12.07.2015 Views

Record of the Senate - Integrated Bar of the Philippines

Record of the Senate - Integrated Bar of the Philippines

Record of the Senate - Integrated Bar of the Philippines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ms. Cristi. A decision was rendered on September 5, 2001, Sir.Mr. Roy. How many decisions were rendered because you told me earlier <strong>the</strong>re were two cases?Ms. Cristi. Only one decision, Sir, because <strong>the</strong> two cases were consolidated.Mr. Roy. Does that mean that <strong>the</strong>y were heard jointly?Ms. Cristi. Yes, Sir.Mr. Roy. All right. Now, what was <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>—do you have a copy <strong>of</strong> that decisionwith you?Ms. Cristi. Yes, Sir.Mr. Roy. Your Honor, <strong>the</strong> decision has been previously marked....Ms. Roxas. Your Honor please, we would like to manifest that <strong>the</strong> Defense has already caused<strong>the</strong> marking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same exhibit and this is Exhibit “176” for <strong>the</strong> Defense.The Presiding Officer. All right, noted.Mr. Roy. Can you tell us, Madam Witness, what is <strong>the</strong> dispositive—what does <strong>the</strong> dispositiveportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision state? Can you please attest to <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision?Ms. Roxas. We have already admitted, Your Honor, on <strong>the</strong> same, that <strong>the</strong>re was a conviction.Mr. Roy. Your Honor, I am a little perplexed. I thought that <strong>the</strong>re had been no admissionsprecisely why I have been directed to proceed.Ms. Roxas. We have made several stipulations already on <strong>the</strong> matters. Perhaps, Counsel herewould be able to propound questions on those matters which we have not stipulated upon.The Presiding Officer. I said disregard <strong>the</strong> stipulation. Let it be—Ms. Roxas. We will submit, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. Direct <strong>the</strong> questions and subject to <strong>the</strong> objections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prosecution.Mr. Roy. Thank you, Your Honor. May I just <strong>the</strong>refore request that <strong>the</strong> Clerk <strong>of</strong> Court, whois here to certify <strong>the</strong> decision and to attest to its au<strong>the</strong>nticity, anyway, read <strong>the</strong> dispositive portion for<strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> record and all concerned.The Presiding Officer. Proceed. The Witness may read <strong>the</strong> dispositive portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Decision.Ms. Cristi.“WHEREFORE, in Criminal Case No. Q-96-68147, <strong>the</strong> Court finds accused Jose MariaBasa III, Raymunda Gorospe Basa and Virgilio Macabenta GUILTY beyond reasonabledoubt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crime charged in <strong>the</strong> Information for libel. And <strong>the</strong> Court sentences <strong>the</strong>m to suffer<strong>the</strong> penalty <strong>of</strong> four (4) months and twenty-one (21) days as minimum to one (1) year, eight(8) months and twenty-one (21) days as maximum, ordering <strong>the</strong>m to pay jointly and solidarilyCristina Basa Roco-Corona <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000.00) moraldamages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) for attorney’s fees.“Accused Cecilia Henson-Basa, Betsie Basa-Chavez and Flor Maria Guidote Basa arehereby ACQUITTED.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!