Heritage Impact Assessment - SAHRA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Site significance characteristics slide scale (Post-Contact Criteria)Scientific Significance 3Historic Significance 3Public Significance 2Other Significance 2Ethnic Significance 0Economic Significance 1Total Score 11This places this structure within the high significance section of heritage value.Site 4The structure located at this site consists of a multi-room house. The building methods, style andmaterials all suggest that the structure is older than 60 years. Specifically the use of sun dried bricks andchalk plaster is common in the construction techniques from the 1920’s – 1950’s. Photo 12 Building materials and techniquesThe inside of the structure also shows indications of fittings associated with the historic era between 1920and 1950. Some of these are the wooden door frames as well as the wooden floor boards used in thecommon room areas of the house. The house also has a fireplace built in the colonial style with amantelpiece.22Ibamba Private Nature and Hunting Reserve – Eastern Cape
Photo 13 Building fixturesSite significance characteristics slide scale (Post-Contact Criteria)Scientific Significance 2Historic Significance 2Public Significance 1Other Significance 1Ethnic Significance 0Economic Significance 1Total Score 07This allocates the site to the moderate significance section of the heritage value scale. Even though thesite is not unique it is of historic value and deserves preservation or further study before demolishment.Impact Identification and AssessmentSite 1As indicated this site has already undergone significant alterations during the renovation activities. Thereare no indications that this structure is of historic value so no negative impacts were affected.Site 2As indicated this site consists of two components, only one of which has any heritage significance.Impacts on this site will be determined by the recommendations of the proposed management plan (seerecommendations).23Ibamba Private Nature and Hunting Reserve – Eastern Cape
Page 2: CREDIT SHEETProject DirectorSTEPHAN
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction .....
Page 7 and 8: GlossaryArchaeology: Remains result
Page 9 and 10: Proclaimed heritage sites, public m
Page 11 and 12: Proposed ProjectThe proposed area f
Page 13 and 14: Jansenville is proposed. The struct
Page 15 and 16: Chapter2Project ResourcesPaleontolo
Page 17 and 18: "----- /:-=" ,..... .';1'I'.I ,d1 "
Page 19 and 20: Site 3 - Historic Stone Walled Kraa
Page 21: Site 2This site consists of two com
Page 25 and 26: Site 2The modern structures that ha
Page 27 and 28: References Cited1. Aldenderfer, M.
Page 29 and 30: MethodologyInventoryInventory studi
Page 31 and 32: to recognize that although an archa
Page 33 and 34: Impacts will be defined along the f
Page 35 and 36: The qualitative value of a site’s
Page 37 and 38: present and potential land useland
Page 39 and 40: may have short-term or temporary ef
Page 41 and 42: Map 1 Location Map 1
Page 43 and 44: Map 3 Study Area Location43Ibamba P
Page 45 and 46: Map 5 Location of Site 2 & 345Ibamb

Heritage Impact Assessment - SAHRA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?