12.07.2015 Views

Lower Byersville Creek Flood-Risk Mapping Update - City of ...

Lower Byersville Creek Flood-Risk Mapping Update - City of ...

Lower Byersville Creek Flood-Risk Mapping Update - City of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peterborough<strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Flood</strong>-<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Mapping</strong> <strong>Update</strong>STUDY METHODrepresentation <strong>of</strong> backwater effects and <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> flood conditions in themain outlet channels on conditions within tributary storm sewer systems.In this approach, the EXTRAN object is providing dynamic routing using the sametechnique that had previously been applied circa 1990 when the NWS DAMBRKmodel had been used to account for floodplain storage effects on the mildly slopedlower portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> (especially downstream <strong>of</strong> The Parkway). In themore recent updates to the HEC-RAS model, the newly developed “unsteady flow”capabilities <strong>of</strong> HEC-RAS had been enabled in the 2003 update (GreenlandEngineering) apparently in an effort to do away with the need for a separate dynamicrouting model.The use <strong>of</strong> PCSWMM2005 EXTRAN to provide the dynamic flow routing, and thento apply the resulting peak flows in a steady-state version <strong>of</strong> the HEC-RAS modelhas been selected as the preferred approach, based on discussions with ORCA.2.3.2 Scope <strong>of</strong> PCSWMM Model <strong>Update</strong>To support an update to the flood-risk mapping for lower <strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>, it wasdetermined that some modifications to the PCSWWM2005 model were needed.Details are provided in Appendix C. In summary, the modifications were as follows:Modification to Subcatchment BoundariesIt was decided that some minor adjustments to subcatchment boundaries in the lowerwatershed were warranted, to better represent inflow distribution along the mainstem <strong>of</strong> <strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>, below The Parkway.Also, it was decided that an increase in surface imperviousness was needed in thesubcatchment (Subcatchment 5.1; see Appendix C, Figure C-1, for map) in which issituated the property on which a Costco commercial development has recently beencompleted (in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> The Parkway and Crawford Drive).<strong>Update</strong> to Flow Routing ElementsThe PCSWMM2005 EXTRAN model has been modified to include the following(see Appendix C for detail):• Flow routing elements to better represent the possibility <strong>of</strong> flow spilling over topthe former CNR line (recreational pathway), and resulting surface flow downCameron Street, Mountain Ash Road, Orpington Road and Erskine Avenue.• Potential for lateral split <strong>of</strong> flow from the Examiner Ditch at the 90-degree bendat the former CNR, with elements added to represent overland flowsouthwestward alongside the recreational pathway; and including the culvert pipeunder the pathway near the northwest corner <strong>of</strong> Master Brand Cabinets.• Potential for spill flow from the main stem <strong>of</strong> <strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> flowing eastwardalong Crawford Drive and from Crawford Drive into to drainage swale alongrear yards <strong>of</strong> homes on Mountain Ash Road.3-2087-09-01/R_3-04108226_<strong>Byersville</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> <strong>Mapping</strong> <strong>Update</strong> 2-708/11/10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!