0 w C ^ ^.-^• t^J - Rparchives.org

Onr Vieius of Miss-ion Work. 135ridicule foreign missions are, too frequently, also ence. Ragged schools had not yet come intonon-subscribers to and non-workers in the home being. City missions were unknown. Bibleinissions, while the most earnest and indefatiga- readers, tract distributors, district visitors,ble advocates of foreign missions, are, at che same andall the home missionary machinery withtime, the most energetic in their efforts to evaii- which we are now so iamiliar, were thingsgeUze the heathen at home. Tbere may be ex- unheard of. But when the reports of theceptions on both sides, yet the general law is as agents who had been sent abroad came home,I have stated it. But without dwelling npon the members of the churches were awakenedtbat, the attempt io sei home effovts into an- to individual responsibility. They felt f^at ittagonism with the foreign enterprise, betokens was not enough for thera to give money, bututter ignorance, both of the origin of our vecent that they ought to work as missionaries whereactivity in the foreign field, and of the effects they were. This led at length to thewhich that activity has produced on the efforts establishment of town and oity missions, ofof the home churches themselves. Wbat created whioh David Nasmyth was the chief apt stle,our modern societies? Go back to theiv origin and since that time, the home enterprise has(and as being more famUiar with the history of been widened so as to include many valuableBritish missions I must be allowed to draw my agencies, too numerous to mention. Now, ifillustrations mainly from ihem), and you will the prosecution of missions abroad be incom-Snd ihat they grew out ofthe great religious patible with the discharge of our evangelisiicrevivals, which, during the latter part of the duties at home, how oame it ihat fhe morelast century, roused the church of Great heartily the British churches went into theBritain from iheir formalism and indifference, foreign fitld,ihey labored ultimately only theThese revivals, however, were just great more earnestly at home ? The two have inhomemissions. Whitefield, Wesley, and creased together or, rather, they have actedfheir coadjutors were itinerant home mission- and reacted on each other; the home revivalaries. They went everywhere over ihe land, creating the ioreign activity, and the foreignawakening the common people to the reality aciifity leading again to fresh energy aiand importance of spiriiual things, and iheir home. They are noi contradictory but colaborsresulted in the conversion of myriads, ordinate enterprises, and interest in both hasand in ihe buiUing of great numbers of sprung oui of revived interest in Christ.places of worship throughout the country. This is beautifully illustrated in the one de-The new converts had their attention partment of medical missions, by factsdirected by such men as Claudius Buchanan, ihat came under my own observation inCarey, Bogue, and others, to ihe con- Liverpool. With the view io adding to thedition of ihe heathen, and the founding of efficiency of the work at some foreignthe London Missonary Society in 1795, of the stations, medical men of Christian characterBaptist Missionary Society in 1792, the and gifted with the power of utterance, wereScottish Missionary Society in 1796, ihe sent out, in order that they might, in someGlasgow Missionary Society in 1797, and the measure, follow in the footsteps of the LordChurch of England Missionary Society in 1799 himself, by attempting to reach fhe malady ofwere the results. Up till this time, be it re- the spirit through the cure of tbe disease ofmembered, there were no organized efforts the body, and so great was the success, thatfor reaching ihe poor and neglected at home, in Edinburg, a special institution for tbeThere was hardly a Sunday-school in exist- training of such laborers was founded, and