<strong>Turtles</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Trouble</strong>: Top <strong>25+</strong> <strong>Endangered</strong> Tortoises and Freshwater <strong>Turtles</strong>—2011<strong>The</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e maps used <strong>in</strong> this document are from Buhlmann et al. (2009), show<strong>in</strong>g the global distribution of species richness <strong>in</strong> terms ofthe number of terrestrial and freshwater turtle and tortoise species <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed dra<strong>in</strong>age bas<strong>in</strong>s (color scale = number of species per area).Projected distributions were based on GIS-def<strong>in</strong>ed hydrologic unit compartments (HUCs) constructed around verified localities and thenadd<strong>in</strong>g HUCs that connected known po<strong>in</strong>t localities <strong>in</strong> the same watershed or physiographic region, and similar habitats and elevationsas verified HUCs. <strong>The</strong> highest concentrations of species are <strong>in</strong> the Ganges-Brahmaputra bas<strong>in</strong>, Southeastern USA, and Southeast Asia.<strong>in</strong>g the concept from the orig<strong>in</strong>al prospectus outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g theconservation goals of the TCF (Turtle Conservation Fund2002). <strong>The</strong> second Top 25 list was issued four years laterby the TFTSG (IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater TurtleSpecialist Group 2007), be<strong>in</strong>g expanded to also <strong>in</strong>cluderegional list<strong>in</strong>gs of more than just the Top 25 species andprovid<strong>in</strong>g a general descend<strong>in</strong>g order of ext<strong>in</strong>ction risk.This, our third Top 25 list<strong>in</strong>g, encompasses morespecies than previously (and is therefore called the Top<strong>25+</strong>), add<strong>in</strong>g several more species that are also at very highrisk of ext<strong>in</strong>ction. <strong>The</strong> species are arranged <strong>in</strong> a more or lessgeneral and approximate descend<strong>in</strong>g order of ext<strong>in</strong>ctionrisk, and separated <strong>in</strong>to the Top 25, the Other Top 40[species 26–40], and Others [species 41 and higher], for atotal of 49 species covered (see overview tables, maps, andphotos on pp. 12–16).In contrast to the previous Top 25 lists, which werepresented by s<strong>in</strong>gle organizations (the TCF <strong>in</strong> 2003 and theTFTSG <strong>in</strong> 2007), the current 2011 list is presented by a groupof organizations, that we have jo<strong>in</strong>tly agreed to designateas the Turtle Conservation Coalition (TCC) to reflect ourcollaborative approach <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g together, and <strong>in</strong> order tospeak with one voice on this important subject. <strong>The</strong> TCC is an<strong>in</strong>formal alliance of the follow<strong>in</strong>g turtle- and conservationfocusedorganizations currently work<strong>in</strong>g together on behalfof chelonian and biodiversity conservation: the IUCN/SSCTortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group (TFTSG),the Turtle Conservation Fund (TCF), the Turtle SurvivalAlliance (TSA), the Turtle Conservancy / Behler ChelonianCenter (TC/BCC), Chelonian Research Foundation (CRF),Conservation International (CI), <strong>Wildlife</strong> ConservationSociety (WCS), and San Diego Zoo Global (SDZG).Work<strong>in</strong>g closely with the TCC, the International Unionfor the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and its SpeciesSurvival Commission (SSC) and Red List Programme haveprovided a global framework for many of our conservationefforts, and CITES and the U.S. Fish and <strong>Wildlife</strong> Servicehave provided important support to allow much of thebackground analysis on specific threats to be accomplished.<strong>The</strong> TCC welcomes future participation by other associatedorganizations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those focused more on sea turtles,for other potential projects or endeavors as <strong>in</strong>dicated.Our methodology for this 2011 Top <strong>25+</strong> list wasto take the previous Top 25 lists from TCF (2003) andTFTSG (2007), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a synthesis of all the 2007regional lists, and circulate them to the membership ofthe TFTSG (currently 274 members from 51 nationswho work or focus their turtle conservation efforts <strong>in</strong> 107nations; http://www.iucn-tftsg.org/membership/) for <strong>in</strong>putand recommendations as to rank<strong>in</strong>g of all terrestrial andfreshwater turtle and tortoise species based on ext<strong>in</strong>ctionrisk. Those recommendations were then collated and sentfor further review to the 30-member Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee ofthe TFTSG, and then f<strong>in</strong>ally discussed at a jo<strong>in</strong>t leadershipmeet<strong>in</strong>g of the pr<strong>in</strong>cipals of the Turtle ConservationCoalition, thereby generat<strong>in</strong>g the current list.– 8 –
<strong>Turtles</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Trouble</strong>: Top <strong>25+</strong> <strong>Endangered</strong> Tortoises and Freshwater <strong>Turtles</strong>—2011Species accounts were then prepared by the editors with<strong>in</strong>put from multiple experts <strong>in</strong> the field, and photographs selected,us<strong>in</strong>g photos from the wild whenever possible. Mapsshow<strong>in</strong>g general locations for the species utilized the basemap from Buhlmann et al. (2009), show<strong>in</strong>g the patterns ofdistribution of tortoise and freshwater turtle species richnessacross the globe.In general, this document <strong>in</strong>cludes all terrestrial and freshwaterturtles and tortoises currently ranked as Ext<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong> theWild or Critically <strong>Endangered</strong> on the current 2010 IUCN RedList, or provisionally so, based on recent draft assessments bythe TFTSG (Turtle Taxonomy Work<strong>in</strong>g Group 2010) carriedout <strong>in</strong> a series of turtle-focused IUCN Red List<strong>in</strong>g workshopsheld around the world. In addition, <strong>in</strong>cluded on this list are afew species at lesser Red List categories that are also consideredto be at a high risk of ext<strong>in</strong>ction.A few turtle taxa listed as Critically <strong>Endangered</strong> on theRed List or by the TFTSG are not <strong>in</strong>cluded on this 2011 Top<strong>25+</strong> list. For example, Dahl’s Toad-headed Turtle, Mesoclemmysdahli, currently listed on the Red List as Critically<strong>Endangered</strong>, and <strong>in</strong>cluded on the first Top 25 list <strong>in</strong> 2003,has recently been determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the TFTSG to warrantdownlist<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Endangered</strong>. This was based on the recentdiscovery of additional populations and less apparent habitatthreats, and the species may even qualify for Vulnerablestatus pend<strong>in</strong>g further analysis. This species represents agood case of <strong>in</strong>creased conservation focus on a perceivedcritically endangered species lead<strong>in</strong>g to improved knowledgeand survival status.Additionally, the Giant South American River Turtleor Arrau, Podocnemis expansa, currently listed on the RedList as Lower Risk / Conservation Dependent, has recentlybeen determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the TFTSG to warrant uplist<strong>in</strong>g toCritically <strong>Endangered</strong> on a global basis. However, regionalpopulations <strong>in</strong> Brazil, despite be<strong>in</strong>g markedly reduced, arestill fairly large and hold<strong>in</strong>g their own due to good conservationmanagement, and the species is not considered to beat high risk for impend<strong>in</strong>g ext<strong>in</strong>ction at this time.Subspecies and populations were not considered for <strong>in</strong>clusion<strong>in</strong> this document, although a few are listed as Critically<strong>Endangered</strong> on the Red List. <strong>The</strong> Black Sp<strong>in</strong>y or CuatroCienegas Softshell Turtle, Apalone sp<strong>in</strong>ifera atra, theSeychelles Black Mud Turtle, Pelusios subniger parietalis,and the Seychelles Yellow-bellied Mud Turtle, Pelusioscastanoides <strong>in</strong>tergularis, are all at high risk of ext<strong>in</strong>ction,but <strong>in</strong> need of further genetic analysis to help determ<strong>in</strong>etheir dist<strong>in</strong>ctiveness. <strong>The</strong> Greek Tortoise subspecies Testudograeca nikolskii is still listed as Critically <strong>Endangered</strong>on the Red List, but has recently been synonymized underthe Asia M<strong>in</strong>or Tortoise, Testudo graeca ibera, a taxon notconsidered at high risk (Turtle Taxonomy Work<strong>in</strong>g Group2010). <strong>The</strong> Mediterranean population of the African or NileSoftshell Turtle, Trionyx triunguis, is listed as Critically <strong>Endangered</strong>on the Red List, but the species as a whole is consideredLeast Concern, and the Mediterranean populationhas recently been determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the TFTSG to no longerwarrant a rank<strong>in</strong>g of Critically <strong>Endangered</strong>.What About Sea <strong>Turtles</strong>?This 2011 Top <strong>25+</strong> list<strong>in</strong>g does not formally assess or <strong>in</strong>cludethe seven species of sea turtles, as the Red List status ofthose species is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the IUCN/SSC Mar<strong>in</strong>e TurtleSpecialist Group, and our groups are here focused only onterrestrial and freshwater turtles and tortoises. Unfortunately,non-mar<strong>in</strong>e turtles often receive much less conservation attentionthan the generally more apparently charismatic sea turtles(although we naturally feel that tortoises and freshwater turtlesare fully as charismatic as sea turtles).However, if we had <strong>in</strong>cluded sea turtles <strong>in</strong> ourassessment, it is our op<strong>in</strong>ion that two species might havewarranted <strong>in</strong>clusion on our Top <strong>25+</strong> list. <strong>The</strong> Kemp’sRidley, Lepidochelys kempii, assessed as Critically<strong>Endangered</strong> on the IUCN Red List, with its small regionaland highly impacted population, might have been <strong>in</strong>cludedon the lower portions of the list. And the Leatherback SeaTurtle, Dermochelys coriacea, also assessed as Critically<strong>Endangered</strong> on the IUCN Red List, with its larger globalbut highly impacted populations, might also have been<strong>in</strong>cluded, but possibly further down on the list. However,the Hawksbill Sea Turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, althoughalso assessed as Critically <strong>Endangered</strong> on the IUCN RedList, would probably not have been <strong>in</strong>cluded on our Top<strong>25+</strong>, as it is similar to the Giant South American RiverTurtle, Podocnemis expansa, also provisionally consideredCritically <strong>Endangered</strong> on the IUCN Red List, but also not<strong>in</strong>cluded on our Top <strong>25+</strong> list. That species also has a largeglobal population and, just like the Hawksbill, though manypopulations are reduced <strong>in</strong> a major way and fac<strong>in</strong>g localextirpation <strong>in</strong> several areas, neither species appears to befac<strong>in</strong>g a high risk of global ext<strong>in</strong>ction anytime soon.Unfortunately, there are many more species ofterrestrial and freshwater turtles and tortoises that are atsignificantly higher risk of impend<strong>in</strong>g ext<strong>in</strong>ction than any(or at least most) of the sea turtles. Nevertheless, sea turtles<strong>in</strong> general tend to garner much broader and stronger levelsof support from both non-governmental and governmentalconservation organizations than non-mar<strong>in</strong>e turtles receive .It is evident that conservation resource allocation should<strong>in</strong>clude similar or comparable levels of support for terrestrialand freshwater turtles and tortoises and sea turtles alike. Allthese highly endangered and important animals are fac<strong>in</strong>g ahigh ext<strong>in</strong>ction risk, and all need our help.Patterns of Threat Among<strong>Turtles</strong> and TortoisesWith anywhere from 48 to 54% of all 328 of theirspecies considered threatened (Turtle Taxonomy Work<strong>in</strong>gGroup 2010), turtles and tortoises are at a much higher riskof ext<strong>in</strong>ction than many other vertebrates: birds (ca. 13%),mammals (ca. 21–25%), sharks and rays (ca. 17–31%), oramphibians (ca. 30–41%) (Hoffmann et al. 2010), and paralleledamong the larger groups only by the primates (ca.48%) (www.iucnredlist.org).– 9 –