11.07.2015 Views

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

Download the document - Global CCS Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Because of <strong>the</strong>se differences, we chose two viable conceptual models for <strong>the</strong> SW Hub. The first conceptualmodel for <strong>the</strong> SW Hub project (Figure 2.9) is based on a structural interpretation of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn-mostEast-West seismic line (GA2011-LL1) across <strong>the</strong> Harvey Ridge. Of <strong>the</strong> new seismic data, this line has<strong>the</strong> best S/N ratio when compared to <strong>the</strong> existing seismic lines, a greater amount of geological structureand intersects a likely (Barclay et al., 2009) injection site at about 10 km horizontal distance. Thisconceptual model will be used in Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 of this report.A0Westhorizontal distance (km)East0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16B−1elevation (km)−2−3Tertiary sedimentsJurassic sedimentsMyallupWonnerupSabina sandstones & Sue group1D model location−4Figure 2.9: South West Hub Project conceptual model 1. This model was derived from line GA2011-LL1, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn most seismic line AB in Figure 2.2. This report takes <strong>the</strong> region around10 km as <strong>the</strong> most likely injection site. Seismic data from GA2011-LL1 were shown inFigure 2.8(a).The second conceptual model is illustrated in Figure 2.10. From Figure 2.6, this is most central of <strong>the</strong>West-East 2011-vintage seismic lines and it intersects <strong>the</strong> Harvey-1 well. The veracity and applicabilityof this model should be proven once data from this well are available. This conceptual model will beused in Sections 4.1.4 and 4.1.6.1 of this report. Since <strong>the</strong>se sections deal with 2D surface and boreholeseismic monitoring, we choose to include more structure in <strong>the</strong> model by including interpreted subdivisionof Jurassic into Eneabba, Cattamarra, and Cadda formations, and adding Cretaceous sediments(Wanbro).To construct <strong>the</strong> model, <strong>the</strong> interpreted horizons were converted from time to depth using interval velocitiesobtained from <strong>the</strong> migration velocities. The corresponding interval velocities are summarisedin Table 2.1. The P-wave velocities are well correlated with log data from Lake Preston 1 well. Thedensities of <strong>the</strong> interval were obtained using Gardner’s empirical relation Gardner et al. (1974). Sincewe do not have direct measurements of S- wave velocities, <strong>the</strong>se were derived using Castagna’s equation(mudrock line).| 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!