12.07.2015 Views

The economic dimensions of interpersonal violence - libdoc.who.int ...

The economic dimensions of interpersonal violence - libdoc.who.int ...

The economic dimensions of interpersonal violence - libdoc.who.int ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. COSTS OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCEsectors <strong>of</strong> society - as well as differences between direct and indirect costs. Aswith other types <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>int</strong>erpersonal</strong> <strong>violence</strong>, there were complex methodologicalissues involved in measuring the <strong>economic</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imate partner <strong>violence</strong>.Many, if not most, incidents <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imate partner <strong>violence</strong> go unreported, and theeffects <strong>of</strong> such abuse on investments in human capital and productivity insideand outside the home are difficult to estimate. Unsurprisingly, there is a widerange <strong>of</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imate partner <strong>violence</strong> <strong>int</strong>ernationally, andthis literature overlapped considerably with that related to <strong>violence</strong> againstwomen and domestic <strong>violence</strong> (Table 3).AustraliaSeveral studies <strong>of</strong> the <strong>economic</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imate partner <strong>violence</strong> have beencarried out in Australia (Laing & Bobic, 2002). A 1998 study in Queensland<strong>int</strong>erviewed 20 women <strong>who</strong> had experienced domestic <strong>violence</strong>. Using a 3.0%prevalence estimate for severe domestic <strong>violence</strong>, based on police and hospitalreports, the total annual costs <strong>of</strong> domestic <strong>violence</strong> in the province wereestimated at over $106 million. A second study in Queensland included indirectcosts related to women's lost wages due to absenteeism from work, resulting inan estimated $546 million annually. A 1991 study <strong>of</strong> 40 women in Tasmaniacalculated $8 117 in direct costs and an additional $19 023 in indirect costs -mostly replacement <strong>of</strong> damaged property - per woman. <strong>The</strong> Australian Institute<strong>of</strong> Criminology (2001) reported annual costs <strong>of</strong> $14.2 million for refugeaccommodation for victims <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imate partner <strong>violence</strong> in Australia.CanadaDay (1995) comprehensively calculated the costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>violence</strong> against women inCanada, using data from the Statistics Canada Violence against Women Survey,the Canadian Urban Victimization Survey, and the Quebec Health Survey.Including health care costs, policing, legal fees, incarceration, lost earnings andpsychological costs, <strong>violence</strong> against women cost an estimated $1.2 billion. Inthese calculations, medical and dental visits are assigned a value <strong>of</strong> $67, aprobable underestimate - so the total costs are likely to be higher than reported.Health Canada (2002) calculates a cost <strong>of</strong> $1.1 billion just for the direct medicalcosts <strong>of</strong> <strong>violence</strong> against women in Canada.Chile and NicaraguaAs a percentage <strong>of</strong> the gross domestic product, estimates <strong>of</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>int</strong>imatepartner <strong>violence</strong> were considerably higher in low- and middle-income countriesthan in high-income countries. Morrison, Andrew & Orlando (1999) calculatedthe costs <strong>of</strong> domestic <strong>violence</strong> against women based on stratified randomsamples <strong>of</strong> women in Chile and Nicaragua. Based only on the lost productivecapacity <strong>of</strong> these women, they extrapolated total costs <strong>of</strong> $1.73 billion in Chileand $32.7 million in Nicaragua.<strong>The</strong>se estimates did not include the "multiplier"effect - i.e. the foregone productivity would have stimulated additional <strong>economic</strong>activity. <strong>The</strong> calculated costs were equivalent to 1.6% <strong>of</strong> the gross domesticproduct in Nicaragua and 2.0% <strong>of</strong> the gross domestic product in Chile.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!