11.07.2015 Views

Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models ... - Sense Publishers

Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models ... - Sense Publishers

Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models ... - Sense Publishers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MORAL MOTIVATION AND THE FOUR COMPONENT MODELreconciliation model mentioned earlier, individuals who emphasize either agencyor communion ought to present a pattern across Rest’s components that highlightsthe lack <strong>of</strong> coordination between these two competing claims on one’s <strong>motivation</strong>.We note Walker and Frimer’s (2007) finding that statistical interactions betweenagency and communion do not out predict the individual main effects. Neverthelesswe suggest that a lack <strong>of</strong> coordination between these themes would be evidencednot by statistical interactions, but through the identification <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles across thecomponents as defined by mean differences and the strength <strong>of</strong> paths betweencomponents. It is interesting to note that Bebeau (2009a; 2009b) found that dentistswho were disciplined by their governing bodies did not show evidence <strong>of</strong> a failingon a particular component in Rest’s system. Instead most noticeable was a lack<strong>of</strong> coordination across components and a particular weakness in one <strong>of</strong> them. Itis interesting to speculate whether pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who fail to uphold standards <strong>of</strong>the pr<strong>of</strong>ession do so in characteristic ways based on an uncoordinated emphasis onagency or communion .An alternative approach to reconcile the four components with personality andself-systems <strong>models</strong> is to focus on moderators and mediators <strong>of</strong> the componentassessments. For instance Seligman, (1991) defines an affective/<strong>motivation</strong>aldimension labeled “learned optimism” that has been independently noted in the <strong>moral</strong>exemplar literature (e.g., Colby & Damon, 1992; Rule & Bebeau, 2005). It seemsreasonable to expect that measures that capture learned optimism may moderate thelink between processes and <strong>moral</strong> action . Secondly, we suggest further exploringKegan’s model within a broader range <strong>of</strong> populations. Bebeau and her colleagueshave demonstrated how measures <strong>of</strong> identity development have clear implicationsfor understanding how <strong>moral</strong> <strong>motivation</strong> becomes integrated into the <strong>moral</strong> self(Bebeau & Monson, 2011; Rule & Bebeau, 2005). Although this work has focusedon pr<strong>of</strong>essional populations, the consistent findings supporting a link between thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> identity and <strong>moral</strong> <strong>motivation</strong> indicates that a more representativetest <strong>of</strong> these claims is warranted. Taken together we see the development <strong>of</strong> a secondgeneration <strong>of</strong> research that helps to connect the <strong>moral</strong> self literature with the keyinsights from Rest’s model.NOTE1The full version <strong>of</strong> the PROI has two additional dimensions: Agency and Autonomy. These dimensionshave not been emphasized in the literature and are not described here.REFERENCESBandura, A. (2002). Selective <strong>moral</strong> disengagement in the exercise <strong>of</strong> <strong>moral</strong> agency. Journal <strong>of</strong> MoralEducation, 31(2), 101–119.Bebeau, M.J. (2009a). Enhancing pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism using ethics education as part <strong>of</strong> a dental licensingboard’s disciplinary action: Part 1 An evidence-based process. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American College <strong>of</strong>Dentists, 76(2), 38–50.65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!