12.07.2015 Views

Formation of atomic point contacts and molecular junctions with a ...

Formation of atomic point contacts and molecular junctions with a ...

Formation of atomic point contacts and molecular junctions with a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 1 Schematic drawing <strong>of</strong> a MCBJ setupAu wire <strong>with</strong> nanobridge in the middle is fixed on a substrateThe device is mounted by a three-<strong>point</strong> setupBy bending up the substrate <strong>with</strong> a mechanical actuator (e.g. piezoelectrictransducer <strong>and</strong> a stepping motor), the nanobridge is elongated2 Experimental method <strong>and</strong> resultsWe first fabricated a pair <strong>of</strong> Au electrodes separated <strong>with</strong>1 mm gap on an Si substrate using photolithography. Toreduce ionic leakage current, the Au electrodes werecovered <strong>with</strong> Si 3 N 4 insulating layer except for a smallwindow to expose the gap. We then etched a trench in theSi underneath the Au electrodes to suspend the electrodes.The last step was to reduce the separation <strong>of</strong> the two suspendedelectrodes to a <strong>molecular</strong> gap or to form an <strong>atomic</strong><strong>point</strong> contact by electrochemically depositing Au onto theelectrodes. A mechanical actuation in an MCBJ configurationallows one to further adjust the gap or contact between theelectrodes. We provide more fabrication details <strong>and</strong> discussexperimental results subsequently.2.1 Fabrication <strong>of</strong> the deviceWe used a 360-mm thick Si (1 0 0) wafer (7–13 V cmresistivity) covered <strong>with</strong> a 50 nm thermal SiO 2 insulationlayer. We then patterned the Si substrate <strong>with</strong> an array <strong>of</strong>Au electrode pairs using st<strong>and</strong>ard photolithography tools.The separation between the two electrodes in each pairwas 1 mm. The Au electrodes were thermally evaporated<strong>with</strong> a thickness <strong>of</strong> 60–100 nm on top <strong>of</strong> 8-nm Cradhesion layer. Thicker Au electrodes were not attemptedto avoid hard lift-<strong>of</strong>f. A 400-nm thick Si 3 N 4 layer wasdeposited by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) on theentire wafer except for a 10-mm wide strip that exposesthe gap regions <strong>of</strong> all the electrode pairs. The Si 3 N 4 layerserved as an insulation layer to minimise leakage currentdue to ionic conduction which is important for carryingout electrical measurement in electrolytes. The leakagecurrent was typically a few pA, but it increased afterwet-etching Si 3 N 4 , SiO 2 <strong>and</strong> Si. The Si 3 N 4 also functionedas a mask needed to etch the 10-mm wide strip into a trench.This was carried out by first removing the Si 3 N 4 <strong>and</strong> SiO 2using 20:1 buffered oxide etchant (BOE). The etch ratewas calibrated on Si wafer <strong>with</strong> thermal SiO 2 or CVDSi 3 N 4 in advance. It was followed by etching away theexposed Si in the strip in 0.44 g/ml KOH. This wetetching was anisotropic <strong>and</strong> it created a triangular trenchin the Si substrate (Fig. 2a). We covered the backside <strong>of</strong>the wafer by another layer <strong>of</strong> 400 nm CVD Si 3 N 4 beforewet etching Si, in order to prevent the backside frometching during the last etching process. Before electrochemicaldeposition <strong>of</strong> Au in the next step, we usedoxygen plasma to remove the organic contaminationduring the process, followed by rinsing <strong>with</strong> acetone,ethanol, <strong>and</strong> 18-MV pure water for 5 min each.84Fig. 2 SEM images <strong>of</strong> two pairs <strong>of</strong> Au electrodesa Without Au deposition, Au electrodes are separated <strong>with</strong> 1 mm gapb After Au deposition, an Au nanojunction is formed. Note that theL-shape electrode in the upper left <strong>of</strong> a is a marker for alignmentduring the micr<strong>of</strong>abrication processThe inset is a typical current plot during electrodeposition processshowing that a rather stable <strong>molecular</strong> gap can be obtained by controllingthe potentialThe bias was 0.01 V during the electrodepositionThe two Au electrodes in a pair were then bridged byelectrochemically depositing Au onto the electrodes. Thedeposition was controlled by a homemade bipotentiostatusing a Pt coil as the counter electrode <strong>and</strong> an Ag wire asthe quasi-reference electrode. The quasi-reference electrodewas calibrated against the more commonly used Ag/AgCl(in 3.5 M KCl). Au material was deposited onto the Au electrodesat constant potential <strong>of</strong> 20.15 V against Ag/AgCl<strong>with</strong> 8–10 mM sodium gold thiolsulfate in 0.3 M citricacid (pH 3.5). During the electrodeposition process, thecurrent between the two electrodes was monitored continuously.Initially, the current was small <strong>and</strong> entirely due toionic leakage current, but it increased sharply when a<strong>molecular</strong> gap or <strong>atomic</strong> <strong>point</strong> contact was formed. The conductance<strong>of</strong> the junction was used as a feedback for us tocontrol the deposition process (Fig. 2b). The inset inFig. 2 shows a typical current plot during the electrodepositionprocess. The tunneling current showed a big jump whenMicro & Nano Letters, Volume 1, Issue 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!