12.07.2015 Views

Predicting Cardiovascular Risks using Pattern Recognition and Data ...

Predicting Cardiovascular Risks using Pattern Recognition and Data ...

Predicting Cardiovascular Risks using Pattern Recognition and Data ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Zoo SmallThis data contains 101 cases distributed in 7 categories <strong>and</strong> 18 attributes (15 Boolean, 2 numerical, <strong>and</strong>1 unique attributes). The results in Table 4.3 show the accuracy <strong>and</strong> error for 10 experiments withalternative r<strong>and</strong>omised data sets for the KMIX algorithm. The average error is about 0.15 (0.84 ofaccuracy). This error result is similar to the results of Shehroz <strong>and</strong> Shri (2007) (0.166).R<strong>and</strong>om experiments Accuracy ErrorR<strong>and</strong>0 0.90 0.10R<strong>and</strong>1 0.75 0.25R<strong>and</strong>2 0.90 0.10R<strong>and</strong>3 0.82 0.18R<strong>and</strong>4 0.90 0.10R<strong>and</strong>5 0.88 0.12R<strong>and</strong>6 0.81 0.19R<strong>and</strong>7 0.84 0.16R<strong>and</strong>8 0.87 0.128R<strong>and</strong>9 0.80 0.198Average 0.84 0.15Std Deviation 0.05 0.05Table 4.3: 10 test results of Zoo data set in r<strong>and</strong>omisation.Vote dataThe data set contains 435 records with 2 output classes labelled as 168 “republicans” <strong>and</strong> 267“democrats”. Table 4.4 shows the experimental results from 10 r<strong>and</strong>omised data sets. Overall, theaccuracy is about 86%. The sensitivity rates are quite consistent (an average of 0.95) over theexperiments except in R<strong>and</strong>0 (0.83). Figure 4.9 shows that although the experiments fluctuate insensitivity <strong>and</strong> specificity rates their accuracy <strong>and</strong> the error rates remain consistent.56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!