12.07.2015 Views

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

CA, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaim - Reed Smith

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From the state tax library of <strong>Reed</strong> <strong>Smith</strong> LLPwww.reedsmith.com/DEtaxfor other related documents, please email ksollie@reedsmith.com244. Through the VDA, <strong>CA</strong> <strong>and</strong> the State entered into a binding contract that specifiesall of the material <strong>and</strong> essential terms of the parties' agreement.245. The material <strong>and</strong> essential terms of the parties' agreement are explicitly set forthin two st<strong>and</strong>ard forms – the VDA Notice of Intent <strong>and</strong> VDA Agreement – that were drafted bythe State.246. Pursuant to the material <strong>and</strong> essential terms of the parties' agreement, <strong>CA</strong> wasrequired to (1) complete a self-audit of its books <strong>and</strong> records for a certain amount of years tocalculate all ab<strong>and</strong>oned or unclaimed property due to the State; (2) file certain ab<strong>and</strong>onedproperty "reports" with the State; <strong>and</strong> (3) pay over all ab<strong>and</strong>oned or unclaimed property to theState in accordance with its self-audit.247. Pursuant to material <strong>and</strong> essential terms of the parties' agreement, the State wasrequired to (1) waive any interest or penalties that might otherwise have been owed by <strong>CA</strong> inconnection with its payment of ab<strong>and</strong>oned <strong>and</strong> unclaimed property for the years covered by itsself-audit <strong>and</strong> all preceding years; <strong>and</strong> (2) execute a st<strong>and</strong>ard VDA Agreement with <strong>CA</strong> thatmemorializes its release of <strong>CA</strong> from any obligation to pay interest <strong>and</strong> penalties.248. The conduct of the State, including, but not limited to, not accepting <strong>CA</strong><strong>'s</strong> offeredpayment, not executing the VDA Agreement, seeking to conduct a "second audit" of <strong>CA</strong>, <strong>and</strong>seeking to impose interest on <strong>CA</strong>, constitute one or more material breaches of the VDA.249. As a result of the State<strong>'s</strong> conduct, <strong>CA</strong> suffered <strong>and</strong> will continue to suffersubstantial damage.250. As a direct <strong>and</strong> proximate result of the State<strong>'s</strong> breach of contract, the State isliable to <strong>CA</strong> in an amount to be determined by the Court, together with interest, costs <strong>and</strong>attorneys' fees.- 77 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!