IMAGING & ONCOLOGY - Society of Radiographers

202010IMAGING &ONCOLOGYReferences1. Vining D J, Gelfand D W. Non-invasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3Dreconstruction, and virtual reality. Syllabus: Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists 23rdAnnual Meeting, Maui, HI, February, 19942. McFarland E, Levin B, Lieberman D, Pickhardt P, Johnson C D, Glick S, Brooks D, SmithR Revised Colorectal Screening Guidelines: Joint Effort of the American Cancer Society,U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology.Radiology, 2008; 248:717-7203. Burling D, Halligan S,Taylor S, Usiskin S, Bartram C. CT colonography practice in the UK: anational survey. Clin Radiol, 2004; 59(1),39-434. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Computed tomographic colonography(virtual colonoscopy), NICE, 2009. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG1295. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the early detection of cancer, American CancerSociety, 2008. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp#coloncancer6. Taylor S, Laghi A, Lefere P, et al. European Society Of Gastrointestinal and AbdominalRadiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography, Eur Radiol, 2007;17:575–5797. Yee J, Kumar N, Hung R et al. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and incombination at CT colonography, Radiology 2003; 226: 653–6618. Burling D, Taylor S, Halligan S et al. Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCTcolonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation, AmJ Roentgenol, 2006; 186:96–1039. Macari M, Megibow AJ. Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with twodimensionalimaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:137-14310. Chaoui AS, Barish MA. Virtual colonoscopy: a new tool for colorectal cancer screening.Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2001; 17:78-8511. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopyto screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:162-16812. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Dewyspelaere J et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansingmethod before CT colonography: initial results—polyp detection and patient acceptance,Radiology 2002;224:393–40313. Jensch S, de Vries A, Pot D, Peringa J, Bipat S, Florie J, van Gelder R, Stoker J. Imagequality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxativesfor CT colonography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008; 191:158-16714. Siewert B, Gareen I, Vanness D, Herman B, Johnson C, Gatsonis C. ACRIN 6664: Patientacceptance and preferance of CT colonography compared to optical colonoscopy for coloncancer screening J Clin Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-MeetingEdition). Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 403415. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellström M. Patient acceptance of CT colonographyand conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with orsuspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002; 222(2):337-4516. Taylor S, Halligan S, O’Donnell C et al., Cardiovascular effects at multi–detector row CTcolonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon, Radiology,2003;229:782–79017. Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A et al., Potentially serious adverse events at CTcolonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom,Radiology, 2006;239:464–47118. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT ColonographyStudy Group Investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CTcolonography: multicenter study, Radiology 2007;242:152–16119. Johnson C, MacCarty R, Welch T et al. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CTcolonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectalpolyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2004;2:314–32120. Burling D, Wylie P, Gupta A, Illangovan R, Muckian J, Ahmad R, Marshall M, Taylor S.CT colonography: accuracy of initial interpretation by radiographers in routine clinicalpractice Clin Radiol, 2010;65(2)126-13221. Fisichella V, Jäderling F, Horvath S, Stotzer P, Kilander A, Båth M, Hellström M.Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CTcolonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers Clin Radiol, 2009; 64,(10)972-98222. Taylor S, Charman S, Lefere P, McFarland E, Paulson E, Yee J, Aslam R, Barlow J, GuptaA, Kim D, Miller S, Halligan S. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum readerparadigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology, 2008; 246:463-47123. Taylor S, Robinson C, Boone D, Honeyfield L, Halligan S. Polyp characteristics correctlyannotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologistsduring CT colonography. Radiology, 2009; 253:715-72324. Regge D, Hassan C, Pickhardt P, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim D, Iafrate F, Morini S. Impact ofcomputer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography. Radiology,2009;250:488-49725. Tawn D, Squire C, Mohammed M et al. National audit of the sensitivity of doublecontrastbarium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts, Clin Radiol 2005;60: 558–56426. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, SiewertB, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB,Hara AK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ. Accuracyof CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;18;359(12):1207-17. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):285327. Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, Lavin P, Eliahou R, Fraifeld S, Libson E. Critical analysis of theperformance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps >= 6 mmin the era of CT colonography. Am. J. Roentgenol, 2008; 190(2): 374 - 38528. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington deGonzález A, Miglioretti D. Radiation dose associated with common computedtomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. ArchIntern Med. 2009;169(22):2078-2086.29. van Gelder R, Venema H, Serlie I, Nio C, Determann R, Tipker C, Vos F, Glas A,Bartelsman J, Bossuyt P, Laméris J, Stoker J. CT colonography at different radiation doselevels: Feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology, 2002; 224:25-3330. Hirofuji Y, Aoyama T, Koyama S, Kawaura C, Fujii K. Evaluation of patient dose for bariumenemas and CT colonography in Japan. Br. J. Radiol. 2009;82:219-22731. Kim D, Pickhardt P, Hanson M, Hinshaw J. CT colonography: Performance and programoutcome measures in an older screening population. Radiology, 2010; 254:493-50032. Spreng A, Netzer P, Mattich et al. Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrastmedium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography, EurRadiol, 2005;15: 2088–2095.33. Pickhardt P, Hanson M, Vanness D, Lo J, Kim D, Taylor A, Winter T, Hinshaw J.Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: Clinical and economicimpact1. Radiology, 2008; 249:151-15934. Pickhardt P, Kim D, Meiners R, Wyatt K, Hanson M, Barlow D, Cullen P, Remtulla R, CashB. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10286asymptomatic adults. Radiology. 2010; 255:83-88