12.07.2015 Views

The economics of IPTV - Roland Berger Strategy Consultants

The economics of IPTV - Roland Berger Strategy Consultants

The economics of IPTV - Roland Berger Strategy Consultants

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18InfoCom Competence Center<strong>IPTV</strong> uses the broadband infrastructure as support, andthere is close cross-selling between broadband and <strong>IPTV</strong>.Many operators condition provision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IPTV</strong> service onthe broadband service. While <strong>IPTV</strong> might be the driver forbroadband dpenetration, ti modem costs are <strong>of</strong>ten not directlyattributed to <strong>IPTV</strong> and can be <strong>of</strong>fset by the broadbandservice. <strong>The</strong>ir influence on <strong>IPTV</strong> variance is thus reduced.Additional costs occur when <strong>IPTV</strong> subscribers do not opt forbroadband connection (if this is allowed by the operator)or when the modems already in use for broadband do nothave the necessary functionality to support <strong>IPTV</strong> (e.g.IGMP).A successful approach will involve operators deploying <strong>IPTV</strong>compatiblemodems for all broadband users, cross-selling<strong>IPTV</strong> and broadband, pushing for lower STB prices and finetuningthe logistics for returning CPEs at the end <strong>of</strong> therental period. <strong>The</strong> residential gateways required by <strong>IPTV</strong> aremore expensive than the minimum modems required forxDSL. However, deploying residential lgateways for broadbandusers provides an entry point for additional andsubstitute services such as <strong>IPTV</strong> and VoIP. Technologically,<strong>IPTV</strong> and broadband are prime candidates for cross-selling.Companies must target their marketing efforts carefully.<strong>The</strong> latest compression algorithms – H264, for example –are highly complex and place major performanceconstraints on current STBs. This drives prices upwards.As technology evolves and matures, however, compatibleSTBs will become available from various sources and priceswill begin to fall. Given the direct impact <strong>of</strong> STBs on thebottom line, operators should strive for excellence in theirsourcing activities.3.4 Middleware and network – <strong>The</strong> underestimatedt dcash burnerFor a traditional telecommunications broadband network tostart providing <strong>IPTV</strong> services, considerable investments areneeded both in the platform itself and in upgrading theexisting network infrastructure. Different platforms placedifferent demands on infrastructure. Network-agnostic <strong>IPTV</strong>platforms can be deployed quickly and easily, while variousarchitectural trade-<strong>of</strong>fs are possible to improve performancefor network-aware platforms.<strong>The</strong> investments in <strong>IPTV</strong> infrastructure (platform and network)mainly relate to the network. <strong>The</strong> sheer bandwidthrequired by video services means that the biggest share <strong>of</strong>investments goes into upgrading network transport capacity,down to the DSLAMs. <strong>The</strong> traditional DSL access and corenetworks used to provide best-effort broadband accessrequire upgrading in order to provide the guaranteedbandwidth needed for <strong>IPTV</strong>.<strong>The</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> services – live TV and content on demand –place different constraints on the various components <strong>of</strong>network infrastructure. Live TV network load can dependboth on the number <strong>of</strong> live TV channels and on the number<strong>of</strong> subscribers. Content on demand, on the other hand,depends solely on the number <strong>of</strong> subscribers viewing thecontent at the same time.Live TV is usually carried either solely as multicast traffic oras a combination <strong>of</strong> multicast and unicast traffic. Multicasttraffic increases load in proportion to the number <strong>of</strong> live TVchannels (multicast streams). Unicast traffic increases networkload in proportion with the number <strong>of</strong> users watchingcontent at the same time.In the case <strong>of</strong> multicast, each channel is streamed once forall users across the entire core, edge and access network.Viewers <strong>of</strong> a specific live TV channel join the same multicaststream as other users, thus not increasing the overall networkload. Adding a new TV channel increases the bandwidthrequirements on the entire multicast domain, however.To support full multicast distribution, DSLAMs must beIP-aware (rather than blind layer-2 DSLAMs) and be ableto perform channel replication (understand IGMP requestsand replicate the right TV channels to individual users onthe local l loop). <strong>The</strong> multicast t approach has the advantage<strong>of</strong> reduced bandwidth consumption and faster channelzapping.In combined multicast/unicast transmission, channelreplication is performed at a higher level inside the network,transforming the multicast stream into a unicast streamearlier on in the process. <strong>The</strong> live TV channel is carried asa combination <strong>of</strong> multicast and unicast traffic – multicastfrom the headend down to the edge router and unicastfrom the edge router to the user through the DSLAM.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!