12.07.2015 Views

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 T. Geissmann et al. – <strong>The</strong> Male Song <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Javan</strong> Silvery Gibbonoccurred infrequently in <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Munich<strong>male</strong>, and only one poorly-expressed trill wasfound in <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Howletts 1 <strong>male</strong>.Frequency <strong>of</strong> note types<strong>The</strong> frequency distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various notetypes provide first insights into <strong>the</strong> rules by which<strong>male</strong> <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong>s build up <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>song</strong> bouts. Asshown below, at least two distinct phases canroughly be distinguished in <strong>the</strong> <strong>male</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout: abuild-up or introductory phase and a main phase.In order to monitor changes in <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong>notes types in various stages <strong>of</strong> a <strong>male</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout,we divided each <strong>song</strong> bout in 50-note segmentsand determined <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> all note types foreach segment. Not all segments comprise exactly50 notes, because we avoided splitting phrases(described below) into different segments. A andB1 notes were pooled in this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis.Figure 3 shows <strong>the</strong> relative frequency <strong>of</strong> allnote types in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>song</strong> bouts <strong>of</strong> our studyanimals. <strong>The</strong> <strong>song</strong> bouts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Halimun, Jakarta1, Jakarta 2 and Kalejetan <strong>male</strong>s were nottape-recorded in <strong>the</strong>ir entirety and may lack <strong>the</strong>build-up phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout. In order to facilitatecomparison, <strong>the</strong> frequency distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>incomplete <strong>song</strong> bouts are shown in separate parts<strong>of</strong> Figure 3.<strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> most note types changesmarkedly during <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout. <strong>The</strong> amount anddirection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se changes differ among notetypes. <strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> note types A+B1, forinstance, tends to decrease during <strong>song</strong> bouts.Whereas <strong>the</strong>se two note types make up between37 - 92% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first 50 notes in <strong>the</strong> introductoryphase <strong>of</strong> all completely-recorded <strong>song</strong> bouts, <strong>the</strong>proportion decreases during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong>to levels below 20% and eventually approaches oreven reaches zero, although <strong>the</strong> proportion may goup again towards <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> (Howletts 3)or fluctuate around 15% during <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> bout (Howletts 2). In <strong>the</strong> incompletelyrecorded <strong>song</strong> bouts, this trend cannot berecognised clearly, because <strong>the</strong> build-up part ispartly or completely missing. Yet, a decrease in<strong>the</strong> proportions <strong>of</strong> note types A+B1 can also beobserved in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incomplete <strong>song</strong> boutsexcept in <strong>the</strong> Jakarta 2 <strong>male</strong>, which exhibits strongfluctuations around 15% in <strong>the</strong>se note proportionsduring <strong>the</strong> whole tape-recording.<strong>The</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> note type B2 also tends todecrease somewhat during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong>bout, but <strong>the</strong> decrease is less pronounced than innote types A+B1, and <strong>the</strong> proportion appears toexhibit strong individual differences. During <strong>the</strong>Table 3. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> note types and some figures in <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> each study animal, based on all available tape-recordedmaterial. aNote Halimun Howletts 1 Howletts 2 Howletts 3 Jakarta 1 Jakarta 2 Kalejetan c Munichtype bA + + + + + + + +B1 + + + + + + + +B2 + + + + + + + +B3 + + + + + + + +B4 + + + + (+) – + +C1 + + + + + + + +C2 + + + + + + + +C3 + + + + + + + +C4 (+) + (+) + + (+) + +C5 (+) + – – (+) + + –C6 + – + – + + + +C7 + + + + + + + +D – + + + + (+) + (+)E + + + + + + + +FiguretypeTrill f. – (+) – – – + – (+)Variablef.– + + – + + – (+)a Symbols: + = present, (+) = very rare, less than 0.5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> notes, – = absentb f. = figurec Absence <strong>of</strong> some note types in this <strong>male</strong> may be due to <strong>the</strong> shortness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tape-recorded <strong>song</strong> excerpt (2min 17s, see Table 1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!