Heritage Impact Assessment - SAHRA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Photo 10 Dilapidated StructureResource EvaluationSite 1This site is not of any historic or archaeological value, the owners has indicated that the renovatedstructure dates from the 1970’s and it is therefore not protected under any of the sections of the NHR Act.Since renovations on this structure has is already nearing completion, no further work is recommended.Site significance characteristics slide scale (Post-Contact Criteria)Scientific Significance 0Historic Significance 0Public Significance 1Other Significance 1Ethnic Significance 0Economic Significance 0Total Score 2This evaluation shows that the site holds very little heritage significance.20Ibamba Private Nature and Hunting Reserve – Eastern Cape
Site 2This site consists of two components. Firstly there is the modern houses of which there is two located onthis site and secondly there is the old historic barn. The houses have been renovated and it is difficult todetermine their age of origin at this stage. The owners indicate that the structures are not older than 60years, however the building style indicates otherwise.The structure that is now referred to as the barn seems to have been the original homestead as it still hasa chimney stack which you would not expect to find in a barn structure. The structure itself has beenextensively modified during its lifetime; however it still retains much of its historic characteristics such aswooden flooring an attic and sundried brick walls. Photo 11 Interior of structureSite significance characteristics slide scale (Post-Contact Criteria)Scientific Significance 3Historic Significance 3Public Significance 2Other Significance 2Ethnic Significance 0Economic Significance 1Total Score 11This rating places the historic structure (barn) within the high value section.Site 3This site has significant heritage value. It is a good example of this classic building style associated withthe historic era of the Eastern Cape. The site was utilised for keeping livestock but is not currently beingused for this application. The client has recently constructed a concrete storage structure within 2m of theedge of this enclosure.21Ibamba Private Nature and Hunting Reserve – Eastern Cape
Page 2: CREDIT SHEETProject DirectorSTEPHAN
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction .....
Page 7 and 8: GlossaryArchaeology: Remains result
Page 9 and 10: Proclaimed heritage sites, public m
Page 11 and 12: Proposed ProjectThe proposed area f
Page 13 and 14: Jansenville is proposed. The struct
Page 15 and 16: Chapter2Project ResourcesPaleontolo
Page 17 and 18: "----- /:-=" ,..... .';1'I'.I ,d1 "
Page 19: Site 3 - Historic Stone Walled Kraa
Page 23 and 24: Photo 13 Building fixturesSite sign
Page 25 and 26: Site 2The modern structures that ha
Page 27 and 28: References Cited1. Aldenderfer, M.
Page 29 and 30: MethodologyInventoryInventory studi
Page 31 and 32: to recognize that although an archa
Page 33 and 34: Impacts will be defined along the f
Page 35 and 36: The qualitative value of a site’s
Page 37 and 38: present and potential land useland
Page 39 and 40: may have short-term or temporary ef
Page 41 and 42: Map 1 Location Map 1
Page 43 and 44: Map 3 Study Area Location43Ibamba P
Page 45 and 46: Map 5 Location of Site 2 & 345Ibamb

Heritage Impact Assessment - SAHRA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?