Founding of the First Waldorf School - Waldorf Research Institute
Founding of the First Waldorf School - Waldorf Research Institute
Founding of the First Waldorf School - Waldorf Research Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
those present what <strong>the</strong>y have experienced. He tells <strong>the</strong>m: Thiswas a festive act <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world order. He says it three timesin different words — what has occurred <strong>the</strong>re. But he doessomething else as well. What he does now is quite concrete:He expresses his thanks to Emil Molt. But that is not concrete— he does not express his gratitude to Emil Molt, but to<strong>the</strong> good spirit who gave Emil Molt <strong>the</strong> good thought to dowhat he actually did. This is <strong>the</strong> concrete fact: He thanks<strong>the</strong> good spirit who gave Emil Molt <strong>the</strong> impulse to found<strong>the</strong> <strong>School</strong>. That is what is important. I want to read <strong>the</strong> lastsentence here that concludes this solemn, introductory act:“Let us look upon ourselves as human beings whom karmahas brought to this place where something is to happen whichshall surpass ordinary events — something which may makeall participants here feel that <strong>the</strong>y have witnessed a festivemoment <strong>of</strong> world destiny.”Dear friends, let us consider this as if it were being saidto us at <strong>the</strong> present moment ... this word that we have beenbrought toge<strong>the</strong>r here by karma. Rudolf Steiner explains thisin <strong>the</strong> conference <strong>of</strong> September 26, 1919, and <strong>the</strong> statementabout karma is mentioned again. He says: “It is a fulfilledkarma. We have looked for each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>refore we havefound each o<strong>the</strong>r.” It is a fulfilled karma, for it goes back todecisions that were made in <strong>the</strong> Michael <strong>School</strong>, and we bring<strong>the</strong>m into actuality at <strong>the</strong> present moment, inasmuch as weapproach this young pedagogical work. We can feel that <strong>the</strong>sewords are addressed to us at this present moment.Indeed, we must take a fur<strong>the</strong>r step still. What RudolfSteiner has said so far is not <strong>the</strong> whole thing. Something elsenow takes place which was as if forgotten, and I must admitthat we really only discovered it in <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Herbert Hahn,who was an eyewitness to this event, had not yet told us about41