26.11.2012 Views

List of Poster Presentations - Journal of Dental Education

List of Poster Presentations - Journal of Dental Education

List of Poster Presentations - Journal of Dental Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Poster</strong> Abstracts<br />

good quality study materials. The web site is also used for clinical<br />

examination in orthodontic courses. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the webbased<br />

digital records in providing relevant information to students in<br />

comparison to the traditional records was evaluated by a randomized<br />

controlled trial involving 99 second-year dental students. One group<br />

(50 students) studied two cases from the web site; the other group<br />

(49 students) studied the same two cases from traditional orthodontic<br />

records. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing test scores and the<br />

time spent to complete the tests by way <strong>of</strong> t-statistics. Both for test<br />

scores and times, there were no significant differences between means<br />

for the two study groups. Attitudes <strong>of</strong> students towards the web site,<br />

assessed from post-test questionnaires, were positive. In conclusion,<br />

for orthodontic diagnosis, digital orthodontic records appear to be<br />

comparable to conventional records. The method is an efficient way<br />

to generate, store, and edit orthodontic records for teaching and clinical<br />

examination. In the present study web-based orthodontic study cases<br />

were preferred as an adjunctive tool to conventional teaching.<br />

84. Going Mobile: Providing a Platform to Enhance<br />

Student-Faculty Resources and Communications<br />

Karimbux, Nadeem, Harvard School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> Medicine, Howell,<br />

Howard, Harvard School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> Medicine, Don<strong>of</strong>f, Bruce, Harvard<br />

School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> Medicine, Halamka, John, Harvard Medical School<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this project is to compare several outcomes prior<br />

to and during the introduction and implementation <strong>of</strong> the MyCourses<br />

platform.<br />

Recent reports have reported a crisis in <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

regarding the shrinking pool <strong>of</strong> faculty. In response to this crisis, dental<br />

schools are developing or purchasing information technology tools<br />

to deliver curriculum content and to monitor student progress. The<br />

MyCourses Mobile Platform has been developed for medical, health<br />

science and technology and dental courses at the Harvard Medical<br />

School (HMS), and the Harvard School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> Medicine (HSDM).<br />

The platform gives students immediate access ( via computers or<br />

hand held devices) to personalized course calendars, announcements,<br />

and resources such as class notes and syllabi. Mobile devices also<br />

enable better communication between students and faculty. This<br />

presentation will display the process to digitize materials, provide<br />

faculty development and examples <strong>of</strong> the MyCourses platform. As a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this project, course evaluations for the last six years (cohort<br />

that has not used MyCourses; n=153) at HSDM were analyzed. Using<br />

a scale <strong>of</strong> 1-5 (1=very poor to 5=excellent), the following results<br />

were generated: Accessibility <strong>of</strong> faculty: 4.32; Library facilities/<br />

Services; 3.66; Computer Resources: 3.34; Content <strong>of</strong> Courses: 3.78.<br />

When comparing the Classes <strong>of</strong> 1996-1998 (n=80) with the Classes<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1999-2001 (n=73), the accessibility <strong>of</strong> faculty dropped from 4.76<br />

to 3.65 . Our hypothesis is that the MyCourses platform will improve<br />

all <strong>of</strong> the above outcomes by allowing students immediate access to<br />

course materials, library materials and faculty resources. For example,<br />

using personal digital assistants (PDAs), students can log casebook<br />

procedures and observations (either at the HSDM, or at externships<br />

and rotations) which they can upload to a central computer for the<br />

faculty to easily retrieve and review.<br />

A centralized platform has been developed to serve as a<br />

repository for curriculum content and resources, that can be accessed<br />

by students and faculty wherever and whenever they want. The impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> the MyCourses on these outcomes will continue to be analyzed as<br />

students are exposed to and start to use this platform to access<br />

resources and to communicate with faculty.<br />

85. Dentists’ Opinions about Undergraduate Clinical<br />

Supervision<br />

Kay, Charles J., Shapiro Developmental Center<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine, in the opinion <strong>of</strong><br />

general dentists and dental specialist, what aspects <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> undergraduate dental students can be performed by a<br />

well experienced general dentist.<br />

Seventy eight dentists were surveyed (42 general dentists, 38<br />

dental specialist). They were asked if a well experienced general dentist<br />

(with a specifically defined educational and experience background)<br />

could adequately supervise certain dental procedures commonly<br />

performed by undergraduate dental students. A list <strong>of</strong> 40 <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

commonly performed procedures by undergraduate dental students<br />

was generated which included aspects <strong>of</strong> oral surgery, periodontics,<br />

prosthodontics, pedodontist, endondontics, restorative dentistry, and<br />

adjunct procedures.<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> those surveyed indicated that it was suitable for a well<br />

experienced general dentist to supervise at least some <strong>of</strong> the procedure<br />

listed. 73% <strong>of</strong> the dentists indicated that all <strong>of</strong> the listed procedure<br />

could be adequately supervised. Of the remaining 27% <strong>of</strong> dentists,<br />

on average they felt that 94% the procedure could be adequately<br />

supervised by a well experienced general dentist. There was no<br />

statistical difference between the responses <strong>of</strong> general dentists and<br />

specialists when all specialist were grouped together . Subgroups <strong>of</strong><br />

specialist showed differences in their responses These results show<br />

that the great majority <strong>of</strong> the surveyed dentists , both general dentists<br />

and specialist, feel that it is appropriate for a well experienced general<br />

dentist to supervise the majority <strong>of</strong> clinical procedures performed by<br />

undergraduate dental students. As a large portion <strong>of</strong> most dental<br />

faculty time is spent clinically supervising undergraduate dental<br />

students and it is becoming increasingly difficult to recruit dental<br />

specialist to dental education, these results may have implications<br />

with regard to alternate avenues for locating faculty who can<br />

adequately supervise undergraduate dental students.<br />

These results show that the great majority <strong>of</strong> the surveyed<br />

dentists , both general dentists and specialist, feel that it is appropriate<br />

for a well experienced general dentist to supervise the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical procedure performed by undergraduate dental students.<br />

86. DentSim Virtual Reality in Preclinical Operative<br />

Dentistry to Improve Psychomotor Skills - A Pilot Study<br />

Urbankova, Alice, Columbia University School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> and Oral<br />

Surgery, Lichtenthal, Richard M., Columbia University School <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Dental</strong> and Oral Surgery<br />

Purpose: To determine the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the DentSim computer<br />

assisted simulation system in improving the quality <strong>of</strong> the technical<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> students at varying levels <strong>of</strong> skill in the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

operative procedures assessed by their performance in practical<br />

examinations as part <strong>of</strong> the preclinical operative dentistry curriculum<br />

at Columbia University.<br />

Thirty students were chosen randomly from the second year<br />

class in pre-clinical operative dentistry. Based on their average<br />

performance in their previous practical examinations, they were<br />

divided into three groups: unacceptable, acceptable and excellent.<br />

Each group consisted <strong>of</strong> ten students. Five students in each group<br />

were randomly assigned to the DentSim training group and five to<br />

the control group. The instruction for the DentSim training group<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a one hour introduction followed by ten hours <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />

assisted training, performing Class I and Class II cavity preparations.<br />

The training group also had access to the DentSim during their free<br />

time and on weekends.<br />

The hypothesis being evaluated was that the students using the<br />

DentSim technology would improve their performance in the practical<br />

preclinical examinations to a greater, discernable degree than those<br />

in the control group who did not have access to this technology.<br />

284 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Education</strong> ■ Volume 66, No. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!