12.07.2015 Views

Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling - A Historical Contextual Perspective to the 2010 Nobel Prize

Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling - A Historical Contextual Perspective to the 2010 Nobel Prize

Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling - A Historical Contextual Perspective to the 2010 Nobel Prize

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Palladium</strong>-<strong>Catalyzed</strong> <strong>Cross</strong>-<strong>Coupling</strong>AngewandteChemieScheme 13. The Sonogashira reaction. [67–69]peting homocoupling (Glaser coupling, see Section 2.1.1.1)byproduct formation. The combination of <strong>the</strong> detrimentaleffects of <strong>the</strong> Castro–Stephens coupling combined with <strong>the</strong>high functional-group <strong>to</strong>lerance of <strong>the</strong> Sonogashira methodplaces <strong>the</strong> latter reaction in a premium position as a late-stagecoupling strategy in <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis of complex molecules, forexample, sensitive eneyne-based natural products. [70]2.2.4.2. The <strong>Palladium</strong>-<strong>Catalyzed</strong> Corriu–Kumada Reaction(1975): Nickel Catalysis Evolves in<strong>to</strong> <strong>Palladium</strong> CatalysisThe disclosure of <strong>the</strong> palladium-catalyzed Sonogashirareaction opened a new vista for dependable C(sp 2 ) C(sp)coupling. The advantageous effects of palladium catalysisbecame increasingly recognized and <strong>the</strong> promise of similarbenefits through its use in <strong>the</strong> previously established nickelcatalyzedprocesses became an alluring prospect.At <strong>the</strong> time, <strong>the</strong> nickel-catalyzed process was specific <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> coupling of Grignard reagents. However, <strong>the</strong> activity ofa number of palladium complexes were independently investigatedover <strong>the</strong> 1975–1979 period by several groups(Scheme 14) in efforts <strong>to</strong> broaden <strong>the</strong> substrate scope of <strong>the</strong>Corriu–Kumada reaction. The contributions of Murahashi in1975 [71] demonstrated, for <strong>the</strong> first time, coupling of Grignardreagents under palladium catalysis. In this context, noteworthyare also <strong>the</strong> contributions of Fauvarque and Jutand, [72]Sekiya, [73] Dang, [74] and Negishi. [75] Moreover, Murahashidemonstrated, although not catalytically, <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong>resourceful organolithium species as a coupling partner—a transformation previously impossible under nickel catalysis.Murahashi would subsequently develop this observation in<strong>to</strong>a catalytic variant of <strong>the</strong> reaction 1979. [71a]Similar <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> palladium-catalyzed Sonogashira reaction,studies on <strong>the</strong> Corriu–Kumada coupling, catalyzed by palladiumra<strong>the</strong>r than by nickel, revealed some striking improvements.The palladium-catalyzed Corriu–Kumada couplingshowed increased stereofidelity and broader substrate scopeof <strong>the</strong> organometallic coupling partner. However, this selectivitycame at a cost—<strong>the</strong> palladium-catalyzed proceduresonly allowed <strong>the</strong> coupling of <strong>the</strong> more reactive aryl bromidesand iodides, whereas aryl chlorides proved <strong>to</strong> be inert. Thus,nickel remained <strong>the</strong> brutish older bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> palladium, able<strong>to</strong> affect <strong>the</strong> coupling of a wider range of halide (and laterpseudohalide) partners for which palladium failed. However,repeatedly over <strong>the</strong> coming years, palladium would usurpnickel because its reactivity could be modulated through <strong>the</strong>use of ligands whilst still retaining its improved selectivity. Asdiscussed below, nowhere is this observation clearer than in<strong>the</strong> efforts of Negishi <strong>to</strong> broaden <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> organometalliccoupling partner.2.3. The Second Wave (1976–1995): Exploration of <strong>the</strong>Organometallic <strong>Coupling</strong> PartnerA common limitation of both organomagnesium andorganolithium coupling methods was <strong>the</strong> inherent in<strong>to</strong>leranceof sensitive functional groups <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> reactive nature of <strong>the</strong>seanionic organometallic species. Thus, in <strong>the</strong> years surrounding<strong>the</strong> Mizoroki–Heck discoveries, chemists sought <strong>to</strong> find lessreactiveanionic organometallic reagents.2.3.1. The Negishi Reaction (1976): Organoaluminum andOrganozinc as <strong>Coupling</strong> PartnersIn 1976, Negishi reported on <strong>the</strong> cross-coupling oforganoaluminum reagents, employing nickel catalysts(Scheme 15). [76] However, in <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis of conjugateddienes with organoaluminum reagents, a significant deteriorationof stereospecificity was observed in several cases. OnScheme 14. The palladium-catalyzed Corriu–Kumada cross-couplingreaction. [71, 72] Scheme 15. The Negishi cross-coupling reaction. [76–78]Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5062 – 5085 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.angewandte.org5071

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!