12.07.2015 Views

ERA guide for application of the Common Safety Methods ... - Europa

ERA guide for application of the Common Safety Methods ... - Europa

ERA guide for application of the Common Safety Methods ... - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

European Railway AgencyGuide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CSM Regulation 2.3.5. If one or more hazards are controlled by codes <strong>of</strong> practice fulfilling <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong>point 2.3.2, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> risks associated with <strong>the</strong>se hazards shall be considered asacceptable. This means that:(a) <strong>the</strong>se risks need not be analysed fur<strong>the</strong>r;(b) <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> codes <strong>of</strong> practice shall be registered in <strong>the</strong> hazard record as safetyrequirements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant hazards.[G 1] The hazards and associated risks that are covered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>application</strong> <strong>of</strong> codes <strong>of</strong> practice areimplicitly considered as acceptable, provided <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>application</strong> <strong>of</strong> codes <strong>of</strong>practice in section 2.3.2 are fulfilled. This means that explicit risk acceptance criteria neednot be defined <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> hazards controlled by this principle.[G 2] The demonstration that <strong>the</strong> system under assessment complies with <strong>the</strong> related codes <strong>of</strong>practice is per<strong>for</strong>med according to section 3.2.3.6. Where an alternative approach is not fully compliant with a code <strong>of</strong> practice, <strong>the</strong>proposer shall demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> alternative approach taken leads to at least <strong>the</strong>same level <strong>of</strong> safety.[G 1] If one or more conditions from <strong>the</strong> code <strong>of</strong> practice are not fulfilled by <strong>the</strong> system underassessment, <strong>the</strong> related code <strong>of</strong> practice can still be used <strong>for</strong> controlling hazards provided<strong>the</strong> proposer demonstrates that at least <strong>the</strong> same level <strong>of</strong> safety is achieved.2.3.7. If <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>for</strong> a particular hazard cannot be made acceptable by <strong>the</strong> <strong>application</strong> <strong>of</strong> codes<strong>of</strong> practice, additional safety measures shall be identified applying one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>rrisk acceptance principles.[G 1] This may also occur when it is discovered that <strong>the</strong> related code <strong>of</strong> practice does notsufficiently cover <strong>the</strong> identified hazards, e.g. <strong>the</strong> code <strong>of</strong> practice is not applicable to <strong>the</strong> fullrange <strong>of</strong> hazards. Then <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se hazards ei<strong>the</strong>r o<strong>the</strong>r codes <strong>of</strong> practice or one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rtwo risk acceptance principles needs to be used <strong>for</strong> controlling <strong>the</strong> associated risks (see alsopoint [G 1] in section 2.3.1).2.3.8. When all hazards are controlled by codes <strong>of</strong> practice, <strong>the</strong> risk management process maybe limited to:(a) The hazard identification in accordance with section 2.2.6;(b) The registration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> codes <strong>of</strong> practice in <strong>the</strong> hazard record inaccordance with section 2.3.5;(c) The documentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk management process in accordancewith section 5;(d) An independent assessment in accordance with Article 6.[G 1] This text summarises in one section <strong>the</strong> different requirements in <strong>the</strong> CSM Regulation thatare to be fulfilled when all hazards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system under assessment are controlled by codes<strong>of</strong> practice. Reference: <strong>ERA</strong>/GUI/01-2008/SAF Version: 1.1 Page 40 <strong>of</strong> 54File Name: Guide_<strong>for</strong>_Application_<strong>of</strong>_CSM_V1.1.docEuropean Railway Agency ● Boulevard Harpignies, 160 ● BP 20392 ● F-59307 Valenciennes Cedex ● France ● Tel. +33 (0)3 27 09 65 00 ● Fax +33 (0)3 27 33 40 65 ● http://www.era.europa.eu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!