AMCS Bulletin 5 Reprintfour first <strong>for</strong>m males, two females, one juvenile male,and two juvenile females from Cueva del Guayabo,12 km NE of Valle Nacional, Oaxaca, taken by thesame collectors on 29 December 1972, is tentativelyassigned to this subspecies. On the basis of the proximityof this and the locality from which the nominatesubspecies was described, one might anticipatethat the crayfish in Cueva del Guayabo would bemore closely allied to P. fA) oaxacae oaxacae, particularlyin as much as both serve as hosts to the sametwo species of ostracods, Entocythere claytonhoffiand Ankylocythere maya. In the type-locality of P.fA) oaxacae reddelli this crayfish harbors E. claytonhoffiand Ankylocythere bidentata (Rioja).Variations-As in the nominate subspecies, themost conspicuous variations among the specimensfrom the type-locality are those associated with injuriesand regeneration. Numbers of tubercles on thepodomeres of the cheliped, except in regeneratedappendages, vary little from the range expressed in theabove descriptions. While the size of the pigmentspot in the eye is slightly variable, the spot is alwayssharply defined. In comparing the specimens comprisingthe type-series with those from Cueva del Guayaboand the type-series of the nominate subspecies, thefollowing were noted. In Cueva del Guano (nominatesubspecies), the areola constitutes from 35.8 to 37.8(Average 36.5) percent of the carapace length and43.7 to 46.1 (Av. 44.8) percent of the postorbitallength. In Cueva del Nacimiento del RIo San AntoniofP. o. reddelli), the corresponding ranges are 32.9 to35.6 (Av. 34.3) and 42.0 to 43.7 (Av. 43.0) percent.In Cueva del Guayabo (Atypical P. o. reddelli), theranges are 34.1 to 35.7 (Av. 35.1) and 42.5 to 44.4(Av. 43.5). In Cueva del Guano, the telson has fromone to three (usually two) spines in the caudolateralcorner of the cephalic section; none of the individualshas cervical spines; and the reddish purple eye pigmentmay be absent to moderately abundant, butnever is the pigmented area sharply delimited. Incontrast, the specimens from Cueva del Nacimientodel RIo San Antonio have three spines in at leastone of the caudolateral corners of the cephalic sectionof the telson, a cervical spine is present on atleast one side, and the black eye-pigment is sharplymargined. Among the specimens from Cueva delGuayabo, only one has three spines in the caudolateralcorner of the cephalic section of the telson(usually there are two); two of the specimens lackcervical spines; in all of them, however, the blackpigment spot in the eye is sharply outlined.In view of the intermediate nature of the charactersexemplified in the specimens from Cueva delGuayabo between those observed in the specimensfrom the other two localities, it seems highly probablethat the populations in the latter two are capable ofinterbreeding, if indeed there does not exist a geneflowbetween them. Because of the characteristics ofthe specimens from Cueva del Guayabo, subspecificrank is assigned to these new troglobites.Relationships-Procambarus fA) oaxacae is moreclosely allied to Procambarus fA) rodriguezi Hobbs(1943) than to any other descri bed species, and asthe troglobitic crayfish fauna in the karst area ofVeracruz and Oaxaca becomes better known, it ispossible, if not probable, that intergradation will bediscovered between all three of the taxa recognizedhere. The characters that serve to separate the twosubspecies of P. fA) oaxacae have been discussedunder variations above, and those that serve to distinguishthese subspecies from P. fA) rodriguezi arethe absence of a prominent corneous caudomesialboss on the fifth pereiopod and the decidedly lessflattened mesial process of the first pleopod in thefirst <strong>for</strong>m male; in the female the annulus ventralisis less protruding, more gently rounded posteroventrally,and the postannular plate does not have asimple transverse row of tubercles. In addition, inthe nominate subspecies, there is no cervical spine,and, in P. fA) oaxacae reddelli, there are several distinguishingcharacteristics: the spines on the chelipedare distinctly more strongly developed, and there isone strong one on the mesial surface of the carpus andanother on the distolateral extremity of the merusthat are absent in P. rodriguezi; furthermore, threespines in the caudolateral corner of the cephalic sectionof the telson have not been observed in the latterspecies.LITERATURE CITEDHobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1943. Two new crayfishes of the genusProcambarus from Mexico (Decapoda, Astacidael. L1oydia,6: 198-206.Hobbs, Horton H., Jr. 1969. Procambarus villalobosi, unnuevo Cambarino de San Luis Potos( Mexico (Decapoda,Astacidael. An. Inst. BioI. Univ. Nal. A. de Mexico, SerieCiencia del Mar y Limnologla, 38( 1) :41-46.Holthuis, L.B. 1952. The subfamily Palaemoninae. In Generalrevision of the Palaemonidae (Crustacea Decapoda Natantialof the Americas, II. Dec. Pap. Allan Hancock Found.,no. 12, pp. 1-396.Villalobos, Alejandro. 1955. Cambarinos de la fauna rnexicana.Tesis, Facultad de Ciencias. Univ. Nal. A. de Mexico,pages 1-290.Villalobos, Alejandro. 1958. Estudios de los cambarinos mexicanosXIII. Descripcion de una nueva especie de cambarinosdel estado de Veracruz. An. Inst. BioI. Univ. Nal. A.de Mexico, 28( 1,2):279-288.38
AMCS Bulletin 5 ReprintTHE GENUS SPHAEROMICOLA (OSTRACODA, ENTOCYTHERIDAE) IN MEXICOHorton H. Hobbs, Jr., and H. H. Hobbs IIISmithsonian Institution and Indiana UniversityChiefly through the diligence and cooperation ofthose active in surveying the troglobitic fauna ofMexico, the range of the genus Sphaeromicola israpidly becoming more accurately defined. Almostcertainly, the occurrence of ostracods of this genus inMexico is limited by the ranges of their isopod hosts,and collections of these much more conspicuous animalshave resulted in the accumulation of specimensof Sphaeromicola from some 18 localities in thestates of Nuevo Leon, San Luis POtOSI: and Tamaulipas.All of the localities from which these ostracodsare known are reported here together with referencesto earlier records of their occurrence in each cave.One or both of us have examined specimens fromevery locality cited except Cueva de EI Pachon,Tamaulipas.The host of the new species described here is notknown with certainty, <strong>for</strong> the ostracods were retrievedfrom a container in which there were fourspecies of isopods: Mexistenasellus parzefalli Magniez,M. wilkensi Magniez, an undescribed member of thefamily Cirolanidae, and another belonging to the genusCyathura. These specimens were collected inCueva del Huisache, San Luis POtOSI~We should like to thank all of those collectorscited <strong>for</strong> permitting us to examine the specimens onwhich this report is based. Special thanks are dueJames R. Reddell, who sorted and transmitted mostof the specimens to the Smithsonian, William R. Elliott,who permitted the removal of specimens fromisopods that were in his collection, and Thomas E.Bowman who kindly identified most of the hosts.We are also grateful to Fenner A. Chace, Jr., MargaretA. Daniel, and James E. Peters <strong>for</strong> their criticisms ofthe manuscript.Sphaeromicola cirolanae RiojaFig. 1a, bSphaeromicola cirolanae Rioja, 1951:170.Hobbs (1971 :45-47) reviewed the range of thisostracod, including several new locality records, citeda previously unreported host, and called attention tothe two types of clasping apparatus, here designatedthe angular (Fig. 1a) and curved (Fig. 1b) types, thatoccur in the male.Listed below are all of the known locality records<strong>for</strong> this ostracod together with the host and the typeor types of clasping apparatus represented in eachcave. The species is known only from Mexico.NUEVO LEON:Cueva La Chorrera, 27.3 km SW Linares, on Speocirolanaguerrai Contreras, 13 June 1971, SalvadorContreras-Balderas, coil. - curved type.SAN LUIS POTOSI:Sotano de Yerbaniz, 21 km NNE Ciudad Valles, onSpeocirolana pelaezi (Bolivar), 7 January 1970, R.W.Mitchell et aI., coil. - curved type.Sotano del Tigre, 14 km NNE Ciudad Valles, on S.pelaezi,1 February 1968, R.W. Mitchell, coil. - angularand curved types (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Sotano del Arroyo, 12 km NNE Ciudad Valles, onS. pelaezi, 24 November 1962, M. Tandy and W.Russell, coil. - angular type (Hobbs, 1971 :46).Sotanito de Montecillos, 9 km NE Ciudad Valles,on S. pelaezi, 21 May 1971, C. Bittinger, coil. -39