12.07.2015 Views

Edible Bean Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results 2010

Edible Bean Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results 2010

Edible Bean Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2010</strong> Heat Unit <strong>and</strong> Precipitation Summary for Ridgetown, Exeter <strong>and</strong> BrusselsOntario Corn Heat Units (OCHU)Huron <strong>Research</strong> (Exeter) Brussels Ridgetown CampusNorm Norm NormMonth <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (32 yr) <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (20 yr) <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (37 yr)May 500 432 346 448 na 281 502 423 366June 690 602 651 610 na 605 706 600 682July 823 696 772 759 na 701 834 675 795August 826 734 744 758 na 679 808 714 769September 557 565 550 476 na 444 554 552 578October 388 67 72 129 na 32 161 73 203Total 3784 3096 3135 3180 na 2742 3565 3037 3393Precipitation (mm)Huron <strong>Research</strong> (Exeter) Brussels Ridgetown CampusNorm Norm NormMonth <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (32 yr) <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (20yr) <strong>2010</strong> 2009 (37 yr)May 118 64 81 39 na 90 122 45 78June 83 91 78 135 na 88 85 56 74July 143 59 79 129 na 84 136 30 80August 39 47 68 7 na 89 26 93 90September 114 72 106 60 na 102 80 36 85October 133 84 86 na na 75 78 70 63Total 601 417 498 370 na 528 527 330 47020% or more below average20% or more above average<strong>2010</strong> WeatherHeat unit accumulation for <strong>2010</strong> was above average at Ridgetown <strong>and</strong> well above average atExeter <strong>and</strong> Blyth. This was due to a warmer than average May <strong>and</strong> September. Precipitation wasabove average from May to July, <strong>and</strong> below average for August. In most cases, this did not affectcrop yields, because crop development was ahead of schedule. The harvest season went well,despite the fact that there were good precipitation levels in September <strong>and</strong> October, particularlyat Ridgetown.4


Desiccation (Year 2 of 4)Locations: Three studies were conducted at each of the following locations:1) Huron <strong>Research</strong> Station (Exeter ON) using cranberry <strong>and</strong> navy bean market classes2) University of Manitoba (Carmen MB) using pinto bean market class3) AAFC Lethbridge (AB) using small red market classWeather conditions in ON were excellent, <strong>and</strong> all of the studies were harvested without incident.In MB, the studies were replanted due to wet conditions early in the growing season. Cool <strong>and</strong>wet conditions in the fall delayed harvest, but meaningful data was collected. In AB, continualwet weather throughout the growing season <strong>and</strong> an early fall frost, forced the ab<strong>and</strong>onment of thestudies at this location.Tankmix Study: Ignite, Aim, Valtera <strong>and</strong> Eragon were evaluated at two rates <strong>and</strong> Reglone wasevaluated at three rates. Each product was compared to the full label rate of glyphosate. Eachdesiccant was applied alone <strong>and</strong> in a tankmix with glyphosate, which gave a total of 24treatments for the study.<strong>Results</strong> from Ontario – Pod dry down was highest with diquat, glufosinate ammonium <strong>and</strong>flumioxazin, <strong>and</strong> slowest with glyphosate. For stem dry down, flumioxazin <strong>and</strong> saflufenacilwere the fastest, <strong>and</strong> glyphosate was the slowest. For leaf dry down, flumioxazin, diquat <strong>and</strong>saflufenacil were the fastest, while glyphosate was the slowest.A tankmix of glyphosate <strong>and</strong> each did not impact the dry down leaves <strong>and</strong> pods until 8 days afterapplication (DAA) <strong>and</strong> the dry down of stems until 12-16 DAA. Carfentrazone appeared tobenefit the most from a tankmix with glyphosate. There were no differences between treatmentsfor white bean yield. Small differences were detected between treatments for cranberry beanyield, but the differences were not consistent within each desiccant. In an analysis of seed colour,all desiccants except diquat reduce seed whiteness. All of the desiccants reduce seed yellowness,compared to the untreated control.The analysis of herbicide residues in the seed is currently being conducted, <strong>and</strong> results will notbe available until the spring of 2011.<strong>Results</strong> from Manitoba –Visual observations suggest that the speed of desiccation varies among the herbicides evaluated.In addition, tankmixing herbicides appeared to affect rate of crop desiccation. Visual rating datawill be subject to statistical analysis in early 2011.Crop samples are currently being processed for yield <strong>and</strong> herbicide residue in seed. Datacollection <strong>and</strong> a preliminary statistical analysis of these data is expected to be completed byspring 2011.Weed Control Study: Glyphosate at two rates was applied alone <strong>and</strong> in a tankmix with Reglone,Ignite, Aim, Valtera <strong>and</strong> Eragon were evaluated alone at the full label rate, <strong>and</strong> in a tankmix withglyphosate at two rates (1/2 <strong>and</strong> full label rate). This gave a total of 18 treatments. The analysisof seed for herbicide residues was not conducted on this study.<strong>Results</strong> from Ontario - The desiccants which provided the most rapid pod dry down were diquat,glufosinate ammonium <strong>and</strong> flumioxazin while glyphosate was the slowest. The desiccants whichdried down the stems most rapidly were flumioxazin <strong>and</strong> saflufenacil. Glyphosate resulted in theslowest leaf dry down. With respect to weed dry down, generally diquat was the fastest whileglyphosate <strong>and</strong> carfentrazone had the slowest activity. Generally, all of the desiccants reducedbean moisture content at harvest with the exception of the low rate of glyphosate <strong>and</strong>carfentrazone. There was no decrease in white or cranberry bean yield with the desiccantsevaluated.<strong>Results</strong> from Manitoba – The rate of desiccation of weeds appeared to be similar to that observedfor pinto beans in the tankmix study. Desiccation was rated on redroot pigweed, wild buckwheat,<strong>and</strong> volunteer wheat. Preliminary results suggest differences in the rate of <strong>and</strong> final efficacy ofdesiccation among the weed species evaluated. Visual rating data will be subject to statistical6


analysis in early 2011.Timing Study: Roundup, Eragon <strong>and</strong> Roundup plus Eragon were evaluated as desiccants in drybeans at five timings for plant maturity (0, 25, 50, 75 <strong>and</strong> 100% pod maturity), which gave a totalof 16 treatments for the study.<strong>Results</strong> from Ontario – Saflufenacil provided rapid dry down of pod, stem <strong>and</strong> leaf tissuecompared to glyphosate, for each of the application timings. The tankmix of glyphosate +saflufenacil did not alter the rate of tissue dry down, compared to saflufenacil alone. Theapplication of glyphosate alone had little effect on crop yield, even when it was applied at 0%pod maturity. Saflufenacil decreased crop yield, particularly at early application timings, <strong>and</strong> thetankmix of saflufenacil + glyphosate resulted in a further decrease in crop yield. In general,results were similar for seed weight, pick <strong>and</strong> seed quality. Both desiccants reduced seedwhiteness, particularly early application timings of saflufenacil. However, both desiccants alsoreduced the yellowness of seed.The analysis of herbicide residues in the seed is currently being conducted, <strong>and</strong> results will notbe available until the spring of 2011.<strong>Results</strong> from Manitoba – refer to the Manitoba results from the Tankmix Study (above).White Mold (ongoing)The head-to-head foliar fungicide study provided excellent data in <strong>2010</strong>. Serenade applied alonewas not different than the untreated check. However for the second year in a row, Serenadecombined with a low rate of Lance was quite effective. For the first time ever, CaCl wassignificantly better than the untreated control. Lance, Allegro <strong>and</strong> Senator provided equivalentdisease control. The top treatment was a Bayer experimental, applied twice at a higher rate.A second study looked at early timing of Allegro (late vegetative) compared to a normalapplication timing (early flowering). This was to determine Allegro’s efficacy on sclerotiaapothecia. Few significant differences were observed.Several studies (proprietary) were conducted with BASF <strong>and</strong> Dupont, to evaluate experimentalchemistry.Anthracnose (ongoing)Two head-to-head seed treatment studies were conducted, using infected seed of Nautica <strong>and</strong>OAC Rex. The two st<strong>and</strong>ards were DCT <strong>and</strong> ApronMaxx/Dynasty. In the study seeded withNautica, Maxim Advance (ApronMaxx/Mertect) <strong>and</strong> two BASF experimentals were equivalentto the st<strong>and</strong>ards. The top yielding treatment was ApronMaxx/Dynasty/Agress. In the studyseeded with OAC Rex, Maxim Advance (ApronMaxx/Mertect) <strong>and</strong> one BASF experimental wasequivalent to DCT, but slightly poorer than ApronMaxx/Dynasty. ApronMaxx/Dynasty/Agresswas equivalent to both control treatments.Two head-to-head foliar fungicide studies were conducted, using infected seed of T9905 <strong>and</strong>OAC Rex. The two st<strong>and</strong>ards were Headline <strong>and</strong> Quadris. In the study seeded to T9905, therewere few differences between fungicides. In the study seeded with OAC Rex, Quilt <strong>and</strong> Senatorboth provided equivalent yield to the st<strong>and</strong>ards. The top yielding treatment was Quilt.Two studies were conducted for BASF (proprietary) to evaluate experimental foliar fungicides.For the registered treatments in this study, Allegro was one of the top treatments, while Lanceprovided moderate disease control in one study, <strong>and</strong> was not significantly different from theuntreated control in the other study.Common Bacterial Blight (Year 2)Four studies were conducted to determine the efficacy Agress (activated silver compound) on7


CBB. Two studies were seeded to infected navy beans (cv. Navigator) <strong>and</strong> two studies wereseeded to infected kidney beans. The two studies for each bean type were planted approximately2 weeks apart. The two st<strong>and</strong>ards were kocide 2000 (copper sulfite) <strong>and</strong> streptomycin. In thenavy bean studies, the disease pressure was too light to provide treatment differences. In theDRK studies, disease pressure was higher, <strong>and</strong> a few treatment differences were observed.Kocide tended to improve emergence <strong>and</strong> vigour in two studies, <strong>and</strong> streptomycin consistentlyprovided the best results in three studies.Carbon Based Fertilizers (year 1 of 2)Several carbon-based commercial fertilizer products are being used by Ontario growers. Theyare made from liquefied lignite coal, <strong>and</strong> contain high levels of humic <strong>and</strong> fulvic acids, as well astrace minerals. <strong>Research</strong> conducted at Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Agri-Food Canada in Ottawa hasdemonstrated benefits in the development <strong>and</strong> yield of several field crops. This research iscomplemented by side by side comparisons conducted by organizations such as the MiddlesexSoil <strong>and</strong> Crop Association. A 2009 field strip trial near Ailsa Craig, showed a substantial yieldincrease in dark red kidney beans from one product.A total of 10 field studies were conducted in 6 dry bean market classes in <strong>2010</strong>, to evaluate twosoil applied carbon-based fertilizer products (MTS Environmental <strong>and</strong> Alpha Agri Products).Plant vigour, height <strong>and</strong> yield data was collected in each study. To date, no response to theproducts has been measured. Field studies will be conducted in 2011, which will evaluate theproducts under different environmental conditions.Potato Leafhoppers (ongoing)Two studies were conducted at Ridgetown to determine the efficacy of Endigo (lambdacyhalothrin<strong>and</strong> thiamethoxam) on PLH. The first study was seeded to dutch brown beans (cv.Berna) <strong>and</strong> the second study was seeded to navy beans (cv. T9905). The st<strong>and</strong>ard was Matador(lambda-cyhalothrin). PLH nymph populations were high enough to separate all of theinsecticide treatments from the untreated control, but were not high enough to provide separationbetween the insecticide treatments, or to provide any yield differences.Evaluation of Marsh Spot in Dry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Ongoing, Year 5)Marsh spot is a physiological disorder found primarily in cranberry beans. Cells in the centre ofthe coltyledons die <strong>and</strong> turn a gray/black colour. The damage is evident once the seed is splitalong the cotyledonary axis, <strong>and</strong> opened up to view the interior of the cotyledons. Marsh spotcreates serious marketing issues for bean dealers.The cranberry cultivars entered into the variety trials at Kippen, Thorndale, Monkton, Elora <strong>and</strong>St. Thomas locations were evaluated for marsh spot <strong>and</strong> compared to Etna, a cultivar withconsistently low susceptibility to marsh spot. <strong>Results</strong> from preliminary yield trials at Kippen <strong>and</strong>Woodstock are also included. Monkton followed by Thorndale had the highest incidence ofmarsh spot this year. Several breeding lines (ACUG 10-C2 <strong>and</strong> ADMC213259) <strong>and</strong> onecommercial cultivar (Crimson) demonstrated some susceptibility to this disorder.8


Top Level Varieties in the R&P <strong>and</strong> PYT TrialsType Trial Yields Visual AppraisalsThorndale/Woodstock Kippen Blyth KippenLRK R&P OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 ***PYT CORN 18-V96 *** CORN 18-V96 *** Red Kanner **ADML945138 ** CORN 18-V96 ***Clouseau ** Pink Panther *Clouseau *DRK R&P GTS104 *** OAC 07-6D1 *** HR174-4239 **HR174-4239 ** Majesty **OAC 07-6D1 **PYT GTS106(COB 472-03) *** GTS106(COB 472-03) ***GTS104 **SEM1013 WSEM1030 WCRAN R&P Hooter *** Hooter *** Hooter ***Red Rider *** Red Rider *** Red Rider ***ACUG 10-C1 W ACUG 10-C1 W ACUG 10-C1 WHR 202-4973 W ACUG 10-C2 W ACUG 10-C2 WPYT Crimson (BD1003) ** SEMC1015 W ADMC213259 **SEMC1015 W HRC187 W October ***BLACKR&PZorro *** Zorro ***Eclipse ** Black Velvet ***COB 214-99 ** Loreto (COOP00044) ***PYT MSUB09197 W COB 214-99 *** Shania ***MSUB09204 W Zorro ** CORN96-148 ***Black Velvet *MSUB09197 WWhite R&P OAC 7-2 *** OAC 07-3 **OAC 07-3 *** OAC 7-2 ***OAC Dublin (05-2) ** AC Compass **Thunder ** AC Mast *HR177-3719 * OAC Dublin (05-2) *PYT HMS Medalist ** HMS Medalist ***COOP 02084 *COOP03019 ****-- excellent variety over a number of years** -- excellent variety over a more limited number of years* -- above average variety over a number of yearsW---- excellent for only one year9


10DVCAKMajor Coloured <strong>Bean</strong> R. & P. Trial - KippenSeed Blight 100Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality 1-10 Seed Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Aug 29 Weight Maturity1 AC Calmont DRK 7 2579 27 1.8 3.4 52.4 97 L2 Red Hawk DRK 10 2261 26 2.3 7.7 51.0 85 E3 OAC Redstar DRK 8 2449 26 1.9 5.2 54.6 95 L4 Majesty DRK 5 2629 30 1.6 5.9 64.9 88 E5 OAC 07-6D1 DRK 1 3044 34 1.8 4.0 62.6 89 M6 GTS 104 DRK 9 2425 26 2.0 5.7 52.8 93 M7 HR 174-4239 DRK 4 2684 31 1.5 6.9 66.5 86 E8 GTS 106 DRK 11 2190 25 2.0 5.8 53.2 88 E9 ACUG 10-D1 DRK 2 2987 33 1.9 3.6 58.3 90 M10 ACUG 10-D2 DRK 6 2619 30 1.9 6.8 64.0 88 E11 ACUG 10-D3 DRK 3 2911 33 1.8 4.8 59.1 88 EAverage 2616 29 1.8 5.4 58.1 9012 Red Kanner LRK 2 2797 28 2.3 1.6 44.3 99 L13 Pink Panther LRK 3 2777 33 2.0 7.8 62.0 85 E14 OAC Lyrik LRK 5 2339 29 1.8 8.2 65.0 80 E15 OAC 07-L1 LRK 1 2939 29 2.0 2.9 58.4 102 L16 ACUG 10-L1 LRK 4 2751 29 2.0 2.1 51.5 96 LAverage 2720 30 2.0 4.5 56.2 9217 Hooter Cran 5 3102 32 1.9 2.6 63.7 98 L18 Etna Cran 6 3057 37 2.1 8.0 59.0 82 E19 Red Rider Cran 3 3236 34 2.0 2.6 57.7 96 L20 HR202-4973 Cran 4 3229 34 2.0 2.3 59.2 96 L21 Crimson Cran 7 2708 32 2.0 4.4 67.0 85 E22 ACUG 10-C1 Cran 2 3301 36 2.0 3.5 65.3 92 M23 ACUG 10-C2 Cran 1 3335 39 1.9 6.0 61.9 86 EAverage 3138 35 2.0 4.2 62.0 9124 Beluga WK 1 2570 26 1.5 2.3 52.1 97 L25 ACUG 10-W1 WK 2 2536 27 1.9 4.2 50.7 96 LAverage 2553 26 1.7 3.2 51.4 97Mean Mean 2778 29 1.9 4.7 58.3 91Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V. 8.1 11.2 19.8 2.7 1.9PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 264 0.3 1.1 1.9 2.1Maturity: 93= L 97check variety 95Trial SummaryDesign: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: 100-0-0 spring applied at corn timeRow Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seedNumber of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 26)Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during thePlot Length: 6m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesHarvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 15Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.17& 2310


10DVCAT Ontario Coloured <strong>Bean</strong> Variety Registration <strong>and</strong> Performance – Major – ThorndaleSeed 100 SeedTreatment Market Treatment Yield Yield Quality Weight Days to MarshNumber Class Name Rank (kg/ha) (1-5) (g) Maturity Spot (%)1 DRK AC Calmont 7 3034 2.0 60.0 95 Check2 DRK Red Hawk 11 2540 2.3 56.9 95 Check3 DRK OAC Redstar 9 2863 2.0 58.8 964 DRK Majesty 2 3410 2.0 75.4 97 Check5 DRK OAC 07-6D1 8 2963 1.9 65.6 946 DRK GTS 104 1 3588 2.4 58.8 977 DRK HR 174-4239 6 3068 2.3 76.9 948 DRK GTS 106 3 3357 2.0 55.5 979 DRK ACUG 10-D1 10 2563 1.8 56.5 9610 DRK ACUG 10-D2 4 3235 2.0 71.9 9411 DRK ACUG 10-D3 5 3180 2.3 58.7 97Average 307312 LRK Red Kanner 2 3657 2.4 54.4 101 Check13 LRK Pink Panther 4 2924 2.0 58.8 91 Check14 LRK OAC Lyrik 5 2338 2.3 61.2 90 Check15 LRK OAC 07-L1 1 3760 1.8 63.1 9816 LRK ACUG 10-L1 3 3191 2.0 52.4 98Average 317417 Cran Hooter 1 3650 1.9 67.0 97 Check18 Cran Etna 5 3290 1.9 64.7 91 Check19 Cran Red Rider 2 3599 1.9 66.5 96 Check20 Cran HR 202-4973 3 3510 1.9 68.8 9921 Cran Crimson 6 3081 2.5 64.2 9322 Cran ACUG 10-C1 4 3438 2.0 75.2 9423 Cran ACUG 10-C2 7 2829 2.1 64.2 92Average 334224 WK Beluga 1 3255 1.5 57.6 98 Check25 WK ACUG 10-W1 2 3120 2.0 56.6 94Average 3188Mean 3178 2.0 62.8 95.4C.V. 8.7 12.1 3.6 1.4PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 325 0.3 2.7 1.7Planting Date: May 27 Fungicide: Headline @ 0.4 L/ha July 13, 26Harvest Dates: August 30 & September 7 Insecticide: Cygon 1.0 L/ha July 13, 26Yields adjusted to 18 % moisture. Insecticide: Matador 50 ml/ha July 13, 26Seeding Rate 17 seeds / mSeed Quality: 1=good 5=poorInsecticide: CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> @ 195 ml/100 kg of seed Design: Nearest NeighbourDynasty 20 g./100 kg of seed Number of Rows Per Plot: 2Fertilizer: N (28%) @ 85 kg actual N / ha May 26 Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2Herbicide: Pursuit 200 ml/ha May 26 Plot Length: 5 metresFrontier 1.25 L/ha May 26 Harvest Length: 4 metresProwl 2.5 L/ha May 2611


10KPYTKCran. Kidney & Misc. PYT - KippenSeed CBB 100Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality 1-10 Seed Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Aug 29 Weight Maturity1 Red Kanner LRK 26 2741 28 2.5 1.2 46.7 98 L2 CORN 18-V96 LRK 16 2964 31 2.2 2.1 46.1 97 L3 Wallace (CORN 773-V98) LRK 28 2727 32 2.9 6.9 43.3 85 M4 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK 19 2925 36 2.3 8.5 61.9 82 E5 ADML945138(ADML945) LRK 20 2861 34 2.5 8.5 56.4 84 M6 OAC 07-L1 LRK 15 2971 30 1.7 2.3 59.3 100 L7 Pink Panther LRK 29 2703 32 2.2 6.8 58.6 84 M8 Majesty DRK 25 2744 30 1.7 5.4 64.0 90 M9 OAC Redstar DRK 30 2504 27 1.5 5.0 55.9 93 L10 ADMD118376(ADMD118) DRK 24 2805 32 1.8 4.5 55.6 89 M11 SEMD1013 DRK 18 2934 34 1.5 5.7 58.9 86 M12 SEMD1030 DRK 21 2848 34 1.6 7.1 55.4 83 E13 Etna CRAN 9 3227 40 2.3 8.9 57.6 80 E14 ADMC213259(ADMC213) CRAN 7 3255 39 2.1 7.5 61.5 84 M15 SEMC0926 CRAN 13 3080 39 2.7 9.0 61.6 79 M16 SEMC0929 CRAN 11 3136 38 2.5 9.1 62.7 83 E17 SEMC1015 CRAN 3 3437 35 2.1 2.4 60.1 99 L18 SEMC1016 CRAN 14 3068 36 2.4 4.6 57.7 86 M19 SEMC1031 CRAN 22 2827 35 2.0 8.7 57.8 81 E20 Red Rider CRAN 5 3366 36 2.9 3.0 57.7 95 L21 HRC187 CRAN 4 3390 39 2.5 6.7 59.2 87 M22 T9905 Navy 2 3606 39 1.5 1.0 23.0 93 L23 Condor Black 17 2957 32 1.8 1.4 20.5 92 L24 Merlot SRM 6 3295 37 1.5 3.7 37.4 90 M25 Sedona Pink 12 3131 36 2.3 5.4 39.0 87 M26 Beluga WK 27 2740 28 2.1 2.3 54.4 97 L27 Erimo Adzuki 31 2312 27 1.6 0.9 13.1 86 M28 Hime Otebo 10 3155 37 1.4 4.4 30.2 85 M29 Fuji Otebo 8 3239 37 1.5 4.1 26.1 86 M30 SEMY0863 Yellow 23 2819 29 1.9 2.2 36.7 97 L31 La Paz Pinto 1 3610 43 1.9 4.9 36.9 84 M32 HDC Exp #1 Mung <strong>Bean</strong> 32 887 10 1.4 3.9 6.6 85 MMean Mean 2946 2.0 4.9 47.6 88Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V. 6.7 10.3 16.6 4.8 1.8White Mold: 1 = good 10 = poor PR > F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 271 0.3 1.1 3.1 2.2Maturity: 91= L#REF!check varietyTrial SummaryDesign: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 26)Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during thePlot Length: 6m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesHarvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 15Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.15 & 2320 seeds / m. (small seeded) Desiccant: None#REF!12


10DVWBKWhite <strong>Bean</strong> Registration <strong>and</strong> Performance - Narrow Row- KippenSeed 100 CBB CBB SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed (1-10) (1-10) Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Aug 29 Sept 6 Harvest Maturity1 OAC Thunder 20 3583 98 39 2.3 21.0 5.3 8.1 3.3 2.5 G 91 M2 Lightning 11 3842 105 44 1.5 21.0 5.8 7.6 2.0 1.4 VG 87 E3 OAC Dublin 6 3958 108 42 1.5 20.0 2.3 5.3 3.3 2.7 G 94 M4 OAC Rex 7 3898 107 42 1.8 20.0 2.0 3.5 2.1 1.8 VG 93 M5 OAC 07-2 16 3739 102 39 3.0 19.8 1.5 3.4 2.1 1.3 VG 96 M6 OAC 07-3 1 4150 114 45 2.5 22.3 3.0 5.6 1.8 1.5 VG 92 M7 OAC 09-3 2 4087 112 44 2.5 20.8 2.5 4.2 2.2 1.1 E 93 M8 OAC 09-4 13 3786 104 41 2.3 21.3 2.3 4.7 2.0 1.0 E 93 M9 ACUG 10-1 23 3495 96 42 2.3 22.2 7.7 5.5 1.0 1.0 E 83 E10 ACUG 10-4 34 3332 91 38 3.3 18.5 6.5 7.3 1.7 1.0 E 87 E11 ACUG 10-6 3 4045 111 45 1.9 21.3 3.0 4.1 2.3 1.1 E 90 M12 AC Compass 21 3560 98 40 2.3 18.2 6.7 8.5 3.0 2.0 VG 89 M13 Nautica 25 3434 94 37 2.0 19.5 3.2 4.1 1.3 1.0 E 92 M14 AC Cruiser 28 3380 93 37 2.3 19.0 4.2 6.9 3.0 2.4 G 92 M15 AC Mast 36 3225 88 35 3.0 20.7 4.5 7.2 3.4 3.1 P 93 M16 HR199-4857 14 3778 103 39 2.8 22.5 2.3 4.6 2.2 1.6 VG 96 M17 HR177-3719 4 4038 111 44 3.3 19.3 4.0 6.0 2.2 1.6 VG 91 M18 HR200-4345 8 3890 107 40 2.8 19.7 1.5 3.2 3.0 2.0 VG 98 L19 HR205-4457 9 3889 107 43 2.3 21.2 6.8 8.3 2.7 2.2 VG 90 M20 HR206-4170 12 3836 105 40 2.0 20.2 3.0 3.9 2.0 1.2 VG 95 M21 ACUG 10-2 18 3664 100 39 2.3 21.3 2.3 5.3 1.6 1.1 E 95 M22 ACUG 10-3 10 3880 106 42 2.5 20.0 1.5 2.3 1.5 1.0 E 93 M23 ACUG 10-5 26 3400 93 39 3.8 20.6 7.7 8.6 2.3 2.1 VG 87 E24 Vista 33 3360 92 36 2.8 19.5 4.5 6.0 3.1 2.1 VG 94 M25 Reliant 29 3376 92 35 3.3 18.3 3.2 5.8 3.1 2.1 VG 96 M26 Viscount 24 3473 95 35 3.3 19.5 3.8 4.1 3.9 2.9 P 101 L27 Gts 544 32 3363 92 35 2.8 20.8 2.7 5.3 4.0 2.9 P 96 M28 Gts 564 35 3311 91 35 2.5 18.0 5.2 5.8 3.0 2.0 VG 94 M29 T9905 15 3743 103 40 2.0 22.2 2.6 3.6 2.5 1.7 VG 93 M30 T9903 30 3372 92 40 1.3 22.3 7.5 8.0 3.1 2.3 G 85 E31 T10303 17 3671 101 39 2.5 20.0 3.8 5.3 2.5 2.0 VG 94 M32 T10704 19 3636 100 38 1.8 20.5 2.1 3.8 1.5 1.0 E 95 M33 T95-051 31 3371 92 37 1.8 18.5 3.0 6.0 2.3 1.1 E 92 M34 T154-051 22 3533 97 35 2.3 18.3 1.0 1.2 3.2 2.4 G 102 L35 Indi 5 3962 109 48 1.8 18.0 5.3 6.5 1.0 1.0 E 83 E36 Lattice Control 27 3381 93 37 1.8 22.0 2.7 6.2 2.6 1.3 VG 91 MSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3651 40 2.4 20.2 3.8 5.4 2.4 1.7 92Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 8.0 39.6 21.9 2.9 28.6 22.1 19.3 22.5 3.5PR > F 0.00 39.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 359 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.6 0.5 4Trial SummaryMaturity: 96= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 2.8= PoorDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 1.6 L/ha & Bonanza 1.6 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 1Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed13


10DVWBBWhite <strong>Bean</strong> Registration <strong>and</strong> Performance - Narrow Row- BlythSeed 100 SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Pick Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (%) Harvest Maturity29 T9905 1 4173 112 42 1.5 24.3 2.7 2.3 2.5 VG 99 M5 OAC 07-2 2 4115 110 42 1.0 22.3 1.8 2.0 1.7 E 98 M31 T10303 3 4083 110 42 1.6 22.5 1.7 2.6 2.0 VG 98 M11 ACUG 10-6 4 3895 104 40 1.6 22.8 2.7 1.4 1.8 E 97 M6 OAC 07-3 5 3890 104 39 1.1 24.8 0.9 0.9 2.5 VG 99 M2 Lightning 6 3886 104 41 1.5 23.3 0.8 1.5 2.1 VG 96 M21 ACUG 10-2 7 3873 104 40 1.5 22.8 2.8 2.0 1.1 E 96 M1 OAC Thunder 8 3850 103 40 1.3 24.3 1.8 2.1 3.0 G 96 M34 T154-051 9 3849 103 38 1.5 19.3 1.9 3.3 3.2 G 102 L33 T95-051 10 3842 103 39 1.7 21.3 1.3 3.0 2.9 G 100 L18 HR200-434 11 3838 103 37 2.0 21.8 4.8 1.7 2.2 VG 104 L17 HR177-371 12 3838 103 40 1.3 22.3 2.8 1.3 2.0 VG 96 M35 Indi 13 3825 103 40 1.4 20.3 2.7 1.2 1.5 E 95 M16 HR199-485 14 3822 103 38 2.1 25.0 3.2 2.2 2.0 VG 101 L22 ACUG 10-3 15 3815 102 40 1.0 22.3 0.5 1.1 2.0 VG 96 M7 OAC 09-3 16 3795 102 39 1.5 22.3 2.6 2.0 2.0 VG 96 M24 Vista 17 3784 101 37 2.0 20.8 5.0 3.7 2.9 VG 101 L25 Reliant 18 3780 101 38 1.9 21.0 1.7 3.9 3.7 G 98 M36 Lattice Control 19 3773 101 39 1.5 24.3 4.7 3.0 2.6 VG 98 M8 OAC 09-4 20 3747 101 39 1.3 23.0 0.4 1.4 1.8 E 95 M32 T10704 21 3745 100 39 1.2 22.0 2.1 1.1 1.2 E 97 M4 OAC Rex 22 3739 100 39 1.5 22.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 VG 97 M13 Nautica 23 3697 99 38 1.7 20.8 3.8 1.4 1.2 E 96 M14 AC Cruiser 24 3695 99 39 1.7 22.0 2.3 3.1 3.0 G 96 M12 AC Compass 25 3652 98 40 1.3 21.0 1.4 3.0 2.5 VG 91 E20 HR206-417 26 3649 98 37 1.1 22.3 1.3 1.3 2.1 VG 97 M3 OAC Dublin 27 3621 97 38 1.2 22.0 1.6 1.5 3.0 G 96 M9 ACUG 10-1 28 3591 96 38 1.3 26.3 2.9 1.2 1.7 E 93 E26 Viscount 29 3558 95 36 1.9 19.5 4.0 4.7 4.7 P 98 M30 T9903 30 3505 94 38 1.1 23.3 1.6 3.3 3.0 G 91 E10 ACUG 10-4 31 3497 94 38 1.5 19.5 3.6 1.9 1.3 E 91 E19 HR205-445 32 3410 91 35 1.7 23.5 3.3 2.5 2.9 G 97 M28 Gts 564 33 3399 91 35 1.6 19.5 2.7 3.4 3.2 G 97 M15 AC Mast 34 3396 91 35 1.9 22.5 2.0 2.9 3.2 G 97 M27 Gts 544 35 3349 90 34 2.0 21.8 5.7 4.2 3.8 G 99 M23 ACUG 10-5 36 3241 87 34 1.9 22.8 6.1 2.2 2.2 VG 97 MSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3728 38 1.5 22.2 2.6 2.3 2.4 97Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 6.5 38.5 30.4 3.3 85.4 18.6 17.4 1.4Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F 0.00 38.47 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) 304 0.6 0.8 n/a 0.5 0.5 2Maturity: 99= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 3.9= PoorTrial SummaryDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 45-100-120 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 1)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Dual .5 L/ha & Rival .7 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Reflex 1 L/ha (July 2)Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 1Harvest Length: 4m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dessication Date: Sept 5Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed Direct Harvest Date: Sept 27&Oct 114


10DVNPYTKNavy Screening & PYT - Narrow Row- KippenSeed 100 CBB SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed (1-10) Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Sept 6 Harvest Maturity2 OAC Thunder 1 4198 112 45 2.0 21.6 7.9 2.8 2.5 G 92 M1 T9905 2 4072 108 43 2.3 22.7 3.8 2.8 2.0 VG 95 M6 HRN 5143 3 3999 106 40 1.4 19.4 8.3 2.0 1.4 VG 100 M20 MSUN09056 4 3999 106 42 1.8 21.8 5.3 2.5 1.5 VG 94 M4 HRN 5008 5 3986 106 40 1.8 20.2 2.4 2.0 1.0 E 99 M3 AC Compass 6 3960 105 46 1.9 20.2 7.6 2.5 2.0 VG 86 E5 HRN 4958 7 3932 104 42 0.7 19.9 5.8 2.3 1.4 VG 94 M12 HMS Medalist 8 3925 104 43 1.6 19.9 6.2 1.8 1.0 E 92 M10 T10704 9 3838 102 39 1.6 20.5 4.7 1.5 1.0 E 97 M8 HRN 4170 10 3831 102 41 1.6 18.9 5.8 2.3 1.4 VG 92 M17 ADMN5039540 (ADMN 503) 11 3810 101 43 1.9 17.2 7.4 2.0 1.0 E 88 E14 COOPN02084 12 3710 99 41 1.7 19.4 7.6 2.0 1.0 E 90 M19 MSUN08007 13 3695 98 39 1.8 19.3 5.1 1.0 1.1 E 95 M13 COOPN03019 14 3596 96 37 2.1 20.1 5.6 1.5 1.3 E 97 M9 T95-051 15 3518 93 36 1.8 18.1 6.6 2.0 2.0 VG 97 M15 SEMN1008 16 3515 93 35 2.0 18.1 1.9 4.0 3.6 P 100 M7 HRN 4871 17 3489 93 33 1.9 19.1 2.9 2.8 2.0 VG 105 L16 SEMN 1009 18 3458 92 35 1.9 20.8 4.0 2.8 1.5 VG 100 M11 T154-051 19 3431 91 33 2.2 18.3 1.8 3.3 2.4 G 104 L18 AMDN5058576 (ADMN 505) 20 3329 88 34 2.1 20.5 4.4 3.3 2.8 P 98 MSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3765 39 1.8 19.8 5.3 2.3 1.7 96Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 7.5 39.4 22.5 2.1 22.8 17.5 13.6 3.1PR > F 0.00 39.44 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 333 n/a 0.5 1.4 0.5 0.3 4Trial SummaryMaturity: 100= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 2.7= PoorDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 15Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed15


10DVBPYKBlack & Misc. PYT- Narrow Row- KippenSeed 100 CBB SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed (1-10) Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Aug 29 Harvest Maturity28 S10B7 IP Soy 1 4751 130 46 1.8 19.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 E 104 L21 MSUB09197 Black 2 4278 117 45 1.6 21.4 3.8 2.0 1.4 E 95 M22 MSUB09204 Black 3 4213 115 45 1.8 22.7 4.5 1.5 1.4 E 94 M16 Eclipse Black 4 4206 115 50 1.3 20.4 5.3 1.8 1.1 E 84 E24 Jaguar Black 5 4066 111 44 1.5 19.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 E 93 E5 Zorro Black 6 4037 110 43 1.6 21.3 3.5 2.5 1.4 E 94 M9 ACUG 10-B2 Black 7 4008 109 43 1.5 20.2 6.8 2.0 1.1 E 93 E10 ACUG 10-B3 Black 8 3986 109 38 1.5 21.2 4.5 2.0 1.1 E 105 L25 ADMB6020035 (ADMB602) Black 9 3962 108 42 1.3 21.6 6.5 2.8 2.0 VG 95 M8 ACUG 10-B1 Black 10 3944 108 41 1.4 24.1 6.0 2.3 1.8 VG 96 M26 ADMB6017225 (ADMB601) Black 11 3914 107 41 1.5 21.5 7.8 2.5 1.9 VG 96 M27 T9905 Navy 12 3868 105 39 1.8 22.1 3.8 3.0 2.1 VG 100 M23 Domino Black 13 3847 105 40 1.3 21.1 4.0 3.8 3.5 P 96 M6 GTS 1103 Black 14 3846 105 39 1.5 22.1 3.8 3.0 1.6 E 99 M19 SEM0963 Black 15 3769 103 38 1.4 22.9 5.0 1.8 1.5 E 99 M15 CORN96-148 Black 16 3684 100 36 1.6 22.5 3.5 3.3 1.5 E 103 L20 COOP06252 Black 17 3668 100 36 1.6 20.8 6.5 3.0 2.3 VG 103 L17 Condor Black 18 3628 99 37 1.5 21.1 3.3 3.5 2.3 VG 99 M1 AC Harblack Black 19 3623 99 40 1.6 19.2 6.8 3.3 3.0 G 90 E2 Blackjack Black 20 3589 98 37 1.3 22.5 4.5 4.3 3.9 P 98 M31 Hime Otebo 21 3575 97 39 1.6 29.1 6.5 3.5 3.4 P 92 E29 Merlot SRM 22 3548 97 38 2.3 39.4 8.0 4.0 3.6 P 94 M18 Jet Black Black 23 3521 96 34 1.6 20.4 6.0 3.5 2.1 VG 103 L4 Black Velvet Black 24 3492 95 34 1.3 23.3 3.5 2.5 1.9 VG 103 L33 COOPG05106 GN 25 3480 95 39 1.5 34.1 8.8 4.5 3.6 P 90 E3 Shania Black 26 3436 94 34 1.3 20.4 4.3 2.0 1.3 E 101 L11 ACUG 10-B4 Black 27 3420 93 33 1.6 23.2 7.3 3.8 2.5 VG 104 L12 ACUG 10-B5 Black 28 3356 92 33 1.4 22.6 4.0 2.3 1.4 E 103 L13 Loreto Black 29 3352 91 32 1.8 21.8 3.0 3.8 2.1 VG 103 L32 La Paz Pinto 30 3324 91 36 1.4 34.7 8.0 3.8 3.1 G 91 E14 COOP05222 Black 31 3238 88 34 1.3 21.9 8.5 3.8 3.1 G 96 M30 Erimo Adzuki 32 3135 86 34 2.0 12.4 1.0 2.3 1.8 VG 93 E7 COB 2159-00 Black 33 2933 80 29 2.0 25.4 3.0 4.0 3.6 P 102 L34 HDC Exp#1 Mung <strong>Bean</strong> 34 984 27 11 1.6 6.5 6.3 5.0 4.5 P 89 ESeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3638 18 1.6 22.5 5.0 2.9 2.2 97mean +/- 50% LSD C.V. 6.9 37.0 22.4 3.2 24.0 18.0 21.1 2.5PR > F 0.00 37.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 296 0.4 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.5 3Trial SummaryMaturity: 100= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 3.2= PoorDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 15Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed16


10BPYTBBlack,Navy <strong>and</strong> Misc. PYT - Narrow Row- BlythSeed 100 SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Harvest Maturity22 Jet Black Black 1 4575 119 43 1.4 24.8 2.0 1.6 VG 107 L23 GTS 1103(COB 214-99) Black 2 4366 113 45 1.6 23.4 2.8 2.0 VG 97 M25 MSUB09197 Black 3 4358 113 45 1.3 24.2 1.2 1.1 E 97 M9 COOPN02084 White 4 4151 108 43 1.3 21.9 1.5 1.1 E 96 M20 Black Velvet Black 5 4145 107 39 1.5 27.2 2.1 1.3 E 107 L8 COOPN03019 White 6 4065 105 42 1.3 21.5 1.5 1.4 E 97 M24 COB 2159-00 Black 7 4061 105 39 2.0 28.7 4.3 4.5 P 103 L27 La Paz Pinto 8 4032 105 43 1.5 39.6 3.3 2.9 VG 94 E17 Zorro Black 9 3977 103 41 1.2 23.9 1.4 1.3 E 96 M3 HRN 4958 White 10 3966 103 39 1.1 21.1 2.1 1.3 E 101 L21 Shania Black 11 3960 103 38 1.4 23.4 2.0 1.1 E 104 L12 ADMN5039540 (ADMN 503) White 12 3958 103 41 1.1 20.9 1.1 1.4 E 97 M7 HMS Medalist White 13 3955 103 41 1.1 19.2 2.3 1.8 VG 96 M26 MSUB09204 Black 14 3948 102 41 1.4 23.8 1.2 1.2 E 97 M16 Eclipse Black 15 3944 102 42 1.3 21.2 1.3 1.4 E 93 E4 HRN 5143 White 16 3903 101 39 1.2 21.1 1.6 1.2 E 99 M18 Loreto Black 17 3849 100 37 1.4 22.4 3.0 1.8 VG 103 L19 Condor Black 18 3848 100 40 1.4 22.9 2.8 2.4 VG 97 M14 MSUN08007 White 19 3796 98 38 1.1 22.1 1.4 1.8 VG 99 M1 AC Compass White 20 3715 96 40 1.4 20.8 2.4 1.8 VG 92 E2 HRN 5008 White 21 3658 95 37 1.0 21.0 1.3 1.5 VG 99 M30 COOPG05106 GN 22 3650 95 39 2.3 40.1 4.1 3.7 P 95 E15 MSUN09056 White 23 3647 95 38 1.3 23.5 1.6 1.1 E 96 M10 SEMN1008 White 24 3587 93 37 2.0 19.0 4.8 4.7 P 96 M6 HRN 4170 White 25 3567 92 37 1.0 20.6 1.5 1.5 VG 97 M11 SEMN 1009 White 26 3501 91 36 1.1 21.8 3.0 1.7 VG 98 M13 AMDN5058576 (ADMN 505) White 27 3465 90 36 1.3 22.7 2.6 1.9 VG 96 M29 Etna Cran 28 3425 89 37 2.1 71.0 1.1 2.9 VG 93 E28 Hime Otebo 29 3407 88 36 1.9 34.6 4.8 4.6 P 94 E5 HRN 4871 White 30 3270 85 32 1.4 19.4 2.1 1.1 E 101 LSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3858 39 1.4 25.6 2.3 2.0 98Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 6.0 39.4 24.6 3.2 17.9 20.0 1.7Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F 0.00 39.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) 273 0.4 1.0 0.5 0.5 2Maturity: 100= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 3.5= PoorTrial SummaryDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 45-100-120 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 1)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Dual .5 L/ha & Rival .7 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Reflex 1 L/ha (July 2)Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 1Harvest Length: 4m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dessication Date: Sept 5Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed Direct Harvest Date: Sept 27&Oct 117


10DVPPYTKPinto - Narrow Row - HRSSeed 100 SuitabilityTreatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For DirectNumber Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average (1-5) Weight Harvest1 Pecos 5 3842 100 2.0 34.8 1.3 1.9 VG2 Medicine Hat 8 3434 89 2.5 38.5 3.3 2.8 VG3 La Paz 3 4047 105 2.0 34.6 3.8 1.9 VG4 Lariat 2 4084 106 2.3 39.8 4.0 2.6 VG5 HRP 214 7 3463 90 2.3 41.3 2.8 2.0 VG6 HRP 215 6 3618 94 2.0 42.0 2.0 1.5 E7 SEMP 1012 4 4036 105 2.3 33.7 3.8 2.6 VG8 Sante Fe 1 4191 109 2.3 41.6 4.8 3.8 PSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3839 2.2 38.3 3.2 2.4Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 7.1 18.3 3.0 15.9 21.2PR > F 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 331 n/a 1.4 0.6 0.6Maturity: 100= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 3.7= PoorTrial SummaryDesign: NNFertilizer: 60-20-20 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 18)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 18Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 8Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Note: A filler was planted of S10B7 (IP soybean). The replicated (4X)Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed average yield was 4727 kg/ha for the trial.18


10DVMPYTK Black Variety Mixture Trial, Kippen <strong>2010</strong>Seed 100 CBB SuitabilityTreatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed (1-10) Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to MaturityTrt Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Sept 6 Harvest Maturity1 T-39 4 3518 96 36 1.1 21.6 8.0 4.8 4.7 P 97 E2 Zorro 3 3786 104 39 2.1 20.8 4.0 2.3 1.3 E 97 E3 Black Velvet 1 3909 107 38 1.7 24.1 3.5 2.3 1.6 E 102 L4 T-39+Zorro 2 3895 107 40 1.7 21.5 5.3 3.3 2.4 VG 97 E5 T-39+Black Velvet 6 3306 91 33 1.9 23.2 3.8 3.0 2.3 VG 102 L6 Blackjack+Black Velvet 5 3480 95 34 2.0 24.8 3.0 3.0 2.2 VG 101 LSeed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean 3649 1.8 22.7 4.6 3.1 2.4 99Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V. 4.7 22.0 3.5 24.8 12.3 14.2 0.7PR > F 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00LSD(0.05) 213 n/a 1.0 1.4 0.5 0.4 1Trial SummaryMaturity: 100= LSuitability for Direct Harvest 3.3= PoorDesign: LatticeFertilizer: 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiRow Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Number of Rows Per Plot: 6Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 15Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed19


Desiccation in Cranberry Dry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Thunder) with Desiccant <strong>and</strong> / or Glyphosate TankmixesPlant Response to Desiccant Yield <strong>and</strong> Quality Analysis Seed Colour Analysis (h)Yield Adjusted Pick % (f) Seed Quality (d) Value (g)Colorimeter ReadingsLbs/ac. 100 seed wt.$ /ac.4 DAA © Days After Application 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAATrt Treatment Rate Rate L a b Whiteness YellownessNo. Name Unit1 Untreated check 44 f 55 c 69 c 75 b 83 e 94 b 98 b 100 a 16 f 20 h 30 i 49 f 2156 25.5 4.3 1.6 594 76.00 h 2.26 a 11.48 a 7.95 f 21.61 a2 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 59 e 74 b 85 b 83 b 83 e 95 b 100 a 100 a 20 f 23 h 48 h 74 e 1809 24.7 2.1 2.4 519 82.39 def 2.01 b 10.45 c-f 18.78 ab 18.14 f-i3 diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA 87 bcd 94 a 98 a 100 a 95 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 43 de 49 g 59 fgh 81 b-e 2064 24.1 5.3 2.6 562 70.47 ij 1.60 h-l 9.86 e-h 9.98 ef 19.99 bcAgSurf 0.1 % V/V4 diquat (Reglone) 400 G A/HA 90 a-d 97 a 99 a 100 a 97 abc 100 a 100 a 100 a 45 cde 58 d-g 58 gh 81 b-e 2050 24.4 5.2 2.4 555 71.51 i 1.59 i-l 9.93 d-h 10.63 def 19.88 bcdAgSurf 0.1 % V/V5 diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA 89 a-d 97 a 99 a 100 a 95 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 45 cde 63 b-f 74 c-g 85 a-e 2362 26.1 4.8 2.5 645 71.12 ij 1.62 g-l 9.73 fgh 11.03 def 19.53 b-fAgSurf 0.1 % V/V6 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 90 a-d 96 a 100 a 100 a 94 bcd 100 a 100 a 100 a 43 de 51 fg 63 e-h 81 b-e 2265 27.0 3.8 2.3 627 69.99 j 1.77 c-h 9.61 gh 10.55 def 19.64 b-e7 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 87 bcd 97 a 99 a 100 a 93 cd 100 a 100 a 100 a 41 e 55 efg 66 efg 79 de 2237 23.7 4.8 2.4 607 81.47 f 1.84 b-f 10.52 c-f 17.49 bc 18.47 d-i8 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA 83 d 93 a 97 a 99 a 94 bcd 100 a 100 a 100 a 39 e 59 c-g 61 e-h 76 e 2348 25.5 3.2 2.0 661 70.93 ij 1.67 f-k 9.40 h 12.22 de 18.94 c-hAgSurf 0.25 % V/V9 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA 90 a-d 96 a 98 a 100 a 96 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 38 e 53 fg 65 efg 79 de 2333 25.2 1.2 1.8 684 83.22 b-e 1.78 c-g 10.17 d-h 20.92 ab 17.47 hiAgSurf 0.25 % V/V10 flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA 97 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 63 ab 70 a-d 86 abc 93 abc 2227 25.3 2.7 2.0 633 84.15 ab 1.91 bcd 10.50 c-f 20.34 ab 17.83 ghiMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA11 flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA 92 a-d 99 a 100 a 100 a 97 abc 100 a 100 a 100 a 55 abc 73 ab 86 abc 93 abc 1867 23.2 3.4 3.0 525 83.43 a-d 1.60 h-l 10.06 d-h 21.66 a 17.22 iMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA12 saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA 91 a-d 98 a 100 a 100 a 97 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 53 bcd 66 a-e 75 b-f 85 a-e 2058 25.1 2.8 2.6 587 82.39 def 1.56 jkl 10.38 c-g 19.00 ab 18.00 ghiMerge 0.5 % V/V13 saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA 95 abc 99 a 100 a 100 a 97 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 61 ab 68 a-e 76 b-e 90 a-d 1944 23.5 3.8 2.5 540 83.91 abc 1.75 d-i 10.50 c-f 20.06 ab 17.89 ghiMerge 0.5 % V/V14 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 92 a-d 94 a 99 a 100 a 96 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 41 e 51 fg 73 c-g 86 a-e 2324 24.2 2.8 2.5 658 81.85 ef 1.58 i-l 10.44 c-f 18.16 abc 18.23 e-idiquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V15 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 91 a-d 96 a 98 a 100 a 95 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 41 e 50 fg 70 c-g 85 a-e 2073 22.7 6.0 3.1 552 81.76 f 1.54 kl 10.51 c-f 17.75 abc 18.37 e-idiquat (Reglone) 400 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V16 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 90 a-d 96 a 100 a 100 a 95 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 43 de 55 efg 70 c-g 80 cde 2262 24.2 2.5 2.3 646 84.83 a 1.70 f-k 10.39 c-g 21.64 a 17.51 hidiquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V17 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 89 a-d 96 a 99 a 100 a 94 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 41 e 51 fg 70 c-g 81 b-e 2189 23.7 4.5 2.5 600 78.55 g 1.88 b-e 11.34 ab 10.82 def 20.63 abglufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA18 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 85 cd 94 a 98 a 100 a 93 d 100 a 100 a 100 a 40 e 56 efg 69 d-g 81 b-e 2105 23.5 3.2 2.4 592 83.47 a-d 1.61 g-l 10.36 c-g 20.28 ab 17.74 ghiglufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA19 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 92 a-d 98 a 100 a 100 a 96 a-d 99 a 100 a 100 a 45 cde 56 efg 73 c-g 81 b-e 2142 24.8 2.3 2.1 614 82.62 c-f 1.61 g-l 10.32 c-g 19.54 ab 17.84 ghicarfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HAAgSurf 0.25 % V/V20 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 96 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 97 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 36 e 63 b-f 73 c-g 84 a-e 2277 25.2 2.2 1.8 654 78.67 g 1.73 e-j 10.56 b-e 14.46 cd 19.18 b-gcarfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HAAgSurf 0.25 % V/V21 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 95 abc 100 a 100 a 100 a 97 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 54 bc 66 a-e 94 a 96 a 2167 24.8 4.3 2.0 592 78.30 g 1.94 bc 10.73 a-d 13.32 de 19.58 b-fflumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HAMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA22 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 96 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 97 ab 100 a 100 a 100 a 61 ab 75 ab 85 a-d 94 ab 2036 24.1 2.5 2.3 581 77.92 g 1.88 b-e 11.02 abc 11.68 def 20.23 abcflumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HAMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA23 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 97 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 96 a-d 100 a 100 a 100 a 58 ab 78 a 91 ab 93 abc 1996 24.0 3.6 2.6 555 83.58 a-d 1.48 l 10.15 d-h 21.40 ab 17.35 isaflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HAMerge 0.5 % V/V24 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 97 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 65 a 71 abc 84 a-d 90 a-d 1727 23.3 4.3 2.6 478 82.66 c-f 1.66 g-k 10.54 b-e 18.54 ab 18.22 e-isaflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HAMerge 0.5 % V/Vn/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.45 0.18 0.80 3.951.48Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is sig. at mean comparison OSL.Trial SummaryP(Bartlett's X2) value with an * beside it indicates a transformation needed Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 100,000 seeds / acre Seed Colour Analysis (h)Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: May 29 L (lightness) : 0 = black, 100 = whiteFootnotes Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actual a (red-green) : + = red , - = green(c)(d)(f)(g)Part Rated LeafLSD (P=.05)CVGr<strong>and</strong> MeanP(Bartlett's X2)Treatment Prob(F)Pods Stems15.2 6.6 66.9 31.0 16.8 1.3 7.2 5.4 17.35.62126 24.5 3.6 2.3 594 79.38 1.73 10.37 16.18 18.731.00 0.42 0.008* 0.90 0.99 0.14 0.85 0.99 0.960.990.33 0.07 0.46 0.44 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00DAA = Days after Application No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual b (yellow-blue) : + = yellow, - = blueSeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Plot Length: 6m. liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (May 29) Whiteness Index : (L/100) * (L - 5.715 (b)) > whiteness closer to 0Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The Harvest Length: 5.0 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha Yellowness Index E-313 : (142.9* [b]) / L > yellowness futher from 0discolouration determination was modeled on industry norms. Desiccation Application Date*: August 26Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot:Harvest Date: Oct.13[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Application occurred at the 80% timing stage for the selected plants. The majority of the plants were beyond this stage.This stage is when 80 % of the pods on a plant are yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if a minimum of 95% of the pods are yellow)20


Desiccation in Cranberry Dry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Hooter)with Desiccant <strong>and</strong> / or Glyphosate TankmixesPlant Response to Desiccant Yield <strong>and</strong> Quality Analysis Seed Colour Analysis (h)Yield Adjusted Pick % (f) Seed Quality (d) Value (g)Colorimeter ReadingsLbs/ac. 100 seed wt.$ /ac.4 DAA © Days After Application 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAATrt Treatment Rate Rate L a b Whiteness YellownessNo. Name Unit1 Untreated check 0 k 13 f 40 e 80 b 0 e 8 i 41 c 86 d 0 j 6 l 19 j 38 h 2665 a 67.1 a 16.0 1.4 gh 539 60.51 ef 8.79 abc 12.48 fgh -6.47 a-e 29.51 c-h2 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 0 k 44 e 84 bc 97 a 0 e 39 h 83 b 98 ab 0 j 11 kl 30 ij 71 efg 2396 ab 62.0 b-e 20.9 1.3 h 422 63.13 abc 8.58 a-f 12.78 e-h -6.21 a-d 28.96 e-h3 diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA 59 def 85 bc 97 a 100 a 2 cde 81 cde 97 a 100 a 10 cde 30 e-j 61 b-e 79 b-g 2289 a-d 59.5 cde 25.4 2.3 c-f 332 62.40 a-e 8.33 c-f 12.95 c-g -7.17 b-g 29.73 c-hAgSurf 0.1 % V/V4 diquat (Reglone) 400 G A/HA 83 ab 88 ab 96 ab 100 a 5 ab 90 a-d 99 a 100 a 14 abc 41 a-d 68 ab 76 d-g 2352 abc 60.8 cde 26.8 2.6 bcd 322 62.81 a-d 8.67 a-d 13.16 a-e -7.72 c-h 30.00 b-gAgSurf 0.1 % V/V5 diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA 91 a 95 ab 100 a 100 a 5 a 91 abc 100 a 100 a 16 a 50 a 75 a 94 ab 2128 bcd 61.7 b-e 22.6 2.4 cde 351 62.70 a-d 8.67 a-d 13.48 abc -8.92 e-i 30.76 a-dAgSurf 0.1 % V/V6 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 61 c-f 94 ab 100 a 100 a 4 abc 90 a-d 100 a 100 a 13 abc 45 abc 75 a 95 a 2438 ab 62.5 bcd 23.1 1.5 fgh 392 62.80 a-d 8.28 c-f 12.25 h -4.31 a 28.00 h7 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 68 bcd 95 ab 99 a 100 a 2 cde 90 a-d 100 a 100 a 10 cde 46 abc 66 abc 89 a-d 2394 ab 62.9 bc 27.2 1.5 fgh 327 61.68 b-e 8.68 a-d 12.31 h -5.30 abc 28.55 gh8 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA 26 ij 60 d 80 c 95 a 1 de 61 g 83 b 96 b 3 g-j 20 jk 35 hi 69 fg 1883 d 61.2 cde 16.7 1.5 fgh 368 62.86 a-d 8.49 b-f 12.53 fgh -5.45 a-d 28.51 ghAgSurf 0.25 % V/V9 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA 15 jk 24 f 60 d 81 b 1 de 34 h 78 b 93 c 1 ij 13 kl 30 ij 46 h 2684 a 65.3 ab 22.1 1.8 e-h 447 62.97 abc 8.32 c-f 12.66 e-h -5.83 a-d 28.79 fghAgSurf 0.25 % V/V10 flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA 45 fgh 84 bc 98 a 100 a 2 cde 80 de 97 a 100 a 10 cde 31 d-i 45 gh 69 fg 2324 abc 60.7 cde 25.0 1.6 e-h 354 62.24 a-e 8.33 c-f 12.81 d-h -6.74 a-f 29.50 c-hMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA11 flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA 56 d-g 90 ab 99 a 100 a 3 bcd 89 a-d 97 a 100 a 8 def 26 g-j 48 fgh 76 d-g 2218 bcd 60.8 cde 20.4 1.9 d-h 406 61.74 b-e 8.36 c-f 12.62 e-h -6.37 a-d 29.26 d-hMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA12 saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA 39 ghi 93 ab 99 a 100 a 3 cd 90 a-d 99 a 100 a 6 efg 29 f-j 49 efg 68 fg 2067 bcd 61.3 b-e 22.9 1.9 d-h 338 63.12 abc 8.28 c-f 12.98 b-g -6.95 b-g 29.39 c-hMerge 0.5 % V/V13 saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA 39 ghi 95 ab 99 a 100 a 2 cde 94 ab 99 a 100 a 6 efg 34 d-h 60 b-f 66 fg 2231 bcd 59.3 cde 28.0 3.9 a 292 61.80 b-e 8.60 a-e 13.42 a-d -9.10 f-i 31.09 abcMerge 0.5 % V/V14 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 59 def 90 ab 97 a 100 a 4 abc 86 a-e 97 a 100 a 11 bcd 29 f-j 63 a-d 76 d-g 2405 ab 59.6 cde 27.2 2.4 cde 314 63.35 ab 8.39 c-f 13.57 ab -8.92 e-i 30.66 a-ediquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V15 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 78 abc 85 bc 100 a 100 a 2 cde 85 b-e 98 a 100 a 13 abc 39 b-f 54 c-g 78 c-g 2036 bcd 58.1 e 20.3 2.3 c-f 353 64.18 a 8.08 ef 12.64 e-h -5.15 ab 28.15 hdiquat (Reglone) 400 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V16 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 81 ab 95 ab 99 a 100 a 6 a 90 a-d 99 a 100 a 15 ab 41 a-d 71 ab 93 abc 2063 bcd 59.6 cde 18.4 1.5 fgh 383 63.30 ab 8.60 a-f 12.80 e-h -6.15 a-d 28.94 e-hdiquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HAAgSurf 0.1 % V/V17 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 70 bcd 99 a 100 a 100 a 2 cde 96 a 100 a 100 a 10 cde 48 ab 70 ab 88 a-d 2407 ab 60.0 cde 16.0 1.6 e-h 491 62.32 a-e 8.05 f 12.50 fgh -5.63 a-d 28.68 fghglufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA18 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 63 c-f 95 ab 100 a 100 a 2 cde 93 ab 99 a 100 a 10 cde 40 a-e 73 ab 96 a 2403 ab 59.9 cde 16.8 2.0 d-h 475 62.73 a-d 8.23 def 12.40 gh -5.04 ab 28.29 ghglufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA19 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 24 ij 73 cd 98 a 100 a 1 de 68 fg 95 a 100 a 1 hij 25 hij 49 efg 81 a-f 2430 ab 63.0 abc 21.5 1.9 d-h 423 61.54 b-e 8.45 c-f 13.04 a-f -7.91 d-i 30.35 a-fcarfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HAAgSurf 0.25 % V/V20 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 23 ij 84 bc 98 a 100 a 2 cde 76 ef 97 a 100 a 3 g-j 21 ijk 44 gh 65 g 2187 bcd 61.5 b-e 22.4 2.1 d-g 364 61.13 c-f 8.62 a-e 12.94 c-g -7.77 d-h 30.31 a-fcarfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HAAgSurf 0.25 % V/V21 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 49 e-h 90 ab 98 a 99 a 3 cd 85 b-e 96 a 100 a 8 def 21 ijk 45 gh 79 b-g 2327 abc 60.8 cde 18.4 2.3 c-f 433 62.69 a-d 8.54 b-f 13.15 a-e -7.77 d-h 30.02 b-gflumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HAMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA22 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 66 b-e 95 ab 100 a 100 a 3 bcd 94 ab 99 a 100 a 11 bcd 26 g-j 53 d-g 81 a-f 2213 bcd 60.8 cde 21.6 1.8 e-h 379 59.07 f 9.13 a 13.08 a-f -9.21 ghi 31.68 abflumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HAMSO Concentrate (UAP) 2.5 L/HA23 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 34 hi 95 ab 100 a 100 a 2 cde 94 ab 100 a 100 a 4 f-i 31 d-i 60 b-f 85 a-e 2402 ab 62.5 bcd 26.1 3.3 ab 347 60.88 def 8.78 abc 13.62 a -10.25 i 32.04 asaflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HAMerge 0.5 % V/V24 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 45 fgh 100 a 100 a 100 a 4 abc 95 ab 100 a 100 a 5 fgh 36 c-g 64 a-d 90 a-d 1952 cd 58.6 de 28.1 3.0 bc 262 61.35 b-e 9.01 ab 13.64 a -10.16 hi 31.80 asaflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HAMerge 0.5 % V/V426 4.2 n/a 0.8 n/a 2.07 0.55 0.61 2.461.75Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is sig. at mean comparison OSL.Trial SummaryP(Bartlett's X2) value with an * beside it indicates a transformation needed Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 73,000 seeds / acre Seed Colour Analysis (h)Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: May 29 L (lightness) : 0 = black, 100 = whiteFootnotes Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actual a (red-green) : + = red , - = green(c)(d)(f)(g)Part Rated LeafLSD (P=.05)CVGr<strong>and</strong> MeanP(Bartlett's X2)Treatment Prob(F)Pods StemsDAA = Days after Application No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual b (yellow-blue) : + = yellow, - = blueSeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Plot Length: 6m. liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (May 29) Whiteness Index : (L/100) * (L - 5.715 (b)) > whiteness closer to 0Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The Harvest Length: 5.0 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha Yellowness Index E-313 : (142.9* [b]) / L > yellowness futher from 0discolouration determination was modeled on industry norms. Desiccation Application Date*: August 26Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Harvest Date: Sept 25[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Application occurred at the 80% timing stage. This stage is when 80 % of the podson a plant are yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if a minimum of 95% of the pods are yellow)13.2 4.8 31.4 27.5 26.8 2.4 4.6 3.4 0.04.22287 61.2 22.3 2.1 380 62.22 8.51 12.91 -7.10 29.710.29 0.45 0.86 0.26 0.99 0.50 0.71 0.95 0.980.990.04 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.0021


Desiccation in White Dry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Thunder)with Glyphosate Tankmixes at Different TimingYield <strong>and</strong> Quality AnalysisSeed Colour AnalysisPart Rated LeafPods StemsYield Adjusted Pick % (f) Seed Quality (d) Value (g)Colorimeter Readings (h)Days After Application 4 DAA © 8 DAA 12 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA Lbs/ac. 100 seed wt.$ /ac.Trt Treatment L a b Whiteness YellownessNo. Name1 Untreated check 2299 a 26.6 a 2.6 def 1.4 gh 655 a 74.14 i 2.59 a 12.28 a 2.96 h 23.68 a2 glyphosate (Weathermax)[0%] 1 b 21 b 64 b 0 a 15 b 65 b 0 a 5 c 13 b 1937 bcd 24.8 b-e 4.6 cde 2.6 cde 527 b-e 76.37 gh 2.27 cde 11.24 bcd 9.28 d-g 21.05 bcd7 saflufenacil (Eragon][0%] 39 a 89 a 95 a 0 a 53 a 98 a 0 a 23 b 35 a 1724 de 23.6 ef 4.6 cde 3.0 a-d 468 def 80.05 a 2.40 bc 11.19 bcd 12.91 bc 19.98 deMerge12 glyphosate (Weathermax)[0%] 43 a 91 a 98 a 0 a 70 a 98 a 0 a 30 a 43 a 1554 e 23.1 f 10.4 a 3.6 ab 374 f 77.67 d-g 2.11 efg 11.79 ab 8.02 fg 21.70 bsaflufenacil (Eragon][0%]Merge3 glyphosate (Weathermax)[25%] 0 b 53 b 91 a 0 c 70 c 97 a 0 b 8 a 43 a 2073 a-d 23.8 def 4.9 cd 3.3 abc 564 a-d 78.03 c-f 2.24 c-f 11.25 bcd 10.70 c-f 20.61 b-e8 saflufenacil (Eragon][25%] 18 a 95 a 96 a 8 b 85 b 100 a 7 a 20 a 43 a 2108 abc 24.8 b-e 5.9 bc 3.1 abc 556 a-d 79.40 ab 1.98 g 11.03 cd 12.99 bc 19.86 defMerge13 glyphosate (Weathermax)[25%] 19 a 99 a 99 a 11 a 95 a 100 a 5 a 30 a 50 a 1724 de 24.0 c-f 9.1 ab 3.8 a 435 ef 79.36 ab 1.97 g 11.10 cd 12.64 bc 19.99 cdesaflufenacil (Eragon][25%]Merge4 glyphosate (Weathermax)[50%] 0 b 28 b 90 a 0 b 50 b 96 b 0 b 6 b 34 b 2015 a-d 24.5 b-e 1.8 def 2.5 cde 582 a-d 77.41 efg 2.09 fg 10.84 de 12.01 cd 20.04 cde9 saflufenacil (Eragon][50%] 15 a 93 a 98 a 7 a 91 a 99 a 7 a 44 a 50 a 2044 a-d 24.9 b-e 2.6 def 2.1 efg 582 a-d 78.94 a-d 2.28 b-e 10.84 de 13.44 bc 19.62 ef14 glyphosate (Weathermax)[50%] 11 a 100 a 100 a 5 a 93 a 100 a 5 a 38 a 60 a 1800 cde 24.6 b-e 4.5 cde 2.3 def 492 cde 78.32 b-e 1.99 g 10.70 def 13.45 bc 19.52 efsaflufenacil (Eragon][50%]Merge5 glyphosate (Weathermax)[75%] 9 b 59 b 74 b 63 b 85 a 100 a 3 b 19 b 40 a 2234 ab 25.1 bcd 2.1 def 1.3 h 637 ab 76.00 h 2.31 bcd 11.58 bc 7.52 g 21.78 b10 saflufenacil (Eragon][75%] 63 a 96 a 99 a 76 a 99 a 100 a 13 a 43 a 58 a 2098 abc 24.9 b-e 4.0 c-f 2.9 b-e 583 abc 75.77 h 2.37 bc 11.24 bcd 8.76 efg 21.21 bcMerge15 glyphosate (Weathermax)[75%] 49 a 97 a 100 a 70 ab 100 a 100 a 10 a 45 a 63 a 2082 a-d 24.9 b-e 3.0 c-f 2.3 def 589 abc 77.67 d-g 2.16 def 11.19 bcd 10.68 c-f 20.59 b-esaflufenacil (Eragon][75%]Merge6 glyphosate (Weathermax)[100%] 48 b 74 b 80 b 78 b 97 b 99 a 6 b 20 b 43 b 2110 abc 25.2 bc 0.8 f 1.4 gh 622 ab 79.11 abc 2.39 bc 10.12 f 16.84 a 18.30 g11 saflufenacil (Eragon][100%] 93 a 98 a 99 a 95 a 100 a 100 a 34 a 48 a 63 a 1960 a-d 25.4 ab 2.1 def 1.6 fgh 568 a-d 78.92 a-d 2.43 ab 10.32 ef 15.75 ab 18.69 fgMerge16 glyphosate (Weathermax)[100%] 95 a 100 a 100 a 98 a 100 a 100 a 35 a 48 a 64 a 2079 a-d 24.6 b-e 1.6 ef 1.3 h 604 abc 76.98 fgh 2.08 fg 10.82 de 11.72 cde 20.11 cdesaflufenacil (Eragon][100%]MergeLSD (P=.05) 360 1.3 3.2 0.8 115 1.32 0.16 0.61 3.131.22CV12.7 3.7 55.0 22.4 14.5 1.2 5.2 3.8 19.54.2Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean1990 24.7 4.02.4 552 77.76 2.23 11.10 11.23 20.42P(Bartlett's X2) 0.63 0.37 0.29 0.41 0.19 0.028* 0.69 1.00 0.991.00Treatment Prob(F)0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is sig. at mean comparison OSL.Trial SummaryP(Bartlett's X2) value with an * beside it indicates a transformation needed Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 100,000 seeds / acreRow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: May 29Footnotes Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actual(c)DAA = Days after Application No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual(d)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Plot Length: 6m. liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (May 29)(f)Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The Harvest Length: 5.0 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/hadiscolouration determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Date: Oct 5(g)Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot:[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)*** D Dates of Each Timing*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Sprayed 0% timing --- August 20Sprayed 25% timing --- August 23Seed Colour Analysis Sprayed 50% timing --- August 23L (lightness) : 0 = black, 100 = white Sprayed 75% timing --- August 28a (red-green) : + = red , - = green Sprayed 100% timing --- August 30b (yellow-blue) : + = yellow, - = blue A 25% timing is defined when all the plots on average had 25% of theWhiteness Index : (L/100) * (L - 5.715 (b)) > whiteness closer to 0 pods yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if 95% of the pod is yellow)Yellowness Index E-313 : (142.9* [b]) / L > yellowness futher than 022


Desiccation in Cranberry Dry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Hooter)with Glyphosate Tankmixes at Different TimingPlant Response to Desiccant Yield <strong>and</strong> Quality Analysis Seed Colour AnalysisStemsPart Rated LeafPods Yield Adjusted Pick % (f) Seed Quality (d) Value (g)Colorimeter Readings (h)Days After Application 4 DAA © 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA 4 DAA 8 DAA 12 DAA 16 DAA Lbs/ac. 100 seed wt.$ /ac.Trt Treatment L a b Whiteness YellownessNo. Name1 Untreated check 1986 bcd 63.0 ab 4.0 g 1.3 g 550 b 52 d 7.7 a 12.1 bc -9 g 52 a2 glyphosate (Weathermax)[0%] 1 c 17 b 66 a 91 a 0 a 3 b 31 c 75 a 0 a 3 b 14 c 38 b 1999 bcd 58.9 b-f 18.8 d 3.0 cd 374 c 56 bc 7.3 abc 11.4 de -5 cde 46 c-f7 saflufenacil (Eragon][0%] 35 a 84 a 89 a 98 a 0 a 40 a 55 b 98 a 0 a 20 a 33 b 58 a 1431 fg 55.4 ef 27.2 b 4.4 ab 196 def 56 bc 6.8 d-h 11.8 cd -7 ef 47 cdMerge12 glyphosate (Weathermax)[0%] 16 b 88 a 99 a 100 a 0 a 40 a 76 a 100 a 0 a 20 a 48 a 68 a 1253 g 48.5 g 35.7 a 4.9 a 104 f 55 c 7.1 b-e 12.5 ab -9 g 50 absaflufenacil (Eragon][0%]Merge3 glyphosate (Weathermax)[25%] 1 b 8 b 36 b 93 a 0 a 2 a 18 b 88 b 0 a 1 b 11 b 43 a 2223 abc 61.6 abc 10.4 e 2.9 de 530 b 55 bc 7.2 b-e 11.4 de -5 de 46 cde8 saflufenacil (Eragon][25%] 15 a 85 a 93 a 94 a 0 a 29 a 60 a 96 ab 0 a 23 a 35 a 58 a 1750 def 60.7 a-d 25.2 bc 4.4 ab 268 d 55 c 7.2 bcd 11.2 ef -5 cde 46 cdeMerge13 glyphosate (Weathermax)[25%] 9 ab 85 a 95 a 99 a 0 a 30 a 73 a 99 a 0 a 23 a 35 a 63 a 1401 fg 54.5 f 29.6 b 5.0 a 171 ef 56 bc 7.5 ab 12.7 a -9 g 50 absaflufenacil (Eragon][25%]Merge4 glyphosate (Weathermax)[50%] 0 b 30 c 65 b 1 a 2 b 54 b 0 a 7 b 24 a 2350 ab 61.4 abc 7.5 efg 1.8 fg 599 ab 57 ab 6.8 d-h 11.1 ef -4 a-d 44 e-h9 saflufenacil (Eragon][50%] 10 a 88 b 83 a 5 a 40 a 92 a 5 a 18 a 33 a 2233 ab 59.2 b-e 17.4 d 3.0 cd 432 c 56 bc 6.6 f-i 11.4 de -5 cde 45 d-gMerge14 glyphosate (Weathermax)[50%] 15 a 95 a 96 a 4 a 59 a 98 a 4 a 21 a 33 a 1518 efg 56.3 def 21.2 cd 3.8 bc 259 de 56 abc 7.0 c-f 12.3 abc -8 fg 48 bcsaflufenacil (Eragon][50%]Merge5 glyphosate (Weathermax)[75%] 0 b 56 b 88 a 0 b 40 b 85 b 0 b 9 b 38 b 2306 ab 61.4 abc 4.6 fg 1.9 fg 624 ab 58 a 6.6 f-i 11.0 efg -3 ab 42 h10 saflufenacil (Eragon][75%] 13 a 99 a 100 a 2 a 98 a 100 a 2 a 44 a 58 a 1844 cde 57.1 c-f 11.0 e 2.2 def 434 c 56 bc 6.7 e-i 11.2 ef -5 b-e 45 d-hMerge15 glyphosate (Weathermax)[75%] 15 a 99 a 100 a 2 a 96 a 100 a 2 a 38 a 55 a 2212 abc 60.8 a-d 9.7 ef 1.8 fg 536 b 56 abc 6.9 c-g 11.5 de -5 cde 45 c-fsaflufenacil (Eragon][75%]Merge6 glyphosate (Weathermax)[100%] 2 b 60 b 93 b 2 b 46 b 94 b 2 b 15 b 38 b 2488 a 60.7 a-d 6.2 efg 1.6 fg 651 a 55 bc 6.4 i 10.5 g -3 a 42 gh11 saflufenacil (Eragon][100%] 61 a 99 a 100 a 33 a 98 a 100 a 9 a 43 a 66 a 2350 ab 64.1 a 3.7 g 1.9 fg 653 a 55 bc 6.5 ghi 10.8 fg -3 abc 43 fghMerge16 glyphosate (Weathermax)[100%] 69 a 100 a 100 a 44 a 100 a 100 a 10 a 48 a 69 a 2349 ab 60.9 abc 8.7 efg 2.1 ef 580 ab 55 bc 6.4 hi 11.2 ef -5 b-e 45 d-hsaflufenacil (Eragon][100%]MergeLSD (P=.05) 376 4.65.6 0.8 96 2 0.4 0.5 1.92.8CV13.3 5.4 25.9 20.4 15.4 2.2 4.5 3.2 0.04.2Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean1973 59.0 15.0 2.9 435 55.6 6.9 11.5 -5.6 46.0P(Bartlett's X2) 0.22 0.13 0.014* 0.44 22.89 0.21 0.039* 0.62 0.790.44Treatment Prob(F)0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is sig. at mean comparison OSL.Trial SummaryP(Bartlett's X2) value with an * beside it indicates a transformation needed Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 73,000 seeds / acreRow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: May 29Footnotes Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actual(c)DAA = Days after Application No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual(d)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Plot Length: 6m. liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (May 29)(f)Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The Harvest Length: 5.0 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/hadiscolouration determination was modeled on industry norms.Harvest Date: Sept 13 & 25 (untreated plots)(g)Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot:[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)***Dates of Each Timing*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Sprayed 0% timing --- August 17Sprayed 25% timing --- August 18Seed Colour Analysis Sprayed 50% timing --- August 22L (lightness) : 0 = black, 100 = white Sprayed 75% timing --- August 24a (red-green) : + = red , - = green Sprayed 100% timing --- August 28b (yellow-blue) : + = yellow, - = blue A 25% timing is defined when all the plots on average had 25% of theWhiteness Index : (L/100) * (L - 5.715 (b)) > whiteness closer to 0 pods yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if 95% of the pod is yellow)Yellowness Index E-313 : (142.9* [b]) / L > yellowness futher than 023


White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head <strong>2010</strong>Huron <strong>Research</strong> StationIncidence (0-1) Severity (%)Phyto (%)Trt Treatment Rate 15 20 26 50 15 20 26 50 5 18 Seed Wt YieldNo. Name Form Rate Unit Days after applicationDays after applicationDAA g/100 kg/ha1 Untreated 0.63 0.78 1.01 1.00 2.3 14.8 35.0a 60.0a 0 0 30.4 1402c2 Lance 70DF 392 G A/HA 0.33 0.70 0.97 1.00 0.6 4.1 12.0bc 40.6bcd 0 0 28.4 1902b3 Lance 1X 70DF 540 G A/HA 0.40 0.78 0.93 1.00 0.6 4.3 12.3bc 32.0bcd 0 0 29.7 2085ab4 Lance 70DF 540 G A/HA 0.53 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.2 6.4 14.4bc 37.8bcd 0 0 29.0 1966ab5 Allegro 500F 300 G A/HA 0.35 0.58 1.01 1.00 0.5 3.4 14.5bc 36.5bcd 0 0 28.2 2093ab6 Allegro 1X 500F 500 G A/HA 0.48 0.83 0.98 1.00 1.4 7.5 18.4b 48.6ab 0 0 29.2 1893b7 Allegro 500F 500 G A/HA 0.38 0.88 0.98 1.00 0.6 5.9 12.8bc 35.3bcd 0 0 29.8 2141ab8 Serenade ASO 4000 ML/HA 0.53 0.70 1.01 1.00 3.1 10.6 32.9a 64.1a 0 0 28.9 1346c9 Serenade ASO 4000 ML/HA 0.28 0.63 0.98 1.00 0.5 2.6 8.3c 25.5cd 0 0 29.6 2140ab9 Lance 70DF 392 G A/HA10 Bayer Exp 1X 250 G A/HA 0.45 0.80 0.98 1.00 1.1 5.4 15.3bc 42.5bc 0 0 30.2 2129ab11 Bayer Exp 150 G A/HA 0.33 0.78 1.01 1.00 0.8 4.7 17.8bc 40.8bcd 0 0 30.7 2091ab12 Bayer Exp 250 G A/HA 0.38 0.85 0.88 1.00 1.1 4.9 10.7bc 24.9d 0 0 29.4 2318a13 CaCl 874 G A/HA 0.49 0.78 0.98 1.00 1.6 7.8 16.0bc 40.5bcd 0 0 29.3 1913b14 Senator 70WP 1210 G A/HA 0.73 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.4 7.2 16.0bc 28.1cd 0 0 31.5 2242ab15 Senator 70WP 1575 G A/HA 0.55 0.83 0.95 1.00 1.3 4.8 12.2bc 32.0bcd 0 0 30.9 2177abMean 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 6.3 16.6 39.3 0.0 0.0 29.7 1989CV 67.0 36.3 8.8 0.0 108.6 97.0 40.8 31.1 0.0 0.0 6.2 13.6Pr>F 0.79 0.93 0.75 1.00 0.27 0.44 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.00Notes: All fungicides applied twice except trt 2,6 & 10 which were applied once.Planting:White Mold Fungicide:June 16, <strong>2010</strong>July 27 <strong>and</strong> August 8 300 l/ha 310 kPaInsecticide Application: July 26 <strong>2010</strong> for leafhopper control.Fungicide Application: July 26 <strong>2010</strong> to prevent anthracnose.White Mold:sclerotia, ascospores <strong>and</strong> nitrogen managed to optimize white mold.Irrigation: August 3, 6, 16 &20Harvest:September 27, <strong>2010</strong>24


White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head <strong>2010</strong>Huron <strong>Research</strong> StationIncidence (0-1) Severity (%)Phyto (%)Trt Treatment Rate 21 26 39 57 21 26 39 57 7 Seed Wt YieldNo. Name Form Rate Unit Days after applicationDays after applicationDAA g/100 kg/ha1 Untreated 0.48 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.1 6.0 20.4a 40.0a 0 29.1b 2345a2 Allegro 500F 500 G A/HA 0.18 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.3 7.3 12.4b 20.3b 0 30.5ab 2699a3 Allegro 500F 300 G A/HA 0.28 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.2 2.1 8.6b 12.8b 0 31.2a 2894a4 Allegro 500F 500 G A/HA 0.13 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.2 2.2 7.4b 12.0b 0 31.3a 3212aMean 0.3 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.5 4.4 12.2 21.3 0.0 30.5 2788CV 108.3 23.4 0.0 0.0 108.5 77.0 28.8 35.6 0.0 3.0 15.9Pr>F 0.37 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.03 0.11Notes: Allegro applied at 4th trifoliate for Trt 2, 50% bloom for Trts 3&4Planting:White Mold Fungicide:June 29, <strong>2010</strong>August 3 & 12 300 l/ha 310 kPaInsecticide Application: July 26 <strong>2010</strong> for leafhopper control.Fungicide Application: July 26 <strong>2010</strong> to prevent anthracnose.White Mold:sclerotia, ascospores <strong>and</strong> nitrogen managed to optimize white mold.Irrigation: August 3, 6, 16 &20Harvest:September 27, <strong>2010</strong>25


Head to Head Nautica Anthracnose Seed Treatment TrialTrial ID: 10DPAFEYield Dockage (e) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (d)Pick (f) Value (g) AdditionalEmergence Vigour Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (b) Moisture1-5 0-100 0-100 $ per acre ValueObservations0-100 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams ($ per acre)2.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 8 WAP 8 WAP 11 WAP beforedockageadj. for moistTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit1 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 52 3.0 38 a 10 a 10 a 1282 bc 15.9 16.1 1.6 10.6 2.3 3292 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 53 2.6 20 b 4 b 1 b 1261 bc 15.7 16.5 1.5 10.7 3.0 322 -7DCT (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 197.6 G A/100 KG3 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 G A/100 KG 52 2.5 22 b 4 b 0 b 1452 ab 15.0 16.7 1.8 9.4 3.7 366 37Dynasty ST (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 1 G A/100 KG4 Gaucho 156 G A/100 KG 53 2.3 44 a 12 a 10 a 1202 c 14.1 16.6 2.0 11.7 5.7 280 -49Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG5 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 54 2.4 14 b 2 b 2 b 1504 a 15.2 17.1 2.0 7.8 2.5 396 67Rancona Summit 9999 G A/100 KGNCF (TPM) (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 6.15 G A/100 KG6 Maxim Advance 39 G A/100 KG 52 2.4 18 b 3 b 0 b 1429 ab 16.0 16.4 1.8 9.6 4.3 355 26Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG7 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 54 2.4 15 b 2 b 1 b 1421 ab 16.1 16.6 1.6 9.5 2.3 369 40BASF #1 0.125 G A/100 KG8 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 53 2.6 18 b 3 b 0 b 1361 abc 16.0 16.6 2.0 10.2 1.7 355 26BASF #2 1.5 G A/100 KG9 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 G A/100 KG 55 2.4 16 b 3 b 1 b 1539 a 15.9 16.6 1.8 8.5 2.3 405 76Dynasty ST (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 1 G A/100 KGAgress 4 G A/100 KGLSD (P=.05)n/a n/a 12 6 5 222 n/a n/an/a n/a n/a n/aCV8.0 21.9 35.081.6 134.1 10.9 6.83.035.521.3 99.5 15.5Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean56 2.4 235 3 1387 15.5 16.5 1.89.9 3.1353P(Bartlett's X2) 0.39 0.85 0.480.009* 0.001* 0.51 0.31 0.490.990.63 0.004* 0.59Treatment Prob(F) 0.78 0.08 0.00 0.010.00 0.04 0.220.86 0.96 0.590.71 0.10** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(b)(d)(e)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeverity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 18This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width:17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-40-40 lbs/ac.NPK actual ppi (May 27)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (May 27)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 27)Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry st<strong>and</strong>ards Plot Length: 6m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during thePick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesdetermination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 18 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: A cover spray of Quadris was applied Aug 16 & 29Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot:Harvest Date: Oct.17[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** dockage is removed as a straight percentage*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it26


Head to Head Rex Anthracnose Seed Treatment TrialTrial ID: 10DPAGHIncidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (d)Pick (f) Value (g) AdditionalEmergence Vigour Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (b) Moisture1-5 0-100 0-100 $ per acre ValueObservations0-100 1-5 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams ($ per acre)3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8 WAP 8 WAP 11 WAP beforedockageadj. for moistTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit1 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 57 c 2.6 a 1 bc 12 b 13 1584 de 18.8 a 20.0 bc 1.6 1.0 abc 3.3 439 de2 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 60 bc 2.1 abc 0 d 4 cd 5 1968 ab 18.6 a 21.2 a 1.4 0.4 e 2.5 560 ab 121DCT (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 197.6 G A/100 KG3 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 G A/100 KG 61 bc 2.5 ab 1 bcd 4 cd 7 2020 a 18.0 a 21.4 a 1.3 0.3 e 1.8 582 a 143Dynasty ST (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 1 G A/100 KG4 Gaucho 156 G A/100 KG 58 c 2.0 abc 3 a 19 a 15 1486 e 18.2 a 19.5 c 1.9 1.5 a 3.5 407 e -32Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG5 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 66 a 2.0 abc 1 bcd 6 bcd 5 1941 ab 18.3 a 20.7 ab 1.0 0.4 cde 2.2 555 ab 116Rancona Summit 9999 G A/100 KGNCF (TPM) (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 6.15 G A/100 KG6 Maxim Advance 39 G A/100 KG 63 ab 2.0 abc 2 b 9 bc 8 1793 bc 18.7 a 20.4 abc 1.4 0.5 b-e 2.4 509 bc 70Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG7 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 64 ab 1.9 bc 1 bcd 8 bcd 13 1710 cd 18.7 a 20.6 ab 1.5 1.0 a-d 1.6 491 cd 52BASF #1 0.125 G A/100 KG8 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 64 ab 1.5 c 1 bcd 8 bcd 11 1826 bc 18.0 a 20.8 ab 1.9 1.1 ab 2.9 510 bc 71BASF #2 1.5 G A/100 KG9 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 G A/100 KG 58 c 1.9 bc 0 cd 2 d 5 1976 ab 18.2 a 21.2 a 1.6 0.4 de 2.9 556 ab 117Dynasty ST (St<strong>and</strong>ard) 1 G A/100 KGAgress 4 G A/100 KGLSD (P=.05)5 n/a 1 7 n/a 186 0.8 1.0n/a 0.6 n/a 60CV5.8 20.5 67.560.4 57.9 7.1 2.93.331.457.1 76.6 8.0Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean61 2.0 18 9 1811 18.420.6 1.50.7 2.6512P(Bartlett's X2) 0.71 0.82 0.049*0.23 0.47 0.270.86 0.130.290.005* 0.68 0.52Treatment Prob(F) 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.000.07 0.00 0.270.01 0.22 0.000.88 0.00** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Yield Dockage (e) 27(b)(d)(e)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeverity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 18This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width:17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-40-40 lbs/ac.NPK actual ppi (May 27)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (May 27)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 27)Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry st<strong>and</strong>ards Plot Length: 6m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during thePick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesdetermination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 19 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: A cover spray of Quadris was applied Aug 16 & 29Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot:Harvest Date: Oct.17[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** dockage is removed as a straight percentage*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it


Head to Head Foliar Trial RexTrial ID: 10DPAGEIncidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (d) Dockage (e) Pick (f) Value (g) AdditionalVeins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (b) Moisture1-5 0-100 0-100 $ per acre ValueObservations0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams ($ per acre)7 Days After 7 Days After 16 WAP beforedockage2nd. App. 2nd. App.adj. for moistTrt No. Treatment Name Product Rate Product Rate Unit1 Untreated Check 0.0 1.6 2.3 1831 ab 14.6 21.0 1.9 a 0.3 3.0 ab 514 bc2 Quilt 1.5 L/ha 0.0 0.0 2.4 1951 a 14.9 20.9 1.0 c 0.3 2.1 bc 558 a 443 Senator (Low) 1.75 kg/ha 0.0 0.1 5.2 1731 b 14.2 21.7 1.6 ab 0.3 4.1 a 475 c -394 Senator (High) 2.25 kg/ha 0.0 0.0 2.8 1818 ab 15.1 21.3 1.3 bc 0.3 3.3 ab 508 bc -65 Quadris 500 ml/ha 0.0 0.0 0.0 1718 b 14.8 21.0 1.3 bc 0.4 1.0 c 504 bc -106 Headline 400 ml/ha 0.0 0.0 0.0 1845 ab 14.6 21.0 1.0 c 0.3 1.8 bc 532 ab 18LSD (P=.05)n/an/a n/a 139 n/a n/a0.40 n/a 1.88 42.36CV159.68460.85 135.87 5.03 4.222.4519.55 39.79 48.71 5.42Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean0.020.29 2.12 1816 14.68 21.16 1.340.32 2.55515.21P(Bartlett's X2) 0.004*0.001* 0.001* 0.290.120.590.760.26 0.63 0.95Treatment Prob(F) 0.800.460.17 0.03 0.500.280.00 0.57 0.04 0.02** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(b)(d)(e)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeverity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 18This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width:17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-40-40 lbs/ac.NPK actual ppi (May 27)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (May 27)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 27)Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry st<strong>and</strong>ards Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Applications were made on Aug 7 &17Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Phytotoxic symptoms with the Quilt treatment disappeareddetermination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed 2 weeks after both applicationsValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seed Treated with Cruiser Maxx Dynasty (1g.) Harvest Date: Oct.17[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** dockage is removed as a straight percentage*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it28


Head to Head Foliar Trial T9905Trial ID: 10DPAHEIncidence of Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (d)Pick (f) Value (g) AdditionalVeins Infected Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (b) Moisture1-5 0-100 0-100 $ per acre ValueObservations0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams ($ per acre)4 Days Before 7 Days After 7 Days After 16 WAP beforedockage1st App. 2nd. App. 2nd. App.adj. for moistTrt No. Treatment Name Product Rate Product Rate Unit1 Untreated Check 0.3 7.7 a 0.1 11.6 a 1612 b 19.0 a 20.8 3.6 a 0.8 15.4 a 332 c2 Quilt 1.5 L/ha 0.1 0.4 b 0.0 4.9 b 2089 a 17.5 abc 22.0 1.8 c 0.4 5.4 c 557 a 2253 Senator (Low) 1.75 kg/ha 0.1 2.0 b 0.1 5.4 ab 1933 a 16.2 c 22.2 2.9 ab 0.6 14.0 a 417 b 854 Senator (High) 2.25 kg/ha 0.1 4.1 ab 0.0 4.3 b 2039 a 18.3 ab 21.7 2.0 bc 0.5 9.4 b 494 a 1625 Quadris 500 ml/ha 0.3 0.5 b 0.3 1.1 b 2018 a 17.1 bc 21.6 1.6 c 0.6 5.1 c 540 a 2086 Headline 400 ml/ha 0.5 0.6 b 0.0 1.9 b 2130 a 16.2 c 22.3 1.5 c 0.5 8.4 bc 530 a 198LSD (P=.05)n/a4.52 n/a6.34243.43 1.64 n/a0.90n/a 3.42 65.30CV143.69117.27 240.0286.19 8.20 6.26 3.0426.83 30.28 23.54 9.06Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean0.242.560.114.88 1970.28 17.36 21.77 2.230.55 9.63478.20P(Bartlett's X2)0.001*0.001*0.001* 0.53 0.250.100.800.890.57 0.01* 0.42Treatment Prob(F) 0.640.020.480.04 0.00 0.010.06 0.000.070.00 0.00** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Yield Dockage (e) 29(b)(d)(e)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeverity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 18This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width:17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: 60-40-40 lbs/ac.NPK actual ppi (May 27)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 5 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (May 27)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (May 27)Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry st<strong>and</strong>ards Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Applications were made on Aug 7 &17Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Phytotoxic symptoms with the Quilt treatment disappeareddetermination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed 2 weeks after both applicationsValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seed Treated with Cruiser Maxx Dynasty (1g.) Harvest Date: Oct.17[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)****** dockage is removed as a straight percentage*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it


Bacterial Blight Trial Early Planted Trial - WhitesRating Data TypeEmergenceVigourLeaf Infection Leaf Infection Pod Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ valueRating Unit%emerged1-10 (1=best)1-10 1=best%1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac.Crop Stage VC VC/V1 V2 V3 VC VC/V1 V2 V3g.Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WA2.5 WA3.5 WA4.5 WAP 1.5 WA 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP4.5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP 10 WAP 10.5 WAP 10.5 WAPTrt Treatment Rate 10.5 WAPNo. Name g ai/100 kg1 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 58 61 68 64 bc 5.0 4.0 2.9 2.4 abc 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.0 21.3 3.2 1.5 1975 555Dynasty 12 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 61 62 68 69 bc 4.8 3.5 3.4 2.1 bc 1.1 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.1 21.5 2.4 1.8 2340 669Dynasty 1Agress 0.253 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 63 67 76 73 abc 4.5 3.6 3.5 2.5 abc 1.1 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 21.6 3.5 1.9 2264 630Dynasty 1Agress 0.54 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 60 63 68 68 bc 4.9 3.9 3.5 3.0 a 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.1 22.3 2.2 1.4 2289 656Dynasty 1Agress 15 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 61 61 69 69 bc 4.8 3.8 2.8 2.0 bc 1.2 0.4 1.3 0.2 0.1 21.5 1.3 2.1 2307 675Dynasty 1Agress 56 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 70 68 76 75 ab 4.1 3.5 3.3 2.6 ab 1.2 0.5 3.4 0.6 0.0 22.6 2.3 2.1 2179 622Dynasty 1Agress 107 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 58 61 64 63 c 4.6 4.0 3.5 3.0 a 1.0 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.0 22.2 1.5 1.8 2160 628Dynasty 1Agress 208 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 58 65 71 70 bc 4.5 3.4 3.4 2.2 abc 1.1 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.0 21.9 2.3 1.7 2361 676Dynasty 1Ag-Streptomycin 0.59 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 80 80 83 84 a 3.4 3.1 2.4 1.8 c 1.1 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 21.7 1.5 1.7 2277 663Dynasty 1Kocide 2000 61LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a 12 n/a n/a n/a 0.8 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aCV 19.1 13.6 14.2 11.6 19.8 14.4 21.1 22.4 11.6 238.5 118.4 99.9 77.6 4.7 60.4 33.0 11.8 11.5Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean 63 65 71 70 4.5 3.6 3.2 2.4 1.1 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.0 21.8 2.3 1.8 2239 641P(Bartlett's X2)0.35 0.55 0.42 0.37 0.95 0.77 0.48 0.16 0.005* 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* 0.96 0.05 0.89 0.90 0.74 0.48Treatment Prob(F) 0.23 0.11 0.27 0.04 0.35 0.27 0.26 0.04 0.71 0.62 0.53 0.41 0.80 0.68 0.34 0.64 0.60 0.41* Means should be transformed as per Bartlett's X2** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(d)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seedPick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolourationRow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 2determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 1 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actualValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: inside row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Reflex 1L/ha. , Agral 90 2.5L/1000LHarvest Date: Sept.11Discussion: * There was very little CBB pressure in this trial resulting in minimal treatment differences.* There was a consistent trend to improved emergence <strong>and</strong> vigour with Kocide.* There was a definite advantage to having a seed treatment applied this may have been due to early wet conditions.30


Bacterial Blight Trial Late Planted Trial - WhitesRating Data TypeEmergenceVigourLeaf Infection Leaf Infection Pod Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ valueRating Unit%emerged1-10 (1=best)1-10 (1=best) %1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac.Crop Stage VC VC/V1 V2 V3 VC VC/V1 V2 V3g.Crop Stage Scale1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 4.5 WAP 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP4.5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP 10 WAP 10.5 WAP 10.5 WAPTrt Treatment Rate 10.5 WAPNo. Name g ai/100 kg1 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 80 80 86 81 3.1 1.6 bcd 1.6 1.6 3.8 1.0 0.6 b 0.7 0.0 19.4 4.0 2.5 1953 ab 538 abDynasty 12 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 72 78 81 82 3.4 1.5 cd 1.8 1.8 4.6 0.0 0.7 b 0.5 0.0 19.7 3.6 2.5 1780 bc 496 bcDynasty 1Agress 0.253 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 81 81 77 84 3.3 1.9 abc 1.9 1.9 1.1 0.0 0.4 b 0.5 0.0 19.5 4.8 2.3 1820 bc 493 bcDynasty 1Agress 0.54 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 75 76 82 83 3.4 2.1 a 1.9 1.9 5.0 1.0 2.1 a 2.0 0.0 19.8 3.7 2.4 1662 c 462 cDynasty 1Agress 15 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 66 68 76 74 3.4 2.0 ab 2.3 2.3 4.4 1.0 0.8 b 0.5 0.0 19.2 3.4 2.1 1810 bc 506 bcDynasty 1Agress 56 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 76 78 83 83 3.3 1.9 abc 2.0 2.0 0.6 0.0 0.7 b 0.9 0.0 20.9 3.4 2.0 1921 ab 537 abDynasty 1Agress 107 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 76 80 82 82 3.4 1.8 a-d 1.8 1.8 5.8 1.0 1.0 b 1.2 0.0 19.7 4.9 2.5 1886 b 511 bcDynasty 1Agress 208 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 82 84 83 88 3.0 1.4 d 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.0 0.2 b 0.3 0.0 19.5 4.0 1.8 2130 a 588 aDynasty 1Ag-Streptomycin 0.59 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 74 74 81 80 3.4 2.0 ab 2.0 2.0 2.8 0.0 0.7 b 0.9 0.0 19.2 5.4 2.3 1735 bc 464 cDynasty 1Kocide 2000 61LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 223 68CV 10.4 10.8 8.4 9.5 11.0 14.5 29.6 29.6 93.4 126.7 84.8 85.0 175.8 6.7 46.5 32.0 8.2 9.1Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean 76 78 81 82 3.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 3.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.0 19.7 4.1 2.3 1855 511P(Bartlett's X2)0.13 0.78 0.95 0.88 0.77 0.84 0.42 0.42 0.001* 0.16 0.49 0.48 0.78 0.002* 0.07 0.42 0.30 0.31Treatment Prob(F) 0.20 0.28 0.70 0.54 0.79 0.01 0.57 0.57 0.18 0.41 0.03 0.08 0.61 0.75 0.81 0.83 0.01 0.02* Means should be transformed as per Bartlett's X2** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(d)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seedPick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 17determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 1 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actualValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: inside row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .30/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Reflex 1L/ha. , Agral 90 2.5L/1000LHarvest Date: Oct.4Discussion: * There was some CBB pressure in this trial which resulting in minimal treatment differences.* There was however a consistent trend for the Ag-Streptomycin treatment thoughout the season.31


Bacterial Blight Trial Early Planted Trial - DRKRating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Vigour Vigour Leaf Infection Leaf InfectionRating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-100%Crop Stage VC VC/V1 V2 V3 VCVC/V1 V2V34.5 WAP100 Seed Pick Seed YieldWeight % Quality lbs/ac.g.Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 4.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAPTrt Treatment Rate 10.5 WAPNo. Name g ai/100 kg1 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 57 67 69 68 3.4 2.3 1.9 c 11.2 5.6 1.1 4.8 2.6 56.3 3.3 2.4 1614 533Dynasty 12 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 50 61 66 62 4.0 2.4 2.0 bc 11.2 16.3 1.6 7.0 3.2 56.8 2.6 2.3 1550 518Dynasty 1Agress 0.253 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 53 51 55 55 4.8 2.1 3.3 a 11.3 3.4 0.3 2.5 1.5 58.0 2.3 2.3 1563 524Dynasty 1Agress 0.54 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 47 57 60 59 4.0 2.6 2.3 bc 11.3 4.8 0.7 5.1 3.6 55.9 4.6 2.3 1515 480Dynasty 1Agress 15 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 58 64 67 65 4.0 2.8 1.8 c 11.1 9.1 1.9 4.2 2.2 57.2 2.3 2.4 1376 460Dynasty 1Agress 56 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 39 56 60 58 4.8 2.4 2.9 ab 11.2 8.4 1.3 8.3 2.6 55.7 4.0 2.3 1417 461Dynasty 1Agress 107 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 47 57 61 58 4.8 2.4 2.6 abc 11.2 2.5 0.5 5.1 2.8 57.3 3.4 2.4 1647 543Dynasty 1Agress 208 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 49 60 63 62 4.0 2.6 1.9 c 11.2 0.4 1.5 1.9 0.8 58.8 2.6 2.0 1594 532Dynasty 1Ag-Streptomycin 0.59 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 63 69 69 68 4.0 2.4 2.4 abc 11.3 5.9 0.5 3.9 1.4 56.2 3.4 2.4 1562 510Dynasty 1Kocide 2000 61LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.9n/a n/a n/an/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aCV 26.0 13.7 12.5 11.0 21.8 21.3 26.51.3 167.5 149.5 117.2 108.8 3.6 80.8 23.4 20.6 24.5Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean 51 60 63 62 4.2 2.4 2.311.2 6.31.0 4.8 2.3 56.9 3.2 2.3 1537 507P(Bartlett's X2)0.45 0.70 0.78 0.47 0.70 0.66 0.240.58 0.013* 0.046* 0.028* 0.82 0.53 0.72 0.49 0.13Treatment Prob(F) 0.36 0.10 0.20 0.12 0.42 0.800.030.50 0.62 0.810.83 0.83 0.48 0.92 0.99 0.95* Means should be transformed as per Bartlett's X2** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(d)(f)(g)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. infected seedPick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 2determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 1 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actualValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: inside row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .35/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Reflex 1L/ha. , Agral 90 2.5L/1000LHarvest Date: Sept.11Discussion: * There was some CBB pressure in this trial which resulting in minimal treatment differences.* There was a consistent trend to improved emergence with Kocide.* There was a definite advantage to using Ag-Streptomycin for improved leaf <strong>and</strong> pod infection levels.This resulted in improved seed quality, 100 seed weight <strong>and</strong> pick values.Leaf Infection1-100%Pod Infection1-100%$ value0.120.9732


Rating Data TypeEmergenceRating Unit%Crop Stage VC VC/V1 V2Bacterial Blight Trial Late Planted Trial - DRK100 Seed Pick Seed YieldWeight % Quality lbs/ac.g.Crop Stage Scale1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP3.5 WAP4.5 WAP6 WAP 7 WAP 9 WAP 10 WAP 10 WAPTrt Treatment Rate 10.5 WAPNo. Name g ai/100 kg1 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 68 71 74 76 a-d 2.4 bc 1.1 1.6 1.8 4.8 0.8 1.2 2.5 cd 0.2 bc 53.6 2.1 2.0 1557 523Dynasty 12 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 72 70 72 79 abc 2.3 bc 1.1 1.5 1.3 13.6 1.2 6.2 5.8 abc 0.3 abc 52.1 6.8 2.8 1289 392Dynasty 1Agress 0.253 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 70 73 77 81 a 2.3 bc 1.1 2.1 1.4 3.0 0.3 2.0 2.8 bcd 0.2 bc 53.1 5.0 2.1 1505 479Dynasty 1Agress 0.54 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 63 65 73 77 a-d 2.4 bc 1.1 1.6 1.5 9.0 2.1 8.8 8.5 a 0.6 a 52.0 3.6 2.5 1206 392Dynasty 1Agress 15 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 70 77 72 80 ab 2.6 ab 1.1 1.8 1.9 4.9 0.5 2.1 3.1 bcd 0.2 bc 54.5 2.6 2.0 1594 532Dynasty 1Agress 56 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 65 67 72 73 d 2.0 c 1.1 1.6 1.4 9.9 1.7 4.8 7.1 a 0.3 bc 53.2 6.2 2.8 1276 391Dynasty 1Agress 107 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 70 69 73 74 cd 2.6 ab 1.1 1.8 1.5 15.4 2.4 5.4 6.4 ab 0.4 ab 52.8 5.9 2.5 1228 383Dynasty 1Agress 208 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 60 64 66 75 bcd 2.4 bc 1.5 2.1 1.6 3.1 0.4 1.4 1.9 d 0.1 c 54.0 4.1 1.6 1572 505Dynasty 1Ag-Streptomycin 0.59 CruiserMaxx <strong>Bean</strong> 56.25 54 60 66 73 d 3.1 a 1.8 2.5 1.9 4.5 0.1 2.1 1.7 d 0.2 bc 53.9 3.7 1.8 1392 453Dynasty 1Kocide 2000 61LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a 6 0.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.7 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aCV 14.4 11.4 9.0 5.2 16.6 28.0 38.0 35.0 84.4 110.4 93.5 57.2 65.8 3.5 65.6 36.6 16.6 20.8Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean 66 69 72 77 2.4 1.2 1.9 1.6 7.6 1.1 3.8 4.4 0.3 53.3 4.4 2.2 1402 450P(Bartlett's X2)0.69 0.91 0.60 0.58 0.68 0.42 0.38 0.50 0.43 0.004* 0.05 0.56 0.06 0.013* 0.59 0.61 0.96 0.90Treatment Prob(F) 0.20 0.12 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.14 0.55 0.71 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.58 0.31 0.42 0.12 0.14* Means should be transformed as per Bartlett's X2** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(d)(f)(g)V34.5 WAPVCVigour1-10 (1=best)VC/V1 V2Leaf Infection1-10 1=bestLeaf Infection%Pod Infection1-100%FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. infected seedPick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 17determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 1 Fertilizer:60-20-20 lbs/ac.NPK lbs actualValue per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: inside row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual[yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($ .35/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha*** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Reflex 1L/ha. , Agral 90 2.5L/1000LHarvest Date: Oct. 4V3Value$Discussion: * There was some CBB pressure in this trial which resulting in minimal treatment differences.* Early in the season the lower rates of Agress tended to have slightly better emergence <strong>and</strong> vigour.* Later in the season the Ag-Streptomycin had lower leaf <strong>and</strong> pod infection resulting in slightly better seed quality ratings.33


ObservationsXL Carbon Trial - Narrow Row - KippenYield Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (a)Emergence Vigour Uniformity HeightMoisture1-51-5 1-5 1-5 (cm) lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams8 WAP 8 WAP Harvest 8 WAPLodging (b)Harvestibility (c)Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit1 Untreated Check 2.1 1.5 2.453.83428 10.4 19.31.52 Plant XL 2.5 L/HA 1.1 1.0 2.556.73520 10.4 19.11.6LSD (P=.05)n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/an/aCV30.8 23.1 29.93.0 5.90.73.021.7Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean1.6 1.3 2.455.2 3474 10.419.2 1.6P(Bartlett's X2)0.30 . 0.76 0.17 0.120.89 0.32.Pr>F (0.05) 0.07 0.09 0.82 0.09 0.57 0.650.63 0.64** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)2.52.0n/a12.81.91.6n/a11.72.3 1.80.37 0.300.090.18(a)(b)(c)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: NN Fertilizer 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiLodging Rating 1 - 5 1= Straight up, 5=flat Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Harvestibility Rating 1 - 5 1= All pods harvested (bottom pods are high,no lodging), 5 = majority of pods unattainable Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 15Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed34


MTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale AVigour Vigour* Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 8.0 7.5 52.8 2.3 26.5 34632 Starter Fertilizer 7.8 7.8 47.5 2.3 26.1 33773 Plant XL + Starter 2.5 L/HA 8.0 8.0 52.5 2.0 27.6 3672MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)7.9 7.8 50.9 2.2 26.8 35043.7 6.5 6.6 9.4 3.6 4.10.42 0.42 0.12 0.25 0.18 0.10n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: Black (Black Velvet)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Reps: 4Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)Fertilizer Application: May 27, <strong>2010</strong> 2.5 l/ha included with 3-12-3 liquid starter fertilizer in furrowMTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale BVigour Vigour* Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 7.5 ab 8.0 33.0 2.1 64.1 a 22542 Starter Fertilizer 8.0 a 7.0 32.0 1.9 64.2 a 22673 Plant XL + Starter 2.5 L/HA 6.8 b 7.8 31.3 2.1 61.9 b 1956Mean7.4CV6.7Pr>F (0.05)0.03LSD (0.05)0.9* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)7.6 32.1 2.0 63.4 21597.3 11.5 8.2 1.4 6.90.10 0.80 0.13 0.02 0.07n/a n/a n/a 1.6 n/aMarket Class: Cranberry (Etna)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Reps: 4Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)Fertilizer Application: May 27, <strong>2010</strong> 2.5 l/ha included with 3-12-3 liquid starter fertilizer in furrow35


MTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale CVigour Vigour* Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 7.5 8.0 40.8 2.4 58.1 28942 Starter Fertilizer 8.0 8.0 43.8 2.3 56.6 30743 Plant XL + Starter 2.5 L/HA 7.5 8.0 43.0 2.3 57.0 2639MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)7.7 8.0 42.5 2.3 57.3 28696.2 0.0 6.6 14.1 2.5 8.30.30 1.00 0.35 0.82 0.36 0.10n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: DRK (Red Hawk)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Reps: 4Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)Fertilizer Application: May 27, <strong>2010</strong> 2.5 l/ha included with 3-12-3 liquid starter fertilizer in furrowMTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale DVigour Vigour* Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 7.3 8.0 46.3 2.3 25.9 39792 Starter Fertilizer 7.5 8.0 43.8 2.1 25.8 41303 Plant XL + Starter 2.5 L/HA 6.8 8.0 46.5 2.0 25.4 3862MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)7.2 8.0 45.5 2.1 25.7 39907.0 0.0 10.7 11.8 3.0 3.10.18 1.00 0.69 0.42 0.59 0.06n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: Navy (T9905)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Reps: 4Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)Fertilizer Application: May 27, <strong>2010</strong> 2.5 l/ha included with 3-12-3 liquid starter fertilizer in furrow36


MTS Carbon Trial - Narrow Row - Kippen100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (a)Emergence Vigour Uniformity Height1-51-5 1-5 1-5 (cms) Yield Seed grams8 WAP 8 WAP Harvest 8 WAPMoisturelbs/ac. % adj. for moistTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit1 Untreated Check1.4 1.9 2.857.3 360510.420.21.52.92 MTS 5 L/HA1.3 1.6 3.058.6340310.220.21.52.53 MTS 10 L/HA1.0 1.5 3.059.5339710.119.81.92.84 MTS 20 L/HA1.1 1.5 2.458.4352610.320.01.32.45 MTS 40 L/HA1.5 1.6 3.158.2335910.319.61.52.56 MTS 80 L/HA 1.3 1.3 1.959.5347010.2 19.81.61.8 1.6LSD (P=.05)n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/an/aCV36.5 32.1 26.52.9 4.91.62.919.9Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean1.3 1.6 2.758.5 3460 10.219.9 1.5P(Bartlett's X2)0.45 0.97 0.80 0.55 0.220.25 0.590.83Pr>F (0.05) 0.70 0.65 0.17 0.44 0.35 0.220.59 0.18** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(a)(b)(c)ObservationsLodging (b)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: NN Fertilizer 100-0-0 NPK, actual ppiLodging Rating 1 - 5 1= Straight up, 5=flat Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 15)Harvestibility Rating 1 - 5 1= All pods harvested (bottom pods are high,no lodging), 5 = majority of pods unattainable Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Pursuit 200 mL/ha & Bonanza 2 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Planting Date: June 15Plot Length: 6m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theHarvest Length: 4m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Direct Harvest Date: Oct 7Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seedDynasty .2 ml./1kg.seedn/a24.62.5 2.10.27 0.300.20Harvestibility (c)2.52.32.32.02.1n/a25.80.3737


ObservationsMTS Carbon Trial - Narrow Row - BlythYield Seed 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (a)Emergence Vigour Uniformity HeightMoisture1-51-5 1-5 1-5 (cms) lbs/ac. lbs/ac. grams8 WAP 8 WAP Harvest 8 WAPLodging (b)Harvestibility (c)Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit1 Untreated Check 1.0 1.5 3.5 a 55.2 c 340610.522.11.42.4 a 2.1 a2 MTS 5 L/HA 1.3 1.8 3.4 ab 57.3 bc 322310.521.71.11.6 b 1.6 b3 MTS 10 L/HA 1.0 1.3 2.6 bc 59.5 ab 337610.622.21.31.6 b 1.6 b4 MTS 20 L/HA 1.1 1.1 2.5 c 58.8 ab 343510.422.71.51.6 b 1.6 b5 MTS 40 L/HA 1.1 1.1 2.5 c 59.6 a 322110.722.31.11.5 b 1.5 b6 MTS 80 L/HA 1.1 1.4 3.3 abc 59.5 ab 340010.722.31.31.5 b 1.5 bLSD (P=.05)n/a n/a 0.8 2.3 n/a n/a n/an/a 0.30.3CV20.7 30.3 18.02.6 6.02.32.624.513.511.8Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean1.1 1.4 3.058.3 3343 10.622.2 1.31.7 1.7P(Bartlett's X2)0.99 0.75 0.82 0.008* 0.360.45 0.790.950.56 .Pr>F (0.05) 0.65 0.28 0.04 0.00 0.50 0.440.34 0.520.000.00** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(a)(b)(c)FootnotesTrial SummarySeed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Design: Nearest Neighbour Fertilizer 45-100-120 NPK, actual ppiLodging Rating 1 - 5 1= Straight up, 5=flat Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid 3- 12- 3 actual at seeding (June 1)Harvestibility Rating 1 - 5 1= All pods harvested (bottom pods are high,no lodging), 5 = majority of pods unattainable Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual .5 L/ha & Rival .7 L/haNumber of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Reflex 1 L/ha (July 2)Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 1Harvest Length: 4m.Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during theSeeding Rate: 17 seeds / m.season to minimize distortions in the varietal differencesSeed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dessication Date: Sept 5Dynasty .2 ml./1kg.seed Direct Harvest Date: Sept 27&Oct 138


MTS Carbon Trial - Ailsa CraigVigour * Vigour Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 23 DAP 72 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 7.2 7.5 54.0 2.0 13 18012 MTS 5 L/HA 7.3 7.7 55.0 2.0 13.2 18543 MTS 10 L/HA 7.3 7.8 54.8 2.0 13.2 18014 MTS 20 L/HA 7.3 7.5 53.3 2.0 13 18335 MTS 40 L/HA 7.2 7.6 53.2 2.0 13.1 17086 MTS 80 L/HA 7.5 7.5 55.3 2.0 12.7 1887MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)7.3 7.6 54.6 2.0 13 18147.8 6.2 11.0 0.0 3.3 13.50.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.28 0.86n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: AdzukiPlanted: June 15, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 6Fertilizer Application: June 18, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPaMTS Carbon Trial - LondonVigour Vigour Plant Seed 100 Seed *(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 23 DAP 72 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 6.3 7.6 47.5 1.7 52.5 bc 28502 MTS 5 L/HA 6.3 7.3 46.3 1.8 53.0 ab 28283 MTS 10 L/HA 7.0 7.6 47.2 1.7 52.6 abc 29434 MTS 20 L/HA 5.5 7.0 43.3 1.8 51.4 c 27885 MTS 40 L/HA 5.5 7.3 48.0 1.8 54.1 a 28246 MTS 80 L/HA 7.2 7.6 46.3 1.8 53.2 ab 2918Mean6.3 7.4 46.4 1.8 52.8 2859CV26.7 10.9 8.9 17.4 2.48.9Pr>F (0.05)0.40 0.72 0.45 0.82 0.03 0.89LSD (0.05)n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.5n/a* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Market Class: DRKPlanted: June 18, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 6Fertilizer Application: June 18, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPa39


MTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale AVigour Vigour* Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 7.0 7.8 a 50.5 2.0 26.2 a 34382 Starter Fertilizer 7.3 7.8 a 54.3 2.0 26.4 a 34703 MTS + Starter 5 L/HA 7.5 8.0 a 54.3 2.0 27.0 a 36164 MTS + Starter 10 L/HA 6.8 7.0 b 53.5 2.0 26.8 a 35805 MTS + Starter 20 L/HA 7.3 7.0 b 52.5 2.0 26.7 a 35546 MTS + Starter 40 L/HA 7.0 6.8 b 54.0 2.0 24.7 b 3340Mean7.1 7.4 53.2 2.0 26.3 3500CV5.7 3.7 8.4 0.0 3.1 5.6Pr>F (0.05)0.20 0.00 0.81 1.00 0.02 0.39LSD (0.05)0.4 0.4 n/a n/a 1.2 n/a* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Market Class: Black (Black Velvet)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 4Fertilizer Application: May 28, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPaMTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale BVigour Vigour Seed 100 Seed Plant(1-10) (1-10) Quality Weight Height* YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (1-5) (g) (cm) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 6.5 7.3 2.5 63.0 30.3 bc 29242 Starter Fertilizer 7.0 8.0 2.5 64.7 33.0 a 30573 MTS + Starter 5 L/HA 7.0 7.5 2.5 63.9 30.3 bc 29344 MTS + Starter 10 L/HA 6.8 8.0 2.4 65.1 29.5 c 26895 MTS + Starter 20 L/HA 7.0 7.8 2.4 66.1 30.5 bc 30406 MTS + Starter 40 L/HA 7.0 8.0 2.5 63.6 31.8 ab 3156Mean6.9 7.9 2.5 64.4 30.9 2967CV4.3 3.7 6.1 2.1 4.6 8.7Pr>F (0.05)0.13 0.13 0.6 0.06 0.04 0.22LSD (0.05)n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.2 n/a* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Market Class: Cranberry (Etna)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 4Fertilizer Application: May 28, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPa40


MTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale CVigour* Vigour Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 6.5 8.0 36.3 2.1 50.2 19152 Starter Fertilizer 6.8 7.8 36.8 2.1 50.8 20193 MTS + Starter 5 L/HA 7.3 8.0 34.3 2.1 52.5 <strong>2010</strong>4 MTS + Starter 10 L/HA 6.8 8.0 36.0 2.1 54.3 20345 MTS + Starter 20 L/HA 6.8 7.5 35.8 2.0 53.0 21626 MTS + Starter 40 L/HA 6.5 7.3 34.0 2.0 53.6 1962MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)6.8 7.8 35.5 2.1 52.4 20177.8 5.1 8.0 9.5 3.8 11.40.41 0.07 0.69 0.82 0.08 0.75n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: DRK (Red Hawk)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 4Fertilizer Application: May 28, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPaMTS Carbon Trial - Thorndale DVigour* Vigour Plant Seed 100 Seed(1-10) (1-10) Height Quality Weight YieldTrt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 46 DAP 91 DAP (cm) (1-5) (g) (kg/ha)1 Untreated Check 6.6 7.5 44.8 2.0 24.8 38782 Starter Fertilizer 5.9 7.8 42.5 2.0 23.9 40003 MTS + Starter 5 L/HA 6.0 8.0 44.5 2.3 23.9 36154 MTS + Starter 10 L/HA 6.3 7.8 44.0 2.0 24.2 37835 MTS + Starter 20 L/HA 5.8 7.5 43.8 2.1 23.4 35966 MTS + Starter 40 L/HA 6.1 8.0 47.5 2.0 24.9 4298MeanCVPr>F (0.05)LSD (0.05)* Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)6.1 7.8 44.5 2.1 24.2 386112.1 5.4 7.8 7.1 3.1 6.60.62 0.39 0.49 0.13 0.1 0.06n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aMarket Class: Navy (T9905)Planted: May 27, <strong>2010</strong>Reps: 4Fertilizer Application: May 28, <strong>2010</strong>Vigour rating uses 1-10 scale (10=best)Seed quality rating uses 1-5 scale (1=best)200l/ha water volume 275 kPa41


Syngenta Foliar Insecticide for Leafhoppers <strong>2010</strong> (Berna)Nymph CountsLeaf BurnSeedRate -2 0 4 10 13 19 26 -2 0 4 10 13 19 26 Phyto Maturity Quality Seed Wt Yieldtrt Name g a/ha Days after applicationDays after application% Days 1-5 g/100 kg/ha1 Untreated 0.5 1.9 2.0a 2.7a 2.8a 0.5a 1.5a 1 3 3.3 4.8a 4.5a 3.3 4 0 101 2 41.0 24732 Matador 10.0 0.5 1.6 0.6b 1.7ab 1.0b 0.4ab 0.7b 1 3 2.3 3.8ab 3.8ab 3.3 3.3 0 101 1.8 42.5 26373 Endigo A13623B 45.5 0.7 1.8 0.0b 0.4bc 0.7b 0.1c 0.2b 1 3 2.3 3.0b 3.3b 3.5 3.5 0 101 1.6 42.7 26464 Endigo A18481A New 39.0 0.5 1.9 0.0b 0.3c 0.4b 0.2bc 0.4b 1 3 2.3 3.0b 3.3b 3.3 3.3 0 101 1.9 41.6 2748Mean 0.5 1.8 0.6 1.3 1.2 0.3 0.7 1.0 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 3.5 0.0 101.0 1.8 41.9 2626C.V. 49.7 15.7 81.7 66.0 37.5 58.1 47.7 0.0 0.0 23.1 9.5 13.0 16.1 13.5 0.0 0.0 19.0 2.4 6.3Pr>F 0.57 0.44 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.88 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.14 0.20Planting: June 11 <strong>2010</strong>Row Width75 cmInsecticide ApplicationLeafhopper PressureJuly 9 <strong>2010</strong> 200 l/ha 275 kPalow/moderateSyngenta Foliar Insecticide for Leafhoppers <strong>2010</strong> (T9905)Nymph CountsLeaf BurnSeedRate -2 0 4 10 13 19 26 -2 0 4 10 13 19 26 Phyto Maturity Quality Seed Wt Yieldtrt Name g a/ha Days after applicationDays after application% Days 1-5 g/100 kg/ha1 Untreated 0.2 1 1.4a 0.4 0.6 a 0.1 0.1 0 1 1.3 1.8a 1.5 1 1 0 90.5 1.5 25.1 39920.32 Matador 10.0 0.3 0.9 0.3b 0.4 0.1 0.4 0 1 1 1.0b 1.3 1 1.3 0 90.5 1.5 24.8 4423ab3 Endigo A13623B 45.5 0.3 0.9 0.0b 0.2 0.2 b 0 0.2 0 1 0 1.0b 1.3 1 1 0 90.8 1.3 25.1 45074 Endigo A18481A New 39.0 0.4 0.9 0.0b 0.2 0.1 b 0.1 0.2 0 1 0.5 1.0b 1.3 1 1 0 90.3 1.3 24.5 4410Mean 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.1 0.0 90.5 1.4 24.9 4332C.V. 59.6 15.4 86.3 63.6 73.7 124.7 109.3 0.0 0.0 97.7 21.0 40.7 0.0 23.5 0.0 0.4 19.2 3.0 8.7Pr>F 0.59 0.48 0.00 0.15 0.03 0.34 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 0.88 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.28 0.36 0.65 0.28Planting: June 11 <strong>2010</strong>Row Width75 cmInsecticide Application July 9 <strong>2010</strong> 200 l/ha 275 kPaLeafhopper Pressure low/moderate42


Marsh Spot Evaluations in Cranberry <strong>Bean</strong>s <strong>2010</strong> - Registration TrialsTrt No. CultivarThorndale% Incidence Severity (0-5) I X S (0-5)Kippen% Incidence Severity (0-5) I X S (0-5)1 Hooter 11.0 b 1.9 bc 0.22 b 1.0 b 1.3 ab 0.03 b2 Etna 2.0 c 1.8 bc 0.03 b 0.8 b 0.4 b 0.01 b3 Red Rider 4.5 bc 1.6 c 0.08 b 2.8 b 1.2 ab 0.05 b4 HR 202-4973 9.3 bc 2.3 ab 0.20 b 0.3 b 0.5 b 0.01 b5 Crimson 11.0 b 2.0 abc 0.22 b 20.5 a 2.3 a 0.49 a6 ACUG 10-C1 7.3 bc 1.5 c 0.11 b 0.8 b 0.3 b 0.01 b7 ACUG 10-C2 30.3 a 2.6 a 0.80 a 24.5 a 2.2 a 0.54 aMeanC.V.10.856.02.022.10.2465.97.258.21.283.30.1673.5PR>F0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00LSD(.05)9.0 0.6 0.26.2 1.4 0.2Evaluation: Based on 50 seed sample taken from each rep of each variety trial location.Severity (0-5): 0 = none, 1 = 4.5 mm43


Marsh Spot Evaluations in Cranberry <strong>Bean</strong>s <strong>2010</strong> - Registration TrialsMonktonEloraSeveritySeverityTrt No. Cultivar % Incidence (0-5) I X S (0-5) % Incidence (0-5)I X S (0-5)St.Thomas% Incidence Severity (0-5) I X S (0-5)1 Hooter 5.3 b 1.8 0.09 b 0.6 c 0.5 0.01 c 3.3 b 3.1 a 0.09 bc2 Etna 6.3 b 2.1 0.13 b 2.5 c 1.2 0.03 c 4.3 b 2.1 ab 0.08 bc3 Red Rider 4.8 b 1.7 0.08 b 1.3 c 1.1 0.03 c 3.3 b 1.7 bc 0.07 bc4 HR 202-4973 7.3 b 2.1 0.16 b 0.3 c 1.0 0.01 c 4.8 b 2.7 ab 0.13 b5 Crimson 12.8 b 2.1 0.30 b 15.3 a 2.3 0.36 a 14.5 a 2.8 ab 0.41 a6 ACUG 10-C1 5.5 b 1.9 0.11 b 2.0 c 1.5 0.04 c 0.3 c 0.5 c 0.01 c7 ACUG 10-C2 56.8 b 2.7 1.56 a 8.3 b 2.1 0.18 b 16 a 2.5 ab 0.4 aMean 14.1 2.0 0.35 4.3 1.4 0.09 6.6 2.2 0.17C.V. 51.4 25.1 72.2 64.9 73.4 85.6PR>F 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00LSD(.05) 10.7 N/A 0.37 4.2 N/A 0.1227.3 38.5 35.20.00 0.01 0.002.7 1.3 0.09Evaluation: Based on 50 seed sample taken from each rep of each variety trial location.Severity (0-5): 0 = none, 1 = 4.5 mm44


Marsh Spot Evaluations in Cranberry <strong>Bean</strong>s <strong>2010</strong> - PYT TrialsKippenWoodstock% Incidence Severity (0-5) I X S (0-5) % Incidence Severity I X STrt No. Cultivar (0-5) (0-5)1 Etna 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.00 bc 0.0 b 0.0 0.002 ADMC213259 3.5 a 1.9 a 0.09 a 1.3 b 2.3 0.043 SEMC0926 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 c 1.5 b 1.1 0.034 SEMC0929 1.8 ab 2.1 a 0.06 ab 2.0 ab 2.1 0.065 SEMC1015 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 c 0.0 b 0.0 0.006 SEMC1016 1.3 b 1.5 ab 0.03 bc 3.8 a 2.1 0.097 SEMC1031 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 c 0.3 b 0.5 0.018 Red Rider 0.8 b 1.1 ab 0.02 bc 2.0 ab 1.6 0.059 HRC 187 -- -- -- 0.5 b 0.6 0.01Mean 0.9 0.9 0.02 1.3 1.2 0.03C.V. 135.0 127.4 152.2 122.4 119.8 146.1PR>F 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.14 0.16LSD(.05) 1.9 1.6 0.05 2.2 N/A N/AEvaluation: Based on 50 seed sample taken from each rep of each variety trial location.Severity (0-5): 0 = none, 1 = 4.5 mm45


Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) <strong>2010</strong> - Narrow Row Whites (T9905)Trial ID: 10DPFNAHEmergence Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (e) Days to YieldObservations%emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams 1-5 Maturity Kg/HaTrt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt.11 DAP 18 DAP 26 DAP 11 DAP 18 DAP 26 DAP 76 DAP 82 DAP 76 DAP adj. for moist(Factor A) (Factor B)1 0 70 87 86 6.0 5.3 b 7.0 7.8 0.257 52.5 22.3 2.1 95 30342 35 73 87 88 6.1 5.9 a 7.1 7.9 0.243 53.0 22.8 2.1 95 32903 70 74 85 85 6.5 6.0 a 7.3 7.9 0.282 54.3 22.7 2.3 95 33014 105 72 85 88 6.1 6.1 a 7.0 7.8 0.258 54.4 22.7 2.1 95 32765 140 74 86 85 6.3 6.1 a 7.4 8.0 0.250 51.8 22.9 2.2 95 32766 175 73 86 85 6.4 6.3 a 7.3 7.8 0.265 54.8 23.2 2.1 95 32861 Untreated 69 b 82 b 82 b 6.0 5.6 b 6.8 b 7.8 0.257 52.6 22.8 2.2 95 32112 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 76 a 90 a 91 a 6.5 6.3 a 7.5 a 7.9 0.262 54.3 22.7 2.1 95 32771/1 0 Untreated 69 84 80 6.0 4.8 6.5 7.5 0.222 52.3 22.2 2.1 95 29312/1 35 Untreated 70 82 82 6.0 5.5 6.8 8.0 0.232 49.0 22.8 2.1 95 32253/1 70 Untreated 70 82 81 6.3 6.0 6.8 7.8 0.293 52.8 22.9 2.4 95 33074/1 105 Untreated 69 85 87 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.8 0.277 56.0 22.9 2.0 95 32515/1 140 Untreated 69 78 78 5.8 5.8 7.0 8.0 0.258 52.0 22.7 2.3 95 32756/1 175 Untreated 67 80 81 6.0 5.8 7.0 7.8 0.260 53.8 23.2 2.1 95 32761/2 0 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 71 90 92 6.0 5.8 7.5 8.0 0.293 52.8 22.3 2.1 95 31382/2 35 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 75 91 94 6.3 6.3 7.5 7.8 0.253 57.0 22.9 2.0 95 33543/2 70 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 78 89 88 6.8 6.0 7.8 8.0 0.272 55.8 22.5 2.3 95 32954/2 105 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 74 86 88 6.3 6.3 7.3 7.8 0.239 52.8 22.6 2.1 95 33005/2 140 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 80 94 91 6.8 6.5 7.8 8.0 0.242 51.5 23.0 2.1 96 32786/2 175 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 78 91 90 6.8 6.8 7.5 7.8 0.271 55.8 23.2 2.1 95 3296Mean 73 86 6.2PR>F (A) 0.97 0.99PR>F (B)PR>F (A X B)LSD(0.05) (A)0.020.92N/A0.000.36N/ALSD(0.05) (B) 6 4 N/A 0.3 0.4 N/ALSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)86 6.0 7.2 7.9 0.260 53.5 22.8 2.2 95 32440.950.000.62N/A0.830.600.83N/A0.000.000.260.50.770.000.92N/A0.560.380.31N/A0.340.660.06N/A0.890.340.53N/A0.080.820.81N/A0.320.550.87N/A0.640.680.58N/A0.100.270.88N/A4N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A(a)(b)(e)FootnotesVigour Rating 1 - 10, 1 = plants irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colourTrial SummaryDry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 12 - Variety T9905This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 15 inch (38 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 14th)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (Jun 1st)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 r Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [<strong>Bean</strong> Leaf Bettle control] (July 14, 26)- 18 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Tractor mounted ProbePlanting - Treatment 1 - June 14 by Tractor mounted ProbeHarvest - All Treatments - September 21 by Tractor mounted ProbeSoil Sampling Harvest Length: 5m. Scuffled June 24thPlot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Headline 0.4 L/Ha (July 14, 26), Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 2Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sep. 2146


Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) <strong>2010</strong> - Light Kidneys (Pink Panther)ObservationsTrt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt.(Factor A) (Factor B)Trial ID: 09DPFNBHEmergence Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (e) Days to Yield%emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams 1-5 Maturity Kg/Ha11 DAP 18 DAP 26 DAP 11 DAP 18 DAP 26 DAP 76 DAP 82 DAP 76 DAP adj. for moist1 0 55 74 74 b 5.5 5.6 b 6.5 8.0 0.332 39.1 58.0 1.7 91 21402 35 55 71 71 b 5.4 5.4 b 6.5 8.1 0.345 37.8 58.4 1.6 91 23853 70 55 76 78 ab 5.5 5.9 b 6.6 7.5 0.312 39.3 57.2 1.7 91 21384 105 59 77 79 a 6.1 6.3 a 6.9 7.6 0.319 38.3 58.1 1.8 91 22505 140 55 74 74 b 5.4 6.3 a 6.5 8.0 0.344 38.9 60.1 1.7 92 23776 175 60 76 77 ab 6.0 6.4 a 6.9 7.8 0.322 40.1 57.1 1.6 92 21641 Untreated 56 73 74 5.5 5.6 b 6.4 b 7.8 0.323 37.7 57.6 1.7 91 21652 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 57 76 77 5.8 6.3 a 6.9 a 7.8 0.335 40.1 58.7 1.6 91 23201/1 0 Untreated 53 73 74 5.0 5.3 6.0 8.0 0.331 38.5 57.8 1.6 91 20672/1 35 Untreated 52 67 66 5.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 0.344 35.8 57.6 1.8 91 22623/1 70 Untreated 59 77 77 5.8 5.8 6.5 7.3 0.282 37.8 56.9 1.6 91 21524/1 105 Untreated 59 77 78 6.3 5.8 6.8 8.0 0.344 38.0 58.0 1.9 91 22515/1 140 Untreated 54 73 73 5.3 5.8 6.3 7.8 0.308 35.3 58.6 1.8 92 20426/1 175 Untreated 59 74 77 6.0 6.0 6.8 8.0 0.328 40.8 56.7 1.6 91 22131/2 0 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 58 75 74 6.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.333 39.8 58.2 1.8 91 22132/2 35 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 58 74 76 5.8 5.8 7.0 8.3 0.345 39.8 59.1 1.5 91 25093/2 70 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 50 74 79 5.3 6.0 6.8 7.8 0.342 40.8 57.4 1.8 92 21234/2 105 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 60 78 80 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.3 0.294 38.5 58.2 1.8 92 22485/2 140 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 56 74 74 5.5 6.8 6.8 8.3 0.380 42.5 61.5 1.6 92 27116/2 175 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 60 78 77 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.5 0.315 39.5 57.5 1.5 92 2116Mean 57 75 76 5.7 6.0 6.7 7.8 0.329 38.9 58.2PR>F (A) 0.63 0.12 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.76 0.45 0.91 0.87 0.10PR>F (B) 0.65 0.11 0.09 0.42 0.00 0.01 1.00 0.56 0.03 0.11PR>F (A X B)0.49 0.43 0.26 0.51 0.76 0.76 0.37 0.52 0.33 0.81LSD(0.05) (A)N/A N/A 5.0 N/A 0.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ALSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.4 N/A N/A 2.3 N/ALSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)1.70.490.390.58N/AN/AN/A91 22430.59 0.640.35 0.180.45 0.43N/A N/AN/A N/AN/A N/A(a)(b)(e)FootnotesVigour Rating 1 - 10, 1 = plants irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colourTrial SummaryDry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 12 - Variety Pink PantherThis index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 14th)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (Jun 1st)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rows Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [<strong>Bean</strong> Leaf Bettle control] (July 14, 26)- 18 DAP - Composite - May 25 by tractor mounted probePlanting - Treatment 1 - June 14 by Tractor mounted ProbeHarvest - All Treatments - September 22 by Tractor mounted ProbeSoil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Scuffled June 24thPlot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Headline 0.4 L/Ha (July 14, 26), Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 26)Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sep. 1447


Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) <strong>2010</strong> - Cranberry <strong>Bean</strong>s (Etna)Trial ID: 10DPFNCHEmergence Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. YieldObservations%emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-10 kg/m2 cm grams Kg/HaTrt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt.11 DAP 18 DAP 22 DAP 13 DAP 22 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist(Factor A) (Factor B)1 0 66 81 80 6.4 6.9 d 7.3 7.6 0.350 29.3 56.6 16852 35 67 83 84 6.5 7.3 cd 7.4 7.8 0.344 29.4 57.0 16813 70 67 83 82 6.5 7.5 bc 7.5 8.0 0.359 31.6 57.1 18374 105 72 86 87 6.9 8.0 a 7.8 7.6 0.384 30.9 57.6 17785 140 68 83 84 6.5 7.8 ab 7.5 7.9 0.389 30.0 57.1 17806 175 69 83 83 6.8 7.9 ab 7.6 7.4 0.373 29.6 57.4 18671 Untreated 69 85 85 6.8 a 7.5 7.5 7.7 0.375 29.1 b 57.3 17762 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 68 82 82 6.4 b 7.6 7.5 7.8 0.358 31.1 a 57.0 17661/1 0 Untreated 66 81 80 6.3 7.0 7.5 8.0 a 0.372 28.8 57.3 16762/1 35 Untreated 68 84 85 7.0 7.0 7.3 7.5 abc 0.341 28.3 56.9 16373/1 70 Untreated 68 86 87 6.8 7.5 7.5 8.0 a 0.363 31.0 56.9 17774/1 105 Untreated 73 86 88 7.0 8.0 7.8 7.5 abc 0.417 31.5 58.3 18605/1 140 Untreated 68 84 83 6.5 7.8 7.5 8.0 a 0.391 28.0 57.8 18536/1 175 Untreated 73 87 87 7.0 7.8 7.8 7.0 c 0.368 27.3 56.6 18561/2 0 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 66 81 80 6.5 6.8 7.0 7.3 bc 0.329 29.8 56.0 16952/2 35 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 67 83 83 6.0 7.5 7.5 8.0 a 0.347 30.5 57.1 17243/2 70 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 67 79 78 6.3 7.5 7.5 8.0 a 0.355 32.3 57.3 18984/2 105 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 71 86 87 6.8 8.0 7.8 7.8 ab 0.351 30.3 57.0 16975/2 140 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 68 82 85 6.5 7.8 7.5 7.8 ab 0.387 32.0 56.4 17076/2 175 Cruiser Maxx <strong>Bean</strong>/Dynasty 66 79 80 6.5 8.0 7.5 7.8 ab 0.378 32.0 58.2 1877Mean 68 83 83 6.6 7.6 7.5 7.7 0.367 30.1 57.1 1771PR>F (A)0.56 0.52 0.32 0.48 0.00 0.43 0.17 0.15 0.52 0.74 0.16PR>F (B) 0.32 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.54 0.57 0.55 0.13 0.02 0.43 0.83PR>F (A X B)LSD(0.05) (A)0.90N/A0.49N/A0.40N/A0.31N/A0.700.50.75N/A0.05N/A0.32N/A0.35N/A0.17N/A0.42N/ALSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A 0.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1.7 N/A N/ALSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)(a)(b)(e)FootnotesVigour Rating 1 - 10, 1 = plants irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colourTrial SummaryDry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 12 - Variety EtnaThis index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 14th)given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (Jun 1st)Seed Quality Rating 1 - 5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size <strong>and</strong> colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowInsecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [<strong>Bean</strong> Leaf Bettle control] (July 14, 26)- 18 DAP - Composite - May 25 by tractor mounted probePlanting - Treatment 1 - June 14 by Tractor mounted ProbeHarvest - All Treatments - September 13 by Tractor mounted ProbeSoil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Scuffled June 24thPlot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Headline 0.4 L/Ha (July 14, 26), Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 2Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sep. 1048


DRK Cracking Study -- Kippen <strong>2010</strong>Seed 16% 400 rpm 1Seed CharacteristicsSize Colour Shape ofseed with a crack>1mm. Stainedseed with a crack>1mm. Soakedseed with a crack>1mm. TotalMarking 21-10 (1=none)of seed 31-10 (1=excellent)of Red the crosssectionEntry EntryNo. Name1 AC Calmont 3.4 11.1 bcd 14.5 abc 1.9 b-e 2.3 Medium Light Round2 Red Hawk 2.2 12.2 ab 14.4 a-d 2.5 ab 2.6 Medium Light Medium3 OAC Redstar 1.6 7.8 bcd 9.4 b-e 2.0 b-e 2.1 Medium Light Round4 Majesty 1.4 3.8 cd 5.2 de 1.6 de 1.8 Large Light Round5 OAC 07-6D1 2.3 19.8 a 22.1 a 2.8 a 2.3 Large Light Round6 GTS 104 1.5 3.3 d 4.8 e 1.9 b-e 2.4 Medium Dark Medium7 HR 174-4239 3.4 7.4 bcd 10.8 b-e 1.6 de 1.8 Large Light Round8 GTS 106 1.2 9.3 bcd 10.5 b-e 2.1 a-d 2.4 Medium Dark Medium9 ACUG 10-D1 2.8 15.6 ab 18.4 ab 2.1 a-d 2.3 Medium Light Medium10 ACUG 10-D2 1.3 7.5 bcd 8.7 cde 1.4 e 1.9 Large Light Round11 ACUG 10-D3 3.4 15.1 ab 18.5 ab 2.0 b-e 2.5 Large Light Round12 ADMD118376 3.7 14.3 ab 18.1 ab 1.8 cde 2.6 Large Light Round13 SEMD1013 2.9 12.8 ab 15.6 abc 2.1 a-d 2.0 Large Light Round14 SEMD1030 1.8 11.9 abc 13.7 a-e 2.4 abc 2.0 Medium Dark RoundLSD (P=.05) n/a 8.3 9.30.7 n/aCV 87.453.4 49.122.726.6Gr<strong>and</strong> Mean 2.410.9 13.22.02.2Treatment Prob(F)0.680.01 0.010.01 0.47Footnotes:VarietiesPercentage of Percentage of Percentage of Severity ofUniformity1 Plants from a one row plot were h<strong>and</strong> harvested <strong>and</strong> threshed using a single plant belt cleaner to insure minimal cracking. Two samples were verifiedby HDC graders in 2009 as having very little cracking. A representative 100 seed sample was cracked in the paddle machine at 400 rpm <strong>and</strong> placed inthe cooler. The cracking study occurred within a 3 week period of harvest. The 100 seeds were stained for 30 seconds using a blue food grade dye.The seed was rinsed with methyl hydrate. If no crack greater than 1 cm was seen it was soaked for 10 minutes with water that was at room temperature.Any seed with a crack > 1cm was discarded. The percentage of no cracks was determined on a weight basis.2 Severity of Marking is a subjective deterimination were 1= no cracking <strong>and</strong> 10 = a lot of cracking <strong>and</strong>/or a lot of large cracks3 Uniformity of seed was determined using colour,size <strong>and</strong> shape. Were 1 = excellent <strong>and</strong> 10 = totally irregular size,shape <strong>and</strong>/or colour49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!