12.07.2015 Views

2013 Wind Project Performance White Paper ... - DNV Kema

2013 Wind Project Performance White Paper ... - DNV Kema

2013 Wind Project Performance White Paper ... - DNV Kema

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>How is the industry doing?Robert Z. PooreMay 7, <strong>2013</strong>


Background• Industry has a reputation for projects that underperformrelative to pre-construction energy production estimates• <strong>DNV</strong> KEMA has been documenting the magnitude of thisunderperformance since 2006 using a database of energyestimates from many consultants and actual project energyproduction• Energy estimates from <strong>DNV</strong> KEMA have historically beenmore accurate than other consultants• Significant changes in other consultants energy estimatingmethodology have been made since ~2008• Have these changes been big enough?<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>2


Database Characteristics• 150 <strong>Project</strong>s• Preconstruction energy estimates from multiple organizations (at least 5)700Number of <strong>Project</strong> Years600500400300200198454<strong>Project</strong> years of Data:2001-2009: 6522012-2012: 112Added in <strong>2013</strong>2012 Data set100090222001 - 2009 2010 - 2012First Full Year of Commercial Operation<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>


Database CharacteristicsBy Region<strong>Project</strong> SizeWestCentralEastTXCanada>100 MW


Database CharacteristicsTurbine SizeFirst year of operation301.5 MWNumber of <strong>Project</strong>s25201510502001200220032004200520062007200820092010First Full Year of <strong>Project</strong> Operation20112012Turbine sizes and installation dates are generally representative ofthe market.<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>5


<strong>Project</strong> Average Results for 2001-200916%14%12%Industry-wide Shortfall – 9%<strong>DNV</strong> KEMA Shortfall – 3%Other Consultants Shortfall – 12%% of Total <strong>Project</strong>s10%8%6%SignificantCurtailmentOther Consultants<strong>DNV</strong> KEMAExpected Distribution4%2%0%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%105%110%115%<strong>Project</strong> Average Actual Energy / P50 Estimate 2001-2009120%125%130%135%140%145%<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>6


<strong>Project</strong> Average Results for 2010-201235%30%25%Industry-wide Shortfall – 3%<strong>DNV</strong> KEMA Shortfall – 0%Other Consultants Shortfall – 4%% of Total <strong>Project</strong>s20%15%10%SuspectedCurtailmentOther Consultants<strong>DNV</strong> KEMAExpected Distribution5%0%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%105%110%115%<strong>Project</strong> Average Actual Energy / P50 Estimate 2010-2012120%125%130%135%140%145%<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>7


<strong>Project</strong> Year Results for 2001-200911%10%9%Industry-wide Shortfall – 10%<strong>DNV</strong> KEMA Shortfall – 3%Other Consultants Shortfall – 12%8%% of Total <strong>Project</strong> Years7%6%5%4%3%2%1%SignificantCurtailmentOther Consultants<strong>DNV</strong> KEMAExpected Distribution0%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%105%110%115%120%125%130%135%140%145%150%Actual Energy / P50 Estimate 2001-2009<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>


<strong>Project</strong> Year Results for 2010-201220%18%16%Industry-wide Shortfall – 2%<strong>DNV</strong> KEMA Shortfall – 0%Other Consultants Shortfall – 3%14%% of Total <strong>Project</strong> Years12%10%8%6%4%SuspectedCurtailmentOther Consultants<strong>DNV</strong> KEMAExpected Distribution2%0%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%105%110%115%120%125%130%135%140%145%150%Actual Energy / P50 Estimate 2010-2012<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>


<strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> by First Full Year of Commercial OperationAverage Annual Production vs. P50 PreconstructionEstimate1.41.31.21.110.90.80.70.6 Significant0.5Curtailment2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012First Full Year of Commerical OperationIndividual <strong>Project</strong>MedianSuspectedCurtailment<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>


Conclusions & Observations• Bias in 2010-2012 reduced compared to 2001-2009 with industry average bias of3% (1% if curtailed projects ignored)• When projects with curtailment are ignored, 2010 to 2012 results show <strong>DNV</strong>KEMA and other consultants are in close agreement on average• Recent experience tells us there are sometimes still significant differencesbetween consults when estimating wakes, topographic effects and “performancelosses”. There is work to be done in these areas.• More attention to curtailment risks would improve P50 results• Uncertainty distributions used by industry seem to capture the uncertaintiesappropriately.• We need more data! Consider providing us with data to build a more robustdatabase to documents the industry’s ability to estimate wind projectperformance• If you would like a copy of the white paper, please give me your card.<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>11


www.dnvkema.com<strong>2013</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>White</strong> <strong>Paper</strong>May 7, <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!