30.11.2012 Views

Country & Territory Reports - Landmine Action

Country & Territory Reports - Landmine Action

Country & Territory Reports - Landmine Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 falklands islands/malvinas<br />

Falklands Islands/Malvinas<br />

Background<br />

The Falklands Islands/Malvinas are contaminated with<br />

ERW and AV mines as a result of an armed conflict between<br />

the U.K. and Argentina in 1982. 658 The British Royal<br />

Engineers conducted post-conflict clearance in and around<br />

Port Stanley, as well as in Argentinean minefields. 659<br />

However, due to casualties among deminers, clearance of<br />

the minefields was stopped. ERW and mine contaminated<br />

areas were to “be surrounded by perimeter fences and<br />

marked off as danger areas”. 660<br />

Assessment of the problem<br />

ERW and MOTAPM contaminate conflict-affected areas of the<br />

islands, especially the settlements on West Falkland at Port<br />

Howard and Fox Bay and on East Falkland at Goose Green,<br />

Port Fitzroy, Darwin, the Murrell peninsular and in and<br />

around Port Stanley. 661 Stanley Common, Gypsy Cove and<br />

York Bay beaches are heavily mined with AP and AV mines,<br />

the latter “totally inaccessible.” 662 Contamination is also<br />

significant north-west of Stanley, near Wireless ridge and<br />

Mount Longdon, south of Stanley on the Common and east of<br />

the capital around the FIGAS (Falkland Islands Government<br />

Air Service) airstrip. 663 Exact numbers of ERW are not<br />

available because: “Unfortunately, as there was no<br />

requirement at the time to keep such records (of munitions<br />

used), any that were kept would now have been destroyed<br />

through routine file maintenance and document control. (...)<br />

The best estimate we have of the quantities of ERW/MOTAPM<br />

left in the Falklands is about 15,000 items.” 664<br />

The precise number of booby traps and AV mines in the<br />

Malvinas/Falklands Islands is unknown. 665 In 2001, the<br />

U.S. Department of State calculated that the quantity of<br />

ERW is small and estimated that the extent of the land area<br />

affected by ERW and landmines was about 20 sq km. 666 In<br />

2003, Argentina gave a similar estimate. 667 The JSEOD<br />

(Joint Service Explosive Ordnance Disposal) stationed in<br />

the islands holds maps of battlefields and mined areas. 668<br />

There have been assessments of ERW/MOTAPM contamination<br />

in suspected areas, as well as assessments of the<br />

impact of this contamination. 669 When the U.K. deposited<br />

its first Article 7 report it highlighted three items: “Stanley<br />

Minefield Record Map revised 12/06/90; Stanley Minefield<br />

and Area Situation; and Camp Minefield Situation map<br />

dated 01/02/94.” 670<br />

Cluster munitions were used on the islands by British forces<br />

during the 1982 conflict. Because of their high failure rate,<br />

due in part to soft ground in target areas, the air-dropped BL-<br />

755 cluster munitions left large numbers of ERW. 671<br />

erw and motapm – global survey 2003–2004<br />

Impact<br />

Fourteen landmine casualties have been reported by the U.S.<br />

Department of State in the Falklands/Malvinas, but there<br />

were no ERW/mine casualties in the period 1994-2001. 672<br />

The U.K. Ministry of Defense and sources from the Falkland<br />

Islands, however, contend that there have been no deaths or<br />

injuries from ERW or mines after the 1982 conflict. 673<br />

ERW and MOTAPM have little socio-economic impact on the<br />

Falklands Islands. 674 Although contaminated land cannot<br />

“be used for livelihood activities such as agriculture”, this<br />

has no significant effect on the Falkland Islands economy<br />

or society. 675 According to UK officials, housing and infrastructure<br />

projects are potentially affected by MOTAPM and<br />

ERW contamination, but JSEOD personnel are prepared to<br />

attend to any ERW or mine-related matter. 676 “There are<br />

areas that the population would like to see returned to<br />

safe land around Stanley, such as Stanley Common, but<br />

Falkland islanders have adapted their lives around the<br />

threat and manage to remain on the whole unaffected by<br />

the problem.” 677<br />

In the period 2003-2004, several items of ERW were found:<br />

■ In January 2003, an 11-year-old boy found an 81mm highexplosive<br />

mortar hidden in peat. 678<br />

■ On 16 October 2003, the JSEOD received a report of a<br />

suspicious metal object near Stanley Airport. The item, a<br />

1,000lb bomb, was blown up in situ. 679<br />

■ In November 2003, a journalist working for a U.S. radio<br />

station witnessed the detonation of an Italian AV mine. 680<br />

■ On 26 January 2004, an AV mine was discovered between<br />

two rocks close to the Tussock islands in Port William. The<br />

mine, located about 100 metres from two minefields in<br />

the area, was blown up by JSEOD personnel. 681<br />

■ In May 2004, a mortar and an AP mine were found on<br />

Wireless Ridge. The devices were located some distance<br />

from the nearest minefield and police suspected they had<br />

been picked up and moved. 682<br />

Efforts to address these problems<br />

The Royal Engineers Joint Service Explosive Ordnance<br />

Disposal (JSEOD) conducts mine action in the Falklands<br />

Islands. 683 It briefs locals and tourists on mine awareness,<br />

safe areas on the islands and minefield marking and<br />

fencing. 684 In addition, the Falkland Islands have two<br />

regular press publications, which post ordnance-related<br />

subjects. 685 Civilian contractors maintain fences around<br />

contaminated areas and the JSEOD conducts regular<br />

checks. 686 The detachment is also responsible for the<br />

disposal of all ERW and mines found outside minefields. 687

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!