L A W Y E R S I N L I T E R A T U R EReflections on Mark Twainand The <strong>Law</strong>This article is excerpted from a full analysis <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> lawyers and judges inMark Twain’s fiction that was originally published as: Lucia A. Silecchia,Things Are Seldom What They Seem: Judges and <strong>Law</strong>yers in the Tales <strong>of</strong> Mark Twain,35 Conn. L. Rev. 559 – 646 (2003). This piece is re-printed with the permission <strong>of</strong> the Connecticut <strong>Law</strong> Review.David Wilson. Hal Brayton. Pembrooke Howard. Robert Allen.Jim Sturgis. General Buncombe. Mr. Braham. Mr. <strong>Law</strong>son. Mr.McFlynn. These — and many anonymous others — comprise thememorable menagerie <strong>of</strong> lawyers that Mark Twain called to the bar in his prolificfiction. Judge Thatcher. Judge York Leicester Driscoll. Judge Pierre Cauchon.Judge O’Shaunnessy. Justice Robinson. Captain Ned Blakey.Governor Roop. The bench in Mark Twain’s work has beenpopulated by these and other colorful figures. Judges andlawyers have long captivated authors, and Mark Twain wasan avid creator <strong>of</strong> jurisprudential characters. A brief study <strong>of</strong>these legal characters has much to teach today’s attorneys.Mark Twain was a man <strong>of</strong> startling contrasts. He cultivatedan image <strong>of</strong> himself as a wild frontiersman; yet he marriedinto a genteel, wealthy family and lived in the heart <strong>of</strong> highbrownortheastern intellectual life. He prided himself on limitedformal education; yet, he delighted in honorary degrees from Yaleand Oxford. He portrayed himself as a bold, untamable writer;yet, by most accounts, he submitted much <strong>of</strong> what he wrote to thescrutiny <strong>of</strong> his beloved — and very proper — wife, OliviaLangdon. He is remembered as America’s consummate comedian;yet his poignant private writings are filled with sorrow as hemourned the premature deaths <strong>of</strong> his father, three siblings, Olivia,and three <strong>of</strong> his own four children. He is celebrated as the most“American” <strong>of</strong> writers; yet, much <strong>of</strong> his public career was spentabroad. His work <strong>of</strong>ten reflects rebellion against and disdaintoward religion; yet, his favorite work was his “biography” <strong>of</strong>Saint Joan. His novels mock those who pursue “get-rich-quick”schemes; yet, Twain dissipated his own fortune and bankruptedhis family by speculative investments. His most famous workshave <strong>of</strong>ten been branded as insensitive to racial equality; yet,underneath the surface, Twain’s books attacked slavery’s inhumanityand degrading aftermath.by Lucia A.SilecchiaSamuel Clemens’ personalexperience with lawyersis reflected in his ambivalenttreatment <strong>of</strong> the legalpr<strong>of</strong>ession in his work.Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>The Catholic University <strong>of</strong> America22<strong>CUA</strong>LAWYER /<strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2004</strong>
L A W Y E R S I N L I T E R A T U R EThrough Tom Sawyer and other beloved characters,Clemens imparted his belief that true justice occursonly in consultation with one’s conscience.Not surprisingly, Twain’s depictions<strong>of</strong> lawyers and judges suffer from — orare enlivened by — similar inconsistencies.In an ideal world, those who servethe legal system are charged withadvancing justice. The presumption thatunderlies sound legal regimes is that thelegal process will achieve just results ifthe rules <strong>of</strong> that process are respected.Conversely, it is logical to assume thatwhen lawyers and judges disobey thoserules, injustice will result. However, thisis not true in Twain’s fiction. Instead,study <strong>of</strong> his works reveal a disturbingdichotomy between the conduct <strong>of</strong> legalcharacters and the justice they achieve orfail to achieve.Mark Twain’s life was marked withextensive personal interactions withlawyers. He claimed that he did notunderstand legal affairs and describedhis ignorance <strong>of</strong> the law in highly selfdeprecatingterms. Yet, this feigned ignorancebelies the fact that Twain, fieryand opinionated by nature, was an experiencedlitigant, an eager plaintiff, and awilling participant in legal adventuresand misadventures. He squabbled withnewspapers publishing his work; he sueda cab driver for overcharging his servant;he litigated to prevent Canadian piracy<strong>of</strong> his works; he sued to get a trademarkon his nom de plume; he fought to preventunauthorized production <strong>of</strong> hisplays; he tackled the legal ramifications<strong>of</strong> his personal bankruptcy; he participatedin the prosecution <strong>of</strong> a man whotried to rob his home; he broughtnumerous suits against his personal secretary;he plotted potential suits inresponse to critics’ doubts about theauthenticity <strong>of</strong> his memoirs <strong>of</strong> UlyssesGrant; and he brought suit to preventpremature advertising <strong>of</strong> The Adventures<strong>of</strong> Huckleberry Finn. Mark Twain’s litigiousadventures were not confined tothe United States. In Italy, for example,he brought suits against the Florentinecountess who was his landlady andagainst his wife’s physician.Out <strong>of</strong> his studies and his personalinterest, Mark Twain also became a lawreform advocate on matters both proceduraland substantive. Procedurally, hebecame a consistent and outspoken critic<strong>of</strong> the jury system. The exact origin <strong>of</strong>his disdain for the jury system is unclear— but there can be no doubt as to hispassion on the issue. Twain directedsimilar venom toward the insanity pleawhich was, during his time, becomingmore widely used as a defense in criminaltrials. Perhaps he was at his sarcasticbest when he simultaneously attackedboth the jury system and the insanityplea.In substantive law as well, MarkTwain advocated reform, particularly incopyright legislation. Burned by actualand anticipated abuses <strong>of</strong> his ownintellectual property rights, Twain was afervent advocate for two particularreforms. Domestically, he pursued legislationthat would extend the copyrightprotection beyond the mere forty-twoyears then afforded so that his childrencould be supported by the income fromhis earnings long after his death. On theglobal level, he advocated stringentinternational protection <strong>of</strong> copyrightto prevent transboundary piracy <strong>of</strong>original works.Beyond his personal involvementwith the law, lawyers, and judges,Twain’s exposure to the rule <strong>of</strong> law andthe role <strong>of</strong> its agents was pr<strong>of</strong>oundlyshaped by the era during which he lived.Mark Twain was born in 1835, a timewhen the county was still young and theAmerican experiment was still new.He died in 1910, a time by which thecharacter <strong>of</strong> the young nation had beensorely tested by the fundamentalsocio-legal dilemmas <strong>of</strong> the nineteenthcentury. It was, therefore, only naturalthat Twain’s fiction would reflect uponand wrestle with legal problems.Hence, in spite <strong>of</strong> the claim Twainmade in his Autobiography that he was aman “not knowing anything about lawsexcept how to evade them and not getcaught,” he was not the naif that heclaimed to be. Instead, he had extensivepersonal knowledge <strong>of</strong> and experiencewith legal concerns. This is readilyapparent when one examines the depthwith which the legal characters aredeveloped in his works, and it makes thestudy <strong>of</strong> those characters fruitful andproductive.The legal system — and its authority— is based on the ideal that a justsystem <strong>of</strong> procedural and substantive lawexists, and that this system is capable <strong>of</strong>yielding justice as long as lawyers andjudges respect it. Should they fail to doso, then injustice and even tragedy willbe the necessary result. This paradigm iswell illustrated in two trials that form asignificant part <strong>of</strong> two Twain tales, TheAdventures <strong>of</strong> Tom Sawyer and PersonalRecollections <strong>of</strong> St. Joan <strong>of</strong> Arc. Unfortunately,these neat, tidy cases are inthe clear minority <strong>of</strong> Twain fiction.However, it is wise to begin reflection onTwain’s legal characters with these “paradigmcases” since they illustrate the waythings should be.In The Adventures <strong>of</strong> Tom Sawyer,Twain presents the case <strong>of</strong> Muff Potter,an innocent man unjustly accused <strong>of</strong>murder. Careful analysis <strong>of</strong> the conduct<strong>of</strong> the lawyers and the judge in MuffPotter’s trial reveals behavior that ishonorable, intelligent, and pr<strong>of</strong>essional.The result is a just one: the innocentPotter is released and the identity <strong>of</strong> thetrue killer is disclosed. This is a verdict<strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2004</strong> / C UALAWYER 23