12.07.2015 Views

Open Quantum Dynamics of Mesoscopic Bose-Einstein ... - Physics

Open Quantum Dynamics of Mesoscopic Bose-Einstein ... - Physics

Open Quantum Dynamics of Mesoscopic Bose-Einstein ... - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Quasiprobability distributions using squeezed-state expansionsξ m that would minimise the spread in phase space. But not only do we not know thisoptimum value, we also have no guarantee that it exists as a constant independent <strong>of</strong> thesystem dynamics. In fact, we would expect the optimum value ξ m to be correlated toα (for the single-mode case the phase <strong>of</strong> ξ m must be such as to minimise the amplitudefluctuations). So we need a phase-space representation in which ξ is a variable:∫ˆρ = dαdα ∗ dξdξ ∗ P (α, α ∗ ,ξ,ξ ∗ ) ∣ ∣α, ξ 〉〈 α, ξ ∣ (B.11)To obtain evolution equations for ξ, we need to rewrite the effect <strong>of</strong> the creation andannihilations on the squeezed state in terms <strong>of</strong> partial derivatives with respect to ξ, inthe manner <strong>of</strong> Eq. (B.7). To prevent any higher order derivative terms from appearingin the evolution equation for the P distribution, we need direct operator correspondencesfor â 2 and â †2 . One may consider doing this via the squeezing operator S(ξ,ξ ∗ ). Thesimplest way to differentiate this operator (because [ â 2 , â †2] does not commute with â 2 orâ †2 )appearstobeL(ξ,ξ ∗ )S(ξ,ξ ∗ ) =(= 1 2ξ ∗ ∂∂ξ ∗ + ξ ∂ )S(ξ,ξ ∗ )∂ξ(ξ ∗ â 2 − ξâ †2) S(ξ,ξ ∗ ),(B.12)which is not useful, since we cannot generate operator correspondences separately for â 2and â †2 . The exponent <strong>of</strong> S(ξ,ξ ∗ ) can be factored to find ∂ ∂ξ S andlike[156]∂∂ξ ∗ S using resultse ξ∗Â−ξ† = e −ξ† e − ln cosh r ˆBe ξ∗ ,(B.13)where  = 1 2â2 and ˆB =â † â + 1 2. But this does not appear to lead to anything moreuseful.Alternatively the phase <strong>of</strong> ξ can be locked into that <strong>of</strong> α to ensure an expansion inamplitude-squeezed states:ˆρ =∫dαdα ∗ drP (α, α ∗ ,r) ∣ ∣ α, r〉〈α, r∣ ∣.(B.14)This reduces the phase-space dimensionality, but has complications <strong>of</strong> its own: sinceS(ξ,ξ ∗ ) −→ S(α, α ∗ ,r), the correspondences for â and â † must be rederived.Thus there are many ways in which generalised phase-space representations couldbe generated. However, finding one which gives exact phase-space equations (regardless<strong>of</strong> whether these give improved statistics) is not a trivial matter, without having thesimplicity <strong>of</strong> coherent states.175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!