lifestyle needs to be upgraded, and theeducational system requires more complexdevelopment. In regions where budget andhousehold incomes are not so high, fuel andenergy orientation does not give any clearsocial development advantages.2.4. The crisis andits social aftermathin fuel & energy regionsIn the new economic crisis, which beganin the fall of 2008, specialization in the fuelindustry acted as safety net for regions onceagain, though not for all regions. Levels ofindustrial output held up best in single-industryoil extraction regions: in Khanty-MansiAutonomous District and Tomsk Regionindustrial output in H1 2009 was only 2% lowery-o-y (i.e. compared with the same period of theprevious year), while Sakhalin Region and NenetsAutonomous District showed y-o-y growth of 22-39%. These figures compare with averageshrinkage of <strong>Russia</strong>n industrial production by15% y-o-y in the first half of 2009. In oil producingregions with more diversified economies severityof the crisis was partly determined by the state ofother industries: decline of industrial output wasmoderate (between 8% and 14%) inBashkortostan, Tatarstan and Orenburg Region,but problems in the machine-building industryled to a particularly acute recession (29% outputdecline) in Samara Region. The situation in thegas industry has been more difficult than in theoil industry, so recession rates in major gasproducingregions have been much higher (15%in Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District and 19% inAstrakhan Region). Kemerovo Regionexperienced the worst decline among coalminingareas (19%), but that was mainly due toproblems in the local steel industry, whichsuffered particularly badly as a result of theeconomic crisis.The social aftermath of the crisis has twovectors. The first has been a sharp decline inbudget revenues of more developed regions,regardless of acuteness of their industrial decline.Before the crisis the share of profit tax in budgetsof these regions was as high as 20-45%. Fallingprices on international markets dramaticallyreduced corporate incomes, and profit taxpayments in resource-oriented regions fell bybetween 2 and 9 times. As a result, own budgetrevenues (both tax and non-tax) in Kemerovoand Tyumen regions fell by 30-35%, revenues inKhanty-Mansi Autonomous District andKrasnoyarsk Territory were down by a quarter,and the budget of Samara Region lost 20% ofrevenues raised inside the region. A forecast byFigure 2.7Infant mortality per 1000 live births302000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20082520151050Khanty-Mansi Autonomous DistrictRepublic of TatarstanKomi RepublicSamara RegionSakhalin RegionOrenburg RegionRF national averageAstrakhan RegionKemerovo RegionNenets Autonomous DistrictRepublic of BashkortostanKrasnoyarsk TerritoryPerm TerritoryYamal-Nenets Autonomous District40 National Human Development <strong>Report</strong> in the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation 2009
the Ministry for Regional Development predictsthat negative difference between actual andexpected budget earnings in 2009 will be largestin Tyumen Region (59%), Khanty-MansiAutonomous District (38%), Republic of Tatarstan(25%), Perm Territory and Yamal-NenetsAutonomous District (20%), i.e. in all the leadingoil & gas producing regions of the country. Thiswill inevitably lead to reduction of socialspending (purchases of new equipment for socialpurposes will be most affected), though localgovernment has promised to maintain socialpayments and wages of employees in the budgetsector.The other main social consequence ofthe crisis is unemployment. Regionsspecializing in machine-building andmetallurgy have been hardest hit, becausethese industries suffered most from therecession and because they are more laborintensive.Highest rates of unemployment inearly 2009 among fuel & energy regions werein Komi, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Astrakhan andSakhalin Regions, and Nenets AutonomousDistrict, all of which had unemployment ratesabove the national average (Figure 2.8).Quarterly surveys of regional labor markets areinsufficiently accurate, but trends are clear.Firstly, the autonomous districts of TyumenRegion (<strong>Russia</strong>’s largest oil & gas producers)have been able to avoid a surge ofunemployment. Secondly, the situation inregions, which had higher unemployment rateseven before the crisis, is now worse. Thirdly, inaddition to job losses, there has been a growingtendency towards part-time employment,which is a form of concealed unemployment.The tougher the recession (e.g. in Samara andKemerovo Regions, and in Perm Territory), themore frequently private businesses tried toreduce costs by switching their employees topart-time work. Employment issues came to ahead in Q1 2009 and tension on the labormarket had started to subside by the summer,albeit slowly. However, the improvement maybe seasonal, in which case a new wave ofunemployment should be expected in the fallof 2009.Growth of unemployment and hiddenunemployment should be accompanied bydecline of personal incomes, but the declinehas been minimal to date: in January-May 2009Figure 2.8Unemployment (ILO standards) as % of economically active population and part-time employment(those working part-time and temporarily laid off, % of average employee headcount)16Unemployment, 200814121086Unemployment,February 2009Unemployment, May2009Part-time employment,January-March 2009Part-time employment,June 2009420Nenets AutonomousDistrictSakhalin RegionKomi RepublicKrasnoyarsk TerritoryPerm TerritoryRepublic of TatarstanOrenburg RegionKemerovo RegionRF national averageAstrakhan RegionTomsk RegionRepublic of BashkortostanTyumen RegionKhanty-Mansi Autonomous DistrictSamara RegionYamal-Nenets Autonomous District41
- Page 1 and 2: National Human Development Reportin
- Page 3 and 4: National Human Development Reportin
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors express
- Page 7 and 8: Dear Reader,You have before you the
- Page 9 and 10: PREFACEThis is the 13 th National H
- Page 11 and 12: country’s fuel & energy regions r
- Page 13 and 14: environmental degradation and enhan
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1The Energy Sector,the Econ
- Page 17 and 18: By 2008 Russia had increased its sh
- Page 19 and 20: the share of energy in the national
- Page 21 and 22: exported, increased. However, this
- Page 23 and 24: elimination of structural and terri
- Page 25 and 26: • Establishment of competitive me
- Page 27 and 28: number of developed countries, incl
- Page 29 and 30: Although the United Nations Climate
- Page 31 and 32: industrial region of the Urals - Sv
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2. Budget capacityand structure o
- Page 35 and 36: (the Federal State Statistics Servi
- Page 37 and 38: Immigration by young and highly ski
- Page 39 and 40: energy regions exacerbate the incom
- Page 41: Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Auton
- Page 45 and 46: various other long-term problems in
- Page 47 and 48: is also associated with the fuel an
- Page 49 and 50: Republic of Mordovia 8051 0.732 68.
- Page 51 and 52: Legislative control of impact audit
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3Personal Incomes, the Ener
- Page 55 and 56: than any other sources of income -
- Page 57 and 58: Are wages now the main instrument f
- Page 59 and 60: comparison of month-on-month develo
- Page 61 and 62: • The unemployed, people who aree
- Page 63 and 64: Employment in the energy sector acc
- Page 65 and 66: The share of household expenditures
- Page 67 and 68: subsidization practices in the regi
- Page 69 and 70: in power use between regions now de
- Page 71 and 72: Electricity prices for households h
- Page 73 and 74: • Steady decrease in the percenta
- Page 75 and 76: 1. The number of graduates with eng
- Page 77 and 78: As well as requiring better fuelcom
- Page 79 and 80: Box 4.1. The village of Kolvain Uss
- Page 81 and 82: continue to use solid fuel for a lo
- Page 83 and 84: Box 4.3. Ambient air pollution andp
- Page 85 and 86: either by large power generating fa
- Page 87 and 88: Box 4.6. A city at riskNovocherkass
- Page 89 and 90: In order to assess impact of thesee
- Page 91 and 92: generation facilities through safer
- Page 93 and 94:
achieved in developed countries. So
- Page 95 and 96:
equires 2-6 times more capital inve
- Page 97 and 98:
government) should set targets and
- Page 99 and 100:
networks. In 2007 government budget
- Page 101 and 102:
enhancement is also important. Ener
- Page 103 and 104:
energy efficiency of the transport
- Page 105 and 106:
Box 5.1. Programme of the Ministry
- Page 107 and 108:
educational and informational suppo
- Page 109 and 110:
mechanism for using national quota
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 6.2Share of electricity gene
- Page 113 and 114:
One of the major benefits of renewa
- Page 115 and 116:
odies; outdoor air; rocks and soil;
- Page 117 and 118:
Design and construction of geotherm
- Page 119 and 120:
Box 6.3. Prospects for nuclear powe
- Page 121 and 122:
consists of out-dated equipment at
- Page 123 and 124:
ConclusionThe world’s nuclear pow
- Page 125 and 126:
7.1. Impact of the fuel& energy sec
- Page 127 and 128:
Table 7.5Solid waste from productio
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 7.7Areas of disturbed and rec
- Page 131 and 132:
nature of the impact (atmospheric e
- Page 133 and 134:
Further, the economic cost ofenviro
- Page 135 and 136:
trends continued the damage would a
- Page 137 and 138:
What the government needs to do ino
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 7.2.1Specific atmospheric em
- Page 141 and 142:
money value of industrial output) c
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 7.2.4Trends in specific atmo
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 8The Energy Industry and Su
- Page 147 and 148:
eing equal) it only reflects that p
- Page 149 and 150:
(MDGs), issued by the UN in 2000. T
- Page 151 and 152:
8.4. The energy factorin integral i
- Page 153 and 154:
Canada, the USA and Great Britain h
- Page 155 and 156:
Box 8.2. Energy efficiencyindicator
- Page 157 and 158:
Box 8.4. Energy efficiency rating o
- Page 159 and 160:
41 Penza Region 116.0 -35.2 -4.542
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix to Chapter 1Table 1.1. GDP
- Page 163 and 164:
Attachment to Chapter 4Table 4.1Rus
- Page 165 and 166:
Attachment to Chapter 4Volga Federa
- Page 167 and 168:
Attachment to Chapter 4Belovo Belov
- Page 169 and 170:
The previous National Human Develop