 100 hlong endurance study. Two <strong>of</strong> identical engineswere aged under equal loading conditions thendismantled and analysed. The main subject <strong>of</strong> theinvestigation is the additive layer formation <strong>of</strong>lubricant on combustion chamber surface.Considering the measurements and observationsmade with optical microscope, SEM and EDS,findings can be summarized as;A- Higher level <strong>of</strong> deposit formation wasdetected with PC lubricant on bothcombustion chamber and piston shadedsurfaces.B- PC conventional lubricant mainly differsfrom NPNA with oxygen content oncombustion chamber surface; thisdiscrepancy originates from the type <strong>of</strong>deposited compounds.REFERENCES[1] B.G. Rosen, R. Ohlsson, T.R. Thomas: Wear <strong>of</strong>cylinder bore microtopography, Wear, Vol. 198,pp. 271-279, 1996.[2] M.F. Jensen, J. Bottiger, H.H. Reitz, M.E. Benzon:Simulation <strong>of</strong> wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> enginecylinders, Wear, Vol. 253, pp. 1044-1056, 2002.[3] D. Troyer, J. Fitch: Oil analysis basics, NoriaCorporation, Oklahoma,USA, 1999.[4] Z. Pawlak: Tribochemistry <strong>of</strong> Lubricating Oils,Elsevier Science, 2003.[5] M.A. Nicholls, T. Do, P.R. Norton, M. Kasrai,G.M. Bancr<strong>of</strong>t: Review <strong>of</strong> the lubrication <strong>of</strong>metallic surfaces by zinc dialkyl-dithlophosphates,Tribol Int, Vol. 38, pp. 15-39, 2005.[6] A.J.J. Wilkins, N.A. Hannington: The Effect <strong>of</strong>Fuel and Oil Additives on Automobile CatalystPerformance, Platinum metals review, Vol. 34, pp.16-24, 1999.[7] EUP, Official Journal <strong>of</strong> the European Union,(EC) No 715/2007, 2007.[8] T. Katafuchi, N. Shimizu: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> theantiwear and friction reduction characteristics <strong>of</strong>mercaptocarboxylate derivatives as novelphosphorous-free additives, Tribol Int, Vol. 40,pp. 1017-1024, 2007.[9] 8178-4:2007 Reciprocating internal combustionengines, Exhaust emission measurement in: Part4: Steady-state test cycles for different engineapplications, ISO, 2007.[10] T.V. Johnson: Vehicular Emissions in Review,SAE Int. J. Engines, Vol. 5, pp. 216-234, 2012.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 101


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL STUDY OF BIOCOMPATIBLE HYBRIDORGANIC MOLECULES FILM WITH ANTIBACTERIALEFFECTJ.H. Horng* 1 , C.C.Wei 1 , S. Y. Chern 1 , W.H. KAO 2 , K.W. Chern 1 , Y.S. Chen 11 Department <strong>of</strong> Power Mechanical Engineering, National Formosa University, Taiwan2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Mechatronoptic Systems, Chienkuo Technology University, Taiwan*jhhorng@gmail.comAbstract: Optical glass is widely used on bioengineering and various utilities such as public touchscreendisplay and mobile devices. This work evaluates the feature <strong>of</strong> anti-bacterial and anti-adhesion on OTSmaterial that mixed with biocompatibility antibacterial agent coated on the optical glass. Test samples wereallocated with different bath and drying temperatures as well as reaction time. The result shows that in thecontact <strong>of</strong> angle experiments, pure OTS film and mixed antibacterial films have almost the same contactangle about 105° at the condition <strong>of</strong> reaction time <strong>of</strong> 12 hours and reaction temperature <strong>of</strong> 80 ° C.Theantibacterial test find that the order: antibacterial agent> OTS+ antibacterial agent(50%) > OTS+antibacterial agent(10%) > OTS. At the same operation condition, OTS mixed with 50% antibacterial agentis able to increase adhesion force between OTS film and lens. It suggests that the surface treatment <strong>of</strong> opticallenses involving OTS with 50% antibacterial solution is the most to increase the antifouling andantibacterial functions and enhance the adhesion function between films and lens surfaces.Keywords: self-assembled monolayer, adhesion force, friction, terminal group bonding, contact angle, antibacterial.1. INTRODUCTIONThe uses <strong>of</strong> SAMs in biomedicine utilities areincreasing rapidly, such as in biosensors,nonfouling surfaces, bioactive surfaces, and drugdelivery [1, 2]. Octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)monolayer is one <strong>of</strong> the most extensively studiedself-assembled monolayer [3-5]. Therefore, how toimprove the adhesion and anti-bacterialperformance <strong>of</strong> SAMs film becomes an attractivetopic in order to enhance device application andreliability. Bierbum [6, 7] noted that the substratesurface water layers are an important factor in theformation <strong>of</strong> OTS films. Bierbum explained thatOTS molecules initially spread vertically onsubstrate surfaces and been clustered after locatingactivation positions. Afterwards, other OTSmolecules spread to the cluster edges and formislands. The molecules then spread outwards andcause adsorbed molecules to form connections,finally forming tightly connected monolayers. In1998, Vaillant et al. [8] used atomic forcemicroscopy (AFM) and a Fourier-transforminfrared spectrometer (FTIR) to observe the processby which OTS molecules form films on substratesurfaces. The results showed that a larger amount <strong>of</strong>water in the solutions cause the OTS molecules toundergo a hydrolysis reaction and producepolymerization within the solution. Cloud-shapedor island-shaped molecule films form throughoutthe solution. In the contrast, solutions withcomparatively low proportions <strong>of</strong> water exhibitpoint distribution and OTS molecules igrowchaotically into liquid-like form. While the surfacediffusion makes OTS molecules absorbingmolecules within the solution, the tightly knit,island-shaped structures are formed by messymolecule films. Resch [9] also used AFM andfound that OTS molecules initially grow messilyand irregularly. With the passage <strong>of</strong> time,molecules covering the surface spread horizontallyand ultimately form tightly arranged molecular102 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


films. Carraro et al. [10] examined formation <strong>of</strong>OTS SAMs under different ambient temperatures.They discovered when the ambient temperaturefalls below 16°C, OTS first form islands or cloudsand then films. When the ambient temperature risesabove 40°C, the films grow evenly instead <strong>of</strong>forming islands. In addition, films form morequickly at lower temperatures. The formation <strong>of</strong>OTS monolayer on a material surface is highlysensitive to several factors, which include thedensity <strong>of</strong> surface hydroxyl groups, reactiontemperature, reaction environment, reaction time,solvent used to deposit OTS water content <strong>of</strong> thesolvent concentration <strong>of</strong> OTS, solution age,roughness <strong>of</strong> the underlying substrate andcleaning procedures after SAM deposition [11].Therefore, how to improve the adhesion and antibacterialperformance <strong>of</strong> SAMs film becomes anattractive task in order to enhance deviceapplication and reliability.2. EXPERIMENTALThe optical lenses were ultrasonicated in acetoneand then rinsed with solvent tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>uran anddeionized water and immediately dipped in the OTSsolution containing approximately 40 ml. For thepreparation <strong>of</strong> SAMs film, OTS was dissolved inalcohol and prepared to a molar concentration <strong>of</strong>10 mM, and then mix in different proportions <strong>of</strong>antibacterial agent (10%, 50%). The test pieces wereplaced in the solution at different bath temperaturesand duration times and a drying time <strong>of</strong> 10 min. Thetest pieces were then removed and set aside for 12 hrbefore being ultrasonicated in acetone for 5 min toremove loosely bound material and rinsed indeionized water and blown dry with nitrogen gas.The molecular structure <strong>of</strong> OTS is shown in Table 1.It’s hydrophobic properties comes from terminalgroup (CH 3 ). Main composition <strong>of</strong> biocompatibilityantibacterial agent is bi<strong>of</strong>lavonoid and citric acid.For the experimental investigation <strong>of</strong>hydrophobic properties for the different surface filmson the lens, FTA contact angle equipment was usedto measure contact angle, as shown in Figure 1.Larger contact angle indicates better hydrophobicand anti-fouling properties <strong>of</strong> surfaces. Contactangles were measured on both sides <strong>of</strong> the waterdrop. Droplet pr<strong>of</strong>iles were captured using a videocomprising <strong>of</strong> digital frames over a period <strong>of</strong> 12seconds and transferred to a computer for anglemeasurement. The adhesion force between surfacefilms and substrates were measured using atomicforce microscopy (AFM) by scratch mode. AFMalso was used to examine topography <strong>of</strong> samplesbefore and after SAM deposition by non-contactmode.Table 1. The molecular structure <strong>of</strong> OTSSAMs Molecular formula Head group Terminal groupOTS CH 3 (CH 2 ) 17 SiCl 3 -SiCl 3 -CH 3Figure 1. Contact angle equipment3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONIn the contact angle analysis <strong>of</strong> variousoperation conditions, the measurement data <strong>of</strong> eachtest piece was obtained from the mean <strong>of</strong> fivemeasurements. Figure 2(a) is a photo <strong>of</strong> the contactangle for OTS material. Figure 2(b) show thecontact angle changes with various reaction timesand bathe temperatures.Contact Angle (deg)120906030(a)020 40 60 80Temperature ( o C)(b)Figure 2. Contact angles (a) experimental photo (b)comparison chart for different reaction times andtemperatures.It shows that the higher the bathe temperature,the higher the contact angle. The higher the reactiontime, the higher is the contact angle. However, thevariation <strong>of</strong> contact angles <strong>of</strong> OTS+50%antibacterial agent films under various operation13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 103


conditions are all quite low. Bathing OTS+50%agent films at a bath temperature <strong>of</strong> 80 graduallyincreases the contact angle to approximately 105degree. The various reaction time and bathetemperature have extremely little influence on thecontact angle. In summary, the bath temperature <strong>of</strong>80 ° C and duration time <strong>of</strong> 12 hours was chosen asoperation condition in order to investigate theantibacterial characteristics <strong>of</strong> surface film on lenses.Ra (nm)25020015010050LensOTSOTS + 10% agentOTS + 50% agentantibacterial agent absorbed and stored in thetopographic valley <strong>of</strong> OTS film.The reliability and beauty requirement <strong>of</strong> thedisplay elements made from company becomeimportant in their service life. The lighttransmittance and film adhesion properties are one<strong>of</strong> key performances <strong>of</strong> lens. In order to explore therelation between surface film and lighttransmittance <strong>of</strong> lens, Figure 4 shows thattransmittance <strong>of</strong> OTS film and antibacterial agenton the lens. This result indicates that the OTSsurface film will decrease the light transmittance <strong>of</strong>lens. However, the antibacterial agent hasextremely little influence on the transmittance <strong>of</strong>lens. The minimum value <strong>of</strong> transmittance is 93.6%under the film <strong>of</strong> OTS + 50% agent. It concludesthat all transmittance <strong>of</strong> surface films is acceptablefor industrial applications in our work.1200(a)100LensOTSOTS + 10% agentOTS + 50% agentRa=102 nmTransmittance (%)80604020(b)Figure 3. (a)The roughness values <strong>of</strong> the differentsurface films (b) 3-D topography image <strong>of</strong> the OTS +50% agent film.The various roughness values <strong>of</strong> differentsurface materials are shown in Figure. 3.Roughness test were conducted in air at a relativehumidity <strong>of</strong> about 50% using AFM by non-contactmode. The scanned detection range was 40 µm × 40µm. The various surface roughness value <strong>of</strong> differentsurface materials are shown in Figure 3(a). Thecomparison chart shows that antibacterial agent candecrease the surface roughness value <strong>of</strong> pure OTSfilms. The roughness value <strong>of</strong> OTS film surfaceadding 10% antibacterial agent is approximately 175nm, whereas the OTS film roughness value adding50% antibacterial agent was decreased toapproximately 100 nm. The 3-D topography imagefor the hybrid organic molecules film (OTS + 50%agent) is shown as Figure 3(b). The island-shapedstructures were formed on the surface, as mentionedin Vaillant’s work [8]. It shows hybrid organic filmexhibit uniform coverage the surface with regularpattern <strong>of</strong> island formation. It indicates thatFigure 4 The light transmittance <strong>of</strong> differentsurface films on lensThe film adhesion is another one <strong>of</strong> keyperformances <strong>of</strong> lens for reliability. Figure 5 showsthe effect <strong>of</strong> antibacterial agent on the critical load<strong>of</strong> surface films on the lens. It shows thatantibacterial agent increases adhesion forcebetween OTS film and lens. Mixing antibacterialagent (50%) in OTS material increases the criticalload to approximately 104N. In summary, thesurface treatment <strong>of</strong> optical lenses involving OTS+Agent (50%) is the most capable <strong>of</strong> effectivelyincreasing anti-adhesion functions.In the antibacterial tests, staphylococcus aureuswere inoculated with different self-assembled film,and then after 24 hours to measure bacteria values(JISZ 2801:2010). Figure 6 is the comparison chart<strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> the bacteria for the differentsurface films. For the general lens surface, thebacteria number is about 135000 after 24 hours.The pure OTS film also has little antibacterialfunction. It shows that the bacteria number on OTSwith 50% antibacterial agents and pure antibacterialagent surface is less than 10. It is far lower than thebacteria value, 5.3 × 10 4 , on the OTS film.104 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


PlateCount No.Critical Load ( N)1201101009080706050OTSOTS + 10% agentOTS + 50% agentFigure 5. Critical loads between surface films andsubstrate16000012000080000400000LenseOTSOTS + 10% agentOTS + 50% agentagentFigure 6. Effect <strong>of</strong> surface film material onantibacterial4. CONCLUSIONThis work studied the feature <strong>of</strong> anti-bacterialand anti-adhesion on OTS self-assembledmonolayers which mixed with biocompatibilityantibacterial agent that coated on optical lens. Theresults can be concluded as follows:1. Both OTS and mixed OTS film caneffectively increase the contact angle <strong>of</strong> alens surface at various bath temperatures aswell as duration time and reduces deviceadhesion force effectively.2. The adding <strong>of</strong> antibacterial agent has littleeffect on the contact angle and lighttransmittance <strong>of</strong> pure OTS film.3. The antibacterial agent can effectively reducethe surface roughness while increase theadhesion force and antibacterial abilities <strong>of</strong>pure OTS film on lens surfaces (reactiontime = 12hr., reaction temperature = 80 ° C).ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe author gratefully acknowledges common Lab.for Micro-Nano Science and Technology at NFU.


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTHE INFLUENCE OF CORROSION ON THEMICROSTRUCTURE OF THERMALLY TREATED ZA27/SIC PCOMPOSITESBiljana Bobić 1 , Aleksandar Vencl 2 , Miroslav Babić 3 , Slobodan Mitrović 3 , Ilija Bobić 41 Institute ″Goša″, Belgrade, Serbia, biljanabobic@gmail.com2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, avencl@mas.bg.ac.rs3 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia,babic@kg.ac.rs, boban@kg.ac.rs4 ″Vinča″ Institute <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, ilijab@vinca.rsAbstract: The influence <strong>of</strong> corrosion on the microstructure <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p composites was examined.The composites were produced by compo casting technique and then subjected to the thermaltreatment (T4 regime). Microstructural examinations were performed after 30-day exposure <strong>of</strong>thermally treated composites in the sodium-chloride solution. Corrosion processes have occurredin the composite matrix. Corrosion did not affect SiC particles in the composites. The localprogress <strong>of</strong> corrosion in depth <strong>of</strong> the composite matrix was noticed in micro-cracks. Corrosionresistance <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p composites was evaluated based on the mass loss <strong>of</strong> composite samplesduring the immersion test. It was found that corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the composites decreased withincrease in content <strong>of</strong> SiC particles. The applied thermal treatment had a negative influence on thecorrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p composites.Keywords: Metal-matrix composites, ZA27 alloy, Compocasting, Thermal treatment, Corrosion,Microstructure1. INTRODUCTIONDomestic composites with base ZA27 alloy[1, 2] have been developed with an aim toobtain composites which maintain goodmechanical characteristics at elevatedtemperatures as well as to make compositeswith improved tribological propertiescompared to those <strong>of</strong> the matrix alloy.Particulate ZA27/SiC p composites were shownto possess significant tribological potentialbecause <strong>of</strong> high hardness and high wearresistance [3, 4]. Within this work, domesticZA27/SiC p composites were obtained bycompo casting technique. The matrix alloy,with 27 wt. % aluminum, belongs to zinc–aluminum foundry alloys with relatively highcontent <strong>of</strong> aluminum (ZA alloys). The alloy ischaracterized by good physical, mechanicaland technological properties (low density, highstrength and hardness, easy machinability) [5,6], by a substantial resistance to corrosion andhigh wear resistance [7–9]. This enabledcommercial application <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy as asignificant tribomaterial, especially for makingbearings and bushings.ZA27 alloy solidifies in the widetemperature range and is suitable forprocessing in the semi-solid state [10]. This ledto the application <strong>of</strong> compo casting techniquefor producing domestic particulate compositeswith base <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy. Micro-particles <strong>of</strong>SiC [1], Al 2 O 3 [1, 2, 11, 12], graphite [9, 13]or ZrO 2 [14] were incorporated in the semi-106 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


solid melt <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy using mechanicalmixing. Obtained composites were subjected tomicrostructural examinations [11, 12] andtribological tests [9, 13]. In addition,mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the compositeshave been studied, at room temperature [11,12] and moderately elevated temperatures [2].However, corrosion behavior <strong>of</strong> domesticcomposites with base ZA27 alloy has not beentested so far.Physical, mechanical and corrosioncharacteristics <strong>of</strong> metal-matrix composites aredeeply influenced by the microstructure <strong>of</strong>metal matrices [15, 16]. It was shown thatthermal treatment affected the microstructureand properties <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy [17–19]. Abeneficial effect <strong>of</strong> T4 regime on ductility [17]and tribological characteristics <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy[18, 19] was noticed, although this thermaltreatment resulted with minor reduction inhardness and tensile strength [18]. In addition,it was shown that T4 regime affected themicrostructure and corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> ascastZA27 alloy [20] and thixocast ZA27 alloy[21].ZA27 alloy is highly corrosion resistant inatmospheric conditions and natural waters [22].The most common form <strong>of</strong> corrosion in theseenvironments is general corrosion, whichenables calculations <strong>of</strong> the alloy corrosion rate,based on the weight loss <strong>of</strong> samples duringexposure in corrosive media. Immersion testsin chloride solutions have been usedfrequently, because chloride ions are present innumerous corrosive environments.Тhixocast ZA27 alloy is the base <strong>of</strong>ZA27/SiC p composites obtained by compocasting technique [23]. Accordingly, themicrostructure <strong>of</strong> thixocast alloy is actually themicrostructure <strong>of</strong> the composite matrix. It wasshown recently that thermal treatment (T4regime) negatively affected the corrosionbehavior <strong>of</strong> thixocast ZA27 alloy [21].However, there have been no published resultsuntil now, concerning the effect <strong>of</strong> T4 regimeon the microstructure and corrosion resistance<strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p composites obtained by compocasting technique.Considering the importance <strong>of</strong> corrosionresistance for selection and application <strong>of</strong>metal-matrix composites, it was the aim <strong>of</strong> thiswork to study the influence <strong>of</strong> corrosion on thesurface appearance and microstructure <strong>of</strong> thethermally treated ZA27/SiC p composites.Corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the composites wasevaluated based on the weight loss <strong>of</strong> samplesduring immersion in the sodium-chloridesolution.2. EXPERIMENTAL2.1 MaterialsA domestic producer <strong>of</strong> zinc-aluminumalloys (RAR Foundry ® Ltd., Batajnica) hasprovided the master alloy for the experimentalwork. SiC particles (with average diameter <strong>of</strong>40 µm) were obtained from the domesticmanufacturer <strong>of</strong> abrasive products (GinićTocila ® Ltd., Barajevo).ZA27 alloy was conventionally melted andcasted in the Department <strong>of</strong> Materials Science″Vinča″ Institute. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> thealloy is given in Table 1.Table 1. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloyElement* Al Cu Mg Znwt. % 26.3 1.54 0.018 balance*Concentration <strong>of</strong> other elements (Fe, Sn, Cd,Pb) is within acceptable limits.Compo casting technique was used formaking composites with 1, 3 and 5 wt. % SiCparticles. The particles were incorporated intothe semi-solid melt <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy with use <strong>of</strong>mechanical mixing. Parameters <strong>of</strong> the appliedcompo casting aprocess nd description <strong>of</strong> theapparatus can be found in [23].Composite castings were subjected to a hotpressing, in order to reduce porosity andimprove the bond strength between the matrixand particulate reinforcements. Samples formicrostructural examinations and corrosiontesting were machine cut from the compositecastings. The samples were thermally treatedaccording to T4 regime: solutionizing at 370ºCfor 3 hours, with subsequent water quenchingand natural aging.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 107


2.2 MethodsMicrostructural examinationsSurface morphology and microstructure <strong>of</strong>thermally treated ZA27/SiC p composites wereexamined by optical microscopy (OM) andscanning electron microscopy (SEM). CarlZeiss optical microscope and JEOL JSM–5800scanning electron microscope were used.Cylindrical samples (5 mm in diameter and 8mm in height) were embedded in thepolymethacrylate and then they were groundand polished. Wet grinding was performedwith successively finer abrasive papers (240,360, 600 and 800 grit SiC), while polishingwas done using polishing cloth and diamondpaste (particles size up to 2 μm). Aqueoussolution <strong>of</strong> nitric acid (9 v/v % HNO 3 ) wasused for etching <strong>of</strong> the samples.The samples were rinsed with acetone anddried in the air before exposure in the testsolution (3.5 wt. % NaCl). After finishing <strong>of</strong>the exposure, the samples were prepared formetallographic examination in the usual way.Corrosion rate testingCorrosion rates <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p composites were calculated basedon the samples mass loss during exposure inthe test solution (immersion test). Preparation<strong>of</strong> the samples and testing procedure wereperformed in accordance with ASTM G31 [24].The samples (18 x 28 x 3 mm), in triplicate,were suspended vertically in the stagnantsodium-chloride solution (3.5 wt. % NaCl,pH=6.7) open to the atmosphere. The test wasperformed at room temperature (23 ± 2°C).After 30 days <strong>of</strong> exposure, the samples werewithdrawn from the test solution and rinsedwith distilled water. Corrosion products wereremoved from the surface <strong>of</strong> the samples bychemical procedure [25]. The samples werethen reweighed to determine the mass lossduring exposure in the test solution.Calculation <strong>of</strong> the average corrosion rateCR [mm/year] is based on the mass loss <strong>of</strong> thesamples Δm [g] during the immersion test:8.76 ⋅ ∆mCR =d ⋅ A ⋅τ(1)τ is the exposure time (720 hours), A is thesample surface [cm 2 ] and d [g/cm 3 ] is thecomposite density. Values <strong>of</strong> the compositedensity (for the composite with 1, 3 and 5 wt.% SiC particles, respectively) were calculated[23] and shown in Table 2.Table 2. Density <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p compositesMaterial ZA27/1%SiC p ZA27/3%SiC p ZA27/5%SiC pd[g/cm 3 ]4.97 4.92 4.87The values in Table 2 were used to calculatecorrosion rates <strong>of</strong> the thermally treatedZA27/SiC p composites.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3.1 Microstructure <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p compositesSurface appearance and microstructure <strong>of</strong>thermally treated ZA27/SiC p composites wereexamined before exposure and after 30-dayexposure in the sodium-chloride solution.Surface appearance <strong>of</strong> the composites with 3wt.% SiC particles, is shown in Figure 1a, b.Figure 1. Surface appearance <strong>of</strong> the thermally treatedcomposite ZA27/3wt.%SiC p (OM, polished):a) before exposure, b) after 30-day exposure in 3.5wt.% NaCl.108 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


SiC particles are uniformly distributed in themetal matrix (Fig. 1a). A few inclusions can benoticed on the surface <strong>of</strong> the composite sampleand mechanical damages on the edge <strong>of</strong> thesample. Applied thermal treatment had noeffect on the particles <strong>of</strong> reinforcement andtheir distribution in the composite matrix.The microstructure <strong>of</strong> composites wasrevealed by etching (Figure 2a, b). It can beseen in Fig. 2a that SiC particles are distributedin the regions <strong>of</strong> η phase and regions <strong>of</strong> phasemixture α+η. There are no voids, due to thefallout <strong>of</strong> SiC particles from the compositebase (e.g. during machining or metallographicpreparation <strong>of</strong> samples). This indicates goodbonding between SiC particles and the matrixalloy.Figure 2. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> the thermally treatedZA27/3wt.%SiC p composite (OM, etched):a) before exposure, b) after 30-day exposure in 3.5 wt.%NaCl.Main micro-constituents in the compositematrix are also visible in Fig. 2a. Themicrostructure <strong>of</strong> the composite base is nondendriticand is characterized by the presence<strong>of</strong> large primary particles [21, 23]. The primaryparticles are complex; they consist <strong>of</strong> a core(rich in aluminum) and a periphery (composed<strong>of</strong> the phase mixture α+η). Interdendritic ηphase, rich in zinc, is located between theprimary particles. The microstructure <strong>of</strong> thecomposite matrix and the microstructure <strong>of</strong>thixocast ZA27 alloy are morphologically verysimilar [23]. The applied thermal treatment (T4regime) has caused changes in the structure <strong>of</strong>the composite matrix. The region <strong>of</strong> phasemixture α + η was expanded, while the regions<strong>of</strong> individual phases (α and η) were reduced. Inaddition, the size <strong>of</strong> primary particles <strong>of</strong> αphase was decreased for about 30 vol. % [21,23]. All this resulted with finer microstructure<strong>of</strong> the composite matrix. However, the increasein number <strong>of</strong> micro-cracks on the phaseboundaries η/α+η was noticed in the compositematrix after the thermal treatment [23].Thermal stress at boundary surfacesmatrix/particle, due to quenching withinthermal treatment, was preceded by thermalstress during solidification <strong>of</strong> the compositemixture. The stress can cause a localdeformation <strong>of</strong> the metal matrix aroundparticles <strong>of</strong> reinforcement [26], appearance <strong>of</strong>micro-cracks or fracture <strong>of</strong> the particles.Electrolytes can be retained in the microcracks,causing local progress <strong>of</strong> corrosionprocesses into depth <strong>of</strong> the composite base.The number <strong>of</strong> boundary surfacesmatrix/particle was significantly increased inthe ZA27/SiC p composites due to the presence<strong>of</strong> SiC particles.. It can be assumed thatdislocation density was also increased duringcooling <strong>of</strong> the composite mixtures, due todifferent coefficients <strong>of</strong> linear expansion <strong>of</strong> thematrix ZA27 alloy and SiC particles.Corrosion processes have influenced thesurface appearance and microstructure <strong>of</strong>thermally treated ZA27/SiC p composites. Thesurface appearance <strong>of</strong> the composites with 3wt. % SiC p , after 30-day exposure in thesodium-chloride solution, is shown in Fig. 1b.Large primary particles <strong>of</strong> α phase are visiblein the central area <strong>of</strong> the composite sample. Itcan be seen that corrosion has started at places<strong>of</strong> mechanical damages, voids, inclusions.Corrosion processes occurred in the compositebase, in the regions <strong>of</strong> phase mixture α+η andregions <strong>of</strong> η phase. The local progress <strong>of</strong>corrosion was noticed in the micro-cracks andpores. The micro-cracks were probably formedduring solidification <strong>of</strong> the composite mixtures,in hot pressing as well as during quenching13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 109


within thermal treatment <strong>of</strong> the composites.The presence <strong>of</strong> micro-cracks negativelyaffected corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> thermallytreated ZA27/SiC p composites.SiC particles were not involved in corrosionprocesses because <strong>of</strong> their inherent chemicalstability. However, these particles haveinfluenced corrosion behavior <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC pcomposites. The continuity <strong>of</strong> boundarysurfaces matrix/particle is disturbed in theclusters <strong>of</strong> SiC particles. On these placesmicro-pores and micro-cracks can be formed.Due to the retention <strong>of</strong> sodium-chloridesolution in these places, local progress <strong>of</strong>corrosion in depth <strong>of</strong> the composite matrix wasnoticed, as it was mentioned before.Figure 3. Corrosion products <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/3wt.%SiC p composite after 30-day exposure in3.5 wt.% NaCl (SEM): a) surface appearance, b) detail.During exposure in the sodium-chloridesolution, corrosion products were formed onthe surface <strong>of</strong> the composite samples. Spongy,white deposits <strong>of</strong> the corrosion products,mostly in the form <strong>of</strong> rosettes, are shown inFigure 3a, b.Microstructural examinations <strong>of</strong> thermallytreated ZA27/SiC p composites, after exposurein the sodium-chloride solution, made itpossible to gain some insight into the influence<strong>of</strong> corrosion processes on the structure <strong>of</strong> thesecomposite materials. It was found thatcorrosion started in places <strong>of</strong> mechanicaldamage, voids, inclusions. Corrosion processeshave occurred mainly in the composite base,although in pores and micro-cracks, the localprogress <strong>of</strong> corrosion in depth <strong>of</strong> thecomposites was noticed. Corrosion processesdid not influence SiC particles.Results <strong>of</strong> the microstructural examinations,after exposure <strong>of</strong> thermally treated ZA27/SiC pcomposites in the sodium-chloride solution, arein accordance with results obtained during theimmersion test.3.2 Corrosion rate <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p compositesAfter finishing <strong>of</strong> exposure in the NaClsolution, corrosion products were removedfrom the surface <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p compositesamples by chemical procedure [25]. It wasfound that corrosion attack was mostlyuniform, while corrosion processes took placepredominantly on the composite surface. Theaverage value <strong>of</strong> corrosion rate CR [mm/year]was calculated based on the mass loss <strong>of</strong>composite samples during the immersion test.The results are presented in Figure 4.For the purpose <strong>of</strong> comparison, results <strong>of</strong> theimmersion test for thermally treated ZA27alloys (as-cast and thixocast) [21, 23] are alsopresented in Figure 4. It can be seen thatcorrosion rates <strong>of</strong> the composites are higherthan those <strong>of</strong> both ZA27 alloys (as-cast andthixocast).Corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the compositematrix (thermally treated thixocast ZA27 alloy)is higher than that <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedcomposites.Corrosion rate (mm/year)0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00ZA27 cast ZA27 thixo K1 K2 K3MaterialFigure 4. Corrosion rate <strong>of</strong> thermally treated ZA27alloys and ZA27/SiC p composites after 30-day exposurein 3.5 wt.% NaCl. K1 - ZA27/1wt.%SiC p , K2 -ZA27/3wt.%SiC p , K3 - ZA27/5wt.%SiC p .Corrosion rate <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p composites increases with increasein content <strong>of</strong> SiC particles, because <strong>of</strong> increase110 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


in number <strong>of</strong> micro-cracks and clusters <strong>of</strong> SiCparticles. All above presented indicates lowercorrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p composites with higher content <strong>of</strong>particulate reinforcements.4. CONCLUSIONSParticulate ZA27/SiC p composites (with 1, 3and 5 wt.% SiC particles) were obtained bycompo casting technique and subsequentlysubjected to the T4 thermal treatment.Thermally treated composites were exposed inthe sodium-chloride solution for 30 days. Theinfluence <strong>of</strong> corrosion on the surfaceappearance and microstructure <strong>of</strong> thecomposites was examined. Corrosionresistance <strong>of</strong> the composites was evaluatedbased on the mass loss <strong>of</strong> composite samplesduring the immersion test. According to theresults presented, the following conclusionscan be proposed:1. SiC particles are uniformly distributed in themetal matrix <strong>of</strong> the particulateZA27/3wt.%SiC p composite that was madeby compo casting technique.2. Morphological changes and appearance <strong>of</strong>micro-cracks in the microstructure <strong>of</strong> thecomposite matrix were noticed after T4thermal treatment. However, the thermaltreatment had no effect on SiC particles andtheir distribution in the composite matrix.3. Corrosion process has influenced themicrostructure and surface appearance <strong>of</strong>thermally treated ZA27/SiC p composites,after 30-day exposure in the sodiumchloridesolution. However, corrosion didnot affect SiC particles in the composites.4. Corrosion started at places <strong>of</strong> mechanicaldamages, voids, inclusions. Corrosionprocesses ocurred mainly in the compositematrix although the local progress <strong>of</strong>corrosion was noticed in the micro-cracks.5. Corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the compositematrix is higher than that <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC pcomposites.6. Corrosion rate <strong>of</strong> thermally treatedZA27/SiC p composites increases withincrease in content <strong>of</strong> SiC particles.7. Applied thermal treatment (T4 regime) hasshown a negative effect on the corrosionresistance <strong>of</strong> ZA27/SiC p composites.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science andTechnological Development <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong>Serbia has supported financially this workthrough the projects TR 35021 and OI 172005.The authors are gratefully acknowledged to theRAR ® Foundry Ltd., Batajnica (Belgrade,Serbia) and Ginić Tocila ® Abrasive ProductsFactory Ltd., Barajevo (Belgrade, Serbia), forproviding the master alloy and SiC particles, toperform this research.REFERENCES[1] I. Bobić: Development if Metal Forming Process inSemi-Solid State (Rheocasting and CompocastingProcess) and Process Controling Effects on Quality<strong>of</strong> ZnAl25Cu3 Alloy Products, PhD thesis, Faculty<strong>of</strong> Technology and Metallurgy, University <strong>of</strong>Belgrade, Belgrade, 2003.[2] B. Bobić, M. Babić, S. Mitrović, N. Ilić, I. Bobić,M.T. Jovanović: Microstructure and mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> Zn25Al3Cu based composites withlarge Al 2 O 3 particles at room and elevatedtemperatures, Int. J. Mat. Res. (formerly Z.Metallkd.), 101, pp. 1524–1531, 2010.[3] I.A. Cornie, R. Guerriero, L. Meregalli, I. Tangerini:Microstructures and Properties <strong>of</strong> Zinc-Alloy MatrixComposite Materials, in <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> theInternational Symposium on Advances in CastReinforced Metal Composites, 24–30.09.1988.,Chicago, pp. 155–165[4] N. Karni, G.B. Barkay, M. Bamberger: Structureand properties <strong>of</strong> metal-matrix composite, J. Mater.Sci. Lett., 13, pp. 541–544, 1994.[5] E. Gervais, R.J. Barnhurst, C.A. Loong: An analysis<strong>of</strong> selected properties <strong>of</strong> ZA alloys, JOM, 11, pp.43–47, 1985.[6] E.J. Kubel Jr.: Expanding horizons for ZA alloys,Adv. Mater. Process., 132, pp. 51–57, 1987.[7] R.J. Barnhurst, S. Beliste: Corrosion Properties <strong>of</strong>Zamak and ZA Alloys, Tech. Rep., NorandaTechnology Centre, Quebec, Canada, 1992.[8] M. Babić, R. Ninković: Zn-Al alloys astribomaterials, Trib. Ind., Vol. 26, No. 1–2, pp. 3–7,2004.[9] S. Mitrović: Tribological Properties <strong>of</strong> ZnAl AlloyComposites, PhD thesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac,2007.[10] M. Flemings: Behavior <strong>of</strong> metal alloys in the semisolidstate, Metall. Trans. A, Vol. 22A, pp. 957–981, 1991.[11] I. Bobić, M.T. Jovanović, N. Ilić: Microstructureand strength <strong>of</strong> ZA-27 based composites reinforced13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 111


with Al 2 O 3 particles, Mater. Lett., 57, pp. 1683-1688, 2003.[12] I. Bobić, R. Ninković, M. Babić: Structural andmechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> composites with basematrix <strong>of</strong> Rar 27 alloy reinforced with Al 2 O 3 andSiC particles, Trib. Ind., Vol. 26, No. 3–4, pp. 27–29, 2004.[13] M. Babić, S. Mitrović, D. Džunić, B. Jeremić, I.Bobić: Tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> composites basedon ZA-27 alloy reinforced with graphite particles,Tribol. Lett., 37, pp. 401–410, 2010.[14] Z. Aćimović–Pavlović, K.T. Raić, I.Bobić, B.Bobić: Synthesis <strong>of</strong> ZrO 2 Particles Reinforced ZA25Alloy Composites by Compocasting Process, Adv.Compos. Mater., 20, pp. 375–384, 2011.[15] L.L. Shreir, R.A. Jarman, G.T. Burstein: Corrosion,Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 2000.[16] S.L. Donaldson, D.B. Miracle: ASM HandbookVolume 21, Composites, ASM International, 2001.[17] I. Bobić, B. Đurić, M.T. Jovanović, S. Zec:Improvement <strong>of</strong> Ductility <strong>of</strong> a Cast Zn–25 Alloy,Mater. Charact., 29, pp. 277–283, 1992.[18] M. Babić, A. Vencl, S. Mitrović, I. Bobić: Influence<strong>of</strong> T4 heat treatment on tribological behavior <strong>of</strong>ZA27 alloy under lubricated sliding condition,Tribol. Lett., 2, pp. 125–134, 2009.[19] M. Babić, S. Mitrović, R. Ninković: R: TribologicalPotential <strong>of</strong> Zinc-Aluminium Alloys Improvement,Trib. Ind., Vol. 31, No. 1–2, pp. 15–28, 2009.[20] B. Bobić, J. Bajat, Z. Aćimović–Pavlović, M. Rakin,I. Bobić I: The effect <strong>of</strong> T4 heat treatment on themicrostructure and corrosion behaviour <strong>of</strong>Zn27Al1.5Cu0.02Mg alloy, Corros. Sci., 53, pp.409–417, 2011.[21] B. Bobić, J. Bajat, Z. Aćimović–Pavlović, I. Bobić,B. Jegdić, Corrosion behaviour <strong>of</strong> thix<strong>of</strong>ormed andheat-treated ZA27 alloys in the natrium chloridesolution, Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. <strong>of</strong> China, to bepublished[22] F.C Porter: Corrosion Resistance <strong>of</strong> Zinc and Zincalloys, Marcell Dekker, New York, 1994.[23] B. Bobić: Examination <strong>of</strong> the Corrosion ProcessImpact on the Microstructure and MechanicalProperties <strong>of</strong> Zn27Al1,5Cu0,02Mg alloy CastingsReinforced with Silicon Carbide Particles, PhDthesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Technology and Metallurgy,University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, 2011.[24] ASTM G31–72 (2004): Standard Practice forLaboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing <strong>of</strong> Metals.[25] ASTM G1–03(2011): Standard Practice forPreparing, Cleaning and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> TestSpecimens.[26] R.J. Arsenault, L. Wang, C.R. Feng: Strengthening<strong>of</strong> composites due to microstructural changes in thematrix, Acta Metall. Mater., Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 47–57, 1991.112 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISATION OF PBT + GLASS BEADCOMPOSITES WITH THE HELP OF BLOCK-ON-RING TESTConstantin Georgescu 1 , Mihai Botan 1 , Lorena Deleanu 11 ”Dunarea de Jos” University <strong>of</strong> Galati, Romania, constantin.georgescu@ugal.roAbstract: The materials involved in this research study were produced by die moulding in order to obtainbone samples type 1A (SR EN ISO 527-2:2003). These composites have a matrix <strong>of</strong> polybutyleneterephthalate (PBT) commercial grade Crastin 6130 NC010, DuPont. The values for the glass beadsconcentrations were established at 10% and 20% (wt). Block-on-ring tests were run in order to characterizethe tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> this friction couple (PBT and PBT composites with glass beads on steel). Theblock was manufactured by cutting parts from the bone samples, having the dimensions <strong>of</strong> 16.5 mm × 10 mm× 4 mm. The other triboelement was the external ring <strong>of</strong> the tapered rolling bearing KBS 30202, havingdimensions <strong>of</strong> Ø35 mm × 10 mm and was made <strong>of</strong> steel grade DIN 100Cr6. There were analysed thefollowing characteristics: friction coefficient (mean value over a test and scattering range), wear (wearrate). There are also presented particular aspects <strong>of</strong> the worn surfaces, as investigated from SEM images.Keywords: PBT composite, tribological behaviour, block-on-ring test, dry sliding.1. INTRODUCTIONMaterials based on PBT are obtained both byadding very different materials (nano and micr<strong>of</strong>ibre reinforcements [1], metallic or/and ceramicpowders, minerals [2], [3]), the result could beincluded in the class <strong>of</strong> composites, and byblending with other polymers polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE) [4], polycarbonate (PC) [5],polyethylene (PE), SAN, epoxy resin, with fireresistant additives [6], both solutions directioningone or a set <strong>of</strong> the properties <strong>of</strong> PBT matrix.The adding materials in PBT are very diverse,almost all types known for the polymericcomposites (long and short fibres, particles andtheir mixtures), both at micro scale and nano scale.For tribological applications, the fibre nature is alsodiverse: glass, carbon, aramidic, titanates.Even if the specialized literature emphasis theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the adding materials in PBT, uponsome mechanical characteristics (traction limit andelasticity modulus) [2], [3], [7], these properties donot also reflect the tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> thesematerials. This is why the testing <strong>of</strong> the polymericcomposites is <strong>of</strong> high importance and, even if theresults could not be extrapolated from thelaboratory tests on tribotesters, to the actual frictioncouple, these studies are useful in materials'ranking, when the designer is interest in a particularparameter or a set <strong>of</strong> characteristics [8], [9], [10].2. MATERIALS AND TESTINGMETHODOLOGYThe tested materials were produced by diemoulding in order to obtain bone samples type 1A(as required by the tensile test ISO 527-2) at theResearch Institute for Synthetic Fibres Savinesti,Romania, taking into account the producerspecification for moulding and heat treatment [11].These composites have a matrix <strong>of</strong> polybutyleneterephthalate (PBT), commercial grade Crastin6130 NC010, DuPont.The recipes for the composite materials based onPBT, included in this study, were elaborated by theauthors based on up-to-date documentation [1], [4],[11] and were designed in order to point out theinfluence <strong>of</strong> matrix and adding materials on thetribological behaviour in dry regime. Table 1presents their compositions and the abbreviationsused in this paper. The polyamide (PA) was addedin low concentration in order to have a better13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 113


dispersion <strong>of</strong> the micro glass beads. The blackcarbon was added for both technological andtribological reasons.Table 1. The tested materialsConcentration [%, wt]Material symbol Micro glassBlackPBTPAbeadscarbonPBT 100 - - -GB10 88 10 1.5 0.5GB20 77.5 20 2 0.5The tests were done using a block-on-ringtribotester, functioning on a CETR tribometerUMT-2 Multi-Specimen Test System.The ring was the external ring <strong>of</strong> the taperedrolling bearing KBS 30202 (DIN ISO 355/720),having the dimensions <strong>of</strong> Ø35 mm × 10 mm andwas made <strong>of</strong> steel grade DIN 100Cr6, having 60-62HRC and Ra = 0.8 μm on the exterior surface.The block was manufactured by cutting partsfrom the bone samples, having the dimensions <strong>of</strong>16.5 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm.The tests were run in dry condition, forcombination (F, v), F being the normally appliedload (F = 1.0 N, F = 2.5 N and F = 5.0 N) and vbeing the sliding speed (v = 0.25 m/s, v = 0.50 m/sand v = 0.75 m/s). The sliding distance was thesame for all tests, L = 7500 m.For evaluating the mass loss <strong>of</strong> the blocks, ananalytical balance METTLER TOLEDO was used,having the measuring accuracy <strong>of</strong> 0.1 mg.The SEM images were done with the help <strong>of</strong> thescanning electron microscope Quanta 200 3D,having a resolution <strong>of</strong> 4 nm, a magnification×1.000.000.3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS3.1 Friction coefficientIn order to compare the three tested materials, theextreme values and the average value <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient were graphically presented in Figure 1 asa function <strong>of</strong> the sliding speed and the normal load.These values (the lowest value, the highest value andthe average one) were calculated based on therecorded values during each test (sampling rate being10 values per second). Thus, it could be appreciatedthe stability <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient by the size <strong>of</strong>the scattering interval and an average energyconsumption by the average value <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient.For actual applications working under similarconditions <strong>of</strong> speed and load, the author wouldrecommend the materials with a smaller scatteringinterval and lower values <strong>of</strong> the average frictioncoefficient.The low loads and speeds produce a largerscattering interval for the friction coefficient, but theload and speed increase makes the frictioncoefficient diminish the average value and to narrowthe scattering interval. A research report from NASA[12] had evidenced high average values <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient <strong>of</strong> over 0.6, for three polymerssliding against steel (the tribotester: polymeric ballon steel disk).From these research reports and theexperimentally obtained data during this study, theauthors point out the importance <strong>of</strong> the laboratorytests for evaluating the friction coefficient and othertribological characteristics.0.80.6µ 0.40.200.80.6µ 0.40.200.80.6µ 0.40.20TBP10BG20BGF = 1 NTBP10BG20BGTBP10BGv = 0.25 m/s v = 0.50 m/s v = 0.75 m/sMaterialTBP01BG02BGF = 2.5 NTBP01BG02BGTBP01BGv = 0.25 m/s v = 0.50 m/s v = 0.75 m/sMaterialTBP10BG20BGF = 5 NTBP10BG20BGTBP10BGv = 0.25 m/s v = 0.50 m/s v = 0.75 m/sMaterialFigure 1. Variation <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> PBT andcomposites with different micro glass beads content, forthe sliding distance L = 7500 m20BG02BG20BG114 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


PBT has the average values <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient, , in the narrowest range, around thevalue 0.2. The increase <strong>of</strong> this average could beexplained by the elimination <strong>of</strong> the relatively bigwear particles that are characteristic for this polymer(see Figure 4). The values obtained for F = 5 N aregrouped under 0.2 for all the tested sliding speeds.The composites GB10 (PBT + 10% micro glassbeads) and GB20 (PBT + 20% micro glass beads)have the average value <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficientscattered on larger intervals, especially for thesmaller normal loads (F = 1 N and F = 2.5 N). For F= 1 N, it is hard to establish a dependency relation <strong>of</strong>the friction coefficient on the adding materialconcentration and the sliding speed. It could benoticed that for blocks made <strong>of</strong> GB20, there arelarger intervals.At the sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v = 0.25 m/s, the abrasivewear is predominant, the polymer being hung (torn)and drawn from the superficial layers as microvolumes,their size being greater at higher speeds(Figure 2). At the sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v = 0.75 m/s, theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the normal load on the average value <strong>of</strong>the friction coefficient is similar: increases from0.12 for F = 1 N, to ~0.2 for F = 5 N.the composites with same type <strong>of</strong> micro glass beadsadded in a polyamide matrix [13].The values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient have thetendency <strong>of</strong> being less dependent on the slidingspeed for the normal load F = 5 N; this recommendsthese materials for an exploitation regime withdifferent working speeds (differentiated speedsimposed by the technological process), withouthaving very different energy consumption levelswhen the speed is changing.The extreme values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient arecaused by the generation and the detaching <strong>of</strong> thewear debris, the ring passing over a bigger microglass beads, an agglomeration <strong>of</strong> micro glass beadsor fragments <strong>of</strong> some broken ones on the surface asremained after a preferential elimination <strong>of</strong> thepolymer from the superficial layer. In other studieson the polymeric composites with micro glass beads,there were no reports on fracturing the hard particles.For the composites with PBT matrix, the authorsnoticed breakings <strong>of</strong> the micro glass beads, generallythose <strong>of</strong> bigger diameters (20...40 m) being broken.Figure 3 presents four broken micro glass spheres(A, B, C and D) on an area <strong>of</strong> ~ 600 m × 600 m inthe central zone <strong>of</strong> the contact; the resultedfragments are embedded into the polymeric matrix.Such events taken place in the contact create highoscillations <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient.Figure 2. SEM image <strong>of</strong> the block made <strong>of</strong> GB10, forv = 0.25 m/s, F = 5 N, L = 7500 mFor the blocks made <strong>of</strong> GB20, under F = 2.5 N,the scattering <strong>of</strong> the values for the friction coefficientis the largest. The probable cause would be themicro-cutting processes that will have a morereduced intensity when the sliding speed increases.There were not noticed processes <strong>of</strong> dragging themicro glass beads on the block surfaces, meaningthat the interface between the micro glass beads andthe polymeric matrix is harder to damage, ascompared to, for instance, the mobility <strong>of</strong> the microglass beads in the sliding direction, but also in thedepth <strong>of</strong> the superficial layer, as noticed in testingFigure 3. SEM image <strong>of</strong> a block made <strong>of</strong> GB10 – fourbroken micro glass beads (A, B, C and D). Testconditions: v = 0.25 m/s, F = 5 N, L = 7500 mFrom SEM images (Figure 4), the wear debriswere characterized as size and shape, many are madeespecially <strong>of</strong> polymer with only small glass debris(from fragmented micro glass beads) or small microglass beads (but rare). During the test, the weardebris adhere one to each other and are generally bigand rare (as compared to the wear debris resultedfrom other polymer in dry sliding against steel) and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 115


they are volumic (Figure 4), not laminated and thin,as it is happening in the case <strong>of</strong> PTFE [14].Generally, small micro glass beads are evacuatedfrom the superficial layers and the polymer aroundthe bigger ones is detached. In this scenario, one ormore micro glass beads will support an individualload great enough to be broken.a) At the edge <strong>of</strong> the wear track from the ring(v = 0.5 m/s) determines diminishing the averagevalue <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient characterizing thesecomposites, from 0.15...0.28, to 0.12...0.22. At v =0.5 m/s, both composites behave well, the frictioncoefficient becoming stable around the average value<strong>of</strong> 0.2. The polymer is warming and, thus, it isreducing its mechanical properties and allows forgenerating a very thin viscous film that is notexpelled from the contact (as it happens with otherpolymer under high speed) and becomes afavourable factor in reducing friction also byembedding the glass beads in the s<strong>of</strong>ten matrix.At F = 2.5 N, the average value <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient has a slightly tendency <strong>of</strong> increasingwhen the micro glass beads concentration areincreased.At F = 5 N, the values <strong>of</strong> the analysed parameters<strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient have been reduced (figure1), confirming the results obtained in other research[12] that the small loads generate a more intensefriction for the friction couple element(s) made <strong>of</strong>polymer or polymeric composites and hardcounterpart (steel). The normal force, for which thefriction coefficient begins to decrease, is dependingon the shape and size <strong>of</strong> the triboelements and on theworking conditions [15], [16].3.2 Wearb) Wear particles made <strong>of</strong> polymer and very smallfragments from the broken glass beadsFigure 4. Aspect <strong>of</strong> the wear particles generated duringthe test involving the sliding <strong>of</strong> the block made <strong>of</strong> GB20on the metallic ring. Test conditions: F = 5 N, v = 0.75m/s, L = 7500 mAt F = 1 N and v = 0.25 m/s, a larger scatteringinterval <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient had resulted; thereare prevailing the micro-cutting process and eventsimplying the glass beads (overrunning <strong>of</strong> the hardasperities <strong>of</strong> the metallic ring, the breakage <strong>of</strong> themicro glass beads and rare shear <strong>of</strong> the hardasperities, the micro glass beads embedding into thepolymeric matrix). A doubling <strong>of</strong> the sliding speedTaking into account the commanding parametersinvolved in this study (the material, by theconcentration <strong>of</strong> the adding materials, the slidingspeed and the load) and the recent documentation onwear parameterization [15], [16], [17], [18], [19],[20], the authors selected the wear rate (k) foranalysing the experimental wear results obtainedduring this research.V mk F L F L3[mm /(N m)] (1)where F [N] – the normal force and L [m] – thesliding distance, V [mm 3 ] is the material volume lostby wear, Δm [g] is the mass loss <strong>of</strong> a block,calculated as the difference <strong>of</strong> the initial mass <strong>of</strong> theblock and its mass after being tested, ρ [g/mm 3 ] isthe density <strong>of</strong> the tested block material.The wear maps (see Figure 5) were plotted usingMATLAB R2009b, the wear parameter beingrepresented for each material as a function <strong>of</strong> thesliding speed and the normal force, with the help <strong>of</strong> acubic interpolation.For PBT (see Figure 5), one may notice asignificant increase <strong>of</strong> the wear parameter when thenormal force is decreasing - the cause could be theincrease <strong>of</strong> the heightening factor for the abrasivewear under low loads and the absence <strong>of</strong> a transferfilm on the hard surface due to the absence <strong>of</strong> the116 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


mechanical pressure and thermal loading greatenough for initiating and maintaining an adherenceprocess.For all tested sliding speeds, the tendencycharacterizing the wear variation as a function <strong>of</strong>load has a minimum zone around the value <strong>of</strong> 4 N.- an accentuated increase <strong>of</strong> the wear rate forloads smaller than 2.5 N, with higher values for thecomposite GB10;- for the composite GB10, the wear rate isdecreasing almost linearly when the load isincreasing and it is insignificantly decreasing whenthe sliding speed is increasing; k is smaller for thetwo composites with micro glass beads as comparedto the basic material (PBT), the lowest values beingrecorded for the composites, under the load F = 5 N;- at F = 5 N, for all the tested materials, the wearrate has a very low sensitivity to the variation <strong>of</strong> thesliding speed, the smaller values being obtained forthe composites.Thus, the wear rate diminishes when introducingglass beads in PBT. The wear is diminishing due tothe increase <strong>of</strong> the material resistance (see theresults for the composite GB10), but when themicro glass beads concentration becomes 20%, theabrasive component <strong>of</strong> the wear process increases,too.4. CONCLUSIONSAdding micro glass beads in PBT makes thefriction coefficient increase almost linearly with themicro glass beads massic concentration, with ~15%for each 10% <strong>of</strong> micro glass beads.An addition <strong>of</strong> 10% micro glass beads decreasesthe wear rate with ~20%. When the concentration <strong>of</strong>micro glass beads is increased, the decrease <strong>of</strong> thiswear parameter is smaller as compared to PBT, with~18%.REFERENCESFigure 5. The wear rate for PBT and the composites PBT+ micro glass beadsFor the composites PBT + micro glass beads,analysing Figure 5, the following conclusions couldbe drawn:- a zone with minimum values, for F = 5 N;[1] C.P. Fung, P.C. Kang: Multi-response optimizationin friction properties <strong>of</strong> PBT composites usingTaguchi method and principle component analysis,Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Processing Technology, Vol.170, pp. 602-610, 2005.[2] G.S. Deshmukh, D.R. Peshwe, S.U. Pathak, J.D.Ekhe: A study on effect <strong>of</strong> mineral additions on themechanical, thermal, and structural properties <strong>of</strong>poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) composites, JPolym Res, Vol. 18, pp.1081-1090, 2011.[3] G.S. Deshmukh, D.R. Peshwe, S.U. Pathak, J.D.Ekhe: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> mechanical and thermalproperties <strong>of</strong> Poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT)composites reinforced with wollastonite,Transactions <strong>of</strong> The Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Metals, Vol.64, No. 1 & 2, pp. 127-132, 2011.[4] C. Georgescu, L. Deleanu: Influence <strong>of</strong> PTFEconcentration on the tribological characteristics <strong>of</strong>PBT, in: <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 7 th InternationalSymposium KOD 2012 Machine and IndustrialDesign in Mechanical Engineering, 24-26.05.2012,Balatonfured, Hungary, pp. 405-410.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 117


[5] J. Wu, K. Wang, D. Yu: Fracture toughness andfracture mechanisms <strong>of</strong> PBT/PC/IM blends. Part VEffect <strong>of</strong> PBT-PC interfacial strength on the fractureand tensile properties <strong>of</strong> the PBT/PC blends, Journal<strong>of</strong> Material Science, Vol. 38, pp. 183-191, 2003.[6] R.J. Crawford: Plastics Engineering, 3 rd Edition,Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2002.[7] J.A. Brydson, Plastics Materials, 7 th Edition,Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1999.[8] H. Czichos, T. Saito, L. Smith: Springer Handbook<strong>of</strong> Materials Measurement Methods, SpringerScience-Business Media, 2006.[9] A. Dasari, Z.Z. Yu, Y.W. Mai: Fundamental aspectsand recent progress on wear/scratch damage inpolymer nanocomposites, Materials Science andEngineering, Vol. 63, pp. 31-80, 2009.[10] K. Friedrich: Advances in Composite Tribology,Vol. 8, Composites Materials Series, UniversitätKaiseslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1993.[11] ***: Crastin PBT. Molding Guide, available on-line:http://www2.dupont.com/Plastics/en_US/assets/downloads/processing/cramge.pdf[12] W.R. Jr. Jones, W.F. Hady, R.L. Johnson: Frictionand Wear <strong>of</strong> Poly(Amide-Imide), Polyimide andPyrone Polymers at 260°C (500°F) in Dry Air,NASA TN D-6353, Lewis Research Center, 1971.[13] L. Deleanu, G. Andrei, L. Maftei, C. Georgescu, A.Cantaragiu: Wear maps for a class <strong>of</strong> compositeswith polyamide matrix and micro glass spheres,Journal <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Tribological Association, Vol.17, No 3, pp. 371-379, 2011.[14] P. Samyn, J. Quintelier, W. Ost, P. De Baets, G.Schoukens: Sliding behaviour <strong>of</strong> pure polyester andpolyester-PTFE filled bulk composites in overloadconditions, Polymer Testing, Vol. 24, pp. 588-603,2005.[15] G.M. Bartenev, V.V. Lavrentev: Friction and Wear<strong>of</strong> Polymers, Elsevier, 1981.[16] B.J. Briscoe, S.K. Sinha: Wear <strong>of</strong> polymers, Proc.Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J. Engineering Tribology, Vol.216, pp. 401-413, 2002.[17] H. Czikos: Tribology – A System Approach to theScience and Technology <strong>of</strong> Friction, Lubricationand Wear, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,New-York, 1978.[18] K. Friedrich, A.K. Schlarb: Tribology <strong>of</strong> PolymericNanocomposites – Friction and Wear <strong>of</strong> BulkMaterials and Coatings, Tribology and InterfaceEngineering Series, 55, Elsevier, 2008.[19] N.K. Myshkin, M.I. Petrokovets, A.V. Kovalev:Tribology <strong>of</strong> polymers: Adhesion, friction, wear, andmass-transfer, Tribology International, Vol. 38, pp.910-921, 2005.[20] K. Holmberg: Reporting Experimental Results inTribology – Summary <strong>of</strong> the discussion on NewWear Rate Unit, in: OECD IRG 26th Meeting,5-6.10.2006, Lyon, France.118 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacNORMAL FORCE INFLUENCE ON3D TEXTURE PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZINGTHE FRICTION COUPLE STEEL – PBT + 10% PTFEConstantin Georgescu 1 , Lorena Deleanu 1 , Catalin Pirvu 11 ”Dunarea de Jos” University <strong>of</strong> Galati, Romania, constantin.georgescu@ugal.roAbstract: This study presents the influence <strong>of</strong> the normal force on the surface quality <strong>of</strong> the friction couplesteel – polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) + 10% polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). There were calculated theaverage values <strong>of</strong> the amplitude and functional parameters, as obtained from investigating square areas on thewear tracks, with the help <strong>of</strong> a proposed methodology, for initial and tested surfaces generated on the blocksand on counterpart ring made <strong>of</strong> rolling bearing steel, for the following test conditions: three normal forces (F= 1 N, F = 2.5 N and F =5 N), three sliding speeds (v = 0.25 m/s, v = 0.50 m/s and v = 0.75 m/s) and a slidingdistance <strong>of</strong> L = 7500 m. The conclusion <strong>of</strong> the research study was that the tested normal force range has aninsignificant influence on the surface quality for the tested materials. This friction couple could berecommended for variable dry regimes.Keywords: PBT + PTFE material, surface texture parameters, block-on-ring test, dry sliding.1. INTRODUCTIONIn actual application for bearings and seals in dryregime, a self-lubricating polymeric material slideson a hard surface, proved to be tribologicallyefficient as compared to the sliding <strong>of</strong> a polymericmaterial on itself [1], [2]. The adhesion and abrasioncomponents <strong>of</strong> the friction and wear processessinergically influence themselves. For instance,extend <strong>of</strong> the junctions depends on the elasto-plasticdeformation <strong>of</strong> the asperities [3], [4], [5] and theycould not be separated. For the polymer-metalcontact, the deterioration <strong>of</strong> the polymer by elastoplasticdeformation is more intense and the adhesioncomponent increases for the harder surfaces [6]. Thegenerated transfer film characteristic for thepolymer-metal friction couple, also changes thesurface texture, depending <strong>of</strong> the polymer nature andthe working conditions [7], [1], [2].There are many published studies on thetribological behavior <strong>of</strong> polymeric materials [8],[7], [9], but few <strong>of</strong> them deal with the influence <strong>of</strong>the surface texture on the tribologicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the polymeric materials and evenfewer reported how the working conditions affectthe surface texture. In 1970, Pooley and Tabor(quoted in [1]) pointed out that for PTFE, the value<strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient is only slightly affectedby the surface quality when involving relativelysmooth ones, but with rough surfaces the wear andthe friction are intensified. Till now, the terms"smooth" and "rough" were used only in aqualitative way and there are no recommendedvalues <strong>of</strong> the texture parameters for particularapplications.Experimental studies proved that a change <strong>of</strong> thetexture parameters could significantly affect thefriction and the wear. There is why the authors <strong>of</strong>this research consider the texture evaluation, beforeand after testing, necessary for understanding anddirecting the tribological processes. Many polymericfriction couples are working with frequent startsand stops and the evolution <strong>of</strong> the surface texture is<strong>of</strong> great importance for improving the reliabilityand the durability <strong>of</strong> these tribosystems.For polymeric friction couples and especially forpolymer – metal contacts, the wear could be relatedboth to the amplitude and functional parameters.As resulted from the studied documentation[12], [13], the surface quality is frequentlydescribed by parameters as Sa (arithmetic average<strong>of</strong> absolute values) and Sq (root mean squared).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 119


The authors’ estimates that for studying the wornsurfaces and for obtaining correlations among thesurface parameters and the testing conditions, thefollowing parameters are more suitable: theparameters related to the maximum values <strong>of</strong> thetopography (Sz – the height difference between thehighest and lowest heights in the investigated area,Sv – the largest pit height, Sp – the largest peakheight) and the functional parameters (Svk –reduced valley depth, Sk – core roughness depth,Spk – reduced summit height).2. MATERIAL AND TESTINGMETHODOLOGYThere were selected the following testparameters: three sliding speeds (v = 0.25 m/s, v =0.50 m/s, v = 0.75 m/s), three applied loads (F = 1.0N, F = 2.5 N, F = 5.0 N), the sliding distance beingL = 7500 m for each test done at room temperatureand in a laboratory environment.In order to do this study, the pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer LaserNANOFOCUS μSCAN [14] was used.For parameters' calculation it was used thes<strong>of</strong>tware SPIP 5.1.11 [15]. Figure 2 presents avirtual (rebuilt) image <strong>of</strong> the investigated zone withthe help <strong>of</strong> this s<strong>of</strong>tware.The friction and wear behavior <strong>of</strong> PBT slidingagainst steel was evaluated with the help <strong>of</strong> aUniversal Micro-Tribometer UMT-2 and a blockon-ringtribotester. The geometry <strong>of</strong> the frictionalcouple is given in figure 1.Loadsamplea) The initial surfacerotating ringFigure 1. The shapes and dimensions <strong>of</strong> the frictioncouple block-on-ringThe polymeric blocks are prisms <strong>of</strong> 16.5 mm ×10 mm × 4 mm and they were obtained by injectionat ICEFS Savinesti, Romania, according to thespecifications <strong>of</strong> the producer from tractionsamples, cutting the blocks from the middle parallelzone <strong>of</strong> them.The polymeric blend has 90% (wt) PBT, thecommercial name being Crastin 6130 NC010 (assupplied in grains by DuPont) and 10% (wt) PTFE,commercial grade NFF FT-1-1T® Flontech, havingthe average size <strong>of</strong> the particles ~20 μm.The other element <strong>of</strong> the friction couple was theexternal ring <strong>of</strong> the tapered rolling bearing KBS30202 (DIN ISO 355/720), having the dimensions<strong>of</strong> Ø35 mm × 10 mm and they were made <strong>of</strong> steelgrade DIN 100Cr6, having 60 - 62 HRC and Ra =0.8 μm on the exterior surface.b) The worn surface (F = 5 N, v = 0.25 m/s, L = 7500 m)Figure 2. Virtual images <strong>of</strong> the polymeric blocks made<strong>of</strong> PBT + 10% PTFEMeasurements were done for blocks made <strong>of</strong> thepolymeric blend PBT + 10% PTFE and for theexternal rings <strong>of</strong> tapered rolling bearings, bothelements being involved in block-on-ring tests, forboth non-worn and worn surfaces.For evaluating the 3D parameters involved inthis study, there were selected three zones, each <strong>of</strong>500 m 500 m for the polymeric blocks and <strong>of</strong>100 m 100 m for the metallic rings, thesebeing reduced for reason <strong>of</strong> the surface curvature.All 3D measurements were done with a step <strong>of</strong> 5m. The distance between lines for 3Dmeasurements was also 5 m. The 3D parametersare calculated for all the values z(x, y), measuredon one area <strong>of</strong> 500 m 500 m on the block andone area <strong>of</strong> 100 m 100 m on the steel ring.120 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSTaking into account that PTFE has lowermechanical properties as compared to PBT [10], itwas considered necessary to study the influence <strong>of</strong>the normal force on the surface quality <strong>of</strong> thispolymeric blend, before and after testing.Figures 3, 4 and 5 present the average values <strong>of</strong>the amplitude and functional parameters, obtainedwith the help <strong>of</strong> the proposed methodology, for theinitial and tested surfaces generated on the blocksmade <strong>of</strong> PF10 (material symbol for the polymericblend PBT + 10% PTFE), for the tested conditions:three forces and three sliding speeds and a slidingdistance <strong>of</strong> L = 7500 m.μm141210m 8µ6420141210m 8µ6420141210m 8µ642014121086420PF10L = 7500 mInitial surfaceSa Sq Sp Sv SzF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.25 m/sSa Sq Sp Sv SzF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.5 m/sSa Sq Sp Sv SzF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NPF10L = 7500mv = 0.75 m/sSa Sq Sp Sv SzFigure 3. The influence <strong>of</strong> the normal force on theaverage values <strong>of</strong> the dimensional amplitude parametersfor the blocks made <strong>of</strong> PF10 (PBT + 10% PTFE)The wear track surfaces are characterized byparametric values 2...3 times lower than those <strong>of</strong>the initial surfaces as they were obtained by themoulding technology.6420-26420-26420-26420-2PF10L = 7500 mInitial surfaceSskPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.25 m/sSskPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.5 m/sSskPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.75 m/sSskSkuSkuSkuSkuFigure 4. The influence <strong>of</strong> the normal force on theaverage values <strong>of</strong> the a dimensional amplitudeparameters for the blocks made <strong>of</strong> PF10The surface quality <strong>of</strong> this material is onlyslightly dependent on the normal force, at least forthe tested values (F = 1 N, F = 2.5 N and F = 5 N).Sa and Sq have very close values, regardlessthe force values, but Sp and Sz present a slightdecrease when the force increases, for the testdone with the sliding speeds <strong>of</strong> v = 0.25 m/s and v= 0.5 m/s.Sku (surface Kurtosis) values greater than 3.0indicate narrower height distribution due to the13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 121


particular ductile fracture <strong>of</strong> the polymer duringadhesion – abrasion wear. Ssk (surface Skewness)has values oscillating around zero, indicatingsymmetric height distributions. If Ssk < 0, thebearing surface has holes and if Ssk > 0 it is a flatsurface with peaks.μm43mµ 210431043210µm 243mµ 210PF10Initial surfaceSpk Sk SvkPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.25 m/sF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NSpk Sk SvkPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.5 m/sF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NSpk Sk SvkPF10L = 7500 mv = 0.75 m/sF=1.0NF=2.5NF=5.0NSpk Sk SvkFigure 4. The influence <strong>of</strong> the normal force on theaverage values <strong>of</strong> the 3D functional parameters for theblocks made <strong>of</strong> PF10It was noticed a slight decrease <strong>of</strong> thefunctional parameters when the load increases,for tests done with the sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v = 0.25m/s. For the other two tested speeds (v = 0.50 m/sand v = 0.75 m/s), this poor dependence on thenormal force was noticed only for Svk. Thegreater forces make this parameter to decreaseand this tendency could be justified by the elastoviscousbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the polymeric blend; it ispossible that the passing <strong>of</strong> the hard asperitieslaterally moves the s<strong>of</strong>ter material <strong>of</strong> thecounterpart accompanied by an elevation <strong>of</strong> thevalley bottoms between asperities, process alsoreported in [11], [1].4. CONCLUSIONFor the polymeric blend PBT + 10% PTFE,there was found no significant influence <strong>of</strong> thenormal force on the surface quality, for the testingconditions: range <strong>of</strong> force 1 N ... 5 N, range <strong>of</strong>speed 0.25 m/s ... 0.75 m/s and the sliding distance7500 m.The obtained results recommend the testedmaterial for friction couples functioning undervariable conditions (speed and load) in dry sliding.REFERENCES[1] G.W. Stachowiak: Wear – Materials, Mechanismsand Practice, John Wiley & Sons, England, 2005.[2] G.W. Stachowiak, A.W. Batchelor: EngineeringTribology, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.[3] D. Boazu, I. Gavrilescu: Contactul mecanic.Analiză cu elemente finite, EUROPLUS, Galaţi,2006.[4] S. Creţu: Contactul concentrat elastic-plastic,Politehnium, Iaşi, 2009.[5] N.B. Demkin, V.V. Izmailov: The Relationbetween the Friction Contact Performance and theMicrogeometry <strong>of</strong> Contacting Surfaces, Journal <strong>of</strong>Friction and Wear, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 48-55, 2010.[6] P. Samyn, J. Quintelier, W. Ost, P. De Baets, G.Schoukens: Sliding behaviour <strong>of</strong> pure polyesterand polyester-PTFE filled bulk composites inoverload conditions, Polymer Testing, Vol. 24, pp.588-603, 2005.[7] K. Friedrich, A.K. Schlarb: Tribology <strong>of</strong> PolymericNanocomposites – Friction and Wear <strong>of</strong> BulkMaterials and Coatings, Elsevier, pp. 17-148,2008.[8] B.J. Briscoe, S.K. Sinha: Wear <strong>of</strong> polymers, Proc.Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J. Engineering Tribology,Vol. 216, pp. 401-413, 2002.[9] K. Friedrich, Z. Zhang, A.K. Schlarb: Effects <strong>of</strong>various fillers on the sliding wear <strong>of</strong> polymercomposites, Composites Science and Technology,Vol. 65, pp. 2329-2343, 2005.[10] J.A. Brydson: Plastics Materials, 7 th Edition,Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.[11] K.L. Johnson: Contacts Mechanics, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, 1987.122 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[12] L. Blunt De, X. Jiang: Advanced Techniques forAssessment Surface Topography, Elsevier, London,2003.[13] F. Blateyron: États de surface: la norme, Mesures,Vol. 787, pp. 44-47, 2006.[14] ***: NanoFocus AG μScan® – Instruction Manual.[15] SPIP The Scanning Probe Image ProcessorSPIP TM , Version 5.1.11, 2012, available on-line:http://www.imagemet.com/WebHelp/spip.html.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 123


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccWEARBEHAVIOUROF COMPOSITES BASED ONN ZA27 ALLOYREINFORCED WITH GRAPHITEPARTICLESSlobodan Mitrović 1 , Miroslav Babić 1 , Ilija Bobić 2 , Fatima Zivić 1 , Dragan D Dzunić 1 , MarkoPantić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia,boban@ @kg.ac.rs, babic@kg.ac.rs, zivic@kg.ac.rs, dzuna@kg. ac.rs, pantic@ @kg.ac.rs2 INN "Vinca", Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija, ilijab@vinca.rsAbstract: Itis well known that reinforcing the matrix with graphite particles effects on frictionproperties,while reinforcing the matrix with hard particles (Al 2 O 3 , SiC, Garnet. ..) increasess wear resistance <strong>of</strong> thematrix material, in thiscase ZA27alloy.Reinforcing the matrix by adding a the graphite also effects onmechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> material. In this studyy authors made an attempt to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong> smalllamount <strong>of</strong> graphite reinforcement on wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> composites andd in order to preserve themechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the material. The composites with 1 and 2wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite particles were produced bycompocasting procedure. Wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> unreinforcedZA27 alloy and composites were studied using,computer aided block-on-disc tribometer, underr dry slidingconditions at different sliding speeds (0.25, 0.5and 1m/s) and normal loads (10N, 30N and 50N). The obtained resultss revealed that composites exhibitedbetter wearresistance in comparison to unreinforced ZA27alloy. Better wear properties <strong>of</strong> composites incomparisonto the unreinforced matrix alloy are a result <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> o graphite rich film onthe contacttsurfaces.Keywords: Composite, ZA27, Graphite, Wear.1. INTRODUCTIONDue to wide potential applications, compositematerials have been investigated very intensivelyover the recent decades [1]. Metal matrixcomposites have emerged as an important class <strong>of</strong>engineeringgmaterials because they provideopportunityto manage the material mechanical andtribological properties [2].Zinc-aluminium (ZA) alloys are importantbearing materials, especially suitable for high-loadand low-speed applications [3, 4]. ZA alloys arecharacterized by good tribological and mechanicalproperties, low weight excellent foundry castabilityand fluidity, good machining properties, low initialcost, and environmentally friendly technology.However, major limitations <strong>of</strong> ZAalloys aree itsinferior mechanical andwear properties on elevatedproperties. Also, this alloy exhibits dimensionalinstability at temperatures above 120°C [5].Various authors have reportedthat theincorporation <strong>of</strong> hard particles (SiC, Al 2 O 3 , zircon,garnet and glass) [6-17] improves wear resistance124<strong>of</strong> base alloy. Also, A many researchers have reportedthat MMCs reinforced r with graphite particlesexhibits low friction andd low wear rate, andsuggested that such behaviour is the result <strong>of</strong> self-lubricating graphite-rich film formation on thecontact surface [4, 18-20]. Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>ZA27 alloy graphite reinforced are significantlychanged by varying the amount <strong>of</strong> graphite [21].Theincrease <strong>of</strong> o the graphite contentt within theZA27 matrix results in increase <strong>of</strong> ductility,compressive strength, corrosion resistance, but in adecrease <strong>of</strong> hardness. In spite <strong>of</strong> thesignificantdecrease in hardness, tribological tests showed thattaddition <strong>of</strong> graphite particles to ZA27 alloy matriximproved wear resistance <strong>of</strong>f compositess [22].Based on presented literature review smalllamount <strong>of</strong> graphite will not degrade mechanicalproperties so An A attempt has been madeto evaluateethe dryslidingg wear behaviour <strong>of</strong>f the ZA-27/ /graphite composites over a range <strong>of</strong> appliedloads and slidingspeeds. The unreinforced ZA-27alloy was tested as a referencematerial.The role <strong>of</strong>graphite in dry was discussed.13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


2. EXPERIMENTALTESTING2.1 MaterialThe ZA-27 alloy (27.5% Al, 2.5% Cu, 0.012%Mg, and balance Zn) was used as the base matrixalloy. The graphite particles <strong>of</strong> mean size 30 μmwere used as the reinforcement. The percentagee <strong>of</strong>graphite was 1 and 2 by weight. The compositespecimens were obtained by thecompocastingprocedure, which was executed bymixing in theisothermal regime.More detailed process <strong>of</strong> thecompocating proceduree could be found f elsewhere[4].a)After obtainingthe compositematerialssamples, it was necessary to perform the hotpressing to reduce porosity. The samples (blocks)for the tribological investigations weree then madefromthe ZA-277 as-cast alloy and pressed pieces.Microstructural characterization <strong>of</strong>f the alloyswascarriedoutt using the optical microscopy onsamples, similar tothose used for wear testing. Thetypical OM micrographs m <strong>of</strong>the matrixalloy andcomposite are shown s in Fig. 1.Bulk hardness <strong>of</strong> all thee samples was measuredusing a Brinell hardness tester witha 2.5-mmmdiameter steel ballindenter b and at an applied load <strong>of</strong>625N. The load application time was 60 s. Themeanvalues <strong>of</strong> at leastfivemeasurements,conducted in different areas <strong>of</strong> each sample, showthat the composite attained lower hardness (115HB) than that <strong>of</strong> o the matrixx ZA-27 alloy (124 HB).Hardness <strong>of</strong> the matrix alloy was 124HB, whilehardness for composites reinforced with1 wt% and2 wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite particless were 119 HB and 115HB, respectively.In his investigation<strong>of</strong>mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the cast ZA-27/ graphiteparticulate composites Seah found that withgraphite contenincrease hardness monotonicallydecreases significantly [23]. In fact, as the graphitecontent is increased from 0 to 5% the t hardnesssdecreases for about 27%.2.2Wear testsb)c)Figure 1. Optical microscopy <strong>of</strong> tested specimens: a)unreinforced matrix alloy ZA27; b) composite withh 1wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite particles; c) composite with 2 wt% % <strong>of</strong>graphite particles13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13Samples forr tribological testing were made bycutting. Cuttingg was realised by machine saw withintensive cooling in orderto avoid changes <strong>of</strong>surface layers, due d to high temperature.Wear test were w carried out in a computer aideddblock-on-disk sliding s wear testing machine with thecontact pair geometry in accordance with ASTM G77– –05. More detailed description <strong>of</strong> the tribometerris available elsewhere [4].The test blocks (6.35x15.75x10.16mm) wereeprepared from ZA27 unreinforced alloy and fromcomposite withh 1% and 2% % <strong>of</strong> graphite particles.Alll samples prior to wear testare polished. Thecounter face (disc <strong>of</strong> 35 mmm diameter and 6.35 mmmthickness) was made <strong>of</strong> EN: HS 18-1-1-5 tool steel<strong>of</strong> 62HRC hardness. Thee tests weree performedunder dry sliding conditions at different slidingspeeds (0.25 m/s, 0.5 m/s, 1 m/s) and applied loads(10N, 30 N, 500 N). The duration <strong>of</strong> sliding was 10min. Each experiment was repeated fivetimes.The tests were performed at room temperature.tThewear behavior <strong>of</strong> the block was monitored interms <strong>of</strong> the wear scar width (Figure 2). Using thewear scar width and geometry <strong>of</strong> the contact pairthe wear volume (expressed in mm 3 ) wascalculated.125


Figure 2. The scheme <strong>of</strong> contact pair geometryload is presented on Fig.3. Presented plots suggestthat wear volume <strong>of</strong> all tested samples increasesswith normal load increase, , at all values <strong>of</strong> slidingspeed. Increasee in wear volume with ncreasing <strong>of</strong>normal load is more pronounced at higher slidingspeed (1 m/s) , as could be clearly seen if wecompare plots on o Fig. 3a with plots on Fig. 3c. Thisphenomenon iss more pronounced for unreinforcedmatrix alloy. According to Seah et al. [24] wear rateincreases monotonically with normal load increase.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONWear volume<strong>of</strong> tested ZA27/graphitecomposites,as well as unreinforcedZA27 alloy, asa function <strong>of</strong> sliding speed and normal load in drysliding conditions is illustrated on figures presenteddown below.a)a)b)b)c)Figure 4.Wear volume v <strong>of</strong> tested samples versus slidingspeed under different applied normal loads in dry slidingconditionsc)Figure 3.Wear volume <strong>of</strong>tested samples versus normalload for different sliding speeds in dry sliding s conditionsThe effect <strong>of</strong> normal load on wear volumee <strong>of</strong>tested composites, as well as the matrix alloyspecimens at different values <strong>of</strong> applied normal126The influence <strong>of</strong> slidingg speed on wear volume<strong>of</strong> tested composites, as well as matrix alloyspecimens at constant values <strong>of</strong> applied normal loadis presented on Fig. 4. Fromm presented plots it couldbe clearly seenn that with increase <strong>of</strong> sliding speedwear volume <strong>of</strong> all tested specimens increases.Wear volume increase iss more pronounced atapplied load <strong>of</strong>f 50N, and for unreinforced matrixalloy in comparison to the composites.Also, on the13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


figure 3a it could be seen that the wear <strong>of</strong> thecomposite with 2 wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite is almostnegligible under appliedload <strong>of</strong> 10N.Seah et al. [24] have confirmedthat the wearrate <strong>of</strong> as-cast ZA-27/graphite particulate decreasesmonotonically with an increase in sliding speed, , butin our caseit is inversely because <strong>of</strong> differentcontact geometry.portion <strong>of</strong> the contact surface. Presence <strong>of</strong> thegraphite film inn contact zone reduces the t metal-to--during drysliding,themetal/graphiteecompositestribo-influenced the graphitefilmm forming onthe contacttsurface <strong>of</strong> elements [18–20], whichacts as solidlubricantthatreducesmetal-to-metallcontactbetweenn the sliding surfaces. The formation<strong>of</strong> graphiterichlubricant film between the slidingsurfaces has beenexplainedd as a resultt <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>tsecond phase (graphite)squeezing-out from thesubsurface toward the mating surfacedue toextensive plastic deformation metal contact between the sliding pairs.Many researchers have reported that[18].4.CONCLUSIONa)b)Based on the results presented in this t paper itcould be concluded: Generally wear w volumee <strong>of</strong> the composites arelesser in comparison to o the unreinforced matrixalloy. Higher content <strong>of</strong> graphite particles within thematrix alloyy results in higher wear resistance r <strong>of</strong>material, composite with 2 wt% <strong>of</strong> graphiteparticles has lesser values <strong>of</strong> wearr volumes incomparisonn to the composite with 1wt% <strong>of</strong>graphite particles, p under the same contacttconditions. Wear volume <strong>of</strong> all tested specimens increasesswith slidingg speed and normal load increase. Higher wear resistance <strong>of</strong> ZA27/graphitecomposites in comparison to the unreinforcedmatrix alloyy is a result <strong>of</strong> graphite film f formingon the surface <strong>of</strong> contact elements.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTTThestudy was financed byy Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education,Science and TechnologicaTal Development, Serbia,project No.35021.c)Figure5. Wear scars <strong>of</strong> tested specimens: a)unreinforced matrix alloy; b) and c) composites withh 1and 2 wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite particles, respectively.Figure 5 presents wear scarss <strong>of</strong> all testedspecimens Based on the wear scars it couldd beconcluded that the dominant wear mechanism wasabrasive wear, because <strong>of</strong> this parallel tracks withinthe wear scars <strong>of</strong> all tested materials. One canclearly notice that on the worn surface the blackgraphite film is smeared and it covers the large13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13REFERENCES[1] Vasiliev, V.V., V Morozov, E.V.: Mechanics andAnalysis <strong>of</strong> Composite Materials. Elsevier, Oxford,2001.[2] Pruthviraj, R.D., R Krupakara, P.V.: Influence <strong>of</strong> SiCadditions onn mechanical l properties <strong>of</strong> the Zn–Alalloy (ZA-27). Int J Mater Sci 2(1) ), pp. 53–57,2007.[3] Babic, M., Ninkovic, R., Rac, A.: Sliding WearBehavior <strong>of</strong> o Zn-Al Alloys in Conditions <strong>of</strong>Boundary Lubrication. L The Annals <strong>of</strong> University‘‘Dunarea De Jos’’ <strong>of</strong> Galati Fascicle VIII.Tribology, pp. p 60–64, 2005.[4] Babic, M., Mitrovic, S., Dzunic, D., Jeremic, B.,Bobic, I.: Tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> composites based127


on ZA-27 alloy reinforced with graphite particles.Tribology Lett., pp. 401-410, 2010.[5] Prasad, B.K.: Abrasive wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> azinc-based alloy and zinc-alloy/SiC composite.Wear 252(3–4), pp. 250–263, 2002.[6] Tjong, S.C., Chen, F.: Wear behavior <strong>of</strong> as-castZnAl27/SiC particulate metal-matrix compositesunder lubricated sliding condition. Metall MaterTrans A 28A, 1951–1955, 1997.[7] Prasad, B.K., Das, S., Jha, A.K., Modi, O.P.,Dasgupta, R., Yegneswaran, A.H.: Factorscontrolling the abrasive wear response <strong>of</strong> a zincbasedalloy silicon carbide particle composite.Composites A 28(4), 301–308, 1997.[8] Prasad, B.K., Modi, O.P., Khaira, H.K.: High-stressabrasive wear behavior <strong>of</strong> a zinc-based alloy and itscomposite compared with a cast iron under varyingtrack radius and load conditions. Mater SciEng A381, 343–354, 2004.[9] Prasad, B.K.: Abrasive wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> azinc-based alloy and zinc-alloy/SiC composite.Wear 252(3–4), 250–263, 2002.[10] Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M., Kamath, R., Satish,B.M.: Effect <strong>of</strong> SiC particle reinforcement on theunlubricated sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> ZA-27 alloycomposites. Wear 213, 33–40, 1997.[11] Sastry, S., Krishna, M., Uchil, J.: A study ondamping behavior <strong>of</strong> aluminate particulatereinforced ZA-27 alloy metal matrix composites. JAlloys Compd 346, 268–274, 2001.[12] Sharma, S.C., Sastry, S., Krishna, M.: Effect <strong>of</strong>aging parameters on the micro structure andproperties <strong>of</strong> ZA-27/aluminate metal matrixcomposites. J Alloys Compd 346, 292–301, 2002.[13] Bobic, I., Jovanovic, M.T., Ilic, N.: Microstructureand strength <strong>of</strong> ZA-27 based composites reinforcedwith Al2O3 particles. Mater Lett 57, 1683–1688,2003.[14] Modi, O.P., Rathod, S., Prasad, B.K., Jha, A.K.,Dixit, G.: The influence <strong>of</strong> alumina particledispersion and test parameters on dry sliding wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> zinc-based alloy. TribolInt 40, 1137–1146, 2007.[15] Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M., Kamath, R., Satish,B.M.: Sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> zircon particlesreinforced ZA-27 alloy composite materials. Wear224, 89–94. 1999.[16] Ranganath, G., Sharma, S.C., Krishna, M.: Drysliding wear <strong>of</strong> garnet reinforced zinc/aluminummetal matrix composites. Wear 251, 1408–1413,2001.[17] BabicMiroslav, Slobodan Mitrovic, Fatima Zivic,IlijaBobic: Wear Behavior <strong>of</strong> Composites Based onZA-27 Alloy Reinforced by Al2O3 Particles UnderDry Sliding Condition, TribolLett 38, pp. 337–346,2010.[18] Riahi, A.R., Alpas, A.T.: The role <strong>of</strong> tribo-layers onthe sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> graphitic aluminummatrix composites. Wear 251, 1396–1407, 2001.[19] Yang, J.B., Lin, C.B., Wang, T.C., Chu, H.Y.: Thetribological characteristics <strong>of</strong> A356.2Al alloy/Gr(p)composites. Wear 257, 941–952, 2004.[20] Akhlaghi, F., Zare-Bidaki, A.: Influence <strong>of</strong> graphitecontent on the dry sliding and oil impregnatedsliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> Al 2024-graphitecomposites produced by in situ powder metallurgymethod. Wear 266, 37–45, 2009.[21] Seah, K.H.W., Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M.:Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> cast ZA-27/graphiteparticulate composites. Mater Des 16(5), 271–275,1995.[22] Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M., Kramath, R., Satish,B.M.: Graphite particles reinforced ZA-27 alloycomposite materials for journal bearing applications.Wear 219, 162–168, 1998.[23] Seah, K.H.W., Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M.: Effect <strong>of</strong>artificial ageing on the hardness <strong>of</strong> cast ZA-27/graphite particulate composites. Mater Des 16(6),337–341, 1995.[24] Seah, K.H.W., Sharma, S.C., Girish, B.M., Lim,S.C.: Wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> as-cast ZA-27/graphiteparticulate composites. Mater Des 17(2), 63–67,1996.128 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacWEAR PROPERTIES OF A356/10SiC/1Gr HYBRID COMPOSITESIN LUBRICATED SLIDING CONDITIONSBabić Miroslav 1 , Stojanović Blaža 1 , Mitrović Slobodan 1 , Bobić Ilija 2 , Miloradović Nenad 1 , Pantić Marko 1 ,Džunić Dragan 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, babic@kg.ac.rs, blaza@kg.ac.rs2 Institution Institute <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Sciences “Vinca”, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaAbstract: This paper presents basic tribological properties <strong>of</strong> A356/10SiC/1Gr hybrid composites inconditions with lubrication. Hybrid composite specimen is obtained by compocasting procedure. A356aluminium alloy is used as a base matrix alloy, reinforced with 10wt% <strong>of</strong> SiC and 1wt% <strong>of</strong> graphite.Tribological tests are done on advanced and computer supported tribometer with block-on-disc contact pair.By the experimental plan, test is conducted under three different values <strong>of</strong> sliding speed, three differentvalues <strong>of</strong> normal load, different sliding distances, and also different lubricants. SEM and EDS are used forwear analysis. The analysis has shown the presence <strong>of</strong> MML, which means that there was transfer <strong>of</strong>material from steel disc to composite block.Keywords: Hybrid composites, aluminium, SiC, graphite, wear, lubrication, MML.1. INTRODUCTIONAluminium is the most attractive material inautomotive, airplane, space and precise devicesindustry. Improvement <strong>of</strong> mechanical andtribological properties <strong>of</strong> aluminium can beachieved through aluminium reinforcement with theproper material and through creating compositematerial. The most effective improvement <strong>of</strong> theseproperties is achieved through creating hybridcomposites with two or more types <strong>of</strong>reinforcements. By adding the ceramicreinforcement, mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the matrixare changed, but in that case problem <strong>of</strong>machinability occurs. To improve machinability,the graphite is added to composite materials that arealready reinforced with ceramic material. Presence<strong>of</strong> graphite reduces mechanical properties (hardnessdecreases), but tribological properties are improved[1-5].Basavarajappa et al [6-8] have studied thetribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> hybrid composites withaluminum base Al2219 reinforced by SiC andgraphite. They studied the tribological properties <strong>of</strong>hybrid composites with 5, 10 and 15% SiC and 3%Gr obtained with process <strong>of</strong> liquid metallurgy. Thetribological tests show that wear decreases withincreasing SiC content in the hybrid composite.With increasing sliding speed and normal load,wear rate <strong>of</strong> composites is growing. Mahdavi andAkhlaghi [9,10] have studied the tribologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> Al / SiC / Gr hybrid compositesobtained by In situ Powder Metallurgy process.Aluminum alloy Al 6061 is used as a base,reinforced with graphite 9% and 0 ÷ 40% SiC. Thetribological tests are done on tribometer with pin ondisc contact, and the composite with 20% SiC hasthe best properties. Further increase <strong>of</strong> SiC leads toincreased wear <strong>of</strong> hybrid composites.Suresh and Sridhara [11-14] have studied theeffect <strong>of</strong> SiC content and graphite on thetribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> hybrid Al / SiC / Grcomposites with aluminum base LM25 (Al-Si7Mg0.5) obtained by stircasting process.Ames and Alpas have [15] studied thetribological testing <strong>of</strong> hybrid composites with a base<strong>of</strong> aluminum alloy A356 reinforced with 20% SiCand 3 ÷ 10% Gr. The tribological tests are done ontribometer with block on ring contact. The wear rate<strong>of</strong> hybrid composites is significantly lower than thewear rate <strong>of</strong> the base material withoutreinforcements, especially at low normal loads.Vencl et al [16,17] have studied the tribologicalbehaviour <strong>of</strong> hybrid composites with the A35613 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 129


matrix reinforced with SiC, Al2O3 and graphite. Thetribological tests are done on tribometer with pin ondisc contact and show that the wear and frictioncoefficient decreases with addition <strong>of</strong> graphite.This paper presents tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong>hybrid composites with aluminum base <strong>of</strong> A356alloy reinforced with SiC and Gr obtained withcompocasting procedure. The tests are done oncomputer aided block-on-disc tribometer underlubricated sliding conditions by varying the contactpairs (sliding speed and normal load).2. EXPERIMENT2.1 The procedure for obtaining compositesHybrid Al / SiC / Gr composites are obtained by themodified compo-casting procedure (infiltration <strong>of</strong>particles in the semi-solidified melt A356 alloy). subeutecticAl-Si alloys En AlSiMg0,3 (A356 alloy) isused as a basis. Using compocasting procedure, particlereinforcements are easily infiltrated / trapped. Thissolves the problem <strong>of</strong> wettability on the border baseand reinforcements. The cost <strong>of</strong> composite producingwith that process is much lower.Figure 1 shows the structure <strong>of</strong> the base materialA356 and the hybrid composite with 10wt%SiCand 1wt%Gr. When mixing composites, particles <strong>of</strong>graphite have become fragmented with regard tooriginal size <strong>of</strong> 35 µm. The picture shows thedistribution <strong>of</strong> SiC particulate reinforcements, thesize <strong>of</strong> 39 um.2.2 Plan <strong>of</strong> experiment and description <strong>of</strong>equipmentTribological tests are done on advanced andcomputer supported tribometer with block-on-disccontact pair in accordance with ASTM G77standard. Contact pair consists <strong>of</strong> rotating disc <strong>of</strong>diameter Dd = 35 mm and broadness bd = 6.35 mm,and a stationary block <strong>of</strong> size 6.35x15.75x10.16mm 3 . The discs are made <strong>of</strong> steel 90MnCrV8hardness <strong>of</strong> 62-64 HRC with grinded surfaces.The tests were performed in lubricated slidingconditions on the samples with the best structural,mechanical and anti-corrosive properties.a)Figure 2. Tribometer.The values <strong>of</strong> sliding speed (0.25 m / s, 0.5 m / sand 1 m / s) and the normal loads (40N, 80N and120 N) are in accordance with the plan <strong>of</strong>experiment. The tests are performed for slidingdistance <strong>of</strong> 2400 m.b)Figure 1. The structure <strong>of</strong>: a) base material A356, andb) hybrid composite Al/10SiC/1Gr.Figure 3. Lubrication <strong>of</strong> the contact pair.All tests used the same hydraulic lubricant withimproved anti-wear properties, viscosity VG46(ISO 3848). Lubricant is housed in a small tank,130 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


and lubrication is done so that the bottom <strong>of</strong> thedisc is immersed to up to depth <strong>of</strong> 3 mm into thesmall tank with lubricant, whose volume is 30 ml.During rotation <strong>of</strong> the disc, oil is continuouslyintroduced into the zone <strong>of</strong> the contact and makesboundary lubrication <strong>of</strong> contact pair (Figure 3).All experiments were repeated 5 times, and themean values <strong>of</strong> obtained values are taken asauthoritative.3. RESULTS OF TRIBOLOGICAL TESTSResults <strong>of</strong> tribological tests <strong>of</strong> hybrid compositeAl/10SiC/1Gr and basic material A356 are shownin the following diagrams.Wear, mm 3 x 10 -2Wear, mm 3 x 10 -28765432987654321A356, F 1 =40NA356, F 2=80NA356, F 3 =120NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 1 =40NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 2=80NA35610SiC/1Gr, F 3=120NV=0.25 m/s, lubrication00 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Sliding distance, mA356, F 1=40NA356, F 2=80NA356, F 3=120NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 1=40NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 2=80NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 3=120NV=0.5 m/s, lubricationDiagrams <strong>of</strong> wear volume are formed on thebasis <strong>of</strong> wear scar which is obtained by measuringafter 150 m, 300 m, 1200 m, 2400 m, and they aregiven for all three values <strong>of</strong> sliding speed (Figure4).It is obvious that the wear rate <strong>of</strong> the hybridcomposites A356/10SiC/1Gr is several times lessthan the wear rate <strong>of</strong> the base material A356. Withincrease <strong>of</strong> sliding speed, wear rate <strong>of</strong> the hybridcomposite A356/10SiC/1Gr and the base materialare decreases. Wear rate dependence has almostlinear dependence for all values <strong>of</strong> the normal loads(Figure 5).Wear rate, mm 3 x10 -5 /m4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.5s=2400 m, lubricationA356, F 1=40 NA356, F 2=80 NA356, F 3=120 NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 1=40 NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 2=80 NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 3=120 N0.00.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25Sliding speed, m/sFigure 5. Wear rate dependence on sliding speed.With increase <strong>of</strong> normal load, wear rateincreases. This increase is particularly pronouncedat the base material A356 (Figure 6).4.0s=2400 m, lubricationWear, mm 3 x 10 -2100 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Sliding distance, m87654321A356, F 1=40NA356, F 2=80NA356, F 3=120NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 1=40NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 2=80NA356/10SiC/1Gr, F 3=120NV=1 m/s, lubricationWear rate, mm 3 x10 -5 /m3.53.02.52.01.51.00.5A356, V 1=0.25 m/sA356, V 2=0.5 m/sA356, V 3=1.0 m/sA356/10SiC/1Gr, V 1=0.25 m/sA356/10SiC/1Gr, V 2=0.5 m/sA356/10SiC/1Gr, V 3=1.0 m/s0.00 40 80 120 160Load, NFigure 6. Wear rate dependence on normal load.00 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Sliding distance, mFigure 4. Wear volume for all three values <strong>of</strong> slidingspeed.Wear rate dependence on normal load andsliding speed for sliding distance <strong>of</strong> 2400 m, isshown in Figure 7.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 131


compared to the base material. Decrease <strong>of</strong> wearrate occurs due to the effects <strong>of</strong> SiC from hybridcomposite in contact with a steel disc.Wear rate dependence on normal load and slidingspeed are shown in Figures 9 and 10 as the 3D plots.Wear rate is approximated by exponential functionwith a high correlation coefficient.Both tested materials show that at least wearoccurs at the maximum sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 1 m / s andthe minimum normal load <strong>of</strong> 40N.Figure 7. Wear rate dependence on normal load andsliding speed.After the tribological tests, SEM analysis isperformed for wear scar <strong>of</strong> base material A356 andhybrid A356/10SiC/1Gr composite, whose microphotosare shown in Figure 8.Figure 9. Wear rate dependence on the base material.a)Figure 10. Wear rate dependence on the hybridcomposites А356+10SiC+1Gr.b)Figure 8. SEM micro-photos <strong>of</strong> wear scar:a) base material A356,b) hybrid composite A356/10SiC/1Gr.4. ANALYSES OF OBTAINED RESULTSThe analyses <strong>of</strong> the obtained tribological resultsshow that the wear rate or wear volume is muchlower in the hybrid composites Al/10SiC/1GrSEM microscopy shows that due to the contact<strong>of</strong> the SiC composites and Si phases from the basicA356, wear <strong>of</strong> steel disc occurs. Fe particles enterthe surface layer <strong>of</strong> the composites and lead to thecreation <strong>of</strong> mechanically mixed layer (MML). Theformation <strong>of</strong> MML layer is characteristic <strong>of</strong>aluminum alloys reinforced with SiC [18-23]. Ironaccumulates around the SiC particles taking aposition <strong>of</strong> small particle <strong>of</strong> graphite. At some partswhite lines appear enriched with iron oxides, whichare consistent with the sliding direction (Figure 11).132 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


5. CONCLUSIONFigure 11. The accumulation <strong>of</strong> iron in the compositeA356/10SiC/1Gr, 120 N, 0.25 m/s.Figure 12 shows the SEM photograph <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong>the hybrid composite A356/10SiC/1Gr. Wear scar isobtained by sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 0.25m/s and normal load<strong>of</strong> 120N in conditions <strong>of</strong> lubrication. At higher loads,the dominant wear mechanism is abrasive wear. SiCparticles (darker) and iron particles (bright colours)are clearly visible on the scar. Confirmation <strong>of</strong> theseassumptions is obtained by EDS analysis, as shownin the two spectrums. The first spectrum shows thepresence <strong>of</strong> SiC particles, and the particles <strong>of</strong> ironand its oxides can be seen on second spectrum .Figure 12. EDS analysis A356/10SiC/1Gr, 120N,0.25m/s, SEM.Wear tests <strong>of</strong> hybrid compositesA356/10SiC/1Gr show their superior performancein relation to the base material A356. Appliedcompocasting modified procedure, in addition tolow prices, confirms the good distribution <strong>of</strong>reinforcements in the composite.Wear rate on A356/10SiC/1Gr hybridcomposites is 3 ÷ 8 times lesser than the wear rateon the base material A356. It is especially bigdifference <strong>of</strong> wear rate at the lowest sliding speed<strong>of</strong> 0.25 m / s and maximum normal load <strong>of</strong> 120N.Wear rate decreases with decrease <strong>of</strong> normal loadand increase <strong>of</strong> sliding speed.SEM microscopy and EDS analysis confirm agood distribution <strong>of</strong> SiC reinforcements in thehybrid composite. Also, advent mechanically mixedlayer (MML) is obvious, respectively, theappearance <strong>of</strong> iron and its oxides in the hybridcomposite.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis paper presents the research resultsobtained within the framework <strong>of</strong> the project TR–35021, financially supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong>Education and Science <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.REFERENCES[1] A. Vencl: Tribology <strong>of</strong> the Al-Si alloy based MMCsand their application in automotive industry, u:Magagnin L. (ed.), Engineered Metal MatrixComposites: Forming Methods, Material Propertiesand Industrial Applications, Nova Science Publishers,Inc., New York (SAD), pp. 127-166, 2012.[2] B. Stojanovic, M. Babic, S. Mitrovic, A. Vencl, N.Miloradovic, M. Pantic: Tribological characteristics<strong>of</strong> aluminium hybrid composites reinforced withsilicon carbide and graphite. A review, Journal <strong>of</strong>the Balkan Tribological Association, Vol.19, No.1,pp. 83-96, 2013.[3] N. Miloradovic, B. Stojanovic: Tribologicalbehaviour <strong>of</strong> ZA27/10SiC/1Gr hybrid composite,Journal <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Tribological Association,Vol.19, No.1, pp. 97-105, 2013.[4] S. Mitrovic, M. Babic, B. Stojanovic, N.Miloradovic, M. Pantic, D. Dzunic: TribologicalPotential <strong>of</strong> Hybrid Composites Based on Zinc andAluminium Alloys Reinforced with SiC and GraphiteParticles, Tribology in industry, Vol. 34, No. 4,pp.177-185, 2012.[5] P. Ravindran, K. Manisekar, R. Narayanasamy, P.Narayanasamy: Tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> powdermetallurgy-processed aluminium hybrid compositeswith the addition <strong>of</strong> graphite solid lubricant,Ceramics International, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 1169-1182, 2013.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 133


[6] S. Basavarajappa, G. Chandramohan, K. Mukund,M. Ashwin, M. Prabu: Dry sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong>Al 2219/SiCp-Gr hybrid metal matrix composites,Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Engineering and Performance,Vol. 15, No. 6, pp.668-674, 2006.[7] S. Basavarajappa, G. Chandramohan: Dry slidingwear behavior <strong>of</strong> hybrid metal matrix composites,Materials Science, Vol.11, No.3, pp. 253-257, 2005.[8] S. Basavarajappa, G. Chandramohan, A.Mahadevan: Influence <strong>of</strong> sliding speed on the drysliding wear behaviour and the subsurfacedeformation on hybrid metal matrix composite,Wear, Vol. 262, pp. 1007–1012, 2007.[9] S. Mahdavi, F. Akhlaghi: Effect <strong>of</strong> SiC content onthe processing, compaction behavior, and properties<strong>of</strong> Al6061/SiC/Gr hybrid composites, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Science, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1502-1511, 2011.[10] F. Akhlaghi, S. Mahdavi: Effect <strong>of</strong> the SiC Contenton the Tribological Properties <strong>of</strong> Hybrid Al/Gr/SiCComposites Processed by In Situ PowderMetallurgy (IPM) Method, Advanced MaterialsResearch, pp. 1878-1886, 2011.[11] S. Suresha, B.K. Sridhara: Wear characteristics <strong>of</strong>hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced withgraphite and silicon carbide particulates, OriginalResearch Article, Composites Science andTechnology, Vol. 70, No. 11, pp. 1652-1659, 2010.[12] S. Suresha, B.K. Sridhara: Effect <strong>of</strong> addition <strong>of</strong>graphite particulates on the wear behavior inaluminium–silicon carbide–graphite composites,Materials & Design, Vol. 31, pp. 1804–1812, 2010.[13] S. Suresha, B.K. Sridhara: Effect <strong>of</strong> silicon carbideparticulates on wear resistance <strong>of</strong> graphiticaluminium matrix composites, Materials & Design,Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 4470-4477, 2010.[14] S. Suresha, B.K. Sridhara: Friction characteristics<strong>of</strong> aluminium silicon carbide graphite hybridcomposites, Materials & Design, Vol.34, pp. 576-583, 2012.[15] W. Ames, A.T. Alpas: Wear mechanisms in hybridcomposites <strong>of</strong> graphite-20% SiC in A356 aluminumalloy, Metall.Mater.Trans. A; Vol. 26, pp. 85-98, 1995.[16] A. Vencl, I. Bobic, S. Arostegui, B. Bobic, A.Marinkovic, M. Babic: Structural, mechanical andtribological properties <strong>of</strong> A356 aluminium alloyreinforced with Al 2 O 3 , SiC and SiC + graphiteparticles, Journal <strong>of</strong> Alloys and Compounds, Vol.506, pp. 631-639, 2010.[17] A.Vencl, I.Bobic, B.Stojanovic, Tribologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> A356 Al-Si alloy composites under drysliding conditions, Industrial Lubrication andTribology, Vol. 66, No.3, 2014 (in print).[18] J. Rodriguez, P. Poza, M.A. Garrido, A. Rico: Drysliding wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> aluminium–lithium alloysreinforced with SiC particles, Wear, Vol. 262, pp.292–300, 2007.[19] L. Jung-moo, K. Suk-bong, H. Jianmin: Dry slidingwear <strong>of</strong> MAO-coated A356/ 20 vol.% SiCpcomposites in the temperature range 25–180°C,Wear, Vol. 264, pp. 75–85, 2008.[20] R.N. Rao, S. Das, D.P. Mondal, G. Dixit: Effect <strong>of</strong>heat treatment on the sliding wear behaviour <strong>of</strong>aluminium alloy (Al– Zn–Mg) hard particlecomposite, Tribology International, Vol. 43, pp.330–339, 2010.[21] M. Gui, S.B. Kang: Dry sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong>plasma-sprayed aluminum hybrid compositecoating, Metall. Mater. Trans., A Vol. 32A, pp.2383–2392, 2001.[22] A.K. Mondal, S. Kumar: Dry sliding wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> magnesium alloy based hybridcomposites in the longitudinal direction, Wear, Vol.267, pp. 458–466, 2009.[23] R.N. Rao, S. Das, D.P. Mondal, G. Dixit: Drysliding wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> cast high strengthaluminium alloy (Al–Zn–Mg) and hard particlecomposites, Wear, Vol. 267, pp. 1688–1695, 2009.134 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacA REVIEW OF THE TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF PTFECOMPOSITES FILLED WITH GLASS, GRAPHITE, CARBON ORBRONZE REINFORCEMENTMiloš Stanković 1 , Aleksandar Vencl 2 , Aleksandar Marinković 21 University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Inovation Center <strong>of</strong> Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia,mstankovic@mas.bg.ac.rs2 University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia,avencl@mas.bg.ac.rs , amarinkovic@mas.bg.ac.rsAbstract: Polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) is currently finding increasing utility due to its unique propertieslike high chemical resistivity, low coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction and high temperature stability. However, PTFEexhibits poor wear resistance, especially abrasion. The wear resistance <strong>of</strong> PTFE can be significantlyimproved by addition <strong>of</strong> suitable reinforcement (filler) materials. Among the most common filler materialsare glass fibers, graphite, carbon and bronze. In this paper, it is presented a review <strong>of</strong> tribologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> composite materials with PTFE matrix and above mentioned filler materials.Keywords: PTFE, composites, glass fibres, graphite, carbon fibres, bronze, friction, wear.1. INTRODUCTIONNowadays, there is very intensive growth in thelarge scale production <strong>of</strong> the fibre reinforcedpolymer composites since they posses certainadvantages over the metals. The advantages includelower density, less need for maintenance and lowercost [1]. Polymers and polymers reinforced withfibres are used for producing <strong>of</strong> various mechanicalcomponents, such as gears, cams, wheels, brakes,clutches, bush bearing and seals [2]. Considerableefforts are being made to extend the range <strong>of</strong>applications. Such use would provide the economicaland functional benefits to both manufacturers andconsumers. Many researchers have studied thetribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> polytetrafluroethylene(PTFE). Studies have been conducted with variousshapes, sizes, types and compositions <strong>of</strong> fibres. Ingeneral these composites exhibit lower wear andfriction when compared to pure PTFE.The most commonly used reinforcements(fillers) for tribological applications are carbon,graphite, bronze and glass. Generally the fillersimprove the wear resistance from 10 to 500 times,depending on the filler type and shape. On the otherhand, coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction <strong>of</strong> various PTFEcomposites is strongly dependent on filler crystalstructure and improvements are not so significant.Subject <strong>of</strong> this paper are composites with PTFEmatrix. Filler materials investigated in this paperare glass, graphite, carbon and bronze. Analysedtribological characteristics are coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionand wear. In most cases, friction and wear testswere carried out on pin-on-disc tribometer atambient conditions (temperature and humidity).Counterpart material used in the experiments wasalways harder than composite. In most cases,counterpart material was steel. All tests werecarried out at dry sliding conditions. Overall resultsfrom all analysed papers are summarized andpresented in Table 1.2. FACTORS AFFECTING POLYMERCOMPOSITE WEAR AND FRICTIONThere are many factors that affect materialtribological properties. For polymer composites themost influential are [6]:Normal load: In order for a polymer compositeto function as a solid lubricant it must be able tosupport the load, as well as the tangential stressesinduced by sliding. At high loads severe wear13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 135


Table 1. Overview <strong>of</strong> the results from the analysed papers (for pure PTFE and its composites at dry sliding conditions)*Ref.[7]Testrig**Ballon-disc[8] Pin-ondisc[9] Pin-ondisc[10] Pin-ondisc[11] Pin-ondiscType (amount and size) <strong>of</strong> thefiller***1. C particles (18 %; 10 – 25 μm)+ Gr flakes (7 %; 25 – 50 μm);2. E-glass fibres(15 %; 10 × 50 – 75 μm);3. E-glass fibres(25 %; 10 × 50 – 75 μm)1. Glass fibres (17 %);2. Bronze (25 %);3. C (35 %)1. Glass particles(25 %; 40 μm);2. Bronze particles(40 %; 48 μm)1. Gr flake (2 %; 10 μm);2. Gr flake (5 %; 10 μm);3. Gr flake (10 %; 10 μm)1. Bronze (25 %);2. Bronze (40 %);3. Bronze (60 %)CounterpartmaterialAISI 440Csteel ball(d = 9 mm)AISI 440Csteel discEN 32hardenedsteel discStainlesssteel discAISI 400Csteel discLoad,N (MPa)5(pointcontact)5 – 30(0.2 – 1.1)60(0.6)25(0.2)Slidingspeed,m/sSlidingdistance,mCoefficient <strong>of</strong>frictionSpecific wear rate,mm 3 /Nm × 10 –6PTFE Composites PTFE Composites0.1 1000 0.11 0.13 – 0.16 950 90 – 7000.32 –1.281152 –46080.13 –0.790.11 – 0.711.5 2500 – –476 –943app.5676 – 290app. 4.4 –3351 8000 0.24 0.20 – 0.26 1650 10 – 190app.5 – 200(0.2 – 7.1) 0.32 – 2 2000 0.12 –0.22app.0.12 – 0.181000 1 – 100* The friction and wear values in the table are approximate and can be used only as a guidance, since the authors in most cases didnot presented the results in appropriate way; ** Pin – cylindrically shaped specimen (flat contact); *** C – carbon, Gr – graphiteoccur, characterized by brittle fracture or severeplastic deformation. On the other hand, at low loadsusually mild wear occur, characterized by the localplastic flow <strong>of</strong> the thin transfer film and surfacelayers (decreasing friction), together withdelamination wear.Contact area: The contact area will determine theprojected contact stresses. If the load cannot bereduced, one way <strong>of</strong> reducing stress is to increase theprojected contact area. However, if the area <strong>of</strong>contact becomes too large instead <strong>of</strong> the materialflowing across the counterpart surface, it will have atendency to build up, forming ridges, which cancause high localized stresses and higher adhesion,thus higher friction and wear. It is important to designa part with correct match up <strong>of</strong> load and contact area.Sliding speed: The high sliding speeds canproduce high temperatures due to friction heating.This may cause the polymer or the polymercomposite additives to degrade. However in somecases higher temperature might be beneficial to thelubricating process. In order to develop a surfaceshear film and/or a transfer film, the molecular chainmust have time to reorient. If one slides too fast overthese un-oriented chains, instead <strong>of</strong> reorienting, theywill fracture, leading to the production <strong>of</strong> large wearparticles and high wear. Thus it is important tochoose sliding speed for each particular polymer toensure the optimum performance.Counterpart topography: If the counterpartmaterial is too rough it can abrade the compositeand not allow a shear film or transfer film to form.Therefore, it could be generally accepted that, thesmoother the counterpart the lower the wear. Thishas certain limits, since it is also found that overpolishingtend to remove the counterpart s<strong>of</strong>termatrix material, leaving the harder phases and/orparticles protruded above the surface.Temperature: At lower temperature the frictionand wear properties <strong>of</strong> most polymers are not asexceptional as they are at or above the ambienttemperature. At lower temperatures polymers losetheir relaxations ability, i.e. the movement <strong>of</strong> theirmain molecule chain do not obtains adequatedegree <strong>of</strong> freedom, and thus the polymer does notobtain a great deal <strong>of</strong> plasticity. High temperaturescan affect bonding between the filler material andpolymer matrix. They can also affect the lubricatingproperties <strong>of</strong> some additives in polymer composite,since these additives might desorbs gases at certaintemperature or even decompose.3. STATE-OF-THE-ART OF PTFECOMPOSITES TRIBOLOGICALRESEARCHESTribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> PTFE and itscomposites with filler materials such as carbonparticles, graphite flakes and E glass fibres (Table 2)was investigated by Khedkar et al. [7]. Experimentswere performed under the normal load <strong>of</strong> 5 N andsliding speed <strong>of</strong> 0.1 m/s. They found that the usedfiller additions increase wear resistance in allcomposites that were studied. The highest wear136 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


esistance was found for composite containing 18vol. % <strong>of</strong> carbon and 7 vol. % <strong>of</strong> graphite (Figure1). The coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction values were from 0.11to 0.16 (Figure 2). This behaviour can be attributedto the presence <strong>of</strong> hard carbon particles, which areembedded within the matrix and impart additionalstrength to the composite. Wear testing and SEManalysis showed that three-body abrasion wasprobably the dominant mode <strong>of</strong> failure for PTFE +18 vol. % carbon + 7 vol. % graphite composite.Table 2. Composition (vol. %) <strong>of</strong> materialsDesignationSpecific wear rate, mm 3 /Nm × 10 –4AB109876543210MaterialPure PTFE75 % PTFE + 18 %amorphous carbon + 7 %hexagonal graphiteCharacteristic <strong>of</strong>filler material99 % pure PTFEpowderCarbon particles(diameter: 10 – 25μm); graphite flakes(size: 25 – 50 μm)C 85 % PTFE + 15 % E-glass E-glass fibres(diameter: 10 μm;D 75 % PTFE + 25 % E-glass length: 50 – 75 μm)5 N; 0.1 m/ssA B C DMaterialFigure 1. Average specific wear rate <strong>of</strong> PTFE and PTFEcomposites (adopted from [7])Coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00ACBD0 200 400 600 800 1000Sliding distance, mFigure 2. Frictional behaviour <strong>of</strong> PTFE and PTFEcomposites (adopted from [7])Unal et al. [8] studied PTFE composites filledwith glass fibres (17 %), bronze (25 %) or carbon(35 %). Experiments were performed under loadrange from 5 to 30 N (0.18 – 1.06 MPa) and speedrange from 0.32 to 1.28 m/s. The results showedthat, for pure PTFE and its composites, thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction decrease with the increase inload. For the ranges <strong>of</strong> load and speed used in thisinvestigation, the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction showedvery little sensitivity to the sliding speed and largesensitivity to the applied load, particularly at highload values. Figure 3 shows that sensitivity for thepure PTFE, but it is quiet similar for composites, aswell. Adding glass fibres, bronze and carbon fillersto PTFE were found effective in reducing the wearrate. The maximum reductions in wear rate andcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction were obtained by PTFEreinforced with 17 % <strong>of</strong> glass fibres. The specificwear rate for PTFE + 17 % glass fibres was almosttwo orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude lower than for pure PTFE.By means <strong>of</strong> microscopy, it is noticed that thePTFE with glass fibre filler form a good thin anduniform transfer film which have positive influenceto the wear rate.Coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction0.300.250.200.150.100.050.000.32 m/s0.64 m/s0.96 m/s1.28 m/sPTFECoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction0.800.700.600.500.400.300.200.100.00PTFE5 N10 N20 N30 NFigure 3. Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> PTFE coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction tothe sliding speed (for 20 N load) and applied load (for0.32 m/s speed) (adapted from [8])A single influence <strong>of</strong> glass particles (25 vol. %;40 μm) and bronze particles (40 vol. %; 48 μm) onwear behaviour <strong>of</strong> PTFE based composites wasstudied by Mudasar Pasha et al. [9]. The tests weredone on a pin-on-disc tribometer with differentnormal loads (20 – 100 N, i.e. 0.2 – 1 MPa), slidingspeeds (1.5 – 5.5 m/s) and distances (500 – 2500m). The experimental results indicate that theweight loss increases with increasing load andsliding speed (Figure 4). The PTFE + 40 % bronzecomposite exhibits better wear resistance compareto the others (Figure 5). The transfer film formedon the counterpart surface, sliding against PTFE +40 % bronze, is smooth, thin and uniform, which13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 137


indicates that the formation <strong>of</strong> adhesive strengthbetween the transfer films and the counterpartsurface is strong. In the case <strong>of</strong> the counterpartsliding against the pure PTFE, the transfer film isvery thick.Figure 4. Weight loss vs. sliding speed at constantapplied load <strong>of</strong> 60 N and sliding distance <strong>of</strong> 1500 mFigure 6. Specific wear rate <strong>of</strong> PTFE with variouscontent <strong>of</strong> graphite flakesCompared to pure PTFE, composites showedstable coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction (Figure 7). The lowestcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction was 0.20 for composites with2 and 5 wt. % <strong>of</strong> graphite. For composite with 10wt. % <strong>of</strong> graphite, the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction wasslightly higher and close to the value obtained withpure PTFE. Anyway, variations <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction are very small.Figure 5. Wear curves <strong>of</strong> tested materials for 60 N loadand speed <strong>of</strong> 1.5 m/sEvaluation <strong>of</strong> the wear rate and coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction for graphite flake (2, 5 and 10 wt. %; 10μm) filled PTFE composites were studied byGoyal and Yadav [10]. It was performed on apin-on-disk tribometer under dry slidingconditions, at sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 1 m/s and 25 Nload (0.19 MPa), during 8000 m. A significantdecrease in wear <strong>of</strong> composites in compare topure PTFE is noticed. The wear rates <strong>of</strong>composites with 5 and 10 wt. % <strong>of</strong> graphite weredecreased 22 and 245 times, respectively (Figure6). This decrease in wear rate is also attributed tothe formation <strong>of</strong> a thin and tenacious transfer filmon the counterpart surface.Figure 7. Coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction with various content <strong>of</strong>graphite flakesUnal et al. [11] also studied the friction andwear behaviour <strong>of</strong> pure PTFE and bronze (25, 40and 60 %) filled PTFE polymer composites underapplied load range from 5 to 200 N (0.18 – 7.07MPa) and sliding speed range from 0.32 to 2.0 m/s,using a pin-on-disc tribometer. The results showedthat bronze filled PTFE composite exhibited lowercoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction (Figure 8 and Figure 9) andhigher wear resistance (Figure 10) compared topure PTFE. The coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction <strong>of</strong> both –pure PTFE and bronze filled PTFE compositesdecreases when the applied load is increased from 5to 30 N (light condition). Above 30 N thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction remains stable.The PTFE filled with 60 % <strong>of</strong> bronze showedhigher wear resistance than pure PTFE. Thisbehaviour can be attributed to the presence <strong>of</strong>138 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


onze, which is embedded within the matrixmaterial and impart additional strength to thecomposite. The applied load has shown moreinfluence on the wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> PTFE and PTFEcomposite than the sliding speed.In addition, it could be interested to present adiagram that shows dependence <strong>of</strong> specific wearrate on wt. % <strong>of</strong> filler materials (Figure 11) [12].Although there are filler materials which are notsubject <strong>of</strong> this paper, it might be interesting tocompare specific wear rate for different polymercomposites.Figure 8. Variation <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction with slidingdistance (normal load: 50 N; sliding speed: 1.5 m/s)Figure 11. Specific wear rate vs. wt. % <strong>of</strong> filler materialfor various polymer composites(FEP – fluorinated ethylene propylene; PA6 – polyamide6; HDPE – high-density polyethylene; PA11 –polyamide 11; GF – glass fibre; PEEK – polyether etherketone; CNT – carbon nanotube)4. CONCLUSIONFigure 9. Variation <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction withapplied load and sliding speed for PTFE andPTFE + 60 % bronze compositeIn this review paper, the tribological behaviour<strong>of</strong> PTFE composites, filled with glass fibres,graphite flakes, carbon, bronze or combination <strong>of</strong>mentioned filler materials has been analysed.It is noticed that coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction usuallyremains in the range from 0.1 to 0.3. When purePTFE is compared with PTFE composites, there isonly slight decrease in coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction withalmost all analysed composites.On the other hand, regarding to wear <strong>of</strong> purePTFE and its composites, influence <strong>of</strong> fillermaterials is quiet significant. Presence <strong>of</strong> fillermaterial can increase wear resistance (decreasewear) up to 2 to 3 orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude. However, itcan be concluded that the best results, regarding towear resistance, were obtained by PTFE + bronzecomposites. Nevertheless, if we compare it to theother composites, that difference is not thatsignificant, i.e. similar wear resistance can beobtained with appropriate amount <strong>of</strong> othermentioned filler materials.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTFigure 10. Variation <strong>of</strong> specific wear rate with appliedload and sliding speed for PTFE and PTFE compositesThis work has been performed within theprojects TR 35021, TR 34028 and TR 35011. Theseprojects are supported by the Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia,Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science and TechnologicalDevelopment, whose financial help is gratefullyacknowledged.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 139


REFERENCES[1] W. Brostow, V. Kovačević, D. Vrsaljko, J.Whitworth: Tribology <strong>of</strong> polymers and polymerbasedcomposites, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Education32, pp. 273-290, 2010.[2] K. Friedrich, P. Reinicke: Friction and wear <strong>of</strong>polymer-based composites, Mechanics <strong>of</strong> CompositeMaterials 34, pp. 503-514, 1998.[3] W.A. Glaeser: Materials for Tribology, Elsevier,Amsterdam, 1992.[4] N.K. Myshkin, A.Yа. Grigoriev, V.L. Basiniuk, A.I.Mardasevich, V.G. Kudritsky, I.N. Кavaliova:Equipments and materials for tribotesting in openspace on International Space Lab, Tribology inIndustry 33, pp. 43-46, 2011.[5] I. Zidaru, R.G. Ripeanu, I. Tudor, A.C. Drumeanu:Research regarding the improvements <strong>of</strong>tribological behavior in three cone bits bearings,FME Transactions 37, pp. 99-102, 2009.[6] P.V. Kulkarni, N.K. Chapkhhane: Development andtesting <strong>of</strong> PTFE based composite bearing materialfor turbine pump, International Journal <strong>of</strong>Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) 1,pp. 15-20, 2012.[7] J. Khedkar, I. Negulescu, E.I. Meletis: Sliding wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> PTFE composites, Wear 252,pp. 361-369, 2002.[8] H. Unal, A. Mimaroglu, U. Kadıoglu, H. Ekiz:Sliding friction and wear behaviour <strong>of</strong>polytetrafluoroethylene and its composites underdry conditions, Materials & Design 25, pp. 239-245,2004.[9] B.A. Mudasar Pasha, D. Abdul Budan, S.Basavarajappa, S. Manjunath Yadav, B.A.Nizamuddin: Dry sliding wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> PTFEfilled with glass and bronze particles, Tribology –Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces 5, pp. 59-64, 2011.[10] R.K. Goyal, M. Yadav: Study on wear and frictionbehavior <strong>of</strong> graphite flake-filled PTFE composites,Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Polymer Science 127, pp. 3186-3191, 2013.[11] H. Unal, E. Kurtulus, A. Mimaroglu, M. Aydin:Tribological performance <strong>of</strong> PTFE bronze filledcomposites under wide range <strong>of</strong> applicationconditions, Journal <strong>of</strong> Reinforced Plastics andComposites 29, pp. 2184-2191, 2010.[12] D.L. Burris, W.G. Sawyer: A low friction and ultralow wear rate PEEK/PTFE composite, Wear 261,pp. 410-418, 2006.140 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccWEARCHARACTERISTICSS OF HYBRID COMPOOSITES BASEDON ZA27 ALLOY REINFORCED WITH SILICON CARBIDE ANDGRAPHIITE PARTICLESSlobodanMitrović 1 , Miroslav Babić 1 , Nenad Miloradović 1 , Ilija Bobić 2 , Blažaa Stojanovićć 1 , DraganDžunić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, boban@kg.acb.rs, babic@kg.ac.rs,mnenad@kg.ac.rs,blaza@kg.ac. .rs, dzuna@kg.ac.rs,2Institute <strong>of</strong> Nuclear Sciences ”Vinča”, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, ilijab@vinca.rsAbstract: The paper presents the wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> a hybrid composite based on zinc-aluminium ZA27alloy, reinforced with silicon-carbide and graphite particles. The tested sample contains 5 vol.%<strong>of</strong> SiC and3 vol.% Gr particles. Compocastingtechnique has been used to preparee the samples. The experiments wereeperformed on a “block-on-disc” weree determinedd by varying the normal loads and sliding speeds. . The paper contains theprocedure for preparation <strong>of</strong> sample compositess and microstructure <strong>of</strong> the composite material and the baseZA27 alloy. The wear surface <strong>of</strong> the composite materialwas examined using the scanningelectroniccmicroscope (SEM) andenergy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Conclusions were e obtained based on theobserved impact <strong>of</strong> thesliding speed, normal load and sliding distance on tribological behaviour <strong>of</strong> theobserved composite.Keywords: ZA27 alloy, hybrid composites, wear r characteristicstribometer under conditions <strong>of</strong> dry sliding. The wear volumes <strong>of</strong> the alloyand the composite 1. INTRODUCTIONThe composite material represents the solidconnection <strong>of</strong> the two or more constituents, whichare joined into the unbreakableconnection, forobtaining the better mechanical, tribological t andother characteristics.Metal matrix composites (MMCs) have attractedconsiderable attention recently because <strong>of</strong> theirpotential advantages over monolithic alloys [1 - 3].Zinc–aluminium (ZA) alloys have emergedd asimportant material fortribological applications,especially suitable forhigh-load and low-speedapplications. Commercially available ZA alloyss arecharacterized by good tribomechanical properties,low weight, excellentfoundry castability andfluidity, good machiningproperties, low initial cost,and environmentally friendly technology The zincalloy with increased content <strong>of</strong> aluminium is one <strong>of</strong>the alloys, which can beused for manufacturingg themetal matrix composites. The ZA27 alloyy isconsidered as the most prospective for f obtainingg thecomposites, since it is convenient as a substrate forseveral methods <strong>of</strong> composites manufacturing.Besides, it is also convenient for the heat treatmenttandplastic forming, thus it is possible to aposteriori influence the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>the final products [4 - 7].Various methods and techniques were used tosubstantially improve wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> Zn–Al(zinc–aluminium) alloysswithout loweringsignificantly the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> materials[6 - 8].Thanks to mentioned properties and goodcharacteristics,zinc-aluminium alloys have inspiredresearchers too reinforce them with differentdispersed reinforcement materials (SiC, Al 2 O 3 ,graphite and garnet) in order to obtain much moreenhanced mechanical and d tribological properties[9 - 16].Consideringg the above,ZA27/ SiC/graphitecomposites may be a good alternative to zinc-aluminium alloys in many industrial applications.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13141


2. EXPERIMENTALPROCEDURE2.1 Preparation <strong>of</strong> the compositesHybrid ZA27/SiC/Graphite composites havebeen successfully prepared using the compocastingprocedure.Hybrid ZA27/SiC composite reinforced r withgraphite was produced at the Laboratory formaterials <strong>of</strong> the Institute for nuclear sciences“Vinca”. The obtained chemical structure <strong>of</strong> ZA27alloy thatt was usedduring experimentalinvestigations coincides with thecorrespondingchemical structure defined by standard. Averagesize <strong>of</strong> SiC particles was 26 μm, while average size<strong>of</strong> graphite particles was15 μm.The applied compocasting procedure consisted<strong>of</strong> two phases. During the first phase, infiltrationn <strong>of</strong>the particles from the secondary phases into thesemisolid melt <strong>of</strong> the basic alloy was conductedwith constant mechanical blending. Obtainedcomposite casts were then subjectedto hot pressingduring the second phase. This was done in order todecrease porosity and get better connectionbetween thematrix andthe reinforcement particles.At the same time, better mechanical characteristic<strong>of</strong> the composite material were obtained.2.2 Structure <strong>of</strong> the sample materialsMicrostructure <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloyand obtainedcomposite were observed by metallurgy microscopeand presented in Figure 1 and 2. Stucture <strong>of</strong> f thesample <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy ismainly dendrite (Figuree 1).Distinct uniformity <strong>of</strong> the structure was present,which indicates a favourable ratio<strong>of</strong> mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the tested materials.Figure 2. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> ZА27/3% SiC/3% Grcomposite (magnification х 400)A uniform distributionn <strong>of</strong> SiC and graphiteparticles was present in tested composite materials.2.3 Testing methodsExperimental tests were performed at the Centreefor tribology <strong>of</strong> the Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering,University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac. KThe tests <strong>of</strong> the ZA27/SiC/Grcomposite’sstribological characteristicswere performed on thecomputer supported tribometer with “block-on--disc” contact geometry (Figure 3). Tribometerrprovides variation <strong>of</strong> contact conditionss in terms <strong>of</strong>shape, dimension and material <strong>of</strong> contact elements,normal contact load and sliding speed.Figure 1. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloyFigure 2 shows the microstructure <strong>of</strong>obtained composite.theFigure 3. The “block-on-disc” tribometerBased on the measured wear scar width on thecontact surfacee obtained by variation<strong>of</strong> normalloads and sliding speeds, the material wear volumewascalculated. The tests were performed in drysliding conditions, with variation <strong>of</strong> sliding speedlevels (0.25 m/ /s, 0.5 m/s and 1 m/s) and contacttload levels (100 N, 20 N and 30 N). The observedsliding distances during tests were: 30 m, 60 m,90 m, 150 m and 300 m.14213 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The test contact pair meets the requirements <strong>of</strong> theASTM G77-05 standard. It consists <strong>of</strong> the rotationaldisc with the diameter <strong>of</strong> D d =35 mm and the width <strong>of</strong>b d =6.35 mm and <strong>of</strong> the stationary block <strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong>b b =6.35 mm, the length <strong>of</strong> l b =15.75 mm and the height<strong>of</strong> h b =10.16 mm. The discs were made <strong>of</strong> 90MnV8steel with hardness <strong>of</strong> 62 HRC and the surfacesroughness <strong>of</strong> R a =0.40 m. The blocks were made <strong>of</strong> thetested ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr.3. THE RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe variations <strong>of</strong> dry sliding wear volume loss arepresented in corresponding diagrams in the paper,depending on the sliding distance and for differentvalues <strong>of</strong> sliding speeds and contact loads. The results<strong>of</strong> wear for given hybrid composite and for ZA27alloy were presented in the same diagrams in order tounderstand the wear process evolution during testsand to make corresponding comparisons. Solid lineson the diagrams refer to the wear scar widths <strong>of</strong> thecomposite, while the wear scar widths <strong>of</strong> the ZA27alloy are denoted by dashed lines.The variation <strong>of</strong> dry sliding wear volume losswith the sliding distance for different applied loadsand for a sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 0.25 m/s is presented inFigure 4. All diagrams are given for the slidingdistance <strong>of</strong> 300 m.Wear, mm 3 x10 -3Figure 4. Variation <strong>of</strong> wear volume <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy andZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite against sliding distance fordifferent contact loads and for sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v=0.25 m/s.Wear, mm 3 x10 -3140012001000800600400200140012001000ZA27, F1=10 NZA27, F2=20 NZA27, F3=30 NComposite, F1=10 NComposite, F2=20 NComposite, F3=30 Nv 1 = 0.25 m/s00 50 100 150 200 250 300800600400200ZA27, F1=10 NZA27, F2=20 NZA27, F3=30 NComposite, F1=10 NComposite, F2=20 NComposite, F3=30 Nv 2 = 0.5 m/sSliding distance, m00 50 100 150 200 250 300Sliding distance, mFigure 5. Variation <strong>of</strong> wear volume <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy andZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite against sliding distance fordifferent contact loads and for sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v=0.5 m/s.The variation <strong>of</strong> wear volume loss <strong>of</strong> ZA27alloy and ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite dependingon the sliding distance and for different appliedcontact loads and the sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 0.5 m/s maybe seen in Figure 5.Diagram in the Figure 6 presents the variation <strong>of</strong>wear volume loss <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy andZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite depending on thesliding distance and for different applied contactloads and the sliding speed <strong>of</strong> 1 m/s.Wear, mm 3 x10 -314001200100080060040020000 50 100 150 200 250 300Figure 6. Variation <strong>of</strong> wear volume <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy andZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite against sliding distance fordifferent contact loads and for sliding speed <strong>of</strong> v=1 m/s.Wear, mm 3 x10 -3140012001000800600400200v 3 = 1 m/sZA27, F1=10 NZA27, F2=20 NZA27, F3=30 NComposite, F1=10 NComposite, F2=20 NComposite, F3=30 NZA27, F1=10 NZA27, F2=20 NZA27, F3=30 NComposite, F1=10 NComposite, F2=20 NComposite, F3=30 NSliding distance, ms = 300 m00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2Sliding speed, m/sFigure 7. Wear volume <strong>of</strong> ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr compositeand ZA27 alloy depending on sliding speeds, for differentcontact loads and for sliding distance <strong>of</strong> 300 m.The wear volume losses <strong>of</strong> the alloy and thecomposite increase with the increase <strong>of</strong> the slidingdistance. The wear volume loss curves are <strong>of</strong> thesame character, both for alloy and for the observedcomposite material. The only difference may beseen in level <strong>of</strong> wear. At the beginning, a largerslope <strong>of</strong> the curves is noticeable, so there is theintensive initial wear <strong>of</strong> the composite material. Arapid increase <strong>of</strong> wear volume loss is characteristicfor sliding distance <strong>of</strong> approximately 35 m. Afterreaching the zone <strong>of</strong> constant wear, the wearvolume loss has slight, almost linear increase.Generally, the wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> the testedmaterials is characterized by very intensive wearduring initial period, after which there is a period <strong>of</strong>stabilization. Wear <strong>of</strong> the composites was alwayssignificantly lower when compared to wear <strong>of</strong> thematrix ZA27 alloy.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 143


The influence <strong>of</strong> the sliding speed on wearvolume for both materials is shown in Figure 7, fordifferent values <strong>of</strong> normal loads.The effects <strong>of</strong> the normal load on wear volume<strong>of</strong> both composite and alloy is presented inFigure 8, for different values <strong>of</strong> sliding speeds andfor sliding distance <strong>of</strong> 300 mWear, mm 3 x10 -314001200100080060040020000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Figure 8. Wear volume <strong>of</strong> ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr compositeand ZA27 alloy depending on contact loads, for differentsliding speeds and for sliding distance <strong>of</strong> 300 m.Analytical and graphical variations in wear ratedue to changes <strong>of</strong> sliding speeds and normal loadsin dry sliding conditions are presented in Figures 9and 10. Exponential regression functions wereadopted. Corresponding regression functionscoefficients and curvilinear correlation indices wereobtained showing the good correlation betweenexperimental data and used empirical distributions.Wear rate <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy in dry slidingconditions is presented in Figure 9 and wear rate <strong>of</strong>ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite in dry slidingconditions is shown in Figure 10. Variations <strong>of</strong> thewear rate as a function <strong>of</strong> the sliding speed andnormal load are graphically presented for the ZA27alloy and composite materials.Both tested materials share basically the samenature <strong>of</strong> wear process development in all contactconditions. The observed composite material hasbetter wear resistance, under the same test conditions.I, mm 3 /m x 10 -3432100.4ZA27, v1=0.25 m/sZA27, v2=0.5 m/sZA27, v3=1 m/sComposite, v1=0.25 m/sComposite, v2=0.5 m/sComposite, v3=1 m/s0.6v, m/s0.81ZA2710s = 300 mLoad, NFigure 9. Wear rate <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy in dry slidingconditions.1520Fn, N25304.44.243.83.63.43.2I, mm 3 /m x 10 -3Figure 10. Wear rate <strong>of</strong> ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr compositein dry sliding conditions.The comparative histograms <strong>of</strong> the wear volumeformed after 300 m <strong>of</strong> sliding distance, dependingon the contact conditions (the sliding speed and thenormal force) for the basic ZA27 alloy andZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite materials are shownin Figure 11.Wear, mm 3 x 10 ‐31400120010008006004002002.51.50.5032100.40.6v, m/sZA27ZA27/5%SiC/3%GrZA27+5%SiC+3%Gr0.8110Figure 11. Comparative histograms <strong>of</strong> wear volume <strong>of</strong>ZA27 alloy and ZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr composite.Analysis <strong>of</strong> histograms in Figure 11 shows that atrend <strong>of</strong> increase <strong>of</strong> wear with the increase <strong>of</strong> normalload may be observed. The increase <strong>of</strong> sliding speedinduces also the increase <strong>of</strong> wear. This observation isvalid for both tested materials. It may be noticed thatthe wear <strong>of</strong> the tested ZA27 alloy is alwayssignificuly higher compared to wear <strong>of</strong> thecomposite with addition <strong>of</strong> the SiC and graphiteparticles.From the Figure 11, the influence <strong>of</strong> the normalload and sliding speed on the wear magnitude maybe clearly noticed. The wear rate increases both withthe increase <strong>of</strong> the normal force the increase <strong>of</strong> thesliding speed. The largest value <strong>of</strong> wear correspondsto the highest sliding speed (v 3 = 1 m/s) and to thehighest value <strong>of</strong> the normal contact load (F 3 = 30 N).For the lowest sliding speed (v 1 = 0.25 m/s) and thelowest load (F 1 = 10 N), the smallest wear valueswere recorded.Characterization <strong>of</strong> the microstructure <strong>of</strong> wearsurface for metal matrix composites is morecomplex than that <strong>of</strong> the metals or alloys and anunderstanding <strong>of</strong> wear mechanisms is far from1520Fn, Nv1‐F1 v1‐F2 v1‐F3 v2‐F1 v2‐F2 v2‐F3 v3‐F1 v3‐F2 v3‐F325302.82.62.42.221.81.61.41.21144 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


complete. The SEM analysis maycontributee tobetter understanding <strong>of</strong> this mechanism.The SEMmicrograph <strong>of</strong> the worn surfacee atload <strong>of</strong> 10 N and at speed <strong>of</strong> 0.25 m/s for a slidingdistance <strong>of</strong> 300 m is presented in Figure 12 forr thetested composite material.Figure 14. Appearance <strong>of</strong> the worn surface <strong>of</strong> ZA27alloy photographed by SEM M in dry slidingconditions(vv 1 = 0.25 m/s, , F 1 = 10 N)Figure 12.SEM micrographs <strong>of</strong> wornsurfaces <strong>of</strong> theZA27/5%SiC/3%Gr compositeQualitative and quantitative chemical analyses<strong>of</strong> micro-constituents were performed using energydispersive spectrometry(EDS), Figure 13.Analysess confirm the presencee <strong>of</strong> constituentelements like: Zn, Al, SiC, Gr (C), as well as thepresence <strong>of</strong>Fe as a consequence <strong>of</strong> material transferfrom the counterpart to the compositeblock.Figure 15. Appearance <strong>of</strong> the worn surface <strong>of</strong>ZА27/5%SiC/3%%Gr compositephotographed by SEM indry sliding conditions (v 1 = 0.25 m/s, F1 = 10 N)4.CONCLUSIONFigure 13. EDS analysis <strong>of</strong> worn surface on theZA27/10%SIC/1%Gr compositeMicrostructure <strong>of</strong> worn surface <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy isshown in Figure 14.Microstructure<strong>of</strong>worn surface <strong>of</strong>ZА27/5%SiC/3%Grcomposite is given inFigure 15.Generally, the parallel grooves and scratches canbe seen over all the surfaces in the t directionn <strong>of</strong>sliding. These grooves and scratches resulted fromthe contact between theworn surface <strong>of</strong> the testedmaterial andthe counterdisc <strong>of</strong> significantly higherhardness.This research was conducted inorder tocomplete the tribological knowledge on developeddcomposite materials with ZA27 alloy reinforced bythe SiC and graphite g particles. The goal was toconfirm the further possibilities for f broaderrapplication <strong>of</strong> given g composites as advanced tribo-materials, in different d technical systems becauseethey have excellent wear resistance when comparedwith the base ZA27 alloy.By monitoring the wear process throughhobservation <strong>of</strong> wear volume in dry slidingconditions, the following conclusions can be made: Wear <strong>of</strong> o the testedd compositeis smallerthan wear w <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy forr all appliedsliding speeds and normal loads. Wear process evolution hass the samecharacter for both tested materials (basicZA27 alloy anddZA27/10%SiC/1%Grcomposite).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13145


Values <strong>of</strong> the wear volume <strong>of</strong> the observedcomposite material increase with theincrease <strong>of</strong> normal loads.Wear volume also increases with theincrease <strong>of</strong> the sliding speed.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis paper presents the research results obtainedwithin the framework <strong>of</strong> the project TR-35021,financially supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education,Science and Technological Development <strong>of</strong> theRepublic <strong>of</strong> SerbiaREFERENCES[1] M. Babić, S. Mitrović: Tribological characteristics<strong>of</strong> composites based on ZA alloy, (in Serbian),Monograph, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering,Kragujevac, 2007.[2] M. Babić, S. Mitrović, I. Bobić, TribologicalProperties <strong>of</strong> Composites with Substrate Made <strong>of</strong> theZA-27 Alloy Reinforced by the Graphite Particles,Tribology in industry, Vol. 29 No. 3&4, 2007.[3] S. Mitrović, M. Babić, B. Stojanović, N.Miloradović, M. Pantić, D. Džunić: TribologicalPotential <strong>of</strong> Hybrid Composites Based on Zinc andAluminium Alloys Reinforced with SiC and GraphiteParticles, Tribology in Industry, Vol. 34, No. 4,177-185, 2012.[4] M. Babić, A. Vencl, A., S. Mitrović, I. Bobić,Influence <strong>of</strong> T4 heat treatment on tribologicalbehavior <strong>of</strong> ZA27 alloy under lubricated slidingcondition, Tribology Letters, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp.125-134, 2009.[5] M. Babic, S. Mitrovic, B. Jeremic: The Influence <strong>of</strong>Heat Treatment on the Sliding Wear Behaviour <strong>of</strong> aZA-27 Alloy, Tribology International, Vol. 43, No.1-2, pp. 16-21, 2010.[6] M. Babic, S. Mitrovic, D. Džunic, B. Jeremic, I.Bobic: Tribological Behaviour <strong>of</strong> Composites Basedon Za-27 Alloy Reinforced With Graphite Particles,Tribology Letters, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 401-410, 2010.[7] K.H.W. Seah, S.C. Sharma, B.M. Girish:Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> as-cast and heat-treatedZA-27/graphite particulate composites, Composites,Part A 28A, pp. 251-256, 1997.[8] S.C. Sharma, B.M. Girish, R. Kramath, B.M. Satish:Graphite particles reinforced ZA-27 alloy compositematerials for journal bearing applications, Wear,Vol. 219, pp. 162-168, 1998.[9] B.K. Prasad: Abrasive wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> azinc-based alloy and zinc-alloy/SiC composite,Wear, Vol. 252, pp. 250-263, 2002.[10] S.C. Sharma, B.M. Girish, R. Kramath, B.M. Satish:Effect <strong>of</strong> SiC particle reinforcement on theunlubricated sliding wear behavior <strong>of</strong> ZA-27 alloycomposites, Wear, Vol. 213, pp. 33-40, 1997.[11] B.K. Prasad: Investigation into sliding wearperformance <strong>of</strong> zinc based alloy reinforced with SiCparticles in dry and lubricated conditions, Wear,Vol. 262, pp. 262-273, 2007.[12] S. Mitrović, M. Babić, I. Bobić: ZA-27 alloycomposites reinforced with Al 2 O 3 particles, Tribologyin Industry, Vol. 29, No. 3-4, pp. 35-41, 2007.[13] M. Babić, S. Mitrović, I. Bobić, F. Živić: Wearbehavior <strong>of</strong> composites based on ZA-27 alloyreinforced by Al2O3 particles under dry slidingcondition, Tribology Letters, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.337-346, 2010.[14] A Vencl: MMCs based on hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy:Tribological properties in dry sliding conditions,Tribological Journal BULTRIB, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.17-22, 2012.[15] N. Miloradović, B. Stojanović: Tribologicalbehavior <strong>of</strong> ZA-27/10SiC/1Gr Hybrid Composite,Journal <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Tribological Association, Vol.19, No. 1, pp. 97-105, 2013.[16] B. Stojanović, M. Babić, S. Mitrović, A. Vencl, N.Miloradović, M. Pantić: Tribological characteristics <strong>of</strong>aluminum hybrid composites reinforced with siliconcarbide and graphite, Journal <strong>of</strong> the Balkan TribologicalAssociation, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 83-96, 2013.146 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313 thtInternational Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringgin KragujevacINFLUENCE OF OXIDATION LAYER GENERRATED ONPREHEATEDCONTACT PAIRS ONSTATIC COEFFICIENT OFFRICTIONMarija Jeremić 1 , Dragan Adamović 1 , Slobodan Mitrović 1Bojan Bogdanović 1 AleksandarSimić 1 , Sašaa Ranđelović 1 , Petar Todorović 1 ,1 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, SestreJanjić 6, Kragujevac, Serbia, mjeremic88@yahoo.com, adam@kg.ac.rs,boban@kg.ac.rs, bogdanovicboki@@gmail.com, aleksandarsimickg88@gmail.com, sasarandjelovic@yahoo.com,petar@kg.ac.rsAbstract: The subject <strong>of</strong> the work includes theoretical considerations, conducting c experimentall tests whichhare subjected to the analysis <strong>of</strong> the test t results related to the determination <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction,<strong>of</strong> contact pairs which were previously heat treated. Contact pairs were, before thee procedure to t determineethe coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction, heated to t temperatures <strong>of</strong> 50⁰C-350⁰C andd cooled to room temperature. Testresults showthat, depending on thethermal treatment <strong>of</strong> contact pairs, there is significant increase in thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction. The authors believe thatt the reasonss for the increase <strong>of</strong> thee friction coefficient arerelated to the creation <strong>of</strong> oxide and changes in the surface layer <strong>of</strong> contact pairs.Keywords: coefficient <strong>of</strong>static friction, oxidationn layer, pre heat treatment, normal load1. INTRODUCTIONPreciselyprediction <strong>of</strong> static friction is <strong>of</strong> f theessence significance due to its application in manymodern tribological systems, such as chucks,clamps, seals, micro-electromechanical systems andso on. Importance <strong>of</strong> the evaluation <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction isfigured long time ago andthat area studied some <strong>of</strong> the first scientists suchh asLeonardo da Vinci, Guillaume Amontons, CharlesAugustin Coulomb, George Rennie and manyothers [1]. As the force <strong>of</strong> friction occurs when twobodies are in contacts, based on the relative speed<strong>of</strong> movement it can be divided int<strong>of</strong>riction at t theidle status and the friction in state <strong>of</strong> motion. Startthe movement <strong>of</strong> any kind is related to the existence<strong>of</strong> static friction. The static coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictiondepends onmany parameters, primarily from thesurface <strong>of</strong> contact, normal load, atmosphereandtemperaturee at whichh contact occurs, surfaceabsorption, quality <strong>of</strong>surfaces in i contact andmaterials <strong>of</strong> contact surfaces [2-6]. Many authorshave been examining the influence <strong>of</strong> roughnessparameters on the <strong>of</strong> contact surfaces for the staticfriction coefficient and came to the conclusion thattthe static coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction increases withincreasing surface roughness parameters [4, 5].Some authors have concluded that some s <strong>of</strong> theroughness parameters, such as skewness andkurtosis, havee more influence on the staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction compared to other parameters[7] [8]. The friction force at idle phase increasesswith increasingg tangential displacements up to thevalue that is needed n to begin movement <strong>of</strong> thebodies in contact [9]. The main parameters <strong>of</strong> staticfriction are thee maximum force <strong>of</strong> static friction,which is realized at the moment <strong>of</strong> macrodisplacement,and corresponding value <strong>of</strong> themicro-movement. The influence <strong>of</strong> temperature andnormal load on the friction characteristics <strong>of</strong>materials is topic <strong>of</strong> numerous scientificc works [10-13] ], especially when are concerned materials usedin process <strong>of</strong> hot h metal forming. Etsion and Amit[10] experimentally investigated theeffect <strong>of</strong>normal load on the coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction f for avery smooth metal m surface. Normal load is in therange <strong>of</strong> 10 -3 N - 0,3N andd applied tosamples <strong>of</strong>small diameter made <strong>of</strong> three different aluminumm13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13147


alloys in contact with nickel-platedfinish. The testswere conductedin conditions <strong>of</strong> controlledhumidity and air cleanliness. The dramatic increase<strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction was noticed whenthe normal load reduced to the lowest level. Thiskind <strong>of</strong> behavior is attributed to the adhesion forceswhich havea significant role and which are moreprominent at low normal loads and smoothsurfaces. Tothe knowledge <strong>of</strong> authors the studyy <strong>of</strong>static coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction under conditionss <strong>of</strong>high temperature wasnot the topic <strong>of</strong> moreextensive theoretical and experimental works [14-17]. Behavior <strong>of</strong> the static and kinematic frictionn <strong>of</strong>materials coupling at differentvalues <strong>of</strong>temperaturee and contact pressures investigatedChaikittiratana, Koetniyom and Lakkam [ 17].Device which is used for performing <strong>of</strong> theexperiment is specifically constructed for thedetermination <strong>of</strong> slidingfriction at highertemperatures. It was established that at 100°C thereisn't significant change in the coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionwhen the contact pressure varies. However, at atemperaturee <strong>of</strong> 200°C observed friction coefficientchange with the change <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure.There was an increase in the coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionwhen the contact pressure increasedfrom0.147MPa - 0.252MPa. It is concluded that theincrease in temperaturee significantly increases thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction. One <strong>of</strong> the most importantconclusionss <strong>of</strong> this workis that the static s coefficient<strong>of</strong> friction increases with increasing temperature,which is partly a consequence <strong>of</strong> increase theplasticity <strong>of</strong> most contact materials at highertemperatures.The aim<strong>of</strong> this paper is to determine theinfluence <strong>of</strong>previously heat treated contact pairss onthe value <strong>of</strong>the static coefficient <strong>of</strong> f sliding friction,with contact elements made <strong>of</strong> steel. Experimentalmeasurements were performed on instrumentationdeveloped by the authors, in order to accuratelydetermine the value <strong>of</strong> the staticcoefficientt <strong>of</strong>sliding friction at highertemperatures and relativelylow values <strong>of</strong> contactt pressures in the variableradius <strong>of</strong> curvature <strong>of</strong> contact elements. The resultscould havea significant aplication in industrialapplications.accurately measure very small values <strong>of</strong> physicalquantities(normaland friction force). f Formeasuring small values <strong>of</strong> the friction force isnecessary to exist e electronic components in themeasuring chain (sensorss <strong>of</strong> force and otherelectronic components). Since the forcesensors, forreasons <strong>of</strong> measurementmreliability, should beoutside the zone <strong>of</strong> high temperatures,, it becomesimportant ,to the signals associated with smallldisplacement and a force, that they have to betransmitted mechanically from the high temperatureezone (the chamber in which the pair is heated todesired temperature) to thee sensor to quantify thevalue <strong>of</strong> the friction and normal contact load <strong>of</strong>contact pair. Mechanicaltransmission chain <strong>of</strong>friction force pulls the corresponding measurementerrors, especially when it comes to measure verysmall values <strong>of</strong> f force.The authors started from the idea that theprinciple <strong>of</strong> measuring m the static coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction over the steep plane have to be upgradeddandenable measurementin conditions <strong>of</strong> highhtemperatures and low values <strong>of</strong> contact pressure.Theprinciple <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction over the steep plane (Figure 1) ) is based ongravity. Static coefficient c <strong>of</strong> friction, ass it is knownnis the ratio <strong>of</strong> the friction force and the force f normalto the surfacee <strong>of</strong> contact, where condition forequilibrium on a steep plane is given byexpression ∙sin. In the limiting case<strong>of</strong> slidingfriction valid equation is:Fmggsin tg (1)N mggcoswhere are: value <strong>of</strong> st tatic frictioncoefficient;F - friction force; m - mass <strong>of</strong> body; g -acceleration <strong>of</strong>f gravity; - steep angle <strong>of</strong> theplane.2. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONSMeasurement <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient at hightemperaturee in contact pairs is associated with anumber <strong>of</strong>problems <strong>of</strong> physicall and technicalnature. Issuesrelated to the reliability <strong>of</strong>measurements are especially pronounced in themeasurement <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient under lowcontact pressure. Problems related tothe fact that athigh temperatures in the contact pairs must148Figure 1. Thee balance <strong>of</strong> the body on a steep s planeMeasurement error e <strong>of</strong> static coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionon this principle arising from error <strong>of</strong> anglemeasurement in i relation to an ideal horizontalposition when the t body which is located on a steepplane crossed from sleep p in a state<strong>of</strong> motion(Figure 2), respectively:13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


tg( ) tg 100, [%] (2)tgwhere are: relative error <strong>of</strong> measurement; -angular error <strong>of</strong> measurement . If I one takes intoaccount that the frictioncoefficient tg , thenthe diagramgiven in Figure 2 candetermine therelative measurement error ()which is, amongother, function <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction.Friction coefficient µ [-]Relative percent difference ε [%]21.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.2004 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40Rotation <strong>of</strong> steep plane [ ]°Figure 2. Graphical representation<strong>of</strong> the relativeemeasurement error <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong>f friction over r thesteep planeOn the basis <strong>of</strong> eqquation (2) and the diagram(Figure 2) can be noted that values <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> sliding friction μ> 0.1 with Δα = 1'correspond to the measurement error which is less<strong>of</strong> 0.3%. This means that theprinciple <strong>of</strong>measurement can be efficiently used to determinethe static friction coefficient at higher temperatures,especially if one takes into accountt that the slidingcoefficient <strong>of</strong> staticfriction at elevatedtemperatures for most materials is greater than n theabove values.44tops <strong>of</strong> some asperities a and in that case betweenmost asperitiess there is noo real physical contact.Block and the rollers are made <strong>of</strong> same material(theaforementioned). Experiments weree carried outwith increase <strong>of</strong> temperatures by 50⁰ C, startingfromthe temperature T 1 =50 ⁰ C up to temperatureeT 2 = 350 ⁰ C, andd after heating samples were left tocool to room temperature.Each measurement wasrepeated 10 times, so that a total <strong>of</strong> 350independent experimentsis performed at roomtemperature after heating the contact pair.Figure 3. Schematic representation <strong>of</strong> the contact pairThe coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction was determined usingspecially designed devicess (Figure 4). Workingprinciple <strong>of</strong> designed d Tribometer iss based onrotation <strong>of</strong> steep plane, which is done on amechanical principle to the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the readings<strong>of</strong> 1’. Namely, rotation steep plane is carried out bymanually turning <strong>of</strong> nonius. . Leveling <strong>of</strong>f Tribometerris done using level whichh provides precision <strong>of</strong>reading which is i less than 0,02/1000 ⁄ .3. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCHExperimentalstudieswere performed onsamples made <strong>of</strong> steel EN X160 CrVMo12 1 whichis subjectedto heat treatment hardening, with theaim to obtain the highh hardness <strong>of</strong> 64 HRC andwear resistance. Tribological contact pair is realizedby setting the rollers <strong>of</strong> diameters 4 mm, 6 mm, 8mm, 10 mmm and 12 mm, length 20mm, on prismblock (Figure 3). This simulates tribological contactwhich is, theoreticaly,realized on line. If we takeinto account that the mass <strong>of</strong> the rollers is smallthen we have small values <strong>of</strong> contact pressure.When rollers are in contact on flat surface s block, inthe absencee <strong>of</strong> temperature, contactt is achievedd on13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13Figure 4. Measuring equipmentContact pairs were heated to temperatures from50 ⁰ C to 350 ⁰ C with the step <strong>of</strong> 50 ⁰ C, after whichhthey are cooled to roomtemperature.So,determining the size <strong>of</strong> the static coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction was performed withh contact pairs that wereeheat treated at temperatures indicated. This meansthat contact pairs in the process <strong>of</strong> determining thestatic coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction weree at roomtemperature. The T results <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction f depending on the weight <strong>of</strong>149


ollers, that is, the normal contact loadtemperaturee are shown in Table 1:150dTF [N][mm][ ⁰ C]121086412108641210864121086412108641210864121086412108640.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 0.174101 0.120903 0.077378 0.043525 0.019345 202020202050505050501001001001001001501501501501502002002002002002502502502502503003003003003003503503503503500.1965810.1852610.2956190.2438110.2296940.2102290.2124840.2181930.2855140.2273320.1908950.2045410.2056290.2436610.2400490.3104430.2844180.2890480.3309710.3515920.2400520.2286210.234370.3408610.4591680.2702270.2867180.3778370.3225730.5229930.2917250.3666280.5479850.5717560.3891940.2796390.3417810.3540480.3152330.462363andAccording to the data from Table 1 was formeddiagram <strong>of</strong> static friction coefficientwhichdepending on the normal load and temperatures towhich contact pairs are pre-treated.Figure 5. The static coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction whichdepending on o the normal l load and temperature4. DISCUSSIOONBased on theoreticalconsiderationsandexperimental investigationss it can be concluded thattthe physical principle p <strong>of</strong>f measuringthe staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction f overr the steep plane can beeffectively applied in testing conditions at highhvalues <strong>of</strong> temperature andd low valuess <strong>of</strong> contacttpressures.It requires a certainprecisionmeasurement instrumentation (precisionmeasuringequipment - Tribometer),Twhich is realized withequipment used for conducting this tests. Theaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the measurement was the angle <strong>of</strong> Δα =1'. A large number <strong>of</strong> measurements and a number<strong>of</strong> repetitions <strong>of</strong> experiments under identicalconditions alloww statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the t results <strong>of</strong>measurements to t minimize random error.Experimental results <strong>of</strong> f investigation presentedin the form <strong>of</strong> 3D 3 diagram in Figure 5 indicates thattfor given conditions the temperature treatment t <strong>of</strong>contact pairs have substantial effect on the value <strong>of</strong>staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction.Theessentialdependence<strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficientfromtemperature, which can be seen from the t diagram,expressed that for temperature change from 50⁰ Cto 300⁰ C value <strong>of</strong> the static frictioncoefficientincreases nearlyy two times. Based on the foregoing,it is obvious that the changes <strong>of</strong> static frictioncoefficient arise from temperatureeffect onmaterial in contact. It is likely that preheating <strong>of</strong>contact pairs above the temperature values close to200⁰C leads too physical changes in the surfacelayers <strong>of</strong> contact pairs.With diagram shown inn Figure 5 iss possible toanalyze the effect <strong>of</strong> normal load on the staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction. f Normal load in the range <strong>of</strong>0.019 to 0, 17 N is used during experiment. Fromthe diagram it can c be seen that the minimum values<strong>of</strong> the normal load l in the entire temperature range,13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


corresponding to the maximum value <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction, and reverse. This proves thatthe static coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction under conditions <strong>of</strong>low values <strong>of</strong> contact pressures andpreheat treatedcontact pairs, just depends on the level <strong>of</strong> contactpressure, which is in line with tests performedd indifferent conditions [ 10]. The increase in thecontact pressure can lead to lower frictioncoefficient and reverse.When analyzing theresults, theauthors <strong>of</strong> thiswork started from the next. Because <strong>of</strong> preheating<strong>of</strong> contact pairs it comes to decrease <strong>of</strong> hardness,which can be the reason for the increase <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient. It ispossible, and more likely,that oxidation layer iscreated at the surfacee <strong>of</strong>contactpairs withdifferenttribologicalcharacteristics comparing to base material, steel ENX160 CrVMo12 1. Theoretically,changes in thestructure changes the mechanicall propertiess <strong>of</strong>hardened steel. With temperature increase hardnessand strengthdecrease, while ductility and toughnessincrease. During the heating <strong>of</strong> the samples wasthree modes lay<strong>of</strong>fs and low firingup to 200⁰⁰ C,the transformation <strong>of</strong> retained austenite 200⁰ C -300⁰ C andremoving internal stresses <strong>of</strong> 300⁰ C -400⁰ C. This, withincreasingtemperingtemperatures the hardness and strength decrease,while ductility and toughness increase. Oxidationoccurs as a chemical reaction between metal andoxygen from the atmosphere. Theoccurrencee <strong>of</strong>oxidation ispossible at room temperature, however,the metals that are exposed to elevated temperaturesabove 200⁰⁰ C are able to createe more intenseoxidation layer.The authors were not able to carry out structureanalysis<strong>of</strong> surface layer withelectronicmicroscope, so the question <strong>of</strong> largeincrease inn thefriction coefficient hastwo options listed. It isunlikely that changes inhardness <strong>of</strong>f steel EN X160CrVMo12 due to release 1 (Figure 6) from thevalue <strong>of</strong> 64 HRC to value <strong>of</strong> 60 HRC can lead too anincreasein the coefficient<strong>of</strong>friction <strong>of</strong>approximately 70%. For this reason the authorsbelieve thatt significant increase in the coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction is very probably due to the creationn <strong>of</strong>oxides at the surface <strong>of</strong> contact pairs.Figure 6. 6 Releasing diagram <strong>of</strong> material5. CONCLUSIIONSBased on these tests and analyzingthe results,conclusions were made, preheated contact pairsmade <strong>of</strong> steel EN E X160 CrVMo12 1, at relativelylowtemperaturesresultingleads tosignificant change in the value <strong>of</strong> staticcoefficient<strong>of</strong> friction. Results R <strong>of</strong> measuring the staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> sliding s friction <strong>of</strong> the test material,under conditions <strong>of</strong> high temperaturee and smalllvalues <strong>of</strong> load contact, c indicating a verysignificanteffect <strong>of</strong> temperature and contact pressure on value.Theimpact <strong>of</strong> the minimumm values <strong>of</strong> normal loadin the entire temperature range, corresponding tothe maximum value <strong>of</strong> thee coefficientt <strong>of</strong> friction,andvice versa. It is very unlikely that the changes<strong>of</strong> hardness <strong>of</strong> steel EN X160 CrVMo12 1 due tothe release fromm the value 64 HRC to the t value 60HRC may leadd to an increase in the coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction <strong>of</strong> approximately 70%. From this reason theauthors believe that a significantincrease <strong>of</strong>coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction is probably a consequence <strong>of</strong>creation <strong>of</strong> oxides at the surface <strong>of</strong> contact pairs.REFERENCE[1] Dowson, D. , History <strong>of</strong> Tribology, Longman, NewYork, 1979[2] K.-H. ZumGahr, K. Voelker, Friction and wear <strong>of</strong>SiCfiberreinforced borosilicate glass mated to steel, ,Wear 225–229, pp. 888–895, 1999.[3] P. Blau, The significance and use <strong>of</strong>f the frictioncoefficient, Tribol. T Int. 34, , pp. 585–591 2001.[4] B. Ivkovic, M. M Djurdjanovic, D. Stamenkovic: TheInfluence <strong>of</strong> f the Contact Surface Roughness on theStatic Friction Coefficient, Tribologyin Industry,22, pp. 41-44, 2000.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13151


[5] U. Muller, R. Hauert: Investigations <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction diamond-like carbonfilms, Surface and Coatings Technology, 174 –175,pp. 421–426, 2003.[6] B. Polyakov, S.Vlassov, L.M. Dorogin, P. Kulis, I.Kink, R. Lohmus: The effect <strong>of</strong> substrate roughnesson the static friction <strong>of</strong> CuO nanowires, SurfaceScience 606, pp. 1393–1399, 2012.[7] N. Tayebi, A.A. Polycarpou: Modeling the effect <strong>of</strong>skewness and kurtosis on the static frictioncoefficient <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces, TribologyInternational 37, pp. 491–505, 2004.[8] B. Bhushan, S. Sundararajan, W.W. Scott, S.Chilamakuri: Stiction analysis <strong>of</strong> magnetic tapes,IEEE Magnetics Transactions 33, pp. 3211–3213,1997.[9] E.L. Deladi: Static Friction in Rubber-MetalContacts with Application to Rubber Pad FormingProcesses, PhD thesis, University <strong>of</strong> Twente,Twente, 2006.[10] I. Etsion, M. Amit: The effect <strong>of</strong> small normal loadson the static friction coefficient for very smoothsurfaces, Journal <strong>of</strong> tribology, Vol.115, July 1993.[11] O. Barrau, C. Boher, R. Gras, F. Rezai-Aria: Wearmecahnisms and wear rate in a high temperaturedry friction <strong>of</strong> AISI H11 tool steel: Influence <strong>of</strong>debris circulation, Wear 263, pp.160–168, 2007.[12] H. Kumar, V. Ramakrishnan, S.K. Albert, C.Meikandamurthy, B.V.R. Tata, A.K. Bhaduri: Hightemperature wear and friction behaviour <strong>of</strong> 15Cr–15Ni–2Mo titanium-modified austenitic stainlesssteel in liquid sodium, Wear 270, pp. 1–4, 2010.[13] A. Chaikittiratana, S. Koetniyom, S. Lakkam:Static/kinetic friction behaviour <strong>of</strong> a clutch facingmaterial: effects <strong>of</strong> temperature and pressure,World Academy <strong>of</strong> Science, Engineering andTechnology 66, 2012.[14] H. Kumar, V. Ramakrishnan, S.K. Albert, C.Meikandamurthy, B.V.R. Tata, A.K. Bhaduri: Hightemperature wear and friction behaviour <strong>of</strong> 15Cr–15Ni–2Mo titanium-modified austenitic stainlesssteel in liquid sodium, Wear 270, pp. 1–4, 2010.[15] P. Mosaddegh, J. Ziegert, W. Iqbal, Y. Tohme:Apparatus for high temperature frictionmeasurement, Precision Engineering 35, pp. 473–483, 2011.[16] M. Worgull, J.F. Hetu, K.K. Kabanemi, M. Heckele,Hot embossing <strong>of</strong> microstructures: characterization<strong>of</strong> friction during demolding, MicrosystTechnol 14,pp. 767–773, 2008.152 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacDYNAMICS OF SAMS IN BOUNDARY LUBRICATIONJelena Manojlović 11 The Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Niš, Srbija, jmanojlo@gmail.comAbstract: Surfactant molecules have some properties responsible for a number <strong>of</strong> remarkable phenomena,such as oriented adsorption <strong>of</strong> surfactants at surfaces and interfaces. The capability to self-assemble intowell-defined structures is <strong>of</strong>ten seen as being more important than their surface activity. When a surfactantsolution is in contact with a solid surface, the surfactant molecules adsorb onto the surface, ideally formingan adsorbed layer <strong>of</strong> high order, termed as self-assembled monolayer (SAM). Many surface properties areinfluenced by such a film, and therefore, SAMs <strong>of</strong>fer the capability to form ordered organic surface coatings,suitable for various applications, such as wetting or corrosion protection. Due to the flexibility in choosingthe molecular architecture, organic molecules have many interesting applications, such as biosensors, inphotoelectronics, in controlling water adsorption or boundary lubricant coating. This paper focuses oncationic surfactants (quaternary ammonium surfactants), with some unique properties that are not present inother surfactants.Keywords: surfactants, self-assemble, boundary lubrication, nanotechnology.1. INTRODUCTIONA contact between two surfaces is <strong>of</strong> greatimportance in technology. At the interface <strong>of</strong> twomaterials, when they are brought together,separated or moved with respect to one another,contact formation, friction, wear or lubrication arethe processes that occur [1]. Friction has long beenthe subject <strong>of</strong> research. All machined metalsurfaces, as viewed through a microscope, havetheir own roughness, called asperity. Therefore, twosurfaces touch at an extremely small number <strong>of</strong>points, and their true area <strong>of</strong> contact is a part <strong>of</strong>their apparent contacting area. In contact <strong>of</strong> twosurfaces, the number <strong>of</strong> asperities increases due toplastic deformation <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> them. Theconsequence <strong>of</strong> this is the appearance <strong>of</strong> theremoval <strong>of</strong> material from a surface in bearing underdynamic conditions, defined as wear [2]. In order toreduce wear, lubricants are employed between thesurfaces. Friction, wear and lubrication are thecenter <strong>of</strong> consideration in many tribological andtechnological problems. Having in mind that acontact occurs in numerous asperities, the research<strong>of</strong> two contact surfaces, especially at the molecularlevel and the friction phenomenon at the nanometerscale, is studied by nanotribology, a branch <strong>of</strong>tribology.In order to categorize the friction propertiesbetween two surfaces, the "Stribeck curve" wasdeveloped. Machine elements may experienceseveral lubrication regimes, including full-film,mixed, and boundary lubrication. These regimesdepend on the properties <strong>of</strong> a lubricant andoperating conditions. In the case where speeds aretoo low and loads are too high to permitestablishing a hydrodynamic film, or when thedistance between contact surfaces is a fewnanometers or a few molecular layers, we candefine boundary lubrication (fig.1).Figure 1. Boundary lubricationThe boundary films have been the subject <strong>of</strong>study for decades, since friction and wearphenomena are affected by these ultrathin films.Under friction, the dynamics <strong>of</strong> lubricants onsurfaces is very important, especially the molecularbehavior <strong>of</strong> lubricants in boundary lubrication. Thebehavior and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the boundary films,13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 153


formed during sliding, becomes more complex dueto change <strong>of</strong> some experimental parameters, such astemperature [3]. The computer simulation <strong>of</strong>processes during sliding contact, when severalhundreds <strong>of</strong> atoms are involved, indicates thatatomic processes cannot be neglected, when wedescribe nanotribology experiments [1, 4]. For thatpurpose, several available methods can be includedfor research at a molecular level [5].2. BOUNDARY LUBRICATION BY SAMSAttractive model systems for boundarylubrication are organic self-assembled monolayers(SAMs). Preparing self-assembled monolayers isone <strong>of</strong> the most elegant ways to make ultrathinorganic films <strong>of</strong> controlled thickness. The process<strong>of</strong> self-assembly is considered as a very importantexample <strong>of</strong> equilibrium structural organization onthe molecular scale. Organic thin films are anemerging area <strong>of</strong> materials chemistry and areutilized in many application areas, such aselectronic components, as well as in biomedicalapplication [6]. There is also special interest in thepossibility <strong>of</strong> manufacturing molecular layers withparticular properties. Molecular self-assembly isrecognized as a powerful strategy for thefabrication <strong>of</strong> nanoscale structures [7].The interest in these systems has been furtherintensified in order to understand and solve friction,lubrication and related problems [8]. More recently,lubrication in a small-size system, such as themicroelectromechanical system (MEMS) ornanoelectromechanical system (NEMS), is a bigchallenge in scientific work, especially in the study<strong>of</strong> new kind <strong>of</strong> lubricants. Different type <strong>of</strong>monolayers attached to sliding surfaces appears as agood candidate in MEMS lubrication. Therefore,the understanding <strong>of</strong> behavior between monolayersfilms is <strong>of</strong> great importance in tribological andnanotribological experiments.Due to very small thickness <strong>of</strong> monolayers(range <strong>of</strong> few nanometers), new tools are requiredfor this nanotribological studies. Widely used arethe following: surface-force apparatus (SFA), thescanning tunneling miscorscope (STM), the atomicforce and friction-force microscopes (AFM andFFM). Developed more than 40 years ago, the SFAis usually applied to study properties <strong>of</strong> molecularlythin films, confined between two molecularlysmooth macroscopic surfaces, with surfaceseparations at the angstrom level and forcesbetween them. A scanning tunneling microscope(STM) is an instrument for imaging surfaces at theatomic level [1]. With the development <strong>of</strong> a number<strong>of</strong> powerful techniques in surface analysis, asmentioned above, academic interest in SAMs hasregained, because <strong>of</strong> the possibilities to investigatethe growth and the structure <strong>of</strong> such layers on thenanometer scale [9, 10].3. SURFACTANTS SELF-ASSEMBLYThe word “surfactant”, does not always appearin dictionaries, because it is a contracted form <strong>of</strong>the phrase SURFace ACTive AgeNT. Surfactantsare molecules essential to the chemical industry andin many products such as soaps, detergents,shampoos, s<strong>of</strong>teners, pharmaceutical products, etc.Surfactant molecules have amhiphilic propertiesbecause they consist <strong>of</strong> two distinct parts - one thathas an affinity for the solvent, and the another onethat does not. This dual structure is responsible fora number <strong>of</strong> remarkable phenomena, such asmicelle formation in solution at a certainconcentration, the so-called critical micelleconcentration (cmc), and oriented adsorption <strong>of</strong>surfactants at surfaces and interfaces. Micelleformation has attracted a notable part <strong>of</strong> thesurfactant research, in order to investigate theformation <strong>of</strong> micelles [11, 12], their shape [13] ortheir interactions [14]. Systems below the cmc havenot been widely studied [15].The self-assembled monolayers can be preparedusing different types <strong>of</strong> molecules and differentsubstrates. A very <strong>of</strong>ten studied SAM model systemcomprises thiol molecules, adsorbed onto gold,silanes on an oxide surfaces, or alkanephosphatemonolayers, which was in detail reviewed byUlman [16]. The choice <strong>of</strong> the substrates, used inthe self-assembling process, is dictated by themolecules and their interactions, as well as the finalapplication.Self-assembled monolayers form spontaneously,when certain classes <strong>of</strong> molecules adsorb onto asolid surface from solution. When a surfactantsolution is in contact with a solid surface, thesurfactant molecules adsorb onto the surface,ideally forming an adsorbed layer <strong>of</strong> high order,termed as self-assembled monolayer (fig.2).Figure 2. a) An organized monolayer on a substrate,b) CTAB chainMany surface properties are influenced by sucha film, e.g. the hydrophobicity or the wetting or154 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


electrostatics [17]. Due to the flexibility inchoosing the molecular architecture, organicmolecules have many interesting applications, suchas biosensors, for lubrication or in controlling wateradsorption. Therefore, in recent years, muchattention has been directed to the study <strong>of</strong> SAMs.However, a discrepancy still exists between thetheoretical understanding and the practicalimportance involved in the formation <strong>of</strong> suchlayers.Cationic surfactants are a small subgroup withsome unique properties that are not present in othersurfactants. In order to help understanding <strong>of</strong>adsorption <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactants, adsorption <strong>of</strong>quaternary ammonium surfactants onto inorganicsubstrates, such as mica, has been widely studied[18, 19, 20]. The process <strong>of</strong> adsorption has beeninvestigated by different techniques [21], such as x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the surfaceforces apparatus, (SFA) [15] or contact angle (CA)measurements [22]. This paper focuses onquaternary ammonium surfactants with a cationichead group, single-tailedhexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB,with the molecular structureCH 3 (CH 2 ) 15 N + (CH 3 ) 3 Br - (figure 2b).4. SAMS PREPARATION ANDCHARACTERIZATIONA standard protocol, which can produce a welldefinedand reproducible hydrophobic CTAB filmon mica, does not exist. Namely, previous studies<strong>of</strong> CTAB adsorption on various substrates,suggested that the behavior <strong>of</strong> CTAB is morecomplex than the behavior <strong>of</strong> other cationicsurfactants [22, 23, 24], but the reason for thissingularity has not been clearly determined [17].The original goal <strong>of</strong> these experiments was toproduce self-assembled monolayers and use themas model systems to study boundary lubrication.But, there was a problem concerning the resultsbeing repeated, as well as the characterization <strong>of</strong>the adsorbed CTAB layers on muscovite mica indetail. The various SAM morphologies, found onmica by the use <strong>of</strong> different adsorption protocols,demonstrate the influence <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong>experimental parameters on the adsorption process,such as concentration, pH, temperature andhumidity. They are rarely described in theliterature.Figure 3. CTAB layer on muscovite micaIn order to characterize and determine theproperties <strong>of</strong> SAMs, two techniques have beenextensively used in this work, contact anglemeasurements and the atomic force microscopy(AFM). For example, freshly cleaved mica hascontact angle less than 10° and contact angle on theSAM produced by CTAB adsorption on mica canbe 140° [22]. A contact angle greater than 90° isdetermined on hydrophobic surfaces.In our experiments the contact anglemeasurements have been used in order to define thedegree <strong>of</strong> hydrophobicity <strong>of</strong> the modified micasurface and molecular order after surfactantadsorption, performed by using ultra pure water.All contact angle measurements were averagedover several samples.5. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDUREWe made self-assembled monolayers <strong>of</strong>quaternary ammonium surfactants on mica. Singletailedhexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide,CTAB, with the molecular structureCH 3 (CH 2 ) 15 N + (CH 3 ) 3 Br - , was purchased fromFluka. For further purification, CTAB wasrecrystallized from an ethanol/acetone mixture. Asa solvent, ultra pure water <strong>of</strong> resistivity 18.3MΩcmwas prepared using a Barnstead EASYpurebatch-fed water purification system. The samewater quality was also used for the sample rinsing,before drying with a clean nitrogen stream.The glassware and bottles used in theexperiments were consistently cleaned by piranhasolution and then rinsed with purified water toavoid any organic contamination. All the employedtools were previously cleaned in order to minimizethe occurrence <strong>of</strong> molecular contamination,particularly on the high-energy mica surface.Muscovite mica purchased from Spruce PineMica Company Inc. (USA) was used for theadsorption experiments. Small mica samples <strong>of</strong> 1-1.5cm 2 size, were cut by scissors. Then, they werefreshly cleaved on both sides before immersion intothe surfactant solution. The adsorption was13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 155


performed from the surfactant solution in a volume<strong>of</strong> 20ml.In our first adsorption series withouttemperature control, a 1000ml stock solution <strong>of</strong>10 -2 M (~10cmc) CTAB was prepared at roomtemperature. Since the solubility <strong>of</strong> CTAB in waterwas low at room temperature, the solution washeated to 30-35°C. By dilution <strong>of</strong> this solution,prepared by adding the appropriate volume <strong>of</strong> ultrapure water, surfactant solution concentrationsranging from 10 -3 M (~cmc) to 10 -6 M (~cmc/1000)have been prepared. One option, called “CTABin/CTAB out“(figure 4), involves immersion andextraction from the surfactant solution at thenominal concentration. In the water dipping step,the mica samples were dipped for 30sec into 20ml<strong>of</strong> ultra pure water to remove the excess solutionand excess surfactant molecules.After the post-rinsing step, the modified micasurface was gently blown dry with nitrogen, beforethe AFM imaging or contact angle measurements.This type <strong>of</strong> protocol (at different concentrations)was repeated several times to also assess thereproducibility.During the first experiments in March, the roomtemperature was in the range 21±2°C, and a fewmonths later, in June, the conditions in thelaboratory were clearly different, 32±2°C. Asdocumented by the air temperature measuredoutside <strong>of</strong> our building, shown in figure 5, thetemperature during the summer 2003 has beenmuch higher than in spring. In several experimentsthe temperature was more than 30°C.Using the above described preparation protocolsa significant number <strong>of</strong> samples have beenprepared. The AFM images <strong>of</strong> two representativesamples obtained by the ″CTAB in/CTAB out″protocol at a concentration below the cmc areshown in figure 6. The AFM results observed at allsolution concentrations below the cmc (from 10 -4 Mto 10 -6 M), are very similar with the resultspresented in figure 6.a) 85°/30°Figure 4. ″CTAB in CTAB out″ experimentb) 82°/22°6. RESULTS OBTAINED WITHOUTTEMPERATURE CONTROLThe first two sets <strong>of</strong> experiments were realizedwithout temperature control, in March and June2003.Figure 5. Local temperature recorded in June 2003(measured at 12:40 PM in Zürich-SwissMeteo data)Figure 6. AFM images <strong>of</strong> CTAB on mica obtained withthe “CTAB in/CTAB out” protocol at a concentration <strong>of</strong>10 -4 M. Advancing and receding water contact angles arealso shown:a) in March 2003 and b) in June 2003A clear seasonal influence on SAMs adsorptionhas been observed in all experiments realizedwithout temperature control, regardless <strong>of</strong> theexperimental protocols. On the sample prepared inJune, where the air temperature outside <strong>of</strong> thelaboratory building was higher than in March(figure 5), a significant number <strong>of</strong> clusters <strong>of</strong> heightbetween 0.5nm to 3.8nm and the size around156 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


250nm size have been observed, according to thegrey scale <strong>of</strong> the image, which represents a heightrange <strong>of</strong> 5nm (cf. Figure 6.b). The sample preparedin March, shown in figure 6.a, is more promising.The advancing and receding water contact anglewere measured on both samples exhibit hysteresis.Without temperature control, the reproducibility <strong>of</strong>those surfactant films was difficult to accomplish.Therefore, it was difficult to identify the mostpromising protocol for us.We have performed a significant number <strong>of</strong>experiments at 10 -2 M CTAB (i.e.10xcmc) solutionsby the protocol “CTAB in/CTAB out”, whichnicely document the crucial role <strong>of</strong> the temperature.The results are summarized in figure 7.Figure 7.a is representative <strong>of</strong> the sampleprepared at 27°C and is qualitatively different fromthe samples prepared at the lower temperatures.The bright spots observed in figure 7.b representsmall islands on mica with a height between 0.5-1.3nm. In figure 7.c we detect clusters <strong>of</strong> a height inorder <strong>of</strong> 23nm.a) 27°Cb) 24.5°C7. DISCUSSIONOur adsorption results have shown that themorphology, the structure and the stability <strong>of</strong> theadsorbed films are sensitive to the experimentalconditions, primarily temperature.One very important concept <strong>of</strong> surfactantsolution is the Krafft temperature, whose effect is<strong>of</strong> great importance in SAMs formation. The Kraffttemperature is the minimum temperature at whichsurfactants form micelles. Below the Kraffttemperature micelles cannot form. The Kraffttemperature is a point <strong>of</strong> phase change below whichthe surfactant remains in crystalline form, even inaqueous solution (figure 8). Around the Kraffttemperature, Tk, many physical properties <strong>of</strong> thesurfactant solution reflect this transition. Thetransition in CTAB solution around Tk clearlyoccurs over a range <strong>of</strong> temperatures. Although theKrafft temperature is a well-established concept,reported values <strong>of</strong> Tk for CTAB in water varyconsiderably, from 20°C [17] to 25°C [14]. Kraffttemperatures, close to room temperature,significantly complicate the explanation <strong>of</strong>experimental results.According to the AFM images, the sampleobtained in March 2003 (figure 6.a) revealed ahomogeneous CTAB film, in contrast to the sampleperformed in June (figure 6.b). The reason for sucha difference must be related to changes in thesolution structure.c) 22°CFigure 7. Series <strong>of</strong> AFM images showing thesurface morphology <strong>of</strong> CTAB coated mica by theprotocol “CTAB in/CTAB out” at 10 -2 M solution attemperatures: a) 27°C, b) 24.5°C and c) 22°C.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 157


day later, at a room temperature <strong>of</strong> 22°C, reveals asubstantially different SAM as shown in figure 7.c.Upon cooling <strong>of</strong> micellar CTAB solution from theinitial value ~30°C to 22°C, the solution thenconsists <strong>of</strong> crystals, monomers and micelles. As aconsequence <strong>of</strong> such structural changes in thesolution, the complex morphology (figure 7.c) isnot surprising. A distinction between monolayer orbilayer formation is not readily possible from AFMimages above (figure 7). The applied test, notdescribed here, on the samples in severalexperiments, suggested bilayer formation even atconcentration 10 -4 M.8. CONCLUSIONFigure 8. The structural changes in the CTAB solutionin the performed experiments, such as heating/coolingcycle <strong>of</strong> solution (marked as hysteresis) and the dilution<strong>of</strong> the solution, both above the cmcNamely, solution used in the both experiments(10 -4 M) has been prepared by dilution <strong>of</strong> a 10 -2 Mstock solution. The room temperature in March(21±2°C) was slightly below the Krafft temperature<strong>of</strong> CTAB and we could expect that this stocksolution mainly consisted <strong>of</strong> monomers. The sameargument applies, <strong>of</strong> course, also to the dilutedsolution (10 -4 M).In June, however, a significant daily temperaturevariation, with temperatures clearly above theKrafft temperature, has been recorded, particularlyin the days before the described adsorptionexperiment. It is to be expected that the solutionstructure <strong>of</strong> the stock solution is metastable andcomplex. The diluted solution may thus not be inthermodynamic equilibrium and consists <strong>of</strong>micelles and monomers. The clusters seen on thesample prepared under such conditions (figure 7.b)can be interpreted as micelle, adsorbed in differentshapes and sizes.The results shown in figures 6 and 7 clearlydemonstrate the temperature influence on thesurfactant films, morphology formed in differentseasons <strong>of</strong> 2003. The variety <strong>of</strong> adsorbed filmmorphologies in uncontrolled conditions above thecmc can also be explained by structural changes inthe stock solution. Namely, warming up the highlyconcentrated stock solution (10 -2 M) to some 30°C(above the Krafft temperature) will result in theformation <strong>of</strong> micelles. Since the film shown infigure 7.b. has been adsorbed at a temperature <strong>of</strong>24.5°C, which is near the Krafft temperature, wemight expect the presence <strong>of</strong> some aggregates inthe solution and also on the mica surface. Some <strong>of</strong>the micelles are expected to transform into surfacelayers.The repetition <strong>of</strong> the same experiment oneThe performed experiments describe theadsorption <strong>of</strong> quaternary ammonium surfactantsonto anionic, atomically smooth, muscovite mica.The surfactant films on mica, formed according todescribed experimental protocols, werecharacterized by contact angle measurements andby AFM. We have observed that SAMs can havecompletely different properties, depending on themeteorological conditions, influenced bytemperature. These results suggested thattemperature can influence all steps in adsorptionprocedure, from solution preparation to the rinsingstep. The fact that the Krafft temperature range <strong>of</strong>CTAB (~25°) is around room temperature, makesthis system appear particularly complex.The dynamic CA experiments and AFMmeasurements have shown that the exact protocol<strong>of</strong> solution and self-assembled monolayer (SAM)preparation can substantially influence the stability<strong>of</strong> the hydrophobic layer, as well as thehydrophobicity. The results indicate that themorphology and the homogeneity <strong>of</strong> SAMs dependon many parameters, and the main reason for that isprobably the molecular structure <strong>of</strong> the solution,controlled by the temperature and concentration <strong>of</strong>the solution.In this model case <strong>of</strong> quaternary ammoniumsurfactants, the formation <strong>of</strong> homogeneous, wellorderedand reproducible monolayers is a verychallenging task. In order to assess such complexsystems, systematic variation <strong>of</strong> a great number <strong>of</strong>parameters was a necessary procedure.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author would like to gratefully acknowledgethe support in obtaining and understanding thepresented results provided by her mentors, NicholasD. Spencer and Manfred Heuberger, members <strong>of</strong>the Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology(LSST), a part <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Materials at the158 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


ETH Zurich, Switzerland, where all theexperiments were performed.REFERENCES[1] B. Bhushan, J. N. Israelachvili, and U. Landman:Nanotribology:friction, wear and lubrication at theatomic scale, Nature 374,pp. 607-616, 1995.[2] NASA: Lubrication, friction and wear, 1971.[3] Choa Sung-H. et al.: A model <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong>boundary film formation, Wear 177, pp. 33-45,1994.[4] B. Bhushan: Nanotribology and Nanomechanica II,Springer, New Tork, 2011.[5] K. Miyake, et al.: Effects <strong>of</strong> surface chemicalproperties on the frictional properties <strong>of</strong> selfassembledmonolayers lubricated with oleic acid,Tribology Online 7, pp. 218-224, 2012.[6] J. e. a. Swollen: Molecular Monolayers and Films,Langmuir 3, pp. 932-950, 1987.[7] J. a. M. Mellott: Supercritical self-assembledmonolayer growth, Journal <strong>of</strong> the AmericanChemical Society 126, pp. 9369-9373, 2004.[8] M. K. Chaudhury: Adhesion and friction <strong>of</strong> selfassembledorganic monolayers, Current opinion incolloid & interface science 2, pp. 65-69, 1997.[9] R. o. M. S. Carpick: Fundamental investigations <strong>of</strong>tribology with atomic force microscopy, ChemicalReviews 97, pp. 1163-1194, 1997.[10] D. K. Schwartz: Mechanisms and kinetics <strong>of</strong> selfassembledmonolayer formation, Annual Review <strong>of</strong>Physical Chemistry, Vol.52, pp. 107-137, 2001.[11] J. Oremusova et al.: Thermodynamics <strong>of</strong>micellization <strong>of</strong> hexadecylpyridinium bromide inaqueous and alcoholic (C-1-C-4) solutions,Collection <strong>of</strong> Czechoslovak ChemicalCommunications 65, pp. 1419-1437, 2000.[12] K. K. Ghosh: Thermodynamics <strong>of</strong> micelle formation<strong>of</strong> some cationic surfactants as a function <strong>of</strong>temperature and solvents, Indian Journal <strong>of</strong>Chemistry, Sec. B. 37B, pp. 875-880, 1998.[13] K.Boschkova et al.: Lubrication in aqueoussolutions using cationic surfactants - a study <strong>of</strong>static and dynamic forces, Langmuir 18,pp. 1680-1687, 2002.[14] PS. Goyal, VK Aswal: Micellar structure and intermicelleinteractions in micellar solutions: Results <strong>of</strong>small angle neutron scattering studies, CurrentScience 80, pp. 972-979, 2001.[15] Y. a. J. I. N. Chen: Effects <strong>of</strong> Ambient Conditions onAdsorbed Surfactant and Polymer Monolayers,Journal <strong>of</strong> Physical Chemistry 96, pp. 7752-7760,1992.[16] A. Ulman: An introduction to ultrathin organicfilms: from Langmuir-Blodgett to self assembly, ed.Academic Press, Boston, 1991.[17] I.Grosse, K.Estel: Thin surfactant layers at the solidinterface, Colloid and Polymer Science 278, pp.1000-1006, 2000.[18] F. Zhao et al.: Adsorption behavior <strong>of</strong>hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromida (CTAB) tomica substrates as observed by atomic forcemicroscopy, Science in China Ser. B Chemistry 48,pp. 101-106, 2005.[19] S.Perkin et al.: Stability <strong>of</strong> self-assembledhydrophobic surfactant layers in water, Journal <strong>of</strong>Physical Chemistry B 109, pp. 3832-3837, 2005.[20] JM Mellott et al.: Kinetics <strong>of</strong>octadecyltrimethylammonium bromide selfassembledmonolayer growth at mica from anaqueous solution, Langmuir 20, pp. 2341-2348,2004.[21] B.Y. Li et al.: Time dependent anchoring <strong>of</strong>adsorbed cationic surfactant molecules atmice/solution interface, Journal <strong>of</strong> Colloid andInterface Science 209, pp. 25-30, 1999.[22] Sharma,B.G. et al.: Characterization <strong>of</strong> adsorbedionic surfactants on a mica substrate, Langmuir 12,pp. 6506-6512, 1996.[23] W.A.Ducker and Erica J. Wanless: Adsorption <strong>of</strong>hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica:Nanometer-scale study <strong>of</strong> binding-site competitioneffects, Langmuir 15, pp. 160-168, 1999.[24] S. Manne, H. Gaub: Molecular-Organization <strong>of</strong>Surfactants at Solid-Liquid Interfaces, Science 270,pp. 1480-1482, 1995.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 159


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacINFLUENCE OF RICE HUSK ASH – SILICON CARBIDEWEIGHT RATIOS ON THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OFAL-MG-SI ALLOY MATRIX HYBRID COMPOSITESK. K. Alaneme 1 , T. M. Adewale 1,21 Department <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Federal University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Akure, Nigeria,kkalaneme@gmail.com2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering and Physical Sciences, School <strong>of</strong> Materials, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, Manchester, UnitedKingdomAbstract: The influence <strong>of</strong> rice husk ash (RHA) and silicon carbide (SiC) weight ratio on the mechanicalbehaviour <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix hybrid composites was investigated. RHA and SiC mixed in weight ratios0:1, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1, and 1:0 were utilized to prepare 5, 7.5 and 10 wt% <strong>of</strong> the reinforcing phase with Al-Mg-Sialloy as matrix using two-step stir casting method. Density measurement, estimated percent porosity, tensileproperties, fracture toughness, and SEM examination were used to characterize the composites produced. Theresults show that the composites were <strong>of</strong> good casting quality as the estimated porosity values were less than2.5 % in all grades produced. For the three weight percent worked on, the tensile-, yield-, and specific strengthdecreases with increase in the weight proportion <strong>of</strong> RHA in the RHA-SiC reinforcement. However, the resultsshow that the composites with composition <strong>of</strong> 1:3 weight ratio RHA:SiC (25% RHA: 75% SiC) <strong>of</strong>ferscomparable specific strength values with the single SiC reinforced Al composite grades. The strain to fractureswas invariant to the weight ratio <strong>of</strong> RHA/SiC for all weight percent but the composite compositions containingRHA had improved fracture toughness compared with the single SiC reinforced Al composite grades.Keywords: Aluminium matrix composites, rice husk ash, mechanical properties, scan electron microscopy,stir casting, silicon carbide.1. INTRODUCTIONAlternative sources <strong>of</strong> reinforcements that <strong>of</strong>fer thepotential <strong>of</strong> producing Aluminium matrix composites(AMCs) at reduced cost while maintaining highperformance levels is attracting interests fromresearchers [1-2]. Compared to other engineeringmaterials, AMCs are noted for the rare combination <strong>of</strong>properties they <strong>of</strong>fer such as high specific strength andstiffness, good wear and corrosion resistance, lowthermal coefficient <strong>of</strong> expansion, good hightemperature mechanical properties, and excellentthermal management potentials among others [3-5].Aluminium based matrices also have the advantagethat they are the cheapest among other competingmatrix materials (Copper, Titanium, Magnesium) formetal matrix composites (MMCs) development; andalso are amenable to processing using techniquesconventionally suited for the production <strong>of</strong> metals andalloys [6,7].The unique properties <strong>of</strong> AMCs are derivedfrom the material characteristics <strong>of</strong> both the matrixand the reinforcing phases [8]. The reinforcementsare responsible for the improved mechanical, wear,and high temperature properties <strong>of</strong> the AMCs [9-10]. Thus the type <strong>of</strong> reinforcement andreinforcement parameters such as size, volumefraction, distribution, shape, and orientation <strong>of</strong>tenaffect significantly the properties <strong>of</strong> AMCs [11].The use <strong>of</strong> cheaper source <strong>of</strong> reinforcements suchas industrial wastes (fly ash, red mud) [12-13] andagro wastes (rice husk ash, bamboo leaf ash,coconut shell ash) [14-15] for AMCs developmentis gaining popularity considering its advantage insolid waste recycling which has been a cause formajor concern over the years. Additional to theadvantages <strong>of</strong> low cost, availability in largequantities, and contributions to creation <strong>of</strong> a moreeco-friendly environment; is lower densities whichmost <strong>of</strong> the agro and industrial wastes possess in160 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


comparison with the synthetic reinforcements suchas silicon carbide (SiC) and alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) [16].The properties achieved with the sole utilization <strong>of</strong>these cheaper source reinforcements have beenreported to be lower than that <strong>of</strong> the syntheticreinforced but with promise for use in semistructuraland thermal management applications[17]. The use <strong>of</strong> hybrid reinforcements utilizingSiC/Al 2 O 3 and agro waste ashes as a means <strong>of</strong>improving the properties <strong>of</strong> AMCs has attractedinterest recently with very encouraging resultsobtained [18-19].The present work is aimed at investigating theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the weight ratios <strong>of</strong> rice husk ash andsilicon carbide on the mechanical behaviourAluminium matrix hybrid composites having variedweight percent <strong>of</strong> both reinforcements. Themotivation for this work is to establish optimumRHA/SiC weight ratios required to achieveoptimized performance <strong>of</strong> low cost AMCs developedwith the use <strong>of</strong> rice husk. Literatures on the use <strong>of</strong>synthetic/agrowaste hybrid reinforcements forAMCs development are still very limited and there iscurrently none that the authors are aware <strong>of</strong> thatdiscusses the use <strong>of</strong> RHA and SiC as hybridcomposites in Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix.2. MATERIALS AND METHOD2.1 MaterialsAl-Mg-Si alloy billets with chemicalcomposition determined using spark spectrometricanalysis (Table 1) was selected as Aluminiummatrix for this investigation.Table 1. Elemental composition <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy.Elementwt%Si 0.4002Fe 0.2201Cu 0.008Mn 0.0109Mg 0.3961Cr 0.0302Zn 0.0202Ti 0.0125Ni 0.0101Sn 0.0021Pb 0.0011Ca 0.0015Cd 0.0003Na 0.0009V 0.0027Al 98.88For the hybrid reinforcing phases, siliconcarbide (SiC) and rice husk ash (RHA) wereselected. The silicon carbide procured was <strong>of</strong> highchemical purity with average particle size <strong>of</strong> 28µmwhile rice husks utilized for the processing <strong>of</strong> ricehusk ash was obtained from Igbemo-Ekiti, EkitiState (a rice producing community in south westernNigeria). Magnesium for improving wettabilitybetween the Al-Mg-Si alloy and the reinforcementswas also procured.2.2 Preparation <strong>of</strong> Rice Husk AshThe procedure adopted is in accordance withAlaneme et al [16]. It involves the use <strong>of</strong> a simplemetallic drum with perforations as burner for therice husk. Dry rice husks placed inside the drumwas ignited with the use <strong>of</strong> charcoal. The husk wasallowed to burn completely and the ashes removed24 hours later. The ash was then heat-treated at atemperature <strong>of</strong> 650 o C for 180 minutes to reduce itscarbonaceous and volatile constituents. Sieving <strong>of</strong>the bamboo leaf ash was then performed using asieve shaker to obtain ashes with mesh size under50µm. The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the rice huskash from this process is presented in Table 2.Table 2. Chemical Composition <strong>of</strong> the Rice Husk AshCompound/Element (constituent) weight PercentSilica (SiO 2 ) 91.59Carbon, C 4.8Calcium oxide CaO 1.58Magnesium oxide, MgO 0.53Potassium oxide, K 2 O 0.39Haematite, Fe 2 O 3 0.21Sodium, NatraceTitanium oxide, TiO 2 0.202.3 Composites ProductionTwo step stir casting process was utilized toproduce the composites [20]. The process startedwith the determination <strong>of</strong> the quantities <strong>of</strong> rice huskash (RHA) and silicon carbide (SiC) required toproduce 5, 7.5, and 10 wt% reinforcementconsisting <strong>of</strong> RHA and SiC in weight ratios 0:1,1:3, 1:1, 3:1, and 1:0 respectively (which amountsto 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% RHA in thereinforcement phase). The rice husk ash and siliconcarbide particles were initially preheated separatelyat a temperature <strong>of</strong> 250 o C to eliminate dampnessand improve wettability with the molten Al-Mg-Sialloy. The Al-Mg-Si alloy billets were charged intoa gas-fired crucible furnace (fitted with atemperature probe), and heated to a temperature <strong>of</strong>750 o C ± 30 o C (above the liquidus temperature <strong>of</strong>the alloy) to ensure the alloy melts completely. Theliquid alloy was then cooled in the furnace to asemi solid state at a temperature <strong>of</strong> about 600 o C.The preheated rice husk ash and SiC particles alongwith 0.1 wt% magnesium were then charged into13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 161


the semi-solid melt at this temperature (600 o C) andstirring <strong>of</strong> the slurry was performed manually for 5-10 minutes. The composite slurry was thensuperheated to 800 o C± 50 o C and a second stirringperformed using a mechanical stirrer. The stirringoperation was performed at a speed <strong>of</strong> 400rpm for10minutes before casting into prepared sandmoulds inserted with chills. The designations usedto represent each grade <strong>of</strong> the composites producedare presented in Table 3.Table 3. Composite Density and Estimated Percent Porosity.Sample CompositionDesignation RHA: SiCTheoreticaldensity(g/cm 3 )Experimentaldensity(g/cm 3 )%PorosityA0 0 wt% 2.700 2.655 1.675wt%B1 A (0:1) 2.721 2.700 0.77B2 B (1:3) 2.691 2.650 1.52B3 C (1:1) 2.660 2.640 0.75B4 D (3:1) 2.630 2.590 1.52B5 E (1:0) 2.599 2.579 0.777.5 wt%C1 A (0:1) 2.733 2.670 2.31C2 B (1:3) 2.689 2.640 1.82C3 C (1:1) 2.640 2.590 1.89C4 D (3:1) 2.595 2.570 0.96C5 E (1:0) 2.550 2.510 1.5710 wt%D1 A (0:1) 2.743 2.690 1.9D2 B (1:3) 2.680 2.650 1.11D3 C (1:1) 2.620 2.610 0.3D4 D (3:1) 2.560 2.50 2.34D5 E (1:0) 2.500 2.497 0.122.4 Density MeasurementThe experimental density <strong>of</strong> each grade <strong>of</strong>composite produced was determined by dividingthe measured weight <strong>of</strong> a test sample by itsmeasured volume; while the theoretical density wasevaluated by using the formula:ρ Al-Mg-Si / RHA-SiCp = wt. Al-Mg-Si × ρ Al-Mg-Si + wt. RHA ×ρ RHA + wt. SiC × ρ SiC (2.1)where, ρ Al-Mg-Si / RHA-SiCp = Density <strong>of</strong> Composite,wt. Al-Mg-Si = Weight fraction <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy, ρ Al-Mg-Si = Density <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloy, wt. RHA = Weightfraction RHA, ρ RHA = Density <strong>of</strong> RHA, wt. SiC =Weight fraction SiC, and ρ SiC = Density <strong>of</strong> SiC.The experimental densities were compared withthe theoretical densities for each composition <strong>of</strong> theRHA-SiC reinforced composites produced; and itserved as basis for evaluation <strong>of</strong> the percentporosity <strong>of</strong> the composites using the relations [20]:% porosity = {(ρ T – ρ EX ) ÷ ρ T } × 100% (2.2)Where, ρ T = Theoretical Density (g/cm 3 ), ρ EX =Experimental Density (g/cm 3 ).2.5 Tensile PropertiesThe tensile properties <strong>of</strong> the composites wasevaluated with the aid <strong>of</strong> tensile tests performedfollowing the specifications <strong>of</strong> ASTM 8M-91standards [21]. The samples for the test weremachined to round specimen configuration with 6mm diameter and 30 mm gauge length. The testwas carried out at room temperature using anInstron universal testing machine operated at astrain rate <strong>of</strong> 10 -3 /s. Three repeat tests wereperformed for each grade <strong>of</strong> composite produced toguarantee repeatability and reliability <strong>of</strong> the datagenerated. The tensile properties evaluated from thestress-strain curves developed from the tension testare - the ultimate tensile strength (σ u ), the 0.2% <strong>of</strong>fsetyield strength (σ y ), and the strain to fracture (ε f ).2.6 Fracture Toughness EvaluationThe fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> the composites wasevaluated using circumferential notch tensile (CNT)specimens [22]. Samples for the CNT testing weremachined having gauge length, specimen diameter(D), notch diameter (d), and notch angle <strong>of</strong> 30, 6,4.5mm, and 60 o respectively. The specimens werethen subjected to tensile loading to fracture usingan Instron universal testing machine. The fractureload (P f ) obtained from the load – extension plotsgenerated from the CNT testing were used toevaluate the fracture toughness using the empiricalrelations by Dieter [23]:K 1C =P f /(D) 3/2 [1.72(D/d)–1.27] (2.3)where, D and d are respectively the specimendiameter and the diameter <strong>of</strong> the notched section.The validity <strong>of</strong> the fracture toughness valuesobtained was determined using the relations inaccordance with Nath and Das [24]:D ≥ (K 1C /σ y ) 2 (2.4)Three repeat tests were performed for eachcomposite composition and the results obtainedwere taken to be highly consistent if the differencebetween measured values for a given compositecomposition is not more than 2%.2.7 Microstructural ExaminationA JSM 7600F Jeol ultra-high resolution fieldemission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) equipped with an EDS was used for detailedmicrostructural study and for determination <strong>of</strong> theelemental compositions <strong>of</strong> the composites.162 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3.1 MicrostructureFigure 1 shows some representative SEMmicrographs <strong>of</strong> the RHA - SiC reinforced AMCsproduced. It is observed that there is a good dispersion<strong>of</strong> the RHA and SiC particulates in the Al alloy matrixand little particle clusters are observed. Thus there isno significant problem <strong>of</strong> segregation orsedimentation which <strong>of</strong>ten occurs duringsolidification <strong>of</strong> MMCs having components withdifferent densities and wettability characteristics [25].(d)(a)(e)Figure 1. showing (a) SE image <strong>of</strong> the Al-Mg-Si/5 wt%SiC composite showing the SiC particles dispersed in theAl-Mg-Si matrix; (b) SE image <strong>of</strong> the 5 wt% hybridreinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composite havingRHA:SiC weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:3; (c) SE image <strong>of</strong> the 7.5wt% hybrid reinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC compositehaving RHA:SiC weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:3; (d) SE image <strong>of</strong> the10 wt% hybrid reinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC compositehaving RHA:SiC weight ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:3; and(e) SE image <strong>of</strong>the Al-Mg-Si/10 wt% RHA composite showing the RHAparticles dispersed in the Al-Mg-Si matrix.(b)(c)This shows that the two step stir casting processadopted for the production <strong>of</strong> the composites isreliable judging from the microstructures examinedin Figure 1.The EDS pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the particulates in thecomposites produced, some <strong>of</strong> which are presentedin Figures 2 and 3; show peaks <strong>of</strong> aluminium (Al),oxygen (O), carbon (C), iron (Fe), silicon (Si),calcium (Ca), sodium (Na) and magnesium (Mg).The presence <strong>of</strong> these elements confirm the presence<strong>of</strong> SiC; as well as silica (SiO 2 ), alumina (Al 2 O 3 ),Potassium oxide (K 2 O), ferric oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ), andMagnesium oxide (MgO) which are constituentsderived from the rice husk ash (Table 2).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 163


(a)(b)Figure 2. Showing (a) representative SEPhotomicrograph showing the reinforcing particlesdispersed in the Al-Mg-Si matrix; and (b) EDS pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong>the particle in 2(a) confirming the presence <strong>of</strong> Al 2 O 3 ,SiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 , K 2 O, CaO, SiC and Na.(a)3.2 Composite Density and Estimated PercentPorosityThe results <strong>of</strong> the composite densities andestimated percent porosity are presented in Table 3.It is observed from the results that the estimatedporosity values are not dependent on the weightpercent <strong>of</strong> the reinforcement phase or the weightratio <strong>of</strong> RHA to SiC. It is however noted that theestimated porosity levels are less than 4 % whichhas been reported to be the maximum permissiblein cast AMCs [26]. The low porosity levels <strong>of</strong> thecomposites supports our submission that the twostep stir casting method adopted for producing thecomposites is reliable. As a result <strong>of</strong> the lowerdensity <strong>of</strong> RHA (0.31 g/cm 3 ) in comparison to SiC(3.6 g/cm 3 ), it is expected that the density <strong>of</strong> thecomposites will reduce with increase in the RHAcontent in the composite as observed from Table 3.3.3 Mechanical BehaviourThe variation <strong>of</strong> tensile strength and yieldstrength <strong>of</strong> the composites produced is presented inFigure 4. It is observed that there is a generalincrease in tensile strength (Figure 4a) and yieldstrength (Figure 4b) with increase in weight percent<strong>of</strong> the RHA-SiC hybrid reinforcement. However,for specific weight percents <strong>of</strong> the hybridcomposites (that is B, C, and D series), it is notedthat the tensile and yield strength decreases withincrease in the weight proportion <strong>of</strong> RHA in theRHA-SiC reinforcement. For the compositescontaining 5 wt% <strong>of</strong> the reinforcing phase, it isobserved that 4.9, 8.9, 12.5, and 15.8 % reductionin tensile strength was obtained from thecomposites with weight ratio RHA:SiC <strong>of</strong> 1:3, 1:1,3:1, and 1:0 (that is containing 25, 50, 75, and 100% RHA) in comparison to the 5 wt% SiC singlereinforced Al matrix composite. For the compositescontaining 7.5 wt% <strong>of</strong> the reinforcing phase,reductions <strong>of</strong> 5, 9, 13.4, and 19 % were observedfor the compositions <strong>of</strong> 1:3, 1:1, 3:1, 1:0 RHA:SiCweight ratios respectively (in comparison with the7.5 wt% SiC single reinforced composite). In thecase <strong>of</strong> the composites containing 10 wt%reinforcements, reductions <strong>of</strong> 4, 8.1, 13.2, and 18.3% was observed in comparison to the 10 wt % SiCsingle reinforced Al matrix composite.(b)Figure 3. Showing (a) representative SEPhotomicrograph <strong>of</strong> some clustered particles dispersed inthe Al-Mg-Si matrix; and (b): EDS pr<strong>of</strong>ile the particlesidentified in 3(a) confirming the presence <strong>of</strong> Al 2 O 3 ,SiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 , SiC, Cao, and Na which are constituentsfrom the RHA-SiC hybrid reinforcement.164 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


(a)(b)Figure 4. Showing (a) variation <strong>of</strong> tensile strength forthe monolithic Al-Mg-Si alloy, single reinforced andhybrid reinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composites; and(b) variation <strong>of</strong> yield strength for the monolithic Al-Mg-Si alloy, single reinforced and hybrid reinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composites.It has been well reported that particle reinforcedAMCs achieve improved strength due to loadtransfer from the matrix to the particles (directstrengthening) and creation <strong>of</strong> more dislocationswhich serve as constraints to plastic deformation bythermal mismatch between the particles and theAluminium matrix arising from their differences incoefficient <strong>of</strong> thermal expansion (indirectstrengthening) [27-28]. Thus even in a scenariowhere the particles are not sufficiently strong toinduce strengthening via the ‘direct route’ <strong>of</strong> loadtransfer from matrix to particles, the indirectstrengthening it could <strong>of</strong>fer is adequate to inducesome strength improvements well and above that <strong>of</strong>the monolithic alloy. In the present case underinvestigation, the reduction in strength observedwith increase in the RHA content <strong>of</strong> the compositesis as a result <strong>of</strong> the decrease <strong>of</strong> the directstrengthening capacity <strong>of</strong> RHA which containspredominantly silica. Silica is noted to be a s<strong>of</strong>terceramic with elastic modulus <strong>of</strong> 60-70 GPa, whichis within the range <strong>of</strong> Aluminium unlike SiC whichhas an elastic modulus <strong>of</strong> 400GPa. Thus theefficiency <strong>of</strong> load transfer from the Al matrix to theparticles (load carrying capacity) <strong>of</strong> the hybridparticulates will be dependent on the amount <strong>of</strong> SiCthan RHA. However, it should be noted that samplesB5, C5, and D5 which contain only RHA, show aprogressive increase in tensile strength and yieldstrength with the increased weight percent <strong>of</strong> RHAsupporting our hypothesis that the indirectstrengthening mechanism (which entails dislocationgeneration results in higher dislocation densities withincreased weight percent <strong>of</strong> the particles) can resultin modest improvement in strength with increase inthe weight percent <strong>of</strong> the reinforcing particles.The variation <strong>of</strong> the specific strength <strong>of</strong> thecomposites produced with weight ratio <strong>of</strong> RHA/SiCis presented in Figure 5. It is observed that thespecific strengths <strong>of</strong> the composites generallyincreased with increase in the weight percent <strong>of</strong> thereinforcing phase (that is RHA-SiC weightpercent). Also the specific strength values decreaseswith increase in the RHA content in the hybridreinforcement. However, the % decrease in specificstrength <strong>of</strong> the composites is generally lower incomparison with that <strong>of</strong> the ultimate tensile strengthanalyzed earlier. For the 5 wt% compositions, it isobserved that 3.1, 6.8, 8.75, and 11.9 % reductionin specific strength is obtained. For the 7.5 wt %compositions (grades) 3.93, 6.2, 10 and 13.9 %reductions were obtained. In the case <strong>of</strong> the 10 wt%grade, 2.6, 5.3, 6.54, and 11.9 % reductions wereobtained. The results show that the composites withcomposition <strong>of</strong> 1:3 weight ratio RHA:SiC (25%RHA: 75% SiC) can <strong>of</strong>fer comparable specificstrength values at reduced cost <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> thecomposite since its difference is less than 4 % for thethree weight percents <strong>of</strong> reinforcement worked on.Figure 5. Variation <strong>of</strong> specific strength for themonolithic Al-Mg-Si alloy, single reinforced and hybridreinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composites.The results <strong>of</strong> the variation <strong>of</strong> strain to fracture<strong>of</strong> the composites with weight percentreinforcement and weight ratio RHA/SiC ispresented in Figure 6. It is observed that there is ageneral decrease in ductility <strong>of</strong> the composites withincrease in the weight percent <strong>of</strong> reinforcing phase13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 165


in the composites. Closer observation show that foreach weight percent <strong>of</strong> hybrid compositesproduced, the strain to fracture was invariant to theweight ratio <strong>of</strong> RHA/SiC. It can be inferred fromthe results that the ductility levels <strong>of</strong> the hybridcomposites is not compromised by the addition <strong>of</strong>RHA in the hybrid compositions. Thus its capacityto sustain plastic strain without fracture is notimpelled by the addition <strong>of</strong> RHA.particles like most hard and brittle ceramic particleshave a higher tendency to undergo rapid crackpropagation [32].Figure 7. Variation <strong>of</strong> Fracture Toughness for themonolithic Al-Mg-Si alloy, single reinforced and hybridreinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composites.4. CONCLUSIONSFigure 6. Variation <strong>of</strong> strain to fracture for themonolithic Al-Mg-Si alloy, single reinforced and hybridreinforced Al-Mg-Si/RHA-SiC composites.The fracture toughness values determined by theuse <strong>of</strong> circumferential notched tensile (CNT)specimens are presented in Figure 7. The valuesobtained were reported as plain strain fracturetoughness because the conditions for valid K 1C(plain strain condition) was met with the specimendiameter <strong>of</strong> 6mm when the relation D ≥ (K 1C /σ y ) 2[24] was utilised to validate the results obtainedfrom the CNT testing. It is observed that thefracture toughness decreases with increase in theweight percent <strong>of</strong> the composites. But for specificweight percents <strong>of</strong> the composites (that is B, C, andD series) it is observed that the compositecompositions containing RHA had improvedfracture toughness results compared with the singleSiC reinforced grades <strong>of</strong> the composites. Thus theaddition <strong>of</strong> RHA appears to be beneficial in terms<strong>of</strong> improving the resistance to crack propagation <strong>of</strong>the composites making them slightly lesssusceptible to sudden crack failure in comparisonwith the single reinforced SiC composite grades.The mechanism <strong>of</strong> fracture in particle reinforced Almatrix composites have been reported by severalauthors [29-30]. The primary mechanisms <strong>of</strong>fracture have been reported to be facilitated by oneor a combination <strong>of</strong> particle cracking, interfacialcracking or particle debonding [31]. In the presentcase, the improved fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> thecomposites containing RHA, is most likely due tothe reduced amount <strong>of</strong> relatively harder and brittleSiC particles in the composites [19]. The SiCThe mechanical behaviour <strong>of</strong> Al-Mg-Si alloymatrix composites containing 5, 7.5, and 10 weightpercent <strong>of</strong> RHA and SiC reinforcements prepared inweight ratios 0:1, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1, and 1:0 respectivelywas investigated. The results show that:1. The estimated porosity values are notdependent on the weight percent <strong>of</strong> thereinforcement phase or the weight ratio <strong>of</strong>RHA to SiC. They were however less than2.5 % in all grades produced.2. There is a general increase in tensile strength,and yield strength with increase in weightpercent <strong>of</strong> the RHA-SiC hybridreinforcement. However, the tensile andyield strength decreases with increase in theweight proportion <strong>of</strong> RHA in the RHA-SiCreinforcement.3. The specific strength followed the same trendas the tensile and yield strengths; however,the % decrease in specific strength <strong>of</strong> thecomposites is generally lower in comparisonwith that <strong>of</strong> the ultimate tensile strength. Thecomposites with composition <strong>of</strong> 1:3 weightratio RHA to SiC (25% RHA: 75% SiC)<strong>of</strong>fers comparable specific strength valueswith the SiC single reinforced grades <strong>of</strong> thecomposite.4. There is a general decrease in ductility <strong>of</strong> thecomposites with increase in the weightpercent <strong>of</strong> reinforcing phase in thecomposites. However, the strain to fracturewas invariant to the weight ratio <strong>of</strong>RHA/SiC.5. The fracture toughness decreases withincrease in the weight percent <strong>of</strong> the166 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


composites. But the composite compositionscontaining RHA had improved fracturetoughness compared with the single SiCreinforced grades.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe electron microscopy assistance rendered byDr. P. A. Olubambi <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Chemicaland Metallurgical Engineering, Tshwane University<strong>of</strong> Technology, South Africa is appreciated.REFERENCES[1] S.D. Prasad, R.A. Krishna: Production andMechanical Properties <strong>of</strong> A356.2 /RHAComposites, International Journal <strong>of</strong> AdvancedScience and Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 51-58, 2011.[2] H. Zuhailawati, P. Samayamutthirian, C.H. MohdHaizu: Fabrication <strong>of</strong> Low Cost Aluminium MatrixComposite Reinforced with Silica Sand, Journal <strong>of</strong>Physical Science, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 47-55, 2007.[3] T.V. Christy, N. Murugan, S. Kumar: Acomparative study on the microstructures andmechanical properties <strong>of</strong> Al 6061 alloy and theMMC Al 6061/TiB2/12p, Journal <strong>of</strong> Minerals andMaterials Characterization and Engineering, Vol.9, No. 1, pp. 57-65, 2010.[4] P.K. Rohatgi, B.F. Schultz, A. Daoud, W.W.Zhang: Tribological performance <strong>of</strong> A206aluminum alloy containing silica sand particles,Tribol Int, Vol. 43, pp. 455–66, 2010.[5] K.K. Alaneme, M. O. Bodunrin: Corrosionbehaviour <strong>of</strong> alumina reinforced Al (6063) metalmatrix composites, Journal <strong>of</strong> Minerals andMaterials Characterisation and Engineering, Vol.10, No. 2, pp. 1153-1165, 2011.[6] P. Rohatgi, B. Schultz: Light weight metal matrixcomposites – stretching the boundaries <strong>of</strong> metals,Materials Matters, Vol. 2, pp. 16-19, 2007.[7] D.B. Miracle: Metal matrix composites - fromscience to technological significance, CompositesScience and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 15/16, pp.2526-2540, 2005.[8] K.K. Alaneme: Influence <strong>of</strong> Thermo-mechanicalTreatment on the Tensile Behaviour and CNTevaluated Fracture Toughness <strong>of</strong> Borax premixedSiCp reinforced Aluminium (6063) Composites,International Journal <strong>of</strong> Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 96-100, 2012.[9] T. Senthilvelan, S. Gopalakannan, S.Vishnuvarthan, K. Keerthivaran: Fabrication andCharacterization <strong>of</strong> SiC, Al 2 O 3 and B 4 CReinforced Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy (AA 7075) MetalMatrix Composites: A Study, Advanced MaterialsResearch, Vol. 622-623, pp. 1295-1299, 2012.[10] S.A. Sajjadi, H.R. Ezatpour, H. Beygi:Microstructure and mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> Al–Al 2 O 3 micro and nano composites fabricated bystir casting. Materials Science and Engineering A,Vol. 528, pp. 8765-8771, 2011.[11] S. Tahamtan, A. Halvaee, M. Emamy, M.S Zabihi:Fabrication <strong>of</strong> Al/A206-Al 2 O 3 nano/microcomposite by combining ball milling and stircasting technology, Materials and Design 2013,DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.032.[12] P. Naresh: Development and characterization <strong>of</strong>metal matrix composite using red Mud anindustrial waste for wear resistant applications,PhD Thesis, Department <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, National Institute <strong>of</strong> TechnologyRourkela, India, 23 – 34, 2006.[13] J. Bienia, M. Walczak, B. Surowska B, J.Sobczaka: Microstructure and corrosionbehaviour <strong>of</strong> aluminium fly ash composites,Journal <strong>of</strong> Optoelectronics and AdvancedMaterials, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 493-502, 2003.[14] P.B. Madakson, D.S. Yawas, A. Apasi:Characterization <strong>of</strong> Coconut Shell Ash forPotential Utilization in Metal Matrix Compositesfor Automotive Applications, International Journal<strong>of</strong> Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST),Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 1190-1198, 2012.[15] S.D. Prasad, R.A. Krishna: TribologicalProperties <strong>of</strong> A356.2/RHA Composites, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 4,pp. 367-372, 2012.[16] K.K. Alaneme, I.B. Akintunde, P.A. Olubambi,T.M. Adewale: Mechanical Behaviour <strong>of</strong> RiceHusk Ash – Alumina Hybrid ReinforcedAluminium Based Matrix Composites, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Research and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1,pp. 60-67, 2013.[17] R. Escalera-Lozano, C. Gutierrez, M.A. Pech-Canul, M.I. Pech-Canul: Degradation <strong>of</strong> Al/SiCpComposites produced with Rice-Hull Ash andAluminium Cans, Waste Management, Vol. 28, pp.389-395, 2008.[18] K.K. Alaneme, P.A. Olubambi: Corrosion andWear Behaviour <strong>of</strong> Rice Husk Ash – AluminaReinforced Aluminium Matrix Hybrid Composites,Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Research and Technology,2013 (In Press).[19] K.K. Alaneme, E.O. Adewuyi: MechanicalBehaviour <strong>of</strong> Bamboo Leaf Ash – Alumina HybridReinforced Aluminium Based Matrix Composites,Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Serbia,2013 (In Press).[20] K.K. Alaneme, A.O. Aluko: Production and agehardeningbehaviour <strong>of</strong> borax pre-mixed SiCreinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy composites developedby double stir casting technique, The West IndianJournal <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1/2, pp. 80-85, 2012.[21] ASTM E 8M: Standard Test Method for TensionTesting <strong>of</strong> Metallic Materials (Metric), AnnualBook <strong>of</strong> ASTM Standards, Philadelphia; 1991.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 167


[22] K.K. Alaneme: Fracture toughness (K 1C ) evaluationfor dual phase low alloy steels using circumferentialnotched tensile (CNT) specimens, MaterialsResearch, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 155-160, 2011.[23] G.E. Dieter: Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, Singapore; 1988.[24] S.K. Nath, U.K. Das: Effect <strong>of</strong> microstructure andnotches on the fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> mediumcarbon steel, Journal <strong>of</strong> Naval Architecture andMarine Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 15-22, 2006.[25] B.F. Schultz, J.B. Ferguson, P.K. Rohatgi:Microstructure and hardness <strong>of</strong> Al 2 O 3nanoparticle reinforced Al–Mg compositesfabricated by reactive wetting and stir mixing,Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 530,pp. 87-97, 2011.[26] M. Kok: Production and mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>Al 2 O 3 particle reinforced 2024 aluminiumcomposites, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials ProcessingTechnology, Vol. 16, pp. 381-387, 2005.[27] K.K. Alaneme KK, A.O. Aluko: FractureToughness (K1C) and Tensile Properties <strong>of</strong> As-Cast and Age-Hardened Aluminium (6063) –Silicon Carbide Particulate Composites, ScientiaIranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering(Elsevier), Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 992-996, 2012.[28] N. Chawla, Y. Shen: Mechanical behaviour <strong>of</strong>particle reinforced metal matrix composites,Advanced Engineering Materials, Vol. 3, No. 6,pp. 357-370, 2001.[29] M.T. Milan, P. Bowen: Tensile and fracturetoughness properties <strong>of</strong> SiCp reinforced Al alloys:Effects <strong>of</strong> particle size, particle volume fractionand matrix strength, Journal <strong>of</strong> MaterialsEngineering and Performance, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp.775-783, 2004.[30] M.M. Ranjbaran: Low fracture toughness in Al7191-20% SiCp aluminium matrix composite,European Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research, Vol. 41,No. 2, pp. 261-272, 2010.[31] K.K. Alaneme: Mechanical Behaviour <strong>of</strong> ColdDeformed and Solution Heat-treated AluminaReinforced AA 6063 Composites, The West IndianJournal <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 31-35,2013.[32] Fracture Mechanics <strong>of</strong> Ceramics, Vol. 13 – Crack-Microstructure Interaction, R – Curve Behaviour,Editors (Bradt RC, Munz D, Sakai M,Schevchenko V Ya, White KW, Springer, FirstEdition, pp. 538, 2002.168 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF NANOMETRIC ATOMICLAYER DEPOSITIONS APPLIED ON AISI 420 STAINLESSSTEELE. Marin 1 , A.Lanzutti 1 ,L.Fedrizzi 11 University <strong>of</strong> Udine, Department <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Via del Cotonificio 108, 33100 Udine Italy,elia.marin@uniud.itAbstract: Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) is a modern technique that allows to deposit nanometric,conformal coatings on almost any kind <strong>of</strong> substrate, from plastics to ceramic, metals or even composites.ALD coatings are not dependent on the morphology <strong>of</strong> the substrate and are only regulated by thecomposition <strong>of</strong> the precursors, the chamber temperature and the number <strong>of</strong> cycles.In this work, mono- and bi-layer nanometric, protective low-temperature ALD coatings, based on Al2O3 andTiO2, were applied on AISI 420 Stainless Steel in order to enhance its relatively low corrosion resistance inchloride containing environments. Tribological testing were also performed on the ALD coated AISI 420 inorder to evaluate the wear and scratch resistance <strong>of</strong> these nanometric layers and thus evaluate theirdurability.Scratch tests were performed using a standard Rockwell C indenter, under a variable load condition, inorder to evaluate the critical loading condition for each coating. Wear testing were performed using astainless steel counterpart, in ball-on-disc configuration, in order to measure the friction coefficient and toconfront the wear resistance. All scratch tests scars and wear tracks were then observed by means <strong>of</strong>Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in order to understand the wear mechanisms that occurred on thesample surfaces.Corrosion testing, performed under immersion in 0.2 M NaCl solutions, clearly showed that the ALDcoatings have a strong effect in protecting the Stainless Steel substrate against corrosion, reducing thecorrosion current density by two orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude.The preliminary tribological results showed that ALD depositions obtained at low temperatures have abrittle behavior caused by the amorphous nature <strong>of</strong> their structure, and thus undergo delaminationphenomena during Scratch Testing at relatively low applied loads. During ball-on-disc testing, the coatingswere removed from the substrate, in particular for monolayer ALD configurations, which seem to have alower toughness when compared to bi-layer configurations..Keywords: Atomic Layer Deposition, Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , wear, AISI 420, Stainless Steel, Scratch Test, Ball-on-disc1. INTRODUCTIONMartensitic stainless steels are widely used for awide range <strong>of</strong> applications, mainly due to theirbalanced properties, as they couple relativelymicrohardness, mechanical resistance and corrosionresistance in many aggressive environments [1].For these reasons, martensitic stainless steels arenowadays applied for: knife blades [2], oil and gas[3], <strong>of</strong>fshore platforms [4], turbine blades [5],components subject to abrasive wear at relativelyhigh temperature or aggressive environments [6].Even so, stainless steels could show insufficientcorrosion resistance in strongly aggressive mediacontaining Cl - and S 2- ions, at high temperature orvery high / low pH values [7]. For these reasons, inparticular circumstances Stainless Steels may needa further improvement <strong>of</strong> corrosion protection.Conventional treatments, such as painting, are13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 169


hardly applicable to Stainless Steel due to adhesionproblems between paint and the metal substrate [8].A great number <strong>of</strong> innovative treatments arenowadays under intensive study to improveStainless Steel corrosion resistance, such as plasmadetonation techniques [9], arc-ion plating [10], solgeldeposition [11], chemical conversion layers <strong>of</strong>cerium [12] chromium [13] or other elements,Chemical Vapor Deposition [14], High-VelocityOxy-fuel Spray (HVOF) [15], plasma-nitriding[16], and Atomic Layer Deposition [17]. All thesetechniques may also be applied in order to improvethe tribological resistance <strong>of</strong> the substrate, as theygrant higher hardness and wear abrasion whencompared to stainless steel or other commonmetallic alloys [18-20].The modern concept <strong>of</strong> ALD is an extension <strong>of</strong>the ALE (Atomic Layer Epitaxy), patented by Pr<strong>of</strong>.Suntola [21]. Suntola’s studies were mainly focusedon switching effects in chalcogenide nanometricfilms for solid state electronic devices [22][23][24],and lately extended to a wide range <strong>of</strong> amorphoussemi-conductive thin films [25]. ALD (as ALE)process involves a sequence <strong>of</strong> self-limiting surfacereactions. As evidenced in 1980 by Ahonen et al.[26], the self-limiting characteristic <strong>of</strong> each reactionstep differentiates ALE and ALD from otherchemical vapor deposition technolnologies. In ALDeach deposition cycle is clearly divided in foursteps: in the first step a precursor is injected in thedeposition chamber. The precursor is chosen so thatits molecules will not react with each other at thedeposition temperature. In ideal situations, a singlemonolayer is thus formed as a result <strong>of</strong> the reactionwith the substrate. In the second step, the chamberis purged with nitrogen or argon gas in order toremove the excess <strong>of</strong> reactant and prevent“parasitic” CVD deposition on the substrate, whichwill eventually occur if two different precursors arepresent in the deposition chamber at the same time.In the third step, the second precursor is injected inthe chamber. In the case <strong>of</strong> metal oxide layers, thisis an oxidant agent, usually simple H 2 O. The laststep <strong>of</strong> the deposition cycle is a second purge toremove the excess <strong>of</strong> reactant with purging gas.Closed-loop repetitions <strong>of</strong> the four basic stepstheoretically allow obtaining perfectly conformaldeposits <strong>of</strong> any desired thickness. By avoiding thecontact between the precursors throughout thewhole coating process, a film growth at atomiclayer control, with a thickness control within ~ 10pm, can be obtained.Interest in ALD has increased stepwise in themid-1990’s and 2000’s, with the interest focused onsilicon-based microelectronics [27]. Up to thepresent time, ALD processes have been used todeposit several types <strong>of</strong> nanometric films, includingseveral chemical compounds (e.g. AsGa, CdSe,…),metal oxides (e.g. Al 2 O 3 , CaO, CuO, Er 2 O 3 , Ga 2 O 3 ,HfO 2 , La 2 O 3 , MgO, Nb 2 O 5 , Sc 2 O 3 , SiO2, Ta 2 O 5 ,TiO 2 , Y 2 O 3 , Yb 2 O 3 , ZnO, ZrO 2 ), nitrides (e.g. TiN,TaN, AlN, GaN, WN, NbN), sulfides (e.g. SrS,ZnS), carbides (e.g. TaC, TiC), fluorides (e.g.CaF2, LaF 3 , MgF 2 ), pure metals (e.g. Ru, Ir, Ta,Pt), biomaterials (e.g. hydroxyapatite(Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 )) and even polymers (e.g.Polyimides) [28,29].Results on the corrosion protection on stainlesssteel by ALD TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 layers were alreadyobtained by Matero et al. (1999)[29], whichsupposed that the conformal ALD coatings couldimprove the corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> different metalalloys. In 2007, Shan et al. [30] used TiO2 ALDlayers to protect an undefined stainless steel,obtaining only a limited effect. In 2011, Marin et al.[31], Diaz et al. [17] and Potts et al. [32] clearlyshowed that the residual porosity <strong>of</strong> ALD layersdecreases increasing the thickness <strong>of</strong> the layer thusimproving the protection <strong>of</strong> the substrate. In mostcases [31,17,32, 33] the nanometric ALD layersclearly showed a corrosion protection similar, if notsuperior to conventional protective technolniquesand thicker coatings, even if common industrialtests (salt spray) performed on Plasma EnhancedALD by Potts et al. [32] clearly showed a timelimitedcorrosion protection.In this work, characterization <strong>of</strong> ALD coatedAISI 316 L has been carried out, in order todetermine the possible use <strong>of</strong> nanometric ceramicALD coatings for the corrosion and tribologicalprotection <strong>of</strong> stainless steel.2. EXPERIMENTAL2.1 Samples productionDiscs <strong>of</strong> standard AISI 420 martensitic stainlesssteel (chemical composition wt.%: C = 0.035; P


coated and uncoated region after adhesive taperemoval.The ALD coating was deposited using a TFS500 reactor (Beneq Oy, Finland): Al 2 O 3 layers wereobtained using trimethylaluminium (Al(CH 3 ) 3 ) andH2O precursors and TiO 2 layers were obtainedusing titanium tetrachloride (TiCl 4 ) and H 2 Oprecursors. Both depositions were performed at atemperature <strong>of</strong> 120 °C. The low temperatureprocesses were chosen in order to obtain anamorphous structure for both layers. The number <strong>of</strong>precursor cycles for each deposition was calculatedusing a growth rate per cycle (GPC) <strong>of</strong> ~0.1nm/cycle for TiO 2 and a GPC <strong>of</strong> ~0.15 nm/cycle forAl 2 O 3 .The samples were coated using different ALDconfigurations, with an overall coating thickness <strong>of</strong>about 200 nm.2.2 MorphologyMorphological characterization was carried outusing Veeco’s Digital Instrument’s Nanoscope IIIaatomic force microscope (AFM) in tapping modeconfiguration, using a Bruker SCM-PIT tip(Antimony (n) doped Si, frequency: 60-100 kHz,elastic constant: 1-5 N/m, PtIr coated) and CarlZeiss EVO-40 scanning electron microscope (SEM)with an operating voltage <strong>of</strong> 20 kV. Analyses wereperformed on the stainless steel substrate and oncoated samples. In particular, SEM was used inorder to scan the surface <strong>of</strong> the sample andinvestigate the presence <strong>of</strong> deposition defectsand/or surface anomalies. AFM was mainly used toinvestigate the presence <strong>of</strong> surface morphologicaldefects on the coating that were supposed to behardly visible using SEM due to the coatingtransparency. AFM was also used at the interfaceregions between coated and uncoated substrate afteradhesive tape removal in order to obtaininformation about the overall thickness <strong>of</strong> thedeposits and confront it with the theoreticaldeposition rates values and the results obtainedfrom GDOES analyses.2.3 CompositionIn-depth compositional analyses were carriedout using Horiba Yobin-Yvon’s RF – GD Pr<strong>of</strong>ilerGDOES. Due to the difficulties in calibration <strong>of</strong>GDOES for the analysis <strong>of</strong> Titanium andAluminum oxides, only qualitative compositionalanalyses were performed, even if a keen calibrationwas performed in order to obtain reliable singlelayer thickness values. GDOES technolnique isstrongly influenced by surface roughness, whichwas relatively high.2.4 Mechanical propertiesIn order to evaluate the resistance todelamination <strong>of</strong> the different ALD configurations,Vickers indentations were applied to the samplesunder different load conditions (HV0.1-0.2-0.5-1.0-2.0) and the delaminated areas have been thenmeasured using a specific image post-processings<strong>of</strong>tware (Wayne Rasband, ImageJ 1.44p). As allindentation hardness tests, Vickers indentation aredependant from the mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong>the substrate and can only be used to comparedifferent coatings applied on the same substrate andnot results from different substrates. As adhesion isstrictly connected to the surface roughness [33-35],Vickers adhesion tests will give reliable results onlyfor substrates with similar surface finishing.2.5 Electrochemical propertiesElectrochemical characterization <strong>of</strong> the differentsamples was performed using PotendiodynamicPolarizations. An AUTOLAB PGSTAT-20potentiostat was used in a standard three electrodesconfiguration. The reference electrode wasAg/AgCl and the counter electrode was a 99.99%pure Platinum wire. All measurements have beenperformed in a pH 6.5, 0.2 M solution <strong>of</strong> NaCl. Allpolarization curves were obtained using a scanspeed <strong>of</strong> 0.2 mV/s after 10 minutes <strong>of</strong> immersion <strong>of</strong>the samples, in order to stabilize the OCP. Thepotential has been increased from -200 mV respectto the OCP to a measured current density <strong>of</strong> about10-3 A/cm 2 .2.6 Wear propertiesWear properties were investigated using anindustrial CETR UMT tribometer in ball-on-discconfiguration, using a WC counter-material. Weartesting was performed for 1, 10 and 100 cyclesunder dry conditions, at a relatively low rotatingspeed (1 rps) and at different diameters (15 mm, 18mm, 21 mm). After testing, the wear tracks wereobserved using SEM and the volume losses werethen estimated using a stylus pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer.3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS3.1 MorphologySEM resulted to be an inadequate technique forthe analysis <strong>of</strong> ALD layers, since no morphologicaldifferences were found between images obtained oncoated and uncoated regions and no morphologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the ALD layers could be correctly13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 171


esolved using this technique, even at relativelyhigh magnifications, such as 20k or 50k.Figure 2: SEM images <strong>of</strong> Al2O3 coated sampleobtained at 1000 (a) and 5000 (b) magnificationsFigure 1: SEM images <strong>of</strong> Al2O3 coated sampleobtained at 1000 (a) and 5000 (b) magnificationsFig. 1 shows the SEM image obtained on theAl 2 O 3 coated samples, at relatively “low” (fig. 1a)and “high” (fig. 1b) magnifications. It is onlypossible to discriminate the presence <strong>of</strong> scars andscratches caused by the cutting and grinding <strong>of</strong> thestainless steel substrates, while no informationabout the presence <strong>of</strong> the ALD layer could beobtained from these images.Similar results were obtained in the case <strong>of</strong> theAl 2 O 3 /TiO 2 coated samples, at relatively “low” (fig.2a) and “high” (fig. 2b) mangifications. It can beobserved that, even for this sample, only scars andscratches caused by the mechanical cutting andgrinding <strong>of</strong> the sample can be observed.AFM observations gave similar results, withonly scratches and scars clearly visible on themorphological maps obtained. In the case <strong>of</strong> themaps obtained at the interface between coating andsubstrate, they were successfully used in order toestimate the overall coating thickness <strong>of</strong> thedifferent ALD layers (fig. 3).Figure 3: AFM image obtained at the interface betweencoated and uncoated areas <strong>of</strong> the Al 2 O 3 coated sample.The results obtained are resumed in Table 1:Table 1: Coating thickness as obtained by AFMmeasurementsCoatingThicknessµmAl2O3 102± 3Al2O3/TiO2 107 ± 53.2 CompositionGDOES thickness measurement accuracy wasstrongly influenced by the sharpness <strong>of</strong> theinterface region between coating and substrate.Conventionally, in this work the coating thickness172 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


has been measured between the top surface and theintersection point between oxygen and iron signals.Since no reference materials were present foramorphous ceramics, a specific GDOES calibrationwas required. Sputtered crater’s depth wasmeasured using a stylus pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer and thesputtering rate has been evaluated accordingly.Following this calibration GDOES results shall beconsidered semi-quantitative and for this reason thecomposition <strong>of</strong> the coatings and in particular <strong>of</strong>Al2O3 layers is not stoichiometric.Fig. 4 shows the results obtained by GDOES onthe Al 2 O 3 coated sample.be observed up to 100 nm, while the Aluminiumsignals can be observed up to 170 nm.Figure 5: GDOES graph obtained for the Al2O3 coatedsample. Signals <strong>of</strong> Iron, Chromium, Titanium, Oxygenand Aluminum3.3 Mechanical propertiesFigure 4: GDOES graph obtained for the Al2O3 coatedsample. Signals <strong>of</strong> Iron, Chromium, Titanium, Oxygenand AluminumIt can be observed that the interface betweencoating and substrate is not sharp. This is caused bythe relatively high surface roughness obtained afterthe sample preparation. The iron signal, which isconsidered representative for the substrate, reachesa plateau at about 200 nm, which is influenced byboth coating thickness and surface roughness,meaning that, after 200 nm, only substrate signalscan be seen by GDOES. At about 75 nm, the twosignals <strong>of</strong> Iron and Oxygen are even, while at thesurface, both Oxygen and Aluminium show a peak.This behaviour is caused by the substrateroughness, which causes a strong signal overlap.For this reason, coating thickness could not becorrectly estimated using GDOES, but only thethickness range could be determined. Surface peakin oxygen content can also be explainedconsidering the well known hydrogen effect [36].In the case <strong>of</strong> the bi-layer formed by a layer <strong>of</strong>Al2O3 followed by a second layer <strong>of</strong> TiO2, bothsignals <strong>of</strong> Ti and Al can be observed in the first150-200 nm <strong>of</strong> analysis, while Oxygen can beobserved for more than 300 nm. The Iron signalsshows a plateau after about 170 nm. It can beobserved that Titanium and Aluminium have a clearpeak in the coating region. The titanium signals canFigure 6: 3 N Vickers indentation on AISI 420 StainlessSteel coated with Al 2 O 3Vickers indentations performed on the coatedsample surface were observed using SEM, as theOptical Microscope field depth resulted to be toosmall to sharply resolve all the delamination detailson the deformed region in just one image. Thedimension <strong>of</strong> the Vickers indentation is related tothe applied load. Even if localized defects arehardly visible on the ALD coatings due to theirtransparency, larger areas with a complete coatingremoval resulted to be clearly visible on the SEMimages. A clear example <strong>of</strong> how the delaminatedareas have been evaluated is presented in Fig. 6 andFig. 7. Fig. 6, in particular, shows a Vickersindentation as obtained using a 3 N load on the 100nm TiO 2 coated sample, while Fig. 7 shows details<strong>of</strong> cracks and delamination obtained using a 10 Nload. The results obtained for the different samples13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 173


are plotted in Fig. 8, as a function <strong>of</strong> the appliedload.a passive behavior in the 0.2 M NaCl solution, witha corrosion current density between 10 -6 and 10 -7A/cm2 and a passive region from -0.25 to -0.1 Vwith respect to Ag/AgCl. The Open CircuitPotential (OCP) for uncoated AISI 316 L steelresulted to be about 0.1 V with respect to Ag/AgCl.Figure 7: Cracks and delamination in proximity <strong>of</strong> aVickers indentation (5N on Al 2 O 3 coated AISI 420)All coatings showed a clear dependence on theapplied load for the delaminated Area/Load ratio,which remains almost constant only at the highestindentation loads (9.8 N = HV1 and 19.6 N =HV2).It can be observed that the best behaviour isshown by the coating formed by two differentlayers, with a lower delamination, in particular atlow loading conditions. At high loading conditions,and in particular at 19.6 N, the two coatings shownalmost the same delamination areas.Data dispersion was considerably high so astatistical approach was followed, with about 20Vickers indentations per load for each sample.Figure 3: polarization curves obtained on both coatedsamples and on naked substrateThe two coatings showed two different shifts <strong>of</strong>the corrosion potential, a positive shift to about -0.15 V respect to Ag/AgCl in the case <strong>of</strong> the singlelayer Al 2 O 3 coating and a negative shift to about -0.35 V in the case <strong>of</strong> the bi-layered structure <strong>of</strong>Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 .In the case <strong>of</strong> the single layer coating, acorrosion current density reduction <strong>of</strong> about oneorder <strong>of</strong> magnitude, to about 3*10 -8 A/cm 2 , wasobserved, while in the case <strong>of</strong> the bi-layeredstructure, the corrosion current density reductionresulted to be more intense, reaching 3*10 -9 A/cm 2 .In the case <strong>of</strong> the single layer coating, the barriereffect resulted to be similar in extension to thepassive range <strong>of</strong> the naked AISI 420 substrate, atlower currents, while an extended barrier effect wasobserved in the case <strong>of</strong> the bi-layered structure.3.5 Wear propertiesFigure 8: delamination as a function <strong>of</strong>the indentation load3.4 Electrochemical propertiesPolarization curves for the different sampleswith a total coating thickness <strong>of</strong> about 100 nm areshown in Fig. 9. Uncoated AISI 420 clearly showsFigure 9: wear track obtained after just 10 cycles forAl 2 O 3 single layer174 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Fig. 9 shows the wear track obtained after 10cycles <strong>of</strong> ball-on-disc wear testing on the samplecoated with a single layer <strong>of</strong> Al 2 O 3 . It can beobserved that, even if the applied load is relativelylow, a wear track is clearly visible on the surface <strong>of</strong>the sample and, in particular, third body wear scarscan be observed. The pristine surface roughness <strong>of</strong>the sample has been completely removed from thesurface due to the tribological contact with the WCcounter-part.EDXS localized analysis shown that the ALDlayer has been completely removed from thesurface due to the tribological contact.It is possible that the clearly visible third bodywear on the surface <strong>of</strong> the sample has also beencaused by Al 2 O 3 particles detached from the samplesurface during testing.Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> cycles, it was possibleto observe the formation <strong>of</strong> a thick oxide layerinside the wear track, and strong adhesionphenomena, leading to a coarse wear track full <strong>of</strong>irregular oxide depositions.applied to AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel usinga thermal ALD process based on H 2 O, TMA andTiCl 4 .The applied ALD layers and the substrate wheresuccessfully characterized using SEM, AFM,GDOES, stylus pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer, electrochemicalequipment and an industrial tribometer in ball-ondiscconfiguration.The morphological characterization evidencedthat ALD layers are conformal and almost defectfreeeven at relatively high magnifications.GDOES testing correctly discriminated thepresence <strong>of</strong> the different ceramic layers on the AISI420 substrate.Adhesion testing showed that adhesion betweenAISI 420 and 200 nm ALD layers is relatively poorand cracks propagate from microhardness Vickersindentations.Electrochemical testing clearly showed that evenan ALD coating with a limited thickness <strong>of</strong> about200 nm is sufficient to strongly improve thecorrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the martensitic stainlesssteel substrate, strongly reducing the corrosioncurrent densities and widening the passive range <strong>of</strong>this material.Wear testing results showed that ALD layersdeposited at the temperature <strong>of</strong> 120 °C onmartensitic stainless steel, are unable to granttribological resistance to the substrate, due to theirintrinsic brittleness and the relatively low hardness<strong>of</strong> the substrate on which they were applied.REFERENCESFigure 10: wear track obtained after just 10 cycles forAl 2 O 3 /TiO 2 bi-layerFig. 10 shows the wear track obtained after 10cycles <strong>of</strong> ball-on-disc wear testing on the samplecoated with a bi-layer formed by Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 .It can be observed that, as seen before for thesingle layer sample, the wear track is clearly visibleat 1000 magnifications. Scars <strong>of</strong> third body wearare present inside the wear track, even if the trackitself is smaller when compared to the trackobtained from the single layer sample.Even in this case, EDXS analyses shown that theALD layer has been completely removed from thewear track on the sample surface, due to thetribological contact with the WC counterpart.4. CONCLUSIONSNanometric ALD mono- and bi- layers, with atotal thickness <strong>of</strong> about 200 nm, were successfully[1] H. Zhang, Y.L. Zhao, Z.D. Jiang, Materials Letters59, 3370-3374; 2005.[2] P.J. Hidalgo, Surcae Technology 10, 193-208; 1980.[3] A. Turnbull, B. Nimmo, Environment-InducedCracking materials, 2008, 2, 483-492;[4] J.W. Boh, L.A. Louca, Y.S. Choo, Shreir’sCorrosion 3, 1802-1878, 2010.[5] D. Ferreno, J.A. Alvarez, E. Ruiz, D. Mendez, L.Rodriguez, D. Hernandez, Engineering FAilureAnalysis, 18, 256-270, 2011.[6] B. Fournier, M. Sauzay, C. Caes, M. Noblecourt, M.Mottot, A. Bougault, V. Rabeau, J. Man, O. Gillia,P. Lemoine, A. Pineau, International Journal <strong>of</strong>Fatigue 30 (10-11), pp. 1797-1812, 2008.[7] C. Liu, G. Lin, D. Yang, M. Qi, Surface and CoatingTechnology 200, pp. 4011-4016, 2006.[8] V.H.V. Sarmento, M.G. Schiavetto, P. Hammer,A.V. Benedetti, C.S. Fugivara, P.H. Suegama,[9] S.H. Pulcinelli, C.V. Santilli, Surface and CoatingsTechnology 204, pp. 2689-2701, 2010.[10] R. Di Maggio, L. Fedrizzi, S. Rossi, P. Scardi, ThinSolid Films 286, pp. 127-135, 1996.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 175


[11] C. Wang, F. Jiang, F. Wang, Corrosion Science 46,75-89, 2004.[12] C.R. Tomachuk, C.I. Elsner, A.R. Di Sarli, O.B.Ferraz, Materials Chemistry and Physics 119, pp.19-29, 2010.[13] D. Pech, P. Steyer, J. P. Millet, Corrosion Science50, 1492-1497, 2008.[14] J. Kawakita, T. Fukushima, S. Kuroda, T. Kodama,Corrosion Science 44, 2561-2581, 2002.[15] C.X. Li, T. Bell, Corrosion Science 48, pp. 2036-2049, 2006.[16] C.X. Shan, X. Hou, K. L. Choy, Surface & CoatingsTechnology 202, pp. 2399–2402, 2008.[17] E. Marin, L. Guzman, A. Lanzutti, W. Ensinger, L.Fedrizzi, Thin Solid Films 522, pp. 283-288; 2012.[18] P. Corengia, F. Walther, G. Ybarra, S. Sommadossi,R. Corbari, E. Broitman, Wear, pp. 479-485, 2006.[19] O. Choumad, X. Badiche, P. Montmitonnet, Y.Gachon, Journal <strong>of</strong> Manufacturing Processes 15, pp.77-86, 2013.[20] J.B. Cambon, F. Ansart, J.P. Bonino, V. Turq,Progress in Organic Coatings 75, pp. 486-493, 2012.[21] T. Suntola, J. Antson, J. (1977) U.S. Patent4,058,430;[22] T. Suntola, Solid State Electron. 14 933, 1971.[23] T. Stubb, T. Suntola, O.J.A. Tiainen, Solid StateElectron., 15, 611, 1972.[24] T. Suntola, O.J.A. Tiainen, M. Valkiainen, ThinSolid Films 227, 1972.[25] T. Suntola, Thin Solid Films 34 9, 1976.[26] M. Ahonen, M. Pessa, T. Suntola, Thin Solid Films65, 301, 1980.[27] J. Lua, J. Aarik, J. Sundqvist, K. Kukli,1, A. Harsta,J.-O. Carlsson, J. Cryst. Growth 273, 510, 2005.[28] Bedair, S. M., The Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> AdvancedMaterials, vol 1. Edited by Bloor D, Brook RS,Flemings, M.C., Mahajan, S., Oxford: Pergamon141, 1994.[29] R. Matero, M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, T. Salo, J.Aromaa, O. Forsén, J. Phys. IV France 09, 493,1999.[30] C.X. Shan, X. Hou, K. L. Choy, Surf. Coat.Technol. 202, 2147, 2008.[31] E. Marin, A. Lanzutti, L. Guzman, L. Fedrizzi, J.Coat. Technol. Res. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-011-9327-0, 2011.[32] S. E. Potts, L. Schmalz, M. Fenker, B. Dìaz, J.Światowska, V. Maurice, A. Seyeux,P. Marcus, G.Radnóczi, L. Tóth, M. C. M. van de Sanden, and W.M. M. Kessels, J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, 132, 2011.[33] M. Ritala, Appl. Surf. Sci. 112, 223, 1997.[34] J. Takadoum , H.H. Bennani, Surf. Coat. Technol.96, 272, 1997.[35] H.C. Barshilia, A.Ananth, J. Khan, G. Srinivas, Vac.8, 1165, 2012.[36] R. Payling, D.G. Jones and A. Bengtson, “GlowDischarge Optical Emission Spectrometry”, JohnWiley, Chichester, 1997.176 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF QUATERNARYAMMONIUM SURFACTANTS ON MUSCOVITE MICAJelena MANOJLOVIĆ 11 The Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Srbijajmanojlo@gmail.comAbstract: In order to reduce friction, lubricants are usually employed. We describe the possibility <strong>of</strong> selfassembledmonolayers (SAMs) being used as lubricants. Our aim was to produce homogeneousmonolayers <strong>of</strong> surfactants on substrate. Because the surfactant behavior in the solution can be changed incontact with a substrate, we considered the adsorption mechanisms <strong>of</strong> surfactant molecules at the solidliquidinterface to be important. SAMs were prepared by using different methods, and their stability andstructure was studied, but a homogeneous hydrophobic monolayer was difficult to realize. It has beenshown that the factors, such as the temperature during solution preparation, frequently neglected, can bevery important in the process <strong>of</strong> surfactant adsorption from solution.Keywords: adsorption, SAMs, stability, muscovite mica, contact angle1. INTRODUCTIONThe tribological research involves the study <strong>of</strong>friction, wear and lubrication. These threecomponents between materials in contact are <strong>of</strong>fundamental importance in many areas, such asaircraft engines, automobiles, gears or bearing.Practically, in all modern mechanical machines themajor problems are friction and wear. Theadvanced technical applications and the invention<strong>of</strong> new characterization techniques, lead to theappearance <strong>of</strong> the new field <strong>of</strong> tribology, known asmicro-tribology/nano-tribology, which involvesthe study <strong>of</strong> friction and wear at a very smalllength scales. Nanotribology part <strong>of</strong> particularimportance is called nanolubrication, defined as thestudy <strong>of</strong> ultra-thin lubricant films. The application<strong>of</strong> nanolubrication is important in a device whichneeds a lubricant layer <strong>of</strong> few nanometers, toreduce friction and wear. Therefore, research andtesting <strong>of</strong> nano-lubricants, needed formicroelectromechanical systems (MEMS)components, is a big challenge.An attractive model system that can be used forstudies in wetting, adhesion and friction <strong>of</strong> surfacesis the system <strong>of</strong> self-assembled organic monolayers(SAMs). The concept <strong>of</strong> self-assembly was invokedby Zisman, more than 50 years ago. At that time,the potential <strong>of</strong> self-assembly was not recognized,but the field <strong>of</strong> self-assembled monolayers hasconsiderably developed in the past 30 years. Due topossibility <strong>of</strong> controlling the physical and chemicalproperties <strong>of</strong> these systems in a systematic way, andin order to solve many practical friction connectedproblems by SAMs, the interest in their studysignificantly increases 1,2. The interest in thegeneral area <strong>of</strong> self-assembly, specifically inSAMs, comes from their observed importance inscience and technology.One example <strong>of</strong> the general phenomena <strong>of</strong> selfassemblyis the formation <strong>of</strong> monolayers, by selfassembly<strong>of</strong> surfactant molecules at surfaces. Selfassembledmonolayers can be prepared usingdifferent types <strong>of</strong> molecules and differentsubstrates, by very simple process, which makesSAMs manufacturable and thus technologicallyattractive in surface engineering 3. Surfactantadsorption from solution can produce various SAMmorphologies. It has been shown that surfactantscan form monolayers, bilayers 4, or aggregates <strong>of</strong>various shapes and sizes 5. Commonly studiedfactors during SAMs formation are properties <strong>of</strong> thesurfactant concentration - above the cmc 6 andbelow the cmc 7 different chain length and headgroup structure 4 or types <strong>of</strong> solid surfaces (oxide13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 177


surfaces, graphite, gold, silica or mica 8. Asignificant part <strong>of</strong> work has been done at aconcentration above the cmc 6, in order to clarifythe structure <strong>of</strong> the adsorbed layers, especially theaggregates on the surface. The properties <strong>of</strong> theadsorbed films on the solid surface seem to bedependent on experimental parameters, such asconcentration, pH, temperature and humidity, rarelydescribed in the literature.Adsorbed surfactants have been characterizedusing various techniques, such as x-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) 9, contactangle measurements 10, ellipsometry 11. TheAFM was first used to image surfactant aggregateson the surface by Manne et al. 12. This techniqueindeed <strong>of</strong>fers a convenient method for the imaging<strong>of</strong> molecular assemblies, i.e. in situ 13 or rarely inex situ. In order to test the stability and measure thethickness <strong>of</strong> SAMs on mica, a scratch test can beused 14. Due to the small thickness <strong>of</strong> SAMs(~nm), the development <strong>of</strong> AFM gives a powerfultool to the visualization <strong>of</strong> the adsorbed surfactanton solid substrates and facilitates the study <strong>of</strong> theadsorption mechanism at the molecular level. It canidentify defects on the sample and detect thestructure <strong>of</strong> formed layers on the substrate. Over thelast 20 years experiments performed with theatomic force microscope or with the othermeasuring techniques, have provided new insightsinto the physics <strong>of</strong> contact between singleasperities, friction, wear and lubrication on amolecular level.Many authors have aimed at investigating theadsorption <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactants from aqueoussolution onto a variety <strong>of</strong> solid surfaces, includinggraphite 12, silica 15 and mica 16. Cationicsurfactants have been the most studied ones, usingthe technique <strong>of</strong> the direct surface forcesmeasurements, particularly with the surfaces forcesapparatus 17. Most <strong>of</strong> the surface force work wasdirected towards studying the interaction betweensurfactant coated surfaces, for better understanding<strong>of</strong> hydrophobic forces 18. The surface forcetechnique has been used to probe the lubricationproperties <strong>of</strong> aqueous surfactant solutions 19. Dueto the possibility to simultaneous measuring <strong>of</strong> thethickness and the intermolecular forces <strong>of</strong>surfactant films, this technique has been used as aneffective tool in the study <strong>of</strong> surfactant modelsystem.Adsorption <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactants, especiallyquaternary ammonium surfactantscetyltrimethylammonium bromide-CTAB, ontorelatively simple inorganic substrates, such as mica,has been studied very <strong>of</strong>ten, as a good modelsystem for boundary lubrication. Depending on theconditions, it has been reported that CTAB adsorbson mica as a compact monolayer 19 , as a stablehydrophobic surface 20, as a bilayer 6, or formsaggregates 21. For the preparation <strong>of</strong> CTAB selfassembledfilms on mica, numerous adsorptionprotocols have been proposed in the literature. Theapplied procedures include the variation <strong>of</strong> manyparameters, such as different temperatures in SAMpreparation, the immersion time or the postadsorptionsample treatment 10. Differentconclusions about adsorption theories and theexistence <strong>of</strong> numerous mechanisms, underline thisbroadness 22. On the other hand, the Kraffttemperature is a very important quantity for CTAB/water solutions as previously reported 6. Due tothe important structural changes in CTAB solution,above the cmc at and above the Krafft temperature,this surfactant transition is still the area <strong>of</strong> researchinterest.Our attention here will be directed towardmodification <strong>of</strong> the mica surface by adsorption <strong>of</strong>quaternary ammonium surfactants, with the aim toproduce hydrophobic and well-orderedhomogeneous monolayers. Adsorbed layers wereprepared on mica using different concentrations <strong>of</strong>surfactants in aqueous solution, below and abovethe critical micelle concentration, in order to checkthe hypothesis that the adsorption depends on thesolution structure. The adsorbed layers werecharacterized by contact angle (CA) measurementsand atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging.2. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe self-assembled monolayers <strong>of</strong> quaternaryammonium surfactants on mica, we made bysingle-tailed hexadecyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB), with the molecular structureCH 3 (CH 2 ) 15 N + (CH 3 ) 3 Br - . CTAB was purchasedfrom Fluka and for further purification wasrecrystallized from an ethanol/acetone mixture. Asa solvent, ultra pure water <strong>of</strong> resistivity 18.3Mcmwas prepared, using a Barnstead EASYpurebatch-fed water purification system. In the process<strong>of</strong> sample rinsing we used water <strong>of</strong> the same qualitybefore drying with a clean nitrogen stream.To avoid any contamination, the glassware andbottles used in the experiments were consistentlycleaned by piranha solution and then rinsed withpurified water. All the employed tools werepreviously cleaned in order to minimize theoccurrence <strong>of</strong> a molecular contamination,particularly on the high-energy mica surface.178 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Mica samples preparationFor the adsorption experiments, we usedmuscovite mica purchased from Spruce Pine MicaCompany Inc. (USA). Small mica samples <strong>of</strong> 1-1.5cm 2 size were cut by scissors and after thatfreshly cleaved on both sides and immersed into thesurfactant solution. The adsorption was performedfrom the surfactant solution in a volume <strong>of</strong> 20ml.<strong>of</strong> 18°C or 30°C. It is important to emphasize thatall the used chemicals, tools and substrates wereequilibrated at the defined temperature before theadsorption experiments.3. EXPERIMENTAL PARTSeveral experiments, described in the literature,suggested that the transition through the threephaseboundary is an important step, with asignificant influence on the surfactant filmmorphology. To distinguish effects due toadsorption at the solid-liquid interface and thedeposition at the three-phase boundary (TPB), wehave systematically varied theimmersion/extraction protocol and defined fourdifferent experiments. All four adsorptionprotocols, separately described below, have beenused with/without temperature control. The resultsobserved under the temperature controlledconditions have been described.Every experiment consists <strong>of</strong> four steps:adsorption, rinsing, drying and analysis (AFM andCA). Varying the immersion and extraction <strong>of</strong> micasample into and out <strong>of</strong> the surfactant solution, wehave defined four different adsorption protocols(figure 1).The first option, called “CTAB in/CTAB out“,involves immersion and extraction from thesurfactant solution at the nominal concentration.The second adsorption type (“CTAB in/diluteout”) uses immersion into the nominal surfactantsolution, a rest time and subsequent rapid(10seconds) dilution with pure water prior toextraction, in order to eliminate surfactantdeposition during the transition through the TPB.The third option (“dilute in /dilute out”) preventssurfactant deposition at the TPB in both steps,immersion into solution and extraction from it. Inthis case, CTAB is added to the solution after thesample is submerged.The fourth option (“dilute in/CTAB out”) allowsdeposition at the TPB during extraction only.In the water dipping step, the mica samples weredipped into 20ml <strong>of</strong> ultra pure water to remove theexcess surfactant molecules.The same set <strong>of</strong> adsorption experiments shownin figure 1 has been repeated at controlledtemperature in the laboratory, at 18C (below theKrafft temperature) and 30°C (above the Kraffttemperature). A stock solution, 250ml <strong>of</strong> 10 -3 MCTAB, has been prepared at controlled temperatureFigure 1. Schematic representation <strong>of</strong> four differentadsorption protocols used to discriminate differentdeposition mechanisms at the three-phase boundary. Allsamples were dipped into ultra pure water to strip <strong>of</strong>fpossible excess CTAB (e.g. incomplete second layer)After the post-rinsing step, the modified micasurface was gently blown dry with nitrogen beforethe AFM imaging or contact angle measurements.Each type <strong>of</strong> protocol (at different concentrations)was repeated several times to also assess thereproducibility.The samples were imaged with an Atomic ForceMicroscope (Digital Instruments, Nanoscope IIIa),which was operated under ambient conditions. Theimages were systematically collected for differentscan sizes (i.e. 10µmx10µm, 5µmx5µm and1µmx1µm, and again 10µmx10µm) and they wererepeated by scanning several different areas on agiven sample. At least two samples <strong>of</strong> eachpreparation protocol were analyzed.The contact angle is the angle conventionallymeasured through the liquid, where aliquid/vaporinterface meets a solid surface. It quantifies thewettability <strong>of</strong> a solid surface by a liquid. On everysample advancing (maximal) contact angle and thereceding (minimal) contact angle are measured. Awater contact angle greater than 90° is determinedon hydrophobic surfaces. For example, freshlycleaved mica has a contact angle less than 10, anda contact angle on the SAM produced by CTABadsorption on mica can be 140.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 179


For water contact angle measurements, after theplacing the droplet on the surface, the advancingcontact angle was measured, a , after which thedroplet was retracted, and the receding contactangle, r , recorded. The times for both contact anglemeasurements, were similar, in the range <strong>of</strong> a fewseconds duration for each.Using hexadecane as the probing liquid, we candefine a well-ordered monolayer on a substrate andthe expected CA <strong>of</strong> ordered surfactant layers arearound or larger than 40°. A high contact anglesuggests a high degree <strong>of</strong> order and “tails-up”molecules orientation in the layer. With hexadecaneonly a static contact angle has been measured byplacing 1µL drop on the sample. Measurementswere performed at room temperature conditions andhumidity. The contact angle values were detectedwith accuracy 1-2.spots, both the results for water(advancing/receding) and hexadecane are givenwith errors.4. RESULTSThe influence <strong>of</strong> the temperature on thesurfactant solution properties and the resultingSAM morphology, spurred us to control thetemperature during the solution preparation, as wellas during adsorption. Two distinct temperatureshave been chosen-one below (18C) and one above(30°C) the Krafft temperature <strong>of</strong> CTAB.CTAB adsorption results on mica observed atlow concentrations are illustrated in figure 2.abelow the Krafft temperature (at 18°C), and 2.babove the Krafft temperature (at 30°C). Thetemperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the observed filmmorphology at 18C and 30°C can be confirmed bycontact angle measurements. Due to the variationsdetermined in the different samples spots, both theresults for water (advancing/receding) are givenwith errors.In both groups <strong>of</strong> experiments, hydrophobicsurfaces with advancing contact angles between 75°and 90° have been obtained. The significanthysteresis suggests a chemical heterogeneity orroughness in the surfactant film 24.Considering the highest contact angles in bothmeasurements with water and hexadecane, the mostpromising hydrophobic surfaces have been obtainedat 18°C, using the protocol “CTAB in /CTAB out”,suggesting a significant surfactant adsorption at thethree-phase boundary. Therefore, this adsorptionprotocol has been selected for all the followingmeasurements at 18°C.The temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the observedfilm morphology at 18C and 30°C can beconfirmed by contact angle measurements. Contactangles for various preparation protocols aresummarized in the tables below. Due to thevariations determined in the different samplesFigure 2. The comparison <strong>of</strong> AFM images <strong>of</strong> CTABmodified mica by the “CTAB in/CTAB out” protocol atcontrolled temperature: a) from saturated 10 -3 M solution(at 18°C) b) from 10 -4 M solution (at 30°C)Table 1. Contact angle <strong>of</strong> water and hexadecane onCTAB coated mica from the saturated 10 -3 M solutionprepared at 18°C18°C hexadecane waterCTAB in/CTAB out 272 85/35CTAB in/dilute out 192° 79/25Table 2. Contact angle <strong>of</strong> water and hexadecane onCTAB coated mica at 30°C from 10 -4 M solution30°C hexadecane waterCTAB in/CTAB out 172 85/15dilute in/dilute out 14 90/10dilute in/CTAB out 12 79/12CTAB in/dilute out 7 76/125. DISCUSSIONThe structure and the stability <strong>of</strong> the adsorbedfilms are sensitive to the experimental conditions,primarily temperature.180 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


According to the AFM results in figure 2.a, theadsorbed film can be the homogeneous SAM on themica. Hysteresis in water CA indicates ahydrophobic but not homogeneous film. Similarcontact angles have been reported in the literature.The decay in CA values with time shows instability<strong>of</strong> the formed layer, due to desorption <strong>of</strong> theadsorbed molecules into the water drop. A similarobservation has been also made 24 and interpretedas water penetration into the monolayer, aphenomenon already known to Langmuir in 1938.The degree <strong>of</strong> water penetration can also beinfluenced by the local environment, e.g. relativehumidity or temperature 24.In all experiments hydrophobic surfaces withadvancing contact angles between 75° and 90° havebeen obtained. The significant hysteresis suggests achemical heterogeneity or roughness in thesurfactant film. Measurements <strong>of</strong> hexadecanecontact angle represent one <strong>of</strong> the most sensitivetools to determine the conformational order <strong>of</strong>hydrocarbon thin films. High hexadecane contactangles are observed on hydrocarbon SAMs onlywhen the monolayers are densely packed. Usinghexadecane we have observed lower values than theexpected 40° for ideally ordered films.In order to relate our SAM preparation protocolsto previous work, we have compared our resultswith those described in the literature. Much workhas been devoted to the study <strong>of</strong> the adsorption <strong>of</strong>CTAB on mica using a variety <strong>of</strong> adsorptionprotocols and measurement techniques. For bothsolution concentrations, below and above the cmc,the picture drown in the literature demonstrates ahigh degree <strong>of</strong> variability.The protocol proposed by Zhao 25 wasreported to produce cylinder aggregates on the micasurface at a solution concentration <strong>of</strong> 2cmc (figure3.a). Due to the measured height <strong>of</strong> ~6nm <strong>of</strong> thefeatures, the layer has been described as consisting<strong>of</strong> two bilayers.At the CTAB concentration 10 -5 M monolayersand bilayers have been observed 22, using asimilar adsorption protocol at room temperature(around 25°C), as shown in figure 3.b. The AFMwas operated in the surfactant solution.We can conclude that the literature confirms thateven small differences in the SAM adsorptionprotocol can significantly affect the surfactant filmmorphology on mica, especially above the cmc andthe Krafft temperature. These observations areconfirmed by our experimental results and there isthe need to explain these variations by structuralchanges <strong>of</strong> the surfactant solution 26. There aresignificant structural changes around the Kraffttemperature. Below the bulk cmc and below theKrafft temperature, an equilibrated solution isexpected to be free <strong>of</strong> micelles. At the Kraffttemperature, the solubility becomes equal to thecmc and micelles will form in the solution and thistemperature is very <strong>of</strong>ten described in the literature.But, reported values <strong>of</strong> T k for CTAB in water varyconsiderably ( from 20°C to 25°C), which is veryclose to a room temperature and complicates theexplanation <strong>of</strong> experimental results.Figure 3. a) AFM topographic image <strong>of</strong> a mica surfaceprepared unspecified temperature conditions, using“CTAB in/CTAB out” protocol (immersion time-1min),at 2cmc, without rinsing after removal from the solution,dried with nitrogen before AFM imaging 25; b) AFMimage <strong>of</strong> a CTAB adsorbed layer on mica in a 10 -5 Msolution at 25°C for 25min immersion time, observed inthe surfactant solution 22.It is important to note that most <strong>of</strong> theexperiments described in the literature do notmention the problem <strong>of</strong> temperature control, and itis not possible to reconstruct this importantparameter from the information provided. We havea clear evidence that temperature is the key factordetermining SAM morphology. Therefore, we havesystematically studied temperature effects byrigorously controlling the temperature during allprocedures.6. CONCLUSIONThe concept <strong>of</strong> self-assembly on surfaces hasbeen treated in this research and the experimentshave revisited the adsorption <strong>of</strong> CTAB onto amuscovite mica. These results demonstrate theinfluence <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> parameters on theadsorption process, as well as the morphology and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 181


the molecular order <strong>of</strong> SAMs. The molecularstructure <strong>of</strong> the solution seems to be a key element.It is chiefly controlled by the temperature andconcentration <strong>of</strong> the solution. The fact that theKrafft temperature range <strong>of</strong> CTAB is around roomtemperature (25C), makes this systemparticularly complex.We have systematically studied the transferacross the three-phase boundary, under differentexperimental conditions and different adsorptionprotocols. The surfactant films on mica, formedaccording to different experimental protocols, werecharacterized by contact angle measurements andby AFM. It has been observed that the transitionthrough the three-phase boundary during sampleextraction can be a step <strong>of</strong> significant influence onthe SAM morphology.A high stability <strong>of</strong> the adsorbed films is veryrarely detected. The problem <strong>of</strong> reproducibility inSAMs formation can be observed by controlling thetemperature during all steps, or, working below thecmc. A reproducible stability <strong>of</strong> the resulting films,however, remains an issue.Acknowledgements: The author would like togratefully acknowledge the support in obtainingand understanding the presented results provided byher mentors, Nicholas D. Spencer and ManfredHeuberger, members <strong>of</strong> the Laboratory for SurfaceScience and Technology (LSST), a part <strong>of</strong> theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Materials at the ETH Zurich,Switzerland, where all the experiments wereperformed.REFERENCES[1] M. K. Chaudhury: Adhesion and friction <strong>of</strong> selfassembledorganic monolayers, Current opinion incolloid & interface science, Vol.2, pp. 65-69, 1997.[2] S. Manne et al.: Direct Visualization <strong>of</strong> SurfactantHemimicelles by Force Microscopy <strong>of</strong> the ElectricalDouble-Layer, Langmuir, Vol.10(12), pp. 4409-4413, 1994.[3] A. Ulman: Formation and Structure <strong>of</strong> Self-Assembled Monolayers, Chem. Rev., Vol. 96, pp.1533-1554, 1996.[4] H. Patrick et al.: Surface micellization patterns <strong>of</strong>quaternary ammonium surfactants on mica,Langmuir, Vol. 15(5), pp. 1685-1692, 1999.[5] S. Manne, H. Gaub: Molecular-Organization <strong>of</strong>Surfactants at Solid-Liquid Interfaces, Science, Vol.270(5241), pp. 1480-1482, 1995.[6] W. Ducker, E.Wanless: Adsorption <strong>of</strong>hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica:Nanometer-scale study <strong>of</strong> binding-site competitioneffects, Langmuir, Vol. 15(1), pp. 160-168, 1999.[7] M. Fujii et al.: Heterogeneous growth and selfrepairingprocesses <strong>of</strong> two-dimensional molecularaggregates <strong>of</strong> adsorbedoctadecyltrimethylammonium bromide at cleavedmica aqueous solution interface as observed by insitu atomic force microscopy, Langmuir, Vol.15(10), pp. 3689-3692, 1999.[8] R. Atkin et al.: Adsorption kinetics and structuralarrangements <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactants on silicasurfaces, Langmuir, Vol. 16(24), pp. 9374-9380,2000.[9] K. Boschkova et al.: Lubrication in aqueoussolutions using cationic surfactants - a study <strong>of</strong>static and dynamic forces, Langmuir, Vol. 18(5),pp. 1680-1687, 2002.[10] B.Y.Li et al.: Time dependent anchoring <strong>of</strong>adsorbed cationic surfactant molecules atmice/solution interface, Journal <strong>of</strong> Colloid andInterface Science, Vol. 209(1), pp. 25-30, 1999.[11] K. Eskilsson and V.V. Yaminsky: Deposition <strong>of</strong>monolayers by retraction from solution:Ellipsometric study <strong>of</strong> cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide adsorption at silica-air and silica-waterinterfaces, Langmuir, Vol. 14(9), pp. 2444-2450,1998.[12] S. Manne et al.: Direct Visualization <strong>of</strong> SurfactantHemimicelles by Force Microscopy <strong>of</strong> the ElectricalDouble-Layer, Langmuir, Vol. 10(12), pp. 4409-4413, 1994.[13] J. a. M. Mellott: Supercritical self-assembledmonolayer growth, Journal <strong>of</strong> the AmericanChemical Society, Vol. 126(30), pp. 9369-9373,2004.[14] HY Nie et al.: Robust self-assembledoctadecylphosphonic acid monolayers on a micasubstrate, Langmuir, Vol. 21(7), pp. 2773-2778,2005.[15] T. Horr et al.: XPS film thickness and adsorptionstudies <strong>of</strong> alkyltrimethylammonium bromides andorganosilanes on silica surfaces, Colloids andSurfaces A: Physicochemical and EngineeringAspects, Vol. 102, pp. 181-190, 1995.[16] S. Nishimura et al.: AFM Studies <strong>of</strong> AmineSurfactant Hemimicelle Structures at the Mica-Water Interface, Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Vol.103(3), pp. 289-298, 1995.[17] M. Rutland, J. Parker: Surface Forces betweenSilica Surfaces in Cationic Surfactant Solutions -Adsorption and Bilayer Formation at Normal andHigh pH, Langmuir, Vol.10(4), pp. 1110-1121,1994.[18] A. e. a. Rennie: Structure <strong>of</strong> a Cationic SurfactantLayer at the Silica Water Interface, Langmuir, Vol.6(5), pp. 1031-1034, 1990.[19] R. Pashley, J. Israelachvili: A Comparison <strong>of</strong>Surface Forces and Interfacial Properties <strong>of</strong> Mica inPurified Surfactant Solutions, Colloids andSurfaces, Vol. 2(2), pp. 169-187, 1981.[20] M. Fujii et al.: Two-dimensional arrangements <strong>of</strong>adsorbed alkylammonium halides on cleaved micasurface, Langmuir, Vol. 17(4), pp. 1138-1142, 2001.182 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[21] B. G. Sharma et al.: Characterization <strong>of</strong> adsorbedionic surfactants on a mica substrate, Langmuir,Vol. 12(26), pp. 6506-6512, 1996.[22] G. Ceotto et al.: Ionic surfactant films imaged byatomic force microscopy, Journal <strong>of</strong> MolecularCatalysis A: Chemical, Vol 167(1-2), pp. 225-233,2001.[23] T. Davey et al.: Krafft temperature depression inquaternary ammonium bromide surfactants,Langmuir, Vol. 14(12), pp. 3210-3213, 1998.[24] Y. L. Chen et al.: Molecular MechanismsAssociated with Adhesion and Contact-AngleHysteresis <strong>of</strong> Monolayer Surfaces, Journal <strong>of</strong>Physical Chemistry, Vol. 95(26), pp. 10736-10747,1991.[25] F.Zhao et al.: Adsorption behavior <strong>of</strong>hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromida (CTAB) tomica substrates as observed by atomic forcemicroscopy, Science in China Ser. B Chemistry,Vol. 48(2), pp. 101-106, 2005.[26] Manojlovic J.: Structure, morphology andhistory effects in surfactant self-assembly,Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland , 2006.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 183


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacMO-C MULTILAYERED CVD COATINGSA. Sagalovych, V. SagalovychScientific technological Centre “Nanotechnologie”, Kharkov, UkraineAbstract: Production processes <strong>of</strong> multi-layered Mo-C coatings by the method <strong>of</strong> chemical vapor deposition(CVD) with the use <strong>of</strong> organometallic compounds were developed. Coatings are applied on technicalpurpose steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) and DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10) heat-treated ball with the high class<strong>of</strong> surface roughness (> 10). The average deposition rate was 50 μm/h. The optimal conditions <strong>of</strong> coatingsdeposition for different technological schemas were defined.Metallographic investigations <strong>of</strong> the obtained coatings were carried out.Tribological studies <strong>of</strong> the friction and wear characteristics <strong>of</strong> sliding friction in conditions <strong>of</strong> boundarylubrication <strong>of</strong> Μo-С multilayered CVD coatings shows, that coatings have low friction coefficients (0.075 -0.095) at loads up to 2.0 kN, showed high resistance to wear and are effective in increasing the stability <strong>of</strong>the pair for precision friction pairs <strong>of</strong> hydraulical units.Key words: CVD processes, multi-layered coatings, tribology.1. INTRODUCTIONEver-increasing requirements to raise durabilityand efficiency <strong>of</strong> various newly created parts andmechanisms working in friction conditions lead tosharp increase in demands to search new materialsworking in the conditions <strong>of</strong> frictional contact andtheir tribotechnical characteristics. Complexity andintegrated nature <strong>of</strong> these demands boost constantsearch <strong>of</strong> new materials and techniques <strong>of</strong> theirproduction. Especially acute problem <strong>of</strong> makingnew highly effective wear resistant materials is foradvanced industries <strong>of</strong> machine building – aircraftengineering, aggregate building, shipbuilding,rocket and space engineering.Raise <strong>of</strong> the functional properties <strong>of</strong> parts by use<strong>of</strong> protective coatings is very widespreadtechnological tool for today. Hardsurfacing, wearresistant, corrosion resistant, etc. functionalcoatings are widely applied in the industry.Among coating deposition methods are chemicalvapor deposition methods (CVD) based on thepyrolysis <strong>of</strong> gaseous metal containing compounds [1].The relative simplicity <strong>of</strong> realization <strong>of</strong> processes,absence <strong>of</strong> high demands to vacuum (in many casesprocesses take place at atmospheric pressure), highcoating deposition rates (up to a few millimeters perhour), and possibility <strong>of</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> the evenqualitative coatings on figurine-shaped (includinginternal) surfaces with great value <strong>of</strong> relationship L/d,make these methods rather perspective for deposition<strong>of</strong> the functional coatings [1-3].Wei and Lo [4] carried out examination <strong>of</strong>deposition <strong>of</strong> Mo and Cr coatings at temperatures170-450 °С and pressure ~ 1 torr using a mixture <strong>of</strong>carbonyl with hydrogen. Upon that, they usedspecially prepared carriers made <strong>of</strong> SiC and SS304.The main emphasis in the work is placed onstudying <strong>of</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> obtained coatings.In the work [5] molybdenum was deposited on aporous ceramic carrier at atmospheric pressure.Chromium was deposited from carbonyl atatmospheric pressure also, but already on thepolished carriers in the work [6].It should be pointed out that application <strong>of</strong> CVDmethods to receive hardsurfacing wear- andcorrosion resistant coatings was limited yet. Fromthe point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> practical application,development <strong>of</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> obtaining <strong>of</strong> chemicalvapor deposited functional coatings ongeometrically complex precision surfaces <strong>of</strong> highsurface finish class (above 10 grade) is <strong>of</strong> interest.The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is development <strong>of</strong> process<strong>of</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> multilayered Мо-С coatings by a184 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


chemical vapor deposition method with useorganometallic compounds, studying multilayeredand tribological properties <strong>of</strong> the obtained coatingsand an estimate <strong>of</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> their application inthe capacity <strong>of</strong> candidate materials for precisionfriction pairs.2. EQUIPMENT, TECHNIQUES, AND USEDPROCEDURESMaking Mo-С coatings was carried out by athermal decomposition <strong>of</strong> metal-containingcompound – molybdenum hexacarbonyl Mo (CO) 6 .Process development was carried out using gasphaseunit <strong>of</strong> Avinit installation intended fordeposition <strong>of</strong> the multilayered functional coatingsby means <strong>of</strong> complex methods (plasma-chemicalCVD, vacuum-plasma PVD (vacuum-arc,magnetron), and processes <strong>of</strong> ion saturation, andtreatment <strong>of</strong> surfaces by ions) united in onetechnological cycle), presented in [7].Process <strong>of</strong> coating application was controlled bymeans <strong>of</strong> temperature <strong>of</strong> the sample, workingpressure in the chamber, and a method <strong>of</strong>evaporation <strong>of</strong> molybdenum hexacarbonyl.For heating <strong>of</strong> the sample, high-frequency heaterwas applied with working frequency <strong>of</strong> 3 MHz andeffective power ~ 0.2 kW. Pressure was controlled bydynamical changing <strong>of</strong> velocity <strong>of</strong> a pumping-out <strong>of</strong>vacuum system within 2.6 … 13 Pa (0.02 … 0.1 torr).Carbonyl evaporation was carried out under twoprocess flow charts:• The process flow chart <strong>of</strong> excessiveevaporation when a considerable quantity <strong>of</strong>carbonyl was evaporated within a containervolume. Then, along the heated up steampipeline through the adjustable valve, the gasmixture immediately supplied to the sample.It allowed obtaining major streams <strong>of</strong>carbonyl and, accordingly, highconcentration <strong>of</strong> molybdenum in a reactionlayer. In this case the carbonyl streamdepended on temperature <strong>of</strong> the carbonyl.• Under other process flow chart (the residualatmosphere) evaporation <strong>of</strong> a small amount<strong>of</strong> carbonyl was made immediately insidechamber volume. Thus, the uniformconcentration <strong>of</strong> the reaction gas consisting<strong>of</strong> carbonyl and carbonic oxide vapors wasobtained. At that, molybdenum volumeconcentration in a chamber atmospheredecreased with the course <strong>of</strong> process.3. PROCEDURES OF EXAMINATIONDuring metallographic analysis the multilayeredand microlayer coatings on the basis <strong>of</strong> system Mo-C were deposited on samples.Samples were made <strong>of</strong> structural steelDIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) and heat steel DIN 1.7709(25Х2МФ (ЭИ10) which are the materialscommonly used in the industry.Samples made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ(ЭИ10) with a size <strong>of</strong> 20х10х5 mm were polishedaccording to factory production method up to 8grade surface roughness (R a =0.32 μm).Microhardness was НВ~900.Samples made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1),56... 61HRC, with a size <strong>of</strong> 10х10х10 mm werepolished to surface roughness <strong>of</strong> 10 grade(Ra=0.063 μm) to demanded geometricalparameters (nonflatness ≤ 0.001мм, surfaceroughness – Ra 0.08 μm).Tribological tests <strong>of</strong> antifriction and wearproperties and seizure <strong>of</strong> samples with coatingswere carried out with friction and wear machine2070 SMT-1 under the "cube" - "roller" test patternat an incremental loading (with increments <strong>of</strong>200N) in 1-20 MPa loading range according to theprocedures presented in [8, 9]. The linear slipvelocities - 1.3m/s. Time <strong>of</strong> tests in each cycle –150 seconds. Operating fluid is fuel ТS-1, GOST10227-86.For reproducibility <strong>of</strong> results <strong>of</strong> wearing tests,mating <strong>of</strong> face surfaces by size <strong>of</strong> the contact areawas controlled: not less than 90 % <strong>of</strong> a workingarea <strong>of</strong> each sample.During tribological tests there were registered:– Values <strong>of</strong> frictional force F tr , normal loadingN, contact pressure P, by which value mechanicallosses in tribosystems were estimated;– Temperature <strong>of</strong> devices was continuouslyrecorded in real time during the tests in immediateproximity (1 mm) from a friction zone, withapplication <strong>of</strong> the sliding thermocouple. Frictioncoefficients were determined as f = F tr /N.4. RESULTS4.1 Deposition <strong>of</strong> coatingsTechnological information for process <strong>of</strong>coating deposition on steel DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ(ЭИ10) is presented in Tables 1.1, 1.2 and 2.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 185


Table 1.1 Mo/Mo-C coatings obtained at puffing <strong>of</strong> carbonyl from the container.Temperature, °С Pressure, Pa Exposition τ, min. Thickness δ, μm Deposition rate V, μm/min. Adhesion5.20 10 8 0.80 +++10.00 10 7 0.70 +++3505.30 15 17 1.13 +++11.00 15 10 0.67 +++8.80 30 25 0.83 +++11.00 30 31 1.03 ++5.60 5 3 0.60 ++5.40 10 8 0.80 +4005.50 10 6 0.60 +6.10 10 8 0.80 +5.00 15 10 0.67 -5.40 15 12 0.80 -7.60 5 6 1.20 +++4505.30 15 17 1.13 +++7.20 15 20 1.33 +++5.10 30 12 0.40 ++++++ - the coating is deleted only by pickling++ - insignificant chipping+ - a lot <strong>of</strong> chippingTable 1.2 Coatings Mo/Mo-C obtained in an atmosphere <strong>of</strong> the residual gases.Temperature, °С Pressure, Pa Exposition τ, min. Thickness δ, μm Deposition rate V, μm/min. Adhesion3.90 15 4 0.27 +++35010.0 15 4 0.27 ++12.0 30 10 0.33 +11.0 60 16 0.27 -2.80 15 0.5 0.03 -4003.20 30 1 0.03 -3.80 60 5 0.08 -4504.00 15 2 0.13 ++30 3.70 4 0.13 +Table 2. Parameters <strong>of</strong> CVD process <strong>of</strong> coating application.Sample No. Sample temperature, ° C Exposition, min. Microhardness H v , kg / μm 2 Thickness δ, μm23 430 10 2500 1525 360 10 1800 1025 290 10 2500 10Properties <strong>of</strong> coatings sharply differ in the settemperature interval. At 350°С and 450°С stableuniform deposition <strong>of</strong> coating with high value <strong>of</strong>microhardness is observed: НВ=2200 at 350°С,НВ=1700 at 450°С. The thickness <strong>of</strong> a coating dependslinearly on cure time. The lower temperature, the loweradhesion to the initial sample is observed, while at450°С the coating has the good adhesion with a carrier.Deposition rate <strong>of</strong> the coatings obtained in anatmosphere <strong>of</strong> the residual vapors at temperature 350°Сis even during long enough time intervals; however,quality <strong>of</strong> a coating deteriorates in process <strong>of</strong>magnification <strong>of</strong> coating thickness that is obviouslyrelated with accumulation <strong>of</strong> sufficient internal stressesin a film.Parameters <strong>of</strong> CVD-process <strong>of</strong> coating applicationon samples made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) areshown in table 2. After deposition <strong>of</strong> CVD coatingsamples were polished with diamond paste АSМ7/3with removal <strong>of</strong> 0.004-0.006 mm stock up to recovery<strong>of</strong> flat surface accuracy.Change <strong>of</strong> working pressure within 0.01 … 0.1 torraffects Mo/Mo-C composition and leads toinappreciable decrease in adhesion which becomesmore appreciable at magnification <strong>of</strong> a thickness <strong>of</strong> acoating.4.2 Metallographic examinationMetallophysics measurements <strong>of</strong> the obtainedsamples are carried out on raster-type electronicmicroscope JSM T-300. Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo-Ccoating on samples made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379(Х12Ф1) (a traversal metallographic sample) withmarked zones <strong>of</strong> analysis (a) and an approximatechemical composition <strong>of</strong> analyzed zones (b) isshown in Fig. 1.186 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


analysis (a) and an approximate chemical composition<strong>of</strong> analyzed zones (b) is shown in Fig. 3.a) DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1)Point No. Si Cr Fe Ni Mo Ρ003 97.0 3.0004 96.5 3.5005 2.21 94.79 3.0006 3.17 94.83 2.0007 10.13 22.67 9.90 55.31 2.0008 0.21 6.85 92.13 0.8009 0.34 7.13 91.73 0.8b) Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> analyzed zones.Fig. 1. Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo-C coating on samples made <strong>of</strong>steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) with marked zones <strong>of</strong>analysis (a), and the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> analyzedzones (b).Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo/Mo-C coating on the samplemade <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) in a mappingmode is shown in Fig. 2.Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo-C coating on samples made<strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10)) (a traversalmetallographic sample) with marked zones <strong>of</strong> thea) DIN 1.7709 (25X2 МФ (ЭИ 10)Point No. Si Cr Fe Ni Mo С021 3.40 94.12 2.48022 3.32 94.01 2.67023 3.05 95.61 1.34024 3.40 94.80 1.80025 3.18 94.64 2.18026 2.72 1.98 93.69 1.57027 0.17 1.93 97.69 0.22028 0.25 1.88 97.55 0.32029 0.27 1.67 97.86 0.19b) Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> analyzed zones.Fig. 3. Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo-C coating on samples made <strong>of</strong>steel DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10)) with marked zones<strong>of</strong> the analysis (a) and the chemical composition <strong>of</strong>analyzed zones (b).Fig. 2. Appearance <strong>of</strong> Mo/Mo-C coating on the sample made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1) in a mapping mode. Morecontent <strong>of</strong> the element there matches to more saturated color.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 187


Metallophysics measurements have shown highenough extent <strong>of</strong> coincidence <strong>of</strong> phase composition<strong>of</strong> a carrier material - steels DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1)and DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10)) (zones 009and 029, accordingly).Photos <strong>of</strong> a microrelief <strong>of</strong> coating surfaces areshown in Figs. 4 and 5.Fig. 6. Dependence <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient on loads for afriction pair Mo-C/steel DIN 1.4021 20Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415).Fig. 4. A microrelief <strong>of</strong> a surface <strong>of</strong> the sample (steelDIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10)).Fig. 7. Dependence <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient on a loadingfor a friction pair Mo-C / Avinit coating (on the basis <strong>of</strong>Mo-N).Fig. 5. A microrelief <strong>of</strong> a surface <strong>of</strong> the sample (steelDIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1)) after its polishing.4.3 Results <strong>of</strong> tribological testsMultilayered and microlayer coatings on thebasis <strong>of</strong> Mo-C system are deposited on basicsamples - cubes made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 1.2379 (Х12Ф1)with hardness 56 … 61HRC (НВ~900) with theworking planes polished by diamond paste to reachrequired geometrical parameters (nonflatness - ≤0,001mm, surface roughness - R a 0,08 μm) forcarrying out <strong>of</strong> tribological tests. Parameters <strong>of</strong>CVD-process <strong>of</strong> coating application on examinedsamples and properties <strong>of</strong> the obtained CVDcoatingsare shown in tab. 2. After deposition <strong>of</strong>CVD coatings samples were polished by diamondpaste АSМ7/3 with with removal <strong>of</strong> 0.004-0.006mm stock up to recovery <strong>of</strong> flat surface accuracy.Results <strong>of</strong> tribological tests are presented inFigs. 6-8 and in Tab. 3.Fig. 8. Dependence <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient on a loadingfor a pair <strong>of</strong> a friction Mo-C / Avinit coating (on thebasis <strong>of</strong> Ti-Al-N).When carrying out tribological tests, the specialpriority has been given to studying <strong>of</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> thedeveloped coatings in tribological matings with steels.As is clear from the obtained data, and also byresults <strong>of</strong> carried out earlier tribological studying[10, 11], the best tribological parameters in contactpair with steel are determined for Mo-C coatings.Good tribological properties are exhibited byMo-C coatings in case <strong>of</strong> friction in pairs with hardand extremely hard coatings which have beenalready used in friction pairs <strong>of</strong> precision units inaircraft aggregate building [10-12].188 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 3. Friction coefficients <strong>of</strong> samples during tribological tests.Roller (coating)Avinit coating (on the basis <strong>of</strong> Mo-N)δ =1.5 μm, 2200HVAvinit coating (on the basis <strong>of</strong> Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HVThe sameRun in separatelyThe sameRun in separatelyDIN 1.402120Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),cementation, 88HRCDIN 1.402120Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),run in separatelyCubeApplied loading, kN(coating) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4Mo-C (23) 0.14 0.13 0.127 0.13 0.124 0.12 0.12Mo-C (24) 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.157 0.152 0.127 0.107Mo-C (24) 0.13 0.11 0.133 0.122 0.108 0.105 0.101Mo-C (25) 0.14 0.15 0.153 0.148 0.146 0.145 0.134Mo-C (23)scoringMo-C (24) 0.18 0.17 0.193 0.175 0.16 0.15Mo-C (25)scoringMo-C (25) 0.16 0.18 0.167 0.157 0.152 0.157 0.153Mo-C (23) 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.125 0.126 0.125 0.12Mo-C (23) 0.14 0.14 0.143 0.135 0.128 0.123 0.12Mo-C (24) 0.14 0.14 0.137 0.137Mo-C (25) 0.11 0.125 0.127 0.122 0.132 0.127 0.12MoC (24) 0.14 0.14 0.133 0.13 0.126 0.123 0.123Table 4. Estimate <strong>of</strong> aging traces on samples after tribological tests.Мо-С cube (No. 23) δ ≈ 15 μm, 2500HV; After a lapped finishing with diamond paste δ ≈ 10 μm.Ή Roller (coating)Test resultsDIN 1.4021The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -1 20Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),cementation, ≥88HRCdepth - ≈0.4 μm; - width - 0.6 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.233 aAvinit coating (based on Mo-N)δ =1.5 μm, 2200HVAvinit coating (based on Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HVAvinit coating (on the basis <strong>of</strong>Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HVRun in separatelyThe cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - ≈0.5 μm; - width - 0.8 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace, signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absentThe cube has 2 seizure sites which are placed near to ribs <strong>of</strong> a cube, the mainaging trace has following parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram):- Depth - ≈3.4 μm; - width - 1 mm.The roller has two ring furrows which are reciprocal to the seizure sites on thecubeThe cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - ≈1.2 μm; - width - 0.8 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.Mo-C Cube (No. 24) δ ≈ 10мкм, 1800HV; after a lapped finishing diamond paste δ ≈ 5 μm.No. Roller (coating)Test resultsDIN 1.4021The cube has large fretting in width <strong>of</strong> ≈7 mm4 20Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),The roller has ring traces <strong>of</strong> cube material transportcementation, ≥88HRC55а66аAvinit coating (based on Mo-N)δ =1.5 μm, 2200HVAvinit coating (based on Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HVDIN 1.402120Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),cementation, ≥88HRC,run in separatelyThe cube has aging tracesThe roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - ≈18 μm; - width - 1.8 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - ≈19μm; - width - 1.9mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - 0.4 μm; - width - 0.5 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.Mo-C Cube (No. 25) δ ≈ 10μm, 2000 … 2500HV; after a lapped finishing diamond paste δ ≈ 5 μm.No. Roller (coating)Test resultsDIN 1.4021The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -7 20Х3МВФ (ЭИ 415),cementation, ≥88HRCdepth - ≈0.3 μm; - width - ≈0.5 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 189


899аAvinit coating (based on Mo-N)δ =1.5 μm, 2200HVAvinit coating (based on Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HVAvinit coating (based on Ti-Al-N)δ =1.5 μm, 3500HV run inseparatelyThe coating on a cube inside the trace is visually worn to the carrier.The cube has aging traces with parameters (determined using the pr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): -depth - ≈4.4 μm; - width - 1 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.The cube has 2 seizure sites which are placed near to ribs <strong>of</strong> a cube; flaws on acoating were formed on the same plane <strong>of</strong> a cube.The roller has two ring furrows which are reciprocal to the seizure sites on thecube.Exfoliation <strong>of</strong> the coating on the given plane <strong>of</strong> a cube, along aging traces fromboth its sides, is available, parameters <strong>of</strong> aging traces (determined using thepr<strong>of</strong>ilogram): - depth - 19 μm; - width - 2 mm.The roller has a normal aging trace; signs <strong>of</strong> wear are visually absent.When friction <strong>of</strong> cubes with Mo-C coatings overrollers with Avinit coating (on the basis <strong>of</strong> Mo-N),low enough antifrictional parameters are alsoobserved.Rollers with extremely hard Avinit coatings (onthe basis <strong>of</strong> Ti-Al-N) exhibit higher frictioncoefficients, and there are cases <strong>of</strong> a scoring <strong>of</strong> Mo-C coating.Results <strong>of</strong> an estimate <strong>of</strong> aging traces in testedfriction pairs after tribological tests are shown inTable 4.It is noted, that in case <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> already run-inrollers, minimum friction coefficients are obtained,thus cases <strong>of</strong> a scoring <strong>of</strong> Mo-C coating are notavailable.Carried out tribological tests <strong>of</strong> Мо-С coatingstestify to efficiency <strong>of</strong> the developed coatings forprecision friction pairs («steel/coating» and«coating/coating») with the raised wear hardnessand low friction coefficient.5. CONCLUSIONS1. Process <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> multilayered Мо-Сcoatings by a chemical vapor depositionmethod with use <strong>of</strong> organometalliccompounds is developed. The multilayeredcomposite coatings on the basis <strong>of</strong> Mo-Csystem are obtained. Optimization <strong>of</strong>processes <strong>of</strong> deposition <strong>of</strong> qualitative tightlyinterconnected coatings is carried out.2. The kinetics <strong>of</strong> coating deposition process isstudied. Coating deposition rate up to 100μm/hour is obtained.3. Metallographic examination confirmpossibility <strong>of</strong> the low-temperature deposition<strong>of</strong> qualitative very hard Mo-C coatings indeveloped CVD process, good adhesion tocarrier materials (to steels DIN 1.2379(Х12Ф1), DIN 1.7709 (25Х2МФ (ЭИ10))without decrease in strength properties <strong>of</strong> a steeland without a deterioration <strong>of</strong> an initial surfacefinish class is thus provided.4. Multilayered and nanolayer coatings onsamples for tribological tests are obtainedand tribological tests <strong>of</strong> samples with coatingsare carried out.5. Possibility <strong>of</strong> postoperative machining <strong>of</strong>coatings by industrial methods without losses<strong>of</strong> the functional properties <strong>of</strong> coatings isproven.6. Tribological tests exhibit high tribologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> Мо-С coatings and testify toperspectivity <strong>of</strong> the developed coatings forselection <strong>of</strong> optimum constructions <strong>of</strong>coatings for raise <strong>of</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> precisionfriction pairs.REFERENCES[1] Ivanov V. E.: Crystallization <strong>of</strong> refractory metalsfrom vapor phase / [V.E.Ivanov,E.P.Nechiporenko, V.M.Krivoruchko, V.V.Sagalovich]. //M.—Atomizdat.—1974.[2] Sagalovich А.V. Coating the surface <strong>of</strong>the figurine-precision gas-phase method (CVD) /[А.V. Sagalovich, V.V. Sagalovich ea.]. //Physical surface engineering.—2011.— v. 9.—№3.— P. 229-236.[3] Powell K.Chemical vapor deposition / [K.Powell,J. Oxley, J. Blocher Jr.]. //Translated from theEnglish//M.—Atomizdat.—1970.[4] Wen-Cheng J. Wei. Processing and Properties <strong>of</strong>(Mo, Cr) Oxycarbides from MOCVD / [Wen-Cheng J. Wei, Ming-Hung Lo]. //Appl.Organometallic .—1998.—v. 12.—P. 201–220.[5] Skudin V.V. Obtaining <strong>of</strong> membranes using amethod <strong>of</strong> chemical vapor deposition in a reactorwith "cold" walls / [Skudin V. V, S. G. Streltsov].//Crit. Technologies. Membrany. .—2007.—№ 2(34).— P. 22-33.[6] Douard A. Reactivity <strong>of</strong> Cr (CO) 6 in atmosphericpressure CVD processes for the growth <strong>of</strong> variousmetallurgical coating [Douard A, Maury F.].//Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci.—2007.—v. 15.[7] .Sagalovich А.V. Avinit installation fordeposition <strong>of</strong> multilayered functional coatings[O.V.Sagalovich, O.V.Kononykhin, V.V. Popovea]. // Physical surface engineering. .—2010.—v.8.—P. 336-347.[8] Lyubchenko A.P.. Examination <strong>of</strong> wear <strong>of</strong>vacuum-plasma coatings made <strong>of</strong> TiN at afriction on metal materials / [A.P. Lyubchenko,190 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


A.K.Oleynik, V.M.Matsevity, ea.]. //Friction andwear.—1981.—No. 6.—P. 29-31.[9] Dudnik S.F.. Examination <strong>of</strong> friction and wearproperties <strong>of</strong> the ionic-plasma coatings oproduced on an aluminium alloy / [S.F.Dudnik,A.V.Sagalovich, V.V. Sagalovich, ea.]. //Physical surface engineering.—2004.—v. 2.—P.110-114.[10] .Sagalovich A.V. Examination <strong>of</strong> tribologicalproperties <strong>of</strong> multicomponent multilayeredcoatings <strong>of</strong> Avinit type / [A.V.Sagalovich, V.V.Sagalovich, A.V.Kononykhin, etc.]. //Bulletin <strong>of</strong>KhNARU.—2011.—v. 53.-P. 87-94.[11] Sagalovych A. The Tribological Investigation <strong>of</strong>Multicomponent Multilayered Ion-plasmaCoatings Avinit / [A. Sagalovych V. Sagalovych,A. Kononyhin ea.]. //Tribology in industry.—2011.—v. 33.—No. 2.-P. 79-86.[12] Sagalovych A. Experimental research <strong>of</strong>multicomponent multilayer ion-plasma Avinitcoatings / [A. Sagalovych V. Sagalovych, A.Kononyhin ea.]. // Physical surface engineering. .—2012.—v. 10.—P. 136-14813 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 191


Tribology <strong>of</strong> MachineElements13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ’1315 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, Serbia


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEQUILIBRIUM STATE FORMATION FEATURES OFSURFACE LAYERS OF MACHINE PARTSVyacheslav F. Bezjazychnyj, Alexander N. SutyaginFederal State-Financed Educational Institution <strong>of</strong> High Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Education “P. A. Solovyov Rybinsk State AviationTechnical University”, Rybinsk, Yaroslavl region, Russian Federation,e-mail: technology@rgata.ruAbstract: The article describes the problem <strong>of</strong> forming the equilibrium state <strong>of</strong> surface layer <strong>of</strong> friction units.The possibility <strong>of</strong> taking into account the parameters <strong>of</strong> the lubricant in the mathematical model <strong>of</strong> therelationship <strong>of</strong> the wear rate with the equilibrium parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer <strong>of</strong> parts is considered.Possibility <strong>of</strong> technological support equilibrium parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer <strong>of</strong> machine parts is discussed.Keywords: friction, wear rate, surface layer, machining, quality parameters, equilibrium state.1. INTRODUCTIONPractice <strong>of</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> machines andmechanisms shows that one <strong>of</strong> the major causes <strong>of</strong>failures <strong>of</strong> various kinds <strong>of</strong> equipment is thedestruction <strong>of</strong> its parts or wear. Destruction andwear usually begins with working surfaces, so thestate <strong>of</strong> the last <strong>of</strong>ten becomes the dominant factorin determining the reliability and durability <strong>of</strong>manufactured equipment.Study the wear <strong>of</strong> machine parts friction unitsindicate that the transition to the normal process <strong>of</strong>wear most <strong>of</strong> them are directed to change theirinitial geometry.During the break-in such quality parameters <strong>of</strong>machine parts undergo significant changes aspr<strong>of</strong>ile deviation, waviness, roughness <strong>of</strong> theirsurfaces, as well as the physical and mechanicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the surface layer. If time and thewear are large enough, the stable steady state isreached tribosystem when the geometry <strong>of</strong> partssurfaces becomes conformal.2. THE STUDIED PHYSICAL MODELResearch the wear can provide a theoreticaljustification <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> stablereproducing geometric shapes <strong>of</strong> surfaces and theirphysical and mechanical properties in wear processin the given conditions <strong>of</strong> relative motion andloading.This rationale is based on the fundamentalprinciples <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics <strong>of</strong> dissipativesystems, which tribosystem are.Such systems can exchange with other systemsand the environment energy and mass (eg, massworn out particles), so stationary statescharacterized by a constant gradient <strong>of</strong> entropy canoccurΔS = S° – S = const, (1)where S°– entropy <strong>of</strong> the equilibrium state <strong>of</strong> thesystem; S – instantaneous entropy <strong>of</strong> the system.In the steady state, all the processes <strong>of</strong> heat andmass transfer are independent <strong>of</strong> time, asdetermined by the configuration <strong>of</strong> the system onlyin general terms and conditions on its borders.Tribosystem exhibit properties <strong>of</strong> selforganizationconsist <strong>of</strong> to consistently reproducethe macroscopic space-time structures that can existonly through the exchange <strong>of</strong> flows <strong>of</strong> energy(matter).Under self-limitation created by nature, astribosystem located on the border <strong>of</strong> artificialdevices and natural systems, and the selforganizationcan arise from a chaotic state, that is,the initial conditions do not matter, and therunning-in period, <strong>of</strong> course, increases anddecreases life <strong>of</strong> the friction units.The equilibrium state <strong>of</strong> the surface isdetermined by the minimum <strong>of</strong> its free energy,which may differ from the minimum <strong>of</strong> surface,13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 195


which is responsible for one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for thedeviation <strong>of</strong> the real surface <strong>of</strong> the crystal from theinitially smooth and the emergence <strong>of</strong> so-callednatural roughness [3]. Such modifications <strong>of</strong>surface geometry are sub roughness, whichsignificantly exceeds the atomic scale roughnessarising at vibrations <strong>of</strong> the atoms or molecules dueto thermal fluctuations.The most appropriate criterion for selectingmaterials for the parts <strong>of</strong> tribosystems can be takenminimum value <strong>of</strong> frictional work [4].Friction work calculated by the formula [5]Wfr fFS , (2)frwhere F – normal force <strong>of</strong> friction pair elementsinteraction; f – a friction coefficient; S fr – frictiontrack.Tribosystem are open thermodynamic systemsthat exchange energy and matter with theenvironment. Friction is the process <strong>of</strong> convertingthe external mechanical energy into internal energyin the form <strong>of</strong> vibration and wave motion <strong>of</strong>particles <strong>of</strong> tribosystem followed by thermal,thermionic, acoustic, and other phenomena. Most <strong>of</strong>this energy is converted into heat and is given to theenvironment, the other - is to change the physicaland chemical state <strong>of</strong> the surface layers <strong>of</strong> thematerial. Dissipation <strong>of</strong> energy corresponds to anincrease <strong>of</strong> entropy (dS > 0).Energy balance <strong>of</strong> tribosystem according to thefirst law <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics describes by theequation.Wfr q W. (3)where q – energy <strong>of</strong> heat exchange with theenvironment, ΔW – change <strong>of</strong> internal energy is thesum <strong>of</strong> the energy used to change the structure <strong>of</strong>the material and energy <strong>of</strong> heating.At the same time, the work <strong>of</strong> the friction forceis the sum <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> plastic deformation,hysteresis loss and the elastic deformation <strong>of</strong> thedispersion, that is, the work expended in theformation <strong>of</strong> new surfaces and associated with thesurface energy <strong>of</strong> solids [6, 7].The basis <strong>of</strong> the thermodynamic approach t<strong>of</strong>racture and wear <strong>of</strong> solids is energy mechanicalanalogy (deformation) and thermal (melting andsublimation) <strong>of</strong> failure.The energy spent on the deformation andfracture <strong>of</strong> solid bodies, compared with one <strong>of</strong> thethermodynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the material (heat<strong>of</strong> sublimation enthalpy <strong>of</strong> the solid and liquid state,latent heat <strong>of</strong> fusion). In this case, it is assumed thatthermodynamic properties are independent <strong>of</strong> thestructure <strong>of</strong> the material. The body is treated as acontinuous, homogeneous, isotropic medium with astatistically uniformly distributed structuralelements.Plastic deformation is considered as acombination <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong>microscopic atomic-molecular rearrangementsassociated with the generation <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong>deformation (dislocations).Plastic deformation <strong>of</strong> the surface temperaturebelow the recrystallization temperature leads towork hardening <strong>of</strong> the surface layer and itsstrengthening. At widely differing hardnessstructural components <strong>of</strong> the material and repeatedexposure <strong>of</strong> loading occurs initially high wear <strong>of</strong>s<strong>of</strong>t base; specific pressures acting on the solidcomponent thereby increasing, solid componentsare pressed into a s<strong>of</strong>t base, some <strong>of</strong> them arebroken up and moved further under the forces <strong>of</strong>friction. As a result <strong>of</strong> such selective wear surfaceenriched solid structural components and gets stitchstructure that during wear <strong>of</strong> babbit, for example,according to research <strong>of</strong> M. M. Khrushchov andA. L. Kuritsyna [8].As a result <strong>of</strong> the interaction <strong>of</strong> the interfacedparts new surfaces are formed, which is followedby the energy release, γ ef , consumed for itsforming [6]: f F,Rz HV , (4)ef ,where F – the normal force <strong>of</strong> friction pair elementsinteraction; Rz – ten point height <strong>of</strong>irregularities [9].Rough surface can be considered as a set <strong>of</strong>irregularities randomly located on a perfect surfaceand having a random size, in other words, as therealization <strong>of</strong> the random field. This approachmakes it possible to represent the surface as a scalarrandom function [10]z = z(t, ω), (5)where the parameter t runs through the set <strong>of</strong> values<strong>of</strong> T, defined by the spatial arrangement <strong>of</strong> therough surface; ω – elementary event <strong>of</strong> aprobability space Ω.To determine the surface characteristics requiredfor calculations in tribology, <strong>of</strong>ten enoughknowledge only first two derivatives <strong>of</strong> the functionz(t, ω). Thus there is a need to calculate the density<strong>of</strong> the joint distribution <strong>of</strong> several random variables.Quantify the contact <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces is animportant step in the development <strong>of</strong> physicalmodels <strong>of</strong> frictional interaction. It requiresconsideration <strong>of</strong> both the characteristics <strong>of</strong> theroughness, and the specific properties <strong>of</strong> thecontacting bodies, depending on their internalstructure, loading time and environmentalconditions.196 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Most <strong>of</strong> the friction units <strong>of</strong> products used inengineering works in conditions <strong>of</strong> oiling Thisrequires a comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> processes in thearea <strong>of</strong> friction as lubricant in some way facilitatesextraction <strong>of</strong> heat from the friction contact zone, theremoval <strong>of</strong> the zone <strong>of</strong> wear and corrosionprotection, and the protection <strong>of</strong> the frictionsurfaces and other structures from the effects <strong>of</strong> theenvironment and also seal gaps, etc.Taking into consideration that expression,V W / S (V fr W – the volume <strong>of</strong> the worn material, S fr –the friction track) represents the value <strong>of</strong> the wearrate J V [11], and changing <strong>of</strong> an inner energy isdetermined by the formula <strong>of</strong> specific energy <strong>of</strong>deformation ΔW accumulated in the material as aresult <strong>of</strong> dislocation forming [12] W f HVHV , , G, (6), 0 0where G – a displacement module <strong>of</strong> an examinedmaterial; α 0 – a parameter <strong>of</strong> interdislocationinteraction; HV – a microhardness <strong>of</strong> a surface layer<strong>of</strong> an examined part at the specified depth; HV 0 – amicrohardness <strong>of</strong> a undeformed material; based onenergy-based approach to the problem <strong>of</strong> definingthe relationship <strong>of</strong> the wear rate <strong>of</strong> work surfaces <strong>of</strong>machine parts with quality parameters <strong>of</strong> thesurface layer the wear rate functional relationshipwith geometrical (roughness) and physicomechanical(degree <strong>of</strong> work hardening) parameters<strong>of</strong> surface layer <strong>of</strong> machine parts during normaloperation can be represented aJV0,55FG(0,9fSRz F T (7)Sfr bal 0 ,2 4 )exp(200/ )2 2fr RzbalNbalHV0 0,2where J V – the wear rate [m 3 /m]; F – the normalforce <strong>of</strong> friction pair elements interaction [N]; f – afriction coefficient; S fr – the friction track [m]; Rz bal– the balanced roughness <strong>of</strong> the interfaced surfaces<strong>of</strong> the components [m]; 0,2 – the yield strengthconditional with the tolerance <strong>of</strong> 0,2% for the value<strong>of</strong> the plastic deformation at stressing [Pa]; T – thetemperature in friction area [K]; N bal – the balanceddegree <strong>of</strong> hardening; HV 0 – a microhardness <strong>of</strong> aundeformed material [Pa].3. CONCLUSIONOn the basis <strong>of</strong> [13] can be defined relationshipequilibrium parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer parts withmachining process parameters.The analysis <strong>of</strong> the experimental research results<strong>of</strong> the wear rate <strong>of</strong> contacted surfaces aftermachining has shown that the receivedmathematical model <strong>of</strong> the correlation between thewear rate and the technological requirements <strong>of</strong>machining allows for calculating the wear rate <strong>of</strong>the interfaced machine components after therunning-in period.REFERENCES[1] A. G. Suslov, A. M. Dalsky: Nauchnye osnovytehnologii mashinostroenija (Scientific Basis <strong>of</strong>Mechanical Engineering), - Mashinostroenie,Moscow, 2002.[2] A. V. Chichinadze, E. D. Brown, N. A. Boucher:Osnovy tribologii (trenie, iznos, smazka)(Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> tribology (friction, wear andlubrication)), - Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 2001.[3] V. S Kombalov: Ocenka tribotehnicheskih svojstvkontaktirujushhih poverhnostej (Evaluation <strong>of</strong>tribological properties <strong>of</strong> contacting surfaces), -Nauka, Moscow, 1983.[4] V. I. Butenko: Struktura i svojstva poverhnostnogosloja detalej tribosistem (Structure and properties <strong>of</strong>the surface layer <strong>of</strong> parts tribosystems), - Taganrog:TTI UFU, 2012.[5] U. N. Drozdov, V. G. Pavlov, V. N. Puchkov:Trenie i iznos v jekstremalnyh uslovijah:Spravochnik (Friction and wear in extremeconditions: Reference), - Mashinostroenie, Moscow,1986.[6] V. N. Kashcheev: Processy v zone frikcionnogokontakta metallov (Processes in the area <strong>of</strong> frictionalcontact metals), - Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1978.[7] V. Weibul: Ustalostnye ispytanija i analiz ihrezultatov (Fatigue testing and analysis <strong>of</strong> theresults), - Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1964.[8] I. P. Sukharev: Prochnost sharnirnyh uzlov mashin(The strength <strong>of</strong> hinged machine units), -Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1977.[9] Russian State Standard 25142-82, 1988,Sherohovatost poverhnosti. Terminy I opredelenia.(Surface roughness. Terms and definitions),publishing company <strong>of</strong> State Standards, Moscow.[10] A. I. Sviridyonok, S. A. Chijik, M. I. Petrokovets:Mehanika diskretnogo frikcionnogo kontakta(Mechanics <strong>of</strong> discrete frictional contact), - Minsk,1990.[11] Russian State Standard 27674-88, Trenie,iznashivanie i smazka. Terminy i opredelenija,Moscow, 1988.[12] V. F. Bezjazychnyj, A. N. Sutyagin:Tehnologicheskoe obespechenie iznosostoikostidetalei mashin na osnove izucheniya nakoplennoienergii v poverhnostnom sloe detali prideformacionnom uprochnenii pri obrabotke(Machine components wear resistance technologicalassurance based on analysis <strong>of</strong> accumulated energy<strong>of</strong> part surface layer while strain hardening duringthe machining), Uprochnyauschie tehnologii ipokrytiya, 7, pp. 3-6.[13] V. F. Bezjazychnyj: Metod podobija v tehnologiimashinostroenija (Method <strong>of</strong> Similarity inmechanical engineering), Mashinostroenie,Moscow, 2012.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 197


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTHE INVESTIGATION OF COATED TOOLS TRIBOLOGICALCHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCE ON THE CUTTING PROCESSAND THE QUALITY PARAMETERS OF THE PARTS SURFACELAYERFomenko Roman NikolaevichFSBEIHPE «Rybinsk State Aviation Technical University» named after P.A. Solovjev (RSATU), Russia,fomenko85@mail.ruAbstract: The influence <strong>of</strong> cutting tools nanostructured coatings on the parameters <strong>of</strong> machined partssurface layer has been researched. The interaction between friction characteristics <strong>of</strong> coated tools and shearplane angle during machining has been determined. The results <strong>of</strong> different materials cutting with coatedcarbide-tipped tools have been shown.Keywords: nanostructured coatings, quality parameters <strong>of</strong> the surface layer, tools friction coefficient1. INTRODUCTIONThe most important production properties arereliability and endurance. These properties provideproduct safety and competitiveness. The main causeleading to breakdown <strong>of</strong> parts is fatigue cracks.Such cracks appear and propagate in thin surfacelayers <strong>of</strong> parts. In order to hamper crack growing,the surface layer has to exhibit certain features.They are: roughness, residual stress and strainhardening, which depend on the characteristics <strong>of</strong>cutting operation.The cutting force, temperature <strong>of</strong> cutting, depth<strong>of</strong> wear hardening and degree <strong>of</strong> deformation arereferring to the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> cuttingoperation. These characteristics influence on theparts quality, reliability and endurance.Technological conditions <strong>of</strong> cutting such as toolsgeometry, processing conditions, work materialproperties and tooling material properties, includingtribological feathers, determine the characteristics<strong>of</strong> cutting process. Therefore there is a need toselect optimal cutting conditions to provide therequirement parts quality. In order to select optimalcutting conditions, there is necessity to have aspecial methodic, which takes into considerationthe relationship between parts quality andtechnological conditions.2. TASKS OF RESEARCHAt the Rybinsk state <strong>of</strong> aviation technicaluniversity named after P. A. Solovjev (Russia)there was developed the methodic, which permit toestimate the optimal cutting conditions. On the base<strong>of</strong> this methodic underlay a functional connectionbetween cutting rate, tools geometry and theparameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer, accuracy <strong>of</strong> machiningand the rigidity <strong>of</strong> manufacturing system, includingwork material and tool material properties.But all advanced tools have wear-resistantcoatings that exhibit specific properties. Wearresistantcoatings have low friction coefficient inconsequence <strong>of</strong> weak adhesion interaction <strong>of</strong>covering material with work material. Theyinfluence on the cutting process and qualityparameters <strong>of</strong> the surface layer. Tools coveringsreduce chips contact length with tools surface,cutting force, temperature <strong>of</strong> cutting anddeformation <strong>of</strong> cut allowance. It causes due toincreasing <strong>of</strong> a chip flow angle.Thus the main purpose <strong>of</strong> research was thecreation <strong>of</strong> the methodology for calculation <strong>of</strong>technological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning, which providesrequired quality and accuracy levels at the stage <strong>of</strong>machining and takes into consideration thetribological properties <strong>of</strong> coated tools.198 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


In order to provide both high parts quality andmaximum tools life one should calculate so called«optimal cutting speed» v О . Optimal cutting rates(v О , S О ) correspond to the optimal cuttingtemperature. It is constant magnitude for the definecombination work – tool material [1]. Whenmachining with this temperature, maximum toolslifetime, minimal roughness <strong>of</strong> machined surfaceRa, minimal amount <strong>of</strong> surfaces defects have beenoccurred. Therefore these cutting rates should beused, when finishing work was performed for parts,which work in corrosive medium and hightemperature, because the surface layer has to containminimal amount <strong>of</strong> defects. For estimating <strong>of</strong> theoptimal cutting speed the equation is obtained bypr<strong>of</strong>. Silin S. S. [1]:vOCO⋅ a ⎛ a b c ⎞a⎜1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ ρ ⋅θ=Pz⎟ , (1)1 ⎝ min ⎠where a 1 , b 1 – is the thickness and the width <strong>of</strong> cutrespectively [m]; а – is the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the temperatureconductivity <strong>of</strong> the work material [m 2 /s]; сρ – is thespecific heat capacity per unit volume[J/(m 3 · s · degree)]; θ – is the temperature in the cuttingarea, °С; n, C o – are coefficients, which depend on theproperties <strong>of</strong> work material; Pz min – is a minimalstabilized cutting force [N].But very <strong>of</strong>ten there is a need to select a cuttingcondition, which differs from the optimal ones.Therefore the opportunity to estimate thetechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning with taking intoconsideration the tribological properties <strong>of</strong> coatedtools, will provide the required quality and serviceproperties <strong>of</strong> parts at the stage <strong>of</strong> machining.The analysis <strong>of</strong> the mathematical models forestimating <strong>of</strong> the parameters <strong>of</strong> cutting process andquality <strong>of</strong> the surface level has shown, that themore important variable quantities are the shearplane angle β 1 and the adhesive component <strong>of</strong> thenfriction coefficient f M . Thus the main tasks <strong>of</strong> thescientific research were:1. To investigate the influence <strong>of</strong> tribologicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> coated tools on cutting process andthe parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer.2. To define optimal cutting speed for tools withdifferent coatings.3. EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONSThe wide range <strong>of</strong> cutting rates, different workmaterials and coated tools were selected forperforming <strong>of</strong> experiments (Table 1).In the capacity <strong>of</strong> tools were used the replaceableinserts 120412, material – VK6R (chemicalcomposition: Co – 6%, basis – WC) and TT7K12(chemical composition: Co – 12%, TiC – 1 %, TaC –7%, basis – WC). The different compositenanolaminated ion-plasmous coatings weredeposited on the replaceable inserts: (Ti;Si)N,(Ti,Si,Zr)CN and (Ti;Si;Al)N. Other groupreplaceable inserts was modified by implanting <strong>of</strong>nanoparticle TiB 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Ta 2 O 3 and ZrB 2 in worksurface <strong>of</strong> tools. All selected coatings have beencharacterized by the minimal adhesive <strong>of</strong> the toolssurfaces with work material, and also they have beenprovided maximum tools lifetime. The machiningwas performed by the regular engine lathe NH 22.The temperature was measured by means <strong>of</strong> adynamic thermocouple <strong>of</strong> work material – toolingmaterial. The normal component <strong>of</strong> a cutting forcePz was measured by using the tool dynamometerDyna-Z, which was connected with personalcomputer (Figure 1). The tool dynamometer Dyna-Zis a self-sufficient measurement system, which canuse without an additional power source, atensometric station and DAQ board. And a precisionmeasured signal can be shown and saved in a veryuseful for operator form [3].Table 1. Experimental conditionsChanging parametersToolsgeometryCuttingrateWork materialHeat-resistant alloy(CrNi77ТiAlW)EI437Stainless steel(05Cr12Ni2Co3Мo2WV)EK26Cutting angle, γ° 5 8 0Relief angle, α° 10 12 10Lead angle, φ, φ 1 ° 45Nose radius, r, [mm] 1,2Titanium alloyOT4Deph t [mm] 0,25; 0,5; 0,75; 1Feed S [mm/rev] 0,07; 0,14; 0,2; 0,32Speed v [m/min] 14-170 33-190 15-130Tool material –VK6R TT7K12 VK6R ТТ7К12 VK6Rcarbide materialNanostructured coating (Ti,Si)N Ta 2 O 3 (Ti,Si)N Ta 2 O 3 (Ti,Si)N(Ti,Si,Al) ZrB 2 (Ti,Si,Al)N ZrB 2 (Ti,Si,Zr)CNNTiB 2 TiB 2 ZrB 2Al 2 O 3 Al 2 O 3 Al 2 O 313 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 199


Fig. 1. The dynamometer Dyna-Z4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe experimental data <strong>of</strong> machinabilityinvestigation has been shown, that a cover <strong>of</strong> toolcan reduce a temperature θ in a cutting area on 50-70 °С, and a cutting force Pz can be reduced on 10-30% (Figure 2).Thus on the base <strong>of</strong> obtained powerdependences, one can make an equation <strong>of</strong>machinability to estimate <strong>of</strong> optimal cutting speedv О for different combination work material – coatedtool. The equations <strong>of</strong> machinability for consideredexamples have been given on Table 2.The optimal cutting speed <strong>of</strong> coated tool exceedsthe optimal cutting speed <strong>of</strong> uncoated tool. Thenfewer the coatings friction coefficient, then biggeroptimal cutting speed.In order to estimate the influence <strong>of</strong> coated toolson the parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer, one have todetermine the influence <strong>of</strong> coated tools on a shearplane angle β 1 or a criterion B. This criterion is one<strong>of</strong> the major parameter, which used for estimating<strong>of</strong> roughness, residual stress and strain hardening inthe parts surface layer.Fig. 2. The dependence <strong>of</strong> a cutting force andtemperature on cutting conditions and tools cover; workmaterial – Stainless steel EK26; Tool material – carbidematerial VK6R; tools geometry: φ = φ 1 = 45°, γ = 8°; α= 7°, r = 1,2 mm; cutting rate: t = 1 mm; S = 0,32mm/rev; nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> tool: VK6R(without cover); (Ti; Si)N; (Ti; Si; Al)N;TiB2; Al 2 O 3.B = tg β 1 – Is the quantity, which defines thedegree <strong>of</strong> allowance plastic deformation and thedeformation <strong>of</strong> parts surface layer.The quantity β 1 was estimated by means <strong>of</strong>Tim’s I. A. formula using a chip reductioncoefficient k а , which was determinedexperimentally [1].cos( β1− γ )k a =, (2)sin βwhere γ – is a cutting angle.1Figure 3 shows the dependence <strong>of</strong> criterion B onthe technological conditions <strong>of</strong> operation.Table 2. The equations <strong>of</strong> machinability.Materials VK6R–EK26 VK6R–EK26–(Ti,Si)N VK6R–EK26–Al 2 O 3Equation <strong>of</strong>2,472,48⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⎛⎞machinability 2,31⋅a ⎜ a1⋅b1⋅ cρ⎟ 2,76 ⋅ a ⎜ a1⋅ b1⋅ cρ⎟ 4,76 ⋅ a ⎜ a1⋅ b1⋅ cρ⎟vO=0,72a⎜ ⎟ vO=0,7661 0,77 0 , 083a⎜ ⎟ vO=0,695⎝ t ⋅ St1 0,68 0 , 106a⎜⎟t1 0,737 0 , 044⎠⎝ t ⋅ S ⎠⎝ t ⋅ St⎠Frictioncoefficientf M0,44 0,35 0,16θ = 800 °Сv О [m/min],cutting ratet = 1 [mm];56 64 102S = 0,32[mm/rev]2,53200 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Fig. 3. The comparison the criterion В andtechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> operation; Work material –the stainless steel EK26, tool – TT7K12, coating – ZrB 2.It is clearly shown, that in the time <strong>of</strong> increasing<strong>of</strong> cutting speed v the criterion В increases too. It isthe reason for increasing <strong>of</strong> an angle <strong>of</strong> shear planeβ 1 . The angle <strong>of</strong> shear plane β 1 increases, becausethe materials ultimate stress σ В reduces by reason <strong>of</strong>increasing <strong>of</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> deformation and temperaturein the cutting area.On the base <strong>of</strong> experimental research theinfluence <strong>of</strong> different technological conditions onthe criterion В has been obtained. The quantity <strong>of</strong>shear plane β 1 <strong>of</strong> coated tool increasesapproximately on 5-10 %. But experimentalequations are limited by technological conditions <strong>of</strong>experiments and couldn’t be used for otherconditions or other covers <strong>of</strong> tool. Therefore themethodology for estimating <strong>of</strong> a criterion B forother covers <strong>of</strong> tool has been developed. Thismethodology is based on the taking intoconsideration adhesive component <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient f M <strong>of</strong> coated tool.For determination <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient twoapproaches were used. According to the firstapproach, friction coefficient μ F was determined asa ratio <strong>of</strong> a tangential force to a normal force <strong>of</strong>cutting:F FtanPy + Pх Ру ⋅ cosϕ+ Px ⋅ cos(90 − ϕ)µ = = =,(3)N РzPzwhere μ F – friction coefficient; Py, Px, Pz – components<strong>of</strong> a cutting force, [Н]; F tan – tangential force to a cutterface, [Н]; N – normal force to the cutter face, [Н]; Py –radial component <strong>of</strong> a cutting force, [Н]; Px – axialcomponent <strong>of</strong> a cutting force, [Н].On the figure 4 the dependence <strong>of</strong> criterion Band friction coefficient μ F on a dimensionlessv ⋅ a1complex Pe = , which defines theatechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> operation, has beenshown.The comparison <strong>of</strong> curves on the figure 4permits to create the proportion:В21Fµ ⋅ В1= (4)µF2The magnitude <strong>of</strong> unknown criterion B 2 can beapproximately estimated if the magnitudes <strong>of</strong>F Fcriterion B 1 and friction coefficients µ1, µ2whichcorrespond to the tools with different coatings, areknown. But the determination <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient μ F according to the first approachdoesn’t take into consideration the temperature inthe cutting area.The second approach has ‘not this shortcoming.According to the second approach fordetermination <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient theadhesiometer was used (figure 5). It is known, thatthe friction coefficient:f = f D + f M , (5)where f D – deformation component <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient; f М – adhesion (molecular) component <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient:Fig. 4. The dependence <strong>of</strong> criterion B and friction coefficient μ F on a dimensionless complex Pe; work material –Stainless steel EK26; tool material – carbide material VK6R; nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> tool: VK6R (withoutcover); (Ti;Si)N; (Ti;Si;Al)N; TiB 2 ; Al 2 O 313 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 201


f M3 F ⋅ R= ⋅ , (6)4 N ⋅ rwhere R – radius <strong>of</strong> the disc, [m]; r – radius <strong>of</strong> theimpress on the sample, [m]; N – normal force, [H]; F –peripheral force on the disc, [H].quality and accuracy levels at the stage <strong>of</strong>machining and takes into consideration thetribological properties <strong>of</strong> coated tools, has beendeveloped. The methodology can estimatetechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning and solve aninverse task – it can estimate roughness, residualstress and strain hardening. The algorithm forcalculation <strong>of</strong> required technological conditions <strong>of</strong>turning was implemented in the s<strong>of</strong>tware (figure 7).Opportunity to choose oredit a function <strong>of</strong> frictionFig. 5. The flow chart <strong>of</strong> one-ball adhesiometer; 1 –samples <strong>of</strong> the work material; 2 – indenter <strong>of</strong> the toolmaterial; N – normal force, which impress the indenter[H]; F – peripheral force, which roll the disc, [H].Figure 6 shows the friction coefficient, whichwas determined for different temperatures andcombinations <strong>of</strong> work materials – coated indenter(pin).Figure 6. The influence <strong>of</strong> the temperature on afriction coefficient; work material – heat-resistant alloyEI437; tool material – carbide material H10F;nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> indentor: H10F (withoutcover); (Ti;Si)N; (Ti;Si;Al)N;TiB 2 ; Al 2 O 3.Thus if the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the criterion B 1 <strong>of</strong>cover 1 and the functions <strong>of</strong> friction f M = f(θ) <strong>of</strong>cover 1 and 2 like the dependence <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient on the temperature θ are known, themagnitude <strong>of</strong> a unknown criterion B 2 <strong>of</strong> cover 2can be approximately estimated by means <strong>of</strong>correcting coefficient:cov er1Mcov er2Mfk = (7)fcov er1 cov er2where f M , f M – adhesion component<strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> work material withcover 1 and 2.On the base <strong>of</strong> obtained results <strong>of</strong> experimentsthe methodology for calculation <strong>of</strong> technologicalconditions <strong>of</strong> turning, which provides requiredFig. 7. The s<strong>of</strong>tware for calculation <strong>of</strong> requiredtechnological conditions <strong>of</strong> turning.In order to check the obtained mathematicalmodels, the comparison <strong>of</strong> the experimental andcalculated data was performed. The investigation <strong>of</strong>the parameters <strong>of</strong> surface layer has been performedon the machined parts “ring”. The conditions <strong>of</strong>turning <strong>of</strong> the parts “ring”: work material –stainless steel EK26; tool material – carbidematerial VK6R; tools geometry: φ = φ 1 = 45°, γ =8°; α = 7°, r = 1,2 mm; cutting rate: t = 0,75 mm; S= 0,2 mm/rev; nanostructured coatings <strong>of</strong> tool:(Ti;Si)N; (Ti;Si;Al)N.The results <strong>of</strong> experiments (Table 3) have beenclearly shown, that coated tool reduces themagnitude <strong>of</strong> the roughness, residual stress andstrain hardening in according with the magnitude <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient. The calculation <strong>of</strong> theparameters <strong>of</strong> the surface layer was performed bymeans <strong>of</strong> mathematical models presented in [2] ands<strong>of</strong>tware. The parameters <strong>of</strong> the roughness Ra andRz reduce on the average 5 %, therefore the maincause leading to the formation <strong>of</strong> the roughness aretools geometry, feed rate, vibration and so on, butnot the cover <strong>of</strong> tool. The strain hardening reduceson 20 % as compared with uncoated tool.In order to check our obtain data we havecompared the experimental and calculateddistribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> tangential residual stress.The using <strong>of</strong> coated tool leads to the considerablereduces <strong>of</strong> adverse tensile residual stresses.The distribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> the tangentialresidual stress are shown on a Figure 8.202 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 3. Experimental and calculated value <strong>of</strong> strain hardening h C and parameters <strong>of</strong> the roughness Ra and Rz.Cover Calcul. Exper. Δ, % Calcul. Exper. Δ, % Calcul. Exper. Δ, % Criterion ВRa, mkm Rz, мкм h CVK6R 1,84 1,42 29 8,4 6,8 23 37 50 26 0,95(Ti;Si)N 1,53 1,35 13 7 6,3 11 34 40 15 1,02(Ti;Si;Al)N 1,64 1,34 22 7,5 5,8 29 35 40 13 1,01The experimental distribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> thetangential residual stress were performed by means<strong>of</strong> methodology <strong>of</strong> layer-by-layer electrochemicaletching. The using <strong>of</strong> coated tool leads to theconsiderable redaction <strong>of</strong> adverse tensile residualstress and its depth, the calculated data correlatewith the experimental ones.5. CONCLUSION (TIMES NEW ROMAN 11PT) - ALIGN LEFT1. The optimal cutting speed <strong>of</strong> coated toolexceeds the optimal cutting speed <strong>of</strong> uncoated tool;then less the coatings friction coefficient, then moreoptimal cutting speed.2. The using <strong>of</strong> coated tool leads to theconsiderable redaction <strong>of</strong> adverse tensile residualstress and its depth.REFERENCES[1] S. S. Silin: Similitude method <strong>of</strong> cutting,Manufacturing, Moscow, 1979.[2] V. F. Bezjazichnij: The method <strong>of</strong> similarity inmanufacturing engineering, Manufacturing,Moscow, 2012.[3] http://ooo-technolog.ru/Fig. 8. The distribution diagrams <strong>of</strong> the tangentialresidual stress <strong>of</strong> machined part.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 203


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacMODELING SURFACE ROUGHNESS EFFECTS ON PISTONSKIRT EHL IN INITIAL ENGINE START UP USING HIGH ANDLOW VISCOSITY GRADE OILSMubashir Gulzar 1 , S.Adnan Qasim 1 , Riaz A Mufti 11 College <strong>of</strong> Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, National University <strong>of</strong> Sciences and Technology (NUST), Pakistan,mubashir_nustian@hotmail.comAbstract: The absence <strong>of</strong> fully developed fluid film lubrication between Piston and Liner surfaces is responsible forhigh friction and wear at initial engine start-up. In this paper flow factor method is used in two dimensional Reynolds’equation to model the effects <strong>of</strong> surface roughness characteristics on Piston Skirt elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Thecontact <strong>of</strong> surface asperities between the two surfaces and its after effects on EHL <strong>of</strong> piston skirt is investigated. Forthis purpose, two different grade oils are used to show the changing effects <strong>of</strong> viscosity combined with surfaceroughness on different parameters including film thickness, eccentricities and hydrodynamic pressures. The results <strong>of</strong>the presented model shows considerable effects on film thickness <strong>of</strong> rough piston skirt, hydrodynamic pressures andeccentricities pr<strong>of</strong>iles for 720 degrees crank angle.Keywords: EHL, Piston Skirt, flow factor, asperity, hydrodynamic, Vogelpohl parameter1. INTRODUCTIONIn initial engine start-up the piston and linersurfaces are not separated by an oil film whichcauses maximum wear and friction between the twosliding surfaces. The effects <strong>of</strong> physical contactsbetween the asperities <strong>of</strong> surfaces which are inrelative motion must be included in lubricationmodel to get a better understanding <strong>of</strong> rheology.Hamilton, Wallowit and Allen [1] were thepioneer for taken into account the roughness effectson lubrication phenomenon and their work datesback to 1966.They developed a theory <strong>of</strong>hydrodynamic lubrication between two parallelsurfaces with surface roughness on one or both <strong>of</strong>the surfaces. The classical theory <strong>of</strong> lubricationdoes not predict the existence <strong>of</strong> any pressure incase <strong>of</strong> sliding flat parallel surfaces. Surfaceroughness helps in the pressure buildup between thetwo interacting surfaces, so provide a load supportand avoid collapse <strong>of</strong> two bodies. Early researchintegrated the roughness amplitude with the filmthickness and developed the modified onedimensional Reynolds’s equation but the presentedmodels did not cover different regimes and asperitycontacts and limited to one dimensional changes. Inthis prospective an exception is given in 1978 and1979 by Patir and Cheng [2][3]. Since thecontacting surfaces have an inherent roughness, soLambda Ratio or Tallian Parameter will be used asthe defining parameter between differentlubrication regimes [4]. In recent research the filmthickness parameter (λ) range has been investigatedand redefined for different lubrication regimes [5].The P.C. model was suitable for values <strong>of</strong> filmthickness ratio λ > 3 1.e; full film lubricationregime where asperity contacts were neglected[6][7].To minimize the wear and friction losses theelastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) model ispresented where λ is much lesser than a value <strong>of</strong> 3[5]. Thus the flow factor model provided by J.H.Tripp [8] is numerically modelled forhydrodynamic lubrication at initial engine start-up.Greenwood-Tripp asperity contact model is used toincorporate the asperity contact forces and asperitycontact friction force in EHL between the slidingsurfaces [9]. To incorporate the directionalbehaviour the Peklenik number [10] is defined forthe rough surfaces which are generated by normaldistribution using Fast Fourier Transform(FFT)[11][12]. Here isotropic surface roughnessproperty is used.204 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


For developing the numerical model followingassumptions are taken:1. Lubricant is incompressible and thermaleffects are neglected.2. Non-Newtonian lubricant behavior isneglected.3. Pressure at the inlet is zero and surfaces areoil-flooded.4. Lubricant flow is laminar and turbulenceeffects are neglected.5. Leakage at the sides and edges is neglected.2. NOMENCLATUREC = Radial clearance between piston and liner =10micronsC f = Specific heat <strong>of</strong> lubricantC g = Distance from piston center <strong>of</strong> mass topiston pin = 0.2cmC p = Distance <strong>of</strong> piston-pin from axis <strong>of</strong> piston= 1 cmF = Normal force acting on piston skirtsF f = Friction force acting on skirts surfaceF fh = Friction force due to hydrodynamiclubricant filmF G = Combustion Gas force acting on the top <strong>of</strong>pistonF h =Normal force due to hydrodynamic pressurein filmF IC = Transverse Inertia force due to piston massF ~ = Reciprocating Inertia force due to pistonICmassF IP = Transverse Inertia force due to piston pinmassF ~ = Reciprocating Inertia force due to pistonIPpin massF c = Asperity Contact ForceF fc = Friction force due to asperity contactG = Shear modulus <strong>of</strong> elastic lubricantI pis = Piston inertia about its centre <strong>of</strong> massM = Moment acting on piston skirtsM f = Friction moment acting on skirt surfaceM fh = Moment about piston pin due tohydrodynamic frictionM h = Moment about piston pin due tohydrodynamic pressureM c = Asperity Contact MomentM fc = Moment due o friction force <strong>of</strong> asperitycontactR = Radius <strong>of</strong> pistonU = Piston Velocitya = Vertical distance from skirt top to pistonpin= 0.0125mb = Vertical distance from skirt top to pistoncenter <strong>of</strong> gravity = 0.0015me t = Piston eccentricities at skirts top surfacee b = Piston eccentricities at skirts bottom surfaceё b = Acceleration <strong>of</strong> piston skirts bottomeccentricitiesё t = Acceleration <strong>of</strong> piston skirts topeccentricitiesh = Film Thicknessl = Connecting rod lengthm pis = Mass <strong>of</strong> piston = 0.295 kgm pin = Mass <strong>of</strong> piston-pin = 0.09 kgp = Hydrodynamic pressurer = Crank radius = 0.0418 mω = Constant crankshaft speed (engine speed)τ = Shear stressη A = Oil A viscosity = 0.016 Pa.s,η B = Oil B viscosity = 0.1891 Pa.s. = Connecting rod angle = Crank angle X ,y = Pressure flow factor along x and y-axisrespectivelys = Shear flow factor = combined root mean square (rms)roughness1 = rms roughness <strong>of</strong> piston skirt= 1.4µm2 = rms roughness <strong>of</strong> cylinder liner = 1.5µm3. MATHEMATICAL MODEL3.1. Equations <strong>of</strong> Piston MotionThe forces and moments are in the form <strong>of</strong> theforce and moment balance equations similar to thatdefined by Zhu et al [13]: a a1121aa2222 e Fh Fc Fs ( Ffh Ft eb Mh Mc Ms Mffc) tan (1) a b a11 mpin 1 mpin 1 (2a) L L a a b a12 mpin mpin (2b) L L 21aF I Lpin mpinbLa b (1 )b I(2c)pin 22 mpina b ( ) (2d)L L s~ ~ tan F F F(3)MsGGpIP~ F C F C(4)Using the Greenwood-Tripp’s Asperity ContactModel, the values <strong>of</strong> F c , F fc , M c and M fc can befound for EHL regime [9].ICgIC13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 205


3.2. Film Thickness EquationThe film thickness between the skirts and the linergiven by Zhu [9]:h C ety ( t ) cos x eb( t ) et( t )] cos x (6)L 3.3. Reynolds’ Equation ModellingModified 2-D Reynolds equation is given as [2]:2 3 p R 3 p hTS h x h y 6U( ) (7)x x L y y xxwhere x and y are Poiseulle or pressure flowfactors and s is Cuotte or shear flow factor [2][8].The boundary conditions are defined as [4]:pxp 0x p =0 when x 1 ≤ x ≤ x 2p( ,0) p( , L) 0In dimensionless form the 2-D Reynoldsequation is given by [9][4]:20(8) 3 p* R 3 p* hT* Sh*x h*y * (9)x* x* L y* y* x*x*Where by J. H Tripp [8] 1 3( 2) /( 1)][ / h]X y = ( 1/ ) X2212 (h, 1) (hs, 2)2 s 2 s 3 (hs , 2) ( / h)( 1)and is the Peklenik number [10]In order to read the pressure pr<strong>of</strong>iles conveniently,the Vogelpohl parameter M v is introduced [4]:21.5M v p*h*The Reynolds equation in terms <strong>of</strong> the Vogelpohlparameter is given as:2 2 2Mv R Mv . x Mv2 2 (1 / ) ( ) . x* L . y* . x* . x*2 . y R.Mv (1 / ) ( ) FMvG. y* L. y*where(10)2 2 2 2 2 2h* R h* h* R h* 2 20.75 1.5x* Ly* x* Ly*F 2h* h*2h* Rh*1.5 x* x* L y* y* h * h* S * x* x*G 1.5( h * )Mvi ,, jRC. M M C.M ML 2. C 2.C F v i j v il j v i jlv i ji1 , 1, , , 2 , , , ,. * C. (1/ *)M M . x * 2. C 2.C F21 2 i,j3 vi , 1, j vi , l,j1 2 i,j. * C. (1/ *)M M G. y *2. C 2.C F4 vi , 1, j vi , l, j i.j1 2 i,j3.4. Film Thickness in EHL RegimeEHL regime the film thickness includes filmInthickness in the rigid hydrodynamic regime and theelastic surface displacements etc. By consideringthe bulk elastic deformation, the lubricant filmthicknessequation takes the following form [14] h f ( , y) vh eh ;where f(θ ,y ) is neglected. The differentialsurface displacement is [14]:1 p ( x , y ) dydydv E rr( xxy220) ( y0)221 1 (1 v 1) (1 v2) E 2 E1E2 At a specific point (x o , y o )deformation is [4]:1v( x0,y0)Eap(x,y)dxdyr4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONthe elasticThe hydrodynamic lubrication and EHL models<strong>of</strong> the piston skirts at 500 rpm are developed afterincorporating the pressure flow and the shear flowfactors. Two different oils having viscosity 0.016Pa.s and 0.1891 Pa.s are used for a comparison andinvestigating the viscosity effects on differentparameters which include film thickness206 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


,eccentricities and hydrodynamic pressure pr<strong>of</strong>ilesat 720 degree crank rotation cycle.4.1 Piston EccentricitiesThe dimensionless eccentricities <strong>of</strong> the top andthe bottom surface <strong>of</strong> the piston skirts (Et and Eb)are plotted against the 720 degree crank rotationcycle. Figure 1(a) and 1(b) show eccentricitypr<strong>of</strong>iles for Oil A at 500 rpm. The results areplotted between a range <strong>of</strong> 1 and -1 where thephysical contact between the sliding surfaces canoccur. At central value ‘0’ the motion is concentric.Figure 1(a) shows the dimensionless eccentricitypr<strong>of</strong>iles in the hydrodynamic lubrication regimewhereas figure 1 (b) shows the similar pr<strong>of</strong>iles inthe EHL regime. The behaviour is shown for all thefour strokes where it can be seen that at the start <strong>of</strong>cycle the piston and liner axis are concentric thendue to the secondary motion the pr<strong>of</strong>iles are highlydisplaced from the centre towards thrust side andnon thrust side, but for Oil A the physical contact isavoided as shown in Figure 1. For Oil B , thedimensionless eccentricities pr<strong>of</strong>iles forhydrodynamic and EHL regime are shown inFigure 4. Figure 4 (a) shows that the contact isestablished at lower surface as line is meeting with-1 in rigid hydrodynamic regime. However inFigure 4 (b) the EHL regime shows the physicalcontact is clearly avoided. This shows that theelastic deformation <strong>of</strong> asperities help in avoidingthe contact between interacting surfaces, thus helpin avoiding friction related wear.Comparison <strong>of</strong> eccentricities for both oilsprovides an interesting finding that the lowviscosity oil can be more helpful at initial enginestart-up speed <strong>of</strong> 500 rpm for rigid hydrodynamicregime as well as equally good for EHL regime.4.2 Hydrodynamic PressuresThree dimensional pressure fields and relatedpressure distribution are plotted for 720 degreecrank angle. Figure 2 (a), 2(b), 2(c), 2(d) show 3- Dhydrodynamic pressure pr<strong>of</strong>iles at 900, 4500, 6300and 7200 crank angles at 500 rpm. The positivepressures are developed over the piston skirt andvary as shown in Figure 2. In figure 2 (a), for Oil A,at 90 degrees crank angle the pressures are biasedtowards bottom <strong>of</strong> piston skirt and extended to themiddle <strong>of</strong> piston skirt. The peak pressure occurs atthe bottom <strong>of</strong> piston skirt. In figure 2 (b), for Oil A,at 450 degrees crank angle, the pressure field showsthat the hydrodynamic pressures are developed attop <strong>of</strong> piston skirt though a small ridge can be seenat bottom <strong>of</strong> piston Skirt. The peak pressures arelarger than the 90 degrees angle. In figure 2 (c), at630 degrees crank angle, the pressures are shiftedtowards top <strong>of</strong> piston skirt. In figure 2(d), at 720degrees the pressure pr<strong>of</strong>ile is more steep anddeveloped at bottom <strong>of</strong> piston skirt showing the end<strong>of</strong> cycle. For Oil B, in figure 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d)show 3- D hydrodynamic pressure pr<strong>of</strong>iles at 900,4500, 6300 and 7200 crank angles at 500 rpmspeed.For the pressure fields it can be clearlyinvestigated that the hydrodynamic pressures aretotally shifted towards top <strong>of</strong> piston skirt at 450degrees crank angle while the case was not same incase <strong>of</strong> Oil A for similar conditions. The majorchange in shape <strong>of</strong> pressure filed can be observedfor 630 degrees crank angle where thedimensionless pressure is biased towards bottom <strong>of</strong>piston skirt instead <strong>of</strong> top as discussed for Oil A.Thus changing the viscosity <strong>of</strong> oil is affecting thedistribution <strong>of</strong> hydrodynamic pressures over pistonskirt.4.3 Hydrodynamic and EHL Film ThicknessFigure 3(a) shows the maximum and theminimum hydrodynamic film thickness for Oil A at500 rpm and 10 micron radial clearance. Themaximum film thickness is calculated before theapplication <strong>of</strong> load and on the other side theminimum film thickness is found after theapplication <strong>of</strong> load. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> minimumfilm thickness shows whether the film thickness iscapable <strong>of</strong> avoiding the contact between slidingsurfaces or not. In figure 3(a), the minimumhydrodynamic film start getting establish from start<strong>of</strong> cycle and reaches at a peak at power stroke anddecrease to minimum at end <strong>of</strong> exhaust stroke andcycle continues. Similar case can be seen for Oil Bin figure 6(a) , but the difference is evident at end<strong>of</strong> exhaust stroke where a second peak <strong>of</strong> filmthickness can be seen. In figure 3(b) and 6(b) EHLfilm thickness pr<strong>of</strong>iles are shown. By comparingboth pr<strong>of</strong>iles, it can be seen that in case <strong>of</strong> Oil A theEHL film thickness is greater in magnitude fordifferent crank angles as compare to Oil B. ThusOil A , which is low viscosity oil, will be morehelpful in avoiding the contact and wear betweenrough piston and liner surfaces.(a)(b)Figure 1. For Oil A , Dimensionless Eccentricities at500 rpm in (a) Hydrodynamic regime (b) EHL Regime13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 207


(a)(b)(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 2. : For Oil A, 3-D Hydrodynamic pressurefields at 500 rpm at crank angle (a) 90 degree (b) 450degree (c) 630 degree (d) 720 degree(c)(d)Figure 5. : For Oil B, 3-D Hydrodynamic pressurefields at 500 rpm at crank angle (a) 90 degree (b) 450degree (c) 630 degree (d) 720 degree(a)(b)Figure 3. : For Oil A, At 500 rpm (a) Film thicknesspr<strong>of</strong>iles (b) EHL film(a)(b)Figure 6. : For Oil B, At 500 rpm (a) Film thicknesspr<strong>of</strong>iles (b) EHL film5. CONCLUSION(a)(b)Figure 4. For Oil B , Dimensionless Eccentricities at500 rpm in (a) Hydrodynamic regime (b) EHL RegimeTwo dimensional numerical models forhydrodynamic and EHL regimes were developed atinitial engine start-up speed for isotropic roughpiston skirt and cylinder. Two different grade oilswere used to investigate the different parametersaffecting the rough piston skirt wear phenomenon.The different rough surfaces <strong>of</strong> the interacting skirtsand the liner were considered by introducing thepressure and the shear flow factors in thelubrication model. For Oil ‘B’ having a viscosity <strong>of</strong>0.1891 Pa.s, the simulation results verify that aphysical contact between the rough skirts and theliner surfaces cannot be avoided in the rigid208 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


hydrodynamic regime. However, for both oils, therough interacting surfaces deform elastically togenerate a sufficiently thick film in the EHLregime. The hydrodynamic pressures shifting occurfrom top <strong>of</strong> piston skirt to bottom at 630 degreescrank angle by changing Oil A to Oil B at 500 rpmand 10 micron radial clearance. Comparing bothoils for given conditions, Oil A is more suitable toavoid the contact and wear between interactingrough surfaces.REFERENCES[1] Hamilton, D. B., Walowit, J.A., & Allen, C.M. ATheory <strong>of</strong> Lubrication by Microirregularities.,Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic Engineering, Trans ASME, Ser.D., March 1966, pp. 177-185.[2] N. Patir, & H. S. Cheng, An Average Flow Modelfor Determining Effects <strong>of</strong> Three-DimensionalRoughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication,ASME Journal <strong>of</strong> Lubrication Technology, 100(1),pp 12-17, 1978.[3] N. Patir, & H. S. Cheng, Application <strong>of</strong> AverageFlow Model to Lubrication Between Rough SlidingSurfaces, ASME Journal <strong>of</strong> LubricationTechnology, 101 (2), pp220-230,1979.[4] G. W. Stachowiak & A. W. Batchelor Engineeringtribology, 3rd ed., Elsevier, pp. 328 2005[5] Dong Zhu and Q Jane Wang ,On the λ ratio range <strong>of</strong>mixed lubrication, Proc IMechE Part J: Journal <strong>of</strong>Engineering Tribology pp1010–1022,226(12)[6] Tripp JH, Hamrock BJ. Surface roughness effects inelastohydrodynamic contacts. In: Proc 1984 LeedsLyon Symposium on Tribology 1985:30–9.[7] H. G. Elrod, A General Theory for LaminarLubrication with Reynolds Roughness, ASMEJournal <strong>of</strong> Lubrication Technology, 101(1), pp 8-14,1979.[8] J. H. Tripp, Surface Roughness Effects in HydrodynamicLubrication: The Flow Factor Method,ASME Journal <strong>of</strong> Lubrication Technology, 105, pp458-463,1983.[9] J. A. Greenwood, & J. H. Tripp, The Contact <strong>of</strong>Two Nominally Flat Rough Surface, Proc.Institution <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineers (IMechE), UK,(185), pp 625-633,1971.[10] Peklenik, J., New Developments in SurfaceCharacterization and Measurement by Means <strong>of</strong>Random Process Analysis, Proc. Instn. Mech.Engrs., Volume 182, pp 108-125,1967-68.[11] Garcia, N.; Stoll, E.: Monte Carlo Calculation <strong>of</strong>Electromagnetic-Wave Scattering from RandomRough Surfaces, Physical Review Letters, Volume52, Issue 20, pp. 1798-1801, 1984.[12] FFTW library - free collection <strong>of</strong> fast C routines forcomputing discrete Fast Fourier Transforms.Developed at MIT by Matteo Frigo and Steven G.Johnson.[13] Zhu, D., Hu, Y., Cheng, H.S., Arai, T., and Hamai,K.:, A numerical Analysis for Piston Skirt in MixedLubrication, Part 2 : Deformation Consideration,ASME Journal <strong>of</strong> Tribology,pp115-125, 1992.[14] S. A. Qasim, M. A. Malik, M. A. Khan, & R.A.Mufti, Low Viscosity Shear Heating in PistonSkirts EHL in the Low Initial Engine Start UpSpeeds, Tribology International, 44(10), pp. 1134-1143, 2011.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 209


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacSTRESSES AND DEFORMATIONS ANALYSIS OFA DRY FRICTION CLUTCH SYSTEMOday I. Abdullah 1 , Josef Schlattmann 1 , Abdullah M. Al-Shabibi 21 Department <strong>of</strong> System Technology and Mechanical Design Methodology, Hamburg University <strong>of</strong> Technology,oday.abdullah@tu-harburg.de2 Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical and Industrial Eng. College <strong>of</strong> Eng. / Sultan Qaboos UniveristyAbstract: The friction clutch is considered the essential element in the torque transmission process. In thispaper, the finite element method is used to study the stresses and deformations for clutch system (pressureplate, clutch disc and flywheel) due to the contact pressure <strong>of</strong> diaphragm spring and the centrifugal forceduring the full engagement <strong>of</strong> clutch disc (assuming no slipping between contact surfaces). The investigationcovers the effect <strong>of</strong> the contact stiffness factor FKN on the pressure distribution between contact surfaces,stresses and deformations. The penalty and Augmented Lagrangian algorithms have been used to obtain thepressure distribution between contact surfaces. ANSYS13 s<strong>of</strong>tware has been used to perform the numericalcalculation in this paper.Keywords: Dry friction clutch, Stresses and deformations, pressure distribution, full engagement,2D axisymmetric FEM.1. INTRODUCTIONA clutch is a very important machine elementwhich plays a main role in the transmission <strong>of</strong>power (and eventually motion) from onecomponent (the driving part <strong>of</strong> the machine) toanother (the driven part). A common and wellknown application for the clutch is in automotivevehicles where it is used to connect the engine andthe gearbox. Furthermore, the clutch is used alsoextensively in production machinery <strong>of</strong> all types.When the friction clutch begins to engage, slippingoccurs between the contact surfaces (pressure plate,clutch disc and flywheel) and due to this slipping,heat energy will be generated in the interfacesfriction surfaces. At high relative sliding velocity,high quantity <strong>of</strong> frictional heat is generated whichlead to high temperature rise on the clutch discsurfaces and hence thermo-mechanical problemssuch as thermal deformations and thermo-elasticinstability can occur. This in turn, can lead tothermal cracking and high rate <strong>of</strong> wear. Thepressure distribution is essential factor effect on theperformance <strong>of</strong> the friction clutch because <strong>of</strong> theheat generated between contact surfaces during theslipping period dependent on the pressuredistribution.Al-Shabibi and Barber [1] used the finiteelement method to find the transient solution <strong>of</strong> thetemperature field and contact pressure distributionbetween two sliding disks. Two dimensionalaxisymmetric FE model used to explore analternative method based on an eigenfunctionexpansion and a particular solution that can be usedto solve the thermoelastic contact problem withfrictional heating. Both constant and varying slidingspeed is considered in this analysis. Results <strong>of</strong> thedirect finite element simulation have been obtainedusing the commercial package ABAQUS. Theresults from the approximate solution show a goodagreement with the results from the direct finiteelement simulation.Lee et al. [2] used finite element method tostudy the effect <strong>of</strong> thermo-mechanical loads on thepressure plate and the hub plate <strong>of</strong> the frictionclutch system. Three types <strong>of</strong> loads are taking intoconsideration the thermal load due to the slippingoccurs at the beginning <strong>of</strong> engagement, the contactpressure <strong>of</strong> diaphragm spring and the centrifugalforce due to the rotation. Two and threedimensional finite element models were performed210 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


to obtain the temperature distributions and thestresses. The results show the significant effect <strong>of</strong>the thermal load on the temperatures and stresses;therefore it is desirable to increase the thickness <strong>of</strong>the pressure plate as much as possible to increasethe thermal capacity <strong>of</strong> the pressure plate to reducethe thermal stresses. High stress intensity valueoccurs around the fillet region <strong>of</strong> the window in thehub plate.Shahzamanian et al. [3] used numericalsimulation to study the transient and contactanalysis <strong>of</strong> functionally graded (FG) brake disk.The material properties vary in the radial directionfrom full-metal at the inner radius to that <strong>of</strong> fullceramicat the outer radius. The coulomb contactfriction is considered between the pad and the brakedisk.Two-dimensional finite element model used inthe work to obtains the pressure distribution, totalstresses, pad penetration, friction stresses, heat fluxand temperature during the contact for differentvalues <strong>of</strong> the contact stiffness factor. It was found,that the contact pressure and contact total stressincrease when the contact stiffness factor increasesand the gradation <strong>of</strong> the metal–ceramic hassignificant effect on the thermo-mechanicalresponse <strong>of</strong> FG brake disks. Also, it can beconcluded when the thickness <strong>of</strong> the pad increasesthe contact status between pad and disc changesfrom sticking to contact and then to near contact.Abdullah and Schlattmann [4-8] investigated thetemperature field and the energy dissipated <strong>of</strong> dryfriction clutch during a single and repeatedengagement under uniform pressure and uniformwear conditions. They also studied the effect <strong>of</strong>pressure between contact surface when varyingwith time on the temperature field and the internalenergy <strong>of</strong> clutch disc using two approaches heatpartition ratio approach to compute the heatgenerated for each part individually whereas thesecond applies the total heat generated for thewhole model using contact model. Furthermore,they studied the effect <strong>of</strong> engagement time andsliding velocity function, thermal load anddimensionless disc radius (inner disc radius/outerdisc radius) on the thermal behavior <strong>of</strong> the frictionclutch in the beginning <strong>of</strong> engagement.In this paper the finite element method used tostudy the contact pressure and stresses during thefull engagement period <strong>of</strong> the clutches usingdifferent contact algorithms. Moreover, sensitivitystudy for the contact pressure is presented toindicate the importance <strong>of</strong> the contact stiffnessbetween contact surfaces.2. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLESThe main system <strong>of</strong> the friction clutch consists<strong>of</strong> pressure plate, clutch disc and flywheel as shownin figure 1.TTorqueFlywheelFigure 1. The main parts <strong>of</strong> clutch systemThermal +Contact pressureSlipping period(Transient case)Thermal +Contact pressure+Centrifugal effectFull engagementperiod(Steady-statecase)TimeFigure 2. The load conditions during theengagement cycle <strong>of</strong> the clutchWhen the clutch starts to engage the slippingwill occur between contact surfaces due to thedifference in the velocities between them (slippingperiod), after this period all contacts parts arerotating at the same velocity without slipping (fullengagement period). A high amount <strong>of</strong> the kineticenergy converted into heat energy at interfacesaccording to the first law <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics duringthe slipping period and the heat generated betweencontact surfaces will be dissipated by conductiont sClutch discPressure plate13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 211


etween friction clutch components and byconvection to environment, in addition to thethermal effect due to the slipping there is other loadcondition which is the pressure contact betweencontact surfaces. In the second period, there arethree types <strong>of</strong> load conditions the temperaturedistribution from the last period (slipping period),the pressure between contact surfaces due to theaxial force <strong>of</strong> diaphragm spring and the centrifugalforce due to the rotation <strong>of</strong> the contacts parts.Figure 2 shows the load conditions during theengagement cycle <strong>of</strong> the clutch, where t s is theslipping time and T is the transmitted torque byclutch.3. FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATIONThis section presented the steps to simulate thecontact elements <strong>of</strong> friction clutch using ANSYSs<strong>of</strong>tware. Moreover it gives more details about thetypes <strong>of</strong> contacts and algorithms which are used inthis s<strong>of</strong>tware.The first step in this analysis is the modelling;due to the symmetry in the geometry (frictionallining without grooves) and boundary conditions <strong>of</strong>the friction clutch (take into the consideration theeffect <strong>of</strong> the pressure and centrifugal force loads,and neglected the effect <strong>of</strong> thermal load due to theslipping), two-dimensional axisymmetric FEM canbe used to represent the contact between the clutchelements during the steady-state period as shown infigure 3.There are three basic types <strong>of</strong> contact used inAnsys s<strong>of</strong>tware single contact, node-to-surfacecontact and surface-to-surface contact. Surface-tosurfacecontact is the most commonly type <strong>of</strong>contact used for bodies that have arbitrary shapeswith relative large contact areas. This type <strong>of</strong>contact is most efficient for bodies that experiencelarge values <strong>of</strong> relative sliding such as block slidingon plane or sphere sliding within groove [9].Surface-to-surface contact is the type <strong>of</strong> contactassumed in this analysis because <strong>of</strong> the large areas<strong>of</strong> clutch elements in contact.In this work, it has been assumed two types <strong>of</strong>load conditions effects on the clutch system duringthe steady-state period (full engagement period) thecontact pressure between clutch elements due to theaxial force by diaphragm spring and the centrifugalforce due to the rotation.The elements used for contact model are: “Plan13” used for all elements <strong>of</strong> theclutch (flywheel, clutch disc and pressureplate). “Conta172” used for contact surfaces thatare the upper and lower surfaces <strong>of</strong> clutchdisc. “Targe169” used for the target surfacesthat are the lower surface <strong>of</strong> the flywheeland the upper surface <strong>of</strong> the pressure plate.Figure 4 shows the details about schematic for allelements that has been used in this analysis.zTarge169rThe frictional liningFlywheelPressure plateAxialFigure 3. The Contact model for clutch systemPlane13FlywheelClutch discConta172Pressure plateFigure 4. Schematic elements used for the friction clutchelementsThe stiffness relationship between contact andtarget surfaces will decide the amount <strong>of</strong> thepenetration. Higher values <strong>of</strong> contact stiffness willdecrease the amount <strong>of</strong> penetration, but can lead toill-conditioning <strong>of</strong> the global stiffness matrix andconvergence difficulties. Lower values <strong>of</strong> contactstiffness can lead to certain amount <strong>of</strong> penetrationand low enough to facilitate convergence <strong>of</strong> thesolution. The contact stiffness for an element <strong>of</strong>area A is calculated using the following formula[10]: f e f i iTFkn dA(1)The default value <strong>of</strong> the contact stiffness factorFKN is 1, and it is appropriate for bulkdeformation. If bending deformation dominates thesolution, a smaller value <strong>of</strong> KKN = 0.1 isrecommended.There are five algorithms used for surface-tosurfacecontact type are: Penalty method: this algorithm used constant“spring” to establish the relationship betweenthe two contact surfaces (figure 5). The contact212 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


force (pressure) between two contact bodies canbe written as follows:F k x(2)nnWhere F n is the contact force, k n is the contactstiffness and x p is the distance between two existingnodes or separate contact bodies (penetration orgap).pF nshown in figure 6. A mesh sensitivity study wasdone to choose the optimum mesh fromcomputational accuracy point <strong>of</strong> view. The fullNewton-Raphson with unsymmetric matrices <strong>of</strong>elements is used in this analysis assuming a largedeflectioneffect. In all computations for the frictionclutch model, it has been assumed a homogeneousand isotropic material and all parameters andmaterials properties are listed in Table. 1.In this analysis also assuming there are nocracks in the contact surfaces and the actual contactarea is equal to the nominal contact area.k nx pωFlywheelFigure 5. The contact stiffness between two contact bodies Augmented Lagrange (default): this algorithm isan iterative penalty method. The constanttraction (pressure and frictional stresses) areaugmented during equilibrium iterations so thatthe final penetration is small than the allowabletolerance. This method usually leads to betterconditioning and is less sensitive to themagnitude <strong>of</strong> the constant stiffness. The contactforce (pressure) between two contact bodies is:F k x (3)nnWhere λ is the Lagrange multiplier component. Lagrange multiplier on contact normal andpenalty on tangent: this method applied on theconstant normal and penalty method (tangentialcontact stiffness) on the frictional plane. Thismethod enforces zero penetration and allowssmall amount <strong>of</strong> slip for the sticking contactcondition. It requires chattering controlparameters, as well as the maximum allowableelastic slip parameter. Pure Lagrange multiplier on contact normal andtangent: This method enforces zero penetrationwhen contact is closed and “zero slip” whensticking contact occurs. This algorithm does notrequire contact stiffness. Instead it requireschattering control parameters. This method addscontact traction to the model as additionaldegrees <strong>of</strong> freedom and requires additionaliterations to the stabilize contact conditions. It<strong>of</strong>ten increase the computational cost comparedto the augmented lagrangian method. Internal multipoint constraint: this method usedin conjunction with bonded contact and noseparation contact to model several types <strong>of</strong>contact assemblies and kinematic constraints.The axisymmetric finite element model <strong>of</strong> thefriction clutch system with boundary conditions ispzrClutch discPressure plateU x =0Table 1. The properties <strong>of</strong> materials and operationsParametersPressureContactsurfacesFigure 6. FE models with the boundary conditions.ValuesInner radius <strong>of</strong> friction material & axial cushion, r i [m] 0.06298Outer radius <strong>of</strong> friction material & axial cushion, r o [m] 0.08721Thickness <strong>of</strong> friction material [m], t l 0.003Thickness <strong>of</strong> the axial cushion [m], t axi. 0.0015Inner radius <strong>of</strong> pressure plate [m], r ip 0.05814Outer radius <strong>of</strong> pressure plate [m], r op 0.09205Thickness <strong>of</strong> the pressure plate [m], t p 0.00969Inner radius <strong>of</strong> flywheel [m], r if 0.04845Outer radius <strong>of</strong> flywheel [m], r <strong>of</strong> 0.0969Thickness <strong>of</strong> the flywheel [m], t f 0.01938pressure, p [MPa] 1Coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction, μ 0.2Number <strong>of</strong> friction surfaces, n 2Torque [Nm], T 432Maximum angular slipping speed, ω o [rad/sec] 200Young’s modulus for friction material, E l [GPa] 0.30Young’s modulus for pressure plate, flywheel &axial cushion, (E p , E f , and E axi ), [Gpa]125Poisson’s ratio for friction material, 0.25Poisson’s ratio for pressure plate, flywheel & axialcushion0.25Density for friction material, (kg/m 3 ), ρ l 2000Density for pressure plate, flywheel & axialcushion, (kg/m 3 ), (ρ p , ρ f , and ρ axi )780013 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 213


4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSSeries <strong>of</strong> computations have been carried outusing ANSYS13 s<strong>of</strong>tware to study the contactpressure and stresses between contact surfaces <strong>of</strong>clutch (pressure plate, clutch disc and flywheel)during a full engagement period using differentalgorithms and contact stiffness factor values.The variation <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure with discradius for both sides <strong>of</strong> clutch disc (flywheel sideand pressure plate side) using penalty andaugmented algorithms (FKN = 1) is shown infigures 7 and 8. From these figures, it can be seenthat the identical results when using penalty andaugmented (default) methods and approximatelythe same behaviour <strong>of</strong> contact pressure for bothsides <strong>of</strong> clutch disc. The maximum contact pressurevalues in the flywheel side and pressure plate sideare found to be 1.491 MPa and 1.524 MPa,respectively. The maximum and minimum contactpressure values occur at outer disc radius r o andnear inner radius (1.01r i ) for both cases,respectively.The contact pressure [MPa]1.61.551.51.451.41.351.31.251.21.151.11.051Penalty methodAugmented method0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 7. The variation <strong>of</strong> contact pressure with discradius (flywheel / clutch disc)The contact pressure [MPa]1.61.551.51.451.41.351.31.251.21.151.11.051Penalty methodAugmented method0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 8. The variation <strong>of</strong> contact pressure with discradius (pressure plate / clutch disc)The contact total stress [MPa]1.61.551.51.451.41.351.31.251.21.151.11.051Penalty methodAugmented method0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 9. The variation <strong>of</strong> total contact stress with discradius (flywheel / clutch disc)The contact total stress [MPa]1.61.551.51.451.41.351.31.251.21.151.11.051Penalty methodAugmented method0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 10. The variation <strong>of</strong> total contact stress with discradius (pressure plate / clutch disc)Figures 9 and 10 show the variation <strong>of</strong> totalcontact stresses with disc radius for both sides <strong>of</strong>clutch disc. It can be seen, that the total contactstresses have the same behaviour <strong>of</strong> the contactpressure.Figures 11 and 12 demonstrate the variation <strong>of</strong>total displacement <strong>of</strong> clutch surfaces with discradius. It’s clear; the values <strong>of</strong> total deformations <strong>of</strong>clutch disc (pressure plate side) are higher than thedisplacements values at the flywheel side. Themaximum values <strong>of</strong> total deformation in the clutchdisc at flywheel and pressure plate sides are foundto be 4.6529E -6 m and 2.84E -5 m, respectively.The variation <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure for usingdifferent algorithms and different values <strong>of</strong> FKNalong the radial direction at contact area <strong>of</strong> clutchdisc with flywheel is shown in figures 13 and 14. Itcan be noted for both cases (when using penaltyand augmented method), that the values <strong>of</strong> contactpressure increases when FKN increases. Thepercentage increasing in contact pressure whenFKN change from 0.01 to 10 is found to be 19.5%and 17.9% corresponding to penalty and augmentedmethods, respectively.214 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


5E-06The total displacement [m]4.5E-064E-063.5E-063E-062.5E-062E-06Penalty methodAugmented methodThe contact pressure [MPa]1.7 FKN = 0.01FKN = 0.1FKN = 1FKN = 001.61.51.41.31.5E-060.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 11. The variation <strong>of</strong> total displacement with discradius (flywheel / clutch disc)The total displacement [m]3E-052.8E-052.6E-052.4E-052.2E-052E-05Penalty methodAugmented method0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 12. The variation <strong>of</strong> total displacement with discradius (pressure plate / clutch disc)The contact pressure [MPa]1.7 FKN = 0.01FKN = 0.1FKN = 1FKN = 101.61.51.41.31.20.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 13. The variation <strong>of</strong> contact pressure with discradius using Penalty method (flywheel / clutch disc)1.20.065 0.07 0.075 0.08 0.085r[m]Figure 14. The variation <strong>of</strong> contact pressure with discradius using augmented Lagrange algorithm (flywheel /clutch disc)5. CONCLUSIONS AND REMARKSThe variations <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure, totalcontact stress and total displacements <strong>of</strong> the frictionclutch using different contact algorithms anddifferent values <strong>of</strong> FKN are investigated. Twodimensionalaxisymmetric finite element model forthe contact elements <strong>of</strong> clutch were conducted toobtain the numerical results.The present work presents a simplified model <strong>of</strong>clutch to determine the contact pressure betweencontact surfaces during a full engagement period.The conclusions obtained from the presentanalysis are summarized as follows:1. The value <strong>of</strong> FKN is very important andeffective on the values <strong>of</strong> contact pressure, thecontact pressure is directly proportional to FKNfor both contact methods (penalty andaugmented).2. The penalty method has sensitivity for FKNmore than the augmented method.3. The maximum and minimum values <strong>of</strong> contactpressure and total contact stress occur at outerdisc radius and inner disc radius, respectively.The permanent deformations and thermal crackson the contact surfaces <strong>of</strong> clutch if taken intoconsideration will affect the contact pressuredistribution and the actual contact area will change.These disadvantages will focus the contact pressureon small region compared with the nominal contactarea.REFERENCES[1] Abdullah M. Al-Shabibi and James R. Barber:Transient Solution <strong>of</strong> The UnperturbedThermoelastic Contact Problem, J. thermal stresses,Vol. 32, pp. 226-243, 2009.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 215


[2] Choon Yeol Lee, Il Sup Chung, Young Suck Chai:Finite Element Analysis <strong>of</strong> an Automobile ClutchSystem, J. Key Eng. Materials, Vol 353-358, pp.2707-2711, 2007.[3] M.M. Shahzamanian, B.B. Sahari , M. Bayat, Z.N.Ismarrubie and F. Mustapha: Transient and thermalcontact analysis for the elastic behavior <strong>of</strong>functionally graded brake disks due to mechanicaland thermal loads, J. Materials & Design, Vol. 31,Issue 10, pp. 4655–4665, 2010.[4] Oday I. Abdullah and Josef Schlattmann: The Effect<strong>of</strong> Disc Radius on Heat Flux and TemperatureDistribution in Friction Clutches, J. AdvancedMaterials Research, Vol. 505, pp. 154-164, 2012.[5] Oday I. Abdullah and Josef Schlattmann: FiniteElement Analysis <strong>of</strong> Dry Friction Clutch with Radialand Circumferential Grooves, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> WorldAcademy <strong>of</strong> Science, Engineering and TechnologyConference, Paris, pp. 1279-1291, 2012.[6] Oday I. Abdullah and Josef Schlattmann: Effect <strong>of</strong>Band Contact on the Temperature Distribution forDry Friction Clutch, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> World Academy<strong>of</strong> Science, Engineering and TechnologyConference, Berlin, pp. 167-177, 2012.[7] Oday I. Abdullah and Josef Schlattmann: TheCorrection Factor for Rate <strong>of</strong> Energy Generated inthe Friction Clutches under Uniform PressureCondition, J. Adv. Theor. Appl. Mech., Vol. 5, no.6, pp. 277 – 290, 2012.[8] Oday I. Abdullah and Josef Schlattmann: FiniteElement Analysis <strong>of</strong> Temperature Field inAutomotive Dry Friction Clutch, J. Tribology inIndustry, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 206-216, 2012.[9] ANSYS Contact Technology Guide, ANSYSRelease 11.0 Documentation, ANSYS, Inc.[10] Mohr GA: A contact stiffness matrix for finiteelement problems involving external elasticrestraint, Compos Struct., Vol. 12, pp. 189–91,1979.216 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313 thtInternational Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 20133Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringinn KragujevacTHE WAVINESS OFAN ABRASIVEWATERJET GENERAATED SURFACEJ.Baralić 1 , P.Jankovićć 2 , B.Nedić 31 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Technical Faculty Čačak, Serbia, , jbaralic@tfc. .kg.ac.rs2 University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Serbia, jape@masfak.ni.ac.rs3 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac Faculty <strong>of</strong> mechanical engineering, , Serbia, nedic@kg.ac.rsAbstract: Abrasive water jet generated surface has appearance that is characteristic for all machiningprocedures with the beam <strong>of</strong> high-energy density. On the surface machined with these procedures,characteristic lines, which are traces resultingg from the passage <strong>of</strong> beam throughh the workpiece, can beobserved. When machining with abrasive water jet, on the generated surface occurs trace lines andwaviness. The appearance <strong>of</strong> waviness is more pronouncedin the lower part <strong>of</strong> thee machined surface. s Theaim <strong>of</strong> this study is to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong>f traverse speed on the waviness appearance on machinedsurface andthe regularity at whichh the waviness occurs. During investigation, it was observedthat in thesame period<strong>of</strong> time, atall traversee speeds andd the thickness <strong>of</strong> material that has been processed, there isalmost the same number<strong>of</strong> waves.Keywords: waviness, trverse speed, abrasive water jet1. INTRODUCTIONAbrasivewater jet machining is one <strong>of</strong> the latestnon-conventional methods, whichh have recentlybeen increasingly usedin industryfor cuttingg <strong>of</strong>various materials, fromthose with pronouncedplastic properties, to very-brittle materials. Themain advantage <strong>of</strong> thismachining process is thatthere is no occurrence <strong>of</strong> heat affected zone.Abrasivewater jet machining is i based on theprocess <strong>of</strong> erosion as the primary mechanism forthe removal<strong>of</strong> materialfrom the workpiece. Bitter[1] has defined erosion <strong>of</strong> material as damage,which occurs as a result <strong>of</strong> single impactt <strong>of</strong>abrasive particle (whichh is located in i a fluid and ismoving at high speed).Hutchings [2] has definederosion as abrasive wear in which abrasive particles(which are also located in a fluid and movingrapidly) hitting the surface several times and thusleads to erosion <strong>of</strong> the material. The traces on thesurface machined with abrasive water jet, resultingfrom erosion <strong>of</strong> the workpiece material, are visibleunder a microscope. Their direction is changingwith depth <strong>of</strong> cutting, and follows the directionn <strong>of</strong>the cutting beam through the workpiece. On theabrasive water jet generated surface can be13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13observed the curved lines that are characteristic forthistype <strong>of</strong> machining. Also, machinedsurface hasa pronouncedwaviness inn the lower part, and itincreases withh increasing g depth <strong>of</strong> cut. Theseeirregularities onn machined surface, and the taper <strong>of</strong>cut, significantly constrainthe opportunities <strong>of</strong>application <strong>of</strong> abrasive a waterjet machining.2. ABRASIVEE WATER JET MACHININGModern installations for abrasivewater jetmachining workk with waterr pressure over 400MPa,while the water jet reaches speedss <strong>of</strong> up to1000m/s. They consist <strong>of</strong> a driver and the executiveeandsupportingg components. The driver is a unitthat creates high-pressure water, while an executiveecomponenet is a cutting head. The systemcomponents <strong>of</strong> f abrasive water jet cutting machineare shown in Figure 1.Theway <strong>of</strong> working is the following: Hydraulic oilunder pressure <strong>of</strong> 535 MPa enters the hydrauliccylinder and intensifier. Because <strong>of</strong> large differenceein the diameters <strong>of</strong> the intensifier, water pressureereaches the value <strong>of</strong> 400 MPa or more. Intensifyingsystem is the key k <strong>of</strong> equipment. Pressure value inintensifier depends on the e ratio <strong>of</strong> cross sectionss217


area <strong>of</strong> thecylinders. This ratio usually rangesbetween 1:10 and 1:25 and is a constant. To changethe value <strong>of</strong> water w pressure, it is necessary tochange the oil pressure inn the hydraulic system.Figure 1. The system components <strong>of</strong> abrasive water jet cutting machine [3]In order to get a jet <strong>of</strong> water, whose pressure isapproximately constant,the most commonly duplexreciprocating pump- intensifier (DRP) is used. Thisis actually a complex cylinder which is double-joined with the back towards each other. Whenn theacting pump, with two high pressure cylinders,first cylinder completee stroke, piston rod movesback and compresses the water in the secondcylinder.218Figure 2. Fluctuations <strong>of</strong> pressure during machiningwith abrasive water jet [4][These cycles are repeated successively. Becausethe water can be compressed 12% under thepressure <strong>of</strong> 400 MPa, the initial stage <strong>of</strong> the pistontravel is used to compress the water [4]. Water isnot delivered into the system until the waterpressure reaches the set value. Therefore, theactions <strong>of</strong> draining water and absorbing water arediscontinuous, and thepressure is fluctuant. Toneutralize the pressure p fluctuations, it is necessaryto install an accumulator behind the intensifier.Figure 2 is a diagram which shows the pressureefluctuations in a conventionall intensifier and the phase-shifted intensifierr cylinders.3. ABRASIVEE WATER JET GENERATEDSURFACEAbrasive water w jet generated surface has acharacteristic appearance and is shown in Figure 3.Curved lines, showing s thee movement <strong>of</strong> abrasivewater jet through the workpiece material, can beobserved in the Figure 3. The topography <strong>of</strong> themachined surface and thee appearancee <strong>of</strong> curvedlines are the most importantmacroscopic properties<strong>of</strong> the surface machined with abrasive water jet.Based on the analysis a <strong>of</strong> these two characteristicsscanresult in significant informationn about themachining process.Roughness <strong>of</strong> the surface machined withabrasive water jet increases with increasing depth<strong>of</strong> cut [5]. Surfaces machined with abrasive waterjet are divided into two areas, fine machining zone(theupper zone) and roughh zone (the lower l zone).Irregularities that occur inn the upper zone <strong>of</strong> themachined surface are considered as microscopiccirregularities and are in the domain <strong>of</strong>f roughness.Irregularities that occur inn the lower zone <strong>of</strong> themachined surface have macroscopicdimensions.These irregularities are in the domain <strong>of</strong> wavinesssin conventionall machining.13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[11]. Figure 5 shows s the influence <strong>of</strong> traverse speedandabrasive mass flow on the waviness.10Abrasive mass flow rate [g/min]40220110440Figure 3. Appearance <strong>of</strong> the surface machined withabrasive water jetWaviness <strong>of</strong> the machined surface is alsoo animportant phenomenonn in the machining withabrasive water jet, Figure 4. It was found that thereis a primaryand secondary waviness on the surfacemachined with abrasive water jet [6]. Primarywaviness isa waviness with higher step values,while the secondary waviness has less step value.For all cutting parameters,iff the primarywavelength <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile at the rough cutting zoneis smaller, the surface is smoother. . Guo [7] foundthat there isa dependence <strong>of</strong> the waviness step andfocusing tube diameter,while Kovacevic [8] founda correlationbetween waviness stepand a diameter<strong>of</strong> abrasive particles and the focusing tubediameter.Amplitude [mm]WavinessRoughnessWavelenghtFigure 4. Waviness and surface roughnessThe quality <strong>of</strong> the surface machined withabrasive water jet isinfluencedwith systemoperational process parameters such as traversespeed, waterjet pressure, abrasive flow rate,stand<strong>of</strong>f distance, depth<strong>of</strong> cut and angle <strong>of</strong> cutting[9].Level <strong>of</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> certainparameterss isdifferent. The largest number <strong>of</strong> authors agrees thatthe most influential are traverse speed, s operatingpressure andthe abrasive flow rate. Traverse speed<strong>of</strong> the jet has a stronginfluence on the surfacefinish <strong>of</strong> the workpiecee and material removal rateWaviness[ m m]4.86420 120 240 360 480 600Traverse speed [mm/min]Figure 5. Parameter influence on the waviness [10]EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONSThe aim <strong>of</strong> o this study was to investigateeinfluence <strong>of</strong> traverse speedd on the appearance <strong>of</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>ile waviness on machined surface. Theexperiments were conducted using a Byjet 40222abrasive water jet cutting machine (Bystronic AG,Switzerland). Aluminium A alloy AA-ASTM 60600(EN: AW-6060; ISO: AlMgSi) was used as aworkpiece material. Aluminum and its alloys arecharacterized by b high reflectivity and thermalconductivity. This makes them relatively difficult tocutwith lasers. Therefore, the machining withabrasive water jet is much more acceptable foraluminium alloy.Abrasive water w jet cutting involves a largenumber <strong>of</strong> variables that affect the cutting resultss(kerf width, taper and surface roughness, waviness).In the present study, s the influence <strong>of</strong> the followingparameters was investigated: traversee speed (thespeed at which the cutting head moves alongworkpiece during cutting operation) and materialthickness. The other process parameters were keptconstant using the standardd machine configurationn(d 0 =0.3mm;d A =1.02mm;p=380MPa;Q= =350g/min).The samples <strong>of</strong> aluminum alloy 6 and 10mmmthick were cut with different traverse speedssV= =(200, 300, 400, 4 500, 800 i 1000 mm/min). Onsuch machinedd samples, length at which the tenwaves were observed, was measured, Figure 6.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13219


5.CONCLUSIONL w10 L wFigure6. Measuringthe length <strong>of</strong> ten wavesFor thismeasured values (10L w ), based onFormula 1, the time needed to maketen waves (t 10 )was calculated.0L wt 10 10 VBased onthese values, according to Formula 2,the number <strong>of</strong> waves that were made in one minute(N) was calculated.t 10 10∙60t 10∙60 s(1)(2)Table 1 shows the images <strong>of</strong> 6mm thicksamples, obtained withdifferent traverse t speeds,and values for 10L w , t 10 and N.Table 1. 6mmm thick samplesBy analyzing the results, it was observed that achange in traverse speed affects the wavelength andheight on surface machinedd with abrasive water jet.As the traversee speed increases, the higher is thewavelength <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile waviness. Also, machiningwith higher traverse speed results in theincrease <strong>of</strong>height <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile waviness. The most interesting isthe fact that, regardless <strong>of</strong>f the traverse speed andthickness <strong>of</strong> thee workpiece, , the numberr <strong>of</strong> waves inoneminute is i approximately the same. Thefrequency <strong>of</strong> the waves, andd also the curved lines, isapproximately constant c andd in this case ranges from460to 476 waves w per minute. This fact canprobably be explained with fluctuationss in the value<strong>of</strong> the operatingg pressure <strong>of</strong> the abrasive water jet.In order to better explain the relationship betweenpressureoscillationsandpr<strong>of</strong>ile wavinesssfrequency, more detailed examination are required.Table 2. 10mm thick t samplesV[mm/min]200300Images <strong>of</strong>samples10L w[mm]t 10[s]N[1/min]Waves are a notclearly markedWaves are a notclearly markedV[mm/min]Images <strong>of</strong>samples10L w[mm]t 10[s]N[1/min]4008.4 1.266 476.2200Waves are notclearly marked50010.6 1.272 471.7300Waves are notclearly marked80016.8 1.266 476.24008.41.26 476.2100021.1 1.266 473.950010.61.272 471.7800100016.821.11.26 476.21.266 473.9ACKNOWLEDGMENTSSThe authors would like to thank to the Ministry<strong>of</strong> Science andd Technological Development <strong>of</strong> theRepublic <strong>of</strong> Serbia. Paper is result <strong>of</strong> technologicallproject TR35034: "The research <strong>of</strong> modern non-conventionaltechnologiesapplicationinmanufacturingcompanies with the aim<strong>of</strong> increasee22013 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


efficiency <strong>of</strong> use, product quality, reduce <strong>of</strong> costsand save energy and materials" which is supportedby Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science <strong>of</strong> theRepublic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.REFERENCES[1] J. Bitter: A studu <strong>of</strong> erosion phenomena, part I,Wear, No. 6, pp. 5-21, 1963.[2] I.M.Hutchings, R.E.Winter, J.E.Field: Severe Solidparticle erosion <strong>of</strong> metals: the removal <strong>of</strong> surfacematerial by spherical projectils, in:Proc.R.Sec.Lond.A., 348, London, pp.379-302[3] A. Akkurt: Cut Front Geometry Characterization inCutting Applications <strong>of</strong> Brass with Abrasive WaterJet, Journal <strong>of</strong> Mterials Engineering andPerformance, pp. 599-606, 2010.[4] J. Xu, B. You, X. Kong, Design and ExperimentResearch on Abrasive Water-jet Cutting MachineBased on Phased Intensifier, in: <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the17th World Congress, Seoul, Korea, July 6-11,pp.14846-14851, 2008.[5] J. Baralić, B. Nedić, P. Janković: The traverse speedinfluence on surface roughness in abrasive waterjetcutting applications, in: : <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12thInt.Conf. on Tribology, Kragujevac, Serbia, pp. 349-354, May 11 – 13, 2011.[6] A.W.Momber, R. Kovacevic: Principles <strong>of</strong> AbrasiveWaterjet Machining, Springer, London, 1998.[7] N.S. Guo, H. Louis, G. Meier: Surface structure andkerf geometry in abrasive water jet cutting:formation and optimization, in: Proc. 7-th Amer.Water Jet Conf., Vol. 1, Water Jet Techn.Ass.,ST.Louis, pp.1-25,1993.[8] R. Kovacevic, R. Mohan, Y.M. Zhang: Cuttingforce dynamics as a tool for surface pr<strong>of</strong>ilemonitoring in AWJ, ASME J. Engng. For Ind. 117,pp.340-350, 1995.[9] J.Valiček, M. Držík, M. Ohlídal, V. Mádr, L.M.Hlaváč: Optical method for surface analyses andtheir utilization for abrasive liquid jet automation,in: Proc. <strong>of</strong> the 2001 WJTA American WaterjetConference, Minneapolis, pp. 1–11, 2001.[10] M. Hashish: A modeling study <strong>of</strong> jet cutting surfacefinish, PED-Vol.58, pp.151-167, 1992.[11] E. Lemma: Maximum depth <strong>of</strong> cut and mechanics<strong>of</strong> erosion in AWJ oscillation cutting <strong>of</strong> ductilematerials, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials ProcessingTechnology, Vol. 160, No. 2, pp.188–197, 2005.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 221


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEFFECT OF REFRACTORY ELEMENTS ON WEAR INTENSITYOF THE SURFACE LAYERS IN THE ABRASIVE SOIL MASSJ. Napiórkowski 1 , P. Drożyner 1 , P. Szczyglak 11 University <strong>of</strong> Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Polandnapj@uwm.edu.pl, przemyslaw.drozyner@uwm.edu.pl, szczypio@uwm.edu.plAbstract: The paper presents the results <strong>of</strong> researches on tthe influence <strong>of</strong> vanadium and niobium on wearintensity <strong>of</strong> the surface layers in soil mass. The investigations were conducted in the laboratory conditions ona wearing machine MZWM -1. The study adopted two types <strong>of</strong> surface layers obtained by welding withadditon <strong>of</strong> niobium and vanadium. The resulting layers were tested in three kinds <strong>of</strong> soil masses: loamysand, ligh clay and ordinary clay. Significant differences in the wear between the layers, depending on thetype <strong>of</strong> soil were observed.Keywords: weld overlay layer, vanadium, niobium, soil abrasive mass, the wear process.1. INTRODUCTIONWear in abrasive soil mass is a natural process<strong>of</strong> destruction which intensity depends on kind <strong>of</strong>soil [2,5]. Significant here is the occurrence <strong>of</strong>various phenomena <strong>of</strong> wear, depending on therandom changes in the soil, the working processparameters and material properties used in theworking elements. The choice <strong>of</strong> material forelements work in soil with optimal properties forspecific environmental conditions should bepreceded by an analysis <strong>of</strong> the nature and type <strong>of</strong>wear on the surface and the surface layer [1,4]. Thecriterion for the selection <strong>of</strong> the material is chosenprimarily on the basis <strong>of</strong> well-definedheterogeneous phase composition <strong>of</strong> the layerstructure. It has been found that the abrasive wearresistance is the sum <strong>of</strong> the individual resistances[3].In the case <strong>of</strong> iron alloys it is just a matter <strong>of</strong>carbide phase. Selection <strong>of</strong> carbide must take intoaccount the specific characteristics <strong>of</strong> theinteraction between Fe-Cr-C and carbide formerselements. Some <strong>of</strong> them are refractory elementssuch as vanadium and niobium. These elementsmelting at very high temperatures are quite difficultto obtain in the pure state. In chemical terms arerelatively unreactive, and their reactivity decreaseswith increasing atomic number. Most <strong>of</strong> theniobium is used in the form <strong>of</strong> ferrosilicon, andmay be used in the form <strong>of</strong> NbC carbides. Onlyabout 6% <strong>of</strong> the total production <strong>of</strong> niobium isintended for Nb alloys production. Niobium has arelatively low solubility in iron- a (alpha), and ironγ(gamma). Niobium is added to the surface layer inan amount up to 10%. The addition <strong>of</strong> niobium tothe steel and heat resistance alloys gives the effect<strong>of</strong> precipitation hardening by intermetalliccompounds or by NbC. Pure vanadium has goodplasticity, it is easily workable and have a goodwelding properties under argon atmosphere. It isresistant to corrosion and influence <strong>of</strong> alkali. Thevanadium in the steel forms a very hard VCcarbides in combination with the resistance totempering heat makes it is used in engineeringconstructions.Aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to analyze the wear processin the soil mass in the context <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong>the abrasive surface layers containing refractoryelements V and Nb.2. METHODSThe laboratory researches have beenconducted on a wear machine "spinning mass" type.The sample was a rectangular prism withdimensions 30x25x10 mm, cut from the weldoverlay padding (with additional materials) on steel222 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


38GSA. The chemical composition, determined bymethods <strong>of</strong> classical chemistry, is as follows:C - 0.38%, Mn - 1.07%, Si - 1.17%, P - 0.028%,S - 0.02%, Cr - 0 , 18% Cu - 0.16% Al - 0.022%.The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the steel: martensite withbainite and troostyt. At the same time two samples<strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> each type were placed in the machine.The chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the surface layers areshown in Table 1.Table 1. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> layers testedRootChemical composition [%]NbVC Coal 5.2 5Si Silicon 2.2 1.5Cr Chrome 29 23Nb Niobium 6.8 -V Vanadium - 10Other - 3.5 -Fe Iron rest restEach sample underwent a total <strong>of</strong> 20 000 meterswith speed <strong>of</strong> about 1.7 m/s. Measurement <strong>of</strong> themass <strong>of</strong> the sample was performed at each2 000 meters with use <strong>of</strong> laboratory scale withaccuracy <strong>of</strong> 0.0001 g, after the cleaning in anultrasonic cleaner. At that time the mass <strong>of</strong> soilwere exchanged with a new one. Samples hadoscillating movement.The study was conducted in three types <strong>of</strong>abrasive soil mass (according to USDA) in loamysand, light clay and ordinary clay. Characteristicsare shown in Table 2. Granulometric evaluationwas performed using a laser particle size meter+ Hydro Mastersizer 2000. Humidity <strong>of</strong> the soilwas determined by measuring the weight <strong>of</strong> thedried solid at a temperature <strong>of</strong> 105 C. The studywas conducted on humid mass.Table 2. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> soil pulpGroupgrain size2,0-0,05mmdiametersandFraction [%]0,05-0,002 mmdiameterdustClay below0.002 mmin diameterHumidityweight%Loamysand77, 48 20.83 1.69 9-11Light clay 56.48 30.83 12.69 12-13Ordinaryclay26.86 48.62 24.52 13-15Microscopic examination was performed bylight microscopy methods - Neophot 52 microscopecoupled with a digital camera Visitron Systems.Scanning microscope JEOL JSM - 5800 LVcoupled with X-ray microanalyser Oxford ISISLINK - 300 were used for scanning electronmicroscopy and chemical compositionmicroanalysis. Samples were digested with 3%HNO3 (Mi1Fe) and electro-chromic acid.Hardness measurements <strong>of</strong> the surface layerwere determined by Vickers method in accordancewith DIN EN ISO 6507-1:1999. Measurementswere carried out with load <strong>of</strong> 1 kg (9.807 N) actingduring the 15s. To quantify the wear it wasassumed unit weight wear related to 1cm2 abradedsurfaces and road friction. Figure 1 presents wearmachine "spinning mass" type which was usedduring experiment.Figure 1. Photo <strong>of</strong> wear machine "spinning mass" type3. RESULTSFigures 2 and 3 shows macroscopic images <strong>of</strong>the construction <strong>of</strong> the layer containing Nb and V.Figure 2. Macroscopic picture <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> thelayers with Nb content. Visible traces <strong>of</strong> grinding (1).In the right part <strong>of</strong> the layer - macro cracks (2) and (3).WN – weld overlay, MP - pad material.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 223


Figures 6 and 7 show the characteristics <strong>of</strong> thesurface layer containing vanadium. Outside thefusion zone, layer has a microstructure consisting<strong>of</strong> ledeburite, primary carbides <strong>of</strong> chromium andvanadium carbides.Figure 3. Macroscopic picture <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong>the layers with V content. Visible traces <strong>of</strong> grinding (1).No evidences <strong>of</strong> macro cracks .WN – weld overlay, MP - pad material.Figures 4 and 5 show microscopic structure <strong>of</strong>Niobium-containing layer. In addition to the narrowstrip <strong>of</strong> ferritic alloy, weld overlay hashomogeneous structure. Large initial separation <strong>of</strong>chromium carbides and niobium carbide are visibleon background <strong>of</strong> ledeburite (Fig. 11).Figure 6. Microscopic images <strong>of</strong> the surface layermaterial "V". Ferrite tungsten alloy (mixture <strong>of</strong>construction ledeburitic) with unevenly spaced primarychromium carbide precipitates (1) and fine carbides <strong>of</strong>vanadium (2).Figure 4. Microscopic image <strong>of</strong> material "Nb" fusionzone. At the junction <strong>of</strong> the weld metal pad materialvisible "bar" <strong>of</strong> ferrite alloy from which crystallizeddendritic deposit separating the phases (1). In thematerial "pad" the microstructure <strong>of</strong> ferrite grains withbright dark areas <strong>of</strong> perlite. WN - layer <strong>of</strong> the deposit,FS - ferrite alloy, MP - pad material.Figure 5. The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the weld layer material"Nb" <strong>of</strong> chromium carbide precipitates (1) and niobium(2).Figure 7. Microscopic image <strong>of</strong> the plastic layer "V".Ledeburitic mixture <strong>of</strong> ferrite alloy and chromiumcarbides M7C3 type (1) and vanadium carbides (2).Table 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> layers hardnessType <strong>of</strong> layer Material "Nb" Material "V"Hardness HV 10 HV 100.5 694 7831.0 676 7771.5 643 7332.0 638 7222.5 612 6923.0 593 6543.5 5 <strong>of</strong> 85 6394.0 540 6414.5 541 2665.0 550 2565.5 286 -The distance from the surface[mm]As is clear from the measurements <strong>of</strong> hardness(table 2) test layers have diverse hardness on thecross section. The layer <strong>of</strong> vanadium content isharder for almost 90 units <strong>of</strong> the layer containing224 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


niobium. It should be noted that for both layersgradual decrease in cross-sectional hardness wasobserved. Figure 8-11 presents the results <strong>of</strong> wearin different abrasive masses.Figure 8. The course <strong>of</strong> wear layers in loamy sand.Figure 9. Mileage wear light layers in clay.Figure 10. Light clay wear layers in the clay normal4. CONCLUSIONThe results <strong>of</strong> the research carried out in threedifferent soil masses showed the complexity <strong>of</strong>process <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wear in tribological discretenodes. The highest wear was recorded in layers <strong>of</strong>sandy soil and it was higher by more than 2.5 timeshigher than in clay soils. Wear <strong>of</strong> layer withvanadium content was about 30% smaller than thelayer containing niobium. Causes <strong>of</strong> dependenceshould be sought in the mechanism <strong>of</strong> wear. In theevent <strong>of</strong> wear in the abrasive mass containing largeamounts <strong>of</strong> silica, there was the greatest contactwith the abraded area. A different analysis isrequired for results obtained during friction in claysoil masses. The friction in these soils had adifferent course than the sandy soil. Clay soil tendsto form aggregates <strong>of</strong> soil, hence there are many airpores, and thus much more discontinuities frictionsurface than in the case <strong>of</strong> sandy soil. In addition,the impact <strong>of</strong> the clay and dust on the process <strong>of</strong>wear is negligible, but in combination with otherfactions can be multiplied. Greater wear in clayhard was observed due to the fact that the weight <strong>of</strong>the formed soil aggregates was greater than a lightloam. The intensity <strong>of</strong> wear for layers <strong>of</strong> light andordinary clay remained at the same level valueswherein layer containing vanadium wear lessintense than the layer containing niobium.REFERENCES[1] M.F. Buchely, J.C. Gutierrez, L.M. Le´on, A. Toro:The effect <strong>of</strong> microstructure on abrasive wear <strong>of</strong>hardfacing alloys, Wear, 259, pp. 52–61, 2005.[2] J. Coronado: Effect <strong>of</strong> Abrasive Size on Wear,Reserch Group <strong>of</strong> Fatigue and Surfaces, MechanicalEngineering School, Universidad del Valle, CaliColombia, 2011.[3] J. Napiórkowski, L. Pękalska, G. Pękalski: Structure<strong>of</strong> material and its wear resistance in the soil,Tribologia 6, pp. 871-879, 1998.[4] J. Napiórkowski, G. Pękalski, K. Kołakowski:Badanie struktur i zużywania powłok napawanych wglebowej masie ściernej, Tribologia 3/2012,pp. 111-118, 2012.[5] J. Napiórkowski, P. Drożyner, K. Kołakowski, P.Mikołajczak: Analysis <strong>of</strong> tribological processes <strong>of</strong>construction materials in the soil mass abrasivewear process, International Virtual Journal forScience, Technics and Innovations for the Industryyear VI, 11/2012, ISSN 1313-0226, pp. 27-29, 2012.Figure 11. Comparison <strong>of</strong> intensity <strong>of</strong> layers dependingon the type <strong>of</strong> mass13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 225


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF TOOTH HEIGHT CHANGINGAT TIMING BELTSBlaža Stojanović 1 , Lozica Ivanović 1 , Andreja Ilić, Ivan Miletić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, blaza@kg.ac.rs, lozica@kg.ac.rs, imiletic@kg.ac.rsAbstract: Timing belt drives present relatively new power transmitters that transmit power by friction andform contact. Load at timing belts is under direct influence <strong>of</strong> active surface <strong>of</strong> timing belt tooth. Duringexploitation, the height <strong>of</strong> tooth at timing belt decrease and, by that, reduction <strong>of</strong> active surface is provoked,load increases and working life decreases. Besides <strong>of</strong> tooth height, changing <strong>of</strong> tooth width at timing belt,also presents very important factor. The tribomechanical system at pulley teeth - timing belt teeth withheight changing during exploitation is analyzed in this paper. Experimental testing <strong>of</strong> tribologicalcharacteristics was done at custom design and made testing device at Center for power transmission atFaculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering in Kragujevac.Keywords: timing belt, tribomechanical system, timing belt teeth, friction, testing.1. INTRODUCTIONWorking life and reliability <strong>of</strong> timing belttransmitters are highly influenced by timing beltgeometrical dimensions that means timing beltpitch, its tooth height and width. Timing belts aremade <strong>of</strong> polymer materials reinforced by metallicmaterials and their dimensions vary duringexploitation. Highest variation <strong>of</strong> geometricaldimensions occurred during running-in period <strong>of</strong>new belt. During this period, changing <strong>of</strong> timingbelt pitch is highest, primarily influenced by plasticdeformations <strong>of</strong> side surfaces <strong>of</strong> its tooth. Afterrunning-in period, changings <strong>of</strong> geometricalcharacteristics are linear with same trend forconsidered values [1-4].The contacts <strong>of</strong> timing belt and pulley causechanging <strong>of</strong> geometrical properties. On the basis <strong>of</strong>kinematic analysis <strong>of</strong> pulley and belt contact indetails, following three tribomechanical systemscan be identificated [5, 6]:1. belt teeth – pulley teeth2. side surface <strong>of</strong> belt – pulley rim3. inter teeth belt space – head <strong>of</strong> teeth pulleyFriction force in tribomechanical system beltteeth – pulley teeth is dominant factor in case <strong>of</strong>tooth height changing analyses.2. TRIBOMECHANICAL SYSTEM BELTTEETH – PULLEY TEETHDuring mashing <strong>of</strong> belt teeth with pulley teethcontact between side surfaces is done. The contactis at line, for the beginning, when belt teeth come inmash with pulley teeth. The mashing starts withimpact <strong>of</strong> belt teeth and pulley teeth. The belt teethdeform, due to its elastic properties and, by that,enlargement <strong>of</strong> contact surface is done. Afterenlargement <strong>of</strong> contact surface, and rotations <strong>of</strong> beltand pulley, belt teeth slide on side surface <strong>of</strong> pulley,when rolling with sliding type <strong>of</strong> friction ishappened.The value <strong>of</strong> friction force decreases withlength <strong>of</strong> sliding path, so its maximal value is at thebase <strong>of</strong> belt teeth (Fig. 1). Simultaneously, actingpoint <strong>of</strong> resulting component <strong>of</strong> normal forcemoves from head to base <strong>of</strong> the teeth. Normal forcevaries with parabolic dependence:NN ( ) 2i=− ⋅ l− l + N (1)lmax2 t max,twhere is:Nmax- maximal value <strong>of</strong> normal force,l - length <strong>of</strong> tooth pr<strong>of</strong>ile andl - length <strong>of</strong> sliding path.t226 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 1. Friction force on side surface <strong>of</strong> belt teethFriction force on side surface <strong>of</strong> belt teeth can bedetermined by following relation:where is:Foi⋅ µF = Ni⋅ µti=(2)cos βN i - normal force on belt teeth,μ - friction coefficient,( 2)F oi - peripheral force that act on belt teeth andβ - belt pr<strong>of</strong>ile angle.3. TESTING OF TIMING BELTExperimental testing <strong>of</strong> tribologicalcharacteristics was done at custom design and madetesting device with open power loop at Center forpower transmissions at Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering inKragujevac [7-9]. Basic elements <strong>of</strong> testing deviceare (Fig. 2):1. driving unit,2. Cardan transmitter,3. input shaft with measuring devices,4. sensor for input shaft number <strong>of</strong> rotation,5. torque sensor on input shaft,6. considered power transmitter (timing beltpulley),7. output shaft,8. mechanical brake,9. tension mechanism and10. signal amplifier.Figure 2. Device for timing belt testing.Driving unit, type KR-11/2C (37-180 rpm -1 ),consists <strong>of</strong> electromotor (1) type ZKT90S-4 (totallyenclosed single phase asynchronous motor withcage rotor with thermal protection, size 90L, 4-poletype), friction power transmitter, and gear reductor.Design solution provides automatic regulation <strong>of</strong>pressure between friction discs and compensation <strong>of</strong>axial gap due to wear. Changing <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong>rotations per minute is done manually, by rotation<strong>of</strong> wheel that by coupling <strong>of</strong> gear and bar, radially(vertically) move electromotor with conical frictiondisc from friction wheel. Driving unit (1) and inputshaft (3) are connected by Cardan transmitter (2).Input shaft (3) is design in the way to beelastically deformed under maximal torque load.Inductive sensor <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> rotations per minute(4), type MA1 is placed on input shaft, so as torquetransducer (5) that is formed <strong>of</strong> strain gauges andsignal transmitter MT2555A that is mounted byspecial adapter with battery compartment BK2801A.Input and output shafts (7) are connected byconsidered power transmitter (6), means timing belt- pulley system. Tension <strong>of</strong> timing belt is done bythe tension mechanism (9) with external threadedspindle. By spindle rotations the movements <strong>of</strong>plate with output shaft and mechanical brake aredone.Mechanical brake is specially designed for openpower loop (Fig. 3). Breaking is done by acting <strong>of</strong>breaking pads on both sides <strong>of</strong> the disc. Regulation<strong>of</strong> force and torque is done manually by the means<strong>of</strong> spring and screw.Mechanical brake obtain certain braking torque,means load torque on output shaft <strong>of</strong> timing belt –pulley power transmitter. Value <strong>of</strong> torque ispresented on digital display <strong>of</strong> the signal amplifierthat gets signal from measuring device on shaft bysignal transmitter EV2510A. The number <strong>of</strong>rotations per minute <strong>of</strong> input shaft is alsodisplayed on amplifier gain that gets signal frominductive sensor and impulse receiver DV2556.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 227


Working regime <strong>of</strong> input shaft at powertransmitter is measured and regulated inpresented way.Figure 3. Mechanical BrakeBy adaptations <strong>of</strong> joining elements with drivingunit from one side and output shaft equipped withmeasuring devices testing <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> powertransmitters can be done on presented equipmentwith limitations in dimensions and load.4. TESTING RESULTSMeasuring <strong>of</strong> geometrical dimensions is done atZastava tool factory, Department <strong>of</strong> quality. Inorder to provide relevant analysis measuring <strong>of</strong> thefollowing values are done at eight teeth <strong>of</strong> timingbelt (Fig. 4):• pitch ( h ),• belt width ( b ) ,• distance between belt teeth ( t 1)and• belt height ( t ) .Figure 5. Measuring device –DIGIMARResults <strong>of</strong> measuring <strong>of</strong> the belt height changingduring exploitation at eight considered tooth arepresented at Tab. 1 by values and at Fig. 6 bydiagrams.Table 1. Change <strong>of</strong> timing belt height ∆ t = t − t [ μm ]o∆ tBelt teeth1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85 52 75 34 23 17 3 32 1310 53 77 38 30 23 15 39 1520 62 83 46 41 36 17 42 3050 65 96 49 52 57 26 53 51100 65 98 50 53 57 33 53 53150 67 101 54 53 57 35 57 53200 68 105 58 61 57 55 74 55250 69 109 58 65 67 63 82 63300 76 125 63 67 67 66 84 63Exploitationperiod [h]Figure 4. Basic geometrical properties <strong>of</strong> timing beltChange <strong>of</strong> timing belt height is considered inthis paper. Belt height is distance between head <strong>of</strong>belt tooth and backing surface. Measuring was doneby DIGIMAR measuring device (Fig. 5). Changing<strong>of</strong> belt height ( ∆ t)during testing can be calculatedby following relation:∆ t = t − t,where is:t - measured value <strong>of</strong> belt height andt - starting height <strong>of</strong> the belt.ooFigure 6. Changing <strong>of</strong> tooth timing belt height inexploitationEvaluations <strong>of</strong> the obtained results implicate thatbelt height decreases monotonely duringexploitation. During running-in period, that lasts forapproximately 20 hours, this changing is verysignificant and it is happening on all <strong>of</strong> consideredeight belt tooth. The changing during running-inperiod is caused by deformations <strong>of</strong> the belt, itspitch and width decrease. During period <strong>of</strong>exploitation due to normal wear belt heightdecreases. During period <strong>of</strong> 20 hours to 50 hours <strong>of</strong>228 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


exploitation this changing is significant. After 50hours <strong>of</strong> exploitation till 200 hours <strong>of</strong> exploitation,the very fast changing occurred at most <strong>of</strong> thetooth. Plastic deformation occurred during runninginperiod. Due to the fact that those deformationsare small during period <strong>of</strong> normal wear, cylindricalwear <strong>of</strong> tooth head are not significant, so heightchangings are small. After 200 hours <strong>of</strong>exploitation changing <strong>of</strong> tooth heights aresignificant.On the basis <strong>of</strong> the further analyses, conclusionthat changings <strong>of</strong> all values are subjected to samedecrease function is implicated. But, on the basis <strong>of</strong>the analysis in details it is implicated that changing<strong>of</strong> belt height is bigger than changing <strong>of</strong> inter toothspace width. This fact leads to decrease <strong>of</strong> activetooth heights that are in contact with tooth <strong>of</strong> thepulley. If the reduction <strong>of</strong> belt width after 150hours is taken into consideration, it is implicatedthat value <strong>of</strong> nominal surface side <strong>of</strong> timing belttooth also decrease. As timing belt - pulleytransmitters transmit power by form contact andfriction, increase <strong>of</strong> timing belt pitch and decrease<strong>of</strong> nominal active surface <strong>of</strong> tooth all together causefailures in exploitation <strong>of</strong> those transmitters.5. CONCLUSIONThe basic tribomechanical systems at timing belt– pulley transmitter are: timing belt teeth – pulleyteeth, belt side – rim <strong>of</strong> the pulley, inter space <strong>of</strong>timing belt tooth – head <strong>of</strong> pulley tooth. Frictionforces are highest at side surfaces <strong>of</strong> timing belttooth and pulley tooth. Directions and values <strong>of</strong>those forces are under direct influence <strong>of</strong> meshingkinematics <strong>of</strong> timing belt transmitters.As the consequence <strong>of</strong> friction at side and headsurface <strong>of</strong> tooth, the reduction <strong>of</strong> belt height iscaused. Decrease <strong>of</strong> belt width and reduction <strong>of</strong> itsheight cause decrease <strong>of</strong> active contact surface, thatfurther cause increase <strong>of</strong> loads at tooth andsimultaneous decrease <strong>of</strong> transmitter coefficient <strong>of</strong>efficiency. Average changing <strong>of</strong> timing belt toothheight relatively to starting value is 3.14 %.Considered changing <strong>of</strong> geometrical properties<strong>of</strong> timing belt causes significant influence toreliability and working life <strong>of</strong> timing belttransmitters.REFERENCES[1] R. Perneder, I. Osborne: Handbook Timing Belts:Princilpes, Calculations, Applications, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.[2] S. Tanasijević: Mechanical drives: chain drives,timing belt drives, cardanic drives (in Serbian),Yugoslav tribological society, Faculty <strong>of</strong>engineering from Kragujevac, 1994.[3] B. Stojanović, S. Tanasijević, N. Marjanović, L.Ivanović, M. Blagojević: Wear as the Criterion <strong>of</strong>Mechanical Transmitters Working Life, J BalkTribol Assoc 17, pp. 215-222, 2011.[4] B. Stojanović, M. Babić, N. Marjanović, L.Ivanović, A. Ilić: Tribomechanical Systems inMechanical Power Transmitters, J Balk TribolAssoc 18, pp. 497-506, 2012.[5] B. Stojanović, S. Tanasijević, N. Miloradović:Tribomechanical Systems in Timing Belt Drives, JBalk Tribol Assoc 15, pp. 465-473, 2009.[6] B. Stojanović, N. Miloradović, N. Marjanović, M.Blagojević, A. Marinković: Wear <strong>of</strong> Timing BeltDrives, J Balk Tribol Assoc 17, pp. 206-214, 2011.[7] B. Stojanović, N. Miloradović, N. Marjanović, M.Blagojević, L. Ivanović: Length Variation <strong>of</strong>Toothed Belt During Exploitation, Strojniškivestnik, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 648-654, 2011.[8] B. Stojanović, L. Ivanović, M. Blagojević: Frictionand Wear in Timing Belt Drives, Tribology inIndustry 32, pp. 33-40, 2010.[9] B. Stojanović, L. Ivanović, N. Miloradović: Testing<strong>of</strong> Timing Belt Drives, IMK-14 37, pp. 77-80, 2010.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 229


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacCYCLO DRIVE EFFICIENCYTihomir Mačkić 1 , Živko Babić 2 , Nenad Kostić 3 , Mirko Blagojević 41 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, tihomir.mackic@unibl.rs2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, zivkobabic@unibl.rs3 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, nkostic@kg.ac.rs4 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, mirkob@kg.ac.rsAbstract: Cyclo drives have a many good characteristics: high gear ratio, compact design, two-thirds <strong>of</strong> itsreduction components in contact at all times, reliability and long life in the most severe applications,minimal vibration, low noise, low backlash and extended operational life, high power density, wide variety <strong>of</strong>inputs available,… One <strong>of</strong> the most important its characteristics is high efficiency.Two methods for determining <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiency are presented in this paper. Their complete analyticalmodels are defined. The influence <strong>of</strong> various parameters on the cyclo drive efficiency is also analyzed(power, rotational angle <strong>of</strong> input shaft, gear ratio, …). The calculation <strong>of</strong> the cyclo drive efficiency by bothmethods is done for the real one-stage cyclo speed reducer. Concluding remarks and directions for futurework are presented at the end <strong>of</strong> the paper.Keywords: cyclo drive, cycloid, gear, power losses, efficiency1. INTRODUCTIONCycloidal speed reducer belong the group <strong>of</strong>planetary drives (Figure 1). Because <strong>of</strong> very widearea <strong>of</strong> application, production <strong>of</strong> cyclo drives hasgrowing character and wide area <strong>of</strong> application:processing equipment, conveyors, presses, mixers,food industry, automotive plants, spinningmachines, cranes,…The most important working characteristics <strong>of</strong>cyclo drives are: wide range <strong>of</strong> possible gear ratios,quiet and reliable work, low level <strong>of</strong> noise andvibrations, exceptionally compact design, highefficiency rate, ... Lehmann gave the basicinformation about cycloidal gearing, [1]. Thedynamic behavior <strong>of</strong> a cyclo drives is presented inRefs. [2,3]. Kosse investigated the hysteresisphenomenon in cyclo drives and dampingproperties derived from dickey curves undertorsional impact load, [4]. Liu and other generateda new type <strong>of</strong> double-enveloping cyclo drive andcalculated the torsional stiffness, [5]. The influence<strong>of</strong> friction on contact forces distribution ispresented in papers [6,7]. Sensiger developed a newmethod for cycloidal gear pr<strong>of</strong>ile, efficiency andstress optimization, [8]. Chmurawa and Lokiecpresented the inside meshing and force distributions<strong>of</strong> cycloid disk with modified pr<strong>of</strong>ile, [9]. A newconcept <strong>of</strong> a two-stage cyclo drive is presented inpaper [10].Friction and wear have a greatest impact on thecyclo drive efficiency, [11, 12]. The calculation <strong>of</strong>the cyclo drive efficiency by two method (Malhotraand Gorla) for the real one-stage cyclo speedreducer is presented in this paper.Figure 1. Cyclo drive230 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


2. EFFICIENCY OF CYCLO DRIVEEfficiency <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive primarily depends onthe resistance due to friction between the elements<strong>of</strong> cyclo drive. Two methods for determining <strong>of</strong>cyclo drive efficiency are presented in this paper:Malhotra method [11] and Gorla method [12].2.1 Malhotra method for calculating <strong>of</strong> cyclodrive efficiency, [11]The various sources <strong>of</strong> power loss in a cyclodrive are:• Rolling friction in the mounting <strong>of</strong> thecycloid disc on the input shaft,• Rolling friction between output rollers andholes in the cycloid disc,• Rolling friction between housing rollersand the cycloid disc,• Sliding friction in the mounting <strong>of</strong> theoutput rollers,• Sliding friction in the mounting <strong>of</strong> thehousing rollers.Design parameters are presented on Figure 2,and loads on Figure 3.W =⎛+ n⎜f+r2⎝+2πn∫ dW =0fs1fr1⋅ d2π⋅ Dm⋅ n n∫ ( θ)dθ +DFr 0 E2π⎞ n q⎟ ∫ ∑ F ( θ)dθ +Kj⎠ 0 j = 12πVK2⎛ ⋅ d ⎞ n q( u + 1) ⎜f+f s2 O ⎟ ∫ ∑ F ( θ)dθ(1)CR ⎜ r3 ⎟⎝2Kj⎠ 0 j = 1where: f r1 , f r2 and f r3 are lever arms <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction, f s1 and f s2 are sliding friction coefficients,D m is mean diameter <strong>of</strong> input shaft bearing, D r isinput shaft bearing rollers diameter, F E is bearingreaction, d VK is diameter <strong>of</strong> outpit mechanism pins,F Kj is force between output roller j and cycloid disc,q is number <strong>of</strong> output rollers, u CR is cyclo driveratio and d 0 is diameter <strong>of</strong> housing pins.Figure 3. Loads on cycloid discThe overall efficiency <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive is then:M a 2π− Wη = (2)M 2πwhere M a is input torque.aFigure 2. Geometry <strong>of</strong> cyclo driveFor the elemental rotation dθ <strong>of</strong> the cycloid disc,the rotations <strong>of</strong> the input shaft, output rollers andhousing rollers are n⋅dθ, n⋅dθ and (n+1)⋅dθ,respectively. The frictional work per rotation <strong>of</strong> theinput shaft can be determined as:2.2 Gorla method for calculating <strong>of</strong> cyclo driveefficiency, [12]Power loss due to the bearing friction could becomputed by means <strong>of</strong> the following equation:WMa M a( ω − ω )= ⋅(3)innerouterwhere: ω inner is bearing inner race speed and ω outeris bearing outer race speed.Power loss due to the friction between the pins<strong>of</strong> the output shaft and the holes <strong>of</strong> the cycloid discis:13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 231


Ws= ∑KFKj Kjj = 1f⋅⋅υKj(4)where: f Kj is friction coefficient between the pins <strong>of</strong>the output shaft and the holes <strong>of</strong> the cycloid discand υ Kj is sliding speed between the pins <strong>of</strong> theoutput shaft and the holes <strong>of</strong> the cycloid disc.Power loss due to friction between thecylindrical rollers, the surface <strong>of</strong> the ring gear andtheir housing in the planet wheel is:presented in the paper, too (Figure 4, Figure 5 andFigure 6).Dependence <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiency on inputpower is presented on Figure 4. Input power wasvaried in range from 3 kW to 5 kW. Increasing theinput power, cyclo drive efficiency is increasing,too (from 93% to 96%). Values <strong>of</strong> efficiencycalculated by Malhotra [11] and Gorla [12] methodare very similar.WNn= ∑ ρ ⋅ sin( arctg(f )) ⋅Nii = 1FNi⋅ ωNi(5)where: ρ is radius <strong>of</strong> cylindrical roller, f Ni is frictioncoefficient between the cylindrical rollers and theirhouses and ω Ni is relative rotational speed betweenthe cylindrical rollers and the cycloid disc.Vertical component <strong>of</strong> force F Ni is calculatedbased on following expression:The efficiency <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive can be calculatedas:P − ( W + W + W )EM Ma Kη =N (6)PEMFigure 4. Dependence <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiencyon input power3. CALCULATION OF CYCLO DRIVEEFFICIENCYThe efficiency <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive by two presentedmethod is has calculated for input parameters inTable 1.Table 1. Cyclo drive parametersMarkP EMValue4,0 kWn EM 1420 min -1u CR 13f r1 , f r2 , f r3 f r1 = f r2 = f r3 = 0,003f S1 , f S2 f S2 = f S2 = 0,03d 08 mmD 014 mmq 8d vk8 mm14 mmD vkCyclo drive efficiency is calculated in programcreated in MATLAB. Values <strong>of</strong> cyclo driveefficiency are:• η = 94,55% (Malhotra method),• η = 95,03% (Gorla method).Analysis <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> input power P EM ,input number <strong>of</strong> revolutions n EM and gear ratio u CRon cyclo drive efficiency by both method isFigure 5. Dependence <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiencyon input number <strong>of</strong> revolutionsDependences <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiency frominput number <strong>of</strong> revolutions is presented on Figure5. Number <strong>of</strong> revolutions was varied from 1180min -1 to 1660 min -1 . Increasing the input number<strong>of</strong> revolutions, cyclo drive efficiency decreases (forboth method, Figure 5).Dependence <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiency on gearratio is presented on Figure 6. Gear ratio was variedin range from 11 to 16. Increasing the gear ratio(Malhotra method), cyclo drive efficiencydecreases from 95% to 94%. For Gorla method,cyclo drive efficiency increases from 94,8% to95,3%.232 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 6. Dependence <strong>of</strong> cyclo drive efficiencyon gear ratio4. CONCLUSIONTwo methods for calculating <strong>of</strong> cyclo driveefficiency are presented in this paper (Malhotra andGorla method). Their complete analytical modelsare defined. The calculation <strong>of</strong> the cyclo driveefficiency by both methods is done for the real onestagecyclo speed reducer.By analyzing the results, it can be concluded thenext:• One-stage cyclo drive has very highefficiency,• Both method (Malhotra and Gorla) havevery similar values for efficiency,• With increasing <strong>of</strong> input power, cyclo driveefficiency is increasing too,• With increasing <strong>of</strong> input number <strong>of</strong>revolutions, cyclo drive efficiencydecreases,• With increasing <strong>of</strong> gear ratio, cyclo driveefficiency decreases (Malhotra method), orincreases, (Gorla method).REFERENCES[1] M. Lehmann: Calculation and measurement <strong>of</strong>forces acting on cycloidal speed reducer (inGerman), PhD Thesis, Technical UniversityMunich, Germany, 1976.[2] S.V. Thube, T.R. Bobak: Dynamic analysis <strong>of</strong> acycloidal gearbox using finite element method,AGMA Technical Paper, 2012.[3] M. Blagojević, V. Nikolić - Stanojević, N.Marjanović, Lj. Veljović: Analysis <strong>of</strong> cycloid drivedynamic behavior, Scientific Technical Review,Vol. LIX, No. 1, pp. 52-56, 2009.[4] V. Kosse: Using hysteresis loop and torsional shockloading to asses damping and efficiency <strong>of</strong> cyclodrives, 14 th International Congress on Sound andVibration, 9-12. July, 2007, Cairns, Australia.[5] J. Liu, S. Matsumura, B. Chen, H. Houjoh:Torsional stiffness calculation <strong>of</strong> double-envelopingcycloid drive, Journal <strong>of</strong> Advenced MechanicalDesign, Systems and Manufacturing 6, pp. 2-14,2012.[6] M. Blagojević, N. Marjanović, B. Stojanović, Z.Đorđević, M. Kočić: Influence <strong>of</strong> friction on theforce distribution at cycloidal speed reducer, 12 thInternational Conference on Tribology, 11-13.5.2011, Kragujevac, pp. 226-229.[7] M. Blagojević, M. Kočić, N. Marjanović, B.Stojanović, Z. Đorđević, L. Ivanović, V.Marjanović: Influence <strong>of</strong> the friction on thecycloidal speed reducer efficiency, Journal <strong>of</strong> theBalkan Tribological Association, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.217-227, 2012.[8] J. Sensiger: Unified Approach to Cycloid DrivePr<strong>of</strong>ile, Stress, and Efficiency Optimization, Journal<strong>of</strong> Mechanical Design (ASME), Vol. 132, 2010.[9] M. Chmurawa, A. Lokiec: Distribution <strong>of</strong> loads incycloidal planetary gear (CYCLO) includingmodification <strong>of</strong> equidistant, in: 16 th EuropianADAMS user conference, 2001, Berchtesgaden,Germany.[10] M. Blagojević, N. Marjanović, Z. Đorđević, B.Stojanović, A. Dišić: A new design <strong>of</strong> a two-stagecycloidal speed reducer, Journal <strong>of</strong> MechanicalDesign (ASME) 133, 2011.[11] S.K. Malhotra, M.A. Parameswaran: Analysis <strong>of</strong> acycloidal speed reducer, Mechanism and MachineTheory 18, pp. 491-499, 1983.[12] C. Gorla, P. Davoli, F. Rosa, C. Longoni, F.Chiozzi, A. Samarani: Theoretical and experimentalanalysis <strong>of</strong> a cycloidal speed reducer, Journal <strong>of</strong>Mechanical Design (ASME) 130, 2008.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 233


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROCESS OF WINDINGTHE STEEL ROPE AROUND THE WINCH DRUMMiloš Matejić 1 , Mirko Blagojević 1 , Vesna Marjanović 1 , Rodoljub Vujanac 1 , Boban Simić 21 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia,mmatejic@kg.ac.rs, mirkob@kg.ac.rs, vmarjanovic@kg.ac.rs, vujanac@kg.ac.rs2 D.O.O RAPP Zastava, Serbia, bsi@rappzastava.comAbstract: Proper winding <strong>of</strong> the steel rope around the winch drum is great importance, mostly for:prolonging the service life <strong>of</strong> the rope, reduction <strong>of</strong> deformations <strong>of</strong> the body and the sides <strong>of</strong> the drum if thewinding <strong>of</strong> the rope is multilayered, increasing <strong>of</strong> the safety factors, easier unwinding <strong>of</strong> the rope whilelowering the load, even running <strong>of</strong> the drive unit, etc. The focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is on the analysis <strong>of</strong> the frictionwhich occurs in the process <strong>of</strong> winding and unwinding the rope around the winch drum. Friction force is inits highest intensity when the rope passes from one layer to another, if the winding <strong>of</strong> the rope ismultilayered. As the result <strong>of</strong> the research, certain mechanisms <strong>of</strong> winding <strong>of</strong> the rope from the aspects <strong>of</strong> thefriction force were obtained, and the affect <strong>of</strong> the forces on the sides <strong>of</strong> the drum were analyzedKeywords: winch, drum, rope, friction, friction force.1. INTRODUCTIONModern technological achievements haveenabled a great progress in the ship equipmentindustry. Ship winches, as one <strong>of</strong> the mostimportant parts <strong>of</strong> the equipment, are highlydeveloped. Their dimensions, compared to the forcethey use, have been reduced and the degree <strong>of</strong>efficiency has increased with the use <strong>of</strong> variouskinds <strong>of</strong> compact mechanical gear and drive. Thecapacities for winding <strong>of</strong> the ropes have beenincreased for any kind <strong>of</strong> use on the vessels, fromthe oceanographic researches on the bottom <strong>of</strong> theocean, to catching <strong>of</strong> the special kinds <strong>of</strong> fish.A lot <strong>of</strong> research into vessel winches have beendone: increasing <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> efficiency,reduction <strong>of</strong> dimensions, reduction <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong>winches, improvement <strong>of</strong> the drive unit regardingthe compactness and the power they use,improvement <strong>of</strong> the drum for rope-winding as thebasic element <strong>of</strong> a winch, <strong>of</strong> the rope-windingsystem, development and analysis <strong>of</strong> the varioustypes <strong>of</strong> ropes for various uses, etc.Great attention is paid to examination anddevelopment <strong>of</strong> the ropes used for winches. Steelropes are mostly used for vessel winches, while thesynthetic ones are rarely used. Different types <strong>of</strong>cables are used for winches for oceanographicresearches rather than ropes because <strong>of</strong> thetransmission <strong>of</strong> information from the researchdevices from the bottom <strong>of</strong> the ocean to the vessel.When it comes to the development <strong>of</strong> the new types<strong>of</strong> ropes, great attention is paid both to the outertensile and twisting forces affecting the rope, andthe inner friction forces that occur between thewires <strong>of</strong> the rope, [1], [2], [3]. When examining theexisting types <strong>of</strong> ropes, it is very important toexamine the inner friction in the ropes, as well asthe failure mechanism <strong>of</strong> the ropes, [4], [5]. In thecase where the steel rope cannot be installed on awinch because <strong>of</strong> its large mass, synthetic ropes areused. Synthetic ropes are still not widely usedbecause they are still in the development andimprovement stages, [6]. Synthetic ropes can bemade with the molten core for the improvement <strong>of</strong>its mechanical characteristics.Reduction <strong>of</strong> the dimensions and the increase inthe degree <strong>of</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong> a winch is mostlyachieved by installing the compact mechanicalgear, gearboxes. Single-stage gearboxes with two,three or more drives are <strong>of</strong>ten used for increasingthe compactness <strong>of</strong> the vessel winch constructions,[7]. In addition, the use <strong>of</strong> planetary gearboxes is234 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


common for their ability to be installed within thewinch drum.Improvement <strong>of</strong> the winch drum, as the basicelement <strong>of</strong> the winch, is based on the examination<strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the forces on the drum,experimentally and using finite element analysis,[8]. Improvement <strong>of</strong> the drum is done by reducingthe thickness <strong>of</strong> the material from which the drumis made in noncritical places, while increasing it inthe critical ones, and inserting the requiredstructural stiffeners, [9], [10]. Optimizationmethods are also a possible approach <strong>of</strong>improvement, [11].Improvement <strong>of</strong> the system for proper winding<strong>of</strong> the rope around the drum <strong>of</strong> the vessel winch isbased on its synchronization with the number <strong>of</strong>turns <strong>of</strong> the drum. The synchronization can be donein many ways. Some <strong>of</strong> the ways are themechanical synchronization with the powertransmission or installing a special driving enginegeneratorfor the system, which is synchronized,with the engine-generator <strong>of</strong> the winch.In this paper, a mathematical model <strong>of</strong> winding<strong>of</strong> a steel rope around the drum is presented. Themathematical model shows the correlation betweenthe friction and pulling forces using geometricalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> winding on the winch drum andthe friction coefficient. Following this, the results<strong>of</strong> the algorithm, which are also developed in thispaper, mathematical model as well as comparisoncharacteristics <strong>of</strong> friction forces for differentcoefficients <strong>of</strong> friction during winding, are given.Finally conclusions and guidelines for furtherresearch have been presented.2.1 General case <strong>of</strong> winding <strong>of</strong> the ropearound the drumIn determining the general case <strong>of</strong> winding, annth winding on the nth layer is observed. Thewinding lies upon the two windings from theprevious layer (Figure 1).The forces FWR occur as the reaction <strong>of</strong> therope to the pulling force FW. The friction force Fµalso occurs. Further observation is done on thecross-section where the force FWR acts (Figure 2).In this cross-section, the perpendicular force FNoccurs due to acting <strong>of</strong> friction force Fµ.Figure 1. General spooling case2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF STEELROPE WINDING AROUND THE WINCH-DRUMThe winding <strong>of</strong> the steel rope around the winchdrum can be single-layered or multilayered. Themathematical model concerns the multilayeredprocess <strong>of</strong> rope winding, from the first to the lastlayer. The model could be used for defining singlelayeredwinding too, by excluding the upper layersfrom the model. The bevel <strong>of</strong> the rope due to thewinding is excluded from the mathematical model,because the bevel has an insignificant effect in themajority <strong>of</strong> winding cases. Also, the assumptionthat during winding the rope acts as an absoluteelastic body is taken, while the wound rope acts asa solid body.Figure 2. Cross-section <strong>of</strong> ropes in general caseSince the rope is <strong>of</strong> constant cross-section, thecenters <strong>of</strong> circumferences, which make the crosssection<strong>of</strong> the rope, generally, form an equilateraltriangle. Horizontal component reaction forces <strong>of</strong>the windings <strong>of</strong> the lower layer FR are annulledbecause <strong>of</strong> the previous claim. The connectionbetween the perpendicular force FN and thereaction force FR is derived by setting the planarsystem <strong>of</strong> opposed forces, and the resulting isrelation (3):FN3FR (1)3After determining the reaction, it is necessary todetermine the friction force, which is caused by thetractive force. The friction force was determined by13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 235


observing the simplified tensile system <strong>of</strong> the upperlayer <strong>of</strong> rope over the lower layer (Figure 3) on asmall angle ±dφ/2 from the cross-section shown onthe Figure 2.The friction force Fµ in the expression (6) wascalculated as the total friction force. Because <strong>of</strong> theadopted assumption about the symmetry <strong>of</strong>winding, the friction force Fµ is divided into twoequal parts (8) (Figure 1) in order to make arelation between the friction force appearing in thecontact <strong>of</strong> the upper and lower layers.F W1Fμ1 (8)LC2 e 2.2 Special case <strong>of</strong> rope winding on the drumFigure 3. Basic part <strong>of</strong> the ropeFor the elementary part <strong>of</strong> the rope on the angle±dφ/2, the following equation system is derived:ddx : dF F dF cos F cos 0 (2)WR WRWR2 2d dy : dF F dF sin F sin 0 (3)N WR WRWR2 2Accepting the assumptions for the basic angle±dφ/2 (φ→0): cosdφ/2≈1, sindφ/2≈dφ/2, dFµ =µ·dF N i dF WR dφ = 0, and by solving equations (2)and (3), the connection between the inputtedpulling force F W and the reaction force within therope F WR :μFW FWR e(4)With further solving, the connection between thetractive force F W and perpendicular force F N isobtained, as well as the connection between thefriction force Fµ and the tractive force F W :F W1F 1 (5)N e 1Fμ F 1 (6)W e From expressions (4), (5) and (6) it can be seenthat all resulting values directly depend on thetractive force F W , coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction µ, and theangle <strong>of</strong> winding φ.Returning the values from expression (5) toexpression (1) the function <strong>of</strong> the reaction <strong>of</strong> therope on the lower layer (7) is derived depending onthe tractive force, coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction, and theangle <strong>of</strong> rope winding:3 F F W11 (7)R3 μ e In the special case <strong>of</strong> rope winding on the drum(figure 4), the crossover <strong>of</strong> the rope from layer nthto the nth+1 layer is considered. The critical wind isobserved in this case, during the crossover. In thiscase, in the beginning, the contact on the last wind<strong>of</strong> the previous lower layer and the side <strong>of</strong> the drumoccurs, while in the second wind that contact is lost,and the rope changes to the general winding case.Figure 4. Special rope winding caseEstablishment <strong>of</strong> the connection between theforces <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> the lower layer <strong>of</strong> the rope F R ,<strong>of</strong> friction between the layers <strong>of</strong> the rope Fµ R(Fµ R = F R·µ 2 ), forces <strong>of</strong> reaction on the side Fµ S(Fµ S = F S·µ 1 ) and perpendicular force F N , in thiscase must be done by introducing the angle α. Thischanges in the interval <strong>of</strong> 0 ≤ α ≤ π/2, while theangle <strong>of</strong> the winding changes in the interval <strong>of</strong> 0 ≤φ ≤ 2π. The connection between angle α and theangle <strong>of</strong> winding φ is established according to thefact that for the angle φ = 2π [rad] the rope iswinding for the length <strong>of</strong> the diameter <strong>of</strong> the roped W, while angle α changes from 0 to π/2.x F cos F sin F 0 (9):R2 RSy : FRsin 2 FRcos FN 1 FS 0 (10)By solving the equations above the followingexpressions are obtained:236 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


FNF (11)R sin cos11 21 22FNF (12)R sin cos11 21 2FNcos 2sin 1 sin cosF (13)S121FNcos 2sin 1 sin cosF (14)S12In the expressions (11), (12), (13) and (14) thefriction coefficient µ 1 is the friction coefficientbetween the rope and the drum <strong>of</strong> the winch, whileµ 2 is the friction coefficient between the windings<strong>of</strong> the rope.3. FRICTION FORCES IN THE WINDINGOF THE STEEL ROPE AROUND THEWINCH DRUMFor this paper a mathematical model has beendeveloped which for given initial parameters <strong>of</strong>winding <strong>of</strong> the rope gives the friction forcesdiagrams, perpendicular forces, as well as thecomparative friction forces diagram for differentcoefficients <strong>of</strong> friction. The initial parametersaccording to which the forces were calculated aregiven in Table 1.Table 1. Initial parameters for force examinationSize description Designation ValueDrum length L 100 [mm]Wire diameter d W 10 [mm]Number <strong>of</strong> windedlayers1122n L 10Load weight m 250 [kg]Friction coefficient µ 1 0,25Friction coefficient µ 2 0,35Mathematical model for calculating the forcevalues has been developed in MS Excel s<strong>of</strong>tware.The division <strong>of</strong> the winding angle was made with10, but was converted to radians for easierclarification. All <strong>of</strong> the output diagrams have thedivision in radians [rad] on their x - axis, and inNewtons [N] on the y – axis.3.1 Spooling <strong>of</strong> the rope on the first layerIn the spooling <strong>of</strong> the first layer it ischaracteristic that the friction force occurs only onone rope inlet. Because <strong>of</strong> the relatively smallfriction coefficient (µ1 = 0,25) during the first layerspooling, the friction force Fµ does not have a rapidincrease in the first two layers (φ ≈ 18 [rad])regarding the greater friction coefficients (Figure5).Friction force [N]3000250020001500100050000 5 10 15 20 25Spooling angle [rad]Figure 5. Friction force Fµ on the first layer dependenceon the spooling angleAt the end <strong>of</strong> the third layer spool (φ ≈ 18 [rad]),the friction force is almost equal to the pullingforce. It can be said with certainty that after thefourth spool, with the friction coefficient being µ1= 0,25, the whole load <strong>of</strong> tractive force is carried bythe friction force.3.2 Rope spooling in the crossover from onelayer to anotherThe rope spooling is most critical in thecrossover from one layer to another (Figure 6). Inthat case, only one critical winding is observedduring the crossover from layer n to layer n +1,until the rope turns to the general spooling case. Inthis case, it is very hard to determine the frictioncoefficient between the winding spool and the lastspool on the previous layer because <strong>of</strong> the changingtrajectory <strong>of</strong> the rope inlet. When the rope gets tothis position, the friction force appears in thecontact between the side <strong>of</strong> the drum and the spoolthat is being wound by the rope inlet, but also thefriction force appears in the contact between thelast spool on the previous layer and the spool beingwound. In this case, the assumed coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction which occurs in the rope inlet is the same asthe friction coefficient which occurs between therope spools (µ2 = 0,35).From the diagram on the Figure 6 which shows:the reaction force <strong>of</strong> the lower rope layer FR ,friction force between the rope layers FµR ,reaction force on the side FS and friction force onthe side FµS , their changes during the critical spoolin the crossover <strong>of</strong> the rope from one layer toanother are visible. The lower rope layer reactionforce FR has the steady increasing character fromthe beginning to the end <strong>of</strong> the critical spooling,and transcends the nominal value <strong>of</strong> the pullingforce almost by two.Fµ13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 237


Forces: Fr, Fµr, Fs, Fµs [N]50004000300020001000FrFµrFsFµsFriction force in line contact [N]14001200100080060040020000 5 10 15 20 25Spooling angle [rad]Fµlc00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Spooling angle [rad]Figure 6. The reaction force <strong>of</strong> the lower rope layer FR ,friction force between the rope layers FµR , reactionforce on the side FS and friction force on the side FµSdependence on the spooling angleThe friction force between the layers FµR alsohas the increasing character from the beginning <strong>of</strong>the critical spooling and all the way to the pointwhen the rope crosses to the general spooling case,for it is directly related to the force FR by thefriction coefficient µ2, (12). The reaction force onthe side <strong>of</strong> the drum FS rises up to the spoolingangle <strong>of</strong> φ ≈ 1,5 [rad], while after reaching theextreme value it decreases to zero. Its value equalszero at φ ≈ 4, 2 [rad]. The friction force on the sideFµS acts similarly, because it is related to thereaction force on the side through the frictioncoefficient µ1, (12). When the forces FµS and FSreach zero, the perpendicular force transfers to thelast spool <strong>of</strong> the lower spooling layer exclusivelyby the friction force between the rope windings.3.3 General case <strong>of</strong> rope spoolingGeneral case <strong>of</strong> rope spooling for multilayeredspooling has the greatest share in the spoolingprocess. Generally, friction force occurs on the tworope inlets on the contact line <strong>of</strong> the winding beingspooled and the two spools from the previous layer.In this case the total friction force is divided intotwo equal parts, (8). Friction force FµLC in linecontact on the rope inlet gets close asymptoticallyto the half <strong>of</strong> the nominal value <strong>of</strong> the pulling force,(Figure 7). In the case <strong>of</strong> rope spooling onto thehigher layers, the general case, in difference withfirst layer spooling, the friction force carries thetotal tractive force (φ≈12÷15[rad]) between thesecond and the third layer.Figure 7. Friction force Fµ in general case <strong>of</strong> ropespooling dependence on the spooling angleIn this case a grater friction coefficient value isadopted from the one used for rope spooling ontothe first layer (µ 2 =0,35).3.4 Comparative diagrams for different frictioncoefficient valuesLastly the comparative friction force diagrams(Figure 8) and perpendicular force (Figure 9)diagrams for friction coefficients µ = 0,2 ÷ 0,4(initial parameters are also taken from Table 1) aregiven. For these resulting diagrams the general ropespooling case was used.Friction force in line contact [N]14001200100080060040020000 5 10 15 20 25Spooling angle [rad]µ = 0,20µ = 0,25µ =0,30µ =0,35µ =0,40Figure 8. Friction force Fµ for different frictioncoefficients dependence on the spooling angleIt can be seen from Figure 8 that for all frictioncoefficient values the friction force has the sameinitial value during spooling. As expected, thehighest number <strong>of</strong> spools for total transfer <strong>of</strong> pulingforce to friction force is necessary for the highestfriction coefficient (φ > 12 [rad]), while for thelowest friction coefficient the transfer is possibleonly after the third spooling (φ > 19 [rad]).With perpendicular forces the case is slightlydifferent (Figure 9). Perpendicular forces do notexceed the nominal value <strong>of</strong> the pulling force forthe value <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0,3.Perpendicular forces with the friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0,3 do exceed the value <strong>of</strong> nominal pullingforce.238 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Normal force [N]400035003000250020001500100050000 5 10 15 20 25Spooling angle [rad]µ = 0,20µ = 0,25µ =0,30µ =0,35µ =0,40Figure 9. Perpendicular force FN for different frictioncoefficients dependence on spooling angleEven though the perpendicular and frictionforces are in linear correlation by the frictioncoefficient, the differences in their behavior occurin the general spooling case because the frictionforce is distributed to the two components on therope inlets.4. CONCLUSIONUsing the mathematical model and friction forcecalculation, it has been shown that the friction forcein the rope spooling onto the winch drum processdoes not depend only on the friction coefficient, butalso in the position <strong>of</strong> the rope during the process. Ithas been shown that the greatest friction forcesoccur during the crossing <strong>of</strong> the rope from one layerto another. With the increase <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient, the time needed for the pulling t<strong>of</strong>riction force transfer shortens. For the transfer witha friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0.2 more than four spoolsare required (φ > 24 [rad]), while for the transfer <strong>of</strong>the same pulling force with a coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0.3 lessthan three spools are needed (φ < 18 [rad]). Thefriction coefficient value depends mostly on therope material as well as on its characteristics, butfor the first layer the material and thecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the drum have an equal share. Forthe transfer <strong>of</strong> smaller masses, ropes with a highfriction coefficient can be used, but this is notadvisable for greater masses.During the crossing <strong>of</strong> the rope from one layerto another, effect <strong>of</strong> the rope on the side <strong>of</strong> thedrum in the interval when the spooling angle is 0


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacAPPLICATIVE MONITORING OF VEHICLES ENGINE OILPerić Sreten 1 , Nedić Bogdan 2 , Grkić Aleksandar 31 University <strong>of</strong> Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy, Serbia, sretenperic@yahoo.com2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering in Kragujevac, Serbia, nedic@kg.ac.rs3 University <strong>of</strong> Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy, Serbia, iralex@eunet.rsApstrakt: Confirming the basic causes <strong>of</strong> failures and their elimination, control <strong>of</strong> certain phenomena, isdefining proactive maintenance, as a new method that reduces maintenance costs and prolongs the life <strong>of</strong>assets. Determination <strong>of</strong> tribomehanical systems condition has very important role in development <strong>of</strong> frictiontheory and practice, wear and lubrication. There are used today different physical and chemical methodsand tribology methods for tribomehanical system diagnosis. Experience in technical systems exploitationshoved that the most effective failure prognosis is according to parameters, particles created as result <strong>of</strong>wear, which are reliable indicators <strong>of</strong> wear. Analysis <strong>of</strong> oil samples which contain particles, created asresults <strong>of</strong> wear, enable evaluation <strong>of</strong> system tribology condition in different phases <strong>of</strong> system exploitation.The paper presents the physical chemical tests in the analysis <strong>of</strong> oils that are used for the assessment <strong>of</strong> hiscondition. Furthermore the results <strong>of</strong> experimental research <strong>of</strong> physical chemical characteristics engines oilwas sampled from engines <strong>of</strong> vehicles, which were in use. The research results are originating from theresearch <strong>of</strong> the paper authors.Keywords: Monitoring, lubrication systems, analysis oils, proactive maintenance, diagnosis.1. INTRODUCTIONModern trends <strong>of</strong> diagnosis in recent years, go tothe affirmation <strong>of</strong> the monitoring <strong>of</strong> oil, which hasresulted in growth <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> producers and users<strong>of</strong> oil. The reasons lie primarily in increasing thereliability, effectiveness, economy, and recentlymore and more present protection <strong>of</strong> theenvironment.Using Oil Analysis programs for engine oils hasseveral benefits: reduction <strong>of</strong> unscheduled vehicledowntime, improvement <strong>of</strong> vehicle reliability, helpin organizing effectiveness <strong>of</strong> maintenanceschedules, extension <strong>of</strong> engine life, optimization <strong>of</strong>oil change intervals and reduction <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> vehiclemaintenance.In application, oils change their propertiesthrough [1]: contamination by combustion productsand metal wear particles, consumption <strong>of</strong> additiveswhich is chemical and bears impact on importantoil functions and base oil oxidation.The primary role <strong>of</strong> engine oil is the lubrication<strong>of</strong> moving engine parts and reducing friction andwear <strong>of</strong> metal surfaces which provides the goodengine performance and its long life. In order toprovide a defined quality <strong>of</strong> engine oils duringproduction and for final products to meet theproduct specifications we need to know thephysical chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> engine oils.Certain physical-chemical characteristics whichare significant for the quality <strong>of</strong> engine oils areachieved by adding additives to base oils. The mostfrequent additives are for: improving <strong>of</strong> viscosityindex-improvers, reducing pour point-depressants,maintaining engine cleanness-detergents anddispersants, preventing oxidation-antioxidants,preventing corrosion-corrosion inhibitors.2. LUBRICANT SERVICE LIFE ANDANALYSISTo know analytical properties <strong>of</strong> lubricants isthe base to make a decision in development,production and application <strong>of</strong> lubricants. Thelubricant classifications and approved systemspecify many performance characteristics and240 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


analytical tests. The analytical tests are classicaland instrumental. Instrumental technical have theadvantages in small quantity <strong>of</strong> the sample andrapid analyze. As a part <strong>of</strong> the common proactivestrategy <strong>of</strong> the hydraulic systems maintenance,concept <strong>of</strong> on-line monitoring is introduce inpractice, recently [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. It is acombination <strong>of</strong> the measurement procedures, bywhich sample <strong>of</strong> fluid is to be analyzed is takendirectly from the system and the results <strong>of</strong> themeasurements are continuously. On-line monitoringconsidering, first <strong>of</strong> all, control <strong>of</strong> cleanlinessclasses (according to ISO, NAS, SAE), control <strong>of</strong>humidity, viscosity, permittivity (acid),temperature…The following tests are the most used incondition monitoring: Spectrometric analysis,Analytical Ferrography, Rotrode FilterSpectroscopy (RFS), Infrared Analysis (FT-IR),Viscosity, Total Acid Number (TAN), Total BaseNumber, Water and Particle Count.Spectrometric analysis is a technique fordetecting and quantifying metallic particulates inused oil arising from wear, contamination andadditive packages. The oil sample is energized tomake each element emit or absorb a quantifiableamount <strong>of</strong> energy, which indicates the element’sconcentration in the oil. The results represent theconcentration <strong>of</strong> all dissolved metals and particles.The equipment for spectrometric analysis is thestandard equipment for oil analysis laboratoriestoday. It provides information on technical system,contamination and wears condition relativelyquickly and accurately. Spectroscopy is more-orlessblind to the larger particles in an oil sample,more precisely, to particles greater than 10 µm indiameter, which are more indicative <strong>of</strong> an abnormalwear mode [7].Analytical ferrography is a technique whichseparates magnetic wear particles from oil. Thoseparticles settle on a glass slide known as aferrogram. Microscopic examination enables todetermine the wear mode and probable sources <strong>of</strong>wear in the technical system. Analyticalferrography is an exceptional indicator <strong>of</strong> abnormalferrous wear and it is inadequate for nonferrouswear.Rotrode Filter Spectroscopy (RFS) was firstintroduced in 1992. This spectrometric techniquedetects coarse wear metals and contaminants in aused oil sample. Diameter <strong>of</strong> those particles is upto 25 µm, but it excludes all additives. The coarseparticles are especially important. They are the firstindicators <strong>of</strong> abnormal wear situations.Fourier-Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy is aspectrometric technique for detecting organiccontaminants, water and oil degradation products ina used oil sample. It monitors lubricant degradation(oxidation, nitration, sulfation, additive depletion)and liquid contaminants (water, glycol, fueldilution).Viscosity is the resistance <strong>of</strong> a fluid to flow andthe most important lubricant physical property. Thefluid is placed in a "viscometer" (a calibratedcapillary tube for precise flow measurementbetween two pre-marked points on the tube) andpre-heated to a given temperature in a "viscositybath" (which is usually oil-filled). After the oilreaches the desired viscosity temperature, gravityinfluencedflow <strong>of</strong> the oil is initiated in theviscometer and timed between two calibratedpoints. This time becomes the determinant for theresult.Total Acid Number (TAN) is a neutralizationnumber intended for measuring all acidic and acidactingmaterials in the lubricant, including strongand weak acids. It is a titration method designed toindicate the relative acidity in a lubricant. The TANis calculated from the amount <strong>of</strong> KOH consumed.The acid number is used as a guide to follow theoxidative degeneration <strong>of</strong> oil in service.Total Base Number (TBN) is a neutralizationnumber intended for measuring all basic (alkaline)materials in the lube (acid-neutralizing componentsin the lubricant additive package). The converse <strong>of</strong>the TAN, this titration is used to determine thereserve alkalinity <strong>of</strong> a lubricant. The TBN is highestwhen oil is new and decreases with its use. LowTBN normally indicates that the oil has reached theend <strong>of</strong> its useful life.Water can be detected visually if grosscontamination is present. Excessive water in asystem destroys a lubricant's ability to separateopposing moving parts, allowing severe wear tooccur with resulting high frictional heat. There areseveral methods used for testing the moisturecontamination (crackle, FT-IR water, centrifuge,Karl Fischer) each with a different level <strong>of</strong>detection (1000 ppm or 0.1 % for first threemethods and 10 ppm or 0.001 % for Karl Fischermethod).Particle Count is a method used to count andclassify particulate in a fluid according to acceptedsize ranges, usually to ISO 4406 and NAS 1638 [8].There are several different types <strong>of</strong> instrumentationon the market, utilizing a variety <strong>of</strong> measurementmechanisms, from optical laser counters to poreblockage monitors.3. THE RESULTS OF OIL ANALYSIS ANDDISCUSSIONIn this part are presented the results <strong>of</strong> oilanalysis examination during application in four-13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 241


stroke engines by physic-chemical methods in orderto evaluate possibilities <strong>of</strong> engine conditionmonitoring by oil analysis. This part presents theresults <strong>of</strong> experimental research <strong>of</strong> physic-chemicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> engines oil which was sampledfrom engines <strong>of</strong> PUCH 300GD, Pinzgauer 710 andIKARBUS IK 104P vehicles [9], [10].The research was carried out in two vehiclesPUCH 300GD (PUCH-1, PUCH-2), two vehiclesPINZGAUER 710M (PINZ-1, PINZ-2) and twovehicles IKARBUS IK 104P (IK104P-1, IK104P-2).The research was conducted through periodicsampling oil from engine vehicles listed above.Apart from the fresh oil (“zero” sample), samplesare taken after 1.000 km, 2.000 km, 3.000 km,4.000 km and 5.000 km for vehicles.The physical-chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> oil inaccordance with standard methods are examined,shown in table 1.Table 1. Implemented tests and methods for examiningthe physic-chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> oilCharacteristicMethodKinematic viscosity, mm 2 /s SRPS B.H8.022Viscosity IndexSRPS B.H8.024Flash Point (C) ISO 2592, ASTM D 92Pour Point (C) ISO 3016Water Content, mas.% ASTM D 95Total Base Number (TBN),mgKOH/gASTM D 2896Insoluble substances inpentane, %ASTM D 893Insoluble substances inbenzene, %ASTM D 4055Fe Content, %ASSCu Content, %ASSThe analysis was done on the fresh (new) oilsand oils that are used in the engines <strong>of</strong> vehicles.During the sampling <strong>of</strong> oil choice <strong>of</strong> the samplingwere conducted carefully according to the actual oilusage, which enabled each sample as representativeone.The wear mechanism <strong>of</strong> a tribologicallubrication system consists in the wear <strong>of</strong> contactsurfaces, and lubricant consumption. If there iswear <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaces, there are wearparticles present.Regardless <strong>of</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> numerousmethods for diagnosing the physic-chemicalchanges <strong>of</strong> lubricants, in order to create a truepicture <strong>of</strong> the condition <strong>of</strong> lubricants from the usersystem, it is <strong>of</strong> importance to satisfy theprecondition <strong>of</strong> the possibility to obtain arepresentative sample. That is why it is extremelyimportant to take the sample in a proper way.Allowable values <strong>of</strong> deviation limits <strong>of</strong>individual characteristics <strong>of</strong> the oil are conditionedby the type <strong>of</strong> oil, working conditions and internalrecommendations <strong>of</strong> the manufacturer <strong>of</strong> lubricantsand users. Limited value characteristics <strong>of</strong> oils thatcondition the change <strong>of</strong> oil charging from engineare given in table 2. They represent the criteria forthe change <strong>of</strong> oil charge. Deviation <strong>of</strong> only onesource changes characteristics <strong>of</strong> oil charge, nomatter <strong>of</strong> what a characteristic is about.Table 2. Allowed values deviation <strong>of</strong> physico-chemicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> new and used oilPhysical-chemicalcharacteristics oil andproducts wearViscosity at 40C and100C, mm 2 /sMaximum allowedvariationMotor oil20%Viscosity Index, % 5 %Total Base Number (TBN),mg KOH/gr The fall to 50%Flash Point, C 20 %Water Content, % 0,2 %Products wear – Content Fe,ppm(μg/gr)100 ppmProducts wear – Content Cu,ppm(μg/gr)50 ppmUsed engine oil in examined vehicles are shownin table 3. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> zero samples <strong>of</strong> motoroil are shown in table 4, and the results used oilsamples in table 5.Table 3. Used engine oil in examined vehicles [9]Engine oil from engine <strong>of</strong> PUCH 300 GD vehiclesSAEclassificationAPIclassificationManufacturerFAMSAE 15W-40 API SG/CEKrusevacEngine oil from engine <strong>of</strong> PINZGAUER 710 M vehiclesSAEclassificationAPIclassificationManufacturerGALAXSAE 30/S3 -BeogradEngine oil from engine <strong>of</strong> IKARBUS 104 P vehiclesSAEclassificationSAE 15W-40APIclassificationAPI SG/CEManufacturerFAMKrusevacThe viscosity index is an empirical numberwhich shows how the viscosity <strong>of</strong> some oilschanges by increasing or reducing the temperature.High viscosity index shows relatively smalltendency <strong>of</strong> viscosity to change upon influence <strong>of</strong>certain temperature, as oppose <strong>of</strong> low viscosityindex which shows greater viscosity change withtemperature.242 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 4. Results <strong>of</strong> zero samples <strong>of</strong> oil from the engine[9]Type <strong>of</strong> motor oilCharacteristic FAMSAE 15W-40GalaxSAE 30/S3Color 3,0 3,0Density, gr/cm 3 0,881 0,902Viscosity at 40C,mm 2 /s104,81 104,63Viscosity at100C, mm 2 /s14,12 11,67Viscosity Index ─ ─Flash Point, C 230 240TBN,mg KOH/g10,5 9,8Table 5. The results <strong>of</strong> testing samples <strong>of</strong> used oil fromengines examined vehicles [9]SamplePUCH PUCH IK104 IK104 PINZ PINZ–1 –2 –1 –2 –1 –20 14,1 14,1 14,1 14,1 11,6 11,61 14,6 14,2 13,7 13,6 10,9 10,52 15,4 15,0 12,8 13,5 10,3 10,43 16,0 15,6 12,4 13,2 9,96 10,14 16,6 16,1 12,3 12,9 9,3 9,65 17,5 17,0 12,2 12,6 8,7 9,00 104,8 104,8 104,8 104,8 104,6 104,61 111,0 110,4 96,9 104,4 100,4 100,92 113,5 111,8 96,2 101,9 94,4 96,13 119,4 113,8 92,3 97,1 86,3 88,64 126,4 115,9 90,8 94,8 79,1 82,25 132,7 127,5 90,2 93,1 75,9 76,9Viscosity at100C, mm 2 /sViscosity at40C, mm 2 /sViscosityIndexFlashPoint,CTBN,mgKOH/gFe Content(ppm)Cu Content(ppm)0 135 135 135 135 100 1001 129 131 132 133 96 972 122 126 130 131 93 953 119 123 125 127 89 914 116 120 122 124 84 875 112 115 119 121 82 840 230 230 230 230 240 2401 220 215 217 212 196 1932 208 210 214 210 186 1773 205 204 213 202 168 1594 197 202 210 193 154 1435 192 188 189 184 136 1280 10,5 10,5 10,5 10,5 9,8 9,81 9,1 9,4 8,8 8,1 9,6 9,42 7,2 8,9 8,7 7,7 9,1 8,43 6,5 8,7 8,4 7,2 8,3 7,84 6,1 8,1 7,9 6,8 7,6 6,65 5,2 7,6 7,3 6,4 7,1 6,21 98,4 27,4 30,1 20,5 19 17,92 123 59,8 32,5 46,3 19,8 40,93 137,1 71,2 35,6 57,6 38,3 86,74 149,4 71,4 37,5 62,8 54,3 132,85 165,3 86,8 38,5 69,6 105,4 2611 4,9 2 1,5 3,2 3,5 3,32 5,9 3,4 1,9 5,1 4,1 3,83 6,7 3,7 3,2 6,3 5,3 64 7,3 3,9 4,4 7,7 6,9 8,15 7,9 5,4 4,9 9,1 8,7 9,7During the exploitation it is desired that theviscosity changes as lesser as possible with thechange <strong>of</strong> temperature. If during work temperaturemodes are changeable and cause major changes <strong>of</strong>viscosity that may cause disruptions in thefunctioning <strong>of</strong> the system, which is a manifestation<strong>of</strong> increased friction, wear and damage.Change <strong>of</strong> engine oil Viscosity Index is shownin the figure 1. The decrease in the Viscosity Indexoil is evident for all vehicles, exceeding the limit <strong>of</strong>5 % (table 2).Viscosity Index1401301201101009080Max allowed decrease 5 %= 128,25 (SAE 15W-40)Max allowed decrease 5 %= 95 (SAE 30)0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmIndex viscosity <strong>of</strong> "0" sample:135 (SAE 15W-40)PUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2Figure 1. The change <strong>of</strong> Viscosity Index [9]The most important engine oils characteristic isthe viscosity defined as a measure <strong>of</strong> inner frictionwhich works as a resistance to the change <strong>of</strong>molecule positions in fluid flows when they areunder the impact <strong>of</strong> shear force, or in other words,it is the resistance <strong>of</strong> fluid particles to shear.The viscosity is a changeable category and itdepends on the change <strong>of</strong> temperature and pressure.A higher temperature reduces the viscosity andmakes a fluid thinner.Multigrade engine oils among numerousadditives always contain also viscosity indeximprovers. These additives are special types <strong>of</strong>polymers, which in small concentrationsignificantly improve engine oils rheologicalproperties, especially viscosity and viscosity index.However, during engine oils utilization,degradation <strong>of</strong> viscosity index improvers i.e. Breakdown <strong>of</strong> polymeric molecules occurs. It results inreduction <strong>of</strong> their molecular weight what leads toviscosity loss and oil film thickness decrease,which causes undesirable phenomena <strong>of</strong> frictionand wear.Reasons for the increase <strong>of</strong> viscosity lubricantsare as follows: oxidation <strong>of</strong> lubricants, cavitationsdue to foaming lubricants, dissolution <strong>of</strong> lubricantswith water, pouring and charging system viscosityfat greater than recommended and contamination <strong>of</strong>solid particles and products wear lubricants.The reasons for the reduction <strong>of</strong> lubricantsviscosity are: lubricants contamination <strong>of</strong> fuel (formotor oil), shearing additive for reclamationviscosity, drop point <strong>of</strong> flash, grinding molecules,lubricants contamination without solubility withwater, pouring and charging system viscosity lessfat than recommended, and the impact <strong>of</strong> liquid13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 243


cooling. Also, the causes may be high temperature,load, uncontrolled long interval use, insufficientamount <strong>of</strong> oil in the oil system, inefficient coolingsystems and the like.As expected, kinematic viscosity usuallydecreases in time due to fuel penetration, or - inwell maintained engines, there occurs a slightincrease as a result <strong>of</strong> the increase <strong>of</strong> the oilinsoluble, without fuel penetration.Figure 2. shows the changes viscosity at 40Cengine oils during exploitation.Viscosity at 40 ° C, mm 2 /s135125115105958575Viscosity <strong>of</strong> "0" sample:104,81 (SAE 15W-40)104,63 (SAE 30)Max. allowed increase 20%=125,77 (SAE 15W-40)Max. allowed decrease20% = 83,84 (SAE 30)0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmPUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2Figure 2. The change <strong>of</strong> viscosity at 40C [9]The increase viscosity at 40ºC engine oil isevident for PUCH-1 and PUCH-2 vehicles,exceeding the limit <strong>of</strong> 20%. The decrease viscosityat 40ºC engine oil is evident for PINZ (exceedingthe limit <strong>of</strong> 20%) and IK104P vehicles.Viscosity at 100 ° C, mm 2 /s2018161412108Viscosity "0" sample:14,12 (SAE 15W-40)11,67 (SAE 30)Max. allowed increase 20%=17,04 (SAE 15W-40)PUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2Max. allowed decrease 20%= 11,29 (SAE 15W-40)Max. allowed decrease 20% = 9,33 (SAE 30)0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmFigure 3. The change <strong>of</strong> viscosity at 100C [9]TBN is a neutralization number intended formeasuring all basic (alkaline) materials in the lube(acid-neutralizing components in the lubricantadditive package). The TBN is generally acceptedas an indicator <strong>of</strong> the ability <strong>of</strong> the oil to neutralizeharmful acidic byproducts <strong>of</strong> engine combustion.The TBN is highest when oil is new and decreaseswith its use. Low TBN normally indicates that theoil has reached the end <strong>of</strong> its useful life. TBN is ameasure <strong>of</strong> the lubricant's alkaline reserve, andmostly applies to motor lubricants. If a lubecontains no alkaline additives, there is little use todetermine a TBN, as there will likely be none.Combustion acids attack TBN, e.g., sulfuric acid,decreasing as it consumes.Figure 4. shows the changes <strong>of</strong> total basenumber (TBN) engine oils.TBN, mg KOH/g111098765TBN <strong>of</strong> "0" sample:10,5 (SAE 15W-40)Max allowed decrease50% = 4,9 (SAE 30)Max allowed decrease 50% = 5,25 (SAE 15W-40)0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmFigure 4. The change <strong>of</strong> TBN [9]PUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2The decrease TBN engine oil is evident for allvehicles. Until 5.000 km TBN value does notexceed the allowed limit, except for PUCH-1vehicle.Flash point, ° C240220200180160140120Flash point "0" sample:230 (SAE 15W-40)240 (SAE 30)Max allowed decrease20% = 192 (SAE 30)Max allowed decrease20% =184 (SAE 15W-40)0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmFigure 5. The change <strong>of</strong> flash point [9]PUCH–1PUCH–2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2Flash point represents data that shows whattemperature leads to open fire ignition by the steamcreated by oil heating. In engine oil analysis theflash point determines the presence <strong>of</strong> fuel oil,which is a consequence <strong>of</strong> poor motor (bad workinjectors). The reduction <strong>of</strong> flash point is due to thepenetration <strong>of</strong> fuel.Figure 5 shows the change <strong>of</strong> flash point forengine oils. The decrease in the flash point is244 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


noticeable, and by the end <strong>of</strong> exploitation testingexceeds the allowed limits (20%, table 2) for PINZvehicles.Analysis <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> different metals thatare in the lubricant is very important. Metalparticles are abrasive, and act as catalysts in theoxidation <strong>of</strong> oils. In motor oils, the origin <strong>of</strong> theelements may be from the additives, the wear, thefuel, air and liquid for cooling. Metals from theadditives can be Zn, Ca, Ba, or Mg and thatindicates the change <strong>of</strong> additives. Metalsoriginating from wear are: Fe, Pb, Cu, Cr, Al, Mn,Ag, Sn, and they point to the increased wear inthese systems. Elements originating from the liquidfor cooling are Na and B, and their increasedcontent indicates the penetration <strong>of</strong> cooling liquidin the lubricant. Increased content <strong>of</strong> Si or Ca,which originate from the air, points to amalfunction <strong>of</strong> the air filter.Iron and copper content (figure 6 and 7), as aproduct <strong>of</strong> wear, in the oil charge to the end <strong>of</strong>exploitation testing has a growing trend.Content <strong>of</strong> Fe, ppmContent <strong>of</strong> Cu, ppm121030025020015010086420500Max content <strong>of</strong> Fe ─ 100 ppmPUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK 104P−1IK104P−20 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmFigure 6. The change <strong>of</strong> content Fe [9]Max content <strong>of</strong> Cu ─ 50 ppm0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Crossed kilometers, kmFigure 7. The change <strong>of</strong> content Cu [9]PUCH−1PUCH−2PINZ−1PINZ−2IK104P−1IK104P−2Content <strong>of</strong> iron is significantly above theallowable limits (100 ppm, table 2) for PUCH-1and PINZ-2 vehicles.Content <strong>of</strong> cooper is significantly below theallowable limits (50 ppm, table 2) for all vehicles.4. CONCLUSIONThe interpretation <strong>of</strong> used oils analysis is verycomplex, because the individual analyses areinterdependent. That is the reason why it isnecessary to know the entire oil analysis, and notbring conclusions based on individual analysisresults. It is also necessary to establish both normaland critical quality levels for specific oils in givenengines and under specific application conditions.The lubricant, being an inevitable factor in thetribomechanical system <strong>of</strong> engine has – apart fromthe usual lubricating role, also an important role indetecting the engine operation efficiency andcondition. This is achieved through a systematicmonitoring <strong>of</strong> oil in application and a permanentcontact between the motor oil manufacturer anduser.Analyses from used oil sample should always becompared with previous samples and finalconclusions should be based on “trend analysis”and has two closely related objectives: to obtaininformation on the lubricant drain intervals andpreventive maintenance <strong>of</strong> the machine.Investigations it was realized that there is achange <strong>of</strong> physical-chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> oilfor lubrication in the engines vehicle. Thesechanges are in direct dependence on the state <strong>of</strong> allelements tribomechanical engines system, anddepending on their functional characteristics.REFERENCES[1] J. Denis: Lubricant properties analyses and testing,Editions Tehniq, Paris, 1997.[2] D. Grgić: On-line monitoring <strong>of</strong> oil quality andconditioning in hydraulics and lubrications systems,in: <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> 10th SERBIATRIB '07,Kragujevac, Serbia, pp. 305-309.[3] I. Mačužić, P. Todorović, A. Brković, U. Proso, M.Đapan, B. Jeremić: Development Of Mobile DeviceFor Oil Analysis, Tribology in Industry 32, pp. 26-32, 2010.[4] V. Macian, B. Tormos, P. Olmeda, L. Montoro:Analytical approach to wear rate determination forinternal combustion engine condition monitoringbased on oil analysis, Tribology International 36,pp. 771–776, 2003.[5] L. Guan, X. L. Feng, G. Xiong, J. A. Xie:Application <strong>of</strong> dielectric spectroscopy for enginelubricating oil degradation monitoring, Sensors andActuators A: Physical 168, pp. 22–29, 2011.[6] V. Macian, R. Payri, B. Tormos, L. Montoro:Applying analytical ferrography as a technique to13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 245


detect failures in diesel engine fuel injectionsystems, Wear 260, pp. 562–566, 2006.[7] R.I. Taylor, R.C. Coy: Improved fuel efficiency bylubricant design, 2001[8] M. Piest and C.M. Taylor: Automobile enginetribology, 2000.[9] S. Peric, The development <strong>of</strong> a method <strong>of</strong> diagnosisthe condition from the aspect <strong>of</strong> physical-chemicaland tribological characteristics <strong>of</strong> lubricating oils <strong>of</strong>vehicles, PhD thesis, Military Academy, Belgrade,2009.[10] S. Perić, B. Nedić: Monitoring oil for lubrication <strong>of</strong>tribomechanical engine assemblies, Journal <strong>of</strong> theBalkan tribological association 16, pp. 242-257,2010.246 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacADVANTAGES AND APPLICATIONS OFSELF-LUBRICATING PLASTIC BEARINGSAleksandar Marinković 1 , Miloš Stanković 21 Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Serbia, amarinkovic@mas.bg.ac.rs2 Inovation Center <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Serbia, mstankovic@mas.bg.ac.rsAbstract: Self-lubricating sliding bearings are widely used in industrial applications and we could assortthem in several groups towards manufacturing or lubrication. Some <strong>of</strong> them, such are oil-retaining porousbearings have been long time studied, but plastic bearings are not enough investigated where we have justsome <strong>of</strong> experimental results. Self-lubricating plastic bearings are produced on polymer basis which isoptimized with fiber reinforcement and solid lubricants. They are an ideal solution for machinery thatrequire clean and oil-free operation. Plastic bearings also perform well in dirty environments since there isno oil to attract dust and dirt. Authors <strong>of</strong> this paper describe main performances and reasons why this kind<strong>of</strong> bearings are current widely used. A few typical applications <strong>of</strong> plastic bearings are presented in thepaper, taking into account advantages in lubrication, production and maintenance costs in comparison withclassical rolling and sliding bearings.Keywords: self-lubricating, plastic sliding bearing, polymers, dry operating.1. INTRODUCTIONMost <strong>of</strong> machine and equipment manufacturersare trying to eliminate or at least to reducelubrication systems in aim to settle production costsdown without sacrificing machine performances.According to significant Bearing Companiesinvestigations, more than 50% <strong>of</strong> bearing failuresare lubrication related (Figure 1). In a study byMIT, USA it was estimated approximately $240billion is lost annually due to downtime and repairsto equipment damaged by poor lubrication [1].By eliminating lubrication from machinery,equipment manufacturers can minimize the costsand risks associated with maintenance for the enduser. Because <strong>of</strong> lubrication problem and costs,which are dominant during the working life, apossible solution is to apply dry running plasticsliding bearing.Plastic bearings are produced on polymer basiswhich is optimized with fibre reinforcement andsolid lubricants. They are an ideal solution formachinery that requires clean and oil-freeoperation. Plastic bearings are doing well in dirtyenvironments since there is no oil to attract dust anddirt.2. PLASTIC BEARING MATERIALSThere are several typical groups <strong>of</strong> materials forplastic bearings, taking into account their physicalmechanicalperformances [2]:- Thermoplastic materials- Phenol and Epoxy plastic materials- Elastomers- Multilayer plastic materialsFigure 1. Types <strong>of</strong> lubricated related bearing failures13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 247


Thermoplastics and thermoplastic materials arepolymers that turn to liquid when heated and turnsolid when cooled. They can be repeatedly remeltedand remolded, allowing parts and scraps to bereprocessed. In most cases they are also veryrecyclable. Some thermoplastics contain fillermaterials such as powders or fibres to provideimproved strength and/or stiffness. Products inthermoplastics could also contain solid lubricantfillers such as graphite or molybdenum disulfide.Others contain metal powders or inorganic fillerswith ceramics and silicates aimed to improve theirmechanical and tribological performances.different coatings or solid lubricants. Because <strong>of</strong>current great plastic bearing expansion in widerange <strong>of</strong> different applications, many companies areexploring and try to on the market with theirproducts. Most <strong>of</strong> them are sited in Europe or USAand have relatively long tradition, but last years lot<strong>of</strong> Far East companies are trying to overrun themby low cost products. Some <strong>of</strong> best knownmanufacturers <strong>of</strong> plastic bearings are multinationalCompany Igus® [4] (Figure 2) with main factoriesin Germany; famous bearing Company SKF hasalso some investigations and products in plastics;CSB Bearings [5]; Federal Mogul Germany withGlyco products; AFT Fluorotec (SW Plastics) UK;ISB Italcuscinetti Group Italia [6], etc.3. ADVANTAGES OF PLASTIC BEARINGSFigure 2. igus® lines <strong>of</strong> plastic bearings made from highperformance polymersPolyethylene (PE), Fluoroplastics (such asPTFE), Polyamide (PA) and Polyoxymethylene ( asPOM) are common plastic materials from thisgroup and in general, those are using in slidingbearing manufacturing. Detailed performancesstudy <strong>of</strong> those materials is not aim <strong>of</strong> this paper [3],but here used to be mentioned just characteristicsimportant for typical applications. If somebodyneeds plastic bearing for extreme load, than aHomopolymers or Copolymers (POM) with higheststrength are recommended. In high environmentaltemperature conditions <strong>of</strong> the bearing exploitationPolytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is useful with max.working temperature around 200 o C. From tribologypoint <strong>of</strong> view, materials such PTFE is, has thelowest friction coefficient value (between 0,02 and0,06 in dry conditions). If we need good wearresistance <strong>of</strong> the bearing, materials as Polyamide(PA) and POM plastic materials are recommended.Other plastic materials except above explainedgroup <strong>of</strong> Thermoplastics are not so common in use,but we could apply them in some special cases. Forexample, multilayer plastic materials are useful incombination with some metal as a matrix, withIf we are taking into account proper lubricationdelivery as a critical for the operation <strong>of</strong> ballbearings and most require continued maintenancefor re-lubrication, this is a starting reason forthinking about their replacement with plasticbearings. There are also additional parts required toprotect ball bearing from contaminants. Accordingto several Institute research, the leading cause <strong>of</strong>bearing failure is due to contamination <strong>of</strong> thelubrication by moisture and solid particles. If aslittle as 0.002 percent water gets mixed into thelubrication system, it increases the probability <strong>of</strong>failure by 48 percent. Just six percent water canreduce the bearing lifetime by 83 percent.Ball bearings require seals to keep oil in andunwanted water and liquids out, as well as wipers /scrapers to keep dust and debris out. Seals only lastso long and do not perform well in dirty and dustyenvironments and can also increase friction in theapplication. In some applications where dust anddebris are prevalent during operation, seals andwipers may require frequent replacement.Figure 3. Comparing ball bearings to plastic bearings248 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


4. PLASTIC BEARING APPLICATIONSRegarding their advantages, plastic bearings aregood solution for many applications in machinerythat require clean and oil-free operation. They alsoperform well in dirty environments since there is nooil to attract dust and dirt, like the agriculturalindustry. Some manufactures creates individualplanting row units using walking gauge wheels todeliver a consistent planting depth (Figure 4).successfully used with shafts made <strong>of</strong> bronze andsteels <strong>of</strong> different hardness and structure.Figure 4. Plastic bearing application in agricultureOil impregnated bronze bearings with graphiteplugs were used to facilitate this movement untilthey began causing severe problems. They wereeven requiring replacement two to three times aseason. But the bronze bearings were experiencinghigh wear and premature failure due to the veryabrasive conditions caused by high levels <strong>of</strong>volcanic ash in the soil, or the high salt content inthe air caused corrosion and seizure. By replacingall 144 bronze bearings with iglide® selflubricatingplastic bearings from igus®, the pick arms lif wasincreased by 5 to 6 times. The actual bearings cost70 to 80 percent less than bronze bearings and weremore reliable.Shipbuilding and hydraulic turbine buildinghave accumulated much experience with the use <strong>of</strong>sliding bearings made <strong>of</strong> UGET carbon plastic [7].These include friction units <strong>of</strong> a driving rudder set<strong>of</strong> ships <strong>of</strong> different types and design (supports forrudders and rudder machines) with regard tostabilizers, interceptors, drives for actuators <strong>of</strong>Kingston valve type, and scupper screens, as wellas mast elevating extending devices andmechanisms (Figure 5). Sliding bearings have beenpreviously made <strong>of</strong> bronze, and shafts have beenmade <strong>of</strong> a corrosion resistant material having ratherlow antifriction characteristics, corrosion resistantsteel or titanium alloys. Therefore, in the absence <strong>of</strong>reliable oil lubrication system there is a danger <strong>of</strong>seizure <strong>of</strong> metallic bearings, which may result inthe failure <strong>of</strong> the whole mechanism. UGET carbonplastic containing poly functional epoxy resin andtissue <strong>of</strong> low module carbon fibre was developed.Bearings made <strong>of</strong> UGET carbon plastic areFigure 5. Sliding friction unit <strong>of</strong> a hydraulic turbineOne manufacturer specializes in vertical, form,fill and seal packaging equipment for handling awide range <strong>of</strong> products: from green beans to candyto detergent. The machines are capable <strong>of</strong> reachingup to 160 cycles per minute and withstanding loadsup to 15 pounds, while operating at speeds <strong>of</strong> 750feet per minute (Figure 6).The manufacturer had been using metal linearball bearings. After the metal bearings scored theshafts and leaked grease on some <strong>of</strong> the machines,the company decided to replace them with selflubricating linear plain bearings. To date, the linearbushings have surpassed the 10 million cycle markon some <strong>of</strong> the company’s packaging machineswith little to no noticeable wear.Figure 6. Packaging machine with plastic bushingsIn the quest to improve the way prostate canceris detected and treated, a team <strong>of</strong> researchers fromthe Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) inMassachusetts have developed a specializedmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatiblepiezoelectric actuated robot [1]. To facilitate13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 249


different types <strong>of</strong> motion, the robot uses a DryLin®linear guide system and iglide® plastic selflubricating plain bearings. The linear guidesfacilitate translational motion <strong>of</strong> the positioningmodule, which provides gross positioning for therobot’s needle driver. The needle driver is a vitalpart <strong>of</strong> the system, as it enables the rotation andtranslational movement <strong>of</strong> the “needle cannula”: aflexible tube inserted into the patient’s body cavityfor MRI-guided diagnosis and therapy (Figure 7).loads in dry conditions, such also in the presence <strong>of</strong>many lubricants (water, acids, alkali, oils, hydraulicliquids).- This kind <strong>of</strong> bearing can be used on s<strong>of</strong>tershafting, even anodized aluminium, which hasexcellent corrosion resistance and is usually lessexpensive and easier to machine than case hardenedmaterial or stainless steel.This paper is just a part <strong>of</strong> preview andintroduction in further researches <strong>of</strong> plasticbearings subjected to make simpler machinemaintenance and better energy efficiency. Because<strong>of</strong> great expansion and clear explained advantages<strong>of</strong> plastic bearings application in several branches<strong>of</strong> industry, not only investigations <strong>of</strong> new polymermaterials, but also deformation behaviour analysisin dry and conditions under different lubricantsused to be done.AKNOWLEDGEMENTFigure 7. Plastic bearings in magnetic resonance robotTwo plastic plain bearings are used in the frontand rear <strong>of</strong> the driver to constrain the needle guide.The bearings enable the robot’s motor to rotate theneedle using the mechanism by way <strong>of</strong> a timingbelt. This rotating needle would reduce tissuedamage while enhance targeting accuracy. Another10 plain bearings were used to create a revolutejoint, also known as a “pin joint” or “hinge joint”,to provide single-axis rotation.CONCLUSIONAn actual scientific and practical problem couldbeen solved concerning the development andapplication <strong>of</strong> high strength antifriction polymermaterials in machine building. According to manyresearches following by experience in lot <strong>of</strong> typicalapplications [8], we could summarize the mainbenefits <strong>of</strong> plastic bearings:- No maintenance- Oil free, dry-running;- Corrosion resistant;- Cost less than ball and other bearings;- Handle contamination well and <strong>of</strong>ten do notrequire seals or scrapers;- High damping characteristics for vibrations,ability to reliably work under static or dynamicThis work has been performed within theprojects TR-35021 and TR-35011. Those projectsare supported by the Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia, Ministry<strong>of</strong> Education, Science and TechnologicalDevelopment, which financial help is gratefullyacknowledged.REFERENCES[1] Mat Mowry: The Thrue Cost <strong>of</strong> BearingLubrication, igus White Paper, igus inc.USA, 2012.[2] Momčilo R Janković: Exploitation Performances <strong>of</strong>Plastic Radial Sliding Bearings made in Yugoslavia,Master Thesis, Mechanical Engineering FacultyUniversity <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Belgrade, 1976.[3] S. P. Zakharychev and D. V. Otmakhov: UsingPolymer Adhesive Compositions in Design <strong>of</strong> SliderBearings, Polymer Science, Series D. Glues andSealing Materials, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 314–316.Pleiades Publishing Ltd. 2011.[4] Igus Bearings Catalogue, Igus inc.USA.[5] CSB Bi-metallic Composite Bearings, CSB France.[6] ISB Technical Catalogue, Italcuscinetti Group,Italia.[7] A. V. Anisimov, V. E. Bakhareva, and G. I.Nikolaev: Antifriction Carbon Plastics in MachineBuilding, Journal <strong>of</strong> Friction and Wear, Vol. 28, No.6, pp. 541–545, Allerton Press, Inc., 2007.[8] T.A. Osman: Effect <strong>of</strong> lubricant non Newtonianbehaviour and elastic deformation on the dynamicperformance <strong>of</strong> finite journal plastic bearings,Tribology Letters, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 31–40,Springer, 2004.250 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEFFECT OF VISCOSITY ON ELASTOHYDRODYNAMICLUBRICATION BETWEEN PARALLEL SURFACES SUBJECTEDTO HIGH ACCELERATIONUsman Ali Zia 1 , Aamer A. Baqai 1 , Waseem Akram 11 National University <strong>of</strong> Science & Technology(NUST), Pakistanusman_ali442@hotmail.com, aamerbaqai1@gmail.com, wasim6@gmail.comAbstract:Material wear due to friction is one <strong>of</strong> the most commonly experienced causes <strong>of</strong> material failure inany mechanical industry. Various studies have been conducted and as a result <strong>of</strong> these studies variouslubrication solutions have been proposed. Present work is an attempt to propose an Elastohydrodynamiclubrication solutio20n for a frictional wear problem experienced in an industrial application involving thesliding contact between two parallel surfaces subjected to high acceleration. The “Numerical model formixed lubrication” developed by Dong Zhu in 1990s has been modified to accommodate the constraints <strong>of</strong>problem at hand. The solution proposed predict the lubricant film thickness that when maintained betweenthe contacting surfaces can avoid full metal contact, which in turn shall avoid the material wear. The presentresearch is an attempt to comprehend the effect <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> viscosity and change <strong>of</strong> clearance between thesurfaces on the value <strong>of</strong> film thickness. Different grades <strong>of</strong> nonflammable, anticorrosive Perfluoropolyetherbased grease (Krytox) are used. The results obtained are in the form <strong>of</strong> graphs which calculates the value <strong>of</strong>film thickness for one complete slide <strong>of</strong> one surface over the other. The results obtained by the numericalmodel are compared and found well-in-accordance with the experimental data available and with theanalytical predictions made by scholars in the past.Keywords: Tribology, Friction, Elastohydrodynamic lubrication, Krytox, Shear stress factor, hydrodynamicpressure1. INTRODUCTIONWear is the major cause <strong>of</strong> material wastage andloss <strong>of</strong> mechanical performance and any reductionin wear can result in considerable savings. Frictionis a principal cause <strong>of</strong> wear and energy dissipation.Considerable savings can be made by improvedfriction control. It is estimated that one-third <strong>of</strong> theworld's energy resources in present use is needed toovercome friction in one form or another.Lubrication is an effective means <strong>of</strong> controllingwear and reducing friction. Principles studied underthe field <strong>of</strong> tribology helps to analysis suchproblems <strong>of</strong> frictional wear. Lubricationphenomenon is being used to avoid fricational wearsince the time <strong>of</strong> its discovery.For any tribological studies the lubricationregime in which that particular machine/application is working is very important as it steersthe later research in the field. The outcome <strong>of</strong> most<strong>of</strong> these researches is a lubrication solution that ifmaintained between the contacting surfaces canavoid dry metal-metal contact and inturndiminishes the chances <strong>of</strong> any mechanical wear. Alubrication solution can be studied under two maintypes <strong>of</strong> regimes:Fluid Film Lubrication andBoundary Lubrication.Out <strong>of</strong> these regimes, the fluid film lubrication isconsidered in case the required factor <strong>of</strong> safety ishigh so it is desired that the two contacting surfaceshave minimum chances <strong>of</strong> coming in contact witheach other. This requires a thick lubrication layer(exceeding a thickness <strong>of</strong> more that 1um) [1]between the surfaces so that enough hydrodynamicpressure exists to keep the surfaces apart.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 251


Table 1: Nomenclature <strong>of</strong> Symbols.Terms Definition Value Terms Definition ValueF h and M hF fh andM fhF MBHydrodynamic Force andmomentfrictional force andmoment due to lubricantfilmInertial force due toprimary bodyCalculated byintegratinghydrodynamic pressuresCalculated byintegrating the ShearstressCalculated by Equation(3)M MBF MB andF FınF G Gas Force or Thrust Force Pre-defined term aYF FinInertial force due to FinCalculated by Equation(4)I BMoment due to mass<strong>of</strong> primary bodyReciprocatinginertial forcesAcceleration <strong>of</strong> thebodyCalculated byEquation (5)Calculated byEquation (7)Calculated byEquation (8)Calculated byEquation (9)Angular moment <strong>of</strong> Inertia about thebody’s center <strong>of</strong> massxPerpendicular distance from point <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong>F MB to the center <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> FinC Constantη p Viscosity at Pressure ‘p’ p Concerned pressureη 0Viscosity at atmosphericpressuren Constantαpressure viscosity coefficientThe slope <strong>of</strong> this graph is α[16]Obtained throughexperimental dataApproximately 16Calculated by plotting the natural algorithm <strong>of</strong> dynamic viscosity versus pressure.For the case <strong>of</strong> boundary lubrication nohydrodynamic film is sustained. The coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction is very high and friction is proportional tothe applied load for a certain range <strong>of</strong> slidingvelocity and temperature.Fluid film lubrication is further classified ashydrodynamic and Elastohydrodynamiclubrication, based on the fact that the surfacesunder consideration show remarkable elasticdeformation or not. As evident from abovediscussion the selection <strong>of</strong> lubrication regime isvery important and is completely dependent on thecircumstances under which the surfaces come incontact.The present research is focussed on thelubrication solution for problem under the regime<strong>of</strong> elastohydrodynamic lubrication. The presentresearch is devided into 7 sections. Section 2focusses on the literature studied and benchmarkedfor the present research. The problem underconsideration is explained in the section 3.The constraints explained in the senction 3 laiddown the basics for developement <strong>of</strong> amethodology for the solution, the same isexplained in the section 4. Section 5 explains theresults obtained on the basis <strong>of</strong> methodology <strong>of</strong>section 4. Section 6 concludes the work bydrawing the conclusions based on discussions <strong>of</strong>section 5.2. LITERATURE SURVEY:The studies in the field <strong>of</strong> tribology initiated in19 th century with the experiment <strong>of</strong> BeauchampTower when he noticed that the oil film providedin between the surfaces <strong>of</strong> a journal bearing tries topump out <strong>of</strong> a hole provided on top <strong>of</strong> the bearing.He conculded that the pumping phenomenon canbe explained with the generation <strong>of</strong> hydrodynamicpressure between the bearing surfaces.Reynolds in 1886 [2] provided themathematical solution for the generation <strong>of</strong> abovementioned pressure. The theory presented byReynolds provided the long waited analytical pro<strong>of</strong><strong>of</strong> the hydrodynamic pressure generated betweenthe surfaces. This hydrodynamic pressure helpskeep the surfaces apart and thus avoiding themetal-metal contact which inturn avoid themechanical wear.After Reynolds, many scholars tried to predictthe lubricant film thickness based on his work, forproblem related to different types <strong>of</strong> bearingsincluding thrust bearing, journal bearing and sliderbearing etc. The most notable work in this reagrdwas done in the field <strong>of</strong> automobiles to predict thelubrication solution for piston-liner assembly.G.M. Hamilton in 1972 [3] predicted the filmthickness solution for piston-liner problem whileconsidering the regime <strong>of</strong> hydrodynamiclubrication. Further in 1977 Hamrok and Dowson[4] formulated the empirical formulae for filmthickness calculation.252 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


For Elastohydrodynamic film thickness solution,the first realistic model was provided by Ertel andGrubin [5]. After Grubin other significantcontribution in the field was made by Dowson andHigginson [6]. They described an iterativeprocedure that not only yielded a wide range <strong>of</strong>solutions during the next decade, but also enabledthem to derive an empirical minimum-filmthickness formula for line contacts.One <strong>of</strong> the most considerable works in thisregard was presented by Dong Zhu in 1991 [7, 8].He presented a model namely “Numerical Modelfor Piston-Skirt assembly under mixed lubrication”.He developed a new relationship for film thicknessbased on the eccentricities and clearance betweenthe piston and cylinder. It was also claimed that theempirical relationship developed previously byHamrok is not applicable for cases <strong>of</strong> high pressureand acceleration. Further in 2002 he extended hiswork [9-11] by considering a wider range <strong>of</strong>parameters like Load, Speed and Materialproperties. He also supported his theory withexperimental data in a series <strong>of</strong> research papers.The aim <strong>of</strong> the present research is to verify theapplicability <strong>of</strong> Dong Zhu’s model on our presentassembly. However our present problem, describedin detail in the next section, has differentgeometrical and environmental constraints,therefore it requires certain modification in theoriginal model.3. PROBLEM DEFINITION:The problem at hand involves a cylindrical bodysliding inside a hollow tube. The sliding action <strong>of</strong>the cylidrical body is under high accelearation andtherfore involves high pressure environment. It isdesirable that the body does not have any wear atits surface as it can alter the trajectory followed byit during its further operation. Based on high factor<strong>of</strong> safety required and the deforamtion <strong>of</strong> the bodydue to high pressure and high acceleration,elastohydrodynamic lubrication regime isconsidered. The assembly is shown below.The force which forces the cylindrical body toslide is a thrust force at the base <strong>of</strong> the body. Thisfurther guides the research to be done in the field <strong>of</strong>thrust bearing. The thrust force is also responsiblefor the wobbling action <strong>of</strong> the cylinder inside thetube this wobbling is in itself responsible for thegeneration <strong>of</strong> hydrodynamic pressure in thelubricants’ layers provided between the surfacesthat keeps the surfaces apart and avoid mechanicalwear as will be explained in more detail in latersections.Outer Tube-Stationary SurfaceFins <strong>of</strong>BodyCylindrical Body– Sliding SurfaceThe present research tries to find a lubricationsolution in term <strong>of</strong> film thickness for the assemblyexplained earlier. The film thickness predictedthrough the results <strong>of</strong> the research, if maintained inbetween the contacting surfaces shall be able towithstand the thrust force avoiding the surfaces tocome in contact.The model preseneted by Dong Zhu is modifiedbased on the above mentioned constarints as shallbe described in the following section.4. MODIFIED NUMERICAL MODEL:To model the phenomenon, followingassumptions are made:• The lubricant is an incompressibleNewtonian fluid and the flow is laminar.• Side leakage, oil starvation and surfaceroughness factors are neglected.• No relative motion between the bodiesunder sliding motion.• An Iso-viscous case, that is, viscosity issame in the circumferential and slidingdirections.• The fully flooded inlet and Reynolds exitconditions are applied.• The surfaces <strong>of</strong> the ring and the liner areperfectly smooth.• Thermal effects are neglected.Based on the problem constraints and theassumptions made following modification are madein the Piston skirt model.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 253


4.1. Modifying mixed lubrication model to EHLModelAs previsouly explained the lubrication regimeto be considered for our present case isElastohydrodynamic lubrcation whereas the regime<strong>of</strong> Dong Zhu’s work [7] was mixed lubrcaiton. Inorder to incorporate this change, the terms (forcesand moments) related to the contact between thetwo bodies are neglected.F = F h + F cF f = F fh + F fcM = M h + M cM f = M fh + M fc4.2. Modification in Basic Dynamic ModelDue to different geometrical constraints thedynamic model is modified thorugh following set<strong>of</strong> equations. These equation are based onsummation <strong>of</strong> forces and moments. The forces andmoments acting around the Center <strong>of</strong> Gravity <strong>of</strong> thecylindrical body and fin are considered andequilibrium equations are applied at center <strong>of</strong>gravity <strong>of</strong> fin. Final equations formulated bysimplifying the equilibrium equation are:WhereF h + F S + F fh = −F MB − F Fin (1)M h + M fh + M MB + F MB ∗ (x) = 0 (2)F MB = −m MB e ẗ + b L (ë b − e ẗ)(3)F Fın = m Fin ∗ aY (8)aY =F G(m MB + m Fin )4.4. Modification in Pressure-ViscosityRelationship(9)The numerical model for mixed lubrication usesthe Barus eqution to cater for the change inviscosity due to pressure. Studies have shown thatin case <strong>of</strong> high pressure problems the use <strong>of</strong> Barusequation can result in serious error in film thicknessand hydrodynamic pressur calculations andtherefore a new relationship developed by Chu etal. [14] in 1962 shall be used.Barusη p = η 0 e αp (10)Equation[13]Equation byChu et. alη p = η 0 (1 + C × p) n (11)5. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Following data is used as input for the numericalmodel.TermsSymbolUsedValueMass <strong>of</strong> primary body m MB 2000 KgMass <strong>of</strong> fin m Fin 10 KgViscosity <strong>of</strong> fluid (Krytox215, 226, 227)η 00.03204Pa.s0.04550 Pa.s0.07476 Pa.sF Fin = −m Fin e ẗ + a L (ë b − e ẗ)(4)Diameter <strong>of</strong> primary body D 0.45 mElastic Modulus E 69 GPaM MB = −I B (e ẗ − e b )/L ̈ (5)F S = F G + F MB + F Fın(6)Where e b & e t are eccentricities at the top andbottom <strong>of</strong> the tube.4.3. Modification in Acceleration Pr<strong>of</strong>ileThe acceleration pr<strong>of</strong>ile is modified based on theresearch by D.K. Kankane et. al. [12] whilecalculating the in-bore velocity <strong>of</strong> a projectile:F MB = m MB ∗ aY (7)Thrust Force F G 17-32 KNFollowing results have been plotted usingMATLAB. The results are graphical, showing theeffect <strong>of</strong> change in clearance between thecontacting surfaces, viscosity and the thrust force.The graph is drawn between the film thickness andthe length <strong>of</strong> the outer tube, this gives us the value<strong>of</strong> the film thickness that if maintained between thesurfaces throughout the length <strong>of</strong> the tube shallavoid any metal contact between the surfaces andtherefore will help diminish the mechanical weardue to it.254 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The results concluded for different grades <strong>of</strong>Krytox at different values <strong>of</strong> clearance have beenattached at the end <strong>of</strong> the paper for referencepurpose however a summarized graph for both case<strong>of</strong> thrust forces are plotted in MS Excel and areshown above.Based on the graphs attached at the end <strong>of</strong> thepaper and the summary graph displayed above,following is concluded:• The film varies almost linearly throughoutthe length <strong>of</strong> the tube. This can beexplained by the fact that during the sliding<strong>of</strong> one surface over the other the thrustforce increases and this increase in thethrust force causes an increase in thehydrodynamic pressure which is directlyproportional to the velocity <strong>of</strong> the slidingsurface. This increase in the hydrodynamicpressure requires an increased amount <strong>of</strong>lubricant to avoid metal-metal contact.• The small peaks in the beginning <strong>of</strong> thegraph can be explained with the help <strong>of</strong>wobbling phenomenon that takes place dueto the impulsive nature <strong>of</strong> the forceprovided.• It is clear from the above graphs that thevalue <strong>of</strong> film thickness required, increaseswith increase in the viscosity <strong>of</strong> the liquidkeeping the clearance between the surfacesconstant. This conclusion is also supportedby the experimental results provided in theresearch carried out by Crook, A. W in1961 [15].• It is also concluded that with increase in theclearance between the surface the value <strong>of</strong>film thickness increases this can also be13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 255


• explained with the direct relationshipbetween the film thickness and theclearance as provided by Dong Zhu [7, 8].• The experimental results already availablefor the present problem are for the case <strong>of</strong>Krytox 226 while keeping the clearancelevel <strong>of</strong> 0.00002 are 0.25 µm that is closein accordance with the numericallycalculated value <strong>of</strong> 0.265 µm with an error<strong>of</strong> 6%.• The summarized graph also show that thegreater the value <strong>of</strong> the viscosity the greaterthe slope <strong>of</strong> the line which show that theeffect <strong>of</strong> clearance between the contactsurfaces increases with increase in theviscosity <strong>of</strong> the lubricant.6. CONCLUSION:Based on the above discussion it is concludedthat the effect <strong>of</strong> clearance between the slidingsurfaces under Elastohydrodynamic lubricationregime increases with increase in the viscosity <strong>of</strong>the lubricant and also that the increase in the thrustforce requires a more thick layer <strong>of</strong> lubricant to beprovided between the surfaces to avoid mechanicalwear. The comparison <strong>of</strong> results with theexperimental data and the analytical data <strong>of</strong>scholars from past, the applicability <strong>of</strong> the modifiedDong Zhu’s model for present case <strong>of</strong> slidingsurfaces subjected to high acceleration is verified.The present work can be extended to incorporatethe roughness <strong>of</strong> the contacting surfaces as well asto draw a comparison <strong>of</strong> Elastohydrodynamic andhydrodynamic lubrication regime’s circumstances.REFERENCES[1] B. J. Hamrok, S. R. Schmid, B. Jacobson:Fundamental <strong>of</strong> Fluid Film Lubrication. MarcelDekker Inc., 2004.[2] O. Reynolds: On the Theory <strong>of</strong> Lubrication and itsApplication to Mr. Beauchamp Tower's ExperimentsIncluding an Experimental Determination <strong>of</strong> theViscosity <strong>of</strong> Olive Oil, Phil. Trans., Roy. Soc.London 177, pp: 157-234, 1886.[3] G.M. Hamilton, S.L. Moore: The Lubrication <strong>of</strong>Piston Rings--First Paper--Measurement <strong>of</strong> the Oil-Film Thickness Between the Piston Rings and Liner<strong>of</strong> a Small Diesel Engine, IMechE 188, pp: 253-261,1974.[4] B.J. Hamrock, D. Dowson: IsothermalElastohydrodynamic Lubrication <strong>of</strong> Point Contacts.Part III -Fully Flooded Results, J. Lubr. Technol.99, pp: 264-276, 1977.[5] Morales-Espejel, E. Guillermo, A.W. Wemekamp:"Ertel–Grubin methods in Elastohydrodynamiclubrication a review." <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Institution<strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal <strong>of</strong>Engineering Tribology 222.1, pp: 15-34, 2008.[6] D. Dowson, G.R. Higginson, ElastohydrodynamicLubrication, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977.[7] D. Zhu, H.S. Cheng, A. Takayuki, K. Hamai: ANumerical Analysis for Piston Skirts in MixedLubrication-Part I: Basic Modeling ASME Journal<strong>of</strong> Tribology, 114, pp: 553-562, 1992.[8] D.Zhu, H.S. Cheng, A. Takayuki, K. Hamai: ANumerical Analysis for Piston Skirts in MixedLubrication-Part II: Deformation ConsiderationASME Journal <strong>of</strong> Tribology, 115, pp: 125-133,1993.[9] D. Zhu: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication inExtended Parameter Ranges—Part I: Speed Effect,Tribology transactions, 45.4, pp: 540-548, 2002.[10] D. Zhu: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication inExtended Parameter Ranges—Part II: Load Effect,Tribology transactions, 45.4, p: 549-555, 2002.[11] D. Zhu: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication inExtended Parameter Ranges—Part III: EllipticityEffect, Tribology transactions, 46.4, pp: 585-591,2003.[12] D.K. Kankane, S.N. Ranade: Computation <strong>of</strong> InboreVelocity-time and Travel-time pr<strong>of</strong>iles fromBreech Pressure Measurements, Defence ScienceJournal, 53.4, pp: 351-356, 2003.[13] C. Barus, Isotherms, Isopiestics and IsometricsRelative to Viscosity, American Journal <strong>of</strong> Science45, pp: 87-96, 1893.[14] P.S.Y. Chu, A. Cameron, Pressure ViscosityCharacteristics <strong>of</strong> Lubricating Oils, Journal <strong>of</strong> theInstitute <strong>of</strong> Petroleum 48, pp: 147-155, 1962.[15] A.W. Crook, The lubrication <strong>of</strong> rollers II. Filmthickness with relation to viscosity and speed. Phil.Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London. SeriesA, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 254.1040,pp: 223-236, 1961.[16] G.W. Stachowiak, A.W. Batchelor, EngineeringTribology. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.256 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


For Thrust Force <strong>of</strong> 40KNKrytox 215 (µ = 0.03204 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.00002Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004Krytox 226 (µ = 0.0445 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.0000213 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 257


Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004Krytox 227 (µ = 0.07476 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.00002Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004For Thrust Force <strong>of</strong> 32KN258 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Krytox 215 (µ = 0.03204 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.00002Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004Krytox 226 (µ = 0.0445 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.0000213 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 259


Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004Krytox 227 (µ = 0.07476 Pa.s)Figure 1. Clearance = 0.00001 Figure 2. Clearance = 0.00002Figure 3. Clearance = 0.00003 Figure 4. Clearance = 0.00004260 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacINCREASING OF TOOL LIFE FOR HOT FORGING USINGSURFACE MODIFICATIONMilentije Stefanović 1 , Dragan Džunić 1 , Vesna Mandić 1Srbislav Aleksandrović 1 , Dragan Adamović 1 , Slobodan Mitrović 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, stefan@kg.ac.rs, dzuna@kg.ac.rs, mandic@kg.ac.rs,srba@kg.ac.rs, adam@kg.ac.rs, boban@kg.ac.rsAbstract: Techno-economic indicators in the hot forging <strong>of</strong> steel and other materials are highly dependenton the total life <strong>of</strong> forging tools, that is, the number <strong>of</strong> forged parts requires accuracy <strong>of</strong> regeneration afteretching. Key influences on the life <strong>of</strong> tools, like in every tribo-system are: the pieces <strong>of</strong> material, geometryand material tools and machines for forging and environmental conditions. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> hot forginghigh temperatures are in contact materials and tools, and local high working pressures, the dynamiccharacter <strong>of</strong> the load tools etc. Tool life is usually limited to the complex mechanisms <strong>of</strong> wear and tear, as aconsequence <strong>of</strong> cyclic loading, such as abrasive and adhesive wear and, thermal and mechanical fatigue,and plastic deformation. This paper presents an overview <strong>of</strong> opportunities for increasing the life <strong>of</strong> forgingtools by modern techniques for modifying the working surfaces <strong>of</strong> tools, according to comparative results <strong>of</strong>different methods, and gives appropriate recommendations.Keywords: Hot forging, tool life, wear, coatings1. INTRODUCTIONIn general, forging entails the sequentialdeformation <strong>of</strong> the workpiece material through anumber <strong>of</strong> different processes. Furthermore, eachforging operation comprises all the input variablessuch as billet material, dies, the conditions at thedie-workpiece interface, the mechanics <strong>of</strong> shapechange in the workzone, and the characteristics <strong>of</strong>the processing equipment, as illustrated in Fig. 1 [1]Thus, in designing and developing bulk metalforming processes, key technical problem areas thatmust be addressed include:- workipiece material-shape and size, chemicalcomposition and microstructure, flow propertiesunder processing conditions (flow stress in function<strong>of</strong> strain, strain rate and temperature), thermal andphysical properties- dies or tools-geometry, surface conditions,material and hardness, surface coating, temperature,stiffness and accuracy- interface conditions -surface finish, lubrication,friction, heat transfer- workzone - mechanics <strong>of</strong> plastic deformation,material flow, stresses, velocities, temperatures- equipment used -speed, production rate, force andenergy capabilities, rigidity and accuracy .The understanding <strong>of</strong> these variables allows theprediction <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the formedproduct, i.e., geometry and tolerances, surfacefinish, microstructure and properties.Figure 1. Variables <strong>of</strong> a bulk forming process [1]13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 261


Tools for hot forging are used in extremelydifficult conditions: impact and very highmechanical load, variable partial and generalthermical load, friction on the surfaces <strong>of</strong> tools andmore. Each tribological system in the field <strong>of</strong> hotforging is characterized by the following elements[2]:- contact pair, which consists <strong>of</strong> tool andworkpiece-metal that is plastically deformed, withappropriate structural and mechanical properties,- lubricant with properties relevant for hotprocess,- a machine that implements processing,- micro and macro environmentThe final characteristics <strong>of</strong> the finished pieceforgings,such as size, shape, surface quality andstructure depend on the values <strong>of</strong> systemparameters. Figure 2. shows a global approach tothe modeling <strong>of</strong> machining processes, whereas thequality <strong>of</strong> lubricants is main output.Figure 2. Tribo-modelling <strong>of</strong> hot forging process [2]2. CAUSES OF DAMAGE TO THE TOOLSTools for hot forging function during cyclicmechanical and thermal loads. The complexprocess <strong>of</strong> tear occurs as a result <strong>of</strong> the two loads.Due to the high pressures and inadequatelubrication regime, the intensity <strong>of</strong> wear and teardue to friction is high. The main causes <strong>of</strong> damageto the tool, Figure 3:- Wear as a result <strong>of</strong> tribological processes- Plastic deformation,- Thermal cracks,- Mechanical fatigue crack growth,- Breakdowns (die failures).Figure 3. Failure and damaging <strong>of</strong> forging diesTool wear. This type <strong>of</strong> wear occurs as a result<strong>of</strong> relating the material particles from the surface <strong>of</strong>tools. Consequence <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> abrasiveand adhesion processes and the formation <strong>of</strong>welded layers that are later destroyed.Plastic deformation occurs under the influence<strong>of</strong> high pressure to the tool. As a result <strong>of</strong> resistmaterials, the deformation <strong>of</strong> the walls <strong>of</strong> tools andmeasuring tools changes.Thermal cracks. They are caused by cyclicthermal change and show it as a grid cracks on thesurface etching. Microcracks are connected andgrow into large thermal cracking. They can grow onthe surface and in depth.Mechanical cracks are caused by mechanicalloading tools. Consequence <strong>of</strong> fatigue, pretreatmentand initial thermal cracking. These arecalled large cracks.Failure <strong>of</strong> tools is the result <strong>of</strong> hidden defects,bad thermal processing, errors in design, irregularexploitation and so on.Generally, due to the forging temperature beingwell above 1000 ◦C, the temperature <strong>of</strong> the surface<strong>of</strong> the tool temporarily exceeds 500 ◦C and thus thetempering temperatures <strong>of</strong> conventional hot worktool steel. In such a case, the hardness <strong>of</strong> the tool isreduced and the mechanical impacts during forgingoperations can easily cause plastic deformation aswell as abrasion <strong>of</strong> tool material, Figure 4 [3].Life <strong>of</strong> forging tools is a complex function <strong>of</strong>several parameters, the most important being:structural, method design and exploitationconditions. Figure 5. demonstrates an interactionbetween these parameters.Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> tool wear, we can givethe following recommendations for the design <strong>of</strong>tools [4]:- The choice <strong>of</strong> tool material with high resistance toabrasion,- The application <strong>of</strong> appropriate methods forimproving surface properties <strong>of</strong> tools,262 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


- Reliable exploitation tools, primarily because <strong>of</strong>the importance <strong>of</strong> lubrication,- Use <strong>of</strong> an active role <strong>of</strong> friction,- New design tool that allows the hydrostatic orhydrodynamic lubrication.Figure 4. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> the convex radius <strong>of</strong>different hot work tool steels after 1000 forging cycles.Tool temperature, 200 ◦C; forging material, C45; forgingtemperature, 1100–1150 ◦C; lubricated contact; cycletime, 13 s; hardness <strong>of</strong> tools, 47 HRC.[3]Figure 5 . The interaction <strong>of</strong> construction, technologyand the industrial conditions <strong>of</strong> working tools [4]3. METHODS OF INCREASING THE LIFEOF TOOLSThe predominant causes <strong>of</strong> damage are the result<strong>of</strong> tool wear and thermal and thermal-mechanicaldamage. Forging dies are exposed to highmechanical loads, which are accompanied byextreme thermal and tribological load for a verynarrow surface layer. As a result <strong>of</strong> preheating steelparts at temperatures above 1000 ° C, the size <strong>of</strong> thehard oxide particles come in contact zone causingvery strong abrasive wear. At elevated temperaturestribological conditions are very favorable for theprocesses <strong>of</strong> adhesion and a transfer <strong>of</strong> material toand from the surface <strong>of</strong> the tool. During execution<strong>of</strong> cyclic forging process heat is transferred due tocontact with the heated work pieces followed bycooling lubricant tools in the form <strong>of</strong> spray, whichis performed at room temperature. In this way,thermal shocks occurring within the tool material,resulting in high internal stresses initiate cracking.Further development <strong>of</strong> the cracks formed inparallel to the contact surface may lead to itspeeling, when these cracks meet with cracks normalto the contact surface. In case <strong>of</strong> insufficientcooling <strong>of</strong> tools, it is possible to slightly releasetool steel [5].To increase the life <strong>of</strong> hot forging tools,different surface modification techniques are usedsuch as welding, thermal application,electrodeposition, diffusion method and othercombined methods. These special methods <strong>of</strong>surface modification increase the hardness, wearresistance and corrosion resistance <strong>of</strong> the tool athigh temperatures. One possible way to satisfy allthe conditions <strong>of</strong> hot forging process is acombination <strong>of</strong> thermo-chemical surfacemodification process (ie, carbonization andnitriding) with coating processes (ie, PVD, CVD, orPACVD), which is known in the literature asduplex modification process surface [6].Figure 6 shows the results <strong>of</strong> testing the wearalloy tool steel to functioning in a warm envirnment(WNL-55NiCrMoV6) using various surfacetreatments: nitriding, sulphurizing, diffusionchroming, Cr plating, plasma spraying withmetallic coatings <strong>of</strong> Cr, WFe, WC-types,burnishing [4].Using spray-metal coatings leads to triplereduction <strong>of</strong> wear compared to conventionaltreatment tools. It also shows that the wear <strong>of</strong> thetool depends directly on the oxide that is generatedon the surface <strong>of</strong> pieces and to a lesser extent on theoxide surface tools. Cr and WC plasma sprayedcoatings should be applies to hot working tools.These coatings are characterized by considerablewear ressistance and thermal and imact fatiqueresistance.According to the investigations [7] the bestresults for die service life were obtained for weldoverlay coated dies, Table 1. Compared to receiveddies, the results showed an increase <strong>of</strong> 892%. Theresults were 206% better than TOKTEK Coatings,which held the second place.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 263


Figure 6. The influence <strong>of</strong> surface treatment andworking on wear [4]The dies can be ranged from the best to worst asweld overlay coated dies, multilayer dies TOKTEKcoated, single layer AlTiN coated dies, plasmanitrided dies and dies as received. This range is alsovalid for the die polishing life, with the exceptionthat it is equal for TOKTEK and AlTiN coatings.Table 1. Number <strong>of</strong> polishing and total number <strong>of</strong> partsobtained with experimented dies [8]1stpolishing2ndpolishing3rdpolishing4thpolishing5thpolishingTotalprod.Asreceiv.OperationNitrided4. CONCLUSIONNumber <strong>of</strong> Forged PartsAlTiNcoatedTOKTEKWeld overlaycoated1st 2ndforg. forg.1440 3920 4810 4660 8690 83301260 2140 1980 2030 8160 84101320 2110 1860 1750 8240 7830- - 1720 1830- - 17804290 9420 12280132102781025930Tools for hot forging are applied in extremelydifficult conditions: impact and very highmechanical load, variable partial and generalthermical load, friction on the surfaces <strong>of</strong> tools andmore.With these tools, a special kind <strong>of</strong> coating oncontact surfaces is regularly applied, in order toextend their working life. There are very differentmethods for modifying the tool surface. The mostcommon are different types <strong>of</strong> heat treatment,which significantly affects the hardness <strong>of</strong> thesurface layers.Shown results are related to single-layer andmultilayer coatings. It's hard to make a generalconclusion regarding the most influentialparameters, but it is certain that the surfaceroughness has a significant effect on the adhesioncharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the coating. Also the surfacehardness to which the coating is applied is veryimportant as is the ability to carry the load inquestion.Coatings based on Cr and WC, and weldingprocedures show the best results. From thestandpoint <strong>of</strong> economy <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> forging,welding is the best. The temperature and thepercentage <strong>of</strong> nitrogen in the nitration are veryimportant for tribological characteristics <strong>of</strong> contactlayers.The ratio <strong>of</strong> alloying components <strong>of</strong> chromium(Cr), molybdenum (Mo), and vanadium to carbonratio (H/C) is highly significant influence on thechange <strong>of</strong> tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> tool materialregarding wear resistance.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors wish to acknowledge the financialsupport from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science<strong>of</strong> the Republic Serbia through the project TR34002.REFERENCES[1] V. Vazquez, T. Altan: New concepts in die design -physical and computer modeling applications,Journal <strong>of</strong> MPT 98, pp. 212-223, 2000.[2] M. Stefanović, R. Stanković: Importance <strong>of</strong>Tribological Investigations in the Hot Forging,YUTRIB 1995 Herceg Novi, pp, 181-182, 1995.[3] Barrau, C. Boher, R. Gras, F. Rezai-Aria: Analysis<strong>of</strong> the friction and wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> hot work toolsteel for forging, Wear, Vol. 255, pp. 1444–1454,2003.[4] M.Gierzynska-Dolna: Effect <strong>of</strong> the Surface Layer inIncreasing the Life <strong>of</strong> Tools for Plastic Working:Journal <strong>of</strong> MWT 6, pp. 193-204, 1982.[5] J. H. Beynon: Tribology <strong>of</strong> hot metal forming,Tribology International 31, pp. 73–77, 1998.[6] B. Navinsek, P. Panjan, F. Gorenjak: Improvement<strong>of</strong> hot forging manufacturing with PVD andDUPLEX coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol. 137,pp. 255–264, 2001.[7] M. Bayramoglua, H. Polat, N. Geren: Cost andperformance evaluation <strong>of</strong> different surface treateddies for hot forging process, Journal <strong>of</strong> MPT 205,pp. 394–403, 2008.264 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacANALYSIS OF TRIBOLOGICAL PROCESS DURING IRONINGOF SHEET METAL MADE OF AlMg3Dragan Adamović 1 , Milentije Stefanović 1 , Srbislav Aleksandrović 1 ,Miroslav Živković 1 , Fatima Živić 1 , Marko Topalović 11 Fakultet inženjerskih nauka u Kragujevcu, S. Janjić 6, 34000 Kragujevac, adam@kg.ac.rs, stefan@kg.ac.rs,srba@kg.ac.rs, zile@kg.ac.rs, zivic@kg.ac.rs,Abstract: The paper gives detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> tribological processes which occur in ironing, their influenceon tool and formed material by means <strong>of</strong> specially developed physical model <strong>of</strong> drawing process. The typicalproperty <strong>of</strong> such cold forming procedures is multiple repetitions <strong>of</strong> operations, i.e. several thinnings in oneoperation, which leads to gradual increase <strong>of</strong> thickness <strong>of</strong> glued material layer on contact surfaces <strong>of</strong> thetool. At sufficiently large thickness <strong>of</strong> glued layers, plastic forming <strong>of</strong> created glued particles occurs, i.e.their tear-<strong>of</strong>f, disruption <strong>of</strong> forming process stability and increase <strong>of</strong> surface roughness <strong>of</strong> work piece. Theobtained results indicate the basic influence <strong>of</strong> tribo-conditions on ironing process, tool durability andquality <strong>of</strong> obtained parts.Key words: Ironing, tribo-modeling, tribological processes1. INTRODUCTIONFriction accompanies all physical processes thatinvolve movement. It is also very important inmetal forming, during which only external frictionis considered. External friction occurs betweenmaterial which is being plastically deformed andmaterial <strong>of</strong> tool.External friction shows significant influence onthe course <strong>of</strong> plastic deformation, and thus theuseful properties <strong>of</strong> the final product as well as thetool lifetime. The friction force, i.e. its contactcomponents, show a significant influence on thestress field in a deformed metal, especially in itsouter layers that came in contact with work surface<strong>of</strong> tool. Stress field has influence on the course <strong>of</strong>metal forming, and thus the movement <strong>of</strong> deformedmetal surface on the acting surface <strong>of</strong> tool, and thismovement have influence on the friction force.During this process, certain types <strong>of</strong> reverse elasticreleases occur as well.This type <strong>of</strong> resulted external friction betweenthe plastically deformed metals and tool(technically dry friction with distinct adhesioneffect between contact surfaces, coupled withboundary friction), significantly influences thequality <strong>of</strong> the product. If the adhesions (compoundsformed by friction due to the "cold welding") areformed on surface <strong>of</strong> the tool they can be causes <strong>of</strong>scratch and allowances on the surface <strong>of</strong> theproduct that deteriorates its quality.As a result <strong>of</strong> the friction notable changes incharacteristic <strong>of</strong> outer layers occur, with differentcharacter <strong>of</strong> the changes that happens on theproducts surface layers in comparison to changeson tool surface.The most <strong>of</strong> the work piece surface is in contactwith the working surface <strong>of</strong> the tool and will haveshare in the friction process only once, while toolsurface takes part in this process multiple times.The characteristics <strong>of</strong> tool deformation and thework piece deformation are also different. Theouter layer <strong>of</strong> the work piece (as well as the entirevolume), has lower yield stress than tool, resultingin plastic deformations, while, at the same time,tool generally remains in the zone <strong>of</strong> elasticdeformation. Given the fact that surface layer hasthe highest stress gradient, properties <strong>of</strong> outerlayers, for both product and tools, will be differentfrom properties <strong>of</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> product and tools.As a result <strong>of</strong> the friction, tool wear occurs.Mechanism and the intensity <strong>of</strong> tool wear arefunctions <strong>of</strong> friction force magnitude and type <strong>of</strong>the friction [1].13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 265


Model <strong>of</strong> the phenomena that occurs in microzones<strong>of</strong> contact during friction is shown in Figure1 [2]. One can distinguish three main stages <strong>of</strong>interaction between contact surfaces during frictionStage I. At this stage contact occurs as well asmechanical action between contact surfaces whichare initially covered with oxide layers, whereby theamount <strong>of</strong> oxide depends largely on the type <strong>of</strong>processes (metal forming <strong>of</strong> hot or cold), andsusceptibility to oxidation <strong>of</strong> the metals that formcontact pairs. The dominant phenomenon at thisstage <strong>of</strong> contact is the plastic deformation, not only<strong>of</strong> the surface roughness but also, and in theconsiderable volume <strong>of</strong> the material.Stage IStage IIStage IIIFigure 1. Model <strong>of</strong> the phenomena that occur in the micro-areas <strong>of</strong> contact during friction [1]Stage II. As a result <strong>of</strong> molecular interaction,adhesive joints (compounds) are formed. Thequantity <strong>of</strong> joints depends largely on the geometry<strong>of</strong> the contact and the specific pressure.Stage III. This stage <strong>of</strong> the contact surfaceinteraction includes the destruction <strong>of</strong> adhesionjoints which were formed during the relativedisplacement <strong>of</strong> contact pair metals. Failuremechanism <strong>of</strong> contact joints can be very complex.In the first stage <strong>of</strong> joint destruction micro-slip willsurely occur, and therefore the complex phenomena<strong>of</strong> movements and mutually dependent movement<strong>of</strong> dislocations. As a result <strong>of</strong> these phenomenasurface defects such as micro-cracks and micronotchescan be created.As a result <strong>of</strong> repeated displacement <strong>of</strong>deformed metals in regards to the surface <strong>of</strong> thetool, the effect <strong>of</strong> friction and the associatedforming and destruction <strong>of</strong> adhesive joints, toolwear occurs.In the case <strong>of</strong> metal forming, process ischaracterized by the fact that multiple repeatedoperations (forging or ironing) causes a gradualincrease in thickness <strong>of</strong> glued layer, which meansthat the sum <strong>of</strong> the individual joints goes into acontinuous layer.As a result <strong>of</strong> predominance <strong>of</strong> adhesive forceover resistance to plastic flow in the glued layer, infurther stage glued particles suffer from plasticdeformation until they are torn <strong>of</strong>f and smeared.When a sufficiently large thickness <strong>of</strong> gluedlayers is formed as a result <strong>of</strong> repeated process <strong>of</strong>plastic deformation (in a series <strong>of</strong> passages whichleads to increasing and decreasing <strong>of</strong> mutualinteraction), process begins which leads to theseparation <strong>of</strong> adhesive joint from tool surface bypeeling (shear) or tearing. This leads to thesignificant damage <strong>of</strong> the tool surface layers, andtherefore to the increase in surface roughness. Theoccurrence <strong>of</strong> peeling or tearing depends on thetype <strong>of</strong> formed joint.In case <strong>of</strong> contact pairs with higher chemicalaffinity, the strength <strong>of</strong> diffusion produced joints(solid solutions) may be greater than strength <strong>of</strong>material <strong>of</strong> contact pairs, causing the destruction <strong>of</strong>joint to occur in depth <strong>of</strong> less strong and n<strong>of</strong>ortified material, which means it occurs at such adepths at which there is no more squeezing.In the case <strong>of</strong> diffusion-less joints, as well as forthe occurrence <strong>of</strong> brittle inter-metallic phases, thedestruction <strong>of</strong> joint will be based mainly on layeredpeeling <strong>of</strong> metal with less strength. Tearing <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong>glued particles also occurs. Further relativedisplacement <strong>of</strong> contact elements (the work piece isplastically deformed in relation to the tool), makesthese glued particles to reappear on the surface <strong>of</strong>the friction. Afterwards they are compressed on thetool surface, which results in creation <strong>of</strong> groovingin "partner" made <strong>of</strong> material with less hardness(usually plastically deformed work piece). The typeand intensity <strong>of</strong> this secondary effect depends onthe hardness <strong>of</strong> the plastically deformed andstrengthened adhesive joints.266 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


In addition, as a result <strong>of</strong> cyclic loading <strong>of</strong> thetool, on its surface there might be occurrence <strong>of</strong>such defects such as intrusion and extrusion, as wellas micro-cracks, which are characteristic <strong>of</strong> themetal fatigue process.2. EXPERIMENTAL TESTSTests were conducted on the original tribomodel<strong>of</strong> ironing, which simulate the two-sidedh=max 70 mm8TF ir/262vF ir"A"F frP49F ir/21 - Die support2 - "Die"3 - "Punch" body4 - "Punch" front5 - Gauge with measuring tapes6 - Plates7 - Sheet metal strip (Test piece)8 - Termocouple9 - Potentiometer travel gauge1F Dsymmetrical zone <strong>of</strong> contact with the die and thepunch [3]. This model enables the realization <strong>of</strong>high contact pressures with the respect <strong>of</strong> physicaland geometric conditions <strong>of</strong> the real process (thematerial <strong>of</strong> the die and material <strong>of</strong> the punch, thetopography <strong>of</strong> the contact surface, the angle <strong>of</strong> thedie cone - , etc.). Diagram and image <strong>of</strong> theaforementioned tribo-model is shown in Figure 2.175632Figure 2. Diagram and image <strong>of</strong> the tribo-model used in this researchDevice for testing <strong>of</strong> ironing was installed on aspecial machine designed for sheet metal testingERICHSEN 142/12.For the experiments presented in this paper, weused sheet made <strong>of</strong> aluminum alloy, AlMg3(.43)(according to EN: AlMg3 F24, and in text belowonly AlMg3). Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> testedmaterial are given in Table 1.Table 1. Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> tested materialMaterijalRp,MPaRm,MPaA,%AlMg3 201.1 251.0 12.0 0.135 0.405Contact pairs ("die" and "punch") are made <strong>of</strong>alloyed tool steel with high toughness and strength,designated as Č4750 (EN: X160CrMoV121).3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTSDuring ironing friction coefficients <strong>of</strong> die andpunch can have a wave-like (unstable) form (Fig.3). Friction coefficients alternately rise and fallwith irregular and approximately the sameamplitude and frequency. At a particular time,friction coefficients can have slightly increasing,constant or slightly decreasing flow.Very interesting explanation <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong>friction is given in the papers [4, 5]. It is consideredthat the wavy type friction coefficients occur whenthere is a micro-welding <strong>of</strong> roughness peaks in the"form <strong>of</strong> the islands".n,-r,-Friction coefficient on die, -Friction coefficient on punch, -0.200.150.100.050.000 10 20 30 40 50Ironing travel, h, mm0.50.40.30.20.1abba0.00 10 20 30 40 50Ironing travel, h, mmFigure 3. Examples <strong>of</strong> unstable friction coefficients onthe side <strong>of</strong> the die and punch: a-constant, b-decreasing,c-growingaSubsurface layer <strong>of</strong> the contact surface on theexit part <strong>of</strong> the die, which surface is about 80% <strong>of</strong>the total contact area between the tool and thematerial, suffers considerable distortion due toshear stress which is result <strong>of</strong> friction forces. Thisstress is approximately equal to the shear stress inthe weld zone. This zone is therefore called the"zone <strong>of</strong> quasi-welding". At the entrance part <strong>of</strong> thebc13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 267


die, where there is a layer <strong>of</strong> the lubricant which isnot yet squeezed out, there is a formation <strong>of</strong> socalled"nipple slip". During this process quasi-weldzone is steadily increased and thus coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction is increased as well. When the surface <strong>of</strong>quasi-weld zone become equal to the entire frictionsurface, friction coefficient reaches its maximumvalue. In addition, due to strong frictionconnections, micro cracks in the subsurface layerare formed. Due to the continuous material inflowin the zone <strong>of</strong> deformation noticeable nipple isformed, which at some point, because <strong>of</strong> crackscaused by the weakening <strong>of</strong> the frictionalconnection, detach itself from the base material. Inthis way the quasi-welded zone is reduced andlubricant starts to penetrate places <strong>of</strong> brokenconnections, which reduces the friction coefficient.Chipped <strong>of</strong> metal fragments are trapped betweenthe die and the surface <strong>of</strong> sheet metal and are beingcontinuously moved towards the exit part <strong>of</strong> the die.When they came out <strong>of</strong> the zone <strong>of</strong> deformationcoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction will have a minimum value.Then, the aforementioned process continuouslyrepeats itself.If the inadequate lubricant is used coupled withgreater gripping forces, stickers are formed andcontact conditions are greatly deteriorated whichlead to the significant increase <strong>of</strong> drawing force foreach subsequent passage (Fig. 6).Sila izvlačenja, kN2 µm14121086420.25 mmFigure 5. Grooved surfaceIVIIIIIIAlMg300 10 20 30 40 50Put klizanja, mmFigure 6. Change <strong>of</strong> drawing force4. CONCLUSIONFigure 4. Aluminum glued particles on die and punchersurfacesSome lubricants, no matter the fact that theyproduce satisfactory results in steel plates, in case<strong>of</strong> plates made <strong>of</strong> AlMg3 have very poor results.Their usage leads to intense gluing <strong>of</strong> aluminumonto tool, which is shown in Figure 4. Gluedparticles that are formed on the die during theironing can cause severe damage to the sheet metalsurface (galling) (Figure 5).In the case <strong>of</strong> ironing one <strong>of</strong> the maincharacteristic <strong>of</strong> this processes is the fact thatmultiple repeated operations lead to a gradualincrease in thickness <strong>of</strong> glued layer, which meansthat the sum <strong>of</strong> the individual resulting layerscrosses over into the continuous layer.As a result <strong>of</strong> predominance <strong>of</strong> the adhesionforces over resistance to plastic flow within gluedlayer plastic deformation <strong>of</strong> glued particles occursfollowed by their tearing <strong>of</strong>f and smearing.When a sufficiently large thickness <strong>of</strong> the gluedlayers is achieved, as a result <strong>of</strong> the multiplerepeated process <strong>of</strong> plastic deformation, process <strong>of</strong>separating glued particle from tool material begins.This separation is done by pealing (shear) or tearing<strong>of</strong>f, and creates significant damage to the surfacelayers <strong>of</strong> tool, and therefore increases the surfaceroughness <strong>of</strong> the work piece. Such processes arecharacteristic <strong>of</strong> ironing sheet metal made <strong>of</strong>aluminum alloys, where no adequate lubricant isapplied.268 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


AcknowledgementThe part <strong>of</strong> this research is supported byMinistry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science, Republic <strong>of</strong>Serbia, Grant TR32036 and TR34002REFERENCES[1] Леванов А.Н, Колмогоров В.Л. и др.:Контактное трение в процессах обработкиметаллов давлением, Металлургия, 1976.[2] Gierzynska M.: Tarcie zužycie i smarowanie wobrobce plastycznej metali, WNT, Warszawa, 1983.[3] Adamović D.: Ponašanje materijala u kontaktu priprocesima hladnog plastičnog oblikovanja savisokim radnim pritiscima, Doktorska disertacija,Mašinski fakultet u Kragujevcu, Kragujevac, 2002.[4] Kawai N., Nakamura T., Seko S.: The weldingmechanism in drawing <strong>of</strong> aluminum sheet, Journal<strong>of</strong> Engineering for Industry, Vol. 102, No. 8, pp.229-238, 1980.[5] Kawai N.: Laboratory simulation for galling inmetal forming, metal transfer and galling in metallicsystems, Proc. Conf. Orlando, Florida, Metal. Soc.AIME, pp.63-86, 1987.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 269


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccOPTIMAL DESIGN OFA CAMMECHANISMWITHTRANSLATING FLAT-FACE FOLLOWERUSINGG GENETICALGORITHMI. Tsiafis 1 , S. Mitsi 1 , K.D. Bouzakis 1 , A. Papadimitriou 11 AristotleUniversity <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Departmentt <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Greece,tsiafis@eng.auth.gr, mitsi@eng.auth.gr,bouzakis@@eng.auth.gr, thanpap22@gmail.comAbstract: The optimumm design <strong>of</strong> f a cam mechanism is a time consuming task, due to the numerousalternativesconsiderations. In the present work, the problem <strong>of</strong> designn parameterss optimization <strong>of</strong> a cammechanism with translating flat-facefollower is investigatedfrom a multi-objective point <strong>of</strong> view. The designparameters,just like the cam basecircle radius, the follower face width and thee follower <strong>of</strong>fset can bedetermined consideringas optimization criteriaa the minimization <strong>of</strong> the cam size, <strong>of</strong>f the input torque and <strong>of</strong>the contact stress. During the optimization procedure, a number <strong>of</strong> constraints regarding the pressure angle,the contact stress, etcare taken into account. The optimization approach, based on genetic algorithm, isapplied to find the optimal solutionss with respect to the afore-mentionedd objective function and to t ensure thekinematic requirements. Finally, the dynamic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the designed cam mechanism is investigatedconsideringthe frictional forces.Keywords: Cam mechanism, geneticalgorithms, , contact stress, optimization.1. INTRODUCTIONThe optimal design <strong>of</strong> cam mechanismm ishandled in many publications [1-5], where variousconstraints and methods are considered. Αnon-known as SUMT algorithm is used in [3]foroptimum synthesis <strong>of</strong> a disk cam mechanism withswinging roller follower.In [4] the designparameters are determined by the minimizationn <strong>of</strong>linear programming technique with constraints,the maximum compressive stress at the contact area<strong>of</strong> a cam-disk mechanism with translating rollerfollower, where the campr<strong>of</strong>ile is described withthe aid <strong>of</strong> cubic spline functions. Tsiafis ett al.present in [ 5] a multi-objective procedure basedd ongenetic algorithmsto optimize the designparameters <strong>of</strong> a disk-cam mechanism with a rollerfollower.In the present paperthe problem<strong>of</strong> the designparameters optimization<strong>of</strong> a cam mechanism witha reciprocating flat-face follower is investigated,using multi-objectiveoptimizationwith geneticalgorithm. The design parameters for this typee <strong>of</strong>mechanism are the radius <strong>of</strong> the cam base circle,the follower face width andd the follower <strong>of</strong>fset. Theoptimization iss achieved by the development <strong>of</strong>programs usingg the high level computing languageMATLAB withh the GA (genetic algorithm) toolboxapplication. Furthermore, the dynamical analysis <strong>of</strong>the designed mechanism m consideringfriction isinvestigated.2. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONA cam mechanism withh a translating flat-facefollower is shown in figuree 1. The camis assumedto have constant angular velocity. The pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> thecamcan be determined considering thekinematicalanddynamical requirementss <strong>of</strong> the mechanism.The design parameters under optimization arethe cam base circle c R b , thee width follower face Landthe follower <strong>of</strong>fset e as shown in figure 1.The optimization <strong>of</strong> the design parameters <strong>of</strong> thecammechanism can beachieved by theminimisation <strong>of</strong>f the cam size, <strong>of</strong> the torque requiredto drive the camm and the contact stress between thecamand the follower.27013 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Thepressure angle can be calculated by[1]:Figure 1. Cam mechanism with translating flat-facefollower.Therefore, it could be formulated as anoptimizationproblem, where the objective function(F) takes into account the cam size(F 1 ), the inputtorque (F 2 ) and the maximum contact stress (F 3 )::WithF 2 FF 1σ max1F P'21μ11μ ρ E1E2where T is the input torque, P is the t total normalload on the cam, vis thefollower velocity, ω iss thecamshaft angular velocity, σ max iss the maximumcontact stress between the follower and the cam, P’is the normal load per unit width <strong>of</strong> the contactingmembers, ρ is the radii <strong>of</strong> curvature <strong>of</strong> the cam,μ 1 and μ 2 arePoisson’s ratio for the cam and thefollower respectively and E 1 , E 2 arethe modulee <strong>of</strong>elasticity <strong>of</strong>the cam andthe follower respectively.The weighting factors α, β and γ are used in orderto scale the contributionn <strong>of</strong> the corresponding termsin the objective function value. The minimization<strong>of</strong> the objective function determines the optimumvalues <strong>of</strong> the unknown parameters. During theoptimizationproceduree the following functionalconstraints are imposed:a) The maximum value <strong>of</strong> the pressure anglemust be smaller than the maximum permitted:δ max


An important issue in genetic algorithms is thetreatment <strong>of</strong> constraints. For each solution <strong>of</strong> f thepopulation, the objectivefitnessvalues arecalculated. Furthermore, every solution is checkedfor constraints violation.4. NUMERICAL APPLICATIONThe introduced methodology is applied to findthe design parameters <strong>of</strong> a cam mechanism withtranslating flat-face follower where the follower<strong>of</strong>fset is set equal to zero (e=0).Figure 2 shows the kinematic equirements pertransient region <strong>of</strong> the indicated in this figurefollower displacement diagram.The functional requirements and the t materialproperties usedd in this investigation areinserted inFigure 3.The parameters involved in all tests, mainly in GAprocedure, are the same and selected as optimumsthroughmanyyapplied tests: population<strong>of</strong>individuals=20,cross probability=80%, elite count=2andthe maximum number <strong>of</strong>f generations is 100.Consideringgkinematicrequirementsthedisplacement,velocity and acceleration <strong>of</strong> thefollower are determined (Figure 4).Figure 2. Kinematic requirements.Figure3. Materials properties andfunctionalrequirements.Figure 4. The follower motion diagrams.In general the weighting factors α, β and γ <strong>of</strong> thefitness functionn (1) are selected considering theimportance <strong>of</strong> the objectives that must beachieved bythe mechanism. A high value <strong>of</strong> the weighting factorα increases the importance <strong>of</strong>f first part <strong>of</strong> the objectiveefunction (F 1 ) that is to obtainn a small camsize. Afterseveral tests the followingg weighting factors arechosen: α=0.1, , β=0.1 and γ=0.8. Running theMATLAB codes with above mentionedparameters,the following design parameters are obtained:R b =32.67 mm and L=53.21 mm. Forr constructed27213 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


mechanism these parameters are finally set: R b b=35mm and L=50 mm.The campr<strong>of</strong>ile is shown in Figure 5. The 3Dmodel <strong>of</strong> the designed cam mechanism is illustratedin Figure 6.Figure 5. Cam pr<strong>of</strong>ile.Figure6: 3D model <strong>of</strong> the cam mechanism.5. FORCEANALYSISS OF CAM MECHANISSMCONSIDERING FRICTION FORCESIn this section the dynamic forceanalysis <strong>of</strong>f thedesigned mechanism considering the friction forcebetween follower and its guide and the frictionforce between cam and flat face followerr isinvestigated.The force transmission <strong>of</strong> a radial cam with areciprocating flat-faced follower is shown in figure7, where P is the external load on the follower, μ isthe coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction between the follower stemand its guide, μ o the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction f betweenthe cam andthe flat facefollower and d is the guidediameter.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13Figure 7: Forcee transmissionn <strong>of</strong> cam mechanism withtranslating flat-face follower.From the equilibrium e equations <strong>of</strong> horizontalandvertical forces and moments about the point Adandassuming that t difference the between μ N12dandμ N2is negligible, the forces Fc, N 1 and N 22are determined [1]:withandΝ2N1FCbPΓ aμ0ξb PΓ 0 a μ b 1 ξ PΓΓ b2aμ μμ0b12ξP ms cskwhere m is thee follower mass, s, s an nd s are thedisplacement,velocity and acceleration <strong>of</strong> thefollower respectively, c is the dampingcoefficient,k isthe spring constant, c s 0 is the initial compression<strong>of</strong> the spring and F b is the follower weight.Furthermore, the friction forces arewritten as:Qμ F(11)0 Q 1Q 2μ μNμ μNandthe cam shaft torque due to the frictionis given by:d dTf Q 0 Rb s Q1 Q2(14)2 20ss F012b(8)(9)(10)(12)(13)273


considering thee spring force greater than inertiaforce corresponding to maximum deceleration, inorder to avoid the jump phenomenon.The parameter ξ is determined with the relation:ξ= (15-s)/b.The diagramm <strong>of</strong> friction forces versus cam angleis illustrated in Figure 9.In Figure 100 is inserted the diagram <strong>of</strong> the inputtorque with andd without friction.6.CONCLUSIONFigure 8. Constructed cam mechanism.Figure 9. Friction forces <strong>of</strong> cam mechanism withtranslatingflat-face followerFigure 10. Input torque with and without friction.In the designed and constructed mechanism(Figure 8) the data used in dynamic analysis are:μ=0.78, μ 0 =0.15, m=1 kg, k=3004 N/m, s 0 =13 mm,d= 50 mm and b=50 mm.1000k mThe damping coefficient is c 2ζ1000with ζ=0.1. The spring constant k is chosen274In this paper the optimization <strong>of</strong> f the designparameters <strong>of</strong> a cam mechanism with a flat-facedfollower is approached. For this taskthe multi-objective optimization with genetic algorithm isapplied using the high levell programming language<strong>of</strong> MATLAB. The T optimization satisfies constraintsswhich are made in order to operate a cammechanism properly. This procedure is automatic,gives results fast and it appears to be reliable. r Thefinal results provide usefull informationn for a cammechanism synthesis and can be used as a basis <strong>of</strong>final preference dependingg on the objectives thatthave to be succeeded.Subsequently,after the cam mechanismmsynthesis, the applied a friction forces arecalculated.Themost important conclusion is the fact that thefriction forces are a analogous with the action <strong>of</strong> thefollower movement. This means that inthe areas <strong>of</strong>dwell the friction forces aresteady, whereas in theareas <strong>of</strong> rise or return the friction forces alter in analmost similar way. wREFERENCES[1][2][3][4][5][6]Chen Y. F., Mechanics and Design <strong>of</strong> CamMechanisms,Pergamon Press, USA, 1982.Norton R. ., Cam design and manufacturinghandbook, Industrial I Press, Inc., New York, 2002Bouzakis K. K D., Mitsi S., Tsiafis I., Computeraided optimum design and NC milling <strong>of</strong> planarcam mechanisms, International Journal <strong>of</strong> MachineTools and Manufacture, ,Vol. 37, No 8, pp 1131-1142, 1997. .Mitsi, S., Bouzakis, B K. -D., Tsiafis, J., Mansour,G.,Optimal synthesis <strong>of</strong> cam mechanism usingcubic spline interpolation for cam NC milling.Journal <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Tribological Association,Vol. 7, No 4, 4 2001, pp. 225-233.Tsiafis, I., Paraskevopoulou, R., Bouzakis, K.-D.,Selectionn <strong>of</strong> optimal design parameters for acam mechanism usingg multi-objective geneticalgorithm, Annals <strong>of</strong> the “Constantin Brancusi”University <strong>of</strong> TarguJiu, Engineering series, nr. 2,Romania, 2009, pp. 57- 66.Coley D., An A introductionon to genetic algorithms forscientists and engineers, World Scientific Press, 1999.13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacINFLUENCE OF VARIOUS TYPES OF ROCK AGGREGATESON SELECTION OF THE WORKING PARTS MATERIALIN CIVIL ENGINEERINGV. Lazić 1 , M. Mutavdžić 2 , R. Nikolić 1, 3 , S. Aleksandrović 1 , D. Milosavljević 1 , B. Krstić 1 , R. Čukić 11 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Sestre Janjić 6, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia2 Road Building Company Kragujevac, Tanaska Rajića 16, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia3 University <strong>of</strong> Žilina, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, Univerzitna 1, 010 26 Žilina, SlovakiaAbstract: In this paper are presented results <strong>of</strong> theoretical and experimental investigations and mutual comparison <strong>of</strong>various types <strong>of</strong> rock aggregates from the aspect <strong>of</strong> working parts wear <strong>of</strong> different machines for preparation anddeposition <strong>of</strong> the rock materials on roads. Here are considered only the most important types <strong>of</strong> building stones: limestone,dolomite marble, calcite-dolomite marble and andesite, which are exploited at four sites in Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia. Thoseaggregates are convenient for manufacturing <strong>of</strong> certain layers <strong>of</strong> the driveway constructions on roads, streets, airports, asthe base layer on railways and for preparation <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> asphalt and concrete. In selection <strong>of</strong> rocks for depositingon roads, it is necessary to know both their general and specific properties. It is necessary to conduct the mineralogicalpetrographicand physical-mechanical investigations and, if needed, certain special ones, as well.The civil engineering machines for manufacturing and building-in materials in various structural objects are exposed todifferent types <strong>of</strong> high loads, what is especially true for some <strong>of</strong> their working parts, which come into direct contact withthe rock materials. The working life <strong>of</strong> those machines is directly dependent on the type <strong>of</strong> the building material as wellas on maintenance. In exploitation, the construction mechanization is subjected to various types <strong>of</strong> corrosion and wear,and some <strong>of</strong> its parts are occasionally subjected to impact loads, as well. Certain parts are also frequently in contactwith various types <strong>of</strong> stones, sands, soil, asphalt, concrete and occasionally with water.Key words: rock materials, aggregates, minerals, working parts, civil engineering mechanization.1. INTRODUCTIONCivil engineering machines for manufacturingand building in materials during construction <strong>of</strong>various building objects are subjected to differenttypes <strong>of</strong> loads, especially some <strong>of</strong> their workingelements, which are in direct contact with rockmaterials. Working life <strong>of</strong> construction machines'parts is directly dependent on the kind <strong>of</strong> the rockmaterials, properties <strong>of</strong> construction mechanizationworking parts and exploitation and maintenanceconditions. Those machines are, during operation,exposed to different types <strong>of</strong> wear and corrosion,some working part are even exposed to occasionalimpact loads. Some parts <strong>of</strong> construction machinesare frequently in contact with various kinds <strong>of</strong>rocks, sands, soil, asphalt, concrete, sometimes areeven exposed to influence <strong>of</strong> water.Knowing physical-mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>the rock minerals are <strong>of</strong> a special importance, bothfor their exploitation and for their processing andbuilding in. Since the matter <strong>of</strong> speaking are thecomplex tribo-mechanical processes, in whichtake part different elements <strong>of</strong> constructionmechanization, rocks and third objects, it isespecially important to properly select material <strong>of</strong>the construction machines' working parts, as wellas the technology for reparation <strong>of</strong> the damagedand worn parts <strong>of</strong> those machines.Based on investigations <strong>of</strong> the construction rocksfrom four available sites, the useful data wereobtained both for design and reparation <strong>of</strong> theworking parts <strong>of</strong> machines for minerals' exploitation,their processing and building into roads.2. THE MOST IMPORTANT TYPES ANDPROPERTIES OF ROCK MATERIALSRocks mainly consist <strong>of</strong> seven groups <strong>of</strong>minerals: silicates, carbonates, oxides, sulphates,13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 275


sulphides, chlorides and hydroxides. To get amore complete picture about number <strong>of</strong> differentminerals that rocks are made <strong>of</strong>, it is necessary toemphasize that only the silicate group containsabout 800 minerals, categorized into varioussubgroups. Mineral masses in the Earth’s crustcan be found in forms <strong>of</strong> compounds – as solidrocks or in the unbound – dispersed form. Thusthe rocks are being divided, according to strength,into weak, solid and exceptionally solid rocks,since minerals can be in the crystal, crystallite oramorphous form. Rock properties can besignificantly changed due to action <strong>of</strong> water, frostor heat; thus it is highly important to know thelaws <strong>of</strong> those changes. The most importantproperties <strong>of</strong> rocks are petrographic, physical,mechanical and technological [1-8]. All the rocksthat are contained in the Earth's crust can beclassified in three major groups: magmatic,sediment and metamorphic rocks.In this paper are investigated properties <strong>of</strong>stones from the four near-by sites: limestone,dolomite marble, calcite-dolomite marble andandesite. The most exploited (over 70 %) is thelimestone from the "Vučjak" site, thus this particularstone was taken as representative for rocks'properties experimental investigations.3. DETERMINATION OF PETROGRAPHICPROPERTIESThe most important petrographic properties <strong>of</strong>rocks are: mineral composition, structure andtexture. The structure <strong>of</strong> rocks consists <strong>of</strong> mineralcrystallite grains, whose shape and strengthdepend on way <strong>of</strong> coalescence during the rockformation. The texture <strong>of</strong> rocks consists <strong>of</strong>minerals spatial distribution and occupancy.Petrographic properties <strong>of</strong> rocks were testedaccording to standard SRPS.B.B8.002:1989.The limestone site "Vučjak" mainly consists <strong>of</strong>organogenic-detritic 1 limestone. The rock's textureis massive. i.e., the mineral grains are notregularly distributed within the substrate. InFigure 1 are presented macroscopic andmicroscopic appearances <strong>of</strong> this rock [6].The dolomite marble site "Samar" mainly consists<strong>of</strong> the dolomite marble. The structure <strong>of</strong> thistype <strong>of</strong> rock is granoblastic. Texture is massiveand noncompact. In Figure 2 are presentedmacroscopic and microscopic appearances <strong>of</strong> thisrock [6].The calcite-dolomite marble site "Gradac"mainly consists <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> rocks. The rock's1 Detritus (latin): aggregate <strong>of</strong> small particles <strong>of</strong>crushed rockstexture is homogeneous and compact. In Figure 3are presented macroscopic and microscopicappearances <strong>of</strong> this rock [6].The andesite site "Šumnik" mainly consists <strong>of</strong>this type <strong>of</strong> rock. The rock's texture is massive. InFigure 4 are presented macroscopic and microscopicappearances <strong>of</strong> this rock [6].4. EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OFSOME ROCKS PHYSICAL PROPERTIESFor construction <strong>of</strong> roads the most frequentlyexperimentally tested are the following rocks'physical properties: specific mass, bulk mass,porosity, water absorption and compactness, sincethose properties directly influence changes <strong>of</strong>mechanical and technological properties <strong>of</strong> rocksand their aggregates.4.1. Determination <strong>of</strong> specific mass (density) <strong>of</strong>rocksIn Table 1 are presented average values <strong>of</strong>specific mass <strong>of</strong> various rocks' samples [6].4.2. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks' porosityWater absorption is defined by ratio <strong>of</strong> watermass and mass <strong>of</strong> solid mineral substance; for varioustypes <strong>of</strong> rocks it ranges from 1.5 to 4.4% [6].4.3. Determination <strong>of</strong> rock compactionpossibilitiesDetermination <strong>of</strong> the rock bulk mass can serveas criterion for estimates <strong>of</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> theircompacting in the infilling state, what is <strong>of</strong> a greatimportance in construction <strong>of</strong> building objects.Complete investigation <strong>of</strong> compaction possibility<strong>of</strong> rocks requires: determination <strong>of</strong> granulometriccomposition, compacting possibility by theProctor test and the Californian capacity index (cf.[1], [3-4], [7], [9 - SRPS B.B8.030: 1986]).4.4. Influence <strong>of</strong> water, low and elevatedtemperatures on rock content changesWater, low and high temperatures significantlyinfluence some <strong>of</strong> the rocks' properties. In contactwith water at low temperatures (< 0° C) and hightemperatures (>100° C), the minor changes inrocks are observed, while at temperatures lowerthan - 25° C and higher than 500° C, thesignificant changes occur.Low temperatures (frost) significantly affectrock properties, especially if the temperatures arevariable. Alternating heating and cooling <strong>of</strong> rocks276 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


causes big changes <strong>of</strong> their properties. All the dryrocks endure well the low temperatures actions,while the wet rocks and rocks completelysaturated with water have significantly lowerresistance, since their destruction occurs due t<strong>of</strong>reezing <strong>of</strong> water in cavities.a) b)Figure 1. Appearance <strong>of</strong> limestone structure: a) macroscopic appearance, b) microscopic appearance.a) b)Figure 2. Appearance <strong>of</strong> dolomite marble structure: a) macroscopic appearance, b) microscopic appearance.a) b)Figure 3. Appearance <strong>of</strong> calcite-dolomite marble structure: a) macroscopic appearance, b) microscopic appearance.a) b)Figure 4. Appearance <strong>of</strong> andesite rock structure: a) macroscopic appearance, b) microscopic appearance.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 277


Table 1. Bulk masses <strong>of</strong> tested rock samples.Tested rock propertyLimestone- VučjakDolomitemarble- SamarCalcitedolomitemarble- GradacAndesite -ŠumnikBulk mass with pores, V2690 2780 2820 2630v m sSpecific mass without pores and voids, m V 2730 2870 2850 2750sssBulk mass coefficient, i 0.985 0.969 0.989 0.956vsAll types <strong>of</strong> rocks well endure action <strong>of</strong> elevatedtemperatures up to 500° C. Further temperature increaseleads to visible changes: loss <strong>of</strong> characteristicringing sound at impact, significant decrease <strong>of</strong>strength and appearance <strong>of</strong> crumbling or totaldestruction if poured over with cold water. At hightemperatures (over 850° C) more durable are rocksmade <strong>of</strong> minerals whose heat conductivity is significantlydifferent. More durable are firm and finegrainedrocks than the porous and coarse ones. Atthat temperature granites crack irregularly, whilethe sand rocks usually crack parallel to stratification.Limestones and marbles possess good strengthup to the calcification temperature (~ 800° C),when they transform into quicklime (CaO). At hightemperatures quartzites, quartz sandstones withsilicon binder, clays, serpentinite, serpentinite andchromite are stable. Firepro<strong>of</strong> bricks are made <strong>of</strong>magnesite and chromite.5. EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OFMECHANICAL ROCK PROPERTIESOf all the mechanical properties, the mostfrequently investigated are compressive strength,hardness, elasticity, toughness and wear resistance.The rocks' mechanical properties tests are definedby corresponding standards [9- SRPS B.B8.-012:1987 do SRPS B.B8.018:1957].5.1. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks hardnessThe basic mineral that all the limestones aremade <strong>of</strong> is calcite, thus their hardness is usuallyabout 650 HB. Hardness <strong>of</strong> calcite-dolomitemineral depends on percentage shares <strong>of</strong> calcite anddolomite; it is usually within limits 650-850 HB,while the dolomite marble hardness is usually about850-1150 HB. Hardness <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong>andesites is within the wide range and it depends ontheir type. The biotitic andesite has hardness similarto limestone, 550-700 HB, ensitite andesite 750HB, amphibolic andesite 1000-1500 HB, whilecontent <strong>of</strong> quartz SiO 2 (55-65%) in andesite canincrease hardness up to 1800 HB. Hardness <strong>of</strong>rocks has strong influence on their processing andapplication, but also on damage <strong>of</strong> the workingparts <strong>of</strong> the construction machinery duringprocessing and building-in <strong>of</strong> the rock materials.This is why one must use metals that possess highhardness, with carbides in the metal substrate, orrelatively s<strong>of</strong>t steels, which can, under pressure orimpact load, provide martensitic transformation <strong>of</strong>austenite – like the Hadfield steels [10].5.2. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks impact toughnessIn Table 2 are presented values <strong>of</strong> impact hardness<strong>of</strong> rock materials from the four studied sites.Testing was conducted in three mutually perpendiculardirections (I-I is parallel to rocks' stratificationdirection; II-II is perpendicular to I-I and lies instratification plane and III-III is perpendicular todirection <strong>of</strong> the rock's stratification). This isimportant to emphasize, since rocks are highlyanisotropic due to stratification and schistosityinhomogeneity<strong>of</strong> rocks.Based on these results one can conclude thatthose rocks have relatively low impact toughness;according to the fracture site appearance the similarconclusion can be drawn as well, since the fracturesurface is rough and with sharp edges.5.3. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks elasticityThis property is related to solid bound rocks andit depends on type and hardness <strong>of</strong> rock minerals,structure and texture and minerals freshness,moisture, strength and direction applying <strong>of</strong> load,etc. Fine-grained rocks have higher values <strong>of</strong>elasticity modulus, than the coarse rocks <strong>of</strong> thesame composition.For the stratified and inhomogeneous rocks theelasticity modulus is higher in the directionperpendicular to than parallel to stratification andschistosity. By testing the limestone samples thefollowing values were obtained: average Poisson'sratio = 0.36, elasticity modulus E = 50247 MPa,shear modulus G = 18608 MPa and bulk modulus K= 59714 MPa.278 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 2. Impact toughness <strong>of</strong> some types <strong>of</strong> rocks.Impact toughness, MPaLimestone - VučjakDolomite marble- SamarCalcite-dolomitemarble - GradacAndesite -ŠumnikDirection I-I 22.40 17.00 27.20 13.40Direction II-II 24.20 20.60 26.10 17.20Direction III-III 28.80 24.60 28.30 22.40Average value 25.13 20.73 27.20 17.675.4. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks' strengthExperimental determination <strong>of</strong> rocks' strength isusually done with at least three samples, mostfrequently with 5 samples, cut out from the rock inthree mutually perpendicular directions; samplesare <strong>of</strong> prismatic form; the whole is defined byadequate standards [9- srps b.b8.012:1987 to srpsb.b8.018:195].Compression strength. Determination <strong>of</strong> thecompression strength was done on dry and watersaturated cubic samples, cube edge is 40 ± 1 mm,with ground and plan parallel surfaces. The averagevalue <strong>of</strong> the compression strength for the limestonefrom site Vučjak (15 samples, 5 for each direction)was R cm = 131 MPa. Tests <strong>of</strong> samples from othersites were done in the same way. For obtaining thecompression strength after 25 cycles <strong>of</strong> freezing 3cubic samples were used; cube edge was 1000 ± 1mm (Table 3).Tensile strength. Determination <strong>of</strong> the tensilestrength is conducted less frequently though it isalso an important property. The tests were done onsamples <strong>of</strong> the same shape and dimensions as forthe compression strength; but only dry samples weretested. The average value <strong>of</strong> the tensile strength<strong>of</strong> the tested limestone samples was R m = 6.00MPa, while in large number <strong>of</strong> references reportedvalue is about 1.5 MPa for the porous limestonesand 6.4 MPa for the firm limestones. Tests <strong>of</strong>samples from other types <strong>of</strong> rocks were done in thesame way and results are shown in table 4.Bending strength. Bending tests were done onone dry sample per each type <strong>of</strong> rocks, for thedirection which is perpendicular to stratificationand schistosity propagation, in order to obtain thebest possible results, [6].Shear strength. Determination <strong>of</strong> shear strengthwas done only on limestone from the Vučjak site bythe direct shear method, by the Casagrande testingdevice, [6].5.5. Determination <strong>of</strong> rocks' wear resistanceExperimental investigation <strong>of</strong> the rocks' wearresistance is defined by corresponding methods:the Bome method, the Los Angeles and the Devalprocedure, [9]. By the Bome method the wearresistance is checked on the cubic samples, whilethe other two methods are more frequentlyapplied for the rock aggregates; results arepresented in [6].Table 3. Compression strength <strong>of</strong> some rock materials.Rocks' type and originDrysamplesCompression strength, R cm , MPaWater saturatedsamplesSamples after 25freezing cyclesS<strong>of</strong>tening coefficient,K s<strong>of</strong>tLimestone - Vučjak 131 123 117 0.94Dolomite marble - Samar 150 136 130 0.91Calcite dolomite marble - Gradac 161 140 138 0.87Andesite - Šumnik 195 186 184 0.95Table 4. Tensile strength <strong>of</strong> some rock materials.Rocks' type and originTensile strength, R m , MPaDirection I-I Direction II-II Direction III-IIIAverage valuesLimestone - Vučjak 5.97 6.14 5.89 6.00Dolomite marble - Samar 5.26 5.42 3.72 4.80Calcite dolomite marble - Gradac 5.64 5.36 4.03 5.00Andesite - Šumnik 9.48 9.82 8.90 9.4013 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 279


6. SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THECONSTRUCTION MECHANIZATIONWORKING PARTSLarge number <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the constructionmechanization (hoop's teeth, rippers, mixers' blades,knives for lifting and removing asphalt, knivesbladesfor channels digging, crushers impact beamsetc.) are, during operation, in indirect or directcontact with rock materials, and, depending on therole and function <strong>of</strong> the part, they are exposed tovarious types <strong>of</strong> wear [10-12]. Mainly one dealswith abrasive wear or a combination <strong>of</strong> severaltypes <strong>of</strong> wear.The main factors in selection <strong>of</strong> materials exposedto wear are their chemical composition andstructure. Those materials are mainly steels and(white) cast irons. The most resistant to wear arematerials <strong>of</strong> high hardness. Though that characteristiccan not be the only criterion, it is mainly usedfor quality estimates <strong>of</strong> materials exposed to wear.Depending on the degree <strong>of</strong> wear, machines'working parts could be replaced by the new ones,or could be subjected to reparatory hard-facing.When selecting the reparation technology,mechanism <strong>of</strong> abrasive wear is being analyzed,both theoretically and experimentally, taking intoaccount hardness and microstructure <strong>of</strong> parts, andrelated wear resistance in laboratory and realoperating conditions. That represents the basis forselection <strong>of</strong> the optimal procedure, technology andfiller metal for working surfaces regeneration.Investigations, until now conducted by these authors,have shown that the working life <strong>of</strong> the properlyregenerated parts exceeds several times thenew parts working life. Besides that, the machinedown-time, assortment and quantity <strong>of</strong> the necessaryspare parts are reduced. All these point tocomplexity <strong>of</strong> materials selection for the workingparts <strong>of</strong> construction mechanization, as well as toimportance <strong>of</strong> knowing the properties <strong>of</strong> the rockmaterials.7. CONCLUSIONIn this paper are presented investigation results<strong>of</strong> the rock materials physical and mechanical propertiestests, for four types <strong>of</strong> rock materials mostfrequently applied in construction <strong>of</strong> driveways.The conclusion was reached that those materials arefirm and homogeneous rocks, <strong>of</strong> medium to highhardness. It was determined that the compressionstrength values are on average 10-40 times higherthan the shear, bending and tensile strengths, whilethe wear resistance is good in majority <strong>of</strong> studiedrocks, being especially high for andesite.Obtained results enable estimates <strong>of</strong> the individualrock material's quality and point to the complexity<strong>of</strong> the material selection for the workingparts pf construction mechanization. Experimentalresults <strong>of</strong> rock materials properties and the complexworking conditions <strong>of</strong> the tribo-system, can serveand must be taken into account in selection <strong>of</strong> thebase metal and reparation technology <strong>of</strong> thedamaged parts <strong>of</strong> the construction mechanization.AcknowledgementThis research was partially financially supportedthrough grants TR35024, TR35021, TR34002 andOI174004 <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science <strong>of</strong>Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.REFERENCES[1] M. Janjić: Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> geology and engineeringgeology, Part I, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering,Belgrade, 1964.[2] M. Janjić: Engineering geodynamics, Faculty <strong>of</strong>Mining and geology, Belgrade, 1979.[3] M. Janjić: Engineering geology with geologyfundamentals, Scientific Book, Belgrade, 1982.[4] M. Luković: Engineering geology, Scientific Book,Belgrade, 1950.[5] N. Panjukov: Engineering geology, Civil EngineeringBook, Belgrade, 1963.[6] M. Mutavdžić: Reparatory hard-facing <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong>machines and devices in constructionmechanization, MS thesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, Kragujevac, 2007.[7] R. Stojadinović: Soil mechanics – I, Faculty <strong>of</strong>Civil Engineering, Belgrade 1978.[8] M. Muravljov: Civil engineering materials, CivilEngineering Book, Belgrade, 2002.[9] Standards: JUS B.B8.001 to JUS B.B8.086.[10] V. Lazić et al.: The working life theoretical andexperimental estimates for machine parts hardfaced using austenite-manganese electrodes,Materials end Technology, Vol. 46, No 5, pp. 547-554, 2012.[11] M. Mutavdžić et al.: Model investigations <strong>of</strong> thefiller materials for regeneration <strong>of</strong> the damagedparts <strong>of</strong> the construction mechanization, Tribologyin Industry, Vol. 30, No. 3&4, pp. 3-9, 2008.[12] V. Lazić et al.: Selection <strong>of</strong> the most appropriatetechnology <strong>of</strong> reparatory hard facing <strong>of</strong> workingparts on universal construction machinery, Tribologyin Industry, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 18-27, 2011.280 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTECHNO-ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR REPARATORYHARD-FACING OF MACHINE SYSTEMS' WORKING PARTSV. Lazić 1 , R. Čukić 1 , S. Aleksandrović 1 , D. Milosavljević 1 , R. Nikolić 1, 2 , B. Krstić 1 , B. Nedeljković 31 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Sestre Janjić 6, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia2 University <strong>of</strong> Žilina, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, Univerzitna 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia3 High technical school in Kragujevac, Kosovska 8, 34000 Kragujevac, SerbiaAbstract: Research in the field <strong>of</strong> hard-facing <strong>of</strong> various parts <strong>of</strong> mechanical systems is being done for technical andtechno-economic reasons. The reasons for introducing the new reparation technologies by hard-facing are numerous:three quarters <strong>of</strong> all the mechanical parts <strong>of</strong> engineering systems could be regenerated or manufactured by hardfacing;the working life <strong>of</strong> the repaired part reaches or even exceeds the working life <strong>of</strong> a new part, while the workinglife <strong>of</strong> the hard-faced manufactured part surpasses several times the working life <strong>of</strong> the new part manufactured by someother technology. Large number <strong>of</strong> damaged and, frequently even broken parts causes terminations <strong>of</strong> the workingprocess. Thus, due to difficulties in procurement <strong>of</strong> new, mainly imported parts, the alternative solution must be appliedand that is regeneration by hard-facing.It is shown that the a proper choice <strong>of</strong> the hard-facing technology is related to the complex procedure <strong>of</strong> checkingthe quality <strong>of</strong> the hard-faced layer, what indicates that the reparatory operations could be performed only in specializedregeneration workshops, which are furnished with adequate equipment and corresponding expert and skilled staff. Theestimated net benefit for the analysed parts is exceptionally high, regardless <strong>of</strong> the fact that the additional external andinternal effects have not been quantified. After the successful application <strong>of</strong> these new manufacturing hard-facingtechnologies it would be possible to create the knowledge base and apply it in maintaining the parts <strong>of</strong> civil engineeringmachinery, forging equipment and other similar mechanical parts.Key words: regeneration, wear, hard-facing, costs, techno-economic analysis.1. INTRODUCTIONThe reasons for the introduction <strong>of</strong> technologyfor manufacturing and reparatory hard-facing arenumerous: research indicates that three-quarters <strong>of</strong>all the mechanical parts can be regenerated andmanufacturing hard-faced, service life <strong>of</strong> repairedpart reaches or exceeds the service life <strong>of</strong> the newpart, service life <strong>of</strong> new in production hard-facedpart exceeds several times that <strong>of</strong> the new part,which was not hard faced, repair costs are reducedas well as the downtime due to purchasing a newpart, which increases productivity, financing costsand cost <strong>of</strong> storage are also reduced [1- 4]. A largenumber <strong>of</strong> damaged, and <strong>of</strong>ten broken, parts causetermination <strong>of</strong> the process, and the difficulties inthe procurement <strong>of</strong> new, mostly imported parts,must use an alternative such as hard-facingregeneration.In addition, the maintenance <strong>of</strong> thetechnical system should take in considerationmanufacturing <strong>of</strong> new parts by hard-facing, what isexpected to extend their service life with respect tothe new working parts.To perform the modelling <strong>of</strong> hard-facing <strong>of</strong>working parts, i.e., to prescribe generalregeneration procedures, it is necessary to performprevious studies on a number <strong>of</strong> models and realworking parts made <strong>of</strong> various types <strong>of</strong> steel andcast iron. While the surfacing almost every time is aunique job, because it requires the technologycustomized to each working part, it is possible toestablish general procedure for groups <strong>of</strong> similarparts and then to apply it [2,5-6].2. SELECTION OF THE OPTIMAL HARD-FACING TECHNOLOGYIn examining the state <strong>of</strong> the damaged parts oneshould first determine: whether the wear occurred duringthe normal exploitation or it appeared due to somemechanical damage; what is the degree <strong>of</strong> the part's wearis crucial for the decision whether it is cost-effective and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 281


safe to use it in furter exploitation (to apply regenerationor the part) or should it be rejected. The size <strong>of</strong> expecteddeformation and residual stresses are also importantfactors in making such a decision [7-8]. Afterdetermination <strong>of</strong> the chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the basemetal and working conditions, it is possible to create thebasic conditions for the design <strong>of</strong> technologicalprocesses. Based on those facts and previouslyconducted detailed techno-economic analysis, themethod <strong>of</strong> regeneration should be chosen, taking intoaccount the local possibilities <strong>of</strong> the company. The basicrequirement is to obtain the required properties <strong>of</strong> theregenerated part and, <strong>of</strong>course, the reliability <strong>of</strong> the partduring the estimated working life.To achieve the above requirements it is necessary tomake the proper selection <strong>of</strong> filler material for hardfacing.In some cases <strong>of</strong> reparation <strong>of</strong> working parts itis necessary to apply two or more kinds <strong>of</strong> additionalmaterial to insert an intermediate layer, the so calledbuffer layer, between the layer and the substrate. Thisreduces the large differences in the chemicalcomposition, structure and, consequently, the thermophysicalproperties, <strong>of</strong> the substrate and the deposit.Next follows the selection <strong>of</strong> the regeneration processparameters, resulting from the properties <strong>of</strong> the baseand filler metal, and form demands concerning the sizeand shape <strong>of</strong> regenerated parts. The final stage <strong>of</strong>planning, before the experimental surfacing, is theassessment <strong>of</strong> the necessity for implementation <strong>of</strong>special measures and the previous, current andsubsequent heat treatment.For verification <strong>of</strong> the proposed technologies, thecomparative tests in laboratory and in workingconditions have been performed, and, in some cases,comparative test <strong>of</strong> imported parts, which were nothard-faced and the new-hardfaced parts. Laboratorytests are related to the microstructure, hardnessdistribution and tribological tests and working tests <strong>of</strong>comparing the working life <strong>of</strong> the new and repairedparts installed in the same machine [2-3,9].From the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> techno-economicanalysis, reparation welding technology is a complexset <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> mandatory procedures, whichtake into account: the conditions <strong>of</strong> work, damageidentification, estimation <strong>of</strong> weldability, weldingprocess, filler material, welding and hard-facingregimes, heat treatment applied, model and real tests.Having in mind the complexity <strong>of</strong> the process, it isnecessary to determine the optimal technicaltechnologicalsolutions to bring the reparation processto a stage when it is possible to make a final decision,wheter to buy a new part or to repaire it.3. EXAMPLES OF IMPLEMENTED REPAIRSHere is considered the justification for application<strong>of</strong> the production and reparation hard-facing and it ispointed to pr<strong>of</strong>itability<strong>of</strong> repairs on examples <strong>of</strong>damaged forging hammer, forging press frame andlarge gear <strong>of</strong> eccentric presses. The subject matter is thereparatory welding and surfacing <strong>of</strong> the damaged orcracked forging hammers, broken and cracked frames,forging presses and large gear eccentric presses [10-11]. To determine the optimal technology <strong>of</strong> hardfacing,it was necessary to carry out tests on model andreal working parts. Test hard-facing and testing <strong>of</strong>models have served to establish the initial reparationtechnology, and to "transfer" thus approvedtechnologies to the working parts, which are thenfurther checked under actual working conditions.This paper mainly deals with the techno-economicadvantages <strong>of</strong> the hard-facing technology, while thecomplete procedures <strong>of</strong> determining the optimaltechnology for each particular part were presented inpapers [2-3,5,9-11].3.1. Regeneration equipment’s for forginghammer and press frameFor regeneration <strong>of</strong> responsible parts with complexgeometries and large masses, made <strong>of</strong> material sutiblefor tempering, a detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the working partsis required as well as the precisely proposed reparationtechnology.Hammers mallets and presses frames are exposed,during the long operation, to thermal fatigue due tocyclic temperature changes and to impact loads. Due tothe high costs and <strong>of</strong>ten to impossibility <strong>of</strong> purchasingthe new working parts, it is necessary to evaluate thepossibility <strong>of</strong> their repairs. Harsh working conditionssometimes lead to a complete fracture <strong>of</strong> the part andendangering the workplace safety. Figure 1 showsfracture <strong>of</strong> a forging mallet, which has originated fromfatigue crack propagation.Mallet <strong>of</strong> forging's hammer, shown in Fig. 2, andframe forging press, shown in Fig. 3, are primarilysubjected to impact compression loads, and, in partiallyto temperature gradient, that is thermal stresses causedby uneven temperature field [2,7-8]. After a long work<strong>of</strong> these parts, i.e., large number <strong>of</strong> repeated cycles onhammer mallet and on the press frame, visible crackswere observed, and on one portion <strong>of</strong> the frame and ona single occurred the complete fracture (Fig. 1 and 3).Taking into account that these are parts <strong>of</strong> largedimensions and complex shapes, and that componentsare subjected to dynamic and thermal loads, they aredimensioned on the basis <strong>of</strong> the increased safetydegrees; thus the special measures are required for themanufacturing and reparatory technologies, as well.Forging press frame is madeby casting in sand, from the medium carbon cast steel.On the other hand, pneumatic forging hammer mallet,as one <strong>of</strong> the most loaded mechanical parts, is made <strong>of</strong>low alloyed steel for tempering.282 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 1. Appearance <strong>of</strong> fractured forging hammer mallet.900920250200748.2150170 802102600480a) b)Figure 2. Forging hammer malleta) Sketch <strong>of</strong> mallet with observed crack; b) Apperance <strong>of</strong> the regenerated mallet <strong>of</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> 6000 kgSection S-S75S10075160S1211902400a) b)Figure 3. Frame <strong>of</strong> vertical forging press.a) sketch <strong>of</strong> the frame (1 – fracture site; 2 - observed cracks); b) regenerated, heat treated and machined partThe complete technology for regeneration <strong>of</strong>damaged forging hammers' mallets and presses'frames is shown in [6, 10-11]; here are presented onlythe techno-economic indicators for the mallets'regeneration.The following data are relevant for comparison:A. The price <strong>of</strong> the new part is: 83987 Є(This price includes price <strong>of</strong> a new part - 67470 Є,tax -12144 Є, the customs 3373 Є and the cost <strong>of</strong>shipping and transportation services - 1000 Є);B. The total real costs <strong>of</strong> reparation <strong>of</strong> 4912 Єinclude: Identification and damage detection:3 days × 8 (nh*/day) × 10 (Є/nh) = 240 Є;13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 283


Machining <strong>of</strong> damaged area:10 days × 8 (nh/day) × 12 (Є/nh) = 960 Є; Selection <strong>of</strong> the optimal hard-facing technology:8 days × 8 (nh/day) × 15 (Є/nh) = 768 Є; Model testing:4 days × 8 (nh/day) × 12 (Є/nh) = 384 Є; Surfacing <strong>of</strong> real working parts:20 days × 8 (nh/day) × 10 (Є/nh) = 1600 Є; The costs <strong>of</strong> machining operations <strong>of</strong> surfaced areas:10 days × 8 (nh/day) × 12 (Є/nh) = 960 Є.nh = norm-hourBased on these data one can conclude that thetotal reparation costs are far lower than the costs <strong>of</strong>a new part (less than 6%). Therefore, the "buy" or"repaire" dilemma is apparently resolved withoutmore detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the positive effects thatmallet regeneration allows.3.2. Reparation <strong>of</strong> large gears - toothed hub <strong>of</strong>an eccentric pressThe techno-economic analysis <strong>of</strong> reparatorywelding and hard-facing <strong>of</strong> the damaged teeth <strong>of</strong> acoupling hub with mass <strong>of</strong> 500 kg, shown in Fig. 4,is performed after the repair has already beenperformed, because it is a unique part that could notbe easily obtained. The coupling is exposed toharsh environmental conditions and is made <strong>of</strong>alloyed steel for tempering. Since it is aconditionally weldable steel, it was necessary toprescribe a particular reparation technology. It wasestablished through previous model tests [5,10].The analysis <strong>of</strong> obtained results leads to the optimalhard-facing technology which is then "transferred"to the real part.Figure 4. Appearance a coupling hubIn economic "buy" or "repaire" analysis, anestimate <strong>of</strong> the more complete effects was notconducted, which should be performed by thebenefit-cost (BC) analysis, or more precisely byusing the life-cycle-cost (LCC) analysis, whichwould point to more precise and more clearadvantages <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> this advancedtechnology [3]. A comparative analysis wasperformed after two and a half years <strong>of</strong> the hardfacedrack hub couplings operation.As relevant for comparison the following datawere taken:A. Purchasing price <strong>of</strong> the new part: 26500 Є(This price includes price <strong>of</strong> a new part, the cost <strong>of</strong>taxes, customs duties, freight forwarding servicesand transport).B. The total real reparation costs <strong>of</strong> 3380 Єinclude: Identification and damage detection: 1day × 8 (nh/day) × 10 (Є/nh) = 80 Є; Machining <strong>of</strong> damaged area:2 days × 8 (nh/day) × 12 (Є/nh) = 192 Є; Selection <strong>of</strong> the optimal hard-facing technology:1 day × 8 (nh/day) × 15 (Є/nh) = 120 Є; Model testing:3 days × 8 (nh/day) × 12 (Є/nh) = 288 Є; Surfacing <strong>of</strong> real working parts:10 days × 8 (nh/day) × 10 (Є/nh) = 800 Є; Costs <strong>of</strong> production services (processing hardfacedteeth and transport)1900 Є.Based on these data one can conclude that thetotal cost <strong>of</strong> repairs is significantly lower than thecost <strong>of</strong> purchasing a new part (less than 13%).4. CONCLUSIONThrough the proper selection and application <strong>of</strong>the reparatory and manufacturing hard-facingtechnologies, it is possible to achieve a number <strong>of</strong>advantages compared to the installation <strong>of</strong> newparts. This is primarily related to the extension <strong>of</strong>the service life <strong>of</strong> the analyzed parts, increase <strong>of</strong>productivity, reduction <strong>of</strong> downtimes, reduction <strong>of</strong>inventory costs and other benefits derived byapplying the welding technology.It is shown that a proper choice <strong>of</strong> hard-facingtechnologies is associated with the complexprocedure <strong>of</strong> checking the quality <strong>of</strong> deposits, whatindicates that the repair work can be performedonly in specialized workshops for regeneration,which have adequate equipment and appropriateskilled staff. The expected net benefit for theanalyzed parts is very high, regardless <strong>of</strong> the factthat additional external and internal effects have notbeen quantified. After the successful284 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


implementation <strong>of</strong> these new manugacturingsurfacing technologies in presented areas, it ispossible, by applying the similar procedure, to forma knowledge base and to use it for maintenance <strong>of</strong>equipment for forging, and other similarmechanical parts.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis research was partially financially supported byMinistry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbiathrough grants TR35024, TR35021, TR34002 andOI174004.REFERENCES[1] R. Wasserman: How to save millions by reducinginventories <strong>of</strong> spare parts, Eutectic-CastolinInstitute for the Advancement <strong>of</strong> Maintenance andRepair Welding Techniques, 1971.[2] V. Lazić: Optimization <strong>of</strong> the hard-facingprocedures from the aspect <strong>of</strong> tribologicalcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the hard-faced layers and residualstresses, PhD thesis, The Faculty <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, Kragujevac, 2001. (In Serbian)[3] R. Čukić: Techno-economic analysis <strong>of</strong> productionand reparatory hard-facing <strong>of</strong> various parts <strong>of</strong>machine systems, PhD thesis, University <strong>of</strong>Belgrade, Serbia, 2010. (In Serbian).[4] V. Lazić et al.: Selection <strong>of</strong> the most appropriatetechnology <strong>of</strong> reparatory hard-facing <strong>of</strong> working partson universal construction machinery, Tribology inIndustry, Vol. 33, No 1, pp. 18-27, 2011.[5] M. Mutavdžić et al.: Model investigations <strong>of</strong> thefiller materials for regeneration <strong>of</strong> the damagedparts <strong>of</strong> the construction mechanization, Tribologyin Industry, Vol. 30, No. 3&4, pp. 3-9, 2008.[6] V. Lazić et al.: Reparation <strong>of</strong> damaged mallet forhammer forging by hard-facing and weld cladding,Technical Gazette, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 107-113, 2009.[7] A. Wernoski: Zmeczenie cieplne metali,Wydawnictwa Naukowo - Techniczne, Warszawa,1983. (In Polish).[8] R. Pasierb: Spawanie žarowytrzymalych stalichromowo-molibdenowo-wanadowych, WNT,Warszawa, 1982. (In Polish).[9] V. Lazić et al.: Selection <strong>of</strong> the optimum technology<strong>of</strong> the forging dies reparation from the aspect <strong>of</strong>tribological characteristics, TRIBOLOGIA -TEORIA I PRAKTIKA, ROK XXXVI, NR 2/2005,pp. 11-30, 2005.[10] V. Lazić et al.: Development and application <strong>of</strong>welding technologies for regeneration <strong>of</strong> damagedworking parts <strong>of</strong> forging presses and hammers,Welding and Joining Technologies for aSustainable Development and Environment, 24-26.05. 2006., Timisoara, Romania, pp. 341-346.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 285


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGY ASPECT OFRUBBER SHOCK ABSORBERS DEVELOPMENTMilan Banić 1 , Dušan Stamenković 2 , Miloš Milošević 3 , Aleksandar Miltenović 41 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Serbia, banic@masfak.ni.ac.rs2 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Serbia, dusans@masfak.ni.ac.rs3 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Serbia, mmilos@masfak.ni.ac.rs4 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Serbia, amiltenovic@yahoo.comAbstract: Rubber is a very flexible material with many desirable properties which enable its broad use inengineering practice. Rubber or rubber-metal springs are widely used as anti-vibration or anti-shockcomponents in technical systems. Rubber-metal springs are usually realized as a bonded assembly, howeverespecially in shock absorbers, it is possible to realize free contacts between rubber and metal parts. Inprevious authors research it was observed that friction between rubber and metal in such case have asignificant influence on the damping characteristics <strong>of</strong> shock absorber. This paper analyzes the developmentprocess <strong>of</strong> rubber or rubber-metal shock absorbers realized with free contacts between the constitutive parts,starting from the design, construction, testing and operation, with special emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong>rubber-metal springs for the buffing and draw gear <strong>of</strong> railway vehicles.Keywords: rubber friction, rubber-metal spring, shock absorber, product development.1. INTRODUCTIONRubber or rubber-metal springs are widely usedin industry as anti-vibration or anti-shockcomponents giving many years <strong>of</strong> service. Theyhave several advantages in respect to metal springs(lower price, easier installation, lower mass,reduced corrosion, no risk <strong>of</strong> fracture and no needfor lubrication) [1]. However, they have one majordisadvantage reflected in insufficiently reliableservice life caused by rubber fatigue.Those elements are well established to controlvertical and lateral movements. Nowadays, themore demanding operating environment has madethe design <strong>of</strong> such components more challengingthan ever before. In addition to the design <strong>of</strong> therubber part itself the interface between the part andthe structure is also important.The properties <strong>of</strong> the rubber-metal spring aremainly influenced by a rubber compound. Rubbercompounds are generally composed <strong>of</strong> a baserubber (e.g. natural rubber), filler (e.g. carbonblack) and a curing agent (e.g. sulphur). Additionalcomponents may include antioxidants, adhesionagents, flame retardant agents and special processenhancingchemical additives. Common physicalproperties <strong>of</strong> rubber compounds are affected byevery ingredient <strong>of</strong> a rubber recipe independently <strong>of</strong>or dependently on each other. The mixing andcuring process is also critical in determining theseproperties. Improving one compound propertyalways results in changing other properties, forbetter or for worse. Noted fact makes development<strong>of</strong> elastomeric based products a very complicatedtask. Up to appearance <strong>of</strong> modern computer aidedtools, the development <strong>of</strong> those products relied onlyon previous experience <strong>of</strong> the designer and trial anderror procedure. Such approach was inefficient,expensive and time consuming because it requirediterative procedure combined with excessiveexperimental testing to achieve desired mechanicalproperties.Rubber-metal springs are usually realized as abonded assembly, however especially in shockabsorbers, it is possible to realize free contactsbetween rubber and metal parts. In that case,connections between rubber blocks and metal platesare realized by applying pressure and resultingstatic friction. During the load cycle <strong>of</strong> the shockabsorber, apart the energy dissipation in rubber,286 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


additional energy is dissipated due to frictionbetween rubber and metal parts.In previous authors research [2] it was observedthat friction between rubber and metal in such casehave a significant influence on the dampingcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> shock absorber. This paperanalyzes the development process <strong>of</strong> rubber orrubber-metal shock absorbers realized with freecontacts between the constitutive parts, startingfrom the design, construction, testing and operation,with special emphasis on the development <strong>of</strong>rubber-metal springs for the buffing and draw gear<strong>of</strong> railway vehicles.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUBBER-METAL SHOCK ABSORBERWith appearance <strong>of</strong> modern computer tools andvirtual product development, the developmentprocess <strong>of</strong> shock absorbers became more efficientdue to simulated experimental testing <strong>of</strong> virtualprototype. With virtual product development toolsit is possible to predict the absorbing capacity andservice life before the manufacturing <strong>of</strong> the productprototype which was not possible in classicaldevelopment process.The assembly <strong>of</strong> shock absorber with rubbermetalspring usually consists <strong>of</strong> a few rubber-metalelements separated with metal plates andprestressed with a central screw. A rubber-metalelement represents a metal carrier in the shape <strong>of</strong> acircular plate with natural or synthetic rubbervulcanized on both sides. Therefore, the advantages<strong>of</strong> both component elements are involved: highabilities <strong>of</strong> displacement and amortization <strong>of</strong> rubberand large loads which are sustained by metal parts.These ensure the decrease <strong>of</strong> noise and amortization<strong>of</strong> impact loads. Figure 1 shows the design <strong>of</strong>buffing gear spring assembly, while Figure 2 showsthe design <strong>of</strong> draw gear spring assembly.Figure 1. Rubber-metal spring assembly <strong>of</strong> buffing gearFigure 2. Rubber-metal spring assembly <strong>of</strong> draw gearAs already noted, these springs are used as antishockcomponents, so the main properties designermust take into account are absorbing capacity andstiffness <strong>of</strong> the spring. The most importantabsorbing characteristic <strong>of</strong> rubber is evaluated byits hysteresis. Hysteresis is the mechanical energyloss that always occurs in an elastic materialbetween the application and the removal <strong>of</strong> a load.If the displacement <strong>of</strong> a system with hysteresis isplotted on a graph against the applied force, theresulting curve is in the form <strong>of</strong> a loop. It dependsnot only on the elastomer type, but also on fillersand other compound ingredients as othermechanical properties.The authors defined a virtual productdevelopment procedure (Figure 3) for development<strong>of</strong> rubber-metal springs used in shock absorbers.The development procedure is based on application<strong>of</strong> modern viscoplastic rubber constitutive model(Bergström-Boyce), which besides higher accuracy<strong>of</strong> prediction, enables the assessment rubbercompound hysteresis and strain rate dependencewhich is not possible by application <strong>of</strong> hyperelasticmodels usual for rubber FE analysis. Theparameters <strong>of</strong> rubber constitutive model(Bergström-Boyce) are determined by uniaxialcompression at different strain rates and stressrelaxation test on the samples <strong>of</strong> the rubbercompound (35.7 x 17.8 mm) [3]. The samples arecompressed between hardened steel plateslubricated with machine oil in order to prevent thebarrelling <strong>of</strong> samples. Based on the performedexperiments, the database <strong>of</strong> model parameters forthe rubber compounds can be defined. Databasealso contains data about other significant properties<strong>of</strong> rubber compound, such as composition, commonmechanical properties, etc.The first step in procedure shown at Figure 3 isto determine the rubber compound for rubber-metalspring. From the formed database severalcompounds are selected based on criteria definedby widely known selection and service guide forelastomers [4] regarding the product specificrequirements (creep, low-temp stiffening, heataging,…) and the operating environment conditions(resistance to ozone, radiation, …). The selected13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 287


compounds are used for simulation <strong>of</strong> static anddynamic hysteresis <strong>of</strong> standardised specimens.The simulation <strong>of</strong> static hysteresis test isconducted on cylindrical test samples (35.7 x17.8 mm), according to the internal standardSIMF.92.006 [5]. The simulation dynamichysteresis (Yerzley hysteresis) test is carried out oncylindrical test samples (19.5 x 12.5 mm)according to the standard ASTM D 945-06 [6].The obtained results <strong>of</strong> static and dynamichysteresis are used for final selection <strong>of</strong> rubbercompound. As the main feature and an indicator <strong>of</strong>the quality <strong>of</strong> rubber-metal springs is energyabsorption capacity, the compound is selectedbased on criterion <strong>of</strong> highest static and dynamichysteresis obtained during simulation.The next step following the adoption <strong>of</strong> therubber compound is the selection <strong>of</strong> the appropriatestructural design <strong>of</strong> the basic rubber metal elementand their combination into a spring package. Asalready noted, the main problem in developingrubber-metal springs is that a designer cannotestimate how many basic rubber metal springelements need be combined in a serial set toachieve the required absorption capacity. Theamortizing ability <strong>of</strong> a rubber-metal spring package,and therefore the constitutive number <strong>of</strong> basicrubber metal elements, should be determined bysimulation using the finite element method. Basedon the required operating stroke, built-in measuresand assumptions about preloading <strong>of</strong> rubber-metalspring the initial design <strong>of</strong> the basic rubber metalelements is adopted. For instance, the initialgeometry <strong>of</strong> the basic element <strong>of</strong> buffer rubbermetalspring is shown on Figure 4. It consisted <strong>of</strong> ametal disk with openings and vulcanized rubberparts on both sides <strong>of</strong> the plate connected throughthe plate’s openings (Figure 4).Figure 4. The basic rubber metal spring element <strong>of</strong>buffing gearUpon the simulation <strong>of</strong> static hysteresis <strong>of</strong> basicelement, the number <strong>of</strong> elements in rubber-metalassembly can be easily determined as the ratio <strong>of</strong>required spring absorption capacity and theabsorption capacity <strong>of</strong> the single element. Theprocedure is sometimes iterative to obtain desiredresults with required value <strong>of</strong> normal reaction forceduring impact and limited number <strong>of</strong> basic elementsdue to installation requirements.Figure 3. Procedure for development <strong>of</strong> shock absorberswith rubber-metal springFigure 5. S-N curves <strong>of</strong> the rubber-metal element [7]288 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The adopted geometry parameters are furtherimproved by optimisation. The optimizationprocedure is performed in order to improve thedesign <strong>of</strong> the spring element regarding its servicelife. By lowering the element stress levels values,the service life is prolonged which is obvious fromFigure 5. As an example, the optimisation basicrubber metal spring element <strong>of</strong> buffing gear isperformed by defining the design <strong>of</strong> experiment asa central composite design in simulation. Byvariation <strong>of</strong> the plate opening diameter (D o ), thenumber <strong>of</strong> openings (B o ) and radius on top andbottom <strong>of</strong> the rubber part <strong>of</strong> the element (R), thefunctional dependence <strong>of</strong> maximum equivalentstress from input parameters was obtained.Minimisation <strong>of</strong> the obtained functionaldependence results in optimal geometricdimensions <strong>of</strong> the basic spring element. Thefunctional dependence <strong>of</strong> maximal equivalent stressfrom input parameters is shown in Figure 6.Upon the definition <strong>of</strong> final geometry <strong>of</strong> theelement, the actual production and testing <strong>of</strong>prototype are performed in order to validate designand to determine the accordance with the designrequirements.3. TRIBOLOGY ASPECT OF THE SHOCKABSORBER DEVELOPMENTRubber has a very high coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionwhich can even reach value <strong>of</strong> μ = 4. High frictioncoefficient, and thus high grip <strong>of</strong> rubber, found itsway in many engineering applications; for example,rubber is not always bonded in bushes, since itsfrictional grip is almost equal to a bond. During theload <strong>of</strong> unbounded rubber metal assembly incompression the friction force occurs (Figure 7).Due to high grip between the rubber and the metalthe rubber is barrelling thus increasing the contactsurface.Figure 6. Functional dependence <strong>of</strong> maximal equivalentstress from the optimisation parametersFigure 7. Compression <strong>of</strong> rubber between steel plates: a)unloaded; b) loadedIt has been noticed that the amount <strong>of</strong> theaccumulated/absorbed energies <strong>of</strong> rubber-metalsprings loaded in compression greatly depends onthe contact between the rubber and the metal [2].Noted findings were also confirmed by otherauthors. For instance, Figure 8 shows the effect <strong>of</strong>lubricating the contact between rubber and metal incompression. Provided that the steel ends are cleanthe grip is almost equal to that <strong>of</strong> a bonded sample.Although bonded contact provides a highernormal reaction force during impact, the freecontact such as in draw and buffer gear rubbermetal spring assembly dissipates more energy asthere are friction induced energy losses due tocontact sliding. If the friction coefficient issufficiently high to ensure that significant sliding13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 289


etween metal and rubber will not occur shockabsorber will have better absorbing properties.Figure 8. Effects <strong>of</strong> surface conditions on thestress/deflection curve for rubber under compression [8]Significant sliding compromises the assemblystability and has a great effect on lowering <strong>of</strong>normal resulting force. Furthermore, the increase <strong>of</strong>the friction coefficient on the contact surfaces <strong>of</strong>the rubber element increases the shear stress and itsshare <strong>of</strong> the total stress also. The increasing shearstress further increases the total stress in theelement and the force which resists the deformation<strong>of</strong> the element. The increase <strong>of</strong> the shear stressshare <strong>of</strong> the total stress leads to the enhancedamortization capacity <strong>of</strong> rubber elements. As thehigh values <strong>of</strong> normal resulting force are the designrequirement, it is necessary to find the balancebetween the sliding allowance and resulting normalforce. It can be achieved by influencing thetribological contact parameters (lubrication, surfaceroughness <strong>of</strong> the metal part, contact pressure, …)and thus the friction coefficient value.Based on above it can be concluded that it is notpossible to actually perform the virtualdevelopment process <strong>of</strong> the shock absorber withrubber metal spring without the knowledge <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient value in contact between therubber and metal parts.The coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction <strong>of</strong> rubber is highlydependent on contact pressure. As the contactpressure between the rubber and the free metalplates in shock absorbers is approximately 20 MPa,it is extremely difficult or even impossible toexperimentally determine the actual value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient at noted operating contactpressure.The compound friction coefficient can bepredicted based on experiments with rubberspecimens or based on existing data on normalreaction force in similar operating conditions. Bysimulation <strong>of</strong> experiments on rubber specimens orpreviously performed experiments, the frictioncoefficient can be determined by goal drivenoptimisation procedure. The value <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient will be approximately determined whenthe normal reaction force obtained by simulation isequal to experimentally obtained one.As an example, it is necessary to determine thefriction coefficient in contact between rubber withtrade name TG-B-712 (manufactured by companyTIGAR, Pirot) and metal plate at contact pressure<strong>of</strong> 3 MPa. The rubber specimen (with dimensions(35.7 x 17.8 mm) was compressed between steelplates at specific tribological conditions for which itwas necessary to determine the value <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient. The force-displacement data wasrecorded during the experiment (Figure 9).Figure 9. Experimental force – displacement dataFigure 10. Functional dependence between frictioncoefficient and force determined by virtual experimentThe friction coefficient was determined byvirtual experiment from which the functionaldependence between friction coefficient and normalresulting force was obtained (Figure 10). Based onrealistic experimental data (Figure 9) it is clear thatthe maximal resulting normal force correspond t<strong>of</strong>riction coefficient value <strong>of</strong> μ = 1.5.290 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


4. CONCLUSIONTools <strong>of</strong> virtual product development enablesignificant cost and time savings in the process <strong>of</strong>development <strong>of</strong> shock absorbers filled with rubbermetalsprings.But to employ the tools <strong>of</strong> virtual productdevelopment it is essential to have a value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient in free contact between rubberand metal parts. Without the correct value <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient the proposed procedure outlinedin the paper would provide incorrect data which isnot suitable for shock absorber developmentprocess.As experimental determination <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient in contact between rubber and metal athigh values <strong>of</strong> contact pressure can be veryproblematic, the friction coefficient can beestimated by goal driven optimisation duringnumerical simulation <strong>of</strong> realistic experiments withexisting resulting force data.REFERENCES[1] V. Miltenović: Mašinski elementi-oblici, proračun,primena, Mašinski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu,2009.[2] D. Stamenković, M. Milošević: Friction at Rubber-Metal Springs, 11 th International Conference onTribology - SERBIATRIB ’09, 13-15.05.2009,Belgrade, pp. 215-219.[3] M. Banić, et al.: Prediction <strong>of</strong> Heat Generation inRubber or Rubber-Metal Springs, Thermal Science,16 (Suppl. 2), pp. 593-606, 2012.[4] …:Vibration & motion control catalogue, LORDCorporation, 2008.[5] SIMF.92.006.[6] ASTM D 945 Standard Test Methods for RubberProperties in Compression or Shear.[7] R. K. Luo, W. X. Wu, P. W. Cook, W.J. Mortel:Fatigue design <strong>of</strong> rubber springs used in rail vehiclesuspensions, <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Institution <strong>of</strong>Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal <strong>of</strong> Rail andRapid Transit, 217/3, pp. 237-240, 2003.[8] A. B. Davey, A. R. Payne: Rubber in engineeringpractice, Great Britain, 1964.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 291


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacEFFECTS OF USING OF MQL TECHNIQUE IN METALCUTTINGGordana Globočki Lakić 1 , Branislav Sredanović 1 , Davorin Kramar 2 , Bogdan Nedić 3 , Janez Kopač 21 University <strong>of</strong> Banjaluka, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina2 University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Ljubljana, Slovenia3 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Kragujevac, SerbiaAbstract: In this paper an effect <strong>of</strong> using <strong>of</strong> minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in turningoperations is presented. Experimental research was performed on carbon steel C45E. Technologicalparameters: depth <strong>of</strong> cut, feed rate and cutting speed were adjusted to semi-machining and roughing. Highervalues <strong>of</strong> feed and cutting speed were used, than recommended from literature, and different types <strong>of</strong> coolingand lubrication conditions in turning were applied. As a conventional procedure and technology, lubricationwith flooding was applied. As special lubrication technique the MQL was used. During research, monitoring<strong>of</strong> the cutting force, chip shape, tool wear and surface roughness was performed. Relations betweenparameters, material machinability and economy <strong>of</strong> process were analyzed.Keywords: lubrication, cutting, MQL, effects1. INTRODUCTIONThe future <strong>of</strong> metal machining by 2020 is in thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> flexible machining systems,economical and productive processes, energyefficientprocesses, production without waste,ecological production with a reduced quantity <strong>of</strong>the cooling and lubrication fluids and etc. Thisconclusion is based on the study National ResearchCouncil <strong>of</strong> the USA and other teams <strong>of</strong> researchers[1, 2, 3, 4].Figure 1. Possibilities to increase the productivity <strong>of</strong>manufacturingIncreasing <strong>of</strong> productivity (Fig 1.) is impossiblewithout utilization <strong>of</strong> modern tools and machines,modern types <strong>of</strong> cooling and lubrication fluids(CLF), CLF dosing techniques, and modernequipment. Progress is not possible withoutknowledge <strong>of</strong> the materials machinability andexpert systems for the selection <strong>of</strong> suitablemachining regimes based on machinability andprocess modelling [3]. Phases <strong>of</strong> research,obtaining and application <strong>of</strong> knowledge in the field<strong>of</strong> cutting process are:• study <strong>of</strong> materials machinability based onexperimental research,• modelling <strong>of</strong> the cutting process and• integration <strong>of</strong> knowledge in expert systemsand specialized databases.The main progress in developing <strong>of</strong> highproductive machining processes is realized in thearea <strong>of</strong> special CLF dosing techniques. One <strong>of</strong> thesetechniques is minimum quantity lubrication (MQL).The analysis <strong>of</strong> previous researches have shownthat this CLF dosing technique was applied forlower cutting speed (v c = 100 -150 m/min) [5, 6, 7].From the structure <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> machined part,it can be concluded that the cost <strong>of</strong> CLF participate15%, costs <strong>of</strong> tools 10% and costs <strong>of</strong> energyconsumption 4% <strong>of</strong> total costs (Fig 2).292 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 2. Structure <strong>of</strong> the machining costsThe focus <strong>of</strong> researches presented in this paperwas on effects <strong>of</strong> different CFL dosing techniquesin the field <strong>of</strong> higher cutting speed (v c = 200 - 400m/min), which contributed to the expansion <strong>of</strong>technological fields. In order to analyse themachinability when applying standard and MQLCFL dosing techniques, analysis <strong>of</strong> machiningenergy balance, effect <strong>of</strong> chip formation, tool lifeand quality <strong>of</strong> machined surface were also included[8].Figure 3. Influence technique <strong>of</strong> lubrication onproductivity and efficiencyThe studies that are presented in this paper arerelated to the analysis <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> modern techniquesCFL dosing, with the aim <strong>of</strong> defining the directions<strong>of</strong> increasing productivity and efficiency <strong>of</strong>machining process (see Fig. 3).2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUPThe material that was used for the experimentalresearches is the carbon steel C45E. This steelbelongs to the group <strong>of</strong> construction steels whichare used for essential parts in the machines andconstructions. Workpiece is cold-rolled steel barwith a diameter <strong>of</strong> 120 mm and length <strong>of</strong> 300 mm.Research was performed on universal latheBOEHRINGER with the following properties:8 kW <strong>of</strong> power, maximum spindle speed <strong>of</strong>2240 rev/min, and feed <strong>of</strong> 1.6 mm/rev. Carbidecutting tool for semi machining SNMG 1204 08NMX was used. Tool clearance angle was 10°, rakeangle 0°, and a tool tip radius was 0.8 mm withoutchip breakers. Tool holder was PSDN 2525 M12with inclination angle 45° (Fig. 4).Figure 4. Experimental setup on machineIn this research two different CLF dosingtechniques were analysed:• conventional flooding and• special dosing technique - MQL.In conventional flooding, CLF is dosed at thetop <strong>of</strong> machining zone, from a distance <strong>of</strong>approximately 150 mm. CLF was directed on nonmachinedworkpiece surface and rake surface <strong>of</strong>insert.In the MQL technique, CLF was dosed using aspecial device which utilizes a compressed air t<strong>of</strong>orm an oil mist in the mixing chamber (Fig 5).During machining with MQL technique, the toolwas protected from sudden changes <strong>of</strong> heat loads.The effects <strong>of</strong> rapid expansion and contraction <strong>of</strong>the tool material and the cracks appearance andcoatings cracking were avoided. During themachining, due to the effect <strong>of</strong> the spray, the toolwas enveloped with a thin layer <strong>of</strong> emulsion. InMQL technique spray nozzle was installed at adistance <strong>of</strong> 30 mm (L MQL = 30 mm), normal to thecutting edge, with an angle <strong>of</strong> 30° (ψ MQL = 30°)regarding to the rake face <strong>of</strong> tool (Fig 6.). Withsuch recommended position <strong>of</strong> the nozzle qualitylubrication <strong>of</strong> machining zone were ensured. Table1 shows the values <strong>of</strong> the hydraulic conditions forboth CLF dosing techniques.Figure 5. MQL device13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 293


Table 1. The values <strong>of</strong> pressures and flowTechnique <strong>of</strong> CLFdosingPressure p[MPa]Flow Q[l/min]Standard flooding 0.3 2MQL 0.3 0.0005penetration cutting force (F p ). For processing <strong>of</strong> themeasured signals LabVIEW s<strong>of</strong>tware package withspecially designed program framework was used.The developed program framework enables datatransmission to s<strong>of</strong>tware package MATLAB.Monitoring and measurement <strong>of</strong> tool wear wasperformed using a tool microscope TMMITOTOYO 510 equipped with high-resolutioncamera (Fig 7). Surface roughness was measuredusing a mobile measuring device MITOTOYOSURFTEST SJ 301. During the experiments a chipformation process was monitored as well.Figure 7. Measuring devices: force data acquisition(left) and tool microscope (right)In the first phase <strong>of</strong> research cutting forces (F c ,F f and Fp) for different combinations <strong>of</strong> inputparameters were measured. At the same time theformed chips were collected, and the shape wasevaluated with the purpose <strong>of</strong> technological framesdefinition (Fig 8).Figure 6. Position <strong>of</strong> conventional flooding (left) andMQL nozzle (right) during the experimentsTechnological parameters varied in theexperiments were as follows: depth <strong>of</strong> cut (a), feed(f) and cutting speed (v c ). Technological parameterswere adjusted to the semi- turning, with the use <strong>of</strong>higher values (Table 2). The total numbers <strong>of</strong>experiments for both dosing techniques were 72.Table 2. The levels <strong>of</strong> technological parametersParameterCutting deptha [mm]The levels <strong>of</strong> variation1 2 3 41.5 2.0 2.5 -Feed s [mm/rev] 0.224 0.280 0.355 0.400Cuuting speed v c[m/min]210 310 400 -KISTLER dynamometer was used to measurethree cutting force components in turning: maincutting forces (F c ), feed cutting forces (F f ) andFigure 8. Data flow in measuring and monitoringIn the second phase <strong>of</strong> the experimental teststool wear was measured, as follows: the values <strong>of</strong>concentrated wear (VB), tool wear on tool clearanceface (VB') and the size <strong>of</strong> the crater on the rake face(b w ). Due to wear <strong>of</strong> tools values <strong>of</strong> surfaceroughness were measured, as follows: mean values<strong>of</strong> roughness (R a ) and maximum height <strong>of</strong>roughness (R y ).294 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


3. ANALYSIS OF RESULTSThe results <strong>of</strong> experimental investigations whichconcerning the values <strong>of</strong> machinability parameters:cutting resistances, shape <strong>of</strong> chip, tool wear andsurface roughness is shown. Modelling wasperformed using regression analysis and artificialneural networks (ANN).From the analysis <strong>of</strong> the cutting forcescomponents (Fig. 9, 10 and 11) in case <strong>of</strong>conventional CLF dosing application, it can beconcluded that the value <strong>of</strong> the cutting forcescomponents increase with increasing feed anddepth <strong>of</strong> cut. When MQL technology is applied, thevalues <strong>of</strong> cutting forces increase with feed anddepth <strong>of</strong> cut as well. The values <strong>of</strong> forcecomponents F f and F p were smaller than the values<strong>of</strong> F c component for both dosing techniques, whichis consistent with the theoretical assumptions.Penetration cutting forces F p and feed cuttingforces in MQL technique are greater thanconventional technique <strong>of</strong> CLF dosing.Figure 11. Values <strong>of</strong> penetration cutting forceOne <strong>of</strong> the main indirect indicators <strong>of</strong> themachining process condition is chips shape. Basedon chip shapes the following features can bedetermined: tool wear, surface roughness, theamount <strong>of</strong> generated heat and related phenomena.Conclusions based on chip shape were adopted onthe basis <strong>of</strong> recommendations from the literature [1,2, 3].Table 3. Chip shape during machining with conventionalfloodingDepth a [mm]Cuuting speed v c[m/min]Feed f [mm/rev]0.224 0.280 0.4001.5Figure 9. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the mean value <strong>of</strong> components<strong>of</strong> cutting force for both dosing techniques2.02102.5Figure 10. Values <strong>of</strong> feed cutting forcesIn table 3 forms <strong>of</strong> chips obtained whenmachining steel C45E while using conventionaltechnique <strong>of</strong> CLF dosing are shown. Based onanalysis <strong>of</strong> chip shapes it can be concluded thatmachining with lower feed rates (f = 0.224 mm/rev)and greater depths (a = 2.5 mm), creates anunfavourable chip shape. However, for the sameparameters, in conditions with higher speeds, itforms more favourable chips shape.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 295


Table 4. Chip shape during processing with MQLtechniqueDepth a [mm]1.52.02.5Cuuting speedv c [m/min]210Feed f [mm/rev]0.224 0.280 0.400Some chip shapes during machining <strong>of</strong> the samesteel C45E, with the same tool, using MQLtechnique are shown in Table 4. Chips are dark,which indicates that in the machining area a largeramount <strong>of</strong> heat is generated and dissipated throughthe chips. It can be concluded that MQL techniqueprovides good effects <strong>of</strong> lubrication, but the badeffects <strong>of</strong> cooling the machining zone. Based on achip shape, it can be concluded that the use <strong>of</strong> MQLtechnique provide favourable shapes <strong>of</strong> chip for allanalyzed machining conditions.The technological areas for both techniques <strong>of</strong>lubrication and different depths <strong>of</strong> cut are shown infigures 12 and 13. They are based on the assessedchip suitability. From the analysis <strong>of</strong> thetechnological areas, it can be concluded that MQLtechnique <strong>of</strong>fers a wider field <strong>of</strong> machining.Previous studies have shown that differenttechniques <strong>of</strong> lubrication have a great impact on thewear <strong>of</strong> tools as well. In our study the measuredparameters <strong>of</strong> tool wear were as follows: concentricwear (VB) and wear on the secondary surface <strong>of</strong>tool (VB'), and crater wear - see table 5 and 6. Thisparameters has direct impact on the machiningprocess, and thus on the machinability. Criterion <strong>of</strong>tool wear was VB = 0.3 mm. Tool life in the case <strong>of</strong>MQL technique was for about 33% longer (see Fig.14). The parameters <strong>of</strong> the surface roughness -mean height <strong>of</strong> roughness (Ra) and maximumroughness (Ry) were measured depending on themachining time. As regimes for machining themean values <strong>of</strong> the obtained technological areashave been adopted: a = 2.0 mm and f =0.280 mm/rev, cutting speed v c = 320 m/min(Figure 14 and 15).Table 5. Tool wear during machining with conventionalCLF dosingTime T [min]Machining lenghtL c [m]0.93 2723.75 1286Secondary rakeTool wear on tool facePrimaryrakeClerance7.23 2080Figure 12. Technological areas for depth a = 1.5 mmFigure 13. Technological areas for depth a = 2.5 mmFigure 14. Comparative diagram <strong>of</strong> tool wear fordifferent techniques <strong>of</strong> CLF dosing296 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 15. Surface roughness regarding the tool wear inmachining with conventional CLF dosingFigure 15 shows that tool wear take affects onthe surface roughness parameters R a and R y .Roughness is influential parameter in assessing themachinability, and in the flooding conditions <strong>of</strong>machining, and this parameter was increased fromthe initial 14 μm to 18 μm at the time when toolwear achieved criterion 0.3 mm. Tool life for thegiven machining conditions was T = 7.23 min.Table 6. Tool wear during machining using MQLtechniqueFigure 16. Changes <strong>of</strong> parameters Ra and Ry, dependingon the tool wear in machining with MQL techniqueThe increase <strong>of</strong> R a the parameter value duringmachining with MQL technique is shown in Fig.16. It can be seen, that due to a higher percentage <strong>of</strong>heat generated during processing the value <strong>of</strong>parameter R y is higher when machining with MQLtechnique than in conventional lubrication.Time T [min]Machininglenght L c [m]SecondaryrakeTool wear on tool facePrimary rakeClerance1.10 3395.92 1952Figure 17. Values <strong>of</strong> tool life for different lubricationtechniques9.65 3163In Table 6 the values <strong>of</strong> the tool wear parametersduring machining with MQL technique <strong>of</strong>lubrication is shown. The regime a = 2.0 mm, f =0280 mm/rev, v c = 320 m/min was applied. In thiscase, it can be concluded that the tool insertenveloped with a thin layer <strong>of</strong> emulsion, which isnot the case with conventional CLF dosing. Toolachieved full damage at T = 9.65 min. The highervalue <strong>of</strong> tool life with MQL technique compared toconventional flooding is the result <strong>of</strong> a thin filmthat completely covered the tool insert surface(Figure 17).Figure 18. Values <strong>of</strong> surface roughness parameters fordifferent lubrication techniques13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 297


Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> results 1n the figures 17and 18 indicates that the MQL technique providesbetter results in aspect <strong>of</strong> tool wear and tool life, butslightly worse results in aspect <strong>of</strong> the surfacequality as consequence <strong>of</strong> thermodynamicprocesses in the cutting zone.4. MODELING OF RESULTSExamination <strong>of</strong> the experimental results wasperformed by multiple regression analysis. (see Fig.19). The output values from the regression modelshowed a significant correlation with theexperimentally measured values. The averagerelative error <strong>of</strong> the regression models does notexceed 5%. The models presented in the form <strong>of</strong>regression equations can be used with highaccuracy <strong>of</strong> prediction. The models <strong>of</strong> main cuttingforce (F c ) have errors less than 2%, while the mainsquare errors for models <strong>of</strong> forces (F f ) and (F p ) arehigher. This corresponds to the theoreticalassumptions <strong>of</strong> cutting parameters behaviour in thecase <strong>of</strong> machining <strong>of</strong> steel C45E.the main cutting force and resultant cutting force.Cutting speed and feed have a great influence onthe force (F f ) and (F p ), and the resultant forces(F f,p ), especially during machining with MQLtechnique. It can be concluded that the increase <strong>of</strong>feed and depth <strong>of</strong> cut increases the value <strong>of</strong> thecomponents <strong>of</strong> the cutting force. Increasing cuttingspeed reduces the values <strong>of</strong> cutting force becausethere is no negative phenomenon, such as the burrson the tool edge.Table 7. Models <strong>of</strong> cutting forces with coefficients <strong>of</strong>machiningMaterial: C45ETool: SNMG 1204 08 NXMCollerationcoefficientRelative error (%)F c = 2485 · a 0.878 · f 0.844 · v -0.047 · K 1 0.99 1.9F f = 1154 · a 0.838 · f 0.391 · v -0.157 · K 2 0.93 3.9F p = 822 · a 0.589 · f 0.644 · v -0.052 · K 3 0.93 3.7Techniques K 1 K 2 K ‚3Conventional 1 1 1MQL 0.99 0.96 1.02Figure 19. Comparison <strong>of</strong> outputs regression model withexperimental resultsThe biggest errors is expected in the predictivemodels <strong>of</strong> forces (F f ) and (F p ) in machining withMQL technique; 4.93% and 4.44% respectively. Inaddition to modelling the <strong>of</strong> cutting forcecomponents, also a resultant force F f,p , which is aresultant <strong>of</strong> (F p ) and (F f ) was modelled. Theseresultant forces have a higher value than the maincutting force. The resultant force (F f,p ) is a mainindicator <strong>of</strong> tool wear, and with its growth usuallyintensive tool wear occurs.Analyzing the models, and their correspondingexponents (Figure 19 and Table 7), it can beconcluded that the depth <strong>of</strong> cut has the highest,while the cutting speed has the least influence onModelling <strong>of</strong> cutting force for differenttechniques <strong>of</strong> CLF dosing using regression analysiswas done. The developed models are presented inTable 7, where the influential factors representedby the corresponding coefficient Ki. Developedregression models have error less than 4%, whichindicates the high accuracy <strong>of</strong> the model. Theapplying MQL technique reduces the energyconsumption compared to the conventionallubrication technique. MQL technique should befavoured in highly productive processes.Often, multiple regression analysis is notsuitable for the modelling <strong>of</strong> complex processes,which depends on a many number <strong>of</strong> factors. Formodelling <strong>of</strong> such processes a large number <strong>of</strong>experimental data are needed. In our study ANNtechnique was applied. For this technique a specialmodule Neural Toolbox in the s<strong>of</strong>tware packageMATLAB, is used. Modelling with ANN wasconducted using a model <strong>of</strong> two-layer neuralnetwork with forward propagation.298 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


From the analysis <strong>of</strong> the diagram it can beconcluded that the output values <strong>of</strong> both types <strong>of</strong>model correspond to experimental values. Meanrelative error <strong>of</strong> predicted values for forces F c , F fand F p in the model based on ANN is 1.01%,2.24% and 1.71% respectively, while for regressionmodel error is 1.85%, 3.55% and 2.92%respectively.Figure 20. Output values <strong>of</strong> the main cutting force fromregression model and ANN modelFigure 21. Output values <strong>of</strong> the feed cutting force fromregression model and ANN modelFigures 20, 21 and 22 give the measured andpredicted values for all cutting forces respectively.The results <strong>of</strong> predicting with the model based onANN show that the developed models can be usedfor modelling the cutting force, although the set <strong>of</strong>learning, validation and testing include a relativelysmall number <strong>of</strong> combinations <strong>of</strong> input and outputvalues. In order to analyse the accuracy <strong>of</strong> themultiple regression model the output values <strong>of</strong> themodel are also shown on the same chart (Table 7).Figure 23. Modelled curves <strong>of</strong> tool wear for differentlubrication technique in machining steel C45EModelling <strong>of</strong> tool wear was performed with athird order polynomial function. It can beconcluded from Fig. 23 that matching <strong>of</strong> outputvalues <strong>of</strong> model with the experimental values isexcellent.The parameters <strong>of</strong> the surface roughness R a andR y were modelled with linear function dependingon the machining times and depending on the toolwear using regression analysis.Table 8. Models <strong>of</strong> surface roughness in dependence <strong>of</strong>tool wear for different lubrication techniquesMaterial: C45E; a = 2.0 mm; vc = 320 m/minTool: SNMG 1204 08 NXMConv.MQLR y = 15.15 · VB + 1.45 + (f 2 · 10 3 / (8 · r))R y = 30.50 · VB + 1.18 + (f 2 · 10 3 / (8 · r))Figure 22. Output values <strong>of</strong> the penetration cutting forcefrom regression model and ANN model13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 299


where is I i machinability index <strong>of</strong> i-th material, p iparameter value accepted for machinabilityevaluation <strong>of</strong> i-th material, p r parameter valueaccepted for machinability evaluation <strong>of</strong> referentmaterial.Figure 24. Models <strong>of</strong> parameters roughness for theconventional technique <strong>of</strong> CLF dosingFigure 26. Values <strong>of</strong> machinability index based onenergy aspectFigure 25. Models <strong>of</strong> parameters roughness for theMQL techniqueIf the analysis is carried out from the aspect <strong>of</strong>materials machinability, R y is a more relevantfactor than R a , because parameter R y indirectindicator <strong>of</strong> process condition and a direct indicator<strong>of</strong> quality as well (Fig. 24 and 25). R y models basedon regression analysis are presented in the form <strong>of</strong>the function <strong>of</strong> tool wear VB, feed f and the radius<strong>of</strong> the tool tip r for both CLF dosing techniques.The second part <strong>of</strong> this function is taken from theknown empirical expression for the theoretical level<strong>of</strong> roughness.Comparison <strong>of</strong> material machinability was madefor both lubrication techniques under consideration.Machinability index <strong>of</strong> i-th material in regard toreferent material is defined as:±( p / p ) 1 ⋅100%I =(1)iirFigure 27. Values <strong>of</strong> machinability index based on thetool life aspectFigure 28. Values <strong>of</strong> machinability index based onsurface roughness aspectExponent <strong>of</strong> ratio p i /p r has value <strong>of</strong> +1 in casethat increase <strong>of</strong> chosen parameter has positiveeffect on machining process development;otherwise it is a -1 if effect is negative. Results <strong>of</strong>300 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


comparison from economic, energy consumptionaspect and the aspect <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> machining arepresented in figures 26, 27 and 28.5. CONCLUSIONMachinability is very important category in theindustry. Based on experimental research and usingthe novel model, machinability <strong>of</strong> different coolinglubrication techniques can be concluded. Cuttingforces, intensity <strong>of</strong> tool wear and surface roughnesswere used as the machinability criteria. Analysisshows that turning with MQL is a good alternativefor conventional lubrication. It is important for cost<strong>of</strong> machining and for ecology as well.Future research will be performed in area <strong>of</strong> lowcost technologies, high productive and hybridmachining processes.REFERENCES[1] W. Grzesik: Advanced machining processes <strong>of</strong>metallic materials: theory, modelling andapplication, Elsevier B. V., Netherland, 2008.[2] L.G. Globočki: Metal cutting: theory, modelling andsimulation, (in Serbian), Faculty <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering , Banja Luka, BiH, 2010.[3] J. Kopač: Cutting forces and their influence on theeconomics <strong>of</strong> machining. Journal <strong>of</strong> MechanicalEngineering, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 121-132, 2002[4] F. Klocke, G. Eisenblatter: Dry cutting – state <strong>of</strong>research, VDI berichte, No. 1399, 1998.[5] V.N. Gaitondea, S.R. Karnik, P. Davim: Selection <strong>of</strong>optimal MQL and cutting conditions for enhancingmachinability in turning <strong>of</strong> brass, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 204, pp 459–464, 2008.[6] N.R. Dhar, M.T. Ahmed, S. Islam: An experimentalinvestigation on effect <strong>of</strong> minimum quantitylubrication in machining AISI 1040 steel, Inter.Journal <strong>of</strong> Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 47,pp. 748–753, 2007.[7] K. Weinert, I. Inasaki, J.W. Sutherland, T.Wakabayashi: Dry machining and minimumquantity lubrication, CIRP Annals - ManufacturingTechnology, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 511 - 537, 2004.[8] B. Sredanović: Developed <strong>of</strong> model for universalmaterial machinability defining based on cuttingprocess parameters, MSc thesis, Faculty <strong>of</strong>Mechanical Engineering, (in Serbian), Banja Luka,BiH, 2012.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 301


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL ASPECT OF RUBBER BASED PARTS USED INENGINEERINGDušan Stamenković 1 , Milan Nikolić 1 , Miloš Milošević 1Milan Banić 1 , Aleksandar Miltenović 1 , Miroslav Mijajlović 11 University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering in Niš, Serbiadusans@masfak.ni.ac.rs, milan.nikolic.nis@gmail.com, mmilos@masfak.ni.ac.rs, milan.banic@outlook.com,amiltenovic@yahoo.com, mijajlom@masfak.ni.ac.rsAbstract: In most <strong>of</strong> the cases, the friction is considered as a negative side-effect concerning energyloss following every process <strong>of</strong> the power transmission. However, the friction has significantpositive side effects, because it is an indispensable prerequisite for the movement <strong>of</strong> people,machines, transportation means and others. Efficiency <strong>of</strong> these movements mostly depends on thefriction between rubber and different materials such as metals, concrete, earth, wood, plastic, etc.Certain standards relating to measurement and determination <strong>of</strong> the friction characteristics <strong>of</strong>rubber were established. However considering that tribology <strong>of</strong> the rubber is very complexproblem, numerous studies around the world are conducted. This paper gives an overview <strong>of</strong> some<strong>of</strong> the existing standards and conducted researches in this area. The paper also provides anoverview <strong>of</strong> theoretical and experimental studies <strong>of</strong> friction the rubber and the other materials,which are done at Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering in Niš.Keywords: coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction, rubber, tribology, slip resistance, standards.1. INTRODUCTIONMovement can be realized only and merely bythe friction, but during a motion, frictionpermanently causes different kinds <strong>of</strong> losses(energy dissipation, mass loss, movement loss).Therefore, friction is the process where positive andnegative effects manifest both. In a certainsituation, a large friction force is required, but inother situation small friction force is required.Because <strong>of</strong> that, understanding the tribologicalinteractions between the shoe and the floormaterials is important in order to enhance shoe andfloor design and to prevent slip and fall accidentsduring walking.Since the coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction measurementswere commonly adopted to evaluate slip potentials,it has been found that there were controversies inthe interpretation <strong>of</strong> measurement results. The study[1] was principally focused on broadening theknowledge base and developing new ideas onwhich improvements in the validity and reliability<strong>of</strong> slip resistance measurements might be made. Toachieve this goal, crucial problems on the currentconcept <strong>of</strong> slip resistance measurement wereextensively analysed by a tribological point <strong>of</strong> viewwhere principle <strong>of</strong> understanding the shoe-floorfriction and wear phenomena could be made. Basedon this approach, new theoretical models weresuggested in paper [1].This study discussed the limitations <strong>of</strong> presentconcept on slip resistance measurements andanalysed the seriousness <strong>of</strong> misinterpretations onslip resistance properties that were mainly causedby over-simplified conceptions on frictionphenomena between the shoe heels and floorsurfaces. Based on those critical analyses, a newparadigm on friction and wear phenomena betweenthe shoes and floors was proposed for the futureresearches on the slip resistance measurements.On the basis <strong>of</strong> totality <strong>of</strong> the experimental andthe simulation results as well as concepts somerecommendations for dealing with the tribology <strong>of</strong>polymer-based composites – in instruction as wellas industrial and research setting – are made in thepaper [2].302 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> traditional andmodern approaches <strong>of</strong> surface analysis based onconcepts <strong>of</strong> roughness and texture are discussed inthe paper [3]. Authors considered that traditionalconcept <strong>of</strong> rough surface based mainly on pr<strong>of</strong>ileparameters is not fully satisfied modern trends intribology. This paper presents a review <strong>of</strong> theproblems <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces analysis in theirevolution from statistical height and stepparameters <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles to dimensionless and scaleinvariant representation <strong>of</strong> surface texture. Theyconcluded that texture analysis can be efficientlyapplied for solving practical tribological problemsin micro/nanoscale.Paper [4] presents a study on the surface qualitypointing out the influence <strong>of</strong> relative sliding on thetopography parameters. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> thesurface topography, obtained by changing a singleparameter during the tests, may reveal at least aqualitative influence <strong>of</strong> this parameter that could beuseful for practicians.The authors in paper [5] investigated theboundary friction model, which is built up by thesurface topography. The model contained the effect<strong>of</strong> boundary film, adhesion, plough and lubrication.Based on the model, a coefficient for weakeningplough for the lubrication was proposed. Themodified model could fit for the working condition<strong>of</strong> wet friction elements.In the paper [6] authors indicate that staticfriction is necessary for vehicle starting and runningand show comparative information <strong>of</strong> static frictionexperiment <strong>of</strong> prismatic steel samples slip andtribology studies <strong>of</strong> the wheel-rail contact.The new friction coefficient calculationprocedure based on the Molecular-mechanicaltheory <strong>of</strong> friction is proposed in the paper [7]. Thisprocedure considers roughness parameters andhardness <strong>of</strong> contact surfaces, as well as therelationship between the deformation component <strong>of</strong>the static friction coefficient and the total staticfriction coefficient determined experimentally forspecific tribological conditions. Studied tribologicalconditions in the research are related to the press fitjoints <strong>of</strong> railway vehicles drive unit components.The proposed model considers experimentalresearch <strong>of</strong> tribomechanical pairs at which plasticdeformations exist in the real area <strong>of</strong> contact.A review <strong>of</strong> standards and methods <strong>of</strong> slipresistance measuring provided by flooring andfootwear suppliers in United Kingdom is presentedin paper [8]. It can be seen that a lot <strong>of</strong> suppliersdidn’t specify date about the slip resistance <strong>of</strong> theirproducts.The lack <strong>of</strong> international standards for the slipresistance <strong>of</strong> ceramic tiles is stated in the paper [9].The paper considers recent and current potentialdevelopments in the international standardization <strong>of</strong>slip resistance. It identifies some limitations <strong>of</strong> wetbarefoot ramp test, and suggests that changesshould be made.The paper [10] researches the friction betweenrubber and metal which can significantly influencesdamping characteristics <strong>of</strong> the rubber-metal springs.In the framework <strong>of</strong> the experimental research thathas being conducted the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the staticfriction between the rubber and metal has beenestablished in different contact conditions.Moreover, compressions <strong>of</strong> rubber-metal springsare also performed and force-deflection diagramsare recorded. In this way, the mutual influence <strong>of</strong>the static friction between the rubber and the metalpad and the accumulated/absorbed energy within arubber-metal spring is analyzed.Tribological approach <strong>of</strong> the contact footwearflooris the subject <strong>of</strong> research that has started atFaculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering in Niš.Experimental research <strong>of</strong> static friction <strong>of</strong> footwearrubber samples and different types <strong>of</strong> floormaterials is presented in this paper.2. STATIC FRICTIONIn order to achieve vehicle wheel turning on theroad, it is necessary to have the drive torque as wellas a force <strong>of</strong> resistance in the wheel-road contact.Similarly, in order to make walking on the floorpossible, a drive force delivered by the legs and aforce <strong>of</strong> resistance in the footwear-floor contact areneeded. This resistance is the static force <strong>of</strong> slidingfriction. So, wheel rolling is achieved through thestatic friction force <strong>of</strong> sliding. Likewise, pedestriancan walk with the help <strong>of</strong> static friction force.Friction represents a resisting force that opposesrelative motion <strong>of</strong> bodies’ surfaces that are incontact. According to the state <strong>of</strong> moving, i. e. tothe resultant tangential force that induces movingthere are two types <strong>of</strong> friction. The static friction orthe stationary state friction that exists when theresultant tangential force is lower than thesummation <strong>of</strong> all resistances that oppose movingand the kinetic friction or the moving state frictionwhen the force that induces moving is greater thanthe summation <strong>of</strong> resistant forcesThe diagram F(s) in Fig. 1 shows that the forceincreases from the point O to the point A, where themaximal value <strong>of</strong> the force is achieved. That is thestatic friction force (Fs). The static friction forcerepresents a maximal tangential resistant force thatacts during so called boundary relativedisplacement. Boundary displacement (preslidingmovement) can be defined as a micro moving <strong>of</strong>frictional surfaces that goes before visible or macromoving <strong>of</strong> surfaces in mutual contact (the part OA13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 303


<strong>of</strong> the graphic in Fig. 1). Futhermore, preslidingmovement represents a limit up to which the staticfriction lows between frictional surfaces are valid.After this limit the kinetic friction lows are inaction. Therefore, the presliding movement is aperiod <strong>of</strong> relative movement characterized by anextensive increase <strong>of</strong> the reactive force and a smallincrease <strong>of</strong> movement. Press fit joints, screw andrivet connections, all types <strong>of</strong> friction transmitters(variators, belt transmitters, couplers), parkingbrakes etc. work in the mode <strong>of</strong> preslidingmovement.It can be seen that the force retains the value <strong>of</strong>the static friction force (Fs) for a short time periodand then decreases to the value <strong>of</strong> the kineticfriction force (Fk). This process is followed by anintensive increase <strong>of</strong> movement.There are the following influencing factors: floor,contamination, footwear, pedestrian factors,cleaning and environment.Footwear suppliers use a variety <strong>of</strong> terms todescribe their products, as like as ‘slip-resistant’,‘anti-slip’, ‘improving grip performance’ etc. andthese can <strong>of</strong>ten mislead customers. Slip-resistantindustrial footwear will normally have been testedaccording to European standards, but manymanufacturers and suppliers do not give helpfuladditional information, such as the degree <strong>of</strong> slipresistance and the types <strong>of</strong> work environment forwhich their products are most suited.The aim <strong>of</strong> the HSE’s project [8] was to collect andassess the slips safety information/literature providedby flooring and footwear suppliers in 2008 in GreatBritain. A significant proportion <strong>of</strong> flooring products(55%) did not make any reference to slip resistance orprovide any test data. No indication <strong>of</strong> slip resistancewas given for 47% <strong>of</strong> footwear products.F k – Kinetic friction forceF s – Static friction forceΔs - Presliding movementFigure 1. Static and kinetic frictionUnder permanent conditions and even for thesame material the coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction valueis not a constant and may vary in a certain range.The alteration <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient values ismostly stochastic, so one can only speak about themean values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient.Friction coefficient values depend on differentparameters such as: nature and properties <strong>of</strong> theused materials, contact pressure value, thicknessand type <strong>of</strong> surface film, contact surfacesroughness, duration <strong>of</strong> the contact, chemicalinteraction, presence <strong>of</strong> external bodies in thecontact area, cleanness <strong>of</strong> contact surfaces,temperature <strong>of</strong> the surrounding environment,relative humidity, elasticity etc.Figure 2. The pendulum friction coefficient testA review <strong>of</strong> flooring test data showed that 54%was generated using the pendulum test (Fig. 2),33% using the ramp test (Fig. 3), 0.2% usingroughness measurements and 12.8% was generatedusing sled-type test methods, which in the opinion<strong>of</strong> HSE, can provide misleading results incontaminated conditions. The type <strong>of</strong> test used fromfootwear suppliers are: RAMP test 46 %, SATRAtest 40% and HSL RAMP test 14%.3. MEASUREMENT OF SLIP RESISTANCENearly 11,000 workers suffered serious injury asa result <strong>of</strong> a slip in 2007 in Great Britain [8]. A keyelement <strong>of</strong> HSE’s (Health and Safety Executive)work to reduce slips and trips is to raise awareness<strong>of</strong> how slip risks can be controlled through the use<strong>of</strong> suitable flooring and footwear. Research by theHealth and Safety Laboratory has shown that acombination <strong>of</strong> factors contribute to slip accidents.Figure 3. The ramp friction coefficient test304 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The information provided by footwear andflooring manufacturers was not satisfactory. Manyfootwear manufacturers made vague claimssuggesting slip resistance and did not providesupporting data. Many flooring manufacturersavoid making reference to slip resistance altogetherand information is hard to find.Recommendation <strong>of</strong> the HSE project [8] is thatit was apparent that many suppliers did not considerslip resistance to be a selling point and did notplace significant emphasis on it. Currently, it isvery difficult to make comparisons betweenproducts due to the number <strong>of</strong> tests used andspecifications quoted. Where test data is provided,very little explanation is given and the laypersoncould be easily confused or misled. Footwear andflooring suppliers should be influenced to placemore emphasis on the slip resistance <strong>of</strong> theirproducts, and to use more standardized ways <strong>of</strong>assessing slip resistance; this would allowcustomers to make comparisons and help them toselect the most appropriate product for their needs.Slip resistance properties <strong>of</strong> flooring materialsand footwear are covered by various standards inEurope. Some <strong>of</strong> the most common are: BS7976 – British standard that describesthe specification, operation and calibration<strong>of</strong> the Pendulum test, used for assessment<strong>of</strong> floor surface slipperiness under both dryand contaminated conditions. DIN51130 - Laboratory based ramp test,using cleated safety boots and motor oilcontamination. Results are reported as an Rvalue, on a scale from R9 to R13, with R9being the least slip resistant. DIN51097 - Laboratory based ramp test,using barefoot operators with soapy wateras the contaminant. Results are reported asClass A, B or C, with A being the least slipresistant. EN13845 - Laboratory based ramp testspecifically for resilient floor coveringswith enhanced slip resistance. The test usesstandardized footwear and soapy watercontamination.EN13287 - Laboratory based mechanicalslip resistance test for safety / occupationalfootwear. The test uses several surfaces andcontaminants to assess footwear.Because <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> complexity and factorsinvolved, the measured coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionquantities show inconsistencies even as the sameshoe-floor combinations are employed. This facthas been recognized as a great concern whendifferent friction testers, sensors and/or protocolsare used worldwide.However, variations <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionresults under the same test environments have notreceived much attention in this research area.Despite <strong>of</strong> this fact, most slip safety researcheshave reported that a particular shoe or floor surfaceresists the movement <strong>of</strong> a particular floor surface orone’s shoe sole across its surface.4. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF THESTATIC FRICTIONSlip accidents can happen for a number <strong>of</strong>reasons: footwear, flooring, contamination andobstacles, cleaning, human factors, environment,etc. But footwear and flooring are the mostimportant for tribological research.Because <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> many differentstandards and methods for assess the slip resistance,measuring <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient on tribometer inlaboratory condition is very useful.Footwear is produced most from rubber, because<strong>of</strong> its properties. The rubber is elastic, soundpro<strong>of</strong>and it has low gravity density and good tribologicalproperties.Experimental determination <strong>of</strong> the static frictioncoefficient between samples <strong>of</strong> footwear soles andflooring were held on Mechanical Faculty in Niš.Static friction force can be measured only in themoment <strong>of</strong> sliding beginning for the reason that innext moment, after sliding start, this values falls onfriction kinetic force value.Experimental model for establishing staticfriction coefficient, projected for this investigationand which will be used for further investigation, isshown in Fig. 4.Figure 4. Schematic review <strong>of</strong> device formeasuring static friction forceMeasuring process was done so that by theturning the screw skater start sliding and forcesensor fixed on skater pushes sample A (footwearsole sample). Sample A starts to slide on the sampleB that is fixed in the base <strong>of</strong> device and pushingforce is measured. Static friction force isestablished in the moment <strong>of</strong> sliding start.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 305


Measuring system with experimental samples isshown in Figure 5.Figure 5. Measuring systemSamples used in this experimental investigationare with following characteristics: Footwear sole samples (sample A) areprism shaped and formed <strong>of</strong> soles cutoutglued on a piece <strong>of</strong> chipboard. Nominalcontact area is 30mmx30mm=900mm 2 . Forthis investigation there are four solesamples: new rubber with relief, worn(used) rubber with texture, new flat rubberand leather. For floor samples (sample B) are usedplates <strong>of</strong> laminate, rough ceramic tile andsmooth ceramic tile. Dimensions <strong>of</strong> platesare 60mmx75mm according the measuringdevice.Before testing all contact surfaces are cleanedwith acetone.Floor samples surface roughness was measured byroughness measuring device Mitutoyo Surftest SJ-301. Roughness measuring gave the following results:1. Laminate plate: Ra=0,9µm, R max =4,98µm,R z =3,25µm,2. Rough ceramic tile: Ra=12,85µm,R max =59,04µm, R z =43,93µm,3. Smooth ceramic tile: Ra=0,53µm,R max =3,44µm, R z =2,24µm.Measurements are done with weight (normalforce) variations so that contact pressure was:45kPa, 79kPa and 142kPa.Force sensor is produced by HBM, maximumforce which can be measured is 500N and samplerate is 100Hz. For each contact combination fivemeasuring were done.Contact surfaces are prepared in three ways: drycondition, wet condition and soap lubricated.Tables 1, 2 and 3 show measuring results forstatic friction coefficient for different materialcombination and lubricating. Marks in the tablesare: U1-new rubber with relief, U2-worn rubberwith texture, U3-new flat rubber, U4-leather, P1-laminate plate, P2-rough ceramic tile and P3-smooth ceramic tile.Table 1. Static friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> footwear solesamples and laminate floor sample (P1)µ U1/P1 U2/P1 U3/P1 U4/P1dry 0,54 0,83 0,96 0,52wet 0,39 0,66 0,67 0,65soap 0,43 0,60 0,46 0,70Table 2. Static friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> footwear solesamples and rough ceramic tile sample (P2)µ U1/P2 U2/P2 U3/P2 U4/P2dry 0,52 0,47 0,54 0,63wet 0,46 0,40 0,58 0,79soap 0,38 0,54 0,39 0,77Table 3. Static friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> footwear samplessole and smooth ceramic tile sample (P3)µ U1/P3 U2/P3 U3/P3 U4/P3dry 0,25 0,69 0,44 0,47wet 0,19 0,53 0,42 0,52soap 0,11 0,22 0,13 0,50Performed experiment shows that values <strong>of</strong> staticfriction coefficient are very unpredictable and random.Static friction coefficient <strong>of</strong> leather sample (U4) withpresence <strong>of</strong> lubricants (water, soap) increases that isopposed <strong>of</strong> rubber samples with lubricants wherecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction decreases. Very interesting resultswere in combination <strong>of</strong> rubber sample with relief (U4)and smooth ceramic tile, respectively measured staticfriction coefficient is very small (0,25 in dry conditionuntil 0,11 lubricated with soap). That can be explainedwith small real contact area. Also, it can be concludethat for smooth ceramic tile coefficient <strong>of</strong> static frictionis smallest for each sample.Force (N)65605550454035302520151050Experimental test U3P3M3s5 5,2 5,4 5,6 5,8 6 6,2 6,4 6,6 6,8 7Time (s)Figure 6. Friction force-time diagram for flat rubber andsmooth ceramic tile (normal load 131N, dry condition)Force (N)Experimental test U4P3M2v40353025201510501,5 1,7 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,5 2,7 2,9 3,1 3,3 3,5Time (s)Figure 7. Friction force-time diagram for leather andsmooth ceramic tile (normal load 72,28N, wet condition)306 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Force (N)5,554,543,532,521,510,50Experimental test U1P3M1sa3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7 3,8 3,9 4 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4Time (s)Figure 8. Friction force-time diagram for new rubberwith relief and smooth ceramic tile(normal load 41,82N, soap condition)Figures 6, 7 and 8 give the representativeexamples <strong>of</strong> recorded friction force in performedexperimental investigation.On the presented diagrams can be seen staticand kinetic friction force when footwear solesamples slides over floor samples. Vertical axisrepresents force in Newtons and horizontal axistime in seconds. Diagrams show that friction forceincreases from zero value to the maximum valuethat is static friction force, and then falls to thekinetic friction force.5. CONCLUSIONSDue to the lack <strong>of</strong> static friction force in contactfootwear-floor is <strong>of</strong>ten the reason for falls andinjuries it is necessary to pay more attention infootwear and floor production in part <strong>of</strong> tribologicalproperties. Certain standards about the slipresistance assessing are established in EU. Up tonow in Serbia there isn’t enough pr<strong>of</strong>essionalinterest for this area, and it is left to the producers<strong>of</strong> footwear and floor.Because <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> many differentstandards and methods for assess the slip resistance,measuring <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient on tribometer inlaboratory condition is very useful.According the importance <strong>of</strong> this problem andexperience in earlier studies in the field <strong>of</strong> staticfriction, at Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering inNiš is initiated research with the aim to determinetribological properties <strong>of</strong> rubber produces asfootwear.In that sense measurement <strong>of</strong> static frictioncoefficient between footwear sole and floorsamples was performed. For that purpose it wasdesigned measuring device for static frictionestimation. Measuring results show that staticfriction coefficient is stochastic and unpredictable.In further investigation it is necessary toimprove measuring system and include moresamples. Some samples should be industrial shoesand floors, tiles on public walkways, white stripeson pedestrian crosses the street and material otherrisky points where falls and accidents can happen.REFERENCES[1] I.J. Kim, H. Nagata: Research on Slip ResistanceMeasurements — A New Challenge, IndustrialHealth 46, pp.66–76, 2008.[2] W. Brostow, V. Kovačević, D. Vrsaljko, J.Whitworth: Tribology <strong>of</strong> polymers and polymerbasedcomposites; Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials Education32, pp. 273 – 290, 2010.[3] N. K. Myshkin, A.Ya. Grigoriev: Roughness andTexture Concepts in Tribology; Tribology inIndustry Vol. 35, No. 2; p.p. 97‐103; 2013.[4] N. Diaconu, L. Deleanu, F. Potecasu, S. Ciortan:The Influence <strong>of</strong> the Relative Sliding on the SurfaceQuality; Tribology in industry, Volume 33, No. 3,p.p.110-115; 2011.[5] W. Yanzhong , W. Bin , W. Xiangyu: Wet Friction-Elements Boundary Friction Mechanism andFriction Coefficient Prediction; Tribology inIndustry Vol. 34, No. 4; p.p. 198-205; 2012.[6] M. Đurđanović, D.Stamenković: Static frictioncauses movement, SERBIATRIB ’07 – 10 thInternational Conference on Tribology, p.p.. 215-218, Kragujevac 2007.[7] D. Stamenković, M. Milošević, M. Mijajlović,M. Banić: Estimation <strong>of</strong> the static friction coefficientfor press fit joints; Journal <strong>of</strong> the BalkanTribological Association 17, pp. 341-355, 2011.[8] M. Liddle: Assessment <strong>of</strong> slips safety information/literature provided by flooring and footwearsuppliers, RR747 Research Report, Health andSafety Executive, 2009.[9] R. Bowman: Slip resistance testing - Zones <strong>of</strong>uncertainty, Bol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. 49, pp.227-238,2010.[10] D. Stamenković, M. Milošević: Friction at rubbermetalspring, SERBIATRIB ’09 – 11 th InternationalConference on Tribology, pp. 215-219, Beograd2009.[11] HSE: Assessing the slip resistance <strong>of</strong> flooring, Atechnical information sheet published by the Healthand Safety Executive, 2012.[12] D. Stamenković, M. Milošević: Experimentalinvestigation <strong>of</strong> Static Friction, InternationalConference ''POWER TRANSMISSIONS '03''Section III "Experimental Investigations andApplications", pp. 67-69.Varna Bulgaria, 2003.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 307


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPOSSIBILITY OF REPLACING THE CHORINATED PARAFFINSIN METALWORKING FLUIDSMarica Dugić 1 , Branka Kojić 1 , Pero Dugić 1 , Goran Dugić 11 Oil Refinery Modriča, Bosnia and Herzegovinamajad@modricaoil.com, branka@modricaoil.com, pero@modricaoil.com, gdugic@modricaoil.comAbstract: All components that are used for neat oil formulations for metalworking operations belong togroup <strong>of</strong> chemicals that, because <strong>of</strong> its direct application, can have a big influence on the environment andespecially on human health.With time, metalworking operations become more complex and demanding. New materials with variouscompositions are processed, and they demand metalworking fluids with improved antiwear properties andthat provide extreme load-carrying capabilities.Exactly these additions, known as EP additives, that had been until recently based on chlorinated paraffins,are a group <strong>of</strong> chemicals that need to be replaced as soon as possible with a components that areenvironmentally acceptable.In this paper, in laboratory conditions, we investigated synthetic polymeric esters, as one <strong>of</strong> the possiblesubstitute for chlorinated paraffins, in several neat oil formulations, which are used for variousmetalworking operations. From the above comparative results <strong>of</strong> analysis results it can be concluded thatsynthetic polymeric esters can serve like an adequate substitute for metalworking fluids which are designedfor easy operations.Keywords: neat metalworking oil, environmentally acceptable lubricants, EP additives, chlorinatedparaffins, synthetic polymeric esters.1. INTRODUCTIONFormulation <strong>of</strong> industrial lubricants, depending<strong>of</strong> performance that lubricants must have, requires alot <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> additives. Their role in thelubricants is to improve certain characterisics <strong>of</strong>lubricant or to give the lubricant brand newperformance. Usual types <strong>of</strong> additives are:corrosion and oxidation inhibitor, antifoaming,viscosity index modifier, pour point depressant,antifriction and antiwear additive and additives thatallow carrying heavy loads, usually called EPadditives.That large number <strong>of</strong> additives in particularlubricants formulation lead to a questions not onlyabout the effect <strong>of</strong> additives in the lubricants, butalso the influence <strong>of</strong> one additive to the another.Complex testing <strong>of</strong> antagonism and synergism<strong>of</strong> all components on particular characteristics indifferent lubricant formulations are being made. Itcan sometimes induce a big problem, especially inrecent times, when many components, due tounfavorable effect on humans and environment, arebeing completely banned for usage in lubricants, ortheir allowed dosage is greatly reduced.Research <strong>of</strong> new environmentally acceptablecomponents and their influence in the lubricant hasstarted many laboratory tests and in the same timetests <strong>of</strong> their applications in service.Analyzing the results <strong>of</strong> one survey, which theeditorial <strong>of</strong> scientific magazine Tribology &Lubrication Technology made, on the question atwhich additive has the most influence onperformance characteristics <strong>of</strong> lubricants, showedthat the answer was EP additives. [1]The subject <strong>of</strong> investigation in this paper istesting the antiwear and EP characteristics <strong>of</strong>different formulations <strong>of</strong> neat oil for metalworkingoperations, which in its composition have EPadditives. Exactly this extras, known as EP308 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


additives, that had been, until recently, based onchlorinated paraffins are a group <strong>of</strong> chemicals thatneeds to be replaced as soon as possible withcomponents that are environmentally acceptable.In this paper, in laboratory conditions areprepared samples <strong>of</strong> several different formulation<strong>of</strong> neat oil which are intended for differentmetalworking operations. Among the otherstandard characteristics, are also tested antiwearand EP characteristics <strong>of</strong> samples containingsynthetic polymeric esters, as one <strong>of</strong> the possiblereplacement for chlorinated paraffines. The results<strong>of</strong> analysis are compared with the results <strong>of</strong> thesamples that are formulated with chlorinatedparaffins.2. EXTREME PRESSURE (EP) ADDITIVESPrimary functions <strong>of</strong> metalworking fluids areheat control, cooling the surfaces <strong>of</strong> tools and partsprocessed in the cutting zone and lubrication andenduring the extreme pressures and heavy loadingduring processing. It is particularly important inorder to achieve desired size, shape and degree <strong>of</strong>surface processing <strong>of</strong> workpiece, and longer toollifetime. Removal <strong>of</strong> cuttings from operating zoneis considered as secondary role, but it is veryimportant and it needs to be done continually.Corrosion protection <strong>of</strong> tools, machines andworkpieces is also important. Freshly processedmetal have tendency to corrode faster duringmachine operations, than protected metal.For metalworking it isn’t enough to use only onekind <strong>of</strong> lubricant, but every applicable processrequires specially formulated oil. In order toemphasize differences in characteristics <strong>of</strong> certainlubricants, in this case, <strong>of</strong> neat oils, and point outthe complexity <strong>of</strong> choosing the basestocks forformulations, we start with metalworkingprocesses, which are:- Removal (formation <strong>of</strong> cuttings), mostlynamed cutting operations- Shaping: pressing, rolling, drawing...- Treating (surface strengthening): quenching- Protection (corrosion protection: temporarywith interprocess, during transport...)Cutting operations can be considered as the mostcommon in metalworking operations. Basicmethods <strong>of</strong> metalworking cutting are:- Scraping- Planning (during operation it is identical toscraping, but the process is discontinuous- Drilling (beveling, widely considered:drilling, widening, reaming)- Milling (oblique and orthogonal cutting)- Grinding (removal <strong>of</strong> thin layer <strong>of</strong> materialduring the finest final processing)Operations <strong>of</strong> metal forming, such as: pressing,rolling, drawing (wire, pr<strong>of</strong>iles) are also veryused and are considered as demanding.2.1. EP additives and their role in metalworkingfluids for heavy operationsTraditional additive packages that are added toneat metalworking oils in the boundary lubricationregime remain on the metal surfaces and theycannot prevent increased friction, wear and thedamage to the tool. EP additives are needed toenable the application in the more difficultconditions <strong>of</strong> elevated temperatures and pressures.The main groups <strong>of</strong> EP additives are:1. Chlorine compounds2. Phosphorus additives3. Sulphur additives4. Prebasic sulfonates (calcium and sodium)The first three EP additives are activated inreactions with the metal surfaces in a certaintemperature range. Chlorinated additives areactivated at temperatures between 180 i 420 ⁰C,phosphorus are activated at higher temperatures andsulphur at even higher temperature range whichends at 1000 ⁰C. In the reaction with the metalsurface these three types <strong>of</strong> additives produce Fechloride,Fe-phosphide and Fe-sulphide, whichserve as a barrier to reduce friction and wear andelimination <strong>of</strong> welding.The fourth EP additive, prebasic sulfonate, actby other mechanisms, whose process doesn’tdepend on temperature, and operate below 500 o C.In each category <strong>of</strong> EP additives there areseveral different types. The main used chlorinatedadditives are chlorinated paraffin, or even called achlorparaffine. In case <strong>of</strong> phosphorus compounds,the most common type is phosphate ester. Withsuphur additives those are: sulphurated fats,sulphurated esters, sulphurated hydrocarbons andpolysulphide, which differ in the concentration <strong>of</strong>free (active) sulphur.In order to select EP additive in formulations formetalworking fluids, one must be familiar with theapplications itself, machining operations, state <strong>of</strong>the tools and to have defined expectedperformance. One <strong>of</strong> the most importantinformation is the possibility <strong>of</strong> early cancellation<strong>of</strong> tools before the operation has reached the righttemperature for EP additive to become activated.Besides the choice <strong>of</strong> EP additive, it is necessary toknow the synergism with other additives includedin the formulation, and also to reduce undesirableinteractions which can bring to instability <strong>of</strong>product using certain combination (foaming,sludge).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 309


The greatest influence on the formulation <strong>of</strong>neat oils for heavier operations was limiting thechlorine content. For manufacturers <strong>of</strong> thesesubstances it was hard task to find an adequatereplacement in a very short period <strong>of</strong> time.Many studies have been done on the impact <strong>of</strong>chlorinated paraffins on the environment, and itreached its expansion in mid-nineties.Chlorinated paraffines are divided in threeclasses based on the chain lenght:- Short-chain, C 10-13- Medium-chain, C 14-17- Long-chain, C 18-30The most commonly used chlorinated paraffinswere with 35-70 % <strong>of</strong> chlorine and with thehydrocarbon base with C 10-20 .These studies have shown that short-chainchlorinated paraffins have the biggest potential risk<strong>of</strong> influence on the environment especially if theyare not handled properly when they become wastematerial.[2]In summary, therefore, the lists <strong>of</strong> undesirablechemicals in the formulations <strong>of</strong> manymetalworking fluid include one <strong>of</strong> the mostcommonly used EP additives, chlorinated paraffin.Chlorine in lubricants, at elevated temperaturesand pressures reacts with hydrogen, and formshydrogen chloride and dioxine, and dissolvinghydrogen chloride in water forms hydrochloricacid.A special problem brings the impossibility <strong>of</strong>rerafination <strong>of</strong> used products that contain chlorine,since chlorine acts a catalityc poison. If thisproducts are burned, incomplete combustion als<strong>of</strong>orms hydrochloric acid, which comes inenvironmentally round cycle and leads to increasedenvironmental pollution. [3]3. EXPERIMENTAL PARTBecause <strong>of</strong> all findings on harmfulness <strong>of</strong>chlorparaffins, new components are beingresearched, which might be more ecologicallyacceptable, with function to serve as a replacementfor chlorparaffins in all places where severemetalworking opperations are, and where it was,until recent, only EP additive.A new generation <strong>of</strong> EP additives has beendeveloped, that are, by their chemistry, compunds<strong>of</strong> sulphur and phosphorus, and new generation <strong>of</strong>synthetic esters is currently being tested in severemetalworking fluids. A special focus is onsynergism <strong>of</strong> synthetic esters and sulphur basedadditives.For research <strong>of</strong> antiwear and EP characteristics<strong>of</strong> formulations that have chlorparaffin replacedwith two synthetic esters, we chose formulationsfor vertical broaching, drawing and final finishingoperations, like fine stamping.Characteristics <strong>of</strong> synthetic ester that were usedin tested formulations are listed in Table 1. InTable 2. are listed characteristics and methods usedfor metalworking samples testing for all threemetalworking operations. [4]Table 1. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> syn ester 1 i 2.Characteristic Syn ester 1 Syn ester 2AppearanceHazy. Light Slightly hazy.amber Light amberSpecific gravity @ 25 0 C 1,00 1,01Acid number, mg KOH/g 20


Figure 1. Test results for samples <strong>of</strong> welding points forvertical broaching operations with differentconcentrations <strong>of</strong> chlorparaffine.Figure 3. Test results for samples <strong>of</strong> welding points forvertical broaching operations with differentconcentrations <strong>of</strong> Syn ester 1.Figure 2. Test results for samples <strong>of</strong> wear scar forvertical broaching operations with differentconcentrations <strong>of</strong> chlorparaffine.In Figure 1 are shown welding point values incomparison to increase <strong>of</strong> chlorparaffins content,were broaching operation require chlorparaffinscontent <strong>of</strong> up to 30% in order to achieve weldingpoint <strong>of</strong> 7000 N, which will provide goodprocessing.In Figure 2 are shown wear diameter valuescompared to chlorparaffin content. Diameter weartest values in broaching opereations are not soimportant, welding point values.Table 4. Test results <strong>of</strong> samples for vertical broachingoperations which formulation contains Syn ester 1.Neat oil for vertical broachingSample 1 2 3 4Syn ester 1 % m/m - 2 6 10Additive A,% m/m 4 4 4 4Base oil, % m/m 96 94 90 86Results1 2 3 4Wear, 40 kg, mm 0,96 0,76 0,61 0,67Welding point, N 3800 4000 4800 4800V at 40 0 C, mm 2 /s 34,47 29,85 31,58 37,83Cu corrosion 4c 3b 3a 3bAcid number 0,81 1,85 3,95 6,21Figure 4. Test results for samples <strong>of</strong> wear scar forvertical broaching operations with differentconcentrations <strong>of</strong> Syn ester 1.With Syn ester 1 are prepared samples for finestamping operations, whose test results arecompared with the classical formulations containingoptimal concentration <strong>of</strong> chlorinated paraffine tomeet the performance which this operationdemands. Test results <strong>of</strong> welding points (Table 5.and Figure. 5.) shows that nor with the maximalconcentration <strong>of</strong> Syn ester 1 do not achievesatisfactory results. Because <strong>of</strong> that, samples withSyn ester 2 are prepared where test results <strong>of</strong>welding point has shown that nor with it do notachieve the result which in practical conditionscould meet all expected performance. (Table 6. andFigure 7.)Figure 5. Test results for samples <strong>of</strong> welding points forfine stamping operations with different concentrations <strong>of</strong>Syn ester 1 and classical formulation with chlorparaffine.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 311


Table 5. Test results <strong>of</strong> samples for fine stampingoperation whose forrmulation contains chlorparaffine(Sample 1) and Syn ester 1 (2-6).Neat oil for stampingSample 1 2 3 4 5 6Syn ester 1,% m/m- 5 8 10 20 28Hlorparafin 28 - - - - -Additivepackage,% m/m4 2 2 2 2 2Base oil,% m/m68 93 90 88 78 70Results1 2 3 4 5 6Wear, 40kg, mm0,71 0,42 0,40 0,42 0,41 0,41Weldingpoint, N4400 2000 280 2700 2800 2800V at 40 0 C 89,2 74,8 85,2 89,38 97,7 106,5Cucorrosion1a 1a 1a 3a 1a 3aAcidnumber1,46 5,35 6,62 7,90 13,4 18,16completly satisfies all performance demands forthat operation. With Syn estrer 2 optimal quantity<strong>of</strong> additive package there is a formulation whosetest welding results are close to those withchlorparaffin. (Table 7. and Figure 9.)Table 6. Test results <strong>of</strong> samples for fine stampingoperation whose forrmulation contains chlorparaffine(Sample 1) and Syn ester 2 (2-5).Neat oil for stampingSample 1 2 3 4 5Syn ester 2,% m/m- 6 8 10 12Hlorparafin 28 - - - -Additivepackage, 4 2 2 2 2% m/mBase oil,% m/m68 92 90 88 86Results1 2 3 4 5Wear, 40 kg,mm0,71 0,45 0,47 0,5 0,45Weldingpoint, N4400 2500 2400 4200 2400V at 40 0 C,mm 2 /s89,1 89,91 95,36 96,33 98,99Cu corrosion(3 h, 100 0 C)1 a 1a 1a 1a 1aAcid number 1,46 4,45 5,06 5,69 6,35Figure 6. Test results <strong>of</strong> wear diametar with samples forstamping operations with different concentrations <strong>of</strong>Syn ester 1.Figure 8. Test results <strong>of</strong> wear diametar with forstamping operations with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> Synester 2 and classical formulation with chlorparaffine.Figure 7. Test results <strong>of</strong> welding points with samples forstamping operations with different concentrations <strong>of</strong> Synester 2 and classical formulation with chlorparaffine.For steel pr<strong>of</strong>ile drawing operations there isformulation with the optimal amount <strong>of</strong>chlorparaffins and additive packages, whichSlika 9. Test results <strong>of</strong> welding points with samples fordrawing operations with classical formulation withchlorparaffine and Syn ester 2.312 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 7. Test results <strong>of</strong> oil samples for drawingoperations with classical formulation with chlorinatedparaffine and Syn ester 2.Neat oil for drawingSample 1 Sample 2ChlorinatedSyn ester 2,3paraffine, % m/m% m/m10Additive package, %Additive package,18m/m% m/m7Base oil, % m/m 56 Base oil, % m/m 73Vegetable oil,Vegetable oil,23% m/m% m/m10Results1 2Wear, 40 kg, mm 0,44 Wear, 40 kg,mm 0,35Welding point, N 4000 Welding point,N 4200V at 40 0 C, mm 2 /s 44,26Vat 40 0 C,mm 2 /s40,02Cu corrosionCu corrosion(3 h, 100 0 3aC)(3 h, 100 0 C)1bAcid number,Acid number, mg4,67mg KOH/grKOH/gr7,81which are prepared with Syn esters, as areplacement for chlorinated paraffine, shows:- test result <strong>of</strong> welding points has showed that atheavy operations such as a broaching with Synester 1 they do not achieve good results, although itis attempted to use synergistic effect <strong>of</strong> esters andadditives with active sulphur.- with stamping operations, which is alsoconsidered as heavy, welding points test showedthat with two different formulated Syn estes it isimpossible to achieve good results, which will alsoaffect application conditions- based on test results for steel pr<strong>of</strong>iles drawingoperations, one can conclude that Syn ester 2 canbe used for formulations intended for thatoperations, with reduced quantities <strong>of</strong> otheradditives.This is the start <strong>of</strong> one comprehensive research,in laboratory and application conditions, that arebeing done with additive manufacturers. Testresults shows that it is hard to achieve replacementfor chlorparaffins in formulations <strong>of</strong> heavymetalworking operations, like broaching, deepdrilling, stamping and others.Constant arguing about usage <strong>of</strong> chlorparaffinsand their allowed chain length, confuse both usersand manufacturers. But it initiated many studiesregarding that problematic and efforts to findadequate replacement for chlorparaffins, as soon aspossible.REFERENCESFigure 10. Test results <strong>of</strong> diameter wear with samplesfor drawing operations with classical formulationwith chlorparaffine and Syn ester 2.4. CONCLUSIONTest results <strong>of</strong> samples <strong>of</strong> neat oils intended foroperations: broaching, fine stamping and drawing[1] N. Canter: Special Report: Trends in extremepressure additives, Tribology & LubricationTechnology, September 2007., pp.10-17[2] T. Kelley, R. Fensterhein, A. Jaques : “Voices &Views”, Chlorinated Paraffins, Vol.59, No.4, April2009.[3] L. Rudnick, “Syntetics, Minerals oils, and Bio basedLubricants”, 2006[4] Internal documentation <strong>of</strong> additive manufacturer13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 313


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacQUALITY OF PLASMA CUTTINGBogdan Nedić 1 , Marko Janković 2 , Miroslav Radovanović 3 , Gordana Globočki Lakić 41University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> engineering, Kragujevac, nedic@kg.ac.rs2Fiat automobili Srbija, Kragujevac3University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Faculty <strong>of</strong> mechanical engineering, Niš4 Univerzitet u Banja Luci, Mašinski fakultet, Banja Luka, RS, BiHAbstract: The plasma arc cutting process severs metal by using a constricted arc to melt a localized area <strong>of</strong>a workpiece, removing the molten material with a high-velocity jet <strong>of</strong> ionized gas issuing from theconstricting orifice. The ionized gas is a plasma, hence the name <strong>of</strong> the process. This paper analyzes quality<strong>of</strong> cut in plasma arc cutting. Quality <strong>of</strong> cut in plasma arc cutting is defined using standard EN ISO 9013. Thecorrelation between quality <strong>of</strong> plasma cut Conclusions <strong>of</strong> other authors who investigated quality <strong>of</strong> plasmacut are also presented.In the second part <strong>of</strong> the paper, experimental investigation <strong>of</strong> plasma cut waspresented. Samples <strong>of</strong> steel plate thickness <strong>of</strong> 15 mm were used for creating 17 cuts. Obtained experimentalresults are consistent with theoretical considerations, as well as previous experimental results.Keywords: Plasma arc cutting, experiment, quality <strong>of</strong> cut, process parameters1. INTRODUCTIONThe efficient manufacture <strong>of</strong> high-quality platecomponents is quite difficult task. One <strong>of</strong> theeasiest methods <strong>of</strong> contour cutting steel is oxy-fuelcutting. With respect to oxy-fuel cutting, lasercutting, abrasive water jet cutting, and plasmacutting are new attractive advanced processes forcontour cutting <strong>of</strong> plate. They have numerousadvantages, namely, a narrow cut, a proper cutpr<strong>of</strong>ile, smooth and flat edges, minimaldeformation <strong>of</strong> a workpiece, the possibility <strong>of</strong>applying high feed rates, intricate pr<strong>of</strong>ilemanufacture and fast adaptation to changes inmanufacturing programs [1].Plasma cutting is an industrial process that isessentially controlled by the operator who usesrecommendations given by the manufacturers <strong>of</strong> thecutting equipment. Those recommendations,however, reflect the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> themanufacturers’ business, which includes not onlyselling the cutting torches but also the consumables.Yet, the manufacturers’ recommendations usuallylead to solutions that are technically sound in terms<strong>of</strong> cutting quality, but do not necessarily correspondto the most cost-effective solutions on the user’spoint <strong>of</strong> view [2].As a result, the user attempts to optimize thecutting operations by trial-and-error every time it isneeded to setup the existing equipment for a newdifferent task.This requires the development <strong>of</strong> full studies andapply theoretical and experimental researchesamong all the technological system’s links, in order toestablish (chose) the optimal processing variant.2. PROCESS PARAMETERSAs in the case <strong>of</strong> other machining methods, atthe plasma arc cutting (PAC), in order to obtaingood results, it is very important to well know theprocess, this meaning to exactly know what are theparameters involved in the process and theirinfluences (fig. 1).Input parameters are those parameters that canbe controlled, and their values are known and canbe set by the operator. Output parameters related tothe quality <strong>of</strong> the obtained surface. Factors whichcannot be controlled coming from machines andwork environment.314 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Input parameters- Current intensity (Ip, A)- Plasma gas voltage (Up, V)- Working speed (V, mm/min)- Workpieces thickness (a, mm)- Type <strong>of</strong> material workpieces- Nozzle distance (b, mm)- Pressure gas (p, MPa)- Type <strong>of</strong> plasma gas- Cutting directionDisturbing factors- Current intensity variation- Inaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the equipment- Purity <strong>of</strong> the plasma gas- Etc.PlasmacuttingOutput parameters- Kerf width- Roughness <strong>of</strong> the obtain surfaces, Ra- Angle <strong>of</strong> bevel cut ( )- Melting <strong>of</strong> the top edge (r)- Dross formation- Cutting precision- Thickness <strong>of</strong> heat affected zone - ZIT- Perpendicularity, angularity tolerance (u)This standard defines terms like: kerf width,angle <strong>of</strong> bevel cut… that can be used to define thequality <strong>of</strong> the work piece.Squareness and angularity tolerance is definedas distance between two parallel straight lines thatlimit the upper and lower boundaries <strong>of</strong> the cut facepr<strong>of</strong>ile at the teoretically correct angle, 90 degreesfor square cut edges, fig. 3. Standard establishes azone <strong>of</strong> significance for the measurement <strong>of</strong> Ureduced at the the top and bottom edge by distance,∆a, related to material thickness. This measure alsoapplies to concave and convex surfaces.Since several works in literature highlight thatthe torch cutting direction and the swirling direction<strong>of</strong> the plasma gas determine a different squarenessand angularity tolerance in the two sides <strong>of</strong> the cut[6], both left and right (UL and UR, respectively)were measured in order to highlight the asymmetricbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the plasma beam.Figure 1. Parameters <strong>of</strong> plasma arc cutting [3]3. QUALITY OF PLASMA CUTTING PROCESSEuropean standard "EN ISO 9013" "ThermalCutting" defined classification <strong>of</strong> thermal cutting,contains geometrical product specification andquality. Standard applies to materials suitable forcutting with oxy-fuel (from 3 to 300 mm), plasmacutting (1 to 150 mm) and laser cutting (0.5 to 40mm) [4], fig. 2.Top SpatterDross Build UpCut SurfaceDrag linesKerf WidthCut SurfaceBevel AngleTop EdgeRoundingFigure 2. Quality parameters <strong>of</strong> a plasma cut [5, 14]Using standard "EN ISO 9013" quality <strong>of</strong> thesurface is defined by the following parameters:- Squareness and angularity tolerance (u)- Average peak-to-valley height (Rz5, Ra) -roughness- Drag (n)- Melting <strong>of</strong> the top edge (r)- Possible formation <strong>of</strong> burrs or drops <strong>of</strong>molten metal on the bottom <strong>of</strong> the cut-edge.Figure 3. Squareness and angularity tolerance [5]Surface roughness is defined cut appearance,and gives information on whether the need forfurther processing. Parameter surface roughness ismean height <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile Rz5, unit is μm.Surface roughness is influenced by more inputparameters, but the most influential are: cuttingspeed, current and material thickness. Based on thedeveloped mathematical model [7, 8], shows thatthe thickness <strong>of</strong> the material has the greatestinfluence on surface roughness. This is logicalbecause current and cutting speed are functions <strong>of</strong>material thickness. Surface roughness is a function<strong>of</strong> material thickness defined by ISO 9013, basedon which we can see that the thinner material havelower roughness (Fig. 4).Roughness <strong>of</strong> the cutting edge is connected withstability <strong>of</strong> process. When the torch is too highpositioning from work piece plasma arc is a longand curve. This phenomenon leads to the formation<strong>of</strong> surface waves, and lynx, and therefore to ahigher Rz. When the cutting speed increases thetorch moves fast and plasma arc loses stability withview to the cutting front. Therefore plasma arc cannot remain perpendicular to front surface <strong>of</strong> thework piece, which is on surface cutting formedlynx. On the other side too low cutting speeds leadto excessive melting in a work zone, resultingappearance <strong>of</strong> furrows.It is known that surface roughness <strong>of</strong> the cut isnot same by depth. Experimental studies [9]13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 315


showed that diameter nozzle has a larger effect onsurface roughness on upper reaches <strong>of</strong> cutting (1mm from the top edge) than in the lower zones (5mm from the top edge). These studies demonstratedthat higher values <strong>of</strong> pressure gives lower values <strong>of</strong>Rz.Mean height <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile Rz5, m15010050110+1,8 . aRange 4Range 3Range 270+1,2 . aRange 140+0,8 . a10+0,6 . a0 5 10 15 20 25 30Cut thickness a, mmFigure 4. Influence <strong>of</strong> material thickness on Rz5by standard "EN ISO 9013"Surface roughness is different for the left andright sides <strong>of</strong> the cut. Surface on the right are about25% rougher than on the left side [10].Drag (n) is the projected distance between twoedges <strong>of</strong> drag lines (lag lines) in the direction <strong>of</strong>cutting (Fig. 5.). At extremely high speeds arcbecomes unstable and oscillates so the sparks andmolten metal form a line in the form <strong>of</strong> a "tail"(drag lines) Fig. 5. At high speeds drag angle variesfrom 60 º - 80 º, while at maximum speed this anglehas a value <strong>of</strong> 90 º and cut is lost. In the lower third<strong>of</strong> the cut the arc sweeps back steeply. It is probablethat the hot gas, with no tendency to attach metalwalls, leads the arc slightly at the bottom. Such asmall amount <strong>of</strong> molten metal from the output portis not ejected.Drag angleDrag lineDrossFigure 5. Dross, drag lines, drag angle [4, 11]Melting <strong>of</strong> the top edge (r) occurs due to highcutting speeds or long distance from the nozzle towork piece. Top edge can be with overhang.rrrsharp edge molten edge overhang edgeFigure 6. Melting [4]On the top edge may appear slag spatter,accumulation <strong>of</strong> hardened metal sprayed along theedges <strong>of</strong> the cut. Basically it is easily removed. Thisphenomenon occurs at high speed, the largedistance between the nozzle and the work piece, ifthe nozzle is wears. Slag spatter may also arisefrom the whirling motion <strong>of</strong> plasma gas. Thisphenomenon occurs when there is a big positiveangle, because along the bevel is a difference inpressure that ejected molten metal on top.In plasma cutting one <strong>of</strong> the biggest problemsthat arises is the dross (burr formation on thebottom <strong>of</strong> the kerf and spatter on the top <strong>of</strong> the kerf)Concentrations <strong>of</strong> dross will be higher in the worseside <strong>of</strong> cut. The amount <strong>of</strong> dross depends <strong>of</strong> lotparameters, but the most influential: types <strong>of</strong>materials, cutting speed and currents [7]. There aretwo types <strong>of</strong> molten metal on the bottom <strong>of</strong> cutedge[12]:- low speed dross- high speed drossIf the cutting speed is too low plasma starts tosearch more material to cut. Then cut expanding tothe point where more molten metal does not eject.The molten metal is accumulating along the loweredge <strong>of</strong> the large bulbous-shaped form. Thusformed molten metal are easily remove. Meltedmetal formed by low-speed cutting followed by theoccurrence concave surface (Figure 7). It may bethat the molten metal and the bottom edge forms a"bridge" over which the sectioned piecesconnecting again. At extremely low speeds arc isturns <strong>of</strong>f because there is not enough metal to holdarc. Increasing power or decrease distance betweenthe nozzle and cutting objects have the same effecton appearance <strong>of</strong> molten metal. The practicalcounter measures for this phenomenon is removingpart <strong>of</strong> the heat from the cutting zone, which isachieved by: reducing amperage or increase thedistance between the nozzle and the work piece.Figure 7. Low speed drossHigh speed <strong>of</strong> molten metal gives a rounded tip<strong>of</strong> cut edges (Figure 8). Molten metal on the bottom316 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


edge formed into a thin line. At these speeds arc<strong>of</strong>ten does not penetrate into the metal and can beshut down. Long distance between the nozzle andthe work piece, and a small amperage current canlead to the same phenomenon as the speed too high.Increasing the current or reducing distance betweennozzle and work piece leads to more heat in thecutting zone, which the effect <strong>of</strong> drag line is reduce,effectively reduce negative consequences <strong>of</strong> highspeeds.Figure 8. High speed drossAngle <strong>of</strong> bevel cut is angle between the cutsurface and the top surface <strong>of</strong> the work piece. Theangle <strong>of</strong> inclination can be positive (the upper partis smaller size then the bottom) or negative (lowerdimension is smaller than the upper). Plasma arccutting will usually result in an angle on the cutsurface <strong>of</strong> approximately 1 to 3° on the "good" sideand 3 to 8° on the "bad" side, when using torchesthat swirl the plasma. With larninar-flow torches,the angle on both sides is usually about 4 to 8° [14].Best sideWorst sideFigure 9. Positive angle <strong>of</strong> bevel cut [13]Arc first establishes a connection with a betterside <strong>of</strong> and releases heat. Cutting speed, current anddistance from the work piece also have influence onangle <strong>of</strong> bevel cut.If the cutting speed and the current have acorrect value, and part have big positive angle <strong>of</strong>bevel cut, then the distance from the nozzle to workpiece is too much. If the cutting speed and thecurrent have a correct value, and distance from thenozzle and work piece is small, then angle <strong>of</strong> bevelcut will be negative. Optimal distance from thenozzle to work piece is a distance before angle <strong>of</strong>bevel cut start to appear [15].Kerf width, the rule is that the cutting width atthe plasma cutting is about 1.5-2 times bigger thanthe size <strong>of</strong> the nozzle exit. Cutting width isinfluenced by the cutting speed. If the cutting speeddecreases, the cut is expanding.4. EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATIONIn the experiment were done 17 samples. Asinput parameters used cutting speed V, mm/minand current intensity I, A. Steel plate material S235JRG2 (Č0361) was 15 mm thick. Electric current <strong>of</strong>60 A, 80 A, 100 A and 120 A was used incombination with the tablet, reduced and increasedspeeds value (Table 1).Table 1. Used speeds and current intensitysamples I, A V , mm/min1 60 4252 60 530 (tablet value)3 60 6354 80 4905 80 610 (tablet value)6 80 7307 80 8708 80 10559 100 53010 100 69511 100 870 (tablet value)12 100 105513 120 73014 120 87015 120 105516 120 1320 (tablet value)17 120 1585Quality <strong>of</strong> samples is defined by:- surface roughness Ra (measured by deviceTalysurf 6)- kerf width (St and Sb, defined in Fig. 10.)- dross width (Sd) and dross higth (h), Fig. 10.- dimension <strong>of</strong> molten metal on the bottom edge<strong>of</strong> the cut. (defined in Fig. 11.)Ra was measured in thre points: near to upper edge(g), in the middle (s), near to lower edge (d).5040A40A20rStSbSdhA-AFigure 10. Measuring kerf width and molten metal onthe bottom <strong>of</strong> cut2,52,5Figure 11. Measured in three pointsUsing a current <strong>of</strong> 60 A quality cut can bedescribed as very poor due to large deposits <strong>of</strong>gsd13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 317


waste material to the bottom <strong>of</strong> cut. Thereforerequires additional treatment, and just cutting itvery slowly (Fig. 12.).Figure 12. Cutting with 530 mm/min and 60 AFigure 13 shows the sample which was cuttingwith current intensity <strong>of</strong> 80 A and speed <strong>of</strong> 610mm/min (tablet value). The quality <strong>of</strong> the cut canbe characterized as acceptable. There are wasteparticles on the bottom, but not on a large extent.An additional treatment section is necessary. Usinga current <strong>of</strong> 80 A and a change speed, quality isapproximate when used in tablet value.Figure 13. Cutting with 610 mm/min and 80 AFigure 14. Cutting with 870 mm/min and 100 AUsing a current <strong>of</strong> 100 A obtained quality <strong>of</strong> thecut can be described as solid. There are wasteparticles on the bottom, but not on a large extent.An additional treatment section is necessary.Using the current with intensity <strong>of</strong> 80 A the bestquality is obtained by using the highest speed.Sample <strong>of</strong> 17 is considered best combination <strong>of</strong>parameters because obtained fragment with the bestquality (Fig. 15.). The best quality is obtainedincreasing the speed by 20% <strong>of</strong> tablet speed value.Table 2. Measured values <strong>of</strong> Ra, kerf width and moltenmetal on the bottom <strong>of</strong> cutSamplesMeasur.Sb h SdRa µm St mmpointsmm mm mm1 g 10.5s 17 2.14 1.2 4.78 7.12d 30.72 g 12.41.13s 21.3 2.18 5.11 7.18d 40.43 work piece is not penetrated4gsd17.529.426.62.55 1.61 1.05 5.63567gsdgsdgsd15.235.823.014.124.324.71441552.45 1.38 0.95 4.982.30 1.18 2.23 6.642,01 1,11 4,45 7,388 work piece is not penetrated91011121314151617gsdgsdgsdgsdgsdgsdgsdgsdgsd35193213.013.09.812.48.813.012.012.410.116141817142010.311.010.89.912.98.310.19.82,51 1,75 3,74 10,322.54 1.54 1.16 5.212.45 1.36 0.93 7.292.36 1.23 0.93 8.402,68 1,82 1,15 7,582,46 1,67 0,80 7,832.64 1.45 0.523.072.55 1.29 0.66 3.242.4 1.03 notexist-318 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Lower values <strong>of</strong> current are not resulted withenough heat in the cutting zone, and therefore thequality <strong>of</strong> these clips are worse. With lowercurrents and much higher speed than recommendedmay happend that clip does not penetrate, like insamples 3 and 8.Based on <strong>of</strong> experimental results can concludethat an increase in speed reduces kerf width.Figure 15. Cutting with 1585 mm/min and 120 A5. CONCLUSIONSPlasma cutting is nonconventional technologythat represents the best relation between cost andquality value for money for most <strong>of</strong> the standardports and small series production types. In addition,the processing speed is far greater than thetechnology <strong>of</strong> machining, and quality is comparableto the laser cutting technology.Plasma cutting process may be used to cut anyconductive material, including carbon steel,stainless steel, aluminum, copper, brass, cast metalsand exotic alloys.Obtained experimental results are consistentwith theoretical considerations, as well as previousexperimental results.The best quality is obtainedincreasing the speed by 20% <strong>of</strong> tablet speed value,which indicates that in this area have a place forfurther research and improvements.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis paper is part <strong>of</strong> project TR35034 - Theresearch <strong>of</strong> modern non-conventional technologiesapplication in manufacturing companies with theaim <strong>of</strong> increase efficiency <strong>of</strong> use, product quality,reduce <strong>of</strong> costs and save energy and materials,funded by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science <strong>of</strong>Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia.REFERENCES1. M. Radovanovic, M. Madic: Modeling the plasmaarc cutting process using ANN, NonconventionalTechnologies Review – No.4/20112. P. Ferreira, I. Melo, A.Gonçalves-Coelho,A. Mourão: Plasma cutting optimization by usingthe response surface methodology, The annals <strong>of</strong>“DUNĂREA DE JOS” university <strong>of</strong> Galati fascicleV, technologies in machine building, ISSN 1221-4566, 20093. S.M. Ilii, L. Apetrei, I. Carp: Considerations concerningplasma arc cutting machining, InternationalConference on Manufacturing Engineering(ICMEN), Chalkidiki, Greece, 1-3 October 20084. International standard ISO 9013:2002(E)5. Plasma working group at Linde AG, Linde GasDepartment, and specialists from the companyKjellberg Finsterwalde Elektroden und MaschinenGmbH, Facts about plasma technology andplasma cutting Riverside Corporate Park10 JuliusAvenueNorth Ryde, NSW 2113Australia, 20116. E. Gariboldi, B. Previtali: High tolerance plasmaarc cutting <strong>of</strong> commercially pure titanium, Journal<strong>of</strong> Materials Processing Technology 160, pp. 77–89,2005.7. S.M. Ilii, M. CoteaŃă, A. Munteanu: Experimentalresults concerning the variation <strong>of</strong> surfaceroughness parameter (Ra) at plasma arc cutting <strong>of</strong> astainless steel workpiece, International Journal <strong>of</strong>Modern Manufacturing Technologies II, ISSN2067–3604, 20108. R. Bhuvenesh, M.H. Norizaman, M.S. AbdulManan: Surface roughness and mrr effect on manualplasma arc cutting machining, World academy <strong>of</strong>science, engineering and technology 62, 20129. M. Hatala, R. Čep, Z. Pandilov: Analysis <strong>of</strong> surfaceroughness and surface heat affected zone <strong>of</strong> steelEN S355J0 after plasma arc cutting, MechanicalEngineering–Scientific Journal 29, pp. 1–6, 2010.10. A.P. Hoult, I.R. Pashby, K. Chan: Fine plasma cutting<strong>of</strong> advanced aerospace materials, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Processing Technology 48, pp. 825-831,1995.11. J.A. Hogan, J.B. Lewis, A. Jordan: Plasmaprocesses <strong>of</strong> cutting and welding, Naval SurfaceWarfare Center CD Code 2230- Design IntegrationTools, Building 192, Room 138 9500 MacArthurBlvd Bethesda, MD 20817-5000, 1976.12. D. Cook: Plasma arc cutting-cut quality problems,Welding design and fabrication, November 199813. J. Berglund: Cut cost calculation, Master <strong>of</strong> scienceprogramme industrial economic, Lulea university <strong>of</strong>technology, 2006.14. B.R.Hendricks: Simulation <strong>of</strong> plasma arc cutting,Peninsula Technikon, faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, CapeTown, 1999.15. J.V. Warren: The Contribution <strong>of</strong> arc voltagecontrol to quality plasma cutting, ESAB-30213,South Carolina, USA, 2005.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 319


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacTRIBOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SINTERED STEEL GEAR INAPPLICATION WORM-AND-GEAR SETAleksandar Miltenović 1 , Milan Banić 1 , Miroslav Mijajlović 1 , Đorđe Miltenović 21 University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering in Niš, Serbia,aleksandar.miltenovic@masfak.ni.ac.rs, milan.banic@outlook.com, mijajlom@masfak.ni.ac.rs2 College <strong>of</strong> Textile, Leskovac, Serbia, milten2004@yahoo.comAbstract: Due to the low manufacturing costs, worm-and-gear set with the combination <strong>of</strong> a steelworm and a gear are used almost exclusively in automotive auxiliary drive units such as windowlifters, seat adjustments and windscreen wipers. Worm-and-gear sets are a simple and compact wayto achieve a high speed gear ratio. Tribological aspect <strong>of</strong> worm-and-gear set is very complex whilethere can occur different damage forms such as: wear, pitting or scuffing. The conditions, underwhich a damage form occurs, are not fully elucidated. In this paper are shown experiments thathave been carried out with gear made <strong>of</strong> sintered steel Fe1.5Cr0.2Mo with different treatmentmethods.Keywords: sintered steel, gears, worm-and-gear set, wear, pitting, scuffing1. INTRODUCTIONCrossed helical gears are used, for example, inautomotive auxiliary drive units such as windowlifters, seat adjustments, windscreen wipers, andalso in home appliances. The trend towardsincreased comfort in motor vehicles has led to theutilization <strong>of</strong> more than a hundred servo-drives inluxury class automobiles. Important advantages <strong>of</strong>the crossed helical gears are their easy andinexpensive design, good noise performance andhigh ratio that can be realized in one step.The use <strong>of</strong> gear wheels made <strong>of</strong> sintered metalcan increase the load capacity <strong>of</strong> crossed helicalgears. As in the case <strong>of</strong> plastic gear wheels, thelarge scale production <strong>of</strong> sintered metal gear wheelsrequires a special tool and no additional postproductioncosts.Hochmann [1] determines the load capacity <strong>of</strong>material pair steel/steel with grease. The testedgears with grease have lower load capacity thantested gears with oil. Crossed helical gears havedifferent transmission conditions, therefore, theseresults cannot be used.The lubricating film thickness, pitting andscuffing load capacity correlate significantly withthe base oil viscosity <strong>of</strong> grease. The addition <strong>of</strong> aspecial synthetic graphite as solid lubricant showsincreased wear in this research. The base oilviscosity is a decisive factor for calculating thelubricating film thickness <strong>of</strong> grease, as well as forcalculating the pitting load capacity according toDIN 3990 [2]. Performance data <strong>of</strong> tested lubricantsis available for calculating scuffing and pitting loadcapacity according to DIN 3990. This data takesinto account the influence <strong>of</strong> grease.2. CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONThe material combination steel/sintered metalhas been investigated only in few research projects.Researchers from the company Höganäs AB,Sweden [3] investigated sintered metal Astaloy Mo(Fe0.85Mo) and Astaloy CrL (Fe1.5Cr0.2Mo).320 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Table 1. Chemical composition <strong>of</strong> sintered steel Fe1.5Cr0.2Mo (%)element measure point 1 measure point 2 measure point 3 measure point 4 measure point 5C 0,254 0,243 0,238 0,253 0,273Si 0,054 0,047 0,043 0,057 0,053Mn 0,163 0,161 0,161 0,161 0,161P 0,009 0,009 0,009 0,009 0,009S 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,002Cr 1,521 1,517 1,526 1,51 1,509Ni 0,026 0,026 0,026 0,026 0,026Mo 0,21 0,208 0,209 0,211 0,21Cu 0,066 0,066 0,067 0,067 0,067Al


Table 3: Data <strong>of</strong> the test gear pair [6]ParametersDataCentre distance30 mmModule1.252 mmTransmission ratio 40Pressure angle 20Wheel materialFe1.5Cr0.2MoWorm material16MnCr5Speed 1500 – 10000 min -1Torque12-36 NmSynthetic oil Klüber GH6 1500Mineral oil Optigear BM 1500Grease: Klübersynth G34-130Figure 2. Viscosity-temperature behaviour for usedlubricants4.2 Mineral oilCastrol Optigear BM 1500 was used in theexperiment as the mineral oil with the sameviscosity as Klübersynth GH6 1500. Highperformance gear oil Castrol Optigear BM containsthe mineral oil-based additive packageMICROFLUX Trans (MFT). This combination <strong>of</strong>load-active agents and additives adjusts to varyingloads and actively prevents wear. Difficulties in therun-in phase can be reduced and problems withwear, material fatigue on surfaces (pitting) andmicropitting can be avoided.Table 4: Data <strong>of</strong> lubricants4. LUBRICATIONFigure 1. Test benchFor the sake <strong>of</strong> comparison, lubrications testswere done under same parameters and withdifferent lubricants: synthetic oil, mineral oil andgrease.4.1. Synthethic oilSynthetic oil made by Klüber company(Klübersynth GH6 15000) was used in tests. Thisoil can withstand high scuffing load capacity andhas good wear protection. Furthermore, the oilreduces friction and has a flat viscosity-temperaturebehaviour. This oil is based on polyglycol and it ismainly used in transmissions with the materialcombination <strong>of</strong> steel/steel.The additive GH6 reduces the frictioncoefficient and wear, especially for worm gearswith the material combination steel/bronze. Verylow wear intensities for worm gears can beachieved with this oil. Klübersynth GH6 oil with aviscosity <strong>of</strong> 40 = 1500 mm 2 /s was used for testing.Table 4 shows the characteristics <strong>of</strong> used lubricants.Parameter GH6 1500 BM 1500 G34-130Temperature Range [°C] -20 to 160 -10 to 90 -30 to 130Density (20 o C) [g/cm 3 ] 1.08 0.93 0.87Kin. base oil viscos. DIN51562 ν 40 [mm 2 /s]1500 1507 150Kin. base oil viscos. DIN51562 ν 100 [mm 2 /s]231 75.6 16Consistency class DIN 51818, NLGI (grease) 04.3 GreaseKlübersynth G34-130 grease for small gears wasused in the grease tests. Klübersynth G34-130 isgrease based on synthetic hydrocarbon oil. Otheringredients are mineral oil and lithium soap asspecial polyureas, which serve as consistencyfactors. The grease has good anti-wear propertiesand can be used with the combination <strong>of</strong> steel andplastic.Figure 2 presents the dependence <strong>of</strong> kinematicviscosity on temperature for the selected lubricants.The oils Klüber GH6 1500 and Castrol OptigearBM 1500 have the same viscosity at thetemperature <strong>of</strong> 40 o C. At higher temperatures, theviscosity <strong>of</strong> mineral oil Castrol Optigear BM 1500is smaller than the synthetic oil Klüber GH6 1500.Lubricants dependence on the viscosity is veryimportant at low temperatures. They should still be322 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


flowable at high temperatures and very viscous atextremely high temperatures. The best oil in thissense is the Klüber GH6 1500 oil.5. HERTZIAN CONTACT STRESSThe Hertzian contact stress has a significantinfluence on the wear rate and the width <strong>of</strong> the wearsurface. The Hertzian contact stress in the crossedhelical gears can be determined as the Hertziancontact stress <strong>of</strong> globoid wheel. It should be takeninto consideration that the Hertzian contact stresson the crossed helical gear depends on the width <strong>of</strong>the wear surface. Therefore, a correlation betweenthe width <strong>of</strong> the wear surface b V and thedimensionless ratio p m * [5] is introduced. TheHertzian contact stress by the dimensionlessparameter <strong>of</strong> the average Hertzian contact stressp m,V * is taken into account. The new Hertziancontact stress Hm can be calculate for the averageHertzian contact stress p m,V * according to Equation1, depending on the output torque T 2 , the E-ModuleE red and centre distance a s .4 p EredHm (1)*m, VT210003asAccording to the tests for sintered steelFe1.5Cr0.2Mo with sintered-hardening (S5), thevalue <strong>of</strong> E-Module is E 2 = 203759 N/mm 2 .Therefore, for the material combination <strong>of</strong> wormmade <strong>of</strong> 16MnCr5 and wheel made <strong>of</strong> sintered steelFe1.5Cr0.2Mo, the value <strong>of</strong> the reduced E-Moduleis E red = 227288 N/mm 2 .The Hertzian contact stress that depends on thewidth <strong>of</strong> the teeth p m,V * can be calculated usingEquation 3. The ratio <strong>of</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the globoidwheel b 2H to the width <strong>of</strong> wear surface b v takes intoconsideration the increase <strong>of</strong> the Hertzian contactstress with decreasing width [6].0,8614 b 2Hp m, V pm(2) bvFigure 3 shows the resulting Hertzian contactstress <strong>of</strong> all tests with different lubricants andn 1 = 1500; 5000 und 10000 min -1 . In the first loadstep output torque is 12 Nm, each next step outputtorque T 2 is increased by 4 Nm, and the timeduration <strong>of</strong> load level is set at 40 hours.Higher torques leads to the increase in pressure.There is no great difference in pressure values <strong>of</strong>Hertzian contact stress for lubrication with mineraland synthetic oil for the rotation speed n 1 = 1500min -1 or sliding velocity v gs = 0.76 m/s. For greaselubrication, the Hertzian contact stress is onaverage half the size in relation to mineral andsynthetic lubricating oil.There is great difference in pressure values <strong>of</strong>Hertzian contact stress for lubrication with mineraland synthetic oil for the rotation speedn 1 = 5000 min -1 or sliding velocity v gs = 2.53 m/s.The values <strong>of</strong> Hertzian contact stress with syntheticoil are for about 65% higher compared tolubrication with mineral oil. Hertzian contactstresses for lubrication with synthetic oil goes up to1400 N/mm 2 .Herzian contact stress Hm [N/mm 2 ]Herzian contact stress Hm [N/mm 2 ]Herzian contact stress Hm [N/mm 2 ]160014001200100080060040020001000900800700600500400300200100016001400120010008006004002000n 1 = 1500 min ‐18 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40n 1 = 10000 min ‐1Output torque T 2[Nm]synthetic oilmineral oilgreasesynthetic oilmineral oil4 8 12 16 20 24Output torque T 2 [Nm]n 1 = 5000 min ‐18 12 16 20 24 28 32 36Output torque T 2 [N]synthetic oilmineral oilFigure 3. Hertzian contact stress Hm for duration <strong>of</strong> theexperiment with different lubrication and n 1 = 1500;5000 and 10000 min -1For the rotation speed n 1 = 10000 min -1 orsliding velocity v gs = 5.05 m/s up to the number <strong>of</strong>load changes N L = 0,9×10 6 values <strong>of</strong> Hertziancontact stress are greater for mineral oil lubricationas compared to synthetic lubricating oil. Then it13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 323


comes to the sharp increase <strong>of</strong> wear rate and toreduction <strong>of</strong> pressure. Lubrication with synthetic oilhas a smaller increase <strong>of</strong> wear rate and smallerreduction <strong>of</strong> pressure.Based on the foregoing analysis, it can beconcluded that the Hertzian contact stress dependson the choice <strong>of</strong> lubricant. Synthetic lubricating oilis the most favourable from the aspect <strong>of</strong> wear, andin terms <strong>of</strong> achieving hydrodynamic lubrication.Optimal lubrication conditions were obtained forthe rotation speed <strong>of</strong> n 1 = 5000 min -1 or slidingvelocity v gs = 2.53 m/s.6. DAMAGE TYPES6.1. WearFigure 4. Wear on wheel tooth surface withoutadditional treatment for T 2 = 36 Nm; t = 260 h;n 1 = 5000 min -1tribological system are: the gear wheel (basicbody), the worm (opposed body) and the lubricant(intermediate component).Experiments with wheels with differentadditional treatments provide basic knowledge <strong>of</strong>sintered gears load capacity. Worm and wheel arein contact in a point. During operation, a change inthe tooth flank <strong>of</strong> the wheel appears due to wear.The worm forms on the tooth flank <strong>of</strong> the wheel, awear surface that has a shape that is identical toworm gear flank. Wear progress widens the wearsurface, which leads to a lower Hertzian pressure inthe tooth contact. After a certain period <strong>of</strong> operationunder intensive wear progress, the steady stateoccurs, where a necessary oil layer exists, so thatthe wear progress is minimal. Figure 4 shows theform <strong>of</strong> wear damage on tooth surface <strong>of</strong> wheelmade from material without additional treatment.Figure 5 compares all experiments with wheels<strong>of</strong> different material variants after a trial <strong>of</strong> 100 hand an output torque <strong>of</strong> 20 Nm. The maximumwear, δ wn = 115 m, occurred on material S2 –material with case hardening. The minimum wear,δ wn = 7.8 m, occurred on S5 – sinter-hardening.Figure 4 shows the wear width <strong>of</strong> the wear surfaceon wheel from material S4 - “pyrohydrolysis” andS5 sinter-hardening for different speeds. TheFigure 5. Wear δ wn for all trials with different material variants [6]The wear describes the continuous loss <strong>of</strong>material from the surface <strong>of</strong> the basic body whichhas a relative movement with respect to a solid,liquid or gaseous mating with which it is in contact[7]. Wear has exclusively mechanical causes.Different from hardness or tensile strength, wear isnot a specific material property but a systemproperty which depends on the particulartribological system. In our case, the elements <strong>of</strong> thesmallest wear width occurred at input speedn 1 = 5000 min -1 . The reason for this is that the bestexperimental conditions, with regard to lubricationand wear, are at this input speed.6.2. WearA large pressure on surface does not lead to asudden failure <strong>of</strong> drive, but over the time, small324 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


holes (pits) emerge in the shape <strong>of</strong> shell on toothflank. Pit peak always points in the slidingdirection. This damage occurs through a cyclicfatigue due to repeated elastic and plasticdeformations <strong>of</strong> the surface. The holes occur onlyafter a sufficiently large number <strong>of</strong> overrollings(from ca. 5x10 4 load cycles). If only initial pitting ispresent, the situation is not dangerous. Destructivepitting destroys the flank and causes failure due tonoise and fatigue. The pitting occurred on wheelsmade from materials S4, S5 and S6 by an outputtorque <strong>of</strong> 16 and 32 Nm after the trial time period<strong>of</strong> 120 h to 240 h.Figure 6 shows initial and destructive pitting ontooth flank <strong>of</strong> wheel. In trials with material S1 –without additional treatment, initial pitting ocurredunder input speed n 1 = 5000 min -1 and outputtorque <strong>of</strong> 20 Nm. In trials with material S5 – sinterhardening,destructive pitting occurred under inputspeed n 1 = 5000 min -1 and output torque <strong>of</strong> 20 Nmand mineral oil.6.3. ScuffingThere is a difference between cold and warmscuffing. Both damage types are caused by the lack<strong>of</strong> lubricant in contact between teeth. Cold scuffingis relatively rarely seen. It occurs mainly at lowspeed (< 4 m/s) and between teeth that are havingrelatively high hardness and rough quality <strong>of</strong>contact surfaces. Warm scuffing occurs due to greatpressure and high sliding velocity between toothflanks. Under such a load, combined effects occurwhich lead to the increase in temperature thatdisrupts the lubricant film between tooth flanks,making the contact between tooth flanks direct anddry. This can cause a short local welding <strong>of</strong> theflanks which damages both flanks. Warm scuffingis characterized by strip-shaped bands in thedirection <strong>of</strong> the tooth height, and with the strongestexpression in the tooth addendum and tooth root.Scuffing on high-speed gears increases thetemperature and tooth forces, eventually leading toshaft fracture due to high damage on tooth flanks.Initial pitting: without additional treatmentT 2 = 20 Nm; t = 120 h; n 1 = 5000 min -1Lubricant: synthetic oilVariant with case hardeningT 2 = 20 Nm; t = 160 h; n 1 = 5000 min -1Lubricant: synthetic oilDestructive pitting: sinter-hardening variantT 2 = 20 Nm; t = 120 h; n 1 = 5000 min -1Lubricant: mineral oilFigure 6. Pitting on wheel tooth surface [6]Material with 2% copper additionT 2 = 28 Nm; t = 160 h n 1 = 5000 min -1Lubricant: synthetic oilFigure 7. Scuffing on tooth flanks <strong>of</strong> wheel for differentmaterial variants [6]13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 325


Figure 7 shows the scuffing on wheel toothflanks for different material variants. Withexception <strong>of</strong> S1, scuffing occurred on all materialvariants. On wheels made from materials S2 andS3, under load <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 16 Nm and T 2 = 20 Nm, thephenomenon <strong>of</strong> scuffing and significant increase <strong>of</strong>wear surface and gear forces were observed. Underoutput torque <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 28 Nm, and input speedn 1 = 5000 min -1 scuffing occurred for S4 and S6.Gear loads rose and, suddenly, the failure <strong>of</strong> wormshaft occurred. On material variant S6 “2% copperaddition”, scuffing occurred on tooth root in trialswith input speed n 1 = 5000 min -1 and output torque<strong>of</strong> T 2 = 28 Nm, and a very short running time <strong>of</strong> ca.10 minutes. Scuffing also occurred on wheel toothflanks with speed n 1 = 5000 min -1 and output torque<strong>of</strong> T 2 = 36 Nm for material variant S5 sinterhardening.7. MAXIMUM OUTPUT TORQUEFigure 8. Comparison <strong>of</strong> maximum transmissible torquewith critical damage type for different materials andinput speed n 1 = 5000 min -1 [8]Figure 8 shows maximum transmissible torque,as well as the type <strong>of</strong> critical damage, in a bar chart.With an output torque <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 20 Nm, materials S2(case hardening) and S3 (case hardening and shotpeening) were damaged due to scuffing. MaterialsS4 (pyrohydrolysis) and S6 (2 % copper addition)were damaged by pitting when output torque wasT 2 = 24 Nm, and by scuffing at the value <strong>of</strong>T 2 = 28 Nm. Without an additional treatment, S1had the most critical wear and some pitting atoutput torque <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 28 Nm. The wheels S5(sinter-hardening) had the greatest load carryingcapacity, its maximum transmissible torque being32-36 Nm, and the scuffing being the mostdangerous damage form in this case.8. CONCLUSIONSThe research in this paper shows thattribological parameter <strong>of</strong> worm-and-gear has greatinfluence on working characteristics in exploitationconditions. The material characteristics likemicrostructure, wear load capacity and damagetypes <strong>of</strong> molded parts can be significantlyinfluenced by additional treatments for sinteredsteel.The Hertzian contact stress <strong>of</strong> teeth in contactdepends on the choice <strong>of</strong> lubricants. The smallestwear occurred in experiments with synthetic oilwhen Hertzian contact stresses were largest.Synthetic oil can resist the pressures <strong>of</strong> 1400N/mm 2 at sliding velocity v gs = 2.53 m/s.All experiments with different material variantsshow that additional treatments have significantinfluence on wear. Under identical experimentalconditions, the maximum wear δ wn occurred in thetrials with wheels <strong>of</strong> material variant with casehardening (115 µm) and the minimum with wheelswith sinter-hardening (7.8 µm).The pitting was observed in wheels <strong>of</strong> materialvariants S4, S5 and S6 by output torque from 16 to32 Nm. The initial pitting on the tooth flankoccurred on material variant without additionaltreatment (trials with T 2 = 20 Nm; t = 120 h; n 1 =5000 min -1 ; lubricant: synthetic oil). Destructivepitting on tooth flank occurred in material variantsinter-hardening (T 2 = 20Nm; t = 120h; n 1 = 5000min -1 ; lubricant: mineral oil).With exception <strong>of</strong> S1, scuffing occurred on allmaterial variants. The scuffing was the critical type<strong>of</strong> damage for wheels from material variants S2 andS3 under the output torque <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 20 Nm withn 1 = 5000 min -1 and by S5 under the output torque<strong>of</strong> T 2 = 36 Nm. For wheels <strong>of</strong> material variant S6,scuffing occurred for trials with n 1 = 5000 min -1and output torque <strong>of</strong> T 2 = 20 Nm. For wheels <strong>of</strong>material variants S4 and S6, the critical type <strong>of</strong>damage was the combination <strong>of</strong> pitting andscuffing.Lubrication with synthetic oil is the mostfavorable from the aspect <strong>of</strong> wear and in terms <strong>of</strong>achieving hydrodynamic lubrication. Optimalworking lubrication was obtained for the rotationspeed n 1 = 5000 min -1 or sliding velocity v gs = 2.53m/s.REFERENCES[1] M. Hochmann: Tragfähigkeit vonZahnradpaarungen bei Schmierung mitGetriebefetten, Forschungsbericht, DGMK, 2007.[2] DIN 3990: Tragfähigkeitsberechnung vonStirnrädern, 12/2002.[3] S. Dizdar, P. Johansson, A.B. Höganäs, 263 83Höganäs, Sweden: P/M Materials for GearApplication; EURO PM2007, Tolouse October 16,2007.326 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


[4] W. Schatt, K-P. Wieters, Pulvermetallurgie-Technologien und Werkst<strong>of</strong>fe, VDI-VerlagDüsseldorf, 1994.[5] W. Predki, A. Miltenović, Influence <strong>of</strong> Hardeningon the Microstructure and the Wear Capacity <strong>of</strong>Gears Made <strong>of</strong> Fe1.5Cr0.2Mo Sintered Steel.International Journal “Science <strong>of</strong> Sintering” 42,pp. 183-191, (2010).[6] Miltenović, A.: Verschleißtragfähigkeitsberechnungvon Schraubradgetrieben mit Schraubrädern ausSintermetall, Dissertation Ruhr-Universität Bochum,2011.[7] DIN 50320: Verschleiß: Begriffe – Systemanalysevon Verschleißvorgängen – Gliederung desVerschleißgebietes, 12/1979.[8] Miltenović,A., Predki,W.: Damage Types <strong>of</strong>Crossed Helical Gears with Wheels from SinteredSteel. International Journal “Science <strong>of</strong> Sintering”43, pp. 205-214, 2011.[9] Wendt, T.: Tragfähigkeit von Schraubradgetriebenmit Schraubrädern aus Sintermetall, DissertationRuhr-Universität Bochum, 2008.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 327


Tribometry13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ’1315 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, Serbia


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE SEIZURE TREND OFA MOM-THP WITH SELF-DIRECTED BALLSLucian Capitanu 1 , Liliana – Laura Badita 2 , Virgil Florescu 2 , Dumitru Catalin Bursuc 31 Institute <strong>of</strong> Solid Mechanics <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy, 15 Constantin Mille, 010141, Bucarest, Romanialuciancapitanu@yahoo.com2* National Institute for Research and Development in Mechatronics and Measurement Technique, 6-8 Sos Pantelimon,district 2, Bucharest, Romania badita_l@yahoo.com3 Mechanical Departament, Institute <strong>of</strong> Civil Engineering, 59 Plevnei Way, 050141, Bucharest, Romania,florescuvirgil@yahoo.com4 ”Carol I” National Defance Academy, Bucharest, Romania, catalin258@yahoo.comAbstract: This work continues the approach <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> our topics relating to a MOM THP with self-directedmovement balls. Experiments revealed a certain seizure in some strain conditions. Laboratory trials forballs/plane Hertzian contacts have been restarted in order to determine seizure behaviour depending on theroughness <strong>of</strong> the flat area. The trials have been carried out in BSF (body simulated fluid) lubricationconditions, much closer to the real operating conditions up against the initial tests with distilled water.Seizure burdens to different loadings and contact surfaces roughness influence over the seizure burden havebeen determined. Even though the minimum value <strong>of</strong> the wear must be the same with the minimum value <strong>of</strong>the surfaces roughness, given the experimental conditions, it came out from the trials results on wear that thelowest level <strong>of</strong> wear is acquired at a certain value <strong>of</strong> roughness, not at the lowest level <strong>of</strong> roughness.Keywords: MOM –THP with balls, self-directed movement, seizure, optimal conditions, wear scar, frictioncoefficient.1. INTRODUCTIONNowadays, the design solutions for Total HipProstheses are diverse encompassing for improvingthe materials used for prostheses elements andreshaping geometrically and/or tribologically theload transfer path. In such context Total HipProstheses with rolling balls have been found as apossible viable alternative design to currentindustrial products, based on low friction <strong>of</strong> rollingcontact, against sliding one (now used in mostindustrial designs).Different designs <strong>of</strong> Total Hip Prostheses withDifferent designs <strong>of</strong> Total Hip Prostheses withrolling bodies have been developed in order toimprove the tribological performances <strong>of</strong> theartificial joint. We could mention here the designwith ball train, proposed by Katsutoshi and Kiyoshi[1], the French “Supertête” prosthesis [2], or thedesign with conical rolling elements proposed byImperial College <strong>of</strong> Science, Technology andMedicine <strong>of</strong> London [3].The French design, obtained by “Fondation del’Avenir” in collaboration with “Ministère de laDéfense, Mission Innovation”, propose theinsertion <strong>of</strong> a frictional contact inside a bearing.The design suggested by Imperial College <strong>of</strong>Science, Technology and Medicine <strong>of</strong> Londonconsists in a major modification <strong>of</strong> a elementsbetween the femoral part stem neck and themodular hip prosthesis by introducing a rollingbearing with conical femoral artificial head.The bearing rotation axis corresponds with theaxis <strong>of</strong> femoral stem neck, the rolling elementsbeing guided by both the external surface <strong>of</strong> stemneck and the internal surface <strong>of</strong> the ball replacingthe femoral head. But changing the contactmechanism from sliding to rolling in a hipprosthesis is not an easy task due to difficultiesencountered in establishing the load transfer path, acritical characteristic <strong>of</strong> tribological behavior <strong>of</strong>joint with large influence in functionality anddurability <strong>of</strong> prosthesis active elements.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 331


Basically, the sliding contact between largesurfaces <strong>of</strong> femoral head and acetabular cup wasreplaced by a multitude <strong>of</strong> rolling contacts with adifferent pattern <strong>of</strong> stress distribution influenced byrolling elements position at some instant duringrelative movement between femoral and acetabularparts.In the present paper, the authors focus on theoriginal design proposed by them in [4], i.e. aMOM Total Hip Prosthesis with self directedrolling balls (see Fig. 1).Figure 1. Total Hip Prosthesis with self directed rollingbodies.A characteristic <strong>of</strong> this design solution is the factthat the artificial joint will work similar to aspherical bearing, having what is called a“compensation space”, i.e. enough free spacebetween the femoral and acetabular parts <strong>of</strong> theprosthesis to allow the movement <strong>of</strong> the balls [5].Previous research studies performed by theauthors focused on the determination <strong>of</strong> the initialposition <strong>of</strong> rolling balls due to geometricalrestraints <strong>of</strong> the assembly and on the estimation <strong>of</strong>the overall friction coefficients in dry andlubricated motion [5].The geometrical studies (see [6] and [7]) haveshown that generally the balls are located nonsymmetricallyand that the configuration for a givenspace and a given number <strong>of</strong> balls is not unique.Tribological studies performed by he authors (see[4], [6] and [7]) have shown very low values <strong>of</strong>overall friction coefficients (0.12 to 0.2 for dry jointand 0.006 to 0.009 in the presence <strong>of</strong> lubricants),leading to an enhanced functionality <strong>of</strong> theprosthesis itself. The present study will use theresults <strong>of</strong> the previous studies in order to determinethe load distribution through the balls bed and thecompressions generated between the joint elements(femoral head, rolling balls, acetabular cup).As we previously stated, a general study <strong>of</strong> theproposed design will target the followingmechanical aspects:– characterization <strong>of</strong> load transfer mechanismthrough the joint elements (statics <strong>of</strong> envelopingloads and/or dynamics studies <strong>of</strong> natural,physiological movements);– evaluation <strong>of</strong> tribological behavior <strong>of</strong> all jointelements (including contact mechanics <strong>of</strong> all activeinterfaces – femoral head-ball, ball-ball, ballacetabularcup);– estimation <strong>of</strong> functional threats and damagingmechanisms for the proposed design (i.e. cleardefinition <strong>of</strong> criteria for joint locking, fatigue <strong>of</strong>prosthetic parts, wear <strong>of</strong> active elements <strong>of</strong> thejoint) and determination <strong>of</strong> influencing factors forall these unwanted phenomena.Lessons learned from previous attempts(structural overall analysis performed in [8]) lead todecoupling the statics and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the joint (FEanalyses) from the tribological behavior (separateanalytical evaluation) in order to savecomputational effort and assuming simplifications.The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis underevaluation are as follows:- type: Total Hip Prosthesis (THP) with selfdirected rolling balls;- geometrical features: outer radius <strong>of</strong> femoralhead - 14 mm; radius <strong>of</strong> each rolling ball 1.25 mm;internal radius <strong>of</strong> acetabular cup - 16.5 mm;spherical cap for balls bed (subtended angle) -160°;Material used for components:- femoral head - Stellite 21;- acetabular cup - Ti6Al4V;- rolling balls - CoCrMo alloy.The methodology used for computing thenumber <strong>of</strong> balls needed for assembling the joint andtheir positions inside the artificial joint is that usedin [4]. The resulted configuration <strong>of</strong> artificial jointwas used in order to build the numerical model forload transfer path through the balls bed.The 3D numerical model is a large one – 58,784elements and 73,100 nodes, with numerous surfacesin contact, requiring high computational resourcesand significant time for simulation. Instead <strong>of</strong> usinga big model with multiple non-linearities, asimplified model was built based on the followingassumed hypotheses1. Femoral head and balls have been consideredrigid (their stiffness is much higher than acetabularcup stiffness).2. The compressive force and flexion drivemoment have been maintained constant.3. Linear elastic behavior <strong>of</strong> acetabular cup wasassumed.4. The compressive forces acting at the ball-toballcontact surfaces are smaller than thecompressive forces between balls and femoral head,respectively between balls and acetabular cup. This332 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


assumption allows us to use, instead <strong>of</strong> sphericalballs, unidimensional nonlinear elements(compression only) connecting the spots <strong>of</strong> contactsbetween the balls and cup, respectively between theball and femoral head with the center <strong>of</strong> each ball.The train <strong>of</strong> balls was not actually modeled as itis; instead <strong>of</strong> 3D representation <strong>of</strong> the balls (Fig. 5),unidimensional contact elements have beenconsidered between the center <strong>of</strong> each ball and theactive surfaces <strong>of</strong> femoral and acetabular prostheticelements.2. SIMULATION METHODOLOGY ANDRESULTSThe 3D FE model was loaded by a compressive1 kN force and a flexion <strong>of</strong> the joint was consideredfor ~37.6° (i.e. a relative maximum displacement <strong>of</strong>circumferential points located on femoral head andacetabular cup equal with 4 times the diameter <strong>of</strong>one rolling ball).After the loads on each ball have beendetermined (being categorized based on ballsregions rather than each ball itself) a local analysiswas performed for establishing the extremeHertzian contact parameters based on the followingmethodology [9]:- maximum pressure, given by*26PEp 30 ,(1)3 2 R- radius <strong>of</strong> contact spot, given by*26PEp 30 ,(2)3 2 R- mutual approach between bodies in contact,given by29P 3 ,(3)*216REwhere P is the applied compressing load, and R therelative curvature given by:1 1 1 (4)R R1R2After performing the geometrical assessment,based on the methodology presented in [4], itresults that the maximum number <strong>of</strong> balls neededfor the spherical joint is 199, distributed on 12consecutive rows [9] as follows:n 0 = 37; n 1 = 19; n 2 = 19; n 3 = 19; n 4 =19 ; n 5 = 19;n 6 = 19; n 7 = 19; n 8 = 14; n 9 = 9; n 10 =5 ; n 11 = 1.Images <strong>of</strong> the rolling balls positions for ϕ = 0and β = 0° ±15° (where ϕ and β are the azimuthand zenith angular coordinates in the sphericalcoordinate system associated with the femoralhead). One could notice from the results <strong>of</strong> themathematical analysis that the arrangement <strong>of</strong> theballs in the rolling space is asymmetrical and willnot be uniquely determined.After applying 1 kN compressive load onto theartificial joint having the balls train configured asresulted from the geometrical analysis [8], theloadings on each rolling ball during the 37.6°flexion were determined by FE analysis <strong>of</strong> adynamic nonlinear model <strong>of</strong> the entire joint.Several three instances have been selected forpresenting the results in both vertical a nd normalviews to the flexion plane in Figs. 2.0 13.68618.8 13.52927.6 19.800Figure 2. The compressive loadings transferred fromfemoral to acetabular parts <strong>of</strong> the prosthesis for differentinstances <strong>of</strong> flexion (between 0° and 37.6°); flexionlisted in left, maximum load listed in right part <strong>of</strong> thepictures).Its correspond to 1 - diameter, 2 - diameter, 3 -diameter and 4 - diameter relative displacementsbetween the acetabular and femoral parts <strong>of</strong> theprosthesis.By analyzing the plots, the followingconclusions could be drawn:a. Even for the initial condition, due toasymmetrical arrangement <strong>of</strong> the balls resultedfrom the geometrical analysis, there is someasymmetry <strong>of</strong> transferring the load path from thefemoral head to the acetabular part [8].b. During the flexion (especially for large angles)a part <strong>of</strong> the balls will not be loaded anymore,leading to an increase <strong>of</strong> the maximum forcetransmitted by intermediate <strong>of</strong> a rolling ball (from~1.35% <strong>of</strong> the total joint compression force - as forflexion angles lower than 18.8°, to ~1.98% <strong>of</strong> thetotal joint compression force - as for a flexion <strong>of</strong>37.6°) - Fig.2.c. By analyzing the loading <strong>of</strong> each ball row, ithas been determined (for the initial position, 0°13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 333


flexion) that the most loaded rows are those locatedclose to 40°…60° from the equatorial plane (therows located lower have small loads on each balls,and for the rows located higher each ball carries abigger load but the number <strong>of</strong> balls is low). Thedistribution <strong>of</strong> rolling balls loading versus thezenith positioning angle <strong>of</strong> the rolling ball ispresented in Fig. 3.Analyzing the graph, the following conclusionscould be drawn:1. As reported before, there is a slight asymmetry<strong>of</strong> the distribution even for the initial position. Thisasymmetry evolves with flexion leading tounloading <strong>of</strong> some balls located peripherallyoutside the hemispherical area characterized bycompressive loading pole.2. The peripheral balls located closer to thecompressive loading pole are generally highlyloaded, but the highest loaded balls remain thosepositioned in intermediate rows (between 40° and60° from the equatorial plane).Seizure burdens to different loadings andcontact surfaces roughness influence over theseizure burden have been determined.Even though the minimum value <strong>of</strong> the wearmust be the same with the minimum value <strong>of</strong> thesurfaces roughness, given the experimentalconditions, it came out from the trials results onwear that the lowest level <strong>of</strong> wear is acquired at acertain value <strong>of</strong> roughness, not at the lowest level<strong>of</strong> roughness.For the tests we used the test rig presented inFig. 4. In this test rig, the friction pair is formedfrom a bush with spherical pr<strong>of</strong>ile and a flat diskshaped with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 18 mm and a thickness <strong>of</strong>5 mm (see Fig. 5). The sphere's radius is r = 11.5mm.Figure 4. Experimental test rigFigure 3. The rolling balls loadings versus zenithpositioning angle <strong>of</strong> ball.For the extreme maximum loadings <strong>of</strong> the ballsduring the analyzed flexion, a preliminaryevaluation <strong>of</strong> tribological parameters <strong>of</strong> contactbetween femoral head and rolling balls and betweenrolling balls and acetabular cup has been performedby using formulae (1) - (3).3. LABORATORY TRIALSExperiments revealed a certain seizure in somestrain conditions. Laboratory trials for balls/planeHertzian contacts have been restarted in order todetermine seizure behaviour depending on theroughness <strong>of</strong> the flat area. The trials have beencarried out in BSF (body simulated fluid)lubrication conditions, much closer to the realoperating conditions up against the initial tests withdistilled water.Figure 5. Used friction coupleIn the static contact, compression stresses incontact spot, p max si p med (maximum pressure andmean pressure) are:3pmax 1.5 PE 2 / π r 2 (1 – μ 2 ) 2 (5)Pp med 2a(6)and the radius <strong>of</strong> the contact surface, a, is:a32 1.5 1PrE(7)334 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


where P is the load, a – radius <strong>of</strong> the contactsurface, and r – radius <strong>of</strong> the sphere.In the friction couple components (see Fig. 9)are made <strong>of</strong> steel, the quantities <strong>of</strong> equations (5),(6) and (7) become:p max ≈ 5800 3 P (8)p med ≈ 1700 3 P (9)A1A2a ≈ 0.09 3 P (10)Attention was paid to processing <strong>of</strong> workingsurfaces <strong>of</strong> couples. Surface state defined bytopography, microstructure <strong>of</strong> surface layer andoxidation state has a major influence on the wearprocess.Due to the complexity <strong>of</strong> processing by abrasion<strong>of</strong> the surface, the most reliable way to ensure areproductible surface is stringently observance <strong>of</strong>all processing phases, which are turning <strong>of</strong> theform, finishing turning, thermal treatment, andcorrection <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile by polishing andsuperpolishing <strong>of</strong> working surface.All the operations until smooth processing <strong>of</strong> thepr<strong>of</strong>ile are made by current technology, noting thatthe intensity <strong>of</strong> the process is kept low to protectthe structure <strong>of</strong> the surface layer <strong>of</strong> material.Super-finishing operation using metallographicground slides technique includes:- wet polishing with sandpaper, grain size 32 μmand 17 μm;- polishing with diamont slury, grain size 6 μmand 1 μm;- wet polishing with slury <strong>of</strong> 2000 Ǻ.Finally, the surfaces are washed with distiledwater, alcohol and then are dried.The maintenance <strong>of</strong> processed couples is madein closed vessels, on silica gel. Surfaces roughnesswas measured with a roughness tester withparametric transducer and recording. Theinstrument allow recording <strong>of</strong> surface pr<strong>of</strong>ile, andalso determination <strong>of</strong> R a and r.m.s., defined as:Rar.m.s 1ll01ll0ydxy2dx(11)(12)In Fig. 6 (A1-A8) pr<strong>of</strong>iles (cross-cut) <strong>of</strong> thesurfaces used and <strong>of</strong> microphotographs obtained innormal lighting are presented.A3A5A7Figure 6. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile and micr<strong>of</strong>otograph <strong>of</strong> the surface withroughness R a = 0.015 μm (A1-A2), R a = 0.045 μm (A3-A4), R a = 0.075 μm (A5-A6) si R a = 0.19 μm (A7-A8).4. RESULTS AND DISSCUSION4.1. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the surface state in the wearprocessExperimental determinations were made onthese test conditions:- Load: variabile between P = 20 ÷ 300 N fordetermining <strong>of</strong> seizure limit. A load <strong>of</strong> 50 N wasused for wear tests.- Sliding speed: Main speed for determining thewear rate was u = 174 cm/s. To determine theinfluence <strong>of</strong> speed on the wear, the device allowsachieving speeds:u = 60 cm/s; u = 18 cm/s si u = 3,2 cm/s.- Lubricant: BSF (Body Simulated Fluid) with thedensity 1183 kg/m 3 and vascosity 0.84 Pa s(HyClone, SH30212.03).Using the parameters above mentioned, thecpuple operates in elastohydrodynamic regime.For the minimum thickness <strong>of</strong> the lubricant film,Archard [8] proposed the relationship:hr00.741 20.0740 u0 Er.84 r P A4A6A8(13)where: h 0 -minimum thickness <strong>of</strong> lubricant film; r-radius <strong>of</strong> the sphere; α-pressure coefficient <strong>of</strong>vascosity; u-sum velocity; μ 0 -dynamic viscosity at13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 335


atmospfericic pressure; E-reduced elasticitymodulus; P-load.Relation (13) reproduces satisfacatory thedependence <strong>of</strong> h 0 by the main quantities u, μ 0 , r andP. The exact determination <strong>of</strong> the minimumlubricant film thickness depends on the knowledge<strong>of</strong> pressure coefficient α for lubricant used and theaccuracy <strong>of</strong> the numerical coefficient <strong>of</strong>relationship (13). In working conditions, using anestimated value α, resulted a minimum lubricantfilm thickness h ≈ 0.06 μm.Spatial form <strong>of</strong> lubricant film in the loaded arearesults from Fig. 7 and 8, which represents twosections <strong>of</strong> lubricant film, longitudinal and crosssections (in relation to the movement) by thesymetry axes.Figure 7. Variation <strong>of</strong> lubricant thickness in the x = 0plane, function <strong>of</strong> load, at speed u = 8 cm/s.▪ 0.7 N; ▼ 1.1 N; 1.5 N; ◊ 3 N; ▪ 4.6 N; ▲ 7.8 N; ○10.8 N.Curves were obtained experimentally, underclose conditions to those used by Dowson [9]. Arenoticed significantly higher values for minimumthickness h 0 , even at speed u = 23 cm/s.To watch in good conditions the wear <strong>of</strong> fixedsurface, function <strong>of</strong> couple roughness, thefollowing solution was used: roughness <strong>of</strong> thecouple was focused on one <strong>of</strong> surfaces, in particularon themobile one. Fixed surface had always theminimum roughness achievable, meaning aboutR a ≈ 0.015 μm.As it is known, the composed roughness <strong>of</strong> thecouple, expressed as standard deviations, σ, is:σ 2 = σ 1 2 + σ 22(14)where σ 1 , σ 2 represent the standard deviations <strong>of</strong> thetwo surfaces.If one <strong>of</strong> the surfaces has small roughness, i.e.σ 1


determination (total running in time t = 10 min.,(sample 704); R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min., with thebush from the previous determination (total runningtime t = 20 min. (sample 705).A27A28A9A10A29A30A11A12A13A14Figure 9. Central transversal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and image <strong>of</strong> wearscar (magnification x 68). R a = 0.015 μm, t = 5 min.A17A18A31A32Figure 11. Transversal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and image <strong>of</strong> wearimprint for samples with R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min.(sample 703); R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min., but the bushfrom the previous determination (total running in timet = 10 min. (sample 704); R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min., butthe bush from the previous determination ((total runningtime t = 20 min. (sample 705).Wear evolution depending on the time fordifferent roughness is shown in Fig. 12. Byincreasing the running time from 5 min., to 30 min.,the wear does not increase only about 10%.Is noted the rapid reduction <strong>of</strong> wear ratefunction <strong>of</strong> time, except the surface with roughnessR a = 0.045 μm. In the first 3 seconds it is producedbetween 25% and 50% <strong>of</strong> wear at 30 min. Thiswear evolution explained by complying surfaces,which results in changing the lubrication regime.A19A20A21A22A23A24Figure 10. Central transversal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and image <strong>of</strong> wearscar (magnification x 68). R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 minFigure 12. Wear evolution function <strong>of</strong> time, for differentroughness.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 337


Note that the amount <strong>of</strong> wear on the plateau iscaused by the initial wear (during the first fewseconds <strong>of</strong> operaton). This observation allows theuse <strong>of</strong> wear value at t = 5 min., as representativequantity for the existing operating conditions. Atthis time <strong>of</strong> operation, scattering <strong>of</strong> values is lover.In the case <strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.045 μm, thewear is so low that during the entire period <strong>of</strong> timeused, lubrication conditions remain aproximatelyunchanged.Evolution <strong>of</strong> the wear function <strong>of</strong> time, forroughness R a = 0.075 μm (samples 826, 827, 829,830 and 832, is shown in Fig. 13.A51A53A52A54A43A44A55A56A45A46A57A56A47A48Figure 13. Evolution <strong>of</strong> the wear function <strong>of</strong> time, forroughness R a = 0.075 μm (samples 826, 827, 829, 830 and 832)Different roughness used have caused not only adiference between worn volume value, but also inthe aspect <strong>of</strong> wear imprint (wear type). In the case<strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μm,(t =3 sec.) and R a = 0.19 μm, (t =3 sec.), the wear is<strong>of</strong> adhesive type (metallic shape with prononcedscratches). In the case <strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.045μm, oxidative wear type is prevailling. Whilereducing the wear rate as a result <strong>of</strong> surfacecompliance, surfaces with R a = 0.075 μm and R a =0.19 μm, also goin in oxidative wear regime.Evolution <strong>of</strong> the wear function <strong>of</strong> time, forroughness R a = 0.19 μm (samples 832, 835, 849,836, 837 si 850, is shown in Fig. 14.For roughness R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μmand R a = 0.19 μm, the results obtained for thevolume <strong>of</strong> worn material, are consistent with thestrain <strong>of</strong> contact, determined by the lubricant filmparameter h min / σ.A59A60Figure 14. Wear evolutionear function <strong>of</strong> time, forroughness R a = 0.19 μm (samples 835, 849, 836, 837 and850)For srfaces with roughness R a = 0.045 μm, therewere observed a running-in influence. After thefirst 5 minutes <strong>of</strong> operations, the entire contactsupraface is covered with oxide. The imprintobtained after another 5 minutes, with the samebush, has a particular form, oxidative wear arearestricting the half at outcome <strong>of</strong>the loaded area(samples A52 si A54). It follows that after running,lubrication condition improve.Figure 15 shows the central pr<strong>of</strong>ile and theimage <strong>of</strong> wear imprinr (magnification x 68). R a =0.15 μm, t =30 min. Pr 997, (new bush).A61A62Figure 15. Central transversal pr<strong>of</strong>ile and image <strong>of</strong> wearimprint. R a = 0.15 μm, t = 30 min., sample 997( new bush).Next, Figure 16 ilustrates the effect <strong>of</strong> runningon the wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.15338 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


μm, compared with Figure 17, wich shows theeffect <strong>of</strong> running on the wear behaviour <strong>of</strong> surfacewith R a = 0.045 μm.A63A64Figure 16. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.015 μm, t = 5 min,Pr 998. The bush from previous determination was used.A65A67A69A66A68A70Figure 17. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.045 μm, t = 5 min,samplez 999, (new bush) 1000 and 1001 (with the bushfrom previous determination).Different roughness used has caused not only adifference between worn volume values, but also inthe aspect <strong>of</strong> wear imprint (wear type). In the case<strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μm, (t=3 sec.) and R a = 0.19 μm, (t =3 sec.), the wear is <strong>of</strong>adhesive type (metallic shape with pronouncedscars). In case <strong>of</strong> surfaces with R a = 0.045 μm,oxidative wear type is prevailing. While reducingthe wear rate as a result <strong>of</strong> surface compliance,surfaces with R a = 0.075 μm and R a = 0.19 μm alsogo in oxidative wear regime.In the case <strong>of</strong> super-finished surfaces, with R a =0.015 μm and R a = 0.045 μm, a favourableinfluence <strong>of</strong> running in is not observed.For rouhness R a = 0.015 μm, R a = 0.075 μm andR a = 0.19 μm, the results obtained for the volume <strong>of</strong>worn material, are consistent with the strain <strong>of</strong>contact, determined by the lubricant film parameterh min / σ.For surfaces with rouhness R a = 0.045 μm, therewas observed a running-in influence. After the first5 minutes <strong>of</strong> operation, the entire contact surface iscovered with oxide. The imprint obtained afteranother 5 minutes, with the same bush, has aparticular form, oxidative wear area restricting thehalf at outcome <strong>of</strong> the loaded area (sample 1001).It follows that after running-in, lubricationconditions improve.In the case <strong>of</strong> super-finished surfaces, afavourable influence <strong>of</strong> running-in is not observed.4.2. Influence <strong>of</strong> initial roughness on the wearand friction coefficientSurface wear, a quantity determined by thefraction <strong>of</strong> area in contact, should be a monotonefunction <strong>of</strong> film parameter h / σ. The minimumvalue <strong>of</strong> wear should coincide with the minimumvalue <strong>of</strong> surface roughness.A large number <strong>of</strong> determinatons <strong>of</strong> wear, withfour roughness have been made: R a = 0.015 μm;R a = 0.045 μm; R a = 0.075 μm si R a = 0.19 μm.Mean values <strong>of</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> worn material for thefour roughness are:R a = 0.015 μm→V u = 7.0 x10 -5 mm 3 → μ = 0.038;R a = 0.045 μm→V u = 7.0 x10 -6 mm 3 → μ = 0.050;R a = 0.075 μm→V u = 3.7 x10 -5 mm 3 → μ = 0.038;R a = 0.190 μm→V u = 1.0 x10 -3 mm 3 → μ = 0.078.Simultaneously with the surface wear, thefriction coefficient was also measured.In Fig. 18 reprezentative images for three <strong>of</strong> thefour roughnesses are presented.A75A79A81A76A80A82Figure 18. The effect <strong>of</strong> running-in on the wearbehaviour <strong>of</strong> the surface with R a = 0.015 μm, t = 5 min,Pr 998. S-a folosit bucsa de la determinarea precedenta.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 339


Existence <strong>of</strong> an optimal roughness can beexplained either by an effect on lubricant film or bya change in mecahanical properties <strong>of</strong> surface. Inthis case, at the optimal roughness, reduction <strong>of</strong> theratio h / σ is compensed by increase <strong>of</strong> wearresistence <strong>of</strong> the surfaces.5. CONCLUSIONSFrom determinatios <strong>of</strong> the evolution over time <strong>of</strong>the wear, it resulted that, in the experimentalconditions used, minimal wear occurs at a certainvaloare <strong>of</strong> roughness and not at the minimalroughness.Surprisingly, minimum friction coefficient doesnot coincide with minimal wear.The existence <strong>of</strong> a minimum in the wear curveresults for roughness R a = 0.045 μm. At the sametime the friction coefficient is minimal at roughnessR a = 0.045 μm. A mathematical relationshipbetveen friction coefficient and wear cannot beestablished.REFERENCES[1] B. Katsutoshi, G.E., S. Kiyoshi: US Patent 5092898/ 03.03.1992.[2] J.P. Davant: Chirurgie de la hance. Mieux vivreavec une prosthesis. Fonder l’avenir, 23, pp. 53-56,1995.[3] M. Sadeghi-Mehr: Investigations <strong>of</strong> Rolling ElementBearing for Hip Joint Prosthesis, PhD Thesis,Imperial College <strong>of</strong> Science, Technology andMedicine University. London, 1997.[4] A. Iarovici, L. Capitanu, V. Florescu, M. Baubec:“Hip Joint Prosthesis with rolling bodies”,<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Romanian Academy – Series A:Mathematics and Physics, Technical Sciences,Information Science, 1, 1-2, pp. 37-44, S. 2001.[5] L. Capitanu, V. Florescu. New Concepts forImproved Durability in MOM Total HipEndoprostheses. A review. American Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Science. Vol.2, No. 6, December 2012.[6] A. Iarovici, L. Capitanu, V. Florescu, M. Baubec, F.Petrescu. Hip Joint Prosthesis with Rolling Bodies,Part I – The Balls Arrangement Analysis.<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Annual Symposium <strong>of</strong> theInstitute <strong>of</strong> Solid Mechanics – SISOM, pp. 251-258,2001,[7] A. Iarovici, L. Capitanu, V. Florescu, M. Baubec, F.Petrescu. Hip Joint Prosthesis with Rolling Bodies,Part II – Numerical and Graphical Examples.<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Annual Symposium <strong>of</strong> theInstitute <strong>of</strong> Solid Mechanics – SISOM, pp. 259-263,2001.[8] A. Iarovici, L. Capitanu, J. Onisoru, V. Florescu, M.Baubec. Stresses and deformations analysis for HipJoint Prostheses with Rolling Bodies. Proceeding <strong>of</strong>the Annual Symposium <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> SolidMechanics SISOM 2002, pp. 263-268.[9] Dowson D. Elastohydrodynamic lubrication.Interdisciplinary Approach to the lubrication <strong>of</strong>concentrated contacts. (Ed. P.P.KU) NASA SP –237, 1970.340 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacANALYZING THEINFLUENCE OF THECONSTRUCTIONELEMENTPOSITION ONTORQUE TRANSMISSIONBYFRICTIONMarija Jeremić 1 , Bojan Bogdanović 1 , Aleksandar Simićć 1 , Dragomirr Miljanić 2Petar Todorović 1 , Sasa Randjelovic 1 , Branko Tadić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong>Engineering, Sestre Janjić 6, Kragujevac, Serbia, mjeremic88@yahoo.com, bogdanovicboki@@gmail.com,aleksandarsimickg88@gmail.com, petar@ @kg.ac.rs, sasarandjelovic@@yahoo.com, tadic@kg.ac. rs2 Metalik, Nikšić, MontenegroAbstract: This paper is analysing the impact <strong>of</strong> the construction element position <strong>of</strong> ship winch drum on the effects <strong>of</strong>torque transmission by friction in the mechanization welding process. The driving and driven n wheels (constructionelements) were examined for the general case <strong>of</strong> the load distribution. Based on this examination, the construction <strong>of</strong>the device that should provide the reliable torque transmission andthe movement <strong>of</strong> the drumm in the process <strong>of</strong> itswelding is proposed. This construction is characterized by a high level <strong>of</strong> flexibility and ability to change the frictiontorque basedon changing drum positionin regard too the driving and driven wheels (construction elements) s). With thisnew construction, problems related to the movement synchronization are avoided, unlike the all previouslyy knownconstructionss <strong>of</strong> this type, which lead tothe positive impact on the wear intensityy <strong>of</strong> friction gears.Keywords: friction, wear, transfer <strong>of</strong>f torque, special device, marine winch drum1. INTRODUCTIONResearchdescribed in the paper is related too theproblems <strong>of</strong> friction torque transmission. Researchis applicative and connected with design <strong>of</strong> bootdevice (reversal) drum ship winchess during weldingprocess. Torque transmission is performed byfriction tribological contact with rubber and metal.Movement can be reached by using only the effects<strong>of</strong> friction, but frictionduring movement alwaysbrings different types <strong>of</strong> losses. Connected withthis, knowledge <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong>f coefficientt <strong>of</strong>friction is very important for every engineer anddesignerwho is involvedindesign anddevelopment <strong>of</strong> mechanical structures, whichperform their function through interaction <strong>of</strong>surfaces which move relatively. It is well knownthat the process <strong>of</strong> friction followss every kindd <strong>of</strong>body movement. Friction is a necessary processbecause only with effects <strong>of</strong> friction f can beachieved starting, moving, changing speed orstopping. On the other hand, during movement, as aconsequence <strong>of</strong> frictional resistance, that resistancemust be overcome in order to continue movement,which is why the energylosses exist. In addition to13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13energy loss, friction is always accompanied withwear <strong>of</strong> material on contact surfaces, whichhproducesan additional costs andloss <strong>of</strong>functionality <strong>of</strong>f elements in n contact.Friction is, therefore, such a process which, atthe same time, manifests positive and negativeeeffects. It is therefore natural that there is atendency to eliminate its negative effects, or at leastminimize, and to t increase the positive [ 1]. A review<strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the friction force, as well asways for measurement aree presented by Peter J.Blau [2], he presented some <strong>of</strong> the most commonstandards-defined measuring methods for f static anddynamic friction coefficient, and its potential uses.Beginning <strong>of</strong> movement m <strong>of</strong> any kind is related tothe existence <strong>of</strong> static friction. Static coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction depends <strong>of</strong> manyy parameters, especiallyfromthe surface <strong>of</strong> contact, normal load, andtemperature <strong>of</strong>f the atmosphere in which contacttoccurs, surface absorption, quality <strong>of</strong> contacttsurface materials [3-7]. Analyzing the rollingprocess [8] inn the absence <strong>of</strong> anyload, theconclusion is that t the energy losses are result <strong>of</strong>collisions <strong>of</strong> two moving rolling mass, i.e. mass <strong>of</strong>rolling body with w the body on whose surface is341


olling. Rolling resistance <strong>of</strong> radial motion <strong>of</strong> f thecylinder at flat surface was investigated in the paper[9]. Tested results showed that the coefficient<strong>of</strong>rolling friction depends on the speed <strong>of</strong> cylindermovement. At low speeds <strong>of</strong> cylinder, thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction increases duee toincreasing <strong>of</strong> substraterate <strong>of</strong> deformation.Forhigher speeds, however, the coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction is reduced, thereby loweringthe area <strong>of</strong>f thedeformed surface. The maximum force f <strong>of</strong> frictionat the initial moment <strong>of</strong> slip has been investigatedon rubber-metal frictionpairs under conditionss <strong>of</strong>constant compressivedeformation <strong>of</strong> the rubberduring transition from the high-elastic to the glassystate questioned A. I. El'kin et al [10] in the paper.Filled butadiene-nitrilee rubber compounds werestudied in the temperature rangefrom +200 to−50°C. The temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> themaximum force <strong>of</strong> friction has a sharply expressedmaximum near the glass transition temperature. . Asthe temperature falls, the force <strong>of</strong> friction at firstincreases, inaccordancewith the molecular-kinnetictheory. As the temperature continues to fall, inn thetransition region maximum force <strong>of</strong>f friction beginsto rise more sharply owing to a sharp increasee inthe volume-mechanicalfriction component.Thefall in the maximum force <strong>of</strong> friction below theglass transition point associated with a decrease inthe deformed volume <strong>of</strong> rubber due to shrinkageand with the reducedd mechanical loss factor.Persson et al [11] study the sliding friction forviscoelasticc solids, e. .g., rubber, on hard flatsubstrate surfaces. Consider first the fluctuatingshear stress inside a viscoelastic solid which resultsfrom the thermal motion<strong>of</strong> the atoms or moleculesin the solid. At the nanoscale the thermalfluctuationsare very strong and give rise to stressfluctuationsin the MParange, which is similar tothe depinning stresses which typically occurr atsolid-rubberr interfaces, indicating the crucialimportance <strong>of</strong> thermal fluctuations for rubberfriction on smooth surfaces. Developed a detailmodel which takes into account the influencee <strong>of</strong>thermal fluctuations on the depinning <strong>of</strong> smallcontact patches (stresss domains) at the rubber-thesubstrate interface. The experiment led toconclusion that the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the surfaceroughness has a very small effect <strong>of</strong>f friction slidingrubber. Theeffects <strong>of</strong> carbon and cellulose fiberson the tribological characteristics<strong>of</strong> rubber-basedfriction materials examined Akbar et al in his paper[12]. Friction tests realized with different slidingspeeds anddifferenttemperatures, with theexaminationn <strong>of</strong> the microstructureand mechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> the surfaces in contact. Experimentalresults showed that carbon fibers had a minor effecton the coefficient friction, but that increase wearresistance. Shanahan et al [13] investigated ithemechanism <strong>of</strong> adhesion that occurs inthe contacttpair rubber andd hard metal rolling bodies. The highhdegree <strong>of</strong> adhesion can bee apparent even at roomtemperature if the contact time and pressure reachsufficient values. Based onn obtained results it wasdetermined thatt energy, which is dissipated duringrolling, refers not only to the influence thattaccompanies histeresis h adhesive separation, butalsoto the losses caused by loadingwith largecylinder. The nature n <strong>of</strong> friction between the rubberrandthe solid substrate is very important for manytechnical applications. Friction <strong>of</strong> rubber issignificantly different fromm the friction betweenhard substancess such as metals and ceramics. In thepaper [14] it was proved that the tire hassignificantly favorable friction characteristics.In order too optimize the construction wereeperformedlargenumber<strong>of</strong> theoreticalconsiderationsand preliminary ideas were done fora detailed review and analysis <strong>of</strong> the literature thattexamines this issue. Research is based ondetermining the transmission <strong>of</strong> torque from thespecial device on marine winch drum, which isdone by means <strong>of</strong> friction between rubber andmetal.2. CONCEPTUAL DESING OF ROTATINGEQUIPMENT FOR WELDINDAn important aspect <strong>of</strong> implementing <strong>of</strong> anyautomated system to the manufacturing process isits price. Because <strong>of</strong> that, design should beanalyzed in detail determing which parts <strong>of</strong> thetechnical systemm are not meaningful to t automate.To define the appropriate general design, projectstarts with the technicall requirements <strong>of</strong> theproduct, discusses designn solutions <strong>of</strong> existingproducts with similar functions (Figure 1). Drive <strong>of</strong>rotary positioner shown is realized by two electriccmotors and gears, because speed and variable speeddrive is required. The principle <strong>of</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> theelectric motor which w drivess pieces <strong>of</strong> the t structurerequires ensuring synchronization <strong>of</strong> movement,which is seriouss theoretical and practical problem.Figure 1. Rotating positioner34213 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Especially when the chain transfer torquetransmissionn is based on the basis <strong>of</strong> friction. Therequirementfor the proper operation <strong>of</strong> structures,in the presence <strong>of</strong> synchronization, is that themotors are with the same characteristics. One <strong>of</strong>f theproblems <strong>of</strong> providing synchronized movement isthe possible differencee <strong>of</strong> phasess <strong>of</strong> propulsionmotors. In addition, great equalization currents canoccur that can cause permanent deformation <strong>of</strong>f themotor coils. In addition to these phenomenacanoccur torque on the wheel axle, which can causeeven shaft breakage. Ifthere is a significant phaseshift <strong>of</strong> motors, engines must be harmonized, whichmeans, must be speedup or slow down. Theproblem <strong>of</strong>not synchronized movement has aparticularly negative impact on thefrictional wear<strong>of</strong> the drive wheels.Figure 2. Conceptual design <strong>of</strong>f constructionConceptual principally solution system Apogondrum marine winch, during the drafting process isshown in Figure 2. General function <strong>of</strong> rotationalstructure is achieved (Figure 2) executing a series<strong>of</strong> partial functions. Rotary positioner is composed<strong>of</strong> more machine parts,sub-assemblies, subgroupsand groups linked to a functional unit. A flexibleshaft coupling is interconnected with the shaft andwheels so the torque and power from the engine istransmitted from one shaft to another point. Drivenwheels rotating function performed under theinfluence <strong>of</strong> rotation<strong>of</strong> the drum. Framesconstruction, rely on a base that is used to keeping adistance between frames is realized, dependingg onthe needs <strong>of</strong>the fastener.3. ANALYSISOFTRANSMISIONFORCESONDimensioning <strong>of</strong> steel structures is performedbased on knowledge <strong>of</strong> layout external actions(forces andmoments). Determining the abilityy <strong>of</strong>constructionn to convey given loads <strong>of</strong> force is basedon the characteristics <strong>of</strong>the materials used andd theallowable stress. Allowable stressess are prescribedfor the steelstructure and functionss are determinedby the choice <strong>of</strong> the material and the t character <strong>of</strong>13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13the external load. Calculation <strong>of</strong> the construction ispro<strong>of</strong> load and usability <strong>of</strong>f the structure under theinfluence <strong>of</strong> prescribed loadd during thelife time <strong>of</strong>construction. The process <strong>of</strong> designing, calculatinganddimensioning <strong>of</strong> construction is actually choice<strong>of</strong> a calculationn model to credibly describe the realbehavior <strong>of</strong> thee structure under the prescribed load,buttaking into account thee optimal complexity <strong>of</strong>the model, the t possibility to calculate theperformance and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> individual parts <strong>of</strong>the structure. This work studied the loads that occurin the system. . System shown in Figure 3 wasexaminated as static s system, i.e. systemat rest stateandthe conditions that enable this state are used.External cause (external effects) on thesolid bodyis the force thatt causes a change in sleep mode andthe motion <strong>of</strong> the system. For the analysis <strong>of</strong> theeffects <strong>of</strong> forcess in the specific examplee <strong>of</strong> the drumwith diameter D = 1000 mm and length l = 20000mmm load is thee weight <strong>of</strong> the drum, which is G =50000 N. Based on these data dimensions <strong>of</strong>construction were w developed. It is necessary todetermine the load l distribution, especially load <strong>of</strong>friction wheel as a function <strong>of</strong> drum position(Figure 3). Rotary positioner is designed that atwork most <strong>of</strong> the weight rests on the drum drivewheel. The whole system iss viewed as a horizontalsystem which is attached to the substrate. In thiscase, the main task is reduced to the determinationn<strong>of</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> the supports and the force <strong>of</strong>friction.Figure 3. Schedule forces onn the maximumm size <strong>of</strong> thedrummIn the beginning problem is solved imagininggthat the supports are removed and replaced by theiraction forces called c resistance actions, as in thiscase the normall force wheels and . It analyzesthe effect <strong>of</strong> thee friction forces that appear betweenthe drum andd wheel. How there are differentmaterials in the contact zone, i.e. theinteractionnbetween the rubber and steel, the coefficients <strong>of</strong>friction μ is different. Connected with this, for the3433


sliding friction, apropos coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictionbetween the drive wheel and the drum takes thevalue 0.6, and the value <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong>rolling friction between the driven wheels anddrums 0.05. As a starting basis for solvinggiven problem is the determination <strong>of</strong> friction forcefrom the equation: ∙ ∙ In order that observed system was inequilibrium, the resultant <strong>of</strong> all the forces must beequal to zero. Since in the observed case <strong>of</strong> action<strong>of</strong> horizontal and vertical forces, this implies twoequilibrium conditions. 0 0From the previous two conditions can becalculated unknown resistance supports N 1 and N 2 .It's actually a system <strong>of</strong> two equations with twounknowns. The first condition <strong>of</strong> equilibrium is thesum <strong>of</strong> all components <strong>of</strong> the forces which acthorizontally in the direction <strong>of</strong> the x axis is equal tozero: 01where are: , , - projection force F ti N on the x axis.The second condition is the sum <strong>of</strong> all forceswhich acting vertically on the given system is equalto zero: 0 2where are: , , - projectionforce on the y axis.Further analysis <strong>of</strong> the static equationsdepending on the angles that are withinthe values <strong>of</strong> 65⁰ to 82⁰ for angle ie. from 38⁰ to47⁰ for angle φ to get possible values <strong>of</strong> the forcesthat are shown in Table 1.The final expressions for the calculation <strong>of</strong> reactionto friction wheels are: ∙ cos cos90 3 ∙ cos cos90 ∙ cos cos90 ∙ cos cos90 where k is a dimensionless coefficient.4Table 1. The dependence the force <strong>of</strong> anglesThe dependence the friction force and theresistance supports on the angle φ F N ∙ μ ∙cosφ F N ∙ μ ∙sinφ ∙cos90 ∙sin90 The dependence the friction force and theresistance supports on the angle φ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙90 ∙90 Static equilibrium conditions for the y axis is: ∙ ∙sin ∙sin90 ∙sin sin90 ∙ 56 ∙ 7 ∙ 8Showing force intensity in depending on thechanges <strong>of</strong> angles, ie. depending on the position <strong>of</strong>the drum, and with the same diameter and weight <strong>of</strong>the drum, were calculated and are presented inTable 2.Table 2. Force intensities depending on the anglesφ φ N 1[kN]N 2[kN]F t1[kN]F t2[kN]1 82 38 6.03 41.41 0.30 24.852 80 39 6.88 41.16 0.34 24.703 78 40 7.75 40.88 0.39 24.534 76 41 8.61 40.55 0.43 24.335 74 42 9.48 40.19 0.47 24.116 72 43 10.35 39.79 0.52 23.877 70 44 11.22 39.35 0.56 23.618 68 45 12.11 38.87 0.61 23.329 66 46 12.99 38.35 0.65 23.0110 65 47 13.83 38.01 0.69 22.80Based on analysis <strong>of</strong> obtained values <strong>of</strong> thenormal forces and frictional force from Table 1, itcan be observed that for settings in any position, thehighest intensity have a force N 2 , i.e. maximumload is on the drive wheels. Based on comparativeanalysis calculation, as well as most <strong>of</strong> thecalculation that are not shown in this paper,dependence <strong>of</strong> driving force (friction force) in thefunction <strong>of</strong> the drum position is established, i.e.dependance <strong>of</strong> angles . This dependency <strong>of</strong>the complex form , is shown in thediagram, which is shown in Figure 4.It can be seen from the diagram that the functionreaches a very high values <strong>of</strong> the force intensityaround angles which are close to 90 0 . It344 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


is obvious that this isa so-calledwedge effect,which occurs at extremely high intensity <strong>of</strong>tangential force.Figure 4. Diagrammatic representation <strong>of</strong> theedependence <strong>of</strong> the friction drive wheel <strong>of</strong> the anglesOstensibly, this "extreme function" can be goodsolution from the driving forces aspect. However,to achieve such high values <strong>of</strong> driving force, thesystem must be exposed to very high valuess <strong>of</strong>normal load, in the order <strong>of</strong> 20 [kN]. Theapplication <strong>of</strong> such highh load is veryproblematic interms <strong>of</strong> the allowablestress levels between thedrum and drive wheel. For this reason, the authorsfind that the angles <strong>of</strong> 2 should be chosenin a range with much lower values, with which willnot be intensive wear and will be ensured stability<strong>of</strong> device.In Figure 5, the different dimensions<strong>of</strong> the drumcanbe set on the positioner. The distance betweenthe rollers cann be, depending on needs, set byscrew. Movement <strong>of</strong> rolls is possible in i horizontalandvertical direction <strong>of</strong> thee positioner frame. f Drivefor rollers aree accomplished with one electriccmotor, which reduces the e speed by worm gear.Operation <strong>of</strong> the t second part <strong>of</strong> the carriage isachieved by a flexible shaft. In this way using <strong>of</strong>fluid power the t synchronization <strong>of</strong>f engine isavoided. Usingg a positioner in the productionprocess, which gives high efficiency and cheaperprocess <strong>of</strong> welding, has thee characteristics <strong>of</strong> light,reliability,performanceand widefield <strong>of</strong>applications. Workpieces are therefore placed in thebest possible way and in the most favorableposition in relation to the welders, and on the basiss<strong>of</strong> technical documentation..4. CONSTRUCTIVEDEVICESOLUTIONOFCalculation <strong>of</strong> the structure derived in theprevious section provesportability and usabilityy <strong>of</strong>the structure under the influence <strong>of</strong> f prescribed loadduring the life time <strong>of</strong> construction. Conceptt <strong>of</strong>special device (device for popositioningandrotation <strong>of</strong>drum during manufacturing process)presented has as main function <strong>of</strong> f torque transfer(power) on the basis <strong>of</strong> friction between rubber andsteel elements that are in direct contact. To ensurethe power transfer, it isnecessary that t the forcee <strong>of</strong>friction is greater than torque on the wheels. Inn theprocess <strong>of</strong> developmentas well as design structureshown, estimate segment <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability aspect is akey elementin the design. This type<strong>of</strong> positioner isspecifically designed and manufactured for thepurpose <strong>of</strong>increasing productivity, reducing theintensity for the welder, because all the weldingprocess canbe performed automatically. Weldinghead is managed by welder, while workpiecerotates. Welding circular cylinder (drum), using acrane to set the adjustable rollers trolley. Thedistance <strong>of</strong> cart can adjust the size <strong>of</strong> the cylinder.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13Figure 5. Different sized drum set up in the positionerFigure 6. Rotaryy positioner assembly: 1- wheel drive, 2-driven wheel, 3 - base, 4- frame positioner, 5 - flexibleshaft, 6 - drum345


Rotary positioner (Figure 6) is composed <strong>of</strong> anumber <strong>of</strong> mechanical parts, sub-assemblies, andsub-groups linked to a functional unit. Drive wheel(position 1) is one <strong>of</strong> the main structural elementsand plays an important role in the performance <strong>of</strong>functions. Casing point consists <strong>of</strong> sides and basewich are welded together. Beside the basic functionto combine elements and enable the properfunctioning <strong>of</strong> the wheel, housing need to protectwheel from external influence. During welding <strong>of</strong>sides paralelism should be taken into account toensure that shaft, which is fitted in the openings odsides, can smootly perform their function. Shaftallows rotating <strong>of</strong> all parts which are there,assembling at functional unit and transferring loads.Given that the direction <strong>of</strong> external loads arevertically, for reliable operation <strong>of</strong> the wheel radialbearings are fitted. Both bearing are protectedagainst atmospheric agents’ with cups. Worm gearwith electric motor serves to transmit power fromthe engine to the working machine, and to adjustrotational speed and torque needed for shaft.Subassembly <strong>of</strong> driven wheel (position 2) is easilyderived as opposed to the drive wheel subassembly.For the purpose <strong>of</strong> stiffening the case, it isnecessary to construct the corresponding ribs. Inthis case the stationary shaft and pressed throughthe opening <strong>of</strong> sides, the wheel while under theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the load rotates around it. The wheelsare made <strong>of</strong> steel coated with rubber; where rubberhas a function to reduce wear process. At the ends<strong>of</strong> the shaft exist thread for nut and washner whichlocates bearing. The distance between the bearinghousing and sides is provided with spacers. As eachobject, in general, can be created in several ways,analysis <strong>of</strong> possible variants is done nad optimalsolution is selected. Standard steel pr<strong>of</strong>iles are usedfor base (position 3). Length <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile is chosenoptimally, based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> cases in terms <strong>of</strong>parameters essential for the performance <strong>of</strong> thedrafting process. The main function <strong>of</strong> the base is toensure the proper conduct <strong>of</strong> frame structureswithout the possibility <strong>of</strong> drift during operation.The connection between the frame and the base isaccomplished by means <strong>of</strong> threaded joints.Parallelism <strong>of</strong> the guide is provided with two rods,which are connected with bolts to linear guides.Frame positioner (position 4) is an importantelement <strong>of</strong> the structure. It consists <strong>of</strong> two standardsteel pr<strong>of</strong>iles assembled by welding. The function<strong>of</strong> the frame is to connect wheels into onefunctional unit. Safety and reliability depends onthe position <strong>of</strong> the wheels and safety and reliability<strong>of</strong> threaded fasteners. Nuts and bolts are used toconnect subassembly <strong>of</strong> wheels with frame.Movement <strong>of</strong> the wheels enables frame length andthe distance depends on the size <strong>of</strong> the drum beingprocessed.5. DISCUSSIONThe introduction <strong>of</strong> new design into theproduction process has many advantages which areshown as follows: Improving the quality <strong>of</strong> welded joints isachieved thereby enabling semiautomaticwelding. During rotation <strong>of</strong> the positioner,the worker can freely perform single-passwelding continuously, without interruption<strong>of</strong> the welding. The process is repeated untilthe drum is fully welded at the site. Reduced the preparatory time duringwelding Increase in pr<strong>of</strong>it resulting from reducedpreparation time. Based on the review, withthe introduction <strong>of</strong> the positioner, it ispossible to produce two winches on theyear, which also means, that theintroduction <strong>of</strong> new design will paid in ashort period <strong>of</strong> time.Technical features <strong>of</strong> the structure are suchthat it is possible to perform the procedureon the positioner gas cutting, as well aswelding.Reengineering processes need to improveorganizational structure, to allow the replacement<strong>of</strong> long-term measures and measures to make quickand drastic changes to increase the quality, reducethe cost, reduce execution time <strong>of</strong> the process,improve internal and external relationships,eliminate unnecessary activities, provide a pleasantatmosphere for work and eliminate unnecessaryactivities.6. CONCLUSIONSFrom review <strong>of</strong> the literature sources related tothe considered problem, it can be concluded thatthis area <strong>of</strong> research is very complex. Here ispresented concept <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> specialproducts (devices for positioning and rotation <strong>of</strong> thedrum), based on knowledge <strong>of</strong> engineering sciencegroup. In order to optimize the construction,theoretical considerations made a number <strong>of</strong>conceptual designs and prepared a detailed reviewand analysis <strong>of</strong> the literature that examines thisissue. The proposed solution does not requiresynchronization device for movement <strong>of</strong> two drivemotors, which is a particular problem, which isdiscussed in the paper. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> a specialdevice, designed for the production gets reducedvalue processing, minimum use <strong>of</strong> materials, betterquality and more reliable weld construction346 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


winches. The authors are inclined to think that aproper choice <strong>of</strong> frame and accessory devices forpositioning, funds can be recovered at the level <strong>of</strong>the two-year. It should be noted that this positionerwhich is semiautomated has positive effects onwelding proces in terms <strong>of</strong> safety. In particular, ifone takes into account that safety in the workplaceis one <strong>of</strong> the most important categories <strong>of</strong> businessin modern conditions <strong>of</strong> production. On the otherhand, the structure is very efficient and suitable forwide application in industrial practice. A veryimportant advantage <strong>of</strong> this design is that themachine can be made with a lot <strong>of</strong> low costelements. If we look at design, it is more than clearthat the design does not require a particularly highaccuracy and precision manufacturing. It wastended to meet function durring design <strong>of</strong> device, tobe easy for manufacture, to be easy formanipulation, to have lowest cost possible and tosatisfy safety requirements.REFERENCE[1] M. Đurđanović, D. Stamenković: Trenje mirovanjauslovikretanja, SERBIATRIB`07[2] Peter J. Blau: The significance and use <strong>of</strong> thefriction coefficient, Tribology International,Vol. 34, pp 585–591, 2001.[3] K.-H. Zum Gahr, K. Voelker, Friction and wear <strong>of</strong>SiC fiberreinforced borosilicate glass mated to steel,Wear 225–229, pp 88–895, 1999.[4] P. Blau, The significance and use <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient, Tribol. Int. 34, pp 585–591, 2001.[5] B. Ivkovic, M. Djurdjanovic, D. Stamenkovic: TheInfluence <strong>of</strong> the Contact Surface Roughness on theStatic Friction Coefficient, Tribology in Industry,Vol. 22, No. 3&4, pp 41-44, 2000.[6] U. Muller, R. Hauert: Investigations <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction diamond-like carbonfilms, Surface and Coatings Technology 174–175,pp. 421–426, 2003.[7] B. Polyakov, S. Vlassov, L.M. Dorogin, P. Kulis, I.Kink, R.Lohmus: The effect <strong>of</strong> substrate roughnesson the static friction <strong>of</strong> CuO nanowires, SurfaceScience, Vol. 606, pp 1393–1399, 2012.[8] D.A. Desai: What is rolling friction, Resonance 9,pp 52-54, 2004.[9] T. Pöschel, T. Schwager, N.V. Brilliantov, Rollingfriction <strong>of</strong> a hard cylinder on a viscous plane, TheEuropean Physical Journal B - Condensed Matterand Complex Systems 10, pp 169-174, 1999.[10] A.I. El'kin, A. I. Moskovkin, E. I. Veksel'man,Maximum force <strong>of</strong> friction in rubber-metal frictionpairs under conditions <strong>of</strong> constant compressivedeformation <strong>of</strong> the rubber, Mekhanika Polimerov,Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 533–538, 1967.[11] B.N.J. Persson, A.I. Volokitin, Rubber friction onsmooth surfaces, The European Physical Journal E,21, pp 69-80, 2006.[12] Akbar Shojaei, Mohammad Arjmand, Amir Saffar,Studies on the friction and wear characteristics <strong>of</strong>rubber-based friction materials containing carbonand cellulose fibers, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials ScienceMarch 2011, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 1890-1901[13] M.E.R. Shanahan, N. Zaghzi, J. Schultz, A. Carré,Hard Rubber/Metal Adhesion Assessment Using aHeavy Cylinder Rolling Test, Adhesion 12, pp 223-238, 1988.[14] Valentin L. Popov, Rubber Friction and ContactMechanics <strong>of</strong> Rubber, Contact Mechanics andFriction, pp 255-270, 2010.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 347


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacUSE ALGORITHM FOR CONSTRUCTION 3D VISIBILITYGRAPHS TO DESCRIBE PLASTIC AND ELASTICDEFORMATION OF ROBOT LASER HARDENED SPECIMENSM. Babič 1 , P. Kokol 2 , M. Milfelner 3 , P. Panjan 4 , Igor Belič 51 Emo-Orodjarna d.o.o., Slovenia, babicster@gmail.com2University <strong>of</strong> Maribor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Slovenia,3 Tic-Lens d.o.o., Slovenia,4 Institute Jozef Stefan, Slovenia,5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Materials and Technology, Slovenia,Abstract: Visibility graphs have many applications. One <strong>of</strong> all applications is analyze trend line <strong>of</strong> marketgraph. Here we use 2D visibility graph for analyze it. Construction for 2D visibility graph is known. But inthis paper, we will present algorithm for construction 3D visibility graphs. 3D Visibility computations arecentral in any computer graphics application. Drawing graphs as nodes connected by links in 3D space isvisually compelling but computationally difficult. Construction <strong>of</strong> 3D visibility graph have big timecomplexity, thus require high pr<strong>of</strong>essional computer or supercomputer. Article describe new method,algorithm for analyze 3D visibility graphs. We develop algorithm, which draws 3D visibility graphs, foranalyze microstructure pictures <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened specimens. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardenedspecimens is very complex, but we can present it with 3D visibility graphs. Algorithm for construction 3Dvisibility graph is very usefull in many cases, including illumination and rendering, motion planning, patternrecognition, computer graphics, computational geometry and sensor networks, military and automotiveindustry. This new algorithm we use to patterns recognition. In materials science, deformation is a change inthe shape or size <strong>of</strong> an object due to an applied force (the deformation energy in this case is transferredthrough work) or a change in temperature (the deformation energy in this case is transferred through heat).With 3D visibility graphs we described elastic and plastic deformation <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened specimens.For analysis <strong>of</strong> results, we use an intelligent system method, namely, a neural network, linear regression andsupport vector machine. We compare all methods.Keywords: Elastic and plastic deformation, visibility graph, robot, laser, hardening,1. INTRODUCTIONIn materials science, deformation is a change inthe shape or size <strong>of</strong> an object due to an appliedforce (the deformation energy in this case istransferred through work) or a change intemperature (the deformation energy in this case istransferred through heat). The first case can be aresult <strong>of</strong> tensile (pulling) forces, compressive(pushing) forces, shear, bending or torsion(twisting). In the second case, the most significantfactor, which is determined by the temperature, isthe mobility <strong>of</strong> the structural defects such as grainboundaries, point vacancies, line and screwdislocations, stacking faults and twins in bothcrystalline and non-crystalline solids. Themovement or displacement <strong>of</strong> such mobile defectsis thermally activated, and thus limited by the rate<strong>of</strong> atomic diffusion. Deformation is <strong>of</strong>ten describedas strain.Laser hardening is a metal surface treatmentprocess complementary to conventional ame andinduction hardening processes. A high-power laserbeam is used to heat a metal surface rapidly andselectively to produce hardened case depths <strong>of</strong> upto 1,5 mm with the hardness <strong>of</strong> the martensiticmicrostructure providing improved properties suchas wear resistance and increased strength. We will348 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


find parameters <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened cell,because we will reduce deformations. We observe amicrostructure <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened patterns. Wefind plastic and elastic deformations.Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> material, size andgeometry <strong>of</strong> the object, and the forces applied,various types <strong>of</strong> deformation may result. The imageto the right shows the engineering stress vs. straindiagram for a typical ductile material such as steel.Different deformation modes may occur underdifferent conditions, as can be depicted using adeformation mechanism map. Laser hardening is ametal surface treatment process complementary toconventional ame and induction hardeningprocesses. A high-power laser beam is used to heata metal surface rapidly and selectively to producehardened case depths <strong>of</strong> up to 1,5 mm with thehardness <strong>of</strong> the martensitic microstructureproviding improved properties such as wearresistance and increased strength. We will findparameters <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened cell, because wewill reduce deformations. We observe amicristructure <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened patterns. Wefind plastic and elastic deformations.Figure 2. Robot laser hardening with differenttemperature and speedFirstly, we analize pr<strong>of</strong>ile graph <strong>of</strong>microstructure picture with visibility graph.Graph 1. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile graph <strong>of</strong> surface hardened specimen2. MATERIALS AND METHODOur study was limited to tool steel <strong>of</strong> DINstandard 1.7225 (Fig. 1). The chemical composition<strong>of</strong> the material contained 0.38% to 0.45% C, 0.4%maximum Si, 0.6% to 0.9% Mn, 0.025% maximumP, 0.035% maximum S and 0.15% to 0.3% Mo.Figure 1. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section <strong>of</strong>hardened specimenThe specimen test section had a cylindrical form<strong>of</strong> dimension 25 × 10 mm (diameter × height).Specimens with porosity <strong>of</strong> about 19% to 50%,were prepared by laser technique, followed byhardening at T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C and v ∈ [2, 5]mm/s. We changed two parameters <strong>of</strong> the robotlaser cell: speed v ∈ [2, 5] mm/s with steps <strong>of</strong> 1mm/s and temperature T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C in steps<strong>of</strong> 100 °C (Fig. 2).We develop new algorithm for constructionvisibility graph in 3D space. This algorithm we useto analyze mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> robot laserhardened specimens.Graph 2: 2D Visibility graph for graph 1Reason for develop constructing the visibilitygraph in 3D space is analyze mechanical properties<strong>of</strong> robot laser hardening. Robot laser hardenedspecimens have better microstructure mechanicalproperties after hardening. With 3D visibility graphwe describe complexity <strong>of</strong> microstructure (Fig. 2and Fig. 3) <strong>of</strong> hardened specimens. We will knowwhich extremes on graph <strong>of</strong> microstructure areconnected.3. RESULTOn Graph 3 is presented deformation beforelaser hardening. Graph 4 present deformation afterlaser hardening. On Graph 5 is presentedrelationship between hardness (HV) and depthbefore laser hardening. On Graph 6 is presented13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 349


elationship between hardness (HV) and depth afterlaser hardening.2.51.50.5Depth [um]200 400 600 800 1000Load [mN]Graph 3. Deformation before laser hardening4. CONCLUSIONWe made experiments hardened specimen. Wepresent deformation on material before and afterrobot laser hardening. We present relationshipbetween hardness and depth befor and afterhardening. In the future we want to exploredeformatiuon as a function <strong>of</strong> more parameters <strong>of</strong> arobot laser hardening. Robot laser cell parametersare strength, energy density, focusing distance,energy density in the focus, focus position,temperature and speed <strong>of</strong> hardening. We willinterested to investigate deformation in the twobeamlaser robot hardening (a laser beam is splitinto two parts).Depth [um]2.51.50.5200 400 600 800 1000Load [mN]Graph 4. Deformation after laser hardeningREFERENCES[1] B.M. Yu, P. Cheng: A fractal permeability modelfor bi-dispersed porous media, International journal<strong>of</strong> Heat Mass Transfer 45, pp. 2983–2993, 2002.[2] Z. Q. Chen, P. Cheng, C.H. Hus: A theoretical andexperimental study on stagnant thermal conductivity<strong>of</strong> bi-dispersed porous media, Int. Commun. HeatMass Transfer 27, pp. 601–610, 2000.[3] R. Pitchumani, B. Ramakrishnan: A fractalgeometry model for evaluating permeabilities <strong>of</strong>porous preforms used in liquid composite molding,Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 42, pp. 2219–2232, 1999.[4] B.B. Mandelbrot: The fractal geometry <strong>of</strong> nature.New York: W. H. Freeman, 1982:93.Graph 5. Hardness in depth before laser hardeningGraph 6. Hardness in depth after laser hardening350 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacUSE FRACTAL GEOMETRY TO DESCRIBE FRICTION OFROBOT LASER HARDENED SPECIMENSM. Babič 1 , P. Kokol 2 , M. Milfelner 3 , P. Panjan 4 , Igor Belič 51 Emo-Orodjarna d.o.o., Slovenia, babicster@gmail.com2University <strong>of</strong> Maribor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Slovenia,3 Tic-Lens d.o.o., Slovenia,4 Institute Jozef Stefan, Slovenia,5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Materials and Technology, Slovenia,Abstract: This paper describes some <strong>of</strong> our experience in laser surface remelting, consolidating, andhardening <strong>of</strong> steels. The process <strong>of</strong> laser hardening with remelting <strong>of</strong> the surface layer allows us to veryaccurately determine the depth <strong>of</strong> modified layers. In this procedure, we know the exact energy input into thematerial. Heating above the melting temperature and then rapidly cooling causes microstructural changes inmaterials, which affect the increase in hardness. Mathematics and Computer Science are very useful in manyother Science. We use mathematical method, fractal geometry in engineering, exactly in laser technics.Moreover, with fractal geometry we analize complexity <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened specimens. We analizespecimens hardened with different parameters <strong>of</strong> robot laser cell. So we changed two parameters speed v ∈[2, 5] mm/s and temperature T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C. In this work, we have used a scanning electronicmicroscope (SEM) to search and analyse the fractal structure <strong>of</strong> the robot laser hardened specimens.Friction is the force resisting the relative motion <strong>of</strong> solid surfaces, fluid layers, and material elements slidingagainst each other. The present study is intended to use new method, fractal geometry to describe completelyfriction <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardened specimens. Finally, concept <strong>of</strong> fractal geometry is applied to characterizethe microstructure and derive the useful relationship between fractal dimension and microstructuralfeatures. The modeling <strong>of</strong> the relationship was obtained by the four layer neural network.Keywords: Friction, fractal geometry, robot, laser, hardening,1. INTRODUCTIONFriction is the force resisting the relative motion<strong>of</strong> solid surfaces, fluid layers, and material elementssliding against each other.In nature we have many geometrical objectswhich are irregular and cannot be described withclassical Euclidian geometry. Thus we need a newmethod for describing the complexity andirregularity <strong>of</strong> objects. A relatively new method isfractal geometry. Recently, a concept <strong>of</strong> fractalgeometry which was originally developed for theanalysis <strong>of</strong> irregular features in nature has beenfinding increased applications in the fields <strong>of</strong>materials science for the characterization <strong>of</strong>microstructures. The key to fractal geometry is thefractal dimension, which describes the complexity<strong>of</strong> a fractal and geometrically irregularmicrostructure. Measuring fractal dimensions hasbecome a common practice for describing thestructural properties <strong>of</strong> roughness and hardness <strong>of</strong>heat-treated materials. We use fractal geometry inlaser techniques. Laser hardening is a metal surfacetreatment process that is complementary toconventional aim and induction hardeningprocesses. A high-power laser beam is used to heata metal surface rapidly and selectively so as toproduce hardened case depths <strong>of</strong> up to 1.5mm withthe hardness <strong>of</strong> a martensitic micro-structure,providing improved properties such as wearresistance and increased strength.First, we hardened tool steel standard label DINstandard 1.7225 with a robot laser cell. Thechemical composition <strong>of</strong> the material contained0.38 to 0.45% C, 0.4% maximum Si, 0.6–0.9% Mn,0.025% maximum P, 0.035% maximum S and13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 351


0.15–0.3% Mo [18]. The specimen test section wasin a cylindrical form with dimensions <strong>of</strong> 25×10mm.We changed two parameters, speed v ∈ [2, 5] mm/sin steps <strong>of</strong> 1 mm/s, and temperature T ∈ [1000,1400] °C in steps <strong>of</strong> 100 °C. After hardening, wepolished and etching all specimens. Detailedcharacterization <strong>of</strong> their microstructure before andafter surface modifications was conducted using afield emission scanning electron microscope, JEOLJSM-7600F. We used the ImageJ program(available from the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Health,USA) to analyse these pictures. On these specimenswe took measurements <strong>of</strong> roughness and hardnessbefore and after robot laser hardening.Figure 3. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section <strong>of</strong>hardened specimenThe specimen test section had a cylindrical form<strong>of</strong> dimension 25 × 10 mm (diameter × height).Specimens with porosity <strong>of</strong> about 19% to 50%,were prepared by laser technique, followed byhardening at T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C and v ∈ [2, 5]mm/s. We changed two parameters <strong>of</strong> the robotlaser cell: speed v ∈ [2, 5] mm/s with steps <strong>of</strong> 1mm/s and temperature T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C in steps<strong>of</strong> 100 °C (Fig. 2).Figure 1. Microstructure before robot laser hardeningFigure 2. Microstructure <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardenedspecimen with 1000° C and 2 mm/s2. MATERIALS AND METHODOur study was limited to tool steel <strong>of</strong> DINstandard 1.7225 (Fig. 1). The chemical composition<strong>of</strong> the material contained 0.38% to 0.45% C, 0.4%maximum Si, 0.6% to 0.9% Mn, 0.025% maximumP, 0.035% maximum S and 0.15% to 0.3% Mo.Figure 4. Robot laser hardening with differenttemperature and speedA pr<strong>of</strong>ilometer (available from the InstituteJozef Stefan, Slovenia) was used for themeasurement <strong>of</strong> the surface roughness parameterR a (arithmetic mean deviation <strong>of</strong> the roughnesspr<strong>of</strong>ile) and hardness <strong>of</strong> the robot laser hardenedspecimens. SEM images were converted into binarydigital images (using the public domain s<strong>of</strong>tware,ImageJ). The fractal characterization <strong>of</strong> materialsproperties as an applicable and potential tool hasbeen well documented. The key parameter in fractalgeometry is the fractal dimension, D, which shouldbe determined first before we use the concept andknowledge <strong>of</strong> fractal geometry to characterize themicrostructure <strong>of</strong> the robot laser hardenedspecimens. We calculated the fractal dimensionusing image processing <strong>of</strong> the SEM pictures incombination with implementation <strong>of</strong> a boxcountingmethod (algorithm) using the ImageJs<strong>of</strong>tware. The measure <strong>of</strong> the fractal object, M(L),is related to the length scale, L, through a scaling inthe form <strong>of</strong> Eq. (1):M(L)=L D (1)where M(L) is the surface area <strong>of</strong> a pore and D isthe fractal dimension <strong>of</strong> the sample. A twodimensionalobject, such as the SEM picture, canbe divided into N(ε) self-similarity smaller squares,352 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


each <strong>of</strong> which is measured by the length ε. Thefractal dimension can be calculated according toEq. (2):D=lnN(ε)/lnε. (2)Characterization <strong>of</strong> surface topography isimportant in applications involving friction,lubrication, and wear (Thomas, 1999). In general, ithas been found that friction increases with averageroughness. Roughness parameters are, therefore,important in applications such as automobile brakelinings and floor surfaces. The effect <strong>of</strong> roughnesson lubrication has also been studied to determine itsimpact on issues regarding lubrication <strong>of</strong> slidingsurfaces, compliant surfaces, and roller bearingfatigue. Finally, some researchers have found acorrelation between the initial roughness <strong>of</strong> slidingsurfaces and their wear rate. Such correlations havebeen used to predict the failure time <strong>of</strong> contactsurfaces. A section <strong>of</strong> standard length is sampledfrom the mean line on the roughness chart. Themean line is laid on a Cartesian coordinate systemwherein the mean line runs in the direction <strong>of</strong> the x-axis and magnification is the y-axis. The valueobtained with the formula on the right is expressedin micrometers (Om) when y=f(a).Fractal dimension1,9651,961,9551,951,9451,941,9351,935 mm/s4 mm/s3 mm/s1,9252 mm/s1,920 50 100 150 200 250RoughnessExperimental dataFitting curve with neural networkGraph 3. Relationship between fractal dimension androughness R a in specimens hardened at different speedsat 1000 °CFractal dimension21,991,981,971,961,951,941,934 mm/s5 mm/s3 mm/s2 mm/s1,9234 234 434 634 834 1034 1234 1434RoughnessExperimental dataFitting curve with neural networkGraph 4. Relationship between fractal dimension androughness R a in specimens hardened at different speedsat 1400 °C4. CONCLUSIONGraph 1. Arithmetical mean roughness (Ra)3. RESULTWe studied the relationship between the fractaldimension, parameters <strong>of</strong> the robot laser cell androughness (friction).The paper presents the use <strong>of</strong> fractal geometry todescribe the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> robot laserhardened specimens. We use a relatively newmethod, fractal geometry, to describe thecomplexity <strong>of</strong> laser hardened specimens. The mainfindings can be summarized as follows:1. A fractal structure exists in the robot laserhardened specimens.2. We describe the complexity <strong>of</strong> the robot laserhardened specimens using fractal geometry.3. We have identified the optimal fractal dimension<strong>of</strong> tool steel hardened with different robot laserparameters.4. We use the box-counting method to calculate thefractal dimension for robot laser hardenedspecimens with different parameters.REFERENCESGraph 2. Roughness od robot laser hardenendspecimens[1] B.B. Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry <strong>of</strong>Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman, p. 93, 1982.[2] P.V. Yasnii, P.O. Marushchak, I.V.Konovalenko, R.T. Bishchak, Computeranalysis <strong>of</strong> surface cracks in structuralelements, Materials Science 46, pp. 833-839,2008.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 353


[3] P.V. Yasnii, P.O. Marushchak, I.V.Konovalenko, R.T. Bishchak, Structuraldegradation and damage caused by a system <strong>of</strong>cracks to the steel <strong>of</strong> metallurgical equipment,Materials Science 47, pp. 798-803, 2009.[4] C.C. Barton, Fractal Analysis <strong>of</strong> Scaling andSpatial Clustering <strong>of</strong> Fractures. In: Barton, C.C.and La Pointe, P.R. (eds.), Fractals in the EarthSciences. Plenum Press. New York, pp. 141-178, 1995.[5] L.W. Fan, Y.C. Hu, T. Tian, Z.T. Yu, Thepredication <strong>of</strong> effective thermal conductivitiesperpendicular to the fibres <strong>of</strong> wood using afractal model and an improved transientmeasurement technique, International Journal<strong>of</strong> Heat Mass Transfer 49, pp. 4116–4123,2006.[6] T. Ficker, Fractal strength <strong>of</strong> cement gels anduniversal dimension <strong>of</strong> fracture surfaces,Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 50, pp. 167–171,2008.[7] M.Q. Jiang, J.X. Meng, J.B. Gao, X.L. Wang,T. Rouxel, V. Keryvin, Z. Ling, L.H. Dai,Fractal in fracture <strong>of</strong> bulk metallic glass,Intermetallics 18, pp. 2468–2471, 2010.[8] A. Carpinteri, S.A. Puzzi, A fractal approach toindentation size effect, Engineering Fract.Mech. 73, pp. 2110-2122, 2006.354 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacUSE NEW PROCESS IN ROBOT LASER HARDENING TODECREASE WEAR OF SPECIMENSM. Babič 1 , P. Kokol 2 , M. Milfelner 3 , P. Panjan 4 , Igor Belič 51 Emo-Orodjarna d.o.o., Slovenia, babicster@gmail.com2University <strong>of</strong> Maribor, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Health Sciences, Slovenia,3 Tic-Lens d.o.o., Slovenia,4 Institute Jozef Stefan, Slovenia,5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Materials and Technology, Slovenia,Abstract: The mechanism <strong>of</strong> wear is very complex and the theoretical treatment without the use <strong>of</strong> rathersweeping simplifications is not possible. The material intrinsic surface properties such as hardness, strength,ductility, work hardening etc. are very important factors for wear resistance, but other factors like surfacefinish, lubrication, load, speed, corrosion, temperature and properties <strong>of</strong> the opposing surface etc. areequally important. Robot laser surface-hardening heat treatment is complementary to conventional flame orinductive hardening. A high-power laser beam is used to heat a metal surface rapidly and selectively toproduce hardened case depths <strong>of</strong> up to 1.5 mm with hardness values <strong>of</strong> up to 65 HRc. Laser hardeninginvolves features, such as non-controlled energy intake, high performance constancy and accuratepositioning processes. A hard martensitic microstructure provides improved surface properties such as wearresistance and high strength. We describe a new technological process <strong>of</strong> hardening, which can decrease thewear <strong>of</strong> hardened specimens. The new process uses robot laser hardening with an overlapping laser beam.First, we hardened specimens using different velocities and temperatures and then repeated the process. Inaddition, we present how the speed and temperature affect the wear in two different processes <strong>of</strong> robot laserhardening. Furthermore, we present the improved results after hardening with the overlap process. Toanalyse the results, we used one method <strong>of</strong> intelligent system, neural networks and a relationship wasobtained by using a four-layer neural network. We compare both processes.Keywords: Wear, robot, laser, hardening, process <strong>of</strong> overlapping,1. INTRODUCTIONIn materials science, wear is erosion or sidewaysdisplacement <strong>of</strong> material from its "derivative" andoriginal position on a solid surface performed bythe action <strong>of</strong> another surface. Wear is related tointeractions between surfaces and more specificallythe removal and deformation <strong>of</strong> material on asurface as a result <strong>of</strong> mechanical action <strong>of</strong> theopposite surface. The need for relative motionbetween two surfaces and initial mechanical contactbetween asperities is an important distinctionbetween mechanical wear compared to otherprocesses with similar outcomes.The definition <strong>of</strong> wear may include loss <strong>of</strong>dimension from plastic deformation if it isoriginated at the interface between two slidingsurfaces.However, plastic deformation such as yieldstress is excluded from the wear definition if itdoesn't incorporates a relative sliding motion andcontact against another surface despite thepossibility for material removal, because it thenlacks the relative sliding action <strong>of</strong> another surface.2. MATERIALS AND METHODOur study was limited to tool steel <strong>of</strong> DINstandard 1.7225 (Fig. 1). The chemical composition<strong>of</strong> the material contained 0.38% to 0.45% C, 0.4%maximum Si, 0.6% to 0.9% Mn, 0.025% maximumP, 0.035% maximum S and 0.15% to 0.3% Mo[10].13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 355


Figure 1. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section <strong>of</strong>hardened specimenThe specimen test section had a cylindrical form<strong>of</strong> dimension 25 × 10 mm (diameter × height).Specimens with porosity <strong>of</strong> about 19% to 50%,were prepared by laser technique, followed byhardening at T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C and v ∈ [2, 5]mm/s. First, we changed two parameters <strong>of</strong> therobot laser cell: speed v ∈ [2, 5] mm/s with steps <strong>of</strong>1 mm/s and temperature T ∈ [1000, 1400] °C insteps <strong>of</strong> 100 °C (Fig. 2). Secondly, we repeated theprocess (Fig. 3). In addition, we hardened thespecimens again with equal parameters <strong>of</strong> the robotlaser cell. The microstructure <strong>of</strong> the specimens wasobserved with a field emission scanning electronmicroscope (JSM-7600F, JEOL Ltd.). An irregularsurface texture was observed with a few breaks,which are represented by black islands (Fig. 4). Fig.5 presents the boundary between the hardened andnon-hardened material.Figure 2. Robot laser hardening with differenttemperature and speedFigure 3. Repeated process <strong>of</strong> robot laser hardeningFigure 4. SEM picture <strong>of</strong> robot laser re-hardenedspecimenFigure 5. The boundary between work-hardened andnon-hardened materialWe used the method <strong>of</strong> determining the porosityfrom SEM images <strong>of</strong> the microstructure. It isknown that in a homogenously porous material thearea <strong>of</strong> pores is equal to the volume <strong>of</strong> pores inspecimens. The SEM pictures were converted tobinary images (Fig. 6), from which we calculatedthe area <strong>of</strong> pores <strong>of</strong> all pictures using the ImageJprogram (ImageJ is a public domain, Java-basedimage processing program developed at theNational Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health). The area <strong>of</strong> pores oneach picture <strong>of</strong> the material was calculated and thenthe arithmetic mean and standard deviation <strong>of</strong>porosity were determined. To analyze he possibility<strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> fractal analysis to the heattreatedsurface, we examined the relation betweenthe surface porosity and fractal dimensionsdepending on various parameters <strong>of</strong> the robot lasercell. In fractal geometry, the key parameter is thefractal dimension D. The relationship between thefractal dimension D, volume V and length L, can beindicated as follows:V~L D (1)356 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Fractal dimensions were determined using thebox-counting method which has been proven tohave higher calculation speed and more accuracyby Dougan and Shi.the structure <strong>of</strong> a neural network until it can modelthe problem in the most efficient way. Neuralnetworks are models <strong>of</strong> biological neural structures.The starting point for most neural networks is amodel neuron, as shown in Fig. 7. This neuronconsists <strong>of</strong> multiple inputs and a single output. Eachinput is modified by a weight, which multiplieswith the input value.Figure 6. Calculation <strong>of</strong> fractal dimensions with boxcountingmethodTo analyse the results we used one method <strong>of</strong>intelligent system; the neural network. Artificialneural networks (ANN) are simulations <strong>of</strong>collections <strong>of</strong> model biological neurons. A neuronoperates by receiving signals from other neuronsthrough connections called synapses. Thecombination <strong>of</strong> these signals, in excess <strong>of</strong> a certainthreshold or activation level, will result in theneuron firing, i.e., sending a signal to anotherneuron to which it is connected. Some signals act asexcitations and others as inhibitions to a neuronfiring. What we call thinking is believed to be thecollective effect <strong>of</strong> the presence or absence <strong>of</strong>firings in the patterns <strong>of</strong> synaptic connectionsbetween neurons. In this context, neural networksare not simulations <strong>of</strong> real neurons, in that they donot model the biology, chemistry, or physics <strong>of</strong> areal neuron. However, they do model severalaspects <strong>of</strong> the information combination and patternrecognition behaviour <strong>of</strong> real neurons, in a simpleyet meaningful way. This neural modelling hasshown incredible capability for emulation, analysis,prediction and association. Neural networks can beused in a variety <strong>of</strong> powerful ways: to learn andreproduce rules or operations from given examples;to analyse and generalise sample facts and to makepredictions from these; or to memorisecharacteristics and features <strong>of</strong> given data and tomatch or make associations with new data. Neuralnetworks can be used to make strict yes-nodecisions or to produce more critical, finely valuedjudgments. Neural network technology is combinedwith genetic optimisation technology to facilitatethe development <strong>of</strong> optimal neural networks tosolve modelling problems. Genetic optimisationuses an evolution-like process to refine and enhance3. RESULTFigure 7. A neuron modelGraph [1-2] present relationship betweenroughness R a and hardness in specimens hardenedat different speeds at 1000 °C with both process.Roughness2502001501005004 mm/s3 mm/s5 mm/s2 mm/s55 56 57 58 59 60 61HardnessExperimental dataFitting curve with neural networkGraph 1. Relationship between roughness R a andhardness in specimens hardened at different speeds at1000 °CRoughness1400120010008006004002003 mm/s2 mm/s4 mm/s5 mm/s057,7 57,8 57,9 58 58,1 58,2 58,3HardnessExperimental dataFitting curve with neural networkGraph 2. Relationship between roughness R a andhardness in specimens hardened at different speeds at1000 °C with process <strong>of</strong> overlapping13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 357


4. CONCLUSIONThe paper presents using fractal geometry todescribe the wear <strong>of</strong> robot laser-hardenedspecimens with overlap. We use the relatively newmethod <strong>of</strong> fractal geometry to describe thecomplexity <strong>of</strong> laser-hardened specimens.REFERENCES[1] B.B. Mandelbrot. The fractal geometry <strong>of</strong>Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1982, p. 93.[2] P.V. Yasnii, P.O. Marushchak, I.V.Konovalenko, R.T. Bishchak, Computeranalysis <strong>of</strong> surface cracks in structuralelements, Materials Science 46, pp. 833-839,2008.[3] P.V. Yasnii, P.O. Marushchak, I.V.Konovalenko, R.T. Bishchak, Structuraldegradation and damage caused by a system <strong>of</strong>cracks to the steel <strong>of</strong> metallurgical equipment,Materials Science 47, pp. 798-803, 2009.[4] C.C. Barton, Fractal Analysis <strong>of</strong> Scaling andSpatial Clustering <strong>of</strong> Fractures. In: Barton, C.C.and La Pointe, P.R. (eds.), Fractals in the EarthSciences. Plenum Press. New York, pp. 141-178, 1995.[5] L.W. Fan, Y.C. Hu, T. Tian, Z.T. Yu, Thepredication <strong>of</strong> effective thermal conductivitiesperpendicular to the fibres <strong>of</strong> wood using afractal model and an improved transientmeasurement technique, International Journal<strong>of</strong> Heat Mass Transfer 49, pp. 4116–4123,2006.[6] T. Ficker, Fractal strength <strong>of</strong> cement gels anduniversal dimension <strong>of</strong> fracture surfaces,Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 50, pp. 167–171,2008.[7] [7] M.Q. Jiang, J.X. Meng, J.B. Gao, X.L.Wang, T. Rouxel, V. Keryvin, Z. Ling, L.H.Dai, Fractal in fracture <strong>of</strong> bulk metallic glass,Intermetallics 18, pp. 2468–2471, 2010.[8] A. Carpinteri, S.A. Puzzi, A fractal approach toindentation size effect, Engineering Fract.Mech. 73, pp. 2110-2122, 2006.358 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacDIFFERENT WAYS OF FRICTION COEFFICIENTDETERMINATION IN STRIPE IRONING TESTS Aleksandrovic 1 , M. Stefanovic 1 , V. Lazic 1 , D. Adamovic 1 , M. Djordjevic 1 , D. Arsic 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Serbia, srba@kg.ac.rsAbstract: The sheet metal stripe ironing laboratory test has been developed to study tribologicalappearances and performance <strong>of</strong> lubricants in ironing process. Most common way for friction coefficientdetermination in the test is use <strong>of</strong> different formulas which gives relation between active forces and reactivefriction forces. In application <strong>of</strong> such formulas some difficulties occurs because <strong>of</strong> improper frictioncoefficient values, especially at small intensities <strong>of</strong> tensile or drawing forces. In this paper for literatureapproaches were analyzed and after that defining <strong>of</strong> new formula were proposed. New formula was testednumerically and experimentally. Obtained results indicated that the suggested improvements give much moreacceptable values <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient. That fact is particularly significant in lubricant evaluation process.Keywords: Thick sheet metal, stripe ironing test, friction coefficient1. INTRODUCTIONIroning is technological process which combinecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> sheet metal forming and bulkforming. Thinnig strain reach over 25%, andcontact pressure over 1000 MPa [1]. Most <strong>of</strong>tenapplies in manufacture <strong>of</strong> cylindrical geometrypieces whose depth is much bigger than diameter,and bottom thickness is bigger than wall thickness.Ironing is normally applied following deepdrawing (or extrusion) when forming high, thinwalled cans. Such cans are used for beverages,cartridge cases, high pressure cylinders, housingsfor pumps and shock absorbers etc. World annualproduction (especially for beverage cans) are morethan billion pieces [2].Of the sheet metal forming processes, ironing isone <strong>of</strong> the tribologically most severe, owing to thehigh surface expansion and normal pressure at thetool-workpiece interface. This is particularlysignificant in the case <strong>of</strong> forming <strong>of</strong> pour fomabilitymaterials such as stainless steel, high strength steel,etc. [3]. Because <strong>of</strong> that, use <strong>of</strong> proper performacelubricants is very significant. In order to quantifythe performance <strong>of</strong> the individual lubricants, adifferent simulative test methods has beendeveloped. All the tests are modelling the processconditions in ironing. It is a very convenient to usecoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction at contact surfaces change asa criterion for lubricants evaluation.For this study one <strong>of</strong> classic stripe ironing testswas chosen [4]. By analysis <strong>of</strong> acting <strong>of</strong> drawingforce, side forces and friction forces well knownformula was determined. This particular formulaestablished the connection between tool geometry,forces and coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction. The formula wasused in different researches, [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] in genuinor modified form.However, by more accurate measurements <strong>of</strong> thedrawing force was shown that formula givesnegative friction coefficient values in range <strong>of</strong> forcesmaller intensities. That fact was indicated yet inarticle [5]. That was motive for making analysis <strong>of</strong>several approaches with goal to obtain moreconvenient formula appropriate for abovementioned strip reduction test.2. DEFINING OF FRICTION COEFFICIENTFigure 1 shows scheme <strong>of</strong> the stripe ironing testtooling which models the symmetrical contact <strong>of</strong>the sheet with the die during the ironing process.The metal strip is being placed into the holding jaw.The jaw with the sample is moving from the bottomtowards the top, by the mechanical part <strong>of</strong> thedevice. The sample is being acted upon by the side13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 359


elements with force F D , which simulate theindustrial tool die and perform the ironing. Duringthe ironing process the recording <strong>of</strong> the drawingforce is being done at over the total length <strong>of</strong> thepunch travel, by the corresponding measuringsystem.force in the sliding process starting phase. Thisnotice was given yet in article [5] where wasassumed that cause <strong>of</strong> such a disadvantage isnegligence <strong>of</strong> the forces in narrow vertical zonebetween side element inclined surfaces. Scheme <strong>of</strong>forces at fig. 2 was formed according topropositions from that study [9]. After forceanalysis friction coefficient is given by:F 2F0.25 2tgD (4)Ftg 4FDFigure 1. Stripe ironing test modelTerm (1) gives friction coefficient μ dependenceon drawing force (F), side force (F D ) and inclinationangle α and that is well-known classic formula [4].F tg2FDF 2FDtg Ftg12FD Ftg2FDFcos 2FDsin 2F cos Fsin D(1)Similar term (2) was proposed in article [6]. Ifinstead <strong>of</strong> force F is inserted F/2 term (1) wasgiven.Fcos FDsin F cos Fsin DTerm (3) is using in article [2].Fcos 2FDsin F cos Fsin D(2)(3)Previous three formulas give negative frictioncoefficient values for smaller intensities <strong>of</strong> drawingFigure 2. Force acting scheme [9]Within a framework <strong>of</strong> the same study [9]intuitively was proposed different scheme <strong>of</strong> sideforces F D acting. It assumes that at inclined surfaceacting force F D /2 and at narrow vertical surface alsothe same force F D /2. In such conditions anotherversion <strong>of</strong> previous formula was given.F2F0.25 2tgD (4a)Ftg2FDAfter analysis <strong>of</strong> the previous formulas scheme<strong>of</strong> forces in fig. 3 was formed. Based onequilibrium equation <strong>of</strong> all the forces (for contactsurfaces at both sides) in vertical direction, frictioncoefficient is given by:F (5)2 sin 22aFDcos F 21 aFD2360 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 3. Modified force acting scheme0.80.70.60.5F D =10000 NParameter a is determining distribution <strong>of</strong> sideforce F D between inclined and small vertical contactsurface and his value is in the range 0 to 1. It wasadopted a=0.7 in this case. Parameter a influence onfriction coefficient value is very small (about 1%).Figures 4 and 5 gives comparative overview <strong>of</strong>all the 6 formulas whereat was adopted F D =10 kN(fig. 4) and F D =0 kN (fig. 5). Inclination angle was10 o . Drawing force is linearly increasing from 0 to9500 N and lies on x axis. Clearly can be seen thatformulas 1, 2 and 3 gives unreal negative frictioncoefficient values for smaller force F intensities.Use <strong>of</strong> 4 and 4a formulas is solving thisdisadvantage, but at the sliding process beginningfriction coefficient have positive nonzero alsounreal values. Only formula 5 gives frictioncoefficient values which starts from 0. That is inaccordance with ironing process course. At smallerintensities <strong>of</strong> side force F D friction coefficientvalues are probably higher then real.=10 o Formula 2Proposed formula0.4Formula 4-a0.30.20.10.0-0.1Formula 4 Formula 1-0.2-0.3Formula 3-0.40 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000F, NFigure 4. Friction coefficient dependencies on drawing forceAs a example <strong>of</strong> formula (5) application inlubricants quality evaluation experiment giving arethe figures 6 and 7. Experimental equipment isbased on tribo model from fig. 1 and describedwith more details in [9]. Sliding process was onephase with side forces 5, 10, 15 and 20 kN. Slidinglength was approximately 60 mm at speed <strong>of</strong> 100mm/min. Stripe material is low carbon steel sheetwith 2.5 mm thickness. L2 is special dry ecologicallubricant based on wax and metallic soap.Lubricant layer was obtained by dipping into bathwith proper solution and than drying. L3 is lithiumgrease with MoS 2 .13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 361


0.80.7F D =20000 N0.6=10 o Formula 20.50.4Proposed formula0.30.20.10.0Formula 4-a-0.1-0.2Formula 4 Formula 1-0.3Formula 3-0.40 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000F, NFigure 5. Friction coefficient dependencies on drawing forceBy fig. 6 and fig. 7 comparison can be seen thatfor lubricant L3 contact pressure has no substantialinfluence on friction coefficient. In the case <strong>of</strong>0.25lubricant L3 application friction coefficient isdecreasing with side force decreasing.Lubricant: L2DC 04Friction coefficient , -0.200.150.10F D = 15 kNF D = 5 kNF D = 20 kNFD = 10 kN0.050.000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Sliding length h, mmFigure 6. Friction coefficient dependencies on sliding length362 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


0.25Lubricant: L3DC 04Friction coefficient , -0.200.150.10F D = 15 kNF D = 5 kNF D = 20 kNF D = 10 kN0.053. CONCLUSION0.000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the fourliterature formulas for the friction coefficientdetermining in stripe ironing test wasaccomplished in the first part <strong>of</strong> this study. Threeformulas give negative unreal friction coefficientvalues for smaller intensities <strong>of</strong> drawing force inthe sliding process starting phase. For one formula(in two versions) friction coefficient have positivenonzero but also unreal values at the slidingprocess beginning. These notices are indicatingthat previously mentioned formulas are inaccurate.Different formula was suggested in the secondpart <strong>of</strong> this study. Proposed formula enables todetermine acceptable friction coefficient valuesand dependencies. After performing <strong>of</strong> trialexperiments the results are indicating that proposedformula can be successfully applied in thelubricant evaluation during chosen stripe ironingtest process.REFERENCES[1] N. Bay, A. Azushima, P. Groche, I. Ishibashi, M.Merklein, M. Morishita, T. Nakamura, S. Schmid,M. Yoshida: Environmentally benign tribo-systemsfor metal forming, CIRP Annals - ManufacturingTechnology 59, pp. 760 – 780, 2010.[2] D. Adamovic, M. Stefanovic, V. Lazic, M.Zivkovic: Estimation <strong>of</strong> Lubricants for Ironing <strong>of</strong>Steel Pieces, Tribology in industry 26, pp. 12-20,2004Sliding length h, mmFigure 7. Friction coefficient dependencies on sliding length[3] J.L. Andreasen, N. Bay, M. Andersen, E.Christensen, N. Bjerrum: Screening theperformance <strong>of</strong> lubricants for the ironing <strong>of</strong>stainless steel with a strip reduction test, Wear 207,pp. 1-5, 1997.[4] D. Schlosser: Beeinflussung der Reibung beimStreifenziehen von austenitischem Blech:verschiedene Schmierst<strong>of</strong>fe und Werkzeuge ausgesinterten Hartst<strong>of</strong>fen, Bander Bleche Rohre 7/8,pp. 302-306, 1975.[5] P. Deneuville, R. Lecot: The study <strong>of</strong> friction inironing process by physical and numericalmodelling, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials ProcessingTechnology 45, pp. 625–630, 1994.[6] H.C.E. van der Aa, M.A.H. van der Aa, P.J.G.Schreurs, F.P.T. Baaijens a, W.J. van Veenen: Anexperimental and numerical study <strong>of</strong> the wallironing process <strong>of</strong> polymer coated sheet metal,Mechanics <strong>of</strong> Materials 32, pp. 423-443, 2000.[7] S. Đačić, M. Stefanović, S. Aleksandrovic, D.Adamović: Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Friction in SheetMetal Sliding with Thickness Reduction,International conference SERBIATRIB 2011,Kragujevac, Serbia, <strong>Proceedings</strong> ISBN: 978-86-86663-74-0, pp. 366-369.[8] M. Stefanovic, S. Djacic, S. Aleksandrovic,D. Adamovic: Importance <strong>of</strong> tribologicalconditions at multi-phase ironing, 34 th Internationalconference ICPE 2011, Niš, Serbia, <strong>Proceedings</strong>ISBN: 978-86-6055-019-6, pp. 503-506.[9] M. Djordjević, S. Aleksandrović, V. Lazić, M.Stefanović, R. Nikolić, D. Arsić: Influence <strong>of</strong>lubricants on the multiphase ironing process,SEMDOK 2013, Zilina-Terchova, <strong>Proceedings</strong>ISBN 978-80-554-0629-9, pp. 22-26, 2013.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 363


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccA NANOMECHANICAL APPROACHON THE MEASUREMENTOF THE ELASTICPROPERTIESOF EPOXY REINFORCEDCARBON NANOTUUBE NANOCOMPOSITESG. Mansour 1 , D. Tzetzis 2 , K.D. Bouzakis 31 Aristotle University<strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Greece, mansour@eng.auth.gr2 International Hellenic University, Greece, d.tzetzis@ihu.edu.gr3 Aristotle University <strong>of</strong> Thessaloniki, Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, Greece, bouzakis@eng.auth.grAbstract:The mechanical behaviourr <strong>of</strong> nanocomposite materials with multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)reinforcements is investigated in thepresent paper. Epoxy nanocomposites with different weight percentages<strong>of</strong> carbon nanotubes have been characterized following tensile tests andd nanoindentations. The objective <strong>of</strong>this work was to investigate the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the reinforcement provided by nanotubes and to examine theagreement between the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the epoxy nanocomposites obtained via a macroscale andnanoscale experimental methods. Higher increase in modulus was accomplishedad at weightt fraction <strong>of</strong>nanotube reinforcement<strong>of</strong> 1%. Themodulus as measured by the tensile tests differed an average <strong>of</strong> 18%with the results obtained from the nanoindentaations, however by utilising a properr calibrationmethod thedata were corrected resulting to only a 3% difference. Themodulus results obtained from the experimentswere compared with theHalpin-Tsai model andd with the Thostenson-CChou model accounting for f the outerlayer interactions <strong>of</strong> thenanotube with the hosting matrix. Arelatively good agreement was found betweenthe models and the experiments.Keywords:Properties,Nanoindentation Testing, EpoxyMicroscopyNanocomposites, Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes, Elastic1. INTRODUCTIONEpoxy nanocomposites using carbon nanotubes(CNTs)have been intensivelyinvestigated,following the successful synthesis <strong>of</strong> CNTss in1991[1].CNTs have attracted considerable attentiondue to their uniquemechanical,surface,multifunctional properties and strong interactionswith the hosting matrixmainly associated to theirnano-scale features. Recent experiment shaveshown remarkable enhancements in elastic modulusand strength <strong>of</strong> polymer composites with anaddition <strong>of</strong>small amounts <strong>of</strong> CNTs [2,3]. Amongthe various studies incorporating CNTs, Loos et. al[4] have investigated the matrix stiffness rolee ontensile and thermal properties <strong>of</strong> carbon nanotubeepoxy reinforced nanocomposites. They haveshown thatt the addition <strong>of</strong> a small amountt <strong>of</strong>SWCNTs (0.25 wt.%)in s<strong>of</strong>t matrices, greatlyincreased Young’s modulus and tensile strengthh <strong>of</strong>364such nanocomposites. The results showed that thetensile properties <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t epoxy matrices are muchmore influenced by thee addition <strong>of</strong> carbonnanotubes thann stiffer ones. Also, Kimet. al. [5]studied the effects <strong>of</strong> surface modification onrheologicaland a mechanicalproperties<strong>of</strong>CNT/epoxy composites. The CNTs were modifieddby acid treatment, plasmaa oxidation, and aminetreatment. The surface modified CNTs were wellldispersed in the t epoxy matrix and had stronginterfacial bonding with the polymer matrix. Thenanocompositecontainingg the modified CNTsexhibited higher storage and loss moduli and shearviscosity than those withh the untreated CNTs,because the surface treatments provide morehomogeneousdispersion <strong>of</strong> CNTs and strongerrinteraction between the CNT and the t polymermatrix. Gojny et al. [6] have investigated theinfluence <strong>of</strong> different d types <strong>of</strong> CNTs on themechanicalproperties <strong>of</strong> epoxybased13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


nanocomposites. The influence <strong>of</strong> filler content, thevarying dispersibility, the aspect ratio, the specificsurface area and the functionalisation on thecomposite properties was correlated to theidentified micro-mechanical mechanisms. Theresults showed that the produced nanocompositeshave enhanced the strength and stiffness along withan increase in fracture toughness.Despite the huge amount <strong>of</strong> experimental dataavailable in the literature there are still debatableresults concerning the elastic property and strength<strong>of</strong> such nanocomposites. This is due to thecharacteristic difficulties inprocessing the CNTnan<strong>of</strong>illers in polymer systems, and thereby areliable theoretical correlation <strong>of</strong> the experimentaldata is still lacking. This is because thereinforcement capability <strong>of</strong> the CNTs in apolymeric matrix will depend on their amount aswell as on their arrangement within the matrixwhich plays a fundamental role in the load transfermechanism.On the other hand, in context with the highprices <strong>of</strong> the CNTs, there is a requirement forprocedures using small samples <strong>of</strong> nanocomposites,compared to the standard tensile test samples, inorder to acquire mechanical property data on whichtheoretical predictions can be based. Therefore,alternative approaches have been utilised fordetermination <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>nanocomposites [7]. Nanoindentation is a simplebut powerful testing technique, which can provideuseful information about the mechanical properties(such as elastic modulus and hardness) <strong>of</strong> materials.It has been proven that the nanoindentationtechnique is the most accurate method forevaluation <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> carbon nanotubes on thedeformation behaviour [8].The aim <strong>of</strong> this work was to investigate themechanical properties <strong>of</strong> MWCNTpolymercomposites by nanoindentation. Elastic modulusand hardness are the properties measured by thenanoindentation technique and these werecompared by results obtained by uniaxial tensiletests as well as with popular arithmetic predictions.The morphology <strong>of</strong> the nanocomposites wasinvestigated by using a stereomicroscope andscanning electron micrographs.2. MATERIALSThe epoxy matrix investigated was a lowstrength bisphenol A and epichlorohydrin epoxyresin (Epikote 816, Hexion Specialty Chemicals)containing an added proportion <strong>of</strong> Cardura E10P(glycidyl ester <strong>of</strong> neodecanoic acid) as a reactivediluent. The hardener was amine curing agent(Epikure F205, Hexion Specialty Chemicals). Thenan<strong>of</strong>iller used, was multiwall carbon nanotubes(MWCNT’s). The carbon nanotubes were used asreceivedwithout any further treatment.Epoxy-based nanocomposites were prepared bymixing the nanotubes with an appropriate amount<strong>of</strong> the neat epoxy resin using an ultrasonic stirrer(Bandelin Electronic GmbH, model HD2200) for5min followed by high mechanical mixing. Thiswas followed by the addition <strong>of</strong> the hardener andfurther mechanical mixing. The mixture wasdegassed and then cast into release-agent-coatedspecial formed moulds in order to form the platesfor specimen fabrication. The plates were left tocure for 48hours followed by 2 hours post curing at90ºC. As a result, a series <strong>of</strong> specimens withnan<strong>of</strong>iller contents <strong>of</strong> 0.5% and 1% by weight wereobtained. Small specimens <strong>of</strong> 10x10mm were cutfrom the plates and polished in order to make thenanoindentation specimens.3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES3.1 Tensile TestsTensile tests were performed at roomtemperature (23°C) on a Zwick Z010 (Zwick,Germany) universal testing machine at a constantcrosshead speed <strong>of</strong> 1 mm/min. The measurementsfollowed the EN ISO 527 testing standard usingdumbbell shaped specimens. The specimens havinga 4 mm thickness were machined from the mouldedplates using a Computer Numerical Control (CNC)milling machine. The overall length <strong>of</strong> dumbbellspecimens was 170 mm. The length and width <strong>of</strong>narrow section were 10 and 4 mm, respectively. E-moduli were calculated within the linear part <strong>of</strong> thestress-strain curves. All presented data correspondsto the average <strong>of</strong> at least five measurements.3.2 Nanoindentation TestingNanoindentation tests involve the contact <strong>of</strong> anindenter on a material surface and its penetration toa specified load or depth. Load is measured as afunction <strong>of</strong> penetration depth. Fig. 1 shows thetypical load and unloading process showingparameters characterizing the contact geometry.This schematic shows a generic viscoelastic-plasticmaterial with the loading OA, and unloading AB´segments. The plastic work done in theviscoelastic-plastic case is represented by the areaW1 (OAB´). The area W2 (ABB´) corresponds tothe elastic work recovered during the unloadingsegment. In the case <strong>of</strong> purely elastic material, theunloading curve is a straight line (AB) and h r =h max(W2=0). In this case, penetration depth is thedisplacement into the sample starting from itssurface. Numerous details on the nanoindentation13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 365


measurement process inrelation to polymers cann befound in references [9-11].In the current workthe nanoindentations wereconducted on a Fischerscope H1000 device, with aresolution <strong>of</strong> 0.1 mN. The indenter has a Berkovichdiamond tip(the tip shape is a three-sided pyramid,with a triangular projected geometry and anincluded angle <strong>of</strong> 65.3°; tip radius 20 nm). Thenanoindentations madeon the surface <strong>of</strong> thespecimens appeared asan equilateral trianglee asshown in Fig. 2. Prior to an indentation, itheindenter was driven, under computer control,toward the specimen surface.After contact, theindenter was driven into the surface, to a depthh <strong>of</strong>around 0.6μm, at a constant loading rate <strong>of</strong>0.15mN/s, until a peak load <strong>of</strong> 4.8mN was reachedand subsequently the indenter was unloaded usingthe same rate. This peakload was then t held forr 5 s(in order to minimizethe effect <strong>of</strong> viscoelasticdeformation<strong>of</strong> the specimen, notably creep, onproperty measurements)and then the indenter wasunloaded, toa load <strong>of</strong> zero.The calculation method to determine themodulus and hardness <strong>of</strong> the fumed silica epoxynanocomposites was based on the work <strong>of</strong> Oliverand Pharr [12]. According to this method, thenanoindentation hardness as a function <strong>of</strong> the finalpenetration depth <strong>of</strong> indent can be determined by:Where β is a constant that depends on the t geometry<strong>of</strong> the indenter. For the Berkovich indenter, β=1. .034. The specimen elastic modulus (E(s ) can thenbe calculated as:1 2 1 1 (5)(6)Where Ε i,s , and ν i,s are the elastic modulus andPoisson’s ratio, respectively, for the indenter i andthe specimen. For F a diamond indenter, E i is 1140GPa and ν i is 0. 07. (1)Where P max is the maximum appliedload measuredat the maximum depth <strong>of</strong> penetration (h max ), A isthe projected contact area between the t indenter andthe specimen. For a perfect Berkovich indenter, Acan be expressed as a function <strong>of</strong> the contactindentation depth h f as:Figure 1. Schematic <strong>of</strong> indentation load-depth data <strong>of</strong> aviscoelastic-plastic where h max x is the maximum depth, h eis the elastic depth rebound, h r is the residual impressiondepth, h a is the displacement <strong>of</strong> the surface at theperimeter and h f is the contact indentation depth. 3√3 65.3 24.5(2)The contactt indentation, h f , can be determined fromthe following expression: where ε isa geometric constantt ε=0.75 for apyramidal indenter, S isthe contactt stiffness whichcan be determined as the slope <strong>of</strong> the unloadingcurve at themaximum loading point, i.e. The reducedd elastic modulus E r is given by:(3)(4)Figure 2. Schematic <strong>of</strong> thee loading and unloadingsurfaces <strong>of</strong> an a indentation (half-section)) with thecorresponding indentation depths.Thespecimen’ss hardness H and elastic modulus E swere obtained from the set <strong>of</strong> equations given above.36613 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION4.1 MorphologyMicroscope images from the <strong>of</strong> cured MWCNTepoxy nanocomposites are shown inFig. 3.surface <strong>of</strong> the nanotube n aggregatesthematrix itselfencapsulates the nanovoids inside the agglomeratednanotubes.4.2 Tensile TestsThe stress–strainbehaviour <strong>of</strong> thenanocompositess under tension is shown in Fig. 4.Thespecimenss revealed a characteristic plasticbehaviour.Figure 3. Stereoscope images <strong>of</strong> epoxynanocompositeswith nanotube concentrations <strong>of</strong>: a) 0. 5%wt, b) 1%wt.The nanotubes showsignificantt agglomerationwhich is more pronounced in thecase <strong>of</strong> 1% %wtnanotube loading due to strong van der Waalsinteractionsleading to relativelyinsufficientdispersion despite the ultrasonic application andd thesubsequent mechanical mixing. An aggregateformation could only be achievedin the epoxymatrix while these aggregates at certain areasattract eachother forming greaterr assembliess asseen from the images. The structure <strong>of</strong> nanotubeclusters observed in all specimens was very similarirrespectivee <strong>of</strong> the percentage loading, thoughslightly higher densities <strong>of</strong> particle clusters areevidently for the 1%wt nanocomposites.Theprocessing <strong>of</strong> the epoxy nanocompositesbyultrasonic mixing produced a frothy and viscousdark solution that made the degassing procedurerelatively difficult. Also, it is believed that thenanovoids could not beeliminated in total despitethe degassing procedure and as during the curingperiod the epoxy matrix can reactt only with the13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13Figure 4.Typical uniaxial tensile stress-strain curves <strong>of</strong>epoxyy reinforced nanocomposites.The additionn <strong>of</strong> the MWCNTs slightly increasedthe strength ass reported inn other studies [2]. Thefracture surfaces <strong>of</strong> the tensile specimens wereeexamined using a scanning electron microscope.Thepure epoxyy resin samples showed characteristiccriver lines and a smooth surface as shown in Fig.5(a). This typee <strong>of</strong> fracture behaviour is i typical <strong>of</strong>brittle epoxy surfaces indicating low resistance r tospontaneouscrack propagationwhichwasmonitored during tensile testing <strong>of</strong> specimens.Fig. 5(b) shows the fracture behaviour obtainedfromthe MWCNT nanocomposites.In certainplaces the fracture is a mirror-like which reflectsthat the nanotubes were not dispersed evenly. As aresult, when the external tensile force was applied,debonding mayy have occurred at these areas. Also,the formationss <strong>of</strong> clusters produced a severelytortuous surfacee with certainn yielding regions.During the applied macroscopic tensile stresssthe local stresses around the aggregates <strong>of</strong>MWCNTs (Fig. 5c) triggered yielding <strong>of</strong> the epoxy.Additionally, before b the onset <strong>of</strong> a critical crack,numerous microcracks were formed onthe tensileetestt specimen as a visually monitored during testing.Theaggregates may have induced crack branchingwhich in turn may have triggered multiple locallyielding <strong>of</strong> the matrix. mThe nucleation <strong>of</strong> the cracks may havedeveloped either within network <strong>of</strong> theclusters <strong>of</strong>MWCNTs that have not infiltrated withepoxy resinor at the aggregates’ interfaces.367


4.3 NanoindentationFig. 6 illustrates typical load–displacementcurves <strong>of</strong> indentationsmade at a peak indentationload <strong>of</strong> 4.8mN on the pure epoxyresins and theMWCNT nanocomposites. No cracks were formedduring indentation as no steps orr discontinuitieswere found on the loading curves.The indentation depths at the peak load rangefrom around 0.5 to 0.6 μm. Lower indentationdepths areobserved for the t MWCNTnanocomposites as compared with the pure epoxysamples. The hardness and elastic moduluss isincreased as the concentration is increased. It iswell documented in the literature that the elasticmodulus has an increasing trend ass the percentageloading <strong>of</strong> MWCNTs is increasing [ 13].There is a significant difference in elasticmodulus as obtained from the nanoindentationtesting compared to theone <strong>of</strong> thetensile testss asshown in Table 1.Clearly the elastic modulus obtained from thenanoindentation testingtechniquee was 14-18%higher than the one obtained from the tensile tests.intrinsic errorss may leadd to results which aredifficult to explain in the case <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>ter, viscoelasticcsurfaces like the solidified epoxy resin r in thecurrent case.Table 1. Elastic moduli values as a derived fromexperiments.Material0% CNT0,5%CNT1%CNTE tensile(GPa)3,3 ± 0,124,5 ± 0,154,64 ± 0,18E nanoindentati ionE(GPa) modified (GPa)3,9 ± 0,122 3,375,22 ±,0,18 4,575,31 ±,0,22 4,75The process <strong>of</strong> nanoindentation measurementts isa relativelycomplicateprocedure, , especially forpolymeric materials asit has been reportedd invarious studies [11, 14]. The system compliancemay be tooo low to measure the material responseproperty for ‘s<strong>of</strong>t’ materials like the epoxy resin.Also, the nanoindentation techniquee is based onn theelastic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the test material; thereby theviscoelasticc behaviour may cause an error in thecalculation <strong>of</strong> the elastic modulus. Moreover, thereare uncertainties in tip shape calibrationthatdirectly relate to the area functionn (A) whichh ismaterial dependent in most cases. The tip defect,which is always presentdue to technical limitationsin the fabrication <strong>of</strong> the indenter, may greatly affectthe assessment <strong>of</strong> the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> f thetested surface at the first material layers. This isexacerbatedby the calibration procedure whichrequires a series <strong>of</strong> indentations upon the referencematerial at various depths and produces an intrinsicblunting effect on the calibrated tipat the deepestpenetrations, which donot correspond with thetip/machinebehaviour at theshallowestindentationsand so the final area functionextrapolatedmay not be exact. Therefore, the368Figure 5. SEM micrographs m <strong>of</strong> typical fracture surfaces<strong>of</strong> a) pure epoxy resin, b) MWCNT, c) MWCNT athigher magnificationAlso, for an epoxy resinn material, pile-ups and adistorted surface are usually observedaround thecrater <strong>of</strong> the nanoindentation. It is evident thereforeethat the typical calibration procedure whichhinvolves calibration on a reference material <strong>of</strong> awell-defined elastic modulus such as fused silica isnotsuitable for polymer materials. This isdocumented byy the observed differences in elasticmodulus between the nanoindentationresults andthe uniaxial tensile test measurements.13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 6. Loading and unloadin versuss depth pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong>pure epoxy resin and MWCNT nanocomposites.Figure 7.Hardness versus <strong>of</strong> pure epoxy resin anddMWCNT nanocomposites.Nevertheless the elastic modulus results asmeasured byboth techniques revealed similar trends.Subsequently as suggested by other researchers [10,11] a material depending calibrationprocedure hasbeen utilized for the current measurements. Usingequations (1-6) from the Oliver and Pharr [12, 15], , themodified area function related to indentation depthwas obtained using the elastic modulus from a tensiletest <strong>of</strong> the pure epoxy resin which was 3.3 GPa. Usingthe new calibrated area function the elastic moduli <strong>of</strong>the nanocomposites wascalculated. The result <strong>of</strong>f theelastic modulus based onthe modifiedd area function ismarked as modified nanoindentation. Clearly, themodified elastic modulusvalues shown in Table 1 arein good agreement with the elastic modulus fromtheuniaxial tensile tests. For MWCNTs nanocompositesthe elastic modulus is increasing ass measured fromboth the tensile tests and from the nanoindentationexperimentswith the proposed calibration technique.Fig. 7 also shows the hardness<strong>of</strong> thenanocompositesas a functionMWCNTconcentration. In agreement withthe previousoutcomes the hardness follows the elastic modulustrend and increases in the case <strong>of</strong> MWCNTs ass theconcentration increases from 0.5%wt to 1%wt. Itshould be noted that when measuredat small scales,13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13the hardness is larger than at largerr scales. Anexample <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon is theso called‘indentation sizee effect’ which can be observed as anincrease in hardness with decreasing indentation depth[16]. This effectt complicatess the determination <strong>of</strong> thematerial hardness at low indentation depths, given thesmall remaining impression. However, , the resultssobtained in the current study lie within valuesobtained from other studiess investigating MWCNTepoxy nanocomposites [17, 18].The hardness <strong>of</strong> the carbon nanotubes themselvessis higher than the t one fromm the epoxy resin r therebythisexplains the t small increase noticed in thepresented results.5. ELASTIC MODULUS PREDICTIONSDespite the outstanding mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>nanotubes, thee nanocomposites involving suchnan<strong>of</strong>illers exhibit a very limited improvement <strong>of</strong>mechanical performances,if compared to conventionaladvanced composites.Thisopposingbehavior canbeexplained byy considering that the reinforcingcontribution <strong>of</strong> MWCNTs iss yieldednot only by theiramount within the material, , but also bythe state <strong>of</strong>dispersion, orientation,shapee and number <strong>of</strong> contactswithin the matrix system. All these features play acriticalrole on the t final reinforcement enhancement,andthey shouldd be taken into account if i possible inorder todevelopp reliable models for prediction <strong>of</strong>nanocomposite effective e properties.The classicall micromechanics approaches for shortfibre reinforcedd compositess were employed in thiswork in order todevelop predictive models for theMWCNT nanocomposites.AA popular and widelyadopted model to predict the stiffness <strong>of</strong> MWCNTsnanocompositess is the Halpin-Tsaimodel.TheHalpin–Tsai model m [19] iss widely used in manyliterature references.It is based on a force f balancemodel and empirical data and it isusedwidely formacroscopic composites.Forr the moduli <strong>of</strong> randomlyoriented MWCNTs in the epoxy matrix, theHalpin–Tsai model may predictthe elastic modulus<strong>of</strong> the nanocomposites, E N NC,which is governed bythe following set <strong>of</strong> equations: 3 1 8 1 5 12 8 1 1 (8) 369(7)


2 12(9)(10)Where E MW WCNT and E m are the Young’s moduluss forthe MWCNTs and matrix respectively while v MW WCNTand l/d are the volume fraction andaspect ratioo <strong>of</strong>MWCNTs respectively. From Eq. 7 it can be seenthat E NC strongly depends on the geometry <strong>of</strong> f theMWCNTs such as theiraspect ratio. The lengthh <strong>of</strong>the fibres ranges from 1-25μm while variousdiameterswere measuredas seen in Figure 8. TakingΕ MWCNT = 1GPa whichh is muchgreater thanE m =3.3GPa the predicted values versus the volumefraction <strong>of</strong> the nanotubes <strong>of</strong> E NC based on Eq. 7 isshown in Fig. 9.It can be seen that the Halpin–Tsaiformula for d=5nm gives a slight different valuee forE NC compared to the ones measured from thenanoindentation using the calibrationprocedure.Figure 8.Measurementss <strong>of</strong> the outer diameter <strong>of</strong> theMWCNTs.Figure 9. Comparison <strong>of</strong> the experimental modifiednanoindentation results with the Halpin-Tsai anddThostenson-Chou models.Thostenson and Chou [20]modifiedd the HalpinTsai theory towards its applicability tonanotubereinforced composites. Thostensonand Chouconsidered that, in the case <strong>of</strong>MWCNT, only theouter shell would w carryy the load as logicallassumption <strong>of</strong>f the relativelylow bonding withinner layers. According A to this assumption, theeffective MWCNT elasticmodulus was evaluatedby considering the application <strong>of</strong> all loads only totheouter crosssection(outer diameter andgraphite layerr thicknesss which iss taken ast=0.34nm). Eq. 11 has been derived in orderrcalculate the maximumobtainableE NC for acomposite withh aperfect distribution <strong>of</strong> the CNTsandimpregnation within the epoxy. Predictionscomputed by using Thostenson-Chou modelshow a reduced level <strong>of</strong> efficiencyfor largediameters while for d=3nm the prediction iscompared welll with the experimentally deriveddmodulus for 1% %wt (0.56%vf) MWCNTS.This occurss despite thee fact that as shown bytheSEM investigations there are locally highernanotube concentrationswithin the composite.Accounting for any errors associated with theexperimentallyy derivedvaluesthe results have tobe interpretedd as a lower boundary <strong>of</strong> theobtainable moduli.Additionally, the presence <strong>of</strong>voids developed during mixing the hardener withtheMWCNT/ /epoxy-suspension via ultrasonicmixing and mechanicall stirring may haverestrainedtheecompositesfrom their fulllmechanical performancepotential. The highhviscosity disabled a fully adequate degassing <strong>of</strong>thenanocomposite with voids remaining in thematrix.The initial failuree had been caused bythese voids and expressedd itself in the t reduceddfracture strain in the tensile tests.It is clear therefore t that despite the fact thattthemodels used in this work are valuable toolstowards the prediction <strong>of</strong> the elastic modulus <strong>of</strong>thenanocomposites they do not totally correctlyrepresent thevarious issues associated with thecontent, morphology and type <strong>of</strong> f nanotubesincorporating a variety <strong>of</strong> f diameters and lengths.Also, and most importantly they consider thenanotubes agglomerated-free compared with experimentaldata.whichh may bemisleading when 37013 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


3 8 12 1 4 2 4 2 (11)6. CONCLUSIONThe nanoindentation technique has beensuccessfully utilised in order to study themechanical properties (i.e. hardness and elasticmodulus) <strong>of</strong> MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposites. Theindentation results revealed that the hardness andmodulus <strong>of</strong> the nanocomposites increase withhigher MWCNT concentrations. The elasticmodulus data obtained by nanoindentation arecomparable with those obtained by tensile testingwhen a suitable material calibration is applied. Theresults verify the capability <strong>of</strong> the nanointendationinstrumented technique to characterize themechanical properties <strong>of</strong> polymer nanocompositesusing small sample amounts. Elastic moduluspredictions using the Halpin-Tsai model haveshown comparable results with the experimentaldata, while the Thorsten and Chou model providedgood predictions by taking into account the outerlayer <strong>of</strong> the nanotubes.REFERENCES[1] S. Iijima, Helical microtubules <strong>of</strong> graphitic carbonNature, Vol. 354, pp. 56-58, 1991.[2] K. Sharma, M. Shukla, Experimental study <strong>of</strong>mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> multiscale carbon fiberepoxy-CNTcomposites, Advanced MaterialsResearch, Vol. 383-390, pp. 2723-2727, 2012.[3] H.U. Zaman,P.D. Hun, R.A. Khan, K.B. Yoon,Effect <strong>of</strong> Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes onMorphology, Mechanical and Thermal Properties <strong>of</strong>Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Nanocomposites,Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 128, No.4, pp. 2433-2438, 2013.[4] M.R. Loos, S.H. Pezzin, S.C. Amico, C.P.Bergmann, L.A.F. Coelho, The matrix stiffness roleon tensile and thermal properties <strong>of</strong> carbonnanotubes/epoxy composites, J Mater Sci, Vol. 43,pp. 6064–6069, 2008.[5] J.A. Kim, D.G. Seong, T.J. Kang, J.R. Youn,Effects<strong>of</strong> Surface Modification on Rheological andMechanical Properties <strong>of</strong> CNT/Epoxy Composites,Carbon, Vol. 44, pp. 1898–1905, 2006.[6] F.H. Gojny, M.H.G. Wichmann,B. Fiedler, K.Schulte, Influence <strong>of</strong> nano-reinforcement on themechanical and electrical properties <strong>of</strong>conventional fibre reinforced composites,Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 65, pp.2300–2313, 2005.[7] P.M. Nagy, D.Aranyi, P.Horváth, P.Pötschke, S.Pegel,E.Kálmán, Nanoindentation Investigation <strong>of</strong>Carbon Nanotube–Polymer Composites, InternetElectron. J. Mol. Des., Vol. 5, pp. 135–143, 2006.[8] A.K. Dutta, D. Penumadu, B. Files,Nanoindentation testing for evaluating modulusandhardness <strong>of</strong> single-walled carbonnanotubereinforced epoxy composites, J. Mater.Res., Vol. 19, pp. 158–64, 2004.[9] M.R. VanLandingham,Review <strong>of</strong> instrumentedindentation, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., Vol.108, pp. 249-265, 2003.[10] B. J. Briscoey, L.Fiori, E.Pelillo, Nano-indentation<strong>of</strong> polymeric surfaces, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol.31, pp. 2395–2405, 1998.[11] M.R. VanLandingham, J.S.Villarrubia, W.F.Guthrie,G.F. Meyers, Nanoindentation <strong>of</strong> polymers:An Overview, Macromol. Symp., Vol. 167, pp. 15-43, 2001.[12] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, An improved technique fordetermining hardness and elastic modulus using loadand displacement sensing indentation experiments, JMater Res, Vol. 7, pp. 1564–1583, 1992.[13] A. Montazeri,J. Javadpour, A.Khavandi, A.Tcharkhtchi,A.Mohajeri, Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong>multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites,Materials and Design, Vol. 31, pp. 4202–4208, 2010.[14] M. Sánchez, J. Rams, M. Campo, A. Jiménez-Suárez, A.Ureña, Characterization <strong>of</strong> carbonnan<strong>of</strong>iber/epoxy nanocomposites by thenanoindentation technique, Composites: Part B,Vol. 42, pp. 638–644, 2011.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 371


[15] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement <strong>of</strong> Hardnessand Elastic Modulus by Instrumented Indentation:Advances in Understanding and Refinements toMethodology, J Mater Res, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3–20,2004.[16] C.S. Han, Influence <strong>of</strong> the molecular structure onindentation size effect in polymers, MaterialsScience and Engineering A, Vol. 527, No. 3, pp.619-624, 2010.[17] Sajjad M., B. Feichtenschlager, S. Pabisch, J.Svehla, T. Koch, S. Seidler, H. Peterlik, G.Kickelbickd, Study <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the concentration,size and surface chemistry <strong>of</strong> zirconia and silicananoparticle fillers within an epoxy resin on thebulk properties <strong>of</strong> the resulting nanocomposites,PolymInt, Vol. 61, pp. 274–285, 2012.[18] P.M. Nagy, D. Aranyi, P. Horváth, P. Pötschke, S.Pegel, E. Kálmán, Nanoindentation Investigation <strong>of</strong>Carbon Nanotube - Polymer Composites,InternetElectronic Journal <strong>of</strong> Molecular Design, Vol. 5, pp.135–143, 2006.[19] J.C. Halpin, J.L.Kardos, The Halpin-Tsai equations:A review,Polym. Eng. Sci., Vol. 16, pp. 344–352,1976.[20] E.T. Thostenson, T.W. Chou, On the elasticproperties <strong>of</strong> carbon nanotube-based composites:modeling and characterization, J Phys D: ApplPhys,Vol. 36, pp. 573–82, 2003.372 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccSOMETRIBOLOGY STATE TESTS OF “EPDM” RUBBERBASEDONLABORATORY EXPERIMENTATIONSAbhijit Mukhopadhyay**Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032,India,m_obiji@yahoo.comAbstract: Rubber is very useful and suitablee material for a wide variety <strong>of</strong> engineeringg and otherapplications. Use <strong>of</strong> rubber as engineering material is not new. However, in the recent time, itss applicationis gaining importance due to several other reasons. Recent and renewed researches on rubber materialreveal its suitability forvaried engineering applications. Several researches are also going onto enhanceethe propertyrequirements <strong>of</strong> rubberr for differentt applications.Rubber possesses large elasticity compared to metals, has greater damping capability, high internal frictionand can accumulate energy greater than that <strong>of</strong> steel or other metals. During thee deformation <strong>of</strong> rubberrmaterial, e.g., by compressive force, , internal damping <strong>of</strong> thematerial leads to energydissipation. This is thecause <strong>of</strong> hysteretic friction <strong>of</strong> rubber. Friction <strong>of</strong> rubber is <strong>of</strong> great practical importance at the same time ithas many disadvantagess too.Amongst various rubber Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) rubber emerges as a dominantelastomer for major engineering applications in automobiles, constructions,electric andelectroniccindustries etc. The major properties <strong>of</strong> EPDM are its outstanding heat, ozone o and weather resistance ability.The resistance to polar substances and steam are also good.In automobiles EPDM rubber has a common use as seals. This includes door seals, window seals, trunkseals and sometimes hood seals. Frequently these seals arethe source <strong>of</strong> noise duee to the movement <strong>of</strong> thedoor versuss the car body. This is due to frictionn between the EPDM rubber parts and the mating surfaces.Thus the contact iteration between the t rubber sealing and the indenting object o must be known to optimize theperformance <strong>of</strong> rubber sealing. It I, however, need less tomention that the behavior <strong>of</strong> any viscoelasticcmaterial is very difficultto be predicted.In the present work various tribo-characteristics <strong>of</strong> EPDM rubber <strong>of</strong> o different hardness are evaluatedutilizing thelaboratory test facilitiess available in the frame work <strong>of</strong> the mechanical engineering department,production engineeringg department and other specialization <strong>of</strong> the Jadavpur University, Kolkata.Compressiontests have been carriedout using ‘Instron’ to determine the flow behavior <strong>of</strong> EPDM rubber <strong>of</strong>different hardness values in dry as well as in different lubricated conditions. The flow behaviorr like load -elongation curves, true stress - elongation curves true stresss - true strain curves have been drawn from theexperimental data. Abrasive wear behavior has been evaluatedusing a two-body abrasion tester and the patternabrasion hasbeen appraised through SEM/EDAX X study. It hasbeen proposed to study further the wear loss usinga pin-on-plate (POP) type tribometer and conduct t fretting weartest on the same s material, that is, EPDM.Experimental results revealed that the hardnesss values <strong>of</strong> EPDM rubber had significant effectt on the flowbehavior and wear characteristics.The hardness, again, depends on the carbon black (CB) concentration.Thus it canbe stated that the flowbehavior can be governed by controlling the CB concentration in theEPDM rubber. The results <strong>of</strong> different tests followed by comparativeanalysis have been furnished in the‘result and discussion’ section <strong>of</strong> this paper.Conclusion has been drawn accordingly, highlighting some<strong>of</strong> the important tribo-characteristics <strong>of</strong> EPDMrubber as well as shedding light on various possible areas <strong>of</strong> further researches those should beundertakennin the futureto come.Keywords: EPDM, compression, flow behavior, abrasion, SEM/EDAX.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’133733


1. INTRODUCTIONTribological studies <strong>of</strong> rubber like materialss arenot new. However, in this recent time, being fuelledby several new researches and development inn thefield <strong>of</strong> viscoelastic materials as well as duee tovarious property requirements <strong>of</strong> rubber for severalengineering, domestic,sports and otherapplications, the performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> rubberis becomingvery demanding and gaining renewedresearch interest in different parts <strong>of</strong>f the globe.Propertyprediction is the other driving force[2,17]. It means that theproperty <strong>of</strong> f engineeringg andother materials shouldbe predictable and thereshould havesome useable model in that regard. It is,however, needless to bementioned that t the property<strong>of</strong> any viscoelastic material, like rubber, is veryhard to be predicted. The frictionand wear database <strong>of</strong> rubbers are alsonot very promising due tothe fact that the rubbers used in such tribotestss arenot characterized adequately[1].Test configurations,parameter selections, experimentall conditions areall important factors which should be standardizedbefore comparing the tribotest data generatedd byvarious agenciesorresearchers. All thesenecessitate further study and iteration <strong>of</strong> tribotestdata for rubber to be used as engineering or othermaterials.Ethylenee Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM)rubber is widely used as seals in automobile door,window, hood and otherparts. Theyare subjected towear and tear due to pressure, vibration, frictionn andexposure to extreme conditions <strong>of</strong> atmosphere.Though EPDM has outstandingheat, ozone,weather resistance ability and resistance to anypolar substance as well as steam is also very good,still some realistic tribotest data are yet too bedeveloped.In the present workflow behaviors <strong>of</strong> EPDMrubber <strong>of</strong> different hardness have been evaluated.EPDM specimens have been compressed d inbetweenflat MS platens andstress-strainrelationship, specific energy and loss factors havebeen computed subsequently forr this purpose.Similarly wear characteristics have been studiedd in atwo-body abrasion testing machine. SEM/EDAXstudies havealso been made to appraise the patternabrasion, immediately after two-body abrasiontesting.Table 1. The recipe code <strong>of</strong> different hardness <strong>of</strong> EPDM.IngredientShore Hardnesss55Å 5 60Å 70Å 80Å85ÅEPDMZnOSt.AcidPEG 4000FEF 550P Oil(2500)100511.280130100511.2130110100511.2160100100511.217090100511.218080SulpherHBSZDBSTMT1 11 11 1.51 0.71.21.51.20.71.2 1.21.5 1.51.2 1.20.7 0.7However it is i needless too mention that the actualproportions <strong>of</strong> various ingredients are trade secretandstrictly a ‘not-disclosedd grade’. Theabove tableis thus only a closely indicative one.Basic ingredients were pre-mixed for 6 minutes at a rampressure <strong>of</strong>1000 psi. Curatives were thenn added to the pre-mixedmaterials on a two t roll laboratory mill (330 × 150)at room temperature. Curatives are required toenhance various properties. The mixing time wasapproximately 101minutes. A constant friction f ratio<strong>of</strong> 1:1.25 was maintained m during rolling. .in a K4/2A-MK3(Alfred Herbert)Processingcharacteristics including optimummcuretime (t 90 ) and torque difference (Δm = Mh –M l ) were determinedwithOscillatingDiscRheometer equipped with computer assisted dataaacquisition system and supported by‘Rheos<strong>of</strong>t’s<strong>of</strong>tware. Standard procedure as is observed in [5]andothers were followed in that regard but themachine used for f the purpose is Indiann one andspecific procedural steps for the said machine wereefollowed accordingly. M h and M l are high and lowMooney (torque) respectively. The torque wasmonitored as a function <strong>of</strong>f time and the t optimummcuretimes were recorded from the correspondingrheographs, onee such graph is shown in Figure 1.2. EXPERIMENTALThe EPDM rubber specimen for the tribo tests inthis work were prepared in thelaboratoryy <strong>of</strong>National Engineering Limited (Rubber Division),Kolkata, following the recipe code as mentioned inTable 1.Figure 1. Torque-vs.-Time rheograph <strong>of</strong> an aspecimen.EPDM37413 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


The material after qualifying the rheometricanalysiswas ready for molding operation. Shortcylindrical specimen <strong>of</strong>diameter φ (16.5±0.5) andheight h (12.5±0.5) were then prepared in the steamheated hydraulic press at a pressure <strong>of</strong> 3000 psi i andtemperaturee 150 0 C. Thematerial iss compressed inthe press for approximately 10 minutes. Themolding operation has been carriedout as perr IS:3400 (part-X) - 1977 specification.The extra spew<strong>of</strong> materials have beentrimmed by scissor aftermolding to give the specimen proper shape. Thedimension, specific gravity and shore hardnessvalues <strong>of</strong> all the samples have been measuredaccordinglyusing appropriate measuring tools andinstrumentss for the respective parameters.2.1 Compression testEach test specimen was placed axysymetricallyin between two flat mild steel platens. Much carehad been taken in such placement toensure an evenforce distribution on both the faces <strong>of</strong> the specimen.The required compressive load wass provided byy anInstron (model 8801; serial no. K 2342 with‘Dynacell’ load cell, made in England. Maximumworking pressure: 207 bar; dynamic load capacity:± 100 KN).The machine, as shownin Figure 2, isequipped with ‘8800: Instron SAXV9.3’ s<strong>of</strong>twarebased data acquisition system. Only one fatiguecycle had been utilized at a frequency <strong>of</strong> 0.0055 Hzfor the application <strong>of</strong>compressive load on thespecimen. The height <strong>of</strong> each cylindrical specimenwas reducedd by 65%. Each test hadbeen replicatedtwice to observe the repeatability <strong>of</strong> the process.The compressive load followed byload relaxationdata had been recorded and later utilized to plott theloading andunloading curves.friction, during compression, in between the dieandwork piece mating surfaces leads to thedevelopment <strong>of</strong>f an undesirable phenomenon knownnas ‘barreling’ or o ‘pan caking’. The metal spreadssover the die surface to increase its diameter when itis compressed in between two die halves. Frictionalforce opposes the t outward flow <strong>of</strong> metal near themating zone <strong>of</strong> f work piece and die halves. But thematerial at thee mid height <strong>of</strong> the specimen s isabsolutely free to flow in an out ward direction.This is the basic explanation <strong>of</strong> barreling [3]. Onesuchbarreling during compression under fixedcontact, using sand paper, is shown in i Figure 3.This undesirable frictional force may bereduced byusing some suitable s lubricant. Theeffect <strong>of</strong>compressive load on EPDMM specimen <strong>of</strong> differenthardness in dryy working condition, that is, withouttanylubricant, was w appraised by the present author[4]. Similarly, the flow characteristicss <strong>of</strong> EPDMrubber <strong>of</strong> different hardnesss under compressive loadin the presence <strong>of</strong> some lubricants were studied bythe present author [6]. It is not out <strong>of</strong> place tomention here that to reduce frictionand wearbetween two mating m and interacting surfaces somefilm<strong>of</strong> solid, liquid or gas is applied which isconsidered as lubricant[7] ]. Selection<strong>of</strong> properrlubricant(s) depends on several considerations andshould be judicious [8]. Inn this experimental worksome lubricants were selected based on theliterature surveyy and considering the practical workenvironment [9-12]. The characteristicss studied forthispurpose includes i stress-strain relationships,specific energy and loss factors.Figure 3. Compression <strong>of</strong> EPDM specimenusing fixedcontact.Figure 2. ‘Instron’ equipped with data acquisition s<strong>of</strong>tware.Five different statess <strong>of</strong> test had been appliedduring compression. One in dry condition, oneunder fixed contact and three with differentlubricants like, talc, water and grease. Increased13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’132.2 Abrasion testSpecimen <strong>of</strong> sizes s 70mm x 30mm x 2mm were cutfromvulcanizedd rubber sheets <strong>of</strong> 150mmm x 150mm x2mmm for conducting the abrasion tests. EPDM rubberr<strong>of</strong> three different shore hardness values was selectedfor this purpose. These are 55 Å, 70 Å and 80 Å375


espectively. Abrasion tests were carried out using atwo body abrasion testerTR-605 (Ducom) as shownin Figure 4. The machineis designed to conduct test asper ASTM D 6037 (Testmethod B) and/or ISO 8251[18]. The machine is equipped with a stepper motordrive (makes –My Com,24 V DC, and 40 W, modelno. IMS-200-220 AL) and requires an electricity <strong>of</strong>230 V x 1 φ x 50 Hz and100 W power. The wheel <strong>of</strong>the abrasivewear tester is made <strong>of</strong> stainless steelhaving a diameter <strong>of</strong> 50mm and width <strong>of</strong> 12mm.SiliconCarbide (SiC)water pro<strong>of</strong> paper(Carborundam Universal) <strong>of</strong> grades ER 240, ER 220and ER 180were pasted on the top surface <strong>of</strong>f thewheel for the purpose <strong>of</strong> abrasion. Appropriate sizes <strong>of</strong>the abrasivepapers weree cut and pasted on the wheelusing an adhesive (Feviquick). Rubber specimenswere placedin the desired position on the machinetable and clamped properly. The specimens were alsosubjected tonormal load using a dead weight. Theleverage action obtainedin the machine in use is 1:2,that is, a counter weight <strong>of</strong> 2N will apply 1NN <strong>of</strong>normal loadon the job. Then the specimens wereabraded against the abrasive paper under simulatedabrasive wear condition.3. RESULTS AND A DISCUSSIONSFor thislaboratoryexperimentationthreedifferentlevels <strong>of</strong> four factors have beenconsidered. The factors are hardness <strong>of</strong> EPDMrubber, abrasive grade, load on joband cycles andthe levels are low, medium and highh respectively. Itis needlesss to mention that if a full factorialexperimentation had been conducted with the fourfactors eachat three levels, as mentioned, then atotal <strong>of</strong> 81 experiments would have to be carriedd outand the number would have been multipliedaccordinglyfor replication. In the present study, anL 9 - orthogonal array has been selected basedd onTaguchi’s experimentaldesign technique [13] andthus only 9 experiments have been conducted. Thecombinations <strong>of</strong> different factors and levels as wellas the specific wear rate corresponding to eachcombinationn are shown in Table 3 inAppendix-I.Table 2, inn Appendix-I, indicates the flowcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> o EPDM rubber under compressiveeloadand in different working conditions, that is,withor without lubricants. The lubricants, asindicated in thee table, are selected based primarilyon the literaturee survey as well as from the real lifeexperience. The compressive load imparted byInstron and correspondingg height reduction dataahave been recorded through the dataa acquisitionsystem <strong>of</strong> the machine m andd later on different flowcharacteristics like l load-vs.-deflection,true stress-vs.-deflection and a true stress-vs.-truestain havebeen calculatedd using the indigenouslydevelopeddMATLAB codee in that regard. Some flow curvesare shown in Figure 5 (a), (b) and (c) as samples.L o a d ( K N )141210865560708085WATER4200 5 1015 20 2530 35Percentage deflection(a)40 45 501412556070TALC80Figure 4. Laboratory set up <strong>of</strong> a two-body abrasion tester.t r u e s t r e s s ( N / s q m m )10864285376t r u e s t r e s s ( N / s q m m )121000 5 10864200 0.1556070808515 20 2530 35Percentage deflection(b)FI XED CONTACT0.2 0.30.4 0.5t r u e s t r a i n40 45 500.6 0.7(c)Figure 5. Flow characteristic c curves are shown in (a), (b)and(c) under different conditions as indicatedd in the curves.13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


It has already been mentioned that t four factors,each at three levels, have been selected to conductthe abrasiontest. Table 3 indicates the said factor –level combinations and corresponding specific wearrate data which is obtained fromthe followingformula [11]:mW sFL,where, W s = specific wear rate (mmm 3 /Nm)Δm = mass loss recorded gravimetricallyy(gm)ρ = specific gravity <strong>of</strong> EPDM (gm/cm 3 )F = the normalload on the job (N)and, L = overall sliding distance(m)The worn surface morphology had been studiedfor each sample immediately after the abrasionusing a scanning electron microscope (SEM: JEOL,JSM-6360, model 75 82) to see thesmallest detail<strong>of</strong> the pattern abrasion in the range <strong>of</strong> 4 – 5 nm (4 –5 millionths <strong>of</strong> a millimeter). Thetest had beenconducted immediately after the experiment, thoughit is reported by Pandey et.al. [14] that in theirexperimentsfracture mode did not change withinn 72hours <strong>of</strong> storage before conducting SEM studiess andcoating etc. The worn surfaces had been coated witha very thinlayer <strong>of</strong> palladium (Pd) using ionsputtering machine (Auto Fine Coater: JEOL, JFC-to1600) prior to SEM studies. It is not out <strong>of</strong> placemention here that ioncoating is done on non-etc.)conducting specimen (like biological specimento be analyzed in SEM for quick and highlyefficient results. This is done mainly to preventcharging <strong>of</strong>electrons atthe sample[15]. For somesamples energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy(EDAX) had also beendone in conjunction withSEM to find out thepercentages <strong>of</strong> differentelements inthe sample. Elemental mapping withEDAX is helpful to get insight into the chemicalchanges onthe surface and sub-surface <strong>of</strong> thesample[16].As no chemical reactionis taking placein the present case hence EDAX hass not done for allthe specimens.Figure 6 shows some typical pattern abrasion <strong>of</strong>EPDM as obtained fromSEM studies. In figure 6(b)a chunk <strong>of</strong> rubber agglomerate hass been separatedleaving behind a groove (chunkingand grooving).Figure 6(c) reveals the ridge formation whichsupports theconcept <strong>of</strong>rubber wear by the process<strong>of</strong> plowing.(a)(b)(c)Figure 6. Worn W surface morphology <strong>of</strong> EPDMcorrespondingg to trial no.1 (×200), 2 (×1000) and 6(×2000) as obtained from SEM studies.The graph <strong>of</strong> o the average specific wear rate isshown in Figuree 7.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’133777


0.20.1950.190.1850.180.1750.170.165Figure 7. The specific wear rate <strong>of</strong> EPDM 55Å (1), 70Å(2) and 80Å (3).The curves reveal that the specific wear rate issmallest forthe s<strong>of</strong>ter rubber, that is, EPDM 55Å.The specific gravity is also smaller in casee <strong>of</strong>EPDM 55Å, which depends on the hardness andhardness again dependson the carbon black (CB)content <strong>of</strong> the rubber. However, in i case <strong>of</strong> flowcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> EPDMit is revealed that EPDM70Å is better than others. The selection <strong>of</strong> materialdepends onthe actual requirements in specificapplication area.CONCLUSION1 2This experimental work is devotedd for flow as wellas wears characterization<strong>of</strong> EPDM rubber <strong>of</strong> differenthardness in different experimental conditions. Thee testconditions were very difficult to be harmonizedd butmuch care was taken toobtain results as accurate aspossible accepting the noise factorss included inn theexperimentations. The results obtained are tabulated,graphed andanalyzed accordingly in the previoussection. Future work is proposed with different otherlubricants as well as inclusion <strong>of</strong> complex operatingenvironment, like extreme temperature and pressureconditions etc. It is also proposed toconduct frettingwear test as well as measurement <strong>of</strong> abrasion lossusing pin-on-plate (POP)type <strong>of</strong> tribometer.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe present work has been carried out inn theframe work<strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Department,Production Engineeringg Departmentt and Metallurgyand Material Science Engineering Department <strong>of</strong>the Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. The authoris extremelythankful tothe facultyand laboratorystaff members, the students who at any point <strong>of</strong> timewere involved in this work at any ways. The authoris also thankful to NEL(Rubber division), Kolkata,for their very kind support in providing the workspecimen for the tests, purely for academic interest.3Series1REFERENCE[1] Felhos D., Karger-KocsisKs J.: “Tribological Testing<strong>of</strong> Peroxidee Cured EPDM Rubbers With DifferentCarbon BlackContentsUnder Dry SlidingConditions Against Steel”, Tribology InternationalVol. 41, pp. 404-415, 2008.[2] Kalpakjian S., Schmid Steven R.: “ManufacturingProcesses for Engineering Materials” ”, 4 th. Edition,Pearson Education, 2009. .[3] Dieter George E.: “MechanicalMetallurgy”,McGraw-Hill, SI Metric Edition, 1988.[4] Mukhopadhyay Abhijit: “Flow Behavior <strong>of</strong> EPDMRubber <strong>of</strong> f Different Hardness Values UnderAxysymetricc Compressive Load in Dry WorkingCondition”, <strong>Proceedings</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the 12 th. internationalconference on Tribology“SERBIATRIB’11”,Kragujevac, , Serbia, 11- 13.05.2011, pp. 56-64.[5] Sohail Khan M.,Franke R. et.al.: “Friction andWear Behavior <strong>of</strong> Electron Beam Modified PTFEFilled EPDM Compounds”, Wear, Vol. 266, pp.175-183, 2009.[6] Mukhopadhyay Abhijit: “Effect <strong>of</strong> Some Lubricantson the Flow Characteristics <strong>of</strong> ‘EPDM’ Rubber UnderCompressivee Load”, Acceptedpaper in theinternational conference on Tribology, ‘BALTTRIB-2011’, 17-199 Nov., 2011, Kaunas, Lithuania.[7] Mukhopadhyay Abhijit: “Maintenance Tribology:A New Paradigm in Maintenance”,SURVEY (amanagement journal <strong>of</strong> IISWBM, Kolkata), Vol. 50No. 3&4, pp.1-7, 2010.[8] Lenard J.G. : “Tribology in Metal Rolling”, Annals<strong>of</strong> CIRP, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 567-590, 2000.[9] S<strong>of</strong>uoglu H. ., Rasty J.: “Flow Behaviorr <strong>of</strong> PlasticineUsed in Physical P Modeling <strong>of</strong> Metal FormingProcesses”, Tribology International, Vol. 33, pp.523-529, 2000.[10] El. Tayeb N.S.M., N Nasirr Md.R.: “Effect <strong>of</strong> S<strong>of</strong>tCarbon Black on Tribology <strong>of</strong> Deprotenised andpolyisoprene Rubers”, Wear, Vol. 262, pp. 350-361, 2007.[11] Karger-Kocsis J., Mousaa A., et. al.: “Dry Frictionand Sliding Wear <strong>of</strong> EPDM Rubbers Against Steelas a Function <strong>of</strong> Carbon Black Content”, Wear,Vol. 264, pp. 359-367, 2008.[12] MukhopadhyayAbhijit:“Reviewon theTribological State Test in Some Metal FormingOperation inn Industry”, Mechanica Confab, Vol. 1,No. 3, pp. 29-39, 2012.[13] Logothetis N.: N “Managing for Total Quality: FromDeming to Taguchi andd SPC”, Prentice Hall <strong>of</strong>India, 2000.[14] Pandey K.N., Setua D.K., Mathur G.N., “Materialbehavior: Fracture F topography <strong>of</strong> rubber surfaces:an SEM study”, Polymerr Testing, Vol. 22, No. 3,pp. 353-359, 2003.[15] SEM/EDAXXanalysis,http://www. ML06\1\ANALYSISWITHSEM_EDS.PMD060317.[16] Ginic-Markovic M., Roy Choudhury N.,et.al., ,“Weatherability <strong>of</strong> coatedd EPDM rubber compoundby controlledUV irradiation” ”, Polymer37813 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Degradation & Stability, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 157-168, 2000.[17] Ludema Kenneth C.: “Friction, Wear, Lubrication:A text book in tribology”, CRC press, U.S., 1996.[18] Handbook <strong>of</strong> ‘Two Body Abrasion Tester: TR-605’, Ducom Instruments, http://www.ducom.com.APPENDIX – ITable 2. Flow characteristics data <strong>of</strong> EPDM.EPDMLubricant<strong>of</strong>differentDry Fixed Contact Talc Water Greasehardness A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C55Å 2.71 2.08 2.16 1.77 1.34 9.90 2.71 2.04 2.05 1.99 1.52 1.52 1.66 1.34 1.2560Å 3.35 2.41 2.53 2.65 2.01 6.78 2.64 2.05 2.04 2.72 2.05 2.05 2.36 1.75 1.7970Å 4.05 3.15 3.47 3.18 2.40 2.40 3.95 3.17 3.03 3.09 2.34 2.34 2.52 2.62 1.9180Å 9.03 5.95 6.75 8.36 6.38 2.01 7.88 6.29 5.24 6.78 5.05 4.83 6.94 3.91 5.2485Å 16.57 10.00 12.53 13.03 9.90 1.34 16.32 12.29 12.29 11.76 9.33 8.87 - - -[A: Load (KN) at 50% deflection; B: True stress (N/mm 2 ) at 50% deflection; C: True stress (N/mm 2 at a true strain <strong>of</strong> 0.7]Table 3. Factor-level combinations <strong>of</strong> the experiments as per Taguchi’s L 9 - orthogonal array and the abrasion loss data.TrialNo.Hardness(Shore;Å)AbrasivegradeLoad onjob (N)CyclesSpecific wear rate(mm 3 /Nm)1 st replication 2 nd replication 3 rd replication1 55 Very Fine 5 2000.1149 0.1038 0.10942 55 Fine 10 400 0.2641 0.1692 0.29523 55 Medium 15 600 0.2279 0.1507 0.17414 70 Very Fine 10 600 0.1930 0.1932 0.19215 70 Fine 15 200 0.1991 0.2234 0.19306 70 Medium 5 400 0.1640 0.1963 0.13537 80 Very Fine 15 400 0.1775 0.2142 0.19448 80 Fine 5 600 0.1782 0.2685 0.18489 80 Medium 10 200 0.1551 0.2098 0.195113 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 379


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacAPPLICATION OF 3D SOFTWARE PACKAGES FORDESIGNING TRIBOMETER OF MODULAR TYPEIvan Mačužić 1 Branislav Jeremić 1 Petar Todorović 1Marko Đapan 1 Milan Radenković 1 Marko Milošević 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering Kragujevac, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia,ivanm@kg.ac.rs, bane@kg.ac.rs, petar@kg.ac.rs, djapan@kg.ac.rs, radenkovic@kg.ac.rs, m.milosevic@kg.ac.rsAbstract: In this paper is presented advantages <strong>of</strong> modular type <strong>of</strong> tribometers using various types <strong>of</strong>s<strong>of</strong>twares, especially for modelling. Designing this type <strong>of</strong> tribometer allows significant saving regardingtime, space, people, raw materials as well as financial resources. Design <strong>of</strong> tribometers followed with testingand verifying, which implies simulation using various types <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>twares, significantly improve the way andstandards <strong>of</strong> tribometer contruction. Selection <strong>of</strong> the desired parameters which would be used in theexperiments is very important and the first step in designing <strong>of</strong> the tribometer. Testing and verifying is thelast step when scientists and researchers get the result <strong>of</strong> the final evaluation whether or not to proceed toconstruction <strong>of</strong> the tribometer.Keywords: tribometer design, rapid construction, CAD s<strong>of</strong>tware, simulation1. INTRODUCTIONThe machines and equipment for varioustribology experiments need to be maximal versatile.The versatility is reflected through possibility <strong>of</strong>providing variety <strong>of</strong> experiments. These types <strong>of</strong>equipment are specific and mostly designed,constructed and used by researchers and scientistsfor very complex measurements and experiments.These equipment need to be, not just versatile butvery precise, providing accurate results which areused as an input for further experiments orcalculations.Tribometers are widely used for experimentalresearch for measurement <strong>of</strong> friction characteristicsunder laboratory conditions. This laboratoryconditions have to be pre-defined, beforemeasurements are performed. Also, equipment andmeasurements are designed for conducting differenttypes <strong>of</strong> experiments, to obtain results for furtherexperiments. Laboratory conditions mean variousparameters are constant, for example normal force,velocity, temperature and humidity [4]. Because <strong>of</strong>different types <strong>of</strong> the contact [5] versatility <strong>of</strong>equipment is the most important characteristicwhich is required.There are many different types <strong>of</strong> tribometersfor different use [1] [2] [3] [6]. Different use meansdifferent structure <strong>of</strong> tribometer, different processesfollowed with different parts <strong>of</strong> tribometer. So,rapid development <strong>of</strong> tribometers based on s<strong>of</strong>twarefor 3D modelling is required. The modulartribometer will be able to speed up process <strong>of</strong>design and construction <strong>of</strong> tribometers dependingon type <strong>of</strong> experiment. Today, there are commercialuniversal tribometers which are not the same asmodular we want to present. Universal tribometers<strong>of</strong>fer the various options and different types <strong>of</strong>experiments on the same equipment. The maindifference between universal and modulartribometer is that on the universal all necessaryparts are already mounted on the same equipmentand just small corrections in s<strong>of</strong>tware enablesworking on test equipment. Also, the additionalparts can be added for desired experiments [7]. Onthe modular tribometers researchers can choosewhich <strong>of</strong> the tribology parameters wish to monitor.So, after calculations and simulations <strong>of</strong> properties<strong>of</strong> equipment structure, constructors can proceedwith equipment construction.Modular tribometers are suitable for rapidconstruction <strong>of</strong> equipment and what is the mostimportant, for performance evaluation and380 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


conformance to researchers’ requirements.S<strong>of</strong>tware for 3D modelling allows that beforeconstruction <strong>of</strong> the equipment to check, test, verifyand validate successful experiment’s output. Thismeans there is a possibility <strong>of</strong> predictingsuccess/failure <strong>of</strong> the experiments. The results <strong>of</strong>this prediction provide valuable significant datawhich could save, on the first place, financialresource and then time, space, people, rawmaterials, etc.The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to propose methodology<strong>of</strong> using s<strong>of</strong>tware for modelling tribometer whichhave to be designed and tested performingsimulation for selected parameters. The wholeprocess <strong>of</strong> testing, quality checking and finaladjusting <strong>of</strong> modular tribometer need to beconducted before construction. Every part <strong>of</strong>tribometer is compact in size, having the bestpossible characteristics for selected parameters,overcome technical difficulties and the endchecking is the tribometer functional.The paper is structured as follows: Secton 2present importance <strong>of</strong> using s<strong>of</strong>tware for 3Dmodelling. Section 3 describes one example <strong>of</strong>modular tribometer and what type <strong>of</strong> experimentcan be carried out. The conclusions are given inSection 4.2. BENEFITS OF 3D TRIBOMETERMODELLINGCAD technology is ubiquitous for diverse array<strong>of</strong> fields, particularly engineering andmanufacturing [9]. It is integral part <strong>of</strong> the everyprocess where is needed to meet some goals such asreducing design to production lead time, betterengineering analysis, additional flexibility andfaster response for design modification [8]. Allthese benefits are reflected to manipulation withdesigning parts necessary for final construction.The greatest attention is given to: dimensioning <strong>of</strong> critical parts, which arenecessary for conducting successfulexperiments resulting to relevant outputs;dimensioning <strong>of</strong> measurement parts;possibility to construct various equipmentfor different experiments mean thatmodules have been already designed forrapid design;simulations which are very important to seeif all parts <strong>of</strong> the tribometer are properlyassembled, if all system is functional or notto react in time before spending resources,before construction. simulations have another advantage,researches can see and conclude is thereany overlapping <strong>of</strong> the work areas, someerrors, mistakes and fault decisions whichare made during equipment and processdesign;predicting values <strong>of</strong> the parameters whichare selected for experimental research(normal load, viscosity, stress generated inthe contact zone due to the given force,etc.).All steps in design and construction depend onrequirements from researches and scientists whatparameters would be considered. Also, conceptualdevelopment <strong>of</strong> modules is dependant <strong>of</strong>requirements.In our case, the most important parameters werelinked with basic parameters typical for hydraulicsand its components which can be found in realindustrial systems. Also, we monitor processeswhich appear between selected pin and plate in oilenvironment. Based on this we could simulate andcalculate if the required processes are possible tomonitor and get relevant results. The mostimportant parameters for our research were: liquid resistance (in our case liquid is oil)inside the container and stress in the contact zone due to given load.In the next section will be presented onemodular tribometer designed, tested andconstructed for tribological phenomena in hydrauliccomponents (pumps, motors, cylinders and valves).3. EXAMPLE OF EXPERIMENTALEQUIPMENTThe first step is defining the type and concept <strong>of</strong>the tribometer. In our case, whole concept is basedon analysis <strong>of</strong> hydraulic components andcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> wear processes which are occur inthat kind <strong>of</strong> industrial equipment. From theliterature [10] [11] linear sliding movement andabrasive wear mechanism are the most commonand the most important in the hydrauliccomponents. Regarding this fact, pin-on-platetribometer was selected to be designed andconstructed because we had wear process betweenpin and plate in oil environment. Also, it can beable to control some <strong>of</strong> the basic tribologyparameters such as load in contact, slide length,sliding speed, liquid resistance, etc.On the figure 1 is shown model <strong>of</strong> tribometerwhich is divided in 3 bigger units: experimental unit (positions: 1, 2 3 4and 7); control unit (positions: 6 and 8) and pneumatic drive unit (position: 5)All units need to be well connected andfunctional. Potential problems with the first startingup <strong>of</strong> the constructed tribometer can be prevented13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 381


using number possibilities <strong>of</strong> 3D modellings<strong>of</strong>tware packages.8623Figure 1. Sub-divided components <strong>of</strong> tribometer modelFirst <strong>of</strong> all, whole design <strong>of</strong> the tribometer isbased on container with a plate and oil (1), placedon a horizontal linear guides (2), movingalternately, while pin is stationary. Pin bracket (3)is set to vertical linear guides (4) and given loadson the pin passed through the bar, which is also adynamometer for measuring <strong>of</strong> friction force. Drivesystem for reciprocation motion is pneumatic (5)with pneumatic cycle counter (6).On container with a plate (1) displacementtransducer is fixed (7), with function to measure, inreal time, container position and thus enable theaccurate determination <strong>of</strong> velocity and momentswhen container change movement direction. On atribometer base plate surface there is a connectionpanel for this transducer (8).Now will be described the most important part<strong>of</strong> the tribometer, the contact zone where tests areperformed (figure 2).1475Value <strong>of</strong> normal load in the contact zone isdefined by calibrated weights (1) where the forcestransferred through the shaft (2) with a sphericalend are to the pin bracket (3). Compensation <strong>of</strong>own mass elements which are located on the pinbracket is performed through a spring with athreaded spindle (4). On pin bracket (3) set thesingle-axis piezoelectric vibration sensor (6) whichmeasures vibrations in the tribological contact inthe vertical direction.The close-up view <strong>of</strong> the above describedcontact zone is shown in figure 3.Figure 3. Close up view <strong>of</strong> contact zoneThere is a plate attached at the bottom <strong>of</strong>aluminium container. Pin has cone top that fits intoa spherical end <strong>of</strong> the dynamometer bar and thuscarries the normal force evenly over the entiresurface <strong>of</strong> contact. Container has a volume <strong>of</strong> 500ml and is filled oil up with oil to about 1/3 <strong>of</strong> itsheight. Container is covered with a transparentcover on which there are connections for oilcirculation - suction and return. Suction line takesoil from the bottom <strong>of</strong> container on one side andreturns oil back to the surface on the other side <strong>of</strong>container. This is to ensure adequate oil mixingduring circulation.And, at the end the third part <strong>of</strong> the tribometer ispneumatic system (figure 4).147332Figure 2. System for setting load and forcemeasurementFigure 4. Pneumatic drive unit382 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


This part is assembled <strong>of</strong> pneumatic cylinder(1), air-operated distribution valve 5/2 (2), twopneumatic limit switches (3), pneumatic logic valve3/2 (4), pneumatic cycle counter and the resetbutton. Limit switches limit stroke <strong>of</strong> cylinderpiston which is fixed to container. Switches arefixed and the stroke length is determined byvarying the length <strong>of</strong> a cylindrical end part <strong>of</strong>cylinder (7) which activated limit switches. At bothcommand lines, which bring compressed air to thecylinder, set <strong>of</strong> throttle valves that regulate thespeed <strong>of</strong> the cylinder in both directions.4. CONCLUSIONIn the times where financial savings are moreimportant than results, there need to be the waywhich will satisfy both conditions. Besides that,there is a constant need for various types <strong>of</strong>experiments which need to be precise and its resultsneed to be accurate. Development <strong>of</strong> modulartribometers could be good solution for issuesrelated for rapid construction <strong>of</strong> tribometer andobtaining accurate results for selected parameters.Tribometer which is designed from modules testedand verified through simulations it is very simple toproceed to the next step regarding construction.Desired and requested parameters are alsoimportant because s<strong>of</strong>tware could obtain possiblemistakes and failures in design before construction.ACKNOWLEDGMENTResearch presented in this paper was supportedby Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and TechnologicalDevelopment <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia, GrantTR-35021, Title: Razvoj triboloških mikro/nanodvokomponentnih i hibridnih samopodmazajućihkompozita.REFERENCES[1] E. Sajewicz, Z. Kulesza: A new tribometer forfriction and wear studies <strong>of</strong> dental materials andhard tooth tissues, Tribology International 40,pp. 885–895, 2007.[2] S.K. Sinha, S.L. Thia, L.C. Lim: A new tribometerfor friction drives, Wear, Vol 262, pp. 55–63, 2007.[3] J.L. Dion, G. Chevallier, O.Penas, F.Renaud: A newmulticontact tribometer for deterministic dynamicfriction identification, Wear 300, pp. 126–135,2013.[4] K.D. Moerlooze, F. Al-Bender, H.V. Brussel: Anexperimental study <strong>of</strong> ball-on-flat wear on a newlydeveloped rotational tribometer, Wear 271,pp. 1005– 1016, 2011.[5] P.J. Blau: Friction Science and Technology, MarcelDekker, New York, 1996.[6] M.R. Kashani, E. Behazin, A. Fakhar: Constructionand evaluation <strong>of</strong> a new tribometer for polymers,Polymer Testing 30, pp. 271–276, 2011.[7] URL: www.microtest-sa.com/index.php?lang=en(accessed: 04.03.2013.)[8] M.K. Malhotra, M.L. Heine, V. Grover: Anevaluation <strong>of</strong> the relationship between managementpractices and computer aided design technology,Journal <strong>of</strong> Operations Management 19,pp. 307–333, 2001.[9] W.C. Regli, V.A. Cicirello: Managing digitallibraries for computer-aided design, Computer-Aided Design 32, pp. 119–132, 2000.[10] C.B. Mohan, C. Divakar, K. Venkatesh, K.Gopalakrishna, K.S. Mahesh Lohith, T.N. Naveen:Design and development <strong>of</strong> an advanced linearreciprocating tribometer, Bengaluru 562112, India2009.[11] G.W. Stackhowiak, A.W. Batchelor, G.B.Stachowiak, Experimental methods in tribology,Tribology Series 44, Elsevier Science, 2004.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 383


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB‘1313th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac,Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevaccUSING OFKALMAN FILTER ASA PROGNOSTIC TOOLFOR TRIBOLOGY PROCESSESIvanMačužić 1 , Petar Todorović 1 , Marko Đapan 1 , Milan Radenković 1 , Branislav Jeremić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia,ivanm@kg.ac.rs, petar@ @kg.ac.rs, djapan@kg.ac.rs, radenkovic@ @kg.ac.rs, bane@kg.ac.rsAbstract: The paper consider possibilities for performing <strong>of</strong>prognostic procedure pfor tribology processes inhydraulic equipment using advanced mathematical tool called Kalman filter. It is an algorithmthat uses aseries <strong>of</strong> measurementsobserved over time, containing noiseand other inaccuracies,, and produces estimatess<strong>of</strong> monitored parameter that tend to be more precise than those based on a single measurement alone.Kalman filter operates recursively on streams <strong>of</strong> noisy input data to produce a statistically optimal estimatee<strong>of</strong> the underlying system state.This type <strong>of</strong> procedure could be usedd for prognostic <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong> chosenparameter <strong>of</strong> tribologysystem with significantly accuracy. Efficiencyy <strong>of</strong> Kalman filter were tested onexperimental results <strong>of</strong> hydraulic oill contamination monitoring performed in laboratory conditions.Keywords: Kalman filter, prognostic, tribology processes, hydraulic equipment1. INTRODUCTIONPrognostics is a set <strong>of</strong> activities aimedd atassessing the remaining time t<strong>of</strong>ailure for aparticular technical system or risk <strong>of</strong> presencee oroccurrence <strong>of</strong> one or more failuremodes in thefuture. Prognosticsefficiency can be quitesatisfactory for the failure modes that haverepeating time characteristics,followed byprogressive degradation <strong>of</strong> keyexploitationcharacteristics [1].In casess <strong>of</strong> failure modes with random andunexpected events, prognostic is a very difficulttask with uncertain results.Prognostic process could be based on the model,or on the measurement results. Prognostic basedd onthe measurement resultss includes the use <strong>of</strong> variousmathematical tools for monitoring and predicting,such as for example Kalman filter and its simplifiedversion known as alpha-beta-gammaa filter [2].2. KALMAN FILTERSignal filtering, and extracting the t useful signalfrom noise is a traditional problemin science andtechnology.Significant number <strong>of</strong> models andalgorithms was proposed and developed for solving<strong>of</strong> this problem. In case when signal and noise384spectra lies inn different frequency bands, theirseparation cann be made with appropriate bandfilters.Another problem arises when the spectra <strong>of</strong> thesignal and noise overlapp and thenstatisticalmethods for the assessment and evaluation <strong>of</strong> thesignal should be b used to extract the signal. In suchcircumstancesit is not possible toobtain anaccurate absolute value <strong>of</strong>f the signal, and all themethods <strong>of</strong> filtration are made only to t minimizeinterference.The first such analog signals filter suggested s byNorbet Winer in 1940. using the method <strong>of</strong> leastsquares. New stage in the development <strong>of</strong> thetheory <strong>of</strong> filtration began Rudolf Emill Kalman in1960., with publication <strong>of</strong> his capital work, "A NewApproach to Linear Filtering and PredictionProblems" in which w it was first introduced methodwill become known in science as the Kalman filter[3].The Kalmann filter is a mathematical tool thattcanbe used too assess thee value <strong>of</strong> variables indifferent formss <strong>of</strong> real situation. Mathematicallyspeaking Kalman filter evaluates the condition <strong>of</strong>linear systems. It is a statistical technique thattcombines the statistical nature <strong>of</strong> systemfaults withknowledge <strong>of</strong> the systemm dynamics, , and those13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


matrixes describe the state <strong>of</strong> the system and theirevaluation.The significance <strong>of</strong> this method is that, on theone hand it gives excellent results in practice,while, on the other side, is theoretically attractivesince it has been demonstrated that all <strong>of</strong> the filtersthat are applied precisely this variation achieved byminimizing the error estimates [4], which is <strong>of</strong>tenalso called the optimal filter.Application <strong>of</strong> Kalman filter was recently, inaddition to traditional applications related to signalprocessing, automatic control systems andprocesses, and the projection <strong>of</strong> the trajectory andballistic missiles, and a significant number <strong>of</strong> newareas such as medicine systems, global positioningsatellite (GPS) navigation, computer vision,economics, and so on.In order to use the Kalman filter to remove noisefrom the signal, system, or process that isconsidered to be such that it can be approximated aslinear and present. For nonlinear systems, whichcan’t be present or approximated as linear, the socalled.Extended Kalman filter is developed as anextension <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> linear Kalman filter tononlinear systems [4].Linear systems are those that can be representedusing the following two equations. The first is theequation <strong>of</strong> state: (1)the other is the output <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> equations: (1) (2)These equations are:A - matrix that shows the relationship <strong>of</strong> current andprevious step, B - matrix connections inputs and thecurrent state, C - matrix state and do themeasurements, k - time index, x - variable thatindicates the state <strong>of</strong> the system, in - known inputthe system, y - the output <strong>of</strong> the system beingmeasured, and w and z are noises where w is calledprocess noise and z - measurement noise.Each <strong>of</strong> these values is generally a vector thatcontains more than one element. Vector x containsall the information about the current state <strong>of</strong> thesystem but we are not able to measure directly.Therefore, we measure the value <strong>of</strong> the vector ywhich is a function <strong>of</strong> the vector x with the addition<strong>of</strong> measurement noise z. This means that over themeasured values <strong>of</strong> the vector y can assess the statesystem described by vector x.Introduced the assumption that the averagevalue <strong>of</strong> the process noise w and the measurementnoise z is zero during a time interval and that thereis no correlation between them, and that the tw<strong>of</strong>orests have approximately a normal distributionwith covariance Sw and Sz. Based on the above canbe derived equations for the Kalman filter [4]: (3) (4) (5)Each <strong>of</strong> the three defined equations <strong>of</strong> Kalmanfilter includes a series <strong>of</strong> operations with matriceswhere the index T represent matrix transpositionand index -1 represent matrix inversion. Matrix K iscalled the Kalman gain and the matrix R estimation<strong>of</strong> error covariance.Obviously, the Kalman filter works recursivelyand takes only the value <strong>of</strong> the system state at theprevious time point to generate assessmentfollowing conditions (not required the entire history<strong>of</strong> the state).The Kalman filter can be used in different waysto handle real signals where the results are quitedifferent nature and use. When the filter is used toestimate the previous state <strong>of</strong> the known history <strong>of</strong>the system (measured values) is obtained byeliminating the possibility <strong>of</strong> measuring noise inorder to level the curve that defines the state <strong>of</strong> thesystem changes over time in the past. If we estimatethe current state <strong>of</strong> the system is the result <strong>of</strong>filtering the measured signal [4], [5].The filter can be used for the prediction <strong>of</strong> thesystem in the near future if the state <strong>of</strong> the systemin estimated time is moved to next time interval inadvance. This means that the estimated state andthe actual state were time-shifted by an interval soin accordance with the assessment <strong>of</strong> the situationfor the time moment k+1 conducted on the basis <strong>of</strong>estimated values <strong>of</strong> x from time to time andmeasured values at the time point k + 1. This ispossible because the movement <strong>of</strong> the estimatedstate for a time interval <strong>of</strong> pre-practice leads totemporal overlap <strong>of</strong> the estimated state x from k+1timing and the real state <strong>of</strong> x from k time.Practically on the basis <strong>of</strong> previous estimates anderrors in the actual situation new value is evaluatedfor the next time point.One <strong>of</strong> the great advantages <strong>of</strong> Kalman filter isits feature that it is not necessary to carry outdetailed modelling <strong>of</strong> system which condition isestimated. The reason for this lies in the recursivityprinciple <strong>of</strong> Kalman filter and the periodicrepetition <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> assessment andcorrection, and built-in tendency to corrects andminimize error from step to step. This feature opensthe door to a wide use in solving various technicalproblems since the generation <strong>of</strong> an accurate model<strong>of</strong> the real system is a very demanding and complextask [5].13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 385


3. KALMAN FILTERAPPLICATION FORRPROGNOSTIC OFTRIBOLOGYPROCESSES IN HYDRAULICThe essence <strong>of</strong> the idea for theapplicationn <strong>of</strong>Kalman filter for forecasting andprognosticc <strong>of</strong>tribology processes liesin the fact that it is a toolthat is least dependent on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the model<strong>of</strong> tribology system that is considered.Theprocedure involves projections toprognosticc inmathematical modelling <strong>of</strong> the behaviour <strong>of</strong>tribology parameters in time, whichh severely limitsthe application <strong>of</strong> other, model-based, prognostictools, sincethey are directly dependent on thecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the model for a specific system.On the other hand, Kalman filter will providevery useful results even for very approximatemodels andalso for some standard, general models<strong>of</strong> system behaviour in time (that do not even havedirect link with the observed system),.It is clear that the Kalman filter works onlyy atdiscrete points in time, and its use is relatedd todigital signal processing. Complexmath, matrixtransformations and calculations, represent an easytask for modern computers and processors to thestabile and to mobile devices, which also allowedthe installation <strong>of</strong> Kalman filters in numerousportable monitoring devices.As an example <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Kalman filterfor prognostic <strong>of</strong> tribology processes, trendingg <strong>of</strong>contamination level in hydraulic equipment will bepresented.Method <strong>of</strong> hydraulic oil contamination valuesprognostic (based on ISO4406 contamination levelcode) usingKalman filter is shown on Figuree 1.From 200 measured points, that define the values <strong>of</strong>contamination level, forparticles <strong>of</strong>f defined size, 9points was allocated (8 is shown from T1 to T8) .ISO 4406 class <strong>of</strong> oil contaminationT9PT5PT7T7PT6T4T7T8PT3PT6PT5T4PT2T3projectionerrorT1T2PT1,Kalman filter defines point T2P so that t its valueis the same as the t value <strong>of</strong> the point T1. This is theinitial assumption that nothing will change.At the time <strong>of</strong> obtainingg the measured values <strong>of</strong>other points - T2, T the projection error is i calculatedas the difference in point values T2 and T2P. Onthe basis <strong>of</strong> the projection error values andmeasured values point T2, Kalman filter performsthe projection <strong>of</strong> o the value e <strong>of</strong> the thirdpoint T3P.Then a new measured valuee <strong>of</strong> contamination T3 isreceived and new projectionn error is calculated andthe cycle is repeated.Practically the value <strong>of</strong> each new projected pointis function <strong>of</strong> the previous measuredvalue andprojection errors in the previous point.At Figure 2, , diagram obtained by the projection<strong>of</strong> contamination using a Kalman filter for thecurve related to the measured contamination <strong>of</strong>hydraulic oil is shown, together with diagram <strong>of</strong>error projections. Prognostic process is i conducteddfor 40 points, which define thevalue <strong>of</strong>contamination,in first attempt and 10 points insecond one.ISO 4406class <strong>of</strong> oil contaminationprojection errorISO 4406class <strong>of</strong> oil contaminationprojection errornumber <strong>of</strong> f cyclesnumber <strong>of</strong>f cyclesnumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesmeasured valuesprojection valuesmeasured valuesprojection valuesnumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesFigure 1. Kalman filter prognostic processIn this case, those are equidistant points,although, ingeneral, donot have to t be. Basedd onthe value <strong>of</strong>the first point <strong>of</strong> T1 andset parameters<strong>of</strong> Kalmanfilter define the value <strong>of</strong> the firstprojected point in the future (T2P). Since there isno additional information other than the valuee <strong>of</strong>386number <strong>of</strong> cyclesFigure 2. Kalman filter prognostic and projection errorAt Figure 3. diagrams obtained by the projection<strong>of</strong> contamination using the Kalman filter f for oilsample from the test with the externall addition <strong>of</strong>contamination in i the contact zone is shown.Total <strong>of</strong> 3 diagrams are shown in Figure 3.refers to variants <strong>of</strong> Kalman filters with different13 th International Conference C onn Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


values influence <strong>of</strong> themeasurement noise (fromlower to higher)ISO 4406 class <strong>of</strong> oil contamination ISO 4406 class <strong>of</strong> oil contaminationISO 4406 class <strong>of</strong> oil contaminationnumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesnumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesnumber <strong>of</strong> cyclesFigure 3. Kalman filter prognostic with step-changee incontamination for different values <strong>of</strong> measurement noise4. CONCLUSIONBased on shownresults some generalconclusionss about process <strong>of</strong> prognostic using theKalman filter could be defined: Theexamples <strong>of</strong> practicall applicationn <strong>of</strong>prognostic using Kalman filter obtainedverygood results in tracking <strong>of</strong> realmeasured values with acceptable projectionerror in case <strong>of</strong>measured diagrams withoutsuddenand significant changes <strong>of</strong>contamination value. The biggest mistakee <strong>of</strong> projection, as a rule,is rightt at the beginning at first projectedpoint. Variations in the values <strong>of</strong> the measuredsignal and a noise measurement have a directimpact on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the prognostic. The influence <strong>of</strong> the measurement noise onthe result <strong>of</strong> the projection canbe adjusteddusing the t definition <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> thecorresponding parameter in the t Kalmanfilter equations. Increasing the value <strong>of</strong> thisparameter indicatess the presence <strong>of</strong> moreintensive measuringg noise and vice versa. In the case c <strong>of</strong> a sharp and abrupt prognosticusing a Kalman filter have visible and theexpected delay in the response to change. Itis clear that there is no method <strong>of</strong>forecasting,which can predicttheoccurrence <strong>of</strong> sudden, unexpected andabrupt changes in the values followed bythe diagnostic parameter. In anycase, theseephenomenapoint to theserioussirregularities and problems in the systemand certainly represent an alarmsignal. The great advantage <strong>of</strong> using Kalman filterlies in its fullindependenceandinsensitivity to the shape and characteristicss<strong>of</strong> the measured m contaminationtrend charts.ACKNOWLEDGMENTResearch presented in this paper was supportedby the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education, Science andTechnological DevelopmenDnt <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia,Grant 35021REFERENCES[1] A. Muller, M.C. M Suhner, B. Iung: Formalisation <strong>of</strong> anew prognosis model for supporting proactivemaintenancee implementation on industrial system, ,Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93,pp. 234-253, , 2008.[2] J. Lee, J. Ni, N D. Djurdjanovic, H. Qiu, H. Liao:Intelligent prognostic ptools and e-maintenance,Computers in Industry 57, , pp. 476-489, 2006.[3] R.E. Kalman: A New Approach to Linear Filteringand PredictionProblems,Journal <strong>of</strong> BasicEngineering 82 (Series D) ), pp. 35-45., 1960.[4] D. Simon: Kalman Filtering, Embedded SystemssProgramming, 2001.[5] G. Welch, G. Bishop: An Introduction to theKalman Filter, Department <strong>of</strong> Computer ScienceeUniversity <strong>of</strong> North Carolina13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13387


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacFRICTION COEFFICIENT ESTIMATION DURING FRICTIONSTIR WELDING WITH THE SINGLE SHOULDERED WELDINGTOOLMiroslav Mijajlović 1 , Dušan Stamenković 1 , Milan Banić 1 , Aleksandar Miletnović 1 , Miloš Milošević 11 University <strong>of</strong> Niš, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering in Niš, Serbia, mijajlom@masfak.ni.ac.rs,dusans@masfak.ni.ac.rs, banic@masfak.ni.ac.rs, amiltenovic@yahoo.com, mmilos@masfak.ni.ac.rsAbstract: Friction stir welding utilizes friction forces on the contact <strong>of</strong> the welding tool and workpieces withthe goal <strong>of</strong> heating and s<strong>of</strong>tening workpiece material before stirring and mixing it into the weld. The process<strong>of</strong> stirring, mixing and welding is quite complex: material <strong>of</strong> workpieces in the welding zone is drasticallydeformed/reformed, heated, translated, rotated and s<strong>of</strong>tened, and finally, deposed behind the welding tool tocool, plasticize, and recrystallize as a weld. In such conditions, it is difficult to recognize friction conditions,contact surface(s), and loads on the contact. There are no fully operational analytical models for estimation<strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient during friction stir welding. This paper is giving an overview on a frictioncoefficient research and presents experimental results from performed friction stir welding <strong>of</strong> aluminiumalloy 2024 T351. Experimental results are used as input for the modified analytical model for estimation <strong>of</strong>friction coefficient in friction stir welding.Keywords: Friction Stir Welding, Friction Coefficient, Heat Generation.1. INTRODUCTIONFriction is one <strong>of</strong> the most important parametersfor successful friction stir welding (FSW) process –this is a sentence that no researcher <strong>of</strong> FSW will tryto disapprove. Such influence to the process itselfhas motivated the inventor <strong>of</strong> FSW to use “friction”in the name <strong>of</strong> the process.However, friction in FSW has been neverpresented and explained as a parameter that can bemanipulated or adjusted in some manner to improvethe FSW process itself. For example, when greaterfriction in FSW is needed, welding tool (figure 1, b)must have threads, facets, keys etc., when lessheating is needed, welding tool has to travel fasterwhat will result in shorter contact between weldingtool and some particles <strong>of</strong> workpieces what resultswith less friction on contact.Nowadays experiences in FSW usage recognizetechnological parameters <strong>of</strong> the process (travel rate,rotation speed, duration <strong>of</strong> welding etc.) andgeometry <strong>of</strong> the welding tool (shape, dimensionsetc.) as best parameters for successful management<strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> FSW. Principle <strong>of</strong> “trial and error” andparameters management were successful for FSWand it has been significantly improved. It is knownthat better the mathematical model explaining thephysical process is, the more applicable the processbecomes. “Try and error” principle uses nomathematical model for improvement but alwaysgives results and improvements. Its maindisadvantage is high resource / time consumption.In a certain way, friction is very important foralmost any aspect <strong>of</strong> the FSW, but its ambiguityand complex dependencies with the otherparameters <strong>of</strong> FSW make it difficult to use formanagement <strong>of</strong> the process. That is the main reasonwhy friction is the least investigated physicalprocess <strong>of</strong> FSW.2. SINGLE SHOULDERED FSWThe first application <strong>of</strong> the FSW was with thewelding tool having one probe and one shoulder(figure 1, a). Such construction requires an anvil inorder to make weld creation possible. There arenewer constructions <strong>of</strong> the welding tool with twoshoulders and/or more than one probe.Application and technology <strong>of</strong> FSW with awelding tool with one shoulder is in detailexplained in the literature [1-3].388 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Figure 1. Friction stir weldinga – principle <strong>of</strong> FSW, b – welding tool and its active surfaces, c – heat generation and transport [1]3. ESTIMATION OF THE FRICTIONCOEFICIENT DURING SINGLESHOULDERED FSWThe newest improvement and development <strong>of</strong>the model for estimation <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficientin FSW is 4 years old Kumar’s model [4] and relieson the estimation <strong>of</strong> the momentum <strong>of</strong> frictionwhich is afterwards, with adequate mathematicalmodel, transformed into the friction coefficient.There are several difficulties in application <strong>of</strong> sucha model:1. measuring the momentum <strong>of</strong> friction requiresspecific and limitedly applicablemeasuring/working configuration [1],2. friction coefficient estimated during FSW byKumar is a median value for all contacts surfaces –active surfaces <strong>of</strong> welding tool and workpieces(figure 1, b).3.1 Specific time moments <strong>of</strong> the FSWMijajlovic et al [Ref. 5, Figure 4] gives ascheme <strong>of</strong> welding tools engagement during FSW.It is important to define specific moments <strong>of</strong> timeduring welding.Probe tip is active surface that is fully engagedin the FSW process from the beginning <strong>of</strong> theplunging phase (t 0 ) until the end <strong>of</strong> the seconddwelling phase (t 4 ). At the beginning <strong>of</strong> theplunging phase probe tip slides over the top surface<strong>of</strong> welding plates and there is no significantplunging into material <strong>of</strong> the welding plates.Material <strong>of</strong> the welding plates is still capable toresist influence <strong>of</strong> the contact pressure on contactbetween probe tip and welding plates. Plungingforce is rising as the plunging phase on goes andeventually plunging force will be intensive enoughto produce contact pressure that will overcomeresistance <strong>of</strong> the material and welding tool willpenetrate into the material (in the moment <strong>of</strong>time t ps’ ). This intensive plunging will enablecontact between probe side and material <strong>of</strong> weldingplates and increase <strong>of</strong> engagement <strong>of</strong> the probe side– it will reach some value until the end <strong>of</strong> theplunging phase (t 1 ). It will be kept steady or slightlywill decrease during first dwelling phase (from t 1 tot 2 ) and it will increase again during welding phase(after t 2 ). When welding tool stabilizes (in weldingphase, when it reaches constant speed, at themoment <strong>of</strong> t ps" ) probe side will reach maximalengagement.It will be kept relatively steady until the end <strong>of</strong>the second dwelling phase (t 4 ) and after will slightlydecrease until the minimal value – when weldingtool gets pulled out, at the end <strong>of</strong> the pulling outphase (t 5 ). Shoulder tip will involve in FSW processwhen firstly touches (t st ) the material <strong>of</strong> weldingplates that was pushed upwards while plungingphase lasted. Engagement <strong>of</strong> the active surface willincrease to the maximum when plunging phaseends (t 1 ), it will keep steady value until the end <strong>of</strong>the second dwelling phase (t 4 ) when it will drop tominimum [5].3.2 Contact over the probe tipThe probe tip (pt) <strong>of</strong> the welding tool is rathercurved than flat due to the better distribution <strong>of</strong> thecontact pressure [1]. Without concern on thetopology <strong>of</strong> the welding tool’s probe tip, when theprobe tip is pressing the workpiece while loadedwith the axial force F z (t) and torque T pt (t),equilibrium <strong>of</strong> the force and the torque (no relativemovement <strong>of</strong> the welding tool and workpieces, norrotation <strong>of</strong> the welding tool) is reached if: pt () tFz()[ t dt () d0()]tTpt() t T1() t3 (1)where: (t)= pt (t) – total coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction -coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction at pt, d(t) – diameter <strong>of</strong> the13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 389


probe, d 0 (t) – diameter <strong>of</strong> the technological hole inthe workpieces, t - time.In such condition, the momentum <strong>of</strong> frictionM fr (t) is:Mfr() tFz()[ t dt () d0()]t() t (2)3and therefore, friction coefficient at pt is:3 M fr ( t)() t pt() t , t0 t tps'Fz()[ t d() t d0()]t3.3 Contact over the probe tip and the probeside(2)The probe side (ps) <strong>of</strong> the welding tool iscylindrical or coned surface with or without thread[1]. The thread is <strong>of</strong> great significance for thewelding process, however, it makes greatdifficulties for the analysis <strong>of</strong> friction and it will beneglected in analysis.If only the probe side is in contact with theworkpieces, equilibrium between the forces,represented as the contact pressure at the probe sidep ps (t), and the torque T ps (t) is:2 ps () tdt () ht () pps()π tTps() t T2() t (3)2where: (t)= ps (t) – total coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction –coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction at ps, h(t) – height <strong>of</strong> theprobe (side) plunged into the workpieces.In such condition, the momentum <strong>of</strong> frictionM fr (t) is:Mfr2() tdt () htp () ps ()π t() t (4)2and therefore, friction coefficient at pt is:2 M fr ( t)() t ps() t , t24 t t5(5)dt () htp () ps ()π tWhen the probe tip and the probe side aresimultaneously involved in the contact, equilibrium<strong>of</strong> loads and the torque at the probe tip and theprobe side T pt+ps (t) can be expressed as:2() tdt () ht () pps()π tpt ps () 1() (6)T t T tIn such condition, the momentum <strong>of</strong> frictionM fr (t) is:2M fr () t T1() t T2()t (7)Assuming that the friction coefficients at theprobe side and the probe tip are the same (only as avalue): () t ps() t pt(),t tps't tst(8)transforming the equation (7), friction coefficientbecomes:6 M fr ( t)() t ,22 Fz()[ t d() t d0()] t 3 d() t h() t pps()πttps' t tst3.4 Contact over the probe tip, the probe sideand the shoulder tip(9)The shoulder tip (st) <strong>of</strong> the welding tool iscylindrical or coned surface with the greatest area[1, 2]. Shoulder tip is the last active surface <strong>of</strong> thewelding tool involving into the welding process.If only the shoulder tip is in contact with theworkpieces, equilibrium between the loads and thetorque at the shoulder tip T st (t) is:st() tFz()[ t Dt () dmax]Tst() t T3() t (10)3where: (t)= st (t) – total coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction –coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction at st, D(t) – diameter <strong>of</strong> the st,d max – maximal diameter <strong>of</strong> the probe.However, shoulder tip is never involved in thewelding process as the only active surfaces –shoulder tip is always involved in weldingsimultaneously with the probe tip and the probeside and in such case, equilibrium <strong>of</strong> loads and thetotal torque T tot (t) is:Ttot() t T1() t T2() t T3()t (11)In such condition, the momentum <strong>of</strong> frictionM fr (t) is:M fr () t T1() t T2() t T3()t (12)Assuming that the friction coefficients at theprobe side, the probe tip and the shoulder tip are thesame (only as a value): () t ps () t pt () t st (), t tstt t4(13)transforming the equation (12), friction coefficientis:6 M fr ( t)() t ,22 Fz() t A3 d() t h() t pps()π+2 t Fz( t)BA dt () d0(), t B Dt () dmax , tps'ttst3.5 Contact pressure at the probe side(14)Contact pressure at the probe side is mostlydelivered by the welding force F x (t). Since weldingforce is active only during the welding phase390 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


(t 2 t


Second set <strong>of</strong> experiments was performed withthe conical welding tool - CWT (Figure 2, b),changing the rotation speed from lower to higherand starting with the maximal dimension <strong>of</strong> thetechnological hole and decreasing it to the 0 – fromminimal plunging force to the maximal. [-]1.210.80.60.40.20t 0=5.1 st ps=9.05 st st=24.2 st 1=27.4 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 6. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =5 mmM fr / T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=5.1 st ps=9.05 st st=24.2 st 1=24.7 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 7. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =5 mm1.210.80.60.40.20t 0 =t ps' =3.1st pt=10.1 st st=20.3 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26t [s]Figure 8. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mmM fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t ps' =3.1 st pt=10.1 st st=20.3 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26t [s]Figure 9. Ratio <strong>of</strong> the momentum <strong>of</strong> friction and thetorque: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mm [-]1.210.80.60.40.20t 0=9.6 st ps'=22.7 st st=25.1 st 1=29.7 s0 2 4 6 8 10121416182022242628303234t [s]Figure 10. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =2 mmM fr / T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=9.6 st ps'=22.7 st st=25.1 st 1=29.7 s0 2 4 6 8 10121416182022242628303234t [s]Figure 11. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =2 mm1.21.110.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=2.2 st ps'=6.1 st st=14.05 st 1=18.1 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20t [s]Figure 12. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =0 mm392 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


M fr / T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=2.2 st ps'=6.1 st 1=18.1 st st=14.05 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20t [s]Figure 13. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=265 rpm, d 0 =0 mm1.210.80.60.40.20t 0=t ps ' =5.1 st st=19.9 st 1=21.5 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22t [s]Figure 14. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =5 mmM fr / T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t ps' =5.1 st st=19.9 st 1=21.5 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22t [s]Figure 15. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =5 mm43.532.521.510.50t 0=t ps' =5 .5 8 st pt=13.5 st st=17.5 st 1=21.2 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24t [s]Figure 16. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mmM fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t ps'=5.58 st pt=11.68 st st=21.15 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24t [s]Figure 17. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mm [-]2.221.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20t 0=t ps' =6 .5 st pt=11.68 st st=19.3 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 18. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =2 mmM fr /T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t ps ' =6.5 st st=19.3 st pt=11.68 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 19. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =2 mm1.210.80.60.40.20t 0=5.3 st st=14.8 st ps'=8.2 st 1=18.95 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26t [s]Figure 20. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =0 mm13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 393


M fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=5.3 st st=14.8 st ps'=8.2 st 1=18.95 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26t [s]Figure 21. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=600 rpm, d 0 =0 mm [-]43.532.521.510.5t 0=t ps' =7.8 st st=12.25 st 1=15.8 s00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24t [s]Figure 22. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =5 mmM fr / T [-] [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0 =t ps' =7.8st st=21.15 st 1=24.3 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24t [s]Figure 23. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =5 mm1.210.80.60.40.20t 0=t pt=5.6 st ps'=9.4 st st=19.9 st 1=24.7 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 24. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mmM fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t pt=5.6 st ps'=9.4 st st=19.9 st 1=24.7 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30t [s]Figure 25. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =3.2 mm [-]2.62.42.221.81.61.41.210.80.60.40.20t 0=t pt=6.2st st=31.4 st ps'=20.5 st 1=35.8 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 3032 34 36 38 40t [s]Figure 26. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =2 mmM fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t pt=6 .2 st st=31.4 st ps'=20.5 st 1=35.8 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40t [s]Figure 27. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =2 mm1.2t ps'=11.5 s1t 0=t pt=5.5t st=21.05 s [-]0.80.60.40.20st 1=26.05 s4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32t [s]Figure 28. Friction coefficient: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =0 mm394 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


M fr / T [-]10.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10t 0=t pt=5.5 st ps'=11.5 st st=21.05 st 1=26.05 s0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1820 22 24 26 28 30 32t [s]Figure 29. Ratio M fr /T: CWT, n=910 rpm, d 0 =0 mmMeasured values <strong>of</strong> torque and forces were usedfor calculating values <strong>of</strong> the friction coefficient andratio <strong>of</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> friction and the torque(Figure 6 to Figure 29).6. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSThe first set <strong>of</strong> experiments with the“theoretical” welding tool has shown that weldingtool without thread at the probe can not be used forwelding <strong>of</strong> 2024 T351 alloy. Plunging <strong>of</strong> thewelding tool into workpieces was possible onlywhen diameter <strong>of</strong> the welding tool was the same asthe diameter <strong>of</strong> the technological hole in theworkpieces. During such experiment, appeared thatfriction coefficient, after initial stabilization,reaches almost constant value between 0.3 to 0.4what is prescribed value for the FSW <strong>of</strong> AL 2024T351 and the “theoretical” welding tool [1]. Theratio <strong>of</strong> momentum <strong>of</strong> friction and the appliedtorque has a value <strong>of</strong> 1 – there is no (or hasminimal) deformation in the contact.The conclusion was that the plunging <strong>of</strong> the“theoretical” welding tool in welding plates wasimpossible when small or no technological holepresent what implies that welding couldn't even getstarted.The second set <strong>of</strong> experiments was conductedwith the coned, threaded welding tool with theprescribed technological parameters. Welding waspossible, however, only welding with n=910 rpmhas given the qualitative welds. During allweldings, trends and values <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient were identical. Friction coefficient wasrising from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the plunging until themoment <strong>of</strong> time when the shoulder tip involves inthe welding. Common values <strong>of</strong> maximal frictioncoefficient reach about 1 but it is not uncommon toreach values <strong>of</strong> 2-5 (what is in correspondence withthe literature-present values [1-4] but it is possibleto have peak values as imperfections <strong>of</strong> theproposed method for estimation). From thatmoment, friction coefficient drops down and at thebeginning <strong>of</strong> the first dwelling phase reaches value<strong>of</strong> about 0.2 to 0.7. However, at the end <strong>of</strong> thedwelling phase, friction coefficient in allexperiments reaches the values <strong>of</strong> 0.2 to 0.5.The ratio between the momentum <strong>of</strong> friction andthe applied torque has the same trend for allexperiments. It rises up to the maximal value <strong>of</strong> 1and varies from 0.8 to 1, during every conductedexperiment. The results are in agreement with theexisting results [2, 3, 4].LITERATURE[1] Mijajlović, M., Investigation and Development <strong>of</strong>Analytical Model for Estimation <strong>of</strong> Amount <strong>of</strong> HeatGenerated During FSW (in Serbian), Ph. D. thesis,Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering Nis, University<strong>of</strong> Nis, Nis, Serbia, 2012.[2] V. Soundararajan, M. Valant, R. Kovačević: AnOverview <strong>of</strong> R&D Work in Friction Stir Welding atSMU, MJoM, Metalurgija – Journal <strong>of</strong> Metallurgy,Association <strong>of</strong> Metallurgical Engineers <strong>of</strong> Serbia,204, 12, pp. 277-295, 2006.[3] M. Djurdjanović, M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, D.Stamenković: Heat Generation During Friction StirWelding Process, Tribology in Industry, 1-2, pp. 8-14, 2009.[4] K. Kumar, C. Kalyan, S.V. Kailasa, T.S. Srivatsan:An Investigation <strong>of</strong> Friction during Friction StirWelding <strong>of</strong> Metallic Materials, Materials andManufacturing Processes, 24, pp. 438-445, 2009.[5] M. Mijajlović, D. Stamenković, D. Milčić,M. Đurdanović: Study About Friction CoefficientEstimation in Friction Stir Welding, Balkantrib 11,The 7th International Conference on Tribology,<strong>Proceedings</strong>, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 323-330,2011.[6] M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, B. Anđelković,M. Vukićević, M. Bjelić: Mathematical Model forAnalytical Estimation <strong>of</strong> Generated Heat DuringFriction Stir Welding. Part 1, Journal <strong>of</strong> BalkanTribological Association, 17, pp. 179-191, 2011.[7] P. Ulysse: Three-Dimensional Modeling <strong>of</strong> theFriction Stir-Welding Process, Int. J. Mach. Tool.Manu. 42, pp.1549-1557, 2002.[8] H. Schmidt, J. Hattel, J. Wert: An Analytical Modelfor the Heat Generation in Friction Stir Welding,Modeling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12,pp. 143-157, 2004.[9] M. Mijajlović, D. Milčić, B. Anđelković,M. Vukićević, M. Bjelić: Mathematical Model forAnalytical Estimation <strong>of</strong> Generated Heat DuringFriction Stir Welding. Part 2, Journal <strong>of</strong> BalkanTribological Association, 17, pp. 361-370, 2011.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 395


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacMEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTATION FOR DETERMINATIONOF STATIC COEFFICIENT OF ROLLING FRICTIONPetar Todorović 1 , Ivan Mačužić 1 , Branislav Jeremić 1 ,Marko Đapan 1 , Branko Tadić 11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering Kragujevac, Serbia, petar@kg.ac.rs, ivanm@kg.ac.rs,bane@kg.ac.rs, djapan@kg.ac.rs, btadic@kg.ac.rsAbstract: This paper is considering the influence <strong>of</strong> temperature, at normal load and bend radius <strong>of</strong> contactelements on the coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction. Contact pairs are made <strong>of</strong> steel DIN 17230 (100Cr6).Measurement results in a condition <strong>of</strong> high temperatures, variation <strong>of</strong> the normal load and bend radius <strong>of</strong>contact element indicate complex influence <strong>of</strong> temperature in this specific test condition. Authors’ futureresearch would be in direction <strong>of</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> static friction coefficient on the higher temperatures <strong>of</strong>contact pairs made <strong>of</strong> different materials.Keywords: Measurement instrumentation, coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction, high temperatures, inclined plane1. INTRODUCTIONFor every engineer and constructor, who isengaged in design and development <strong>of</strong> mechanicalconstructions, knowledge <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient isvery important and crucial. However, there aremultiple issues, doubts and problems regardingusing <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient values duringexperiments. These problems occur primarilybecause <strong>of</strong> poor applying <strong>of</strong> standard tables andunder which conditions these values are measured.This is all because friction coefficient values aredifferent from laboratory to laboratory, and dependon equipment, measuring methods and a number <strong>of</strong>other parameters that may influence on diversity <strong>of</strong>measured values. Peter J. Blau [1] has representedreview <strong>of</strong> friction force and ways <strong>of</strong> itsmeasurement. He made a list <strong>of</strong> standardmeasurement methods for static and dynamicfriction coefficient as well as the way <strong>of</strong> itspotential use.As we know, friction occurs when two bodiesare in contact and based on velocity <strong>of</strong> relativemotion, friction can be static or kinetic. The staticfriction coefficient depends on many differentparameters, primarily from surface contact, normalload, atmosphere conditions and temperature,surface absorption, quality <strong>of</strong> processing andmaterial in contact [2-5]. There have been severalstudies regarding the influence <strong>of</strong> surface roughnessparameters with the static friction coefficient andconcluded that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction willincrease if surface roughness coefficient increases[3, 4]. Also, some <strong>of</strong> them concluded that someroughness parameters, like skewness and kurtosis,have a greater influence on coefficient <strong>of</strong> staticfriction compared to other parameters [6, 7].Complete understanding <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> staticfriction is impossible without various analyses <strong>of</strong>mechanisms under which this is occurring. Thisissue is a goal for numerous research efforts [8-10].As a start, some authors represented conditionsunder which the value <strong>of</strong> static friction is greaterthan the dynamic friction value, in terms <strong>of</strong>temperature influence on creep motion. Generally,at temperature above zero, static friction coefficientis higher compared to kinetic friction coefficientdue to different heat activated processes. But, wecannot say that the static friction coefficient hasonly one value because it depends on contact andinitial velocity. In order to determine static frictioncoefficient, Chang et al. [8] analyzed adhesionforce and load in contact at rough metal surfaces.The study showed that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> staticfriction depends on characteristics <strong>of</strong> the materialand topography <strong>of</strong> the surface in contact as well asthat depends on external load versus generaldefined friction law. In this paper, researchers were396 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


experimentally determined that for specific externalload, coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction will decrease ifplastic characteristic <strong>of</strong> material increases andsurface energy decreases. D.-H. Hwang et al [11]concluded that the coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction ishigher if contact pair is made <strong>of</strong> different material -steel/alumina, while the lower value is determinedfor similar materials (steel/steel). This result isconsequence <strong>of</strong> “stick-slip” effect. Also, one <strong>of</strong>conclusions was that the influence <strong>of</strong> surfaceroughness has less influence for similar materials incontact pair, as well as the increasing value <strong>of</strong>normal load affects on increasing coefficient <strong>of</strong>static friction in contact pair <strong>of</strong> different materials,while there is no significant influence for contactpairs <strong>of</strong> the identical materials.Etsion and Amit [12] experimentally researchedthe influence <strong>of</strong> normal load on coefficient <strong>of</strong> staticfriction with very smooth metal surfaces in acontrolled laboratory conditions. Dramaticallyincreasing coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction was noticedwhen the normal load is on the lowest level.Behaviour like this is assigned to adhesion forceswhich have more important function regardingsmall normal loads and surface smoothness.A small number <strong>of</strong> papers deal with coefficient<strong>of</strong> static friction under influence <strong>of</strong> temperature[13-16]. The most important conclusion thatauthors made in this papers is that the coefficient <strong>of</strong>static friction will increase if temperature isincreased, which is resulted <strong>of</strong> increasing plasticcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the most contact material atincreased temperature. Reviewing the literature isnoticed that experimental tests <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong>static friction were performed on experimentalequipment with different design, construction anddifferent contact geometry. Also, very interestingare measurement instruments for static coefficient<strong>of</strong> rolling friction [17-19]. Friction characteristics<strong>of</strong> rolling bearing elements depend on contact pairmaterial, design, tolerance, topography <strong>of</strong> contactsurfaces and lubricants. Authors in this papernoticed, during literature review, that there are noany papers which based their research attempts onstatic coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction, while inconditions at higher temperature referring to issueabove, there was no paper found (when this paper iswritten).The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to determine influence<strong>of</strong> temperature on static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction on contact elements made <strong>of</strong> steel.Experimental measurements were performed oninstrumentation that authors designed, developedand constructed regarding very precisedetermination <strong>of</strong> static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling frictionat higher temperatures and relatively small values<strong>of</strong> contact pressure with changing radius bends <strong>of</strong>contact elements.2. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONAccording to literature, the static coefficient <strong>of</strong>friction increases with increasing temperature. It isfound that temperatures above 200°C lead toincreasing <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction which can beinterpreted as a result <strong>of</strong> increasing plasticcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> material at increased temperature.The static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction tested incondition <strong>of</strong> increased temperature has not beensubject <strong>of</strong> either theoretical or experimentalresearch. The authors will determine the influence<strong>of</strong> temperature, normal load and radius bend <strong>of</strong>contact elements on coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling frictionby experimental methods. According to that,measure instrumentation is designed andconstructed, based on inclined plane principle.In the case <strong>of</strong> rolling friction (contiguous case –figure 1), coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction isdetermined from formula 1 and 2:where are:M N e(1)M PM moment <strong>of</strong> resistance andMP rolling moment.From equations 3 and 4: F R(2)eF N f N(3)Ref tanα(4)Rand from the body balance at inclined plate (figure2), we get the following equation:N G cosα(5)esinα R N e G cosα e tanα (6)Rwhere are:f static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction;N normal force;e coordinate that defines resultant reactionposition N;R radius <strong>of</strong> rolling body;G the force <strong>of</strong> gravity;α angle <strong>of</strong> inclined plane.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 397


The tribometer operates in principle <strong>of</strong> inclinedplane. Contact pair together with system for heatingand probe for temperature measurement is rotatedfrom horizontal to the desired angle α. The rotatedangle <strong>of</strong> inclined plane is measured with readingprecision <strong>of</strong> one minute, which for a wide interval<strong>of</strong> possible values <strong>of</strong> the coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction causes the measurement error less than 3%.Figure 1 – The balance <strong>of</strong> rolling body at inclined plateThe authors’ starting point was from theoreticalassumption that the contact between ball and flatsurface in laboratory conditions will be achieved onthe small number <strong>of</strong> unevenness in a regard anumber <strong>of</strong> unevenness at higher temperatures.Further, it is assumed that due to thermal expansion<strong>of</strong> material in the contact zone, will result asincreasing <strong>of</strong> value e (figure 1). This means that asa consequence we will have an increase <strong>of</strong> rollingmoment resistance and a parallel increase <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction. The authors believethat there is some correlation between staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction and the value <strong>of</strong>thermal dilatation <strong>of</strong> contact pair. If we have inmind the stochastic nature <strong>of</strong> real contact area andnonlinear temperature field, it is hard totheoretically quantify the influence <strong>of</strong> temperatureon coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction. Hence, in order toquantify the influence <strong>of</strong> various parameters oncoefficient <strong>of</strong> friction, authors will provide relativeextensive experimental research.3. EXPERIMENTAL TESTSExperimental tests were performed on a specialdesigned and constructed tribometer. The completemeasuring instrument is showed on figure 2. Also,all positions are marked with numbers anddescribed in following text. The tribometer consists<strong>of</strong> three bigger parts, as follows:1 – Thermoregulator. The main aim <strong>of</strong> this part is tovary a temperature (in our case is 200°C). There aretwo small screens; one is showing desiredtemperature and another current temperature.2 – Block with thermocouple. Inside <strong>of</strong> this block,beside thermocouple, there is a system for heatingand probe for temperature measurement. Also, inthis part <strong>of</strong> tribometer the contact between objectand block is made.3 – Counterweight. This part enables to makerotating <strong>of</strong> the block with thermocouple with verygood precision.Figure 2 – Measurement instrumentation(1-Thermoregulator, 2-Counterweight,3-Block with thermocouple)The tests were performed with rolling balls <strong>of</strong>different diameters over channels with differentradius bends. Balls weight and balls diameter werein a range from 0.04 to 0.08N and from 2.32 to13mm respectively. Bend radius <strong>of</strong> the blockcovered a range from 2.5 to 8 mm. Balls and blockwere heated on selected temperatures, 20, 100, 150and 200°C. Chosen material for balls and block wassteel DIN 17230 (100Cr6) with hardness 62-66HRC. Hardness is achieved by quenching andtempering process. Ball roughness is Ra=0.002µm.The roughness <strong>of</strong> the block channels surface was ina range between: Ra=0.8-1µm. The figure 3 is adiagrammatic representation coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction dependence regarding temperature andnormal load.Figure 3 – Coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction dependenceregarding temperature and normal load398 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


4. DISCUSSIONAccording to the theoretical consideration,physical principle and characteristics <strong>of</strong> inclinedplane for coefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction measurementcan be applicable in the conditions with highertemperatures. The measurement error is function <strong>of</strong>the angle α and value <strong>of</strong> friction coefficient, asfollows:tan(α Δα) tanα 100[%] (7)tan(αawhere are:ε - measurement error andΔα – measurement error <strong>of</strong> angle.Measured coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction is in the rangefrom 0.01 to 0.05 and reading precision is oneminute based on computation, the measurementerror is less than 3%. This result is totallyacceptable. The results <strong>of</strong> experimental tests enableglobal overview <strong>of</strong> how larger number <strong>of</strong>parameters influence on coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction. Besides variations <strong>of</strong> temperature and level<strong>of</strong> normal load, variations were made to blockchannel radius (the second contact element).From diagram (figure 3) we can conclude thattemperature, which is selected for contact pairheating and normal load (ball weight) has largeinfluence on changing trend <strong>of</strong> coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction. The bend radius has indirect influence onreal contact surface, meaning that larger radiuscorresponds to 10% <strong>of</strong> lower values <strong>of</strong> frictioncoefficient. If we have in mind that increasingradius <strong>of</strong> block bend increases contact pressure thenit can be concluded that results correspond withliterature. In conjunction with above stated, it canbe concluded that to lower coefficient <strong>of</strong> frictioncorresponds higher contact pressure.Based on analyses <strong>of</strong> experimental results,generally it can be stated that contact temperaturehas significant influence on coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction. However, level <strong>of</strong> temperature influenceon coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction is highly dependentfrom normal load value, especially in an area <strong>of</strong>lower values <strong>of</strong> normal load.5. CONCLUSIONThe research in the field <strong>of</strong> static friction isspread in a number <strong>of</strong> directions. The topicexplored by authors aimed to draw attention thatresearch in a field <strong>of</strong> static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction have not been carried out in order toquantify complex influence <strong>of</strong> normal load, contactsurface and temperature on coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction. Through theoretical considerationpresented in this paper, authors hypothesized thatthere is necessary thermal potential in a contactzone for redistribution <strong>of</strong> contact pressure andincrease <strong>of</strong> rolling moment resistance attemperatures around 200°C. The instrumentationused for static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling frictionmeasurement in a condition <strong>of</strong> high temperaturesfunctions as inclined plane and enables satisfactorydetermination results <strong>of</strong> static coefficient <strong>of</strong> rollingfriction. In this paper the measurement error is lessthan 3%, for performed program <strong>of</strong> experimentalresearch, and regarding problems <strong>of</strong> measurement<strong>of</strong> very small friction forces this is completelysatisfactory. The measurement results <strong>of</strong> staticcoefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction for selected materials,in a condition <strong>of</strong> high temperatures, normal loadand bend radius <strong>of</strong> contact elements variation,indicate a complex influence <strong>of</strong> temperature in thetesting conditions.Scientists’ future research in this field should bedirected to experimental tests <strong>of</strong> different materialsin contact and optimization in order to determineminimal values <strong>of</strong> static coefficient <strong>of</strong> friction athigh temperatures.ACKNOWLEDGMENTResearch presented in this paper was supportedby Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and TechnologicalDevelopment <strong>of</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Serbia, GrantTR-35021, Title: Razvoj triboloških mikro/nanodvokomponentnih i hibridnih samopodmazajućihkompozita.REFERENCES[1] P. J. Blau, The significance and use <strong>of</strong> the frictioncoefficient, Tribology International, Vol. 34, No. 9,pp. 585–591, 2001.[2] B. Ivkovic, M. Djurdjanovic, D. Stamenkovic, TheInfluence <strong>of</strong> the Contact Surface Roughness on theStatic Friction Coefficient, Tribology in Industry,Vol. 22, No. 3&4, pp. 41-44, 2000.[3] U. Muller, R. Hauert, Investigations <strong>of</strong> thecoefficient <strong>of</strong> static friction diamond-like carbonfilms, Surface and Coatings Technology, Vol. 174-175, pp. 421–426, 2003.[4] B. Polyakov, S. Vlassov, L. M. Dorogin, P. Kulis,I. Kink, R. Lohmus, The effect <strong>of</strong> substrateroughness on the static friction <strong>of</strong> CuO nanowires,Surface Science, Vol. 606, No. 17-18. pp. 1393-1399, 2012.[5] N. Tayebi, A. A. Polycarpou, Modeling the effect <strong>of</strong>skewness and kurtosis on the static frictioncoefficient <strong>of</strong> rough surfaces, TribologyInternational, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 491-505, 2004.[6] B. Bhushan, S. Sundararajan, W.W. Scott, S.Chilamakuri, Stiction analysis <strong>of</strong> magnetic tapes,IEEE Magnetics Transactions, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp.3211-3213, 1997.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 399


[7] J. S. McFarlane, D. Tabor, Relation between frictionand adhesion, in: <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society<strong>of</strong> London. Series A, Mathematical and PhysicalScience, Vol. 202, No. 1069, pp. 244-253, 1950.[8] W.R. Chang, I. Etsion, D. B. Bogy, Static frictioncoefficient model for metallic rough surfaces,Journal <strong>of</strong> Tribology, Vol. 110, pp. 57-61, 1988.[9] B.N.J. Persson, O. Albohr, F. Mancosu, V. Peveri,V.N. Samoilov, I.M. Sivebaek, On the nature <strong>of</strong> thestatic friction, kinetic friction and creep, Wear, Vol.254, No. 9, pp. 835-851, 2003.[10] J. M. Galligan, P. McCullough, On the nature <strong>of</strong>static friction, Wear, Vol. 105, No. 9, pp. 337-340,1985.[11] D.-H. Hwang, K.-H. Zum Gahr, Transition fromstatic to kinetic friction <strong>of</strong> unlubricated or oillubricated steel/steel, steel/ceramic andceramic/ceramic pairs, Wear, Vol. 255, No. 1-6,pp. 365-375, 2003.[12] I. Etsion, M. Amit, The effect <strong>of</strong> small normal loadson the static friction coefficient for very smoothsurfaces, Journal <strong>of</strong> tribology, Vol.115, No. 3, 1993.[13] H. Kumar, V. Ramakrishnan, S. K. Albert, C.Meikandamurthy, B.V.R. Tata, A.K. Bhaduri, Hightemperature wear and friction behaviour <strong>of</strong> 15Cr-15Ni-2Mo titanium-modified austenitic stainlesssteel in liquid sodium, Wear, Vol. 270, No. 1-2,pp. 1-4, 2010.[14] P. Mosaddegh, J. Ziegert, W. Iqbal, Y. Tohme,Apparatus for high temperature frictionmeasurement, Precision Engineering, Vol. 35, No.3, pp. 473-483, 2011.[15] A. Chaikittiratana, S. Koetniyom, S. Lakkam,Static/kinetic friction behaviour <strong>of</strong> a clutch facingmaterial: effects <strong>of</strong> temperature and pressure,World Academy <strong>of</strong> Science, Engineering andTechnology Vol. 66, 2012.[16] M. Worgull, J. F. Hetu, K. K. Kabanemi, M.Heckele, Hot embossing <strong>of</strong> microstructures:characterization <strong>of</strong> friction during demolding,Microsyst Technol, Vol. 14, pp. 767-773, 2008.[17] K. G. Budinski, An inclined plane test for thebreakaway coefficient <strong>of</strong> rolling friction <strong>of</strong> rollingelement bearings, Wear, Vol. 259, No. 7-12, pp.1443-1447, 2005.[18] Ta-Wei Lin, A. Modafe, B. Shapiro, R. Ghodssi,Characterization <strong>of</strong> Dynamic Friction in MEMS-Based Microball Bearings, IEEE Transactions oninstrumentation and measurement, Vol. 53, No. 3,pp. 839-846, 2004.[19] D. N. Olaru, C. Stamate, A. Dumitrascu, G.Prisacaru, New micro tribometer for rolling friction,Wear, Vol. 271, No. 5-6, pp. 842-852, 2011.400 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacIMPLEMENATION SQL REPORTING SERVICE IN THETRIBOLOGYCAL DATA BASESMilan Erić 1 , Marko Djukić 11 University <strong>of</strong> Kragujevac, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, Serbia, ericm@kg.ac.rs, djuka84yu@gmail.comAbstract: In the work it will be presented one <strong>of</strong> the way how to publish the results <strong>of</strong> the scientific andresearch work quickly and efficiently and these results are saved in thedata bases,and this is calledtribologycal researches. The developed technology in the Reporting Services enables usto avoid the writing<strong>of</strong> the application programmes or using the data in the other section <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>tver,type Statistica or Excel,and it enables us directly to form th presentation part over the bases.Scientists and researchers,as the bestway <strong>of</strong> scientific communication,have both the role <strong>of</strong> the creators and the users and they have started to bepublishers anddistributers,and this technology enables them all <strong>of</strong> this.Keywords: tribological data bases, SQL Reporting Services, processing <strong>of</strong> the reports1. INTRODUCTIONToday, in the world <strong>of</strong> inrormation technology,reports are the main key so that we can publish theresults in the scientific researches. It can be said thatthe reports are the final and main step <strong>of</strong> the long andcomplex process <strong>of</strong> collecting, keeping,transformating and manipulating <strong>of</strong> the data.Creating <strong>of</strong> the reports is presentation <strong>of</strong> workingwith the data bases. All reports are not the same. Thevalue <strong>of</strong> the report is information. Information arenot just the data,but they are the data transformedintosomething usefull,something that has value. Thistransformation is extremely important. People canread and publish the data in many different ways andthat is the reason why the data are all around us,butwhat we need in the 21st century to to complete ourjob is well valued, correct, quick and appropriateinformation.There are a lot <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware tools for creating thereports that enable everyone to access to ana opennumber <strong>of</strong> the data which are all around us.However, all these who use these data are notfamiliar to the work technics-and that can be a hugeproblem. The data used to be saved and transferedorally, in the written form and today mostly in anelectronic form in our computers-in the data basesbut the data are not usually from the same base andthey do not come from he same base. Extremelysmall number <strong>of</strong> reports actually has the data in thebase.Today if you want a report to be valued as goodand to be in the terms <strong>of</strong> standards <strong>of</strong> using theinfotmation technologies, it must be reliable, quick,to have a good presentation, to have flexiblefom,connectivity and in the end that it can be usedby yhe correct tool. One <strong>of</strong> the tool or technologywhose develompment still is in a progress isReporting Service (RS) which is the part <strong>of</strong>SQLServer.All tools ana applications in RS are made usingthe API (Application Programming Interface).Reporting Services contains all that is necessary thatresearchers and well trained business users to publisha report. Completed reports are guided by a serverwhere are they. The final users to whom thesereports are mare for, have an efficient and full report.The process <strong>of</strong> correction and analyses by usingthe information <strong>of</strong> Reporting Service leads togeneration <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> the data and it is mostlyknown in the IT world as Distributed intelligence(knowledge technology). In this case, ReportingServices can be seen as server-based platform withthe developed tools for generating, manipulationand publishing <strong>of</strong> the reports.Reporting Services evoluated into a s<strong>of</strong>isticatedreporting platform which gives new abilities <strong>of</strong>the efficient analyses and an atractive presentation13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 401


<strong>of</strong> information which are saved on the hard discs <strong>of</strong>the server, opening complely new dimension <strong>of</strong>working with the the data and reports.Reporting Services must be understandable, wemust be able to read them and they must point tothe date that we need for the analyses andverification <strong>of</strong> the results. To achieve the goal wewant,we can design the report that specific datashows like a table/chart or any other form that canbe understood, Figure 1.trends. The data are not for the use unless there is away that they can be shown in a way that the userscan understand them. Presentation Layer platformsenable different ways <strong>of</strong> presentation like Micros<strong>of</strong>tOffice, Micros<strong>of</strong>t SharePoint, Micros<strong>of</strong>tPerformance Point Server or some othercomparatible applications.Basic components and logic architecture <strong>of</strong>Reporting Services are shown in the Figure 3 [1].Figure 1. The picture <strong>of</strong> the standard report.The reports can be also shown in an ad hoc form.2. PROCESSING OF THE REPORTS USINGTHE REPORTING SERVICESReporting Services is a part <strong>of</strong> MS SQLplatform which <strong>of</strong>fers opportunities <strong>of</strong> processingand manipulating the data, Figure 2 [1].Figure 2. Architecture <strong>of</strong> the MS SQL Server platform.Database Engine is for packing, processing andsecuring <strong>of</strong> the data. Integration Services supportsdifferent typrs <strong>of</strong> the data, which have the samesource <strong>of</strong> the dataand technologies as well as theirintegration Integration Services is mainly used fortransfering,transformation and reading <strong>of</strong> the data.Packets <strong>of</strong> the data <strong>of</strong> Integration Services aremainly used as sources for the reports. AnalysisServices represents multi-dimension base for thequick reporting and generating <strong>of</strong> the questions andFigure 3. Reporting Services logical architectureIn the centre <strong>of</strong> Reporting Services architectureis a server , web-orientied middle part whichaccepts the requests,processes them and on the base<strong>of</strong> that generates the reports. An illustration shows asimple sheme <strong>of</strong> Report Server. Repot Servercommunicate with the the users in two ways: by urlor through web service. The component Reportprocessor is responsible for processing <strong>of</strong> thereports in so called run time. This means that thereport sends the data to an user,combining the datafrom the base with the parametres making the finalreport sent in the requested form.An important characteristic <strong>of</strong> ReportingServices is that the archecture can be enlargedthrough special modules which are calledextensions. When the standard extensions are notenough, programmers can extend theopportunities <strong>of</strong> RS by puttingin their ownextensions. Like the sources <strong>of</strong> the data,the userscan export the report results in a several mostpopular forms like Micros<strong>of</strong>t Excel, Micros<strong>of</strong>tWord, Adobe Acrobat PDF, HTML, SCV, it canbe shown in the pictures or the new extensionscan be written for the sending <strong>of</strong> the report or insome other forms.The definition <strong>of</strong> the report and its adjuctmentsare saved in the data base <strong>of</strong> Report Server. ReportServer is implemented as two SQL Server bases(Report Server and Report Server DB) which areinstalled during their configuration. When weupload the report, Reporting Services saves thedefinition <strong>of</strong> Report Server in the data base whilethe other data base – Report Server DB containsand saves temporary information on the report andits thruthfullness.402 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


2.1 The life cycle <strong>of</strong> the reportThe life cycle <strong>of</strong> the report is the events or theactivities <strong>of</strong> the report, start from the moment whenwe start creating it. In the Figure 4 we can see thatthe life cycle is made <strong>of</strong> Authoring, Managementand Delivery phases [1].requests and sends them to an application thatshould answer to these requests. As a part <strong>of</strong> theconfiguration <strong>of</strong> the Reporting Services, it must besaid that URL address report server i ReportManager. Reporting Services Windows service hasthree server applications: Report Manager, ReportServer Web Service and Background Processor.Behind the scene, this service in fact creates threenet applications which will host them.Figure 4. Work with the reportIn the Authoring phase, the author <strong>of</strong> the reportuses one <strong>of</strong> the Micros<strong>of</strong>t designer reports (ReportBuilder). When the report is completed, the authorcan upload it so it can be seen by the final users. Inthe Management phase, the administratorconfigurates the generated reports and developingsurrounding where it is going to be shown. Theadministrator can use Report Manager to organisethe report in the folders as well as to set the securitymeasures so that the access can be authorised to theusers. When it is configurated, the reports can beseen to only those to whom this right is authorised.The report can be seen by the final users typingURL address in the web searcher or alternatevilyusing the option schedule -through some channallike an e-mail.The designers <strong>of</strong> the report are the tools whichthe authors use for the definition <strong>of</strong> the data looks atthe moment <strong>of</strong> creating the reports. Since thetechnological knowledge and the experiences <strong>of</strong> theauthors can vary, it is not easy to create a designerreport that can satisfy the need <strong>of</strong> the all users.In theFigure 5 allthe designer tools for the creating <strong>of</strong> thereport are shown with their basic characteristics [2].Figure 5. Tools for creating the reports and theircomparisonIt is important to say that all mentioned reportdesigners support RDL standard (Report DefinitionLanguage).2.2 Physical architecture <strong>of</strong> Reporting ServiceIn the Figure 6 we can see the physicalarchitecture <strong>of</strong> the Reporting Services, which ismade <strong>of</strong> three Report Server aplications: ReportManager, Report Server Web Service andBackground Processor. In the physical architecturewe can see an implemented network interfacewhich includes Service Network Interfaces (SNI)which checks new requests HTTP.SYS.HTTP.SYS je HTTP driver which accepts theFigure 6. Reporting Services 2008 architectureReport Manager is an ASP.NET web applicationwhich enables management and the look into theabilities <strong>of</strong> the Reporting Services instanceconfigurated in the natural code. We can see ReportManager as a client application configurated withthe report <strong>of</strong> the server. Thanks to the same hostingmodel, configuration adjustments <strong>of</strong> the ReportManager and Report Server Web service are kept inthe same configuration file in rs report server.confingDue to this, Report Manager can add somenew extensions. For example, if the user developsnew extension, using C# or VB.NET we canconfigurate in the Report Managers a web controland later use it as we adjust the details <strong>of</strong> the report.Report Server Web service processes the reportsby using the systems on-demand. When the userclicks on the link pages where the reports are,he\she sends the requests to the Report Web,service accepts this request, processes this requestand returns the report to the client. To make iteasier integrations with the different types <strong>of</strong> thereports, Report Server Web service enables the use<strong>of</strong> URL and SOAP protocol and their integrationoptions.Background Processor is an application whichjob is to accept all the tasks which are in anunmarked mode. For example, when the description<strong>of</strong> the event is accepted, Background Processorinterprets the description <strong>of</strong> the report and sends itto the final destination. Basically, its job is to13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 403


process the reports, not to communicate withReport Server Web service. Instead <strong>of</strong> this, both <strong>of</strong>the applications communicate with the ReportProcessor in the same time.Report Processor does not save the whole reportin the memory, but it is processing the report ondemand, as it is shown in the Figure 7.After the connection is finished, it is possible toprepare the data by hand, or write SQL request,which will be use full for the report. Projection willdefine the columns and selection will define thelines <strong>of</strong> the data base which will be used in thereport, Figure 9 [2].Figure 7. Grafic picture <strong>of</strong> the processing and the reportAt the moment when Report Processor notesthe new request, (request), it will take the data andit will match them with the report template makingthe middle form <strong>of</strong> the report. That report,processor saves in the Report Server Database.Point is that Report Processor takes and saves onlythe parts <strong>of</strong> the report, for example, grouping,sorting and etc. In the phase <strong>of</strong> the investigating <strong>of</strong>the report and saving it, Report Processor usesRender Object Model (ROM) an object which isforming the form that we can show. Textbox valuesand data are processing every time on-demandwhen we want to see the report.2.3 The connection <strong>of</strong> the tribological bases <strong>of</strong>the data with the reportsTribological data base, whose logic structureand content are shown in the [2], are connected toalready formed template file for the creating <strong>of</strong> thereport. Working surrounding is Visual Studio,where we can connect the data base to the reportfrom the file Report.rdl created in SQL ServerBusiness Intelligence Developer Studio. Thestarting point <strong>of</strong> the model form <strong>of</strong> the connectionis shown in the Figure 8 [3,4].Figure 9. Defining <strong>of</strong> the requests for the data selection.In the next step, we will select the way <strong>of</strong> theshowing the data. Presentation <strong>of</strong> the data by thediagram versus the charts has more visual effects.The diagram can be added in one or two ways,moving control Chart from Toolbox or by pressinga click <strong>of</strong> the right mouse on the desktop Insert →Chart, Figure 10 [3,4].Figure 10. Selection <strong>of</strong> thr type <strong>of</strong> the diagram.After we had sellected the diagram, we need toconnect the Design Body in the dialogue windowwith the values which are chosen from the data basewith the pararmetres <strong>of</strong> the NET control whichdescribe the centres <strong>of</strong> the diagrams.When it isclicked on the diagram, it will show in theright,down part where we need to put the columns- results <strong>of</strong> the requestsfrom the data bases (parts inthe command SELECT), Figure 11 [3,4].Figure 8. Adding Data Source…404 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Obviously the report is checked and the values areeasily seen, can be seen and are clearly shown.3.CONCLUSIONReporting services is a complex and moderntechnology with the tendency for furtheradjustments and enlargement. Because <strong>of</strong> the needand implementation for these kinds <strong>of</strong> technologies,it grows the need that we must know and use them.Reporting services is a great technology whichmakes the job easier to the business world, and itcan also be <strong>of</strong> great need to the scientists while theyare publishing the results from the data base, and itfacilitates the work to the IT techinicians.Figure 11. Adjustments <strong>of</strong> the centers <strong>of</strong> the parameters<strong>of</strong> the diagramsAfter we turn <strong>of</strong>f View mode, BI platform will givethe Render report by processing the request andmaking the graphic interpretation based parametersand adjustments. In the Figure 12 we can see thefinal report <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong> the data,TRIBOLOGYCAL_RESULTS.Figure 12. The final report after the adjustment <strong>of</strong> theparametersREFERENCES[1] T. Lachev: Applied Micros<strong>of</strong>t SQL Server 2008Reporting Services, Prologika Press, USA, 2008.[2] M. Erić, S. Mitrović, M. Babić, F. Živić, M. Pantić:Application <strong>of</strong> Contemporary InformationTechnologies in Nanotribometry, Tribology inIndustry, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 159-163, 2011.[3] B. Larson: Delivering Business Intelligence withMicros<strong>of</strong>t SQL Server 2008, The McGraw-HillCompanies, San Francisco, 2009.[4] B. Larson: Micros<strong>of</strong>t SQL Server 2008 ReportingServices, The McGraw-Hill Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, SanFrancisco, 2009.[5] P. Turley, T. Silva, B. Smith and K. Withee:Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Micros<strong>of</strong>t® SQL Server® 2008Reporting Services, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis,2009.[6] P. DeBetta, G. Low, M. Whiteborn: IntroducingMicros<strong>of</strong>t SQL Server 2008, Micros<strong>of</strong>t Press, 2008.[7] L. Davidson, K. Kline, S. Klein, and K. Windisch:Pro SQL Server 2008 Relational Database Designand Implementation, Springer-Verlag, New York,2009.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 405


Trenje, habanje ipodmazivanje13 th International Conference on Tribology – SERBIATRIB ’1315 – 17 May 2013, Kragujevac, Serbia


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacVEŠTAČKO STARENJE TIKSOLIVENE ZA27 LEGURE IČESTIČNIH ZA27/SIC KOMPOZITAI. Bobić 1 , M. Babić 2 , A.Vencl 3 , S. Mitrović 2 , B. Bobić 41) INN "Vinca", Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija, ilijab@vinca.rs2) Fakultet inženjerskih nauka, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Kragujevac, Srbija, babic@kg.ac.rs, boban@kg.ac.rs3) Mašinski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd, Srbija, avencl@mas.bg.ac.rs4) Institut "Goša", Beograd, Srbija, biljanabobic@gmail.comAbstrakt: ZA27 legura sa nedendritnom strukturom dobijena je tiksokasting postupkom. Čestični kompozitisa osnovom od navedene legure dobijeni su kompokasting postupkom, odnosno infiltracijom 5 vol.% i 10vol.% SiC čestica u poluočvrsli rastop legure. Uzorci tiksolivene ZA27 legure i kompozita bili su podvrgnutiprocesu starenja na 80, 120 i 160°C (T5 režim). Strukturna ispitivanja matrične legure i kompozita i merenjapromena tvrdoća tokom procesa starenja izvršena su u zavisnosti od temperature. Pokazano je da prisustvočestica ojačivača utiče na ubrzanje procesa starenja, odnosno kompoziti dostižu maksimalne vrednostitvrdoće za kraće vreme nego matrična legura. Sa povećanjem temperature starenja opadaju tvrdoće svihispitivanih materijala.Ključne reči: ZA27 legura, čestični kompoziti, kompokasting, veštačko starenje1. UVODZbog dobre kombinacije fizičkih, mehaničkih itehnoloških karakteristika ZA27 legura ima velikikomercijalni značaj. Koristi se izradu niza odlivakarazličlitih dimenzija. Takođe, poznata je kao leguraza izradu kliznih ležajeva [1, 2]. Svojstva leguremogu se modifikovati termičkom obradom.Standardom [3] definisana je samo jedna varijantatermičke obrade ZA27 legure. Proučavanje uticajaraznih režima termičke obrade na svojstva ZA27legure bilo je predmet rada više istraživača [4–6].Budući da u livenom stanju legura sadrži presićene,metastabilne faze, osnovni cilj istraživanja bio je dase poboljša homogenost legure i postigne dobrakombinacija mehaničkih svojstava. Kod ZA27legure koja sadrži Cu [2], cilj je bio da se poboljšadimenziona stabilnost proizvoda.Zbog širokog temperaturnog intervalaočvršćavanja (oko 100 ºC [1]), ZA27 legura jepogodna za preradu u poluočvrslom stanju,različitim postupcima. U zavisnosti od primenjenihprocesnih parametara, moguće je dobiti leguru čijustrukturu karakteriše nedendritna morfologija [7].Pokazano je da čestični kompoziti ZA27/SiCposeduju bolje fizičke i mehaničke karakteristike uodnosu na matričnu leguru [8, 9], kao i većuotpornost prema habanju. Posebno je proučavanuticaj procesa starenja na svojstva navedenihkompozita [10–12].Procesi starenja imaju za cilj da omogućestabilizaciju strukture i da poboljšajudimenzionalnu stabilnost proizvoda pre njihoveeventualne upotrebe na povišenim temperaturama.Ovo je posebno značajno kada se ima u vidunepovoljan uticaj bakra na stabilnost dimenzijaproizvoda od ZA27 legure na povišenimtemperaturama [1].Kompokasting postupak primenjen je zadobijanje čestičnih kompozita ZA27/SiC, koji supredmet ovog rada, s obzirom da je relativnojednostavan i perspektivan za dobijanje jeftinijihkompozitnih materijala.Cilj ovog rada je da se ispita uticaj veštačkogstarenja (u oblasti temperatura od 80 do 160°C) namikrostrukturu i tvrdoću tiksolivene ZA27 legure iZA27/SiC kompozita, koji su dobijenikompokasting postupkom. Rezultati ispitivanjapredstavljaju doprinos boljem razumevanju procesa13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 409


starenja navedenih materijala, što je od značaja zanjihovu praktičnu primenu.2. EKSPERIMENTALNI RAD2.1 Tikso /kompokasting postupciTiksokasting i kompokasting izvršeni supomoću aparature koja je ranije opisana [13].Za potrebe eksperimentalnog rada korišćena jelegura čiji hemijski sastava odgovara standardu [3].Tiksokasting postupak sastojao se iz dve faze. Uprvoj fazi dobijeni su odlivci ZA27 legure, koji su udrugoj fazi podvrgnuti toplom presovanju. Tokomprve faze vršeno je mehaničko mešanjepoluočvrslog rastopa ZA27 legure na temperaturiod 460°C. Na početku je primenjena brzinamešanja od 500 o/min, u trajanju od 2,5 min, u ciljuhomogenizacije poluočvrslog rastopa legure. Zatimje u toku 10 min vršeno intenzivno mešanje rastopa(pri brzini mešanja od 1200 o/min), bez promenetemperature. Po završetku mešanja, poluočvrslirastop legure je izliven u čeličnu kokilu,predgrejanu na 350°C. Dobijeni su odlivcidimenzija 30x20x120 mm, od kojih su mehaničkiizrađeni manji uzorci (30x20x5 mm), koji supodvrgnuti toplom presovanju. Toplo presovanje jeizvršeno pomoću specijalnog alata odtoplootpornog čelika, na 350°C, primenom pritiskaod 250 MPa. Posle toplog presovanja dobijeni suuzorci dimenzija 30x20x6 mm.Kompokasting postupak je, takođe, izveden udve faze; u prvoj fazi izvršeno je dobijanje odlivakaZA27/SiC kompozita, koji su u drugoj fazipodvrgnuti toplom presovanju. U okviru prve fazeizvršena je priprema poluočvrslog rastopa matričnelegure, unošenje SiC čestica (prosečne veličinaprečnika 24 μm) u poluočvrsli rastop i mešanjepoluočvrsle kompozitne smeše. Pri dobijanjukompozita sa 5 vol.% SiC čestica (u daljem tekstukompozit K1) vreme unošenja SiC čestica bilo je3,5 min, pri brzini mešanja 500 o/min. Pri dobijanjukompozita sa 10 vol.% SiC čestica (u daljem tekstukompozit K2) primenjena je ista brzina mešanja,ali je unošenje SiC čestica u poluočvrsli rastopmatrične legure trajalo 7 minuta. Da bi se smanjioukupni viskozitet poluočvrslog rastopa, povećana jeradna temperatura tokom unošenja SiC čestica; od465 do 470°C, u slučaju kompozita K1 i od 465 do475°C u slučaju kompozita K2. Po završenomunošenju ojačavajućih čestica izvršeno je kratko,homogenizaciono mešanje (2,5 min, pri brzini od500 o/min), a zatim intenzivno mešanje (1000o/min) u narednih 10 min. Posle toga izvršeno jeizlivanje kompozitnih masa u čeličnu kokilu,predgrejanu na 350°C.U drugoj fazi izvršeno je toplo presovanje, priistim parametrima koji su primenjeni kodtiksolivene ZA27 legure. Dobijeni su uzorci istihdimenzija, kao uzorci tiksolivene ZA27 legure.2.2. Strukturna ispitivanja i merenje tvrdoćeIspitivanje strukture vršeno je optičkommikroskopijom (pomoću optičkog mikroskopa CarlZeiss) i skening elektronskom mikroskopijom(pomoću skening elektronskog mikroskopa JEOLJSM – 5800).Ispitivanja su vršena na uzorcima dimenzija15x15x6 mm, koji su mašinski izrađeni iz otpresakatiksolivene matrične legure i kompozita. Uzorci subrušeni pomoću brusnih papira (80, 360 i 600grita), dok je poliranje obavljeno primenom tkanineza poliranje i paste (sa Al 2 O 3 česticama). Ispitivanjapomoću SEM rađena su na poliranim uzorcima,dok su ispitivanja primenom OM vršena napoliranim i nagriženim uzorcima. Za nagrizanje jekorišćen vodeni rastvor HNO 3 (9 v/v).Merenje tvrdoće izvršeno je pre nego što suuzorci matrične legure i kompozita bili podvrgnutiprocesu starenja, a zatim tokom procesa starenja, nauzorcima dimenzija 15x15x6 mm. Nezavisno odtemperature starenja, najveći broj merenja tvrdoćeobavljen je tokom prvog sata starenja. Merenje jezatim vršeno u određenim vremenskim intervalima.Za merenje je korišćen uređaj za merenje tvrdoćeKarl Frank GMBH. Rezultati merenja izraženi su uBrinelovim jedinicama (HB). Na svakom uzorkuvršeno je po pet merenja, za svaki vremenskiinterval tokom procesa starenja.3 REZULTATI I DISKUSIJA3.1 Strukturna ispitivanjaNa slici 1a prikazan je izgled mikrostrukturetiksolivene ZA27 legure. Mikrostruktura se sastojiod kompleksnih eliptičnih i globularnih polifaznihzrna. Zrna se sastoje od jezgra (svetle zone) koječini faza i periferije (smeša +η faza, sive zone).Heksagonalna η faze, praktično cink, nalazi seizmeđu eliptičnih zrna (tamne zone).Mikrostruktura prikazana na slici 1 posledica jeuticaja mešanja poluočvrslog rastopa legure (tokomprve faze tiksokasting postupka) i očvršćavanjapoluočvrslog rastopa ZA27 legure po završetkumešanja. Pod uticajem sila smicanja (proizvedenihmešanjem), kao i usled interakcija primarnih česticameđusobno i interakcija mešač–primarne čestice,zid lonca–primarne čestice, došlo je do usitnjavanjai transformacije primarnih čestica premaFlemingsovoj šemi [7].410 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


uticaja na osnovu kompozita, a time i na processtarenja. Mesto čestica u strukturi kompozita zavisiod procesnih parametara u prvoj fazi kompokastingpostupka, kao i od načina očvršćavanja kompozitnemase posle završenog mešanja.3.2 TvrdoćaSlika 1. Mikrostruktura tiksolivene ZA27 legure(OM, nagriženo)Rezultat toga je da su u strukturi tiksoliveneZA27 legure prisutne primarne čestice eliptičnog ikružnog oblika, što znači da je došlo promenemorfologije. Međutim, osnovni elementimikrostrukture, u pogledu faza koje nastaju tokomočvršćavanja, kvalitativno su isti kao elementi umikrostrukturi livene ZA27 legure [1].Na slici 2 prikazan je izgled mikrostrukturekompozita K1 i kompozita K2.Promene tvrdoće sa vremenom starenjaprikazane su pomoću dijagrama na slici 3 (a–c), zasve ispitivane materijala i temperature starenja: 80,120 i 160°C. Starenje na 80 i 120°C vršeno jetokom 25 časova, dok je na 160°C starenje trajalo 5časova.Slika 2. Mikrostrukture čestičnih kompozita ZA27/SiC(SEM, polirano).a) K1 (ZA27+5 vol.%SiC), b) K2 (ZA27+10 vol.%SiC).Na slici 2a prikazana je mikrostrukturakompozita K1. Postignut je relativno dobarraspored SiC čestica u metalnoj osnovi. Izmeđučestica ojačivača vidi se struktura osnovekompozita (tiksolivena ZA27 legura), koja je ranijeopisana.Na slici 2b prikazana je struktura kompozita K2.Može se zapaziti prisustvo nakupina SiC čestica,što znači da se njihova pojava nije mogla izbeći pridobijanju kompozita sa navedenim parametrimakompokasting postupka. Pored nakupina SiCčestica, na slici se mogu videti i SiC čestice kojenisu u međusobnom kontaktu. Čestice su smešteneu oblasti η faze i zalaze u oblast smeše faza +η.Položaj SiC čestica je značajan zbog njihovogSlika 3. Promene tvrdoća tiksolivene ZA27 legure ikompozita K1 i K2 tokom starenja. Temperaturastarenja: a) 80°C, b) 120°C, c) 160ºC. Krive: 1-tiksolivena ZA27 legura, 2 - K1, 3 - K2.Na slici 3a prikazana je vremenska zavisnosttvrdoće na temperaturi starenja od 80ºC, zatiksolivenu ZA27 leguru i kompozite K1 i K2.Početna tvrdoća tiksolivene ZA27 legure (120 HB)13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 411


lago raste tokom prvih 10 min starenja. Tvrdoćazatim neprekidno opada sledećih 50 min, a posle 60minuta starenja počinje da raste. Tiksolivena ZA27legura postigla je maksimalnu vrednost tvrdoćeposle 5 časova starenja. Od tada, pa do krajastarenja, tvrdoća neprekidno opada, tako da jenajniža vrednost tvrdoće za tiksolivenu ZA27leguru izmertena posle 25 časova starenja.Pri starenju na 80°C tvrdoće oba kompozita (K1i K2) u početku rastu veoma brzo, tako da sumaksimalne vrednosti tvrdoće dostignute već posle10 min starenja na ovoj temperaturi. Posle togadolazi do brzog pada vrednosti tvrdoće, pri čemu jeoko 30 min primećen zastoj, a zatim vrednostitvrdoće pokazuju diskontinuitet u pogledu trenda,do isteka 60 min starenja. Posle ovog vremena,tvrdoće kompozita K1 i K2 kontinuirano opadajudo kraja prdviđenog vremena starenja.Na osnovu objavljenih rezultata drugih autora[14], možemo tvrditi da se, u slučaju kompozita,dislokacije na granici čestica/matrica ponašaju kaocentri kristalizacije čestica koje difunduju tokomstarenja. Na taj način, povećao se broj centarakristalizacije taloga [11]), što utiče na ubrzanjeprocesa starenja. Usled toga, došlo je do bržegdostizanja maksimalnih vrednost tvrdoće kodkompozita, nego kod tiksolivene osnovne legure.Sa porastom temperature starenja, menjaju sevrednosti tvrdoće. Na slici 3b prikazana jevremenska zavisnost promene tvrdoće, pri starenjuna 120°C, za tiksolivenu ZA27 leguru i kompoziteK1 i K2. Tvrdoća legure blago raste tokom prvih 5min starenja. Sa dijagrama se vidi da se na daljetvrdoća menja diskontinuirano. Mogu se uočiti dvamanja pika, jedan posle 60 min, a drugi posle 10časova starenja. Posle toga, tvrdoća tiksolivenelegure opada i najniža vrednost izmerena je posle20 časova starenja.ZA27 legura ima relativno nisku tačku topljenja(380°C, odnosno 653K). Zatezna ispitivanja napovišenim temperaturama [1] pokazala su da se većiznad 80°C čvrstoća pogoršava, a izduženjepovećava. Takođe, rezultati ispitivanja pritisnihkarakteristika livene i tiksolivene ZA27 legure [15],pokazuju da dolazi do značajnog pada vrednostigranice popuštanja σ 0,2 , kada se dostignetemperatura od 80°C.Pri povećanju temperature starenja od 80 na120ºC, značajno se intenziviraju procesi starenja.Ovo se odrazilo na promene vrednost tvrdoćetokom starenja na 120°C, kako kod matrične legure,tako i kod kompozita K1 i K2. U slučaju kompozitaK1, maksimalna vrednost tvrdoće dostignuta jeposle 20 min starenja. Tvrdoća zatim relativno brzoopada do isteka prvih 60 min starenja. Tokomsledećih 15 časova vrednost tvrdoće se ne menjaznačajno. Posle 25 časova starenja izmerena jenajniža tvrdoća kompozita K1. Tok promenatvrdoće kompozita K2 sličan je opisanom tokupromena kod kompozita K1, ali postoji razlika uvrednostima tvrdoće. Kompozit K2 dostižemaksimalnu vrednost tvrdoće posle 20 min starenjana 120°C. Tvrdoća zatim opada do kraja trećegsata starenja, posle čega nema znatnijih promenasve do isteka 15 sati starenja. Posle toga, tvrdoćaponovo opada i dostiže najnižu vrednost posle 25časova starenja.Opšte je poznato da je u uslovima starenja nanižim temperaturama brzina nukleacije talogavelika, ali je brzina rasta mala. Obrnuto, na višimtemperaturama starenja brzina nukleacije taloga jemanja, ali je brzina rasta velika. Prema tome, nanižoj temperaturi starenja broj centara nukleacije jeveći, međučestični prostor se smanjuje, što dovodido povećanja tvrdoće. Na osnovu ovoga, mogla seočekivati manja tvrdoća kod svih materijala koji sustareni na 120°C, u odnosu na njihovu tvrdoću pristarenju na 80°C. Ovo očekivanje ispunjeno je uslučaju tiksolivene ZA27 legure i kompozita K1,što je u saglasnosti sa [11, 14].Analizom krivih promene tvrdoće tokomstarenja kompozita, može se videti da semaksimalne vrednosti tvrdoće, u principu,povećavaju sa sniženjem temperature starenja ipovećanjem količine čestica ojačivača. Međutim, ukonkretnom slučaju starenja kompozita K2 na120°C, zapažen je paradoks, koji je primećen ranije[15]. Naime, maksimalna tvrdoća kompozita K2 pristarenju na 120°C nešto je veća od maksimalnetvrdoće istog kompozita pri starenju na 80°C.Pri starenju na 160°C (slika 3c) tvrdoće svihispitivanih materijala opadaju u odnosu na tvrdoćepostignute tokom starenja na 80 i 120°C. Napočetku starenja na 160°C, tvrdoća tiksoliveneZA27 legure opada u odnosu na polaznu vrednost.Posle 1 časa od početka starenja tvrdoća malo raste.a zatim neprekidno opada do kraja starenja. Sličnapromena tvrdoće konstatovana je pri starenjukompozita K1. Ovo navodi na zaključak da sudifuzioni procesi na ovoj temperaturi značajnoubrzani. Kod kompozita K2 dolazi do povećanjatvrdoće u odnosu na polazno stanje, tako da seposle 20 min starenja na 160°C dostiže maksimalnatvrdoća. Posle toga, tvrdoća kompozita K2neprekidno opada do kraja ispitivanja.Rezultati koji su dobijeni u ovom radu, ukazujuna mogućnost postizanja maksimalne tvrdoćekompozita posle relativno kratkog vremenastarenja.412 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


5. ZAKLJUČCIStruktura tiksolivene ZA27 legure grublja je uodnosu na strukturu livene legure, što se odražavana usporavanje procesa starenja tiksolivene legure.Prisustvo čestica ojačivača utiče na ubrzavanjeprocese starenja, na svim primenjenimtemperaturama starenja.Kompoziti veoma brzo dostižu maksimalnevrednost tvrdoće, što je od velikog značaja zanjihovu praktičnu primenu.ZAHVALNOSTAutori se zahvaljuju Ministarstvu za obrazovanje,nauku i tehnološki razvoj Republike Srbije koje jefinansijski podržalo ovaj rad kroz projekte TR35021 i OI 172005. Takođe se zahvaljuju LivniciRAR ® doo, Batajnica (Beograd, Srbija) i Fabriciabrazivnih proizvoda Ginić Tocila ® doo, Barajevo(Beograd, Srbija), koji su obezbedili master leguru iSiC čestice, za ovo istraživanje.LITERATURA[1] E. Gervais, R.J. Barnhurst, C.A. Loong, AnAnalysis <strong>of</strong> Selected Properties <strong>of</strong> ZA Alloys,JOM 11 (1985) 43–47.[2] V. G. S. Mani, P. Sriram, N. Raman, S. Seshan,AFS Transactions, 88-100, pp.525-532, 1988.[3] BS EN 12844:1999 Zinc and zinc alloys.Castings. Specifications.[4] S. Murphy, T. Savaskan, Metallography <strong>of</strong>Zinc-25 % Al Based Alloys in the As–Cast andAged Conditions, Prakt. Metallogr. 24 (1987)204–221.[5] I. Bobic, B. Djuric, M.T. Jovanovic, S. Zec,Improvement <strong>of</strong> Ductility <strong>of</strong> a Cast Zn–25Al–3Cu Alloy, Mater. Charact. 29 (1992) 277–283.[6] P. Choudhury, K. Das, S. Das, Evolution <strong>of</strong> ascastand heat-treated microstructure <strong>of</strong> acommercial bearing alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A398, pp. 332–343, 2005.[7] M. Flemings, Behavior <strong>of</strong> metal alloys in thesemi-solid state, Metall. Transactions A, 22A,pp. 957-981, 1991.[8] I. A. Cornie, R. Guerriero, L. Meregalli, I.Tangerini, Cast Reinforced Metal Composites,ASM International USA, pp. 155-165, 1988.[9] N. Karni, G. B. Barkay, M. J. Bamberger,Structure and Properties <strong>of</strong> metal-matrixcomposite, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 13, pp. 541-544,1994.[10] K. Seah, S. Sharma, P. R. Rao, B. Girish,Mechanical Properties <strong>of</strong> As-Cast and HeatTreated ZA27/Silicon Carbide ParticulateComposites, Materials & Design, 16, pp. 277-281, 1995.[11] S. C. Sharma, S. Sastry, M. Krishna, Effect <strong>of</strong>aging parameters on the micro structure andproperties <strong>of</strong> ZA27/aluminite metal matrixcomposites, Journal <strong>of</strong> Alloys and Compounds346, pp. 292-301, 2002.[12] LI ZI-qani, ZHOU Heng-zhi, LUO Xin-yi,WANG Tao, SHEN Kai, Aging microstructuralcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> ZA-27 alloy and SiC p /ZA-27composite, Transactions <strong>of</strong> Nomnferous MetalsSociety <strong>of</strong> China, 16, pp. 98-104, 2006.[13] Z. Acimovic-Pavlovic, K. T. Raic,, I. Bobicand B. Bobic, Synthesis <strong>of</strong> ZrO2 ParticlesReinforced ZA25 Alloy Composites byCompocasting Process, Advanced CompositeMaterials 20, pp. 375–384, 2011.[14] I. Dutta, D.I. Bourell, A Theoretical andExperimental Study <strong>of</strong> Aluminium Alloy 6061-SiC Metal Matrix Composite to Identify theOperative the Operative Mechanism forAccelerated Aging, Materials Sience andEngineering A11, pp. 267-77, 1989.[15] B. Bobic, M. Babic, S. Mitrovic, N. Ilic, I.Bobic, M.T. Jovanovic, Microstructure andmechanical properties <strong>of</strong> Zn25Al3Cu basedcomposites with large Al 2 O 3 particles at roomand elevated temperatures, Int. J. Mat. Res.101pp. 1524–1531, 2010.[16] T. Savaskan, S. Murphy, Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Zn-Al Alloys on qench-aging, Materials Scienceand Technology, August 6, pp. 695-703, 1990.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 413


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacUTICAJ POVRŠINE PODLOGE NAKARAKTERISTIKE PREVLAKA CINKADesimir Jovanović 1 , Bogdan Nedić 2 , Milomir Čupović 3 , Vlatko Matrušić 41 Zastava oružje AD, Kragujevac, Srbija, zo.tehnologija@open.telekom.rs2 Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Fakultet inženjerskih nauka, Kragujevac, Srbija, nedic@kg.ac.rs3 Državni univerzitet u Novom Pazaru, Srbija, mcupovic@np.ac.rs4 Strojarski fakultet, Slavonski Brod, Hrvatska, vmarusic@sfsb.hrAbstract: Galvanske prevlake cinka se nanose da bi površina osnovnog materijala dobila odgovarajućasvojstava, kao što su: otpornost prema koroziji, hemijska postojanost, potreban estetski utisak i dr.Ispitivanja galvanskih prevlaka cinka usmerena su najčešće vezu Zn sa osnovnim materijalom, dok je veomamalo podataka o uticaju podloge na karakteristike prevlaka. Prethodna završna obrada ima veliki uticaj naformiranje fizičko-mehaničkih svojstava i strukture prevlake. U radu su prikazani rezultati istraživanjakarakteristika prevlaka cinka istaloženih na podlozi dobijenoj različitom završnom obradom sa različitomtvrdoćom i topografijom.Keywords: galvanske prevlake cinka, tvrdoća, topografija1. UVODUticaj vrste postupka obrade i uslova prethodneobrade kao i pripreme površina na koje se nanoseprevlake, odnosno tehnološkog nasleđa, je veomamalo istraživan. Površinski slojevi obrađenihpovršina dobijenih različitim postupcima obrade irežimima mogu imati različitu strukturu, što se teku period eksploatacije može ispoljiti. Prema tome,može se reći da se karakteristike površinskihslojeva formiraju kao rezultat različitih uslovaobrade u tehnološkom lancu izrade gotovog dela.Osnovni parametri koji se nasleđuju kroztehnološki proces izrade mogu se podeliti na dvegrupe. S jedne strane to su parametri vezani zasvojstva materijala: njegov sastav, strukturu,naponsko stanje i dr., dok su sa druge straneparametri vezani za makro i mikrogeometrijupovršina (geometrijski parametri) [1,2]. To ukazujena kompleksnost problema i potrebu izučavanja.Prevlake cinka se najviše koriste za zaštitučeličnih površina od korozije. Elektrohemijskeprevlake cinka mogu imati različite morfologije iteksture. Kada su ove pojave u pitanju većinaistraživanja se odnosi na uticaj standardnihparametra pri taloženju prevlaka kao što sugustina struje, temperatura, sastav kupatila [6-10],dok je znatno manje pažnja posvećeno značajupripreme površine čelične podloge. Istraživanjauticaja stanja podloge za taloženje prevlaka cinkapolirane mehanički [11.12] ili elektrohemijski [10-14]. pokazuju da se morfologija i tekstura prevlakena ovim površinama znatno razlikuju.Završna obrada površina ima veliki uticaj naformiranje fizičko - mehaničkih svojstava istrukture površinskog sloja. U radu se vršiistraživanje uticaja prethodne obrade površina idebljine prevlake na mehaničke i hemijskekarakteristike prevlake cinka.2. EKSPERIMENTALNA ISPITIVANJAKao osnova za nanošenje prevlaka odabran ječelik Č5730 (prema GOST-u 30HN2FA 1).Odabrani čelik se koriste za izradu cevi streljačkogoružja. Hemijski sastav osnove je prikazan u tabeli1. Uzorci za ispitivanje su pločice dimenzija 15 x10 x 6.3 mm (prema ASTM G 77). Nakon izradeuzoraka glodanjem, izvršena je termička obradapoboljšanjem na različite tvrdoće. Završna obradauzoraka vršena je na više načina, brušenjem sa višerežima, poliranjem, peskarenjem. Na ovaj način su414 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


dobijene različite karakteristike površinskog sloja irazličite topografije površina uzoraka.Mikrogeometrija podloge za nanošenje prevlakasnimana je na kompjuterizovanom mernomuređaju Talysurf-6, koji omogućava kompleksnopraćenje kontaktnih površina. Korišćenjem ovogmernog sistema dobijena je informacija o početnojmikrogeometriji kontaktnih površina uzoraka.Tabela 1. Hemijski sastav osnove Č5730element hemijski sastav %1 C 0,27 -0,342 Mn 0,30 - 0,603 Si 0,17 -0,374 Ni 2,0 -2.45 Cr 0,60 - 0,906 Mo 0,20 - 0,307 V 0,10 -0,188 S max 0,0259 P max 0,02510 Cu max 0,25Nanošenje galvanskih prevlaka je vršeno upogonu za galvanizaciju fabrike "Zastava oružje" uKragujevcu. U tabeli 2, date su karakteristikeosnovnog materijala na koji je nanošena prevlaka.Tabela 2. Karakteristike podloge uzorakaUzorakbroj35VrstaobradeRamTvrdoćapodloge,HRC0.818 3845 0.719 39brušenje118 0.844 1910 0.720 37120.600 35šmirglanje33 0.550 3832 peskarenje 0.870 35Prevlake cinka su taložene u programiranomrežimu rada jednosmernom strujom, po zadatomplanu eksperimenta. U toku procesa taloženja,parametri jednosmerne struje su kontrolisani iregulisani u zadatim granicama. Korišćene anodesu napravljene od olova sa 10 % kalaja.Nanošenje prevlaka cinka je vršeno na sledećinačin:‣ alkalno bezcijanidno odmašćivanje saindustrijskim deterxentom,‣ ispiranje u protočnoj vodi,‣ dekapiranje u razređenoj hlorovodoničnojkiselini u odnosu 1:1,‣ ispiranje vodom,‣ elektro-hemijsko nanošenje prevlakecinka, sobna temperatura nanošenja prevlake jačina struje I =3 A/dm2 prosvetljavanje u 2% rastvoru HNO 3 utrajanju od 50 sekundi,‣ ispiranje u protočnoj vodi,‣ sušenje toplim vazduhom.Nanošenje prevlaka cinka je vršena tako što suuzorci postavljani u vertikalni položaj, usmereni naisti način. Tačkom "A" na uzorku (slika 1) jeoznačena gornja strana uzorka. Merenje lokalnedebljine prevlake cinka vršeno je na 15 tačakaprema šemi površine uzorka prikazanoj na slici 1.1,558,510ASlika 1. Šema mesta merenja debljine prevlakeKarakteristike (srednja vrednost debljine ihrapavost) istaloženih prevlaka date su u tabeli 3.Na slici 2, data je topografija prevlaka za uzorke10, 12, i 32.Tabela 3. Karakteristike prevlakaUzorakbrojRaprevlakem1,54,57,510,513,515Debljinaprevlake µm1 35 1.070 8.852 45 1.120 28.903 118 1.130 23.874 10 1.640 20.165 12 2.360 36.576 33 2.61 32.267 32 1.180 10.5713 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 415


10Visina neravnina , µm50-5-100.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25Duzina pr<strong>of</strong>ila , mma) uzorak 10Visina neravnina , µm1050-5-100.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25Duzina pr<strong>of</strong>ila , mm10b) uzorak 12pre nanošenja prevlakeVisina neravnina , µm50-5-100.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25Duzina pr<strong>of</strong>ila , mmc) uzorak 32Slika 2. Topografija nakon nanošenja prevlaka zauzorke 10, 12 i 32Na slici 3. prikazan je izgled uzoraka pre i poslenanošenja prevlaka.posle nanošenja prevlakeb) uzorak 12pre nanošenja prevlakepre nanošenja prevlakeposle nanošenja prevlakea) uzorak 10posle nanošenja prevlakec) uzorak 32Slika 3. Izgled uzoraka pre i posle nanošenja prevlake3. ANALIZA REZULTATANa svim uzorcima prvo je izvršen pregledspoljašnjeg izgleda. Izgled prevlake praćen je416 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


vizuelno, na dnevnoj svetlosti, pod uglom od45º. Površina prevlake kod svih uzoraka je sjajna iglatka. Nema dendrita, pregorelih i nepokrivenihmesta.Debljina prevlake cinka je merena na 15 mestaprema datom planu na slici 1. Na graficima, naslici 4, na osnovu rezultata merenja, prikazana jeraspodela debljine prevlake po površini uzorka.Na osnovu ovih grafika se može zaključiti dadebljina po širini i dužini uzorka odstupa ineravnomerna je. Najveće vrednosti za debljinuprevlake su izmerene na središnjem delu uzorka nadužini 13,5 mm od početka. Početak uzorka jeoznačen tačkom "A". To je tačka koja označavagornju stranu uzorka pri nanošenju cinka.Debljina prevlake, µm30252015105Širinauzorka,mm1.558.5Ispitivani uzorci su zadovoljili zahteve standarda.Prianjanje nanetih prevlaka cinka je dobro, nisuuočene promene na prevlaci cinka koje bi ukazalena odvajanje prevlake od osnovnog materijala,podloge.Koroziona stabilnost prevlaka cinka određivanaje praćenjem uzoraka tokom dužeg vremenaizlaganja dejstvu rastvora 3% Na Cl, u skladu saASTM B117-64 metodom. Ispitivani su uzorcirazličitih karakteristika (hrapavost i tvrdoćapodloge, debljina prevlake), tabela 2. Rezultatipraćenja korozione stabilnosti prevlaka cinka supokazali da nije došlo do pojave korozije, tako dase ne može uspostaviti veza između parametaraprethodne obrade i korozione otpornosti.Tribološkim ispitivanjima na tribometru blokon-diskmerena širina traga habanja na bloku i nataj način određivana otpornost na habanje kaoparametar habanja površini sa prevlakom cinka naispitivanim blokovima (slika 5).01.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5Dužina uzorka, mma) uzorak 45Debljina prevlake, µm252015105Širinauzorka,mm1.558.501.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5Dužina uzorka, mmb) uzorak 118Slika 4. Raspored debljine prevlakeIspitivanje metodom termičkog šoka vršeno jeprema standardu ISO 2819-1980. Uslovi ispitivanja:‣ Temperatura zagrevanje uzoraka T=200 0 C(prema standardu T =180 0 - 200 0 C),‣ Vreme zagrevanja 1 sat.‣ Kvašenje mlazom hladne vode.Posle zagrevanja prema uslovima datimstandardom uzorci se izlažu mlazu hladne vode.Prevlaka mora da ostane nepromenjena, ne sme dadođe do pojave odslojavanja prevlake sa osnovnogmaterijala, podloge.Slika 5. Trag habanja na blokuIspitivanje habanja prevlaka su vršena natribometru TR-95 sa kontaktom blok-on-disk uCentru za obradu metala rezanjem i tribologijuFakulteta inženjerskih nauka u Kragujevcu.Tribometar TR-95 omogućava variranje uslovakontakta sa aspekta oblika, dimenzija i materijala13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 417


kontaktnih elemenata, normalnog kontaktnogopterećenja i brzine klizanja. Ispitivanja se moguvršiti u uslovima sa podmazivanjem i bezpodmazivanja. Razvoj procesa habanja na blokumanifestuje se formiranjem i širenjem izraženogtraga habanja. Normalno opterećenje je bilo 10 N,a brzine klizanja 0,25 m/s, 0,5 m/s i 1 m/s. Ukupanput klizanja je bio 150 m. Realizovana ispitivanjasu bila sa graničnim podmazivanjem sa mineralnimhidrauličnim uljem Hidrovisk HD46 zbog velikogkoeficijenta trenja u slučaju trenja bezpodmazivanja i velikih vibracija u sistemu merenjasile trenja kod tribometra TR-95.Početni nominalni linijski kontakt između diskai bloka usled razvoja procesa habanja postajekontakt po određenoj površini, što kao posledicuima razaranje materijala, najpre u površinskomsloju bloka (slika 6). Promena širine traga habanjaima isti karakter za sve ispitivane uzorke samo jerazlika u nivou njihove pohabanosti.Slika 6. Širina traga habanja na blokuProces habanja karakteriše postizanjeodređenog nivoa, stabilizaciju i usporeni porastširine traga habanja tokom vremena ispitivanja. Naosnovu rezultata merenja širine traga habanja nabloku, formirani su u zavisnosti od uslova kontakt(brzina klizanja, normalna sila) pojedinačni i zbirnihistogram promene širine traga habanja (slika 7).Najveće širine traga habanja odgovaraju najmanjojbrzini klizanja.Ispitivani su uzorci različitih karakteristika(hrapavost i tvrdoća podloge, debljina prevlake).Ako se posmatra histogram, slika 7, može sezaključiti da se između hrapavosti površinauzoraka pre i posle nanošenja prevlake cinka iširine traga habanja na bloku ne može uspostavitiveza. Takođe, ne može se uspostaviti veza izmeđutehnologija obrade uzoraka (brušenje, peskarenje idr.) sa širinom traga habanja.Najmanje habanje je bilo kod uzoraka 10 i 33,odnosno, kod uzoraka sa velikom tvrdoćom podloge ivelikom debljinom prevlake.Najveće habanje je bilo kod uzoraka 32, 35 i118. Uzorak 118 ima najmanju tvrdoću a uzorci 32i 35 najmanju debljinu prevlake cinka.Širina traga habanja, mm1.51.20.90.60.30uzorak10Brzina klizanja:uzorak12uzorak33uzorak35uzorak32uzorak45uzorak118v = 0,25 m/s v = 0,5 m/s v = 1 m/sSlika 7. Širina traga habanja na bloku4. ZAKLJUČAKIspitivane prevlake različitih debljina su nanetena uzorke sa različitom topografijom i tvrdoćom.Rezultati ispitivanja vizuelnim pregledom, ispitivanjakorozione otpornosti i ispitivanja prianjanjeprevlaka cinka za osnovni metal, podlogu, supokazali da prevlake zadovoljavaju zahteve standarda.To znači da je valjano izabrana tehnologijapriprema površina i nanošenja prevlaka.Rezultati ispitivanja uticaja promene topografijepovršine na kvalitet prevlake su pokazali dananošenjem prevlake dolazi do značajne promenetopografije, odnosno povećanja hrapavosti ali da tone utiče na ostale karakteristike prevlake cinka.Realizovana ispitivanja i dobijenih rezultataukazuju na postojanje zavisnosti između tvrdoćepodloge, debljine prevlake i širine traga habanja pritribološkim ispitivanjima, ali uspostavljanjekorelatiuvnih veza je moguće realizacijom znatnovećeg broja eksperimenata.AKNOWLEDGEMENTOvaj rad je deo projekta TR35034 "Istraživanjeprimene savremenih nekonvencionalnihtehnologija u proizvodnim preduzećima sa ciljempovećanja efikasnosti korišćenja, kvalitetaproizvoda, smanjenja troškova i uštede energije imaterijala", koga finansira Ministarstvo prosvete inauke Republike Srbije.418 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


LITERATURA[1] Зинченко В. М.: Технологическая наследственностьпри изготовлении деталей,Технология металлов, № 5, 2007.[2] П. И. Ящерицын : Технологическое наследованиеэксплуатационных параметров деталей машин.Справочник, Инженерный журнал № 9, 2004,[3] S. Đorđević, M. Maksimović, M. G. Pavlović, K. I.Popov, Galvanotehnika, Tehnička knjiga, Beograd,1998.[4] Volker Kunz, ZINTEK–TECHSEAL-TRI-COATCatalouge, Trebur 2001.[5] Nedić, B., Jovanović, D., Lakić Globočki, G.,Influence Of Previous Machining On CharacteristicsOf Galvanic Coatings, Serbiantrib - 12 thInternational Conference on Tribology, Kragujevac,2011.[6] B. Nedić, D. Jovanović, G. Lakić-Globočki:Scratch Testing Of Zn Coating Surfaces,<strong>Proceedings</strong>: 34th International conference onproduction engineering, Niš, 2011.[7] Raeissi, Saatchi, Golozar, Szpunar: Effect <strong>of</strong>surface preparation on zinc electrodepositedtexture, Surface & Coating Tehnology 197, 2005,[8] K. Deblauwe, A. Deboeck, J. Bollen, W.Timmermans, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> the 12th InternationalConference on Textures <strong>of</strong> Materials (ICOTOM-12), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 9–13 August,1999,.[9] S. H. Hong, J. B. Kim, S. K. Lee, Mat. Sci. Forum408–412, 2002.[10] Kim, S. Ch. Hong, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> the 12thInternational Conference on Textures <strong>of</strong> Materials(ICOTOM 12), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 9–13August, 1999,[11] D. Vasilakopoulos, M. Bouroushian,N. Spyrellis, Trans. IMF 79, 2001.[12] M. Ye, J.L. Delplancke, G. Berton, L. Segers, R.Winand, Surf. Coat. Technol. 105, 1998.[13] H. Yan, J. Downes, P.J. Boden, S.J. Harris, J.Electrochem. Soc. 143, 1996.[14] H. Park, J.A. Szpunar, Proceeding <strong>of</strong> the 12thInternational Conference on Textures <strong>of</strong>Materials (ICOTOM 12), Montreal, Quebec, LCanada, 9–13 August, p. 1421, 1999.[15] Standard ISO 2819-1980[16] Standard ASTM B117[17] StandardISO 453913 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 419


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacDEFEKTACIJA REDUKTORA BKSH-335 ZA POKRETANJETRAKASTIH TRANSPORTERA BAGERA Sch Rs 630Svetislav Lj. Marković 1 , Ljubica Milović 2 , Bratislav Stojiljković 31 Visoka škola tehničkih strukovnih studija, Čačak, svetom@open.telekom.rs,2 Univerzitet u Beogradu, Tehnološko-metalurški fakultet, Beograd, acibulj@tmf.bg.ac.rs3 Muzej Nikole Tesle, Beograd, bratislav.stojiljkovic@tesla-museum.orgApstrakt: Remont jednog moćnog mašinskog sistema kao što je bager-glodar Sch Rs 630 je uslovljen visokimnivoom pouzdanosti, ispravnosti i funkcionalnosti svih njegovih sklopova. Iz navedenih razloga remontrazmatranog reduktora mora biti praćen detaljnom defektacijom, odgovarajućom tehnologijom regeneracije,ugradnjom kvalitetnih delova (zupčanika, vratila, ležajeva) i pravilnom montažom kako elemenata ureduktor, tako i montažom reduktora na sam bager. Svi navedeni faktori od presudnog su uticaja na budućirad reduktora. Takođe, neophodno je voditi računa o ekonomskoj opravdanosti izvođenja ovakvih radova. Uvelikim sistemima svaki neplanirani zastoj ovakvih mašina veoma mnogo košta. Nedopustivo je da uzrokzastoja bagera bude kvar jednog ovakvog reduktora.Ključne reči: bager, reduktor, defektacija, remont.1. UVODRotorni bageri su mašine velikih gabarita,kapaciteta i težina. Jedan od takvih je i rotornibager Sch Rs 630, nemačkog proizvođača KRUPP.Bager glodar je moćna i visoko produktivnamašina, koja se koristi na površinskim kopovima zaotkopavanje ugljenih i jalovinskih masa. Spada ugrupu rotornih bagera i ima teorijski kapacitet 4100m 3 /h, visina kopanja je 25 m, a dubina 6 m.Rotorni bager se sastoji od donje i gornjegradnje sa konstrukcijom. U donju gradnju spadatransportni mehanizam (šest transportnih gusenica)od kojih su dve sa hidrauličnim upravljačkimmehanizmom. Iznad transportnog mehanizma jeaksijalni kuglični ležaj koji omogućuje zaokretanjegornje gradnje za 360º. Radno područje zaokretanjagornje gradnje u odnosu na donju je ±105º, a brzinaokretanja gornje gradnje je 10 m/min. U donjugradnju spada još i kablovski bubanj za napajanjecelog bagera visokim naponom od 6000 V. Prečnikkabla je Ø78 mm, maksimalna rezerva kabla nabubnju je 1500 m. Pogonski naponi na spravi su500 V, komandni 220 V kao i naponi za osvetljenje,dok su naponi za ručne lampe i magnetne ventile 24V.Na donju gradnju, preko kugličnog aksijalnogležaja, oslonjena je konstrukcija odložne trake, a sagornje strane ovešena za vertikalni stub bagera.Odložna traka se zaokreće u krug nezavisno odgornje gradnje. Širina trake je 1600 mm, a brzinakojom se kreće je 4,2 m/s. Ispod odložne trakepostoji i posebna traka za otpadni materijal sasopstvenim pogonom i brzinom od 1 m/s.U sastav gornje gradnje glodara spada utovranatraka sa radnim točkom, koja je vezana za čeličnukonstrukciju i može se podizati i spuštati prekouređaja za dizanje (čeličnih užadi). Za čeličnukonstrukciju gornje gradnje vezana je i konstrukcijaprotivtega, kao i montažni kran koji služi zademontažu i montažu delova pri popravci.Radni točak je prečnika 10 m na kome jepostavljeno 20 kašika zapremine 0,63 m 3 . Brzinarezanja je 2,827 m/s. Broj istresa je 108-162 min -1 .Dozvoljeni nagibi za rad su 5%, a za transport 10%.Ukupna masa celog bagera je 1.499.641 kg, aspecifični pritisak na tlo je 0,1 MPa.Bagerom se upravlja iz dva komandna pulta: izkabine bageriste, koja je vezana za konstrukcijuprijemne trake, i iz kabine trakiste, koja se nalazi nakonstrukciji odložne trake.420 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Slika 1. Rotorni bager - glodar VII (Sch Rs 630)snimljen noćuReduktori pogona traka su zajedno saelektromotorima vezani na jedno postolje. Najednoj strani su zakačeni za rukavce pogonskogbubnja preko izlaznog zupčanika, pomoćuelastičnih steznih prstenova, a sa druge strane prekopokretnog zgloba za čeličnu konstrukciju trake. Satako izvedenom vezom osa pogonskog bubnja i osereduktora se uvek seku jedna u odnosu na drugupod 90º.Puštanje u pogon trake može se izvoditi na dvanačina, sa komandnog pulta, odnosno iz kabinebageriste kada se uključuje kompletni lanac zakretanje celog sistema. Drugi način je pogon na licumesta preko uređaja za deblokiranje (ovaj pogon sekoristi prilikom popravki i proba samo tog dela uzveliku opreznost i stručni nadzor).2. REDUKTOR BKSH–335Reduktor BKSH-335 je dvostepeni i koristi se zapogon prijemne i odložne trake na rotornimbagerima za eksploataciju uglja u rudarskombasenu Kolubara. Njegov zadatak je da snagu saelektromotora prenese na pogonski bubanj kojipokreće prijemnu, odnosno odložnu traku nabageru. Traka koju pokreće je beskonačna, širine1800 mm, debljine 30 mm i ukupne dužine u obasmera ≈80 m.Uslovi eksploatacije u kojima se reduktor koristisu prilično loši. Reduktor je pozicioniran na mestukoje je izloženo spoljašnjem uticaju vremenskih iatmosferskih neprilika, tako da radi u po kiši,snegu, prašini, mrazu, vrućini, oksidaciji... Svepomenute nepogode utiču direktno ili indirektno nastanje reduktora i njegove prateće opreme. Usistemu EPS-a kada je u pitanju eksploatacija ugljaizbegavaju se bilo kakvi neplanirani zastoji rotornihbagera. Zbog toga promene stanja reduktora, nijemoguće otkloniti do sledećeg planiranog zastojamašine. Usled toga su i česte pojave havarijeovakvih reduktora, jer otkaz jednog njegovogelementa povlači defekt drugog, pa dolazi dootkaza kompletne pogonske grupe.Za pogon se koristi sinhroni elektromotor snage160 kW, koji ima izlazni broj obrtaja 960 o/min.Prateći deo opreme elektromotora je i upuštač kojiima ulogu menjača. Pogonska grupa se startuje namanjem broju obrtaja, a zatim se posle kraćegvremenskog perioda brzina povećava, da bi tek nakraju dostigla punu vrednost od 960 o/min.Spojnica se sastoji iz kočionog točka koji jevezan za ulazno vratilo reduktora i prirubnicepričvršćene za vratilo elektromotora. Ovo jenajlošiji deo pogonske grupe. Naime, ove dvanezavisna dela međusobno su povezana zavrtnjimakoji jednim delom prolaze kroz gumu tvrdoće50÷60Sh, koja ima ulogu da amortizuje udareprilikom pokretanja pogonske grupe. Guma je čestološeg kvaliteta i vremenom dolazi do njenogdeformisanja što direktno utiče na saosnost vratilana kojima se nalaze.Slika 2. Šema reduktora BKSH-335(I – ulazno vratilo, II – međuvratilo, III – šuplje vratilo,1 – tanjirasti zupčanik, 2 – gonjeni cilindrični zupčanik,A – par konusno-valjkastih ležajeva 31319,B – cilindrično-valjkasti ležaj NU 2322,C – par konusno-valjkastih ležajeva 31320,D – dvoredi bačvasti ležaj 23044)Kućište reduktora je dvodelno i izrađeno je odČL0500. Ojačano je rebrima jer je dolazilo doprslina na bočnim stranama. Tokom godina radakućište je ojačano sa po još jednim rebrom okoglavčina i sada ih ima po tri.Slika 3. Kućište sa kočionim točkom13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 421


3. POSTUPAK REMONTA REDUKTORABKSH–335Slika 4. Kućište reduktoraUlazno vratilo (označeno sa I, slika 2) je odčelika za cementaciju Č 4520 i izrađeno je zajednosa pogonskim, konusnim zupčanikom, koji ima 13zubaca (z 1 =13), modula m e =8 mm. Vratilo je naulazu oslonjeno pomoću para konusno-valjkastihležajeva 31319 (A, slika 3), a na izlazu jecilindično-valjkasti ležaj NU 2322 (B, slika 2).Gonjeni konusni (tanjirasti) zupčanik (1, slika 2)izrađen je od čelika za cementaciju Č 4321 i spojensa glavčinom pomoću podešenih zavrtnjeva. Ima 37zubaca (z 2 =37). Glavčina je navučena nameđuvratilo (II, slika 2) i osigurana klinom, aizrađena je od čeličnog liva ČL0400.Međuvratilo (II, slika 2) je izrađeno od čelika zacementaciju Č 4321. U jednom delu je ozubljeno,broj zuba je z 3 =20, a modul m=6 mm. Oslonjeno jena jednom kraju preko para konusno-valjkastihležajeva 31320 (C, slika 2), a na drugom pomoćucilindrično-valjkastog ležaja NU 2322 (B, slika 2).Izlazni zupčanik (2, slika 2) je izrađen od čelikaza cementaciju Č 4321. Ima 88 zubaca (z 4 =88), amodul mu je m=6 mm. Navučen je na šupljevratilo.Šuplje vratilo (3, slika 2) je izrađeno od čelikaza poboljšanje Č 4732. Oslonjeno je bačvastimdvoredim ležajevima 23044 (D, slika 2). Krozšuplje vratilo je provučeno vratilo bubnja.Neposrednom vezom šuplje vratilo prenosi obrtnimoment na vratilo bubnja, čime ga pokreće,dovodeći traku u pogon, tako da pri najvećem brojuobrtaja reduktora, traka širine 1600 mm dostižebrzinu od 4 m/s.Podmazivanje reduktora je rešeno tako što sezupčanici, vratila i ležajevi podmazuju prirodnimputem. U reduktor se pre početka rada sipa 60 l uljatipa EP koje zadržava svoja svojstva i pritemperaturi od 70÷80°C. Ulje se sipa u za topredviđene komore do određenog nivoa i prilikomrada dolazi do prirodnog kruženja ulja bez dodatnihpumpi.Reduktor se demontira sa pogonske grupebagera-glodara i transportuje u radionicu na remont.Doprema se sa kočionim točkom, koji ga vezuje saspojnicom, a bez postolja. Remontne aktivnosti susledeće: obezbeđivanje adekvatnog radnog prostoraza demontažu, defektaciju i montažureduktora, rasklapanje i demontaža reduktora,defektacija delova i sklopova reduktora,regeneracija starih delova ili izrada novihdelova (koji su defektažom utvrđeni kaoneupotrebljivi u daljoj eksploataciji), kontrola izvršenih radova, kompletiranje reduktora, montaža podsklopova i sklopova, završna montaža i priprema reduktora zaprobni rad, probni rad reduktora i izrada izveštaja oispitivanju, transport reduktora na bager glodar.Radni prostor za reduktor je površine od oko180 m 2 . Ograđen je limenom ogradom visine 2 m.Snabdeven je svim potrebnim energetskimkapacitetima, kao što su: komprimovani vazduh, sistem za gasno zavarivanje, električna energija napona 380 V, iznad radnog prostora funkcioniše kran od40 t nosivosti, koji poseduje dve kuke,jednu nosivosti do 5 t i drugu nosivosti do40 t,regali postavljeni u dva nivoa duž zidovaprostorije, namenjeni za odlaganje sitnihdelova, dobro osnovno osvetljenje sa još četirireflektora postavljena po dijagonali, pokretni hidraulički agregat od 2,8 l,maksimalnog pritiska 600 bar,radni stolovi sa stegama.4. PRANJE I ODMAŠĆIVANJEReduktor se unutrašnjim transportom(viljuškarom) prenosi na pranje, gde se uklanjajusve spolja dostupne nečistoće. Pranje se izvoditoplom vodom pod pritiskom da bi se uklonilenaslage blata, uglja, masnoće od ulja...Posle pranja reduktor se doprema u radionicu,gde se obavljaju dalje aktivnosti utvrđenetehnološkim postupkom. Defektatori pristupajusvom osnovnom zadatku, pregledu reduktora,422 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


stvaraju sliku stanja i svoja zapažanja unose udefektacioni list.Prvo se demontira spojnica pomoćuhidrauličnog agregata, protoka 6 l/min imaksimalnog pritiska 600 bar, i hidrauločnoguređaja koji stvara silu od 5·10 5 N. Iz reduktora senajpre istače staro ulje, zatim se kućište reduktorarazdvaja i skidaju se svi bočni poklopci. Vade seelementi (podsklopovi) iz kućišta: ulazno vratilo,međuvratilo i izlazni zupčanik sa šupljim vratilom.Kućište reduktora se zatim ponovo sastavlja,polutke se postavljaju jedna na drugu tako da buducentrirane i ponovo stežu bez bočnih poklopaca.Otvori za ležajeve u kućištu se odmašćuju,pripremaju za vizuelnu kontrolu stanja otvora imerenje. Podsklopovi se spremaju za defektaciju.Ozubljenja se pripremaju za vizuelnu imagnetn<strong>of</strong>luksnu kontrolu pranjem trihloretilenom.Ležajevi se odmašćuju i pripremaju za vizuelnukontrolu i merenja zazora. Vratila se odmašćuju, aotvori u šupljem vratilu se pripremaju za defektažu.Kao sredstva za pranje i odmašćivanje koristese: trihloretilen, famin, za ozubljenjenitrorazređivač, naročito prilikom ispitivanjamagnetnim fluksom i ultrazvukom. prečnici i pohabanost rukavaca vratila, pojava prslina na delovima reduktora(kontrolom magnetnim fluksom iliultrazvukom), pohabanost kočionog točka.Na kočionom točku se vrši merenje prečnikaotvora u spojnici Ø75H7. Vizuelnom kontrolomradne površine kočionog točka je ustanovljendefektni sloj (risevi), koji su nastali verovatnopohabanošću obloga na paknovima (slika 6). Točakse šalje na strugarsku obradu i balansiranje.Slika 6. Prikaz oštećenog površinskog sloja kočionogtočkaNa kućištu reduktora vizuelnom kontrolomproveravaju se varovi oko glavčina i svi podužnivarovi, kao i promene (lom ili prsline) osnovnogmaterijala, zatim stanje revizionih poklopaca, kao iotvora za ležajeve (Ø275H7 – na mestu ulaznogvratila; Ø260H7 – na mestu međuvratila; Ø340H7 –na mestu izlaznog vratila), koji su ispitivani imerenjem u tri pravca (slika 7).Slika 5. Šuplje vratilo sa izlaznim zupčanikom iležajevima5. DEFEKTACIJAPri defektaciji kontrolišu se: otvori za ležajeve na kućištu, ukupno stanje kućišta, ležajevi i njihovi radijalni zazori, ozubljenja, elementi za vezu na zupčanicima (otvori,žljebovi za klinove), radijalna bacanja vratila,Slika 7. Prikaz merenja otvora za ležajeve na kućištuPrilikom vizuelne kontrole ulaznog vratilaustanovljena su oštećenja na rukavcu na koji nailaziležaj koji se grejao u toku rada. Skinut jecementirani sloj, tragovi su vidljivi (slika 8).13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 423


Izvršeno je magnetn<strong>of</strong>luksno ispitivanje zubakonusnog zupčanika, rukavaca i prelaznih radijusa inisu uočene nikakve indikacije tipa spoljašnjihprslina. Istovremeno je izvršena kontrola ostalihrukavaca na ulaznom vratilu i ustanovljeno da sumere u granicama preporučenih tolerancija (Ø75k6,Ø80h8, Ø95j6 i Ø110k6). Na kraju je vršenaprovera radijalnog bacanja vratila. Postavljeno je nastrug, pročišćena su mu središna gnezda ikomparaterom su očitane mere bacanja vratila.Vuzuelnom kontrolom međuvratila ustanovljenoda nema oštećenja zubaca na ozubljenom deluvratila, ali su vidljiva oštećenja rukavca na koji senavlači par konusno-valjkastih ležajeva (slika 10).Merenjem je ustanovljeno da su prečnici drugihrukavaca u granicama tolerancija.Slika 8. Prikaz oštećenja rukavca ulaznog vratilaVizuelnom kontrolom tanjirastog zupčanikauočena je labavost veze između tanjirastogzupčanika i glavčine za koju je pričvršćen. Tokomrada došlo je do oštećenja otvora Ø18 mm. Otvorimoraju biti razbušeni na prvu veću meru da bi seponovo ostvarila veza podešenim zavrtnjevima.Kontrolisani su i otvor u zupčaniku i žljeb za klin,čije mere se nalaze u granicama preporučenihtolerancija.Slika 10. Međuvratilo sa oštećenim rukavcemVizuelnom kontrolom gonjenog cilindričnogzupčanika ustanovljeno je da nedostaje skoropolovina jednog zupca (slika 11). Zbog ovakvogoštećenja neophodna je regeneracija zupčanika.Slika 9. Međuvratilo sa tanjirastim zupčanikom iležajevimaSlika 11. Izlazni zupčanikI šuplje vratilo je dijagnostikovano vizuelnimmetodom i tehničkim merenjima. Na njemu nemavidljivih oštećena, niti tragova udara i naprsnuća.Merenjem je ustanovljeno da se sve mere nalaze ugranicama tolerancija.Defektacija ležajeva podrazumeva vizuelnukontrolu, merenje radijalnih zazora i uparivanjepaketa ležajeva. Vizuelnom kontrolom jeustanovljeno da nema oštećenja ležajeva niti424 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


njihovih kotrljanih elemenata. Merenjem zazora naležajevima utvrđeno je: paket ležajeva na ulaznom vatilu (31319) jevan preporučenih tolerancija, pa jepotrebna zamena, ležaj na ulaznom vatilu NU 2322 imanedopušteni zazor i on se mora zameniti, ostali ležajevi su u granicama preporučenihtolerancija od strane proizvođača.prijanjanja paknova kočnice i izvršidinamičko uravnoteženje(balansiranje), na ulaznom vratilu izvrši zamena svihležajeva sa obaveznim uparivanjem paraležajeva 31319, pohabani rukavci ulaznog vratila imeđuvratila regenerišu se metalizacijom sabrušenjem na nominalne mere, gonjeni cilindrični zupčanik regenerišenavarivanjem polomljenog zupca.6. ZAKLJUČAKReduktor ulazi u redovan remont jednomgodišnje, za vreme planirane investicione popravkeili remonta, ili ukoliko se desi neki neplanirani kvarili havarija. Najčešći razlozi remonta reduktora su:zagrevanje ležajeva, curenje ulja iz reduktora,povećana bučnost reduktora, pohabanost rukavacavratila, lom zubaca zupčanika.Slika 12. Merenje radijalnih zazora ležajaNa osnovu rezultata merenja i ispitivanjadoneta je odluka da se: kočioni točak na krutoj spojnici obradistruganjem na prvu veću meru radi boljegLITERATURA[1] J. Jevtić: Reduktori – proračuni i konstrukcije,Privredni pregled, Beograd, 1976.[2] S. Marković, D. Josifović: Regeneracija zupčanika,monografija, Jugoslovensko tribološko društvo,Kragujevac, 1998.[3] S. Marković: Održavanje mašina i opreme, Višatehnička škola, Čačak, 2005.[4] M. Trbojević, M. Janković, J. Vugdelija, N. Plavšić,V. Latinović: Reduktori, Naučna knjiga, Beograd,1991.[5] www.rbkolubara.co.yu.DEFECTATION OF THE REDUCER BKSH-335 FOR THE ACTIVATIONOF THE BAND TRANSPORTER OF THE DREDGER Sch Rs 630Abstract: The repair <strong>of</strong> a powerful mechanical system such as dredger Sch Rs 630 is based on the high level<strong>of</strong> reliability, accuracy and functioning <strong>of</strong> all its circuits. Due to the reasons listed above the rapair <strong>of</strong> thementioned reducer must be done with thorough defectation, suitable regeneration technology, embedding <strong>of</strong>quality parts (gears, shafts, bearings) and proper installation <strong>of</strong> the parts into the reducer, and installation<strong>of</strong> the reducer onto the dredger itself. All the mentioned factors are essential and they influence the properoperation <strong>of</strong> the reducer. Also, it is necessary to pay attention to the economical adequacy <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong>work. In big systems every non-planned work failure brings enormous costs. Neither it is recommended noracceptable that the failure in the dredger work has its cause in a malfunction <strong>of</strong> the similar reducer.Keywords: dredger, reducer, defectation, repair.ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis work has been performed within the project TR 35011. This project is supported by the Republic <strong>of</strong>Serbia, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and Technological Development, which financial help is gratefullyacknowledged.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 425


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacISPITIVANJE MEHANIČKIH I STRUKTURNIH OSOBINAPREVLAKA OTPORNIH NA EROZIJU I VISOKETEMPERATUREMihailo R. Mrdak 11 Istraživački razvojni centar, IMTEL Komunikacije a.d., Beograd, Srbija, miki@insimtel.comApstrakt: Cilj ovog rada bio je da se ispitaju mehaničke i strukturne karakteristike termo-barijernihprevlaka TBC otpornih na eroziju i visoke temperature. Deponovana su tri tipa TBC sistema dvojnihprevlaka sastavljenih od metalne vezne prevlake NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 i keramičkih izolacionih prevlaka ZrO 2 MgO,ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 . TBC sistemi prevlaka su deponovani atmosferskim plazma sprej postupkom(APS) na ohrapavljenim čeličnim substratima sa temperaturom od 160 – 180 °C. Prevlake su deponovane saoptimalnim parametrima depozicije prahova. Vezni slojevi su deponovani sa jednim prolazom plazmapištolja, a keramički slojevi sa četrnest prolaza. Procena kvaliteta slojeva je urađena ispitivanjemmikrotvrdoće metodom HV 0.1 i zatezne čvrstoće spoja ispitivanjem na zatezanje. Metalografska procenaudela mikro pora (image analiza) u strukturi veznih i keramičkih slojeva je urađena tehnikom svetlosnemikroskopije. Morfologije čestica praha je urađena na SEM-u. Analize izvršenih ispitivanja su omogućile dase odaberu TBC sistemi prevlaka sa najboljim mehaničkim i strukturnim karakteristikama.Ključne reči: atmosferski plazma sprej (APS), termo barijerne prevlake, mikrostruktura, interfejs,mikrotvrdoća, čvrstoća spoja.1. UVODTermo barijerne prevlake (TBC) su grupeprevlaka namenjene za posebne uslove rada zbogsvojih specifičnih karakteristika. Prevlake su našleširoku primenu kao zaštita delovima izloženimvisokim temperaturama, visokotemperaturnojabraziji čestica, oksidaciji i toploj koroziji. Osnovnauloga TBC je da obezbedi mogućnost radaosnovnog materijala na temperaturama koje suiznad granice njegove izdržljivosti spuštanjemstvarne temperature na donjoj površini veznog slojaTBC sistema za ΔT = 200 – 400 °C [1,2]. Keramičkisloj mora da zadrži nisku toplotnu provodljivosttokom dužeg izlaganja u uslovima eksploatacije i daima dobru otpornost na abraziju čestica, koja možeda javi u različitim vidovima [3]. Keramičkaprevlaka se u poređenju termičkih koeficijenatarazlikuje od komponente na koju se primenjuje.Ovaj sloj treba da bude usklađen sa osnovnimmaterijalom preko veznog sloja. Donji vezni slojkoji je tanji u odnosu na keramički sloj mora da imadobru vezu sa substratom i keramikom, sprečidifuziju na interfejsu, poveća otpornost na koroziju ismanji uticaj zaostalih napona u keramici [4-7].Kompozitni prah NiCr-Al-Co-Y 2 O 3 koji sekoristi za proizvodnju veznog sloja je obloženoksidom Y 2 O 3 koji je stabilizator u keramičkimprevlakama. Oksid Y 2 O 3 koji je istovremenoprisutan u metalnom i keramičkom prahupoboljšava vezu između metalnih i keramičkihslojeva [8]. Za proizvodnju keramičkih slojevakoriste se prahovi kao što su Metco 210NS –ZrO 2 MgO, Metco 202NS – ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i Metco205NS – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 i dr. [9-11]. Atmosferskiplazma sprej postupak (APS) je standardni proces zadeponovanje termalnih barijera. Čestice praha seubrizgavaju u protok plazma gasa i ubrzavaju usledprenosa brzine i temperature jona na čestice praha.Pod uticajem substrata, čestice se plastičnodeformišu i vezuju za substrat da bi se formiralaprevlaka. Proces omogućuje deponovanje širokogspektra prahova: legura, keramike, karbida, metalokarbida,metalo-keramike, kompozitnih prahova idr. Na kvalitet deponovanih prevlaka utiče velikibroj parametara. Opis atmosferskog plazma sprej426 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


postupka i uticaja parametara depozicije praha nakvalitet prevlaka dat je detaljnije u radovima [12-15]. Jedan od veoma bitnih parametara koji utiče nakvalitet i trajnost TBC u eksploataciji je temperaturasubstrata na kojoj se deponuju slojevi. Premaranijim istraživanjima, plazma deponovanikeramički depoziti pokazuju lamelarnu strukturu saograničenom intelamelalnim vezivanjem [16]. Zbogtoga su u depozitu prisutne mikro pore kaozapreminske greške sa velikim koncentracijamanapona koji uzrokuju pojavu mikro pukotina.Ograničeno vezivanje lamela u depozitu smanjujevrednosti tvrdoće, modul elastičnosti, žilavost lomai toplotnu provodljivost odgovarajućeg materijala[17-19].Predgrevanje substrata se koristi za povećanjeadhezije prevlake, poboljšanje mikrostrukture imehaničkih svojstava [2, 20-22]. Svojstava TBCdepozita su uglavnom pod kontrolom morfologijedeponovanih čestica i interakcija/prianjanje međunjima. Jedan od uzroka propadanja keramičkihprevlaka je termičko opterećenje. Nagle promenetemperature mogu uzrokovati pucanje i odvajanjecelog TBC sistema sa substrata zbog značajnerazlike koeficijenata linearnog širenja keramike imetala. Drugi način propadanja keramičkih prevlakanastaje od erozije čestica na visokimtemperaturama. Ispitivanja otpornosti keramičkihprevlaka na eroziju čestica Al 2 O 3 veličine od 15 μmdo 53 μm, za isti nivo poroznosti, na 980 °C supokazala da najveću otpornost imaju keramičkeprevlake ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 sa zapreminskim gubitkom1,72 × 10 4 cm 3 /gm. Za prevlaku ZrO 2 20Y 2 O 3zapreminski gubitak je nešto viši 1,95 × 10 4cm 3 /gm, dok je za prevlaku ZrO 2 MgO zapreminskigubitak bio najviši 3,03 × 10 4 cm 3 /gm [11].U ovom radu su ispitana tri tipa TBC sistemaprevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 MgO,NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 . Prahovi su deponovani napredgrejanim substratima sa temperaturom od 160 –180 °C sa ciljem poboljšanja interlamelarne veze,mikrostrukture i mehaničkih svojstava. Izvršena sumetalografska ispitivanja sadržaja mikro pora ioksida u veznim slojevima i mikro pora ukeramičkim prevlakama. Za svaki sistem TBCprevlaka su ispitane mikrotvrdoće i zatezne čvrstoćespoja. Analize rezultata izvršenih ispitivanja suomogućile da se ustanovi koji sistem prevlaka imanajbolje strukturno mehaničke karakteristike.2. EKSPERIMENTALNI DETALJI2.1 MaterijaliMaterijal na kome su deponovane termalnebarijere je bio od nerđajućeg čelika X15Cr13 (EN1.4024) u termički neobrađenom stanju. Za izradutermalnih barijera su upotrebljena četiri praha firmeSulcer Metko (Sulzer Metco) sa oznakama: Metco461 (NiCr/Al/Co/Y 2 O 3 ), Metco 210NS (ZrO 2 MgO),Metco 202NS (ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 ) i Metco 205NS(ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 ) [8-11].Kompozitni prah NiCr/Al/Co/Y 2 O 3 je NiCrlegura sa 17,5 tež.% Cr obložena sa 5,5 tež.% Al,2,5 tež. % Co i 0,5 tež. % Y 2 O 3 . Prah koji jekorišćen u eksperimentu je imao raspon granulaciječestica od 45 μm do 150 μm. Temperatura topljenjapraha je 1400 °C. Na slici 1 je prikazama SEMmikr<strong>of</strong>otografija praha NiCr/Al/Co/Y 2 O 3 na kojojse vide čestice praha nepravilnog oblika.Slika 1. (SEM) morfologija čestica prahaNiCr-Al-Co-Y 2 O 3Keramički prah ZrO 2 MgO je proizvedentopljenjem. Prednost ove metode je predlegiranost iprirodna homogenizacija čestica praha. KeramikaZrO 2 MgO je predlegirana sa 25 tež.% MgO. Zaeksperiment je korišćen prah uglastog oblika sarasponom granulacije čestica od 10 μm do 53 μm.Temperatura topljenja praha je 2140 °C.Prah ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 je proizveden tehnološkimpostupkom aglomeracije finih čestica keramike sa80 tež.% ZrO 2 i 20 tež.% Y 2 O 3 i suvimraspršivanjem. Tako proizveden prah ima sfernumorfologiju čestica. Raspon granulacije čestica jebio od 45 μm do 106 μm sa temperaturom topljenjapraha 2480 °C.Čestice praha ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 su proizvedenehomogenizacijom u peći i procesom sferoidizacijeHOSP. Keramika ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 je potpunopredlegirana sa 24 – 26 tež.% CeO 2 i 2 – 3 tež.%Y 2 O 3 . Morfologije čestica praha su prikazane naslici 2.SEM mikr<strong>of</strong>otografija pokazuje da su česticepraha sa sfernim morfologijama koje omogućavajuodličan protok praha u mlaz plazme i uniformnotopljenje. Prah koji je korišćen u eksperimentu jeimao raspon čestica od 45 – 90 μm satemperaturom topljenja 2480 °C.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 427


Slika 2. (SEM) morfologija čestica prahaZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3Uzorci za merenje tvrdoće i metalografskaispitivanja su pravougaoni 70 × 20 × 1,5 mm, doksu za zateznu čvrstoću spoja korišćeni cilindričniuzorci Ø25 × 50 mm.Merenja mikrotvrdoća su izvršena korišćenjemVikers dijamant piramide indenter i 100 gramaopterećenje (HV 0.1 ). Merenje je obavljeno u pravcuduž lamela, u sredini i na krajevima uzorka. Na petmesta sprovedeno je pet očitavanja a prikazane suminimalne i maksimalne vrednosti.Testovi zatezne čvrstoće spoja su vršeni nasobnoj temperaturi na hidrauličnoj opremi sabrzinom od 10 mm/min, za sva ispitivanja.Čvrstoća je izračunata tako što se opterećenjekidanja deli sa površinom poprečnog presekauzorka. Geometrija uzoraka je u skladu sa ASTMC633 standardom, koji je detaljnije obrađen u radu[23]. Korišćeni su u paru dva uzoraka, od kojih jeprevlaka deponovana samo na jednom od njih.Uzorci su zalepljeni lepkom i čuvani pod pritiskomjedni prema drugom u peći na temperaturi od 180°C za 2 sata. Za svaki grupu uzoraka urađene su triepruvete a prikazane su minimalne i maksimalnevrednosti. Mehaničke i mikrostrukturnekarakterizacije dobijenih prevlaka su izvršeneprema standardu Pratt & Whitney [24].Mikrostrukturna analiza prevlaka i imageanaliza udela mikro pora sa oksidima u veznimprevlakama i udela mikro pora u keramičkimprevlakama urađena je na svetlosnom mikroskopu.Morfologija čestica praha i morfologija površinekeramičke prevlake urađena je na SEM-u (skeningelektronskom mikroskopu).2.2 Plazma sprej parametriDepozicija prahova je urađena sa atmosferskiplazma sprej sistemom firme Plasmadyne i plazmapištoljem SG-100, sa odgovarajućim robotizovanimkontrolnim sprej uslovima. Plazma pištolj SG-100 sesastojao od katode tipa K 1083-129, anode tipa A2084-145 i gas injektora tipa GI 2083-113. Za svedeponovane prevlake kao lučni gas korišćen je Ar ukombinaciji sa He i snaga napajanja od 40 KW.Plazma sprej parametri depozicije su prikazani utabeli 1. Pre procesa deponovanja površine čeličnihsubstrata su hrapavljene sa česticama korunda veličineod 0,7 – 1,5 mm i predgrejane na temperaturu od 160– 180 °C. Vezne prevlake VP – NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 sudeponovane sa jednim prolazom plazma pištoljadebljine 0,068 – 0,093 mm. Sve keramičke prevlakesu deponovane sa 15 prolaza plazma pištolja. PrevlakaA – ZrO 2 MgO je deponovana sa debljinom 0,486 –0,50 mm, prevlaka B – ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 sa debljinom 0,375– 0,41 mm i prevlaka C – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 sadebljinom 0,425 – 0,470 mm.Tabela 1. Parametri depozicije prevlakaVP – NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 , A – ZrO 2 MgO, B – ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 iC – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3Parametri depozicije VP A B CPlazma struja, I (A) 900 900 900 900Plazma napon, U (V) 38 38 38 38Primarni plazma gasprotok Ar, l/min47 47 47 47Sekundarni plazma gasprotok He, l/min12 12 12 12Noseći gasprotok Ar, l/min5 7 6 6Protok praha, g/min 60 50 50 50Odstojanje substrata, mm 115 100 90 903. REZULTATI I DISKUSIJA3.1 MikrotvrdoćaVrednosti mikrotvrdoće za sve vezne prevlakeNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 su izmerene u rasponu od min. 279HV 0.1 do max. 322 HV 0.1 . Raspodele mikrotvrdoće uveznim prevlakama su posledica različite raspodelemikro pora i oksida u deponovanim slojevima. Ovevrednosti su potvrđene image analizom priodređivanju ukupnog sadržaja mikro pora i oksida uveznim slojevima. Na slici 3 su prikazane min. imax. vrednosti mikrotvrdoće keramičkih prevlaka A– ZrO 2 MgO, B – ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i C – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 .Kao što se i očekivalo za sve tri keramičkeprevlake dobile su se različite vrednostimikrotvrdoće kao posledica uticaja različitih vrsta isadržaja stabilizatora MgO, Y 2 O 3 i kombinacijeCeO 2 Y 2 O 3 . Najveće vrednosti mikrotvrdoće suizmerene u keramičkim slojevima A – ZrO 2 MgO saraspodelom mikrotvrdoće od min. 611 do max. 662HV 0.1 , a najmanje vrednosti mikrotvrdoće suizmerene u slojevima C – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 saraspodelom mikrotvrdoće od min. 525 do max. 542HV 0.1 . Raspodele mikrotvrdoće u keramičkimprevlakama su, kao i u veznim prevlakama,428 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


posledica različite raspodele mikro pora ukeramičkim slojevima. Najmanja raspodelamikrotvrdoće je izmerena u keramičkim slojevimaC – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 , a najveća u keramičkimslojevima A – ZrO 2 MgO. Raspodele vrednostimikrotvrdoće u keramičkim slojevima su bile uskladu sa sadržajem mikro pora, što su potvrdileimage analize keramičkih prevlaka.Zatezna čvrstoća spoja, MPa7006005004003002001000611 662 514 552 525 542A B CPrevlakeSlika 3. Mikrotvrdoća prevlaka3.2 Zatezna čvrstoća spojaNa slici 4 su prikazane min. i max. vrednostizatezne čvrstoće spoja sistema prevlakaNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 MgO, NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 .Zatezna čvrstoća spoja, MPa605040302010035 3646 47A B CPrevlake52 53Slika 4. Zatezna čvrstoća spoja prevlakaZa sve sisteme prevlaka su izmerene dobrevrednosti zatezne čvrstoće spoja. Predgrevanjesubstrata je omogućilo da se deponuju prevlake sadobrim vezivanjem lamela vezne prevlake zasupstrate i lamela vezne prevlake sa keramičkimlamelama. Veća temperatura substrata je uticala napovećanje adhezije prevlaka, mehaničkih svojstavai poboljšanje mikrostrukture, što su potvrdilametalografska ispitivanja.Najveće vrednosti zatezne čvrstoće spoja jeimao sistem prevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 sa rasponom od 52 – 53 MPa, anajniže vrednosti sistem prevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 MgO sa rasponom od 35 – 36 MPa. OksidY 2 O 3 koji je istovremeno bio prisutan u veznoNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 i keramičkoj prevlaciZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 je uticao na bolju inter-lamelarnukohezivnu čvrstoću između dve prevlake. Sistemprevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 je iz istograzloga imao veću vrednost zatezne čvrstoće spojasa raspodelom od 46 – 47 MPa u odnosu na TBCsistem NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 MgO. Izmerenevrednosti su potvrdile da temperatura substrata imabitan uticaj na zatezne čvrstoće spoja. Za sveuzorke lom se dešavao na interfejsu između veznihslojeva i substrata.3.3 MikrostrukturaImage analiza veznih prevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3je pokazala da je ukupan sadržaj mikro pora ioksida u slojevima bio od min. 18 % do max. 22 %.Raspon ukupnog sadržaja mikro pora i oksida uveznim prevlakama su posledica različite raspodelemikro pora i oksida u deponovanim slojevima. Naslici 5 je prikazana mikrostruktura vezne prevlakeNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 u sistemu sa keramičkomprevlakom ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 . Vezni slojevi imajuuniformnu lamelarnu strukturu. Granice nainterfejsu između podloge i prevlake se jasno moguvideti. Na interfejsu sa podlogom i keramičkimslojem nisu prisutne mikro pukotine i makropukotine i ne postoji odvajanje slojeva prevlake iljuštenje sa metalnih substrata.Slika 5. Mikrostruktura prevlake NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3Kroz slojeve NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 prevlake se jasnouočavaju tamni lamelarni oksidi i mikro pore.Podužne oksidne lamele oksida su formirane utečnom stanju u plazmi [8].SEM analiza morfologije površine keramičkeprevlake ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 pokazuje potpunotopljenje i razlivanje keramičkih čestica naprethodno deponovani keramički sloj. Na slici 6 jeprikazana SEM mikr<strong>of</strong>otografija površinekeramičke prevlake ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 .13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 429


Slika 6. SEM mikr<strong>of</strong>otografija površine prevlakeZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3Na SEM mikr<strong>of</strong>otografiji je crvenom linijomzaokružena površina jedne istopljene i razlivenečestice praha. Potpuno istopljena čestica praha jeformirala tanak disk u sudaru sa površinomprethodno deponovanog sloja. Morfologijadeponovane čestice potvrđuje da su istopljenečestice u sudaru sa podlogom formirale pravilanoblik i kao takve ostvarile dobru vezu sa prethodnodeponovanim česticama. U poprečnom presekuprevlake deponovane čestice imaju lamelarnustrukturu.Image analiza ukupnog sadržaja mikro pora ukeramičkim prevlakama ZrO 2 MgO, ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 iZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 je pokazala da slojevi imajurazličiti udeo pora. Najmanji udeo mikro pora jeizmeren u prevlaci ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 sa sadržajem od14 %. U keramičkoj prevlaci ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 je izmerenudeo mikro pora od 16 %, a u prevlaci ZrO 2 MgO jeizmeren udeo mikro pora od 17 %. Morfologijačestica praha je bitan parametar za ravnomeran tokpraha u plazmi i na njegovo topljenje. Keramičkiprah ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 sa sfernom morfologijomčestica koje imaju glatku površinu su omogućileizvrsno i uniformno topljenje čestica u odnosu naklasične postupke izrade prahova [11].Ravnomerno istopljene čestice praha se pravilnijeoblikuju u sudaru sa substratom i deponuju slojevesa manjim sadržajem pora, koji imaju većukohezionu čvrstoću i zateznu čvrstoću spoja. Naslici 7 su prikazana mikrostrukture keramičkihprevlaka ZrO 2 MgO, ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 .Na interfejsu između keramičkih slojeva iveznih prevlaka nisu prisutne pukotine. Nauzorcima nije uočeno ljuštenje – piling keramičkihslojeva sa substrata. U keramičkim slojevima suprisutne tamne površine koje predstavljaju mikropore sa različitim udelima u zavisnosti od vrstekeramičke prevlake. Izmerene vrednosti sadržajamikro pora u keramičkim slojevima su u skladu samikrotvrdoćama i mikrostrukturama.4. ZAKLJUČAKSlika 7. Mikrostrukture keramičkih prevlaka: A –ZrO 2 MgO, B – ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i C – ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 ;uvećanje 200×Na osnovu rezultata prikazanih u ovom radumože se zaključiti, da sistemi prevlakaNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 MgO, NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 i NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 imajudobra svojstva. Predgrevanje substrata predepozicije prevlaka je omogućilo da se dobijuslojevi sa dobrim mikrostrukturama i mehaničkimosobinama. Keramički prah ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 zbogsferne morfologije čestica praha je imao najmanjiudeo mikro pora i najbolju zateznu čvrstoću spoja.Oksid Y 2 O 3 koji je istovremeno bio prisutan uveznoj i keramičkoj prevlaci je uticao na boljuinter-lamelarnu kohezionu čvrstoću između dveprevlake. Sistem prevlaka NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /430 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 je takođe zbog oksida Y 2 O 3 imao većuvrednost zatezne čvrstoće spoja od sistema prevlakaNiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 / ZrO 2 MgO.Najbolje karakteristike od svih sistema prevlakaje imao TBC sistem NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 .ZAHVALNOSTIAutor je zahvalan za finansijsku podrškuMinistarstva prosvete i nauke Republike Srbije(nacionalni projekti OI 174004, TR 34016).LITERATURA[1] B. Basler, R. Buergel, W. H<strong>of</strong>felner: Proc. <strong>of</strong> 1 st Int.Conf. on Plasma Surface Engineering, Germisch-Partenkirchen 1, pp. 347, 1988.[2] M.R. Mrdak, A. Vencl, B.D. Nedeljkovic, M.Stanković: Influence <strong>of</strong> plasma spraying parameterson properties <strong>of</strong> the thermal barrier coatings,Materials Science and Technology, Article in Press,doi: 10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000193, 2013.[3] A. Vencl, N. Manić, V. Popovic, M. Mrdak:Possibility <strong>of</strong> the abrasive wear resistancedetermination with scratch tester, Tribology Letters37, pp. 591-604, 2010.[4] E. Celik, I.H. Mutlu, E. Avci, Y.S. Hascicek: Y 2 O 3 -ZrO 2 insulation coatings on AgMg sheathed Bi-2212superconducting tapes by the sol-gel process, IEEETransactions on Applied Superconductivityb10,pp.1329-1332, 2000.[5] E. Celik, I.H. Mutlu, Y.S. Hascicek: Electricalproperties <strong>of</strong> high temperature insulation coatingsby the sol-gel method for magnet technology, IEEETransactions on Applied Superconductivity 10, pp.1341-1344, 2000.[6] E. Celik, E. Avci, Y.S. Hascicek: High temperaturesol-gel insulation coatings for HTS magnets and theiradhesion properties, Physica C: Superconductivity,Vol. 340, No. 2-3, pp. 193-202, 2000.[7] A.S. Demirkiran, E. Çelik, M. Yargan, E. Avci:Oxidation behaviour <strong>of</strong> functionally gradientcoatings including different composition <strong>of</strong> cermets,Surface and Coatings Technology 142-144, pp. 551-556, 2001.[8] Metco 461 Nickel Chromium-Aluminum-Cobalt-Yttria Composite Powder, Technical Bulletin 10-315, Sulzer Metco, 2000.[9] Metco 210 Magnesium Zirconate Powder, TechnicalBulletin 10-108, Sulzer Metco, 2000.[10] Metco 202NS Zirconium Oxide Composite Powder,Technical Bulletin 10-107, Sulzer Metco, 2000.[11] Metco 205NS PreAlloyed Ceria-Yttria StabilizedZirconia Powder, Technical Bulletin 10-338, SulzerMetco, 2000.[12] A. Vencl, M. Mrdak, I. Cvijović: Microstructuresand tribological properties <strong>of</strong> ferrous coatingsdeposited by APS (Atmospheric Plasma Spraying)on Al-alloy substrate, FME Transactions, Vol. 34,No. 3, pp. 151-157, 2006.[13] A. Vencl, M. Mrdak, M. Banjac: Correlation <strong>of</strong>microstructures and tribological properties <strong>of</strong>ferrous coatings deposited by atmospheric plasmaspraying on Al-Si cast alloy substrate, Metallurgicaland Materials Transactions A, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp.398-405, 2009.[14] M. Mrdak, A. Vencl, M. Ćosić: Microstructure andmechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the Mo-NiCrBSi coatingdeposited by atmospheric plasma spraying, FMETransactions, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 27-32, 2009.[15] M. Mrdak, A. Vencl: Uticaj parametara nanošenjaNiCr prevlake plazma sprej postupkom uatmosferskim uslovima na njene mehaničkekarakteristike i strukturu, Tehnička dijagnostika 10,pp. 9-14, 2011.[16] C.-J. Li, A. Ohmori: Relationships between themicrostructure and properties <strong>of</strong> thermally sprayeddeposits, Journal <strong>of</strong> Thermal Spray Technology 11,pp 365-374, 2002.[17] R. McPherson, B.V. Shafer: Interlamellar contactwithin plasma-sprayed coatings, Thin Solid Films97, pp. 201-204, 1982.[18] S. Kuroda, T.W. Clyne: The quenching stress inthermally sprayed coatings, Thin Solid Films 200,pp. 49-66, 1991.[19] C. Li, A. Ohmori, R. McPherson: The relationshipbetween microstructure and Young’s modulus <strong>of</strong>thermally sprayed ceramic coatings, Journal <strong>of</strong>Materials Science 32, pp. 997-1004, 1997.[20] L. Bianchi, A.C. Leger, M. Vardelle, A. Vardelle, P.Fauchais: Splat formation and cooling <strong>of</strong> plasmasprayedzirconia, Thin Solid Films 305, pp. 35-47,1997.[21] V. Pershin, M. Lufitha, S. Chandra, J. Mostaghimi:Effect <strong>of</strong> substrate temperature on adhesion strength<strong>of</strong> plasma-sprayed nickel coatings, Journal <strong>of</strong>Thermal Spray Technology 12, pp. 370-376, 2003.[22] P. Fauchais, M. Fukumoto, A. Vardelle, M.Vardelle: Knowledge concerning splat formation:An invited review, Journal <strong>of</strong> Thermal SprayTechnology 13, pp. 337-360, 2004.[23] A. Vencl, S. Arostegui, G. Favaro, F. Zivic, M.Mrdak, S. Mitrović, V. Popovic: Evaluation <strong>of</strong>adhesion/cohesion bond strength <strong>of</strong> the thick plasmaspray coatings by scratch testing on coatings crosssections,Tribology International 44, pp. 1281-1288,2011.[24] Turbojet Engine – Standard Practices Manual (PN582005), Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, USA,2002.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 431


TESTING THE MECHANICAL AND THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OFTHE COATING RESISTANT TO THE EROSION AND THE HIGHTEMPERATUREAbstract: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the mechanical and the structural characteristics <strong>of</strong> thethermo-barrier coatings (TBC) resistant to the erosion and the high temperature. The deposited are the threetypes TBC dual coating systems which were consisting <strong>of</strong> a metal-bonded coatings NiCrAlCoY 2 O 3 and aceramical insulating coatings ZrO 2 MgO, ZrO 2 Y 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 CeO 2 Y 2 O 3 . TBC systems <strong>of</strong> the coatings weredeposited, with process <strong>of</strong> atmospheric plasma spraying (APS), on the roughened steel substrates with atemperature <strong>of</strong> 160 – 180 °C. The coatings were deposited with the optimal parameters <strong>of</strong> depositionpowders. A bonding layers were deposited with a single pass <strong>of</strong> plasma gun, and ceramical layers with afourteen passages. Assessment <strong>of</strong> a quality layers was done by the testing microhardness with method HV 0.1and bond strength by the testing on tensile. Metallographic assessment proportion <strong>of</strong> micro-pores (imageanalysis), in the structure <strong>of</strong> the bonding and the ceramical layers, was done with the technique <strong>of</strong> the lightmicroscopy. The Morphology <strong>of</strong> the particles powder was done on the SEM. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the performedtestings have been enabled to choose the TBC systems <strong>of</strong> the coatings with the best mechanical andstructural characteristics.Keywords: atmospheric plasma spraying (APS), thermo-barrier coatings (TBC), microstructure, interface,microhardness, strength bond.432 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacIZBOR MERNE GLAVE DIFERENCIJALNOG PNEUMATSKOGKOMPARATORA ZA KONTROLU UNUTRAŠNJIH MERA MAŠINSKIHDELOVADragiša Skoko 1 , Cvetko Crnojević 1 , Mileta Ristivojević 11 Mašinski fakultet u Beogradu, Srbija, dskoko@mas.bg.ac.rs, ccrnojevic@mas.bg.ac.rs, mristivojevic@mas.bg.ac.rsApstrakt: Apstrakt: U ovom radu je analiziran uticaj promene uticajnih faktora na rad pneumatskogkommparatora.. Instalacija koja se koristi u ovu svrhu omogućava promenu pritiska napajanja, promenuizlazne mlaznice i prečnoka mlaznice merne komore komparatora. Posebna pažnja je posvećenapneumatskoj osetljivosti i dobijeno je da zavisi od pritiska napajanja i prečnika mlaznice u mernoj komori.Utvrđeno je da pneumatska osetljivost raste sa smanjenjem prečnika mlaznice u mernoj komori. Takođe jedat izbor prečnika merne glave pneumatsko komparatora za kontrolu munutrašnjih mera mašinskih delova.Ključne reči: kontrola, merna glava, diferencijalni pneumatski komparator, mašinski delovi, unutrašnjemere, pneumatska osetljivost1. UVODUporedo sa razvojem proizvodnih mašinarazvija se tehnika kontrole i merenja proizvedenihkomada. Prvi uređaji za kontrolu su bili mehanički.Ovi uređaji su mogli da zadovolje potrebu upojedinačnoj i maloserijskoj proizvodnjijednostavnih komada. Razvojem savremeneindustrije XX-tog veka, koju karakterišuvelikoserijska proizvodnja komplikovanih oblika ivelika tačnost izrade, mehanički uređaji nisu moglida zadovolje u svim segmentima proizvodnje. Tonaročito dolazi do izražaja u automobilskoj i avioindustriji. Za merenje i kontrolu razvijeni supotpuno novi uređaji: mehanički, optički, električni,pneumatski, hidraulički i laserki uređaji. Najvažnijaprednost u odnosu na mehaničke je njihova tačnost.Tačnost mehaničkih uređajaje je 1 μm, a pomoćusavremenih uređaja mogu se meriti i deseti i stotidelovi mikrometra.Pneumatski merni sistemi se intenzivnorazvijaju tridesetih godina XX-tog veka, počev odnajednostavnijih [1], pa sve do vrlo savremenihuređaja [2]. Zbog velike mogućnost primene,jednostavne konstrukcije, lakog održavanja,jednostavnog rukovanja a iznad svega veliketačnosti, ovi uređaji su dominantni u kontrolimašinskih delova. Prednost ovih uređaja, u odnosuna ostale, je što komprimovan vazduh koji izlazi izmlaznica merne glave velikom brzinom, oduvamehaničke nečistoće i tanak sloj tečnosti zahlađenje komada i ostalih nečistoća. Na ovaj načinse smanjuje mogućnost pojave greške pri merenju ikontroli. Druga prednost je što se može kontrolisativiše mera istovremeno, bilo spoljašnjih iliunutrašnjih. Vrlo značajnu primenu ima dinamičkapneumatska metoda koja se primenjuje kod obrtnihkomada, znači u toku rada, bez zaustavljanja radamašine, vrši se merenje i kontrola obratka.Teorijske osnove ovog postupka su obrađene uliterarturi [.3], [.4], [.5]. Stepen tačnosti kontrolemašinskih delova zavisi od: izbora izlaznemlaznice, pritiska napajanja p a , prečnika prigušniceD u mernoj komori i prečnika merne glave. Uraduje prikazan postupak određivanja prečnika merneglave. Analiziran je uticaj pneumatske osetljivosti iodstupanja kontrolisanog mašinskog dela na izbordimenzija merne glave.2. EKSPERIMENTALNA INSTALACIJAZa odredjivanje polja pritiska na ravnoj površinimernog komada koristi se instalacija prikazana naslici 1 i slici 2. Instacija se sastoji od pneumatskogkomparatora PC, koji sadrži mernu (B1) ireferentnu granu (B2), izvora vazduha pod13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 433


pritiskom CAS, koji se reguliše regulatorompritiska PR, izlazne mlaznice N i sistema D-r i D-δza fina pomeranja ravnog mernog komada. Umernoj grani se nalazi mlaznica A prečnika D učijem grlu se ostvaruje kritično strujanje. U ovomradu prečnik D je imao vrednost 0,7 i 1 mm, kojiodgovara realnim primenana, a tretitan je slučajkada je D=6 mm što odgovara kada u dovodnojgrani napajanja mlaznice N nema pneumatskogprigušenja. Pritisci napajanja p a menjani su uintervalu od 2 do 5 bar. Svi pritisci mereni sumanometrima koji imaju tačnost 0,001 bar. Izlaznamlaznica N je unutrašnjeg pečnika 2 mm ispoljašnjeg 4 mm. Ostvarivanje željenih položaja ri δ postiže se tako što se iznad fiksnog mernogkomada W pomera izlazna mlaznica N sistemimapomeranja D-r i D-δp()pTolerance rangeareaa)Linearity zoneNominal dimenssionSlika 3. Geometrija izlazne mlaznice [5]Pojava podpritiska na mernom komadu jenepoželjna zbog skupljanja nečistoća, koje remetiispravan rad komparatora. Takođe pogodnimodabirom geometrije izlazne mlaznice teži se dapolje podpritiska bude što dalje od ose mlaznice.Analiza polja pritiska na rad pneumatskogdiferencijalnog komparatora je data u radu [5].Karakteristični oblici mlaznica su dati na slici 3.p [bar]5432Pritisak na mlaznici M-1 za =100 mp a=2 barp a=3 barp a=4 barp a=5 bar1b)CASPRControledpieceSlika 1. Shematski prikazi pritiska p(δ)PCB2B1Nrp(r,p(0,00 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000r [m]Slika 4. Dijagram p=f(r) za M-1 i p ap [bar]Pritisak na mlaznici M-2 za =100 m5p =2 bar4ap =3 bara3p = 4 barp = 5 bar2p a3.1 MlazniceADD-D-rSlika 2. Shematski prikaz - merna instalacijaPolje pritiska na površini mašinskog dela koji sekontroliše zavisi od geometrije izlazne mlaznice.Analizom uticajnih faktora na polje pritiska, bira setakva mlaznica da se potpuno eliminiše podpritisakna komadu koji se kontroliše ili da taj pritisak bude,ako je moguće, što manji.W10r [m]0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Slika 5. Dijagram p=f(r) za M-2 i p aAnaliza uticaja pritiska napajanja i geometrijeizlazne mlaznice na polje pritiska na površinimašinskog dela koji se kontroliše prikazana je nadijagramima na 4 i 5.Analizom dijagrama, slika 4, vidi se da je poljepritiska pozitivno za mlaznicu M-1 po celoj dužinii za sve pritiske napajanja. Polje pritiska zamlaznicu M-2 je pozitivno za za p a =2 i p a =3 bar aza veće pritiske p a =4 i p a =5 bar je negativno, štonije dobro, slika 5434 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


3.2 Pneumatska osetljivostOblast primene pneumatske metrologije jeograničena pravolinijskim delom dijagrama p=p(δ).Pogodnim odabirom prigušnice dobija seodgovarajuća karakteristika pneumatskogdiferencijalnog uređaja - osetljivost uređaja.Pneumatska osetljivost S predstavlja odnos priraštajpritiska p i rastojanja iz pravolinijskog delakrive zavisnosti totalnog pritiska od rastojanjamlaznice i površine mernog komadap a[bar]p a[bar]S [bar/m]S=. Δp / Δδ – ref [6]54321Mlaznica M-2, prigusnica D=1,2 mmp a=2 barp a=3 barp a=4 barp a=5 bar [ m]00 200 400 600 800 1000Slika 6. Dijagram p=f(δ). za M-2 i različite p a54321Mlaznica M-2, prigusnica D=0,7 mmp a=2 barp a=3 barp a=4 barp a=5 bar00 200 400 600 800 1000 [ m]Slika 7. Dijagram p=f(δ) a M-2 i različite p a0.0400.0350.0300.0250.020D=1,7D=1,2D=1,0D=0,7D=0,5Osetljivost za M-1Iz definicije pneumatske osetljivosti uređaja,proizilazi da pneumatski uređaj koji ima većeprigušenje ima veću osetljivost a pravolinijski deokrive zavisnosti pritiska i rastojanja δ ima većiugao nagiba u odnosu na x osu tj. prava je strmija.Pneumatski diferencijalni uređaj koji ima manjeprigušenje ulaznog pritiska u mernu komoru imamanju osetljivost a pravolinijski deo krive imamanji nagib u odnosu na x osu. Osetljivost uređajaje, dakle definisana nagibom krive. Osetljivostuređaja predstavlja tačnost uređaja. Opseg primeneuređaja definisan je dužinom projekcijepravolinijskog dela krive na osu x. Uređaji kojiimaju veću dužinu projekcije imaju veći opsegprimene, tj. veću širinu tolerancijskog polja.Pneumatski diferencijalni uređaji koji su predviđenida rade sa većim pritiskom napajanja imaju većiopseg primene.Na dijagramima sa slike 5 vidi se da je malaosetljivost zbog malog prigušenja D=1,2 mm. Nadijagramima , slika 6 se vidi da krive imaju velikipad tj. veliko prigušenje D=0,7 mm i velikuosetljivost.Na slici 7, data je osetljivost mlaznica M-1 i M-2 uzavisnosti od stepena prigušenja i pritiska napajanjap a . Veliko prigušenje daje veliku pneumatskuosetljivost i obrnuto. Isto tako se vidi da je linearnopovećanje osetljivosti sa povećanjem pritiskanapajanja p a. Takođe se vidi uticaj oblika mlaznicena osetljivost. Najveća osetljivost je za mlaznicuM-5, prečnik prigušnice D=0.7 mm i p a =5 bar iiznosi s=0,039bar/mm.4. ODREĐIVANJE PREČNIKA MERNEGLAVEPneumatski uređaj za kontrolu dimenzija jespecijalan manometar sa skalom, koji umesto skalepritiska ima skalu za očitavanje zazora δ (rastojanjevrha mlaznice i površine komada koji sekontroliše). Pneumatski komparator jetransformisani manometar. Za zadati pritisaknapajanja p a , izabrani prečnik prigušnice D iizabranu mlaznicu M, na uređaju se očitava zazor δza odgovarajuće vrednosti pritiska p a . ,,Takođe ukonkretnim izvođenjima pneumatskih komparatorane meri se pritisak p(δ) na površini komada koji sekontroliše, već pritisak u komori merne grane p0.0150.0100.0050.0001 2 3 4 5Slika 8. Osetljivost mlaznice M-1p [bar]13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 435


Merna glava za kontroluspoljašnjih dimenzijaKomad koji se kontrolišed d – donja granična merad - nazivna merad g – gornja granična meraD mg –prečnik merne glave+dd gd dp (δ)2D mgp2Δp0pop1Δδ1DgδDMerna glava za kontroluunutrašnjih dimenzijad mgD dKomad koji se kontrolišeSlika 9. Šematski prikaz dijagrama p=p(δ) i merneglave za kontrolu spoljašnje i unutrašnje mere [5]436 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


p mg (δ), koji je zbog malih strujnih gubitakapribližno jednak pritisku pZavisnost p=p (δ) prikazana dijagramom na slici9. Na ovom dijagramu uočava se pravolinijski deo.Tačku 2 predstavlja početak pravolinijskog dela 1. 1. Tolerancijsko polje unutrašnje mere je simetričnodijagrama i nju karakteriše povećan pritisak p 2 a u odnosu na nultu liniju, tj. kada su odstupanja istamale vrednosti δ. Na uređajima se ne koristi tačka 2ES = EI.kao reperna, već tačka ispod nje ,,g”., koja imakarakteristiku manji pritisak a veće δ. Ta tačkad mg = D -2 δ 0 - prečnik merne glavepredstavlja gornju granicu tolerancijskog poljakomada koji se kontriliše. Prevedeno u kontroli δ 0 – rastojanje merne glave od površine komadaspoljašnjih dimenzija to je komad sa maksimalno koji se (horizontalna koordinata tačke ,,0”).dozvoljenom merom i na uređaj za očitavanje tubismo stavili reper es, što predstavlja gornjegranično odstupanje. Uobičajeno je da je taj reperna merilu plave boje. Komad koji bi imao većeodstupanje od zadatog bi morao da ide na doradu.Pri kontroli unutrašnjih dimenzija ova tačka bipredstavljala minimalnu dozvoljenu meru i nauređaj za očitavanje tu bismo stavili reper kojioznačava minimalno odstupanje EI. U tom slučajuova tačka predstavlja donju graničnu meru.Povećanjem rastojanja δ smanjuje se pritisak.Naredna karakteristična tačka na pravolinijskomdelu dijagrama p=f(δ) je tačka ,,0”, koja uglavnompredstavlja sredinu dužine pravolinijskog deladijagrama. Ovo je značajna tačka ovog dijagramajer se koristi za određivanje dimenzija merne glave. Slika 10. Prikaz simetričnog tolerancijskog poljaTakođe njena horizontalna projekcija predstavlaunutrašnje merenultu liniju u tolerancijama.Treća tačka na ovom delu dijagrama je tačka 2. Tolerancijsko polje unutrašnje mere nalazi,,d”. Karakteriše je manji pritisak i veliko δ. Onaiznad nulte linije, radi se preslikavanjepredstavlja drugu granicu tolerancijskog poljatolerancijskog polja na tolerancijsko polje ,,J s ”.komada koji se kontroliše. Pri kontroli spoljašnjihOvo polje se naziva ekvivalentno tolerancijskodimenzija to je minimalno dozvoljena mera. Napolje, a postiže se povećanjem prečnika merneskali pneumatskog uređaja se stavi reper kojiglave za vrednost C = EI/2 +ES/2.označava ei, i predstavlja donje granično d mg = D -2δ 0 +(EI/2+ ES/2) - prečnik merne glaveodstupanje. Pri kontroli spoljašnje dimenzijekomada, ako je stvarno donje odstupanje veće odzadatog, komad se odbacuje jer mu je stvarna meramanja od najmanje dozvoljene. To važi i zakontrolu unutrašnjih dimenzija. Horizontalnaprojekcija tačke ,,d” na dijagramu koristi se kaoreper na skali uređaju i predstavlja ES, gornjegranično odstupanje. Svaka stvarna mera koja imaveće odstupanje od zadatog je loša mera i komad seodbacuje.4.1. Određivanje prečnika merne glave zakontrolu unutrašnjih dimenzijatolerancijsko polje. Pri određivanju prečnika merneglave mora se voditi računa o položajutolerancijskog polja u odnosu na nazivnu meru.Imamo tri različita slučaja:Merna glava za kontrolu unutrašnjih dimenzijaje valjak koji po obimu ima dve ili više identičnihmlaznica. Svaka tolerisana mera ima parametre: D -nazivnu meru, D g – gornju graničnu meru, D d –donju graničnu meru, ES – gornje graničnoodstupanje, EI – donje granično odstupanje i T -Slika 11. Prikaz nesimetričnog tolerancijskog poljaunutrašnje mere - tolerancijsko polje iznad nulte linije3. Ako se tolerancijsko polje unutrašnje merenalazi ispod nulte linije, odstupanja su negativna.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 437


Dato tolerancijsko polje se preslikava utolerancijskog polja ,,J”. Ovo polje se nazivaekvivalentno tolerancijsko polje, a postiže sesmanjenjem prečnika merne glave za vrednostE = |EI/2 +ES/2I|.d mg = D -2 δ 0 -|ES/2+EI/2|- prečnik merne glavekonvergentno-divergentne mlaznice merne granepneumatska osetljivost se povećava porastompritiska napajanja komprimovanog vazduha.Pomoću diferencijalnog pneumatskog komparatorakontrolišu se spoljašnje i unutrašnje tolerisanemere. Za svaku tolerisanu meru mora se odreditiprečnik merne glave D mg i d mg . Prečnik merne glavezavisi od položaja tolerancijskog polja u odnosu nanazivnu meru, pritiska napajanja p a i δ 0 .ZAHVALNOSTRad je rezultat istraživanja realizovan u okviruprojekta TR 35029. Rad je finansiran odMinistarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvojaRepublike Srbije na čemu sam im zahvalan.LITERATURASlika 12. Prikaz nesimetričnog tolerancijskog poljaunutrašnje mere - tolerancijsko polje ispod nulte linije2. ZAKLJUČAKNa osnovu eksperimentalnih rezultataprikazanih u ovom radu dolazi se do opštihzaključaka:Iako se različita geometrija izlazne mlazniceprvenstveno koristi radi eliminisanja vrtložne zoneizmedju mlaznice i kontrolisanog komada (ref. [2] i[5]), dati rezultati merenja pokazuju da segeometrijom izlazne mlaznice može uticati i napneumatsku osetljivost komparatora i na promenumaksimalnog tolerancijskog polja kontrolisanogkomada.Na pneumatsku osetljivost pneumatskogkomparotera se prvenstveno utiče promenomprečnika konvergentno-divergentne mlaznicemerne grane. Povećanje pneumatske osetljivosti sepovećava smanjenjem prečnika mlaznice mernekomore, ali se i na taj način i sužava maksimalnotolerancijsko polje kontrolisane mere Za istegeometrijske parametre izlazne mlaznice i[1] Fortier, M.,: Application industrielles desécoulements gazeux à la vitesse critique,Revenu chaleur et Industrie, N°299, p.145.2.(1950)[2] Crnojevic C., Roy G., Bettahar A. and FlorentP.: Influence <strong>of</strong> regulator diameter andinjection nozzle geometry on flow structure inpneumatic dimensional control systems.Transacions <strong>of</strong> ASME, Journal <strong>of</strong> FluidsEngineering, Vol. 119., pp. 609-615 (1997).[3] Crnojević C., Skoko D.,: O nekim pojavamakoje utiču na rad pneumatskog komparatora.XXXI JUPITER konferencija, Zlatibor 2005.Zbornik radova (na CD-u), str. 5.14-5.17.[4] Roy, G., Crnojevic C., Bettahar A., FlorentP.and Vo-Ngoc, D., "Influence <strong>of</strong> nozzlegeometry in radial flow applications,"International Conference on Fluid andThermal Energy Conversion, Proc. Vol. 1,pp.363-368 (1994), Bali, Indonesia[5] Skoko, D., Magistarski rad, Mašinski fakultetBeograd 2007.[6] Skoko D., Crnojević C., : Eksperimentalnoodređivanje osetljivosti pneumatskogkomparatora. XXXII JUPITER konferencija,Zlatibor 2007. Zbornik radova , strana -5.43.438 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


PNEUMATIC PROBE HEAD SELECTION FOR MACHINE PARTSINTERNAL MEASURES CONTROL WITH DIFFERNTIAL PNEUMATICCONTROLERApstract: In this paper, we analyze the influence <strong>of</strong> various parameters on the work <strong>of</strong> pneumatic controller.For that purpose, experimental installation is used, which enables the variation <strong>of</strong> the pressure <strong>of</strong>compressed air source, output nozzle and the diameter <strong>of</strong> the measuring branch nozzle <strong>of</strong> pneumaticcontroller. Special attention is devoted to pneumatic sensitivity and it is determined that it depends on thediameter <strong>of</strong> measuring branch nozzle and supply pressure. In addition, it is determined that pneumaticsensitivity increases with the decrease <strong>of</strong> the diameter <strong>of</strong> measuring branch nozzle. In this paper, we treated<strong>of</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> pneumatic measuring head <strong>of</strong> diferential pneumatic controler for control internalmeasures <strong>of</strong> machine partsKeywords: control, pneumatic measuring head, pneumatic controller, machine parts, internal measure,pneumatic sensitivity13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 439


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPOVEĆANJE POUZDANOSTI PODSISTEMA KOPANJAROTORNOG BAGERA PODEŠAVANJEM TRIBOLOŠKIHKARAKTERISTIKA REZNIH ELEMENATAVojin Vukotić 1 , Dragan Čabrilo 1Rudnik i Termoelektrana Gacko, Bosna i Hercegovina, Republika SrpskaAbstrakt: Poznato je da prilikom obrade tla, u ovom slučaju skidanja jalovone i kopanja korisne mineralnesirovine korištenjem rotornih bagera, rezni elementi mašina koji su u kontaktu sa tlom trpe opterećenje ihabaju se. Rezni elementi na rotornom bageru su k<strong>of</strong>ice i zubi. U ovom radu učinjen je pokušaj da semodeliranjem geometrijskih parametara zuba na k<strong>of</strong>ici isti prilagode režimu i kinematici rezanja tla i smanjise nivo habanja istih. Cilj je da se poveća pouzdanost rotornog bagera preko povećanja pouzdanostipodsistema kopanja, čiji je glavni dio rotorni točak sa reznim elementima.Vršeno je snimanje vremenskeslike stanja podsistema kopanja za nekoliko varijanti geometrijskog oblika zuba i proračunavanaodgovarajuća pouzdanost.Naravno, usvojena je geometrija zuba uz koju je postignut najveći nivo pouzdanosti.Ključne reči: rotorni bager, pouzdanost, zubi, habanje, geometrija1. UVODRotorni bageri su danas najrasprostranjenijeosnovne mašine na površinskim kopovima. Služeza uklanjanje jalovine ili za kopanje korisnemineralne sirovine.Po svom sastavu to je vrlo složen mašinskisistem. Sastavljen je od niza podsistema, koji svakiponaosob obezbjeđuje određenu funkcijuneophodnu za rad bagera.Podjela na podsisteme je uglavnom sledeća: podsistem za kretanje bagera, podsistem kopanja, podsistem prijemnog transportera, podsistem odlagajućeg transportera i podsistem za zakretanje gornjekonstrukcije.Ukoliko samo jedan od pomenutih podsistemanije u funkciji, tada ni rotorni bager kao cjelina nezadovoljava namjeni, odnosno ne obavlja funkcijukriterijuma u propisanim granicama.Zapaženo je i to da je različit uticaj naraspoloživost rotornog bagera, stanje ispravnostiodnosno pouzdanost pojedinih podsistema.Teorijskim razmatranjima i ispitivanjima krozeksploataciju ovih mašina [2], došlo se dozaključka da je podsistem kopanja najnepouzdanijii da njegova pouzdanost najviše snižava ukupnupouzdanost bagera.Na osnovu određenih istraživanja na rotornombageru ЭR – 1250 u sklopu gatačkog ugljenogbasena koje je provodio autor ovog saopštenja, [4]može se A B C dijagramom prikazati učešćeotkaza po podsistemima rotornog bagera kao na sl.1, gdje je:Slika 1. Analiza otkaza na bageru440 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


1. Podsistem kopanja2. Podsistem prijemnog transportera3. Podsistem odlagajućeg transportera4. Podsistem za kretanje5. Podsistem obrtne plarformeOčigledno je, sa pomenutog dijagrama, dapodsistem kopanja u ukupnim otkazima participirasa otprilike 44%.Podsistem kopanja sastoji se od tri glavnasklopa: pogonskog elektromotora, reduktora iradnog točka sa vedricama. Naravno svaki od ovihsklopova učestvuje u ukupnim zastojimapodsistema kopanja sa svojim zastojima.U ovom radu, predmet interesovanja i analize jesklop radnog točka sa vedricama, a sami elementkoji se tretira jeste zub i uticaj radne sredine nahabanje istog.2. OPŠTI PRISTUP PROBLEMU HABANJAHabanje mašinskih dijelova je pojava koja seneminovno javlja na mašinama u toku njihova rada,odnosno eksploatacije. Posljedica je relativnogkretanja i pomjeranja dijelova u sklopu kojiostvaruju fizički kontakt.Spada u štetne pojavne oblike u toku životnogciklusa mašine, javlja se intenzivnije u posljednojetapi toga ciklusa a ovim problemom se bavekonstruktori mašine , rukovaoci i održavaoci iste,kako bi ovo štetno dejstvo sveli na što manju mjeru.Naučna oblast koja se bavi ovom pojavomnaziva se tribologija.Dva su osnovna cilja koja se stavljaju predtribologe, a to su: da mašina što duže traje, da ta mašina troši što manje energije,a u poslednje vrijeme, javlja se i treći; da mašina ima što veću pouzdanost.Zadovoljavanjem ovih ciljeva minimiziraju se iukupni troškovi proizvodnje sa konkretnommašinom.2.1 Abrazivno habanjeNajveći broj mašinskih elementata radi uuslovima abrazivnog habanja. Pojava jekarakteristična po tome što površina koja je ukontaktu dolazi u dodir sa tvrdim česticama –abrazivima. Abrazivi mogu biti sadržani u radnojsredini ( slučaj kod alata za obradu rezanjem,obradi tla, i sl. ) ili su na drugi način dospjeli dokontaktnih površina ( iz vazduha, u mazivu,prašina, pijesak, čestice blata, … ).Proces abrazivnog habanja je u uskoj vezi sakoličinom i vrstom abrazivnih čestica, njihovomtvrdoćom i oblikom, kvalitetom i stanjem tarnihpovršina, pritiskom i temperaturom u zoni dodira,te brzinom relativnog kretanja i karakteromkretanja.Abrazivno habanje je u dosta slučajeva bilopredmet interesovanja istraživača. Uspostavljena jezavisnost između intenziteta habanja u smislupromjene zapremine dijela na koji se habanjeodnosi i normalnog opterećenja spregnutih površinai tvrdoće abrazivnih čestica.Presudan uticaj na intenzitet abrazivnoghabanja, po mišljenju mnogih autora, [1] i [3] imaopterećenje odnosno aktuelna sila na kontaktnimpovršinama. Intenzitet habanja je upravoproporcionalan sa veličinom opterećenja, a zavisi iod vrste i oblika tarnih površina, uglova u kontaktu,vrste trenja, režima rada te naročito od vrsteobrađivanog materijala, odnosno tla koje se kopa, uslučaju rotornih bagera.I pored svih preventivnih mjera, habanje se nemože potpuno spriječiti ali se na tu pojavu možeznačajno uticati ako se prethodno spozna njenasuština, te mehanizam nastanka i razvoja.2.2. Habanje zuba rotornog bageraProblem habanja radnih elemenata na vedricamarotornih bagera prisutan je još od samogpočetka primjene ovih mašina, koje su se napovršinskim kopovima pokazale kao vrloproduktivne i ekeonomične mašine.U procesu kopanja dolazi do intenzivnoghabanja reznih površina izazvanih suvim trenjemklizanja minerala kombinovanog sa značajnimdinamičkim udarima. To dovodi do neželjenihpromjena na elementima mašine u vidu odvajanjačestica materijala sa posmatrane površine zuba.Na proces habanja reznih elemenata, osimmaterijala koji se kopa utiče i niz drugih faktora,kao što su: materijal od koga su izrađeni reznielementi, konstruktivne karakteristike zuba, režim rada rotornog bagera i specifični otpori kopanjuU procesu kopanja dolazi do klizanja materijalapo reznim elementima pri čemu nastaje neželjenohabanje zuba. Proces habanja se nesumnjivoodražava na geometrijske karakteristike reznihelemenata, na njihov vijek trajanja i opštuupotrebljivost, a indirektno na kapacitet rotornogbagera, potrošnju energije i opštu spremnost bageraza normalnu eksploataciju. Očigledno je dafenomen habanja ima veliki uticaj na pogonskuspremnost i pouzdanost rotornog bagera, te ga jepotrebno pažljivo proučiti kako sa aspekta uzroka ipreventivnog djelovanja tako isto i u oblastisanacije i uklanjanja eventualnih posljedica.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 441


Kroz praksu i terenska ispitivanja odavno jepoznato da povećano habanje zuba na vedricamarotornih bagera, za posljedicu, ima sledećenegativnosti: povećane otpore kopanju smanjen specifičan učinak bagera [t/h] povećane vibracije mašine povećana specifična potrošnja energije povećane troškove održavanja smanjenu pouzdanost bagera.3. RADNA OPTEREĆENJA I VRSTEHABANJA ZUBA ROTORNOG BAGERAEksploatacioni uslovi za zube na rotornombageru koji su u neposrednom kontaktu sa radnomsredinom koja se kopa, su bez sumnje, vrlo teški isloženi. Habanje zavisi prvenstveno od osobinamaterijala koji se kopa, otpornosti materijala zubana habanje ili bolje reći od konstruktivneprilagođenosti zuba uslovima kopanja nakonkretnom lokalitetu, odnosno kopu, kao i odrežima rada bagera.U ovom slučaju, zubi su izloženikombinovanom dejstvu abrazije i udara, koji semanifestuju kroz nagle skokove opterećenja zuba utoku rada bagera.Abrazivno habanje u konačnom obliku rezultiraodnošenjem materijala sa radnih površina zuba i tona takav način da nakon što bude “ skinut “ jedanpovršinski sloj, dolazi pod udar procesa habanjasledeći površinski sloj, itd.Ako uporedimo dejstvo abrazije sa brušenjem ilirezanjem kao procesima mehaničke obradematerijala, prva konstatacija je da većina abrazivnihčestica ima negativan ugao rezanja. Zbog toga oneizazivaju na površinama, po kojima se taru,karakteristične ogrebotine-abrazivne brazde,praćene velikom plastičnom deformacijom itečenjem materijala.Istovremeno efekat rezanja, koji varira odčestice do čestice, zahvaljujući izvjesnomsmicajnom dejstvu, čiji je uzrok opet negativanrezni ugao, produkuje mikro strugotinu, a to jenačin odnošenja materijala – abrazije.U toku procesa habanja bagerskog zuba prisutnaje situacija, što se geometrije zuba tiče, kao naslici 2.Početna kontura vrha zuba prikazana je linijom“0”. Linije “1” do “6” prikazuju konture zuba ufunkciji vremena habanja u radu. Kada se zubpohaba za veličinu h b koja je za zube postojećekonstrukcije otprilike 30÷40 mm, na odrađenih200÷250 radnih časova geometrijski izgled vrhazuba predstavljen je linijom – “6”. Tada se vršiskidanje pohabanih zuba, stavljaju se novi ilireparirani, a pohabani šalju na reparaturu.Slika 2. Faze habanja zubaKapacitet rotornog bagera zavisi uglavnom odrada podsistema za kopanje. Tu je veliki doprinospravilnih i oštrih zuba kada je i kapacitet najveći. Ufunkciji vremena dolazi do zatupljenja zuba usljedabrazivnog habanja, odnosno do promjene njihovoggeometrijskog oblika. Usljed zatupljenja zubapovećava se i otpor kopanju, a s tim u vezi dolazido povećanog opterećenja prenosnika, pa i čitavekonstrukcije podsistema kopanja.Konačno, ovo ima za posljedicu promjenurežima rada bagera, dolazi do smanjenja njegovogkapaciteta, što se negativno odražava na ekonomskeefekte proizvodnje.4. PRILAGOĐAVANJE GEOMETRIJEOBLIKA ZUBAZub rotornog bagera, koji je u ovom radupredmet interesovanja, predstavlja kao pojam –mašinski element. Kada tretiramo konstrukciju bilokog mašinskog elementa onda se tu prvenstvenomisli na definisanje: geometrijskog oblika, materijala, kvaliteta obrade i termičke obradeOvom prilikom ćemo se ograničiti na aspektgeo-metrije zuba. Da bi na izvjestan načinkvantificirali nivo po-habanosti zuba, pristupilo semjerenju pojasa pohabanosti. Usvojen je dužinskiparametar h b prema sl.2, kao pokazatelj istrošenostizuba. Ova veličina je mjerena u određenimvremenskim razmacima pa su na osnovu tihmjerenja konstru-isani dijagrami zavisnosti h b =f(t),sl.3.442 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Slika 3. Kriva habanjaNa tom dijagramu uočljive su tri zone. U prvojdolazi do početnog intenzivnog habanja zuba.Kasnije zona II , zub se ravnomjerno i umjerenohaba, da bi se u zoni III počeo intenzivno habati itada se pristupa zamjeni zuba. Opredeljujućaveličina za zamjenu zuba je veličina t 0 – teorijskivijek trajanja. Poznato je iz prakse da se zub nemijenja striktno po isteku perioda t 0 nego posleperioda t z , koji se nalazi u tolerantnoj zoni t tol uodnosu na t 0 . Veličina t z se može iskustvenodefinisati relacijom:t z = ( 1±0,2) t 0Geometriju zuba smo modelirali tako da smo zaizbranu geometrijsku varijantu snimali krivuhabanja zuba i upoređivali izdržljivost zuba prematako konstruisanoj krivoj habanja uz praćenjepopratnih pojava uzrokovanih habanjem zuba.4.1. Varijanta sa originalnim zubimaZatečeno stanje zuba na rotornom bageru je, ugeometrijskom smislu, potpuno isto kao što jeproizvođač bagera isporučio u originalnom obliku,sl.4.Slika 5. Geometrijski izgled vedrice saoriginalnim zubimaMjerenja parametra habanja h b , sl.2 ikonstruisanje krive habanja, sl.3 vršena su zanekoliko zuba na najopterećenijem mjestu navedrici - čeoni zub (rezač) pa na dijagramu, sl.6dajemo izgled krive habanja za te pozicije zuba.Konstatovano je da zub izdrži 200 ÷ 250 radnihčasova dok se pohaba u nivou od h b 40 mm.Slika 6. Kriva habanja za originalni zub4.2. Varijanta IIUčinjena je izmjena samo u domenu geometrijezuba, a kvalitet materijala od koga je zubnapravljen nije mijenjan. Predložena jegeometrijska forma na osnovu savremenih stručnihsaznanja, te iskustava drugih rudnika koji koristerotorne bagere, sl.7 dok su na sl. 8 definisaniosnovni geometrijski parametri zuba učvršćenog navedrici prema radnoj sredini.Slika 4. Originalni oblik bagerskog zubaGeometrijski izgled zuba i vedrice sarelevantnim geometrijskim parametrima dat je nasl.5Slika 7. Oblik bagerskog zuba varijante II13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 443


Nakon tih prepravki dobili smo geometrijskiizgled zuba kao na sl. 9 sa geometrijskimparametrima u zahvatu prema radnoj sredini kao nasl.10.Slika 8. Geometrijski izgled vedrice sazubima varijante IIKonstatovan je mirniji rad bagera jer jeobezbjeđeno da zubi postepeno prodiru u radnusredinu, postoji klin i u vertikalnoj i u horizontalnojravni, a radni dio zuba je znatno duži u odnosu naoriginalnu varijantu zuba. Vedrica je manjeotvorena prema bloku koji se kopa, što ima zaposljedicu manje “struganje” vedrice od radni blok.Prema instrumentima u kabini rukovaoca bagerazaključeno je da se otpori kopanju savlađuju uzmanju angažovanu snagu mašine.Takođe, konstatovan je značajan porastčasovnog kapaciteta bagera, što se objašnjavapovećanjem radne dužine zuba i manjim leđnimuglom. Prilikom ispitivanja ove konstrukcije zubasu primijećena i izvjesne negativnosti. Naime, usledojačanog i previše isturenog leđnog dijela zuba,uočeno je da se taj leđni dio previše ukopava uradnu sredinu. Drugim rječima, taj leđni dio ne ideu otkopanu masu, koju je prethodno vrh zubarazorio, nego on svojim leđnim, isturenim dijelom“gnječi” radnu sredinu. Taj razlog, uz previšedugačak radni dio zuba (L=180 mm) dovodio je dotoga da su zubi savijani, plastično deformisani ilomljeni u dijelu drške i vrata zuba. [5].Zbog ove negativnosti nije se ni pristupalokonstrukciji krive habanja za ovu vrstu zuba.4.3. Varijanta IIIPoslije uočenih nedostataka po prethodnojvarijanti, ispitivanja su obustavljena i pristupilo seispravkama na geometrijskom izgledu zuba: dužina radnog dijela skraćena je naL=165 mm, smanjeno je ojačanje leđnog dijela, zub je prema radnoj sredini otvoren na13°14’7”, izvršeno je bolje pasovanje drške zuba u“džep” i eliminisano je aksijalno pomjeranje zuba u“džepu”.Slika 9. Geometrijski izgled zuba varijante IIISlika 10. Geometrijski izgled vedrice sazubima varijante IIIOsnovna zapažanja u vezi rada bagera saovakvim zubima su: Bager je imao miran rad bez udara ivibracija sa izraženim amplitudama. Ovo seobjašnjava time što je konstrukcija zubasamim vrhom prilagođena da postepenoulazi u radnu sredinu i izaziva manje otporekopanju i manje podrhtavanje bagera.Tome je doprinijela i prilagođenost leđnogugla zuba u sprezi sa vedricom premaradnoj sredini. Časovni kapacitet bagera je veći za 15 do20% u odnosu na rad sa originalnimzubima. Proces kopanja se odvija uz značajnomanju angažovanu snagu mašine nego sazubima originalne izvedbe. Manji su otpori kopanju. Leđni dio zuba je manje isturen pa nemaneželjenog opterećenja koje je zaposljedicu imalo lomljenje zuba.444 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Mjereni su parametri habanja i prilikomkonstrukcije krive habanja za čeone zube jekonstatovano da je znatno duži vijektrajanja ove konstrukcije i da iznosi 300 ÷350 radnih časova, sl.11.Rezultati ovih istraživanja mogu se primjeniti savelikom pouzdanošću na kopove sa sličnim radnimuslovima.LITERATURASlika 11. Kriva habanja čeonog zuba varijante IIIBudući da je radna dužina ove konstrukcije zubaza 20 mm veća od odgovarajućeg dijela naoriginalnom zubu to se reperna dužina parametrahabanja h b od 40 mm može povećati na 50 mm, paimajući to u vidu radni vijek zuba ove konstrukcijemože iznositi i do 500 radnih časova.Ova geometrijska varijanta usvojena je, urađenagarnitura zuba za potpunu zamjenu na rotornombageru i kroz duži period eksploatacije u dobrojmjeri potvrdila pretpostavke iz eksperimentalnefaze.[1] S. Tanasijević: Osnovi tribologije mašinskihelemenata, Naučna knjiga, Beograd 1989.[2] Z. Jugović: Uticaj abrazivnog habanja zubarotornog bagera na njegovu pouzdanost, Zbornikradova, Yutrib ’91 Kragujevac 1991.[3] B. Ivković: Osnovi tribologije u industriji prerademetala, Građevinska knjiga, Beograd 1990.[4] V. Vukotić: Prilog istraživanju efektivnosti složenihenergetskih sistema sa stanovišta integralnesistemske podrške (logistike) sa posebnim osvrtomna područje I BTO sistema rudnika “Gacko”,Magistarski rad, Mašinski fakultet Mostar 1983.[5] V. Vukotić: Povećanje pouzdanosti podsistemakopanja rotornih bagera poboljšanjem tribološkihkarakteristika reznih elemenata, Doktorska disertacija,Mašinski fakultet Kragujevac, 2002.ZAKLJUČAKU sklopu provedenih istraživanja na rotormbageru ER 1250 koji je u eksploataciji u sklopurudnika „Gacko“ učinjen je pokušaj da se istiprilagodi uslovima radne sredine preko optimizacijegeometrijskih parametara reznih elemenata – zuba.Na osnovu polaznih teoretskih postavki izoblasti pouzdanosti proizvodnih sistema, tekarakteristika triboloških procesa na reznimelementima vršena su ispitivanja pouzdanostipodsistema kopanja rotornog bagera koristeći upočetku zube originalne konstrukcije isporučiocabagera a posle u nekoliko varijanti zube predloženegeometrijske izvedbe. Modeliranjem tribološkihkarakteristika zuba na rotornom bageru podešavanjemgeometrijskih parametara istih, kao što jeprikazano u radu, rezultat poboljšanja kroz predloženugeometrijsku varijantu zuba imamo: Manje otpore kopanju, Manji iznos habanja zuba, Veću eksploatacionu pouzdanostpodsistema kopanja, a u vezi s tim i samogrotornog bagera, Veći radni vijek zuba, Manje troškove održavanja bagera, Mirniji rad bagera i Veći specifični kapacitet bagera.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 445


Serbian TribologySocietySERBIATRIB ‘1313 th International Conference onTribologyKragujevac, Serbia, 15 – 17 May 2013Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineeringin KragujevacPONAŠANJE NEHRĐAJUĆIH ČELIKA U KOMBINIRANIMUVJETIMA TROŠENJAGoran Rozing 1 , Antun Pintarić 2 , Desimir Jovanović 3 , Vlatko Marušić 41 Elektrotehnički fakultet Osijek, Hrvatska, goran.rozing@etfos.hr2 Elektrotehnički fakultet Osijek, Hrvatska, antun.pintaric@etfos.hr3 Zastava oružje, Srbija, j.desimir@gmail.com4 Strojarski fakultet Slavonski Brod, Hrvatska, vlatko.marusic@sfsb.hrApstrakt: Glavna karika u proizvodnji sirovog ulja svakako je pužna preša, koja služi za isprešavanje icijeđenje ulja iz samljevenog i zagrijanog uljnog sjemenja. U tijeku tog procesa dolazi do odnošenja česticametala s radnih površina preše, iz čega se može zaključiti da tribosustav čine, radni dijelovi preše isuncokretovo sjemenje. Osim navedenog neizbježnog trošenja, u ovom radu analiziran je i utjecajkorozijskog trošenja dijelova pužne preše nastalog kao posljedica agresivnog djelovanja medija. Navedenatrošenja ukazuju da kod pužne preše prevladavaju kombinirani uvjeti trošenja. Na ispitnim uzorcimaizrađenim od austenitnih korozijskih postojanih čelika AISI 316L i AISI 304 provedeno je nitrokarburiranjeu cilju povećanja tvrdoće u površinskom sloju, koja dovodi do povoljnijih triboloških svojstava. Za potrebeeksperimentalnog rada provedena su ispitivanja korozijskog ponašanja uzoraka, ispitivanja kemijskogsastava osnovnog materijala, mehaničkih svojstava i analiza mikrostrukture. Zaključeno je da se mogućipristup produljenju vijeka dijelova sastoji ne samo u materijalu nego i u izboru postupka toplinske obrade,kojom će se postići povećanje tvrdoće odnosno povoljnija tribološka svojstva uz zadovoljavajuću korozijskuotpornost.Ključne reči: trošenje, pužna preša, nehrđajući čelici, nitrokarburiranje, korozijska otpornost1. UVODProblemi trenja i trošenja u praksi su vrlokompleksni zbog odvijanja mnogostrukihtriboloških procesa. Stoga je nužna brižljivaneposredna i posredna analiza svih komponenata iutjecaja u tribosustavu 1. Jedan od takvihkompleksnih primjera trošenja je i pužna preša,koja služi za isprešavanje i cijeđenje ulja izsamljevenog i zagrijanog uljnog sjemenja. Procescijeđenja jestivog ulja ovisi o mnogo parametarakoji se mijenjaju u ovisnosti o vrsti uljnogsjemenja, načinu njegove pripreme i tipu preše.Nakon djelomičnog ljuštenja i kondicioniranjavodenom parom, pripremljeno sjemenjemehaničkim putem se cijedi u pužnoj preši. Utijeku tog procesa dolazi do odnošenja česticametala s radnih površina preše, iz čega se možezaključiti da tribosustav čine, radni dijelovi preše isuncokretovo sjemenje. Uzroci trošenja radnihdijelova preše (segmenata pužnice, jarmova inoževa cjedilne korpe) su djelovanje česticamikroabraziva SiO 2 x nH 2 O u suncokretovomsjemenu [2]. Mikroabraziv sadržan u ljuscisuncokreta troši radne dijelove preše a taj proces jenemoguće izbjeći. Trošenje se manifestiraoštećivanjem napadnih bridova radnih dijelovapreše tj. smanjenja njihovih dimenzija i promjenegeometrije pr<strong>of</strong>ila. Kao rezultat toga dolazi dosmanjenja efikasnosti cijeđenja ulja [3]. Osimspomenutog neizbježnog trošenja nakon 4,5 godine(16630 sati) rada nastupilo je oštećenje izazvanodjelovanjem agresivnog medija (kisele supare), amanifestiralo se pojavom tribokorozije nadosjednim dijelovima reduktora koje su u kontaktus dosjednim površinama cjedila. Tadašnji pristupproduljenju vijeka istrošenih dosjednih površinasastojao se od zamjene istrošenih površinapoluprstenovima izrađenim od korozijskipostojanih čelika (EN X2CrNiMo18, AISI 316L,EN) i (EN X5CrNi18-10, AISI 304) u sirovomstanju. Opisana trošenja ukazuju da kod pužne446 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


preše prevladavaju kombinirani uvjeti trošenja kojise mogu opisati kao proces koji vodi ka degradacijimetalnih materijala, koja je rezultat mehaničkogkontakta, kombiniranog sa korozijskim djelovanjemagresivne okoline.2. ISPITIVANJA UZORAKA/DIJELOVA UPUŽNOJ PREŠI ZA ZAVRŠNO PREŠANJEIz iskustva proizilazi da je trenje i trošenjematerijala svojstvo sustava, jer na procese osimmaterijala elemenata tribosustava utječekonstrukcijska izvedba tribosustava, vrste i načinopterećenja te naprezanja, način podmazivanja idrugi čimbenici. Stoga se svaki problem morarješavati individualno, ali uzimajuči u obzirtemeljne parametre i utjecajne veličine utribosustavu 1. Nakon što su poluprsteni dvijekampanje rada pužne preše za završno prešanjekapaciteta 100t/dan bili u uporabi, premaprethodnom dogovoru, preša je rastavljena u ciljuvađenja ispitnih poluprstena. Obavljena je vizualnakontrola površina na kojima su bili ugrađeni ispitnipoluprsteni. S obzirom na to da su svi poluprsteniradili u istim uvjetima, odnosno da se vizualno neuočavaju razlike u izgledu poluprstena dosjedne izaptivne površine, ocjenjeno je da su za potrebeistraživanja u ovome radu i donošenjeodgovarajućih zaključaka dovoljni poluprsteni sreduktora i s dosjedne površine cjedila. Na slici 1prikazan je vanjski izgled poluprstena na svimpovršinama prije skidanja za potrebe ispitivanja.pregled površina svih skinutih poluprstena.Kakateristično je uočiti da se golim okom neuočavaju pojave korozijskih oštećenja, ali da suprisutni tanki slojevi praškastih taloga,najvjerojatnije mješavine korozijskih produkataosnovnog materijala kućišta/cjedila (GS-42CrMo4)i sitnih čestica mliva. Izgled površine poluprstenana vratu kućišta reduktora i polutke cjedila prešeprikazan je na slici 2.Slika 2. Poluprsten prije demontaže s praškastimtalozima nakon ispitivanja uporabom u preši tip EP 16Bitno je istaknuti da se na površinama osnovnogmaterijala kako kućišta reduktora, tako i cjedilauočava prisustvo taloga ali i da su te površineintenzivno oštećene korozijom, pri čemu se dubinaoštećenja može procjeniti na 3 do 4 mm.Dimenzionalnom kontrolom pomoću pomičnogmjerila utvrđeno je da nije došlo do smanjenjadebljine niti jednog poluprstena, na svima jeizmjerna debljina 7 mm. Detaljnim pregledomvanjskih površina svih poluprstena, promatranjempod SEM TOPO (skening elektronskimmikroskopom), utvrđeno je da se mogu uočititragovi nastali kao posljedica abrazijskog trošenjasitnim česticama mliva, zatim adhezijom uslijedkontakta poluprstena vrata reduktora spoluprstenom dosjedne površine, ali i oštećenja uformi rupica kao posljedica korozije, slika 3. Naunutarnjim površinama, koje su bile dotegnute naosnovni materijal, promatranjem pod SEM TOPOuočeno je lokalno rupičasto oštećenje, slika 4.Slika 1. Vrat kućišta reduktora i površine polutke cjedilaprije skidanja poluprstenaOdgovarajućim strugačima pažljivo su skinutiuzorci korozijskih produkata za potrebe kemijskeanalize. Utvrđeno je da u sastavu dominirakorozijski produkat željezni oksid tipa FeO/Fe 2 O 3 ,ali i da su prisutni tragovi čestica organskogporijekla iz mliva. Puno je bitniji podatak da jeanalizom kisele supare utvrđeno da se radi okiselini karbonilnog tipa (zbog prisustva isparljivihmasnih kiselina) i još važnije da izmjereni pHsupare iznosi iznosi oko 5,2. Obavljen je vizualniSlika 3. Karakteristični izgled vanjske površinepoluprstena nakon uporabe, SEM TOPO13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 447


Slika 4. Karakteristični izgled unutarnje površinepoluprstena nakon uporabe, SEM TOPOTo je oštećenje najvjerojatnije posljedicadjelovanja kombinacije kiselina karbonilnog tipa ivodene pare koje su se nakon kondenziranja„slijevale“ preko dijelova preše i ipak prodrle uzonu kontakta poluprsten/osnovni materijal, bezobzira na to što su napravom stegnute, pri čemu jesilikonska brtva trebala onemogućiti prodor supare.Izabrani nadomjesni materijali AISI 316L i AISI304 po svom kemijskom sastavu spadaju u grupuaustenitnih nehrđajućih čelika, koji imaju primjenuu prehrambenoj i procesnoj industriji. Naime,ukupno su u dva ciklusa bili u proizvodnomprocesu oko 5000 sati (kroz dvije kalendarskegodine). U odnosu na materijal kućišta GS-42CrMo4 znatno su se pokazali postojanijima. Napoluprstenima izrađenim iz varijantnih materijalaTablica 1. Rezultati ispitivanja kemijskog sastava uzoraka 316L i 304utvrđeni su isti mehanizmi trošenja, pri čemu nisuuočene značajnije razlike u intenzitetu, kakoabrazijskog i adhezijskog tako i korozijskog, bezobzira na razlike u kemijskom sastavu. Tvrdoćaugrađenog nadomjesnog materijala je iznosila oko170180 HV, što se u pogonskim uvjetimapokazalo relativno dostatno, a to potvrđuju imikroskopski snimci (slika 3 i 4) koji pokazujutragove abrazijskog trošenja, adhezije ali i rupičastekorozije. Prva dva mehanizma trošenja su prisutnijana vanjskoj strani poluprstena cjedila, dok je trećimehanizam prisutniji na unutarnjoj strani. Razlogepojave abrazijskog trošenja treba tražiti u sastavumliva točnije u sadržaju SiO 2 x nH 2 O iz ljuskesuncokreta kao glavnog nositelja abrazivnihsvojstava ljuske suncokreta. Pojavu rupičastekorozije može se pojasniti zbog prisutnosti tzv.“kisele supare“.3. EKSPERIMENTALNI DIOIspitivanja kemijskog sastava provedena su nauzorcima oba varijantna čelika u dostavnom stanju.Kemijskom analizom materijala određen je sastavprisutnih elemenata. Za određivanje kemijskogsastava korištena je spektrometrijska metoda, aispitivanja su izvršena uređajem BELEC. Rezultatiispitivanja kemijskog sastava uzoraka (materijalEN X2CrNiMo18-14-3, AISI 316L i materijal ENX5CrNi18-10, AISI 304) prikazani su u tablici 1.MaterijalKemijski sastav [%]C Mn Si Cr Ni Mo V W Ti, Fe316L 0,048 1,224 0,438 16,71 10,08 2,124 0,124 0,185 0,112 68,40304 0,045 1,295 0,651 18,02 8,11 0,414 0,114 80,19 0,007 70,68Tvrdoća i otpornost trošenju austenitnihnehrđajućih čelika može se bitno povećati, a da pritome ne dolazi do značajnog gubitka otpornosti nakoroziju. Jedan od pristupa kako bi se povećalapovršinska tvrdoća i otpornost trošenju čelika jepostupak nitriranja koji nudi visokodimenzijskustabilnost obratka 4. Nitriranje je postupakotvrdnjavanja površine difuzijom dušika upovršinske slojeve i promjena kemijskog sastavačelika [5]. Obzirom na to da na varijantnimmaterijalima poluprstena nisu nakon uporabeuočena korozijska oštećenja koja bi svojimintenzitetom bila uzročnik prestanka funkcionalnograda pužne preše, zaključeno je da bi senitrokarburiranjem varijantnih materijala moglodoprinjeti bitnom povećanju tvrdoće u površinskomsloju koja bi se odrazila na povoljnija tribološkasvojstva i produljenje vijeka tribosustava pužnihpreša za završno prešanje. Postupaknitrokarburiranja bio je sljedeći: uzorci su prvopredgrijani na temperaturu υ p =380 o C, u trajanju od3 sata i potom uronjeni u solnu kupku (volumena1m 3 ) zagrijanu na 580 o C u trajanju od 5 sati. Nakontoga uzorci su hlađeni na zraku.3.1 Ispitivanje strukture varijantnih materijalanakon nitrokarburiranjaMetalografska ispitivanja uzoraka oba varijantnamaterijala nakon nitrokarburiranja daju cjelovitusliku o njihovom mikrostrukturnom stanju. Analizamikrostrukture uzoraka obrađenih postupkomnitriranja omogućava promatranje i ruba i jezgreispitnog uzorka. Mikrostruktura rubnog dijelanitrokarburiranih uzoraka čelika AISI 316L i AISI304 prikazana je na slici 5.448 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


a) b)Slika 5. Karakteristična mikrostruktura nitriranog čelika, povećanje 240xa) uzorak 316L, b) uzorak 3043.2 Ispitivanje mikrotvrdoća varijantnihmaterijala nakon nitrokarburiranjaIspitivanje mikrotvrdoća provedena su uređajemDURIMET Leitz metodom Vickers HV 0,025(opterećenje 0,25 N) i HV 0,5 (opterećenje 5 N), nakojemu je obavljeno i mjerenje tvrdoće osnovnihvarijantnih materijala. Rezultati ispitivanjamikrotvrdoća uzoraka oba čelika metodom VickersHV0,025 dijagramski su prikazani na slici 6a) b)Slika 6. Dijagramski prikaz toka mikrotvrdoća iodređivanja dubine nitriranog sloja uzorka čelika, a) 316L i b) 304Izmjerene vrijednosti tvrdoća poboljšanog uzorkačeličnog lijeva (materijal GS-42CrMo4) kreću seod 230 do 280 HV 0,5.3.3 Elektrokemijska korozijska ispitivanjamodificiranih površina uzorakaU eksperimentalnom dijelu ispitana suelektrokemijska svojstva nekih čelika oznaka AISI316L, AISI 304 i GS-42CrMo4 u zasićenojvodenoj otopini s CO 2 , vrijednosti pH 4,8 do 5 pritemperaturi 50°C, kako bi se simulirali stvarniuvjeti agresivne okoline u kojima se odvija trošenjeradnih dijelova preše. Uzorci za ispitivanjepripremljeni su na dimenziju Ø16x8 mm.Elektrokemijska korozijska DC ispitivanjaprovedena su sukladno normi ASTM G5-94 [6] nauređaju Potentiostat/Galvanostat Model 273AEG&E uz primjenu programa S<strong>of</strong>tCorr III uLaboratoriju za zaštitu materijala, Fakultetastrojarstva i brodogradnje u Zagrebu. Mjerenja suprovedena u odnosu na referentnu zasićenu kalomelelektrodu (ZKE) poznatog potencijala + 0,242 Vprema standardnoj vodikovoj elektrodi. Određenisu parametri opće korozije: korozijski potencijal(E cor ), gustoća korozijske struje (j cor ), brzinakorozije (v kor ), polarizacijski otpor (R p ), pitingpotencijal (E pit ) i zaštitni piting potencijal (Ezpit).Korozijski potencijal Ecor određen je mjerenjempromjene potencijala u vremenu od 1000 s.Polarizacijski otpor materijala R p je određen izTafelovog dijagrama za podruĉje polarizacije ±20mV u odnosu na korozijski potencijal. Rezultatielektrokemijskih ispitivanja prikazani prikazani suu tablici 2.13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 449


Tablica 2. Rezultati elektrokemijskih korozijskih ispitivanja uzorakaMaterijal/stanjeβ AV/dekβ KV/dekJ corA/cm 2 V cormm/godR pcm 2 AISI304, nitrirano 0,078 0,103 6,62 0,067 3282AISI316L, nitrirano 0,988 0,039 6,71 0,069 5254GS-42CrMo4, poboljšano 0,088 0,598 86,62 1,003 250Ciklička potenciodinamička polarizacijska mjerenjaprovedena su na uzorcima AISI 316L, AISI 304 iGS-42CrMo4 u zasićenoj vodenoj otopini s CO 2 ,vrijednosti pH 4,8 do 5 pri temperaturi 50°C. Naslici 7 prikazan je dijagram cikličke polarizacije, ana slici 8 makrostrukturalne snimke uzoraka.Slika 7. Dijagram cikličke polarizacije nitriranog uzorka 316L, 304 i poboljšanog uzorka GS-42CrMo4Slika 8. Makro prikaz površine nitriranog uzorka 316L, 304 i poboljšanog uzorka GS-42CrMo4nakon cikličke polarizacije4. ANALIZA REZULTATA I ZAKLJUČAKNa poluprstenima izrađenim iz varijantnihmaterijala različitog kemijskog sastava utvrđeni suisti mehanizmi trošenja, pri čemu nisu uočeneznačajnije razlike u intenzitetu, kako abrazijskog iadhezijskog tako i korozijskog trošenja. Analizomuvjeta rada pužnih preša za završno prešanjezaključeno je da se abrazivno djelovanje vrlotvrdog SiO 2 x nH 2 O (oko 1100 HV) ne možeizbjeći, ali se može smanjiti povećanjem tvrdoćedijelova preše. U tome smislu zaključeno je da bi senitriranjem varijantnih materijala moglo doprinijetibitnom povećanju produljenja vijekareprezentantnog tribosustava pužnih preša zazavršno prešanje. Na uzorcima izrađenim iz450 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


varijantnih materijala u dostavnom stanju i unitriranom stanju te na uzorcima osnovnogmaterijala provedena su ispitivanja otpornosti naelektrokemijsku koroziju, kako bi se simuliraliuvjeti agresivne okoline u kojima se odvija raddijelova preše. Rezultati elektrokemijskihispitivanja prikazanih u tablici 2, ukazuju damaterijali AISI 316L i AISI 304 imaju dvadesetputa veće vrijednosti polarizacijskog otpora R p uodnosu na materijal GS-42CrMo4. Vrijednostbrzine korozije za austenitne korozijski postojanečelike je podjednaka i četrnaest puta je manja negoza čelični lijev GS-42CrMo4. Iz dijagrama cikličkihpolarizacija (slika 7) vidljivo je da nitrirani uzorciaustenitnih čelika 316L i 304 ne pokazuju sklonostrupičastoj koroziji niti koroziji u procjepu, dokmaterijala GS-42CrMo4 pokazuje sklonostrupičastoj koroziji i koroziji u procjepu štopotvrđuje makrostrukturalna snimka površinenakon ispitivanja. Analizom navedenih podatakamože se potvrditi da se postupkomnitrokarburiranja u solnoj kupki znatno povećavatvrdoća površine što je bio jedan od traženihzahtjeva. Istovremeno dolazi do povećanja brzinekorozije (0,067 0,069 mm/god), ali ta brzina jeznatno manja od granične vrijednosti koja iznosi0,1 mm/god, prema kriteriju primjenjivosti metala sobzirom na prosječnu brzinu prodiranja općekorozije.LITERATURA[1] T. Filetin, K. Grilec: Postupci modificiranja iprevlačenja površina, Hrvatsko društvo zamaterijale i tribologiju, Zagreb, 2004.[2] V. Ivušić, V. Marušić, K. Grilec: Abrasionresistance <strong>of</strong> surface layers, VTT Symposium 180&COST516 Tribology Symposium, VTT TechnicalResearche Centre <strong>of</strong> Finland, pp. 201-210, 1998.[3] G. Rozing, M. Katinić, V. Marušić: Nekespecifičnosti utjecaja dominatnog mehanizmatrošenja na pristup održavanju pužnih preša, 16.Međunarodno savjetovanje ODRŽAVANJE 2010Zagreb: HDO Hrvatsko-društvo održavatelja, pp.120-126, 2010.[4] B. Vasiljević, B. Nedić: Modifikovanje površina,Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Mašinski fakultet uKragujevcu, Jugoslovensko društvo za tribologiju,Kragujevac, 2003.[5] A. Triwiyanto, P. Hussain, A. Rahman, M.C. Ismail:The Influence <strong>of</strong> Nitriding Time <strong>of</strong> AISI 316LStainless Steel on Microstructure and TribologicalProperties, Asian Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research,Vol.6, pp .323-330, 2013.[6] ASTM G5 – 94: Standard Reference Test Methodfor Making Potentiostatic and PotentiodynamicAnodic Polarization Measurements.STAINLESS STEEL BEHAVIOR UNDER COMBINED CONDITIONS OFWEARAbstract: The key element in the production <strong>of</strong> raw oil is definitely the worm press, which is used forpressing and extrusion <strong>of</strong> oil from ground and heated oil seeds. During this process, metal particles areworn from the working surfaces <strong>of</strong> the press, which indicates that the tribosystem consists <strong>of</strong> working parts<strong>of</strong> the press and sunflower seeds. Next to the aforementioned unavoidable wear, damage due to aggressivemedia was also observed. Wear described above indicate that at worm press overcome combined wearconditions. On the test samples made <strong>of</strong> austenitic staineless steel AISI 316L and AISI 304 nitrocarburisingwas conducted to increase hardness in surface layer, which leads to better tribological properties. In theexperimental part <strong>of</strong> paper, there were tested corrosion behaviour <strong>of</strong> samples, chemical composition <strong>of</strong> basematerial, mechanical properties and microstructure analysis. It was concluded that possible extension <strong>of</strong> lifetime consists not only in material but also in heat treatment selection, by which increase <strong>of</strong> hardness will beachieved with reference to better tribological properties with satisfactory corrosion resistance.Keywords: wear, worm press, stainless steel, nitrocarburising, corrosion resistance13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 451


Authors IndexAAbdullah O. I. 210Adamović D. 87, 147, 261, 265, 359Adewale T. M. 160Akram W. 251Al-Shabibi A. M. 210Alaneme K. K. 160Aleksandrović S. 261, 265, 275, 281, 359Arsic D. 359Assenova E. 21BBabić M. 87, 106, 124, 129, 141,409Babić Ž. 230Babič M. 348, 351, 355Badita L-L. 331Balaz P. 55Banić M. 286, 302, 320, 388Baralić J. 217Bartz J. Wilfried 3Baqai A. A. 251Belič I. 348, 351, 355Bezjazychnyj V. F. 195Blagojević M. 230, 234Bobić B. 106, 409Bobić I. 106, 124, 129, 141, 409Bogdanović B. 147, 341Botan M. 113Bouzakis E. 10, 13Bouzakis K.-D. 10, 13, 270, 364Buciumeanu M. 80Bursuc D. C. 331CCapitanu L. 58, 331Charalampous P. 13Chen Y.S. 102Chern K.W. 102Chern S. Y. 102Chowdhury M. A. 65Crnojević C. 433ČČabrilo D. 440Čukić R. 275, 281Čupović M. 414DDeleanu L. 113, 119Doni Z. 80Drożyner P. 222Dugić G. 308Dugić M. 308Dugić P. 308ĐĐapan M. 380, 384, 396Đordjevic M. 359Djukić M. 401DžDžunić D. 75, 124, 129, 141, 261FFabian M. 55Fedrizzi L. 46, 169Florescu V. 331EEliyas A. 55Erić M. 401GGeorgescu C. 113, 119Gidikova N. 42Gligorijević B. 75Globočki Lakić G. 292, 314Grigoriev A.Ya. 4Grkić A. 240Grujović N. 92Gulzar M. 204HHacikadiroğlu H. 98Horng J.H. 102IIlić A. 226Ivanova B. 26, 31Ivanović L. 226JJanković M. 314Janković P. 217Jeremić B. 380, 384, 396Jeremić M. 147, 34113 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 453


Jovanović D. 414, 446KKaleicheva J. 37Kaleli H. 98Kandeva M. 21, 26, 31, 42, 55Kao W.H. 102Karastoianov D. 31Katavić B. 75Katirtzoglou G. 13Kojić B. 308Kokol P. 348, 351, 355Kopač J. 292Kostić N. 230Kostova N.G. 55Kramar D. 292Krstić B. 275, 281LLandoulsi J. 92Lanzutti A. 46, 169Lazić V. 275, 281, 359Lekka M. 46MMačkić T. 230Mačužić I. 380, 384, 396Makrimallakis S. 13Mandić V. 261Manivasagam G. 92Manojlović J. 153, 177Mansour G. 364Marin E., 46, 169Marinković A. 135, 247Marjanović V. 234Marković S. Lj. 420Matejić M. 234Matrušić V. 414, 446Michailidis N. 10Mijajlović M. 302, 320, 388Miletić I. 226Milfelner M. 348, 351, 355Miloradović N. 129, 141Milosavljević D. 275, 281Milošević Miloš 286, 302, 388Milošević Marko 380Milović Lj. 420Miltenović A. 286, 302, 320, 388Miltenović Đ. 320Miljanić D. 341Mitrović S. 87, 106, 124, 129, 141,147, 261, 409Mitsi S. 270Mrdak M. R. 426Mufti R. A. 204Mukhopadhyay A. 373Mutavdžić M. 275Myhkin N.K. 4NNapiórkowski J. 222Nedeljković B. 281Nedić B. 75, 217, 240, 292, 314,414Nikolaevich F. R. 198Nikolić M. 302Nikolić R. 275, 281Nuruzzaman D. M. 65OÖzkan D. 98PPalaghian L. 80Pantić M. 124, 129Panjan P. 348, 351, 355Papadimitriou A. 270Paraskevopoulou R. 13Pelemis S. 87Pintarić A. 446Sreten S. 240Petkov V. 42Petrović V. 92Pirvu C. 119Pojidaeva V. 31Polzer G. 21QQasim S. A. 204RRadenković M. 380, 384Radovanović M. 314Ranđelović S. 147, 341Rezwan A. H. M. 65Richard C. 92Ristivojević M. 433Roy B. K. 65Rozing G. 446Rus D., 58SSagalovych A., 184Sagalovych V. 184Samad S. 65Sarker R. 65Schlattmann J. 210Simić A. 147, 341454 13 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13


Simić B. 234Skoko D. 433Skordaris G. 10Sredanović B. 292Stamenković D. 286, 302, 388Stanković M. 135, 247Stefanović M. 261, 265, 359Stojanović B. 129, 141, 226Stojiljković B. 420Sutyagin A. N. 195Szczyglak P. 222TTadić B. 341, 396Todorović P. 147, 341, 380, 384, 396Topalović M. 265Tsermaa 21Tsiafis I. 270Tzetzis D. 364VValov R. 42Vencl A. 75, 106, 135, 409Vujanac R. 234Vukotić V. 440ZZia U. A. 251ŽŽivić F. 87, 92, 124, 265Živković M. 265YYüksek L. 98WWei C.C. 10213 th International Conference on Tribology – Serbiatrib’13 455


CIP - Каталогизација у публикацијиНародна библиотека Србије, Београд621.89(082)66.017:531.43(082)539.375.6(082)INTERNATIONAL Conference on Tribology (13 ;2013 ; Kragujevac)<strong>Proceedings</strong> / 13th InternationalConference on Tribology - SERBIATRIB <strong>'13</strong>,15-17 May 2013., Kragujevac, Serbia ;[organized by] Serbian Tribology Society[and] Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, University <strong>of</strong>Kragujevac ; editors Miroslav Babic, SlobodanMitrovic. - Kragujevac : Serbian TribologySociety : Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering, 2013(Kragujevac : Kopirnica Masinac). - [12], 455str. : ilustr. ; 24 cmRadovi na srp. i engl. jeziku. - Tekststampan dvostubacno. - Tiraz 100. - Str.[5-6]: Preface / editors. - Bibliografija uzsvaki rad. - Abstracts. - Registar.ISBN 978-86-86663-98-61. Бабић, Мирослав [уредник] [аутор додатногтекста] 2. Serbian Tribology Society(Kragujevac)a) Трибологија - Зборници b) Машинскиматеријали - Триболошке особине - Зборнициc) Хабање - Зборници d) Мазива - ЗборнициCOBISS.SR-ID 198310412


tribology in industryISSN 0354-8996VOLUME 332011.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!