42 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar. Hindi ko na po matandaan kung mayroon man o wala.Mr. Ginez. Okay. So, wala rin kayong mga nakitang empleyado doon o mga <strong>of</strong>fice workersdoon, hindi po ba?Mr. Bisnar. Ang lumabas lamang po nga iyong caretaker po.Mr. Ginez. Caretaker. Ito po ba ay si Celebrada C. Pardines?Mr. Bisnar. Iyon po ang pakilala niya sa akin.Mr. Ginez. Pakilala niya, at hindi niya kilala kung sinuman, kung sino si Jose Maria BasaIII, hindi po ba?Mr. Bisnar. Pagkatanda ko po, ang sabi po niya, bihira lamang po pumunta doon, parangganoon.Mr. Ginez. At hindi taga-doon si Jose Maria Basa, sinabi niya sa inyo?Mr. Bisnar. Hindi po niya sinabi iyon.Mr. Ginez. Sheriff, hindi po ba kapag ang sinasabi ng ating Revised Rules <strong>of</strong> Court na kapagshares <strong>of</strong> stocks ang ating ii-implement or ang ating iga-garnish eh dapat susundin natin ang Rule57, Section 7, paragraph C. Basahin ko po sa inyo dahil baka hindi po ninyo naaalala. “Stocksor shares or an interest....” Basahin ko po muna ito: “Section 7. Attachment <strong>of</strong> Real and PersonalProperty <strong>Record</strong>ing There<strong>of</strong>. Real and personal property shall be attached by <strong>the</strong> sheriff, executing <strong>the</strong>writ in <strong>the</strong> following manner: C) Stocks or shares or an interest in stocks or shares <strong>of</strong> any corporationor company by leaving with <strong>the</strong> president or managing agent <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, a copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writ and a noticestating that <strong>the</strong> stock or interest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> party against whom <strong>the</strong> attachment is issued is attached inpursuance <strong>of</strong> such writ.” Ang tanong ko muna, preliminary, Sheriff, hindi po ito ang unangpagkakataon na kayo po ay nagga-garnish ng isang shares <strong>of</strong> stocks o nagle-levy ng isang shares<strong>of</strong> stocks, hindi po ba?Mr. Roy. Objection, Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. What is <strong>the</strong> basis?Mr. Roy. Misleading, Your Honor. The rule pertains to attachment.The Presiding Officer. What is misleading?Mr. Roy. Your Honor, <strong>the</strong> rule cited by counsel is <strong>the</strong> Rule on Attachment. The sheriff is testifyingon execution. These are two entirely different rules.Mr. Ginez. Your Honor, <strong>the</strong> Revised Rules <strong>of</strong> Court provides that if <strong>the</strong> property to be leviedis a personal property or shares <strong>of</strong> stocks. Your Honor, it specifically says that it will be attached inaccordance with <strong>the</strong> same rules that provide for <strong>the</strong> preliminary attachment. That is basic, I can cite<strong>the</strong> rule.The Presiding Officer. Objection overruled.Mr. Ginez. Thank you, Your Honor.So, may tanong po ako, Sheriff. Hindi po ito ang unang pagkakataon na kayo po ay naglevyng shares <strong>of</strong> stocks ng isang kumpanya sa loob ng inyong 16 years bilang isang sheriff?
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012 43Mr. Cuevas. The question is vague, levy under what? Levy under execution or levy underattachment because levy is....Mr. Ginez. I will clarify again, Your Honor.Mr. Cuevas. Kindly clarify.The Presiding Officer. May I request <strong>the</strong> Counsel to let <strong>the</strong> question to be finished?Mr. Ginez. Yes, Your Honor. I will clarify.Mr. Cuevas. Thank you.Mr. Ginez. Hindi po ito ang unang pagkakataon, Sheriff, na kayo ay nag-levy by executionng shares <strong>of</strong> stocks ng isang kumpanya, hindi po ba?Mr. Bisnar. Sa pagkakatanda ko po, ito po ang first time, ang shares <strong>of</strong> stocks.Mr. Ginez. Sa loob po ng 16 na taon, ito po ang unang pagkakataon, Sheriff?Mr. Bisnar. Sa pagkakatanda ko po.Mr. Ginez. Maaaring may nangyari na in <strong>the</strong> past pero hindi ninyo na matatandaan, tamapo ba iyon?Mr. Bisnar. Wala po akong matandaan.Mr. Ginez. Now, ang sinasabi po dito sa binasa ko kanina, paragraph C <strong>of</strong> Section 7, Rule57, na ang levying ng shares <strong>of</strong> stock ay dapat iniiwan po ninyo sa presidente or managingagent ng kumpanya. Dito ba sa inyong notice <strong>of</strong> garnishment, kanino po ba ninyo iniwan angnotice <strong>of</strong> garnishment?Mr. Cuevas. Again, with <strong>the</strong> kind indulgence <strong>of</strong> this Honorable Court, Your Honor, we haveobjected to this question because <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> law cited is levy under attachment. This is not anattachment, this is levy under execution, and <strong>the</strong>refore, is governed by Rule 39, You Honor. There isentirely a lot <strong>of</strong> difference. In attachment, it is preventive. In levy under execution....The Presiding Officer. Let <strong>the</strong> Prosecution answer that objection.Mr. Ginez. Yes, Your Honor, I will cite <strong>the</strong> rule.Mr. Cuevas. If Your Honor please, may we go a little fur<strong>the</strong>r, with <strong>the</strong> kind permission <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Court?The Presiding Officer. Proceed.Mr. Cuevas. Your Honor please, may we invite <strong>the</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Honorable Court thatRule 57 is strictly applicable only in cases <strong>of</strong> preliminary attachment. The formalities <strong>the</strong>rein referredto refers to attachment. And what we have in question now is not an attachment but a levy underexecution. So, <strong>the</strong> formalities required by Rule 57 do not apply in cases <strong>of</strong> execution. That is our point,Your Honor.The Presiding Officer. That is why I am asking <strong>the</strong> Counsel to answer you.Mr. Cuevas. Thank you, Your Honor.
- Page 1 and 2: TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012 1Republic of t
- Page 4 and 5: 4 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012their own res
- Page 6 and 7: 6 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Cuevas. N
- Page 8 and 9: 8 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012During my pre
- Page 10 and 11: 10 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ms. Roxas. I
- Page 12 and 13: 12 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ms. Cristi.
- Page 14 and 15: 14 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Tha
- Page 16 and 17: 16 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Did
- Page 18 and 19: 18 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Withdrawal a
- Page 20 and 21: 20 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Obj
- Page 22 and 23: 22 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Reconsiderat
- Page 24 and 25: 24 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Do you swear
- Page 26 and 27: 26 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Fou
- Page 28 and 29: 28 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 30 and 31: 30 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 32 and 33: 32 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 34 and 35: 34 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 36 and 37: 36 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Ito po, baba
- Page 38 and 39: 38 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 40 and 41: 40 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Bisnar.
- Page 44 and 45: 44 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. I
- Page 46 and 47: 46 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. N
- Page 48 and 49: 48 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The trial wa
- Page 50 and 51: 50 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 52 and 53: 52 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Ginez. W
- Page 54 and 55: 54 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 56 and 57: 56 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Ros
- Page 58 and 59: 58 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 60 and 61: 60 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 62 and 63: 62 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Anyway, Your
- Page 64 and 65: 64 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. I c
- Page 66 and 67: 66 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. Iyo
- Page 68 and 69: 68 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 70 and 71: 70 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012The Presidin
- Page 72 and 73: 72 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Senator Dril
- Page 74: 74 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2012Mr. Roy. The