12.07.2015 Views

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES AND MEASURING COGNITIVE ABILITY 219<strong>of</strong> items completed, <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> items completed accurately, mayincrease for all groups. Thus, the increased time available to test-takers<strong>of</strong>ten exacerbates the extent <strong>of</strong> group differences.Some contradictory findings may relate to the differential speededness<strong>of</strong> the tests studied <strong>and</strong> ceiling effects in scores before the experimentalmanipulation.Test DesignMany critics suggest that differences in performance between groups is aresult <strong>of</strong> tests that reflect the reasoning processes, definitions <strong>of</strong> intelligence,cultural assumptions, linguistic patterns, <strong>and</strong> other features <strong>of</strong> the testwriters.In the USA, <strong>and</strong> to a large extent around the world, this is thedominant White culture, influenced as it is by rationalism, Western Europeancultures, <strong>and</strong> Judeo-Christian thought. In this section we review some<strong>of</strong> the mechanisms suggested <strong>and</strong> studies that attempt to check whether thesedo affect group differences. Helms (1992) is perhaps one <strong>of</strong> the more coherentcritics <strong>and</strong>, while researchers have begun to address some <strong>of</strong> the hypothesesshe raises, there are still only a few relevant studies. Many <strong>of</strong> these areperformed in a research context <strong>and</strong> investigate trends in small samples <strong>of</strong>college students. Larger studies with more realistic occupational groupswould be desirable.St<strong>and</strong>ardization on White groupsHarrington (1988) pointed out that typically tests are st<strong>and</strong>ardized usingpredominantly White samples. It could be that this process is tending toselect items <strong>and</strong> create tests that favour the White group. One study thatexamines this is by Hickman <strong>and</strong> Reynolds (1986), who tested this hypothesisby creating two forms <strong>of</strong> a cognitive battery for children st<strong>and</strong>ardized onmajority Black <strong>and</strong> majority White samples, respectively. They found nodifference in score patterns for the two forms. Similar null results werefound by Fan, Willson, <strong>and</strong> Kapes (1996). Jones <strong>and</strong> Raju (2000) domanage to find some effects with an Item Response Theory (IRT)-basedapproach—their results are discussed in the next section.Differential item functioningIf there are cultural factors that make tests <strong>and</strong> items differentially difficultfor some groups, it is likely that these load more on some items than onothers. Attempts to identify inappropriate items through reviews were notalways successful. A Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) itemidentified as unfair to Black children turned out to be relatively easier forthem. ‘Culture fair’ tests, such as the Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!