iomass from land clearing operations, each as specified in the definition of Clean CellulosicBiomass in 40 CFR 241.2, excluding any wood which contains chemical treatments or hasaffixed thereto paint and/or finishing materials or paper or plastic laminates. Approvedbiomass is biomass that does not contain contaminants at concentrations not normallyassociated with virgin biomass materials.”Construction and demolition wood or other waste allowed as fuel? NoUse of NCASI or other non-EPA factors to estimate HAPs? YesNotes: While initial stack testing is required to determine emissions of SO 2 , NOx, CO, VOCs,sulfuric acid mist, and hydrogen fluoride, there is no stack testing required for HCl or otherHAPs. Requirements for HAPs testing may be included when Title V operating permits forthe plants are issued.Nippon Paper, Port Angeles, WAWhat: Facility expansion; 420 MMBtu/hr stoker; ~20 MW net (cogen, uses some thermal energy)Estimated CO 2 emissions (tons per year): 360,670Permitted emissions (tons per year): NOx: 184 CO: 644 PM 10 fil : 2 SO 2 : 152Status for NOx, PM, and CO: Major sourceStatus for HAPs: Major source (PSD)Fuel: “Approved Cogeneration Plant Fuels: The Permittee shall burn only clean woody biomass,recycled wood-derived fuel, dewatered wastewater treatment sludge, natural gas, and ultralow sulfur diesel fuel in the cogeneration plant. For the purpose of this order: a. Cleanwoody biomass, also known as hog fuel or hogged fuel, is defined is any woody materialthat meets the definition of clean cellulosic biomass in §241.2. b. Recycled wood-derivedfuel is defined as any woody, non-hazardous secondary material that has been declared nonwasteby the standards and procedures outlined in §241.3. c. Dewatered wastewatertreatment sludge is defined as clarifier sludge consisting largely of pulp and paper fibers andproduced on site that has been declared non-waste by the standards and procedures outlinedin §241.3. d. Natural gas means any fuel defined as natural gas in §63.7575, includingpropane and LPG. e. Ultra low sulfur diesel fuel means fuel oils containing less than 0.05weight percent nitrogen and less than 0.0015 weight percent sulfur that comply with thespecifications for fuel oils numbers 1 and 2 as defined by ASTM D396 or diesel fuelnumbers 1 and 2 as defined by ASTM D975. Ultra low sulfur fuel oil may contain anypercentage of biodiesel that complies with the specifications in ASTM 6751, provided thenitrogen and sulfur limits are met by the liquid fuel mixture.”Construction and demolition wood or other waste allowed as fuel? YesUse of NCASI or other non-EPA factors to estimate HAPs? YesNotes: Located on the Olympic Peninsula, about 31 miles from the Port Townsend PaperCompany, this facility was required to reduce emissions of air toxics more than most otherfacilities we reviewed, but as it burns a variety of contaminated fuels, including papermakingsludge, its emissions of air toxics are likely to be high. The company is required byits permit to develop a fuel monitoring plan and test fuel analyze for chlorine and mercurycontent. It is supposed to ensure that “recycled wood derived fuel” meets a quality80
assurance plan. The plant was permitted as a major source of HAPs before the significantlyweakened version of the boiler rule that exists today, and was required to meet a filterablePM emission limit of 0.0011 lb/MMBtu (the current MACT standard for major sourceboilers is 0.03 lb/MMBtu, which is 27 times higher). The filterable PM limit explains therelatively low estimated emissions of 2 tons per year from the plant. The permit also setslimits for emissions of acrolein, ammonia, benzene, formaldehyde, hydrogen chloride(HCl) mercury, and dioxins/furans. Initial and “intermittent” stack tests are required toensure compliance (once per permit term, or every five years). The plant is also requiredto install a continuous emissions monitoring system for PM, which is unusual for thepermits we reviewed.Port Townsend Paper Company, Port Townsend, WAWhat: Facility expansion; 414 MMBtu/hr stoker; ~24 MW net (cogen, uses some thermal energy)Estimated CO 2 emissions (tons per year): 355,518Permitted emissions (tons per year): NOx: 262 CO: 635 PM 10 fil : 36.4 SO 2 : 96Status for NOx, PM, and CO: Major source (PSD)Status for HAPs: Synthetic minor sourceFuel: “Wood fuels including hog fuel, forest biomass, and urban wood. Ecology does not currentlyclassify these wood fuels as solid waste. Wood fuels do not include wood treated withcreosote, pentachlorophenol, or copper-chrome-arsenic; or municipal waste. Forestbiomass means the by-products of current forest management activities, current forestprotection treatments authorized by the agency, or the by-products of forest healthtreatment prescribed or permitted under Washington's forest health law. Forest biomassdoes not include municipal solid waste. Urban wood is purchased wood fuel meeting anacceptance program which prohibits wood treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol, orcopper-chrome-arsenic; municipal waste, hazardous material contaminants (asbestos, lead,mercury), lead painted items, and plastic coatings.” (Urban wood is demolition waste. PortTownsend Paper's fuel also includes reprocessed fuel oil (about 15% of total fuel) andcorrugated cardboard recycling rejects ("OCC rejects"), meaning corrugated boxes that aretoo contaminated with labels, fasteners, etc., to recycle. PTPC uses approximately onethirdof Washington’s recycled cardboard.Construction and demolition wood or other waste allowed as fuel? YesUse of NCASI or other non-EPA factors to estimate HAPs? YesNotes: Unlike the Nippon Paper plant at Port Angeles, which was issued by the Olympic RegionClean Air Agency in Washington, the permit for this facility was issued by the WashingtonDepartment of Ecology and contains relatively few protective measures, even though it is alarger facility than the Nippon plant. Emissions calculations that were used to justify theexpansion of biomass burning at the facility include reductions from installing futureemissions control equipment that will be required by law regardless of whether the biomassproject is built or not. The proposed expansion will increase fuel throughput to 2.9 timesthe present amounts.81
- Page 1 and 2:
Trees, Trash, and Toxics:How Biomas
- Page 8 and 9:
The fix: EPA should regulate bioene
- Page 10 and 11:
To test whether the industry emissi
- Page 12 and 13:
Verso Bucksport, Bucksport, MEBurge
- Page 14 and 15:
cycle technologies is $59 - $86, de
- Page 16 and 17:
The physical reasons why bioenergy
- Page 18 and 19:
All three facilities went through a
- Page 20 and 21:
supposed to use the technology that
- Page 22 and 23:
Bioenergy emissions of criteria pol
- Page 24 and 25:
CO 2 and conventional air pollutant
- Page 26 and 27:
are federally and practically enfor
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 4: Biomass power plants with
- Page 30 and 31: shutdown, when emissions can increa
- Page 32 and 33: Table 5: Biomass power plants with
- Page 34 and 35: Nitrogen oxides (tons per year)Figu
- Page 36 and 37: PM 2.5 , including condensable PM,
- Page 38 and 39: Synthetic minor facilities tend to
- Page 40 and 41: material classified as a commercial
- Page 42 and 43: is regulated under the boiler rule,
- Page 44 and 45: As an incinerator, the facility wou
- Page 46 and 47: Table 8: Industry data helps biomas
- Page 48 and 49: permitting authorities, especially
- Page 50 and 51: La Pine, Oregon, used the NCASI fac
- Page 52 and 53: Connecticut, the permit only requir
- Page 54 and 55: then the load is considered to 100%
- Page 56 and 57: elatively high filterable PM standa
- Page 58 and 59: EPA rules compare contaminant conce
- Page 60 and 61: commodity” - therefore, the facil
- Page 62 and 63: emove obviously contaminated materi
- Page 64 and 65: developmental and reproductive effe
- Page 66 and 67: The Evergreen plant is located in t
- Page 68 and 69: Loophole 4: Most biomass plants hav
- Page 70 and 71: Summary case studies: the emerging
- Page 72 and 73: emission limits for HAPs, but does
- Page 74 and 75: company was permitted to use non-EP
- Page 76 and 77: Verso Bucksport, Bucksport, MEWhat:
- Page 78 and 79: Biogreen Sustainable Energy, La Pin