KJV Questions and Answers - Far Eastern Bible College

King James Version Defended, 223). Dr D A Waite believes that “thewords of the Received Greek and Masoretic Hebrew text that underlie theKing James Bible are the very words which God has preserved downthrough the centuries, being the exact words of the originals themselves”.The answer is arrived at by simply applying the logic of faith, and byapplying it consistently.(36) Is the Greek Text underlying the KJV a “phantom” or an“intangible” text?The Greek text underlying the KJV is not a “phantom text.” If it wasindeed a “phantom” or “intangible” text, then what did the King Jamestranslators use to translate their Bible? Neither is it a “phantom text”today. How can it be a “phantom” or “intangible” text when it is in print,sold in bookstores, and used in Greek classes? The Textus Receptus (TR)underlying the KJV is essentially Beza’s 1598 TR and the last twoeditions (1550, 1551) of Stephens’ TR, and corresponds with Scrivener’sTR that is today published by the Trinitarian Bible Society and the DeanBurgon Society.(37) Are there textual discrepancies in the original languageScriptures underlying the KJV?There are no textual discrepancies in the Hebrew and GreekScriptures underlying the KJV. Whenever we see differences,contradictions, or discrepancies in the Bible, we should not call them“errors” (scribal or otherwise). Such differences, contradictions, ordiscrepancies are merely apparent and not true errors at all. Principles ofharmonisation should be employed to reconcile the differences and offerpossible solutions. The Apostle Paul offers a safe hermeneutical approachto discrepancies in the Bible: “let God be true, but every man a liar”(Rom 3:4). We should never in any way say the Bible contains errors ormistakes. The Bible God has given us is infallible (i.e. incapable of error)and inerrant (i.e. without mistakes).Francis Turretin explained how we ought to look at copyist orprinting errors in the light of providential preservation: “Although wegive to the Scriptures absolute integrity, we do not therefore think that thecopyists and printers were inspired (theopneustous), but only that theprovidence of God watched over the copying of the sacred books, so thatalthough many errors might have crept in, it has not so happened (or theyQUESTIONS ABOUT INSPIRATION AND PRESERVATION33