Info. List 12-13 - Town of Innisfil
Info. List 12-13 - Town of Innisfil
Info. List 12-13 - Town of Innisfil
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Privacy Disclaimer:Please note that, pursuant to the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> Collection, Use, Disclosure and Destruction <strong>of</strong><strong>Info</strong>rmation Policy (CP.02-07) information contained within the attached list is considered publicinformation, unless otherwise stated.APPENDIX 1TO COUNCIL AGENDAJULY 10, 20<strong>13</strong>INFORMATION LIST # <strong>12</strong>-<strong>13</strong>ITEMS TO BE RECEIVED AS INFORMATION<strong>Town</strong> CorrespondenceG.1 That the memorandum from the Deputy Treasurer/Manager <strong>of</strong> Accounting dated June11, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: Development Charges – Rate Updates, effective July 1, 20<strong>13</strong> be receivedas information.G.2 That the memorandum from Lisa Wooldridge, Senior Engineering Technologist datedJuly 10, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: Churchill Water Supply 20<strong>13</strong> Annual MOE Inspection be received asinformation.G.3 That the memorandum from the Director <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure dated July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: PumpStation 3 Upgrades – Tender Award be received as information.G.4 That the memorandum from the Director <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure dated July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: <strong>Innisfil</strong>Heights Water Supply 20<strong>13</strong> Annual MOE Inspection be received as information.G.5 That the memorandum from the Manager <strong>of</strong> Land Use Planning dated July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>, re:update on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Zoning By-law 050-<strong>12</strong> – approved by the OntarioMunicipal Board be received as information.ProclamationsG.6 That the proclamation from Mayor Barb Baguley declaring the week <strong>of</strong> August 2 to 10,20<strong>13</strong> as “Simcoe Pride” week in the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> be received as information.G.7 That the proclamation from Mayor Barb Baguley declaring the week <strong>of</strong> October 20 to 26,20<strong>13</strong> as “English as a Second Language” week in the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> be received asinformation.Intergovernmental CorrespondenceG.8 That the County Council Update Issue 57 for May 20<strong>13</strong> be received as information.G.9 That the County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe 9 th Annual Warden’s Golf Tournament taking placeSeptember 5, 20<strong>13</strong> at Tangle Creek Golf and Country Club be received as information.
<strong>Info</strong>rmation <strong>List</strong> # <strong>12</strong>-<strong>13</strong> July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 4G.10 That the Environmental Compliance Approval from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment datedMay 17, 20<strong>13</strong> for Summer Lane, Part <strong>of</strong> Block B, C, and D, Plan 1071 be received asinformation.G.11 That the Amended Environmental Compliance Approval from the Ministry <strong>of</strong>Environment dated June 7, 20<strong>13</strong> for <strong>Innisfil</strong> Pumping Station No. 3, 1692 Cedar GroveAve, West <strong>of</strong> Edgewood Ave., be received as information.G.<strong>12</strong> That the correspondence from Environmental Registry, re: Policy Proposal Notice –Freight-Supportive Guidelines be received as information.G.<strong>13</strong> That the correspondence from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure and Ministry <strong>of</strong>Transportation, re: 20<strong>13</strong> Office Consolidation <strong>of</strong> the Growth Plan for the Greater GoldenHorseshoe, 2006 dated June 17, 20<strong>13</strong> be received as information. [Additionalinformation available in Clerk Services]G.14 That the correspondence from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Municipal Affairs & Housing, re: theinvestigation into the use <strong>of</strong> the herbicide 2,4,5-T by Ontario government ministries andagencies be received as information. [copy <strong>of</strong> report www.ontario.ca245T]G.15 That the correspondence from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure and Ministry <strong>of</strong>Transportation dated June 5, 20<strong>13</strong> responding to the <strong>Town</strong>’s letter on the ConnectingLink Funding be received as information.G.16 That the correspondence from the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> Huron-Kinloss dated May 22, 20<strong>13</strong>regarding not being a willing host for Industrial Wind Turbines be received asinformation.G.17 That the correspondence from the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln dated May 29, 20<strong>13</strong>advising they will not sign a Community Vibrancy Agreement with an Industrial WindTurbine Applicant be received as information.G.18. That the correspondence from the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln dated May 29, 20<strong>13</strong>advising they will not be a willing host for Industrial Wind Turbines be received asinformation.G.19 That the correspondence from the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> Petrolia addressed to the Premier <strong>of</strong> Ontariodated May 28, 20<strong>13</strong> advising they will not be a willing host to Industrial Wind Turbines.G.20 That the correspondence from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Labour date June 19, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: guidelineson temporary performance/event structures (temporary structures) be received asinformation.Board and Agency CorrespondenceG.21 That the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit (SMDHU) letter dated April 19, 20<strong>13</strong>encouraging all municipalities in Simcoe Muskoka to consider enacting a bylawprohibiting the use <strong>of</strong> waterpipes, also known as hookahs in enclosed public places andenclosed workplaces be received as information.G.22 That the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, Health Matters dated May, 20<strong>13</strong> bereceived as information.
<strong>Info</strong>rmation <strong>List</strong> # <strong>12</strong>-<strong>13</strong> July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 4G.23 That the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) memorandum <strong>of</strong> Oral Decision delivered onApril 19, 20<strong>13</strong> and Order <strong>of</strong> the Board, re: failure <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Municipal Affairs &Housing to announce a decision respecting the Official Plan <strong>of</strong> the County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe,OMB Case # PL091167 be received as information.G.24 That the OMB memorandum <strong>of</strong> Oral Decision delivered on June 4, 20<strong>13</strong> and Oder <strong>of</strong> theBoard, OMB Case # PL<strong>12</strong>0845 re: By-law 050-<strong>12</strong> – 808 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Holdings Inc., (AbandellGroup) be received as information.G.25 That the correspondence from the Environmental and Land Tribunals Ontario – OMBdated June 18, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: OMB Appeal for 7140 10 Sideroad – Aaristic Services Inc.,OMB Case # PL<strong>13</strong>0580 be received as information.G.26 That the correspondence from the Simcoe County District School Board (SCDSB),advising the facility spaces for partnership proposals list has been updated and can befound at www.scdsb.on.ca under Capital Planning, Facility Partnerships be received asinformation.G.27 That the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Public Library Board minutes dated May 21, 20<strong>13</strong> be received asinformation.G.28 That the Barrie Area Physician Recruitment Task Force minutes dated June 11, 20<strong>13</strong> bereceived as information.G.29 That the Alliston & Area Physician Recruitment Committee minutes dated May 16, 20<strong>13</strong>be received as information.General CorrespondenceG.30 That the correspondence from AMCTO dated May 14, 20<strong>13</strong> acknowledging KarenFraser, Deputy Clerk accreditation as a Certified Municipal Officer (CMO) be received asinformation.G.31 That the United Way notice dated June 3, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: Simcoe County Unites under onUnited Way Banner be received as information.G.32 That the thank you card from Bradford West Gwillimbury Fire Department addressed toFire Chief Smith be received as information.G.33 That the correspondence from Gary Bell <strong>of</strong> Skelton Brumwell dated June 17, 20<strong>13</strong>regarding the Cookstown Sewer Allocations for Wally Smith and Jack Hambly bereceived as information and forwarded to Planning Services for their records.G.34 That the thank you letter from the Paiero Family acknowledging help from Chris Clark,Mel Melanovic from Parks and Recreation and Adoria Pridgar <strong>of</strong> Customer Services dateJune 14, 20<strong>13</strong> be received as information.G.35 That the correspondence from OLG dated May 29, 20<strong>13</strong> re: the new funding formula forthe Municipality Contribution Agreement (MCA) be received as information.
<strong>Info</strong>rmation <strong>List</strong> # <strong>12</strong>-<strong>13</strong> July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 4G.36 That the correspondence from the Simcoe County Food & Agricultural Charter datedJune 14, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: Annual Summer BBQ, July <strong>13</strong>, 20<strong>13</strong> be received as information.G.37 That the correspondence from Andrea Woods Chiodo dated June <strong>13</strong>, 20<strong>13</strong>, re: thenegative impacts <strong>of</strong> the excessive use <strong>of</strong> EssoFlex250 Oil on the 2 nd Line <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> bereceived as information.G.38 That the thank you letter from the Barrie Area Physician Recruitment on behalf <strong>of</strong> theresidents <strong>of</strong> the Family Medicine Teaching Unit dated June 25, 20<strong>13</strong> for the Mayor’sinvolvement in the Graduation on June 4, 20<strong>13</strong> be received as information.ITEMS TO BE REFERRED TO SERVICE AREA INDICATED FOR REPLY, WITH A COPY TOCOUNCIL AS INFORMATION[None received.]ITEMS TO BE RECEIVED AND REFERRED TO SERVICE AREA FOR ACTION AND REPLY,WITH A COPY TO COUNCIL AS INFORMATIONG.39 That the correspondence from Shannon Harwood dated June 17, 20<strong>13</strong> requestingspeed limit reduction on the <strong>13</strong> th Line be received and forwarded to the Director <strong>of</strong>Infrastructure for action and reply, with a copy to Council.G.40 That the correspondence from Valerie Brown requesting consideration <strong>of</strong> parking on onlyone side <strong>of</strong> Booth Ave., Lamstone St., Kell St., and Muriel St. be received and forwardedto the Director <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure for action and reply, with a copy to Council.G.41 That the correspondence from Robin Ritchie expressing concerns for the parking onboth sides <strong>of</strong> Minnetonka Road due to no parking on 30 th Sideroad and othersurrounding roads be received and forwarded to the Director <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure for a actionand reply, with a copy to Council.G.42 That the correspondence from the Barrie Area Physician Recruitment dated June 4,20<strong>13</strong> expressing their appreciation for the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>’s continued support andrequest for financial support in the amount <strong>of</strong> $30,000 be received and forwarded to theEconomic Development Department for action and reply with a copy to Council.ITEMS TO BE RECEIVED AND REFERRED TO SERVICE AREA INDICATED FOR REVIEWAND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL[None received.]Circulated: June 28, 20<strong>13</strong>
MEMORANDUMDate: June 11, 20<strong>13</strong>To:Mayor Baguley, Deputy Mayor Davidson, Members <strong>of</strong> Council & StaffFrom: Audrey Webb, Deputy Treasurer/Manager <strong>of</strong> AccountingRe: Development Charges – Rate Updates - Effective July 1 st , 20<strong>13</strong>The <strong>Town</strong>’s Development Charge pamphlet has been updated for your reference in accordancewith the annual indexing prescribed under By-Law #020-09, By-Law #086-09 (amended by 096-<strong>12</strong>), and By-Law #089-09. These rates take effect on July 1 st , 20<strong>13</strong>.The change in construction price index from the end <strong>of</strong> Quarter 1, 20<strong>12</strong> to the end <strong>of</strong> Quarter <strong>12</strong>0<strong>13</strong> was an increase <strong>of</strong> .8%. Accordingly the “General Services” July 1, 20<strong>13</strong> rates ascontained in Schedule C <strong>of</strong> by-Law #086-09, the “Hard Services” July 1, 20<strong>13</strong> rates ascontained in Schedule A through E <strong>of</strong> by-law #020-09 and the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights July 1, 20<strong>13</strong> ratescontained in Schedules A & B <strong>of</strong> by-law #089-09 have been indexed by .8%.There are several other Capital Charges levied by the <strong>Town</strong> and shown on this flyer which areindexed on January 1 st <strong>of</strong> each year. As such, these fees have not been updated at this timeand will be updated in approximately 6 months.On July 1, 20<strong>13</strong>, please eliminate and destroy all copies <strong>of</strong> the January 1, 20<strong>13</strong> version <strong>of</strong> thisflyer which may still be in circulation. Furthermore, the updated flyer is posted on the <strong>Town</strong>’swebsite for public access.Should you have any questions regarding this update please do not hesitate to contact me.Audrey WebbDeputy Treasurer/Manager <strong>of</strong> Accounting
DESIGNATION OF SERVICESDevelopment Charges are imposed for the followingcategories <strong>of</strong> services to pay for the capital costsrequired because <strong>of</strong> increased needs for servicesTHE CORPORATION OF THETOWN OF INNISFILarising from development:Notwithstanding (b) to (d) above, a DevelopmentDEVELOPMENT CHARGES PAMPHLET(a) General Government – Growth Studies;(b) Library Services;(c) Fire and Rescue Services;(d) Police Services;Charge shall be imposed with respect to the creation <strong>of</strong>one or two additional Dwelling Units in a Building, if theTotal Floor Area <strong>of</strong> the additional one or two DwellingUnits exceeds, the Total Floor Area <strong>of</strong> the existingBY-LAW #020-09(e) Parks and Recreation Services (Indoor);Dwelling Unit (b) and (c) above, and the smallest(f) Parks and Recreation Services (Outdoor);existing Dwelling Unit (d) above.and $0.08 (SMCDSB) per square foot <strong>of</strong> gross floorand(g) Public Works (Buildings and Related); area is imposed upon non-residential development.BY-LAW #086-09(amended by 096-<strong>12</strong>)(h) Municipal Fleet;(i) Road and Related (including associated structures,sidewalks, street lights, traffic signals, landscaping andintersection improvements);(i) Utility Services - Sanitary Sewerage; and(j) Utility Services - Water.APPLICATIONDevelopment Charges are imposed against all lands,Buildings or Structures within the area to which theseBy-laws apply if the Development <strong>of</strong> such lands,Buildings or Structures requires any <strong>of</strong> the following(a) the passing <strong>of</strong> a zoning By-law or an amendmentthereto under Section 34 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act;(b) the approval <strong>of</strong> a minor variance under Section 45<strong>of</strong> the Planning Act;(c) a conveyance <strong>of</strong> land to which a by-law passedunder subsection 50(7) <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act applies;(d) the approval <strong>of</strong> a plan <strong>of</strong> subdivision under Section51 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act;(e) a consent under Section 53 <strong>of</strong> the Planning Act;(f) the approval <strong>of</strong> a description under section 50 <strong>of</strong> theCondominium Act; or(g) the issuing <strong>of</strong> a Permit under the Building Code Act,1992 in relation to a Building or Structure.INTENSIFICATION OF EXISTING HOUSINGThese By-laws do not apply with respect to approvalsrelated to the residential Development <strong>of</strong> land, Buildingsor Structures that would have the affect only:(a) <strong>of</strong> permitting the enlargement <strong>of</strong> an existingDwelling Unit;(b) <strong>of</strong> creating one or two additional Dwelling Units inan existing Single Family Detached Dwelling;(c) <strong>of</strong> creating one additional Dwelling Unit in anexisting Semi-Detached Dwelling; or(d) <strong>of</strong> creating one additional Dwelling Unit for any otherexisting Residential Use.EDUCATION and UPPER TIER DEVELOPMENTCHARGESThe Simcoe County District School Board (SCDSB) andthe Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board(SMCDSB) have established an EducationDevelopment Charge (EDC) under the authority <strong>of</strong> theEducation Act. At the time <strong>of</strong> this pamphlet revisionthese charges are $718.00 (SCDSB) and $370.00(SMCDSB) per dwelling unit is imposed uponresidential development and an EDC <strong>of</strong> $0.15 (SCDSB)The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> is responsible for the collection <strong>of</strong>INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION EXEMPTIONthese charges on behalf <strong>of</strong> the school boards. Formore information on the EDC's, please contact theIf a Development includes the enlargement <strong>of</strong> the TotalFloor Area <strong>of</strong> an existing Building, the amount <strong>of</strong> theDevelopment Charge that is payable is the following:Simcoe County District School Board at (705) 728-7570or the Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Boardat (705) 722-35553555.(a) if the Total Floor Area is enlarged by 50 per cent orThe County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe has established a Developmentless, the amount <strong>of</strong> the Development Charge in respectCharge (DC) under the authority <strong>of</strong> the Development<strong>of</strong> the enlargement is zero; andCharges Act, S.O. 1997. The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> is(b) if the Total Floor Area is enlarged by more than 50responsible for the collection <strong>of</strong> these charges on behalfper cent, Development Charges are payable on the<strong>of</strong> the County. For more information on the County <strong>of</strong>amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 per centSimcoe's DC Background Study, Addendum and By<strong>of</strong>the Total Floor Area before the enlargement.Law #5386 please visit the County's website atwww.simcoe.ca or call 1-866-893-9300.For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this section the terms “Total FloorArea” and “existing Industrial Building” shall have thesame meaning as those terms have in O. Reg 82/98made under the Development Charges Act, 1997.OTHER CAPITAL CHARGESandBY-LAW #089-09EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 20<strong>13</strong>There are several other Capital Charges levied by theEXEMPT INSTITUTIONS<strong>Town</strong> which are indexed on January 1st <strong>of</strong> each year inthe same manner as Development Charges. TheThe following categories <strong>of</strong> Institutions are herebyfollowing is a list <strong>of</strong> those charges and current rates:designated as being exempt from the payment <strong>of</strong>Lake-based water unit charge (By-law #017-96)2101 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach RoadDevelopment Charges:$3,<strong>13</strong>6.00; Wastewater unit charge (CR #011-98)<strong>Innisfil</strong>, Ontario(a) Buildings or Structures used as Hospitals governed$1,111.00; Churchill Water System $4,982.00; 7th andL9S 1A1by the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O 1990, c. P. 40;(b) Buildings or Structurest owned by and used for the8th Line Urbanization Charges (December 4, 2001ADAC) $1,910.00 00 per Residential Lot and $23,887.00purposes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>, the County, or their local boards;per hectare <strong>of</strong> Non-Residential Lands.(c) Buildings or Structures owned by a board <strong>of</strong>education and used for school purposes; This pamphlet is prepared as a result <strong>of</strong> CouncilTelephone (705) 436-3710(d) Buildings or Structures owned by and used for thepurposes <strong>of</strong> a college <strong>of</strong> applied arts and technologyestablished pursuant to the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Colleges andUniversities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.19; and(e) Buildings or Structures owned by and used for thepurposes <strong>of</strong> a university established by an Act <strong>of</strong> theLegislative Assembly <strong>of</strong> Ontario.passing By-law #020-09; By-law #086-09(amended by096-<strong>12</strong>); and By-law #089-09 under the authority <strong>of</strong> theDevelopment Charges Act, 1997 and Ontarioregulations pursuant thereto. For further details aboutDevelopment Charges, we suggest you consult therelevant By-law which is available on the <strong>Town</strong>'swebsite.Revised July 1, 20<strong>13</strong>1-888-436-3710Fax (705) 436-7<strong>12</strong>0E-mail: inquiry@innisfil.caWebsite: www.innisfil.ca
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INNISFIL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SCHEDULE OF RATESNOTESResidential Charges by Unit Type Per Dwelling UnitRows andApartmentsOther Two BedroomMultiples and LargerSingles andSemi-DetachedBachelor andOne BedroomIndustrial, BusinessPark and InstitutionalCharge Per SquareMeter <strong>of</strong> Total FloorCommercial or OtherNon-ResidentialCharge Per SquareMeter <strong>of</strong> Total FloorSCHEDULE "C" to By-law #086-09General Government $ 602 $ 549 $ 367 $ 280 $ 3.55 $3.55Library Services 831 759 506 386 - - 2Fire & Rescue Services 1,027 937 626 477 6.05 6.05Police Services 354 323 216 163 2.10 2.10Parks & Recreation Services (Indoor) 3,535 3,229 2,153 1,643 - -Parks & Recreation Services (Outdoor) 2,142 1,957 1,304 997 - -Public Works 525 480 319 244 3.09 3.09Municipal Fleet 155 141 94 72 0.91 0.911The <strong>Town</strong>-wide Development Charges set out inSchedule "A" <strong>of</strong> By-law #020-09 and Schedule "C"<strong>of</strong> By-law #086-09 revised by by-law 096-<strong>12</strong> areapplied uniformly to all development within the<strong>Town</strong> subject to the provisions <strong>of</strong> those By-laws.The Development Charges set out in By-law #020-09 Schedules "B","C","D" &"E" and By-law #089-09Schedules "A" and "B" are applied to eachidentified service area and are in addition to theSchedule "A" charges in By-law #020-09 andSchedule "C" in By-law #086-09 revised by by-law096-<strong>12</strong>.Total <strong>Town</strong>-Wide General Services $ 9,171 $ 8,375 $ 5,585 $ 4,262 $ 15.70 $ 15.703 The Development Charges set out in By-law #020-SCHEDULE "A" to By-law #020-09Roads and Related $ <strong>13</strong>,246 $ <strong>12</strong>,099 $ 8,067 $ 6,157 $ 71.22 $71.2209 shall be adjusted without amendment to the Bylawannually on July 1st in each year, commencingTotal <strong>Town</strong>-Wide Services $ 22,417 $ 20,474 $ <strong>13</strong>,652 $ 10,419 $ 86.92 $86.92July 1st, 2009, in accordance with the Statistics``Canada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics(catalogue number 62-007) with the base indexbeing that in effect on December 31st, 2008.SCHEDULE "B" to By-law #020-09ALCONAUtility Services - Sanitary Sewerage 5,946$ $ 5,431 $ 3,622 $ 2,764 $ 30.89 $ 30.894Utility Services - Water 3,466 3,164 2,111 1,610 29.80 29.80TOTAL $ 9,4<strong>12</strong> $ 8,595 $ 5,733 $ 4,374 $ 60.69 $60.69SCHEDULE "C" to By-law #020-09LEFROYUtility Services - Sanitary Sewerage $ 5,954 $ 5,438 $ 3,627 $ 2,768 $ 30.89 $30.89Utility Services - Water 7,5<strong>12</strong> 6,861 4,574 3,492 29.80 29.80TOTAL $ <strong>13</strong>,466 $ <strong>12</strong>,299 $ 8,201 $ 6,260 $ 60.6960.69$ 5SCHEDULE "D" to By-law #020-09GILFORDUtility Services - Sanitary Sewerage $ 26,991 $ 24,656 $ 16,437 $ <strong>12</strong>,545 $ 30.89 $30.89Utility Services - Water 15,802 14,434 9,622 7,344 29.80 29.80TOTAL $ 42,793 $ 39,090 $ 26,059 $ 19,889 $ 60.69 $60.69The Development Charges set out in By-law #086-09 revised by by-law 096-<strong>12</strong> shall be adjustedwithout amendment to the By-law annually on July1 each year, commencing July 1, 2010, inaccordance with the Statistics Canada QuarterlyConstruction Price Index (catalogue number 62-007) with the base index in effect on Dec 31, 2009.The Development Charges set out in By-law #089-09 shall be adjusted without amendment to the Bylawannually on July 1st in each year, commencingJuly 1st, 2010, in accordance with the StatisticsCanada Quarterly, Construction Price Statistics(catalogue number 62-007) with the base indexbeing that in effect on December 31, 2009.SCHEDULE "E" to By-law #020-09 6 Sanitary Sewerage and Water Utility ServiceCOOKSTOWNUtility Services - Sanitary Sewerage $ 2,010$ 1,837$ 1,224$ 934$ 30.89$30.89Development Charges apply only to developmentthat t will receive municipal i sanitary or waterUtility Services - Water 11,374 10,389 6,927 5,287 29.80 29.80services or both, subject to the provisions <strong>of</strong> BylawTOTAL $ <strong>13</strong>,384 $ <strong>12</strong>,226 $ 8,151 $ 6,221 $ 60.69 $60.69#020-09 and By-law 089-09.SCHEDULE "A" to By-law #089-09 7INNISFIL HEIGHTSUtility Services - Water $ 10,221 $ 10,221 $ 10,221 $ 10,221 $ 10.83 $10.83SCHEDULE "B" to By-law #089-09INNISFIL BEACH ROAD & HIGHWAY400 INTERCHANGESpecial Road Works $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 26.60 $26.60Non Development Charge Act UrbanizationCharges for the 7th Line and 8th Line areapplicable to all lots within the Alcona SecondaryPlan. In accordance with the agreement betweenthe Alcona Development Group and the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Innisfil</strong> and at the time <strong>of</strong> this pamphlet revision,these charges are $1,910.00 per Residential Unitand $23,887.00 per hectare <strong>of</strong> Non-Residentiallands.
INFRASTRUCTUREM E M O R A N D U MDATE: July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>TO: Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Members <strong>of</strong> CouncilFROM: Andrew Campbell, Director <strong>of</strong> InfrastructureSUBJECT: 20<strong>13</strong> Annual MOE Inspection Report – Churchill Well SupplyThe Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment (MOE) conducted an Annual Inspection <strong>of</strong> the ChurchillDrinking Water System on May 9, 20<strong>13</strong>. The focus <strong>of</strong> annual inspection is to confirmcompliance with MOE legislation and authorizing documents such as Orders, Certificates <strong>of</strong>Approval, Drinking Water Works Permits, Municipal Drinking Water Licenses and Permits toTake Water.The MOE conducted a "focused" inspection <strong>of</strong> the system to assess key compliance issues.The Churchill system was chosen for a focused inspection during this inspection cycle becauseinspection findings over the past three years were such that the number <strong>of</strong> violations wereminimal or non-existent, there were few or no orders issued to the <strong>Town</strong> that were <strong>of</strong>significance in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> water potability, and there were no deficiencies as defined inO. Reg. 172/03.The attached Inspection Report outlines the findings. There were no items <strong>of</strong> non-complianceand the MOE did not make any recommendations for changes to the Churchill system in thereport.The MOE Inspection Risk Framework results for this inspection are; A 0.00% Inspection Risk Rating; and Final Inspection Rating <strong>of</strong> 100.00%.Should you require further information regarding this report please feel free to contact me.Attachment:1. Churchill Drinking Water System – 20<strong>13</strong> Drinking Water Inspection Report
J.('~Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment Ministere de l'Environnementt?OntarioSafe Drinking Water BranchDirection du controle de la qualite de I'eaupotableBarrie District OfficeUnit <strong>12</strong>01Bureau du district de Barrie54 Cedar Pointe Drive Bureau <strong>12</strong>01Barrie ON L4N 5R754, chemin Cedar POinteBarrie (Ontario) L4N 5R7May 27,20<strong>13</strong><strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Innisfil</strong>2155 25 Sideroad<strong>Innisfil</strong>, Ontario L9S 4V3Attention: Mr. John Skorobohacz- Chief Administrative OfficerRe: Churchill Drinking Water System,20<strong>12</strong>/20<strong>13</strong> Drinking Water Inspection ReportPlease find enclosed the Ministry <strong>of</strong>the Environment final report <strong>of</strong> the inspection <strong>of</strong> the Churchill Drinking WaterSystem, <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Innisfil</strong> (DWS #220005063). This report provides an assessment <strong>of</strong>compliance with applicablelegislation, Certificates <strong>of</strong>Approval, Permits to Take Water and any other control documents. Results <strong>of</strong>Ministryaudit samples <strong>of</strong> treated and distribution system water are also attached as an appendix.This inspection was conducted under the Ministry's inspection protocol on May 9, 20<strong>13</strong>. As such, the report formatand scope may vary from previous inspections. You will note as you review the report that the Ministry's Licensingand Approvals Branch is included in the circulation <strong>of</strong> the report. This is in keeping with the recommendations <strong>of</strong>Justice O'Connor arising from the Walkerton Inquiry.Section 19 <strong>of</strong> the Safe Drinking Water Act (Standard <strong>of</strong>Care) creates a number <strong>of</strong>obligations for individuals whoexercise decision-making authority over municipal drinking water systems. Please be aware that the Ministry hasencouraged such individuals, particularly municipal councillors, to take steps to be better informed about thedrinking water systems over which they have decision-making authority. These steps could include asking for acopy <strong>of</strong>this inspection report and a review <strong>of</strong>its findings. Further information about Section 19 can be found in"Taking Care <strong>of</strong>Your Drinking Water: A Guidefor Members <strong>of</strong>Municipai Councils" found under "Resources" onthe Drinking Water Ontario website at www.ontario.caldrinkingwater.Additionally, in order to measure individual inspection results, the Ministry has established an inspectioncompliance risk framework based on the principles <strong>of</strong>the Inspection, Investigation & Enforcement (II&E)Secretariat and advice <strong>of</strong>internal/external risk experts. The Inspection Summary Rating Record (IRR), included asAppendix E <strong>of</strong> the inspection report, provides the Ministry, the system owner and the local Public Health Units witha summarized quantitative measure <strong>of</strong>the drinking water system's annual inspection and regulated water qualitytesting performance. Please note the attached IRR methodology memo describing how the risk rating model hasimproved to better reflect the health related and administrative non-compliance found in an inspection report. IRRratings are published (for the previous inspection year) in the Ministry's ChiefDrinking Water Inspector's AnnualReport. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding the rating, please contact Craig Seabrook, Drinking WaterProgram Supervisor, at (705) 739-6392 or Sheri Broeckel, Drinking Water Program Supervisor, at (705) 739-6386.Please contact the undersigned, should you have any questions or concerns regarding the above.DaDrinking Water Inspection Program - InspectorMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentBarrie District OfficePhone: (705) 739-6382
cc: Medical Officer o/Health, Simcoe Muskoka District Health UnitMOE Barrie District Office FileDon Bauerlein, Superintendent, Water Works Operations, <strong>Town</strong> o/lnnisfilWayne Wilson, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation AuthorityDon Goodyear, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
,,~, t >l/T- OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentCHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMInspection ReportSite Number: 220005063Inspection Number:1-AOCEODate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: May 09,20<strong>13</strong>Inspected By:Darren Haines. - ,
tf'~vr "> OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportOWNER INFORMATION:Company Name: INNISFIL, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OFStreet Number: 2101 Unit Identifier:Street Name: INNISFIL BEACH RdCity:INNISFILProvince: ON Postal Code: L9S 1A1INSPECTION DETAILS:Site Name:Site Address:County/District:MOE District/Area Office:Health Unit:Conservation AuthorityMNROffice:Category:CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMINNISFIL<strong>Innisfil</strong>Barrie DistrictSIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNITN/AN/ASite Number: 220005063Inspection Type:Inspection Number:Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection:Date <strong>of</strong> Previous Inspection:COMPONENTS DESCRIPTIONSite (Name):MOE DWS MappingLarge Municipal ResidentialAnnounced1-AOCEOMay 09,20<strong>13</strong> May 09,20<strong>12</strong> Type: DWS Mapping Point , Sub Type:Comments:Not ApplicableSite (Name):DISTRIBUTION (WATER INSPECTION)Type: Other Sub Type: OtherComments:The Churchill Well Supply drinking-water system services a population <strong>of</strong> approximately 535. Thedistribution system is comprised <strong>of</strong> approximately six kilometres <strong>of</strong> cast iron piping, 17 hydrants and27 valves. In addition. a dedicated sample tap is situated at a distal point in the distribution system.Site (Name):WELL 3 RAWType: Source Sub Type: GroundReport Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 16
t'~t?Ontario'Comments:Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportWell 3 is located within the Churchill Well Supply pumphbuse 3. The well was constructed in 1989 byNorthern Well Drilling and is described within Certificate <strong>of</strong> Approval 5246-7NCLWE as being a 200millimetre diameter, 1<strong>13</strong> metre deep drilled groundwater production well. The well is equipped with asubmersible well pump with a rated capacity <strong>of</strong> 14.07 litres/second, a sanitary well seal and a 75millimetre diameter discharge line within the pumphouse.Site (Name):WELL 2 RAWType: Sour~e Sub Type: , GroundComments:Well 2 is located outdoors at the northwest corner <strong>of</strong> Highway 11 and Meadowland Street. The wellwas constructed in 1975 by Wilson Water Wells and is described within Certificate <strong>of</strong> Approval 5246"7NCLWE as being a 152 millimetre diameter, 154 metre deep drilled groundwater production well. Thewell is equipped with a submersible well pump with a rated capacity <strong>of</strong> 3.42 litres/second, a pitless .adaptor, a vented watertight steel wellcap and a 100 millimetre diameter discharge pipe from the wellto the feed line within the pumphouse.Site (Name):WELL 1 RAWType: Source Sub Type: GroundComments:Well 1 is located outdoors approximately twenty metres north <strong>of</strong> the Churchill Well Supply pumphouse1/2. The well was constructed in 1972 by Snider Well Drilling and is described within Certificate <strong>of</strong>Approval 5246-7NCLWE as being a 152 millimetre diameter, 160 metre deep drilled groundwaterproduction well. The well is equipped with a submersible well pump with a rated capacity <strong>of</strong> 3.03litreslsecond, a pitless adaptor, a vented watertight steel wellcap and a 100 millimetre diameterdischarge pipe from the well to the feed line within the pumphouse.Site (Name):WELL 3 PUMPHOUSEType: Treated Water POE Sub Type: PumphouseComments:Raw water from the well enters the pumphouse through the floor <strong>of</strong> the pumphouse into a treatmentheader. The treatment header has inline pressure monitoring, a pressure relief blow<strong>of</strong>f, a raw waterblow<strong>of</strong>f, a raw water sampling tap, a disinfection chemical injection point and a flow meter. Thesodium hypochlorite disinfection system consists <strong>of</strong> one 60 litre chemical storage tank that feeds twochemical metering pumps (one duty, one standby) each rated at 1.4litres/hour. The automaticswitchover from the duty to the standby pump occurs on duty pump failure and is remotely alarmed.In order to achieve the required contact time for the treated water prior to entering the distributionsystem, 45 metres <strong>of</strong> 600 millimetre contact main was installed outside <strong>of</strong> the pumphouse. This,coupled with approximately 1,150 metres <strong>of</strong> 200 millimetre diameter transmission main prior to thefirst consumer, provides ample contact time. A continuous chlorine residual analyser and turbidityanalyser draw sample water from the end <strong>of</strong> the contact main, at the point where intended CT isachieved.Site (Name):WELLS 1 & 2 PUMPHOUSEType: Treated Water POE Sub Type: PumphouseReport Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 30f16
f"~t?OntarioComments:Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report-------_..__._------_.._-Raw water from Wells 1 and 2 flows into the building from the individual well discharge lines which areequipped with flow meters and is dosed with sodium hypochlorite prior to blending in a commonheader that discharges into the reservoirs. The primary sodium hypochlorite disinfection system iscomprised <strong>of</strong> twinned systems (one dedicated system for each well header) comprised <strong>of</strong> twochemical metering pumps (duty and standby). each rated at 1.4 litres/hourfeeding from a 60 litrechemical solution tank. The automatic switchover from the duty to the standby pump occurs on dutypump failure and is remotely alarmed. Dosed water is then directed into a 4 cell. 95 cubic metrecapacity reservoir. Treated water is fed to the distribution system via three high lift pumps, two ratedat 540 litres/minute and one rated at 360 litres/minute. System pressure is maintained by the high liftpumps. Prior to discharging to the distribution system through a common discharge header, asecondary disinfection system doses the treated water again to maintain adequate chlorine residualswithin the distribution system. This secondary disinfection system is comprised <strong>of</strong> two chemicalmetering pumps (duty and standby), each rated at 0.59 litres/hour feeding from a 60 litre chemicalsolution tank. Continuous chlorine residual analysers measure chlorine residuals prior to waterdischarging to the reservoirs and prior to discharging to the distribution system. and a continuousturbidity analyser measures turbidity prior to treated water being discharged to the distribution system.A 30 kiloWatt standby diesel generator set is also contained within the pumphouse in order to ensurethat the system would be provided with water in the event <strong>of</strong> a power failure.Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 40f 16
f")ht?OntarioINSPECTION SUMMARYMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportINTRODUCTION* The primary focus <strong>of</strong> this inspection is to confirm compliance with Ministry <strong>of</strong> theEnvironment legislation and authorizing documents such as Orders and Certificates <strong>of</strong>Approval, as well as evaluating conformance with Ministry drinking water related policiesand guidelines during the inspectionperiod.The Ministry is implementing a rigorous and comprehensive approach in the inspection <strong>of</strong>drinking water systems that keys on the source, treatment and distribution components <strong>of</strong>the system as well as management practices.This drinking water system is subject to the legislative requirements <strong>of</strong> the Safe DrinkingWater Act, 2002 (SDWA) and regulations made therein, including Ontario Regulation 170/03,"Drinking Water Systems" (O.Reg.170/03). This inspection has been conducted pursuant toSection 81 <strong>of</strong> the SDWA.This report is based on a "focused" inspection <strong>of</strong> your system. Although the inspectioninvolved fewer activities than those normally undertaken by a detailed inspection, itcontained most <strong>of</strong> the elements required to assess key compliance issues.SOURCEYour system was chosen for a focused inspection during this inspection cycle becauseinspection findings over the past three years were such that the number <strong>of</strong> violations wereminimal or non existent, there were few or no orders issued to you that were <strong>of</strong> significancein the maintenance <strong>of</strong> water potability and there were no deficiencies as defined in O. Reg.172/03. The undertaking <strong>of</strong> a focused inspection at your drinking water system during thisyear's inspection cycle does not ensure that a similar type <strong>of</strong> inspection will be conductedat any point in the future.On May 9,20<strong>13</strong>, Provincial Officer Darren Haines conducted an announced inspection <strong>of</strong> theChurchill Drinking Water system which is situated within the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>. The Churchill DWS isclassified as a large municipal residential system as defined in O.Reg 170/03, and services thevillage <strong>of</strong> Churchill, which has a population <strong>of</strong> approximately 520 persons.Documents were given to the Ministry by the Owner/Operating Authority and were reviewed bothon and <strong>of</strong>f site. Ministry audit samples were collected on May 9,20<strong>12</strong> from two locations within theChurchill distribution system.The Churchill DWS relies on groundwater for its raw water supply and draws from three drilledwells referred to in this report as wells 1, 2 and 3. Raw water is primarily taken from well 3 withwells 1 and 2 only being run to obtain raw water samples and in case <strong>of</strong> a well 3 failure. Theprimary disinfection <strong>of</strong> raw water from the three wells is achieved through the addition <strong>of</strong> sodiumhypochlorite. There are two outbuildings on the Churchill DWS which are comprised <strong>of</strong> twopump houses, one for well 3 and one for wells 1 &2 and the reservoir.Both outbuildings were visited by the Ministry during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection. The entire village<strong>of</strong> Churchill is serviced by subsurface septic systems.The inspection review period for this inspection report is from May 9, 20<strong>12</strong> to May 9, 20<strong>13</strong>. Thisreport encompasses compliance with the Owners Municipal Drinking Water License (#<strong>12</strong>0-106)and the Drinking Water Works Permit (#<strong>12</strong>0-206) for the Churchill DWS as well as the SafeDrinking Water Act and Regulation 170/03.Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05f20<strong>13</strong> (ddfmmfyyyy) Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 16
tf'~::>l/T- OntarioSOURCEMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* The owner was maintaining the production well(s) in a manner sufficient to prevent entryinto the well <strong>of</strong> surface water and other foreign materials.Each <strong>of</strong> the three well casings for the Churchill DWS extends above grade and meets the minimumheight requirements as required by Ontario Regulation 903. All three wellshad sealed well caps, pad locks to prevent unauthorized entry and no annular spaces wereobserved around the wells which would allow surface water run-<strong>of</strong>f to enter the wells.* Measures were in place to protect the groundwater and/or GUDI source in accordance witha Permit and Licence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA.Conditions 10.1 to 10.3 <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-106, issued to the Owner for theChurchill DWS, discuss the provision for the elimination or minimization <strong>of</strong> impacts upon sourcewater quality for the Churchill drinking water system. Conditions 16.2.7 to 16.2.9 also discuss therequirements for regular well inspections, maintenance and remedial actions for situations wherethere is a risk to raw water quality for all production wells on the Churchill DWS. All <strong>of</strong> theseprovisions were observed to be in place by the Owner during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection.CAPACITY ASSESSMENT* There was sufficient monitoring <strong>of</strong> flow as required by the Permit and Licence or Approvalissued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWAPTTW 63<strong>13</strong>-7 JMRF5, issued to the Owner for the Churchill DWS, states that the permit holdershall maintain a record <strong>of</strong> all water takings which shall include the dates and times <strong>of</strong> water takingsand the total measured amounts <strong>of</strong> water pumped per day for each day that water is taken fromeach <strong>of</strong> the wells.Section 2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule C <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-106 states continuous flowmeasurement and recording shall be undertaken for: flow rate and daily volume <strong>of</strong> treated waterthat flows from the treatment subsystem to the distribution system; and the flow rate and dailyvolume <strong>of</strong> water that flows into the treatment subsystem.To capture flow data, the Owner has installed flow meters on each <strong>of</strong> the raw well water headersthat convey water from wells 1,2&3 into the treatment system. The Owner also has installed a flowmeter on the outgoing treated water being conveyed to the distribution system from the reservoir.All <strong>of</strong> the Owner's flow meters ·for the Churchill DWS are linked to their SCADA system formonitoring and recording and are calibrated annually. Flow meter verifications and calibrations forthe Churchill DWS were perforlT!ed on September 11,20<strong>12</strong> and October 4&11,20<strong>12</strong>.* The owner was in compliance with the conditions associated with maximum flow rate or therated capacity conditions in the Permit and Licence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> theSDWA.Municipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-106, issued for the Churchill DWS, states in Schedule C,condition 1.1 that the maximum daily volume <strong>of</strong> treated water that flows from the treatmentsubsystem to the distribution system shall not exceed 557m3/day for wells 1 &2 and <strong>12</strong>15 m3/dayfarwell 3.Based on records provided to the Ministry by the Owner, for the inspection review period, none <strong>of</strong>the above stated maximum flow rate parameters for the above noted authorizing document, wasexceeded during the inspection review period.TREATMENT PROCESSES* The owner had ensured that all equipment was installed in accordance with Schedule A andSchedule C <strong>of</strong> the Drinking Water Works Permit.All equipment that is identified in Schedule A and C <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water Works Permit <strong>12</strong>0-206,issued to the Owner for the Churchill DWS. has been installed. The Owner stated during thecourse <strong>of</strong> this inspection that no new treatment equipment has been installed and no alterationshave been made to the Churchill DWS during the inspection review period.Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 16
'):-:;t?OntarioTREATMENT PROCESSESMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* Records indicated that the treatment equipment was operated in a manner that achieved thedesign capabilities required under Ontario Regulation 170103 or a Permit, Licence orApproval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA at all times that water was being supplied toconsumers.Section 1-3 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 1 Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.)170103 requires the Owner <strong>of</strong> a drinkingwater system that obtains water from a raw water supply that is ground water to ensure provision <strong>of</strong>water treatment equipment that is designed to be capable <strong>of</strong> achieving, at all times, primarydisinfection in accordance with the Ministry's Procedure for Disinfection <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water inOntario. including at least 99 per cent (2.0-log) removal or inactivation <strong>of</strong> viruses by the time waterenters the distribution system. This is the case for the treatment train comprising the Churchilldrinking water system.To satisfy these requirements, the Owner has installed free available chlorine residual chemicaldisinfection systems, and employs the CT disinfection concept to quantify the capability <strong>of</strong> thechemical disinfection system and ensure the provision <strong>of</strong> effective pathogen 'inactivation for primarydisinfection purposes. Free available chlorine residual is achieved through the addition <strong>of</strong> sodiumhypochlorite and the appropriate amount <strong>of</strong> contact time is acheived within the 1195m contact mainwith from well 3 to the distribution system and the reservoir and within the 4 celled, 95 cubic metrecapacity reservoir. The treated water is then dosed with sodium hypochlorite again prior to enteringthe reservoir.Continuous chlorine analyzers measuring free available chlorine residual for primary andsecondary disinfection purposes, are supplied with treated water prior to entering the reservoir andprior to treated water being directed to the first consumer in the distribution system. All chlorineanalyzers on the Churchill DWS are linked to the Owner's SCADA system for monitoring purposes.* Records confirmed that the water treatment eqUipment which provides chlorination orchloramination for secondary disinfection purposes was operated so that at all times and alllocations in the distribution system the chlorine residual was never less than 0.05 mg/l freeor 0.25 mg/l combined.During the review <strong>of</strong> records provided by the Owner, it was found that during the inspection reviewperiod, all <strong>of</strong> the free chlorine residuals obtained by system operators within the distributionsystem, had residuals above 0.05mg/L. Secondary disinfectant residuals are monitored by theOwner through the use <strong>of</strong> continuous chlorine analyzers. which are linked to the Owners SCADAsystem or through the collection <strong>of</strong> weekly distribution chlorine residuals obtained by systemoperators.Chlorine residuals were obtained by the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection. Free chlorineresidual readings obtained by the Ministry, during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection, were 0.54 mg/L and0.67 mg/L at two qifferent locations in the Churchill distribution system.* The Operator-in-Charge had ensured that all equipment used in the processes was monitored, inspected, and evaluated.. The Owner has linked their SCADA system to monitor all regulatory activities at both <strong>of</strong> theChurchill pumphouse sites. Both pumphouse's equipment and analyzers are checked, calibratedand inspected on a regular basis by one <strong>of</strong> the system operators. All analyzer calibrations aredocumented in each <strong>of</strong> the pumphouse logbooks, whereby it states the date. time, piece <strong>of</strong>equipment. description <strong>of</strong> work completed and which operator performed the work.TREATMENT PROCESS MONITORINGReport Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 16Site #: 220005063CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy)
('~t -:>vF OntarioTREATMENT PROCESS MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* Primary disinfection chlorine monitoring was being conducted at a location approved byPermit, Licence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA, or at/near a location wherethe intended CT had just been achieved.The Owner has installed chlorine analyzers for measuring chlorine residuals for primary .disinfection, which are supplied with continuous water samples taken from a point where theintended contact time has just been completed for primary disinfection' purposes. The Owner hasinstalled a chlorine analyzer on the Churchill DWS, which is the approved location, after the 1195meter long contact main from well 3, and prior to treated water flowing into the reservoir as well asinstalling one pilor to treated water discharging to the distribution system from the reservoir., /* The secondary disinfectant residual was measured as required for the distribution. system.The Owner utilizes a portable direct read Qut colourimeter to perform secondary disinfection testsat various locations on a weekly basis within the distribution system for the Churchill drinking water. system. These readings are taken at least 48 hours apart and are recorded in the Daily Operationallogbook as well as on a weekly chlorine sampling spreadsheet:* Operators were examining continuous monitoring test results and they were examining theresults within 72 hours <strong>of</strong> the test. . .The Owner prints a copy <strong>of</strong> a "daily summary sheet", from their SCADA program, for each <strong>of</strong> theirdrinking water systems. The information contained on these daily summary sheets are as follows:the Minimum, maximum and average for well flows, high lift pump flow, pre and post chlorineresiduals and turbidity, well pump runtimes and high lift pump run times. The Owner's operatorsreview these daily summary sheets within hours and report any abnormalities.* All continuous monitoring equipment utilized for sampling and testing required by O. Reg;170/03, or approval or order, were equipped with alarms or shut-<strong>of</strong>f mechanisms thatsatisfied the standards described in Schedule 6.The Owner stated during the inspection that all continuous analyzers, utilized for monitoring freechlorine residuals on the Churchill DWS, are linked to their SCADA system and were configured toalarm should the free available chlorine residual fall outside <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the pre-determined setpoints. The alarm set points for the Churchill DWS are as follows:Well #3 Low - 0.80Well #3 High - 3.00Reservoir Pre Chlorine Low - 0.30Reservoir Pre Chlorine High - 2.50Reservoir Post Chlorine Low - 0.40Reservoir Post Chlorine High - 4.25The Owner indicated that if an alarm sounds on one <strong>of</strong> the chlorine continuous analyzers, thateither the well pumps shut down (on pre-chlorine) or the high lift pump (on post chlorine) shut downand must be reset manually at the pumphouse.* Continuous monitoring equipment that was being utilized to fulfill O. Reg. 170/03requirements was performing tests fo'r the parameters with at least the minimum frequencyspecified in the Table in Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170/03 and recording data with theprescribed format.The Owner stated that all <strong>of</strong> the continuous analyzers on the Churchill drinking water systemprovide a reading to their SCADA system on a continuous basis.Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mmfyyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 16
f'):-:t?OntarioTREATMENT PROCESS MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* All continuous analysers were calibrated, maintained, and operated,in accordance with themanufacturer's instructions or the regulation.All <strong>of</strong> the continuous analyzers that the Owner has installed on the Churchill DWS, are verified witha handheld unit on a weekly basis by one <strong>of</strong> the system operators. The continuous analyzers arealso calibrated and maintenance performed by system operators on an as needed basis. Anymaintenance performed on the continuous monitoring equipment by system operators is typicallydocumented in the pumphouse logbook.OPERATIONS MANUALSI* The operations and maintenance manuals contained plans, drawings and process descriptions sufficient for the safe and efficient operation <strong>of</strong> the system. The Operations Manual appears to provide sufficient information/guidance for the safe and efficientoperation <strong>of</strong> the Churchill drinking water system.* The operations and maintenance manuals did'meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Permit andLicence or Approval issued underPart V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA.The Owner's Operations and Maintenance Manual appears to meet the the requirements asoutlined in condition 16.2, Schedule B <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking water License <strong>12</strong>0-106, issued to theOwner for the Churchill DWS.LOGBOOKS* Records or other record keeping mechanisms confirmed that operational testing not- performed by continuous monitoring equipment was being done by a certified operator,water quality analyst, or person who suffices the requirements <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170/037-5.SECURITYOnly adequately certified operators are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> to operate their drinking'water systems. These operators conduct all <strong>of</strong> the operational tests and calibrations, record all <strong>of</strong>the results obtained, make all <strong>of</strong> the log entries, and collect all <strong>of</strong>therequired samples to be sent tothe appropriate accredited laboratory. * The owner had provided security measures to protect components <strong>of</strong> the drinking-water 'system.Both <strong>of</strong> the Churchill pumphouses (well 3 and Wells 1 &2 plus the reservoir) are locked and aregenerally visited on a daily basis by operational staff. All reserVoir hatches and each <strong>of</strong> theproduction wells were locked to prevent unauthorized-access. Access to all locked premises arerestricted solely to the Owner's operators.CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING* The overall responsible operator had been designated for each subsystem.The Owner has designated the waterworks Operations Superintendent as the ORO for theChurchill DWS. The ORO has designated two <strong>of</strong> the Owners other licensed operators to act in hisabsence.* Operators in charge had been deSignated for all subsystems which comprised the drinkingwatersystem.The Owner has designated all licensed operators who are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> as OICfor the Churchill DWS.* Only certified operators made adjustments to the treatment equipment.All <strong>of</strong> the work that was undertaken on the treatment system for the Churchill drinking water systemwas performed by certified operators who are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>.~---, -.-----~---------.-----~~--~-~--...Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 90f16Site #: 220005063CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy)
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportWATER QUALITY MONITORING* All microbiological water quality monitoring requirements for distribution samples werebeing met.Subsection 10-2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 10 Ontario Regulation 170103 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system which serves 100,000 people orless, to collect at a minimum 8 microbiological samples plus one additional sample for every 1000people served by the system,within the distribution system on a monthly basis, with at least onedistribution sample taken each week. .Subsection 10-2 further stipulates that each <strong>of</strong> the distribution samples collected are tested forEscherichia coli, total coliforms and 25 percent <strong>of</strong> the samples taken are sampled for generalbacteria population expressed as colony counts on a heterotrophic plate count (HPC).The Churchill Well Supply serves a popuiation ot'approximately 520 people, therefore'requiring 8distribution samples to be taken each month, two <strong>of</strong> which must be tested for HPC. Recordsprovided by the Owner and reviewed for the inspection review period, indicate that the Owner hascomplied with these sampling .requirements, obtaining between 15 and 20 samples per month, atleast one sample per week, and analyzing at least 25% for HPC eVfdry month.* All microbiological water quality monitoring requirements for treated samples were beingmet. " . .Subsection 10-3 <strong>of</strong> schedule 10 <strong>of</strong> O.Reg. 170 requires that the Owner and the operating authority<strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the Churchill drinking water system,ensure that a water sample is taken at least once every week from the point at which treated waterenters the distribution system. The Owner and operating authority are required to ensure that each<strong>of</strong> these samples are tested forE .coli, total coliforms and general bacteria population expressed ascolony counts ona heterotrophic plate c
f')ht?Ontario~----,WATER QUALITY MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* All organic water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Sections <strong>13</strong>-2 and <strong>13</strong>-4 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170103 require the Owner and theoperating authority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system to ensure that at least onewater sample is taken every 36 months if the system obtains water from a raw water supply that isground water, such is the case for the Churchill drinking water system, and have those samplestested for every parameter set out in Schedule 24.The Owner conducted Organic sampling during the review period for the Churchill DWS onDecember 10, 20<strong>12</strong>. The Owner did not report any exceedences <strong>of</strong> any Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Objectives as a result <strong>of</strong> this sampling. Organic sample analysis is not required again untilDecember 2015.'* All trihalomethanes water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation wereconducted within the required frequency.Section <strong>13</strong>-6 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170103 requires the Owner and the operatin'gauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system,such as the Churchill drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one distribution sample is taken every 3 months and no morethan <strong>12</strong>0 days from the date <strong>of</strong> the last samp,le for THM's, from a point in the drinking-watersystem's distribution system, or in plumbing that is connected to the drinking water system that islikely to have an elevated potential for the formation <strong>of</strong> trihalohlethanes, and tested for'trihalomethanes.'The Owner conducted this required monitoring on June <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; September <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; December10, 20<strong>12</strong> and March <strong>12</strong>,20<strong>13</strong>. All <strong>of</strong> the results exceeded the prescribed 'limits for THM's (rollingaverage <strong>of</strong> 1 OOug/L) within the ODWQO limit. The Owner obtained THM resamples and made thenecessary notifications <strong>of</strong> an adverse water quality incident under Regulation 170103, which isdiscussed later in this report.* All nitrate/nitrite water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conducted within the required frequency for the DWS. Section <strong>13</strong>-7 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the Churchill drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one distribution sample is taken every 3 months and no morethan <strong>12</strong>0 days from the date <strong>of</strong> the last sample for Nitrates/Nitrites.Based on the sample results that were given to the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection, the Ownerconducted this required monitoring on June <strong>12</strong>,20<strong>12</strong>; September <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; December 10, 20<strong>12</strong>and March <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>13</strong>. Results <strong>of</strong>that sampling would indicate that the water met the prescribedstandards set out for those parameters in the ODWQS.* All sodium water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Sections <strong>13</strong>-8 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the Churchill drinkingwater system, to ensure that atleast one water sample is taken every 60 months and tested forSodium.The Owner conducted Sodium sampling for the Churchill DWS during the review period onDecember 10, 20<strong>12</strong>. Results <strong>of</strong> that sample were reported as an adverse sample with a result <strong>of</strong>58.1 mg/L. A resample was taken by the Owner on December.17, 20<strong>12</strong> with a result <strong>of</strong> 56.8 mg/L.The Owner took all steps that were required by the SMDHU. The Owner is not scheduled to takesodium samples again until December 2017.'Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 16
f"):-t?OntarioWATER QUALITY MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* All fluoride water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Section <strong>13</strong>-9 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the Churchill drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one water sample is taken every 60 months and tested forFluoride.The Owner last obtained a fluoride sample for the Churchill DWS in March 2010. The sampleresults were within the prescribed limits. The Owner is not scheduled to take fluoride samplesagain until March 2015.* All water quality monitoring requirements imposed by the Permit and Licence or Approvalissued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA were being met.* All sampling requirements for lead prescribed by schedule 15.1 <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170/03 werebeing met.The Owner collected their annual distribution lead sample from the Meadowland sample stationwithin the Churchill DWS distribution system. The lead sample was collected by the Owner on June<strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong> and the lead sample collected did not exceed the lead standard within the ODWQS.* Records confirmed that chlorine residual tests were being conducted at the same time andat the same location that microbiological samples were obtained.A review <strong>of</strong> the Churchill DWS sampling records, provided by the Owner for the inspection reviewperiod, found that each time a microbiological sample was taken by the Owner in the distributionsystem, a corresponding chlorine residual was also obtained. All <strong>of</strong> the in-house chlorinemonitoring and sampling information that the Owner undertakes for the Churchill drinking watersystem, is recorded in the pumphouse logbooks and on the laboratory sample submission sheet.WATER qUALITY ASSESSMENT* The audit samples collected by the inspector met the applicable Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Standards and/or the aesthetic objectives or operation guidelines. The results <strong>of</strong>·the audit sampling are summarized as follows:On May 9,20<strong>13</strong>, audit distribution samples were obtained by the Ministry for the Churchill drinkingwater system, at two different locations within the distribution system. Ministry audit microbiologicalsamples were taken at the Churchill Community Centre and at the Meadowland sample station.The results <strong>of</strong> the Ministry audit samples showed compliance with the Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Standards (O.Reg. 169/03). Free available chlorine residuals were taken at the same timeand locations as the distribution samples and ranged from 0.54 mg/L to 0.67 mg/l. The Ownerregularily utilizes these sites for their sampling purposes which are considered secure samplesites.A copy <strong>of</strong> these Ministry samples analytical results are attached as an appendix to this report.* Records show that water sample results taken during the review period met the OntarioDrinking Water Quality Standards (0. Reg. 169/03), with the following exceptions:The audit samples that were collected by the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection, had levels belowthe Ontario Drinking Water Quality Objectives (ODWQO).The Churchill DWS has historically experienced high levels <strong>of</strong> trihalomethanes (THM) which eitherexceed the single sample limit or the rolling monthly average limit <strong>of</strong> 100ug/L as outlined in theODWQO. There were THM exceedences, from samples that the Owner obtained during theinspection review period, that were reported as adverse by the Owner as required.The Owner also reported a sodium sample for the Churchill DWS which exceeded the limit outlinedwithin the ODWQO. Both the sodium and THM exceedences are discussed in greater detail in adifferent section <strong>of</strong> this report.Report Generated for hainesda on 27f05f20<strong>13</strong> (ddfmmfyyyy) Page <strong>12</strong> <strong>of</strong> 16Site #: 220005063CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09f05f20<strong>13</strong> (ddfmmfyyyy)
(')::..::t -:>vr- OntarioREPORTING & CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ,1Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* Corrective actions (as per Schedule'17) had been taken to address adverse conditions,including any other steps that were directed by the Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health.There were a total <strong>of</strong> 5 AWOl's reported by the Owner for the Churchill DWS during the inspectionreview period. One <strong>of</strong> the AWOl's reported by the Owner was for sodium (AWOl #109553) and theother four AWOl's (106495; 108493; 109586; 110272) were for trihalomethanes exceedences <strong>of</strong>either a single limit or the rolling average.The Owner performed all <strong>of</strong> the required corrective actions as per Regulation 170/03. No furtheractions were recommended by the local medical <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> health (MOH) beyond what is requiredby Regulation 170/03 for the THM exceedences at the Churchill DWS.* All required notifications <strong>of</strong> adverse water quality incidents were immediately provided asper O. Reg. 170/03 16-6.The Owner was in contact verbally to the Spills Action Centre and the local MOH (SMDHU)immediately after observations or notifications were received <strong>of</strong> an adverse water quality incidentfor the Churchill DWS.* Where required continuous monitoring equipment used for the monitoring <strong>of</strong> chlorineresidual and/or turbidity triggered an alarm or an automatic shut-<strong>of</strong>f, a qualified personresponded in a timely manner and took appropriate actions.The Owner stated that the response time to all alarms during normal business hours and afternormal business hours by the on-call operator is at a maximum 1 hour. The Owner does have awritten procedure for responding to alarms which is kept in their Emergency and Contingency plan.Details <strong>of</strong> any after hours response is also documented in the pumphouse logbook.Report Generated for hainesda on 27105/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page <strong>13</strong> <strong>of</strong> 16
f")ht ">vYOntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report .NON·COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIONS REQUIRED,This section provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all non-compliance with regulatory requirements identified during theinspection period, as well as actions required to address these issues. Further details pertaining to theseitems can be found in the body <strong>of</strong> the inspection report.Not Applicable, .Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mmlyyyy) Site#: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 16
f"~t?OntarioSUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND BEST PRACTICE ISSUESMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportThis section provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all recommendations and best practice issues identified during theinspection period. Details pertaining to these items can be found in the body <strong>of</strong> the inspection report. In theinterest <strong>of</strong> continuous improvement in the interim, it is recommended that owners and operators develop anawareness <strong>of</strong> the following issues and consider measures to address them.Not Applicable---____~,__ Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 15 <strong>of</strong> 16
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportSIGNATURES Inspected By: Sig fficer): .Darren Haines"Reviewed & Approved By:Signature: (Supervisor): Craig Seabrook~E. Review & Approval Date: 05 -2-1! tNote: This inspection does not in any way suggest that there is or has been compliance withapplicable legislation and regulations as they apply or may apply to this facility. It is, and remains,the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the owner and/or operating authority to ensure compliance with all applicablelegislative and regulatory requirements. .Report Generated for hainesda on 27/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005063 CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 09/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 16
't! I: "I"' I! 1f'):-:..t -:> ,Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment,Drinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix A~r OntarioStakeholder Appendix
June 20<strong>12</strong>Key Reference and Guidance Material forMunicipal Residential Drinking Water SystemsMany useful materials are posted on the Ministry<strong>of</strong> the Environment's Drinking Water Ontariowebsite at www.ontario.caJddnkingwater to helpin the operation <strong>of</strong> your drinking water system.Below is a list <strong>of</strong> key materials frequently used byowners and operators <strong>of</strong> municipal drinking watersystems. To read or download these materials, goto Drinking Water Ontario and search in theResources section by Publication Number.Visit Drinking Water Ontario for more usefulmaterials. Contact the Public <strong>Info</strong>rmation Centre ifyou need assistance or have questions at 1-800-5654923/416-325-4000 or picemail.moe@ontario.ca.7152e7467.(" ':Procedure for Disinfection <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water in Ontari~ cStrategl~s' forAcidstlie Disiinfe:cti()O D.·"ti.i"t",Inm,..th,on", and Haloacetice00000000I'-'.6560e7423engfor'L.ead: Stand~utrand Reduced Sampling and7<strong>12</strong>8eDrinking Water System Contact <strong>List</strong>ge01 " " OoclIn.1entfo(QntariO Drinking Water Quality Standards~".) .ontario.ca/drinkingwaterPISS 8990btI'~z,-Y "> Ontario
Juin 20<strong>12</strong>Principaux guides et documents de reference sur les reseaux residentiels municipaux d'eau potableBeaucoup de documentation sur Ie fonctionnementd'un reseau d'eau potable se trouve sur Ie site Webdu ministere de l'Environnement.Vous trouverez ci-dessous la liste des principauxdocuments que les proprietaires et les exploitantsde reseaux municipaux d'eau potable utilisentfrequemment. Pour lire ou telecharger cesdocuments, allez sur Ie site Web du Ministere, eteffectuez une recherche par numero de pUblicationdans Ia section RESSOURCES.Consultez Ie site d'Eau potable Ontario pourobtenir d'autre documentation. Communiquez avecIe Centre d'information du public au 1 800 565-4923ou au 416 325-4000, ou encore apicemail.moe@ontario.ca si vous avez des questions ou besoind'aide.2601f000000006560fr------------------7423f7<strong>12</strong>8f4449f01. reseaux municipaux d'eau;." ~:f :: .. "...i , nBulletin du Programme des permis de reseaux municipaux d'eau potable, numero 1,janvier 2011Guide sur I'accredit.ation desexploitantsde 'reseauxCt'eaiJ potable et desde la qualite de .I'eau de 'reseaux d'eau'potable~'~;,Prelevement d'echantillons dans Ie cadre du programme d'analyse de la teneur enplomb de I'eau dans les collectivitesontario.ca/drinklngwaterPISS 8990btI'~vF "> Ontario
f'~t?OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentDrinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix BAudit Samples
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C2023<strong>12</strong> Print Date: May. 14,20<strong>13</strong>10:01 AM By REPORTADMIN **** REPRINTED ****Program Code <strong>13</strong>0074201 Program: MOE OPERATIONS DIVISIONStudy: WATER, COMMUNAL Project: SOUTHWEST REGION - BARRIE DIST Activity: WTP MUNIC INSPECTIADVERS NOTIF Organization: District Manager - BarrieOrg. Id: 4232Final reports to :HAINES, DARREN SEABROOK, CRAIG VALLEY, JENNY Mail this copy to ,.HAINES, DARRENMOE - BARRIE DISTRICT OFFICE54 CEDAR POINTE DRIVE, UNIT <strong>12</strong>03BARRIE,ONTL4N 5R7..--~,;,....",~ '¥'•..,.· ... __ hApproved for release by: DAVE MORSE Manager, Organic Contaminants Section Approved date: May. 14,20<strong>13</strong>-~. --~----------.......----~~-.:...;...-. .: +-_.- • -----~="'- "" ~--- S-----·--·-~t \. .' '... .;_. .:. I .~t---:--:--:'"]_ ~. .c •.. _~.• ~ ...,.. ~.._ .._~:.' .• .\ . ~d!LOGIN DESCRIPTION: 220005063 CHURCHILL WS DARREN HAINES 705-739-6382''''. J;;~'.. JThe results relate only to items tested. To provide customer service feedback on this report and/or other services provided by LaSB, please contact the LaSB HelpDesk at 416-235-6030 or the Customer Service Manager at 416-235-5831 This report contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other distribution <strong>of</strong> this report, or taking any action on its content is strictly prohibited. If you have received this report in error, please contact the LaSB HelpDesk at 416-235-6030 or the Customer Service Manager at 416-235-5831 Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 5"
_·__••~L. ~____."-_-_ ___.---..---' ____ ____...______--...--- ..-.. • ..~ ....'~~K'.'--.-:~Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C2023<strong>12</strong> Print Date: May. 14,20<strong>13</strong>10:01 AM By REPORTADMINFlelificr"l Station ID'CH-DH- ' 22000506301 Sample IDC2023<strong>12</strong>-000 1M0E:*~IMS Products Requested:WD E3226A PA3226UTM: Collection AccuracyZone Easting Northing Method M!p Datum, (metres),1·1~·-::'~61.15f9:-J~901~35 -1 (WS~ f:.rAD83~~·-r2:"5M-=--·]~ampielqcation"t)escnplion--: __ ·--"·"-~·
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C2023<strong>12</strong> Print Date: May. 14,20<strong>13</strong>10:01 AM By REPORTADMIN •••• REPRINTED ••••Field ID: r CA-t>H:02Sample ID: IC2023<strong>12</strong>-0002 IMOE*LlMS ID:20<strong>13</strong>WD.18-00244Station ID: 220005063Coliect Date: 09 MAY 20<strong>13</strong>Sample Location Description: CHURCHILL COMMUNITY CENTRE @6322YONGE ST, DisTRIBUTIONPage 3 <strong>of</strong> 5
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C2023<strong>12</strong> Print Date: May. 14,20<strong>13</strong>10:01 AM By REPORTADMIN •••• REPRINTED ••••CODEDESCRIPTIONNDAT NO DATA: ABSENT NT: TOTAL COLI FORMS NOON NO DATA: NOT DETECTED NT: DETERIORATION INDICATORS >10C RECD>10C. DATA MAY NOT REFLECT THAT OF ORIG.SAMPlE NDAE NO DATA: ABSENT NT: ESCHERICHIA COLI NON-TARGET TEXTUAl RESULTID: C2023<strong>12</strong>-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname: NT: Tolal Coliforms Value: Units: cl100ml Qual: NDAT Remarks: >10CAbsent-------------------------------------~--------------------------------C2023<strong>12</strong>-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname: NT: Escherichia coli Value: Units: cl100ml Qual: NDAE Remarks: >10CAbsentNot DetectedC2023<strong>12</strong>-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname: NT: Deterioration Indicators Value: Units: c/100ml Qual: NDDN Remarks: >10CSample 10: C2023<strong>12</strong>-0002 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname: NT: Total Coliforms Value: Units: cl100ml Qual: NDAT Remarks: >10CAbsentI~~mple ID: C2023<strong>12</strong>-0002 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname: NT: Escherichia coli Value: Units: cl100ml Qual: NDAE RemarkS: >10CAbsent~~~______________________________________________~________~__Sample ID: C2023<strong>12</strong>-0002 <strong>List</strong>id : 322611 Parmname; NT: Deterioration Indicators Value: Units: c/100ml Qual: NDDN Remarks: >10CNot DetectedTEXT COMMENTProduct CompletionSample ID Matrix Method Product Analytical Department Completion DateC2023<strong>12</strong>·0001 WD E3226A PA3226 6510 <strong>13</strong>·MAY-<strong>13</strong>C2023<strong>12</strong>-0002 WD E3226A PA3226 6510 <strong>13</strong>-MAY-<strong>13</strong>LaSB Method SummaryMethod Method Description Status Status DescriptionPage 4 <strong>of</strong>5I
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C2023<strong>12</strong> Print Date: May. 14, 20<strong>13</strong> 10:01 AM By REPORTADMIN ***. REPRINTED *•••E3226A THE DETECTIONoF-COUFORM BAcTERIA INCLUbING" ESCHERICHIA ROUTINE .. Method has'Seen-fufiy"\iafldated, is oeemed fit" forpurp·ose-andfiasthe associatE~dCOlliN DRINKING WATER BY THE PRESENCE-ABSENCE PROCEDURE UncertaintY iriforrTiation available upon reauest .••• End <strong>of</strong> Report •••Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 5
f'~t?OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentDrinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix DInspection Rating Record
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year': 20<strong>13</strong>-2014)I;>WS Name: CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEM·DWS Number: 220005063DWS Owner: <strong>Innisfil</strong> l The Corporation Of The <strong>Town</strong> OfMunicipal.Location: <strong>Innisfil</strong>Regulation: O.REG 170/03Category: Large Municipal Residential SystemType Of Inspection: FocusedInspection Date: May 9/ 20<strong>13</strong>Ministry Office: Barrie DistrictInspection ModuleMaximum Question Rating: 507Non~Compliance RatingSource 0/28capacity Assessment 0/30Treatment Processes 0/77Operations Manuals 0/28Logbooks 0/14Certification and Training 0/28Water Quality Monitoring 0/<strong>12</strong>4Reporting & Corrective Actions 0/66Treatment Process Monitoring 0/1<strong>12</strong>TOTAL 0/507IInspection· Risk Rating I0.00% IIFINAL INSPECTION RATING: 1100.00 0 /0 IInspection Rating Record Generated On 28-MAY-<strong>13</strong> (Inspection ID: 1-AOCEO).
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment - Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 20<strong>13</strong>-2014)DWS Name: CHURCHILL DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDWS Number: 220005063DWS Owner: <strong>Innisfil</strong>, The Corporation Of The <strong>Town</strong> OfMunicipal Location: <strong>Innisfil</strong>Regulation: O.REG 170/03Category: Large Municipal Residential SystemType Of Inspection: FocusedInspection Date: May 9, 20<strong>13</strong>Ministry Office: Barrie DistrictMaximum Question Rating: 507IInspection Risk Rating I0.00% IIFINAL INSPECTION RATING: 1100.00 0 /0 IInspection Rating Record Generated On 28-MAY-<strong>13</strong> (Inspection ID: l-AOCEO);
INFRASTRUCTUREM E M O R A N D U MDATE: July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>TO:FROM:SUBJECT:Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Members <strong>of</strong> CouncilLisa Wooldridge, Senior Engineering TechnologistSewage Pump Station #3 Upgrades - Tender AwardIn accordance with the <strong>Town</strong>’s Purchasing Policy, Council is to be advised by memo followingthe award <strong>of</strong> any tender that exceeds $1 million in value.The tendering process was successful in receiving bids from 6 contractors. The bid submissionswere all checked for completeness, with Tenebac Ltd being confirmed to have the low compliantbid.Reference checks have been completed for Tenebac Ltd with all reports received indicatingpositive comments about the performance and abilities <strong>of</strong> the contractor. Therefore the low bidby Tenebac Ltd in the total bid price <strong>of</strong> $1,706,515.20 (including 1.76% HST) has beenaccepted by staff and awarded.The low bid was less than the approved budget for the project therefore in accordance with thePurchasing Policy the award <strong>of</strong> the contract is completed by administration and does not requireCouncil ratification.Construction Budget $2,000,000Low Bid $1,706,515Favorable variance $293,485The Sewage Pumping Station #3 contract is to provide upgrades to the existing facility. Thescope <strong>of</strong> works includes the replacement <strong>of</strong> the diesel generator and three pumps, and allmechanical and electrical equipment and controls to make the system operational includingminor structural modifications to the building. Completion <strong>of</strong> this project is expected at the end<strong>of</strong> 20<strong>13</strong>.Should Council have any questions please feel free to contact me.
INFRASTRUCTUREM E M O R A N D U MDATE: July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>TO: Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Members <strong>of</strong> CouncilFROM: Andrew Campbell, Director <strong>of</strong> InfrastructureSUBJECT: 20<strong>13</strong> Annual MOE Inspection Report – <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights Well SupplyThe Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment (MOE) conducted an Annual Inspection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> HeightsDrinking Water System on May 23, 20<strong>13</strong>. The focus <strong>of</strong> annual inspection is to confirmcompliance with MOE legislation and authorizing documents such as Orders, Certificates <strong>of</strong>Approval, Drinking Water Works Permits, Municipal Drinking Water Licenses and Permits toTake Water.The MOE conducted a "focused" inspection <strong>of</strong> the system to assess key compliance issues.The <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights system was chosen for a focused inspection during this inspection cyclebecause inspection findings over the past three years were such that the number <strong>of</strong> violationswere minimal or non-existent, there were few or no orders issued to the <strong>Town</strong> that were <strong>of</strong>significance in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> water potability, and there were no deficiencies as defined inO. Reg. 172/03.The attached Inspection Report outlines the findings. There were no items <strong>of</strong> non-complianceand the MOE did not make any recommendations for changes to the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights system inthe report.The MOE Inspection Risk Framework results for this inspection are; A 0.00% Inspection Risk Rating; and Final Inspection Rating <strong>of</strong> 100.00%.Should you require further information regarding this report please feel free to contact me.Attachment:1. <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights Drinking Water System – 20<strong>13</strong> Drinking Water Inspection Report
,,~ Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment Ministere de ,'EnvironnementSafe Drinking Water BranchDirection du controle de laqualite de )'eaut~Ontariopotable ..Barrie District OfficeUnit <strong>12</strong>01Bureau du district de Barrie54 Cedar Pointe Drive Bureau <strong>12</strong>01Barrie ON L4N 5R754, chemin Cedar PointeBarrie (Ontario) L4N 5R7June 17,20<strong>13</strong><strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>215525 Sideroad<strong>Innisfil</strong>, Ontario L9S 4V3Attention: Mr. John Skorobohacz- Chief Administrative OfficerRe: InnisftlHeights Drinking Water System,20<strong>12</strong>/20<strong>13</strong> Drinking Water Inspe~ction ReportPlease find enclosed the Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment final report <strong>of</strong> the inspection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DrinkingWater System, <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> (DWS #220005081). This report provides an assessment <strong>of</strong>compliance withapplicable legislation, Certificates <strong>of</strong> Approval, Permits to Take Water and any other control documents. Results <strong>of</strong>Ministry audit samples <strong>of</strong> treated and distribution system water are also attached as an appendix.This inspection was conducted under the Ministry's inspection protocol on May 23,20<strong>13</strong>. As such, the reportformat and scope may vary from previous inspections. You will note as you review the report that the Ministry'sLicensing and Approvals Branch is included in the circulation <strong>of</strong> the report. This is in keeping with therecommendations <strong>of</strong>Justice O'Connor arising from the Walkerton Inquiry.Section 19 <strong>of</strong> the Safe Drinking Water Act (Standard <strong>of</strong>Care) creates a number <strong>of</strong> obligations for individuals whoexercise decision-making authority over municipal drinking water systems. Please be aware that the Ministry hasencouraged such individuals, particularly municipal councillors, to take steps to be better informed about thedrinking water systems over which they have decision-making authority. These steps could include asking for acopy <strong>of</strong> this inspection report and a review <strong>of</strong> its findings. Further information about Section 19 can be found in'Taking Care a/Your Drinking Water: A Guide/or Members a/Municipal Councils" found under "Resources" onthe Drinking Water Ontario website at www.ontario.ca/drinkingwater.Additionally, in order to measure individual inspection results, the Ministry has established an inspectioncompliance risk framework based on the principles <strong>of</strong> the Inspection, Investigation & Enforcement (II&E)Secretariat and advice <strong>of</strong>internal/external risk experts. The Inspection Summary Rating Record (IRR), included asAppendix E <strong>of</strong> the inspection report, provides the Ministry, the system owner and the local Public Health Units witha summarized quantitative measure <strong>of</strong>the drinking water system's annual inspection and regulated water qualitytesting performance. Please note the attached IRR methodology memo describing how the risk rating model hasimproved to better reflect the health related and administrative non-compliance found in an inspection report. IRRratings are published (for the previous inspection year) in the Ministry's Chief Drinking Water Inspector's AnnualReport. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the rating, please contact Craig Seabrook, Drinking WaterProgram Supervisor, at (705) 739-6392 or Sheri Broeckel, Drinking Water Program Supervisor, at (705) 739-6386.ersigned, should you have any questions or concerns regarding the above.DDrinking Water Inspection Program - InspectorMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentBarrie District OfficePhone: (705) 739-6382
cc: Medical Officer <strong>of</strong>Health, Simcoe Muskoka District Health UnitMOE Barrie District Office FileDon Bauerlein, Superintendent, Water Works Operations, <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong>lnnisfilWayne Wilson, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation AuthorityDon Goodyear, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Inspection Report Site Number: 220005081Inspection Number: 1-AOCCIDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: May 23,20<strong>13</strong>Inspected By:Darren Haines--"----.--"''''
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportOWNER INFORMATION:Company Name: INNISFIL. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OFStreet Number: 2101 Unit Identifier:Street Name:City:INNISFIL BEACH RdINNISFILProvince: ON Postal Code: L9S 1A1INSPECTION DETAILS:Site Name:Site Address:County/District:MOE District/Area Office:Health Unit:Conservation AuthorityMNR Office:Category:INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMINNISFIL<strong>Innisfil</strong>Barrie DistrictSIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNITN/AN/ASite Number: 220005081Inspection Type:Inspection Number:Large Municipal ResidentialAnnounced1-AOCCIDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: May 23.20<strong>13</strong>Date <strong>of</strong> Previous Inspection:COMPONENTS DESCRIPTIONSite (Name): MOE DWS MappingType: DWS Mapping Point Sub Type:Comments:Not ApplicableSite (Name): DISTRIBUTION (WATER INSPECTION)Type: Other Sub Type: ReservoirComments:The <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights Well Supply drinking-water system services approximately 35 industrial and 21commercial users and approximately 100 residential service connections. The distribution system iscomprised <strong>of</strong> approximately <strong>13</strong> kilometres <strong>of</strong> polyvinylchloride piping, 87 hydrants and 75 valves. Inaddition. two dedicated sample taps are located in the distribution system.An in-ground. two cell water storage reservoir with a capacity <strong>of</strong> 568 cubic metres is located within thedistribution system. Two duty highlift pumps. each rated at <strong>12</strong>.<strong>12</strong> litres/second. supply water to thesystem. A third pump. rated at 63.6 litres/second. can also provide water in the event <strong>of</strong> a fire. Thereservoir is also equipped with a bulk water transfer station for water haulers with <strong>Town</strong> approval anda 100 kilowatt standby diesel generator for use in the event <strong>of</strong> power failure.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 15
tr'~>l/F OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportSite (Name):WELL 3 RAWType: Source Sub Type: GroundComments:. Well 3 is located outdoors at the eastern boundary <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights industrial park. The well wasconstructed in 1990 by International Water Supply aild is described within Certificate <strong>of</strong> Approval2089-5TES8G as being a 304 by 608 millimetre diameter double cased well that is 68.6 metres deep.The well is equipped with a submersible well pump with a rated capacity <strong>of</strong> 36 litres/second, a pitlessadaptor, a sanitary well seal and a discharge pipe from the well to the feed line within the pumphouse.Site (Name):WELL 2 RAWType: Source Sub Type: GroundComments:Well 2 is located outdoors adjacent to the pumphouse approximately 150 metres north <strong>of</strong> Well 3. Thewell was constructed in 1974 by Snider Drilling and is described within Certificate <strong>of</strong> Approval 20895TES8G as being a 254 millimetre diameter, 77.44 metre deep drilled groundwater production well.The well is equipped with a submersible well pump with a rated capacity <strong>of</strong> 34 litres/second, a pitlessadaptor, a sanitary well seal and a discharge pipe from the well to the feed line within the pumphouse.Site (Name):PUMPHOUSE TREATEDType: Treated Water POE Sub Type: PumphouseComments:Raw water from Wells 2 and 3 flows into the building through individual well discharge lines eachequipped with raw water sampling taps, flow meters and raw water blow<strong>of</strong>fs. The raw water thencombines in a common header whElre it is dosed with sodium hypochlorite. The sodium hypochlorite'disinfection system is comprised <strong>of</strong> two chemical metering pumps (duty and standby), each rated at1.85 litres/hour feeding from a 205 litre chemical solution tank. The automatic switch over from theduty to the standby pump occurs on duty pump failure and is remotely alarmed. Dosed water is thendirected into an approximately 105 metre long, 600 millimetre nominal diameter chlorine contact mainwhere it is afforded contact time. Continuous chlorine residual and turbidity analysers draw samplewater from the end <strong>of</strong> the contact main, the location where intended CT is achievedA 60 kiloWatt standby diesel generator set is also contained within the pumphouse in order to ensurethat the system would be provided with water in the event <strong>of</strong> a power failure. This generator isapproved under Certificate <strong>of</strong> Approval 5436-5VCQCJ ..------_.__._--_._--_.__._._-Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 15
'~trOntario--~.---- ......~---......INSPECTION SUMMARYMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportINTRODUCTION* The primary focus <strong>of</strong> this inspection is to confirm compliance with Ministry <strong>of</strong> theEnvironment legislation and authorizing documents such as Orders and Certificates <strong>of</strong>Approval, as well as evaluating conformance with Ministry drinking water related policiesand guidelines during the inspection period.The Ministry is implementing a rigorous and comprehensive approach in the inspection <strong>of</strong>drinking water systems that keys on the source, treatment and distribution components <strong>of</strong>the system as well as management practices.This drinking water system is subject to the legislative requirements <strong>of</strong> the Safe DrinkingWater Act, 2002 (SDWA) and regulations made therein, including Ontario Regulation 170103,"Drinking Water Systems" (O.Reg.170/03). This inspection has been conducted pursuant toSection 81 <strong>of</strong> the SDWA.This report is based on a "focused" inspection <strong>of</strong> your system. Although the inspectioninvolved fewer activities than those normally undertaken by a detailed inspection, itcontained most <strong>of</strong> the elements required to assess key compliance issues. $SOURCEYour system was chosen for a focused inspection during this inspection cycle becauseinspection findings over the past three years were such that the number <strong>of</strong> violations wereminimal or non existent, there were few or no orders issued to you that were <strong>of</strong> significancein the maintenance <strong>of</strong> water potability and there were no deficiencies as defined in O. Reg.172/03. The undertaking <strong>of</strong> a focused inspection at your drinking water system during thisyear's inspection cycle does not ensure that a similar type <strong>of</strong> inspection will be conductedat any pOint in the future.On May 22, 20<strong>13</strong>, Provincial Officer Darren Haines conducted an announced inspection <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights Drinking Water system which is situated within the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> InnisfiL The <strong>Innisfil</strong>Heights DWS is classified as a large municipal residential system as defined in O.Reg 170/03, andservices the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights area, which has a population <strong>of</strong> approximately 225 persons.Documents were given to the Ministry by the Owner/Operating Authority and were reviewed bothon and <strong>of</strong>f site. Ministry audit samples were collected on May 22.20<strong>13</strong> from two locations withinthe <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights distribution system.The <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS relies on groundwater for its raw water supply and draws from two drilledwells referred to in this report as wells 2 and 3. The primary disinfection <strong>of</strong> raw water from the twowells is achieved through the addition <strong>of</strong> sodium hypochlorite. There is a mix <strong>of</strong> residential.commercial and industrial properties located within the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights distribution system.The inspection review period for this inspection report is from June 19. 20<strong>12</strong> to May 22, 20<strong>13</strong>. TheOwner received a final Municipal Drinking Water License (#<strong>12</strong>0-105) for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWSon January 20. 2011 and their Drinking Water Works Permit (#<strong>12</strong>0-205) for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> HeightsDWS on January 19, 2011.This report encompasses compliance with the above noted Drinking Water License and Permitwhich were both in effect at the time <strong>of</strong> this inspection.Report Generated for halnesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (ddimm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05<strong>12</strong>0<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 4 <strong>of</strong> 15
,,~t :>-f"tF OntarioSOURCEMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report.* The owner was maintaining the productionwell(s) in a manner sufficient to prevent entryinto the well <strong>of</strong> surface water and other foreign materials.Each <strong>of</strong> the two well casings for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS extends above grade and meets theminimum height requirement as required by Ontario Regulation 903/90. Both <strong>of</strong> the wellshad sealed well caps, pad locks to prevent unauthorized entry and no annular spaces wereobserved around the wells which would allow surface water run-<strong>of</strong>f to enter the wells. A site visit toboth wells 2&3 was performed by the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection and at that time, both wellsappeared to be in compliance with Regulation 903. .* Measures were in place to protect the groundwater and/or GUOI source in accordance witha Permit and Licence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SOWA.Conditions 10.1 to 10.3 <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-105, issued to the Owner, discussthe provision for the elimination or minimization <strong>of</strong> impacts upon source water quality for the <strong>Innisfil</strong>Heights drinking water system. Conditions 162.7 to 16.2.9 also discuss the requirements forregular well inspections, maintenance and remedial actions for situations where there is a risk toraw water quality for all production ,wells on the Innis~1 Heights DWS. All <strong>of</strong> these provisions wereobserved to be in place by the Owner during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection.Note: It was found during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection that, in a field immediately adjacent to well 2and definitely within 100m <strong>of</strong> well 2, a farmer had again planted a wheat crop. The Owner wasmade aware <strong>of</strong> this situation during the previous inspection report for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS.The Owner has again been made aware <strong>of</strong> this situation with the potential for the application <strong>of</strong>nutrients or pesticides within 100m <strong>of</strong> a municipal well. The Owner stated to the Ministry that theyhave sent another letter to the owner <strong>of</strong> the agricultural property adjacent to well 2 to not onlyadvise the owner <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> the municipal well but also the Best Management Practice <strong>of</strong> notapplying any nutrients or pesticides within 100m <strong>of</strong> a municipal well.CAPACITY ASSESSMENT* There was sufficient monitoring <strong>of</strong> flow as required by the .Permit and Licence or Approvalissued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWAPTTW 8306-7JYPWU, issued to the Owner for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS, states that the permitholder shall maintain a record <strong>of</strong> all water takings which shall include the dates and times <strong>of</strong> watertakings and the total measured amounts <strong>of</strong> water pumped per day for each day that water is taken.Section 2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule C <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-105 states continuous flowmeasurement and recording shall be undertaken for: flow rate and daily volume <strong>of</strong> treated waterthat flows from the treatment subsystem to the distribution system; and the flow rate and dailyvolume <strong>of</strong> water that flows into the treatment subsystem.To capture flow data, the Owner has installed flow meters on each <strong>of</strong> the raw well water headersthat convey water from wells 2&3 into the treatment system. The Owner also has installed a flowmeter on the outgoing treated water being conveyed to the distribution system. All <strong>of</strong> the Owner'sflow meters for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS are linked to their SCADA system for monitoring andrecording. All flow meters on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS were calibrated during the review periodfrom September 19, 20<strong>12</strong>.* The owner was in compliance with the conditions associated with maximum flow rate or therated capacity conditions in the Permit and Licence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> theSOWA.Table A <strong>of</strong> PTTW 8306-7 JTPWU, issued to the Owner for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS. restricts watertaking to the following: 2,937,600 Htres/day or 2040Uminute for well 2 and 3,110,400 litres/day or3110Uminute for well 3. The above noted PTTW states that notwithstanding the limits outlined inTable A <strong>of</strong> the Permit, the maximum combined volume <strong>of</strong> water taken per day shall not exceed3,110,400 litres/day.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 15
t f"):- ::>l/r OntarioCAPACITY ASSESSMENTMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportMunicipal Drinking Water License <strong>12</strong>0-105, issued to the Owner for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS,states in Schedule C, condition 1.1 that the maximum daily volume <strong>of</strong> treated water that flows fromthe treatment subsystem to the distribution system shall not exceed a total <strong>of</strong> 3110 cubicmetres/day from wells 2&3.Based on records provided to the Ministry by the Owner, for the inspection review period, none <strong>of</strong>the above stated maximum flow rate parameters for Owner's license was exceeded during theinspection review period.TREATMENT PROCESSES* The owner had ensured that all equipment was installed in accordance with Schedule A andSchedule C <strong>of</strong> the Drinking Water Works Permit.All equipment that is identified in Schedule A and C <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water Works Permit <strong>12</strong>0-205,issued to the Owner for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS, has been installed. The Owner stated during thecourse <strong>of</strong> this inspection that no new treatment equipment has been installed and no alterationshave been made to the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS during the inspection review period.* Records indicated that the treatment equipment was operated in a manner that achieved thedesign capabilities required under Ontario Regulation 170/03 or a Permit, Licence orApproval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA at all times that water was being supplied toconsumers.Section 1-3 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 1 Ontario Regulation (O.Reg. )170/03 requires the Owner <strong>of</strong> a drinkingwater system that obtains water from a raw water supply that is ground water to ensure provision <strong>of</strong>water treatment equipment that is designed to be capable <strong>of</strong> achieving, at all times, primarydisinfection in accordance with the Ministry's Procedure for Disinfection <strong>of</strong> Drinking Water inOntario, including at least 99 per cent (2.0-log) removal or inactivation <strong>of</strong> viruses by the time waterenters the distribution system. This is the case for the treatment train comprising the <strong>Innisfil</strong>lHeights drinking water system .. To satisfy these requirements, the Owner has installed free available chlorine residual chemicaldisinfection system, and employs the CT disinfection concept to quantify the capability <strong>of</strong> thechemical disinfection system and ensure the provision <strong>of</strong> effective pathogen inactivation for primarydisinfection purposes. Free available chlorine residual is achieved through the addition <strong>of</strong> sodiumhypochlorite and the appropriate amount <strong>of</strong> contact time is acheived within the 105m, 600mmcontact main with no service connections. Water then flows from the contact main to the 568 cubicmetre capacity reservoir. The treated water is then discharged into the distribution system from thereservoir.* Records confirmed that the water treatment equipment which provides chlorination orchloramination for secondary disinfection purposes was operated so that at all times and alllocations in the distribution system the chlorine residual was never less than 0.05 mgll freeor 0.25 mg/l combined.During the review <strong>of</strong> records provided by the Owner, it was found that during the inspection reviewperiod, that all <strong>of</strong> the free chlorine residuals obtained by system operators within the distributionsystem, were above 0.05mg/L. Secondary disinfectant residuals are monitored by the Ownerthrough the use <strong>of</strong> continuous chlorine analyzers, which are linked to the Owners SCADA systemor through the collection <strong>of</strong> weekly distribution chlorine residuals obtained by system operators.Chlorine residuals were obtained by the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection. Free chlorine residualreadings obtained by the Ministry, during the course <strong>of</strong> this inspection, were 1.44 mg/L and 1.43mg/L at two different locations in the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights distribution system.--_.._---------.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) ------_._---_..Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 15
t ('~ ::>z,rr OntarioTREATMENT PROCESSESMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report... The Operator-in-Charge had ensured that all equipment used in the processes was monitored, inspected, and evaluated. The Owner has linked their SCADA system to monitor all regulatory activities at the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heightspumphouse and reservoir sites. The pumphouse and reservoir equipment and analyzers arechecked, calibrated and inspected on a regular basis by one <strong>of</strong> the system operators. All analyzercalibrations are not only documented in the pumphouse log book, whereby it states the date, time,piece <strong>of</strong> equipment, description <strong>of</strong> work completed and which operator performed the work.TREATMENT PROCESS MONITORING... Primary disinfection chlorino monitoring was being conducted at a location approved byPermit, licence or Approval issued under Part V<strong>of</strong> the SDWA, or at/near a location wherethe intended CT had just been achieved.The Owner has installed, on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS, a chlorine analyzer for measuring chlorineresiduals for primary disinfection, which is suppli~d with continuous water samples taken from apoint where the intended contact time has just been completed for primary disinfection purposes.The Owner has installed this chlorine analyzer, which is the approved location, after the 105.meterlong, 60mm contact main, after treated water leaves the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights pumphouse and prior totreated water flowing to the reservoir and into the distribution system.... The secondary disinfectant residual was measured as required for the distribution system.The Owner utilizes a portable direct read out colourimeter to perform secondary disinfection testsat various locations on a weekly basis within the distribution system for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system. These readings are taken at least 48 hours apart and are recorded in the DailyOperational logbook as well as on a weekly chlorine sampling spreadsheet.... Operators were examining continuous monitoring test results and they were examining theresults within 72 hours <strong>of</strong> the test.The Owner prints a copy <strong>of</strong> a "daily summary sheet", from their SCADA program, for each <strong>of</strong> theirdrinking water systems. The information contained on these daily summary sheets are as follows:the Minimum, maximum and average for well flows, high lift pump flow, pre and post chlorineresiduals and turbidity, well pump runtimes and high lift pump run times. The Owner's operatorsreview these daily summary sheets within hours and report any abnormalities.... All continuous monitoring equipment utilized for sampling and testing required by O. Reg.170/03, or approval or order, were equipped with alarms or shut-<strong>of</strong>f mechanisms thatsatisfied the standards described in Schedule 6.The Owner stated during the inspection that all continuous analyzers, utilized for monitoring free .chlorine residuals on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS, are linked to their SCADA system and wereconfigured,to alarm should the free available chlorine residual fall outside <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> thepredetermined set points. The alarm set pOints for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS are as follows:low Chlorine alarm - O.80mg/l freeHigh Chlorine alarm - 4.00mg/l freeThe Owner indicated that if an alarm sounds on one <strong>of</strong> the chlorine continuous analyzers. eitherthe well pumps shut down or the high lift pump shuts down and must be reset manually at thepumphouse.... Continuous monitoring equipment that was being utilized to fulfill O. Reg. 170/03requirements was performing tests for the parameters with at least the minimum frequencyspecified in the Table in Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170103 and recording data with theprescribed format.The Owner stated that all <strong>of</strong>. the continuous monitoring equipment on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system provide readings to their SCADA system on a continuous basis.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 15
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportTREATMENT PROCESS MONITORING*'All continuous analysers were calibrated. maintained, and operated. in accordance with themanufacturer's instructions or the regulation.All <strong>of</strong> the continuous analyzers that the Owner has installed on the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS, areverified with a handheld unit, on a weekly basis by one <strong>of</strong> the system operators. The continuousanalyzers are also calibrated and maintenance performed by system operators on an as neededbasis.OPERATIONS MANUALS*'The operations and maintenance manuals contained plans, drawings and process descriptions sufficient for the safe and efficient operation <strong>of</strong> the system. *'The Operations Manual appears to provide sufficient information/guidance for the safe and efficientoperation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking water system.The operations and maintenance manuals did meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Permit andLicence or Approval issued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA.The Owner's Operations and Maintenance Manual appears to meet the the requirements asoutlined in condition 16.2. Schedule B <strong>of</strong> Municipal Drinking water License <strong>12</strong>0-105, issued to theOwner for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS. "LOGBOOKS*'SECURITYRecords or other record keeping mechanisms confirmed that operational testing notperformed by continuous monitoring equipment was being done by a certified operator,water quality analyst, or person who suffices the requirements <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170/03 7-5.Only adequately certified operators are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> to operate their drinkingwater systems. These operators conduct all <strong>of</strong> the operational tests and calibrations, record all <strong>of</strong>the results obtained, make all <strong>of</strong> the log entries, and collect all <strong>of</strong> the required samples to be sent tothe appropriate accredited laboratory.*'The owner had provided security measures to protect components <strong>of</strong> the drinking-watersystem.'Both the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights pumphouse and reservoir site are locked and are generally visited on adaily basis by operational staff. The pumphouse. reservoir and each <strong>of</strong> the two production wells arelocked to prevent unauthorized access. Access to all locked premises are restricted solely to theOwner's operators.CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING*'The overall responsible operator had been designated for each subsystem.*'*'The Owner has deSignated the waterworks Operations Superintendent as the ORO for the <strong>Innisfil</strong>Heights DWS. The ORO has designated two <strong>of</strong> the Owner's other licensed operators to act in hisabsence.Operators in charge had been designated for all subsystems which comprised the drinkingwatersystem.The Owner has deSignated all licensed operators who are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> as olefor the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS.Only certified operators made adjustments to the treatment equipment.All <strong>of</strong> the work that was undertaken on the treatment system for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking watersystem was performed by certified operators who are employed by the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 8 <strong>of</strong> 15
f'~t> Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Reportf,;F OntarioWATER QUALITY MONITORING* All microbiological water quality monitoring requirements for distribution samples werebeing met.Subsection 10-2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 10 Ontario Regulation 170103 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system which serves 100,000 people orless, to collect at a minimum 8 microbiological samples plus one additional sample for every 1000people served by the system, within the distribution system on a monthly basis, with at least onedistribution sample taken each week.Subsection 10- 2 further stipulates that each <strong>of</strong> the distribution samples collected are tested forEscherichia coli, total colifolms and 25 p'ercent <strong>of</strong> the samples taken are sampled for generalbacteria population expressed as colony counts on a heterotrophic plate count (HPC).The <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights Well Supply serves a population <strong>of</strong> approximately 225 people, thereforerequiring 8 distribution samples to be taken each month, two <strong>of</strong> which must be tested for HPC.Records provided by the Owner,and reviewed for the inspection review period, indicate that theOwner has complied with these sampling requirements, obtaining between 14 and 20 samples permonth, at least one sample per week, and analyzing at least 25% for HPC every month.* All microbiological water quality monitoring requi~ements for treated samples were beingmet.Subsection 10-3 <strong>of</strong> schedule 10 <strong>of</strong> O.Reg. 170 requires that the Owner and the operatillg authority<strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system. such as the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking watersystem, ensure that a water sample is taken at least once every week from the point at whichtreated water enters the distribution system. The Owner and operating authority are required toensure that each <strong>of</strong> these samples are tested for E.coli. total coliforms and general bacteriapopulation expressed as colony counts on a heterotrophic plate count.Based on documents which were given to the Ministry by the Owner, treated water samples wereobtained by the Owner each week during the inspection review period at the·lnnisfil Heightspumphouse, for well 2 and well 3, after CT was met in the stand pipe and before entering thedistribution system to the first consumer.Note: A treated water sample was obtained by the Owner for well 2 on November 19, 20<strong>12</strong> whichwas analyzed for EC and TC but not for HPC, as stated in subsection 10-3 <strong>of</strong> O.Reg. 170103.* All inorganic water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conducted within the required frequency_ Sections 1,3-2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170103 require the Owner and theoperating authority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system to ensure that at least onewater sample is taken every 36 months if the system obtains water from a raw water supply that isground water, such is the case for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking water system, and have thosesamples tested for every parameter set out in Schedule 23.The Owner conducted Inorganic sampling during the review period for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS onDecember 10, 20<strong>12</strong>. The Owner did not report any exceedences <strong>of</strong> any Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Objectives as a result <strong>of</strong> this sampling: The Owner did provide the Ministry a copy <strong>of</strong> theInorganic analytical results that was conducted by the Owner. InorganiC sample analysis is notrequired again for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS until December 2015.Report Generated for hainesda on 17106/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 9 <strong>of</strong> 15
I'Y-t?OntarioWATER QUALITY MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* All organic water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Sections <strong>13</strong>-2 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 require the Owner and theoperating authority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system to ensure that at least onewater sample is taken every 36 months if the system obtains water from a raw water supply that isground water, such is the case for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking water system, and have thosesamples tested for every parameter set out in Schedule 24.The Owner conducted Organic sampling during the review period for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS onDecember 10, 20<strong>12</strong>. The Owner did not report any exceedences <strong>of</strong> any Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Objectives as a result <strong>of</strong> this sampling. The Owner did provide the Ministry a copy <strong>of</strong> theOrganic analytical results. Organic sample analysis is not required again for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> HeightsDWS until December 2015.* All trihalomethanes water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation wereconducted within the required frequency.Section <strong>13</strong>-6 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170103 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one distribution sample is taken every 3 months and no morethan <strong>12</strong>0 days from the date <strong>of</strong> the last sample for THM's, from a point in the drinking-watersystem's distribution system, or in plumbing that is connected to the drinking water system, that islikely to have an elevated potential for the formation <strong>of</strong> trihalomethanes and tested fortrihalomethanes.The Owner conducted this required monitoring on June <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; September <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; December10, 20<strong>12</strong> and March <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>13</strong>. All <strong>of</strong> the THM results for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS were within theprescribed limit <strong>of</strong> 100ug/L for THM's as outlined in the ODWQO.* All nitrate/nitrite water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation wereconducted within the required frequency for the DWS.Section <strong>13</strong>-7 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system. such as the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system. to ensure that at least one distribution sample is taken every 3 months and no morethan <strong>12</strong>0 days from the date <strong>of</strong> the last sample for Nitrates/Nitrites.The Owner conducted this required monitoring on June <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong>; September <strong>12</strong>. 20<strong>12</strong>; December10, 20<strong>12</strong> and March <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>13</strong>. Results <strong>of</strong> that sampling would indicate that the water met theprescribed standards set out for those parameters in the ODWQS.* All sodium water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Sections <strong>13</strong>-8 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one water sample is taken every 60 months and tested forSodium. .The Owner last conducted Sodium sampling for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS on September 10, 2008.The sodium sample results were within the acceptable limits <strong>of</strong> the ODWQS. No sodium sampleswere obtained by the Owner during the review period and the Owner is not scheduled to takesodium samples again until September 20<strong>13</strong>.------_._._----------Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 15
1"):-:,. trOntario----WATER QUALITY MONITORINGMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* All fluoride water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation were conductedwithin the required frequency.Section <strong>13</strong>-9 <strong>of</strong> Schedule <strong>13</strong> Ontario Regulation 170/03 requires the Owner and the operatingauthority <strong>of</strong> a large municipal residential drinking water system, such as the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system, to ensure that at least one water sample is taken every 60 months and tested forFluoride.The Owner last obtained a fluoride sample for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS in September 2008. Thesample results were within the prescribed limits. The Owner is not schedule to sample for Fluorideagain until September 20<strong>13</strong>.* All water quality monitoring requirements imposed by the Permit and Licence or Approvalissued under Part V <strong>of</strong> the SDWA were being met.* All sampling requirements for lead prescribed by schedule 15.1 <strong>of</strong> O. Reg. 170103 werebeing met.The Owner collected their annual distribution lead sample from a fire hydrant on the 7th Line <strong>of</strong><strong>Innisfil</strong> and within the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS distribution system. The lead sample was collected bythe Owner on June <strong>12</strong>, 20<strong>12</strong> and the lead sample collected did not exceed the lead standard withintheODWQS.* Records confirmed that chlorine residual tests were being conducted at the same time andat the same location that microbiological samples were obtained.A review <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS records, provided by the Owner for the inspection reviewperiod, found that each time a microbiological sample was taken by the Owner in the distributionsystem, a corresponding chlorine residual was also obtained. All <strong>of</strong> the in-house chlorinemonitOring andsampling information that the Owner undertakes for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinkingwater system, is recorded in the pumphouse logbooks and on the laboratory sample submission~e~ .WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT* The audit samples collected by the inspector met the applicable Ontario Drinking WaterQuality Standards and/or the aesthetic objectives or operation guidelines. The results <strong>of</strong>the audit sampling are summarized as follows:On May 9, 20<strong>13</strong>, audit distribution samples were obtained for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights drinking watersystem, at two different locations within the distribution system. Ministry audit microbiologicalsamples were taken at the Innisbrook sample station and the Doral sample station. The results <strong>of</strong>the Ministry audit samples showed compliance with the Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards(O.Reg. 169/03). Free available chlorine residuals were taken at the same time and locations asthe distribution samples and ranged from 1.43 mglL to 1.44 mg/L The Owner regularily utilizesthese sites for their sampling purposes which are considered secure sample sites.A copy <strong>of</strong> these Ministry samples analytical results are attached as an appendix to this report.* Records show that all water sample results taken during the review period met the OntarioDrinking Water Quality Standards {O. Reg. 169/03}.The audit samples that were collected by the Ministry as part <strong>of</strong> this inspection, had levels belowthe Ontario Drinking Water Quality Objectives (ODWQO). The Owner did not report any ODWQOexceedences, during the inspection review period for the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Heights DWS.REPORTING & CORRECTIVE ACTIONSReport Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 11 <strong>of</strong> 15
("~t?OntarioREPORTING & CORRECTIVE ACTIONSMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection Report* Where required continuous monitoring equipment used for the monitoring <strong>of</strong> chlorineresidual and/or turbidity triggered an alarm or an automatic shut-<strong>of</strong>f, a qualified personresponded in a timely manner and took appropriate actions.The Owner stated that the response time to all alarms during normal business hours and afternormal business hours by the on-call operator is at a maximum 1 hour. The Owner does have awritten procedure for responding to alarms which is kept in their Emergency and Contingency plan.Details <strong>of</strong> any after hours response are also documented in the pumphouse logbook.Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mmlyyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mmlyyyy) Page <strong>12</strong> <strong>of</strong> 15
'')t-::t?OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportNON·COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIONS REQUIREDThis section provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all non-compliance with regulatory requirements identified during theinspection period, as well as actions required to address these issues. Further details pertaining to theseitems can be found in the body <strong>of</strong> the ilnspection report.Not ApplicableReport Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page <strong>13</strong> <strong>of</strong> 15
1"):-::t?OntarioSUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND BEST PRACTICE ISSUESMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportThis section provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all recommendations and best practice issues identified during theinspection period. Details pertaining to these items can be found in the body <strong>of</strong> the inspection report. In theinterest <strong>of</strong> continuous improvement in the interim, it is recommended that owners and operators develop anawareness <strong>of</strong> the following issues and consider measures to address them.Not ApplicableReport Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Site #: 220005081 INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEM Date <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 14 <strong>of</strong> 15
")k.t >l/F Ontario-----.-.~-.-.-......----Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentInspection ReportSIGNATURES Inspected By: Darren Haines Reviewed &Approved By:Craig SeabrookSignature: (Supervisor):.f~£~Review & Approval Date: ~o<strong>13</strong> - 06 - ,-;;Note: This inspection does not in any way suggest that there is or has been compliance withapplicable legislation and regulations as they apply or may apply to this facility. It is, and remains,the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the owner and/or operating authority to ensure compliance with all applicablelegislative and regulatory requirements.----------~.-----.------._-_._-_._-_._._-----Report Generated for hainesda on 17/06/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy) Page 15 <strong>of</strong> 15Site #: 220005081INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDate <strong>of</strong> Inspection: 23/05/20<strong>13</strong> (dd/mm/yyyy)
'~trOntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentDrinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix AStakeholder Appendix-------...-~.-.--..--....---------.--..--...---
June 20<strong>12</strong>1Key Reference and Guidance Mat~rial for .Municipal Residential Drinking W~ter SystemsMany useful materials are posted on the Ministry<strong>of</strong> the Environment's Drinking Water Ontal'iowebsite at www.ontario.caldrinkingwater to helpin the operation <strong>of</strong> your drinking water system ..Below is a list <strong>of</strong> key materials frequently used byowners and operators <strong>of</strong> municipal drinking watersystems. To read or download these materials, goto Dl'inking Water Olltado and search in theResources section by Publication Number.Visit Drinking Water Ontario for more usefulmaterials. Contact the Public <strong>Info</strong>rmation Centre ifyou need assistance or have questions at 1-800-5654923/416-325-4000 or picemail.moe@ontario.ca.4448e017152e. •Procedure for Disinfection cif DrinkingWater in OntarioStrategies for Minimizing'lhe Disinfection Products Trihalomethanes and HaloaceticAcids .•,' cy, ',".',. .... .'. '. ~, '" 7467 Filtration Processes'Technlcai Bulletin .7685 .8215 Total Trihalomethane (TTHM) Reporting ~equirem(mts Technical Bulletin (February 2011)2601e' " " .. ~:. Oveniie~ Guide:Mun[cipa'I'Drinkin~fWaterIrcens!ng p'rO'gram- .- .... ~,~.~..,..~.~f-.'----------.TMuniCiPall)rinking Water licensing Program Bulletin, Issue 1, January 20110000DODO" .6560eTaking Samples fo~ the C9mmu~ity.lead Testing ProgramComrilUnitySampling and Testing for Lead: Standard and Reduced Sampling and7423e Eligibility fal-EXemptiOn' .: ,- ...... -. • . ' ..' . .. .' "7<strong>12</strong>8e444ge01 .S.;Drinking Water System Contact list, ·.Tethnical S~pportnodmHmtfor:Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standardsontario.ca/drinkingwaterPIBS 8990bf'~t?Ontario
Juin 20<strong>12</strong>... +Principaux guides et documents de referencesur les reseaux residentiels municipaux d'eaupotableBeaucoup de documentation sur Ie fonctionnementd'un reseau d'eau potable se trouve sur Ie site Webdu millistere de l'Environnement.VOllS trouverez ci-dessous la liste des principauxdocuments que Ies proprietaires et les exploitantsde reseaux municipaux d'eau potable utilisentfrequemment. Pour lire ou telecharger cesdocuments, allez sur Ie site Web du Ministere, eteffectuez une recherche par numero de publicationdans la section RESSOURCES.Consultez Ie site d'Eau potable Ontario pourobtenir d'autre documentation. Communiquez avecIe Centre d'inforrnation du public au 1 800 565-4923ou au 416 325-4000, ou encore apicemail.moe@olltario.ca si vous avez des questions ou besoind'aide.4448f01Marche asuivre pour desinfecterl'eau portable en Ontario7152eStrategies for Minimizing the pisinfectio'n Products Trihalonietha'nes'and HaloaceticAcids (en anglais seulement).7467 Filtration Processes Technical Bulletin (en anglais seulement)7685 Ultraviolet Disinfection Technical Bulletin (en anglais seulement) 8215Total Trihalomethane (TTHM) Reporting Requirements Technical Bulletin (tevrier 2011)(en anglais seulement)2601f- Gui~e gen~ral-Programme dedelivrance des permis de reseaux municipaux d'eaupotable' . , 'j ",' • '" ,. • •• ••;000000006560t7423t7<strong>12</strong>8f4449f01Bulletin du Programme des permis de reseaux municipaux d'eau potable, numero 1,janvier 2011 . Guide .sllrJ'acch3ditation des exploitants dereseauX" d'eau potable et des analystesde laqualite de I'eau de reseaux d'eau potable. .Prel£wement d'echantillons dans Ie cadre du programme d'analyse de la teneur enplomb de I'eau dans les collectivitesEchantillonnage ,et analyse du pl6mbdans les collectivites : echantillonnage •normalise ou rMuitet admissibiiite aI'exemption .'<strong>List</strong>e des personnes-ressources du reseau d'eau potableDocument d'aidetechiliqlle pour les normes, directives et objectifs associes alaqualite de l'ealJ potable en Ontario'ontario.ca/drinkingwater:::PIBS 8990b('~t?Ontario
f'):-::t?OntarioMinistry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentDrinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix BAudit Samples
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C202691 Print Date: May. 27, 20<strong>13</strong> 02:53 PM By REPORTADMIN •••• REPRlNTED ••••Program Code <strong>13</strong>0074201 Program: MOE OPERATIONS DIVISIONStudy: WATER, COMMUNALProject: SOUTHWEST REGION :BARRIE DISTActivity: WTP MUNIC INSPECT/ADVERS NOTIFOrganization: District Manager - BarrieOrg. Id: 4232Final reports to :HAINES, DARRENSEABROOK, CRAIGVALLEY, JENNYcopy to:HAINES, DARRENMOE - BARRIE DISTRICT OFFICE's4CEDAR POINTE DRIVE, UNIT <strong>12</strong>03BARHIE,ONTL4N 5R7'-..;;,'Approved for release by: DAVE"
, __ft ___._._.........,..· ...." ..."..- ...___,,_._.'_Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C202691 Print Date: May. 27, 20<strong>13</strong> 02:53 PM By REPORTADMIN •••• REPRINTED ••••Fii:M ref'~ Station ID'bH-IH-O{' 220005081Sample 10C202691-0001MOE:LlMS Products Request~d:WD E3226A PA3226UTM:CollectionAccuracyZone, Easting Northing' Method fI.:1ap Datum' (metres)J7. ~_ 605183~-'~:~90El32C; Gp'S::"'::'~ NAljS3-' J2'~"5M""-_-.JSa7l1pf[L§;r.itiPri D~crie.lioi1:'. ":.~~::-:- .~ -::~-J SamplingOORAL SAMPLESTATioN DISTRIBUTION'. Date23 MAY 20<strong>13</strong>:SltIm'pJe.Cqmment Oes;cri~tion:"':: ~. . ~.~ _.:....:._=._Time10:50Zone5-,S'aiii"plei" --':-'info~,._--_.. "jFiiMld ; Station IDDH-IHc02) 220005081UTM:Sample ID C202691-0002 WDE3226AReque~tedi'P.A.3226Collection~am-ple:[ocatio~_ bescrip!L~---:--=--.:J SamplingINNISBROOK SAMPLE STATION' - ... ".... Date Time ZoneDIS;TRIBUTIO"!. __ 23 MAY 20<strong>13</strong> 11:00 5Samp!~:
C202691ID:ID:10:Station ID:Collect Date:Sample Location Description:Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch -<strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Print Date: May_ 27, 20<strong>13</strong> 02:53 PM By REPORTADMIN ..... REPRINTED * .. *..-~--'" 1C202691-0001 C202691-000220<strong>13</strong>WD20-00192, '20<strong>13</strong>WD20-00193-_.... ,-_.:' ":[fH~iH:O'i'--'-' ~~,",......~,.... ------DH:IH~()2.,-~-.,..~220005081., 220005081. 23 MAY 20<strong>13</strong> 23 MAY 20<strong>13</strong>IDORAlSAMPLE STATION DISTRIBUTION,INNISBROOK SAMPLE STATIONt"'. ;. DISTRIBUTIONtUnits QualRm~1Page 3 <strong>of</strong>5
~~~~Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke. Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C202691 Print Date: May. 27, 20<strong>13</strong>02:53 PM By REPORTADMIN •••• REPRINTED ••••CODENDATNOONNDAEDESCRIPTIONNO DATA: ABSENT NT: TOTAL COLI FORMSNO DATA: NOT DETECTED NT: DETERIORATION INDICATORSNO DATA: ABSENT NT: ESCHERICHIA COLINON-TARGET TEXTUAL RESULTIsamPle ID: C202691-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 3226L1 Parmname: NT: Total Coliforins Value: Units: cl100mL Qual: NDAT Remarks:------------~--------~--------~--------Absentlia-:~I~ID: C202691-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 3226L 1 Parmname: NT: Escherichia coli Value: Units: cl100mL Qual: NDAE Remarks:AbsentNot DetectedID: C202691-0001 <strong>List</strong>id : 3226L 1 Parmname: NT: Deterioration Indicators Value: Units: cl100mL Qual: NDDN Remarks:Sample 10: C202691-0002 <strong>List</strong>id : 3226L 1 Parmname: NT: Total Coliforms Value: Units: c/100mL Qual: NDAT Remarks:AbsentAbsent10: C202691-0002 Li,stid : 3226L 1 Parmname: NT: Escherichia coli Value: Units: cl100mL Qual: NDAE Remarks:Sample 10: C202691-0002 <strong>List</strong>id : 3226L 1 Parmname: NT: Deterioration Indicators Value: Units: c/100mL ,Qual: NDDN Remarks:Not DetectedTEXT COMMENTProduct CompletionSample 10 Matrix Method Product Analytical Department Completion Date, C202691-0001 WD ,E3226A PA3226 6510 27-MAY-<strong>13</strong>C202691-0002 WD E3226A •. PJ\3226, 6510 27-MAY-<strong>13</strong>LaSS Method SummaryMethod Method Description Status Status DescriptionIE3226A' , ' THE DEtECTION OF COLIFORM BACTERIA INCLUDING ESCHERiCHIA" ROOtlNE Method has be,en fully validated, is deemed fit for purpose and has the associatedCOLI IN DRINKING WATER BY. THE PRESENCE"ABSENCE PROCEDURE.Uncertainty information available upon requestPage 4 <strong>of</strong>5
Ontario Ministry <strong>of</strong> EnvironmentLaboratory Services Branch - <strong>12</strong>5 Resources RoadEtobicoke, Ontario M9P 3V6FINAL REPORT(manager)Login: C202691 Print Dale: May. 27, 20<strong>13</strong> 02:53 PM By REPORTADMIN .... REPRINTED ••••••• End <strong>of</strong> Report ...Page 5 <strong>of</strong>5
t,,~-:>Ministry <strong>of</strong> the EnvironmentDrinking Water System Inspection Report Appendix Dl/F OntarioInspection Rating Record
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment - Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 20<strong>13</strong>-2014)DWS Name: INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDWS Number: 220005081DWS Owner: <strong>Innisfil</strong>, The Corporation Of The<strong>Town</strong> OfMunicipal Location: <strong>Innisfil</strong>Regulation: O.REG 170/03Category: Large Municipal Residential SystemType Of Inspection: FocusedInspection Date: May 23,20<strong>13</strong>Ministry Office: Barrie DistrictMaximum Question Rating: 462IInspection Risk Rating I0.00% IIFINAL INSPECTION RATING: 1100.00 0 /0 IInspection Rating Record Generated On 14-JUN-<strong>13</strong> (Inspection ID: l-AOCCI).
Ministry <strong>of</strong> the Environment - Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 20<strong>13</strong>-2014)DWS Name: INNISFIL HEIGHTS DRINKING WATER SYSTEMDWS Number: 220005081DWS Owner: <strong>Innisfil</strong>, The Corporation Of The <strong>Town</strong> OfMunicipal Location: <strong>Innisfil</strong>Regulation: O.REG 170/03Category: Large Municipal Residential SystemType Of Inspection: FocusedInspection Date: May 23, 20<strong>13</strong>Ministry Office: Barrie DistrictMaximum Question Rating: 462Inspection ModuleNon-Compliance RatingSource 0/28Capacity Assessment 0/30Treatment Processes 0/77Operations Manuals 0/28Logbooks 0/14Certification and Training 0/28Water Quality Monitoring 0/<strong>12</strong>4Reporting & Corrective Actions 0/21Treatment Process Monitoring 0/1<strong>12</strong>TOTAL 0/462IInspection Risk Rating I0.00% I1FINAL INSPECTION RATING: 1100,000/01Inspection Rating Record Generated On 14-JUN-<strong>13</strong> (Inspection 10: 1-AOCCI).
DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDATE: July 10, 20<strong>13</strong>TO:FROM:SUBJECT:M E M O R A N D U MMayor, Deputy Mayor and CouncilTim Cane, Manager <strong>of</strong> Land Use Planning<strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Zoning By-law No. 050-<strong>12</strong> – approved by the OntarioMunicipal Board (OMB)PURPOSEThe purpose <strong>of</strong> this memorandum is to update Council on the status <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach RoadZoning By-law No. 050-<strong>12</strong> that was approved by <strong>Town</strong> Council on April 18, 20<strong>12</strong> as per StaffReport DSR-060-<strong>12</strong>, and subsequently appealed by three (3) appellants, namely 735757Ontario Inc., Abandel Group Ltd., and 808 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road (Appellants) for the subject landsknown municipally as 808, 1<strong>12</strong>4, 1<strong>13</strong>0, and 1<strong>13</strong>6 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road, and the property legallydescribed as Part <strong>of</strong> Lot 23, Concession 8, designated as Parts 4, 5, and 8 on Registered Plan51R-<strong>13</strong>417, except for Parts 1 to 3 on Registered Plan 51R-29665, shown as properties 1, 2,and 3 on Attachment 1. Following these appeals, Staff met with the Appellants in Spring 20<strong>13</strong>to discuss their concerns, and review their development options.On June 4, 20<strong>13</strong>, there was a prehearing teleconference related to their appeals. The primarypurpose <strong>of</strong> the teleconference was to consider the <strong>Town</strong>’s request to have By-law No. 050-<strong>12</strong>come into force and effect for all lands which are not the subject <strong>of</strong> these appeals. On consent<strong>of</strong> the parties, the OMB approved the new <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Zoning on all but the three (3)properties noted above.As such, the remaining properties fronting <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road now have By-law No. 050-<strong>12</strong>come into force and effect as <strong>of</strong> April 18, 20<strong>12</strong>, while allowing the three (3) Appellants asubsequent OMB Hearing date <strong>of</strong> December 4 to 6, 20<strong>13</strong> to review their appeals. From July tothis upcoming OMB Hearing date, <strong>Town</strong> Staff will continue to meet and discuss mediationoptions.BACKGROUNDThe purpose <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Zoning Implementation Study (ZIS) was to implementthe “<strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Urban Design Study and Guidelines” prepared by MBPD Inc. whichCouncil adopted by Council Resolution CW-189.07 on May 16, 2007. This would allow the<strong>Town</strong> to implement development standards that will promote compatible intensification withappropriately distributed building heights and densities to establish <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road from the20 to 25 Sideroad in Part <strong>of</strong> Lots 21 to 25, Concession 7 and 8 as “<strong>Innisfil</strong>’s Main Street andDowntown.”PREPARED BY:Garry L. L. Lambright, B.Sc. (Hons.), MCIP, RPPSenior Planner
Tim Cane, M.E.S., RPPManager <strong>of</strong> Planning_________________________________Don EastwoodDirector <strong>of</strong> DevelopmentAttachment:1. <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road Zoning By-law No. 050-<strong>12</strong> – OMB Appeal – Key Map2
FILE: D18 - Zoning By-law - <strong>Innisfil</strong>Beach Road Zoning By-lawStudy - OMB AppealsINNISFIL BEACH ROAD ZONINGBY-LAW NO. 050-<strong>12</strong> - OMB APPEAL - KEY MAP1 23AREA ZONED "MIXED USE 1 (MU1) ZONE" (20th SIDEROAD TO JANS BOULEVARD)AREA ZONED "MIXED USE 2 (MU2) ZONE" (JANS BOULEVARD TO 25TH SIDEROAD)APPELLANT TO BY-LAW NO. 050-<strong>12</strong> - 1) ABANDEL GROUP LTD. - 1<strong>12</strong>4, 1<strong>13</strong>0, and 1<strong>13</strong>6 INNISFIL BEACH ROAD2) NORMAN SMITH - 1090 INNISFIL BEACH ROAD3) 808 INNISFIL HOLDINGS INC. - 808 INNISFIL BEACH ROAD/
PO Box 354Waubaushene ON L0K 2C0www.simcoepride.comsimcoepride@gmail.comJune10, 20<strong>13</strong>RE: REQUEST FOR PROCLAMATION OF SIMCOE AUGUST PRIDE WEEK AUGUST 2-10 TH ,20<strong>13</strong> AND RAISING OF RAINBOW FLAG AUGUST 6 TH , 20<strong>13</strong>Good DayMy name is Mark Cameron and I am a member <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> Simcoe Pride and a resident <strong>of</strong><strong>Innisfil</strong>, Ontario. On behalf <strong>of</strong> the Simcoe Pride, I am writing to request your participation in and support <strong>of</strong>Simcoe Pride Week 20<strong>13</strong>.Simcoe Pride is a group <strong>of</strong> community volunteers who organize Pride Week celebrations and activitiesthroughout the year for the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay Bisexual and Trans) community <strong>of</strong> Simcoe County. We areasking for participation and leadership from the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> through a proclamation <strong>of</strong> Pride Week fromAugust 2 th to 10 th , 20<strong>13</strong>. This proclamation would be a valued recognition <strong>of</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> our community,honouring the lives and contributions <strong>of</strong> people <strong>of</strong> all sexual orientations and gender identities throughout theSimcoe County region. During 20<strong>12</strong> Simcoe Pride Week over 200 community members attended Pride eventsthroughout the county.We request that during Pride Week 20<strong>13</strong>, the Rainbow Flag be raised in The <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> Innisfii in celebration <strong>of</strong>diversity, to raise awareness and the promote equality. If required, Simcoe Pride would be pleased to provide aflag sized to your liking for the occasion. We would hope for this raising to occur Tuesday August 6 th , 20<strong>13</strong> atCityHall.Please feel free to visit the Simcoe Pride web page at www.simcoepride.com for up to date informationregarding planned events throughout Pride Week. Queries may be directed to simcoepride@gmail.com .We thank you for your consideration on this matter and are eager to welcome you to some <strong>of</strong> the exciting eventshappening throughout Simcoe Pride Week.In the spirit <strong>of</strong> diversity, inclusion and community,Mark CameronSimcoe Pride AllySimcoe PrideMcameron016@gmail.com 705-818-0491
The Corporation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>hereby proclaimsAugust 2 nd through to August 10 th , 20<strong>13</strong>asSimcoe Pride Weekin the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>Presented on Behalf <strong>of</strong> Council this 10 th day <strong>of</strong> July, 20<strong>13</strong>____________________Mayor Barbara Baguley
COUNTY COUNCILUpdateISSUE 57 I May 20<strong>13</strong>The County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe celebrated the launch <strong>of</strong> its online portal immigration.simcoe.ca at the Gibson Centre in Alliston on May 3, 20<strong>13</strong>.The Ontario Minister <strong>of</strong> Citizenship and Immigration, the Honourable Michael Coteau, was on hand for the event to get a sneak peek at theportal and its many resources. Special guest performers were also on hand to take part in the celebration. Providing a virtual communityfor immigrant residents and potential newcomers, the portal, which is funded by the Ontario Government with support from the Government<strong>of</strong> Canada, highlights information in five categories: Welcome, Living, Working, Learning, and Doing Business. For more on the portallaunch, please see page 3.CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONSAllan Greenwood, EditorDirector, Corporate CommunicationsAllan.Greenwood@simcoe.ca705-726-9300 Extension <strong>12</strong>30Text: Municipal and mediareproduction permissiongranted.Logos, wordmarks,identifiers, non-stockphotographic images:© 20<strong>13</strong> The Corporation<strong>of</strong> the County <strong>of</strong> SimcoeCal Patterson, WardenMark Aitken, Chief Administrative OfficerThe County Clerk’s Dept. maintains the <strong>of</strong>ficial record for allCounty government proceedings. This publication is intendedto identify highlights <strong>of</strong> Committee and Council meetings.
PAGE 2 COUNTY COUNCIL UPDATECORPORATE SERVICESKeepingtabs oninvasivespeciesCounty taking actionsto ensure ongoinghealth <strong>of</strong> its forestsBill Duffy, from left to right, Tom Walsh, Sandra Cooper, Ken Ferguson, Alicia Savage, and Rick Milne wereamong a group <strong>of</strong> County Councillors who travelled to waste management facilities that manage a portion<strong>of</strong> the County’s garbage disposal.Waste collection services expandNew waste contract revised to add condos, apartments, islands, and private roadsMajor changes and improvementsto waste collection servicesin the County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe came intoeffect April 1 as a result <strong>of</strong> newservice contracts.As directed by Simcoe CountyCouncil, as part <strong>of</strong> these newcontracts, waste collection serviceswas standardized across theCounty. As a result, many commerciallocations (some condosand apartments) saw an increase inservice, while others did not.Council voted on May 28, 20<strong>13</strong>,to revise the existing contracts toensure residential condominiumand apartment complexes receivewaste collection services providingthere is safe access for wastecollection vehicles and each unithas ownership <strong>of</strong> waste; if this isthe case, the County will providecurbside collection to all units <strong>of</strong> thecomplex at the same level as regularresidential curbside collection.Where either safe access orownership <strong>of</strong> waste is not possible,the County will provide collectionthrough a provisional common collectionpoint; however, should any<strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the commoncollection point not be met, thelocation be abused, or unresolvedcomplaint(s) be received, thenCounty collection service to thiscomplex will be terminated.Where a condominium or apartmentcomplex is unable to beserviced curbside as above, andthey are unable or unwilling toutilize a provisional common collectionpoint, the County will provide afinancial subsidy.Council wanted to ensure theCounty’s seasonal properties(including islands and private roads)received standardized service aswell.Where safe access is availableand each unit has ownership<strong>of</strong> waste, curbside wastecollection will be provided onislands and private roads.Where safe access isnot possible, and duringperiods where roadmaintenance doesnot allow safe access,provisional common collectionpoints will be utilized.If provisions <strong>of</strong> the commoncollection point are not met, theCounty collection service will beterminated.If a common collection point isnot feasible or if service is refusedfor any reason, waste facilitypasses will be distributed to eachresidential unit impacted; no otherfinancial subsidy will be provided.Corporate Services CommitteeItem CS <strong>13</strong>-073A number <strong>of</strong> introduced plantpathogens and insects haveplayed a significant role in thehealth and development <strong>of</strong> areaforests for decades.Currently, as a result <strong>of</strong> introducedpathogens, the County isin danger <strong>of</strong> losing its butternutpopulation, and healthy beechtrees are now a rare find.There are several recently introducedinsects, including gypsymoth, pine shoot beetle, and pinefalse webworm, that have alsoimpacted forest health.Emerald ash borer is anintroduced insect that isdecimating ash speciesthroughout much <strong>of</strong>North America,and will soonhave a substantialimpact withinSimcoe County.Although no confirmedinfestations exist within the regionto date, a range <strong>of</strong> actions havebeen taken and continue to evolve.An adaptive managementapproach is being utilized andcontinued improvements andadjustments will be required toensure resources are expendedwisely.Corporate Services CommitteeItem CS <strong>13</strong>-068
COUNTY COUNCIL UPDATE PAGE 3HUMAN SERVICESOnline portal connects newcomersimmigration.simcoe.ca provides a virtual community for immigrant residents and newcomersProviding a virtual communityfor immigrant residents andpotential newcomers, the portal,which is funded by the OntarioGovernment with support fromthe Government <strong>of</strong> Canada,highlights information in fivecategories: Welcome, Living,Working, Learning, and DoingBusiness.Connecting with your communityas a newcomer to Simcoe Countyis only a click away, thanks to theOntario Municipal Immigration<strong>Info</strong>rmation Online program.The County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe celebratedthe launch <strong>of</strong> its online portal immigration.simcoe.caat the GibsonCentre in Alliston on May 3, 20<strong>13</strong>.The Honourable Michael Coteau,Ontario Minister <strong>of</strong> Citizenship andImmigration, and special guestperformers joined in the celebrationas the County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe showcasedthe portal and its many resources.Providing a virtual community forimmigrant residents and potentialnewcomers, the portal, which isfunded by the Ontario Governmentwith support from the Government<strong>of</strong> Canada, highlights informationin five categories: Welcome, Living,Working, Learning, and Doing Business.“We are working with our municipalitiesto help grow Ontario’s economyand open up new opportunitiesfor newcomers,” said Minister <strong>of</strong>Citizenship and Immigration MichaelCoteau. “The Municipal Immigration<strong>Info</strong>rmation Online Program helpsconnect the skills and talents <strong>of</strong>newcomers with local businesses.It’s a win-win for municipalities andimmigrants.”“The County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe strivesto develop sustainable welcomingcommunities within its borderswhere newcomers have access tothe information they need to buildtheir lives in Simcoe County and feelat home,” said County <strong>of</strong> SimcoeWarden Cal Patterson. “This newonline portal is an important step inachieving that goal.”The event also featured a marketplace<strong>of</strong> community service providerswho <strong>of</strong>fer support to newcomersin Simcoe County.The portal was developed in partnershipwith Community Connectionsfor 211 data and following anextensive community consultationprocess with Georgian College, LocalHealth Integration Network, SimcoeMuskoka District Health Unit,OPP, French and English schoolboards, Employment Ontario agencies,Best Start, libraries, municipalities,economic development <strong>of</strong>fices,community futures developmentcorporations, ethnocultural associations,housing resource centres,settlement services organizations,and community health centres.The portal meets communityrecommendations to improveinformation and resources availableonline for newcomers, as well asimproving communication aboutemployment opportunities.
PAGE 4 COUNTY COUNCIL UPDATEAROUND THE COUNTYAbove, Chief Andrew Robert was amongthe many paramedics who volunteeredtheir time to Operation Uniformed Lunchto help feed those in need. Right, to honourthe many dedicated, pr<strong>of</strong>essional,and invaluable men and women whocare for our loved ones, our friends, andour neighbours, Warden Cal Pattersonproclaimed May 6-<strong>12</strong> as Nursing Weekin Simcoe County. Below, the County’sPublic Access Defibrillation (PAD) Programreached a milestone by installingits 500th Automated External Defibrillator(AED) in Marie <strong>of</strong> the IncarnationCatholic School in the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> BradfordWest Gwillimbury.PERFORMANCEMANAGEMENTMuseumreportCircle <strong>of</strong> LearningThe Museum provided programmingfor more than 75 children as part<strong>of</strong> the Simcoe County District SchoolBoard’s Circle <strong>of</strong> Learning Conferenceon April 6. Throughout the day, childrenparticipated in a variety <strong>of</strong> games andactivities while their parents attended aconference at the school board <strong>of</strong>fice.Heritage Fair a successThe 11th annual Simcoe CountyHeritage Fair was held April 24 at theMuseum. Students from schools acrossSimcoe County shared their projectsand enjoyed a day <strong>of</strong> workshops andactivities. In total, 74 projects weredisplayed at the Fair, and 22 prizes,sponsored by a variety <strong>of</strong> organizations,including the Ontario Heritage FairsAssociation and the Simcoe CountyHistorical Society, were awarded tostudents.Sumac marketing strategyMuseum staff has been working as amember <strong>of</strong> Sumac (a network <strong>of</strong> membersfrom Simcoe County’s Archives,Art Galleries and Museums) to continueto develop and implement marketingstrategies with a goal to increase attendancefor all participating sites. TheSimcoe County Museum, along with 14member sites across Simcoe County,participated in the launch day on May25.Performance Management CommitteeItem PM <strong>13</strong>-061County <strong>of</strong> Simcoe1110 Highway 26,Midhurst, Ontario L0L 1X0705-726-9300CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENTFor media inquiries, contact communications@simcoe.caFor more information on the County <strong>of</strong> Simcoeand our programs and services, please visit simcoe.ca
___________________________________________________________________________________________CLERK’S DEPARTMENTMay 29, 20<strong>13</strong>ATTN: All Ontario MunicipalitiesFROM: Carolyn Langley, Clerk, <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln318 Canborough St. P.O. Box 400Smithville, ONL0R 2A0T: 905-957-3346F: 905-957-3219www.westlincoln.caRE: Resolution to Province regarding not being a “Willing Host” for Industrial Wind TurbinesThis is to confirm that West Lincoln <strong>Town</strong>ship Council at its meeting <strong>of</strong> May 27 th , 20<strong>13</strong> adopted thefollowing resolution:WHEREAS the Premier <strong>of</strong> Ontario has repeatedly conveyed the Government’s desire to limitIndustrial Wind Turbine (IWT) Projects to communities that have indicated that they are“willing hosts”;AND WHEREAS Council for the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln has consistently noted itsconcern regarding the Green Energy Act, the installation <strong>of</strong> IWTs, and the restrictedjurisdiction <strong>of</strong> municipalities with respect to the Green Energy Act;NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council for the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincolnhereby applauds the position taken by Premier Wynne, to focus the installation <strong>of</strong> IWT’s incommunities that have indicated that they are “willing hosts”; andTHAT, due to the lack <strong>of</strong> information on the long term health impacts, the potential negativeimpact on property values, and the long term negative economic implications to ourcommunity resulting from the proposed installation <strong>of</strong> IWTs in West Lincoln, the Council forthe <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln hereby confirms that it is not a “willing host” for IWTs; andTHAT, the Council <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln encourages AMO to strike a committeeto review and establish a policy position on municipal jurisdiction as it relates to the GreenEnergy Act; and,THAT, other municipalities not impacted by IWTs show their support for those municipalitieswho have been impacted by this legislation by endorsing this motion; and,THAT, this resolution be forwarded to the Premier, Leaders <strong>of</strong> the Official Oppositions;Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Ministries <strong>of</strong> the Environment, Infrastructure and Energy, Rural Affairs andAgriculture and Food, Municipal Affairs; Region <strong>of</strong> Niagara; Niagara Peninsula Energy Inc.;local MP and MPP, the Association <strong>of</strong> Municipalities <strong>of</strong> Ontario, and the Renewable EnergyApproval applicants in West Lincoln.
___________________________________________________________________________________________CLERK’S DEPARTMENTMay 29, 20<strong>13</strong>ATTN: All Ontario MunicipalitiesFROM: Carolyn Langley, Clerk, <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln318 Canborough St. P.O. Box 400Smithville, ONL0R 2A0T: 905-957-3346F: 905-957-3219www.westlincoln.caRe: Resolution to Province regarding <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln will not sign aCommunity Vibrancy Agreement with any Industrial Wind Turbine ApplicantThis is to confirm that West Lincoln <strong>Town</strong>ship Council at its meeting <strong>of</strong> May 27 th , 20<strong>13</strong> adopted thefollowing resolution:WHEREAS the Niagara Region Wind Corporation presented a draft CommunityVibrancy Agreement to the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln for consideration in September20<strong>12</strong>; and,WHEREAS Council for the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln, and <strong>Town</strong>ship legal counselhave deliberated and discussed the Community Vibrancy Agreement at length; and,WHEREAS Council for the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln has now declared itself as an‘unwilling host’;NOW THEREFORE Council for the <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> West Lincoln hereby declares thatthe <strong>Town</strong>ship will not sign a Community Vibrancy Agreement with any Industrial WindTurbine applicant; and,THAT all municipalities be encouraged not to participate in a Community VibrancyAgreement; and,THAT, this resolution be forwarded to the Premier, Leaders <strong>of</strong> the OfficialOppositions; Ministers <strong>of</strong> the Ministries <strong>of</strong> the Environment, Infrastructure and Energy,Rural Affairs and Agriculture and Food; Region <strong>of</strong> Niagara; Niagara Peninsula EnergyInc.; local MP and MPP, the Renewable Energy Approval applicants in West Lincoln,and all Ontario municipalities through Association <strong>of</strong> Municipalities Ontario.
Ministry <strong>of</strong> LabourDirector’s OfficeOccupational Health and SafetyBranch505 University Avenue19th FloorToronto, OntarioM7A 1T7Telephone: 416 326-7866Fax: 416 326-7242Ministère du TravailBureau du directeurDirection de la santé et de la sécurité quau travail505, avenue Université19 e étageToronto (Ontario)M7A 1T7Téléphone : 416 326-7866Télécopieur : 416 326-7242June 19, 20<strong>13</strong>Dear City ClerksThe summer outdoor entertainment season is starting up. To protect both the public andworkers, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Labour and the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Municipal Affairs and Housing havebeen collaborating on a strategy to prevent failure <strong>of</strong> outdoor entertainment stages andancillary structures. Previous collapses <strong>of</strong> these structures resulted in tragedies andraised issues and concerns regarding their structural stability, design, construction andmaintenance.As a result, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Labour (MOL) requested that the Health and Safety AdvisoryCommittee for Live Performance (Live Performance Committee) develop a guideline ontemporary performance/event structures (temporary structures). The Live PerformanceCommittee is comprised <strong>of</strong> live entertainment industry stakeholders and technicalexperts.The resulting Temporary Performance/Event Structures Safety Guideline for the LivePerformance Industry brings together ministry regulations and sets out industry bestpractices in regard to the design, planning, erection/construction, maintenance anddisassembly <strong>of</strong> temporary structures. This guideline will provide reasonable precautionsthat the constructor/employer may use as guidance and will also help workplace partiesunderstand their obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and itsregulations as they relate to temporary structures. The guideline may be found athttp://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/pubs/liveperformance/gl_live_structures.phphttp://www.labour.gov.on.ca/french/hs/pubs/liveperformance/gl_live_structures.php.If you are permitting/hosting an event in your municipality, please ensure that the MOLguideline is shared with the appropriate city and event staff.Inspectors from the MOL will provide information on the guideline to theconstructor/employer when they become aware that temporary structures exist or arebeing planned/erected in their area.../2
-2-The MOL would appreciate being contacted by you about temporary structures that existor are being planned/erected in your municipality. The MOL is most interested in beingnotified about temporary structures that:1. will be used for multi-day events;2. require large equipment, such as cranes, to assemble the temporarystructure; or3. require separate temporary structures for sound, lighting, pyrotechnics,video equipment, etc.This information should be provided to the MOL Health and Safety Contact Centre tollfreeat 1-877-202-0008.Additionally, this guideline will be shared with both the Live Performance Committee andthe Film and the Television Health and Safety Advisory Committee who will, in turn,share it with their unions and associations. WSN (Workplace Safety North), IHSA(Infrastructure Health and Safety Association), WSPS (Workplace Safety and PreventionServices) and PSHSA (Public Services Health and Safety Association) will be asked toshare/advertise the guideline with their stakeholders as well.MOL’s guidelines are helpful in communicating and educating stakeholders on actionsand precautions that should be taken when planning and holding temporary events. Aswe are entering the summer concert season, the Temporary Performance/EventStructures Safety Guideline for the Live Performance Industry should be sharedimmediately, and whenever a permit is issued for an outdoor event where a temporarystructure may be erected.Thank you for your assistance in sharing this guideline with the industry stakeholders.If you have any questions, please contact Vivien Wharton-Szatan, a MOL ProvincialCoordinator, at (416) 326-7904.Sincerely,Original signed byWayne De L’Orme(A) Director
BARRIE AREA PHYSICIAN RECRUITMENT TASK FORCEM I N U T E SMeeting Title: Barrie Area Physician Recruitment Task ForceDate: June 11 th , 20<strong>13</strong>Location: Barrie City Hall, Sir Robert Barrie RoomTime: 4:00 – 6:00 p.m.Chair: Dr. Stu Murdoch Minutes recorded by: Brittany PetersonAttendees: Mayor Barb Baguley, Mayor Linda Collins, Nora Gavarre, , Michelle Hunter, David Coward, Kevin Macleod, Dr. Rick Irvin andHeather McCarthy on behalf <strong>of</strong> Patrick Brown.Regrets: Mayor Harry Hughes, Dr. Rob Ballagh, and Doug Shipley, Alex NuttallItem Discussion / Decisions Action / Follow-up1.0 WELCOME The attendees were welcomed to today’smeeting.MostResponsiblePersonDr. StuMurdochDue Date2.0 APPROVAL OFMINUTES ANDADOPTION OFAGENDAThe agenda was adopted for today’smeeting.
4.0 BUSINESSARISINGItem Discussion / Decisions Action / Follow-upMostResponsiblePersonDue DateIntroduceBrittany PetersonFormer RecruiterUpdate• Summer Student from GeorgianCollege, Business Administration– Human Resources, GraduatingApril 2014, with hope to stay in thehealthcare field.• Motion was made to go in Cameraby David Coward seconded byMayor Barb Baguley• Motion was made to come out <strong>of</strong>Camera by Mayor Barb BaguleyDavidCowardDavidCoward3.0 STANDINGAGENDA ITEMS:PhysicianRecruitmentUpdate• Family Medicine, 2 Physiciansapproved for Stroud to start inAugust 20<strong>13</strong> (Atapattu)• 4 Residents graduating withapplications to RVH pending exammarks.• Prospective Family Physicians forthe Mapleview Medical Clinic; Dr.Roseberry and Dr Olokodona• 7/10 FMTU Graduates staying inthe community• PR work with Michelle aboutreturn on investment <strong>of</strong>residents/physicians• Media release announcing thenumber <strong>of</strong> residents staying in thecommunity (Carolyn/Stu Jaclyn)Jaclyn Bell
Item Discussion / Decisions Action / Follow-upMostResponsiblePersonDue DateFMTU Update• Graduation sponsored byRVH/BAPR• 7/10 Residents staying withincommunity• Accredited Results: Outstanding9 Strengths0WeaknessesDr. StuMurdoch4.0 NEW BUSINESSSpecialistRecruitmentSupport• Average Physician Recruitmentjournal posting $2500 per posting• Proposal to change from dollaramount per department to dollaramount per hire• 30-50 new hires expected in thenext <strong>12</strong> months at RVH• More aggressive recruitment isneeded based on the type <strong>of</strong>specialty, this may requireadditional funding• Physician HR Plan is needed fromRVH to strategicallyrecruit/support funding• Follow up next meetingDavidCoward
Item Discussion / Decisions Action / Follow-upMostResponsiblePersonDue DateDoctors Day 20<strong>13</strong>Results• 108 Doctors in attendance• Very well received• Emails followed after event fromphysicians thanking organizingstaff• Dr. Irvin guest speaker• Retired physicians attended• BAPR’s first big recognition event• Will become an annual BAPR eventJaclyn BellMedical StudentWeek• Pharmaceutical Talks• ‘Explore Your Future in Medicine<strong>Info</strong>rmation Session’ educatingHighschool and Universitystudents as well as Parents onhow to get into medical school• 8 U<strong>of</strong>T Medical Students• FMTU Resident talk everymorning• Various sessions with volunteerphysician/resident mentorsJaclyn BellBAPR FinalStrategic Plan• Send final comments to Jaclyn t<strong>of</strong>inalize strategic plan• Send final comments to Jaclyn t<strong>of</strong>inalize strategic planJaclynBell
Item Discussion / Decisions Action / Follow-upMostResponsiblePersonDue DateAdministrativeSupport• Not discussed at this meeting Jaclyn Bell6.0 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:30pm7.0 NEXT MEETING: Tuesday September 10 th Barrie CityHall, Sir Robert Barrie Room4:00 – 6:00pm
MinutesAlliston & Area Physician Recruitment Committee Meeting8:30 a.m. Thursday May 16, 20<strong>13</strong>Location: <strong>Town</strong>ship <strong>of</strong> Adjala – Tosorontio Administration CentreAttendance: Aileen Dresser (Chair), Dr. Nigel Gripper, Olga Les, Zanne Cantin, Councillor LynnDollin, Ralph Braden, Rosalba Braden, Pamela Belsham, Kathryn Mooij, CouncillorDonna Jebb, Bev Nix, Larry Keogh, Leo Losereit, Mayor Tom Walsh, David McLeish,and Robin Brown (Minutes)Regrets:Councillor J. J. Paul Whiteside, Krista Morris-Tomini, Irene Venables, Councillor RonHenderson and Councillor Keith White.WelcomeAileen Dresser opened the meeting at 8:34 a.m.1. Approval <strong>of</strong> Agenda:20<strong>13</strong>-05-01 Moved by Bev NixSeconded by Donna JebbMotion to approve the AgendaCarried2. Declaration <strong>of</strong> Conflict <strong>of</strong> InterestNone declared3. Minutes <strong>of</strong> the Meeting held April 18, 20<strong>13</strong>20<strong>13</strong>-05-02 Moved by Leo LosereitSeconded by Mayor Tom WalshMotion that the minutes be acceptedCarried4. Action Item Review:Ad for Physician Appreciation Day will be placed today.A questionnaire will be distributed to the committee followed by a Strategic PlanningMeeting for the entire committee. The hospital would like to review in the fall.5. Correspondence :In:Email from Bill Wray to advise that financials will not be available until after May 20Regrets from J.J. Paul WhitesideEmail from Zanne Cantin advising draft for $900 from Scotiabank for Rural Health Day hadbeen received and deposited.Health Force Ontario letter explaining how they can help the committee with recruitment.Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 3
Out:Letter to Health Force Ontario regarding recruitment efforts.6. Physician Recruitment Coordinator Report:The doctor who visited on April 4 and 5, returned on Sunday to do a month long electivewith Tottenham clinic. She has indicated there is one other community which is high on herlist <strong>of</strong> choices and she will be spending time there this month and will make a decisionthereafter.Dr. B.V. did a week long locum in our ER in April and has indicated he would like to jointhe ER locum pool permanently.Dr. M.A. who attended the Ottawa HPRT visited the community on April 18. He is an ERphysician who will be ready to practice next year.Dr. D.W. visited the community on May 9, she toured the hospital, spoke with Dr. Jansenand visited the Carmen Vanderwater Clinic and the Tottenham Medical Centre. Dr. D.W.has been in touch with Dr. Jansen about doing a Hospitalist locum in July and will likelyvisit the FHT by that time.One other physician showed an interest in visiting in May.HPRTThe dates are Sept. 19 for Thunder Bay, Sept. 29 to Oct 3 for Ottawa, Kingston, London,Hamilton and Toronto. The other northern stop is Sudbury on October 17. Physicians willbe invited to attend as hosts and members <strong>of</strong> the Committee are also invited to host.Rural Medicine Week and Rural Health DayA planning meeting for these events is being held with Cathie MacDonald this afternoon.NewsAlthough the hospital has decided that they only need a recruiter one day per week Kathrynwill continue to work with the AAPRC. She will no longer have an <strong>of</strong>fice in the hospital, butwill have <strong>of</strong>f site access to files and the internet. This change may require more assistancefrom the Committee.7. Sub- Committees:a) Financial:Financials were not available for this meeting.$500 was received from Rotary.b) Hospitality:Ensure posters are upWe need to determine a fall event. A Victorian Evening travelling medicine show wassuggested. Donna will book if they are available.Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 3
c) Marketing / Communications:Announcement for Physician Appreciation day will be on The Circle Marquee and theelectronic signage at the <strong>Innisfil</strong> library.d) Strategic Planning:No report for this month9. New Business:Hospital funding has been cut from 20000 to 10000.New funding sources are Essa <strong>Town</strong>ship and the Rotary Club <strong>of</strong> Alliston.All Committee Members please note that a no liquor policy is in place. This is arequirement <strong>of</strong> the hospital.10. Next Meeting DateThursday 20 June, 20<strong>13</strong>Please attend to meet Guest Charlotte Kirby Health Force Ontario.11. Adjournment:20<strong>13</strong>-05-03 Moved by Donna JebbMotion to adjourn at 9:30 a.m.CarriedAction Items:Strategic planning meeting will be planned for the entire committee. Aileen and Lynn willwork on the agenda.Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 3
June 3, 20<strong>13</strong>For immediate releaseSimcoe County unitesunder one United Way bannerAfter two years in close alliance with highly successful results, the two United Waysserving the Simcoe County area are now working toward a union that will streamlineadministration and maximize positive community impact for the entire region.“Following an exciting and rewarding re-birth <strong>of</strong> United Way South Georgian Bay’s(UWSGB) annual campaign – which exceeded its goal, we want to ensure our donor dollars arebeing re-invested into our community in the most responsible and impactful way possible,” saysUWSGB Board Chair Catherine Campbell. “By coming together with our neighbouring partnerUnited Way Greater Simcoe County, we can draw upon its larger capacity to better support ourvital community-based agencies and local residents, while reducing our expenses. It’s a win-win.”Campbell says current UWSGB Executive Director Dale Biddell will continue to provideleadership and a strong presence in the South Georgian Bay area.“It’s really about the economies <strong>of</strong> scale,” adds UWGSB Board Chair Mark Aitken, who isworking with Campbell to finalize the details. “The UWSGB team has done an exceptional jobrevitalizing the mission and potential <strong>of</strong> United Way within the area they serve, and it’s because<strong>of</strong> this success the two organizations are seeking to continue the forward momentum as one.”The United Way organizations, which are both independent and locally governed byvolunteer boards <strong>of</strong> directors, began working together almost three years ago after a year-longcommunity-consultation process in the South Georgian Bay area identified a local desire tocontinue UWSGB’s activities despite a trend <strong>of</strong> waning awareness and declining financialsupport.“Together, we have come so far very quickly,” reports Biddell, who has accepted theposition <strong>of</strong> Director, Strategic Initiatives within UWGSC. “As our Ontario Trillium Foundationfunding comes to an end, the expenses now being covered by that grant would require much <strong>of</strong>our hard-won donor dollars and leave us under-funded to help the great agency work being donehere. Instead, we’re being pro-active and are now looking forward to tapping into the existingstrength <strong>of</strong> our larger partner, UWGSC, which will allow our local agencies to draw from a muchlarger pool <strong>of</strong> resources to support their programs and services in the future.”UWGSC CEO Alison Pickard agrees this is a great-news story for residents all acrossthe region, and knows both organizations are committed to making the transition as seamless aspossible throughout the coming campaign and funding cycle.“Dale and her team <strong>of</strong> dedicated volunteers are the experts in the western portion <strong>of</strong>Simcoe County, so we will wholeheartedly welcome and respect their knowledge and input,” saysPickard, whose <strong>of</strong>fice is in Midhurst. “We’re looking forward to bringing a unified United Wayapproach to our region.”While the process <strong>of</strong> this union could take several months to formalize, bothorganizations expect their annual fall campaigns to be rolled out this year under one banner.#####Media inquiries should be directed to:Dale Biddell, Executive DirectorMichele Lawson, Director <strong>of</strong> CommunicationsUnited Way South Georgian BayUnited Way Greater Simcoe CountyOffice: 705.444.1141, ext. 223 Office: 705.726.2301, ext. 2025 / Cell: 705.730.2592edirector@UnitedWaySGB.camlawson@UnitedWayGSC.caChange starts here.
From: 211 Simcoe County [mailto:211SimcoeCounty@communityconnection.ca]Sent: June-14-<strong>13</strong> 10:44 AMSubject: Charter Champion AwardsCeremony
From: Andrea Chiodo [mailto:andreawoodschiodo@me.com]Sent: June-<strong>13</strong>-<strong>13</strong> <strong>12</strong>:01 AMTo: Lynn DollinCc: Barb Baguley, MayorSubject: Excessive Use <strong>of</strong> EssoFlex250 Oil on 2nd Line <strong>Innisfil</strong>Hello Lynn,Thank you for taking my call on Monday, May 27, regarding the application <strong>of</strong> Esso Flex 250 oil on the2nd line. The aggressive application <strong>of</strong> this product this year (May 20<strong>13</strong>) has severely and negativelyimpacted the residents on my street.Please advise council: DO NOT USE this petroleum product, or any other oily dust suppression product,on our road this year or in the future.BackgroundAfter contacting the township via their website, Brenda Bodnar, a Customer Service Representative, e-mailed me and referred me to DA- LEE DUST CONTROL for product information on "virgin oil."The product referred to as "virgin oil" is actually EssoFlex 250, a petroleum-based applicationwith NO WHMIS guidelines.As per a product description bearing the Imperial Oil/Esso letterhead and insignia: "ESSOFLEX 200series oils are manufactured from refined petroleum products. As with all petroleum products, goodpersonal hygiene and careful handling should always be practiced. Avoid prolonged contact with the skin,splashing into the eyes, ingestion or vapour inhalation. Please refer to the appropriate MaterialSafety Data Sheet for further information on each product. The Ess<strong>of</strong>lex 200 series represents blends<strong>of</strong> transition materials collected from the production <strong>of</strong> various industrial and automotive oilformulations. Note: These products are not controlled under Canadian WHMISlegislation" http://www.esso.com/Canada-English/Lubes/PDS/IOCAENINDESEss<strong>of</strong>lex_200_Series.aspxMy issues are as follows:1. HAZARD & DANGER ON ROADSThe oil is a health and safety hazard to all who traverse the affected roads and a special source <strong>of</strong> dangerto those <strong>of</strong> us who live and work on the 2nd Line between Sideroad 10 and Rieve Boulevard. Speakingon behalf <strong>of</strong> my diverse neighbors comprised <strong>of</strong> agricultural enterprises, a recreational golf course, andresidential families, we ask the township to CEASE any further application <strong>of</strong> this product on our road. Inaddition, the spread <strong>of</strong> the oil onto the paved intersections <strong>of</strong> Rieve Boulevard and Sideroad 10 hascreated slick and dangerous intersection on <strong>Innisfil</strong>'s roads. Rainy days make the 2nd line absolutelyHAZARDOUS to drive on as the oil and water bead on the roadway.2. DANGER AND LIABILTY TO SCHOOL BUS and VEHICLE BRAKING SYSTEMSWe have also discussed the EXTREME DANGER and LIABILITY the oil creates for our school bus to<strong>Innisfil</strong> Central Public School Route 610. Our bus driver "Crystal" reported the bus company used in ourarea is very concened about oil on the bus's braking system. She has had to have the bus's brakesserviced more than once and has also repeatedly cleaned the bus windows as the oil inhibits visibility. Iwould like to request any studies the town has on file on the impact <strong>of</strong> this oil on brake systems andmotors? My own car's air filter was recently replaced and was caked with oil.3. OIL DESTROYS PROPERTY. The oil is destructive to our property --cars, tractors, driveways,asphalt, cement, shoes, and children's bikes, just to name a few. My property is destroyed by thetown's excessive application <strong>of</strong> EssoFlex 250 on my road. Please see pictures <strong>of</strong> my car and the pittedand stained asphalt in front <strong>of</strong> my house. This asphalt and patterned concrete was a $15,000 upgrade tomy home installed less than a year ago in late June <strong>of</strong> 2011. I will be discussing with contractors and thetownship compensation for my destroyed property.1
4. HEALTH CONCERNS for us residents. According to the MSDS specifications <strong>of</strong> this product, theheavy application <strong>of</strong> EssoFlex250 on the the 2nd Line has created puddles <strong>of</strong> the petroleum product allover my home, my cars, and property which are not in keeping with the MSDS guidelines. There is adefinite petroleum odour emanating from the roads especially on warm days. The oil puddles splash onour clothing and skin when we walk or jog. My family and the residents <strong>of</strong> the 2nd Line have, nodoubt, been over-exposed to this product as per the company's own Material Safety DataSheet. http://www.daleedustcontrol.com/downloads/MSDS/Ess<strong>of</strong>lex%20250%20Virgin%20Oil%20MSDS.pdf5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <strong>Innisfil</strong> has hopefully addressed the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <strong>of</strong>Ess<strong>of</strong>lex 250 in the <strong>Innisfil</strong> Creek as the trucks spray over the 2nd Line bridge and run-<strong>of</strong>f into the creek isobvious from the rainbow coloured slicks on the water's surface. "Organic Petroleum Products" such asEssoFlex250 have the highest number <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts. According to a 2002 EPA studyconducted by the University Nevada in Las Vegas, "the chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the petroleum [dustsuppression] product(s) . . . have high levels <strong>of</strong> heavy metals from specific oil deposits. Several studieshave shown that waste oils may contain known toxic and carcinogenic compounds (e.g. PCBs);therefore EPA prohibits the use <strong>of</strong> these materials" (RTAC, 1987; Metzle, 1985, and USEPA, 1983).http://www.epa.gov/esd/cmb/pdf/dust.pdfRegrettably, there are no plans in the budget to resurface the unpaved section <strong>of</strong> the 2nd Line. As a 19year resident <strong>Innisfil</strong>, I have watched the township grow and my taxes increase. Now is time for you toattend to the rural residents <strong>of</strong> your community. The <strong>Town</strong> is responsible for damages from the excessiveand non-conforming application <strong>of</strong> this substance. Please see below for just a few examples <strong>of</strong> howEssoFlex250 has degraded my property. I will happily supply you with more!I anticipate your replies.Sincerely,Andrea Woods Chiodo2
Name: Shannon Harwood> Address: 679 <strong>13</strong>th line> Phone Number: 706‐241‐3740> E‐mail Address: shayharwood@sympatico.ca> Message:> Good morning I was wondering who I would contact regarding the speeds> on our street we tried the police once and they don't do anything to> help us. My neighbours had to put up signs to tell people to slow down> this is getting out <strong>of</strong> hand we are an 80km hour zone but every where > around us is 60km wehave childern and pets and my childern and my> neighbours have bus stops here we are trying to get this road dropped> to 60km as it drops to 50km just at the bottom <strong>of</strong> our road. we are> also on a blind hill and we don't see cars till the last second when> we pull out <strong>of</strong> our drive way and I can't count the times my self,my> husband,and son almost got hit trying to get out <strong>of</strong> our drive way. I> have spoke to my neighbours and they all are truly concerned and would> like to see the speed limit dropped. We have several cottagers who have no respect for thespeed and most people feel that doing over a 100km is just fine. We have street bikes that tearup and down here and which I have called the police with plate numbers and still never>stopped them, what do we have to do to fix this problem. Our friends> dog was killed in front <strong>of</strong> our house and the person who hit him> admitted to speeding and not stopping when he saw the dog. I fear for> the kids here and pets. Please forward this to our mayor I would > kindly appreciate that andwould truly appreciate some sort <strong>of</strong>> response as soon as you can Thanks kindly The residents <strong>of</strong> <strong>13</strong>th line>> Shannon Harwood
Name: Valerie L. BrownAddress: 1766 Lamstone StreetPhone Number: 705-294-0266E-mail Address: brown@brownlawfirm.caMessage: Office <strong>of</strong> the Mayor<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>2101 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road,<strong>Innisfil</strong>, OntarioL9S 1A1Attention:The Honourable Barb BaguelyRe:Parking by-lawDear Ms. Baguely:I have been a resident <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong> for almost 7 years and have wanted to writeon this issue for some time. With the injury <strong>of</strong> a 4 year old boy last summer in my area, I feelcompelled to action as a matter <strong>of</strong> personal safety and traffic flow.The ProblemI reside in the Victorian Village, Previn Court Homes (now San Diego Homes)development on the south side <strong>of</strong> the 7th line, east <strong>of</strong> Sideroad 20. Although during the daywhen the residents <strong>of</strong> this commuter area have taken their vehicles to work there is seldom anyissue, it is common practice for persons to park their vehicles on the street, especially on theweekends and evenings. Parking takes place on both sides <strong>of</strong> the street. The area resemblesmore <strong>of</strong> a parking lot, rather than a street.This parking takes place without restriction, including in close proximity to intersections and stopsigns, <strong>of</strong>ten blocking site line for traffic at intersectionsTraffic FlowAs a result, use <strong>of</strong> the road is <strong>of</strong>ten reduced to a single lane; drivers weave in and out <strong>of</strong> thespaces left between driveways in a slalom style. Where parking is close to the intersection,visibility is reduced, if not completely blocked.It is worth noting that Booth Avenue, in particular, is the main artery in and out <strong>of</strong> the subdivisionand sees a lot <strong>of</strong> traffic.Personal SafetyPerhaps more importantly, this situation creates a situation <strong>of</strong> reduced visibility for bothdrivers and small children. The area is mainly occupied by families with children. Thesechildren frequently play on or near the street. While this is largely an issue <strong>of</strong> parentalsupervision that unfortunately cannot be addressed by council, knowing this is the case, we cantake steps to reduce the risk.The SolutionBy restricting parking to one side <strong>of</strong> the street, visibility and traffic flow will be improved.I suggest that a two way street is the intention <strong>of</strong> council and that the proposed restriction iswhat is required to give it practical effect.
To my mind, it comes down to a determination <strong>of</strong> whether Booth Avenue, and adjacent streets,are playgrounds or road ways.I therefore request council to consider and implement bylaws restricting parking to one side <strong>of</strong>the street only, and further prohibiting any parking within a safe distance <strong>of</strong> intersections andstop signs. I know I have the support <strong>of</strong> many in my community. If you require such support tobe in the form <strong>of</strong> a petition, I would be glad to canvass the neighbourhood, although the issueand solution seems a clear and simple thing.Thank you for your consideration.Yours truly,Valerie L. Brown
Kim CreamerFrom:Sent:To:Subject:Valerie Brown [brown@brownlawfirm.ca]June-25-<strong>13</strong> 1:43 PMKim CreamerRE: Parking By-lawThank you for contacting me. I actually went last week to watch the meeting for a bit!I see there is a <strong>Town</strong> Parking By‐Law already, and all that would be required is an amendment to schedule “A”, aswell as signs posted…no one is obeying the by‐laws already in place in my area.The streets within the area I am concerned about are :Booth Avenue;Lamstone Street;Kell Street; andMuriel Street.Booth, Lamstone and Kell are probably the greater concerns as they are the longer streets with more traffic.Angus and Wesely are more recent additions and likely have the same issue.I am not an urban planner (lawyer, as you can see), but if there is leg work required to canvass the neighbourhoodfor support, I am certainly able. If it will assist to have it before the meeting, please let me know and I’ll see what Ican do.Yours truly,Valerie L. BrownBROWN LAW FIRMUnit 21<strong>12</strong>28 Gorham StreetNewmarket, OntarioL3Y 8Z1Tel: 905.853.2LAW (2529)Fax: 905.853.3LAW (3529)www.brownlawfirm.ca*The contents <strong>of</strong> this email transmission are governed by the laws <strong>of</strong> solicitor-client privilege and contain certain confidentialinformation intended for the named recipient only. Any distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you havereceived this email transmission in error please notify us immediately by collect telephone call to (905) 853-2529.From: Kim Creamer [mailto:kcreamer@innisfil.ca]Sent: June 25, 20<strong>13</strong> 1:36 PMTo: brown@brownlawfirm.caSubject: Parking By-lawGood Afternoon Ms. BrownPlease be advised that your correspondence requesting no parking on one side <strong>of</strong> the street and none atintersections in your area will be placed on the July 10, 20<strong>13</strong> <strong>Info</strong>. <strong>List</strong>. Your are welcomed to attend thismeeting and if you wish to speak in Open Form to further explain your request you have this opportunityat 7:15 p.m. You will need to sign the Pink Open Form sheets outside the Council Chamber doors onthat evening.1
I have a question <strong>of</strong> clarification. Which road(s) do you want parking on only one side, Lamstone and/orBooth? Just need to put clarification on the <strong>Info</strong>. <strong>List</strong> Agenda.Thank you.Kim CreamerAssistant Clerk705-436-3740 Ext. 24101-888-436-3710 (toll free)705-436-7<strong>12</strong>0 (fax)<strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>2101 <strong>Innisfil</strong> Beach Road<strong>Innisfil</strong>, ON L9S 1A1www.innisfil.caThis information is intended only for the person, person, entity, or entities to which it is addressed; does not necessarily represent the views <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innisfil</strong>; may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under the Municipal Freedom <strong>of</strong><strong>Info</strong>rmation and Protection <strong>of</strong> Privacy Act. If the reader is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering themessage to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying <strong>of</strong> this communication is strictlyprohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email and delete the correspondence from yourcomputer.2
-----Original Message-----From: Robin Ritchie [mailto:ritchie.robin@gmail.com]Sent: June-24-<strong>13</strong> 2:36 PMTo: Maria BaierSubject: MINNETONKA RD, INNISFIL.Dear Ms BaierEarlier this year I sent the communication below to <strong>Innisfil</strong> <strong>Town</strong> and they suggested that Iinitially make contact with you. The email I sent was as follows:"Since the <strong>Town</strong> stopped parking on 30th Sideroad on Big Bay Point (to lake), the owners <strong>of</strong>properties on Minnetonka Rd have had to endure numerous vehicles, trailers and ATV's parkingand driving in front <strong>of</strong> their properties at all times <strong>of</strong> the day, particularly during the ice fishingseason. I am aware that they have a right to do so, but I have a numbers <strong>of</strong> questions to ask the<strong>Town</strong>:1. The road has been in a terrible condition this year (as has 30th Sideroad) due to the amount<strong>of</strong> traffic. The grader used to cover West, South, East, 30th S/R and Minnetonka Rd on aregular basis, but recently Minnetonka Rd has moved to an infrequent schedule, whilst the otherroads have been graded. Having said that, this week the grader did come down Minnetonka Rd,but was unable to do a proper job due to vehicles parked on the road. Property owners onMinnetonka Rd generally pay more in property taxes than owners on adjoining roads, but wereceive a lessor service for our tax dollars.2. More importantly, it is almost impossible for a fire engine to access Minnetonka Rd should aproperty have a fire. Today for instance we have vehicles parked on both sides <strong>of</strong> our narrowstreet making it just about possible for a car to get through. Likewise, if a delivery truck needs tomake a delivery, then access becomes impossible for the driver.3. As Minnetonka Rd is a narrow dead end street, the owners <strong>of</strong> properties on the street are fedup with the driveways being used as turning points".Now summer is here we have trucks and trailers parking on the street so that they can launchtheir boats <strong>of</strong>f Minnetonka Rd. Today for instance, we had vehicles parked on both sides <strong>of</strong> theroad, therefore making it difficult for vehicles, particularly large ones to access the street.The actions taken by the <strong>Town</strong> to prohibit parking on 30th Sideroad and other adjoining streetshas created an untenable situation for the residents <strong>of</strong> Minnetonka Rd and we would thereforelike a restriction on parking in our street to be implemented as soon as possible.I am obviously looking for your support in this matter and therefore could you please inform me<strong>of</strong> the process to formally challenge the <strong>Town</strong>'s parking policy so that I and my fellowneighbours can start the appropriate action.YoursRobin Ritchie
Change language