Preaching and Preachers

The Shape of the Sermonfewer than three heads you are a bad preacher; if you have more thanthree you are an equally bad preacher. This is quite ridiculous, ofcourse, but it is amazing to notice how easily one falls into habits andbecomes the slave of a tradition. I was certainly brought up in thistradition of 'always an introduction and three heads'. People lookedfor them; that was the almost invariable custom of the preachers.That it had become the tradition in that particular Church-theWelsh Presbyterian-was unusually ridiculous because one of thegreatest preachers of that denomination, indeed its greatest preacher,and one of its founders, Daniel Rowlands, often had as many as tenheadings to a sermon. A contemporary writer said that listening toRowlands was like watching an apothecary with a number of bottlescontaining wonderful perfumes. He would take the first bottle andpull out the stopper or the cork and release the wonderful aroma whichwas then wafted over the entire congregation. Then he would putthat bottle down and take up the second one and do the same withthat. And there were often as many as ten bottles. I tell that story inorder to enforce the point that we must not become slaves in thismatter.However, let us turn to something more important. The importantthing about these 'heads' is that they must be there in your text, andthat they must arise naturally out of it. This is vital. The actual divisioninto heads, as I am going to show you, is not as easy as it maysound. Some people seem to be gifted with an unusual facility in thisrespect. It used to be said of Alexander Maclaren-a Baptist preacherin England at the end of the last century and the beginning of thiscentury, and whose volumesof sermons are still being reprinted-thathe seemed to have a kind of golden hammer in his hand with which hejust tapped a text, and immediately it divided itself up into inevitableheads. However it is not given to many of us to have this goldenhammer; but we must always make sure that these divisions arisenaturally out of the text. Let me first put this negatively; because it isso important. Never force a division. And do not add to the numberof divisions for the sake of some kind of completeness that you have2°7