12.07.2015 Views

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From the state tax library of <strong>Reed</strong> <strong>Smith</strong> LLPwww.reedsmith.com/DEtaxfor other related documents, please email ksollie@reedsmith.com"extreme" in this case, admits that the State extends time typically in the VDA process, <strong>and</strong>states that it is without sufficient knowledge to enable it to respond to the remaining allegationsset forth in Paragraph 23 of the Verified Amended Complaint.24. Admits in response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 24 of the VerifiedAmended Complaint only that on November 17, 2004 that <strong>CA</strong> <strong>and</strong> the State entered into a FormAP DE-1, said document speaking for itself. Further answering, <strong>CA</strong> states that the document <strong>and</strong>regulations referred to by the State in Paragraph 24 of the Verified Amended Complaint are thebest evidence of their own contents <strong>and</strong>, therefore, <strong>CA</strong> denies the State<strong>'s</strong> attempt to summarize orcharacterize the contents of the documents <strong>and</strong> regulations, <strong>and</strong> states that no further response tothe allegations in this paragraph is required. To the extent a further answer is deemed necessary,<strong>CA</strong> states that it is without sufficient knowledge to enable it to respond to the remainingallegations set forth in Paragraph 24 of the Verified Amended Complaint.25. States that the allegations set forth in Paragraph 25 of the Verified AmendedComplaint amount to conclusions of law to which no response is required. To the extent ananswer is deemed necessary, <strong>CA</strong> admits only that <strong>CA</strong> entered into a voluntary disclosureagreement with the State in connection with ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>and</strong> unclaimed property, that <strong>CA</strong>conducted a self-audit <strong>and</strong> made submissions of voluminous materials to the State pursuant tothat agreement, <strong>and</strong> has offered to pay millions of dollars to the State in connection with saidagreement. <strong>CA</strong> also states that the document referenced in Paragraph 25 speaks for itself <strong>and</strong> isthe best evidence of its own content <strong>and</strong>, therefore, <strong>CA</strong> denies the State<strong>'s</strong> attempt to summarizeor characterize the contents of those documents, <strong>and</strong> states that no further response to theallegations in this paragraph is required. Further answering, <strong>CA</strong> denies any <strong>and</strong> all remainingallegations contained in Paragraph 25 of the Verified Amended Complaint.- 7 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!