hired air cargo companies willing to fly into combatzones, <strong>and</strong> paid kick-backs to corrupt officialsto cover up the paper trail of their illegal deals.The control of arms brokers—currently only aminority of the world’s states have legislation totackle the problem—would add substantially tothe transparency of a market which is oftenclouded by secrecy. There is only limited documentationof the transport <strong>and</strong> logistics of the armstrade, apart from air transport. Furthermore, theknowledge of the financial infrastructure involvedin illicit small arms deals is patchy. Links betweenthe trade in different illicit commodities (weapons,drugs, human beings, precious gems <strong>and</strong> metals,etc.) are only partially elucidated.Although particular illicit small arms deals aredocumented, there is still no comprehensiveoverview of the illicit market in small arms available.This is no doubt in part because it is moredifficult to gain a full picture of the illicit smallarms trade than, say, the illicit drug trade, as smallarms dem<strong>and</strong> can shift more quickly <strong>and</strong> radicallythan dem<strong>and</strong> in other illicit commodities. Also, itis arguably more difficult to assess the trade of adurable good than a consumer good such as drugs.The Supply Side<strong>Small</strong> arms transfers do not influence the relativemilitary might of the majority of the world’s states.Yet the amount of small arms <strong>and</strong> ammunitionavailable can tip the military balance between state(<strong>and</strong>/or nonstate) actors in conflicts where fewmajor conventional weapons are available. This isthe case in a number of internal conflicts in Africa,Asia, <strong>and</strong> Latin America. Often, small arms are theonly type of weapons available to insurgent groups,thereby determining to what extent armed uprisingsare possible.Although not normally considered strategicallyimportant, small arms <strong>and</strong> light weapons are dominantin many current conflicts. In fact, whilemost major conventional weapons produced <strong>and</strong>transferred are never used in actual combat, smallarms are among the military equipment that ismost likely to be employed in conflict today. Theyare also regularly involved directly in human rightsviolations in states not involved in conflict.Furthermore, in many societies, violent crimecommitted with guns is so common as to threatenthe economic <strong>and</strong> social basis of the community.In light of all this, we need more research followingthe trails of small arms production, arsenals,<strong>and</strong> transfers.Notes1. End-user certificates are documents provided bythe country of destination of the weapons assuring theauthorities of exporting countries that the final use/userof the weapons is legitimate.30
Means <strong>and</strong> Motivations:Rethinking <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Arms</strong> Dem<strong>and</strong>Robert Muggah, Jurgen Brauer, David Atwood, <strong>and</strong> Sarah MeekIntroductionSupply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> are routinely invoked todescribe alternatively how small arms proliferate,ways of managing <strong>and</strong> regulating their availability,<strong>and</strong> specific interventions to mitigate their effects.Although both supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> are acknowledgedas integral to arms control <strong>and</strong> disarmament,in practice attention is devoted predominantly toregulating supplies, not dem<strong>and</strong>: managing stockpiles,controlling brokers, marking <strong>and</strong> tracingfirearms, <strong>and</strong> strengthening export controls <strong>and</strong>end-user certification.But recent experience on the ground suggeststhat lasting violence reduction, even prevention,depends on dem<strong>and</strong>-side interventions. Ultimately,reducing the human costs of arms requiresunderst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> addressing factors that drivetheir individual <strong>and</strong> collective acquisition, notSupply <strong>and</strong> Dem<strong>and</strong> ChainsFigure 1 shows one way of depicting a st<strong>and</strong>ardsupply chain for small arms, from production tostockpiling, brokering, trading, <strong>and</strong> shipping, toend-use. Conventional approaches to underst<strong>and</strong>ingsupply conceive of intervention (i.e., efforts atarms control or disarmament) as analysis <strong>and</strong>action taken at different points along this chain.At each stage of the supply chain, specific interventionsare elaborated that might reduce or controlthe stocks <strong>and</strong> flows of weapons, from conversionin the manufacturing sector to the marking<strong>and</strong> tracing of individual firearms, with the ultimateaim of reducing their availability. The specificmechanisms articulated in the UN Programmeof Action as well as various parallel smallarms control initiatives (e.g., the consultations toagree on the regulation of brokers, marking <strong>and</strong>just their provision. Measures toregulate or limit the supply of production stockpiles <strong>and</strong> stockpile managementfirearms will have limited utility ifdem<strong>and</strong> for weapons creates orbrokering trade <strong>and</strong> transfer end-useturns to alternative supply channels.tracing negotiations) also can largely be Fig. 1. TheWe begin this chapter with a review of supply arranged along this supply chain. 1supply chain<strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> as they relate to the disarmament discourse<strong>and</strong> then summarize an unusual approachto conceptualising dem<strong>and</strong> for small arms.Drawing on Muggah <strong>and</strong> Brauer (2004), theapproach focuses on preferences, prices, <strong>and</strong>resources—that is means <strong>and</strong> motivations—as factorsshaping small arms acquisition <strong>and</strong> use.Finally, we turn to four cases where this dem<strong>and</strong>model has been tested: Papua New Guinea, theSolomon Isl<strong>and</strong>s, South Africa, <strong>and</strong> the US.An approach incorporating a dem<strong>and</strong> perspectivewould recognize that each link in the chainconstitutes a market of its own, i.e., producers supply<strong>and</strong> wholesalers dem<strong>and</strong>; wholesalers supply<strong>and</strong> brokers dem<strong>and</strong>; brokers supply <strong>and</strong> retailersdem<strong>and</strong>; retailers supply <strong>and</strong> end-users dem<strong>and</strong>.Rather than being relegated to the end-user portionof the spectrum, as is usually done, dem<strong>and</strong> isa central feature across all links of the supply chain.This chain could as reasonably be called, therefore,31