12.07.2015 Views

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contributions to Zoology, 74 (1/2) – 2005 13Table 5. Kendall rank-order correlations between note types and <strong>song</strong> motivation (defined as notes per phrase, see text). Eachcell below row 4 includes <strong>the</strong> correlation coefficient (Tau) and <strong>the</strong> error probability (p). Stars and bold print indicate significantcorrelations.NoteIndividual atype Howletts 1 Howletts 2 Munich Halimun Jakarta 1 Jakarta 2Number <strong>of</strong>notes b 1159 1657 483935950615 6587661667Number <strong>of</strong> 295 (453) 379 (546) 106 (178)phrases b 205 (301)190 (341)81 (98) 143 (222)139 (195)A+B1 – 0.2630.078–0.3720.002 *– 0.673 0.999B4 0.1000.0280.2950.1160.2670.5060.8180.0780.5810.165C1 – 0.278 –0.069 –0.007 –0.404 0.0000.0630.5720.9650.055>0.999C2 0.0580.2660.129–0.041 0.3680.6980.029 * 0.4420.8440.080C3 0.2300.1660.3410.053–0.1160.1240.1750.041 * 0.8020.581C4 0.184–0.104 0.3180.2580.4700.2190.3930.0570.2200.025 *C5 0.341does not occur does not occur 0.0480.0000.023 *0.821>0.999C6 does not occur 0.2760.0130.1510.2750.024 * 0.9370.4730.191C7 – 0.122 0.3250.0520.264–0.3250.4160.008 * 0.7550.2090.122C, combined 0.0600.3870.3820.208– 0.2490.6870.002 * 0.022 * 0.3230.196D – 0.360 –0.133 0.109does not occur – 0.0620.016 * 0.2750.5150.746E – 0.173 –0.027 0.4010.4780.1530.2470.8250.016 * 0.022 * 0.426a373 (592)–0.0160.8960.1380.2660.2030.103does not occur–0.2000.1080.3520.047 *–0.2310.0630.0120.926–0.0160.896–0.0860.4880.1400.2610.0910.4630.0050.9700.1240.319Kalejetan was excluded because <strong>the</strong> tape-recorded <strong>song</strong> fragment was to short to calculate a correlation (108 notes, 24phrases if single notes are excluded, 48 phrases if single notes are included).bMore than one <strong>song</strong> was analysed for <strong>the</strong> Munich and Jakarta 1 <strong>male</strong>s, respectively; <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> phrases and number <strong>of</strong>notes are listed for each <strong>song</strong> separately. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> phrases excludes single notes (i.e. phrases with just one note), <strong>the</strong> valuein paren<strong>the</strong>ses includes <strong>the</strong>m.main part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complete <strong>song</strong> bouts describedabove (i.e. 2.5-4.0 notes/phrase). Song motivationin <strong>the</strong> Kalejetan <strong>male</strong> is low (around 1.8 notes perphrase), suggesting that <strong>the</strong> available part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>song</strong> bout represents an initial section, but <strong>the</strong>fragment is too short to draw reliable conclusions.<strong>The</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Halimun <strong>male</strong>, however,exhibits unusually high values, mostly in <strong>the</strong> range<strong>of</strong> 4.0-7.0 notes/phrase, and reaching peak levels<strong>of</strong> 10-11 notes/phrase.<strong>The</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> several note types correlateswith <strong>song</strong> motivation. A total <strong>of</strong> 16 significantcorrelations were found (p < 0.05), and 3 additionalcorrelations are close to significance (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!