titling. In addition, several organizations carried out various conservation <strong>and</strong> policy studies that providedsupport for titling. However in 2004, at the request of the Inter-provincial Federation of Shuar Communities(FICSH), the responsibility for titling was shifted directly to FICSH. To complete this process, CARE trainedparalegal <strong>and</strong> forestry technicians within FICSH to take on these tasks. CARE also contracted a lawyer toprovide legal support throughout the processOutcomes: The project was successful in securing communal titles far beyond its original targets. By 2005,the project has already titled 100,000 hectares out of an eventual total of 229, 654. Respondents identified anumber of positive outcomes that stemmed from this intervention, including: (a) providing value toindigenous skills; (b) giving value to the l<strong>and</strong>; (c) empowering the Shuar to manage their own l<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> (d)reducing conflicts. Taken as a whole, these responses serve as moderate evidence that titling is graduallymoving toward the mid-level outcome, <strong>Tenure</strong> Security (MO-1.1). Here, it is important to consider that thestate of the indicator for <strong>Tenure</strong> Security, Shuar communities’ willingness to make a long-term investment on l<strong>and</strong> (MI-1),was earlier described as unchanged. However, based on the combination of respondent-generated outcomes,the assessment considers titling to be moderately contributing to tenure security from the perspective ofrestricting encroachment. This being the case, there is little evidence that its has manifested higher-leveloutcomes, particularly Increased productive investment on l<strong>and</strong> that uses natural resources sustainably (HO-1) or Increasedcapacity to manage natural resources sustainably (HO-2).4.4.2 LTPR Intervention 2: Community Forestry ManagementDescription of Intervention: The elaboration of integrated forest management plans, including loggingplans, was completed as a formal requirement for l<strong>and</strong> titling in order to guide better use of forest l<strong>and</strong>s.PSUR financed the creation of these plans along with workshops that addressed forestry regulations.Outcomes: Integrated community management plans covering 184,563 hectares (as compared to a planned100,000) were completed. However, respondents claim that these plans are not being implemented. Manyalso noted that the Shuar view the plans as imposed by outside interests. In the case of the Trans Kutukúreserve, l<strong>and</strong> was divided into several areas with different types of titles. Yet, according to respondents, noneof the management plans required by the titling have been carried out because the Shuar maintain that, asowners of the l<strong>and</strong>, they have the right to determine how it is utilized.Similar to those in CAIMAN, many PSUR stakeholders indicated that management plans were createduniquely for the process of titling. Accordingly, low-level outcomes (or outputs) have been achieved throughestablishing Logging <strong>and</strong> integrated forest management plans (LO-2). The information does not demonstrate,however, that this intervention led to PSUR higher-level outcomes: Increased productive investment on l<strong>and</strong> that usesnatural resources sustainably (HO-1) or Increased capacity to manage natural resources sustainably (HO-2).4.4.3 LTPR Intervention 3: Protected Area ManagementDescription of Intervention: This component included the elaboration of three conservation plans, severalproposals for conservation concessions, studies on deforestation <strong>and</strong> hunting, a rapid ecological assessment,<strong>and</strong> mapping of project areas.Outcomes: It appears that no completed protected area management plan was submitted for the TransKutuku forest zone. CARE completed a conservation plan, but the MOE indicated that there was no followupto this plan. Ecociencia, the primary institution responsible for this sub-component, left part way throughthe process. Consequently, no outcomes can currently be assessed for this intervention.20 INDIGENOUS TERRITORIAL RIGHTS IN <strong>ECUADOR</strong>: RAPID IMPACT ASSESSMENT
5.0 INSTITUTIONALSTRENGTHENINGInstitutional strengthening of indigenous entities is considered as a key intervention that heightens thepotential of efficacy <strong>and</strong> sustainability of indigenous territorial consolidation interventions. Accordingly, itssuccesses <strong>and</strong> challenges within both projects are highlighted below.5.1 CAIMAN: FEINCESuccesses: FEINCE has made exceptional progress since CAIMAN began to work with the organization in2003. From the ground up, it has established a physical infrastructure, accumulated staff, securedorganizational <strong>and</strong> technical capabilities, developed relationships with external actors, <strong>and</strong> strengthenedconnections to its Cofán constituents. FEINCE has gone from an ineffective organization existing only onpaper to an entity that has been recognized as the legitimate voice of the Cofán people. The mutuallybeneficial relationship with Fundacion Cofán has further strengthened FEINCE <strong>and</strong> allowed a clearseparation of political <strong>and</strong> technical functions, with FEINCE taking over the former <strong>and</strong> the FundacionCofán maintaining the latter. This has enabled technical work to advance separate from political interests. Thewillingness of organizations such as CARE, The Nature Conservancy, the Institute for the Eco-developmentof the Amazon Region, the Field Museum, <strong>and</strong> the Government of Ecuador’s Child Development Fund toprovide grants (including those that are competitively awarded) to FEINCE attests to the organizationalprogress achieved.Challenges: FEINCE faces challenges in obtaining ongoing financial support, specifically funding that is notdependent on often-shifting donor programming priorities. The federation will further benefit fromenhancing the professional capabilities of its in-house staff <strong>and</strong> adopting by-laws <strong>and</strong> practices that allowprofessionals to remain within the organization—even after leadership changes. While FEINCE is nowviewed as the legitimate representative of the Cofán, it needs to forge stronger relationships with all of itsconstituent communities. The strong partnership FEINCE has with Fundacion Cofán yields many technical<strong>and</strong> financial sustainability benefits <strong>and</strong> should be strategically built upon over the long term.5.2 PSUR: FISCHIn 2003, CARE <strong>and</strong> FICSH reached an agreement whereby the implementation of NRM subcomponentactivities on l<strong>and</strong> titling would be carried out primarily by FICSH. In order to better implement thissubcomponent, CARE carried out two kinds of institutional strengthening activities within FICSH: (a)training of community members in forestry skills, including mapping <strong>and</strong> GPS, to broaden FICSH’s capacityto carry out l<strong>and</strong> titling activities; <strong>and</strong> (b) administrative <strong>and</strong> accounting training of FICSH staff. FICSHcontinued to work with a lawyer to complete the titling process.Successes: FICSH has managed to rally segments of various communities to effectively defend the Shuar’sproperty rights. FICSH also has a clear vision of the Shuar’s desire to control its own destiny. Finally, theINDIGENOUS TERRITORIAL RIGHTS IN <strong>ECUADOR</strong>: RAPID IMPACT ASSESSMENT 21