11.07.2015 Views

Parental socialisation effort and the intergenerational transmission ...

Parental socialisation effort and the intergenerational transmission ...

Parental socialisation effort and the intergenerational transmission ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Our main finding is that <strong>the</strong> strength of <strong>intergenerational</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> of risk tolerancedepends on socialization <strong>effort</strong>. We find a robust relationship between <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r's <strong>effort</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> degree to which her preferences are transmitted to <strong>the</strong> daughter. We also rule out reversecausality as an explanation for this association. The moderation of mo<strong>the</strong>r-daughtercorrelation in risk preferences by parental <strong>effort</strong> also supports a key role for socialization in<strong>the</strong> <strong>intergenerational</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> of attitudes. Additionally, it specifically confirms <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>oretical assumption that parents can influence <strong>the</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> of preferences throughsocialization <strong>effort</strong>.After completing our analysis we became aware of unpublished work by Zumbuehl et al.(2012) which documents a similar relationship between parental involvement <strong>and</strong> preference<strong>transmission</strong>, but with very different data. The two papers complement each o<strong>the</strong>r in that weexamine <strong>the</strong> relationship between maternal risk preferences <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir children in childhood,whereas Zumbuehl et al. study <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> risk preferences of parents <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong>ir adult children (<strong>the</strong> “children” are all 17 years of age or older). We show early<strong>transmission</strong> whereas Zumbuehl et al. show that <strong>the</strong> effects persist into adulthood. In addition,our data have a number of advantages. In particular, in <strong>the</strong> Zumbuehl study <strong>the</strong> degree ofparental involvement during childhood is reported by <strong>the</strong> child, retrospectively, whereas inour work <strong>the</strong>se measures are recorded prospectively as part of detailed child developmentstudy, <strong>and</strong> in Zumbuehl et al. risk preferences are elicited through self-assessments ra<strong>the</strong>r thanan incentivized task. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> two papers offer substantial <strong>and</strong> robust empirical evidenceof a role for socialization in <strong>the</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> of risk preferences.This study contributes to <strong>the</strong> literature on <strong>the</strong> effects of socialization on formation ofpreferences that predict economic behaviour. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> results on gender differences<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> important role of maternal <strong>effort</strong> point to <strong>the</strong> likelihood that such socialization occursvery early in life. The importance of socialization in <strong>the</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> of risk preferencesimplies malleability, at least in childhood. This in turn suggests that attitudes towards risk canbe shaped, not only in <strong>the</strong> home, but potentially also through schools <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r educationalinterventions. Assessing this possibility directly is an important part of our ongoing researchagenda.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!