12.07.2015 Views

SALCO - Who, If, When to Marry -The Incidence of Forced Marriage in Ontario (Sep 2013)

SALCO - Who, If, When to Marry -The Incidence of Forced Marriage in Ontario (Sep 2013)

SALCO - Who, If, When to Marry -The Incidence of Forced Marriage in Ontario (Sep 2013)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9Perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Forced</strong> <strong>Marriage</strong>From the data collected on perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs, it was found that most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividuals fac<strong>in</strong>g FM had more thanone perpetra<strong>to</strong>r pressur<strong>in</strong>g them. <strong>The</strong> father was found <strong>to</strong> be pressur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the marriage<strong>in</strong> 77% <strong>of</strong> the cases, the mother was found <strong>to</strong> be pressur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 74% <strong>of</strong> the cases and the sibl<strong>in</strong>gs werepressur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 30% <strong>of</strong> the cases. <strong>When</strong> the father was found <strong>to</strong> be pressur<strong>in</strong>g, the mother was 88% likelyand the sibl<strong>in</strong>gs were 85% likely <strong>to</strong> be pressur<strong>in</strong>g as well. Many <strong>of</strong> the respondents <strong>of</strong>ten stated “family”as the source <strong>of</strong> the pressure, which was unders<strong>to</strong>od <strong>to</strong> mean the immediate family. <strong>The</strong>se results werecorroborated by Buckeridge who mentioned that <strong>in</strong> her experience, sibl<strong>in</strong>gs, particularly older brothers, arethe next most likely culprits after the parents, <strong>in</strong> pressur<strong>in</strong>g women <strong>to</strong> get married. 1 Aunts were found <strong>to</strong> bepressur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 27% <strong>of</strong> the cases while uncles were pressur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 29% <strong>of</strong> the cases.After parents and sibl<strong>in</strong>gs, extended family, grandparents and religious leaders were reported <strong>to</strong> be mostlikely <strong>to</strong> be push<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> FM. Community elders, future or potential <strong>in</strong>-laws, ex-boyfriend andfriends were also reported <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> forc<strong>in</strong>g people <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> an unwanted marriage.10Reasons for Forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Marriage</strong>Many reasons were reported for forc<strong>in</strong>g a marriage <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g religious and cultural beliefs, economic status,immigration status, community pressure, marriage as a cure for mental health issues, and emotionalmanipulation related <strong>to</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> a parent. 2 <strong>The</strong> survey found that <strong>in</strong> 66% <strong>of</strong> the cases, cultural traditionwas reported <strong>to</strong> be a lead<strong>in</strong>g reason for forc<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the marriage, followed by family reputation(58%). Other common reasons <strong>in</strong>cluded morality and honour (50%), immigration/sponsorship reasons (24%)and economic transactions (20%).Figure 7: Reasons Provided for <strong>Forced</strong> <strong>Marriage</strong>s60PERCENTAGE OF CASES50403020100Cultural TraditionFamily ReputationMorality & HonourEconomic TransactionImmigration & SponsorshpOtherREASONS1 <strong>Forced</strong> marriages and gaps <strong>in</strong> services: <strong>in</strong>terview with Jakki Buckeridge (2012).2 <strong>Forced</strong>/non-consensual marriages: a <strong>to</strong>olkit for service providers (2010, p. 14); and forced marriage: the risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs andthe effect <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>imum age for a sponsor, and <strong>of</strong> leave <strong>to</strong> enter the UK as a spouse or fiancé(e) (2007, p. 30).16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!