12.07.2015 Views

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2INTRODUCTION[1] The appellant in this case was arraigned before Hetisani J, sitting in theThohoyandou High Court on an indictment containing six counts, namely oneof murder, two of attempted murder, one of pointing a firearm in contraventionof s 39(1)(i) of the Arms and Ammunition Act Act 75 of 1969, one ofpossessing an unlicensed firearm in contravention of s 2, read with s 39(1)(h),of the Act and one of possessing ammunition while not in lawful possession ofa firearm capable of firing that ammunition in contravention of s 36, read withs 39(1)(b), of the Act.[2] He was convicted on all the counts, save that relating to thepossession of ammunition, and was sentenced on 14 December 2000 to lifeimprisonment for the murder, 22 years imprisonment for the first attemptedmurder, 18 years imprisonment for the second, 8 years imprisonment forpointing a firearm and six years imprisonment for possessing an unlicensedfirearm. It was ordered that all the determinate terms of imprisonment were torun concurrently with the life sentence imposed in respect of the murder.[3] The appellant’s application for leave to appeal against the convictionsand sentences was refused by the trial court. On application to this Court theappellant’s application for leave to appeal against the convictions was refusedbut his application for leave to appeal against the sentences imposed uponhim was granted.FACTS[4] It was common cause at the trial that the accused had been involved ina romantic relationship with the complainant on the first attempted murdercharge, Dr Engedzani Paulina Khwanda. (In what follows I shall refer to her as‘the complainant’.) According to the complainant the relationship terminated atthe end of February 1999. The appellant averred, however, that therelationship continued until the date on which the incidents which gave rise tothe various charges occurred, namely 13 July 1999.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!