8<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Aid</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Cambodia</strong>: <strong>Practices</strong>, <strong>Perceptions</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Needs</strong>A Study based on a National Survey2.4.4 Interviews with Key InformantsSo-called key <strong>in</strong>formant <strong>in</strong>terviews were done with relevant prov<strong>in</strong>cial leaders, heads ofgovernment departments, <strong>and</strong> policymakers <strong>in</strong> all prov<strong>in</strong>ces that the survey covered (seeAppendix A for a sampl<strong>in</strong>g source for <strong>in</strong>terviews with key <strong>in</strong>formants) <strong>and</strong> numbered 150persons <strong>in</strong>terviewed. These <strong>in</strong>cluded senior prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>and</strong> district officers, judges,prosecutors, senior prison staff <strong>and</strong> police, cadastral commissioners, <strong>and</strong> heads of legal aid,advocacy, <strong>and</strong> other human rights organizations.Key <strong>in</strong>formant <strong>in</strong>terviews were conducted by members of the Survey Management Team <strong>in</strong>conjunction with CLJR PMU staff, accompanied by survey researchers.2.4.5 Documentary Review <strong>and</strong> Data CollectionDocument review work <strong>and</strong> data collection started before fieldwork survey<strong>in</strong>g began <strong>and</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>ued right up to the f<strong>in</strong>al analysis <strong>and</strong> report-writ<strong>in</strong>g stage. This enabled the researchteam to obta<strong>in</strong> pert<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>formation on a range of current legal aid practices. Exist<strong>in</strong>glegislation <strong>and</strong> regulatory <strong>in</strong>struments deal<strong>in</strong>g with legal aid were also exam<strong>in</strong>ed, with a viewto evaluat<strong>in</strong>g their gaps <strong>and</strong> potential uses. Documents reviewed <strong>in</strong>cluded the annual reports,work plans, budgets <strong>and</strong> policy documents of organizations provid<strong>in</strong>g legal aid services,Government development plans, <strong>and</strong> a variety of papers on different aspects of legal aidservice provision. An <strong>in</strong>dependent consultant did the document review for the SurveyManagement Team.2.5. DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS2.5.1 Qualitative DataQualitative data was collected from key <strong>in</strong>formant <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>and</strong> the document reviewprocess. The data were analyzed accord<strong>in</strong>g to topics or themes developed <strong>in</strong> accordance withthe objectives of the study.2.5.2 Quantitative DataThe analysis of quantitative data was done us<strong>in</strong>g the widely-used predictive analyticalsoftware SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Scientists). The data were ma<strong>in</strong>ly obta<strong>in</strong>ed fromlegal aid service providers us<strong>in</strong>g a semi-structured questionnaire.2.6. PLENARY STAKEHOLDERS’ WORKSHOPSThree plenary stakeholders’ workshops were held dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the survey. The firstwas a meet<strong>in</strong>g of Government, donor <strong>and</strong> NGO stakeholders <strong>in</strong> Phnom Penh on February 17,2006. The meet<strong>in</strong>g was to get <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>and</strong> recommendations for improv<strong>in</strong>g the design thesurvey. It was the first time <strong>in</strong>terested government, donor <strong>and</strong> NGO leaders had met to discusslegal aid services <strong>in</strong> <strong>Cambodia</strong>, <strong>and</strong> participants all agreed on the need for regular legal aidstakeholder meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the future.The meet<strong>in</strong>g was divided <strong>in</strong>to two parts. The first consisted of presentations on the variouselements of the survey, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g document review, proposed analysis of supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>,geographic coverage, <strong>and</strong> methodology. The second part consisted of participant feedback,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g various suggestions about how to improve the survey’s terms of reference.
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Aid</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Cambodia</strong>: <strong>Practices</strong>, <strong>Perceptions</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> 9A Study based on a National SurveyThe second stakeholders’ workshop was a meet<strong>in</strong>g of Government, donor <strong>and</strong> NGOstakeholders <strong>in</strong> Phnom Penh on June 2, 2006. The aim of this meet<strong>in</strong>g was to get commentson the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the survey.The third stakeholders’ workshop was a larger meet<strong>in</strong>g held on August 9, 2006 <strong>in</strong> PhnomPenh to consider the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the survey. Some 150 participants from Government, donor<strong>and</strong> NGO stakeholders considered the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> gave their reactions to them. Thoseattend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cluded officials from the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Justice, CLJR, RAJP (Royal Academy ofJudicial Professions), M<strong>in</strong>istry of Women’s Affairs, prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>and</strong> municipal courts, <strong>and</strong>commune councils. A number of legal aid lawyers <strong>and</strong> members of national <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationalNGOs <strong>and</strong> donor agencies were also <strong>in</strong> attendance.The workshop <strong>in</strong>cluded four key presentations: an <strong>in</strong>troduction to the legal aid survey by Mr.Pen Bunchhea, Deputy Director of the CLJR PMU, a review of exist<strong>in</strong>g legal aid laws <strong>and</strong>provisions by Mr. Kong Phallack, Deputy Head of the CLJR PMU legal reform project team,a presentation on the survey f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs by Mr. Tim Smyth, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Director of IRL, <strong>and</strong> asummary of survey recommendations, presented by the <strong>PRAJ</strong> Access to Justice Advisor, Mr.Rajan Shah. An afternoon session allowed for participant feedback, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved groupdiscussions on outreach to communities; l<strong>in</strong>kages with <strong>in</strong>stitutions that provide legal aidservices; <strong>and</strong> legal aid services to under-covered areas. Suggestions from this session were<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the f<strong>in</strong>al study recommendations (see chapter 5, below).2.7. SURVEY LIMITATIONSLike all surveys, the survey had its limitations. The participants <strong>in</strong> the semi-structured<strong>in</strong>terviews with legal aid providers <strong>in</strong>cluded not just legal aid lawyers but also Governmentofficials <strong>and</strong> others rout<strong>in</strong>ely called on to give legal advise as part of their duties or becausethey regularly deal with potential legal aid clients. This be<strong>in</strong>g the case the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the<strong>in</strong>terviews tended to be somewhat general <strong>in</strong> nature. Focus group discussions <strong>and</strong> the August9, 2006, stakeholders’ workshop provided more specificity <strong>in</strong> this field, but perhaps notenough.Another limitation was that the survey was not tasked to measure the quality of exist<strong>in</strong>g legalaid service delivery, though it did address perceptions of this service delivery. Even if it hadbeen tasked to do so, it would have had difficulty <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so, s<strong>in</strong>ce exist<strong>in</strong>g legal aidproviders lack common st<strong>and</strong>ards with respect to client care quality, report<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>and</strong>accountability. Given the lack of such st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> of benchmark data, assessments ofquality would have been hard to make.
- Page 1 and 2: Council for Legal and Judicial Refo
- Page 5: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 8 and 9: iiLegal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 10 and 11: ivLegal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 12 and 13: 2Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 14 and 15: 4Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 16 and 17: 6Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 20 and 21: 10Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 22 and 23: 12Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 24 and 25: 14Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 26 and 27: 16Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 28 and 29: 18Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 30 and 31: 20Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 32 and 33: 22Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 34 and 35: 24Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 36 and 37: 26Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 38 and 39: 28Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices,
- Page 40 and 41: 30 Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices
- Page 42 and 43: 32 Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices
- Page 44 and 45: 34 Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices
- Page 47 and 48: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 49 and 50: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 51 and 52: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 53 and 54: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 55 and 56: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 57 and 58: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 59 and 60: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 61 and 62: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 63 and 64: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 65 and 66: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 67 and 68: Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 69 and 70:
Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P
- Page 71:
Legal Aid in Cambodia: Practices, P