12 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ms. Cristi. A decision was rendered on September 5, 2001, Sir.Mr. Roy. How many decisions were rendered because you told me earlier <strong>the</strong>re were two cases?Ms. Cristi. Only one decision, Sir, because <strong>the</strong> two cases were consolidated.Mr. Roy. Does that mean that <strong>the</strong>y were heard jointly?Ms. Cristi. Yes, Sir.Mr. Roy. All right. Now, what was <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>—do you have a copy <strong>of</strong> that decisionwith you?Ms. Cristi. Yes, Sir.Mr. Roy. Your Honor, <strong>the</strong> decision has been previously marked....Ms. Roxas. Your Honor please, we would like to manifest that <strong>the</strong> Defense has already caused<strong>the</strong> marking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same exhibit and this is Exhibit “176” for <strong>the</strong> Defense.The Presiding Officer. All right, noted.Mr. Roy. Can you tell us, Madam Witness, what is <strong>the</strong> dispositive—what does <strong>the</strong> dispositiveportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision state? Can you please attest to <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision?Ms. Roxas. We have already admitted, Your Honor, on <strong>the</strong> same, that <strong>the</strong>re was a conviction.Mr. Roy. Your Honor, I am a little perplexed. I thought that <strong>the</strong>re had been no admissionsprecisely why I have been directed to proceed.Ms. Roxas. We have made several stipulations already on <strong>the</strong> matters. Perhaps, Counsel herewould be able to propound questions on those matters which we have not stipulated upon.The Presiding Officer. I said disregard <strong>the</strong> stipulation. Let it be—Ms. Roxas. We will submit, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. Direct <strong>the</strong> questions and subject to <strong>the</strong> objections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prosecution.Mr. Roy. Thank you, Your Honor. May I just <strong>the</strong>refore request that <strong>the</strong> Clerk <strong>of</strong> Court, whois here to certify <strong>the</strong> decision and to attest to its au<strong>the</strong>nticity, anyway, read <strong>the</strong> dispositive portion for<strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> record and all concerned.The Presiding Officer. Proceed. The Witness may read <strong>the</strong> dispositive portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Decision.Ms. Cristi.“WHEREFORE, in Criminal Case No. Q-96-68147, <strong>the</strong> Court finds accused Jose MariaBasa III, Raymunda Gorospe Basa and Virgilio Macabenta GUILTY beyond reasonabledoubt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crime charged in <strong>the</strong> Information for libel. And <strong>the</strong> Court sentences <strong>the</strong>m to suffer<strong>the</strong> penalty <strong>of</strong> four (4) months and twenty-one (21) days as minimum to one (1) year, eight(8) months and twenty-one (21) days as maximum, ordering <strong>the</strong>m to pay jointly and solidarilyCristina Basa Roco-Corona <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00) moraldamages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) for attorney’s fees.“Accused Cecilia Henson-Basa, Betsie Basa-Chavez and Flor Maria Guidote Basa arehereby ACQUITTED.
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012 13“In Criminal Case No. Q-96-68148, <strong>the</strong> Court finds accused Jose Maria Basa III,Raymunda Gorospe Basa and Virgilio Macabenta GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>crime charged in <strong>the</strong> Information for Libel. The Court sentences <strong>the</strong>m to suffer <strong>the</strong> penalty<strong>of</strong> four (4) months and twenty-one (21) days as minimum to one (1) year, eight (8) monthsand twenty-one (21) days as maximum, ordering <strong>the</strong>m to pay jointly and solidarily CristinaRoco-Corona <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00) for moral damagesand Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) for attorney’s fees.“Accused Cecilia Henson Basa, Betsie Basa-Chavez and Flor Maria Guidote Basa arehereby ACQUITTED. Let warrant <strong>of</strong> arrest be issued for <strong>the</strong> apprehension <strong>of</strong> accused FelixCarlos Vicentillo.“SO ORDERED.“Quezon City, Metro Manila, September 5, 2001.”Mr. Roy. Thank you, Madam Witness.Your Honor, I would like to manifest that <strong>the</strong> decisions in both cases, I mean, <strong>the</strong> dispositiveportions for both dockets are virtually identical, and that <strong>the</strong> total civil indemnity <strong>of</strong> P500,000 was part<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judgment.Now, you mentioned a....The Presiding Officer. Wait a minute.Mr. Roy. Yes, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. I only heard P200,000 plus P20,000, and P200,000 plus P50,000. WhyP500,000?Mr. Roy. Your Honor, may we ask <strong>the</strong> Witness to clarify.Ms. Cristi. Your Honor, in <strong>the</strong> first case, P200,000 as moral damages—The Presiding Officer. Yes.Ms. Cristi. —plus P50,000 as attorney’s fees.The Presiding Officer. I thought you said P20,000. So....Ms. Cristi. P200,000, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. Now, <strong>the</strong> attorney’s fees, P50,000?Ms. Cristi. P50,000, Sir.The Presiding Officer. In <strong>the</strong> first case.Ms. Cristi. Yes, Sir.The Presiding Officer. And that is also true in <strong>the</strong> second case.Ms. Cristi. Yes, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. All right, I stand corrected. So, that is half a million. Proceed.
- Page 1 and 2: TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012 1Republic of t
- Page 4 and 5: 4 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012their own res
- Page 6 and 7: 6 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Cuevas. N
- Page 8 and 9: 8 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012During my pre
- Page 10 and 11: 10 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ms. Roxas. I
- Page 14 and 15: 14 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Tha
- Page 16 and 17: 16 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Did
- Page 18 and 19: 18 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Withdrawal a
- Page 20 and 21: 20 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Obj
- Page 22 and 23: 22 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Reconsiderat
- Page 24 and 25: 24 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Do you swear
- Page 26 and 27: 26 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Fou
- Page 28 and 29: 28 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 30 and 31: 30 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 32 and 33: 32 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 34 and 35: 34 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 36 and 37: 36 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ito po, baba
- Page 38 and 39: 38 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 40 and 41: 40 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 42 and 43: 42 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 44 and 45: 44 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. I
- Page 46 and 47: 46 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. N
- Page 48 and 49: 48 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The trial wa
- Page 50 and 51: 50 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 52 and 53: 52 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. W
- Page 54 and 55: 54 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 56 and 57: 56 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Ros
- Page 58 and 59: 58 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 60 and 61: 60 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 62 and 63:
62 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Anyway, Your
- Page 64 and 65:
64 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. I c
- Page 66 and 67:
66 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Iyo
- Page 68 and 69:
68 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 70 and 71:
70 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 72 and 73:
72 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 74:
74 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. The