29.11.2012 Views

Review nr 1. 2003 - TTS Group ASA

Review nr 1. 2003 - TTS Group ASA

Review nr 1. 2003 - TTS Group ASA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>TTS</strong> <strong>Review</strong> June <strong>2003</strong> 3<br />

Hatch covers and bearing pads<br />

for China Shipping’s new containership fleet<br />

renewal programme<br />

Both vessels spearhead the<br />

major eight-ship,<br />

70,000dwt fleet renewal<br />

programme currently<br />

underway by China<br />

Shipping and feature hatch<br />

covers designed and<br />

supplied by <strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment’s Bremen,<br />

Germany and Shanghai, China companies,<br />

<strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment GmbH and <strong>TTS</strong> Hua<br />

Hai Ships Equipment Co Ltd.<br />

New Pudong was built by China’s<br />

Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding (Yard No.<br />

H1263A), while New Dalian was built by<br />

Dalian New Shipbuilding Heavy Industries<br />

Co Ltd (Yard No. C5600-1). Both vessels,<br />

the largest of their type yet built by the<br />

respective shipyards, feature <strong>TTS</strong> designed<br />

lift-on/lift-off pontoon hatch covers designed<br />

for non-sequential opening/closing.The<br />

hatch cover panels are designed for lifting by<br />

shore-side cranes and can be stacked either<br />

on adjacent covers or ashore.The hatch<br />

covers are so arranged that longitudinal joints<br />

between the panels align with spaces between<br />

the containers on deck and in the holds.<br />

A total of 44 hatch cover panels have been<br />

supplied to each China Shipping<br />

newbuilding, covering a total day-opening<br />

area of 6,364m2 .Hatch No.1 is fitted with<br />

two panels (12.6m x 15.74m), hatch No.2<br />

with three panels (12.6m x 25.89m), hatch<br />

No.3 with three panels (12.6m x 30.96m),<br />

while hatch No. 4-15 have three panels<br />

(12.6m x 36.04m).<br />

The hatch covers are designed for a<br />

uniformly distributed load of <strong>1.</strong>3 ton/m2 B<br />

for<br />

hatch covers of Hold No. 1-4, and<br />

<strong>1.</strong>05 ton/m 2 for the covers of Hold<br />

No. 5-15. Each hatch cover is sufficiently<br />

strengthened for a container stack load<br />

of 90 tonnes for a maximum of six tiers<br />

of 20ft containers per stack, or 120 tonnes<br />

per six tires of 40ft container per stack.<br />

45ft containers can be loaded from the<br />

third top tier of 40ft containers on<br />

Hatch No. 3,5,9,12 and 15, while 45ft<br />

containers can also be loaded from the first<br />

tier on the hatch covers for Hatch No.1,7<br />

and 1<strong>1.</strong><br />

Both China Shipping vessels also feature<br />

<strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment’s unique, patented,<br />

OptiPad hatch cover bearing pad design,<br />

part of the company’s EverEst range of<br />

new generation hatch cover bearing pads<br />

incorporating advanced technology<br />

materials.The OptiPad design is made of<br />

PTFE in the form of a ‘weave’ fabric, which<br />

results in a highly effective bearing pad able<br />

to absorb very high loadings while<br />

accommodating considerable movement of<br />

the hatch cover/coaming interface.<br />

The start of <strong>2003</strong> has been a busy one for<br />

<strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment GmbH in Bremen and<br />

<strong>TTS</strong> Hua Hai Ships Equipment Co Ltd in<br />

Shanghai with ship deliveries.<br />

Besides the two large containerships for<br />

China Shipping, a further six <strong>TTS</strong> hatch<br />

cover-equipped vessels have been delivered<br />

by Chinese shipyards:<br />

• BBC Europe, 7,000dwt multipurpose<br />

cargoship from Xingang Shipyard (Hull<br />

No. SB325) for Germany’s Brise<br />

Schiffahrts – <strong>TTS</strong> hydraulic, multi-folding,<br />

pontoon hatch covers<br />

Two of the largest<br />

containerships yet built in<br />

China have recently been<br />

handed over to China<br />

Shipping, the 5668 TEU pair<br />

New Pudong and New Dalian.<br />

• IVS Viking, 32,500dwt bulk carrier from<br />

Xingang Shipyard (Hull No. SB333) for<br />

Denmark’s Clipper Elite Carriers – <strong>TTS</strong><br />

hydraulic, folding hatch covers<br />

• Vega Diamond, 1,100 TEU capacity<br />

containership from Jinling Shipyard (Hull<br />

No. JLZ01-0103) for Germany’s Carsten<br />

Rehderi – <strong>TTS</strong> lift-on/lift-off hatch covers<br />

• Annette, 25,500dwt bulk carrier from<br />

Jiangsu Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Co Ltd<br />

(Hull No.YZJ99-599C28) for Germany’s<br />

MST GmbH – <strong>TTS</strong> hydraulic, folding<br />

hatch covers<br />

• Pac Palawan, 6,500dwt multi-purpose<br />

cargoship from Jiangsu Yangzijiang<br />

Shipbuilding Co Ltd (Hull No.YZJ2001-<br />

640C43) for Singapore’s Pacific Carriers<br />

– <strong>TTS</strong> lift-on/lift-off hatch covers<br />

• Asian Trade, 1,100 TEU capacity<br />

containership from Jiangdong Shipyard<br />

(Hull No. JD1100TEU-2) for Germany’s<br />

W. Bockstigel Shipping – <strong>TTS</strong> lift-on/liftoff<br />

hatch covers<br />

China has become an important country<br />

for <strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment and the scope<br />

of supply of hatch covers outlined above<br />

highlights this.With its own dedicated<br />

operation in China,<strong>TTS</strong> Hua Hai Ships<br />

Equipment Co Ltd, in Shanghai (a 50:50<br />

joint venture between China State<br />

Shipbuilding Corp and <strong>TTS</strong> Ships Equipment<br />

AB),<strong>TTS</strong> is able to meet the needs for all<br />

dry cargo handling systems requirements for<br />

newbuilding under construction at Chinese<br />

shipyards locally, backed-up by the hatch<br />

cover ‘Centre of Excellence’ of the group in<br />

Bremen, Germany and the ro-ro ‘Centre of<br />

Excellence’ in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!