29.11.2012 Views

KIRKHAMFurniture-Making1982.pdf

KIRKHAMFurniture-Making1982.pdf

KIRKHAMFurniture-Making1982.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The unspecialised nature of cabinet-making in the quality trade<br />

in the mid-nineteenth century is confirmed by Natthew Digby Wyatt. In<br />

1856, he reported on the furniture displayed at the Paris Exhibition of<br />

1855 and argued that the poor quality of British design and production was<br />

due, in part, to the lack of division of labour 31 . He recommended the<br />

abolition of the piece-rate price books used in the West End and the<br />

introduction of a 'better' division of labour whereby 'the men would be<br />

kept each one at a particular process of which he was the most thorough<br />

master'. He felt that this, together with the introduction of more<br />

processes, would lead to better and cheaper furniture 32 . But even by the<br />

end of the century, when the supremacy of the West End trade had declined,<br />

33<br />

there was little division of labour in the quality cabinet trade<br />

The development of the comprehensive manufacturing firms in the<br />

quality trade ensured that a wide range of cabinet work was undertaken<br />

and gave the cabinet-maker the opportunity to retain all-round skills.<br />

It was the smaller firms, some of them producing good quality work, however,<br />

which restricted their scope. Thomas Sheraton commented in 1792 that<br />

craftsmen were 'sometimes strangers to particular pieces of furniture'<br />

because certain pieces were made in one shop and not in another 34 . It<br />

was this type of production rather than a division of labour within workshops<br />

which produced specialisation in cabinet work.<br />

For most of the eighteenth century, there was little specialisation.<br />

Even when the increasing use of specialised rooms led to a great demand for<br />

a wide variety of tables in the second half of the eighteenth century35,<br />

there was no division of labour between table-making and other aspects of<br />

cabinet-making. The exception was the production of games tables,<br />

particularly backgammon and billiards tables. In this case, it was not<br />

simply demand which affected specialisation but also the fact that very<br />

particular skills were involved. In the case of backgammon tables, a<br />

24.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!