12.07.2015 Views

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 T. Geissmann et al. – <strong>The</strong> Male Song <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Javan</strong> Silvery Gibbon<strong>the</strong> results would help to narrow down <strong>the</strong>possible functions <strong>of</strong> singing in <strong>male</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong>s. If,for instance, <strong>the</strong> extremely variable <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>male</strong> <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong> were found to be more costintensivethan <strong>the</strong> more stereotyped <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<strong>gibbon</strong> species, this could explain why <strong>silvery</strong><strong>gibbon</strong>s sing less <strong>of</strong>ten and why <strong>the</strong>ir rare <strong>song</strong>scan still serve to advertise fitness. If <strong>the</strong> morestereotyped <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>male</strong> Kloss’s <strong>gibbon</strong>s arecheaper to produce, this would explain why <strong>the</strong>yhave to be produced more <strong>of</strong>ten in order to beenough <strong>of</strong> a handicap.It has previously been suggested that <strong>gibbon</strong><strong>song</strong>s – even within one species – serve more thanone function (Geissmann, 1999; Geissmann andOrgeldinger, 2000). Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present studyreveal a differential <strong>song</strong> variability occurringamong <strong>the</strong> various <strong>gibbon</strong> species. This fur<strong>the</strong>rsupports <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>gibbon</strong> <strong>song</strong>s aremultifunctional and that <strong>the</strong> relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sefunctions exhibits strong differences among <strong>the</strong>species. Expecting to discover “<strong>the</strong> <strong>song</strong> function”<strong>of</strong> “<strong>the</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong>” does not appear to be a realisticanymore.Conclusions1 <strong>The</strong> note repertoire <strong>of</strong> <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong> <strong>male</strong>sappears to exhibit a higher degree <strong>of</strong> interindividualvariability than o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>gibbon</strong>s.2 <strong>The</strong> note repertoire <strong>of</strong> <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong> <strong>male</strong>sappears to exhibit a higher degree <strong>of</strong> intraindividualvariability than o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>gibbon</strong>s (both<strong>male</strong>s and fe<strong>male</strong>s).3 <strong>The</strong> high variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>male</strong> <strong>song</strong> in <strong>the</strong><strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong> appears to be a derivedcharacteristic among <strong>the</strong> Hylobatidae.4 Male <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> H. <strong>moloch</strong> may function more toadvertise individual fitness than ownership <strong>of</strong>resources.5 Specific experiments are required in order todetermine whe<strong>the</strong>r different costs are involvedwith producing variable versus stereotyped<strong>song</strong>s.6 Gibbon <strong>song</strong>s probably serve multiple functionsand <strong>the</strong>se functions or <strong>the</strong>ir relevance differamong <strong>gibbon</strong> species.AcknowledgementsAdditional tape-recordings used in <strong>the</strong> present study werekindly made available by Dr. Markus Kappeler and Dr. BjörnMerker. We are grateful to Dr. Robert Dallmann and twoanonymous reviewers for reading and commenting on thismanuscript.ReferencesBrockelman WY, Srikosamatara S. 1984. Maintenance andevolution <strong>of</strong> social structure in <strong>gibbon</strong>s. In: Preusch<strong>of</strong>t H,Chivers DJ, Brockelman WY, Creel N, eds. <strong>The</strong> lesserapes. Evolutionary and behavioural biology. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press, 298-323.Charif RA, Mitchell S, Clark CW. 1995. Canary 1.2 user’smanual. New York: Cornell Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Ornithology,Ithaca.Chivers DJ. 1977. <strong>The</strong> lesser apes. In: Prince Rainier III <strong>of</strong>Monaco, Bourne GH, eds. Primate conservation. NewYork: Academic Press, 539-598.Chivers DJ. 2001. <strong>The</strong> swinging singing apes: Fighting forfood and family in far-east forests. In Chicago ZoologicalSociety, ed. <strong>The</strong> apes: Challenges for <strong>the</strong> 21st century.Brookfield Zoo, May 10-13, 2000, ConferenceProceedings. Brookfield, Illinois, U.S.A.: ChicagoZoological Society, 1-28.Cowlishaw G. 1992. Song function in <strong>gibbon</strong>s. Behaviour121: 131-153.Cowlishaw G. 1996. Sexual selection and informationcontent in <strong>gibbon</strong> <strong>song</strong> bouts. Ethology 102: 272-284.Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. 1977. Primate ecology andsocial organization. J. Zool. 183: 1-39.Dallmann R, Geissmann T. 2001a. Different levels <strong>of</strong>variability in <strong>the</strong> fe<strong>male</strong> <strong>song</strong> <strong>of</strong> wild <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong>s(<strong>Hylobates</strong> <strong>moloch</strong>). Behaviour 138: 629-648.Dallmann R, Geissmann T. 2001b. Individuality in <strong>the</strong>fe<strong>male</strong> <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> wild <strong>silvery</strong> <strong>gibbon</strong>s (<strong>Hylobates</strong> <strong>moloch</strong>)on Java, Indonesia. Contrib. Zool. 70: 41-50.Demars C, Goustard M. 1978. Le “grand chant”d’<strong>Hylobates</strong> concolor leucogenys. Comparaison avec lesémissions sonores homologues d’H. concolor gabriellae etd’H. klossii (Îles Mentawei, ouest Sumatra). Behaviour65: 1-26 (French text, English summary).Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H. 2002. Calls out <strong>of</strong> chaos:<strong>The</strong> adaptive significance <strong>of</strong> nonlinear phenomena inmammalian vocal production. Anim. Behav. 63: 407-418.Geissmann T. 1993. Evolution <strong>of</strong> communication in <strong>gibbon</strong>s(Hylobatidae). PhD <strong>the</strong>sis, Anthropological Institute,Philosoph. Faculty II, Zürich University, 374 pp.Geissmann T. 1995. Gibbon systematics and speciesidentification. Int. Zoo News 42: 467-501.Geissmann T. 1999. Duet <strong>song</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> siamang, <strong>Hylobates</strong>syndactylus: II. Testing <strong>the</strong> pair-bonding hypo<strong>the</strong>sisduring a partner exchange. Behaviour 136: 1005-1039.Geissmann T. 2000. Gibbon <strong>song</strong>s and human music from anevolutionary perspective. In: Wallin NL, Merker B, BrownS, eds. <strong>The</strong> origins <strong>of</strong> music. Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press, 103-123.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!